Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Volume 28
Bioactive Natural Products (Part I)
studies in Natural Products Chemistry
edited by Atta-ur-Rahman
Volume 28
Bioactive natural Products (FM I)
Edited by
Atta-ur-Rahman
H.E.J. Research Institute of Chemistry,
University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistm
2003
ELSEVIER
Amsterdam - Boston - Heidelberg - London - New York - Oxford - Paris
San Diego - San Francisco - Singapore - Sydney - Tol<yo
ELSEVIER SCIENCE B.V.
Sara Burgerhartstraat 25
P.O. Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
This work is protected under copyright by Elsevier Science, and the following terms and conditions apply to its use:
Photocopying
Single photocopies of single chapters may be made for personal use as allowed by national copyright laws.
Permission of the Publisher and payment of a fee is required for all other photocopying, including multiple or
systematic copying, copying for advertising or promotional purposes, resale, and all forms of document delivery.
Special rates are available for educational institutions that wish to make photocopies for non-profit educational
classroom use.
Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier's Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK:
phone: (+44) 1865 843830, fax: (+44) 1865 853333, e-mail: permissions@elsevier.com. You may also complete
your request on-line via the Elsevier Science homepage (http://www.elsevier.com), by selecting 'Customer Support'
and then 'Obtaining Permissions'.
In the USA, users may clear permissions and make payments through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222
Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; phone: (+1) (978) 7508400, fax: (+1) (978) 7504744, and in the UK
through the Copyright Licensing Agency Rapid Clearance Service (CLARCS), 90 Tottenham Court Road, London
WIP OLP, UK; phone: (+44) 207 631 5555; fax: (+44) 207 631 5500. Other countries may have a local
reprographic rights agency for payments.
Derivative Works
Tables of contents may be reproduced for internal circulation, but permission of Elsevier Science is required for
external resale or distribution of such material.
Permission of the Publisher is required for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations.
Except as outlined above, no part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any
form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written
permission of the Publisher.
Address permissions requests to: Elsevier's Science & Technology Rights Department, at the phone, fax and e-mail
addresses noted above.
Notice
No responsibility is assumed by the Publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of
products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or
ideas contained in the material herein. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, in particular, independent
verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made.
A catalogue record from the British Library has been applied for.
ISBN: 0-444-51415-5
@ The paper used in this publication meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).
Transferred to digital printing 2005
Printed and bound by Antony Rowe Ltd, Eastbourne
FOREWORD
"Studies in Natural Products Chemistry" has become the world's leading series of
volumes in the field of isolation, structure elucidation, biological activity and synthesis of
natural products, with comprehensive reviews written by leading experts. Volume 1 of the
series was published in March 1988 and during the last 15 years 27 volumes have been
published. From Volume 21 onwards, the series has been devoted to bioactive natural
products. Natural products present a huge source of organic substances with differing
structural features. The very large number of terrestrial and marine natural products
found in differing environmental conditions with correspondingly different biosynthetic
patterns gives medicinal chemists access to millions of substances with differing
bioactivity profiles. This represents a genuine treasure chest for discovering new
medicinal agents against a variety of diseases. The series on bioactive natural products
should therefore be of considerable interest not only to natural product chemists but also
to medicinal chemists, pharmacologists, and synthetic organic chemists working in
academia and industry. I hope that the present volume will be received with the same
excitement and enthusiasm as the previous volumes of his encyclopaedic series.
I would like to express my thanks to Mr. Shakeel Ahmad for his assistance in the
preparation of the index. I am also grateful to Mr. Waseem Ahmad for typing and to Mr.
Mahmood Alam for secretarial assistance.
Atta-ur-Rahman
Ph.D. (Cantab.), Sc.D. (Cantab.)
Chairman, Higher Education Commission
Government of Pakistan
January, 2003
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
PREFACE
These astute summaries are provided by well-respected authors from seven different
countries. Assembly of the volume is a notable achievement; the work as a whole
nicely illustrates the types of critical discoveries that emanate from the interface of
chemistry and biology. Volume 28 can stand as a proud member of this great family of
useful reference books.
John M. Pezzuto
Professor and Dean
Schools of Pharmacy, Nursing
and Health Sciences
Purdue University
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
CONTENTS
Foreword v
Preface vii
Contributors xi
INTRODUCTION
^Current address: Chemistry and Life Sciences, Research Triangle Institute, P.O. Box
12194, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, U.S.A.
nutritionally poor soil [3]. Preparations made from B. kazinoki have been
used as a tonic to increase vision and sexual potency, and to treat boils,
eczema, infant colic, and leukorrhea [4,5]. Various extracts of 5. kazinoki
have exhibited antifungal, antiinflammatory, antioxidant, and
antispasmodic activities [6-10].
Broussonetia papyrifera (L.) L'Her. ex Vent, is a deciduous tree
growing up to 15 m that is commonly called the paper mulberry. It is
native to East Asia, then later introduced and naturalized in the United
States. It flowers from August to September, and the seeds ripen from
September to November [1,11]. The plant prefers light and well-drained
soil and' is easily cultivated in a warm sunny position in any soil of
reasonable quality [3]. Fibers from the bark are used in making paper,
cloth, and rope. These fibers can be produced by beating strips of bark on
a flat surface with a wooden mallet [12]. 5. papyrifera has been used for
cancer, dyspepsia, and pregnancy [13]. In mainland China, the fruits of 5.
papyrifera have been employed for impotency and ophthalmic disorders
[4,14], Also, the leaf juice of 5. papyrifera is diaphoretic and laxative and
the stembark is hemostatic [4]. Antifungal and antioxidant activities of the
extracts ofB. papyrifera were reported [6,7,9].
Broussonetia zeylanica (Thwait.) Comer is endemic to Sri Lanka
and its tough bark-fibers were used to make string [15].
Several types of bioactive compounds have been reported from the
genus Broussonetia including glycosidase inhibitory alkaloids and
aromatase inhibitory or cytotoxic flavonoids. This chapter reviews the
biologically active constituents from the genus Broussonetia reported by
the end of 2001.
ALKALOIDS
Pyrrolidines
Pyrrolizidine
FLAVONOIDS
Diphenylpropanes
Flavans
Flavonols
H(? OH
1 R,=H,R2 = H
3 R, = OH, R2 = H
7 R, = 0H,R2 = Glc
10 R, = H,R2 = H,A-3',4'
H
HOHjC^i^^V-*'^ CH2OR2
H(f OH 2 R, = H,R2 = H
4 R, = 0H,R2 = H
8 R, = 0H,R2 = Glc
11 Ri=H,R2 = H,A-3',4'
HOH2C*^^\.-*'^
Ha OH
OH
H ^O
H0H2CM^^'\.»^'^
O
H(f OH
CH2OH
Fig. (1). Continued
H
CH2OR
HO OR
12 R = Glc
13 R==H
CH2OH
HOF^C^^'^V.^^^'
HC) OH
14
CH2OH
HOH2C I?
OH
16
17 A^3,4 18
HO.
TCO'
19
Fig. (1). Continued
OH
OH O
24
glycosidase inhibitory activity with IC50 values ranging from 0.002 to 8.2
[xM. Selective inhibition of glycosidase enzymes has a number of
potential therapeutic uses, including the treatment of cancer, diabetes, and
HIV-AIDS [28-32]. Also, the prenylated flavonoid derivatives, kazinols
D (16) and K (17) (diphenylpropanes), 7,4'-dihydroxyflavan (18),
10
effect (A8237 -15.9) and a positive effect (AS223 +16.4), which indicated a
negative chirality as shown in Fig. (2) [16].
C0CH3
BzO OBz
la
Ae(nin): +16.4(223)
-15.9(237)
Fig. (2). Determination of the absolute stereostnicture of broussonetine C (1) by the benzoate
chirality method.
OH
IN. CH2OGIC
nd OH
OH
H
HOHjC*^'^.*^'^ CH2OH
Hcf OH
PhOCOCl
NaHCOj
O—CO QH
CH2OH
CH2OAC
HO OH
PhCOCl
pyridine
O—CO OAc
CH2OAC
Bz(f OBz 8c
OBz
BzQ A8(nm): +15.9(223)
-30.9 (237)
Fig. (3). Determination of the absolute stereostructure of the pyrrolidine ring of broussonetine L
(8) by the benzoate chirality method.
13
O—CO OR4
CH2OR1
R-,(f OR,
A^(^S-^R)
1" 2 3 4 5 r r
8d +0.030 +0.100 -0.039 -0.019 0.000 +0.020 0.000 1
1 8e -0.154 -0.332 -0.161 -0.037 -0.060 +0.013 +0.050
Fig. (4). Determination of the absolute configuration of C-l' of broussonetine L (8) by the
Mosher's method.
MTPAO !?-^^^_,,,
-Z. H +0.013
-0.006 "L r +0.001
C-0.029 c V l
MTPAOH2C H CHoOMTPA
+0.061
OH
MTPAO ''-^\,ri^
-0.075'^ - -^-^'^
CH2OMTPA
OMTPA
15b
Fig. (5). Determination of the absolute configuration of broussonetine N (15) by the Mosher's
method.
from the feeding experiment indicated that C-4 through C-18 were
formed via palmitoyl CoA through the acetate-malonate pathway,
whereas C-1 through C-3 were derived via serine from 3-phosphoglyceric
acid. Therefore, the 18-carbon chain of broussonetine J (27) was assumed
to be formed initially by condensation of serine and palmitoyl CoA [38],
As shown in Fig. (6), the absolute stereochemistry of the pyrrolidine rings
of the broussonetines is related to o-serine and that of broussonetine U
(28) is related to L-serine.
Out of a series of over 30 alkaloids obtained from B, kazinoki,
some of them showed potent glycosidase inhibitory activity as shovm in
Table 1. Interestingly, only broussonetines E and F (3 and 4), which have
a hydroxyl group on C-T, demonstrated potent inhibitory activity against
a-glucosidase [17]. However, broussonetines G and H (5 and 6), which
also have a hydroxyl group on C-l', did not inhibit a-glucosidase [18].
These results suggested that the inhibition of a-glucosidase might be
attributed to the hydroxyl groups on both C-T and C-13' and the keto
groups of C-9' or C-10' [17,18]. However, additional studies seem to be
required to verify this suggestion [24].
15
CHjOH
-O.
COOH
OH OH
OH OH
OH
D-[l-^^C]glucose
O
II ^ HO
.COOH
H O - ^ '
COOH
CoAS
OH
HO
HO OH
FLAVONOroS
Diphenylpropanes
1 2,4,2',4'-Tetrahydroxy-3'-
Inhibition of aromatase** [41]
1 prenylchalcone (35)
Flavans
KazinolB(37)
Inhibition of cyclooxygenase* [43] 1
Platelet aggregation inhibitory activity** [43] 1
Flavanones
(2.S)-2',4'-Dihydroxy-2"-(l-
hydroxy-1-methylethyl)- Inhibition of aromatase*' [41]
dihydrofuro[2,3-Alflavanone (39)
(2iS)-Euchrenone a? (40) Inhibition of aromatase*' [41]
(25)-5,7,2',4'-
Inhibition of aromatase** [41]
1 Tetrahydroxyflavanone (42)
Flavone
1 5,7,2',4'-Tetrahydroxy-3-
Inhibition of aromatase** [41]
1 geranylflavone (43)
Flavonols
Aurone
'
Antioxidant activity (inhibition of lipid peroxidation)' [45]
Broussoaurone A (48) Inhibition of cyclooxygenase* [43]
Platelet aggregation inhibitory activity*" L. _ [43I_.
MISCELLANEOUS
RiO
29Ri = CH3,R2 = H
30Rj = H,R2 = CH3 31
33R = H
34R = OCH3
OH
36
20
OH
OH
37
OH
OH
41R = H
42R = OH
21
HO,
48 49
22
COOH
50 51
HO-
o ^ ^ ^ -o- - o
52
CCX)H
54
homogenate model with an IC50 value of 0.63 |iM as well as in the DPPH
system, and exhibited an inhibitory effect on nitric oxide (NO) production
with an IC50 value of 11.3 jaM. This potent inhibitory effect on NO
production was mediated by suppression of nuclear factor (NF)-KB
activation, phosphorylation and degradation of iKBa (an inhibitory
protein of NF-KB), and inducible NO synthesis expression, which have
been associated with autoimmune or inflammatory diseases [42].
In an effort to investigate antioxidant constituents with
antiproliferative effects in rat vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC),
broussoflavan A (36) [49], broussoflavonols F (45) [50] and G (46) [51],
and broussoaurone A (48) [49] were found to inhibit the Fe^^-induced
thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance formation in rat brain homogenate.
Furthermore, broussoflavonols F (45) and G (46) inhibited fetal calf
serum-, 5-hydroxytryptamine-, or ADP-induced [^H]thymidine
incorporation into rat VSMC [45]. Antioxidant activities and inliibitory
effects on proliferation of rat VSMC with potent antiplatelet activities of
45 and 46 may be useful for vascular diseases and atherosclerosis [43,45].
The concept of cancer chemoprevention is becoming well-
established and refers to the pharmacological intervention to arrest or
reverse the process of carcinogenesis, and thus prevent cancer [52,53]. It
has become evident that various phytochemical components of the diet
are able to prevent cancer formation in full-term carcinogenesis inhibition
studies in animal models [54]. As part of a U.S. National Cancer Institute-
funded program project conducted at the University of Illinois at Chicago
[55-57], an ethyl acetate extract of the whole plants ofB, papyrifera was
found to significantly inhibit aromatase activity in an in vitro assay
[58,59] (74% inhibition at 80 |ig/mL) [41]. This was only one of a
handful of extracts found to significantly inhibit aromatase activity with
the bioassay protocol used, out of over 1,000 extracts screened [60]. This
target was chosen for investigation, because aromatase catalyzes the final,
rate-limiting step in estrogen biosynthesis [61], and is regarded as a target
relevant to the treatment or prevention of breast and prostate cancers [62].
Several synthetic aromatase-inhibitory drugs have been developed,
including aminoglutethimide, substrate androstenedione derivatives,
imidazoles, and triazoles [63-65].
From the active extract of B, papyrifera were isolated several
aromatase inhibitors with IC50 values in the range 0.1-31.1 ^M, inclusive
of broussonin A (29) [66], 3'-[Y-hydroxymethyl-(£)-y-methylallyl]-
24
6c
Carbon
33 34 Gemichalcone C [75]
Fig. (8). Selected HMBC (->) and NOE (<^) correlations of isogemichalcone C (34),
and comparison of *^C NMR data of 3'-[y-hydroxymethyl-(£)-y-methylallyl]-2,4,2',4'-
tetrahydroxychalcone 1 T-O-coumarate (33), 34, and gemichalcone C.
between H-6' and H-l", and H-2" and H-4" confirmed the position of
attachment and the E stereochemistry of the geranyl group [41].
Fig. (9). Selected HMBC (-^) and NOE (<^) correlations of 5,7,2',4'-tetrahydroxy-3-
geranylflavone (43).
CHO
OH N
56
58
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
[I] Walker, E.H. Flora of Okinawa and the Southern Ryukyu Islands. Smithsonian
Institution Press: Washington, D.C., 1976.
[2] Berg, C.C. Bull Nat. Plantentuin Belg., 1977, 47, 267-407.
[3] Huxley, A.J.; Griffiths, M. New Royal Horticultural Society Dictionary of
Gardening, Groves Dictionaries: New York, NY, 1992.
[4] Duke, J.A.; Ayensu, E.S. Medicinal Plants of China, Reference Publications:
Algonac, MI, 1985.
[5] Han, D.S.; Lee, S.J.; Lee, H.K. In Proceedings of the Fifth Asian Symposium on
Medicinal Plants and Spices; Han, B.H.; Han, D.S.; Han, Y.N.; Woo, W.S.,
Eds.; Seoul National University: Seoul, 1984, pp. 125-144.
[6] Shirata, A.; Takahashi, K. Sanshi Shikenjo Hokoku, 1982,28,691-705.
[7] Shirata, A.; Takahashi, K. Sanshi Shikenjo Hokoku, 1982,28, 707-718.
[8] Han, B.H.; Chi, H.J.; Han, Y.N.; Ryu, K.S. Kor, J. Pharmacog,, 1972, 43, 205-
209.
[9] Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.K.; Oh, M.J.; Jung, M.Y. J. Am, Oil Chem. Soc,
1994, 71, 633-640.
[10] Woo, W.S.; Lee, E.B. Ann, Rep, Nat. Prod, Res. Inst, Seoul Natl. Univ., 1976,
15, 138.
[II] Ohwi, J. Flora of Japan. Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, D.C.,
1984.
[12] Bell, L.A. Plant Fibers for Papermaking. Liliaceae Press: McMinnville, OR,
1981.
[13] Johnson, T. CRC Ethnobotany Desk Reference. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL,
1998.
[14] Matsuda, H.; Cai, H.; Kubo, M.; Tosa, H.; linuma, M. Biol. Pharm. Bull, 1995,
18,463-466.
[15] Dassanyake, M.D.; Fosberg, F.R. A Revised Hand Book of the Flora of Ceylon.
Vol. III. Amerind Publishing Co.: New Delhi, India, 1981.
[16] Shibano, M.; Kitagawa, S.; Kusano, G. Chem. Pharm, Bull, 1997, 45, 505-508.
[17] Shibano, M.; Kitagawa, S.; Nakamura, S.; Akazawa, N.; Kusano, G. Chem.
Pharm. Bull, 1997, 45, 700-705.
[18] Shibano, M.; Nakamura, S.; Akazawa, N.; Kusano, G. Chem. Pharm, Bull,
1998,^(5,1048-1050.
[19] Shibano, M.; Nakamura, S.; Kubori, M.; Minoura, K; Kusano, G. Chem.
Pharm. Bull, 1998, 46, 1416-1420.
[20] Shibano, M.; Nakamura, S.; Motoya, N.; Kusano, G. Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1999,
^7,472-476.
[21] Shibano, M.; Tsukamoto, D.; Fujimoto, R.; Masui, Y.; Sugimoto, H.; Kusano,
G. Chem. Pharm. Bull, 2000,48,1281-1285.
[22] Shibano, M.; Tsukamoto, D.; Kusano, G. Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1999, 47, 907-
908.
[23] Tsukamoto, D.; Shibano, M.; Kusano, G. Chem. Pharm. Bull, 2001, 49, 1487-
1491.
31
[24] Tsukamoto, D.; Shibano, M.; Okamoto, R.; Kusano, G. Chem. Pharm. Bull,
2001,49,492-496.
[25] Ko. H.-H.; Yen, M.-H.; Wu, R.-R.; Won, S.-J.; Lin, C.-N. J. Nat. Prod., 1999,
62,164-166.
[26] Lee, H.J.; Park, J.H.; Jang, D.L; Ryu, J.H. YakhakHoechi, 1997,41,439-443.
[27] Zhang, P.-C; Wang, S.; Wu, Y.; Chen, R.-Y.; Yu, D.-Q. J. Nat. Prod., 2001,
64,1206-1209.
[28] Jacob, G.S. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1995,5,605-611.
[29] Look, G.C.; Fotsch, C.H.; Wong, C.H. Ace. Chem. Res., 1993,26, 182-190.
[30] Winchester, B.; Fleet, G.W.J. Glycobiology, 1992,2,199-210.
[31] Graters, R.A.; Nee^es, J.J.; Tersmette, M.; Degoede, R.E.Y.; Tulp, A.;
Huisman, H.G.; Miedema, F.; Ploegh, H.L. Nature, 1987,330,1^-11.
[32] Elbein, A.D. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1987,56,497-534.
[33] Riley, P.A. Pigm. Cell Res., 1993, 6,182-185.
[34] Jang, D.-I.; Lee, B.-G.; Jeon, C.-O.; Jo, N.-S.; Park, J.-H.; Cho, S.-Y.; Lee, H.;
Koh, J.-S. Cosmet. Toiletries, 1997,112, 59-62.
[35] Harada, N.; Nakanishi, K. Circular Dichroic Spectroscopy: Exciton Coupling
in Organic Stereochemistry. University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, 1983.
[36] Dale, J.A.; Mosher, H.S. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1973, 95,512-519.
[37] Ohtani, L; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1991,
113,4092-4096.
[38] Shibano, M.; Tsukamoto, D.; Inoue, T.; Takase, Y.; Kusano, G. Chem. Pharm.
Bull, 2001,49, 504-506.
[39] Takasugi, M.; Anetai, M.; Masamune, T.; Shirata, A.; Takahashi, K. Chem.
Lett., 1980,339-340.
[40] Fukai, T.; Ikuta, J.; Nomura, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1986,34,1987-1993.
[41] Lee, D.; Bhat, K.P.L.; Fong, H.H.S.; Famsworth, N.R.; Pezzuto, J.M.;
Kinghom, A.D. J. Nat. Prod., 2001, 64,1286-1293.
[42] Cheng, Z.-J.; Lin, C.-N.; Hwang, T.-L.; Teng, C.-M. Biochem. Pharmacol,
2001, 61,939-946.
[43] Lin, C.-N.; Lu, C.-M.; Lin, H.-C; Fang, S.-C; Shieh, B.-J.; Hsu, M.-F.; Wang,
J.-P.; Ko, F.-N.; Teng, C.-M. J. Nat. Prod., 1996,59, 834-838.
[44] Wang, J.-P.; Tsao, L.-T.; Raung, S.-L.; Lin, C.-N. Eur. J. Pharmacol, 1997,
320, 201-208.
[45] Ko, H.-H.; Yu, S.-M.; Ko, F.-N.; Teng, C.-M.; Lin, C.-N. J. Nat. Prod, 1997,
60,1008-1011.
[46] Pisha, E.; Chai, H.-B.; Lee, L-S.; Chagwedera, T.E.; Famsworth, N.R.; Cordell,
G.A.; Beecher, C.W.W.; Fong, H.H.S.; Kinghom, A.D.; Brown, D.M.; Wani,
M.C.; Wall, M.E.; Hieken, T.J.; Das Gupta, T.K.; Pezzuto, J.M. Nat. Med.,
1995,;, 1046-1051.
[47] Quere, L.; Wenger, T.; Schramm, H.J. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1996,
227,484-488.
[48] Matsumoto, J.; Fujimoto, T.; Takino, C ; Saitoh, M.; Hano, Y.; Fukai, T.;
Nomura, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1985,33,3250-3256.
[49] Fang, S.-C; Shieh, B.-J.; Lin, C.-N. Phytochemistry, 1994,37, 851-853.
32
[50] Fang, S.-C; Shieh, B.-J.; Wu, R.-R.; Lin, C.-N. Phytochemistry, 1995, 38, 535-
537.
[51] Lin, C.-N.; Chiu, P.-H.; Fang, S.-C; Shieh, B.-J.; Wu, R.-R. Phytochemistry,
1996,^7,1215-1217.
[52] Spom, M.B. Lancet, 1996, 347,1377-1381.
[53] Spom, M.B.; Suh, N. Carcinogenesis, 2000,21, 525-530.
[54] Surh, Y.J. Mutat, Res., 1999, 428, 305-327.
[55] Pezzuto, J.M. In Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, Amason, J.T.; Mata, R.
Romeo, J.T., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1995; Vol. 29, pp. 19-44.
[56] Kinghom, A.D.; Fong, H.H.S.; Famsworth, N.R.; Mehta, R.G.; Moon, R.C.
Moriarty, R.M.; Pezzuto, J.M. Curr, Org. Chem., 1998,2, 597-612.
[57] Pezzuto, J.M.; Song, L.L.; Lee, S.K.; Shamon, L.A.; Mata-Greenwood, E.
Jang, M.; Jeong, H.-J.; Pisha, E.; Mehta, R.G.; Kinghom, A.D. In Chemistry,
Biology and Pharmacological Properties of Medicinal Plants from the
Americas, Hostettmann, K.; Gupta, M.P.; Marston, A., Eds.; Harwood
Academic PubHshers: Amsterdam, 1999, pp. 81-110.
[58] Le Bail, J.C; Laroche, T.; Marre-Foumier, F.; Habrioux, G. Cancer Lett,, 1998,
133, 101-106.
[59] White, E.L.; Ross, L.J.; Steele, V.E.; Kelloff, G.J.; Hill, D.L. Anticancer Res.,
1999,19, 1017-1020.
[60] Jeong, H.-J.; Chang, L.C.; Kim, H.-K.; Kim, I.-H.; Kinghom, A.D.; Pezzuto,
J.M. Arch. PharmacalRes., 2000,23, 243-245.
[61] Cole, P.A.; Robinson, C.H. J. Med Chem., 1990, 33,2933-2942.
[62] Kelloff, G.J.; Lubet, R.A.; Lieberman, R.; Eisenhauer, K.; Steele, V.E.;
Crowell, J.A.; Hawk, E.T.; Boone, C.W.; Sigman, C.C. Cancer Epidemiol
Biomark. Prev., 1998, 7, 65-78.
[63] Brodie, A.M.H. J. SteroidBiochem. Mol Biol, 1994,49,281-287.
[64] Brodie, A.M.H.; Santen, R.J. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 1994,30, 1-6.
[65] Ibrahim, N.K.; Buzdar, A.U. Am. J. Clin. Oncol, 1995,18,407-417.
[66] Takasugi, M.; Niino, N.; Nagao, S.; Anetai, M.; Masamune, T.; Shirata, A.;
Takahashi, K. Chem. Lett., 1984, 689-692.
[67] delle Monache, G.; Derosa, M.C.; Scurria, R.; Vitali, A.; Cuteri, A.; MonaceUi,
B.; Pasqua, G.; Botta, B. Phytochemistry, 1995,39,575-580.
[68] Kamat, V.S.; Chuo, F.Y.; Kubo, I.; Nakanishi, K. Heterocycles, 1981, 75,
1163-1170.
[69] Mizuno, M.; Tanaka, T.; Matsuura, N.; linuma, M.; Cheih, C. Phytochemistry,
1990,29,2738-2740.
[70] Barros, D.A.D.; Dealvarenga, M.A.; Gottlieb, O.R.; Gottlieb, H.E.
Phytochemistry, 1982,21,2107-2109.
[71] Chang, C.H.; Lin, C.C; Kadota, S.; Hattori, M.; Namba, T. Phytochemistry,
1995, 40, 945-947.
[72] Hatano, T.; Kagawa, H.; Yasuhara, T.; Okuda, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1988,
36, 2090-2097.
[73] Rama Rao, A.V.; Deshpande, V.H.; Shastri, R.K.; Tavale, S.S.; Dhaneshwar,
N.N. Tetrahedron Lett., 1983,24, 3013-3016.
33
[74] Matsuyama, S.; Kuwahara, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Sii2aiki, T. Agric. Biol Chem.,
1991,55,1333-1341.
[75] Chung, M.-L; Weng, J.-R.; Lai, M.-H.; Yen, M.-H.; Lin, C.-N. J, Nat, Prod.,
1999, 62, 1033-1035.
[76] Chung, M.-L; Lai, M.-H.; Yen, M.-H.; Wu, R.-R.; Lin, C.-N. Phytochemistry,
1997, 44, 943-947.
[77] Mann, LS.; Widdowson, D.A.; Clough, J.M. Tetrahedron, 1991, 47, 7991-
8000.
[78] Li, J.; Wang, M.S. Phytochemistry, 1989,28,3564-3566.
[79] Reisch, J.; Hussain, R.A.; Mester, I. Phytochemistry, 1984,23,2114-2115.
[80] Gerber, N.N. Phytochemistry, 1986, 25, 1697-1699.
[81] Doi, K.; Kojima, T.; Makino, M.; Kimura, Y.; Fujimoto, Y. Chem, Pharm,
5i///., 2001, ^P, 151-153.
[82] Bhalla, V.K.; Nayak, U.R.; Dev, S. Tetrahedron Lett., 1968, 9,2401-2406.
[83] Fukai, T.; Wang, Q.H.; Takayama, M.; Nomura, T. Heterocycles, 1990, 31,
373-382.
[84] Gustafsson, J.A. J, Endocrinol, 1999,163, 379-383.
[85] Talalay, P.; Delong, M.J.; Prochaska, H.J. Proc. Natl Acad. Set U.S.A., 1988,
85, 8261-8265.
[86] Mehta, R.G.; Liu, J.F.; Constantinou, A.; Hawthorne, M.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Moon,
R.C.; Moriarty, R.M. Anticancer Res., 1994,14, 1209-1213.
[87] Chiang Su New Medical College In Shanghai Scientific Technologic Publisher:
Shanghai, 1986, pp. 2289-2290.
[88] Compounds 33, 38, 39, and 47 have been selected for preclinical development
as potential cancer chemopreventive agents by the National Cancer Institute
through the Rapid Access to Preventive Intervention Development (RAPID)
program (http://www3.cancer.gov/prevention/rapid/).
[89] Gunatilaka, A.A.L.; Quintus, J.S.H.Q.; Sultanbawa, M.U.S.; Brown, P.M.;
Thomson, R.H. J. Chem. Res. (S), 1979, 61.
[90] Gunatilaka, A.AX.; Sultanbawa, M.U.S.; Surendrakumar, S.; Somanathan, R.
Phytochemistry, 1983, 22, 2847-2850.
[91] Gunatilaka, A.A.L.; Surendrakumar, S.; Thomson, R.H. Phytochemistry, 1984,
23,929-931.
[92] Dehmlow, E.V.; Schulz, H.J. Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1987, 1123-1124.
[93] Dehmlow, E.V.; Sleegers, A.; Risch, N.; Trowitzsch-Kienast, W.; Wray, V.;
Gunatilaka, A.A.L. Phytochemistry, 1990,29, 3993-3995.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Atta-ur-Rahman (Ed.) Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, Vol, 28
© 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. 35
ABSTRACT: This paper reports the ph)^ochemical and biological studies carried out on
several species of the Licania genus (Chrysobalanaceae). This genus includes many
species mainly distributed in neotropical South American countries such as Venezuela,
Brasil, and Mexico, most of them not yet investigated from the chemical and biological
point of view. The name Licania derives from the anagram of the indigenous
Venezuelan name "Calignia".
Phytochemical studies of these species led to the isolation and structural
characterization, by NMR and MS analysis, of many secondary metabolites, mainly
flavonoids, and expecially flavonol glycosides, clerodane diterpenes, and triterpenes
having the lupane, ursane, and oleanane skeletons. Particularly flavonoids and their
glycosides have a chemotaxonomic interest in the genus and in general in the
Chrysobalanaceae family.
Furthermore, several biological studies were performed on some crude extracts of these
plants. They were found to be cytotoxic to cultured human hepatoma (HepG2), colon
carcinoma (Caco-2), melanoma B16, and CA-9KB cells. In addition a moUuscicidal
activity against Biomphalaria glabrata was also demonstrated. Pure triterpenes showed
antibacterial activity on Gram positive and yeast and a moderate cytotoxic action against
KB assay, while diterpenes showed antifungal properties. Flavonoids were also tested
for their antioxidative action as radical scavengers.
INTRODUCTION
The Licania genus, until the last decade, v^as almost completely
unexplored and little, if anything, was knov^n about the chemistry of its
family: the Chrysobalanaceae. This family includes 17 genus and 420
36
GENERAL STRATEGIES
cases, after defatting with «-hexane, the plant material was extracted
directly with methanol, and the crude methanol residue was then
partitioned between solvents with different polarity. Thus, non-polar
compounds, such as triterpenes were found in the less polar extract, while
flavonoids in the more polar fractions. The chloroform extracts were
usually subjected to fractionation over silica gel columns with CHCI3-
MeOH gradients, followed by reversed phase HPLC, Lobar on C-18 and
RP-18 columns with MeOH-H20 mixtures as the eluents. Fractionation of
the CHCb-MeOH 9:1 and MeOH extracts was conducted by gel filtration
over Sephadex LH-20 using MeOH as eluent sometimes preceded by
partition of the extracts between A2-butanol and H2O. The Sephadex LH-
20 fractions were finally purified by RP-HPLC, Lobar RP-8 and/or RP-
18, and flash column chromatography.
The structures of the isolated compounds were elucidated by a
combination of NMR techniques, chemical transformation, and EI-MS or
FAB-MS spectroscopy in positive or negative ion mode. In addition, high
resolution NMR techniques, which are very sensitive and non-destructive
were used.
In the course of our phytochemical work we studied seven Licania
species all belonging to Venezuelan flora, collected in Puerto Ayacucho,
Estado Amazonas and in the Parque Nacional Henry Pittieri, Maracay,
Estado Aragua. A number of new and known secondary metabolites,
mainly flavonoids, especially flavonol glycosides, sterols, and triterpenes
having the lupane, ursane, and oleanane skeleton were isolated and
characterized. The last part of this chapter deals also with the isolation of
clerodane diterpenes from the methanol extract of L, intrapetiolaris by
Oberlies et al, 2001 [4]. All the Licania species investigated up to now
are reported in Table 1.
Table 1. Licania species investigated
Table 2 and Table 3 list all triterpenes and flavonoids obtained from
the genus, respectively, to date. Flavonoids and their glycosides were
39
Species A 1 B 1 C I E 1 F
Species A B C D E F G
Flavonols Kaempferol (Kae) +
Kae 3-rha + +
Kae 3-ara +
Kae 3-rut +
Kae 3-(2"-xyl)rha + +
Kae 3-(6"-/?-coum)glc +
Quercetin (Que) + + +
Que 3-gIc + + +
Que 3-gal + + + + +
Que 3-ara + + + +
Que 3-rha + + + + +
Que 3'0Me-3-glc -)-
Que 3-rut + + +
Que 3-(2"-xyl)rha + +
Myricetin (Myr) + +
Myr 3-glc + +
Myr 3-gal + + + +
Myr 3-ara +
Myr 3-rha + + +
Myr 3-xyl +
Myr 3'0Me-3-glc +
Myr 3'0Me-3-gal +
Myr 4'0Me-3-glc +
Myr 4'0Me-3-gal +
Myr4'OMe-3-rha + +
Myr 3'0Me-3-rut +
Myr 3',4'-cliOMe +
-3-glc
Myr 3',5'-diOMe +
-3-glc
Myr3',5'-diOMe +
-3-rha
Myr 3-rut +
Myr 3-(2"-xyI)rha + +
Myr3-(2"-rha)rha +
Myr 4'-rha +
Myr 3,4'-dirha +
Myr 7-OMe-3,4'-dirha +
Dihydro Taxifolin 3-rha + +
flavonol
Dihydromyr 3-rha +
Catechins (+)-Catechin + +
(-)-£/7/catechin +
Flavones 8-OMe apigenin +
8-OH luteolin +
Flavanones 8-OH eriodictyol +
8-OH naringenin + +
4'-OMe-8-OH naringenin 1 +
Legend: A=I. pittieri; B=L. carii; C=I. pyrifolia; D=Ldensiflora; E=I. heteromorpha var. heteromorpha;
F=I. licaniaeflora\ G=JL. apetala var. apetala; rha=rhamnopyranoside; ara=arabinopyranoside;
rut=rutinopyranoside; xyl=xylopyranosyl or xylopyranoside; coum=coumaroyl; glc=glucopyranoside; gal=
galactopyranoside
42
COOH
3 OHcq
R-R"-H R'«CHj 4 OH ax
2 R-CHj R'«R''-H
12 R«H R'«CHj R"«OH
5 R=H
6 R"gal
7 R-gIc
8 R»rha
9 R = ara
COOPT
10 R=OH R'^R^-R-'-H
25 R-R''»R"'»H R'=ara
R'O
27 R«R-=0H R'=H R-'-gIc
30 R«R-=OH R'R'^^H
59 R«R'=R"^'=H R - - 0 H
COOR
26 R-glc R'«OH
2S R-R'-H
29 R=ll R'=OH
44
14 R«H R*-Tha(l-2)xyl
16 R-H R'-glc 15 R=rha(l-2)xyl
17 R«H R'«g«l 18 R=glc(I-*6)rha
19 R=CHj R'«glc(1-6)rha
20 R-H R'-g'c(l-6)rha
uvaol, oleanolic acid (1), ursolic acid (2), and betulinic acid (11). The
CHCl3-MeOH extract was fractionated by column chromatography on
Sephadex LH-20 with MeOH. The portion containing the bulk triterpenes
was chromatographed over Si gel with CHCla/MeOH mixtures followed
by low-pressure CC on Lichroprep RP-18 with MeOH/HiO mixtures to
yield four new compounds: lla-hydroxybetulinic acid (21), 6(3-
hydroxybetulinic acid (22), 2,3-dihydroxylup-12-en-28-oic acid 3-(3\4*-
45
COOH
21 R=OH R'=H
22 R»H R'«OH
COOH
23 R-H
24 R«OH
and C-13 (quaternary carbon) at 138.0 ppm and by the analysis of the
methine and methylene resonances. A detailed analysis of the ^H-NMR
spectrum of 23 confirmed the characteristic features for a lup-12-en-28-
oic acid derivative bearing an a-OH at C-2 and a |3-0H at C-3. The
carbinohc region revealed a doublet of doublets at 6 3.82 (IH, J= 4.5,
9.6, and 10.8 Hz) and a doublet at 8 4.63 (IH, / = 9.6 Hz), whose
chemical shifts and J couplings were typical for a 2a,3(3-dihydroxyl
substitution pattern. Furthermore, the ^H-NMR spectrum revealed the
presence of a 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic unit by the presence of signals at 8
6.90 (2H, m, H-5' and H-6') and 8 7.02 (IH, br s, H-20. Moreover, the
linkage of this moiety to C-3 of the triterpene was derived from the
downfield shift (1.6 ppm) of C-3 when compared with other derivatives
with the same substitution pattem. Compound 24 had resonances similar
to those apparent in the ^H-NMR spectrum of 23 for a 2a,3^-
dihydroxylup-12-en-28-oic acid derivative. In addition, two signals for an
oxymethylene group replaced the signal due to a rer/-methyl of the
aliphatic region (Me-27). Further support for this additional substitution
was obtained from NOESY experiments (Table 4). Thus, NOEs were
observed between H-5 and H-9, H-23 and H-6a; between H-9 and H-23,
H-3, H-27a, and H-27b; between H-27b and H-20; as well as between H-
18 and H-19. These results showed that the primary hydroxyl and
isopropyl groups both had a-dispositions, whereas the OHfimctionat C-3
was p-oriented.
Correlated signal
proton ^6H Proton 5H
5 0.72 9 1.56
5 0.72 23 1.04
5 0.72 6a 1.52
9 1.56 6a 1.52
9 1.56 23 1.04
9 1.56 27a 3.18
9 1.56 27P 3.52
18 1.38 19 1.40
27b 3.52 20 0.88
31 R-rha
33 R = rha(l-2)xyl
34 R = ara 32 R - r h a
36 R » H 35 R » H
63 R-ara
OH 0
37 R - H
38 R - O H
49
.OCH,
41
50
42
43 R = glc R'^CHj R-'R^'H
44 R«gal R'«CHj R-'-R'-^H
45 R-rha R'-R^^H R"«CHj
46 R«glc R'=R'"=CH3 R*»H
47 R-rhi R'-R^-CHj R--H
Mass spectrometry, ^^C, and ^^C DEPT NMR analysis indicated the
flavonoidic nature also for compound 41, and in particular 15 carbon
atoms ascribable to the aglycon and 12 to the sugar moieties. In the H
NMR spectrum the chemical shifts and the proton coupling constants
indicated a 5,7-dihydroxylated pattern for ring A (two meta-couplQd
doublets at 6 6.21 and 6.42, J= 2.0 Hz) and a 3',4\5*-trihydroxylation for
ring B (a two-proton singlet at 86.95), permitting recognition of the
aglycon as myricetin. Furthermore two anomeric protons were easily
identified in the ^H NMR spectrum. Mass spectra evidenced the presence
of two flanked deoxyhexose moieties due to the presence of a molecular
peak at 611 m/z and two prominent peaks were evidenced at 465 m/z
[(M-f-H)-146]"^ due to the loss of a deoxyhexose unit and at 319 m/z
[(M+H)-(146+146)]^ due to the loss of another deoxyhexose unit;
actually they were identified by ^^C NMR data as two rhamnopyranosyl
moieties with a-configuration at the anomeric carbon [12]. The position
of the disaccaridic moiety at C-3 was determined by typical glycosylation
shift observed in the ^^C NMR spectrum with respect to the aglycon
myricetin: upfield shifts of C-2 and C-4 (about 5.0 and 3.7 ppm,
respectively), and a downfield shift of C-3 (about 3.5 ppm). Actually
myricetin 3-dirhamnoside was previously isolated from Azara
microphylla leaves [13], but the authors did not specify sugar
interlinkage. Therefore, from high digital resolution ^H NMR spectral
data and from ^^C NMR, we determined without a doubt this linkage
which was confirmed by bidimensional COSY and HETCOR
experiments. After hydrolysis L-rhamnose was also identified by TLC
and optical rotation value by comparing their data with those of an
authentic sample. ^^C NMR of compounds 40 and 41 are reported on
Table 5.
52
COOH COOH
R'O'
.OR-
R'O,
and identified as: oleanolic acid (1), ursolic acid (2), betulinic acid (11),
maslinic acid (12), tormentic acid 28-P-D-glucosyl ester (27), pomolic
acid (59), oleanolic acid 3-O-a-L-arabinopyranoside (60), arjunic acid
28-(3-D-glucosyl ester commonly known as arjunetin (61), and olean-12-
ene-2a,3|3-diol (62) [see Fig. (1), (2), and (7)] [17]. Their structural
identification was achieved by ^H and ^^C NMR experiments. The n-
butanol fraction submitted to Sephadex LH-20 and RP-HPLC afforded
10 flavonoids, both flavonol and dihydroflavonol glycosides that were
characterised on the basis of spectral data (UV, MS, ^H and ^^C NMR)
and by comparison with literature data or authentic samples: quercetin 3-
0-p-D-galactopyranoside (6), quercetin 3-0-a-L-rhamnopyranoside (8),
myricetin 3-0-(3-D-galactopyranoside (17), myricetin 3-0-a-L-
arabinopyranoside (63), kaempferol 3-0-a-L-rhamnopyranoside (31),
kaempferol 3-(9-(2"-p-D-xylopyranosyl)-a-L-rhamnopyranoside (33),
quercetin 3-(9-a-L-arabinopyranoside (9), 8-hydroxy naringenin (37),
taxifolin 3-0-a-L-rhamnopyranoside (64), and dihydromyricetin 3-0-a-
L-rhamnopyranoside (65) [(see Fig. (1), (2), (4), and (7)] [18]. The
presence of dihydroflavonol glycosides such as taxifolin 3-0-a-L-
rhamnoside and dihydromyricetin 3-O-a-L-rhamnoside in the genus is
reported now for the first time and thus may have some chemotaxonomic
implications.
Licania apetala var. apetala (E. May) Fritsch is a tree native to the
Amazonian forest. Its leaves were extracted with the same method used
for L. licaniaeflora. From the w-butanol extract of the leaves seven
flavonoids were obtained: quercetin 3-0-(3-D-galactopyranoside (6),
quercetin 3-O-a-L-rhamnopyranoside (8) quercetin 3-0-rutinoside (18),
quercetin 3-0-a-L-arabinopyranoside (9), taxifolin 3-O-a-L-
rhamnopyranoside (64), myricetin 4*-0-a-L-rhamnopyranoside (66), and
kaempferol 3-0-rutinoside (67), [see Fig. (1), (2), (7), and (8)] [18].
Fig. (8). Compounds 66-67 from L apetala
Orha
'Oglc(1-^)rh«
66
I \'*°"J
intrapetacin A R^CHj
intrapetacin B R"Ac
OAc
cucurbitacin B
MoUuscicidal activity
Three methanol extracts from the six Licania plants showed activity at
50 ppm within 24 hours on snails, a potency comparable with those
reported in the literature for other tested plants of this family; one killed
snails at 200 ppm, another one at 400 ppm, and the last one is active only
at 1.000 ppm. Furthermore, extracts from L, carii, L. pittieri, and L.
pyrifolia had an high selectivity for snails without toxicity in fishes. All
the tested extracts contained mostly compounds belonging to the class of
flavonoids and triterpenes, derivatives. Studies on the moUuscicidal
activity of triterpenes with oleanane, ursane, and lupane nuclei isolated
from Z. pyrifolia and I . licaniaeflora showed no mortality on snails and
catechins did not exhibit any moUuscicidal activity up to 400 ppm. On
the contrary flavonols glycosides of myricetin were lethal at 100 ppm;
their high content in L carii, L. pittieri, and L. pyrifolia is assumed to be
responsible for the strong moUuscicidal activity of these plants. These
constituents, although characteristic of Z. densiflora andZ. heteromorpha
were not in such high concentration to exhibit moUuscicidal activity at
100 ppm [22].
Antimicrobial activity
Antioxidant activity
Pure flavonoids 6, 8, 9, 31, 33, 37, and 64, both glycosides and aglycons,
isolated from the leaves of Z. licaniaeflora, were tested for their
antioxidant activity by DPPH assay [23]. Oxidation is well known to be a
major cause of material degradation. More recently, oxygen-reactive
species, in particular free radicals, have been recognized as involved in
several diseases, including cancer and atherosclerosis. Ageing may also
be the result of the deleterious free-radical reactions which occur
throughout cells and tissues. In this context, natural antioxidants are
receiving increasing attention; particularly, flavonoids have been
64
100
1 »• » » »
90 1 1 — : r ^ ^ ^
80
^ 70
60
1 III
50 ^ '"^"'^ # Qiiefcetin
40
—A—33
30
B 64
20
• 9
10 VM[ ^^X^^""^
——37 J
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Concentration i&M
Cytotoxic activity
Antifungal activity
REFERENCES
[22] Bilia, A.R.; Braca, A.; Mendez, J.; Morelli, I.; Life Sciences, 2000, 66, PL 53-
59.
[23] Braca, A.; Sortino, C ; Politi, M.; Morelli, I.; Mendez, J.; J. EthnopharmacoL,
2002, 7P, 379-381.
[24] Takao, T.; Kitatani, F.; Wataanabe, N.; Yagi, A.; Sakata, K.; Biosci.
Biotechnol. Biochem., 1994, 51, 1780-1783.
[25] Hanasaki, Y.; Ogawar, S.; Fukui, S.; Free Rad. Biol Med., 1994,16, 845-850.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Atta-ur-Rahman (Ed.) Studies in Natural Products Chemistry^ Vol. 28
© 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. 69
ALAIN R. VALLA
ABSTRACT: Natural retinoids, especially retinol, are present in all living organisms.
They are known as fundamental mediators for many biological processes, e.g. vision,
cellular growth, differentiation of epithelial tissue, reproduction, etc. Although retinol is
an omnipotent compound, natural retinoids like all E, 9Z and dehydroretinoic acids are
clearly more potent outside the retina and trigger gene expression via binding to nuclear
retinoid receptors. Retinaldehyde occupies an intermediate position in this respect, with
the ability to convert to both retinol and retinoic acid (RA). Retinol has an exceptional
position among the retinoids, both in terms of production and its field of applications. In
1995, the sales of retinol reached US $ 500 million. Considering the interplay between
the stereochemistry of retinoids and their biological activities, any synthetic approach to
these compounds must meet the requirement of stereochemical control, in order to
obtain the desired isomer in a highly stereoselective manner. Despite the recent
achievements in the preparation of conjugated E/Z-dienes and trienes using a variety of
synthetic procedures, there is still a need for versatile and efficient approaches to higher
unsaturated E/Z-polyolefins with the appropriated configuration. This review covers the
major synthetic literature on natural retinoids from 1990 to the present.
INTRODUCTION
P-carotene
71
CHEMISTRY
6c^' OR •---
vitamine A
H-LR
PhjP NaOMe
P'^Phs, CI" vitamine A
OH HCl '
BASF AG
"OAc
OH
PhS02Na
^Y^^^^ /BuOK vitamine A
R-P
OAc
The emphasis for the past twenty years has been the stereoselective
syntheses of vitamin A, and its derivatives, retinal and retinoic acid [11].
A range of recent conceptions, using tricarbonyliron complex [12,13],
Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions such as:
Negishi reaction [14] (organozinc reagents and organotriflates or
halides),
Suzuki coupling [15] (orgaboron reagents and organotriflates or
halides),
Stille reaction [16] (organostannate and electrophiles),
Heck reaction [17] (organotriflates or halides with olefins),
72
C(6)-C(7) strategies:
(EtO)2(0)P> COOEt
CHO ^COOEt
Bu.Sn^
Fig (3).
OTf ^COOEt
a)LDA b) Bu3Sn"
phenyltriflimide Pd2(dba)3, NMP, DMPU, AsPh3
COOEt
a) BuLi, 1 b) Mn02
BuSn ^ ^ K2C03^ BuSn''
-^:^ ^ OEt
BuSnH, CuCN [ ^j^Q c) BuLi, DMPU
OH4 ""OH
BuSn •
COOEt COOEt
C(7)-C(8) strategies:
Fig. (6).
OMe I OMe
SO2 I OMe I
OMe
CHO
s
a) NMO I I O-^ ^) L A ^2
CI Nal, DMF /PrMgCl
c) SOCI2, pyridine
d) MeOK j^^^^'-'^^::^.-'^^
e) PPTS
a) Br COOEt
OSi/BuMeo OSi/BuMeo
h) EtOK
NMeo
"^ EtOOC
0SirBuMe2
COOEt
Fig. (9).
0Si/BuMe2 0Si/BuMe2
^0°C
EtOOC
0Si/BuMe2
Fig. (10).
e)Bu4NF,y)TBDPSCl
EtOOC »• OHC ^
g) AlCl3/LiAlH4, h) Mn02
OSi/BuMeo OSi/BuPh,
OSi/BuPho
.o 9
o. ^ ^ so.
OHC OAc OAc
a) Nal, BuLi OH
c) MeOK
b)MOM-ci y^^^Yi^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^V^^OAc
^ \ X \ OMOM
a) Br2 Brv
OAc
b) /BuOK, DMF
SOo I Br
OH
c) AC2O, DMAP
C(io)-C(ii) strategies:
COOH
COOH
Fig. (16). Aurell, Parra, Tortajada, Gil, and Mestres (1990); Aurell,
Came, Clar, Gil, Mestres, Parra, and Tortajada (1993); Aurell, Ceita,
Mestres, Parra, and Tortajada (1995).
80
a)LDA COOMe
b) MeMgBr
^v
l^^^J^ COOMe
COOMe
COOMe
c)l2 CHO
CHO
^COOH
d) BuSnOMe, PdClzCMeCN);
^^ V c)HI e)l2./)KF,HC\ j
SnBu3 g)PdCl2(MeCN)2,DMF I ^ O ^ : ^ ^ ^ ^
COOH I ^ \^-!v
COOH
catalyzed coupling of the C14 alkenylzinc (obtained from the iodide) with
the Ce iodide (derived from 3-methyl-2£'-penten-4-yn-l-ol), followed by
further deprotection with BU4NF. Vitamin A was obtained in 38% yield
based on p-ionone, with complete control of stereo- and regiochemistry,
Fig. (20).
b) MesAl, Cl2ZrCp2,12,
c) DIBAL-H, I2
ClSiPh2/Bu, EtsN, DMAP
d) /BuLi, ZnBr2
P(i(PPh3)4 e) BU4NF
C(ii)-C(i2) strategies:
O
a) LDA, MeCN CHO
^
Fe(C0)3 Q
(EtO)2P''''~V^COOEt
^
c) BuLi
MeOH, HjG
Fig. (22).
O a) LDA, MeCOOEt
^
Fe(C0)3
g) NaOH,
^
^ MeOH, H2O
COOEt COOH
EtOOC
Fig. (24). Wada, Hiraishi, Takamura, Date, Aoe, and Ito (1997); Wada
(2000).
OAc
a) MeLi
J^„." t ^
OSiMe,
or PCC GOGH
SPh
OMe ^^O 6)NaBH4
OH
a) BF3-Et20
a) BF3-Et20 or ZnCl2^
CHO
orLiCl, DMF
OEt OEt
J^^^^ .;Bu3SnMgMe,CuCN i ^ J . ^ ^ ^ ^ c)BuUort^.U u^J.^^^
OEt
b)\2
Fig. (30).
uC^^ ^ QC —"
/^^^N.x^^ fl)MeONa,NMP r^y^^^^'''''^^ ^^ ^E~MgCl
o
T^ ?$^
...^^ ^ " ^ 6)Pd(dba)3,P(napht)3
CHO
' b)
MeO
a) LDA c)H2S04,pH=2.8 \ X \ COOH
O OMe
>Q a) MeONa, HCOOMe "OMe c) ?h^?CH2
b) H2SO4, MeOH
OMe COOMe
OMe d) HCOOH
COOMe y)NaOH
COOH '
ester, led to the acid {ElZ isomers, 80/20) in 80% yield. Reaction of the
latter with MeLi afforded the Cig ketone in 70% yield, as a mixture of
9£/Z isomers (80/20), Fig. (38).
KOH
d) MeS02Cl-Me3N
CHO a) (EtO)2POCH2COMe
^)MeCH=NC6Hii
c) (C00H)2
Fig. (39). Laurent, Prat, Valla, Andriamialisoa, Giraud, Labia, and Potier
(2000).
93
O
P><C^x-v^^,.^^ a) MeCOMe b) HCOOMe/MeONa
^^^^V^^V
Ijl MeONa c) H2S04/MeOH
O OMe I II OMe
OMe ^Ph3PCH2 X^^^:^A,.^^%AAoMe
e)HCOOH /K.^--:^:^^^^
pentane
Fig. (40). Laurent, Prat, Valla, Andriamialisoa, Giraud, Labia, and Potier
(2000).
jCOOEt
O
a) (EtO)2P>. i. .COOEt y)Mn02
CHO
v^^^^^CHO
O
^ (EtO)2P'xA^CN
x ^ e) DIBAL-H
CN
Fig. (41). Valla, Prat, Laurent, Andriamialisoa, Giraud, Labia, and Potier
(2001).
OSiMe
Q a) LDA, Me3SiCl b) PhSCHsCl, ZnBr2
l^'^^^Y'^^ ^) Me3SiCH2MgCl
peroxyde
X^^^^^^A^ SOoPh
Br- COOEt
r^^^Y^^^/^^^ COOEt
I H
e) BuLi
COOH
COOH
R = CH20H;CH0; COOEt
c) NaOMe or
Et3N, MgClj, AcNMe2
or LiOH, DMF
0 OH
'A
1
•rS
t^
\ / II \ > \ /
>C^"« .)EtO^^^^
Uk zii " L-
> ^ b) DIBAL-H r^^
r^
^
0 °
c)CH2(P(OEt)2)2 r^V^V-^^^-<^P(0Et)2 ^
Q) tBuOK
.OH ^OMe
SPh^
^^
a) BF3-Et20
d) NaBH4.
e)Ac20, Et^N
^^Y^""^^ CHO
J) MCPBA
CHO
L^^^A^ SOPh
g)CCl4 A
OAc
C(i2)-C(i3) strategies:
^ ^ ^ a)CBr4,PPh3
/ K ^ ^ ^ c)Pd(PPh3)4,KOH,Ag2C03
L^Jls, Br B(0H)2
OTBDMS
OTBDMS
f) BU4NF, BaMn04
e) TBDMSCl, KH
BuLi, B(0/Pr)3, aq. HCl
SnBu
d) (Bu3Sn)2CuCNLi2
CHO
OH
^ " O a) ICHzPhj?""!- | - ' ' ^ [ t ^ ' " ^ = > ' - " " W ^ b) BujSnCuBuCNLij
NaN(TMS)2
COOEt
j^^K-^^V-^^
nBu, c)Pd2(dba)3,AsPh3
COOEt
EoY Z
Zstannate
COOEt
Conclusions
attributed in parts to the fact, that this C15 aldehyde could be synthesized
in many ways from p-ionone, a relatively Cn inexpensive product.
DEDICATE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
[1] Silveira, E. and Moreno, F. J. Nutr. Biochem. 1998, P, 446-456.
[2] Vahlquist A. Dermatology^ 1999, 199. 3-11. McLaren, D. S. Med. Biol. Environ.
1998,2(5,113-118.
[3] for reviews, see: - Evans, R. Science 1988, 240, 889-895. - Mangelsdorf, D. and
Evans, R. Cell 1995, 83, 841-850. - Rosen, J.; Day, A.; Jones, T.; Jones, E.;
Nadzan, A. and Stein, R. 1 Med Chem. 1995, 38, 4855-4874. - Spom, M. B.;
Roberts, A. B. and Goodman, D. S., Eds. The retinoids: Biology^ Chemistry and
Medicine, 2"^ ed.; Raven Press Ltd.: New York, 1994.
[4] Altucci, L.; Rossin, A.; Raffelsberger, W.; Reitmair, A.; Chomienne, C. and
Groneberger, H. Nature Medicine 2001, 7, 680-686.
[5] Karrer, P.; Morf, R. and SchcJpp, K. Helv, Chim. Acta 1931,14, 1431-1436.
[6] Kuhn, R. and Morris, C. J. O. R. Chem. Ber, 1937, 70, 853-858.
[7] Isler, 0. Carotenoids, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel 1971.
[8] Isler, O.; Huber, W.; Ronco, A. and Kofler, M. Helv. Chim. Acta 1947, 30, 1911-
1927.
[9] Pommer, H. Angew. Chem. 1960, 72, 911-915.
[10] Chabardes, P.; Julia, M. and Menet, A. DE l^QSiei (1973). Chabardes, P.;
Decor, J. P. and Varagnat, J. Tetrahedron 1977, 33,2799-2805.
104
[11] Liu, S. H. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 1931-1969 - Randall, C. E.; Lewis, J. W.; Hug,
5. J.; Bjorling, S. C ; Einsner-Shanas, L; Friedman, N.; Ottolenghi, M.; Sheves;
M and Kliger, D. S. 1 Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 775, 3473-3485 - Paust, J. Pure and
Appl Chem. 1991, 63, 45-58 - Chemla, F.; Julia, M. and Uguen, D. Bull. Soc.
Chim. Fr. 1993,130, 200-205.
[12] Wada, A.; Hiraishi, S.; Takamura, N.; Date, T.; Aoe, K. and Ito, M. J. Org.
Chem. 1997, 62, 4343-48. Wada, A. Vitamin (Japan) 2000, 74, 101-112.
[13] Wada, A.; Hiraishi, S. and Ito, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 42, 757-759. Wada,
A.; Hiraishi, S.; Takamura, N.; Date, T.; Aoe, K. and Ito, M. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 4343-4348. Wada, A. and Ito, M. Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 2295-2302.
Wada, A.; Tanaka, Y.; Fujioka, N. and Ito, M. Bioorg & Med Chem. Lett. 1996,
6, 2049-2052.
[14] Negishi, E. and Baba, S. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1976, 596-597. Negishi,
E. Ace. Chem. Res. 1982, 75, 340-348. Erdik, E. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 9577-
9648.
[15] Miyaura, N. and Suzuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457-2483. Suzuki, A. in
Metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions; Diederich, F.; Stang, P. J. Eds. Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim; Germany, 1988, chapter 2, 49-97.
[16] Milstein, D. and Stille, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.\91S, 100, 3636-3638. Milstein,
D. and Stille, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 707, 4292-4298. Stille, J. K. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed Engl. 1986, 25, 508-524.
[17] Mizoroki, T.; Mori, K. and Ozaki, A. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 1971, 44, 581. Heck,
R. F. and Nolley, J. P. J. Org Chem. 1972, 37,2320-2322.
[18] Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y. and Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 4467-4470.
[19] Dominguez, B.; Iglesias, B. and De Lera, A. R. J. Org Chem. 1998, 63, 4135-
4139.
[20] Pazos, Y.; Iglesias, B. and De Lera, A. R. J. Org Chem. 2001, 66, 8483-8489.
[21] Yokokawa, F.; Hamada, Y. and Shioiri, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 6559-
6562.
[22] a) Ahmad, I.; Gedye, R. N. and Nechvatel, A. J. Chem. Soc. 1968, 185-187. b)
Pattenden, G. and Weedon, B. C. L. J. Chem. Soc. 1968, 1984-1997. c) Bergdahl,
M.; Hett, R.; Friebe, T.; Gangloff, A. R.; Iqbal, J.; Wu, Y. and Helquist, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 7311-1314. d) Helquist, P. ; Bergdahl, M.; Hett, R.;
Gangloff, A. R.; Demillequand, M.; Cottard, M.; Mader, M. M. ; Friebe, T. L.;
Iqbal, J.; Wu, Y.; Akermark, B.; Rein, T. and Kann, N. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994,
66, 2063-2066. e) Mata, E. G. and Thomas, E. J. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans 1
1995, 785-799.
[23] Bennani, Y. L. and Boehm, M. F. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,1195-1200.
[24] a) Scott, W. J.; Crisp, G. T. and Stille, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 4630-
4632. b) Wulflf, W. J.; Peterson G. A.; Bauta, W. E.; Chan, K.-S.; Faron, K. L.;
Gilbertson, S. R.; Kaesler, R. W.; Yang, D. C. and Murray, C. K. J. Org Chem.
1986, 57, 277-279.
[25] Farina, V. and Krishnan, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 775, 9585-9595.
[26] Pazos, Y. and De Lera, A. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8287-8290.
105
[27] Fokakawa, F.; Hamada, Y. and Shioiri, T. Tetrahedron Lett 1993, 34, 6559-
6562. Betzer, J.-F.; Delagoge, F.; Muller, B.; Pancrazi, A. and Prunet, J. J. Org.
Chem. 1997, 62, 7768-7780.
[28] Dominguez, B.; Iglesias, B. and De Lera, A. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 55,
15071-15098.
[29] Chemla, F.; Julia, M. and Ugen, D. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1993,130, 200-205.
[30] Chabardes, P. Eur Pat. Appl. EP 601918 15 Jun. 1994.
[31] Honda, K.; Yoshii, I. and Inoue, S. Chem. Lett. 1996, 671-672.
[32] Orita, A.; Yamashita, Y.; Toh, A. and Otera, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1997, 36, 779-780. aldehyde: see Otera, J.; Misawa, H.; Onishi, T.; Suzuki, S.
and Kujita, Y. J. Org Chem. 1986, 57, 3834-3838.
[33] Odera, J. Jpn. Kokkai Tokkyo Koho JP 10147569 02 Jun 1998 Kuraray Co., Ltd,
Japan
[34] Takahashi, T.; Furutani, A. and Seko, S. PCT Int. Appl. 059860 12 Oct. 2000 -
Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd, Japan.
[35] Takahashi, T.; Seko, S.; Furuya, A. JP 328978 27 Nov 2001 - Sumitomo
Chemical Co., Ltd., Japan).
[36] Takahashi, T. and Seko, S. Eur. Pat. Appl. 1120398, 01 Aug. 2001 - Sumitomo
Chemical Cie, Ltd, Japan.
[37] Takahashi, T.; Miki, T;. and Seko, S. Eur. Pat. Appl. 900785 10 Mar 1999 -
Sumitomo Chemical Co, Japan.
[38] Takahashi, T.; Furutani, A. and Seko, S. PCT Int. Appl. 024713 04 May 2000 -
Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd, Japan.
[39] Takahashi, T.; Seko, S.; Miki, T.U.S. 6348622 02 Feb. 2002 (abandoned)-
Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd, Japan).
[40] Aurell, M. T.; Came, I.; Clar, J. E.; Gil, S.; Mestres, R.; Parra, M. and Tortajada,
A. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 6089-6100. Aurell, M. J.; Ceita, L.; Mestres, R.; Parra,
M. and Tortajada, A. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 3915-3928.
[41] Valla, A.; Cartier, D.; Labia, R. and Potier, P. Fr. Pat. 0013726 26 Oct. 2000
CNRS, France. Valla, A.; Cartier, D.; Labia R. and Potier, P. PCT Int. Appl. 26
Oct. 2001 CNRS, France.
[42] Hemming, K.; De Meideros, E. F. and Taylor, J. K. J. Chem. Soc. Chem.
Commun. 1994, 2623-2624. Taylor, J. K., Hemming; K. and De Meideros, E. F.
J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 11995,2385-2392.
[43] Pattenden, G. and Weedon, B. C. L. J. Chem. Soc. 1968, 1984.
[44] Negishi, E.; Idacavage, M. J. In Organic Reactions; Wiley: New York, 1985,
Vol. 33, pp. 1-246. Negishi E. and Owczarczyk, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
6683-6686. Negishi, E.; King, A. O. and Klima, W. L. J. Org Chem. 1980, 45,
2526-2528.
[45] Belosludtsev, Y. Y.; Borer, B. C. and Taylor, R. J. K. Synthesis, 1991, 320-322.
[46] Thibonnet, J.; Abarbri, M.; Duchene, A. and Parrain, J.-L. Synlett 1999, 141-143.
[47] Negishi, E.; King, A. O. and Tour, J. M. In Org. Synthesis', Wiley: New York,
1990; Collect. Vol.7, pp. 63-66.
[48] Lipshutz, B. H.; Ellsworth, E. L.; Dimock, S.H. and Reuter, D. C. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1989, 30, 2065-2068.
106
[49] Thibonnet, J.; Launay, V.; Abartri, M.; Duchene, A. and Parrain, J.-L.
Tetrahedron Lett 1998, 39, 4277-4280.
[50] Abarbri, M.; Parrain, J.-L. and Duchene, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 2469-
2472.
[51] Negishi, E. and Owczarczyk, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 6683-6386.
[52] Torrado, A.; Iglesias, B.; Lopez, S and De Lera, A. R. Tetrahedron 1995, 51,
2435-2454.
[53] Roush, W. R.; Brown, B. B. and Drozda, S. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 3541-
3544. Roush, W. R.; Moriarty, K. J. and Brown, B. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990,
31, 6509-6512. Roush, W. R. and Brown, B. B. J. Am. Chem. Soa 1993, 115,
2268-2278.
[52] Aurell, M. J.; Parra, M.; Tortajada, A.; Gil, S. and Mestres, R. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990,57,5791-5794.
[55] Duhamel, L.; Guillemont, J. and Poirier, J.-M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 4499-
4500.
[56] Cahard, D.; Duhamel, L.; Lecomte, S. and Poirier, J.-M. Synlett 1998, 1399-
1401.
[57] Cahard, D.; Mammeri, M.; Poirier, J.-M. and Duhamel, L. Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 3619-3622. Cahard, D.; Duhamel, L.; Lecomte, S. and Poirier, J. M.
Synlett 199S, 1399-1401.
[58] Cainelli, G., Cardillo, G.; Contendo, M.; Trapani, G. and Ronchi, U. J. Chem.
Sac, Perkin Trans. 1 1973, 400-404.
[59] Ancel, J.-E.; Bienayme, H.; Duhamel, L. and Duhamel, P. Eur. Pat. EP
92403167.7 25Nov. 1992 - Rhone-Poulenc Nutrition Animale.
[60] Duhamel, L. and Ancel, J.-E. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 9237-9250.
[61] Duhamel, L.; Duhamel, P. and Ancel, J.-E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 1209-
1210.
[62] a S. Pat. Eastman Kodak 1961,3, 013, 080; Pat. AEC 1, 288, 972, C07c.
[63] Beaudet, I.; Launay, V.; Parrain, J.-L. and Quintard, J.-P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 389-392 - Launay, V.; Beaudet, V. and Quintard, J.-P. Bull. Soc. Chim. 1997,
134, 937-946.
[64] Bienayme H. and Yezeguelian, C. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 3389-3396.
[65] Picotin, G. and Miginiac, P. Chem. Ber. 1986,119, 1725-1730.
[66] Bienayme, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 7383-86. Bienayme, H. Bull. Soc.
Chim. Fr. 1995,132, 696-708.
[67] Ancel, J.-E. and Meilland, P. PCT 00 02854 20 Jan. 2000 - Rhone-Poulenc
Agro.
[68] Salman, M.; Kaul, V. K.; Babu, J. S. and Kumar, N. PCT Int. Appl 009089 08
October 2001 - Ranxaby Labs, Ltd, India.
[69] Valla, A.; Andriamialisoa, Z.; Prat, V.; Laurent, A.; Giraud, M. and Potier, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 9235-9237.
[70] Giraud, M.; Potier, P.; Andriamialisoa, Z.and Valla, A. U.S Pat. 5925797 20
July 1999.
[71] Valla, A.; Andriamialisoa, Z.; Prat, V.; Laurent, A.; Giraud, M. and Potier, P.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 7211-7215.
107
[72] Andriamialisoa, Z.; Valla, A.; Zenache, S.; Giraud, M. and Potier, P.
Tetrahedron Lett 1993, 34, 8091-8092.
[73] Laurent, A.; Prat, V.; Valla, A.; Andriamialisoa, Z.; Giraud, M.; Labia, R. and
Potier, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7221-7224.
[74] Valla, A.; Prat, V.; Laurent, A.; Andriamialisoa, Z.; Giraud, M.; Labia, R. and
Potier, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 1731-1734.
[75] Valla, A.; Laurent, A.; Prat, V.; Andriamialisoa, Z.; Cartier, D.; Giraud, M.;
Labia, R. and Potier P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4795-4797.
[76] Kocienski, P. and Todd, M. J. Chem. Soc. 1982, 1078-1079.
[77] Giraud, M.; Andriamialisoa, Z.; Valla, A.; Zennache, S. and Potier P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 3077-3080.
[78] Valla, A.; Prat, V.; Laurent, A.; Andriamialisoa, Z.; Cartier, D.; Labia, R. and
Potier P. Synth. Commun. 2001, 57, 3423-3427.
[79] Valla, A.; Prat, V.; Laurent, A.; Andriamialisoa, Z.; Cartier, D.; Giraud, M.;
Labia, R. and Potier P. Helv. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 3423-3427.
[80] Wang, Q.; Wei, H.-X. and Schlosser, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 3263-3268.
[81] Magnone, G. A. Eur. Pat. Appl. EP 959069 11 Nov 1999 Laboratori Mag S.P.A.,
Italy.
[82] Magnone, G. A. Eur. Pat. Appl. EP 742204 13 Nov. 1996 Laboratori Mag
S.P.A., Italy.
[83] Wang, X. C ; Bhatia, A. V.; Hossain, A. and Towne, T. B. PCT Int. Appl
9948866 30 Sep. 1999 Abbot Laboratories, USA.
[84] John, M. and Paust, J. Ger. Offen. DE 4313089 27 Oct. 1994 BASF A.-G.,
Germany.
[85] White, S. K.; Hwang, C. K. and Winn, D. T. US Pat. US 5567855 22 Oct. 1996
Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc, USA.
[86] Tanaka, M.; Hanakoa, T. and Takanohashi, K. Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho JP
06329623 29 Nov. 1994 Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd, Japan.
[87] Babler, J. H. and Schlidt, S.A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 7697-7700.
[88] Ancel, J. E.; Bienayme, H.; Duhamel, L. and Duhamel, P. Eur. Pat. Appl. EP
544588 02 June 1993 Rhone-Poulenc Nutrition Animale.
[89] Uenishi, J.; Kawahama, R.; Yonemitsu, O.; Wada, A. and Ito, M. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed 1998, 37, 320-323.
[90] Wada, A.; Fukunaga, K. and Ito, M. Synlett 2001, 800-802.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Atta-ur-Rahman (Ed.) Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, Vol. 28
© 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. 109
EMILIO L. GHISALBERTI
INTRODUCTION
The term ^tetramic acid_ was coined in 1901 to refer to the heterocycUc
system l,5-dihydro-4-hydroxy-2H-pyrrol-2-one (1), a tautomer of 2,4-
pyrrolidinedione (2) which is the predominant species in solution [1].
Although tetramic acid was apparently synthesised only in 1972 [2], a
number of natural substances had been identified as derivatives of tetra-
mic acids well before that time. Secondary metabolites containing the
tetramic acid ring constitute an increasingly important class of bioactive
natural products. Compounds containing this structural unit, sometimes
intriguingly camouflaged, exhibit a diverse range of biological activities
and have attracted the interest not only of natural products chemists, but
also of chemical ecologists, medicinal and synthetic chemists. The tetra-
mic acid moiety, in most cases, is present as a 3-acyl derivative with the
acyl group varying from the simple acetyl group to structurally complex
entities incorporating several stereogenic centres. The increasing activity
in this area, stimulated by an increasing number of bioassays and a larger
resource pool, makes periodic reviews of the field useful.
no
It is somewhat surprising to find that there have been only three pub-
lished reviews on tetramic acids. The first reports on the advances in
tetramic acid chemistry up to 1993 [1], another describes the synthesis of
tetramic acid antibiotics [3], and a third, dealing with the structure, isola-
tion and synthesis of naturally occurring tetramic acids, was published in
1995 [4]. The present review is an attempt to cover the field of tetramic
acid metabolites with particular emphasis on the structure, biosynthesis
and biological activity of these compounds.
group of the a-amino acid (from L-leucine) is not involved in the hetero-
cyclic ring in (5), Fig. (2).
Aspects of the structure and properties of tetramic acids have been pre-
sented in detail [1,3] and only a summary will be given here. Tetramic
acid is a much weaker acid (pK^ 6.4 in water) than its oxygen counterpart
and exists mainly in the 2,4-diketone form. The presence of an acyl group
at C3 results in an increase in acidity (pK^ 3.0-3.5) and proton NMR
spectra indicate complete enolisation and the presence of tautomeric
forms. As shown in Fig. (3), these can be separated into two sets of _ii-
temaL tautomers (A/B, C/D), which are rapidly interconverting, and two
pairs of __externaL isomers that interconvert slowly on the NMR time
scale and often give rise to separate NMR signals [1,3]- ^^C-NMR spec-
troscopy is more useful in determining the predominant tautomeric spe-
cies and it indicates that the one represented by D is more important. On
the other hand, if the nitrogen is acylated, the preferred form is A since
the lone pair on nitrogen does not enhance the proton acceptor ability of
the lactam carbonyl at C2 [3,1]. Selected examples of differently substi-
tuted tetramic acids and their spectral parameters are given in Fig. (4).
112
SLOW
^N^^a FAST
R C
are capable of converting salts to the conjugate acid [13-15]. In one case,
it was found that the free acid derived from the magnesium salt was un-
stable and prone to oxidation [16]. For tetramic acids embedded in a mac-
rocyclic lactam ring, it was found that all prior isolations of these type of
compounds involved acidification during extraction or chromatography
[16]. On the other hand, it is also possible for the tetramic acid to seques-
ter metal cations as observed for the case of corresponding tetronic acid
that formed the calcium salt on chromatography with silica gel 60 [17].
^^C-NMR (CD^CN)
IR (film) 1726.1657-1617 cm"''(several bands) TAUTOMER
UV (CH3CN) 238. 286 nm
f^3 H,C^-''
HaC^ 27.5 178.0
26.3 172.8
ACYLTETRAMIC ACIDS
In this section, tetramic acids with an acyl group substituent at C-3 are
discussed. The simplest of the naturally occurring 3-acyl tetramic acids,
tenuazonic acid (6), was first isolated from the culture filtrate of Alter-
naria tenuis [18] and, subsequently, from other fungal species (A. alter-
nata, A. longipes, Pyricularia oryzae) [19,20]. Species of Altemaria are
known to produce more than 70 secondary metabolites, many of which,
particularly those from the Altemaria altemata complex, are mycotoxins
[19]. The absolute stereochemistry of 6 (55,65) was deduced from the
formation of L-isoleucine on ozonolysis followed by acid hydrolysis [21].
Tenuazonic acid has also been isolated as a mixture of calcium and
magnesium complexes from Phoma sorghina, the fungus implicated in
the aetiology of onyalai, a haematologic disorder affecting Black African
populations south of the Sahara [22]. Tenuazonic acid (TA) readily forms
complexes with magnesium" to yield Mg"TA2, and with transition metals
(Cu" TAj, Ni"TA2 ^^^ Fe"'TA3) [23]. An X-ray crystallographic study of
the copper-fc/5-tenuazonate monohydrate, Cu(TA)2.H20, showed that the
chelate is formed between the enolic oxygen of the acyl group and the
amide oxygen [24]. With this in mind, and considering that the isolation
of tenuazonic acid from the liquid cultures of A. tenuis required acidifica-
tion, it is highly probable that these covalent complexes are the __naturaL
form of the metabolite [22].
was detected [16,25]. It was also found that the analogues of tenuazonic
acid (9-11) were obtained when the medium was supplemented with L-
valine [27] L-leucine [27] or L-norvaline [20].
T ° 9 R = i-Pr
10R = i-Bu
11 R = n-Pr
Mg',2+
12 n = 3
13 n = 5
J 2
H3C(CH2W ^ . ^ > ^ A
HdC(CH2)ir A ^N—CH3 ^ ^ ^^^ "Y N—CH3
14 15
Hcp(CH2)l3
N—CH3
16
AcO
117
HN ^ ^ °°^"
HoN 23
Aspects of the biosynthesis have been resolved. The amino acid (see
23) involved in the heterocyclic ring arises from L-2,3-diaminopropionic
119
O OH
24 R = OH
26 R = NH2
OH
^ CO2H
27 Ancorinoside A o^^
28 Ancorinoside A
Mg salt C02® Mg'*
HO\.--V^|- CO2H
OH
R o^N.
29 R = H Ancorinoside B
30R = CH3 Ancorinoside C
CO2H
31 Ancorinoside D
"J^^^^Hs
^fr »/wvvrvAA/v»
33
HsC^
32R, =CH20H;R2 = H
3 4 R i = H ; R 2 = CH20H
»AAA/\AAA/»
H3C
36 37 38
cryptocin and m.p. for the Pezicula metabolite, makes comparison diffi-
cult. Of some interest is the observation that attempted acetylation of the
Pezicula metabolite yielded a derivative (37) in which the secondary al-
cohol had been eliminated and the enol oxygen at C4 acetylated. The
metabolite (CJ-17,572) inhibited the growth of multi-drug resistant strains
of Staphyllococcus aureus (MIC 10 |ig/ml) and Enterococcus faecalis
(MIC 20 |ig/ml) and exhibited cytotoxicity against HeLa cells (ICg^ 7.1
Jig/ml).
NH2
39 40
N—r^^
CO^Hs
o»»'
42
44Ri = C02H;R2=OH
4 5 R i = OH; R2 = C02F
The next tetramic acid to be considered was isolated from lactic acid
bacteria and is unusual in that, while it includes an acetyl group at C-3, it
contains an a,P-unsaturated fatty acid as a substituent on N-1. Lactic acid
bacteria have long been used to make various dairy products, sauerkraut
or also sourdough for bread. Antibiotics from Lactobacillus protect
against infections of Salmonella and Helicobacter, a causative agent of
stomach ulcers [83]. One of these lactobacilli, L. reuteri, is a constituent
of the naturally occurring intestinal bacteria in humans and animals. In a
sourdough that is used in the production of a commercial baking product,
a strain of L. reuteri was found to have an inhibitory effect against gram-
127
positive bacteria [84]. The antibiotic, named reutericyclin (47), was ob-
tained from cell extracts and culture filtrate in a yield of -Img/L [85].
The gross structural features, presence of a tetramic acid and E-
decenoyl side chain, could be inferred from NMR studies. Methanolysis
(HCl/MeOH) of 47 and pentane extraction of the quenched reaction mix-
ture gave two compounds that were determined to be the methyl esters of
decenoic acid and N-(2-decenoyl)leucine. The nature of the 3-acyl tetra-
mic acid was deduced from the identification of 48 and 49 in the aqueous
portion of the methanolysis reaction mixture following treatment with
trifluoroacetic acid anhydride. The unusual C-C bond fragmentation un-
der acidic conditions, and the structure of the antibiotic was confirmed by
synthesis of racemic 47 [86]. The configuration at the lone chiral centre
was established as R by chiral GC. The carbon NMR spectrum of 47 indi-
cated an equilibrium between three tautomers in which the A^-pyrrolin-4-
one form is preferred (60%) and the two internal tautomers (50, 51) make
equal contributions (20% each).
k OCH3
47 49
i'^-^
50
ENOYLTETRAMIC ACIDS
HO, 9H0H
?H QH QH QH QH QH QH QH QH OH OH V ^ N ^ ^ ^ ^ H
53 R = CH3
54R = H
HO. 9HQH
?HQH OH OH OH OHOH OH OH OH OH OHVA^^^QH
OHOH OH
stereochemistry
from optical rotation
1.Q3;Me2S
2. LiAIH4
OH
3. BzCN, EtgN
Nal04
1. Nal04
2. NaBH
QH
.OH
OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 0
?«V^ OH
1. Nal04
2. NaBH4
3. 3N HCI
4. BzCI
relative configuratfon by 5.O3
J-based method I.O3
2. NaBH4
3. AC2O
4. NaOMe OBz
BzO'
5.H^
comparison with I
authentic sample I
I OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
OH = • = • -" OH OH
relative configuration by
J-based method
Fig. (5). Degradation scheme to determine structure and stereochemistry of aflastatin A (53)
have shown that C-7, 27,29,33 and 35 arise from glycolic acid whereas
all the others are as expected [6]. All the three compounds inhibit pro-
duction of aflatoxins in A. parasiticus at 0.5 jxg/nil [90,92,93]. Aflastatin
A inhibits the formation of norsolorinic acid, an anthraquinone precursor
of aflatoxin biosynthesis [94], and melanin production in Colletotrichum
lagenarium [95]. In both cases, indications are that inhibition occurs at an
early step of the biosynthesis. The effect of removing the tetramic acid
group has ben investigated. Thus, compound (55) and the corresponding
methyl glycoside were found to significantly reduce expression of genes
encoding enzymes involved in the aflatoxin pathway, and did not show
antifungal activity [96].
DIENOYLTETRAMIC ACIDS
c CONHMe
H
OH o
COgH
CHgOH
OH o
62R = CH3
63R=:H
POLYENOYLTETRAMIC ACIDS
N
\
CH3
The stereochemistry was determined by comparison of CD data of the
decahydroderivative of compound (64) to that of the synthetic chiral
analogue (65). This established the 5-configuration at C-5. Interestingly,
fuligorubin (66), present as the yellow calcium salt in the aethelia of the
closely related myxomycete Fuligo septica [121], incorporates /?-
glutamic acid whereas P. polycephalum uses ^-serine. Leocarpus fragi-
lis, Plasmodia of which are found in autumn attached to dead conifer nee-
dles or grass, produces the group of tetramic acid pigments (67-70) that
have incorporated iS-tyrosine [122].
134
.CO2H
'OH H3C
CH.I3 65
^ 68 n = 3 O CH3 ^"
69 n = 4 70
71 R = CH3
72R= H
OH
' OH
Trichoderma spp are a well known fungal group that produce a wide
range of metabolites with diverse activities [137]. The only tetramic acid
derivative isolated so far is harzianic acid (78) which was isolated from a
136
OH 0
The orange pigments aurantoside A and B have been isolated from the
marine sponge Theonella swinhoei [139]. The structures contain a di-
chlorohexaene chain and a glutamine-derived tetramic acid that is modi-
fied by an N-trisaccharide unit. The structure and absolute sterochemistry
of the trisaccharide group was established as D-xylo-D-arabino-D-arabino
by GC analysis of the hydrolysis product. The configuration at C4 was S
since L-aspartic acid was obtained on Lemieux oxidation (periodate/ per-
manganate) followed by hydrolysis. The original structure was revised to
include an ^-geometry of the terminal double bond [140]. The auranto-
sides were first isolated as the antifungal and cytotoxic constituents and
were later shown to inhibit binding of interleukin-6 to its receptors. Au-
rantoside C was obtained from a sponge, Homophymia conferta
(Theonellidae) (Phillipines) and was mildly toxic to brine shrimp [141].
Resonances for C-1 and C-2 were not observed in ^^C-NMR spectrum but
were detected in the hexylacetate derivative (5^ 174, C-1, and 5^ 100.3,
C-2). Aurantoside D, E and F from the sponge Siliquariaspongia japonica
(Theonellidae) were obtained by bioassay-guided fractionation [140]. Au-
rantoside F was four times more toxic (IC5Q 0.05 |ig/ml) than D or E (IC50
0.2 |xg/ml), whereas A and B did not show activity at 5 ^ig/ml against P-
388 murine leukemia cells. On the other hand, aurantoside F was inactive
towards C albicans and A. fumigatus, which were sensitive to the others,
in particular E (MIC 0.16 and 0.04 |ig/ml with inhibitory zones of 9.7 and
13.6 mm) [140].
137
The rubrosides are a group of eight related compounds, similar to the au-
rantosides, that have been obtained from Siliquariaspongia japonica
[141]. The methanol extract from the sponge exhibited significant activity
in the 3Y1 rat fibroblasts assay and bioassay-guided fractionation resulted
in the isolation of the metabolites, e.g. 85. Compared to the aurantosides,
OH
O' HO OH
H2N- OH
or V\ HO OH
84 Aurantoside F
•3^" 'OH
they present a slightly more elaborate polyene unit at C-3 that terminates
138
H O
MACROCYCLIC LACTAMS
0 H^ \,.o.H ^^ Ikarugamycin
87 5,6-p-epoxy
structure and stereochemistry, with the exception of C-16 and C-17, were
assigned on the basis of spectral analysis. Discodermide exhibited cyto-
toxic (P388; IC50 0.3 [xg/ml) and antifungal activities (C albicans; MIC
12.5 jxg/ml). A number of related metabolites have been uncovered. Al-
teramide A (89) was isolated from the bacterium Altermonas sp. recov-
ered from the marine sponge Halichondria okadai [147]. An incompletely
characterised congener, the 25-desoxy analogue, alteramide B, is also
produced. Alteramide A shows cytotoxic activity to P388 (IC50 0.1
|Lig/ml), murine lymphoma LI210 (IC50 ^-^ ^g/i^O and human epidermoid
carcinoma (IC50 5.0 ^ig/ml) cell lines. Interestingly, altemamide A on ex-
posure to light undergoes a [4+4]cycloaddition to yield a compound de-
void of theactivity associated with the parent compound.
Cylindramide (90) is a cytotoxic compound isolated from Halichon-
dria cylindrata (7.10'^% wet wt.), but very likely of bacterial origin
[148]. The structure was deduced from spectroscopic analysis, the relative
stereochemistry (only) of the bicyclo[3.3.0]octene unit by NOESY tech-
niques, and the absolute stereochemistry of the amino acid of the tetramic
acid ring (25,3S) from the recovery of erythtro-L-p-hydroxyornithine
from oxidative degradation of 90. It showed cytotoxicity to B16 mela-
noma cells (IC50 0.8 |Lig/ml).
Aburatubolactam A (91) and C (92) were isolated from the culture
broth of Streptomyces sp recovered from a mollusk. X-ray diffraction
studies established the structure of aburatubolactam A which was reported
to inhibit TPA-induced superoxide anion generation by human neutro-
phils [149]. Aburatubolactam C appears to be cytotoxic for various prolif-
erating tumor cells of human and murine origin (0.3-5.8 M'g/inl) via
apoptotic DNA fragmentation [150,151].
140
"OH
88 Discodermide 89 Aiteramide
90 Cylindramlde ^ ^ O
OH
93 Xanthobaccin A
94 27-dihydro
9516-deoxy
An ethanol extract from Geodia sp., a marine sponge from the Great
Australian Bight, showed activity in inhibiting larval development of the
nematode Haemonchus contortus (LD99 14|Lig/ml) [16]. The active mate-
rial (LD991 |Lig/ml) was soluble in BuOH. Energy dispersive spectroscopy
(EDS) indicated the presence of magnesium and HR-ESIMS(-ve) and AA
spectroscopy was consistent with the formula [C27H3iN205]2Mg. The
structure of geodin A magnesium salt (96) was deduced from spectro-
scopic analyses, but the relative stereochemistry of the amino acid com-
ponent of the tetramic acid and the absolute stereochemistry remain to be
assigned [16]. Attempts to convert the salt to its conjugate acid with either
HCl or TEA. gave an unstable compound that could not be characterised.
Mg2^
96
J 2
142
N.ACYL.4.METHOXY-3.PYRROLIN.2-ONES
CH3{CH2)5
^^ 0CH3
9CH3 n Y " l
100 R = H CH3(CH2)
101R = CH3 R I) OCH3
€H3
HaCa
102
104
CH3 107
OCH3
109
110
O CH3
There are several examples of metabolites where the tetramic acid domain
is teasingly disguised. In these cases, it is difficult to be definitive about
the nature of the apparent modification unless this is substantiated by bio-
synthetic studies. The case of lactacystin (5), Fig. (2), has already been
considered. Another example is presented by the oxazolomycin group of
antibiotics, e.g. (Ill), found in strains of Streptomyces [179]. Biosyn-
thetic studies indicate that the carboxylic acid of the amino acid required
to form tetramic acids contributes to the formation of the P-lactone [180].
In this section, metabolites that probably have a tetramic acid origin are
presented.
The neurotoxic lipophilic tripeptide, janolusimide (112), was isolated
from the Mediterranean nudibranch Janolus cristatus. The structure was
determined by spectroscopic and classical chemical methods [181] and
confirmed by synthesis [182]. It has been suggested that the pyrrolidine-
2,4-dione may arise from condensation of valine and isobutyrate [181].
147
N-CH3
N—H
114 115
only in the substituent at C21; butoxy or methoxy. Given that during the
isolation n-BuOH and MeOH were used, the possibility that these sub-
stituents are artefactual cannot be discounted. Ascosalipyrrolidinone A
exhibited antibacterial activity against Bacillus megaterium, and the fungi
Mycotypha microsporum and Mycobotrium microsporum at 50 |ig/disk.
Moderate activity towards chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum
(IC50 736 ng/ml) and significant activity towards Trypanosoma cruzi and
r. brucei subsp. Rhodesiense. The corresponding analogue (118) with ty-
rosine as the contributed amino acid has been isolated as an inhibitor of
platelet-activating factor acetyltransferase from Penicillium rubrum [186].
116R=(CH2)^H3
117R = CI^ H3C CH3 118
CH3
HOHQ
\
OH 121
\ 122
OH
150
124
The formation of the pyrrolidone group involves condensation of an
acetate with L-serine. Since a significant proportion of L-[1,2,3-^^C,
^^N]serine was incorporated into pramanicin, the carbon skeleton of ser-
ine is incorporated intact. Acylation with the 14-carbon moiety then en-
sues leading to the conjugated dieneone tetramic acid intermediate 122.
In fact, this compound co-occurs with 121 and, interestingly, is almost
exclusively produced when 123 and 124 are used as precursors. The re-
maining steps involve formation of the trans-diol at C-3 and C-4 and ep-
oxidation of the terminal alkene in the dienone chain.
Vancoresmycin (125) is a metabolite extacted from the mycelium of an
actinomycete strain of the genus Amycolatopsin sp. It exhibited potent
activity against gram-positive bacteria, including vancomycin-resistant
strains such as Enterococcus spp. [191], but was inactive towards gram-
negative bacteria and showed no fungal activity. The plane structure was
derived from MS and NMR studies which also revealed the stereochem-
151
OH OH
HaC-N
HoC
QH O
O 127
129 O O 128
CONCLUDING REMARKS
ride substituent at C-3. In fact, tenuazonic acid which does not have fiinc-
tionality apart from the 3-acyltetramic acid is considerably more active
[57]. Some of the questions that will require an answer are illustrated by a
few observations on the activity of blasticidin (52) and the aflastatins (53,
54). Removal of the tetramic acid group did not eliminate the inhibitory
effect on aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus or render the modi-
fied blasticidins toxic to the fungus [96]. A fragment of aflastatin A (53),
containing the tetramic acid portion and an eight carbon chain at C-3,
showed no inhibitory activity on production of the toxins [92]. It is clear
that tetramic acid metabolites, because of their intricate structures and di-
verse bioactivity, will continue to attract attention for some time yet.
154
REFERENCES
[I] Henning, H.-G.; Gelbin, A.; Adv. Heterocycl Chem., 1993, 57, 139-185.
[2] Mullholland, T.P.C.; Foster, R.; Haydock, D.B.; J. Chem. Soc, Perkin Trans.
7,1972,2121-2128.
[3] Shimshock, S.J.; DeShong, P.; Stud. Nat. Prod Chem,, 1994,14, 97-141
[4] Royles, B.J.L.; Chem. Rev,, 1995, 95, 1981-2001.
[5] Turner, W.B.; Aldridge, D.C.; Fungal Metabolites IL Academic Press: Lon-
don, 1983.
[6] Natori, S.; Yahara, I. In Mycotoxins and Phytoalexins: Cytochalasins', R.P.
Sharma; R.P.; Salunkhe, D.K., Eds.; CRC: London, 1991, pp. 291-336.
[7] Iwamoto, C ; Yamada, T.; Ito, Y.; Minoura, K.; Numata, A.; Tetrahedron,
2001, 57, 2997-3004.
[8] Ichihara, A.; Oikawa, H. In Comprehensive Natural Products Chemistry, U.
Sankawa, Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, 1999, Vol. 1, pp. 367-408.
[9] Oikawa, H.; Murakami, Y.; Ichihara, A.; J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans., 1992,
2955-2959.
[10] Probst, A.; Tamm, Ch.; Helv. Chim. Acta, 1981, 64, 2065-2077.
[II] Nagakawa, A.; Takahashi, S.; Uchida, K.; Matsuzaki, K.; Omura, S.; Naka-
mura. A.; Kurihara, N.; Nakamatsu, T.; Miyake, Y.; Take, K,; Kainosho, M.;
Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 5009-5012.
[12] Barkley, J.V.; Markopolous, J.; Markopoulous, O.; J. Chem. Soc. Perkin
Trans. 1,1994, 1271-1274.
[13] Capon, R.J.; Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2001, 633-645.
[14] Inamura, N.; Adachi, K.; Sano, H.; J. Antibiot., 1994, 47, 257-261.
[15] Ohta, E.; Ohta, S.; Ikegami, S.; Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 4699-4703.
[16] Capon, R.J.; Skene, C ; Lacey, E.; Gill, J.H.; Wadsworth, D.; Friedel, T.; J.
Nat. Prod, 1999, 62, 1256-1259.
[17] Sodeoka, M.; Sampe, R.; Kojima, S.; Baba, Y.; Morisaki, N.; Hashimoto, Y.;
Chem. Pharm. Bull, 2001, 49, 206-212.
[18] Rosset, T.; Sankhala, R.H.; Stickings, C.E.; Taylor, M.E.U.; Thomas, R.; Bio-
chem. J., 1957, 67, 390-400.
[19] Botallico, A.; Logrieco, A.; In Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food Safety,
Sinha, K.K.; Bhatnagar, D., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1998, chap. 3.
pp. 65-108.
[20] Nukina, M.; Saito, T.; Biosci. Biotech. Biochem., 1992, 5d, 1314-1315.
[21] Stickings, C.E., Biochem. J., 1959, 72, 332-340.
[22] Steyn, P.S.; Rabie, C.J.; Phytochem., 1976,15, 1977-1979.
[23] Lebrun, M.H.; Duvert, P.; Gaudemer, F.; Gaudemer, A.; Deballon, C ; Bou-
cly. P.; J. Inorg. Biochem., 1985, 24, 167-181.
155
[24] Dippenaar, A.; Holzapfel, C.W.; Boeyens, J.C.A.; J. Crysl Mol Struct., 1978,
7, 189-197.
[25] Stickings, C.E.; Townsend, R.J.; Biochem. J., 1961,78, 412-418.
[26] Gatenbeck, S.; Sierankiewicz, J.; Acta Chem. Scand., 1973, 27, 1825-1827.
[27] Gatenbeck, S.; Sierankiewicz, J.; Antimicrob. Agents Chemother,, 1973, 3,
308-309.
[28] Giterman, CO.; J. Med. Chem., 1965, 8,483-486.
[29] Barbacid, M.; Vazquez, D.; Eur. J. Biochem., 1974, 44, A31'AAA.
[30] Lebrun, M.H.; Nicolas, L.; Boutar, M.; Gaudemer, F.; Ranomenjanahary, S.;
Gaudemer, A.; Phytochem., 1988, 27, 71-84.
[31] Sato, Z.; Okuda, S.; Nozoe, S.; Iwasaki, S.; Muro, H.; Jpn. Patent 1973 JP
48048633. Chem. Abst,, 1973, 79, 133658.
[32] Robeson, D.J.; Mahbubul, A.F.J.; J. Inorg. Biochem,, 1991, 44, 109-116.
[33] Kohl, H.; Bhat, S.V.; Patell, J.R.; Gandhi, N.M.; Nazareth, J.; Divekar, P.V.;
de Souza, N.J.; Berscheid, G.; Fehlhaber, H.-W.; Tetrahedron Lett,, 1974, 75,
983-986.
[34] Imamura, N.; Adachi, K.; Sano, H.; J. Antibiot,, 1994, 47, 257-261.
[35] Hoechst A.-G., Fed. Rep. Ger. Brit. Patent 1977 GB 1478643. Chem, Abstr.
1978,55,168480.
[36] Gandhi, N.M.; Nazareth, J.; Divekar, P.V.; Kohl, H.; de Souza, N.J.; J. Anti-
biot,, 1973, 26, 797-798.
[37] Aoki, S.; Higuchi, K.; Ye, Y.; Satari, R.; Kobayashi, M.; Tetrahedron, 2000,
56, 1833-1836.
[38] Takahashi, S.; Sankyo Kenkyusho Nenpo, 1992, 44, 129-133. Chem. Abstr.,
1993, J19, 24279.
[39] Takahashi, S.; Kagasaki, T.; Furuya, K.; lizuka, Y.; Amagai, N.; Naito, S.;
Shiraishi, A.; Sankyo Kenkyusho Nenpo, 1992, 44, 119-127. Chem. Abstr.,
1993,775,187475.
[40] Takahashi, S.; Shiraishi, A.; lizuka, Y.; Furuya, K.; Kagasaki, T.;. Jpn Patent
04049289,1992. Chem. Abstr., 1992, 777, 88730.
[41] Shu, Y.-Z.; Ye, Q.; Kolb, J.M.; Huang,S.; Veitch, J.A.; Lowe, S.E.; Manly,
S,?,;J. Nat. Prod, 1997, 60, 529-532.
[42] Koninklijk Nederlandsche Gist- en Spiritusfabriek N. V.; Neth. Appl,
6701,356,1968. Chem. Abstr,, 1969, 70, 27642.
[43] Batelaan, J.G.; Bamick, J.W.F.K.; van der Baan, J.L.; Bickelhaupt, F.; Tetra-
hedron Lett., 1972, 3103-3106.
[44] Batelaan, J.G.; Bamick, J.W.F.K.; van der Baan, J.L.; Bickelhaupt, F.; Tetra-
hedron Lett., 1972,3107-3110.
[45] van der Baan, J.L.; Bamick, J.W.F.K.; Bickelhaupt, F.; Tetrahedron, 1978,
M 223-231.
156
[46] Schipper, D.; van der Baan, J.L.; Bickelhaupt, F.; J. Chem, Soc. Perkin Trans,
7,1979,2017-2022.
[47] Schipper, D.; van der Baan, J.L.; Bickelhaupt, F.; Tetrahedron Lett,, 1982,
1289-1292.
[48] Schipper, D.; van der Baan, J.L.; Harms, N.; Bickelhaupt, F.; Tetrahedron
Lett., 1982, 1293-1296.
[49] Cole, R.J.; In Mycotoxins-Production, Isolation and Purification, Betina, V.,
Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 405-414.
[50] Holzapfel, C.W.; Tetrahedron, 1968, 24, 2101-2119.
[51] Van Rooyen, P.H.; Acta Crystallogr,, Sect. C, 1992, 48, 551 -
[52] Holzapfel, C.W.; Hutchison, R.D.; Wilkins, D.C.; Tetrahedron, 1970, 26,
5239-5246.
[53] Luo, D.; Nakazawa, M.; Yoshida, Y.; Cai, J.; Imai, S.; Gen. Pharm,, 2000, 34,
211-220
[54] Riley, R.T.; Goeger, D.E.; In Hanbook of Applied Mycology: Mycotoxins in
Ecological Systems. Bhatnagar, D.; Lillehoj, E.B.; Arora, D.K., Eds.; Marcel
Dekker, New York, 1992, Vol. 5, 385-402.
[55] Otha, S.; Ohta, M.; Ikegami, S.; J. Org Chem., 1997, 62, 6452-6453.
[56] Otha, S.; Ohta, M.; Ikegami, S.; Tetrahedron, 2001, 57,4699-4703.
[57] Fujita, M.; Nakao, Y.; Matsunaga, S.; Seiki, M.; Itoh, Y.; van Soest, R.W.M.;
Fusetani, N.; Tetrahedron, 2001,57, 1229-1234.
[58] Burmeister, H.R.; Bennet, G.A.; Vesonder, R.F.; Hesseltine, C.W.; Antimi-
crob. Agents Chemother., 1974, 5, 634-639.
[59] Vesonder, R.F.; Tjarks, L.W.; Rohwedder, W.K.; Burmeister, H.R.; Laugul,
J.A.; J. Antibiot., 1919, 32, 759-761.
[60] Phillips, N.J.; Goodwin, J.T.; Fraiman, A.; Cole, R.J.; Lynn, D.J.; J. Am.
Chem. Soc, 1989, 111, 8223-8231.
[61] Singh, S.B.; Zink, D.L.; Goetz, M.A.; Dombrowski, A.W.; Polishook, J.D.;
Hazuda, D.J.; Tetrahedron Lett,, 1998, 39, 2243-2246.
[62] Wray, B.B.; Rushing, E.J.; Boyd, R.C.; Schindel, A.M.; Arch. Environ.
Health, 1979, 34, 350-353.
[63] Turos, E.; Audia, J.E.; Danishevsky, S.J.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1989, 111,
8231-8236.
[64] Burke, L.T.; Dixon, D.J.; Ley, S.V.; Rodriguez, F.; Org Lett., 2000, 2, 3611-
3613.
[65] Wheeler, M.H.; Stipanovic, R.D.; Puckhaber,L.S.; Mycol. Res., 1999,103,
967-973.
[66] Singh, S.B.; Zink, D.L.; Goetz, M.A.; Dombrowski, A.W.; Polishook, J.D.;
Hazuda, D.J.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 2243-2246.
157
[67] Hazuda, D.; Blau, U.C; Felock, P.; Hastings, J.; Pramanik, B.; Wolfe, A.;
Bushman, F.; Famet, C; Goetz, M.; Williams, M.; Silverman, K.; Lingham,
R.; Singh, S.; Antiviral Chem. Chemother., 1999,10, 63-70.
[68] Koenig, T.; Kapus, A.; Sarkadi, B.; J, Bioenerg. Biomembr., 1993, 25, 537-
545.
[69] Li, J.Y.; Strobel, G.; Harper, J.; Lobkovsky, E.; Clardy, J.; Org. Lett., 2000,2,
767-770.
[70] Ou, S.H.; Rice Diseases. CAB Kew: Surrey, England, 1972.
[71] Sugie, Y.; Dekker, K.A.; Inagaki, T.; Kim, Y.-J.; Sakakibara, T.; Sakemi, S.;
Sugiura, A.; Brennan, L.; Duignan, J.; Sutcliffe, J.A.; Kojima, Y.; J. Antibiot.,
2002, 55, 19-24.
[72] Sugie, Y.; Inagaki, S.; Kato, Y.; Nishida, H.; Pang, C.-H.; Saito, T.; Sakemi,
S.; Dib-Hajj, F.; Mueller, J.P.; SutcUffe, J.; Kojima, Y.; J. Antibiot., 2002, 55,
25-29.
[73] Sasaki, T.; Takagi, M.; Yaguchi, M.; Nishiyama, K.; Yaguchi, T.; Koyama,
M.; Jpn Patent 1992, JP 04,316,578. Chem. Abst., 1993,118,211424.
[74] Toda, S.; Yamamoto, S.; Tenmyo, 0.;Tsuno, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Rosser, M.P.;
Oka, M.; Sawada, Y.; Konishi, M.; J. Antibiot., 1993,46, 875-883.
[75] Toda,S.; Tsuno, T.; Yamamoto, S.; Hasegawa, T.; Tenmyo, O.; Rosser, M.P.;
US Patent 5,266,588,1993. Chem. Abstr., 1994,120, 189873.
[76] Chin, N.X.; Neu, H.C.; Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol Inf. Dis., 1992, //, 755-757.
[77] Minowa, N.; Kodama, Y.; Harimaya, K.; Mikawa, T.; Heterocycles, 1998, 48,
1639-1642.
[78] Furui, M.; Takashima, J.; Mikawa, T.; Yoshikawa, N.; Ogishi, H.; Jpn Patent
1992, JP 04074163. Chem. Abstr., 1992,117, 169564.
[79] Chu, M.; Mierzwa, R.A.; Terraciano, J.; Patel, M.G.; PCT Int. Pat. WO
0174772, 2001. Chem. Abst., 2001,135, 283171.
[80] Hayakawa, Y.; Kanamaru, N.; Shimazu, A.; Seto, H.; J. Antibiot. 1991, 44,
282-287.
[81] Hayakawa, Y.; Kanamaru, N.; Morisaki, N.; Furihata, K.; Seto, H.; J. Anti-
biot. 1991, 44, 288-292.
[82] Hayakawa, Y.; Kanamaru, N.; Morisaki, N.; Seto, H.; Tetrahedron Lett,
1991,52,213-216.
[83] Messens, W.; De Vuyst, L.; Int. J. Food Microbiol, 2002,72, 31-43.
[84] Ganzle, M.G.; Holtzel, A.; Walter, J.; Jung, G.;Hammes, W.P; Appl Environ.
Microbiol, 2000, 66,4325-4333.
[85] Holtzel, A.; Ganzle, M.G.; Nicholson, G.J.; Hammes, W.P., Jung, G.; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed, 2000, 39,2766-2768.
[86] Marquardt, U.; Schmid, D.; Jung, G.; Synlett., 2000,1131-1132.
[87] Fukunaga, K.; Misato, T.; Ishii.; Asakawa, M., Bull Agr. Chem. Soc. Jap.,
1955,79,181-188.
158
[88] Kono, Y.; Takeuchi, S.; Yonehara, H., J. AntibioL, 1968, 27,433-438.
[89] Sakuda, S.; J.; Ono, M.; Ikeda, H.; Inagaki, Y.; Nakayama, J.; Suzuki, A.;
Isogai, A.; Tetrahedron Lett, 1997, 38, 7399-7402.
[90] Ikeda, H.; Matsumori, N.; Ono, M.; Suzuki, A.; Isogai, A.; Nagasawa, H.;
Sakuda, S.; J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65,438-444.
[91] Ono, M.; Sakuda, S.; Ikeda, H.; Furihata, K.; Nakayama,!.; Suzuki, A.; Isogai,
A.; J. Antibiot., 1998, 51, 1019-1029.
[92] Sakuda, S.; J.; Ono, M.; Ikeda, H.; Sakurada, M.; Nakayama, J.; Suzuki, A.;
Isogai, A.; In Biologically Active Natural Products: Agrochemicals; Cutler,
H.G.; Cutler, S.J.; Eds.; CRC Press:Boca Raton, 1999, ch. 16, pp. 185-199.
[93] Sakuda, S.; J.; Ono, M.; Ikeda, H.; Nakamura, T.; Inagaki, Y.; Kawachi, R.;
Nakayama, J.; Suzuki, A.; Isogai, A.; Nagasawa, H.; J. Antibiot., 2000, 53,
1265-1271.
[94] Kondo, T.; Sakurada, M.; Okamoto, S.; Ono, M.; Tsukigi, H.; Suzuki, A.;
Nagasawa, H.; Sakuda, S.; J. Antibiot., 2001, 54, 650-657.
[95] Okamoto, S.; Sakurada, M.; Kubo, Y.; Tsuji, G.; Fuji, I.; Ebizuka, Y.; Ono,
M.; Nagasawa, H.; Sakuda, S.; Microbiology, 2001,147, 2623-2628.
[96] Sakuda, S.; Ikeda, H.; Nakamura, T.; Kawachi, R.; Kondo, T.; Ono, M.; Saku-
rada, M.; Inagaki, H.; Ito, R.; Nagasawa, H.; J. Antibiot., 2000, 53, 1378-
1384.
[97] Rinehart, K.L. Jr.; Beck, J.R.; Epstein, W.W.; Spicer, L.D.; J. Am. Chem. Soc,
1963,85,4035-4037.
[98] Lewis, C,; Wilkins, J.R.; Schwartz, D.F.; Nikitas, C.T.; Antibiotics Annual
1955-1956; Medical Encyclopedia Inc.: New York, 1956, p. 897.
[99] Logan, K.; Zhang, J.; Davis, E.A.; Ackerman, S.; DNA, 1989, 8, 595-604.
[100] DiCioccio, R.A.; Srivastava, B.I.S.; Rinehart, K.L. Jr.; Lee, V.J.; Branfam,
A.R.; Li, L.-H.; Biochem. Pharmacol, 1980, 29, 2001-2008.
[101] Bols, M.; Andersen, N.R.; Hansen, J.; Ocaktan, A.Z.; J. Antibiot,, 1991, 44,
678-679.
[102] Rinehart, K.L. Jr.; Borders, D.B.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1963, 85, 4037-4038.
[103] Rinehart, K.L. Jr.; Beck, J.R.; Borders, D.B.; Knistle, T.H.; Krauss, D.; J. Am.
Chem. Soc, 1963, 85,4038-4039.
[104] Stevens, C.L.; Blumbergs, P.; Wood, D.L.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1964, 86,
3592-3594.
[105] Meyer, C.E.; J. Antibiot., 1971,26, 558-560
[106] Reusser, F.; Infect. Immun., 1970,2, 77-81.
[107] Reusser, F.; Infect. Immun., 1970, 2, 82.
[ 108] Reusser, F.; Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 1976, /0, 618-622.
[109] Reusser, F.; Antibiotics (N.Y.), 1979, 5, 361-369.
[110] Duchamp, D.J.; Branfman, A.R.; Button, A.C.; Rinehart, K.L. Jr.; J. Am.
Chem. Soc, 1973, 95, 4077-4078
159
[111] Hagenmaier, H.; Jaschke, K.H.; Santo, L.; Scheer, M.; Zaehner, H.; Arch.
Microbiol, 1976,109, 65-74.
[112] Brill, G.M.; McAlpine, J.B.; Whittem, D.J.; J, Antibiot, 1988, 41, 36-44.
[113] Karwowski, J.P.; Jackson, M.; Theriault, R.J.; Barlow, G.J.; Coen, L.; Hensey,
D.M.; Humphrey, P.E.; J. AntibioL, 1992, 45, 1125-1132.
[114] Nakagawa, S.; Naito, T.; Kawaguchi, H.; Heterocycles, 1979,13,477-495.
[115] Tsukiura, H.; Tomita, K.; Hanada, M.; Kobaru, S.; Tsunakawa, M.; Fujisawa,
K.; Kawaguchi, H.; J. Antibiot,, 1980, 33, 157-165.
[116] Tsunakawa, M.; Toda, S.; Okita, T.; Hanada, M.; Nakagawa, S.; Tsukiura, H.;
Naito, T.; Kawaguchi, H.; J. Antibiot,, 1980, 33, 166-172.
[117] Brazhnikova, M.G.; Kostantinova, N.V.; Potapova, N.P.; Tolstykh, I.V.; Anti-
biotikiKhim., 1981, 7,298-305. Chem. Abst., 1981, 95, 62092.
[118] Brazhnikova, M.G.; Kostantinova, N.V.; Potapova, N.P.; Tolstykh, I.V.;
Rubasheva, L.M.; Rozynof, B.V.; Horvath, G.; Bioorg. Khim., 1977,22, 486-
489. Chem. Abstr,, 1977,87,100613.
[119] Horvath, G.; Brazhnikova, M.G.; Kostantinova, N.V.; Tolstykh, I.V.; Pota-
pova, N.P.; J. Antibiot., 1979,32, 555-558.
[120] Nowak, A.; Steffan, B.; Liebigs Ann./Recueil, 1997, 1817-1821.
[121] Casser, I.; Steffan, B.; Steglich, W.; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed,, 1987,26, 586-
587.
[122] Steglich, W.; PureAppl Chem,, 1989, 61, 281-288.
[123] Nowak, A.; Steffan, B.; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 3139-3141 {COXXQQ-
X\on Angew. Chem. Int. Ed,1999, 38, 1695)
[124] Shoji, J.; Shibata, S.; Sankawa, U.; Taguchi, H.; Shibanuma, Y.; Chem.
Pharm. Bull, 1965,13, 1240-1246.
[125] Shoji, J.; Shibata, S.; Chem. Ind, 1964, 419-421.
[126] Shibata, S.; Sankawa, U.; Taguchi, H.; Yamasaki, K.; Chem. Pharm. Bull,
1966,14, 474-478.
[127] Beutler, J.A.; Hilton, B.D.; Clark, P.; Tempesta, M.S.; Corley, D.G., J. Nat.
Prod, \9U, 51,562-566.
[128] Dixon, D.J.; Ley, S.V.; Gracza, T.; Szolcsanyi, P.; J. Chem. Soc. Perkin
rraw5. 7,1999,839-841.
[129] Howard, B.H.; Raistrick, H.; Biochem J., 1954, 57, 212-222.
[130] Gyimesi, J.; Ott, I.; Horvath, G.; Koczka, L; Magyar, K.; J. Antibiot., 1971,
24, m-2S2.
[131] Schabacher, K.; Zeeck, A.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1973, 2691-2694.
[132] Kunze, B.; Schabacher, K; Zahner, H.; Zeeck, A.; Arch. Microbiol, 1972,86,147-
174.
[133] Gyimesi, J.; Mehesfalvi-Vajna, Z.; Horvath, G.; J. Antibiot., 1978,31,626-627.
[134] Kovac, L.; Poliachova, V.; Horvath, I., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1982, 721,
349-356.
160
[135] Meszaros, L.; Hoffinann, L.; Konig, T.; Horvath, I.; J. Antibiot., 1980, 33,
494-500.
[136] Shenin, Yu.D.; Antibiot. Med BiotekhnoL, 1986, 31, 835-841. Chem, Abstr.,
mi, 106,66911,
[137] Ghisalberti, E.L.; Sivasithamparan, K. In Trichoderma and Gliocladium. Ba-
sic biology, taxonomy and genetics; Kubicek, C.P.; Harman, G.E., Eds.; Tay-
lor & Francis: London, 1998, Vol. 7, pp. 139-191.
[138] Sawa, R.; Mori, Y.; Inuma, H.; Naganawa, H.; Hamada, M.; Yoshida, S.; Fu-
rutany, H.; Kajimura, Y.; Fuwa, T.; Takeuchi, T.; J. Antibiot., 1994, 47, 731-
732.
[139] Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; Kato, Y.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1991,113, 9690-
9692.
[140] Sata, N.U.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; van Hoest, R.W.M.; J. Nat. Prod.,
1999,(52,969-971.
[141] Wolf, D.; Schmitz, F.J.; Qiu, F.; Kelly-Borges, M.; J. Nat. Prod,, 1999, 62,
170-172.
[141] Sata, N.U.; Wada, S.; Matsunaga, S.; Watabe, S.; van Hoest, R.W.M.; Fuse-
tani, N.; J. Org. Chem,, 1999, 64, 2331-2339.
[142] Jomon, K.; Kuroda, Y.; Ajisaka., M.; Sasaki, H.; J. Antibiot,, 1972, 25, Ill-
ISO.
[143] Ito, S.; Hirata, Y.; Bull. Chem. Soc. Jap., 1977, 50,1813-1820
[144] Paquette, L.A.; Macdonald, D.; Anderson, L.G.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1990,
772,9292-9299.
[145] Aizawa, S.; Akutsu, H.; Satomi, T.; Nagatsu, T.; Taguchi, R.; Seino, A.; J.
Antibiot,, 1979, 32, 193-196.
[146] Gunasekera, S.P.; Gunasekera, M.; McCarthy, P.; J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56,
4830-44833.
[147] Shigemori, H.; Bae, M.-A.; Yazawa, K.; Sasaki, T.; Kobayashi, J.; J. Org.
Chem., 1992, 57,4311-4320.
[148] Kanazawa, S.; Fusetani, N.; Matsunaga, S.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34,
1065-1068.
[149] Bae, M.-A.; Yamada, K.; Ijuin, Y.; Tsuji, T.; Yazawea, K.; Tomono, Y.; Ue-
mura, D.; Heterocycl Comm., 1996, 2, 315-318.
[150] Bae, M.-A.; Yamada, K.; Uemura, D.; Seu, J.H.; Kim, Y.H.; J. Microbiol.
Biotechnol., 1998, 8, 455-460.
[151] Bae, M.-A.; Kang, H.S.; Rue, S.W.; Seu, J.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Biochem. Biophys.
Res. Comm,, 1998,246, 276-281.
[152] Jacobi, M.; Winkelmann, G.; Kaiser, D.; Kempter, C ; Jung, G.; Berg, G.;
Bahl, H.;y. Antibiot.,1996, 49,1101-1104.
[153] Graupner, P.R.; Thomburgh, S.; Mathieson, J.T.; Chapin, E.L.; Kemmitt,
G.M.; Brown, J.M.; Snipes, C.E.; J. Antibiot,, 1997,50, 1014-1019.
161
[154] Nakayama, T.; Homma, Y.; Hashidoko, Y.; Mizutani, J.; Tahara, S.; Appl
Environ. Microbiol, 1999, (55, 4334-4339.
[155] Hashidoko, Y.; Nakayama, T.; Homma, Y.; Tahara, S.; Tetrahedron Lett.,
1999, 40, 2957-2960.
[156] Hashidoko, Y.; Tahara, S.; Nakayama, T.; PCTInt. Appl, 2000. Chem. Abstr.,
2000,752,264215.
[157] Hofheinz, W.; Oberhansli, W.E.; Helv, Chim. Acta, 1977, 60, 660-668.
[158] Moore, R.E. In Marine Natural Products', Scheuer, P.J., Ed.; Academic
Press: San Francisco, 1981; Vol IV, pp. 1-52.
[159] Milligan, K.E.; Marquez, B.; Williamson, R.T.; Davies-Coleman, M.; Ger-
wick, W.H.; J. Nat. Prod,, 2000, 63,965-968.
[160] Burja, A.M.; Banaigs, B.; Abou-Mansour, E.; Burgess, J.G.; Wright, P.C;
Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 9347-9377.
[161] Cardellina II, J.H.; Mamer, F.-J.; Moore, R.E.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1979,101,
[162] Kan, Y.; Sakamoto, B.; Fujita, T.; Nagai, H.; J. Nat, Prod,, 2000, 63, 1599-
1602.
[163] Simmons, C.J.; Mamer, F.-J.; Cardellina II, J.H.; Moore, R.E.; Seff, K.; Tet-
rahedron Lett., 1979,2003-2006.
[164] Cardellina II, J.H.; Moore, R,E.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1979, 2007-2010.
[165] Yamaguchi, H.; Nakayama, Y.; Takeda, K.; Tawara, K.; J. Antibiot. Ser. A,
1957,10, 195-200.
[166] Fujimoto, H.; Kinoshita, T.; Suzuki, H.; Umezawa, H.; J. Antibiot., 1970, 23,
271-275.
[167] Kirst, H.A.; Szymanski, E.F.; Dorman, D.E.; Occolowitz, J.L.; Jones, N.D.;
Chaney, M.O.; Hamill, R.L.; Hoehin, M.M.; J. Antibiot., 1975, 28, 286-291.
[168] Shiba, T.; Inami, K.; Sawada, K.; Hirostu, Y.; Heterocycles, 1979,13, 175-
180.
[169] Nakamura, H.; likata, Y.; Sakakibara, H.; Umezawa, H.; J. Antibiot,, 1974,
27, 894-896.
[170] Zarantonello, P.; Leslie, C.P.; Ferritto, R.; Kazmierski, W.M.; Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett,, 2002,12, 561-565.
[171] Paik, S.; Carmeli, S.; Cullingham, J.; Moore, R.E.; Patterson, G.M.L.; J. Am.
Chem. Soc, 1994,116, 8116-8125.
[172] Carmeli, S.; Moore, R.E.; Patterson, G.M.L.; Tetrahedron, 1991, 47, 2087-
2096.
[173] Pettit, G.R., In Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products; W.
Herz, W.; Kirby, G.W.; Moore, R.E.; Steglich, W.; Tamm, Ch., Eds.;
Springer: New York; 1997, Vol. 70, pp. 1-179.
[174] Pettit, G.R.; Thornton, T.J.; Mullaney, J.T.; Boyd, M.R.; Herald, D.L.; Singh,
S.B.; Flahive, E.J.; Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 12097-12108.
162
[175] Luesch. H.; Yoshida, W.Y.; Moore, R.E.; Paul, VJ.; J. Nat. Prod., 1999, 62,
1702-1706.
[176] Pettit, G.R.; Kamano, Y., Herald, D.L.; Fuji, Y.; Kizu, H.; Boyd, M.R.;
Boettner, F.E.; Doubek, D.L.; Schmidt, J.M.; Chapuis, J.-C; Michel, C ; Tet-
rahedron, 1993, 49, 9151-9170.
[177] Reichenbach, H.; Hofle, G. In Drug discovery from nature. Grabley, S.;
Thiericke, R., Eds.; Springer Verlag: Berlin, 1999, pp. 149-179.
[178] Reichenbach, H.; Hoefle, G.; Gerth, K. Ger. Offen, DE 19718843, 1998.
Chem. Abstr., 1998,130, 3107.
[179] Papillon, J.P.N.; Taylor, R.J.K.; Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 1987-1990.
[180] Graefe, U.; Kluge, H.; Thiericke, R.; Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1992, 429-432.
[181] Sodano,G.; Spinella, A.; TetrahedronLett., 1986, 27, 2505-2508.
[182] Giordano, A.; Delia Monica, C ; Landi, F.; Spinella, A.; Sodano,G.; Tetrahe-
dron Lett., 2000, 41, 3979-3982.
[183] Singh, S.B.; Zink, D.L.; Heinbach, B.; Geniloud, O.; Teran, A.; Silverman,
K.C.; Lingham, R.B.; Felock, P.; Hazuda, D.J.; Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 1123-
1126.
[184] Singh, S.B.; Goetz, M.A.; Jones, E.T.; Bills, G.F.; Giacobbe, R.A.; Herranz,
L.; Stevens-Miles, S.; WilHams, D.L.; J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 7040-7042.
[185] Ostehage, C ; Kaminsky, R.; Konig, G.M.; Wright, A.D.; J. Org. Chem.,
2000,(55,6412-6417.
[186] West, R.R.; Van Ness, J.; Vanning, A.-M.; Rassing, B.; Biggs, S.; Gasper, S.;
Mckeman, P.A.; Piggott, J.; J. Antibiot., 1996, 49, 967-973.
[187] Suzuki, S.; Hosoe, T.; Nozawa, K.; Kawai,K.; Yaguchi, T.; Udagawa, S.; J.
Nat. Prod., 2000, 63, 768-772.
[188] Schv^artz, R.E.; Helms, G.L.; Bolessa, E.A.; Wilson, K.E.; Giacobbe, R.A.;
Tkacz, J.S.; Bills, G.F.; Liesch, J.M.; Zink, D.L.; Curotto, J.E., Pramanik, B.;
Onishi, J.C; Tetrahedron, 1994,50, 1675-1686.
[189] Kwan, C.-Y.; Harrison, P.H.M.; Duspara, P.A.; Daniel, E. E.; Jap. J. Pharma-
col, 2001,85, 234-240.
[190] Harrison, P.H.M.; Duspara, P.A.; Jenkins, S.I.; Kassam, S.A.; Liscombe,
D.K.; Hughes, D.W.; J. Chem. Soc, Perk. Trans. I, 2000,4390-4402.
[191] Hopmann, C ; Kurz, M.; Bronstrup, M.; Wink, J.; LeBeller, D.; Tetrahedron
Lett., 2002, 43,435-43S.
[192] Bloch,P.; Tamm, Ch.; Helv. Chim. Acta, 1981, 64, 304-315.
[193] Breitenstein, W.; Chexal, K.K.; Mohr,P.; Tamm, Ch.; Helv. Chim. Acta, 1981,
64, 379-388.
[194] Hiramitsu, Y.; Yasuhara, C ; Suzuki, K.; Jpn. Patent, 1995, JP 07227294.
Chem. Abstr., 1995,123, 312331.
[195] Komagata, T.; Hayaoka, T.; Jpn. Patent, 1996, JP 08198750. Chem. Abstr.,
1996,725,219757.
163
[196] Wenke, J.; Anke, H.; Sterner, O.; Biosci. Biotechnol Biochem.\ 1993, 57,
961-964.
[197] Komagata, D.; Fujita, S.; Yamashita, N.; Saito, S.; Morino, T.; J. Antibiot.,
1996,46, 958-959.
[198] Wink, J.; Grabley, S.; Gareis, M.; Zeeck. A.; Philipps, S.; Eur, Pat., 1993, EP
546475. Chem. Abstr,, 1993,119, 93704.
[199] Mohr, P.; Tamm, Ch.; Tetrahedron, 1981,37S, 201-212.
[200] Pietroliagi, M.; Igglessi-Markopolou, O.; Markopoulos, J.; Heterocycl Com-
/www., 2000,^,157-164.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Atta-ur-Rahman (Ed.) Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, Vol. 28
© 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. 165
ABSTRACT: Ginkgo biloba L is the solo member of the Ginkgoaceae famfly, and its leaf
extract (EGb) has been clinically used for the treatment of cerd)ral insufficiency. Several
experimental studies have demonstrated that EGb has neuroprotective properties against various
age-related physiological dianges and cerebral injuries induced by ischemia, edema and
apoptosis. The major bioactive prindples of EGb arc recognized to be flavonoids and
terpenoids, ginkgolides and bilobalide. Pharmacological actions of EGb and its constituents
indude platelet-activating factor antagonism, anti-oxidant and free radical scavenging properties,
as well as modulation of neurotransmission, cerebral glucose and lipid metabolism and cerebral
membrane fluidity. These effects are involved in the mechanism related to the protective effect
of the extract in the central nervous system.
INTRODUCTION
Ginkgo biloba L , a dioecious plant, is called a living fossil, because it is the single extant
spedes of the family Ginkgoaceae, which made its appearance in the Permian age [1]. Thus
far, a great variety of compounds have been isolated from the leaves, seeds and root bark of
Ginkgo biloba, induding alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, steroids, catechines, flavonoids,
terpenes and organic adds [2, 3]. After the year 1965, for instance, a standardized Gingko
biloba leaf extract (EGb) termed EGb761 has been used chiefly in Europe for the treatment of
peripheral vascular disease or cerebral insuffidency induding difficulties of concentration and of
memory, absent mindedness, confusion, lade of energy, tiredness, decreased physical
performance, depressive mood, anxiety, dizziness, tinnitus, and headache [4, 5].
Furthermore, in a placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized trial, it has been suggested that
EGb761 is capable of stabilizing and, in a substantial number of cases, improving the cognitive
performance and the social functioning of demented patients tested using the Alzheimer's
Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) and Geriatric Evaluation by
Relative's Rating Instrument (GERRI) [6, 7]. A more extensive discussion on dinical trials
will be found in the book by van Beek [8], and reviews [9, 10]. Despite the accumulation of
considerable evidence in recent years to support the clinical efficacy of EGb [1, 8, 11], the
predse medianisms of action of EGb have not yet been fully eluddated; moreover, there is only
partial agreement concerning which constituents of EGb are involved in its mechanism of the
action in the central nervous system (CNS). Conceivably, however, benefidal effects of EGb
could be explained, at least in part, by its neuroprotective and/or neurotrophic properties against
various symptoms induced by impaired brain functions in advanced age [12].
EGb761 is made up of 24% flavonoid glycosides and 6% terpenes, which are accepted as
active prindples. Many undesirable constituents of Ginkgo biloba leaves (e.g., ginkgoUc add
due to its allergic action) are eliminated by the extraction procedures used to prepare the extract
166
The extraction prooedures and oomponents present in £Gb761 are described in detail elsewhere
[11, 13].
In this article, we present the principal constituents isolated from leaves and seeds of
Ginkgo biloba, and deal with the pharmacological properties of standardized EGb and its
constituents mainly in CNS functions.
Tlie represoitative unique constitu^ts so far reported for Ginkgo biloba L. are stated briefly
below. Adetailed description of this field has been presented in the book of van Beek [8].
Flavonoids
Flavonoids are major constituents of Gingko biloba leaves, and present as biflavones, flavones,
flavonols and associated glycosides (Table 1). Biflavones, in particular, are characteristic
constituents of Ginkgo biloba. They are of the amentoflavone (1) type, and differ from each
other in the number and position of the methoxy groups. Bilobetin (2), ginkgetin (3) and
isoginkgetin (4) were diaracterized by Baker et d, [14] and Nakazawa et al. [15]. Moreover,
sdadopitysin (5) was isolated by Miura et d, [16] and 5' -methoxybilobetin (6) was isolated by
Joly et d, [17]. Briangon-Scheid et d, [18] rqwrted a normal-phase high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) system for the identiHcation and the quantitative determination of these
biflavones by a two-step gradient of isocratic elution. Furthermore, they also showed the
presence of amentoflavone. Pietta et d, [19] reported a reversed-phase HPLC system using
tetrahydrofuran-l-piopanol-water as the eluent for the analysis of biflavones.
No. Ri R2 R3 R4
(1) OH OH OH H
(2) OMe OH OH H
(3) OMe OMe OH H
(4) OMe OH OMe H
(5) OMe OMe OMe H
(6) OMe OH OH OMe
^mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmammammmmmmmmmd
167
No. Compound
Biflavones
(1) Amcntoflavone
(2) Bilobetin
(3) Ginkgetin
(4) Isoginkgetin
(5) Sciadopitysin
(6) 5'-Methoxybilobetin
Flavonois
(7) Kaempferol
(8) Quercetin
(9) Isorhamnetin
(10) Myricetin
(11) Kaempferol-3-O-glucoside
(12) Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside
(13) Kaempferol-3-O-retinoside
(14) Quercetm-3-O-glucoside
(15) Quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside
(16) Quercetm-3-O-rutinoside (Rutin)
(17) Isorhamnetw-3-O-glucoside
(18) Isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside
(19) Myricetin-3-O-rutinoside
(20) 3'-0-methylmyricetin-3-0-rutinoside
(21) Kaenipferol-3-0-(2"-0-glucosyl)rhaninoside
(22) Quercetin-3-0-(2"-0-glucosyl)rhamnoside
(23) Kaempferol-3-0-[6'"-0-{p-(7""-0-giucosyl)coumaroyl}-2"-0-glua)syl]rhamnoside
(24) Quercetin-3-0-[6"'-0-{p-(7""-0-glucosyl)coumaroyl}-2''-0-glucosyl]rhamnosi^^
(25) Quercetin-3-0-(6"'-0-/7-coumaroyl-2"-0-glucosyl)rhamnosyl-7-0-glucoside
(26) Kaempferol-3-0-(6"'-0-/?-coumaroyl-2"-0-glucosyl)rhaninoside
(27) Quercetin-3-0-(6"'-0-/>-coumaroyl-2"-0-glucosyl)rhamnoside
(28) Kaempferol-3-0-[ a -rhamnosyl-(l-»-2)- a -rhaninosyl-(l--^6)]- P -glucoside
(29) Quercctin-3-(9-[ a -rhamnosyl-(l-»-2)- a -rhamnosyl-(l->6)]- j8 -glucoside
Flavones
(30) Apigenin
(31) Delphidenon
(32) Luteolin
(33) Apigenin-7-O-glucoside
(34) Luteolin-3'-0-glucx)side
168
._
c—
No. Rl R2 Fl3 R4
R3
(7) H H H H
^OH (8) H H OH H
1 \ (9) H H OMe H
RaO^
r^V"°^
T )^} '^R4 •
(10)
(11)
H
glucose
H
H
OH
H
OH
H
il^^JLj
(12) H glucose H H
ORi (13) rutinose H H H
OH 0 (14) glucose H OH H
(15) rhamnose H OH H
(16) rutinose H OH H
(17) glucose H OMe H
(18) rutinose H OMe H
(19) rutinose H OH OH
(20) rutinose H OMe OH
\,„^ ^^^^^u
•••••1
V
Ri
f^^^*"
^^0^^'^^^^Y^^
>^^^^^>r^ No. Ri 1
OH 0 J (21) H 1
H^CT—0 ^ (22) OH 1
OH
mmmmmS
More than 20 flavonol glycosides have been isolated from ginkgo leaves. The major
aglycones of ginkgo flavonoid glycosides are kaempferol (7), quercetin (8) and isorhamnetin
(9), and the minor one is myricetin (10). They were determined by reversed-phase HPLC and
diode array detection after hydrolysis of flavonol glycosides [20]. Two new coumaric esters
of flavonol diglyoosides were isolated by Nasr et d. [21, 22]. Their structures were
determined from the spectrum data to be kaempferol/quercetin-3-0-(6"' -0-/7-coumaroyl-2"-0
glucosyl)rhamnoside (26 and 27). Moreover, Hasler et d, [23] isolated new flavonol
diglycosides from the leaves of Ginkgo biloba and determined their structures to be
kaempferol/quercetin-3-0-(2"-Oglucosyl)rhaninoside (21 and 22), kaempferol/quercetin-3-0-
[6"'-0{p-(7""-glucosyl)coumaroyl}-2"-0-glucosyl]rhamnoside(23 and 24), and quercetin-3-
0-(6'"-0-/?-coumaroyl-2"-0-glucosyl)rhanmosyl-7-Ogluooside (25). A procedure that
combined counter-current chromatography (CCC) and HPLC was developed for the isolation
and the purification of flavonol glycosides, and two novel flavonol triglyoosides (28 and 29)
169
were isolated [24]. Fiavones (30-34) also can be identified in ginkgo leaves [25]. The
methods for the analysis of flavonoid glycosides using micellar electrokinetic capillary
chromatography [26], HPLC with diode-array UV detection [27] and thermospray liquid
chromatography mass spectrometry [28] were developed. Lobstein et al, separated flavonoids
using gradient elution with acetonitrile and O.IN phosphoric add within 50 min [29]. Hasler
et d, [25] described fingerprint HPLC separation of Ginkgo biloba, and 33 flavonoids were
assigned. Recently, a multidimensional counter-current diromatography system for the
preparative isolation of isorhamnetin, kaempferol and quercetin from crude extract was
described by Yang et d. [30]. Flavonoid metabolites after oral administration of EGb to rats
and humans were analyzed by reversed-phase liquid diromatography-<iiode array detection, and
the results indicated that more extensive metabolism of flavonoids takes place in humans than in
rats [31, 32].
R2O OR3
OH o J
HaC-^O-V
No. R1 R2 R3
OH
(23) H H glucose
(24) OH H glucose
(25) OH glucose H
(26) H H H
(27) OH H H
OH ,CH3
OH O I OH
OH No. Ri
(28) H
OH-^^^^^^-V (29) OH
HO I
OH
170
No. Ri R2 R3
(30) H OH OH
RiO (31) H H H
(32) H OH H
(33) glucose H H
(34) H OH glucose
Terpenes
Ginkgolides, the bitter principles of Ginkgo biloba U were isolated from the leaves by
Furukawa [33] for the first time and their chemical structures deteraiined by Maruyama et al.
[34] and Nakanishi et d. [35]. The five known ginkgolides, ginkgolides A (35), B (36), C
(37), J (38) and M (39) have a cage-like molecule structure with six five-membered rings and a
tert'hwtyl group, and differ in the positk)n and number of substituted hydroxyl groups on the
spirononane framework. Ginkgolide M is isolated only from the root of the gingko tree. The
diemistry and pharmacological properties of ginkgolides were reviewed by Braquet et al. [36].
From molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) and molecular lipophilidty potential (MLP)
studies, ginkgolides, are considered to be two-pole molecules. Negative electrostatic MEP
C(CH3)3
O' -0-
CH3 R2 0-^0
(40) Bilobalide
Ri R2 R3
(35) Ginkgolide A H OH H
(36) Gini<golide B H OH OH
(37) Ginkgolide C OH OH OH
(38) Ginkgolide J OH OH H
(39) Ginkgolide M OH H OH
171
areas are generated around the lactonic cycles. Tliree MEP areas are present in ginkgolldes B,
Q and M, while in ginkgolides A and J, diere are two NfEP areas due to the fusion of the
negative MEP area as the cage is relatively dosed. Furthermore^ the existence of a marked
hydrophobic zone surrounding the tert-hutyl lqx)philic moiety indicated diat it might lodge in a
hydrophobic pocket of the membrane. Furthermore, Corey et d. [37, 38] carried out the total
syndiesis of ginkgolides. Further experiments demonstrated that ginkgolide M can be
syndiesized from ginkgolide C [39]. Extoisive and oonq)lete NMR analysis has been
performed [40].
Bitobalkie (40) was isolated from the leaves by Wsinges et d. [41], and is a sesquiterpene
lactone, whidi has a tert-bMtyl group and two hydroxyl groups in its chomcal structure [42].
Tlie ginkgo terpenes described above (bilobalide and ginkgolides) seem to be unique
constituents to Ginkgo biloha because they have nev^ been found in any other plants.
GinkgoUdes A, B, C and bilobalide have b e ^ analyzed by reversed-phase HPLC with dther
UVdetectwn at 220 nm [43, 44] or refractive index detection [45]. Furthermore, bilobalide
and ginkgohdes A and B were also analyzed by axillary dectrophoresis with U V detection at
1S5 nriL Reasonable separation was accomplished by a phosphate and sodium dodecyl sulfate
buffer [46]. Chauret et d. [47] developed an analytical method coupling a gas chromatograph
to a high-resolution mass spectrometo: operated in die selected-ion monitoring mode, and
confirmed the production of ginkgolides in Gingko biloba cells cultured in vitro. Recently, a
method based on liquid chromatography coupled with dectrospray mass spectrometry was
developed for the analysis of terpenes in EGb [48].
Total and individual terpene (ginkgoHdes A, B, C, J and bilobalide) contents wore evaluated
in leaves, shoots and roots of a young Ginkgo biloba (three years old) cultivated in a
greenhouse in natural light [49]. Tlie leaves accumulate more terpenes than the roots and
shoots. The contents of ginkgolide A and bilobalide readi a maximum value at the end of
summer or at the begiiming of autumn. Recently Carrier et d, [50] detomined terpene contents
in leaves of the terminal buds, rosettes and side branches, stem and bark, root and root meristem
of the three-year-old Ginkgo biloba. Bilobalide was absent from underground parts, whereas
it was the major constituent in aerial parts. Ginkgolide A occurred at the highest concentration,
followed by relatively equal amounts of ginkgolides B and C, and a small amount of ginkgolide
J. Laurain et d. [51] found that production of ginkgolides A, B, Q and J and bilobalide
occurred in two cell cultures derived from a female prothallus and from putativdy transformed
embryos, by transfection wiaiAgrobacterium rhizogenes agropine type strain CFBP2409 (A4)
Other Constituents
,. ^
r >
"-^ ^^ OH
n
0)-terminal trans trans cis
a-terminal
(41) n=10-18
172
NMR and ^^C-NMR. The concentrations of these polypienols increased from 0.04 to 2.0% of
dry weight with maturation of the leaves. A supercritical fluid chromatographic procedure for
the quantitation of polyprenols in the ginkgo leaves was developed by Huh et d, [53].
6-Hydroxykynurenic add was isolated from ginkgo leaves; the first time it was found in a
gymnosperm. The content reached a maximum value of 0.24% in autumn [54].
To darify the taxonomical dassification, Kraus et d. [55] isolated the water-soluble
polysaccharides from Ginkgo biloba leaves. The polysacdiaride mixture could be separated
into GFl (MW 23,000), GF2a (MW 500,000), GF2b (MW 24,000) and GF3 (MW 40,000).
GFl and GF3 are mainly composed of arabinose and galacturonic add, respectively, and they
are common polysacdiarides of higher plants. On the otiier hand, GE2a and GF2b are
composed of large amounts of mannose, rhamnose and glucuromc add, and seem to be unique
to Ginkgo biloba.
Seven k)ng-diain phenols (42a-g) were isolated from the sarootesta of ginkgo seeds, and
showed antitumor activity against sarcoma 180 asdtes in mice [56]. They indude anacardic
add, bilobol and cardanol, whidi are major allergemc substances of the ginkgo sarcotesta. In
additk)n, the structure-activity relationship for antitumor activity against Qiinese hamster V-79
was investigated [57]. A specific method for the quantitative analysis of ginkgolic adds in the
leaves and seeds of Ginkgo biloba using the HPLC-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry
technique was developed [58].
Following removal of the outer fleshy layer and roasting or boiling, the albumen of ginkgo
seeds is used as a food in Asia. 4-OMethylpyridoxine (MPN) (43), whidi has been known to
have antivitamin Be activity was isolated from the seed of Ginkgo biloba (the Js^anese word:
gin-nan) as the toxic prindple of gin-nan food poisoning [59]. Synthetic MPN is known to
induce oonvulsk)ns through a reduction of tiie brain GABAlevels in humans and in a variety of
experimental animals. Furthermore, MPN is present in not only the ginkgo seed but also in its
leaves. However, the amount of MPN in the extract of ginkgo leaves is much lower than the
concentration that causes the detrimental effects [60]. Fiehe et d. demonstrated biosynthesis of
MPN in cell-suspension cultures of Ginkgo biloba [61]. Recentiy, Wada et d, wrote a review
of the literature concerning the relationship between gin-nan food poisoning and MPN [62, 63].
Kimura et d, [64] purified and diaracterized a 30 kDa Ginkgo glycoprotein from ginkgo
seeds, using an antiserum againstj81-*2 xylose-containiag //-glycans.
Ri R2 R3 1
R2
^RiJ; Ginkgoic acid (CH2)12CH3 COOH H 1
HO-1 (CH2)7CH=CH(CH2)5CH3 GOGH H 1
KJ c. (CH2)9CH=CH(CH2)5CH3 GOGH
H 1
TR3 d.
e.
Bilobol (CH2)7CH=CH(CH2)5CH3
(CH2)9CH=CH(CH2)5CH3
H
H
GH
GH
1
1
f. Ginkgol (CH2)7CH=CH{CH2)5CH3 H H 1
(42) g. (CH2)9GH=CH(CH2)5CH3 H
H 1
173
CH20CH3
.CH20H
H 3 C ^ N ^
(43) 4-0-Methylpyridoxine
There is oonvindng evidence that EGb and its constituents have neuroprotective actions under
experimental conditions sudi as hypoxia/isdiemia, seizure activity and nerve damage.
With regard to beneficial effects of EGb in situations such as hypoxia and isdicmia, Karcher et
d. [65] reported that the survival time induced by hypobaric hypoxia was gready prolonged in
rats treated with EGb (100 mg/kg, Lp.) before 30 min hypoxia. It was shown that the non-
flavonefi-actionof EGb was responsible for the prolonged effects on the survival time of mice
under lethal hypoxia [66]. EGb also retards the breakdown of the brain energy metabolism in
hypoxic artificially ventilated rats [66]. Spinncwyn [67], using a geibil model of bilateral
forebrain ischemia induced by occluding the conmion carotid arteries, showed that pretreatmait
with EGb (30 and 60 mg/kg/day, p.o., for 14 days) produced an increase in the area of
surviving hippocampal CAl neurons. Furthermore, the treatment with EGb reduced ischemic
brain damage with middle cerebral artery ocdusion [68]. The teipenefiraction(ginkgolides A
and B, and bilobalide) of EGb seems to be related to these effects, Le., ginkgolides A and B,
and bilobalide are able to reduce the infarct volume after focal ischemia in mice and rats, and the
number of damaged neurons in cultures after glutamate exdtotoxidty and hypoxia is also
reduced by ginkgolide B and bilobalide [69].
Cerebral Edema
Gabard and Chatterjee [70] were the first to demonstrate the protective and curative effects of
EGb (100 mg/kg, p.o., twice a day for 15 days) against cerebral edema induced by triethyltin
(TET, 0.002% solution in drinking water) in the rat Subsequently, Otani et d. [71] showed
that concurrent administration of EGb (100 mg/kg, p.o.) and TET (0.002% in drinking water)
to rats for 14 days reduced the development of a cytotoxic edema in the white matter of the
brain, as well as the abnormal levels of water and sodium contents induced by TET alone.
Odier experiments by Sancesario and Kreutzberg [72] showed that EGb therapy accelerated the
reabsorption of TET-induced cerebral edema and improved the astroglial reaction. As regards
174
active constituents, datterjee et d, [73] indicated that bilobalide might be responsible for the
anti-edema effects of EGb. Bilobalide (10 mg/kg p.o., for 6 days) and EGb (100 mg/kg p.o.
for 6 days) act protectively and curatively against TET-induced dianges of neuropathobgical
parameters, including body weight, consumption of food and water, and pain reaction time in a
hot-plate test
The TET-induced inhibitory influence on cyclic 3',5'-AMP phosphodiestCTase (PDE)
activities precedes edema formation in the rat brain [74]. To darify the medianism of the
protective action of EGb against TET-toxidty in rats, in vitro and ex vivo effects of EGb on
PDE activities of cerebral tissue were investigated [75]. Higher concentrations of EGb (5-250
mg/L) inhibited the PDE activity in the brain in normal rats, whereas lower concentrations
(0.25-4.0 mg/L) of EGb enhanced the activity of the enzyme. The inhibitory effect of TET on
the high affinity PDE activity (measured with 0.25 //M cydic AMP) of the brain was diminished
in the presence of low EGb concentrations. Furthermore, preventive and curative treatment of
TET-poisoned rats with EGb (100 mg/kg, p.o., for 7 days) prevented both the formation of
edema and the fall of PDE activity induced by TET alone. These results suggested the anti-
edema action of EGb might be partiy assodated with its modulating influences on cellular cyclic
AMP levels via activation of membrane-bound PDE
Barkats et d. [76] showed the effects of dironic treatmoit with EGb on age-dqpendent
structural dianges in the hippocampi of three strains of 15-month-old inbred mice (C57BIV6J,
BALB/cJ and DBA/2J). Treatment with EGb (50 mg/kg/day, in the drinking water for 7
months) significantly inoreased the projection field of intra- and infira-pyramidal mossy fibers
(iipMF) in the CA3 of the hippocampus as compared with control mice, although there was no
difference in the sensitivity to EGb among the mouse strains. Since it has been considered that
the size of the projection field of iipMF correlates strongly with spatial learning [77], this
neuroprotective and/or neurotrophic action of EGb on the hippocampal iipMF might be useful in
explainiag the benefidal effect of EGb on spatial learning. This hypothesis was supported by
the findings that bilateral frontal cortex-lesioned rats treated with EGb (100 mg/kg, i.p. for 30
days) had improved retention of a delayed-spatial alternation task compared to subjects with
lesions treated with saline, and that the treatment with EGb reduced the extent of brain swelling
in histological examination [78]. Furthermore, EGb inaeased protein synthesis in many brain
regions after unilateral labyrinthectomy in the adult rat, and the most stimulated brain regions
were assodated with sensory, behavioral and learning systems [79]. EGb also protects
against oxidative damage to DNA and oxidation of mitodiondrial glutathione, and prevents age-
related morphological changes in mitochondria in the brain and liver in old rats [80, 81].
Anumber of studies have been made concerning the effects of EGb on vestibular compensation.
Administration of EGb (50 mg/kg, Lp. for 30 days) accelerated vestibular compensation
induced by unilateral vestibular neurectomy in rats [82, 83]. The results obtained by perfusion
of EGb into vestibular nuclei of alert guinea pigs suggest that EGb has a direct excitatory effect
on the neuronal level [84]. Further experiments indicated that the extract without the terpenes
was most effective in this experimental model of CNS plastidty involved in vestibular
compensation [85]. On the other hand, Sasaki et d, investigated the effects of bilobaUde, a
terpene constituent of EGb, fi-om the viewpoint of electrophysiology with the use of a rat
hippocampal slice preparation [86]. Bilobalide (10-500 ^M), increases the amplitude of
175
Apoptosis
Apoptosis is associated with cerd^ral ischemia and scversl neurodegenerative diseases, such as
Alzheimo-'s and Parkinson* s diseases [88]. In die study described by Dtdier et al. [89],
apoptosis was induced by sectioning of the olfactory nave in adult rats, and was evaluated by
measuring either the thidmess of the q)ithelium in relation to neuronal death or DNA
fragmentation. These workers showed that pretreatment with EGb (50 or 100 mg/kg/day)
reduced the rate of lesion-induced apoptosis of olfactory neurons in the olfactory mucosa of
adult rats. In addition, EGb also prevents apoptosis induced by treatmoit with hydrogen
peroxide and ferrous sulfate in cerebellar neuronal cells dissociated from rats [90], and protects
PC12 nerve cells in a dose-depradent manner against die B amyloid (AB)-induced apoptosis and
neurotoxidty measured using the 3-(4,5-dimetiiylthia2Dl-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium
bromide and trypan blue assays [91]. With regard to the anti-apoptotic effect of EGb and its
terpene constituents, Ahlemeyer et al. [92] compared their effects on apoptosis induced by
serum dq)rivation and staurosporine. In cultured chick embryonic neurons, EGb (10 mg/L),
ginkgolide B (10 ;<N^, ginkgolide J (100 fiM) and bilobalide (1 /^M) reduced q)optotk: damage
induced by serum- deprivation. In mixed neuronal/glial cultures from neonatal rat
hippocampus, EGb (100 mg/L) rescued rat neurons from apoptosis caused by serum
deprivation, ginkgolide B (100 /^M) reduced staurosporine-induced apoptotic damage, and
bilobalide possessed anti-apoptotic effects in botfi serum-deprived and staurosporine-treated
neurons. Furthermore, bilobalide (25-100 fiM) attenuates the reactive oxygen, spedes (ROS)-
induced apoptosis in PC12 cells, and also reduces ROS-induced elevation of c-Myc, p53, and
Bax and activation of caspase-3 [93]. Recentiy, 4-hydroxy-4-rcft-butyl-2,3,5,6-
tetrahydrothiopyran-1-oxide (10-100 nM), a bibbalide-derived compound, has been shown to
protect diidc and rat neurons against serum dq)rivatk)n- and staurosporine-induced apoptosis
[94]. On the other hand, Rapin et al. [95] showed that the addition of EGb (5-20 mg/ml) or
ginkgolide B (0.2 or 0.4 mg^fil) to the culture medium of rat hippocampal cells led to an
increase in cdl viability and a diminution in the number of apoptotic cells induced by the
peroxyl radical-generator, 2,2'-azobis-2-amidinopropane (AAPH, 20 or 50 mM), whereas
additk)n of bilobalide (0.1-1.0 mg/ml) was ineffective. Moreover, oral administratk)n of EGb
(50 mg/kg/day) and ginkgolide B (2 mg/kg/day, p.o.) to rats caused a significant inaease in cell
viability and a highly significant decrease in the numbers of damaged cells in both
spontaneously occurring and AAPH-induced apoptosis, whereas, bilobalide (2 mg/kg/day, p.o.)
was ineffective. Recently, it was demonstrated that the flavonoid component of EGb, rutin,
quercetin, and a mixture of flavonoids and terpenes protect cerebellar granule cells from
oxidative damage and apoptosis induced by hydroxyl radicals, while terpenes of EGb do not
protect against apoptosis [96, 97]. Moreover, pretreatmoit of PC12 nerve cells with
ginkgolide B or ginkgolide C does not rescue the cells from AB-induced apoptosis and cell
death, although these constituents prevent the AB-induced increase of free radical production
176
Anticonvulsant Activity
Bilobalide, a main constituent of the teipene fraction of the EGb, possesses anticonvulsant
activity against convulsions induced by pentylenetetrazol, isoniazid, 4-0-methylpyridoxine, and
electroshock. Reduced durations of convulsions and prolonged onset time of convulsions
induced by chonical oonvulsants and dectroshock were observed in mice treated orally with
bilobalide (30 mg/kg/day, for 4 days). However, bilobalide has no protective effect against
bicuculline- and strychnine-induced convulsions [99,100].
Winter [101] demonstrated the effects of EGb in aperitive opoant conditioning of mice. EGb
was administered orally at a dose of 100 mg/kg for 4 or 8 weeks prior to the training and was
maintained for 10 weeks sftci training. Treatment with EGb increased the number of correct
responses and reduced incorrect responses. Furthermore, the learning- and memory-
in^roving effects of EGb were confirmed using some conditioned-reflex methods (shutde-box,
step-down, stq)-through, and water maze), when the extract was administered orally for 7 days
before training attiireedoses of 10, 30, and 90 mg/kg to young and old rats [102].
The radial maze has been widely employed in studies concerning learning and memory, and
it has been shown to be sensitive to the aging process. In a trial using an eight-arm radial
maze, effects of EGb (30 and 60 mg/kg/day) administered for 3 weeks before testing and
throughout the testing period were investigated. Parameters of learning (the number of arms
visited, the number of errors and time spent to complete the test) were improved in EGb-treated
rats compared to controls [103]. Recendy, anotho^ trial using the eight-arm radial maze was
performed in aged male Fisch^ 344 rats (20 months old). Chronic pretreatment with EGb
showed a significant positive effect on continuous learning and on delayed nonmatching to
position tasks in aged rats [104].
StoU et d. [105] investigated the effects of chrome treatment with EGb on age-related
cognitive dianges using passive avoidance learning. Aged nuoe treated daily with 100 mg/kg
EGb for three weeks had signifkantly improved short-term memory measured by the avoidance
latency 60 seconds after shock, but long-term memory measured by the avoidance latency 24
hours after shodc did not improve. These results were supported by the findings that dironic
(30 days) and acute treatments with EGb (60 mg/kg) oihanced short-term memory on olfactory
recognition in young and aged rats [106].
Administration of scopolamine to rats induces amnesia in passive avoidance learning.
EGb administered intraperitonealiy 30 min before the initial trial at doses of 150-500 mg/kg
significantly att^uated the amnesic effects of scopolamine on step-through latendes in a
retention trial 4 hours after training for the passive avoidance test in rats [107]. Hoyo* et d,
showed that, using an animal model of intrac^ebroventricular streptozotodn treatment, EGb
treatment compensated for deterioration in working memory, referrace memory and passive
177
avoidance bdiavior and restored a defikit in co-ebral energy metabolism [108]. Furthennore,
pretreatment with EGb (50 and 100 mg/kg, p.o.) ameliorated the impairment of memory
induced by bilateral occlusion of the carotid arteries in mice when the passive avoidance test was
carried out 48 hours after ischemia [109]. These results lead to the condusion that EGb
possesses cognition-enhandng properties.
Porsolt et al. investigated the effects of repeated oral administration of EGb (SO and 100 mg/kg)
on various behavioral models of stress in rodents [110, 111]. The bdiavioral models induded
learned he^lessness", shock-suppressed licking (\bgel conflict test), forced swimming-
induced immobility C^havioral despair^, shock-suppressed expiration (four-plates test),
spontaneous exploration (staircase test) and food consumption (emotional hypophagia). EGb
inaeased the amount of food consumption in the emotbnal hypophagia test and reduced the
acquisition of behavbral defidts induced by dectric shocks in the learned helplessness"
paradigm in both young and old rodents. However, EGb had no marked effects in other
models tested. These results indicated that EGb has anti-stress propoties; however, it cannot
be assimilated into either classical antidepressant or anxiolytic activity.
In addition, it was shown that treatmoit with EGb (100 mg/kg, in 5% ethanol) reduces the
development of the polydipsia induced by the stress of daily handling, anesthetization with
ether and oral intubation [112]. Rapin et al. [113] have reported that oral treatment with EGb
(50 or 100 mg/kg/day, for 20 days) suppresses auditory stress-induced alterations of
discrimination learning in both young and old rats; EGb was espedally effective in decreasing
the number of inefSdent lever presses and in reducing the reaction time in older animals.
Furthermore, treatment with EGb counteracted the auditory stress-induced inaeases in the
plasma concentrations of epinq)hrine, norepinephrine and corticosterone in both young and old
rats.
Wada et al. revealed that feeding a diet containing a 5% powdered dried Ginkgo biloha
leaves or an aqueous extract of these leaves to 4-week-old male ddY mice for 7 days shortened
the sleeping times induced by anesthetics (hexobarbital, a-chloralose plus urethane). A similar
effect was obtained in animals treated orally widi bilobalide or ginkgolide A (both at 10 mg/kg)
[114]. Subsequently, Brochet et al. [115] showed effects of single intraperitoneal injections of
EGb and ginkgolide B and bilobalide on barbital-induced narcosis in the mouse. Single
injections of EGb (25 and 50 mg/kg) ginkgolide B (1 mg/kg) and bilobalide (2 and 5 mg/kg), 60
min prior to sodium barbital (180 mg/kg, i.p.), significantly shortened barbital-induced sleeping
time and increased the latency to onset of sleep. From these data, they suggested that EGb
indudes constituents that have CNS-stimulatory activity.
It has been proposed that possible mechanisms undo'lying the neuroprotective and/or
neurotrophic propolies of EGb in the CNS indude influences on neurotransmitters, oiergy
metabolism and membrane functions, as well as antioxidant activities and inhibition of platelet-
activation factor (PAF).
178
BBB
rPlasman I Brain
Glu - • Glu
LCGU in the cortex, hippocampus, and caudate nudei of rats subjected to normobaric hypoxia.
Treatmoit with EGb significantly increased LCGU in rats with bilateral ligature of the carotid
arteries, but did not modify the deoxyglucose uptake [120]. Kardier et al. [65] estimated the
brain energy metabolism in rats treated with EGb (100 mg/kg Lp. 30 min before hypoxia) under
various experimental conditions. Before as well as after hypobaric hypoxia, the brain glucose
level and glucose-6-phosphate level were elevated by EGb, probably due to enhanced cerebral
blood flow. In the situations of hypobaric or hypoxk hypoxia, the cerebral lactate level of
EGb-treated rats was slighdy lower, whereas its pyruvate level was elevated as compared with
controls, and tiierefore the lactate^yruvate ratk) was markedly deaeased. In addition, the
levels of cerebral aeatine-P and ATP were less severely deaeased by EGb treatment after 7.5
min of hypobaric hypoxia
Janssens et d. [121] showed that EGb and bilobalide inhibited the hypoxia-induced
decrease in ATP content of endothelial cells in vitro. In addition, these compounds delayed the
onset of glycolytic activation, as evidenced by increased glucose transport, as well as by
inaeased lactate production under hypoxia. Tbe respiratory control ratio of mitochondria
isolated from livers of rats treated orally with EGb and bilobaUde increased, suggesting the
protection of ATP content These results indicated that EGb and bilobalide prevented tfie
uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondrial respiration. Further investigations
showed that in vivo (8 mg/kg) and in vitro (0.8 /nM) treatments with bilobalide markedly
inaease the mitochondrial respiratory control ratio, probably by lowaing oxygen consumption
during state 4. Bilobalide protects both complexes I and in from inhibition induced by Amytal
or antimydn A [122]. Further studies demonstrated that bilobalide prevents the deaease in the
state 3 respiration rate induced by ischemia in the liver and brain [123]. Hierefore, bilobalide
may protect mitochondrial respiratory activity under ischemic conditions by maintaining
complex I and III activities, thus preserving ATP regeneration as long as oxygen is present
These medianisms appear useful in explaining the protective effect of EGb on the onset of
ischemia-induced damage.
Furthermore, Bruel et d. [124] found that EGb (0.25 //g/ml) inaeases glucose transport
and glycogen synthesis in cultured vascular smooth musde cells. Essentially similar results
were obtained by oral treatment with EGb in liver and skeletal musdes [125], and in
erythrocytes [126], Vasseur et d, [127], using intracellular mkaroelectrodes, indksited that
administration of EGb (200 mg/kg/day, p.o.) or bilobalide (8 mg/kg day, i.p.) to mice increases
the in vitro sensitivity of their pancreatic 6 cells to glucose. In addition, EGb and bilobalide
correct the impaired glycogen synthesis in liver and muscle cells of the diabetic rats injected with
alloxan or strq)tozotocin [125, 127]. Taken together, these findings indicate that
administration of EGb causes an increase in glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis in various
tissues in part via its bilobalide constituent, and EGb could be useful in treating non-insulin-
dependent diabetes mellitus.
Antioxidant Effects
In dissodated rat cerebellar neurons, the effect of EGb on oxidative metabolism was studied
using a flow-cytometer and 2',7-dichlorofluorescin (DCFH), which is oxidized to a highly
fluorescent compound by intracellular hydrogen peroxide [128]. Preincubation with EGb
dose-dependently decreases DCFH fluorescence, and reduces the isonomydn-induced increase
of DCFH fluorescence, suggesting that EGb reduces oxidative metabolism in both resting and
180
Ca^Moaded brain neurons [129, 130]. Further experiments indicated that myrioetin and
qu^oetin, tiie flavonoid constituents of EGb, reduce oxidation of DCFH in both resting and
Ca^Moaded brain neurons [131]. EGb also gready delays the time-dependent increase in the
number of dead cerebellar neurons during exposure to hydrogen peroxide [132]. Taken
together, these results indicate that EGb and its flavone constituents protect the brain neurons
against oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide, whidi is involved in ischemic brain
damage.
An antioxidant action of EGb has been reported against peroxyl radicals, hydroxyl radicals
and superoxide anions [133, 134, 135, 136]. Production of activated oxygen species (Oj*,
H2O2, OH') in human neutrophils stimulated with phoibol myristate acetate is significantly
decreased in the presence of EGb [134, 135]. The free radical scavenging activities of ginkgo
flavonoids against the diphenyl picryl hydrazyl radical are as follows: myricetin > quercetin >
kaempferol > luteolin. As for biflavones, the best radical scavengo* is amentoflavone,
followed by bilobetin, ginkgetin, isoginkgetin, and sdadopitysin [137]. Recently, free radical
scavenging activities of terpene-free EGb and quercetin w^e revealed by means of an in vitro
electro-spin resonance assay [138]. Additionally, the in vivo experiments showed that
terpene-free EGb inhibits cutaneous blood flux, whidi reflects the skin inflammatory level
[138]. In regard to ginkgo terpenes, it has been revealed by means of electron paramagnetic
resonance and U\7VIS spectroscopy that ginkgolides B, C, J and M, as well as bilobalide but
not ginkgolide A, scavenge superoxide and hydroperoxyl radicals in dimethyl sulfoxide as an
aprotic solvent [139].
Akiba et d. showed that EGb prevents the platelet aggregation induced by a combination of
100 f4M terr-butyl hydroperoxide and Fe^*. However, ginkgolides A, B and C, which are
known to be PAF-antagonists, have no influence on this aggregation. Therefore, it was
suggested that free radicals, but not FAF, might be involved in platelet aggregatk)n induced by
oxidative stress [140].
Serotonin (5-HT) produces a rapid elevation of superoxide that stimulates the mitogenesis of
bovine pulmonary artery smooth muscle ceUs (SMCs). EGb scavenges superoxide elevated
by 5-HT, hence preventing 5-HT-induced mitogenesis on both SMCs and Chinese hamster lung
fibroblasts. These results indicate that EGb inhibits the cellular transduction signaling process
that leads to mitogenesis, as a result of its antioxidant activity [141].
In addition to radical scavenging properties, it has been reported that EGb reacts with nitric
oxide (NO) in in vitro systems [136], and inhibits NO production induced by lipopolysaccharide
plus intoferon-Y in maaophage cell Une RAW 264.7 [142]. Fre-treatment with oral
administration of EGb reduced nitric oxide overproduction after transient brain ischemia in the
MongoHan gerbil [143]. Further experiments showed that EGb inhibits NO production by
attenuating the level of iNOS mRNA in a human endothelial cell line (ECV304) [144], also
inhibits the activation of protein kinase C (PKC) induced by sodium nitroprusside (SNP), NO
generator, and that its flavonoid constituents have protective properties against toxicity induced
by SNP on cells of the hippocampus [145]. Recently, it was shown that ginkgolide A,
ginkgolide B and bilobalide inhibit NO production in macrophages derived from a human
monocytic cell line through attenuation of iNOS mRNA expression. However, these
components have no effect on the eNOS-mediated NO production in endothelial ceUs [146].
181
Acetylcholine Receptors
Taylor [168] examined the effects of chronic administration of EGb (100 mg^g/day, for 28
days in drinking water) on the binding of [^H]quinudyidinyl benzilate ([^H]QNB) to the
muscarinic cholinergic receptors of die hippocampus of young (3 months old) and old (24
months old) male Fisher 344 rats. Asignificant diminution in the number (B^^) of muscarinic
receptors was observed in the old rats compared to the young rats. In contrast, EGb produced
a maiiced iacrease of the B,^ value io the hippocampus of old rats in comparison to controls of
the same age, and also a slight increase of the B,^ in the young rats.
Rapin et d, [11] have reported an increase of the acetylcholine synthesis rate constant
evaluated by a bolus injection of [^H]choline in the hqipocampus of 4-month-old rats after acute
administration of EGb (100 mg/kg Lp.). Similar resuhs were obtained in the frontal cortex,
hippocampus and corpus striatum after dironic treatment with EGb (100 mg^g/day p.o. for 21
days). On the other hand, the acetylcholine turnover rate was not modified by either acute or
chronic administration of EGb. These results indicate that EGb might increase acetylcholine
release.
In the cholinergic nerve terminals of the hippocampus of 24-month-old Wistar rats,
Kristofikova et d, [169] showed that both in vivo administration with EGb (50 mg/kg/day for
30 days in drinking water) and in vitro applicatbn of EGb to synaptosomes (15-30 /^g/ml, i.e.
50-100 //g/mg proteio) cause significant increases in high-affinity dioline uptake (HACU)
levels. Subsequently, these workers showed that EGb (100 figfal) markedly elevates the
specific binding of [^H]hemidiolinium-3 ([^H]HCh-3) (to 306%) in hippocampal synaptosomes
from young Wistar rats, suggesting that EGb causes an ino-ease in the number of dioline
183
cairiers [170]. Taken together, these results suggest tiiat EGb might enhance the cholinergic
neurotransmitter syston on presynaptic nerve terminals.
Adrenoceptors
[^HJAmine Uptake
EGb inhibits the uptake of [^H]norepinq)hrine ([^H]NE) and [^H]dopamine and [^H]5-
hydroxytryptamine^^[^H]5-HT) into in vitro synaptosomes prepared from the striatum and
cortex in a concentration-dq)endent mann^. Tlie rank order of potency for the inhibition of
amine uptake is NE > dopamine > 5-HT [173]. Similar results were obtained by Ramassamy
er d, [174]. These workers showed that EGb deaeased the specific uptakes of [^H]dopamine,
[^H]5-HT and [^H]choline by synaptosomes prepared from tiie striatum of mice in a
concentration-dependent manner. Tlie IQ^ values were 637 figfiol for [^H]dopamine uptake,
803 /ig/ml for [^H]5-HT uptake, >2000 //gAnl for [^H]choline uptake. However, they
conduded that the inhibition of amine uptake caused by EGb appears to be non-specific, since
EGb also prevents the specific binding of the dopamine uptake inhibitor [^H]GBR12783 to
membranes prq)ared from striatum.
EGb in vitro modifies the [^H]5-HT uptake by synaptosomes prepared firom nuce cerebral
cortex in a biphasic manner. As mentbned above, the uptake of [^H]5-HT is inhibited by a
high concentration of EGb [174]. On the other hand, low concentrations of EGb (4-16 //g/ml)
significantly inaease [^H]5-HT uptake. A similar inaease was also obtained when
synaptosomes were prepared from the cortk:es of mice treated orally with EGb, either acutely
(100 mg/kg, 14 hours and 2 hours before death) or semi-dironically (2 x 100 mg/kg/day, for 4
days). Furthermore, such an inaement in the [^H]5-HT uptake is attributed to the flavonoid
constituents of EGb [175], and may be associated with the mechanism of its antidq)ressant
activity.
5'HT Receptors
NMDA Receptor
Taylor [173] showed that EGb acts in vitro as an inhibitor of radioligand binding to the
competitive and non-competitive sites of ^-methyl-i>-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. In
addition, the most potent inhibition (K^ = 0.5 mg/ml) is observed for non-competitive
NMDAsites labeled by ['H]MK-801.
Nigrostriatal
dopamine neuron
BBB
I i^Astrocyte
MPTP • ' - > MPTP
injection
i.p. for 6 days) sigtdficantly reduced striatal dopamine levels in C57 mice. On the other hand,
when C57 mice were pretreated with EGb (20, 50, 100 mg/kg/day, Lp.) for 7 days and then
treated with the same extract 30 min before MPTP injection for 6 days, the neurotoxic effect of
MPTP was antagonized in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, in mice treated with EGb (50
mg/kg/day, Lp.) for 2 weeks after MPTP-lesion, the recovery of striatal dopamine levels was
accelerated. MPTP is oxidized by MAO-B into MPP^ a positively charged species, whereas
EGb, but not ginkgolides A and B, inhibits MAO-B activity. Therefore, another possible
explanation for this protectk)n might lie in the inhibition of MAO activity caused by EGb to
prevent the oxidization of MPTP into MPP* [162].
It is well known that neuro^docrine dianges with advancing age provide information about
CNS functions [183]. The serum prolactin (PRL) level inaeases in old rats (26 months old)
compared with young rats (3 months old). Administration of EGb (10 mg/kg/day, p.o., for 7
days) deaeases the blood PRL level, while greatly inaeasing adrenocorticotrophic hormone
(ACTH) in old rats compared with age-matched controls. On the other hand, EGb, at a dose
of 30 mg/kg, deaeases the serum level of growth hormone (GH) and ACTH in young rats
compared with age-matdied controls [157].
Glucocorticoids are also essential for many aspects of normal brain development; however,
hyperseaetion induces pathological states such as damage to the hippocampus [184].
Treatment with EGb (100 mg/kg/day, for 8 days) causes a 50% reduction of the plasma
corticosterone level This reduction is probably due to deaeases in the number (B,^), mRNA
186
Effects of EGb on ischemia-induced principal changes in the cerebral lipid metabolism were
reviewed by Robin et al. [191]. Figure (3) shows diagram of cerebral lipid metabolism
following ischemia. Pretreatment witii EGb could normalize the increased mitodiondrial lipid
peroxide content and cytosolic lactase dehydrogoiase activity and the deaeased mitochondrial
phospholipid contents and superoxide dismutase activity in rat brain after occlusion of common
carotid arteries [192]. Rogue et d. [193] have shown that EGb is a potent inhibitor of
phospholipase C (PKQ in vitro (ICJQ: 82 //g/ml). Furthermore, in isdiemic rats pretreated
with a single injection of EGb (100 mg/kg, i.p.), a deaease in PKC activity is observed as
compared with untreated ischemic animals.
Impairment of membrane-bound Na,K-ArPase, whidi is responsible for maintaining and
restoring membrane potential, and an increased level of malondialdehyde (MDA), which is a
known as an index of lipid peroxidation, are seen aft^ unilateral focal cerebral ischemia in the
mouse. Pretreatment witii EGb (100 mg/kg/day, p.o. for 10 days) preserves the Na,K-ArPase
activity during cerebral ischemia and prev«its the kiaeased MDA levels caused by cerebral
187
Hydroperoxide
Prostaglandin
Leukotriene
Fig. (3). Diagram of cerebral lipid metabolism following ischemia. During ischemia,
AIT-synthesis is disturbed by deficiencies in oxygen and glucose supplies. The
subsequent energy failure stimulates phospholipase C (PLC) and Aj/Aj (PIAj/Ai), and
thereby leads to formation of diacylglycerol (DAG), which is converted to free fatty adds
(FFA) by Upasc, and leads to accumulation FFA and lysophospholipids. Among FFA,
especially, the peroxidation of arachidonic add (AA) initiates a cascade leading to
lq)oxygenase and cydooxygenase metabolites (prostaglandins and leukotrienes) and
hydroperoxide, which are augmented during reperfusion following ischemia.
Aoetylation of lyso-platelet-activating factor (lyso-PAF) leads to PAF, a mediator of
inflammation.
ischemia [194]. Similar inhibitory effects of EGb on MDA production induced by hydrogen
peroxide have been shown in erythrocyte membranes [195, 196].
Electroconvulsive shock (ECS), as well as ischemia, induces inaeases in free fatty add
(FFA) and diacylglycerol (DAG) in the rat brain, probably due to the breakdown of membrane
phospholipids through the activation of phospholipases (PLC, PLAj/Aj). EGb treatment (100
mg/kg/day, p.o. for 14 days) selectively decreases endogenous FFA levels and increases
endogenous DAG levels in the hippocampus. Therefore, ECS-induced accumulation of FFAis
prevented in the hippocampus of EGb-treated rats during clonic seizures (30 sec to 2 min after
188
ECS). Furthermore, the inaeased DAG levels induced by ECS are delayed by EGb treatment
and the subsequent decrease in DAG levels is accelerated by EGb treatment in both the
hippocampus and cortex [197].
Hypoxic or ischemic conditions led to an immediate release of free dioline via the
breakdown of choline-containing phospholipids in rat hippocampus slices. Klein et d. [198]
showed that bilobalide inhibited the hypoxia-induced dioline release in a dose-dependent
manner both in vitro (ECjo*. 0.38 /^M) and ex vivo (2-20 mgAcg, p.o.). Asimilar reduction of
dioline release was confirmed after administration of EGb (200 mg/kg, p.o.). Bilobalide also
inhibits the ^-methyl-D-aspartate-induced, PLAj-dependent release of dioline from
hippocampal phosphol4)ids both in vitro (10-100;^M) and in vivo (20 mg/kg, Lp.) [199].
Rabin et d. [200] investigated the effect of EGb on the rate of FFAreincorporation into brain
phospholipids during reperfiision following ischemia in the gerbil brain by means of quantitative
autoradiography and biodiemical analysis. Isdiemia-reperfusk>n selectively reincorporated
arachidonic add (AA) into brain phospholipids. Pretreatmait with EGb (50 or 150 mg/kg/day,
for 14 days) accelerated AA reincorporation following isdiemia, suggesting that EGb
ameliorates the neurotoxic reaction caused by prolonged ^posure of the brain to high
concentrations of AAand its metabolites, and stabilizes the membrane bilayer.
Taken together, these results showed that EGb can prevent isdiemia-induced Na,K-ArPase
injury, and suppress hypoxia- and ECS-induced membrane phospholipid breakdown in the
brain, and bilobalide might be associated with its protective action. In addition, EGb reduces
AA-induced neuronal damage as a consequence of the increase in reincorporation of A A
Therefore, these medianisms might provide a possible explanation for neuroprotective
properties of EGb and bilobalide against oxidative damage.
Anti-PAF
It has been demonstrated that ginkgolide B prevents bng-tenn potentiation (LIP) induced
by PAF in the h^}pocampus [208] and in the voitral part of the medial vestibular nudei [209].
These results suggest that PAF might act as a retrograde messenger in ITP, which activates the
presynaptic mechanisms enhancing the glutamate release. Izqui^do et d, found that pre- or
immediate post-training intrahippocampai or intraamygdala infusion of the PAF antagonist,
ginkgolide B, produces amnesia for avoidance tasks. These results support the idea that PAF
may play a role in memory formatfon [210].
Protonged incubatbn of synaptosomes prqiared from the striatum in the presence of ascorbk:
add (10^ M) decreases the ability of synaptosomes to take up [^H]dopamiae. Similar
inhibition is also observed in the ability of cortical synaptosomes to take up [^H]5-HT.
Furthermore, this decrease is potaitiated by addition of Fe^* tons. EGb (4-16 /igAni), in
particular its flavonoid fraction, prevents the reduction in the ability of synaptosomes to take up
either 5-HT or dopamine [211]. Moreover, EGb (10 //g/ml) prevents a decrease in binding of
[^H]GBR12783, the dopamine uptake inhibitor, to dopamine recq)tors in the presence of the
combination of ascorbic add/Fe^* ions. These results suggest that EGb-induced prevention of
the impainnent of the ability of synaptosomes to take up [^H]amine by the ascorbic add/Fe^*
ions is related its inhibitory properties in generation of free radicals. However, EGb does not
modify the inaeased [^H]dopamine release that is triggered by high potassium concentrations in
the presence of the combination of ascorbate/Fe^*, suggesting that the vesicular exocytotic
dopamine release does not seem to depend upon peroxidation [212].
Furthermore, Ramassamy et d. [213] showed that the combination of ascorbic acid/Fe^*
ions could deaease synaptosomal membrane fluidity measured by fluorescence polarization
using 1,6-diphenyl 1,3,5-hexatriene in a concentration-dq)endent manner. Free radical
generation by ascorbic add/Fe^* results in a decrease of membrane fluidity through the
peroxidation of neuronal membrane Upids. These membrane altCTations were prevented by
either EGb (2-16 ;<g/ml) or quercetin (0.1 fiM). Regarding neuronal membrane fluidity, Stoll
et d, [105] assessed the effects of EGb in vivo in young (3 months old), middle-aged (12
months old) and aged (22 to 24 months old) female NMRI mice. There was a significant
improvement in membrane fluidity in the aged animals treated with EGb at a dose of 100 mg/kg
for three weeks.
Taken together, these results reveal that EGb prevents not only the ascorbic add/Fe^*-
induced impairment in amine uptake and membrane fluidity by generating free radicals, but also
the impairment in age-related membrane fluidity. This preventive effect of EGb is probably
due to itsradicalscavenging properties.
CONCLUSION
The convincing evidence from the experimental work presented hare supports the conclusion
that EGb is effective for the treatment of dementia and cerebral insuffidency. To sum up the
major characteristics of the pharmacological activities of EGb, particularly in the CNS, the
following conclusions can be reached. EGb improves hypoxic tolerance and protects cerebral
neurons against s^ptosis-, edema- and ischemia-induced injury. In addition, EGb inhibits
age-related impairment of cerebral neurotransmitters, mduding muscarinic receptors, and 2-
190
adreooo^tors and 5-HT,A leocptois, increases the uptake of cboiine, and improves
deterioration in cognitive functions, induding learning and memory, with advancing age. It
is worth noting that EGb demonstrates evid^ce of neuroprotective effects against various age-
related physiological changes and injuries, although EGb has hardly any influence under normal
conditions; that is, EGb may fadlitate a spontaneous cure of damage occurring in the brain with
advancing age. Hierefore, such attributes appear to be associated with the observation that
EGb is effective in mild to moderately affected patients with ALdieimer's disease and
multi-^nfarct donentia.
It is accepted that flavonoids and teq)enes, composing 24% and 6% of the standardized
extract, respectively, contribute to the pharmacological activities of EGb as active constituents.
Ginkgolides and bilobalide are especially unique constituents in Ginkgo biloba^ and have been
found in no other plants. It has been generally considered diat the anti-oxidant activity of
flavonoids and the platelet-activating factor antagonism of teipenes are usefiil for explaining the
greater part of the restorative and/or neuroprotective properties of EGb as described above.
On the other hand, as far as we know, there seem to be no publications concerning clinical
trials demonstrating the effectiveness of other antioxidants or anti-PAF antagonists on dementia.
Therefore, the possibility of a separate yet unidentified mechanism remains to be clarified. For
example the activities of bilobalide on membrane phospholipids and mitochondria may
contribute to other defense medianisms of EGb. Furthermore, a comprehensive
understanding of the greater part of EGb constituents, Le., those other than flavonoids and
terpenes, is still lacking. FurthCT elucidation of the constituents of EGb is thus necessary.
REFERENCES
[I] Hori, X; Ridge, R.W.; Tulecke, W.; Del Tredid, P.; Tremouillaux-Guiiler, J.; Tobe,
H., Eds. Ginkgo biloba a global Treasure: From biology to medicine. Springer: Tokyo,
1997.
[2] Weinges, K.; Bahr, W.; Kloss, P. Aizneimittel-Forsch., 1968, 18, 537.
[3] Huh, H.; Staba, EJ. J. Herbs Spices Med, Plants, 1992,1, 91.
[4] Kleijnen, J.; Knipschild, P. Lancet, 1992, 340, 1136.
[5] Kleijnen, J.; Knipsdiild, P. Br, J. Clin. Pharmacol, 1992, 34, 352.
[6] Le Bars, P.L.; Katz, M.M.; Berman, N.; Itil, T.M.; Freedman, A.M.; Sdiatzberg, AF.
J. Am. Med. Assoc, 1997, 278, 1327.
[7] Wettstein, A. Phytomedicine, 2000, 6, 393.
[8] van Beek, T.A, Ed. Ginkgo biloba. Harwood academic publisher: Hie Netherlands,
2000.
[9] Perry, EK.; Pkkering, A.T.; Wang, W.W.; Houghton, P.J.; Peny, N.S.L. /. Pharm.
Pharmacol, 1999, 51, 527.
[10] Curtis-Prior, P.; Vere, D.; Fray, P. J. Pharm. Pharmacol, 1999, 51, 535.
[II] DeFeudis, F.V Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761): Pharmacological activities and
clinical applications, Elsevio:, Paris, 1991.
[12] Smith, P.F.; Maclennan, K.; Darlington, C.L. /, Ethnopharmacol, 1996, 50, 131.
[13] Sticher, O. PlantaMed., 1993, 59, 2.
[14] Baker, W.; Finch, ACM.; GUis, W.D.; Robinson, K.W. /. Chem. Soc, 1963,
1477.
191
[15] Nakazawa, K.; Ito, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1963, 11, 283.
[16] Miuia, H.; Kihara, X; Kawano, N. Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1969,17, 150.
[17] Joiy, M; Haag-Bcmiricr, M.;Antoii, R. Phytochemistry, 1980, 19, 1999.
[18] Briangon-Schcid, R; Guth, A;Anton, R. J. Chromatogn, 1982, 245, 261.
[19] Pictta, R; Mauri, R; Rava, A J. Chmmatogr., 1988, 437, 453.
[20] Hasler, A ; Stidier, O.; Meier, B. J. Chrvmatogr, 1990, 508, 236.
[21] Nasr, C ; Haag-Beirurier, M.; Lobstein-Guth, A ; Anton, R. Phytoshemistry, 1986,
25,770.
[22] Nasr, C ; Lobstein-Guth, A ; Haag-Bemirier, M; Anton, R. Phytochemistry, 1987,
26, 2869.
[23] Hasler, A ; Gross, G.; Meier, B.; Sticher, O. Phytochemistry, 1992, 31, 1391.
[24] \^nhaelen, M.; Vknhadcn-Fastrd, R. J. Liquid. Chromatogn, 1988, 11, 2969.
[25] Hasler, A ; Sticher, O.; MeiCT, B. J. Chromatogn, 1992, 605, 41.
[26] Pietta, P.G.; Mauri, P.L.; Rava, A ; Sabbatini, G. /. Chromatogn, 1991, 549, 367.
[27] Pietta, P.G.; Mauri, P.L.; Bruno, A ; Rava, A ; Manera, E.; Ceva, P. J Chromatogn,
1991, 553, 223.
[28] Pietta, P.; Fadno, R.M.; Carini, M.; Mauri, P. J. Chromatogn, 1994, 661,121.
[29] Lobstein, A ; Rietsch-Jako, L ; Haag-Bemirier, M.; Anton, R. Planta Med., 1991,
57, 430.
[30] Yang, R; Quan, J.; Zhang, T.Y; Ito, Y /. Chromatogn A, 1998, 803, 298.
[31] Pietta, P.G.; Gardana, C ; Mauri, RL.; Maffei-Fadno, R.; Carini, M / Chromatogn
B, 1995,673,75.
[32] Pietta, P.G.; Gardana, C ; Mauri, RL. J. Chromatogn B, 1997, 693, 249.
[33] Funikawa, 5 . ScL Papers Ins. Phys. Chem. Res. (Jcpan), 1932, 19, 27.
[34] Maruyama, M.; Terahara, A ; Itagaki, Y; Nakanishi, K, Tetrahedron Lett., 1967, 4,
299.
[35] Nakanishi, K; Habaguchi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1971, 93, 3546.
[36] Braquet, P.; Esanu, A ; Buisine, E ; Hosford, D.; Broquet, C ; Koitai, M Med. Res.
Revs., 1991, 11, 295.
[37] Corey, EJ.; Kang, M.C.; Desai, N . C ; Ghosh, AK.; Houpis, I.N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc, 1988, 110, 649.
[38] Corey, EJ.; Rao, K.S.; Ghosh, AK. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6955.
[39] Weinges, K.; Rummler, M.; Schidc, H. Liebigs. Ann. Chem., 1993, 1023.
[40] Roumestand, C ; Perly, B.; Braquet, P. In Ginkgolides-chemistry, biology,
pharmacology and clinical perspectives; Braquet, P., Ed.; J R Prous Science
pubhsha^, Barcelona, 1988, pp. 49-68.
[41] Weinges, K.; Bahr, W. Liebigs Arm. Chem., 1969, 724, 214.
[42] Nakanishi, K.; Habaguchi, K.; Nakadaira, Y; Woods, M.C.; Maruyama. M.; Major,
R.T.; Alauddin, M.; Patcl, AR.; Weinges, K.; Bahr, W. /. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971,
93, 3544.
[43] Lobstein-Guth, A; Brian^n-Sdieid, F;Anton, R. J. Chromatogn 1983, 267, 431.
[44] Pietta, P.G.; Mauri, R L ; Rava, A Chromatogrcphia, 1990, 29, 251.
[45] van Beek, T.A; Sdieeren, H.A; Rantio, T; Melger W.Ch.; Lelyveld, G.R J.
Chromatogn, 1991, 543, 375.
[46] Oehrle, S.A /. Liquid Chromatogr., 1995, 18, 2855.
[47] Chauret, N.; Carrier, J.; Mandni, M.; Neufeld, R.; Weber, ML; Achambault, J. J.
192
[100] Sasaki, K.; V^da, K.; Hatta, H.; Qhshika, H.; Haga, M Res, Commutu Mol Pathol
Pharmacol 1997, 96, 45.
[101] Winter, E Pharmacol Biochem. Behav,, 1991, 38,109.
[102] Petkov, VD.; Kchayov, R.; Belcheva, S.; Konstantinova, E ; Petkov, VV; Getova,
D.; Markovska, V PlantaMed,, 1993, 59,106.
[103] Blavet, N. In Effects of Ginkgo biloba Extract (EGb76I) on the Central Nervous
System; Giristen, Y; Costentin, J.; Lacour, M, Eds.; Elsevier: Paris, 1992, pp. 119-
127.
[104] Winter, J.C. Physiol Behav., 1998, 63, 425.
[105] StoU, S.; Sdieuer, K.; Pohl, O.; MuUer, W.E Pharmacopsychiatry, 1996, 29, 144.
[106] Wirth, S.; Stemmclin, J.; Will, B.; Christen, Y; Di Scala, G. Pharmacol Biochem.
Bdiav., 2000, 65,321.
[107] Chopin, P.; Brilcy, M. PsychopharmacoL, 1992, 106, 26.
[108] Hoyer, S.; Lanncrt, H.; Noldner, M ; Chatteijee, S.S. J. Neural Transm., 1999,
106, 1171.
[109] Tadano, T ; Nakagawasai, O.; Tan-no, K.; Morikawa, Y; Takahashi, N.; Kisara, K.
Am, J, Chinese Medicine, 1998, 26, 127.
[110] Porsolt, R.D.; Martin, P.; Lenegre, A ; Fromage, S.; Drieu, K. Pharmacol Biochem.
Behav,, 1990, 36, 963.
[ I l l ] Porsolt, R.D.; Martin, P.; Fromage, S.; Lenegre, A ; Drieu, K. In Effects of Ginkgo
biloba Extract (EGb761) on the Central Nervous System; Christen, Y; Costentin, J.;
Lacour, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Paris, 1992, pp. 135-145.
[112] Rodriguezde Turco, E.B.; Droy-Lefaix, M.T,; Bazan, N.G. Physiol Behav., 1993,
53, 1001.
[113] Rapin, J.R.;Lamproglou, L; Drieu, K.;DeFeudis, F.V Gen. Pharmacol, 1994, 25,
1009.
[114] Wada, K.; Sasaki, K.; Miura, K.; Yagi, M.; Kubota, Y; Matsumoto, X; Haga, M.
Biol Pharm. Bull, 1993, 16, 210.
[115] Brochet, D.; Chermat, R.; DeFeudis, F.D.; Drieu, K. Gen. Pharmacol, 1999, 33,
249.
[116] Sokoloff, L.; Reivich, M; Kennedy, C ; Des Rosiers, M.H.; Patlak, C.S.; Pettigrew,
K.D.; Sakurada, O.; Shinohara, M. J, Neurochem., 1977, 28, 897.
[117] Krieglstein, J.; Beck, X; Seibert, A LifeScL, 1986, 39, 2327.
[118] Lamour, Y; Holloway, H.W.; Rapoport, S.L; Soncrant, XT. Drug Dev. Res., 1991,
23, 219.
[119] Duverger, D.; DeFeudis, F.V; Drieu, K. Gen. Pharmacol, 1995, 26, 1375.
[120] Rapin, J.R.; Le Poncin-Lafitte, M In Rokan (Ginkgo biloba). Recera results in
pharmacology and clinic; Fiinfgeld, E W , Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1988, pp.
109-116.
[121] Janssens, D.; Michiels, C ; Delaive, E ; Eliaers, F.; Meu, K.; Remade, J. Biochem.
Pharmacol, 1995, 50, 991.
[122] Janssens, D.; Remade, J.; Drieu, K.; Michiels, C. Biochem, Pharmacol, 1999, 58,
109.
[123] Janssens, De; Delaive, E ; Remade, J.; Mchiels, C. Furuiam, Clin, Pharmacol,
2000,14, 193.
[124] Bruel, A ; Gardette, J.; Berrou, E ; Droy-Lefaix, M.T.; Picard, J. Pharmacol Res,,
195
18, 397.
[155] Murphy, D.L.; Sunderland, T ; Cohen, R.M. Psychiatr. Cluu North Am., 1984, 7,
549.
[156] Morier-Teissier, E.; L'Helgoualc'h, A ; Drieu, K.; Rq)S, R. Biogenic Amines, 1987,
4, 351.
[157] Petkov, VD.; Hadjiivanova, C ; Petkov, VV; Milanov, S.; Vishcva, N.; Boyadjieva,
\^,PhytodiercpyRes., 1993, 7, 139.
[158] Racagni, G.; Brunello, N.; Paoletti, R. In Rokan (Ginkgo Biloba), Recent results in
pharmacology and clinic; Funfgeld, E.W., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1988, pp.
98-102.
[159] Sasaki, K.; Hatta, S.; Haga, M.; Ohshika, H. Eur. J. Pharmacol, 1999, 367,165.
[160] Sasaki, K.; Hatta, S.; Wada, K.; CMbshika, H.; Haga, M. L^eSd, 2000, 67, 709.
[161] White, H.L.; Scates, P.W.; Cooper, B.R. LifeScL, 1996, 58,1315.
[162] Wu, W.R.;Zhu, X.Z. LifeScL, 1999, 65, 157.
[163] Sloley, B.D.; Urichuk, L.J.; Morley, P.; Durkin J.; Shan J.J.;Pang, P.K.; Coutts, R.T.
J. Burnn. Pharmacol., 2000, 52, 451.
[164] Pardon, M C ; Joubert, C. Perez-Diaz, E; Christen, Y; Launay, J.M.; Cohen-Sahnon,
C. Meek AgeingDev., 2000, 113, 157.
[165] Shih, J . C ; Chen, K.; Ridd, M.J.; Seif, I. Antioxid. Redox Signal, 2000, 2, 467.
[166] Fowler, J.S.; Wang, G.-J.; \blkow, N.D.; Logan, J.; Franceschi, D.; Franceschi, M ;
MacGregor, R.; Shea, C ; Garza, V; Liu, N.; Ding, Y-S. Life ScL, 2000, 9, PL
141.
[167] Porsolt, R.D.; Roux, S.; Drieu, K. ArzneimitteUForsch., 2000, 50, 232.
[168] Taylor, J. Br In Rokan (Ginkgo Biloba). Recent results in pharmacology and clinic;
Funfgeld, EW., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1988, pp. 103-108.
[169] KriStofikova, Z.; Benesova, O.; Tejkalov^ H. Dementia, 1992, 3, 304.
[170] KriStofikova, Z.; Klaschka, J. Dement Geriatr. Cogn. Disord., 1997, 8, 43.
[171] Brunello, N., Racagni, G.; Clostre, F.; Drieu, K.; Braquet, P. Pharmacol Res.
Common., 1985, 17, 1063.
[172] Huguet, E; Tarrade, T. J. Pharm. Pharmacol, 1992, 44, 24.
[173] Taylor, J.E. In Effects of Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb761) on the central nervous
system; Christen, Y; Costentin, J.; Lacour, M , Eds.; Elsevier: Paris, 1992, pp. 1-5.
[174] Ramassamy, C ; Clostre, R; Christen, Y; Costentin, J. J. Pharm. Pharmacol, 1990,
42, 785.
[175] Ramassamy, C ; Christen, Y; Clostre, E; Costentin, J. J. Pharm. Pharmacol, 1992,
44, 943.
[176] Huguet, R; Drieu, K.; Piriou, A. J. Pharm. Pharmacol, 1994, 46, 316.
[177] Bolanos-Jimenez, F.; Manhaes de Castro, R.; Sarhan, H.; Prudhomme, N.; Drieu, K.;
Pillion, G. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol, 1995, 9, 169.
[178] De Vivo, M.; Maayani, S. J. Pharmacol Exp. Then, 1986, 238, 248.
[179] Langston, J.W. Eur. Neurol, 1987, 26 (Suppl), 2.
[180] Javitch, J.A; D'Amato, R.J.; Strittmattcr, S.M.; Snyder, S.H. Proa Natl Acad ScL
USA, 1985, 82, 2173.
[181] Perry, XL.; Yong, VW; Clavier, R.M; Jones, K.; Wright, J.M; Foulks, J.G.; Wall,
R.A. NeuroscL Lett., 1985, 60, 109.
[182] Ramassamy, C ; Qostre, R; Christen, Y; Costentin, J. In Effects of Ginkgo biloba
197
Extract (EGb761) on the central nervous system; Christen, Y; Costcntin, J.; Lacour,
M , Eds.; Elsevier Paris, 1992, pp. 27-36.
[183] Ferrari, E.; Magri, E; Locatelli, M; Balza, G.; Nesds, T; Battegazzore, C ; Cuzzoni,
G.; Fioravanti, M ; Solerte, S.B. Aging (Milano), 1996, 8, 320.
[184] Sapolsky, R.M. Exp, Gerontol, 1999, 34, 721.
[185] Amri, H.; Ogwuegbu, S.O.; Boujrad, N.; Drieu, K.; Papadopoulos, V Endocrinol,
1996,137, 5707.
[186] Papadopoulos, V; Kapsis, A ; Li, H.; Amri, H.; Hardwidk, M.; Culty, M ; Kasprzyk,
P.G.; Carlson, M ; Moreau, J.P.; Drieu, K. Anticancer Res., 2000, 20, 2835.
[187] Amri, H.; Drieu, K.; Papadopoulos, V Endocrinol., 1997,138, 5415.
[188] Mardlhac, A ; Dakine, N.; Bourhim, N.; Guillaume, V; Grino, M; Drieu, K.; Oliver,
C L ^ e S d . , 1998, 62,2329.
[189] Rivet, J.M; Stinus, L.; Le Moal, M; Mormede, R Brain Res., 1989, 498, 149.
[190] Trovero, F.; Brochet, D.; Tassin, J.P.; Drieu, K. Brain Res., 1999, 818, 135.
[191] Robin, O.; Chang, MC.J.; Grange, E.; Drieu, K.; Rapoport, S.I. In Advances in
Ginkgo biloba Extract Research, vol 5. Effects of Ginkgo biloba Extract (EGb761)
on neuronal plasticity; Christen, Y; Droy-Lefaix, MX; Madas-Nuiiez, J.F., Eds.;
Elsevier: Paris, 1996, pp. 7-19.
[192] Seif-e-Nasr, M.; H-Fattah, A A Pharmacol Res., 1995, 32, 273.
[193] Rogue, P.; Malviya, AN. In Advances in Ginkgo biloba Extract Research, vol 5.
Effects of Ginkgo biloba Extract (EGb761) on neuronal plasticity; Christen, Y; Droy-
Lefaix, M.T.; Madas-Nunez, J.F., Eds.; Elsevier: Paris, 1996, pp. 1-6.
[194] Pierre, S.; Jamme, I.; Droy-Lefaix, M.T.; Nouvelot, A ; Maixent, J.M Neuroreport,
1999, 10, 47.
[195] Kose, K.; Dogan, R J. InL Med, Res., 1995, 23, 1.
[196] Kose, K.; Dogan, R J. InL Med Res., 1995, 23, 9.
[197] Rodriguez de Turco, EB.; Droy-Lefaix, MX; Bazan, N.G. J. Neurochem,, 1993,
61, 1438.
[198] Klein, J.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Loffelholz, K. Brain Res., 1997, 755, 347.
[199] Wekdiel, O.; Hilgert, M.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Lehr, M; Klein, J. Naunyn-
Schmiedeberg*sArch. Pharmacol, 1999, 360, 609.
[200] Rabin, O.; Drieu, K.; Grange, E.; Chang, M.C.; Rapoport, S.L; Purdon, AD. Mol
Chem. Neuropathol, 1998, 34, 79.
[201] Clark, G.D.; Happel, L.X; Zonimski, C.F.; Bazan, N.G. Neuron, 1992, 9, 1211.
[202] Braquet, P.; Hosford, D. J, Ethnopharmacol, 1991, 32, 135,
[203] Braquet, P.; Spinnewyn, B.; Braquet, M.; Bourgain, R.H.; Xaylor, J.E.; Etienne, A ;
Drieu, K. Blood Vessels, 1985, 16, 558.
[204] Spiimewyn, B.; Blavet, N.; Clostre, F,; Bazan, N.; Braquet, P. Prostaglandins,
1987, 34, 337.
[205] Uu, X.H.; Eun, B.L; Silverstein, F.S.; Barks, J.D. Pediatr. Res., 1996, 40, 797.
[206] Akisu, M; Kultursay, N.; Coker, L; Huseyinov, A Biol Neonate., 1998, 74, 439.
[207] Nogami, K.; Hirashima, Y; Endo, S.; Xakaku, A BminRes. 1997, 754, 72.
[208] Kato, K.; Clark, G.D.; Bazan, N.G.; Zommski, C.F. Nature, 1994, 367,175.
[209] Grassi, S.; Francescangeli, E.; Goracci, G.; Pettorossi, VE. J. Neurophysiol, 1998,
79, 3266.
[210] Izquierdo, L; Fin, C ; Schmitz, P.K.; Da Silva, R.C.; Jersulimsky, D.; Quillfeldt,
198
J.A; Ferrcira, MB.G.; Medina, J.H.; Bazan, N.G. Proa NatL Acad ScL U,S.A.,
1995, 92, 5047.
[211] Ramassamy, C ; Naudin, B.; Christen, Y; Clostre, F.; Costentin, J. Biochem.
Pharmacol, 1992, 44, 2395.
[212] Ramassamy, C ; Giibe, F.; Christen, Y; Costentin, J. Neurodegeneration, 1995, 4,
155.
[213] Ramassamy, C ; Girbe, F.; Christen, Y; Costentin, J. Free RacL Res. Commun.,
1993,19,341.
Atta-ur-Rahman (Ed.) Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, Vol 28
© 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. 199
Moraceous plants
sanggenon A
morusin (3) : R = H
(4): Ri = CH2CH=CMe2. R2 = OH
artonin E (7): R = OH
(4'): Ri = OH, R2 = CH2CH=CMe2
kuwanonG(1):R = H
kuwanon H (2): R = CH2CH=CMe2
OH O
artobiloxanthone (8)
OH
sanggenon C OH 0
(5): Ri = CH2CH=CMe2, R2 = OH sanggenon 0 (6)
cycloartobiloxanthone (9)
(5'): Ri = OH, R2 = CH2CH=CMe2
OH
brosimoneA(13) soroceal (15)
equivalent, Fig. (1). Since that time, about forty kinds of Diels-Alder
type adducts, structurally similar to that of 1 have been isolated from
Morus species. These Diels-Alder type flavonoids are characteristic
constituents oiMorus species [8,11-14].
Morusin (3), a flavone derivative, isolated from the root bark oi Morus
alba L., as a main isoprenylated flavonoid, has a structure bearing an
isoprenoid moiety at the C-3 position and a 2',4'-dioxygenated pattem in
the B ring [15]. These features are one of the characteristics of the
isoprenylated flavonoids of Morus root bark.
Furthermore, from the Chinese crude drug "Sang-Bai-Pi" purchased in
Japanese market, our group reported a series of isoprenylated flavonoids,
such as sanggenons A (4) [16] and C (5) [17]. Recently, the structure of
sanggenons A and C were revised from 4' and 5' to 4 and 5, respectively,
[18], Fig. (1). Sanggenon C (5) seems to be a Diels-Alder type adduct
of a chalcone derivative and a dehydroprenyl (=3-methyl-1,3-butadienyl)-
phenol having a sanggenon A type partial structure. From the root bark
of one of the Chinese mulberry tree, Morus cathayana, a series of
isoprenylated flavonoids could be isolated [19-21]. Some of the
flavonoids are the sanggenon A type flavanones (SATF), 3-hydroxy-
flavanone having a prenyl (=3-methyl-2-butenyl) group at 2 position and
an ether linkage between C-3 and C-2' positions, such as 4 and 5. Most
SATFs are (27?,55)-flavanones, sanggenons A (4), C (5), L, M (100),
sanggenols F, G, and J, and soroceins D and F [22], but sanggenon O (6)
is (2iS',ii?)-flavanone [23]. The stereochemistry at C-2 and C-3 of
sanggenons B (45), Fig. (6), D (33), E, P (sorocein H), S, sorocein E, and
sanggenols H and I is still unclear. Earlier studies of flavonoids and
stilbenes with one or more isoprenoid groups (prenyl group,
2,2-dimethylpyran ring, geranyl group, famesyl group, etc.) from Morus
species have been summarized in review articles [8,11-13,24-26].
On the other hand, the plants of Artocarpus species distribute over the
tropical and subtropical regions, and have been used as traditional folk
medicine so called "Jamu" in Indonesia against inflammation, malarial
fever and so on. Many kinds of isoprenylated flavonoids have also been
isolated from Artocarpus species by Venkataraman's group and other
several groups [27-30]. Our group also studied the constituents of
Indonesian Artocarpus species, such as A. heterophyllus, A, communis, A.
rigida, A. venenosa (^Paratocarpus venenosa), and A. altilis, a
moraceous plant from Sri Lanka [30-32]. About seventy kinds of
isoprenylated flavonoids have been isolated from these Artocarpus
species. The compounds, except some ones, have a characteristic
structure bearing an isoprenoid side chain at the C-3 position of flavone
skeleton, and the B ring has a 2',4',5'-trioxygenated pattem, such as
artonin E (7) corresponds to 5'-hydroxymorusin [31]. In addition to the
feature, some of the flavone, such as artobiloxanthone (8) and
203
OH 0
OH O
antiarone J (19): Ri = OH. R2 = CH2CH=CMe2
antiarone K (20): Ri = OMe, R2 = H antiarone E (21)
Fig. (2). Structures of compounds 1 6 - 2 2 from moraceous plants.
Glycyrrhiza species
Yields from dried licorice roots: -H-i-H=more than 0.01%; +-H-=between 0.01 and 0.001%; ++=0.001-0.0001%;
+=1-0.1 ppm. • The compound was obtained from the stolons. ° 2,2-dimethylpyrano[b=DMP. ** Tentative
name used here (DMP;4,5]-3'-prenyl-2',3,4'-trihydroxychalcone).
The first report for the hypotensive effect of the mulberry tree was
presented by Fukutome in 1938, who asserted that oral administration of
the hot water extract of the mulberry tree showed a remarkable
hypotensive effect in rabbits [53]. Ohishi reported the hypotensive
effect of the ethanol extract of mulberry root bark [54]. Suzuki and
Sakuma reported that the hypotensive activity seemed to be due to
phenolic substances, and that the effect disappeared on acetylation [55].
Later, Katayanagi, et aL reported that the ether extract of the root bark
gives to rabbit (6 mg/kg, i.v.) showed a marked hypotensive effect and
that the active constituents seemed to be a mixture of unstable phenolic
compounds [56]. Tanemura ascribed the activity of mulberry root bark
to acetylcholine and its analogous presumably contained in the alcohol
soluble fraction, and that the hypotensive constituents produced a
yellowish-brown precipitate on treatment with Dragendorff reagent [57].
Yamatake, et al reported that n-butanol- and water-soluble fractions of
mulberry root bark had similar effect except for those on the
cardiovascular system. Both fractions showed cathartic, analgesic,
diuretic, antitussive, anti-edema, sedative, anticonvulsant, and
hypotensive actions in mice, rats, guinea pigs and dogs [7]. On the
beginning of our study of mulberry tree, the hypotensive constituents had
not been identified. In view of the reports, we assumed that the
hypotensive compounds of the plant would be a mixture of unstable
208
Residue Extract
Benzene
Residue Extract
I Methanol C.C, p. TLC
-T
Residue extract Morusin (3), kuwanons C (42), D, E (43), F,
Ethyl acetate soluble portion oxydihydromorusin (46),
I C.C, p. TLC, p. HPLC mulberroftiran A (47)
Fig. (4). Isolation procedure of flavonoids from the root bark of Morus alba.
mmHg
tsmmm |ioo
50
iilSliSirJ'^^
10 s
kuwanon H I mg/kg i.v. '
Fig. (5). Effects of kuwanon G (1) and kuwanon H (2) on blood pressure. Electrocardiogram (ECG),
phrenic nerve discharge (PN), and electroencephalogram (EEG) in a gallamine-immobilized rabbit.
209
mulberrofuran C (28): R = H
mulberrofuran F (29): R = CH2CH=CMe2
chalcomoracin (32): R = CH2CH=CMe2
mulberrofuran G (30): R = H
kuwanon E (43)
sanggenon B (45)
HO^^s^^OH
hv
34
•OOH
This photoreaction and the relative reaction of morusin (3) along with
the anti-tumor promoting activity of EGCG encouraged us to examine the
anti-tumor promoting activities of a series of isoprenylated flavonoids
isolated from Morus species. First we examined the inhibition against
three biochemical effects; the specific binding of ^H-12-O-tetra-
decanolylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) to mouse particulate fraction, the
activation of Ca^'^-activated phospholipid-dependent protein kinase
(protein kinase C) with teleocidin, and induction of ornithine
decarboxylase (ODC) with teleocidin in mouse skin [72]. Interestingly,
of the eight isoprenylated flavonoids, morusin (3), kuwanons G (1) and M
(35), mulberroforan G (30), and sanggenon D (33) gave similar results in
these biochemical tests as described in Table 2.
Table 2. Effects oi Morus flavonoids on biological and biochemical activities
Morusin (3) 57 80 43
Kuwanon G (1) 99 40 34
Kuwanon H (2) 100 80 -35
Kuwanon M (35) 85 22 25
Mulberrofuran G (30) 34 46 10
Sanggenon A (4) 62 80 -62
Sanggenon C (5) 48 46 -17
Sanggenon D (33) 60 42 17
100
^ o
Of these five compounds, morusin (3) is the least toxic and can be
isolated as one of the main phenolic compounds from the root bark.
The more detailed data for the above these biochemical tests of
morusin (3) were as follows [73]. As shown in Fig. (8), morusin (3)
caused dose-dependent inhibition of the specific binding pHJTPA to a
mouse skin particulate fraction. The concentration of morusin (3) for
50% inhibition (ED50) was 57 |amol/L, whereas that of unlabelled TPA
was 4 nmol/L.
As morusin (3) was assumed to interact with the phorbol ester receptor,
we examined whether it inhibited the activation of protein kinase C by
teleocidin in vitro [73]. Fig. (9) shows that morusin (3) inhibited the
phosphorylation of histone type III-S by protein kinase C dose-dependent
and that 80 |imol/L morusin caused 50% inhibition.
100 VA
o
50
a
0.
VA 10- 10-*
\o-
Concentration (mol/L) of morusin (3)
Fig. (9). Inhibition by morusin (3) of activation of protein kinase C by teleocidin in vitro.
The assay mixture (0.25 mL) contained 20 jimol/L CaCh, 7.5 |ag of phosphatidylserine, 2.3 (^mol/L teleocidin,
and various concentrations of morusin (3) with 0.05 units of partially purified enzyme. Enzyme activity was
measured as the incorporation of ^^P from [7-^^P]ATP into histone type III-S during incubation for 3 min. at
30^.
On the other hand, morusin (3) itself did not show a tumor promoting
activity on mouse skin, x in Figs. (10) and (11). From these results,
morusin (3) is an anti-tumor promoter judging from its ability to inhibit
the short-term effects induced by tumor promoters.
100
to
10 20 10 20
Weeks of promotion Weeks of promotion
Figs. (10) and (11). Inhibition by morusin (3) of tumor promotion by teleocidin in a two-stage
carcinogenesis experiment on mouse skin. Inhibition was achieved by a single application of 100 ^g of
DMBA, and teleocidin (2.5 }ig) and morusin (1 mg) were applied twice a week throughout the experiments.
OMe
oxydihydromorusin (46)
ikarisoside A (48): R = Rha
mulberrofuran A (47) ikarisoside B (49): R = Glu(1 ^ 2)Rha
OCH3
OH O
quercetin (50):
Ri = OH,R2=R3 = H
antiarone L (57)
cirsilioi (51):
Ri = H, R2 = 0Me, R3 = Me artonin H (56)
Fig. (12). Structures of flavonoids (46 - 57) from moraceous plants, Epimedium species, and test reagents
(50 and 51).
OH 0
OH o
artonin A (54)
Fig. (13). The inhibitory effect (IC50 ± SD) on arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase activity.
Concentration (|imol/L)
Fig. (14). Dose-dependent inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase by artonin E (7, • ) , morusin (3, o), and cirsiliol (51,
A).
OH 0
(±)-artobiloxanthone (8) (±) -cycloartobitoxanthone (9)
artonin E (7)
8 9
Fig. (15). Photoreaction of artonin E (7) and the reaction with radical reagent.
OH 0 OH 0
(±) -cycloartobiloxanthone (9) (±)-artobiloxanthone (8)
Fig. (16). Plausible mechanism for the formation of artobiloxanthone (8) and cycloartobiloxanthone (9) from
artonin E (7).
219
{jene expression
—1 protein i ^ phosphorylated t - c-fos
okadac acid proteins 1
j — ' phosphatase 1 ojun
NF-KB
ODC
TNF-a - • p
~3
phosporylated
proteins
t
' _
TNF-a — •
V _
Table 5. Cytotoxic activities (IC50, |ig/mL) of Artocarpus and Antiaris flavonoids against L-12i0 and
Colon 38 cells
r\ t\
r
808
215 < \ A^ Y1
f t t t t t t t t t t
BK S BK V ET-1 S ET-l
V BOM S BOM
Fig. (18). Effect of kuwanon H (2) on agonist-induced increases in [Ca^^\ in Swiss 3T3 cells. Cells were
stimulated by 10"* mol/L bombesin (BOM), 10"* mol/L endothelin-1 (ET) or 10"* mol/L bradykinin (BK).
Kuwanon H (S, 500 nmol/L at the final concentration) or dimethyl sulfoxide (V) was added 1 min before
stimulation.
B
o.
35000
B
o
25000
15000
that showed no activity against these B. subtilis strains were also shown
in Table 7. On the comparison between these bioactivities of the
phenolic compounds, relationship between the antibacterial activity
against B, subtilis and cytotoxicity against HSC-2 or MT-4 cells was not
found.
Hatano et al. reported antibacterial effect of licorice flavonoids
against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [114].
8-(y,Y-Di-methylallyl)-wighteone (58) and 3'-(Y,Y-dimethylallyl)-kievi-
tone (27) showed relatively strong activity against clinically isolated
MRSAs (MIC=8 lag/mL). Licochalcone A (59), gancaonin G (60),
glyasperins C (61) and D (62), glabridin (23), licoricidin (63),
licocoumarone (64), and isoangustone A (65), Fig. (20), showed slightly
weak activity against the bacteria (MIC=16 |ig/mL) [114].
glyasperin C (61): Ri = R2 = H
8-(Y,Y-dimethylallyl)-wighteone (58): licochalcone A (59) glyasperin D (62): Ri = Me, R2 = H
Ri = R3 = R4 = H, R2 = CH2CH=CMe2 licoricidin (63):
gancaonin G (60): ^^^ Ri = H, R2 = CH2CH=CMe2
Ri = Me, R2 = R3 = R4 = H
isoangustone A (65):
Ri = R2 = H, R3 = 0H,
R4 =CH2CH=CMe2 i licocoumarone (64)
Rec-assay
licoisoflavanone (66)
""OH
Anti-HIV activity
MeO.
OMe
Fig. (22). Structures offlavonoids73 - 84 from Glycyrrhiza species and Moraceous plants.
227
Traditional Japanese women with their high soy intake, a rich source of
228
Table 7. Inhibitory activity against Bacillus subtilis HI7 and rec-assay (disk division method) of
isoprenoid-substituted phenols (75 |ig/disk), their cytotoxic activities against HSC-2 and MT-4 cells, and
other biological activities
(Licorice phenols/
Table 7 (continued)
Table 7 (c ontinued)
Broussoflavonol E ND ND 12 10
Cudraphenone B ND ND 13 ND
Cudraphenone D ND ND 20
Cycloartobiloxanthone (9) -H- ± ND ND CTC, CTL, 5LG, TAR
Heterophyllin + - ND ND CTC, CTL, 5LG, TAR
Isoalvaxanthone ND ND 14 ND
Kazinol B (81) + - 19 12 ARP,ICO,5LG,NOP
Kazinol E (37) - - <8 9 AOA, ETA, TPA
Kazinol F (38) -H- - 10 9 ETA, TPA
Kazinol N (41) ++ ~ 20 10
Kuwanon C (42) -HH- - 15 44 ABE, AFE, ARP, CTM,
(mulberrin) 5LG, 12LG, NOP, SPB,
TPA
Kuwanon G (1) -H- - 54 66 BRA, FHA, FTB, HPA,
(albanin F, moracein B) ODC, PKC, TPA
Kuwanon M (30) - - 24 7 HPA, ODC, PKC, TPA
Kuwanon R + - ND ND
Moracin C (74) ND ND 17 19 AFA
Morusin (3) ++ - <8 9 ABE, AFE, ANC, AOA,
(mulberrochromene) ARI, ARP, ATP, CTM,
FEA, FHA, FTB, ICO,
5LG, NOP, ODC, PKC,
PSO, SPB, TPA, TAR
Mulberrofiiran B ND ND 23 ND
Mulberrofliran G (25) ND ND <8 2 ARI, FEA, FHA, FTB,
(Albanol A) ODC, PA, PKC, TPA,
Norartocarpetin (83) - - 45 15 ETA, ICO
Oxydihydromorusin (46) ++ + 12 >100 AVR, FEA, FHA, FTB,
(morusinol) SPB, TPA
Sanggenol C ND ND 25 >10
Sanggenol M ND ND 10 ND
Sanggenon A (4) ND ND 23 ND
Sanggenon B (45) -hH- ± 22 ND AFE, ABE, ICO, 5LG,
NOP, TPA
Sanggenon C (5) +++ ± 13 ND ABC, ABE, AFE, FHA,
FTB, HPA, PKC, TPA
Sanggenon M (100) ND ND 21 ND
Sorocein F ND ND 24 ND
"Diameter of inhibition zone (8 mm paper disk was used), +=less than 11 mm, -H-=between 11 and 18 mm,
-H-+=more than 18 mm. Diameter of inhibition zone for kanamicin (10 |ig/disk) is 22 mm.
* Difference in diameter of inhibition zone between Bacillus subtilis M45 (rec: - ) and HI 7 (rec: +), diameter
of inhibition zone on M45 minus that on HI7; -^diameters are same, ±=less than 2 mm, +=between 2 and 5
mm, -H-=more than 5 mm. A positive control is mitomycin C (0.75 ^ig/disk): the difference of inhibition zone
is 6 mm. Inhibition zones of a negative control (kanamicin) were same for the both strains.
^CCso of doxorubicin was 2 |ag/mL.
'^ 50% Cytotoxic concentration against human T-lymphoblastoid cell line MT-4 cells without HIV infection.
" ABC = antibacterial action against a cariogenic bacterium, Streptococcus mutans [121,122];
ABE = antibacterial effect [8,123-132];
ABH = antibacterial effect against Helicobacter pylori [see the text, 126,127],
ABM = antibacterial effect against MRSA [see the text, 114, 115,133];
AFA = anti-feedant activity against silkworm [134];
AFE = antifungal effect [112,134-140];
AIA = anti-inflammatory activity [141,142];
ALA = anti-Leishmania activity [143,144];
ALR = inhibition on aldose reductase [43];
AMA = anti-mutagenic activity [145];
ANE = anti-nociceptive effects in mice [146];
AOA = antioxidant activity [123,125,147-154];
APA = anti-protozoa activity [155];
APV = anti-picomavirus activity [156];
ARI = aromatase inhibitory activity [157];
ARP = inhibition of aggregation of rabbit platelets [158,159];
ATP = anti-tumor promoting activity [see the text, 160,161];
AVC = antiviral activity against Coxsackie virus [162];
231
the breast and uterus. The finding that the soy-derived phytoestrogen
genistein (85), Fig. (23), preferentially binds to the form of the estrogen
receptor found mainly in the cardiovascular system lends some credence
to that belief [196]. It is expected by recent many evidence that phyto-
estrogens exert beneficent actions to chronic diseases, e.g., heartattacks
and other cardiovascular problems, osteoporosis, Alzheimer's disease, etc.
[197]. Nevertheless, the isoflavonoids and Ugnans bind w^ith low^
affinity to estrogen receptors, and thus, it is also suggested that they may
induce production of sex hormone binding globulin in the liver and in this
way influence sex hormone metabolism and biological effects [198].
Recently, Cooke et al. reported that genistein (85) decreased mouse
thymocyte numbers and doubled apoptosis, indicating that the mechanism
of the genistein effect on loss of thymocytes is caused in part by
increased apoptosis [199]. In addition, genistein (85) produced
suppression of humoral immunity. These data indicate that use of soy-
based infant formulas and soy/isoflavone supplements has aroused
concern: genistein (85) and daidzein (102) may be capable of producing
thymic and immune abnormalities. Therefore, the screening of phyto-
estrogen from medicinal plants may be important.
genistein ( 8 5 ) : R = OH
daidzein ( 1 0 2 ) : R = H OH 0
sophorafiavanone B ( 8 6 ) : R = OH licoflavone C (87): R^ = R2 = H
isobavachin ( 9 4 ) : R = H 8-prenylquercetin (88): R i = R2 = OH
noranhydroicaritin (93): Ri = OH, R2 = H
lupiwighteone (89)
6-prenylnaringenin ( 9 0 ) : R = H
17p-estradiol(92)
lonchocarpd A ( 9 1 ) : R = CH2CH=CMe2
Fig. (23). Structures of phytoestrogens (85, 87, 88, 93, and 102) and related compounds having no
estrogenic effect (89-91).
affinity but their binding affinities were weaker than that of 86. In the
report [197], it was also reported that a synthetic 6-prenylated isoflavone,
lupiwighteone (89), and 6-prenylated and 6,8-diprenylated flavanones, 6-
prenylnaringenin (90) and lonchocarpol A (91), Fig. (23), did not exhibit
the binding affinity against the receptor. This study indicated that the
position of the steric hydrophobic bulky group (prenyl group) is
important for the binding affinity of prenylated flavonoids.
We examined whether other types of phenols with two or more
aromatic rings bind to the estrogen receptor [45,211]. About one
hundred phenols with isoprenoid groups or without side chains from
moraceous plants and Glycyrrhiza species and synthetic flavonoids were
evaluated with the estradiol receptor-binding assay [204]. Among them,
13 compoimds exhibited weak binding affinities (1C50<1 |ig/mL) in
which three compounds were isolated from moraceous plants (95, 97, and
100), and six were constituents oi Glycyrrhiza species (24, 75, 76, 94, 99,
and 101), Fig. (24).
HOJ
tetrahydrogiabrene (96) * bH
alband B (97)
OH
Fig. (24). Estrogenic compounds from moraceous plants (95, 97, and 100) and Glycyrrhiza species (99 and
101) and synthetic estrogenic flavonoids with a isoprenoid group (96 and 98).
Table 8. Relative binding affinities of phenolic compounds for the bovine uterine estrogen receptor
Fig. (25). Molecular models of gancaonin R (75, ball and stick) and 17p-estradiol (92, stick): overlay of B
ring of 75 and A ring of 92. These molecular models were minimized with KfM2, and then calculated with
Mopac6.
104
SMERmodd(103)
Fig. (26). Structures of an imaginary compound (103) that built up with estrogenic steroids (104 - 108)
having higher binding affmities than that of 17p-estradiol (92).
SMER
Fig. (27). Overlapping of the SMER and molecular model of glycyrol (76).
[Glu 3531
H----[His 524]
[Glu 353]
[H2O]-
[H2O]'''
[H2O]-
[Arg 394]
dihydrostilbene :75
[Arg 394]
coumestan: 76
[Asp 351],^
[His 524]
[Glu 353]»
[Arg 394]
[His 524]
[Glu 353]
[H2O]'' /
[Arg 394]
[Arg 394] isobavachalcone (95)
sanggenon M (100)
Fig. (28). Orientations that flavonoids and a dihydrostilbene (75) may adopt in the binding site of the
estrogen receptor relative to 17p-eatradiol (92): the amino acid residues mean binding site of estrogen
receptor-a. A-D mean the positions of the A-D rings of 17p-estradiol but not the rings of these phenols.
A ring
Ertng
(SMERandlOO)
(SMERand97)
Fig. (29). Overiapping of the SMER (stick) and molecular model of albanol B (97, ball and stick) and
sanggenon M (100, ball and stick).
OOH H00<
= A
OH 0
kaempferoi (109)
a OCHa
OH 0
OMe
liquiritin (113): R = p-D-gtucopyranosyl poncirin(114):
R = 2-0-a-L-rhamnopyranosyl-
p-D-glucopyranosyl
isosakuranetin (115): R = H
Tabic 9. AnXi'Helicobacter pylori activities (MIC, ng/mL) of the characteristic compounds of licorices
(Glycyrrhiza glabra, G. inflata, and G. uralensis)
H3CO.
3-0-methylglycyrol (118)
OH 0
HO^ ^..^ ^ 0 ^
OH O _ . ^ ^
0CH3
OCH3
Fig. (31). Structures of compounds 117-128 isolated from the active fractions of the methanol extract of
G. uralensis and compounds 129 -131 from the dichloromethane extract of G. glabra (Russian licorice).
their anti-H. pylori activities were shown in Table 10. The MICs of the
growth of H. pylori of vestitol (119), licoricone (120), 1-methoxy-
phaseollidin (125), and gancaonol C (127), Fig. (31), were similar to that
of licoricidin (63). The activities of the other flavonoids were weak and
similar to those of glycyrrhetic acid (111) and liquiritigenin (101). All
the compounds investigated here had weaker anti-//. pylori activity;
however, these compounds may be chemopreventive agent agents the H.
pylori infection. Furthermore, these compounds may be bacteriostatic
agents for the bacteria in the stomach and prevent peptic ulcer or gastric
cancer disease in H. pylori-mfQCtcd people. However, further pharma-
cological and clinical studies including the antibacterial effect in liquid
medium are required for confirmation of this hypothesis.
Imakiire et al. also reported antibacterial activities of compound 23,
4'-0-methylglabridin (129), hispaglabridin A (130), glabrol (25) and
shinflavanone (131), Fig. (31), from the lipophilic extract of Russian
licorice, G. glabra; Maruzen P-TH® that is a material of medicines and
cosmetics [126,127].
Table 10. Anti-Helicobacter pylori activities (MIC, |ig/mL) of the flavonoids from Glycyrrhiza uralensis
ATCC 43504 ATCC 43526 ZLM 1007 ZLM 1200 GP98 (cfu)*
* (a): 2x10^ cfu, (b): 2x10^ cfu. ^ Tentative name used here.
** Positive control; clarithromycin (=CLAR) and amoxicillin (=AMOX).
244
In Japan, the extracts of mulberry tree have been used for promotion of
hair growth and prevention of baldness [263]. Testosterone
5a-reductase catalyses the reduction of testosterone to its active form,
5a-dihydrotestosterone (5a-DHT). 5a-DHT has been implicated in
certain androgen-dependent conditions such as benign prostatic
hyperplasia, acne, and male pattern boldness [264]. And 5a-reductase
activity is high in situ. Inhibitions of 5a-reductase may be usefuU for
the treatment of these diseases. Therefore we studied on 5a-reductase
inhibitory activity of some isoprenylated flavonoids isolated from the
root bark of Japanese mulberry tree [265]. Table 11 shows the
5a-reductase inhibitory activity of flavonoids isolated from the root bark
of Morus species. Most of the flavonoids had inhibitory activities
against 5a-redactase, and showed the activity in the range of 10^ - lO"''
mol/L. Kuwanon E (43) had the most potent activity of these
compounds and its IC50 value is 6.9x10"^ mol/L, while kuwanon G (1)
had no effect at 10"^ mol/L. Fig. (32) shows the effects of kuwanon E
(43) on the Lineweaver-Burk plots of rat prostate 5a-reductase activity
using testosterone as a substrate. The addition of 3x10"^ mol/L
kuwanon E (43) produced a parallel shift indicating un-competitive
inhibitor. And the apparent K\ value is 7.6x 10~^ mol/L.
Enzyme kinetic studies of inhibitor are very important for
considering as a therapeutic agent. It is interesting to note that
isoprenoid-substituted flavonoids having non-steroidal structures are
potent un-competitive inhibitors of 5a-reductase. So, it would be
expected that the isoprenoid-substituted flavonoid derivertive would be
an interesting lead compounds for testosterone 5a-reductase inhibitor.
245
REFERENCES
[1] Kitamura, S.; Murata, G., Genshoku Nihon Shokubutu Zukan, Mokuhon Hen
(Colored Illustrations of Woody Plants in Japan), Hoikusha Publishing Co.:
Osaka, 1980; Vol. 2, p. 231.
[2] Nanba, T. Genshoku Wakanyaku Zukan (Colored Illustrations of Shino-Japanese
Medicines), Hoikusha Publishing Co.: Osaka, 1980; Vol. 2, pp. 154 - 155.
[3] Kimura, K.; Kimura, T. Genshoku Nihon Yakuyo Syokubutu Zukan (Colored
Illustrations of Japanese Medicinal Plants), Hoikusha Publishing Co.: Osaka,
1981, pp. 19-20.
[4] Takahashi, S. Kampo-yaku to Sono Hattenshi (History and Development of
Shino-Japanese Medicines), Kougensha: Toyama (Japan), 1976.
[5] Kubo, M.; Tani, T. Kampo lyaku-gaku (Sino-Japanese Medication), Hirokawa
Shoten: Tokyo, 1985, pp. 1 - 2 .
[6] Otsuka, K.; Yakazu, D.; Shimizu, T.; Kampo Shinryo Iten (Dictionary of Medical
Examination and Treatment using with Shino-Japanese Medicines), Nanzandou
Publishing Co.: Tokyo, 2001; p. 71 and p. 285.
246
[7] Yamatake, Y.; Shibata, M.; Nagai, M.; Jpn. J. Pharmacol, 1976,26,461 - 469.
[8] Nomura, T. In Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products', Herz, H.;
Grisebach, H.; Kibry, G.W.; Tamm, Ch., Eds.; Springer: Vienna, 1988; Vol. 53,
pp. 8 7 - 2 0 1 and references cited therein.
[9] Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Chem. Pharm. Bull,, 1980, 28, 2548 - 2552.
[10] Nomura, H.; Fukai, T.; Narita, T.; Heterocycles, 1980,14, 1943 - 1951.
[11] Nomura, T.; Hano, Y.; Nat. Prod. Rep., 1994,11,205 - 218.
[12] Nomura, T.; Hano, Y.; Ueda, S. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry,
Atta-ur-Rahman, Ed.; Elsevier Science B. V.: Amsterdam, 1995; Vol. 17, pp. 451
-478.
[13] Nomura, T.; Yakugaku Zasshi, 2001,121, 535 - 556.
[14] Ferrari, F.; Delle Monache, F.; Suarez, A. I.; Compagnone, R.S.; Fitoterapia,
2000,77,213-215.
[15] Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Yamada, S.; Katayanagi, M.; Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1978,
26, 1394-1402.
[16] Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Hano, Y.; Sugaya, Y.; Hosoya, T.; Heterocycles, 1980,7^,
1785-1790.
[17] Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Hano, Y.; Uzawa, J.; Heterocycles, 1981, 16, 2141 -
2148.
[18] Hano, Y.; Kanzaki, R.; Fukai, T.; Nomura, T.; Heterocycles, 1997, 45, %61 - 874.
[19] Fukai, T.; Pei, Y.-H.; Nomura, T.; Xu, C.-Q.; Wu, L.-J.; Chen, Y.-J.;
Heterocycles, 1996, 43, 425 - 436.
[20] Fukai, T.; Pei, Y.-H.; Nomura, T.; Xu, C.-Q.; Wu, L.-J.; Chen, Y.-J.;
Phytochemistry, 1998, 47,273 - 280.
[21] Shen, R.; Lin, M.; Phytochemistry, 2001, 57, 1231 - 1235.
[22] Shi, Y.-Q.; Fukai, T.; Ochiai, M.; Nomura, T.; Heterocycles, 2001, 55, 13 - 20.
[23] Shi, Y.-Q.; Fukai, T.; Nomura, T.; Heterocycles, 2001, 54, 639 - 646.
[24] Nomura, T.; Hano, Y.; Fukai, T. In Recent Research Developments in Phyto-
chemistry and Phytobiology; Research Signpost: Trivandrum, 1998; Vol. 2, pp.
191-218.
[25] Nomura, T.; Hano, Y. In Basic Life Sciences', Gross, G.G.; Hemingway, R.W.;
Yoshida, T., Eds.; Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publisher: New York, 1999; Vol.
56, pp. 279-297.
[26] Nomura, T.; Pure Appl. Chem., 1999, 77, 1115 - 1118.
[27] Venkataraman, K.; Phytochemistry, 1972, 77, 1571 - 1586.
[28] Venkataraman, K. In Recent Dev. Chem. Nat. Carbon Comp.; Publishing House
of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences: Budapest, 1976; Vol. 7, pp. 39 - 61.
[29] Sultanbawa, M.U.S.; Surendrakumar, S.; Phytochemistry, 1989, 28, 599 - 605.
[30] Nomura, T.; Hano, Y,; Aida, M.; Heterocycles, 1998, 47, 1179 - 1205.
[31] Hano, Y.; Yamagami, Y.; Kobayashi, M.; Isohata, R.; Nomura, T.; Heterocycles,
1990,57,877-882.
[32] Hano, Y.; Aida, M.; Nomura, T.; Ueda, S.; J. Chem. Soc, Chem. Commun., 1992,
1177-1178.
[33] Messana, I.; Ferrari, F.; Mesquita de Araujo, M. do C ; Tetrahedron, 1988, 44,
6693-6698.
[34] Messana, I.; Ferrari, F.; Delle Monache, F.; Yunes, R.A.; Calixto, J.B.; Bisognin,
T.; Heterocycles, 1991, 32, 1287 - 1296.
247
[35] Hano, Y.; Yamanaka, J.; Nomura, T.; Momose, Y.; Heterocycles, 1995, 41, 1035
- 1043.
[36] Ferrari, F.; Messana, I.; Mesquita de Araujo, M. do C ; Planta Med., 1989, 55, 70
-72.
[37] Hano, Y.; Matsumoto, Y.; Shinohara, K.; Sun, J.-Y.; Nomura, T.; Heterocycles,
1990,57,1339-1344.
[38] Sun, N.-J.; Chang, C.-J.; Cassady, J.M.; Phytochemistry, 1998, 27, 951 - 952.
[39] Hano, Y.; Mitsui, P.; Nomura, T.; Heterocycles, 1990, 30, 1023 - 1030.
[40] Hano, Y.; Mitsui, P.; Nomura, T.; Kawai, T.; Yoshida, Y.; J. Nat Prod,, 1991,
5^1049-1055.
[41] Hano, Y.; Mitsui, P.; Nomura, T.; Heterocycles, 1990, 31, 1315 - 1324.
[42] Aida, M.; Hano, Y.; Nomura, T.; Heterocycles, 1995, 41, 2761 - 2768.
[43] Nomura, T.; Fukai, T. In Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural
Products; Herz, W.; Kirby, G.W.; Moore, R.E.; Steglich, W.; Tamm, Ch. Eds.;
Springer: Vienna, 1998; Vol. 73, pp. 1-140 and references cited therein.
[44] Fukai, T.; Med Plant Res. (Nagasaki), 2001, 24, 38 - 54.
[45] Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Akiyama, T.; Pure Appl Chem., 2002, 74, 1199 - 1206.
[46] Fukai, T.; Tantai, L.; Nomura, T.; Heterocycles, 1994, 37, 1819 - 1826.
[47] Fukai, T.; Nishizawa, J.; Yokoyama, M.; Tantai, L.; Nomura, T.; Heterocycles,
1994,5(9,1089-1098.
[48] Fukai, T.; Tantai, L.; Nomura, T.; Phytochemistry, 1996, 43, 531 - 532.
[49] Fukai, T.; Cai, B.-S.; Nomura, T.; Nat. Med., 2001, 55, 311.
[50] Fukai, T.; Cai, B.-S.; Horikoshi, T.; Nomura, T.; Phytochemistry, 1996, ^ i , 1119
-1124.
[51] Fukai, T.; Cai, B.-S.; Maruno, K.; Miyakawa, Y.; Konishi, M.; Nomura, T.
Phytochemistry, 1998, 49,2005 - 2013.
[52] McKee, T.C.; Bokesch, H.R.; McCormick, J.L.; Rashid, M.A.; Spielvogel, D.;
Gustafson, K.R.; Alavanja, M.M.; Cardellina, J.H., II; Boyd, M.R.; J. Nat. Prod.,
1997,60,431-438.
[53] Fukutome, K.; J. Physiolg. Soc Jpn., 1938, 3, 172.
[54] Ohishi, T.; Technical Bull. Sericultural Experimental Station, 1941, 59, 1 - 8 .
[55] Suzuki, B.; Sakuma, T.; Technical Bull Sericultural Experiment Station, 1941,
59,9.
[56] Katayanagi, M.; Wakana, H.; Kimura, T.; Abstract Papers of The 12th Annual
Meeting of Pharmaceutical Society of Japan', Osaka, 1959, p. 289.
[57] Tanemura, I.; Nippon Yakurigaku Zasshi (Folia Pharmacol. Jpn.), 1960, 56, 704
-711.
[58] Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Momose, Y.; Takeda, R.; Abstract Papers of The 3rd
Symposium on the Development and Application of Naturally occurring Drug
Materials; Tokyo, 1980, pp. 13 - 15.
[59] Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Matsumoto, J.; Fukushima, K.; Momose, Y.;
Heterocycles, 1981,16, 759 - 765.
[60] Fukai, T.; Hano, Y.; Hirakura, K.; Nomura, T.; Uzawa, J.; Fukushima, K.; Chem.
Pharm. Bull., 1985, i i , 3195 - 3204.
[61] Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Hano, Y.; Uzawa, J.; Heterocycles, 1982,17, 381 - 389.
[62] Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd., Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho, 1982, JP57145894; Chem.
Abstr., 98, 40575.
248
[63] Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd., Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho, 1983, JP58041894; Chem.
Abstr,, 99, 93725.
[64] Fujiki, H.; Suganuma, M.; J. Toxicol Toxin Rev., 1996, 75, 129 - 156.
[65] Fujiki, H.; Suganuma, M.; Okabe, S.; Sueoka, E.; Suga, K.; Imai, K.; Nakachi,
K.; Cancer Detection Prevention, 2000,2^, 91 - 99.
[66] Yoshizawa, S.; Horiuchi, T.; Fujiki, H.; Yoshida, T.; Okuda, T.; Sugimura, T.;
Phytother. Res., 1987,1,44-47.
[67] Fujita, Y.; Yamane, T.; Tanaka, M.; Kuwata, K.; Okuzumi, J.; Takahashi, T.;
Fujiki, H.; Okuda, T.; Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 1989, 80, 503 - 505.
[68] Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Yamada, S.; Katayanagi, M.; Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1978,
26, 1431-1436.
[69] Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Heterocycles, 1978, 9, 635 - 646.
[70] Fukai, T.; Nomura, T.; Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 1998,12, 1945 - 1951.
[71] Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Matsumoto, J.; J. Heterocyclic Chem., 1980, 77, 641 -
646.
[72] Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Hano, Y.; Yoshizawa, S.; Suganuma, M.; Fujiki, H. In
Progress in Clinical and Biological Research', Cody, V.; Middleton, E., Jr.;
Harbome, J.B.; Beretz, A., Eds.; Alan R. Liss, Inc.: New York, 1988; Vol. 280,
pp. 2 6 7 - 2 8 1 .
[73] Yoshizawa, S.; Suganuma, M.; Fujiki, H.; Fukai, T.; Nomura, T.; Sugimura, T.;
Phytother. Res., 1989, i, 193 - 195.
[74] Fukai, T.; Nomura, T.; Phytochemistry, 1988, 27,259 - 266.
[75] Okabe, S.; Ochiai, Y.; Aida, M.; Park, K.; Kim, S.-J.; Nomura, T.; Suganuma,
M.; Fujiki, H.; Jpn. J Cancer Res., 1999, 90,133 - 739.
[76] Sueoka, N.; Suganuma, M.; Sueoka, E.; Okabe, S.; Matsuyama, S.; Imai, K.;
Nakachi, K.; Fujiki, H.; Ann. N. Y. Acad Sci., 2001, 928, 21A - 280.
[77] Konoshima, T.; Takasaki, M. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry;
Atta-ur-Rahman, Ed.; Elsevier Science B.V.: Amsterdam, 2000; Vol. 24, pp. 215
-267.
[78] Akihisa, T.; Yasukawa, K. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry,
Atta-ur-Rahman, Ed.; Elsevier Science B.V.: Amsterdam, 2001; Vol. 25, pp. 3 -
42.
[79] Kimura, Y.; Okuda, H.; Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Arichi, S.; Chem. Pharm. Bull.,
1986, 34, 1223 - 1227.
[80] Kimura, Y.; Okuda, H.; Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Arichi, S.; J Nat. Prod., 1986, 49,
639-644.
[81] Reddy, G.R.; Ueda, N.; Hada, T.; Sackeyfio, A.C.; Yamamoto, S.; Hano, Y.;
Aida, M.; Nomura, T.; Biochem. Pharm., 1991, 41, 115-119.
[82] Yamamoto, T.; Furukawa, M.; Yamamoto, S.; Horie, T.; Wakanabe-Kohno, S.;
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1983, 776, 612-618.
[83] Yamamoto, S.; Ueda, N.; Hada, T.; Horie, Y.; In Flavonoids in Biology and
Medicine: Current Issues in Flavonoids Research', Das, N.P., Ed.; National
University of Singapore: Singapore, 1990, Vol. 3, pp. 435-446.
[84] Aida, M.; Yamagami, Y.; Hano, Y.; Nomura, T.; Heterocycles, 1996, 43, 2361 -
2566.
[85] Gorman, J.D.; Sack, K.E.; Davis, J.C, Jr.; New Engl. J Med., 2002, 346, 1349 -
1356.
[86] KeatingG.M.; Perry, CM.; BioDrugs, 2002. 16,\\\- 148.
249
[110] Sakagami, H.; Jiang, Y.; Kusama, K.; Atsumi, T.; Ueha, T.; Toguchi, M.;
Iwakura, I.; Satoh, K.; Fukai, T.; Nomura, T.; Anticancer Res., 2000, 20, 271 -
278.
[ I l l ] Fukai, T.; Sakagami, H.; Toguchi, M.; Takayama, P.; Iwakura, I.; Atsumi, T.
Ueha, T.; Nakashima, H.; Nomura, T.; Anticancer Res., 2000. 20,2525 - 2536.
[112] Hou, A.-J.; T. Fukai, T.; Shimazaki, M.; Sakagami, H.; Sun, H.-D.; Nomura, T.
J. Nat. Prod., 2001, 64, 65 - 70.
[113] Shi, Y.-Q.; Fukai, T.; Sakagami, H.; Chang, W.-J.; Yang, P.-Q.; Wang, F.-P.
Nomura, T.; J. Nat. Prod., 2001, 5^, 181 - 188.
[114] Hatano, T.; Shintani, Y.; Aga, Y.; Shiota, S.; Tsuchiya, T.; Yoshida, T.; Chem.
Pharm. Bull, 2000, 48, 1286-1292.
[115] Fukai, T.; Marumo, A.; Kaitou, K.; Kanda, T.; Terada, S.; Nomura, T.;
Fitoterapia, in press.
[116] Baba, M.; Asano, R.; Takigami, I.; Takahashi, T.; Ohmura, M.; Y. Okada, Y.;
Sugimoto, H.; Ariki, T.; Nishino, H.; Okuyama, T.; Biol. Pharm. Bull., 2002, 25,
247-250.
[117] Luo, S.-D.; Nemec, J.; Ning, B.-M.; Acta Bot. Yunanica, 1995, 77, 89 - 95.
[118] Manfredi, K.P.; Vallurupalli, V.; Demidova, M.; Kindscher, K.; Pannell, L.K.;
Phytochemistry, 2001, 58, 153 - 157.
[119] Wang, I.-K.; Lin-Shiau, S.-Y.; Lin, J.-K.; Eur. J. Cancer, 1999, 35, 1571-1525.
[120] Yanagisawa-Shiota, P.; Sakagami, H.; Kuribayashi, N.; lida, M.; Sakagami, T.;
Takeda, M.; Anticancer Rec, 1995, 75, 259-265.
[121] Hattori, M.; Miyachi, K.; Shu, Y.-Z.; Kakiuchi, N.; Namba, T.; Shoyakugaku
Zasshi, 1986,40,406-412.
[122] Park, W.J.; Lee, H.J.; Yang, S.G.; Yakhan Hoechi, 1990, 34, 434 - 438; Chem.
Abstr.,115,U\li4.
[123] Demizu, S.; Kajiyama, K.; Takahashi, K.; Hiraga, Y.; Yamamoto, S.; Tamura,
Y.; Okada, K.; Kinoshita, T.; Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1988, 36, 3474 - 3479.
[124] Mitscher, L.A.; Park, Y.H.; Clark, D.; Beal, J.L.; J. Nat. Prod., 1980, 43, 259 -
269.
[125] Okada, K.; Tamura, Y.; Yamamoto, M.; Inoue, Y,; Takagaki, R.; Takahashi, K.;
Demizu, S.; Kajiyama, K.; Hiraga, Y.; Kinoshita, T.; Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1989,
57,2528-2530.
[126] Imakiire, M.; Kinjo, J.; Nohara, T.; Saito, T.; Yamahira, S.; Tajiri, Y.; Kimura,
H.; Matuoka, H.; Shimizu, S.; the 14th Kyushu Branch meeting of the
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, 1997. Paper 2B-21; Japan Science and
Technology Corporation Online Information System (http://www.jst.go.jp/EN/).
CN99A0129771.
[127] Kikuchi, M.; Takizawa, H.; Wakebe, H.; Mukai, P.; Shimizu, S.; Okamatsu, H.;
Saito, T.; Yamadaira, S.; Kimura, H.; Sasaki, K.; Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho, 1992,
JP 10130161; PCT Int. Appl. (1998), Chem. Abstr., 128, 235148.
[128] Haraguchi, H.; Tanimoto, K.; Tamura, Y.; Mizutani, K.; Kinoshita, T.;
Phytochemistry, 1998, 48, 125 - 129.
[129] Pillay, C.C.N.; Jager, A.K.; Mulholland, D.A.; van Staden, J.; J.
Ethnopharmacol., 2001, 74, 231 - 2 3 7 .
[130] Fomum, Z.T.; Ayafor, J.F.; Mbafor, J.T.; Mbi, CM.; J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans.
7,1986,33-37.
251
[131] Tanaka, Y.; Kikuzaki, H.; Fukuda, S.; Nakatani, N.; J. Nutr. ScL VitaminoL, 2001,
^7,270-273.
[132] Hwang, J.O.; Ahn, D.K.; Woo, E.-R.; Kim, HJ.; Seo, S.H.; Park, H.; Nat Prod.
ScL, 1998, 4, 130 - 135; Chem. Abstr., 130, 63528.
[133] Fukui, H.; Goto, K.; Tabata, M.; Chem, Pharm. Bull, 1988, 36,4174-4176.
[134] Yasui, H.; Yazawa, M.; BioscL Biotechnol Biochem., 1995, 59, 1326 - 1327.
[135] Lane, G.A.; Sutherland, O.R.W.; Skipp, R.A.; J. Chem. Ecol, 1987, 13, 11\ -
783.
[136] Biyiti, L.; Pesando, D.; Puiseux-Dao, S.; Planta Med., 1988, 54, 126 - 128.
[137] Ingham, J.L.; Keen, N.T.; Hymowitz, T.; Phytochemistry, 1997,16, 1943 - 1946.
[138] Sato, J.; Kawai, S.; Hashimoto, W.; Murata, K.; Goto, K.; Nanjo, F.; Biocontrol
Sci.,2m\,6, 113-118.
[139] Afifi, F.U.; Al-Khalil, S.; Abdul-Haq, B.K.; Mahasneh, A.; Al-Eisawi, D.M.;
Sharaf, M.; Wong, L.K.; Schiff, P.L., Jr.; Phytother. Res,, 1991, 5, 173 - 175;
Chem. Abstr., 115,252^5.
[140] Mizobuchi, S.; Sato, Y.; Agric. Biol .Chem., 1984, 48, 2711 - 2715.
[141] Vakhabov, A.A.; Aminov, CD.; Hasanova, R.Kh.; Dokl. Akad. NaukResp. Uzb.,
1993,43-45; Chem. Abstr., 122, 96053.
[142] Aminov, S.D.; Vakhabov, A.A.; Hasanova, R.Kh.; Dokl. Akad. Nauk Resp. Uzb.,
1995, 55 - 56; Chem. Abstr,, 125, 292520.
[143] Christensen, S.B.; Ming, C ; Andersen, L.; Hjome, U.; Olsen, C.E.; Comett, C ;
Theander, T.G.; Kharazmi, A.; Planta Med,, 1994, 60, 121 - 123.
[144] Chen, M.; Christensen, S.B.; Blom, J.; Lemmich, E.; Nadelmann, L.; Fich, K.;
Theander, T.G.; Kharazmi, A.; Antimicrob. Agents Chemother,, 1993, 37, 2550 -
2556.
[145] Mitscher, L.A.; Drake, S.; Gollapudi, S.R.; Harris, J.A.; Shankel, D.M. In Basic
Life Sciences', Shankel, D.M.; Hartman, P.E.; Kada, T.; Hollander, A.; Eds.;
Plenum Press: New York, 1986; Vol. 39, pp. 153 - 165.
[146] Souza, M.M.; Bittar, M.; Cechinel-Filho, V.; Yunes, R.A.; Messana, I.; Monache,
F.D.; Ferrari, F.; Z Naturforsck, 2000,55c, 256 - 260.
[147] Gordon, M.H.; An, J.; J. Agric. Food Chem, 1995, 43, 1784 - 1788.
[148] Wang, W.; Weng, X.; Cheng, D.; Food Chem., 2000, 71, 45 - 49.
[149] Fuhrman, B.; Buch, S.; Vaya, J.; Belinky, P.A.; Coleman, R.; Hayek, T.; Aviram,
M.; Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 1997, 66, 267 - 275.
[150] Belinky, P.A.; Aviram, M.; Mahmood, S.; Vaya, J.; Free Radic. Biol. Med., 1998,
24, 1419-1429.
[151] Rosenblat, M.; Belinky, P.; Vaya, J.; Levy, R.; Hayek, T.; Coleman, R.; Merchav,
S.; Aviram, M.; J. Biol. Chem,, 1999, 274, 3790 - 13799.
[152] Belinky, P.A.; Aviram, M.; Fuhrman, B.; Rosenblat, M.; Vaya, J.;
Atherosclerosis, 1998,137,49-61,
[153] Lee, H.J.; Park, J.H.; Jang, D.I.; Ryu, J.H.; Yakhak Hoechi, 1997, 41, 439 - 443;
Chem. Abstr,, 127,23X935.
[154] Hano, Y.; Kato, T.; Tanaka, K.; Takayama, M.; Nomura, T.; Bitamin E Kenkyu
no Shinpo (Advanced studies of Vitamin E), 1995, 5, 93 - 98; Chem. Abstr,, 126,
290251.
[155] Khan, I.A.; Avery, M.A.; Burandt, C.L.; Coins, D.K.; Mikell, J.R.: Nash, T.E.;
Azadegan, A.; Walker, L.A.; J. Nat. Prod,, 2000, 63, 1414 - 1416.
252
[156] Meyer, N.D.; Haemers, A.; Mishra, L.; Pandey, H.-K.; Pieters, L.A.C.; Berghe,
D.A.V.; Vlietinck, A.J.; J. Med. Chem., 1991, 34, 736 - 746.
[157] Lee, D.; Bhat, K.P.L.; Fong, H.H.S.; Famsworth, N.R.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Kinghom,
A.D.; J. Nat. Prod., 2001, 64, 1286 - 1293.
[158] Ko, H.-H.; Yu, S.-M.; Ko, F.-N.; Teng, C.-M.; Lin, C.-N.; J. Nat. Prod., 1997, 60,
1008-1011.
[159] Lin, C.-N.; Lu, C.-M.; Lin, H.-C; Fang, S.-C; Shieh, B.-J.; Hsu, M.-F.; Wang,
J.-P.; Ko, F.-N.; Teng, C.-M.; J. Nat. Prod., 1996, 59, 834 - 838.
[160] Shibata, S.; Inoue, H.; Iwata, S.; Ma, R.-D.; Yu, L.-J.; Ueyama, H.; Takayasu, J.;
Hasegawa, T.; Tokuda, H.; Nishino, A.; Nishino, H.; Iwashima, A.; Planta Med.,
1991,57,221-224.
[161] Yamamoto, S.; Aizu, E.; Jiang, H.; Nakadate, T.; Kiyoto, I.; Wang, J.C.; Kato,
R.; Carcinogenesis, 1991, 72, 317 - 323.
[162] El-Sohly, H.N.; El-Feraly, F.S.; Joshi, A.S.; Walker, L.A.; Planta Med., 1997, 63,
348-349.
[163] Lam, Y.K.T.; Sandrino-Meinz, M.; Huang, L.; Busch, R.D.; Mellin, T.; Zink, D.;
Han, G.Q.; Planta Med., 1992, 58,221 - 222.
[164] Hatano, T.; Yasuhara, T.; Miyamoto, K.; Okuda, T.; Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1988,
36,2286-2288.
[165] Nkengfack, A.E.; Azebaze, A.G.B.; Waffo, A.K.; Fomum, Z.T.; Meyer, M.; van
Heerden, F.R.; Phytochemistry, 2001, 55, 1113 - 1120.
[166] Fujimoto, Y.; Zhang, X.X.; Kirisawa, M.; Uzawa, J.; Sumatra, M.; Chem. Pharm.
5w//., 1990,55, 1787-1789.
[167] Cheon, B.S.; Kim, Y.H.; Son, K.S.; Chang, H.W.; Kang, S.S.; Kim, H.P.; Planta
Merf., 2000, 6(5,596-600.
[168] Tamir, S.; Eizenberg, M.; Somjen, D.; Izrael, S.; Vaya, J.; J. Steroid Biochem.
Mol Biol, 2001, 78, 291-298.
[169] Tamir, S.; Eizenberg, M.; Somjen, D.; Stem, N.; Shelach, R.; Kaye, A.; Vaya, J.;
Cancer Res., 2000, 60, 5704 - 5709.
[170] Ito, C ; Itoigawa, M.; Tan, H.T.W.; Tokuda, H.; Mou, X.Y.; Mukainaka, T.;
Ishikawa, T.; Nishino, H.; Furukawa, H.; Cancer Lett., 2000, 752, 187 - 192.
[171] Biyiti, L.; Pesando, D.; Puiseux-Dao, S.; Girard, J.P.; Payan, P.; Toxicon, 1990,
2^,275-283.
[172] Yokota, T.; Nishio, H.; Kubota, Y.; Mizoguchi, M.; Pigm. Cell Res. 1998, II,
355-361.
[173] Jang, D.-L; Lee, B.-G.; Jeon, C.-O.; Jo, N.-S.; Park, J.-H.; Cho, S.-Y.; Lee, H.;
Koh, J.S.; Cosmet. Toiletries, 1997, 772, 59 - 62; Chem. Abstr., 126,255266.
[174] Likhitwitayawuid, K.; Sritularak, B., De-Eknamkul, W.; Planta Med., 2000, 66,
275-277.
[175] Lane, G.A.; Biggs, D.R.; Russell, G.B.; Sutherland, O.R.W.; Williams, E.M.;
Maindonald, J.H.; Donnell, D.J.; J. Chem. Ecol, 1985, 77, 1713 - 1735.
[176] Lin, C.-C; Lee, H.-Y.; Chang, C.-H.; Namba, T.; Hattori, M.; Phytother. Res.,
1996,10, 13 - 17; Chem. Abstr., 124,250880.
[177] Chi, Y.S.; Jong, H.G.; Son, K.H.; Chang, H.W.; Kang, S.S.; Kim, H.P.; Biochem.
Pharmacol., 2001, 62, 1185 - 1191.
[178] Su, B.-N.; Cuendet, M.; Hawthorne, M.E.; Kardono, L.B.S.; Riswan, S.; Fong,
H.H.S.; Mehta, R.G.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Kinghom, A.; J. Nat. Prod., 2002, 65, 163 -
169.
253
[179] Cespedes, C.L.; Achnine, L.; Lotina-Hennsen, B.; Salazar, J.R.; Gomez-Garibay,
F.; Calderon, J.S.; Pesticide Biochem. Physiol, 2001, 69, 63 - 76; Chem. Abstr.,
135,43628.
[180] Cotelle, N.; Bemier, J.L.; Catteau, J.P.; Henichart, J.P.; Pesando, D.; Nat. Prod
Lett/, 1993, 3, 79 - 86; Chem. Abstr,, 120,290038.
[181] Nagumo, S.; Fukuju, A.; Takayama, M.; Nagai, M.; Yanoshita, R.; Samejima, Y.;
Biol. Pharm. Bull, 1999, 22, 1144 - 1146.
[182] Kimura, Y.; Okuda, H.; Okuda, T.; Arichi, S.; Phytother. Res., 1988, 2, 140 -
145; Chem. Abstr,, 110, 33463.
[183] Nagao, M.; Morita, N.; Yahagi, T.; Shimizu, M.; Kuroyanagi, M.; Fukuoka, M.;
Yoshihara, K.; Natori, S.; Fujino, T.; Sugimura, T.; Environ. Mutagen,, 1981, 3,
401-419; Chem. Abstr,, 95, 162878.
[184] Haraguchi, H.; Yoshida, N.; Ishikawa, H.; Tamura, Y.; Mizutani, K.; Kinoshita,
T.; J. Pharm. Pharmacol, 2000, 52, 219 - 223.
[185] Pool-Zobel, B.L.; Adlercreutz, H.; Glei, M.; Liegibel, U.M.: Sittlingon, J.;
Rowland, I.; Wahala, K.; Rechkemmez, G.; Carcinogenesis, 2000, 21, 1247 -
1252.
[186] Chang, L.C.; Gerhauser, C ; Song, L.; Famsworth, N.R.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Kinghom,
A.D.; J. Nat. Prod,, 1997, 60, 869 -873.
[187] Fuhrman, B.; Volkova, N.; Rosenblat, M.; Aviram, M.; Antioxidant Redox
Signaling, 2000, 2, 491 - 506.
[188] Leigh, M.B.; Fletcher, J.S.; Fu, X.; Schmitz, F.J.; Environ. Sci. Technol, 2002,
3(5,1579-1583.
[189] Wang, J.P.; Tsao, L.T.; Raung, S.L.; Lin, C.N.; Br. J. Pharmacol, 1998, 125,
517-525.
[190] Ko, H.-H.; Wang, J.-J.; Lin, H.-C; Wang, J.-P.; Lin, C.-N.; Biochem. Biophys.
Acta, 1999,1428,293-299,
[191] Miyazawa, M.; Okuno, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Kosaka, H.; J. Agric. Food Chem,,
2000,^^,642-647.
[192] Banskota, A.H.; Tezuka, Y.; Adnyana, I.K.; Xiong, Q.; Hase, K.; Iran, K.Q.;
Tanaka, K.; Saiki, I.; Kadota, S.; Biol Pharm. Bull, 2000, 23, 456 - 460.
[193] Kobayashi, S.; Miyamoto, T.; Kimura, I.; Kimura, M.; Biol Pharm. Bull, 1995,
18, 1382-1386.
[194] Yamamoto, K.; Kakegawa, H.; Ueda, H.; Matsumoto, H.; Sudo, T.; Miki, T.;
Satoh, T.; Planta Med.; 1992, 58, 389 - 393.
[195] Mitchell, J.H.; Gardner, P.T.; McPhail, D.B.; Morrice, P.C; Collins, A.R.;
Duthie, G.G.; Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1998, 360, 142 -148.
[196] Finkel, E.; Lancet, 1998, 352, 1762.
[197] Kitaoka, M.; Kadokawa, H.; Sugano, M.; Ichikawa, K.; Taki, M.; Takaishi, S.;
lijima, Y.; Tsutsumi, S.; Boriboon, M.; Akiyama, T.; Planta Med,, 1998, 64,5\\
-515.
[198] Pino, A. M.; Valladares, L. E.; Palma, M. A.; Mancilla, A. M.; Yafiez, M.; Albala,
C ; J. Clin. Endocrinol Metab., 2000, 85, 2797 - 2880.
[199] Yellayi, S.; Naaz, A.; Szewczykowski, M.A.; Sato, T.; Woods, J.A.; Chang, J.;
Segre, M.; Allred, CD.; Helferich, W.G.; Cooke, P.S.; Proc, Natl Acad Sci.
U.S.A.,2002, 99,7616-7621,
[200] Kim, M.K.; Chung, B.C.; Yu, V.Y.; Nam, J.H.; Lee, H.C.; Huh, K.B.; Lim, S.K.;
Clin. Endocrinol, 2002, 56, 321 - 328.
254
[201] Liang, Z.; Valla, J.; Sefidvash-Hockley, S.; Rogers, J.; Li, R.; J. Neurochem.,
2002,50,807-814.
[202] Behl, C ; Moosmann. B.; BioL Chem., 2002, 383, 521 - 536.
[203] Lund, T.D.; West, T.W.; Tian, L.Y.; Bu, L.H.; Simmons, D.L.; Setchell, K.D.R.;
Adlercreutz, H.; Lephart, E.D.; BMC NeroscL, 2001, 2,20 - 32.
[204] Ichikawa, K.; Kitaoka, M.; Taki, M.; Takaishi, S.; lijima, Y.; Boriboon, M.;
Akiyama, T.; Planta Med,, 1997, 63, 540 - 543.
[205] Miyamoto, M.; Matsushita, Y.; Kiyokawa, A.; Fukuda, C; lijima, Y.; Sugano,
M.; Akiyama, T.; Planta Med., 1998, 64,516-519,
[206] Fang, H.; Tong, W.; Shi, L.M.; Blair, R.; Perkins, R.; Branham, W.; Hass, B.S.;
Xie, Q.; Dial, S.L.; Moland, C.L.; Sheehan, D.M.; Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2001,14,
280-294.
[207] Nishihara, T.; Nishikawa, J.; Kanayama, T.; Dakeyama, P.; Saito, K.; Imagawa,
M.; Takatori, S.; Kitagawa, Y.; Hori, S.; Utsumi, H.; J. Health Sci., 2000, 46,282
-298.
[208] Masuda, K.; Akiyama, T.; Taki, M.; Takaishi, S.; lijima, Y.; Yamazaki, M.; Aimi,
N.; Jato, J.; Waterman, P.G.; Planta Med., 2000, 66, 169 - 171.
[209] Minami, E.; Taki, M.; Takaishi, S.; lijima, Y.; Tsutsumi, S.; Akiyama, T.; Chem.
Pharm. Bull., 2000, 48, 389 - 392.
[210] Nishimura, S.; Taki, M.; Takaishi, S.; lijima, Y.; Akiyama, T.; Chem. Pharm.
Bull., 2000, 48, 505 - 508.
[211] Fukai, T.; Nomura, T.; Akiyama, T.; Abstract Papers of The 21st lUPAC
International Symposium on the Chemistry of Natural Products, Beijing, 1998, p.
103.
[212] Kym, P.R.; Anstead, G.M.; Pinney, K.G.; Wilson, S.R.; Katzenellenbogen, J.A.;
J. Med Chem., 1993, 36, 3910 - 3922.
[213] Brzozowski, A.M.; Pike, A.C.W.; Dauter, Z.; Hubbard, R.E.; Bonn, T.; Engstrom,
O.; Ohman, L.; Greene, G.L.; Gustafsson, J-A.; Carlquist, M.; Nature, 1997, 389,
753-758.
[214] Pike, A.C.W.; Brzozowski, A.M.; Hubbard, R.E.; Bonn, T.; Thorsell, A.-G.;
Engstrom, O.; Ljunggren J.; Gustafsson, J-A.; Carlquist, M.; EMBOJ., 1999, 18,
4608-4618.
[215] Gorden, P.; Ferguson, J.H.; Fauci, A.S.; Conference sponsors, Helicobacter
pylori in peptic ulcer disease. NIH Consensus Statement 1994 February 7 - 9 ,
Bethesda: National Institutes of Health, 1994. 12 (1): pp. 1 - 2 3 .
[216] Marshall, B.J.; Warren, J.R.; Lancet, 1984, 1311 - 1315.
[217] Marshall, B.J.; Royce, H.; Annear, D.I.; Goodwin, C.S.; Pearman, J.W.; Warren,
J.R.; Armstrong, J.A.; Microbios Lett., 1984,25, 83 - 88.
[218] Fox, J.G.; Wang, T.C.; New Engl J. Med,, 2001, 345, 829 - 832.
[219] You, W.-C; Zhang, L.; Gail, M.H.; Chang, Y.-S.; Liu, W.-D.; Ma, J.-L.; Li,
J.-Y.; Jin, M.-L.; Hu, Y.-R.; Yang, C.-S.; Blaser, M.J.; Correa, P.; Blot, W.J.;
Fraumeni, J.F., Jr., Xu, G.-W.; J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2000, 92, 1607 - 1612.
[220] Uemura, N.; Okamoto, S.; Yamamoto, S.; Matsumura, N.; Yamaguchi, S.;
Yamakido, M.; Taniyama, K.; Sasaki, N.; Schlemper, R.J.; New Engl. J. Med,,
2001; 545, 784-789.
[221] Correa, P.; Fontham, E.T.H.; Bravo, J.C; Bravo, L.E.; Ruiz, B.; Zarama, G.;
Realpe, J.L.; Malcom, G.T.; Li, D.; Johnson, W.D.; Mera, R.; J. Natl. Cancer
/«5/., 2000, 92,1881-1888.
255
[222] Gail, MH.; Browm, L.M.; You, W.-C; J. Natl Cancer Inst., 2001, 93, 559.
[223] Correa, P.; Fontham, E.T.H.; Bravo, J.C; Bravo, L.E.; Ruiz, B.; Zarama, G.;
Realpe, J.L.; Malcom, G.T.; Li, D.; Johnson, W.D.; Mera, R.; J. Natl Cancer
/«5r., 2001, Pi, 559-560.
[224] Kim, D.-H.; Bae, E.-A.; Jang, I.-S.; Han, M.J.; Arch. Pharm. Res., 1996, 19, 447
-449.
[225] Jones, N.L.; Shabib, S.; Sherman, P.M.; FEMS Microbiol Lett., 1997,146, 223 -
227.
[226] Park, J.-B.; Lee, C.-K.; Park, H.J.; Arck Pharm. Res., 1997, 20, 275 - 279.
[227] Yamada, M.; Murohisa, B.; Kitagawa, M.; Takehira, Y.; Tamakoshi, K.;
Mizushima, N.; Nakamura, T.; Hirasawa, K.; Horiuchi, T.; Oguni, L; Harada, N.;
Hara, Y.; In ACS Symposium Series; Shibamoto, T.; Terao, J.; Osawa, T.; Eds.;.
Oxford University Press: Gary, 1998; Vol. 701, pp. 217 - 238.
[228] Shetty, K.; Labbe, R.G.; Asia Pacific J. Clin. Nutr, 1998, 7, 270 - 276.
[229] Ingolfsdottir, K.; In Proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe;
Paulsen, B.S.; Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 2000; Vol. 44, pp.
25-36.
[230] Ye§ilada, E.; GUrbuz, L; Shibata, H.; J. Ethnopharmacol, 1999, 66, 289 - 293.
[231] Tabak, M.; Armon, R.; Neeman, I.; J. Ethnopharmacol, 1999, 67,269 - 277.
[232] Ohsaki, A.; Takashima, J.; Chiba, N.; Kawamura, M.; Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.,
1999,9,1109-1112.
[233] Hamasaki, N.; Ishii, E.; Tominaga, K.; Tezuka, Y.; Nagaoka, T.; Kadota, S.;
Kuroki, T.; Yano, I.; Microbiol Immunol, 2000, 44, 9 - 15.
[234] Yee, Y.-K.; Koo, M.W.-L.; Aliment. Pharmacol Ther., 2000,14, 635 - 638.
[235] Hashimoto, T.; Aga, H.; Tabuchi, A.; Shibuya, T.; Chaen, H.; Fukuda, S.;
Kurimoto, M.; Nat. Med., 1998, 52, 518 - 520.
[236] Banskota, A.H.; Tezuka, Y.; Adnyana, I.K.; Ishii, E.; Midorikawa, K.;
Matsushige, K.; Kadota, S.; Phytomed., 2001, 8, 16 - 23.
[237] Gadhi, C.A.; Benharref, A.; Jana, M.; Lozniewski, A.; J. Ethnopharmacol, 2001,
75,203-205.
[238] Wang, R.M.; Kondoh, Y.; Bamba, H.; Sekine, S.; Matsuzaki, F.; Saitama Ika
Daigaku Zasshi, 1998, 25, 215 - 223.
[239] Belogortseva, N.I.; Yoon, J.Y.; Kim, K.H.; Planta Med., 2000, 66, 217 - 220.
[240] Koga, T.; Kawada, H.; Utsui, Y.; Domon, H.; Ishii, C.; Yasuda, H.; J. Antimicrob.
Chemother., 1996, 37, 919 - 929.
[241] Ingolfsdottir, K.; Hjalmarsdottir, M.A.; Sigurdsson, A.; Gudjonsdottir, G.A.;
Brynjolfsdottir, A.; Steingrimsson, O.; Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 1997, 41,
215-217.
[242] Hashimoto, T.; Aga, H.; Chaen, H.; Fukuda, S.; Kurimoto, M.; Nat. Med., 1999,
55,27-31.
[243] Kataoka, M.; Hirata, K.; Kunikata, T.; Ushio, S.; Iwaki, K.; Ohashi, K.; Ikeda,
M.; Kurimoto, M.; J. Gastroenterol, 2001, 36, 5 - 9 .
[244] Bae, E.-A.; Han, M.J.; Kim, N.J.; Kim, D.-H.; Biol Pharm. Bull, 1998, 21, 990
-992.
[245] Kubo, J.; Lee, J.R.; Kubo, I.; J. Agric. Food Chem., 1999, 47, 533 - 537.
[246] Kim, D.-H.; Bae, E.-A.; Han, M.J.; Biol Pharm. Bull, 1999, 22,422 - 424.
[247] Bae, E.-A.; Han, M.J.; Kim, D.-H.; Planta Med., 1999, 65,442 - 443.
256
[248] Rho, T.C.; Bae, E.-A.; Kim, D.-H.; Oh, W.K.; Kim, B.Y.; Ahn, J.S.; Lee, H.S.;
Biol Pharm. Bull, 1999,22, 1141 - 1143.
[249] Tezuka, Y.; Zhao, W.; Ishii, E.; Kadota, S.; J. Traditional Med,, 1999, 7(5, 196 -
200.
[250] Bae, E.-A.; Han, M.J.; Kim, D.H; Planta Med,, 2001, 67,161 - 163.
[251] Wang, H.H.; Chung, J.G.; Ho, C.C; Wu, L.T.; Chang, S.H.; Planta Med,, 1998,
5^,176-178.
[252] Chung, J.G.; Hsia, T.C.; Kuo, H.M.; Li, Y.C.; Lee, Y.M.; Lin, S.S.; Hung, C.F.;
Toxicol in Vitro, 2001, 75, 191 - 198.
[253] Graham, D.Y.; Anderson, S.-Y.; Lang, T.; Am. J. Gastroenterol, 1999, 94, 1200
- 1202.
[254] Sasaki, Y.; Mizutani, K.; Kasai, R.; Tanaka, O.; Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1988, 36,
3491-3495.
[255] Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, Ed.; Drugs in Japan Data Base April
2001 [CD-ROM]. JPIC/Jiho: Tokyo, 2001.
[256] Fukai, T.; Marumo, A.; Kaitou, K.; Kanda, T.; Terada, S.; Nomura, T.; Life Sci.,
2002,77,1449-1463..
[257] Kim, D,-H.; Hong, S.-W.; Kim, B.-T.; Bae, E.-A.; Park, H.-Y.; Han, M.J.; Arch.
Pharm. Res,, 2000,23, 172 - 177.
[258] Takagi, K.; Ishii, Y,; Arzneimittel-Forschung, 1967, 77, 1544-1547.
[259] Shibata, S.; Saitoh, T.; Taisha, 1973, W, 619 - 625.
[260] Shibata, S.; Saitoh, T.; Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1968,16, 1392 - 1396.
[261] lovene, M.R.; Romano, M.; Pilloni, A.P.; Giordano, B.; Montella, F.; Caliendo,
S.; Tufano, M.A.; Chemother., 1999, 45, 8 - 14.
[262] Shibata, S.; Yakugaku Zasshi, 2000; 720, 849 - 862.
[263] Zaidan-hojin Tikusan-kai, Ed., Kuwa no Bunka-shi (Cultural History of
Mulberry Tree), Kyodo Publishing Co.: Matsumoto (Japan), 1986, pp. 126 - 127.
[264] Bingham, K.D.; Shaw, D.A.; J. Endocrinol, 1973, 57, 111 - 121.
[265] Yanagisawa, T.; Sato, T.; Chin, M. (Chen, Z.-X.); Mitsuhashi, H.; Fukai, T.;
Hano, Y.; Nomura, T.; In Flavonoids in Biology and Medicine: Current Issues in
Flavonoid Research, Das, N.P., Ed.; National University of Singapore: Singapore,
1990; Vol. i, pp. 557-564.
Atta-ur-Rahman (Ed.) Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, Vol. 28
© 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. 257
PLANT POLYPHENOLS:
STRUCTURE, OCCURRENCE AND BIOACTIVITY
ABSTRACT: Main dietary plant polyphenols are grouped into structural types and their
occurrence in most common foods and beverages is briefly described. The major groups
of plant polyphenols which are examined include flavonols, flavones, flavanones,
isoflavones, anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins and flavanols. The current evidence on the
absorption and the metabolism of each group is discussed. The biochemical and
pharmacological activities of plant polyphenols are summarized, including antioxidant
and anti-radical activity, chelation of metal ions, modulation of some enzymes activity,
anticarcinogenic, antiatherosclerotic, anti-inflammatory, spasmolytic, hepatoprotective,
antiviral, antimicrobial and oestrogenic activity, and inhibition of histamine release. An
overview on the epidemiological evidence linking the intake of plant polyphenols and
diminished risk of chronic diseases is also included.
INTRODUCTION
Dietary occurrence
Some herbs and spices are comparatively rich in various HBAs. After
hydrolysis, protocatechuic acid is the dominant HBA in cinnamon bark
(23-27 mg/kg), accompanied by saUcylic acid (7 mg/kg) and syringic acid
(8 mg/kg). Gallic acid dominates in clove buds (175 mg/kg) and is
accompanied by protocatechuic acid (10 mg/kg), genistic acid/4-HBA (7
mg/kg) and syringic acid (8 mg/kg) [4]. The fruit of anise {Pimpinella
anisum) contains 730-1080 mg/kg of the glucoside of 4-HBA [3].
The skin of potato tubers contains protocatechuic acid (100-400 mg/kg
FW) and vanillic acid (20-200 mg/kg) along with up to 30 mg/kg of
gallic, syringic and salicylic acids [5].
Cereals contain also different HBAs. Canadian wheat flours were
found to contain vanillic acid (up to 16 mg/kg) and syringic acid (up to 7
mg/kg). Oats contain vanillic acid, 4-HBA and salicylic acid, particularly
in the hulls [6].
Alcoholic beverages (wine and beer) have a different content of HBAs.
The gaUic acid content of French wines and spirits can reach 31-38 mg/1
260
[7]. White wines contain less HBAs than red wines, namely 16-46 and
65-126 mg/1 for white and red Califomian wines [8]. Barley contains
vanillic acid (6-17 mg/kg) and syringic acid (1-22 mg/kg), and both are
found in malt (12 mg/kg each) and hops (59 and 30 mg/kg). These two
acids are foimd in stout, ale and lager beers in the range from 0-2 mg/1)
accompanied by gaUic, protocatechuic and 4-HBA (0.1-1.8 mg/1 each)
[9].
Table 2 gives an overview of the occurrence of some HBAs in foods
[10,11] and Table 3 shows the content of the major HBAs in selected
foods [12].
Table 2. Occurrence of some HBAs in different dietary sources (10,11]
I II
%^
Fig. (2). Basic structure of cinnamic acids
261
Dietary occurrence
There is no doubt that caffeic acid is the cinnamate that occurs most
extensively, and the various caffeoylquinic acids (CQA) and
dicaffeoylqumic acids (diCQA) are the most ubiquitous conjugates.
Usually the 5-isomers dominates, but in some fruit and brassicas the 3-
isomer is prevalent. Because of the quantity commonly consumed, coffee
262
beverage must top the list, with 200 ml instant brew (2% w/v) supplying
50-150 mg CQA, mg. Blueberries, aubergines, apples, cider and green
mate are good sources in some populations [13].
However, in view of quantities consumed by other populations, wines
could make a significant contribution for tartaric acid conjugates and
grapes and grape juice for caftaric acid, respectively. Lettuce is the major
source of chicoric (dicaffeoyltartaric) and caffeoylmalic acid (up to 3
mg/100 g), but endive may have twice the concentration. Spinach is
ahnost certainly therichestsource of conjugated p-coumaric acid at some
30-35 mg/100 g [18].
Broccoli florets and leafy cruciferous vegetables will be the major
source of sugar esters and of conjugated sinapic acid (10 mg/100 g).
Tomato and tomato products are likely to be the major source of
glucosides at up to 13 mg/100 g in total, and possibly the second richest
source of conjugate/7-coumaric acid (3 mg/100 g).
Cereal bran and bran-enriched products are the most important source
of wall-bound cinnamates with up to 30 and 7 mg ferulate/10 g in maize
and wheat bran, respectively. This would make these products the richest
dietary source of ferulic acid. However, coffee brew could supply up to
10 mg ferulate (as feruloylquinic acid, FQA) per 200 ml cup [13], and it
is the first for conjugated ferulic acid , followed by Citrus juices.
Table 5. Dietary sources of individual cinnamates and each major class of conjugate [13,18]
J'
11 B 1
.<^\ ^?\,/^\e^^
1 A c II
% / ^
II
0
Fig. (3). Basic structure of 4-oxo-flavonoids
Dietary occurrence
3.1 Flavonols
r^'^4/^
II B 1
l < ^ \ /^^/^'^^K
1 M1 ^ 1
% / ^ S " " ^OH
1 0II
Fig. (4). Basic structure of Flavonols
Dietary occurrence
Flavonols are present in plant foods mainly in the leaves and in the outer
parts of plants with quercetin and kaempferol the most common ones.
Quercetin and its glycoside are ubiquitous in fruits and vegetables.
Conversely, kaempferol and myricetin are less distributed (Table 7) [21-
23].
Specific quercetin glycosides have been detected in onions (quercetin-
4'-glucoside and quercetin-3,4'-diglucoside), broccoli (quercetin-3-0-
sophoroside, kaempferol-3-(9-sophoroside), green beans (quercetin-3-0-
glucuronide) and tomatoes (rutin = quercetin-3-O-rhamnosyl-glucoside)
[24,25], red wine (rutin) and tea (rutin, quercetin-3-(9-glucoside and
quercetin-3-O-galactoside) [26].
Preparation of fruits and vegetables for consumption (for example
peeling, skinning and cooking) can decrease quercetin and kaempferol
content significantly. For example, boiling, microwave cooking and
frying of onions or tomatoes involves a decrease in the content of
flavonols by 30 to 80% [2].
266
Table 7. Content of flavonois (expressed in mg/kg or mg/1) in foods determined by HPLC metliods
after liydrolysis of tlieir glycosides [21-23]
3.2 Flavones
About 300 different aglycones have been identified, and the most
frequently are luteolin, apigenin (especially in parsley) and diosmetin (in
Citrusfruits).Among glycosides, the 7-0- and C-forais are very conunon,
and are characterized by a carbon-carbon bond between the anomeric
carbon of a sugar molecule and the Ce or Cg carbon of the flavone
nucleus. Table 8 describes the most common flavones [19].
Dietary occurrence
Flavones are found mainly in grains and herbs and not frequently in fruits.
Apigenin and chrysoeriol have been detected in parsley, while cereal
grains and herbs contain apigenin and its glycosides as well as luteolin
[21,27].
268
Table 9. Content offlavones(expressed in mg/kg or mg/1) in foods determined by HPLC metliods after
hydrolysis of tiieir glycosides [21,28]
3.3 Isoflavones
Dietary occurrence
Flavanones arise from flavones after reduction of the double bond in the
heterocycle (position C2/C3), Fig. (7).
Among aglycones, the best known are naringenin and hesperidin. Their
glycosylated forms occur commonly as O- or C-glycosides, usually as
rutinosides (6-0-a-L-rhamnosyl-D-glucosides) and neohesperidosides (2-
0-a-L-rhamnosyl-D-glucosides) attached at position 7. Flavanones
contribute to the flavour of citrus [19]. Table 12 reports the structures of
some common flavanones.
Table 12. Structure of some common flavanones
Glycosides
Hesperidin 610.57 5,3' Rli-Gluc; OCH3 7;4'
Naringin 580.54 5,4' O-Rh-Gluc 7
Rh = rhamnose = 6-dcoxy-L-mannosc (CeHnOs); Glue = glucose
OH OH
, ^ ^ ^ 4 ^ rf^^^y
^==^,
OH OH
Dietary occurrence
Flavanones are found in a small number of foods. Chick peas (with the
flavanone garbanzol), cimiin, pepperaiint (both with hesperidin),
hawthom berry, licorice, rowanberry and citrus fruits are among those
fews containing molecules of this group. Naringenin and narirutin
glycosides are present in hawthomberry and rowanberry; liquoritigenin in
licorice roots. Flavanones neohesperidose (such as naringin) are found in
grapefruit and are usually bitter; the tasteless flavanone rutinosides (such
as hesperidin) are present in oranges [35,36]. Flavanone glucosides are
comparatively rare in species but are found for instance in different herbs
[37]. Hesperidin and the aglycones naringenin, eriodictyol and hesperitin
have been reported in the herbal tea (Honeybush tea) prepared from the
legume Cyclopia intermedia [38]. Naringenin and eriodictyol have been
reported in potato [5].
Citrusfiruitsand associated products (fiuit juices, peeled freshfruit)are
a major dietary source of flavanones (Table 13) [35]. However, the
distribution is quite scattered, and much higher concentrations are found
in the solid tissues compared to the juice. For example, an individual
drinking orange juice (250 ml) will have a daily flavone intake (as
aglycones) in the range of 25-60 mg; eating the flesh of a whole orange
(200 g) will provide about 125-375 mg.
Chalcones are comparatively rare in foods. Naringenin chalcone is
present in tomato skin and may be present in juice, paste and ketchup.
Acid hydrolysis, commonly applied prior to HPLC, converts the chalcone
to the corresponding flavanone (naringenin), which is naturally present
only in trace amounts (2-15 mg/kg) in the tomato [23].
Dihydrochalcones (DHCs) are characteristic of apples and derived
products (apple juice, cider, pomace etc.), and their content depends on
272
4. Flavanols (FIavan-3-ols)
Catechins are widely distributed in plants; however, they are rich only in
tea leaves, where catechins may constitute up to 25% of dry leaf weight.
Catechins of green tea include the flavanols epicatechin, epigallocatechin,
and their gallate esters (Table 14).
Table 14. Structure of the most common catechins
OH
OH
mg/1 for EC, 20-287 mg/1 for EGC and 60-408 mg/1 for EGCg are found
[45].
During fermentation in the preparation of black tea, oxidative
polymerization of flavanols occurs with the formation of theaflavin,
theaflavingallates, thearubigins, and epitheaflavic acid [44].
Flavanols have been determined in apples, apricots, pears, cherries,
peaches and plums [47,48].
The contents of (+)-catechin and (-)-epicatechin in red wine are
relatively high (up to 208 mg/1 for catechin and 90 mg/1 for EC) [49].
Low levels of (+)-catechin (-5 mg/1) and (-)-epicatechin (-1 mg/1) have
been reported for lager beers [50].
Data on grapes are limited; qualitative studies show the presence of
(+)-catechin, (-)-epicatechin and ECg in black and white grape seeds and
skins [51].
Recently, chocolate and cocoa have gained interest because of their
contents of catechins and related polymers (procyanidin oligomers) [52].
Fruit juices processing may seriously affect flavanol content. For
example, the preparation of commercial apple juice decreased the flavanol
content in a stepwise manner. In particular, crushing and pressing, storage
of the concentrated juice at room temperature and decolorization by
treatment with activated carbon destroy theflavanolsalmost entirely [46].
secondary structures (the quinoidal base, the carinol pseuodobase and the
chalcone pseudobase) [54]. The pH changes the colour intensity of the
anthocyanins (for example, by the addition of vinegar or other acids while
cooking or processing). Commonly, anthocyanins are red in acid, violet in
neutral, and blue in alkaline solution. In fact, when cooking a food that is
red, such as red cabbage, it may be helpful to add an acidic substance
such as vinegar (or tomato juice or lemon juice) to prevent the food from
tuming purple. Anthocyanins contribute significantly to the red purple,
and blue color of flowers, many fruits of higher plants, vegetables and
associated products, beverages and preserves. Anthocyanins and
polymeric pigments derived from anthocyanins by condensation with
other flavonoids, are responsible for the color of red wine. It has been
recognized that anthocyanin-rich extracts might be used as food additives.
Many factors influence the stability of anthocyanins. Heat and light can
destroy sensitive anthocyanins during processing of fruits and vegetables.
In particular, anthocyanins are rapidly destroyed in the presence of a high
sugar concentration; thus processed foods containing large amounts of
sugar or syrup would not have the same amount of anthocyanins as their
improcessed counterparts [55],
Dietary occurrence
Food Anthocyanins
Blackberry 1150
Blueberry 825-4200
Cherry 20-4500
Cliolceberry 5060-10000
Cranberry 600-2000
Currant (blacic) 1300-4000
Grape (red) 300-7500
Orange, Blood O'uice) 2000
Raspberry, black 1700-4200
Raspberry, red 100-600
Strawberry 150-350
Cabbage, red 250
Onion up to 250
Wines, red 240-350
Wines, Porto + Marsala 140-1100
5.2 Proanthocyanidins
^<^°" r
YY^^K'^^^^OH HO^ ^«^ .0^ ^1* ^^5-^
" \ ^ - \ / ° ^ ^ v ^ V , OH
./'x
OH OH
»°\,^'-v^?\^'v^'
.1
% 4^ ^OH
Dimers:
Procyanidin B3: R3' = H Trimer.
Dietary occurence
Common sources of PAs are fruits, such as apple, strawberry, pear and
grape, beverages such as red wme and tea, and chocolate (Table 17) [59].
PAs complex protems, and are responsible for the astringency of foods
and beverages (e.g. grape skin and seeds, cider, wine) [19].
279
Food Proanthocyanidins
Apple 17-50
Apple juice nd-298
Barley 64-126
Beer 3.5-19,5
Blackberry 9-11
Cacao bean 260-1200
Cherry 10-23
Grape 1-160
Grape juice 3.546
Lentil 316-1040
Pear 0.7-12
Pear juice 11-74
Raspberry, red 2-48
Strawberry 2-50
Wines, red nd-500
5.3 Tannins
OH
HO. OH
COOH O OH
OH
HO. X. .OH
CO
/
OH2C
OH
oc—o I
oc
HO" ^ "OH
OH
1. Hydrolyzable tannins:
• Gallotannins Pentagalloylglucose
• EUagitannins and metabolites Geranin, Corilagin
• Ellagitannin oligomers Agrimoniin
2. Condensed tannins:
• Proanthocyanidlns: Procyanidlns Epicatechin oligomers
Prodelphinidins Epigallocatechin oligomers
• Galloylated proanthocyanidlns
Gut absorption
Polyphenols that are not absorbed in the stomach or small bowel will be
carried to the colon. Polyphenols that are absorbed, metabolized in the
liver and secreted with bile back to the small intestine will also reach the
colon. Here, microorganisms degrade both unabsorbed and absorbed
flavonoids. Indeed, colonic bacteria produce glycosidases,
glucuronidases, sulfatases that can strip flavonoid conjugates of their
sugar moieties, glucuronic acids and sulfates [61]. Human intestinal
bacteria are able to hydrolyse 6>-glycosides [69] as well as C-glycosides
[70]. In addition, the degradation involves the splitting of the heterocyclic
oxygen-containing C-ring. Degradation products can be absorbed [71],
and subsequently metabolized by enzymes present mainly in the liver,
where 3'-0-methylation by catechol-0-methyltransferase,
dehydroxylation, p-oxidation, and conjugation with glucuronic acid,
sulfate, and glycine occurs [72]. These metabolites are considered to
contribute to the biological effects of dietary flavonoids (antioxidants).
INTESTINE
Flavoaoid (agUcones
and glycosilated
fonns)
and products of the
microbic metabolism
FECES
Fig. (15). Metabolism of dietary flavonoids. GlcA = glucuronic acid; UGT = uridine 5'-
diphospoglucuronosyl transferase; Met = methyl; Sulf = sulfate; COMT = catechol-O-methyl
transferase; PST = phenol sulfo transferase
1. Flavonols
2. Flavones
3. Isoflavones
demethylation
dehydroxylation
intestinal glucosidases reduction
ring cleavage
equol
malonylglucosides daidzein dihydrodaidzein
acetylglucosides genistein 0-desmethylangolensin
p-glucosides p-ethylphenol
absorption
5. Flavanols - Catechins
7. Anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins
a. Anthocyanins
b. Proanthocyanidins (PA)
The PP* radical is relatively stable and could react in another reaction
as terminator, as follow:
ROOVPP*->ROO-PP
3. Anticarcinogenic activity
4. Antiatherosclerotic activity
5. Anti-inflammatory activity
7. Hepatoprotective activity
9. Oestrogenic activity
with men in the lowest category. The major sources of dietary quercetin
and other flavonols were revealed as tea and onions (fruits and vegetables
had minor importance).
The same authors [204] confirmed these results in the Seven Country
Study. The contribution of flavonols and flavones in explaining the
variance in coronary heart disease mortaUty rates across 16 cohorts from
seven countries was studied. Flavonol and flavone intake was inversely
correlated with mortality from coronary heart disease. Thesefindingare
in line with the results of a cohort study in Finnland [205], where a
significant inverse gradient was observed between dietary intake of
flavonoids and total and coronary mortality.
A modest but not significant inverse correlation between the intake of
flavonols and flavones and subsequent mortality rates was found in a
prospective cohort study of US Health Professionals by Rimm et al [206].
The authors do not exclude thatflavonoidshave a protective effect in men
with established coronary heart disease although strong evidence was
missing. Also other studies failed to demonstrate a significant statistical
association between the intake of polyphenols and CHD. In Great Britain
for instance coronary and total mortality even rose with the intake of the
majorflavonolsource, tea [207]. The most likely explanation for the latter
observation is that in this study tea consumption merely acted as a marker
for a lifestyle that favours the development of cardiovascular disease.
Indeed, men with the highest intake of tea and flavonols tended to be
manual workers, and they smoked more and ate more fat [208].
2. Risk of cancer
4. Oestrogenic effects
REFERENCES:
[8] Frankel E.N.; Waterhouse A.L.; Teissedre P.L.; J Agric. Food Chem. 1995, 43,
890-894.
[9] McMurrough I.; Roche G.P.; Cleary K.G.; J. Inst. Brewing 1984, 90, 181-187.
[10] Stohr H.; Hermann K.; Z Lebensm. Untersuch, Forsch. 1975,159, 31-37.
[11] Stohr H.; Hermann K.; Z Lebensm, Untersuch. Forsch, 1975,159, 341-348.
[12] Miller N.J.; Rice-Evans C.A.; British Food Journal 1999,2, 57-62.
[13] Clifford M.N.; J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 1033-1043.
[14] Scholz E.; Heinrich M.; Hunkler D.; Planta Med 1994, 60, 360-364.
[15] Agata L; Goto S.; Datano T.; Ishibe S.; Okuda T.; Phytochemistry 1985, 33, 508-
509.
[16] Nishizawa M.; Izuhara R.; Kaneko K.; Fujimoto Y.; Chem. Pharmaceut. Bull.
1987,55,2133-2135.
[17] Nishizawa M.; Fujimoto Y.; Chem. Pharmaceut. Bull. 1986, 34, 1419-1421.
[18] Clifford M.N.; J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79,362-372.
[19] Harbome J.B. In The Flavonoids: Advances in research since 1986; Chapman &
Hall: London, 1994.
[20] Manach C ; Regerat F.; Texier O.; Agullo G.; Demigne C ; Remsey C ; Nutrition
Research 1996,16,517-544.
[21] Hertog M.G.L.; Hollmann P.C.H.; van de Putte B.; J. Agric. Food Chem. 1993,
41, 1242-1246.
[22] Crozier A.; Lean M.E.J.; McDonald M.S.; Black C ; J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997,
42, 590-595.
[23] Justesen U,; Knuthsen P.; Leth T.; / Chromatogr. A 1998, 799,101-110.
[24] Fossen T.; Pedersen A.T.; Andersen 0.T.; Phytochemistry 1998, 47, 281 -285.
[25] Price K.R.; Colquhoun I.J.; Barnes K.A.; Rhodes M.C.; J. Agric. Food Chem.
1998, 46, 4898-4903.
[26] Price K.R.; Rhodes M.J.C.; Barnes K.A.; J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 2517-
2522.
[27] Hermann K.; Z Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch, 1988,186, 1-5.
[28] Setchell K.D.R.; Adlercreutz H.A. In Role of the Gut Flora in Toxicity and
Cancer; Rowland I.R., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1988; pp. 315-345.
[29] Metzger D.; Berry M,; AH S.; Chamber P.; Mol. EndocrinoL 1995, 9, 579-591.
[30] Miksicek R.J.; Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med 1995,208,44-50.
[31] Markiewicz L.; Garey J.; Adlerreutz H.A.; Gurpide E.; J. Steroid Biochem. Mol
Biol. 1993, 45, 399-405.
[32] Cassidy A.; Hanley B.; Lamuela-Raventos R.M.; J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80,
1044-1062.
[33] Reinli K.; Block G.; Nutr. Cancer 1996, 26, 123-148.
[34] Coward L.; Barnes N.C.; Setchell K.D.; Barnes S.; / Agric. Food Chem. 1993,
41, 1961-1967.
[35] Tomas-Barberan F.; Clifford M.N.; J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 1073-1080.
[36] Robards K.; Li X.; Antolovich M.; Boyd S.; J. Sci. Food Agric. 1997, 75, 87-101.
[37] Pietta P.G.; Gardana C ; Pietta A. In Flavonoids in health and disease 11; Rice-
Evans C.A.; Packer L., Ed.; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, 2002.
[38] Ferreira D.; Kamara B.I.; Brandt E.V.; Joubert E.; J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46,
3406-3410.
[39] Lu Y,; Foo Y.; Food Chem. 1997, 59, 187-194.
306
[40] Burda S.; Oleszek W.; Lee C.Y.; / Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 38. 945-948.
[41] Bramati L.; Minoggio M.; Gardana C ; Simonetti P.; Mauri P.L.; Pietta P.G.; J.
Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50. 5513-5519.
[42] Shahidi F.; Naczk M. In Food Phenolics: Sources, Chemistry , Effects,
Application', Lancaster PA: Technomic Publishing Co. Inc., 1995; pp. 75-101.
[43] Mayer A.M.; Harel E.; Phytochemistry 1979,18, 193-215.
[44] Graham H.N.; Prevent. Med 1992, 21, 334-350.
[45] Bronner W.E.; Beecher G.R.; 1 Chromatogr. A 1998,805,137-142.
[46] Spanos G.A.; Wrolstad R.E.; Heatherbell D.A.; J. Agric. Food Chem. 1990, 38,
1572-1579.
[47] Van Gorsel H.; Li C ; Kerbel E.L.; Smits M.; Kader A.A.; J. Agric. Food Chem.
1992, 40, 784-789.
[48] Donovan J.L.; Meyer A.S.; Waterhouse A.L.; J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46,
1247-1252.
[49] Soleas G.J.; Dam J.; Carey M.; Goldberg D.M.; J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45,
3871-3880.
[50] Madigan D.; McMurrough I.; Smyth M.R.; Analyst 1994,119, 863-868.
[51] Santos-Buelga C ; Francia-Arichia E.M.; Escribano-Bailon M.T.; Food Chem.
1995,5(5,197-201.
[52] Adamson G.E.; Lazarus S.A.; Mitchell A.E.; Prior R.L.; Cao G.; Jacobs P.H.;
Kremers B.G.; Hammerstone J.F.; Rucker R.B.; Ritter K.A.; Schmitz H.H.; J.
Agric. Food Chem. 1999,47,4184-4188.
[53] Clifford M.N.; J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 1063-1072.
[54] Brouillard R.; Cheminat A. In Plant Flavonoids in Biology and Medicne II.
Biochemical cellular and medicinal properties', Alan R. Liss, Ed.; New York,
1988; pp 93-196.
[55] Dandles O.; Saito N.; Brouillard R.; Phytochemistry 1993, 34, 119-124.
[56] Timberlake C.F.; Nat. Assoc. Colourers Quart. Inf. Bull. 1988, pp 4-15.
[57] Skrede G.; Wrolstad R,E.; Lea P.; Enersen G.; J. Food Sci. 1992, 57, MlAll,
[58] Hermann K.; Flussiges Obst 1992, 59, 66-70.
[59] Santos-Buelga C ; Scalbert A.; J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000,80,1094-1117.
[60] Okuda T. In Food and Free Radicals', Hiramatsu H., Ed.; Plenum Press: New
York, 1997; pp31-48.
[61] Kuhnau J.; World Rev. Nutr. Diet 1976, 24, 117-191.
[62] Gee J.M.; Dupont M.S.; Rhodes M.J.C.; Johnson I.T.; Free Radic. Bio. Med 1998,
25, 19-25.
[63] Scalbert A.; Williamson G.; J. Nutr. 2000,130, 2073S-2085S.
[64] Aziz A.A.; Edwards C.A.; Lean M.E.J.; Crozier A.; Free Radic. Res. 1998, 29,
257-269.
[65] Mauri P.L.; lemoli L.; Bardana C ; Riso P.; Simonetti P.; Porcini M.; Pietta P.G.;
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1999,13, 924-931.
[66] Ishii K.; Furuta T.; Kasuya Y.; / Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 56-59.
[67] Murkovic M.; Toplak H.; Adam U.; Pfannhauser W.; J. Food Composition Anal.
2000,75,291-296.
[68] Cao G.; Muccitelli H.U.; Sanchez-Moreno C ; Prior R.L.; Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001,
73, 920-926.
[69] Scheline R.R.; Pharmacol. Rev. 1973, 25,451-453.
307
[70] Hattori M.; Shu Y.Z.; El-Sedawy Al; Namba T.; Kobashi K.; Tomimori T.; J.
Nat. Prod. 1988, 57, 874-878.
[71] Pietta P.G.; Gardana C ; Mauri P.L.; J. Chromatogr. B 1997, 693, 249-255.
[72] Pietta P.O.; Simonetti P. In Antioxidant Food Supplements in Human Health;
Packer L.; Hiramatsu M.; Yoshikawa T., Ed.; C.H.I.P.S.: Weimar, Texas, 1999;
pp 283-308.
[73] Manach C ; Morand C ; Crespy V.; Demigne C ; Texier O.; Regerat F.; Remesey
C ; FEBS Letters 1998, 426, 331-336.
[74] Conquer J.A.; Maiani G.; Azzimi E.; Raguzzini A.; Holub B.J.; J. Nutr. 1998,
J 28,593-597.
[75] Young J.F.; Salka E.N.; Haraldsdottir J.; Daneshvar B.; Lauridsen S.T.; Knuthsen
P.; Crozier A.; Sandstrom B.; Dragsted L.O.; Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999, 69, 87-94.
[76] Hollmann P.C.H.; de Vries J.H.M.; van Leeuwen S.D.; Mengelers M.J.B.; Katan
MB,; Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995, 62, 1276-1282.
[77] Erlund I.; Kosonen T.; Alfthan G.; Maenpaa J.; Perttunen K.; Kenraali J.;
Parantainen J.; Aro A.; Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2000, 56, 545-535.
[78] Sesnik A.L.A.; O'Leary K. A.; Hollmann ?.C.K;JNutr 2001,131,1938-1941.
[79] Hollmann P.C.H.; van der Gaag M.S.; Mengelers M.J.B.; van Trijp J.M.P.; de
Vries J.H.M.; Katan M.B.; Free Radic. Biol Med 1996, 21, lOS-lOl.
[80] Hollmann P.C.H.; van Trijp J.M.P.; Buysman M.N.C.P.; van der Gaag M.S.;
Mengelers M.J.B.; de Vries J.H.M.; Katan M.B.; FEBS Lett. 1997, 418, 152-156.
[81] Hollmann P.C.H.; Buysman M.N.C.P.; van Gameren Y.; Cnossen P.J.; de Vries
J.H.M.; Katan M.B.; Free Radic. Res. 1999, 31, 569-573.
[82] Olthof M.R.; Hollmann P.C.H.; Vree T.B.; Katan M.B.; J Nutr. 2000, 130, 1200-
1203.
[83] Engelhardt U.; Finger A.; Herzig B.; Kuhr S.; Deutsche Lebensmittel Rundschau
1992, 88, 69-73.
[84] Kiviranta J.; Huovinen K.; Hiltunen R.; Acta Pharmaceutica Fennica 1988, 97,
67-72.
[85] Shimoi K.; Okada H.; Furugori M.; Goda T.; Takase S.; Suzuki M.; Hara Y.;
Yamamoto H.; Kinae N.; FEBS Lett. 1998,438, IIO-IIA.
[86] Bordello S.P.; Setchell K.D.R.; Axelson M.; Lawson A.M.; J. Appl. Bacteriol.
1985, 58, 37-43.
[87] Joannou G.E.; Kelly G.E.; Reeder A.Y.; Waring M.A.; Nelson C ; J. Steroid
Biochem. Mol. Biol 1995, 54, 167-184.
[88] Setchell K.D.R.; Borriello S.P.; Hulme P.; Kirk D.N.; Axelson M.; Am. J. Clin.
Nutr 1984, 40, 569-578.
[89] Kelly G.E.; Joannou G.E.; Reeder A.Y.; Nelson C ; Waring M.A.; P.S.E.B.M.
1995, 208,40-43.
[90] Lampe J.W.; Karr S.C; Hutchins A.M.; Slavin J.L.; Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol Med.
1998,2/7,335-339.
[91] Setchell K.D.R.; Cassidy A.; J. Nutr. 1999,129,15SS'161S.
[92] Rowland I.R., Wiseman H.; Sanders T.A.; Adlercreutz H.; Bo E.A.; Nutr. Cancer
2000, 36, 27-32.
[93] Setchell K.D.R.; Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 68, 1333S-1346S.
[94] Cruz M.L.A.; Wong W.W.; Mimouni F.; Hachey D.L.; Setchell K.D.R.; Klein
P.D.; Tsang R.C.; Pediatr. Res. 1994, 35, 135-140.
308
[95] Setchell K.D.R.; Nechemias-Zimmer L.; Cai L.; Heubi J.E.; Lancet 1997, 350,
23-27.
[96] Fuhr U.; Kummert A.L.; Clin, Pharmacol. Ther. 1995,58, 365-373.
[97] Lee Y.S.; Reidenberg M.M.; Pharmacology 1998,56,314-317.
[98] Choudhury R.; Chowrimootoo G.; Srai K.; Debnam E.; Rice-Evans C.A.;
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999,265,410-415.
[99] Erlund I.; Meririnne E.; Alfthan G.; Aro A.; J. Nutr. 2001,131, 235-241.
[100] Das N.P.; Biochem. Pharmacol 1971,20, 3435-3445.
[101] Hackett A.M. In Plant Flavonoids in Biology and Medicine: Biochemical,
Pharmacological and Structure Activity Relationship-, Goody V.; Middleton E.;
Harbome J.B., Ed.; Liss: New York, 1986; pp. 177-194.
[102] Lee M.J.; Wang Z.Y.; Li H.; Chen L.; Sun Y.; Gobbo S.; Balentine D.A.; Yang
C.S.; Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev, 1995,4,393-399.
[103] Da Silva E.L.; Piskula M.; Terao J.; Free Rad. Biol. Med. 1998, 24, 1209-1216.
[104] Baba S.; Osakabe N.; Yasuda A.; Natsume M.; Takizawa T.; Nakamura T.;
Terao.; Free Radic. Res. 2000,33,635-641.
[105] Rein D.; Lotito S.; Holt R.R.; Keen C.L.; Schmitz H.H.; Fraga C.G.; J. Nutr.
2000,/iO,2109S-2114S.
[106] Wang J.F.; Schramm D.D.; Holt R.R.; Ensunsa J.L.; Fraga C.G.; Schmitz H.H.;
Keen C.L.; / Nutr. 2000,130,2115S-2119S.
[107] Warden B.A.; Smith L.S.; Beecher G.R.; Balentine D.A.; Clevidence B.A.; J.
Nutr. 2001,131, 1731-1737.
[108] Pietta P.G.; Simonetti P.; Gardana C.; Brusamolino A.; Morazzoni P.; Bombardeli
E.; Biofactors 1998, 8, 111-118.
[109] Li C.; Meng X.; Winnik B.; Lee M.J.; Hong L.; Sheng S.; Buckley B.; Yang C.S.;
Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001,14, 702-707.
[110] Majiach C.; Texier O.; Morand C.; Crespy V.; Regerat F.; Demigne C.; Remeesy
C.; Free Radic. Biol. Med 1999, 27, 1259-1266.
[Ill] Chow H.H.S.; Yan C ; Alberts D.S.; Hakim L; Dorr R.; Shahi F.; Crowell J.A.;
Yang C.S.; Hara Y.; Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 1998, 7, 351-354.
[112] Cheeson A.; Provenza F.; Russell W.R.; ScoUare D.J.; Richart C ; Steward C ; J.
Sci. FoodAgric. 1999, 79, 373-378.
[113] Bourne L.C.; Rice-Evans C.A.; Free Radic. Res. 1998,28,429-438.
[114] Bourne L.C.; Rice-Evans C.A.; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998,255, 222-
227.
[115] Simonetti P.; Gardana C ; Pietta P.G.; J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 5964-5968.
[116] Cao G.; Prior R.L.; Clin. Chem. 1999, 45, 574-576.
[117] Lapidot T.; Harel S.; Granit R.; Kanner J.; J. Agric. Food Chem 1998, 46, 4297-
4302.
[118] Deprez S.; Biomarquage de Tanins Condenses et Etude de Leur Biodisponibilite
dans I'Organisme Humain, Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, Paris,
France, 1999, pp 164.
[119] Jimenez-Ramsey L.M.; Rogler J.C; Housley T.L.; Butler L.G.; Elkin R.G.; J.
Agric. Food Chem. 1994,42, 963-967.
[120] Terrill T.H.; Waghom G.C.; Woolley D.J.:, McNabb W.C; Barry T.N.; Br. J
Nutr. 1994, 72, 461 All.
[121] Duthie G.G.; Crozier A.; Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2000, / / , 43-47.
309
122] Laranjinha J.A.; Almeida L.M.; Madeira V.M.; Biochem. Pharmacol 1994, 48,
487-494.
123] Nardini M.; D'Aquino M.; Tomassi G.; Gentili V.; Di Felice M.; Scaccini C ;
FreeRadic. Biol Med, 1995,19, 541-552.
124] Abu-Amsha R.; Croft K.D.; Puddey I.B.; Proudfoot J.M.; Beilin L.J.; Clin. ScL
(Lond) 1996, 91,449A5S,
125] Pietta P.; 1 Nat. Prod 2000, 63, 1035-1042.
126] Buettner G.R.; Arch. Biochem. Biophis. 1993,300, 535-543,
127] Bors W; Buettner GR. In Vitamin C in health and disease. Packer L.; Fuchs J.,
Ed.; Dekker: New York, 1997; pp. 95-74.
128] Cao G.; Sofic E.; Prior R.L.; Free Radic. Biol Med. 1997,22,749-60
129] Yamanaka N.; Oda O.; Nagao S.; FEBSLett. 1997, 405,186-90.
130] Moran J.F.; Klukas R.V.; Grayer R,J.; Abian J.; Becana M.; Free Radic. Biol
Med 1997,22,861-70.
131] Manthey J.A.; Microcirculation 2000, 7, S29-34.
132] Middleton E. Jr; Kandaswami C.; Theoharides T.C.; Pharmacol Rev. 2000, 52,
673-751.
133] Packer L.; Rimbach G.; Virgili F.; Free Rad. Biol Med. 1999,27, 704-724.
134] Grace S.C; Salgo M.G.; Pryor W.A.; FEBSLett. 1998, 426,24-28.
135] Lodovici M.; Guglielmini F.; Meoni M.; Dolara P.; Food Chem. Toxicol 2001,
39, 1205-1210.
136] Li A.S.; Bandy B.; Tsang S.S.; Davison A.J.; Free Radic. Res. 2000, 33, 551-566.
137] Shibata H.; Sakamoto Y.; Oka M.; Kono Y.; BioscL Biotechnol Biochem. 1999,
63, 1295-1297.
138] Sierens J.; Hartley J.A,; Campbell M.J.; Leathern A.J.; Woodside J.V.; Mutat.
Res, 2Q01, 485,169-116,
139] Win W.; Cao Z.; Peng X.; Trush M.A.; Li Y.; Mutat. Res. 2002, 513, 113-120.
140] Noroozi M.; Angerson W.J.; Lean M.E.J.; Am, J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 67, 1210-
1218.
141] Johnson M.K.; Loo G.; Mutat. Res. 2000, 459,211-218.
142] Fabiani R.; De Bartolomeo A.; Rosignoli P.; Morozzi G.; Nutr. Cancer 2001, 39,
284-291.
143] Aheme S.A.; O'Brien S.M.; Free Radic. Biol Med. 2000,29, 507-514.
144] Kanazawa K.; Yamashita T.; Ashida H.; Danno G.; BioscL Biotechnol Biochem.
1998, 62, 970-977.
145] Musonda C.A.; Helsby N.; Chipman J.K.; Hum. Exp. Toxicol 1997,16, 700-708.
146] Muto S.; Fujita K.; Yamazaki Y.; Kamataki T.; Mutat. Res. 2001, 479, 197-206.
147] Obermeier M.T.; White R.E.; Yang C.S.; Xenobiotica 1995,25, 575-584.
148] Siess M.H.; Mass J.P.; Carivenc-Lavier M.C.; Suchetet M.; J. Toxicol Environ.
Health 1996, 49,4SI-496.
149] Zhai S.; Dai R.; Friedman F.K.; Vestal R.E.; Drug. Metab. Disp. 1998, 26, 989-
992.
150] Gandhi R.K.; Kanduja K.L.; J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 1993,14, 107-112.
151] Inoue M.; Suzuki R. Sakaguchi N.; Li Z.; Takeda T.; Ogihara Y.; Jiang B.Y.;
Chen Y.; Biol Pharmaceut. Bull 1995,18, 1526-1530.
[152] Tanaka T.; Mori H.; In Seizieme Collogue Scientifiquelnternational sur le Cafe;
ASIC, Paris, 1995, pp. 79-87.
310
[153] Mahmoud N.N.; Carothers A.M.; Grunberger D.; Bilinski R.T.; Churchill M.R.;
Martucci C; Newmark H.L.; Bertagnolli M.M.; Carcinogenesis 2000, 21, 921-
927.
[154] Tseng T.H.; Kao T.W.; Chu C.Y.; Chou F.P.; Lin W.L.; Wang C.J.; Biochem.
Pharmacol 2000, 60,307-315.
[155] Ahmad N.; Feyes D.K.; Nieminen A.L.; Argawal R.; Mujhtar H; J, Natl Cancer
/wj/. 1997, «P, 1881-1886.
[156] Chen Z.P.; Schell J.B.;Ho C.T.; Chen K.Y.; Cancer Lett. 1998,129, 173-179.
[157] Saeki K.; Sano M.; Miyase T.; Nakamura Y.; Hara Y.; Aoyagi Y; Isemura M.;
BioscL Biotechnol Biochem, 1999, 63, 585-587.
[158] Romero I.; Paez A.; Femielo A. Lujuan M. Berenguer A.; BJUInt. 2002, 89, 950-
954.
[159] Westhuyzen J.;.4nn. Clin. Lab. Sci. 1997,27, 1-10.
[160] Ross R.; New Engl J. Med. 1999, 340, 115-126.
[161] Heincckc J.W.; Atherosclerosis 199S, 141, 1-15.
[162] Hodgson J.M.; Proudfoot J.M.; Croft K.D.; Puddey I.B.; Mori T.A.; Beilin L.J.;
J. ScL Agric. FoodAgric. 1999, 79, 561-566.
[163] Kerry N.; kVbtyU., Atherosclerosis 1999,140, 341-347.
[164] Rifici V.A.; Stephen E.M.; Schneider S.H.; Khachadurian A.K.; J. Am. Coll Nutr.
1999,18, 137-143.
[165] Zhu Q.Y.; Huang Y.; Tsang D.; Chen Z.Y.; J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 2020-
2025.
[166] Wang W.Q.;GoodmanM.T.;M//r. Res. 1999,19, 191-202.
[167] Carbonneau M.A.; Leger C.L.; Descomp B.; Michel F.; Monnier L.; J. Am. Oil
Chem. Soc. 1998, 75,235-240.
[168] Nigdikar S.V.; Williams N.R.; Griffin B.A.; Howard A.N.; Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
199,8, 68, 258-265.
[169] Kritz H.; Sinzinger H.; Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 1997,109, 944-988.
[170] Ruf J.C; Drugs Exp. Clin. Res. 1999, 25, 125-31.
[171] Pellegrini N.; Pareti F:I.; Stabile F.; Brusamolino A.; Simonetti P.; Eur. J. Clin.
iVw/r. 1996,50,209-213.
[172] Robak J.; Gryglewski R.J.; Pol J. Pharmacol 1996, 48, 555-64.
[173] Tzeng S.H.; Ko W.C; Ko F.N.; Teng CM.; Thromb. Res. 1991, 64, 91-100.
[174] Di Carlo G.; MascoloN.; Izzo A.A.; Capasso F.; Life ScL 1999, 65, 337-353.
[175] Elliot A.J.; Scheiber S.A.; Thomas C ; Pardini R.S.; Biochem. Pharmacol 1992,
44, 1603-1608.
[176] Landolfi R.; Mower R.L.; Steiner M.; Biochem. Pharmacol 1984,33, 1525-1530,
[177] Pikaar N.A.; Wedel M.; van der Beek E.J.; van Dokkum W.; Kempen H.J.; Kluft
C;. Ockhuizen T.; Hermus R.J.; Metabolism 1987,36, 538-43.
[178] Rein D.; Paglieroni T.D.; Pearson D.A.; Wun T.; Schimtz H.H.; Gosselin R.;
Keen C.L.; 1 Nutr. 2000,130, S 2120-2126.
[179] Russo P.; Tedesco I.; Russo M.; Russo G.L.; Venezia A.; Cicala C ; Nutr. Metab.
Cardiovasc. Dis. 2001,//, 25-29.
[180] Dennis D.; Falgueyret J.P.; Riendeau D.; Abramovitz M.; J. Biol Chem. 1991,
266, 5072-5079.
[181] Kalkbrenner F.; Wurm G.; von Bruchhausen F.; Pharmacology 1992, 44, 1-12.
[182] S,mii\iV^.L.',Am. J. Physiol 1992, 263, F181-F191.
311
[183] Melzig M.F.; Pertz H.H.; Krenn L.; Phytomedicine 2001, 8, 225-229.
[184] Yamada K.; Shoji K.; Mori M.; Ueyama T.; Matsuo N.; Oka S.; Nishiyama K.;
Sugano M.; In Vitro CellDev. Biol Anim. 1999, 35, 169-174.
[185] Matsuo N.; Yamada K.; Shoji K.; Mori M.; Sugano M.; Allergy 1997, 52, 58-64.
[186] Peres W.; Tunon M.J.; CoUado P.S.; Herrmann S.; Marroni N.; Gonzalcz-Gallego
J.; J. Hepatology 2000, i i , 742-750.
[187] Bosio K.; Avanzini C ; D'Avolio A.; Ozino O.; Savoia D.; Lett. Appl Microbiol.
2000,57,174-177.
[188] Hegazi A.G.; Abd El Hady F.K.; Abd Allah F.A.; Z Naturforsch 2000,55, 70-75.
[189] Lin Y.M.; Flavin M.T.; Cassidy C.S.; Mar A.; Chen F.C.; Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Le//. 2001,//, 2101-2104.
[190] Puupponen-Pimia R.; Nohynek L.; Meier C ; Kahkonen M.; Heinonen M.; Hopia
A.; Oksman-Caldentey K.M.; J. Appl Microbiol 2001, 90,494-507.
[191] Rauha J.P.; Remes S.; Heinonen M.; Hopia A.; Kahkonen M.; Kujala T.; Pihlaja
K.; Vuorela H.; Vuorela P.; Int. J. Food. Microbiol 2000, 56, 3-12.
[192] Yamamoto H.; Ogawa T.; Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2002, 66, 921-924.
[193] Selway J.W.T.; In Plant Flavonoids in Biology and Medicine: Biochemical,
Pharmacological, and Structure-Activity Relationships, Cody V., Middleton E.
and Harbome J.B., Ed.; Alan R. Liss, Inc.: New York, 1986, pp 521-536.
[194] Nakayama M.; Suzuki K.; Toda M.; Okubo S.; Hara Y.; Shimamura T.; Antiviral
Res. 1993,21,289-299.
[195] Adlercreutz H.; Mazur W.; Ann. Med 1997, 29, 95-120.
[196] Knight D.C.; Eden J.A.; Obstet. Gynecol 1996, 87, 897-904.
[197] Martinex-Campos A.; Amara J.; Dannies P.; Mol Cell Endocrinol 1986, 48, Ml-
133.
[198] Gardner CD.; Newell K.A.; Cherin R.; Haskell W.L.; Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 73,
728r35.
[199] Potter S.M.; Baum J.A.; Teng H.; Stillman R.J.; Shay N.F.; Erdman J.W. Jr.; Am.
J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 68, 1375S.1379S,
[200] Geleijnse J.M., Launer L.J.; Hofmann A.; Pols H.A.P.; Witteman J.C.M.;
Archives of Internal Medicine 1999,159, 2170-2174.
[201] Renaud S.; de Longeril M.; Lancet 1992, 339, 1523-1526.
[202] Frankel E.N.; Kanner J.; German J.B.; Parks E.; Kinsella J.E.; Lancet 1993, 341,
454-457.
[203] Hertog M.G.L.; Feskens E.J.M.; Hollman P.C.H.; Katan M.B.; Kromhout D.;
Lancet 1993, 342,1001-1011.
[204] Hertog M.G.L.; Kromhout D.; Aravanis C ; Blackburn H.; Buzina R.; Fidanza F.;
Giampaoli S.; Jansen A.; Menotti A.; Nedeljkovic S.; Pekkarinen M.; Simic B.S.;
Toshima H.; Feskens E.J.M.; Hollman P.C.H.; Katan M.B.; Arch. Intern. Med.
1995,755,381-386.
[205] Knekt P.; Jarvinen R.; Reunanen A.; Maatela J.; BMJ1996, 312,478-481.
[206] Rimm E.B.; Katan M.B.; Ascherio A.; Stampfer M.J.; Willett W.C; Ann. Intern.
Med 1996, 725,384-389.
[207] Hertog M.G.L.; Sweetnam P.M.; Fehily A.M.; Elwood P.C.; Kromhout D.; Am. J.
Clin. Nutr 1997, 65, 1489-1494.
[208] Katan M.B.; Hollman P.C.H.; Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 1998,8, 1-4.
312
[209] Hertog M.G.L.; Feskens E.J.M.; Hollman P.C.H.; Nutr. Cancer 1994, 22, 175-
184.
[210] Knekt P.; Jarvinen R.; Seppanen R.; Heliovaara M.; Teppo L.; Pukkala E.;
Aromaa A.; Am. J. Epidemiol 1997,146, 223-230.
[211] Kohlmeier L ; Weterings K.G.; Steck S.; Kok F.J.; Nutr. Cancer 1997, 27,1-13.
[212] Imai K.; Suga K.; Nakachi K.; Prev. Med, 1997,26,769-775.
[213] Moline J.; Bukharovich I.F.; Wolff M.S.; Philips R.; Medical Hypotheses 2000,
55, 306-309.
[214] Imai K.; Nakachi K.; BMJ1995, 310,693-696.
[215] Kono S.; Shinich K.; Wakabayashi K. et al.; J. Epidemiol 1996, 6, 128-133.
[216] Cassidy A.; Bingham S.; Setchell K.; Br. J. Nutr. 1995, 74, 587-601.
[217] Ho C.S., Woo J.L.F.; Leung S.S.F.; Sham A.L.K.; Lam T.H.; Janus E.D.; J. Nutr.
2000,130, 2590-2593.
[218] de Kleijn M.J.J.; van der Schouw Y.T.; Wilson P.W.F.; Grobbee D.E.; Jacques
P.F.; J. Nutr. 2002,132, lie-lZl.
[219] Parkin D.M.; Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol 1989,25, 1917-1925.
[220] Ziegler R.G.; Hoover R.N.; Pike M.C.; Hildesheim A.; Nomura A.M.; West
D.W.; Wu-Williams A.H.; Kolonel L.N.; Horn-Ross P.L.; Rosenthal J.F.; et al.; J
Natl Cancer Inst. 1993,55, 1819-1827.
[221] Rose D.P.; Boyar A.P.; Wynder E.L.; Cancer 1986,58, 2363-2371.
[222] Ingram D.; Sanders K.; Kolybaba M.; Lopez D.; Lancet 1997,350, 990-994.
[223] Wu A.H.; Ziegler R.G.; Horn-Ross P.L.; Nomura A.M.; West D.W.; Kolonel
L.N.; Rosenthal J.F.; Hoover R.N.; Pike M.C.; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers
Prev. 1996, 5, 901-906.
[224] Lee H.P.; Gourley L ; Duffy S.W.; Esteve J.; Lee J.; Day N.E.; Lancet 1991, 337,
1197-1200.
[225] Goodman M.T.; Wilkens L.; Hankin J.H.; Lyu L.C.; Wu A.H.; Kolonel L.N.; Am.
J. Epidemiol 1997,146,294-306.
[226] Adlercreutz H.; Fotsis T.; Bannwart C ; Wahala K.; Makela T.; Brunow G.; Hase
T.; J. Steroid. Biochem. 1986,25, 791-797.
[227] Kao P.C.; P'eng F.K.; Chin. Med. J. 1995, 55,209-213.
[228] Ho S.C.; Bacon W.E.; Harris T.; Looker A.; Maggi S.; Am. J. Public Health.
1993, 83, 694-697.
Atta-ur-Rahman (Ed.) Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, Vol. 28
© 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. 313
INTRODUCTION
COOH
Hocx:
Crocctin
COO
OOC
R1-OH2C
R2-OH2C
COO
QOC
HOH2C /^OHa'
O^^^OH O^' OH
Crocetin-(B-D-gcntiobiose)-(6-D-glucosyi)-cstcr
Crocetin-di-(fi-D-glucosyl)-ester
3.00D
1 i1
(15 ml/kg) ( • , n=27 ) and in the shces
(7) treated with 30% of ethanol (15 ml/kg) and
(16) # 20 mg/kg crocin ( A , n=7). (1) and (2)
OLJE (27) indicated 30% ethanol of 15 ml/kg and 10
(7)
ml/kg, respective^. Ethanol or crocin was
added in the perfusing ACSF from 15 or 20
Co«t
( 1 ) ( 2 ) 10 20 30 min, respectively, before tetanic stimulation.
Crocin (mg/kg) The ordinate indicates the population spike
+ 30% EtOH(15 ml/kg) an^Utude expressed as a percentage of the
baseline values immediately before tetanic
stimulation.
B: Summary of the effects of ethanol and crocin on the induction of LTP. The magnitude of LTP was evaluated
with the population spike an^)litude 30 min after tetanic stimulation. The numbers of observations in each
groiq) are shown in parentheses. All data are represented as the mean ± SEM *^p<0.01 vs. control, ^p<0.05 vs.
30% of ethanol (15 ml/kg) alone. Duncan's multiple range test.
318
Ettianoi (mM)
319
Lane 1: cx>flliol
99 ^i !#• Lane 2: TNF adone
5000-
3000- Lane 3: TNF+1JJL M crocta
Lane 4: TNF+10/zM crocin
1500-
1000- Lane 5:10/i M crocin alone
1 2 3 4 5
Fig.(6). Morphological appearance of PC-12 cells treated for 24 h with vehicle alone (panel A), TNF-a
(500 units/ml) alone (panel B), or TNF-a (500 units/ml) plus 10 \»M crocin (panel C). In panel D,
inlemucleosomal DNAfragmentationwas detected by agarose gel electrophoresis of DNA extracted from cells
treated for 24 h.
321
control -i»~TNF.a(500 U)
IOMM crodn -•><-TNF +0.1 MM crodn
TNF +l/iM crocin -A^TNF +10/1M crocin
Time (h)
Flg.(7). Effect of crocin on TNF-a-induced activation of caspase-3 in PC-12 cells. Cells were incubated
for the indicated periods in GIT medium supplemented with vehicle alone, TNF-a alone, crocin alone, or their
combination. After lysis of the cells, caspase-3 activity was assayed as described in Materials and methods.
Each bar represents the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. M P<0.01; ###P<0.001, compared to
TNF-a alone.
a control
BIOMM crodn
fife "rNF-a (500U)
0TNF+lAiM crocin
OTNF+5/xM crodn
DTNF+IOMM crocin
3 18
TlmeCh)
3 18
Time (h)
Fig.(8). RT-PCR analyses of TNF-a and/or crocin-treated PC-12 cell lysates for the mRNA expression of
anti-apoptotic proteins, BC1-XL and Bcl-2. The experimental procedures were those described in Materials and
methods. The bands in agarose gel were visualized and photographed under UVradiation.The i^otographs
were scanned and quantified by using an NIH Imager. The expression of GAPDH mRNA was used as a control.
Each bar represents the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. *P<0.05; *• P<0.01; ***P<0.001,
compared to the control. #P<0.05; ## P<0.01; ###P<0.001, compared to TNF- a alone.
324
o control
"^lO/iMcrocin
•TNF-a (500U)
OTNF+lMMcrodn
OTNF+5MMcrodn
aiNF+lO/xMcroclD
3 18
Time(h)
Fig.(9). RT-PCR analyses of TNF-a and/or crocin-treated PC-12 cell lysates for the mRNA exjwession of
pro-apoptotic proteins, Bax, Bcl-Xs and LICE. The experimental procedures were those described in Materials
and methods. The bands in agarose gel were visualized and photographed under UV radiation. The
photographs were scanned and quantified by using an NIH Imager. The exjwession of GAPDH mRNA was
used as a control. Each bar represents the mean ± S.D, of three independent experiments. • • P<0.01;
••*P<0.001, compared to the control #P<0.05; ## P<0.01; ###P<0.001, compared to TNF-a alone.
325
*
66 r *
l - ^ 50
\ 1B
^
n *
«:
5|20
10
0 i^ 1 "
m
TNF(ir) - 500 500 500
crocin(MM) 1 — —
— 1 10
Fig.(10). ELISA of cytosolic cytochrome c levels in PC-12 cells, treated for 6 h with TNF-a and/or ciocin.
The experimental procedures were those described in Materials and methods. Each bar represents the mean ±
S.D. of three independent experiments. ** P<0.01, compared to the control. M P<0.01, compared to TNF-a
alone.
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
[I] Morimoto, S.; Umezaki, Y.; Shoyama, Y.; Saito, H.; Nishi, K.; Irino, N.;
PlantaMed, 1994.60,438-440.
[2] Xuan, L.; Tanaka, H.; Xu, Y; Shoyama, Y; Cytotechnology, 1999,29,65-70.
[3] Mwa, T.; JapJ.PharmacoL, 1954,4,69.
[4] Gainer, J.L.; Jones, J.R.; Experimentia, 1975,31, 548-549.
[5] Nair, S.C; Pannikar.B.; Panikkar,K.R.; Cancerlert, 1991, 57,109-114.
[6] Salomi, M.J.; Nair, S.C; Panikkar, K.R.; NutCancer, 1991,16,67-72.
[7] Gainer, J.L.; Wallis, D.A.; Jones, J.R.; Oncology, 1976,33,222-224.
[8] Escribano, J.; Alonso, G.L.; Coca-Prados,; M.; Femandes, J. A.; Cancer Lett., 1996,
100,23-30.
[9] Konishima, T.; Takasaki, M.; Tokuda, H.; Morimoto, S.; Tanaka, H.; Xuan, L.J.;
Saito, H.; Sugiura, M.; Molnar, J.; Shoyama, Y; Phytothercpy Res., 1998,12,400-
404.
[10] Ishiyama, J.; Saito. H.; Abe. K.; Neurosci. Lett., 1991,12,403-411.
[II] Abe, K.; Xie, F.; Saito, H; Brain Res., 1991, 547,171-174.
[12] Zhang, Y; Shoyama, Y; Sugiura, M.; Saito, H.; Biol.Pharm.Bull., 1994, 17, 217-
221.
[13] Sugiura, M.; Saito, H.; Abe, K.; Shoyama. Y; Phytotherapy Res., 1995b, 9,
100-104.
[14] Crowe, M.J.; Bresnahan, J.C; Shumann, S.L.; Masters, J.N.; Beattie, M.S.; Nature
Medicine, 1997,3,73-76.
[15] Hill, I.E.; MacManus, J.R; Rasquinha, I.; Tuor. \i.\.,Brain Res., 1995, 676. 398-
403.
[16] Pettmann, B.; Henderson, CE. Neuron, 1998,20, 633-647.
[17] Soeda, S.; Odiiai, T; Paopong, L.; Tanaka, H.; Shoyama, Y; Shimeno, H.; Life
Sci., 2001, 69. 2887-2898.
[18] Sugiura, M.; Shoyama, Y; Saito, H.; Nishiyama, N.; ProcJapan Academy,
1995a, 71, SerB, 319-324.
[19] Sugiura, M.; Shoyama, Y; Saito, H.; Abe, K.; J.Pharmacol.Exp.Therap., 1994.
271, 703-707.
[20] Sugiura, M.; Shoyama, Y; Zhang, Y; Saito, H.; Abe, K. Shibuya, T. In
Preclinical and Clinical Strategies for tiie Treatment of Neurodegenerative,
Cerebrovascular and Mental Disoders. Int. Acad. Biomedi. Drug Res., Basel,
Karger, 1996, Vd. 11, pp 270-276.
[21] Sugiura, M.; Shtqrama, Y; Saito, H.; Abe, K.; Jpn. IPhmmacol., 1995c, 67,
395-397.
[22] Abe, K.; Sugiura, M.; Shoyama, Y; Saito, H.; Brain Res., 1998,787,132-138.
[23] Enari, M.; Sakahira, H.; Ydcoyama, H.; Okawa, K.; Iwamatsu. A.; Nagata, S.;
Nature, 1998,391,43-50.
[24] Sakahira, H.; Enari, M.; Nagata, S;. Nature, 1998,391,96-99.
[25] Liu, X.; Zou. H.; Slaughter, C; Wang. X.; Cell, 1997,89,175-184.
[26] Adams, J.M.; C<My, S.; Science, 1998,281,1322-1326.
329
[27] Yang, J.; Liu, X.; Bhalla, K.; Kim, C.N.; Ibrado, A.M.; Cai, J.; Pen, T.L; Jones,
D.P.; Wang, X.; Science, 1997,275,1129-1132.
[28] Li, P.; Nijhawan, D.; Budihardjo, I.; Srinivasula, S.M.; Ahamad, M.; Alnemri, E.S.;
Wang, X.; Cell, 1997,91,479-489.
[29] Hu, Y; Benedict, M.A.; Wu, D.; Inohara, N.; Nunez, G.; Proc, Nat. Acad Set USA,
1998,95,4386-4391.
[30] Durand, D.; Carlen, PL.; Brain Res., 1984, 308, 325-332.
[31] Sinclair, J.G.; Lo, G.F.; Gen. Pharmacol., 1986, 17,231-233.
[32] Blitzer, R.D.; Orland, G; Emmanuel, L.M.; Brain Res., 1990, 537, 203-208.
[33] Bose, R.; Verheji, M.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Scotto, K.; Fukus, Z.; Kolesnick,
R.;Ce//, 1995, 82,405-414.
[34] Jaflfrezou, J.P; Levade, T.; Bettaieb, A.; Andrieu, N.; Bezombes, C; Maestre, N.;
Vermeetsch, S.; Rousse, A.; Laurent, G; EMSOJ., 1996,15,2417-2424.
[35] Shadle, S.E.; Bammel, B.P; Cusack, B.J.; Knighton, RA.; Olson, S.J.; Mushling,
PS.; Olson, R.D.; Biochem. Pharmacol, 2000, 60,1435-1444.
[36] Yoshimura, S.; Banno, Y; Nakashima, S.; Hayashi, K.; Yamakawa, H.; Sawada,
M.; Sakai, N.; Nozawa, Y; J.Neurochem., 1999, 73, 675-683.
[37] Pham, TO.; Cormier, F.; Famworth, E.; Tong, V.H.; Van Calsteren, MR.; J. Agn
FoodChem., 2000, 48, 1455-1461.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Atta-ur-Rahman (Ed.) Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, Vol. 28
© 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. 331
B YUNG H. LEE
INTRODUCTION
0-4—CH^
QH3
Br~A ON I
\ \ HgC CHo f^^^^'^ CH3
)
(70-98 %; VN -NH
CH,
1 (MFA)
1. PhSe-SePh, NaBH4 (70-90%)
2. Nal04, Heat (80%)
CH3 . CN CH,
Y "^
H3C CH3 ,.^V°-y^^3^J;jaOH_ > \^'\^^'f\}^^'
(50%
I.OSO4/NMO
2. Nal04
3. NaBH4
^
(50%)
6 (PHB)
Less active than MFA
1.LDA/PhSeCI
,
2. H2O2
(58%)
6 (PHB)
Y- OH
triton B
(58%)
Swern
Oxidation MeiVlgBr
LAH/AICI3
• 1
CH3
Hr,CCH,,^v04-^H3
2 (PHA)
H3C fif \ Q
More active than l\^FA
° CH3'-'
CH^
14B
reflux 1 h
15A 15B
Fig. (4). Reaction of MFA with CNI
Cyanogen Iodide (ICN) has been used extensively for the cyanation of
alkenes and aromatic compounds [12], iodination of aromatic compounds
[13], formation of disulfide bonds in peptides [14], conversion of
dithioacetals to cyanothioacetals [15], formation of rran^-olefins from
dialkylvinylboranes [16], lactonization of alkene esters [17], formation of
guanidines [18], lactamization [19], formation of a-thioethter nitriles [20],
iodocyanation of alkenes [21], conversion of alkynes to alkyl-iodo alkenes
[22], cyanation/iodination of p-diketones [23], and formation of alkynyl
iodides [24]. The products obtained from the reaction of ICN with MFA
in refluxing chloroform were fran^-16-iodo-17-cyanomarcfortine A (14)
337
CH3
HoC C H o x ; ^ ^ 0 4 - - C K
I.LDA/PhSeCI
2. HgOg/NaOH
(65%)
3 1.LDA
18
Inactive
18
NMO
(80%)
inactive
CH^
CHg^ 30
MeMgBr
NaBH.
CH^
HX ^-.^04-CH3
SPh
1.LDA \ 4
2. PhS-SPh V-N
(60%) CHo
33
1.,x;s^COOOMg
CI, "COQ- (76%)
2. heat
COOOMg f^'^o
23 (70 g)
To provide additional material for clinical trials, and to eliminate the use
of hazardous reagents such as ICN, PhSeCl, and Se02, an improved
synthesis of 23 was devised [Fig. (9)].
Treatment of MFA 1 with sodium bicarbonate and iodine [30] in
refluxing aqueous THF produced 19 in one step (76%, 350 g scale),
eliminating the use of ICN and Se02. Compound 19 was reacted with
LDA and phenyl disulfide to give 33 (65%). Oxidation with the
magnesium salt of perphthalic acid followed by refluxing in toluene
provided 34 (76%). Repeated reaction with the magnesium salt of
perphthalic acid and diethylamine gave the rearranged product 22 (61%)
[31]. The carbonyl group at C17 in compound 22 was reduced with BH3-
DMS (10 equiv/THF) to provide 14a-hydroxy-MFA 23 (70 g, 50%). The
stereospecific rearrangement of 34 was previously described [32].
342
(60 %) (50 %)
HO
CH,
36 very active
1.LDA
35
2. MeSOgSMe (37)
(57 %)
BHq-DMS
(33 %)
40
9-BBN
>/ NaOH/HgOg
1.MsCI/NEt3
2. DBN
(70%)
45 Inactive
Compound 21 [Fig. (11)] was reacted with vinyl magnesium bromide and
copper iodide in THF at 0 ^C to give the 1,4 addition product 42 in 48%
yield [35]. Hydroboration with 9-BBN followed by NaOH and H2O2
workup provided a mixture of the desired alcohol 43 (20%), recovered
starting material 42 (20%), and the C17 reduced alcohol 44 (5%). Further
reduction of 43 with the BH3-DMS complex gave 44 in 35% yield. The
two combined samples of 44 were mesylated (CH3S02Cl/NEt3) and then
treated with excess DBN to give the furan-containing MFA analog 45 in
70% yield. Compound 45 is inactive, thus demonstrating that hydrogen
bonding of the C14 hydroxyl group is indeed important for anthelmintic
activity. The significance of the geometry of ring G on anthelmintic
activity was next investigated.
CH, C;H3
O4-CH3 COCI2 U
//
QJJ Pyridine
/toluene
^
H^C-
O
J
^^" O' bH O CH, 46
LiBEtgH 40%
HO-4—(•-v4J> NaBHgCN H O
-NH
80% H,
48
Inactive
Economic Viability
HoC
36 32
Many reviews and hundreds of papers have been published on the use
of mono-oxygenases for the introduction of oxygen atoms onto various
substrates [36]. We were especially interested in nonactivated
stereospecific carbon atom hydroxylation. Therefore, a large number of
biotransformation experiments were carried out utilizing cultures reported
in the literature, and random samples from the Pharmacia culture
collection. Screening was performed by adding a solution of 1 (10 mg)
[37] in DMF (0.4 mL) to vigorously growing culture fermentations in 500
mL wide-mouth flasks. Incubation was conducted at 28 °C, and shaking
was continued for 1-3 days depending on the culture. The mixture was
thoroughly extracted with chloroform, centrifuged, and the solvent
removed at 35 °C under reduced pressure. The residue was analyzed by
TLC (three solvent systems) and HPLC. Promising samples were scaled
up 10- to 100-fold and refermented in a Labraferm fermentation tank.
Purification was achieved by various chromatographic techniques, and the
structure determined with the aid of NMR and MS. Whenever
semisynthetic samples were available, a side by side comparison was also
performed.
27
CH3
l>^0-4-CH.
o I to
N-Demethylatlon/^ ^ " s
HO ;HN '/>^NH
35 (20 grams) ^"3
BH3-DMS
CH3 CH3
O-4-CH3 04-CHo
oi +
CH3
04-CH,
-//-
LAH(3or10equiv) 0 CK
52
(3 equiv)
O-UCH,
51 Inactive
5Q Inactive
^ O CH
53 PNU-141962
CHo
CH3 0-4-CHo
O-V-CH3
K)—>"
J, I- NaBH. Hqi
N-Fmoc ^ 3 O CH3 OH
Table 2. Efficacy of Marcfortines, PHA and PNU-141962 in sheep experimentally infected with H.
contortus following oral dosing of conqiounds in 60:40 propyleneglycol/glycerol formal vehicle.
MFA 12.5
23 7 ,
32 2
PHA 1-2
PNU-141962 0.5-1
36 4-5
2. NaBHaCN
(preferred) (500/^
CH«
0-4-CH3 H3C CH3 ^ o^
= \=. C
y" 3
CHo
^ 0 bH,
O CH, 63
56
f-BuOCI
NEtg
CH2CI2,0 °C
^-kteCXJ
0 CH3
-3 :T "°-. V-v^,
CH3 AcOH H3C Jt-^^ CI
65
64
HCOOH
MFA •
K2CO3
Br
"V\—'——^
R Kl m-CPBA
R 66
68a: R, R == cyclobutyl
68b: R, R == cyclohexyl
68c: R, R == diethyl
68d: R. R =: ethyl-methyl
68e: R, R =: dimethyl
C[ r\ SnCU
^O-^ R •
MTPI
The catechol 66 was coupled with the appropriate bromo reagent 68a-d
in the presence of K2CO3 and KI in acetone/water to give mono-alkylated
products 69a-d in 29-82% yield.Epoxidation with m-CPBA in CH2CI2
followed by workup with sodium bisulfite [49] (to remove the N-oxide)
gave epoxides 70a-d in 40-100% yield. Ring closure using SnCUin THF
provides alcohols 71a-d (50-85% yield) which were dehydrated with
methyltriphenoxyphosphonium iodide (MTPI) in THF/DMF to provided
the final products 67a-d in 20-30% yield.
To verify the regiochemistry of the alkylation described above we
reduced MFA with borane-methyl sulfide complex to provide 72 in 40%
yield [Fig. (21)]. This compound was identical to the one prepared from
the catechol 66 and 4-bromo-2-methyl-2-butene (73) using the chemistry
reported in step 1 of Fig. (20), thereby conforming the assigned
regiochemistry of compounds 68a-d.
The biological activity of compounds 67a-d was evaluated in our
standard anthelmintic assay which uses immunosuppressed Mongolian
gerbils inoculated with Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus
colubriformis [41]. The compounds were administrated orally at a dosage
rate of 0.33 mg/gerbil. Unlike MFA, none of these compounds gave the
95% clearance of helminthes we use as a criteria for determining activity,
and were deemed inactive.
Swem oxidation of 71e provided the ketone 74, which was subjected to
Wittig olefination with methyltriphenylphosphonium bromide and n-BuLi
to give the exocyclic methylene containing compound 75 in 50% yield.
The versatile ketone 74 was also epoxidized with trimethylsulfoxium
iodide and potassium r-butoxide in DMSO to give 76 in 35% yield,
whereas Grignard chemistry (MeMgBr) gave a quantitative yield of 77.
Treatment of 77 with DAST afforded a 35% yield of the desired analog
78.
V-OH ^
KgCOg/Nal
CI
79 ^'
Retrosynthetic analysis
^i" 84
(R)N
MeOgC—'N<^^^
Y 86
85 O
OH Ho
OH NaOH O ^-^
H2O2 Pd/C HO (99%)
HO NO2 OMe
(81-93%) (92%)
OMe
89
88
OH (52%) OR (640/^) / y ^ ^
90 91 R = prenyl HO gj
r^
NaBH. 1. protection
^
BFgOEtg
2. Mannich
(46%)
HO
RO
93 94 R = f-BuMe2Si
OR'
o H
95
R = COOMe
R' = f-BuPhSi R-o R" = f-BuMegSi
HO
Reagents: (a) 94, 0.5 equiv of PBuj, CH3CN, reflux, 73%; (b) LiCl, HMPA, 100 °C, 89%; (c) Me30BF4,
Na2C03. CH2CI2. 62-71%; (c) (i) BOC2O, DMAP, EtsN, CH2CI2; (ii) /1-BU4NF, THF, 85-90%; (d) NCS,
Me2S, 74-86%.
NaH, benzene
N
^
^i *BOC (syn, 93%;
anti, 85%)
ization ^
ENDO Cyclization f-^
RO
100
N
BOC
99b
RO
The stage now set to effect the SN2' reaction. [Fig. (27)]
Compound 99 was refluxed in benzene with 20 equiv of NaH, resulting in
a very clean and high-yielding cyclization reaction furnishing the desired
product 100, and the undesired anri-diastereomer was not detected.
It is generally accepted that SN2' reactions favor a syn orientation [56]
(i.e., the incoming nucleophile attacks the 7C-electrons from the same face
as the departing leaving group, polarizing the 7i-system in the proper
orientation for a "backside" displacement on the C-Cl bond).
Alternatively, a frontier molecular orbital analysis has indicated [56a] that
the stabilization imparted by a HOMONuc-LUMOaiiyiic interaction is greater
for the syn overlap. While the greatest level of diastereoselectivity was
observed with a nonpolar aprotic solvent (benzene), a fairly significant
change in the relative amounts of the syn- and anri-diastereomers can be
realized by simply changing the solvent to a more polar solvent such as
DMF. In the present system, additional stabilization for the endo transition
364
State may be due to the formation of a tight contact ion pair between the
chlorine atom and sodium atom of the enolate species in the transition
state for the formation of the C-C bond. [57] The poor ligating solvent
benzene is not capable of effectively solvating the enolate cation nor the
developing chloride anion in the transition state. It is reasonable that this
type of association favors the rotamer that positions the allylic chloride
moiety over the enolate, resulting in the desired syn stereochemistry.
However, initial experiments with this reagent gave poor results, with
the secondary amide undergoing reduction along with the tertiary amide.
Compound 101 [and 107, Fig. (29)] is sufficiently twisted such that the
g^m-dimethyl groups effectively block the P-face of the tertiary amide,
leaving the a-face relatively unencumbered. However, a modification of
the alane procedure [60], proved satisfactory for this transformation. The
piperazinedione 101 was pretreated with AlEts, with the expectation that
this Lewis acid would form a complex with the more exposed secondary
lactam [106, Fig.(29).] and leave the tertiary lactam accessible for
reduction.
365
Reagents: (a) PdClz, AgBF4. MeCN; (b) NaBH4 (63-82% from 100); (c) 1.1 equiv of EtaAl, 5.0 equiv of
AIH3-DMEA, THF, toluene; (d) 2.0 equiv of NaCNBHa. AcOH, MeOH (65% from 101); (e) 2.5 equiv of NaH,
2.0 equiv of Mel, DMF (98%); (f) 80 equiv of TEA, CH2CI2 (96%); (g) /-BuOCl, pyridine, -15 °C; (h) 90%
THF, 10% H2O, pTsOH (76%); (i) MTPI, DMPU (79%).
O \ ^
R = f-BuMe2Si
acetic acid, and methanol to provide the desired amine 102 in 63% yield.
Compound 102 was smoothly alkylated with methyl iodide, affording the
N-methylated product 103 in 95-98% yield. Compound 103 was
subsequently deblocked with 80 equiv of TFA in CH2CI2 to yield the
penultimate heptacycle 104 in 97% yield.
The stage was now set for the final transformations involving the
oxidative pinacol-type rearrangement and dehydration. Thus, treatment of
105 with r-BuOCl and EtsN in CH2CI2 provided the two chloroindolenines
108 and 109 (2.25:1 ratio, respectively, Figure 30). The solvent was
removed, and the crude reaction mixture was refluxed with a solution of
95% THF, 4% H2O, and 1% TFA, giving a 62% yield of oxindole
products (43% of the desired 105 and 19% the epi product 110). The C-3-
epi-isomer (110) was easily distinguishable from the desired isomer (105)
by the upfield shift of the g^m-dimethyl signals in the ^H NMR spectrum.
The relative amounts of products (105 and 110) indicate that the
cyclization was stereospecific under these conditions. It was thus deduced
that an increase in the ratio of the desired oxindole 105 to the undesired
isomer 110 could be achieved simply by finding a method that would
increase the ratio of chloroindolenines (108:109).
108
OH
U^-^Y^OTBS
^" 113
111 112
(86%) c.d.e
^Y^NH f,g
^N cOOEt
V - - ^ v ^ ^ OTBS (93%) ^ . . ^ - ^ ^ OTBS (79%)
OTBS
OMOM
114
Reagents: (a) Baker's yeast; (b) LDA, THF, HMPA, (E)-ICH2CH=C(Me)CH20TBS; (c) 5.7 equiv
MOMCl, (/Pr)2NEt, CH2CI2; (d) 2.7 equiv ZnBr2, CH2CI2; 0 °C (e) K2CO3. 2 equiv BrCHiCOBr, CH2CI2; (f)
NH3 in MeOH (5.7 M), 25 °C; (g) 3 equiv NaH, toluene, HMPA, 25 °C; (h) 1.3 equiv n-BuU, THF, 11.1 equiv
ClCOOMe, - 78 °C; then 4 equiv ClCOOMe, 5 equiv LiN(TMS)2. - 78 °C.
TBS*
n O br"*"*^' R' = COOMe,R" = MOM
:MOM
94 (70%)
OTBS
OMOM
OTBS
116 R' = COOMe
• /--p^N
(68 -71%) V - N , ^
OTBS
120
Boc
Boc
Reagents: (a) 0.7 equiv («-Bu)3P, MeCN; (b) 5 equiv LiCl, H2O, HMPA, 105 °C, 5 h; (c) 2.5 equiv
Me30BF4, CS2CO3. CH2CI2.25 °C; (d) DMAP, 3 equiv (Boc2)0, CH2CI2; 0 °C (e) 3.3 equiv TBAF, THE, 25 °C;
(f) 1.1 equiv Msci coUidine, CH2CI2, 0 °C; (g) 3.3 equiv TBSOTf, 2,6-lutidine, CH2CI2,0 °C.
OMOM,
h (85%),
i (97%)
OH
Reagents: (a) 20 equiv NaH, TOP, reflux 30 h; (b) 3.1 equiv AgODp4, 4.68 equlv PdCh. MeCN, propylene
oxide; then NaBH4, EtOH; (c) 0.1 M HCl, THF; (d) 2-hydroxypyridine, toluene, 120 °C, 2 h; (e) 5 equiv
(iBu)2AlH, CH2CI2. 0 °C; (f) NaH, Mel, DMF, 0 °C; (g) 6 equiv B-bromocatecholborane, CH2CI2, 0 °C; (h)
Sequiv l,l,l-triacetoxy-l,l-dihydro-l,2-benziodoxol-3(7f/)-one (Dess-Martin periodinane), CH2CI2, 25 °C; (i)
TFA, CH2CI2, 25 °C.
The stage now set to effect the SN2' reaction. [Fig. (33)] Compound
120 was refluxed in THF with 20 equiv of NaH, resulting in a very clean
371
mobility on TLC, m.p. (250 °C (dec)), [ajo = -22 (C= 0.2 MeOH)] to the
natural PHA [4].
OH
TsOH
O f-BuOCI
THF/HgO
OH
CH3
^*^LNx^xk^O •
(55%)
O CH3O
54 % from 125 127
3 MeMgBr
(42%)
12
Pt/C A CH«
H3C Ch
dioxane/water
o CH,
7 (14-23%)
o p
\J/ H3C CH,
06^
CH^
MCPBA
130 7
(80%)
1
4
MCPBA
H
o P
p^JiiU/M^c CH3 p<j^^H^C CH3
CH-,
Although the Pt/02 reaction has been used for oxidation of primary and
secondary alcohols [67], hydroxylation of 12a-deoxytetracyclines [68],
oxygenation of cholesterol [69], and oxidation of tertiary amines [5f], this
374
^3^. p^3 o p
%J/ H3C CHo
Pt/Og followed
by MCPBA HO H >-N
23 10 (43%)
131 (3%)
HQC CH<3
Pt/0« J\. HoC CHQ
HO-f-^4v> HO-
H3C >-N
H,C
° CH3
32
132 (10%)
133 (10%)
o o
V ^ H3C CH3 , ,,^
M:^40<J (3%)
H3C Y\
CH^
132 PHA
AIHg-NMegEt
36
135 (6%)
CH«
Pt/C
0-0 \
[O]
B \
Partial aiiyiiic
oxidation
o CH3
C: X = H,H
D: X = H,OHorO
[0] [H2O2]
130 *• 7
oo
[0] [H2O2]
128+ 129
o CH3
E: X = H,OHorO >
Fig. (38). A plausible mechanism for the Pt/O^ meddiated ring contracting reaction
377
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
[1] (a) Prichard, R. Vet. Parasitol. 1994, 54, 259; (b) Sangster, N.C. Int. J.
Parasitol. 1999, 29, 115.
[2] Geary, T.G; Sangster, N.C; Thompson, D.P. Vet. Parasitol. 1999,84,275.
[3] Polonsky, J; Merrien, M. A.; Prange, T.; Pascard, C ; Moreau, S. /. Chem. Soc,
Chem. Commun. 1980, 601.
[4] Yamazaki, M.; Okuyama, E.; Kobayashi, M.; Inoue, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981,
22, 135.
[5] (a) Ondeyka, J. G.; Goegelman, R. T.; Schaeffer, J. M.; Kelemen, L.; Zitano, L
J. Antibiotics 1990, 43, 1375; (b) Liesch, J.; Wichmann, C. J. Antibiotics 1990,
43, 1380; (c) Shoop, W. L.; Egerton, J. R.; Eary, C. H.; Suhayda, D. /
Parasitol. 1990, 76, 349; (d) Ostlind, D. A.; Mickle, W. G.; Ewanciw, D. V
Andriuli, F. J.; Campbell, W. C ; Hernandez, S.; Mochale, S.; Munguira, E. Res,
Vet. Sci. 1990, 48, 260; (e) Blanchflower, S. E.; Banks, R. M.; Everett, J. R.
Manger, B. R.; Reading, C. J. Antibiotics 1991, 44, 492; (f) Blizzard, T. A.
Marino, G.; Sinclair, P. J.; Mrozik, H. European Pat. Appl. EP 0 354 615 Al
1990; (g) Schaeffer, J. M.; Blizzard, T. A.; Ondeyka, J.; Goegelman, R.
Sinclair, P. J.; Mrozik, H. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1992, 43, 679; (h) Mrozik, H,
U.S. Pat. Appl. US 4,866,060, 1989; (i) Blizzard, T. A.; Mrozik, H. U.S. Pat.
Appl. US 4,923,867, 1990. (j) Blizzard, T. A.; Mrozik, H.; Fisher, M. H.
Schaeffer, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1990,55,2256.
[6] Lee, B. H.; Clothier, M. P.; Pickering, D. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 6119.
[7] Lee, B. H.; Clothier, M. F. J. Org. Chem. 1997,62, 1795.
[8] Misner, J. W. J. Org. Chem. 1987,52, 3166.
[9] Bartlett, M. F.; Dickel, D. F.; Taylor, W. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 126.
378
[10] Grieco, P.A.; Nishizawa, M.; Oguri, T.; Burke, S. D.; Marinovic, N. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1977,99, 5773.
[11] Molander, G. A.; Hahn, G. J. Org. Chem. 1986,57,2596.
[12] Henis, N. B. H.; Miller, L. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983,105, 2820-2823.
[13] Woolf, A. A. /. Chem. Soc. 1954,252.
[ 14] Bishop, P; Chielewski, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992,33, 6263.
[15] Herezegh, P.; Bognar, R.; Timar, E. Organic Preparations and Procedures Inst.
1978, iO, 211.
[16] Zweifel, G.; Fisher, R. P.; Snow, J. T.; Whitney, C. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972,
94, 6560.
[17] Arnold, R. T.; Lindsay, K. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 1048.
[18] Neivelt, B.; Mayo, E. C ; Tiers, J. H.; Smith, D. H.; Wheland, G.W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1951, 73. 3475.
[19] Dovlatyan, V. V.; Gevorkyan, R. A. Tovarnye Znaki 1976,55,79.
[20] Pochat, P.; Levas, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, /S, 1491.
[21] McElvain, S. M.; McLeish, W. L. / Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77 3786.
[22] McMurry, J. E.; Bosch, G. K. J. Org. Chem. 1987,52,4885.
[23] Thanbidurai, S.; Samath, A.; Jeyasubramanian, K.; Ramalinggam, S. K.
Polyhedron 1994,13,2825.
[24] Grignard; Perrichon. Ann. Chim (Paris). 1926, 5,9.
[25] Lee, B. H.; Clothier, M. F. J. Org. Chem. 1997,62,1863-1867.
[26] Chen, C. -K.; Hortmann, A. G.; Marzabadi, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,110,
4829.
[27] Picot, A.; Lusinchi, X. Synthesis, 1975, 109.
[28] Lewin, G.; Poisson, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994,35, 8153.
[29] Davis, F. A.; Vishwakarma, L. C ; Billmers, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1984,49, 3241.
[30] Bartlett, M. F.; Dickel, D. F.; Taylor, W. I. / Am. Chem. Soc. 1958,80, 126.
[31] Evans, D. A.; Andrews, G. C. Account of Chemical Research 1974, 7, 147.
[32] Lee, B. H.; Clothier, M. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,38,4009.
[33] Lee, B. H.; Clothier, M. F. J. Org. Chem. 1997,62, 7836.
[34] Solomon, M.; Jamisom, C. L.; McCormick, M.; Maryanoff, C. A. /. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1988,110, 3702.
[35] Lee, B. H.; Clothier, M. F. Heterocycles 1998,48,2353.
[36] Anchelas, A. Oxidation reactions. In Enymatic Catalysis in Organic Synthesis;
Draauz, K.; Waldman, H., Eds.; VCH: Weinheim, 1995; Vol II, pp.667-686.
[37] Lee, B. H.; Komis, G. I.; Cialdella, J. I.; Clothier, M. F.; Marshall, V. P.; McNally,
P. L.; Mizsak, S. A.; Whaley, H. A.; Wiley, V. H. / Nat. Products 1997, 60, 1139.
[38] Lee, B. H.; Clothier, M. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,40, 643.
[39] (a) Lee, B. H.; Clothier, M. F.; Johnson, S. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001,
11, 553. (b) Our process group developed two-step synthesis. See: Lipton, M.
F.; Mauragis, M. A.; Veley, M. F. Organic Process Research and Development
2002,6,192
[40] (a) Shoop, W.L.; Egerton, J.R.; Eary, C.H.; Suhayda, D. J. Parasitol. 1990, 76,
349; (b) Shoop, W. L.; Haines, H.W.; Eary, C. H.; Michael, B. F. Am. J. Vet.
Res. 1992,53,2032.
379
[41] (a) Conder, G.A.; Johnson, S.S.; Guimond, P.M.; Cox, D.L.; Lee, B.L. J.
Parasitol 1991, 77, 621; (b) Conder, G.A., Johnson, S.S. J. Parasitol 1996, 82,
100.
[42] Thompson, D.P.; Klein, R.D.; Geary, T.G. Parasitology 1996, 775, S217.
[43] Schaeffer, J. M.; BHzzard, T.A.; Ondeyka, J.; Goegelman, R.; Sinclair, P. J.;
Mrozik, H. Biochem. Pharmacol 1992,43, 679-684.
[44] Nauen, R.; Ebbinghaus, U.; Tietjen, K. Pestic. Sci. 1999,55,608-610.
[45] (a) Zinser, E.W; Wolfe, M.L.; Alexander-Bowman, S.J.; Thomas, E.M.; Groppi,
V.E.; Davis, J.P.; Thompson, D.P.; Geary, T.G. J. Vet. Pharmacol Ther.,
submitted, (b) Lee, B. H. / Labelled Compd Radiopharm 2002, 45, 0000. (c)
Blizzard TA, Rosegay A, Mrozik H, Fisher MH. / Labelled Compd Radiopharm
1990,2S, 461-464.
[46] (a) Gushing, T. D.; Sanz-Cervera, J. F.; Williams, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 77S, 557. (b) Gushing, T. D.; Sanz-Cervera, J. F.; Williams, R. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 775, 9323.
[47] Lee, B. H.; Clothier, M. F. Bioorg. Med Chem. Lett, 1997, 7, 1261.
[48] Gushing, T. D.; Williams, R. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 6325.
[49] McWhorter, W. W.; Gleave, D. M.; Savall, B. M. Syn. Comm. 1997,27, 2425.
[50] Lee, B. H.; Clothier, M. F. Bioorg. Med Chem. Lett, 1998, 5, 3415.
[51] Sanz-Cervera, J. F.; Glinka, T.; Williams, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 775,
347.
[52] Williams, R. M.; Glinka, T.; Kwast, E.; Coffman, H.; Stille, J. K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 772, 808.
[53] (a) Somei, M.; Karasawa, Y.; Kaneko, C. Heterocycles 1981, 16, 941. (b)
Kametani, T.; Kanaya, N.; Ihara, M. / Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 702, 3974.
[54] (a) Beer, R. J. S.; Clarke, K.; Davenport, H. F.; Robertson, A. /. Chem. Soc.
1951, 2029. (b) Bennington, F.; Morin, R. D.; Clark, L. C , Jr. J. Org. Chem.
1959,2^,917.
[55] Kosuge, T.; Ishida, H.; Inabe, A.; Nukaya, H. Chem. Pharm. Bull 1985, 33,
1414.
[56] (a) Magid, R. M.; Fruchey, O. S.; Johnson, W. L.; Allen, T. G. J. Org. Chem.
1979,44, 359.(b) Magid, R. A. Tetrahedron 1980,36, 1901.
[57] The idea that the stereochemical outcome of an intramolecular enolate
alkylation is determined by chelation in the transition state was recently
demonstrated by Denmark and Henke, who observed a marked preference for a
"closed" transition state (coordination of the cationic counterion to an enolate
and the developing alcohol) resulting in a syn product. For example, the highest
syn.anti ratio (89:11) was obtained in toluene and the lowest syn:anti ratio
(2:98) was obtained with a crown ether. These observations parallel the facial
selectivities described herein and in ref 11 on the intramolecular SN2'reaction;
see: (a) Denmark, S. A.; Henke, B. R. / Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 775, 2177. (b)
Denmark, S. A.; Henke, B. R. /. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 777, 8022.
[58] Trost, B. M.; Fortunak, J. M. D. Organometallics 1982, 7, 7.
[59] In a recently reported synthesis of gelsemine, a tertiary lactam was reduced in
the presence of a secondary lactam with DIB AH. However, this reagent failed
on substrates 101; see: Dutton, J. K.; Steel, R. W.; Tasker, A. S.; Popsavin, V.;
Johnson, A. P. J. Chem. Soc, Chem. Commun. 1994, 765.
380
[60] Martin, S. F.; Benage, B.; Geraci, L. S.; Hunter, J. E.; Mortimore, M. J. Am.
Chem.Soc.l991J 13, 6161.
[61] (a) Yoon, N. M.; Brown, H. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2927. (b) Marlett, E.
M.; Park, W. S.; /. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 2968. (c) Jorgenson, M. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1962, 559. (d) Another very recent synthesis of gelsemine reported the
reduction of the same gelsemine precursor (as in ref 59) with AIH3. Newcombe,
N. J.; Fang, Y.; Vijn, R. J.; Hiemstra, H.; Speckamp, W. N. /. Chem. Soc,
Chem. Commun. 1994, 767
[62] Williams, R. IVl.; CaO, J.; Tsujishima, H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000,39, 2540.
[63] (a) Williams, R. M.; CaO, J. Tetrahedron Utt. 1996, 37, 5441. (b) Cooper, J.;
Gallgher, P. T. ; Knight, D. W. J. Chem. Soc, Perkin Trans 1 1993, 1313.
[64] Fukuyama, T.; Liu, G. Pure Appl Chem. 1997,69,501.
[65] Boeckman, R. K.; Potenza, J. C. Tetrahedron Utt. 1985,26,1411.
[66] (a) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155; (b) Dess, D. B.;
Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1991,113, 7277.
[67] Sneeden, R. P. A.; Turner, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1955, 77, 190.
[68] Muxfeldt, H.; Buhr, G.; Bangert, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1962,1, 157.
[69] Sakamaki, H.; Take, M.; Akihisa, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Ichinohe, Y. Bull. Chem.
Soc Jpn. 1988,61,3023.
[70] Wasserman, H. H.; Ives, J. L. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 1825.
[71] (a) Bhatt, M. V. Tetrahedron 1964, 20, 803. (b) Aoyage, P.; Moriyama, Y.;
Tsuyuki, T.; Takahashi, T. Bull. Chem. Soc Jpn. 1973,46, 569.
Atta-ur-Rahman (Ed.) Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, Vol. 28
© 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. 381
certain districts, losses often exceeded 70% and in some locations even
reached 90% [11]. Varroa mites originated in southeast Asia, where they
parasitized the Asian honeybee. Gradually they have spread and now^
afflict most of the European honeybees. Though the Asian honeybee has
been able to tolerate the mite: it was a pest, but not a fatal one, European
honeybees have almost no resistance, and the mite has proved fatal to
millions of the colonies in Europe and America. Varroa mites suck the
body fluids from adults and brood, prefering the latter, especially drone
brood. The problem of developing suitable treatments was difficult in the
case of the Varroa mites because most substances effective against the
parasites have unacceptable side-effects on bees. Towards the end of the
80s products based on pyrethroids were used. These substances were
very effective on mites, and without any appreciable effects on bees.
Pyrethroids are synthetic analogs of pyrethrins, secondary metabolites
obtained from the flower heads of Chrysanthemum cinerarifolium.
Synthetic pyrethroids replaced the natural ones because they apparently
exhibited no negative effect on plants, animals and humans.
Unfortunately, the limits of this "magic bullet" soon became evident, with
serious impact on beekeeping because of the resistance developed by
Varroa. Since the creation of EU Varroa experts' group, several lines of
research in alternative control measures have been explored: apicultural
techniques for reducing the number of mites, increasing bee resistance, and
searching for acaricidal products that are generally recognized as safe for
humans, such as some natural derivatives [12]. Among these compounds
many simple carboxylic acids have been used, such as formic, oxalic and
lactic acids. The first report on the use of formic acid as miticide was
published in 1980 [13]. Five years later Wachendorfer et al. [14]
developed and carried out field trials on the "lUertisser Milbenplatte"
(=mite plate), an adsorbent cardboard soaked in formic acid on which the
bees alighted before entering in the hive. Other methods of treatment
included dispensation of formic acid by means of evaporators, wood
shavings, or use of liquid reservoirs with wicks [15-27]. The mortality
rate of Varroa mites was however quite variable, with percentages ranging
from 12% [24] to 98.8% [21], with a prevalence of intermediate values
(47%-56%) [18,21,26]. A strong dependence upon the administration
method was observed: in western Switzerland the percentage of mites
killed was 80% when formic acid was applied on the plates, but 90%
385
honey. The taste threshold for acacia honey was about half of the one for
honeydew honey, because the latter has a much stronger aroma and can
whitstand more acid than acacia honey, which has only a weak aroma.
The taste thresholds of formic acid were 150-300 mg/kg in acacia honey
and 300-600 mg/kg in honeydew honey; in pure water it was 10 mg/kg,
about 20 to 50 times below that in honey. Similar thresholds were also
found in Italy [36]; Italian authors also noted that after application in
autumn at the end of the bee season, the formic acid content increases
significantly and may exceed the natural content. Later on, the formic acid
content decreases slowly due to evaporation, to reach the original level in
the following spring. Therefore, formic acid treatments should be
performed in autumn to avoid adverse consequences to the taste of
honey, harvested the following spring.
Further to formic acid treatment, oxalic acid [21,21,37-40] and lactic
acid [17,18,20,21,41-46] have been evaluated for their activity against
Varroa jacobsoni and V. destructor. The application of oxalic acid has
been studied both in different periods and by means of different methods.
It seems that the best period is autumn-winter, the broodless period
(average efficacy 99.44% vs. 52.25% in the presence of brood) [40].
These data have been confirmed in Italy, where a spray treatment of
oxalic acid in water was compared with a topical application of the acid in
a sucrose-water solution; the best result was obtained using the former
method. In general, for both treatments, the highest mite mortality
coincided with the treatment applied with no sealed brood [38]. With
regard to the toxicity of oxalic acid, two contrasting studies are present in
literature. The first one claims that bee mortality in treated hives was not
significantly different from the bee mortality in controls [37], while the
other paper suggests negative long-term effects, with a statistically
significant negative effect on brood development and the death of some
queens [39]. On the presence of oxalic acid in honey, it seems that its
content in samples taken from the nest after treatment did not differ
significantly between treated and control ones [37,38]. If the application
is performed in autumn, the honey content of oxalic acid is comparable to
its natural amount, that is below its taste threshold, determined in 300-
400 mg/kg for acacia honey and 700-900 mg/kg for honeydew honey [35].
Lactic acid was less active than the previous organic acids [18,21] and
again it showed a greater effectiveness during late summer-winter
387
treatments [18]. When its activity was compared with some commercial
acaricides, results show it is less effective than coumaphos, a synthetic
coumarin (umbelliferone) derivative, but also less toxic [42,45].
Rademacher [47] prepared a new formulation containing a synthetic
acaricide, cymiazole hydrochloride, and lactic acid as active ingredients;
furthermore, the content of cymiazole was 50% less than in a commercial
preparation. The mixture resulted highly toxic to Varroajacobsoni, with
the tolerance of honey bees a 100 times greater than that of the mites;
field tests have shown that the mixture killed 83% and over 90% of mites
in colonies with and without brood, respectively. Some authors reported
an increased bee mortality after treatments with lactic acid [18,41].
Immediately after applications in autumn, the lactic acid content of honey
increased up to 1500 mg/kg, but four weeks later it decreased to about
500 mg/kg: this was below the taste threshold of 800-1600 mg/kg in rape
honey [35].
Formic acid was also found effective against another bee parasite,
Tropilaelaps clareae (Acari: Laelapidae). This mite develops in brood
cells and causes disturbances in metamorphosis, resulting in abnormal,
incompletely developed individuals; in the case of a severe attack, bee
larvae are killed. It caused substantial losses of Apis mellifera colonies in
Pakistan, but a single application of formic acid (20 ml) to infested
colonies gave complete control of the mite population, however, it also
destroyed all the brood and some adult bees. Two treatments of 15 ml
also gave complete control of the mite population, but caused only
minimal destruction of brood [48]. The same findings were obtained in
another study [49]. A following study confirmed these results and also
demonstrated the effectiveness of sulfur (450 mg/frame) for T, clareae
control [50]. Furthermore, sulfur was not toxic for bees [31].
Tracheal mites were also killed by formic acid [51]. This parasite,
Acarapis woodi (Acari: Tarsonemidae), lives in the tracheal tubes of adult
honey bees. The bees die because of the disruption to respiration caused
by the mites clogging the tracheae.
In summary, although these organic acids are natural honey
constituents, the international food legislation prohibits honey additives
adulterating its taste. Therefore, the residues of these substances in honey
have to remain below their taste threshold [35].
Another natural substance tested against bee mites was the oil obtained
388
from neem tree, Azadirachta indica, kernels. Its first use in beekeeping as
acaricide dates back to 1995, when it was tested against the tracheal mite
Acarapis woodi [52]. A commercial preparation of neem oil containing
3000 ppm was used to prepare a syrup containing 3 or 6 ml/1 of the drug.
The colonies of Apis mellifera were treated in mid-May, and in August no
mites were found in the colonies treated with 3 ml/1, while they were still
high in controls. Furthermore, the treatment not only killed adult mites
but also reduced the number of mite eggs. Treated colonies collected more
pollen and produced more honey. Topical applications of neem oil in
laboratory to infested bee were highly effective against both Varroa
jacobsoni dead Acarapis woodi [53]. Approximately 50-90% V.jacobsoni
mortality was observed 48 h after treatment with neem oil, with
associated bee mortality lower than 10%. Although topically applied
neem oil did not result in direct A. woodi mortality, it offered significant
protection of bees from reinfestation. Significantly, azadirachtin-rich
extract was ineffective at controlling both the mites, suggesting that
azadirachtin. Fig. (1), one of the main insecticide compounds of neem
tree, has no significant miticidal properties; in fact, honey bees were also
deterred from feeding on a sucrose syrup containing more than 0.01 mg/ml
of azadirachtin-rich extract.
MeOO£.
1 ^OH
MeOOC
MeOOC ^i o
The same research group evaluated neem oil in the field [54]. They
sprayed a 5% solution of the oil on infested honey bee colonies, killing
about 90% Varroa mites but obtaining only a slight but not statistically
significant decrease in tracheal mite infestation levels. Unfortunately this
treatment caused 50% queen loss and the treated colonies showed one-
third as many adult bees and one-sixth as much brood as untreated
389
colonies. The authors hope that these negative effects on bees could be
remedied by changes in the formulation, the application technology, and
the season of application. In another trial the same researchers compared
the spray applications of neem oil with feeding oil or azadirachtin-rich
extract in a sucrose syrup [55]. They concluded that spray application
was more effective than the other methods only on Varroa. They also
reported that spray treatments had no effect on adult honey bee
populations, however treatments reduced the amount of sealed brood in
colonies by 50% and caused queen loss at higher doses. Besides neem oil,
Majeed also tested Azadirachta indica dust obtaining an effective level of
control and increased honey production with both the formulations [56].
Also pure azadirachtin, both commercially formulated and purified, was
tested for its effects on Varroa mites, infested bees and healthy bees [57].
Azadirachtin was administered in 50% sucrose syrup at various
concentrations, ranging from 6 to 162 |i<g/ml to infested and non-infested
worker bees: in both the experiments this compound caused a dose-
dependent reduction in syrup consumption; mite mortality was
significantly lower than their host bees at all test concentrations. Similar
results were obtained using a topical application of azadirachtin in water.
Feeding experiments with worker larvae however, gave unsatisfactory
results, with high larval mortality and abnormal pigmentation.
Other vegetable oils have been shown to be effective in the control of
tracheal mites. The oils were administered as vegetable shortening mixed
in a sugar patty. The oils did not kill the mite directly, but instead made
the bees unattractive or unrecognizable to the mite. Vegetable oils have
been used to control Varroa as well, and several commercial formulations
have been developed that are claimed to kill good percentages of mites.
However, research is somewhat contradictory about their effects [58,59].
Danish researchers performed a trial with a formulation of rapeseed oil
combined to an emulsifier, as well as soyabean oil also with different
emulsifiers. The oils were either sprayed on bees or administered in sugar
patties. While the oils with high concentration of emulsifier killed high
levels of mites (up to 97%), the side-effect was significant bee deaths
(over 50%). Oil mixtures with less emulsifier were not effective in killing
mites. Oil patties similar to those used with tracheal mites did not
significantly reduce Varroa levels. The researchers' conclusion is that
vegetable oils do not seem a realistic altemative for Varroa control [60].
390
confirmed their previous results [67]. In 1992, the same authors again
evaluated the effects of menthol on healthy honey bees. They stated that
the use of menthol in spring reduced brood production and confined the
bees spatially away from the menthol bag; however, menthol did not
affect honey production [68]. A similar study about the effect of Thymus
vulgaris and Salvia officinalis essential oils (2% water emulsions) on
mite-free honey bees was conducted by Marceau [22]. The colonies,
treated with these essential oils, both by microdiffusion and evaporation,
were not negatively affected. The same results were obtained in a
following study as well [23]. A more accurate study on the effect of
essential oils as miticides was performed by Kevan et al. [69], which
determined the following LD50 of some essential oils and pure
constituents administered to bees as feeding solutions: cinnamon oil 150
ppm, clove oil 200 ppm, wintergreen oil 500 ppm, pinene 1500 ppm,
thymol 100 ppm. In another paper the same researchers reported that
menthol was ineffective at causing mortality of mites with the highest
doses adminesterable [70]. Thymol seems to be a very promising natural
acaricide in apiculture, but has an inconsistent efficacy against Varroa
[17,64,71-75]. During the 90s, some commercial preparations against
Varroa appeared. They contained natural products, mainly thymol. The
first one was Apilife VAR® (Chemicals LAIF, Italy), a vermiculite tablet
impregnated with a 20 g mixture of thymol (76%), 1,8-cineole (16.4%),
menthol (3.8%) and camphor (3.8%). Various research groups tested this
preparation both in laboratory and field conditions [76-79]. All the
authors reported high efficacy (74-95%), particularly if employed under
optimal temperatures (>13°C). A formulation without camphor showed
the same positive results as well [78]. Apilife VAR was not toxic for
honey bees and the residues (only thymol) found in honey and wax were
innocuous to humans.
Another registered product, Thymovar®, consists of a sponge cloth
that functions as a vehicle for the drug thymol (15 g). The effects of this
preparation were similar to that of Apilife VAR [80]. Thymol was also
employed as "Frakno thymol frame". It consists of thymol crystals
placed into an evaporation box built into a brood frame and hung next to
the brood nest, to be replaced about 2-3 times a year. However, its
efficacy was judged insufficient for long-term treatment [81]. Finally, the
latest thymol-based acaricide is Apiguard®; a gel formulation designed for
392
mites do not move close to the treated pupae and probably died from
starvation [12].
A recent survey about essential oils and their pure constituents used to
control Varroajacobsoni, contained three interesting tables that reported
the toxicity of essential oils for V. jacobsoni and Apis mellifera after 24,
48 and 72 hours in a topical application and in an evaporation test, and
the effects of essential oils on behavior and reproduction of V. jacobsoni
and on the bee brood [63]. The most interesting oils were those of
cinnamon and clove, with 100% mite mortality after 24 h and no
significant toxicity on honey bees. Furthermore, clove essential oil
produced small brood mortality, and it was an inhibitor of mite
reproduction. Other effective oils were anise, fennel, lavender, rosemary
and wintergreen, which killed 100% mites after 48-72 hours. On the
contrary, the oils obtained from garlic, onion, oregano and thyme, were
found to be very toxic for honey bees. Among pure constituents,
camphor, linalool, linalyl acetate and pinene resulted small brood
mortality and inhibited mite reproduction.
The variable responses observed are probably the main drawback for
the practical use of essential oil as miticides. It must be pointed out that
the same plant species often produces essential oils with variable
composition because of environmental and/or genetic factors; many
species have varieties, the so called chemotypes; for instance at least
seven chemotypes are known for Thymus vulgaris [88,89]. Also the
extraction process influences the composition of the essential oils. For
these reasons, it is advisable that authors report the composition of the
essential oils used in the biological investigations. Unfortunately, only
one paper reported this important information [64].
Summarizing, the use of natural products as miticides in apiculture,
with the exception of some substances, is not widespread. In extensive
laboratory tests many compounds showed significant acaricidal
properties. However, very few of them have proven to be effective when
applied in field trials. Considerable variations in local environmental and
colony conditions can affect efficacy. In case of mixtures, such as
essential oils, the difficulty in obtaining standardized compounds also
affects treatment predictability. Nevertheless, identifying new acaricide
compounds with low toxicity to honey bees is fundamental for providing
candidate compounds for field trials. Furthermore, the development of
394
markets and their skin can be worthless for use in the manufacture of
leather goods. Furthermore, because of the blood sucking ticks, the
animals become weak and anemic, resulting in reduced milk and meat
production; severe infestations usually leads to premature death. Many
synthetic acaricides have been used to control this tick, including
organochlorine derivatives, organo-phosphorous compounds and
carbamates. However, besides resistance problems, these compounds are
expensive, especially for third world countries, and sometimes they cause
toxicity problems in animals and farmers [93,94].
Ndumu et al. evaluated the effectiveness of Azadirachta indica seed oil
against the larvae of this parasite [95]. They administered the oil as
hydroalcoholic solutions ranging 4.2-100% and computed the mortality
within 60 hours. Authors observed that the mortality of larvae was
concentration and time dependent; 100% mortality was observed with
100% pure neem oil after 48 h. The LD50 of different concentrations were
33.3% (56 h) and 66.7% (48 h). Author also observed little or no adverse
effects on treated animals. Furthermore, they stated that the open wound
caused by tick bites and therefore exposed to potential fungal and
bacterial attacks, could be protected by the microbicidal properties of the
neem oil. Previously, the effectiveness of neem oil was also observed by
Williams and Mansingh against another tick species of the same genus. A,
cajennense, another cattle tick [96].
Malonza et al. observed that the leaves of a Capparidaceous plant,
Gynandropsis gynandra, exhibited repellent properties against all stages
of Amblyomma variegatum [97]. In field conditions the ticks were not
found up to 2-5 m from the plant in areas where this species was
predominant, while, in the laboratory, ticks which were continuously
exposed to its leaves, died. The effectiveness of the plant was most
pronounced on juvenile stages and least pronounced on adults. Another
plant, snakeweed {Gutierrezia sarothrae and G. microcephala,
Asteraceae) was found useful against A. americanum [98]. Domestic
rabbits that had received diets containing 5% or 10% of this plant leaves
showed 39% and 33% reduction of tick attachment, respectively.
Dichloromethane extracts of the leaves, topically administered on sheep
skin, significantly reduced tick attachment with respect to control. A
third species, Margaritaria discoidea (Euphorbiaceae), showed acaricidal
properties against A, variegatum [99]. Its water extract was effective on
396
nymphs, but not on adults. The hexane extract at 6.25% was found more
effective, causing 100% mortality of adults. Its application at a 50%
concentration on the ears of rabbits prevented the attachment of adult
ticks for at least 4 days, while its direct application on engorging ticks
induced mortality of 70% adults on rabbits and 50% adults on cattle in
the field.
Ivermectin is a macrolide antibiotic produced from a fungus first
isolated from a soil sample in Japan, Streptomyces avermitilis. In the mid-
80s, ivermectin was introduced as probably the most broad-spectrum
anti-parasite medication ever. It is effective against most common
intestinal worms (except tapeworms), most mites, and some lice. It is also
effective against larval heartworms (the "microfilariae" that circulate in the
blood), but not against adult heartworms (that live in the heart and
pulmonary arteries). Avermectins, to which ivermectin belongs, are
agonist for the neurotransmitter y-aminobutyric acid (GABA). GABA is
a major inhibitory neurotransmitter. In mammals, GABA-containing
neurons and receptors are found in the Central Nervous System; while in
arthropods and nematodes GABA is found primarily in the Peripheral
Nervous System (neuromuscular junction). This difference in the
localization of the GABA receptors, could be the reason for the large
margin of safety of avermectins-containing products in mammals. The
binding of avermectins to a neuronal membrane increases the release of
GABA. GABA binds to the GABA receptor-chloride channel complex of
postsynaptic neuronal membranes, causing an influx of chloride ions. This
influx hyperpolarizes the neuronal membranes, making them less
excitatory and decreasing nerve transmission. The hyperpolarization of
neuronal membranes mediate a flaccid paralysis in arthropods and
nematodes [100-101]. Ivermectin has been used in different way of
administration for the control of Amblyomma. Soil et al. experimented an
intraruminal bolus against natural infestations of five different African
tick species on cattle, among which Amhlyomma hebraeum (the other
species were Boophilus decoloratus, Hyalomma spp., Rhipicephalus
appendiculatus ^ndi Rhipicephalus evertsi evertsi) [102]. Unfortunately,
the observed reduction in the number of engorged female ticks was not
statistically significant. An experiment aimed at controlling A.
americanum in free-living white-tailed deer, Pound et al. prepared whole
kernel com treated with 10 mg of ivermectin per 0.45 kg corn to use as
397
bait [103]. Monitoring of the free tick populations through two years of
study, showed 83.4% fewer adults, 92.4% fewer nymphs, and 100.0%
fewer larval masses in the treatment versus control. In 1997, Miller et al.
compared the treatment of pasture cattle with ivermectin (administered
orally at 200 |ig/kg or by injection at 40 |ig/kg) against A. americanum
[104]. They observed no significant difference in the number of
unengorged, small, and medium sized female ticks to the untreated control
compared with those treated orally. However, the number of large female
ticks was reduced. Significantly, fewer small, medium, and large female
ticks were found on the injection treated cattle, compared with the
untreated controls. There were also significantly more unengorged females
on the animals treated by injection than on those treated orally or left
untreated. Wilson et al. evaluated the effects of ivermectin on the volume
of blood ingested by A, americanum [105]. Adult females were collected
from Bos taurus hosts, treated and untreated with ivermectin, and they
observed that the mites feeding on treated animals contained smaller
quantities of blood. Recently, a bioabsorbable injectable microsphere
formulation has been developed to provide long-lasting delivery of the
drug [106].
Some researchers noticed that some chemicals attract adult of
Amblyomma [107,108]. Among these substances many were of natural
origin, such as nonanoic acid, methyl salicylate, benzyl alcohol,
benzaldehyde, heptadecane and squalene. Other authors exploited this
feature to prepare some drugs in which the acaricides were associated to
the pheromone-like chemicals to control Amblyomma [109,110].
Another "natural" way to control Amblyomma is to use its
hyperparasitic fungi, such as Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium
anisopliae [111,112]. In adult of ^. variegatum, M. anisopliae induced a
mortality of 37%, while B, bassiana induced no mortality. However, both
fiingi induced significant reduction in engorgement weights, egg masses
and egg hatchability; B, bassiana completely inhibited egg hatchability.
Authors concluded that these fimgal species were capable of inducing high
mortalities, decreased fecundity and egg hatchability, and they could
represent a great potential for tick control. Their ability to reduce
fecundity and egg hatchability is of greater importance than adult
mortality, in fact a reduction of egg hatchability by 99-100% may mean a
very significant reduction in the next generation of ticks, and has a greater
398
observed that after four weeks the percentage larval survival was 5.1% for
S, humilis, 7.5% for S. hamata, while in control plots it was 18.9%.
Khudrathulla and Jagannath used the methanolic extract of another
species of Stylosanthes, S. scabra, on different life stages of three tick
species, B, microplus, Haemaphysalis intermedia and Rhipicephalus
sanguineus [120]. In vitro trials, conducted by the tea bag method,
showed a dose-dependent activity both on larval and nymphal mortality,
with the exception of H. intermedia nymphs, which were not killed by
the extract. Finally, authors declared that, in preliminary assays, the
aqueous extract showed better acaricidal properties. Regassa reported the
results of a questionnaire survey about the traditional tick control
methods used in three provinces of Western Ethiopia [121]. The most
frequently employed drugs were the latexes of Euphorbia obovalifolia
(Euphorbiaceae) and Ficus brachypoda (Moraceae), the juice obtained
from the leaves of Phytolacca dodecandra (Phytolaccaceae) and Vernonia
amygdalina (Asteraceae), the fruit juice of Solanum incanum
(Solanaceae), the seeds of Lepidium sativum (Brassicaceae) mixed with
fresh cattle faeces, the juice of crushed leaves and bark of Calpurnea
aurea (Papilionaceae), and the commercially available spice of Capsicum
spp. (Solanaceae) mixed with butter. The same author tested in vitro the
activity of these preparations of Capsicum spp., E. obovalifolia, S.
incanum and F. brachypoda in vitro against Boophilus decoloratus,
obtaining 30-100% killing effects. Following in vivo treatments with the
same extracts ofE. obovalifolia and F. brachypoda on naturally infested
indigenous cattle, reduced infestation up to 70%. In another survey on the
activity on Boophilus microplus of several crude EtOH extracts of
Jamaican plants, the authors evaluated the ability of the drugs to kill
engorged ticks and inhibit the oviposition or embryogenesis [122]. They
associated an acaricidal index, ranging from 0 to 100, on the basis of the
effectiveness verified. The most active species were Quassia simarouba
(100) (Simaroubaceae), Symphytum officinale (99) (Boraginaceae),
Nicotiana tabacum (95) (Solanaceae), Hibiscus rosa-sinensis (93)
(Malvaceae), Ricinus communis (82) (Euphorbiaceae), Salvia serotina
(80) (Lamiaceae), Stachytarpheta jamaicensis (79) (Verbenaceae),
Ocimum micranthum (76) (Lamiaceae), and Spigelia anthelmia (75)
(Loganiaceae). Recently, Chungsamarnyart and Jansawan tested the
extracts in water or in 10% EtOH of the mature Tamarindus indicus
401
(Fabaceae) fruits, from which the seeds had been removed, on engorged
female of Boophilus microplus using the dipping method [123]. The pure
organic acids contained in the fruits, oxalic, malic, succinic, citric and
tartaric acids, were bioassayed at 0.5% and 1% concentrations. Among
the extracts, the most effective were the crude 1:2 ones. Among the
organic acids, 0.5% and 1% oxalic acid exhibited the highest acute
acaricidal activity, while 1% tartaric acid showed the highest delayed
activity. All the compounds caused patchy haemorrhagic swelling lesion
on the parasite skin, as documented by photos. The EtOH extracts of five
marine algae were assayed against Boophilus microplus [124]. The author
evaluated the effects of topical applications on mortality, oviposition and
embryogenesis in the ticks. The most toxic extracts were those of
Laurencia obtusa (Rhodomelaceae) and Liagora elongata (Liagoraceae),
whereas Liagora farinosa, Padina vickerisiae (Dictyotaceae) and
Stypopodium lobatum (Dictyotaceae) resulted barely effective. On
embryogenesis the results were different, with L obtusa, L farinosa and
S. lobatum as the most effective extracts.
Different preparations obtained from neem tree, Azadirachta indica,
were tested on Boophilus sp. Williams investigated the adverse effect of
EtOH extracts of neem (and of Artocarpus altilis, Moraceae) on egg laying
and hatching in B, microplus [125]. Egg laying was inhibited by 50% at an
extract concentration of 0.54 |ig/tick; the same dose also caused a 65%
hatching failure; the extracts of ^. altilis were more effective (0.46 |Lig/tick
and 80%, respectively). The activity of the extracts has been reported to
be due to the inhibition of protein and lipid sequestration by ovaries and
oocytes. Kalakumar et al. compared the activities in vitro and in vivo of
neem oil with those of Annona squamosa (Annonaceae) seed oil and
pyrethrins against B. microplus [126]. Neem oil was the least effective
substance: it was only 60-75% effective in infested cattle and buffaloes
and it was unable to inhibit oviposition, while the other two extracts were
100% effective both against infestation and oviposition. Neem oil was
also tested in association with Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae) and Pongamia
(Fabaceae) oils on Boophilus microplus infested cattle and goats [127].
The most effective mixture was neem/eucalyptus oils. Authors evidenced
a significant reduction of total proteins and total lipids in the treated
ticks. The herbal formulation AV/EPP/14, containing extracts of A cor us
calamus (Araceae), Azadirachta indica (Meliaceae), Pongamia pinnata
402
Epingaione
Cadina-4,10(15)-dien-3-one
Dibenzyltrisulfide
Fig. (2). Structures of epingaione, cadina-4,10(15)-dien-3-one, and dibenzyltrisulfide
Piquerol A
R
R=H spinosyn A
R=CH3 spinosyn B
o
BTG505R=H
BTG504R=COCHb
Fig. (4). Structures of naphthoquinones from Calceolaria andina.
b) Mange mites
Mange is a common skin disease of animals caused by different species of
mites. The most severe form of mange is caused by the mite Sarcoptes
scabiei, which is also the cause of human scabies. Some forms of mange
are known to all domesticated animals, no matter how well-taken care of
or pampered they are. The main genera implicated are Sarcoptes,
Notoedres (Acari: Sarcoptidae), Psoroptes, Chorioptes, Otodectes (Acari:
Psoroptidae), Demodex (Acari: Demodicidae), and Knemidocoptes (Acari:
Knemidocoptidae).
In the management of livestock, both for production and breeding
purposes, the mite genera mainly responsible for causing mange are
Psoroptes, Chorioptes and Sarcoptes mites. Modem animal husbandry
practices create favorable conditions for the multiplication of
ectoparasites, such as mange mites. The subclinical form of the
infestation, which reduces productivity considerably, is well recognized.
Mange mites are mostly transmitted from animal to animal by contact.
Since mange mites are able to survive outside the host, sheds, boxes and
pasture fencing must be considered as sources of reinfestation. The
increased incidence of mange and resistance to the usual forms of
treatment, with increasingly frequent therapeutic failures, has prompted
researchers to look for more efficient forms of acaricide therapy, which
are more acceptable to human and animal patients. Although traditional
topical treatments, including polysulfurous compounds, possess good
antiparasitic action, they have numerous undesiderable characteristics
including an unpleasant odour, require numerous applications, frequently
provoke local irritation and occasionally treated human and animal
patients develop signs of systemic toxicity. There are also other causes
for the failure in treatment of scabies: reinfestation after the end of
treatment, paucisymptomatic forms with rare mites (difficult to find),
possible resistance of these mites to some antiparasitic compounds at
atoxic concentrations, unmotivated human patients or with immune
deficiencies that are strongly prone to parasitosis, and patients who are
sensitive to the active ingredient or substances contained in commercial
preparations [174]. There is no synthetic acaricide yet with which the
eggs of the mange mites can be reliably destroyed. A second treatment is
always necessary to kill the larvae, which have hatched from the eggs in
the meantime. The mites are often concealed in the crusts and scabs.
410
where they are often not directly reached by the acaricide during
spraying; for this reason a mange remedy with vapour effect should be
favoured.
Psoroptes mites prefer hairy parts of the body; by piercing the skin
and sucking lymph fluid they cause pustules that spread rapidly, burst
and form typical yellowish-sticky scabs and crusts. They are particularly
active in the cold season and infest sheep, cattle (especially fattening
bulls), and horses. The animals suffer from intense itching, become
restless, bite and rub the affected parts and the hair or wool becomes
detached. In young animals growth is arrested at first, followed by severe
emaciation and death if the infestation is heavy. While in the past
psoroptic mange in cattle was considered rare, it is today one of the main
problems in bull fattening management.
Sarcopies mites, which are also the cause of human scabies, prefer
hairless parts of the body, which is why mange in the pig, for example, is
always sarcoptic mange. The mites burrow tunnels in the skin, suck
lymph and feed on young epidermal cells. At first acute symptoms, such
as skin reddening and pustules, are observed on the affected parts of the
skin, causing severe itching; even a few mites can cause severe clinical
symptoms. In horses and sheep Sarcoptes mites cause the so-called "head
mange", in susceptible horses this can spread to the neck and shoulder
region. In cattle sarcoptic mange can become a problem particularly in
dairy herds, the body areas most affected being the head, neck and udder.
Sarcoptes mites can also cause mange in dogs and cats. Sarcoptes mites
can survive for approx. 2 weeks off the host.
Chorioptes mites preferentially attack the fetlocks and the base of the
tail, where they chew at the skin surface, thus causing inflammations,
scaly lesions and a powdery coating. The so-called foot and rump or tail
mange can occur in the horse, sheep but especially in dairy cows.
Demodectic mange is caused by small lancet-shaped follicular mites,
belonging to Demodex genus, whose parasitism is not always
accompanied by pathological lesions. These mites are also encountered in
healthy animals and man, and need additional factors in order to produce
clinical demodicosis. The disease has greatest significance in dogs. In other
species, such as horse, cattle, pig, sheep, goat and rabbit, host-specific
Demodex species can occur, but they rarely cause disease.
The genera Psoroptes and Sarcoptes have been subjected to intense
411
Table 1. Acaricidal activity of essential oil, linalool and artificial mixture from Lavandula angustifolia on
Psoroptes cuniculL
The static headspace analysis of the essential oil, showed that linalool
was the most volatile constituent, and indicated that this substance could
easily reach the mites in this kind of experiment. At higher dosages, the
miticidal activity of the essential oil cannot be ascribed only to linalool, in
fact the oil was more active than the artificial mixture. Moreover, the
computed ED50 and ED90 did not overlap, giving a clear indication that
these substances really had different activities, and demonstrating that
linalool was not the only active compound in the oil. We also submitted
to GC analyses the solution obtained by crushing the dead mites in Et20
after the bioassays with the essential oil. This examination revealed only
linalool, so it can be stated that the miticidal activity by inhalation of the
essential oil of L. angustifolia is mainly due to its linalool content.
Linalool was one of the most active compounds, so we have investigated
it effectiveness for the topical treatment of parasitic otitis caused by P.
cuniculi in the rabbit and the goat [182]. The naturally infested animals
were treated with 2.5 ml of three different linalool concentrations (10%,
5% and 3%) in a mixture composed of vaseline oil (2%) and physiological
saline (98%). Both rabbits and goats, treated with the solution containing
5% linalool, recovered completely; no animal presented signs related to
any toxicological effect of linalool, but in some rabbits, treated with higher
concentrations, a transitory erythema of the ear skin was evidenced. The
therapeutic efficacy of linalool was similar to the drugs commonly
413
100% of the mites at all dosages used, indicating that a phenolic function
can enhance the miticidal properties of terpenes. The low susceptibility
of parasites to linalyl acetate, particularly at the lowest doses, could be
related to the esterification of the oxygenated function. Estragole,
structurally close to eugenol, but with a methylated phenolic group
exhibited, at 1% concentration, an activity comparable with the same dose
of eugenol, but at 0.25% this miticidal action decreased (63%) and fell to
zero at 0.125%. These results indicate that the best miticidal activity, in
direct contact tests, can be related to compounds with free alcoholic or
phenolic groups. In vapour diffusion tests, at 6 |Lil, the results were
comparable to the direct contact tests. Thus, while hydrocarbons were
ineffective, alcohols and phenols maintained almost 100% toxicity.
Lowering the dose to 3 |Lil, all the alcohols preserved nearly the same
acaricidal activity, except nerol (83.3%) and 4-terpineol (41.7%). At 1 |Ltl
geraniol, menthol and thymol maintained about 100% effectiveness,
whereas the activity of linalool, eugenol, a-terpineol and nerol was
diminished. Linalyl acetate and estragole, like hydrocarbons, were
partially or completely ineffective at all doses tested. We have evaluated
also the activity, in vitro and in vivo, against eggs, larvae, nymphs and
adults of P. cuniculi of the essential oil (10, 5, 2 and 1%) and two water
extracts (20% and 7.5%) oiArtemisia verlotorum (Asteraceae) [185]. The
in vitro studies indicated that the essential oil was highly effective against
this mite; it killed 100% of larvae, nymphs and adults at all
concentrations and inhibited 100% egg hatching at concentrations of 10, 5
and 2% and 95% mortality was registerd at 1%. Both the aqueous
extracts killed 100% of larvae, nymphs and adults, and the 20%
concentration strongly inhibited (94%) egg hatching. The in vivo efficacy
was evaluated for the oil diluted at 5% and the water extract at 20%. The
compounds were applied directly to the infected ears (2.5 ml). The
treatment with the essential oil resulted in a clinical and parasitological
recovery in all the treated rabbits: neither clinical symptoms nor mites in
ear cerumen were found in these rabbits seven days after the treatment.
This was not the case for the aqueous extract, which completely cured
only one of the treated rabbits; in the other ones clinical lesions
disappeared, but eggs and mites were still present in the ears. Many other
herbs or pure compounds have been tested against manges. Among them
the most studied are probably the extracts of Azadirachta indica. In
415
application, and the itching and rubbing disappeared after the third one.
Benzyl benzoate is one of the most studied pure natural derivatives in
mange control, both in man and animals, but it can be unpleasant to use
because of its unpleasant smell, can cause itching, buming and stinging
[195-197]. Furthermore, in literature many conflicting reports may be
found about its real effectiveness. Positive results were described on
humans infested by Sarcopies scabiei [190,198], against Psoroptes and
Sarcopies mites in rabbits [199] and against Demodex folUculorum in man
[197]. In contrast, failures or incomplete recovery were obtained against
sarcoptic mites on pigs [200], Psoropies in rabbits [201] and Demodex in
dogs [202]. In Rwanda, scabies is the most important problem in parasitic
dermatology; in order to find new anti-scabies agents, Heyndrickx et al.
[203] tested a series of 15 plants used in the Rwandese traditional
medicine to treat this disease. The plants were extracted in a percolator
with EtOH and assayed at 30 mg/ml. The 100% active extracts were
assayed at lO-l, 10"^, 10"^ and 10'"^ mg/ml. The hexane, CHCI3, water and
EtOH extracts of the active plants were also bioassayed. Out of 15 plants
tested, four showed a 100% Psoropies mortality: Heieromorpha irifoliaia
leaves (Apiaceae), Neorauienenia miiis roots (Fabaceae), Penias
longiflora roots (Rubiaceae), and Psorospermum febrifugum roots
(Guttiferae). The EtOH extracts of A^. mitis and P. longiflora showed the
greatest activity, killing the mites up to 10"^ and 10"^ mg/ml, respectively.
Also the hexane and CHCI3 extracts of these two species showed good
acaricidal activity: both the extracts were effective up to 10'^ mg/ml in the
case of A^. miiis, and up to 10"^ mg/ml in the case of P. longiflora.
Several commercial herbal preparations have been tested, mainly in
India, against mange mites. Among these we can found Himax (M/s Indian
Herbs, Saharanpur), containing Cedrus deodara, Polyalihia longifolia and
P. excessa. This preparation always showed good acaricidal action against
psoroptic, sarcoptic and demodectic mites on dogs, goats, sheep, rabbits
[191,204-206]. Charmil, another herbal preparation (Dabur Ayurvet Ltd.,
India), containing extracts of Cedrus deodara and Pongamia pinnaia,
showed even better results against Sarcopies, Psoropies and Noioedris
mites on buffaloes, cattle, pigs, dromedaries, dogs and rabbits [207-212].
Other very effective commercial herbal preparations are Ectozee and
Pestoban (containing extracts of Cedrus deodara, Azadirachia indica,
Emhelia ribes) and AV/EPP/14 {Acorus calamus, Azadirachia indica,
417
activities, with mortalities greater than 50% at the lower dose after three
days. Although the essential oils of M symphyocarpa and M acacoides at
the higher dose killed all mites after three days, the mortalities at 1/10 of
that dose were only 13% and 0%, respectively. Other Japanese
researchers tested the activity of the essential oils obtained from the
leaves of Lauraceae trees {Cinnamomum camphora, C. japonicum, Persia
thunbergii, Actinodaphne lancifolia, Neolitsea sericea and Under a
umbellata) [229]. A^. sericea oil showed the greatest activity against both
D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae. The major active constituents were a-
cadinal, caryophyllene oxide and the rare furane sesquiterpene
isosericenine Fig. (5). D. farinae resulted more susceptible than D.
pteronyssinus.
a-cadinol T-cadinol
COOMe
T-muurolol isosericenine
Fig. (5). Sesquiterpenes from Taiwania cryptomerioides and Neolitsea sericea
House dust mites were of interest also for our research group. In
particular, we have evaluated the activity of the essential oils of four
plants, Lavandula angustifolia, L stoechas, Mentha x piperita
(Lamiaceae) and Eucalyptus globulus (Myrtaceae), against a mite of stored
food, Tyrophagus longior (Acari: Acaridae) [230,231]. We have analyzed
by GC-MS all the essential oils and applied two different methods to test
the activity of these compounds: one by direct contact and the other by
vapour diffusion. In the direct contact assays five different quantities of
420
each undiluted substance (6, 2, 1, 0.5 |Lil) were spread on the internal
surface of petri dishes. The activity by inhalation was tested using two
petri dishes of different sizes: the smaller one, containing the mites, was
covered with a filter-paper disk and enclosed in a bigger dish containing 6
or 2 |il of each undiluted substance. At the highest doses, the essential oils
of the two lavender species and of peppermint killed 100% of the mites,
both by direct contact and inhalation. Eucalyptus oil was the least active.
We have also tested the activity of the main constituents of the above
essential oils, specifically linalool (27.3% in L angustifolid), linalyl
acetate (32.1% in L. angustifolia), camphor (10.0% in L stoechas),
fenchone {A12% in L. stoechas), 1,8-cineole (76.0% in E, globulus),
menthone and menthol (31.8% and 21.7%, resp., in M. piperita). Among
these compounds, menthol showed the highest activity, killing 100% of
the mites at the lowest dose (0.25 |il) by direct contact and at 6 |il by
inhalation. Linalool, fenchone and menthone showed good acaricidal
activity (100% mite deaths at 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 |LI1 in direct contact and 6.0 |Lil
each by inhalation). 1,8-cineole was the least effective compound, killing
81.7% mites at 6.0 |Lil and 50% at 6.0 |LI1 in direct contact and inhalation
tests, respectively. At present, we are evaluating the acaricidal activity of
the essential oils and main pure components of the branches of four Pinus
species against another pest of stored food, Tyrophagus putrescentiae
(Acari: Acaridae) [301]. The species used in this study were P, pine a, P.
halepensiSy P. pinaster and P. nigra, their essential oils being characterized
by GC-MS. The acaricidal tests were performed against mites isolated
from samples of seasoned Parma ham, avoiding direct contact of the
substances with the mites, but evaluating only their volatile fractions.
Each compound was tested at 8 and 6 |LI1. All the essential oils, with the
exception of P. nigra, had a good acaricidal activity. P. pinea oil was the
most effective one, killing 100% mites at 8 |LI1 and 20% at 6 |LI1. P.
halepensis and P. pinaster oils killed 60% and 53% mites at 8 |Lil,
respectively, while at 6 |il they were ineffective. P. nigra oil was
completely ineffective, a-pinene, p-pinene, myrcene, limonene, 1,8-
cineole, P-caryophyllene and germacrene D, the main constituents of
these oils, were assayed in the same way. 1,8-cineole was the most active
compound, killing 100% mites at 8 and 6 |il, followed by limonene which
killed 100% mites at 8 |il and 32% at 6 |xl. All the other compounds were
completely ineffective. Thirteen terpenes were tested by Sanchez-Ramos
421
were 2.7 and 0.6 g/m^, respectively. From the bark of Neolitsea sericea
(Lauraceae) two acaricidal lanostane triterpenes, 24Z-ethylidenelanost-8-
en-3-one and 24-methylenelanost-8-en-3-one, Fig. (6), were isolated and
characterized [234].
Squamocin
R=CH-CI^ 24Z-ethylidenelanost-8-en-3-one
R=CH2 24-methylenelanost-8-en-3-one
Fig. (6). Structures of squamocin from Uvaria pauci-ovulata and lanostanes from Neolitsea sericea
and pure thymol against T. urticae and both compounds were found
effective [259]. Thymol was more potent than thyme oil as a deterrent
factor for reducing egg laying by the mite. Mortality percentage reached
100% with both materials used, however, at lower concentrations, the
effect was more pronounced with thymol than thyme oil. A very
interesting paper deals about the insecticidal and acaricidal activities of
many monoterpenes and their possible phytotoxicity on host plants
[260]. Twenty-nine compounds, belonging to different chemical classes,
were assayed against T. urticae by mean of the leaf-dip method. In
particular, the alcohols carveol, carvomenthenol, citronellol, geraniol, 10-
hydroxygeraniol, isopulegol, linalool, /-menthol, perillyl alcohol, a-
terpineol and verbenol, the phenols carvacrol, eugenol and thymol, the
ketones t/-carvone, /-carvone, /-fenchone, menthone, pulegone, thujone
and verbenone, the aldehydes citral and citronellal, the acid citronellic
acid, the ether 1,8-cineole and the hydrocarbons limonene, a-terpinene
and y-terpinene were used. All the compounds were tested, in water with
Triton X-100 as wetting agent, at 10000 and 1000 ppm, and the activity
was assessed 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment. The toxicity differed
depending on the concentrations and the exposure times. The
monoterpenes tested, except for 1,8-cineole, 10-hydroxygeraniol, a-
terpineol, verbenol and verbenone, caused 100% mortality at the highest
concentration after 24 hours. Carvacrol was the most effective at the
lowest concentrations, followed by citronellol. Geraniol produced 100%
mortality, whereas its analog 10-hydroxy geraniol showed 0% mortality.
Longer exposure time increased acaricidal effects. The most effective
monoterpenoids (carvacrol, carvomenthenol, carvone, citronellol, eugenol,
geraniol, perillyl alcohol, 4-terpineol, thymol) were evaluated in more
detailed tests. Of these, carvomenthenol and 4-terpineol showed greater
acaricidal activity (LC5o= 59 and 96 ppm, respectively) than others.
Furthermore, authors examined the phytotoxicity of some compounds to
both com roots and leaves 3 and 10 days after treatments, /-carvone was
the most phytotoxic compound, while pulegone was the safest. A table
with detailed data is reported in the paper. Two species known for a long
time as potential pesticides, particularly as insecticides and insect
repellents, have also been investigated as acaricides against T. urticae
[261]. The essential oils of Artemisia absinthium and Tanacetum vulgare
(Asteraceae) were obtained from whole cultivated plants harvested in fiiU
427
nerolidol
CH.OH
famesol
Fig. (7). Nerolidol and famesol, two sesquiterpene pheromones
•Mil
has been named pseudoisoeugenol [271], Fig (9). Also derivatives of (1£)-
propenyl-4-hydroxybenzene have been isolated in some Pimpinella
species. The activity in the contact assay of 100 ppm of eight Pimpinella
phenylpropanoids against the red spider mite, T. telarius, has been
evaluated [272]. Epoxy-anoltiglate was the most effective compound,
killing 100% of the mites, while four other substances, epoxy-
pseudoisoeugenolisobutyrate, epoxy-pseudoisoeugenoltiglate, pseudoiso-
eugenolisobutyrate and isoeugenolisobutyrate showed lesser
effectiveness, killing 80-90% of the mites.
X)
HoCO'
H3CO'
epoxy-pseudoisoeugenoltiglate pseudoisoeugenolisobutyrate
epitaondiol
culupulone
ajoene
stypetriol
and only 31.5% of the juvenile stages. These results suggested that
ajoene, besides having direct acaricidal effect, could also control
resurgence of the pest. Glandular trichomes of wild tomato, Lycopersicon
hirsutum f. glabratum (Solanaceae), yielded two methyl ketones: 2-
tridecanone and 2-undecanone [276]. They are known to cause mortality
in several herbivorous insect species; it seems that this kind of chemicals
could be considered defensive substances against pollen-feeding animals,
as confirmed also by their abundance in wind-pollinated plants [277].
Dutch researchers investigated the effects of these compounds on two
strains of T. urticae, collected from tomato and cucumber crops in
greenhouses [276]. The two ketones were tested separately, in
combination in the ratio found in L hirsutum f glabratum and in several
other ratios to detect any synergistic interaction between them.
Synergistic effects were not detected. They measured both the direct
contact and residual toxicity, as well as the viability of the eggs produced
by ketone-treated females. Both compounds showed LC50 values
comparable to the formulated acaricide amitraz; 2-tridecanone was
slightly more toxic than 2-undecanone, but only against the tomato strain.
In the bioassays for the residual effects, no significant mortality occurred,
however the mites avoided feeding on the treated surface and the eggs
were laid almost exclusively on the untreated area. Furthermore, there was
no significant egg viability for most of the treatments. A new plant
species. Quassia sp. aff. bidwillii (Simaroubaceae) was discovered in
Australia and the MeOH extract of its aerial parts was tested against T,
urticae [278]. Because of its effectiveness, subsequent fractionation by
RP-chromatography gave the pure active quassinoid derivative
chapparinone, which showed a LC5o=47 ppm.
Neem extracts, pure constituents (i.e. azadirachtin) and formulated
products showed positive results against Tetranichus mites [279-283].
Less polar extracts were considerably more toxic than polar ones or cold-
pressed neem oil or commercial neem oil, and reduced the fecundity of the
mites on treated plants and the survival of nymphs hatched from treated
eggs; application of pentane extract or neem oil in sublethal
concentrations, caused growth disrupting effects on the nymphal stages
and ovicidal effects. Quantification of the insecticidal substance
azadirachtin in the extracts revealed that this compound was not the most
active principle against the mites [284].
434
AB3217A:R=H ^ ^^
O 11 I
AB3217 B:R= —c—(CH2)4—C-(CH3)2
(f
AB3217C:R= —C—(CH2)2—CH-(CH3)2
^ H N ^ ^
gualamycin
major rotenoids accounted for more than 95% and probably almost all of
the biological activity of the cube resin as inhibitor of Complex I. Many
kinds of Streptomyces strains produce piericidin homologues. Piericidin A
is a very potent inhibitor of Complex I. The natural side chain of
piericidin A is not essential for the activity since piericidin B, C and D
analogues, in which the region from C-5 to C-13 differs, exhibit activity as
high as or only slightly less than piericidin A. On the basis of studies
with synthetic analogues, it was concluded that a branched methyl group
at C-3 and unsaturation between C-2 and C-3 are important for potent
activity [297].
OCH OCHo
OCHo OCHo
Rotenone R=H DeguelinR=H
Rotenolone R=OH Tephrosin R=OH
HoC
H3CO'
Piericidin A
HO* Capsaicin
Fig. (12). Complex I inhibitors
1996,75, 4-11.
[37] Mutinelli, F.; Baggio, A.; Capolongo, F.; Piro, R.; Prandin, L.; Biasion, L.;
Apidologie, 1997, 25, 461-462.
[38] Floris, I.; Satta, A.; ISlutinelli, F.; Prandin, L.; Redia, 1998, 87, 143-150.
[39] Higes, M.; Meana, A.; Suarez, M.; Llorente, J.; Apidologie, 1999, 30, 289-292.
[40] Gregorc, A.; Planinc, I.; Apidologie, 2001, 32, 333-340.
[41] Kraus, B.; Biene, 1991, 727, 427-430.
[42] Kraus, B.; Biene, 1992, 728, 186-192.
[43] Kraus, B.; Apidologie, 1992, 23, 385-387.
[44] Kraus, B.; Biene, 1992, 728, 5-11.
[45] Kraus, B.; Berg, S.; Exper. Appl AcaroL, 1994, 78, 459-468.
[46] Br0dsgaard, C.J.; Hansen, H.; Hansen, C.W.; Apiacta, 1997,3, 81-88.
[47] Rademacher, E.; Apidologie, 1992, 23, 381-382.
[48] Ahmad, R.; Pak. J. Zool, 1991, 23, 363-364.
[49] Gatoria, G.S.; Brar, H.S.; Jhajj, H.S.; 7. Insect, Sci„ 1995, 8, 157-159.
[50] Sharma, S.D.; Kashyap, N.P.; Raj, D.; Sharma, O.P.; Int. J. Trop. Agric,
1994, 72, 96-100.
[51] Garza, Q.C.; Dustmann, J.H.; Deutsch. Imker J., 1991, 2, 455-456.
[52] Liu, T.P.; Am, Bee J„ 1995,135, 562-566.
[53] Melathopoulos, A.P.; Winston, M.L.; Whittington, R.; Smith, T.; Lindberg, C ;
Mukai, A.; Moore, M.; J. Econ. EntomoL, 2000, 93, 199-209.
[54] Whittington, R.; Winston, M.L.; Melathopoulos, A.P.; Higo, H.A.; Am. Bee J.,
2000,140, 567-572.
[55] Melathopoulos, A.P.; Winston, M.L.; Whittington, R.; Higo, H.; le Doux, M.;
J. Econ. EntomoL, 2000, 93, 559-567.
[56] Majeed, Q.; Shashpa, 2000, 7, 49-52.
[57] Peng, C.Y.S.; Trinh, S.; Lopez, J.E.; Mussen, B.C.; Hung, A.; Chuang, R.; J.
Apicult. Res.,2Qm,39, 159-168.
[58] Cobey, S.; Am. Bee J., 1994,134, 257-258.
[59] Goodwin, M.; Van Eaton, C ; Control of Varroa. A Guide for New Zealand
Beekeepers. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 2001.
[60] Br0dsgaard, C.J.; Kristiansen, P.; Hansen, H.; Proc. IX Int. Congr. Acarology,
17-22 July 1994; pp 1-5.
[61] Lejeune, B.; Vennat, B.; Regerat, F.; Gardelle, D.; Foucher, D.; Pourrat, A.;
Parf. Cosm. Aromes, 1984, 56, 65-68.
[62] Angelloz-Nicoud, E.; Bee World, 1930,10, 12-14.
[63] Imdorf, A.; Bogdanov, S.; Ochoa, R.I.; Calderone, N.W.; Apidologie, 1999, 30,
441
209-228.
[64] Colin, M.E.; J. Appl EntomoL, 1990,110, 19-25.
[65] Vecchi, M.A.; Giordani, G.; J. Invert. Path., 1968, 10, 390-416.
[66] Duff, S.R.; Furgala, B.; Am. Bee J., 1991,131, 315-317.
[67] Duff, S.R.; Furgala, B.; Am. Bee J., 1993,133, 127-130.
[68] Duff, S.R.; Furgala, B.; Am. Bee J., 1992,132, A16-A11.
[69] Kevan, P.G.; Nasr, M.; Kevan, S.D.; Hivelights, 1999,12, 1-4.
[70] Kevan, P.G.; Nasr, M.; Kevan, S.D.; Can. Entomol, 1999,131, 279-281.
[71] Lodesani, M.; Bergomi, S.; Pellacani, A.; Carpana, E.; Rabitti, T.; Apicoltura,
1990,6, 105-130.
[72] Chiesa, F.; Apidologie, 1991, 22, 135-145.
[73] Calderone, N.W.; Spivak, M.; /. Econ. Entomol, 1995, 88, 1211-1215.
[74] Calderone, N.W.; Wilson, W.T.; Spivak M.; J. Econ. Entomol, 1997, 90,
1080-1086.
[75] Sammataro, D.; Degrandi-Hoffmann, G.; Needham, G.; Wardell, G.; Am. Bee /.,
1998,138, 681-685.
[76] Rickli, M.; Imdorf, A.; Kilchenmann, V.; Apidologie, 1991, 22, 417-421.
[77] Schulz; S.; Apidologie, 1993, 5, 497-499.
[78] Imdorf, A.; Kilchenmann, V.; Maquelin, C ; Bogdanov, S.; Apidologie, 1994,
25, 49-60.
[79] Imdorf, A.; Bogdanov, S.; Kilchenmann, V.; Maquelin, C ; Bee World, 1995,
76, n-S3.
[80] Bollhalder, F.; Bee Biz, 1999, 9, 10-11.
[81] Bogdanov, S; Kilchenmann, V.; Imdorf, A.; Fluri, P.; Am. Bee J., 1998,138,
610-611.
[82] Mattila, H.R.; Otis, G.W.; Am. Bee J., 1999,139, 947-952.
[83] Mattila, H.R.; Otis, G.W.; Daley, J.; Schulz, T.; Am. Bee J., 2000,140, 68-
70.
[84] Mattila, H.R.; Otis, G.W.; Am. Bee J., 2000,140, 969-973.
[85] PrigU, M.; Suhayda, J.; Bekessy, G.; Int. Pat. Appl., 1991, WO 91 07 875.
[86] Imdorf, A.; Kilchenmann, V.; Bogdanov, S.; Bachofen, B.; Beretta, C ;
Apidologie, 1995, 26, 27-31.
[87] Wilson, W.T.; Pettis, J.S.; Collins, A.M.; Am. Bee J., 1989,129, 826.
[88] Brasseur T., Pharm. Belg., 1983, 38, 261-272.
[89] Stahl-Biskup, E.; /. Essent. Oil Res., 1991, 3, 61-82.
[90] Sewell, M.M.H.; Brocklesby, D.W.; Handbook of Animal Diseases in the
Tropics, 4th ed., BailUere Tindall ELBS, London , 1992.
442
[91] Soulsby, E.J.L.; Elminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domenstic Animals, 6th
ed., The English Book Soc. and Balliere Ltd., London, 1968.
[92] Radostis, O.M.; Blood, D.C; Gay, C.C.; Veterinary Medicine, a Textbook of the
Diseases of Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses. 8th ed. Bailliere Tindall,
London, 1995.
[93] Kagaruki, L.K.; Trop. Pest Manag,, 1991, 37, 33-36.
[94] Regassa, A.; De Castro, J.J.; Tropic. Anim. Health Prod., 1993, 25, 69-74.
[95] Ndumu, P.A.; George, J.B.D.; Choudhury, M.K.; Phytother. Res., 1999, 13,
532-534.
[96] Williams, L.A.D.; IMansingh, A.; Integr. Pest Manag. Rev., 1996,1, 133-145.
[97] Malonza, M.M.; Dipeolu, O.O.; Amoo, A.O.; Hassan, S.M.; Vet. Parasitol,
1992,42, 123-136.
[98] Miller, R.J.; Byford, R.L.; Smith, G.S.; Craig, M.E.; Vanleeuwen, D.; J. Agric.
EntomoL, 1995,12, 137-143.
[99] Kaaya, G.P.; Mwangi, E.N.; Malonza, M.M.; Int. J. Acarol, 1995, 21, 123-
129.
[100] Lasota, J.A.; Dybas, R.A.; Amu. Rev. EntomoL, 1991, 36, 91-117.
[101] Bloomquist, J.R.; Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C, 1993, 706, 301-314.
[102] Soil, M.D.; Benz, G.W.; Carmichael, LH.; Gross, S.J.; Vet. Parasitol, 1990,
37, 285-296.
[103] Pound, J.M.; Miller, J.A.; George, J.E.; Oehler, D.D.; Harmel, D.E.; / . Med.
EntomoL, 1996, 33, 385-394.
[104] Miller, J.A.; Garris, G.I.; Oehler, D.D.; J. Agric. EntomoL, 1997,14, 199-204.
[105] Wilson, K.J.; Hair, J.A.; Sauer, J.R.; Weeks, D.L.; J. Med. EntomoL, 1991,
28, 465-468.
[106] Miller, J.A.; Oehler, D.D.; Pound, J.M.; J. Econ. EntomoL, 1998,97, 655-
659.
[107] Yunker, C.E.; Peter, T.; Norval, R.A.I.; Sonenshine, D.E.; Burridge, M.J.;
Butler, J.F.; Exper. AppL AcaroL, 1992,13, 295-301.
[108] Yoder, J.A.; Stevens, B.W.; Crouch, K.C.; J. Med. EntomoL, 1999, i 6 , 526-
529.
[109] Norval, R.A.I.; Sonenshine, D.E.; Allan, S.A.; Burridge, M.J.; Exper. AppL
AcaroL,1996,20, 31-46,
[110] Allan, S.A.; Barre, N.; Sonenshine, D.E.; Burridge, M.J.; Med. Vet EntomoL,
1998, 72, 141-150.
[Ill] Kaaya, G.P.; Mwangi, E.N.; Ouna, E.A.; J. Invert. Pathol, 1996, 67, 15-20.
[112] Kaaya, G.P.; Hassan, S.; Exper. AppL Acarol, 2000, 24, 913-926.
443
[113] Prates, H.T.; Oliveira, A.B.; Leite, R.C.; Craveiro, A.A.; Pesq. Agropec. Brasil,
1993, 28, 621-625.
[114] Prates, H.T.; Leite, R.C.; Craveiro, A.A.; Oliveira, A.B.; J. Brazil. Chem. Soc,
1998, 9, 193-197.
[115] Chungsamarnyart, N.; Jiwajinda, S.; Kasetsart 7., 1992, 26 SuppL, 46-51.
[116] Chungsamarnyart, N.; Jansawan, W.; Kasetsart /., 1996, 30, 112-117.
[117] Brum, J.G.W.; Teixeira, M.O.; Arq. Brasil, Med. Vet. Zootecn., 1992, 44, 543-
544.
[118] Korpraditkul, R.; Ratanalcreetakul, C ; Jiuraijinda, S.; Swasdiphanich, S.;
Tiraporn, R.; Proc. ICV-1, Chiang Rai, Thailand, 4-8 February 1996, 140.
[119] Cruz Vazquez, C ; Fernandez Ruvalcaba, M.; Solano Vergara J.; Garcia Vazquez,
Z.; Parasitol al Dia, 1999, 23, 15-18.
[120] Khudrathulla, M.; Jagannath, M.S.; Indian J. Anim. Scl, 2000, 70, 1057-1058.
[121] Regassa, A.; /. South Afr. Vet Assoc, 2000, 71, 240-243.
[122] Mansingh, A.; Williams, L.A.D.; Insect Sci. Appl, 1998,18, 149-155.
[123] Chungsamarnyart, N.; Jansawan, W.; Kasetsart J., 2001, 35, 34-39.
[124] Williams, L.A.D.; Florida EntomoL, 1991, 74, 404-408.
[125] Williams, L.A.D.; Invert. Repr. Devel, 1993, 23, 159-164.
[126] Kalakumar, B.; Kumar, H.S.A.; Kumar, B.A.; Reddy, K.S.; J. Vet. Parasitol,
2000, 14, 171-172.
[127] Sivaramakrishnan, S.; Kumar, N.S.; Jeyabalan, D.; Babu, R.; Raja, N.S.;
Murugan, K.; Indian J. Environ. Toxicol, 1996, 6, 85-86.
[128] Banerjee, P.S.; J. Vet. Parasitol, 1997, II, 215-217.
[129] Kumar, R.; Chauhan, P.P.S.; Agrawal, R.D.; Shankar, D.; J. Vet. Parasitol,
2000, 14, 67-69.
[130] Nooruddin, M.; Mahanta, P.N.; Nauriyal, D.C.; Pashudhan, 1990, 5, 4.
[131] Srivastava, P.S.; Sinha, S.R.P.; Pashudhan, 1990, 5, 4.
[132] Kumar, A.; Joshi, B.P.; Indian J. Vet. Med, 1993,13, 38.
[133] Vatsya, S.; Singh, N.P.; Indian J. Vet. Pathol, 1997, 21, 30-31.
[134] Maske, D.K.; Sardey, M.R.; Bhilegaonkar, N.G.; Indian Vet. J., 1992, 69, 57-
58.
[135] Miller, J.A.; Davey, R.B.; Oehler, D.D.; Pound, J.M.; George, J.E.; Vet.
Entomol, 2001, 94, 1622-1627.
[136] Marques, A.O.; Arantes, G.J.; Silva, C.R.; Rev. Brasil Parasitol Vet., 1996,
4, 117-119.
[137] Gonzales, J.C.; Muniz, R.A.; Farias, A.; Goncalves, L.C.B.; Rew, R.S.; Vet.
Parasitol, 1993, 49, 107-119.
444
[138] Leite, R.C.; Muniz, R.A.; Oliveira, P.R.; Goncalves, L.C.B.; Rew, R.S.; Rev,
Brasil Parasitol Vet, 1995, 4, 53-56.
[139] Lombardero, OJ.; Moriena, R.A.; Racioppi, 0.; Errecalde, J.O.; Vet. Argent,
1995, 72, 318-324.
[140] Muniz, R.A.; Hernandez, F.; Lombardero, O.; Leite, R.C.; Moreno, J.; Errecalde,
J.; Goncalves, L.C.B.; Am, J. Vet Res., 1995, 56, 460-463.
[141] Williams, L.A.D.; Gardner, M.T.; Singh, P.D.A.; The, T.L.; Fletcher, C.K.;
Caled Williams, L.; Kraus, W.; Invert Reprod. Develop., 1997, 31, 231-236.
[142] Porter, R.B.R.; Reese, P.B.; Williams, L.A.D.; Williams, D.J.; Phytochemistry,
1995, 40, 735-738.
[143] Johnson, L.; Williams, L.A.D,; Roberts, E.V.; Pestic. ScL, 1997, 50, 228-232.
[144] Williams, L.A.D.; Simpson, G.; Jackson, Y.; Trop. ScL, 1997, 37, 85-87.
[145] de la Parra, G.M.; Chavez Pena, D.; Jimenez Estrada, M.; Ramos Mundo, C ;
Pestic. Sci, 1991, 33, 73-80.
[146] Davey, R.B.; George, J.E.; Snyder, D.E.; Vet Parasitol., 2001, 99, 41-52.
[147] do Correia, C.B.; Fiorin, A.C.; Monteiro, A.C.; Verissimo, C.J.; /. Invert
Pathol., 1998, 71, 189-191.
[148] Bittencourt, V.R.E.P.; de Souza, E.J.; Peralva, S.L.F.; Reis, R.C.S.; Rev.
Brasil, Med, Vet, 1999, 21, 78-82.
[149] Guedes Frazzon, A.P.; da Silva Vaz Jr., I.; Masuda, A.; Schrank, A.; Henning
Vainstein, M.; Vet Parasitol., 2000, 94, 117-125.
[150] Camacho, E.R.; Navaro, G.; Rodriguez, R.M.; Murillo, E.Y.; Rev. Colomb,
Entomol,,199S,24, 67-69.
[151] Abdel Megeed, K.N.; Abdel Rahman, E.H.; Hassanain, M.A.; Vet Med, J. Giza,
1997, 45, 389-395.
[152] Estrada Pena, A.; Jongejan, F.; Experim. Appl. Acarol., 1999, 23, 685-715.
[153] Waller, J.; Ball, C.; Kremer, M.; Bull. Soc. Franc. Parasitol, 1988, 6, 133-136.
[154] Pandita, N.N.; Ram, S.; Small Ruminant Res., 1990, 3, 403-412.
[155] Kumar, A.; Sharma, S.D.; Joshi, B.P.; Indian Vet J., 1992, 69, 62-64.
[156] Panda, D.N.; Misra, S.C.; Indian Vet J., 1997, 74, 562-564.
[157] Panda, D.N.; Misra S.C; J. Vet Parasitol, 1997,11, 155-159.
[158] Bhilegaonkar, N.G.; Maske, D.K.; J. Vet Parasitol, 1998,12, 46-47.
[159] Bagherwal, R.K.; Indian Vet J., 1999, 76, 196-198.
[160] Dipeolu, O.O.; Ndungu, J.N.; Vet Parasitol, 1991, 38, 327-338.
[161] Lwande, W.; Ndakala, A.J.; Hassanali, A.; Moreka, L.; Nyandant, E.; Ndungu,
M.; Amiaani, H.; Gitu, P.M.; Malonza, M.M.; Punyua, D.K.; Phytochemistry,
1999,50, 401-405.
445
[162] Mwangi, E.N.; Hassanali, A.; Essuman, S.; Myandat, E.; Moreka, L.; Kimondo,
M.; Exper. Appl AcaroL, 1995,19, 11-18.
[163] Mallo, O.; Vet. Argentina, 1990, 7, 631-633.
[164] Jernigan, A.D.; IVlcTier, T.L.; Chieffo, C ; Thomas, C.A.; Krautmann, IVl.J.;
Hair, J.A.; Young, D.R.; Wang, C ; Rowan, T.G.; Jacobs, D.E.; Vet, ParasitoL,
2000, 91 Spec. Issue, 359-375.
[165] Morsy, T.A.; Haridy, P.M.; J. Egyp. Soc. ParasitoL, 2000, 30, 117-124.
[166] van Straten, M.; Jongejan, F.; Exper. Appl. Acarol., 1993,17, 605-616.
[167] Singh, S.; Kumar, R.; Chhabra, M.B.; J. Vet. ParasitoL, 1992, 6, 1-5.
[168] Hassanain, M.A,; El Garhy, M.F.; Ghaffar, F.A.; El Sharaby, A.; Megeed,
K.N.A.; ParasitoL Res., 1997, 83, 209-213.
[169] Igboechi, A.C.; Osazuwa, E.G.; Igwe, U.E.; J. Ethnopharm., 1989, 26, 293-
298.
[170] Panella, N.A.; Karchesy, J.; Maupin, G.O.; Malan, J.C.S.; Piesman, J.; J. Med.
EntomoL, 1997, 34, 340-345.
[171] Khambay, B.P.S.; Batty, D.; Cahill, M.; Denholm, I.; Mead-Briggs, M.; Vinall,
S.; Niemeyer, H.M.; Simmonds, M.S.J.; /. Agric. Food Chem., 1999, 47, 110-
775.
[172] Hill, D.E.;y. ParasitoL, 199%, 84, 1124-1127.
[173] Duffy, D.C.; Downer, R.; Brinkley, C.; Wilson BulL, 1992,104, 342-345.
[174] Ena, P; Spano, G.; Leigheb, G.; Giorn. ItaL DermatoL VenereoL, 1999, 134,
115-122.
[175] O'Brien, D.J.; Vet. ParasitoL, 1999,83, 177-185.
[176] Bridi, A.A.; Carvalho, L.A.; Cramer, L.G.; Barrick, R.A.; Vet. ParasitoL, 2001,
97, 277-283.
[177] Kolbjornsen, O,; Gjerde, B.; Hanche Olsen, S.; Norsk Vet,2001, 113, 285-
290.
[178] Madan, V.; Jaskiran, K.; Gupta, U.; Gupta, D.K.; J. DermatoL, 2001, 28, 481-
484.
[179] Ochs, H.; Lonneux, J.F.; Losson, B.J.; Deplazes, P.; Vet. ParasitoL, 2001, 96,
233-242.
[180] Perrucci, S.; Cioni, P.L.; Flamini, G.; Morelli, I.; Macchioni, G.;
Parassitologia, 1994, 36, 269-271.
[181] Perrucci, S.; Macchioni, G.; Cioni, P.L.; Flamini, G.; MorelH, I.; Taccini, F.;
Phytother. Res., 1996,10, 5-8.
[182] Perrucci, S.; Cioni, P.L.; Cascella, A.; Macchioni, F.; Med. Vet. Entom.,
1997,11, 300-302.
446
[183] Perrucci, S.; Flamini, G.; Macchioni, F.; Parassitologia, 1996, 38, 239.
[184] Perrucci, S.; Macchioni, G.; Cioni, P.L.; Flamini, G.; Morelli, I.; J. Nat. Prod.,
1995,58, 1261-1264.
[185] Perrucci, S.; Flamini, G.; Cioni, P.L.; Morelli, I.; Macchioni, F.; Macchioni,
G.; Vet. Record, 2001,148, 814-815.
[186] Dakshinkar, N.P.; Sharma, S.R.; Kothekar, M.D.; Sapre, V.A.; Gore, A.K.;
Indian Vet. Med. J., 1992,16, 288-291.
[187] O'Brien, D.J.; Smyth, E.; McAuliffe, A.; Pike, K.; Indian Vet. Med J., 2000,
16, 288-291.
[188] Charles, V.; Charles, S.X.; Trop. Geogr. Med, 1992, 44, 178-181.
[189] Knust, F.J.; Kleeberg, H.; Micheletti, V.; Proc. 4th Workshop "Practice oriented
results on use and production ofneem ingredients and pheromones" Bordighera,
Italy, November 28th-December 1st 1994, 101-102.
[190] Walton, S.F.; Myerscough, M.R.; Currie, B.J.; Trans. Royal Soc. Trop. Med.
Hyg., 2000, 94, 92-96.
[191] Joshi, S.S.; Dakshinkar, N.P.; Sapre, V.A.; Sarode, D.B.; Indian Vet. J., 2000,
77, 706-708.
[192] Neog, R.; Borkakoty, M.R.; Lahkar, B.C.; Sharma, P.C; J. Vet. Parasitol,
1990, 4, 35-39.
[193] Perrucci, S.; Rossi, G.; Flamini, G.; Ceccherelli, R.; Mani, P.; Selez. Vet.,
1997, 8-9, 837-842.
[194] Sharma, D.K.; Saxena, V.K.; Sanil, N.K.; Singh, N.; Small Rum. Res., 1997,
26, 81-85.
[195] Blanc, D.; Deprez, P.; Lancet Brit. Ed., 1990, 335, 1291-1292.
[196] Nathan, A.; Pharm. J., 1997, 259, 331-332.
[197] Forton, F.; Seys, B.; Marchal, J.L.; Song, M.; Brit. J. Dermatol, 1998,138,
461-466.
[198] Blenkinsopp, J.; Pharm. J., 1989, 243, 274-275.
[199] Sekar, M.; Ulaganathan, V.; Cheiron, 1989,18, 259-260.
[200] Syaamasundar, N.; Chauduri, P.C; Reddy, K.K.; Indian J. Vet. Med., 1994,14,
38.
[201] Rao, V.N.; Mandial, R.K.; Sanjeet, K.; Indian J. Vet. Med, 1992,12, 90-91.
[202] Prasad, V.R.; Singari, N.A.; Choudhuri, P.C; Cheiron, 1999, 28, 52-54.
[203] Heyndrickx, G.; Brioen, P.; van Puyvelde, L.; /. Ethnopharm., 1992, 35, 259-
262.
[204] Tripathy, S.B.; Indian J. Indig. Med, 1990, 7, 55-60.
[205] Parija, B.G.; Misra, S.C; Sahoo, P.K.; Panda, G.M.; Indian Vet. J., 1994, 71,
447
819-821.
[206] Hirudkar, U.S.; Deshpande, P.D.; Narladkar, B.W.; Vadlamudi, V.P.; Indian Vet.
J., 1997, 74, 506-508.
[207] Singh, J.; Gill, J.S.; J. Vet. Parasitol, 1993, 7, 124-126.
[208] Chhabra, M.B.; Jakhar, G.S.; Indian J. Vet. Med., 1994,14, 92-93.
[209] Sangwan, A.K.; Sangwan, N.; Chaudhri, S.S.; Gupta, R.P.; Indian Vet. J.,
1994, 77, 925-927.
[210] Pathak, K.M.L.; Kapoor, M.; Shukla, R.C.; Indian Vet. J., 1995, 72, 494-496.
[211] Das, S.S.; Vet. Parasitol, 1996, 63, 303-306.
[212] Maske, D.K.; Bhilegaonkar, N.G.; Teeware, M.M.; Gore, A.K.; J. Vet.
Parasitol, 1991,11,11-19.
[213] Das, S.S.; J. Vet. Parasitol, 1993, 7, 67-69.
[214] Das, S.S.; / Parasitol Appl Anim. Biol, 1997, 6, 39-41.
[215] Hazarika, R.A.; Deka, D.K.; Phukan, S.C; Saikia, P.K.; J. Vet. Parasitol,
1995,9, 143-145.
[216] Maske, D.K.; Bhilegaonkar, N.G.; Indian J. Indig. Med., 1996, 75, 67-69.
[217] Pathak, K.M.L.; Shukla, R.C.; /. Vet. Parasitol, 1998, 72, 50-51.
[218] Bahir, A.; Goldberg, A.; Mekori, Y.A.; Confino-Cohen, R.; Morag, H.; Rosen,
Y.; Monakir, D.; Rigler, S.; Cohen, A.H.; Horev, Z.; Noviski, N.; Mandelberg,
A.; Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol, 1997, 78, 506-512.
[219] van der Heide, S.; Kauffman, H.F.; Dubois, A.E.J.; de Monchy, J.G.R.; Allergy,
1997, 52, 921-927.
[220] Tovey, E.; Marks, G.; J. Allergy Clin. Immunol, 1999,103, 179-191.
[221] Arlian, L.G.; Platts-Mills, T.A.E.; J. Allergy Clin. Immunol, 2001, 107,
Suppl., s406-s413.
[222] Bischoff, E.; Fischer, A.; Liebenberg, B.; Clin. Ther., 1990, 72, 216-220.
[223] Hayden, M.L.; Rose, G.; Diduch, K.B.; Domson, P.; Chapman, M.D.;
Heymann, P.W.; Platts-Mills, T.A.E.; J. Allergy Clin. Immun., 1992, 89, 536-
545.
[224] McDonald, L.G.; Tovey, E.; J. Allergy Clin. Immun., 1993, 92, 771-772.
[225] Chang, J.H.; Becker, A.; Ferguson, A.; Manfreda, J.; Simons, E.; Chan, H.;
Noertjojo, K.; Chan-Yeung, M.; Ann. Allergy, Asthma Immun., 1996, 77, 187-
190.
[226] Raynaud, S.; Fourneau, C ; Laurens, A.; Hocquemiller, R.; Loiseau, P.; Bories,
C ; Planta Med., 2000, 66, 173-175.
[227] Chang, S.T.; Chen, P.F.; Wang, S.Y.; Wu, H.H.; J. Med. Entomol, 2001, 38,
455-457.
448
[228] Yatagai, M.; Ohira, T.; Nakashima, K.; Biochem. Syst. EcoL, 1998, 26, 713-
722.
[229] Furuno, T.; Terada, Y.; Yano, S.; Uehara, T.; Jodai, S.; Mokuzai Gakkaishi,
1994, 40, 78-87.
[230] Perrucci, S.; Cioni, P.L.; Flamini, G.; Morelli, I.; Macchioni, G.; Proc. Int.
Meeting "Coltivazione e miglioramento di piante ojficinali'\ Trento, Italy, 2-3
giugno 1994, 579-584.
[231] Perrucci, S.; J. Food Prot., 1995, JS, 560-563.
[232] Sanchez-Ramos, I.; Castanera, P.; J. Stored Prod. Res., 2001, 57, 93-101.
[233] McDonald, L.G.; Tovey, E.; J. Allergy Clin. Immun., 1997,100, 464-466.
[234] Sharma, M.C.; Ohira, T.; Yatagai, M.; Phytochemistry, 1994, 37, 201-203.
[235] Nathanson, J.A.; Science, 1984, 226, 184-186.
[236] Russell, D.W.; Fernandez-Caldas, E.; Swanson, M.C.; Seleznick, M.J.; Trudeau,
W.L.; Lockey, R.F.; J. Allergy Clin. Immun., 1991, 87, 107-110.
[237] Walshaw, M.J.; Respir. Med., 1990, 84, 257-258.
[238] Cook, D.A.; Armitage, D.M.; Experim. Appl. Acarol., 1999, 23, 51-63.
[239] Cook, D.A.; Armitage, D.M.; Collins, D.A.; Postharv. News Inform., 1999,
10, 39N-43N.
[240] Krishnamoorthy, A.; Rajagopal, D.; Pest Manag. Hort. Ecosys., 1995, 7, 71-
79.
[241] Berrada, S.; Nguyen, T.X.; Fournier, D.; Z Angew. Entom., 1996, 120, 181-
185.
[242] Childers, C.C; Villanueva, R.; Aguilar, H.; Chewning, R.; Michaud, J.P.;
Exper. Appl. Acarol, 2001, 25, 461-474.
[243] Flexner, J.L.; Westigard, P.H.; Hilton, R.; Croft, B.A.; J. Econ. EntomoL,
1995,88, 1517-1524.
[244] Herron, G.A.; Learmonth, S.E.; Rophail, J.; Barchia, I.; Exper. Appl. Acarol,
1997,21, 163-169.
[245] Herron, G.A.; Rophail, J.; Exper. Appl Acarol, 1998, 22, 633-641.
[246] Ho, C.C; Exper. Appl Acarol, 2000, 24, 453-462.
[247] Fischer-Colbrie, P.; El-Borolossy, M.; Pflanzenschutzberichte, 1988,49, 125-
131.
[248] Stolz,M.; Pflanzenschutzber., 1990, 51, 127-138.
[249] Stolz, M.; Bull OILB SROP, 1994,17, 49-54.
[250] Sekulic, D.; Jovanovic, Z.; Kostic, M.; Sekulovic, D.; Pharmazie, 1995, 50,
835.
[251] Hiremath, I.G.; Ahn, Y.J.; Kim, S.I.; Choi, B.R.; Cho, J.R.; Korean J. Appl
449
[273] Jones, G.; Campbell, C.A.M.; Pye, BJ.; Maniar, S.P.; Mudd, A.; Pestic. ScL,
1996,47, 165-169.
[274] Rovirosa, J.; Sepulveda, M.; Quezada, E.; San-Martin, A.; Phytochemistry,
1992,57, 2679-2681.
[275] Singh, R.N.; Prithiviraj, B.; Singh, U.P.; Singh, P.K.; Wagner, K.G.; Z.
PflanzenL Pflanzen., 1996,103, 195-199.
[276] Chatzivasileiadis, E.A.; Sabelis, M.W.; Exper, Appl. Acarol, 1997, 21, 473-
484.
[277] Dobson, H.E.M.; Bergstrom, G.; PI Syst. EvoL, 2000, 222, 63-87.
[278] Latif, Z.; Craven, L.; Hartley, T.G.; Kemp, B.R.; Potter, J.; Rice, M.J.; Waigh,
R.D.; Waterman, P.G.; Biochem. Syst. Ecol, 2000, 28, 183-184.
[279] Dimetry, N.Z.; Amer, S.A.A.; Reda, A.S.; 7. Appl Entom., 1993,116, 308-
312.
[280] Sundaram, K.M.S.; Sloane, L.; 7. Environ. Sci. Health B, 1995, 30, 801-814.
[281] Sundaram, K.M.S.; Campbell, R.; Sloane, L.; Studens, J.; Crop Prot., 1995,
14, 415-421.
[282] Mansour, F.A.; Ascher, K.R.S.; Abo-Moch, F.; Phytoparasitica, 1997, 25, 333-
336.
[283] Singh, R.N.; Singh, J.; Indian J. Entom., 1999, 61, 188-191.
[284] Sanguanpong, U.; Schmutterer, H.; Z Pflanzenk. Pflanzen., 1992, 99, 637-646.
[285] Zhang, Z.Q.; Sanderson, J.P.; J. Econ. Entom., 1990, 83, 1783-1790.
[286] Kanbe, K.; Mimura, Y.; Tamamura, T.; Yatagai, S.; Sato, Y.; Takahashi, A.;
Sato, K.; Naganawa, H.; Nakamura, H.; Takeuchi, T.; litaka, Y.; J. Antibiot.,
1992, 45, 458-464.
[287] Kanbe, K.; Takahashi, A.; Tamamura, T.; Sato, K.; Naganawa, H.; Takeuchi, T.;
J. Antibiot., 1992, 45, 568-571.
[288] Tsuchiya, K.; Kobayashi, S.; Harada, T.; Kurokawa, T.; Nakagawa, T.; Shimada,
N.; Kobayashi, K.; /. Antibiot., 1995, 48, 626-629.
[289] Benuzzi, M.; NicoH, G.; Inform. Agr., 1991, 41, 41-46.
[290] Campbell, C.A.M.; Lilley, R.; Biocontrol Sci. Techn., 1999, 9, 453-465.
[291] Lilley, R.; Campbell, C.A.M.; Biocontrol Sci. Techn., 1999, 9, 467-473.
[292] Morris, M.A.; Berry, R.E.; Croft, B.A.; J. Econ. Entom., 1999, 92, 1072-1078.
[293] Nicetic, O.; Watson, D.M.; Beattie, G.A.C.; Meats, A.; Zheng, J.; Exper. Appl.
Acarol., 2001, 25, 37-53.
[294] Dick, G.L.; Buschman, L.L.; J. Kansas Entom. Soc, 1995, 68, 425-436.
[295] Dick, G.L.; Buschman, L.L.; Ramoska, W.A; Mycologia, 1992, 84, 729-738.
[296] Lummen, P.; Biochim. Biophis. Acta, 1998,1364, 287-296.
4S1
ABSTRACT: More than seventy podolactones have been isolated mainly from
Podocarpus species. Some of these structures have also been found in filamentous fungi.
The different biosynthetic origin of these molecules considering their vegetal or fungic
source is discussed in this review. These molecules present a wide range of biological
activities: anti-tumor activity, anti-inflammatory activity, fungicide activity, insecticidal
activity and plant growth regulatory activity. These biological properties are analyzed in
detail, and in the light of their results, structure/activity relationships are discussed.
Finally, chemical reactivity, including interconversion reactions, and synthetic
approaches to these compounds are summarized.
INTRODUCTION
Fig.{l)
the Podocarpus species, five podolactones have also been isolated from a
New Zealand mistletoe, Ileostylus micranthus, which was parasiting P.
totara, from which it has been suggested that podolactones were
assimilated [4]. A small number of tetranorditerpenoid dilactones isolated
from the filamentous fungi Oidiodendron truncatum [5-6], O. griseum
[7], Aspergillus wentii [8] and a non-identified species of the
Acrostalagmus genus [9] have also been considered as fomiing a part of
this group.
These natural substances are of great interest due to both their unusual
structures and the potent wide-ranging spectrum of biological activities
that they possess: antitumor activity [10] in vitro and/or in vivo, anti-
inflammatory activity [7], fungicidal activity [11], herbivorous
manmialian antifeedant activity [12], insecticide activity against house-fly
larvae and other insects [13] and, lastly, a potent plant growth regulatory
activity, both as inhibitors and as stimulants [14-15].
BIOSYNTHETIC ORIGIN
All natural podolactones have been isolated from two types of natural
sources, plants related to the genus Podocarpus, from which the majority
of podolactones have been described, and the filamentous fungi. This
different natural source also possesses a different biosynthetic origin. The
first noticeable evidence supporting this difference is that, while
podolactones isolated from plants are nor- orfcwnorditerpenoids(i.e.
nagilactone C and nagilactone E), the dilactones isolated from fungi have
lost four carbons from a diterpene precursor (i.e. oidilactone C).
On the other hand, the C-16 terpenoid dilactones isolated from fiingi
have been postulated to have a biosynthetic origin different from that
reported for podolactones from plants. Two possible biosynthetic ways
were envisaged, one supposing an oxidative loss of four carbons from a
diterpene precursor, and secondly, the addition of a C-1 unit to a
sesquiterpenoid [18]. The results obtained by administering isotopically
labelled acetic and mevalonic acids to an Acrostalamus fungi, together
with the isolation from this same fungus of acrostalidic acid, acrostalic
acid and isoacrostalidic acid let us to conclude an attribution of a
diterpenoid origin for these lactones with the following biogenetic
pathway proposal[19] (Scheme 2).
456
.CO2H COgH
-^ CO2H * CO2H
ciS' and frans-communic acid aerostatic acid
CO2H
'OMe
0 ^
The route could start from the mixture of cis- and rrans-coimnunic
acids (or also from other diterpenes, such as isocupresic acid). The
isolation of hydroxyacid I as a natural product from Acrostalagmus
reinforces the possiblity of the existence of diene II as a key precursor,
not only of isoacrostalidic acid and acrostaiidic acid, but also of dilactone
III. The straightforward chemical conversion of I into III in a recent
publication by Barrero et al. [20] supports this hypothesis.
457
Type A
inumakilactone E
6
P. macrophyllus,
P. polystachyus [24, 26]
O
C02Me
1 -deoxy-2a-hydroxy- 15-methoxycarbonyl-
hallactone A nagilactone D
nagiiactone A
7
8 9
P. ham [30] P. nag/ [31]
P./lag/[31]
459
3p-hydroxy- 15-hydroxy-
10
nagiiactone A nagitactone D
P. nagi [32]
11 12
P. nagi [32] P. nag/ [32]
O R=p-D-glc
O 1-deoxy-2p,3p- urbalactone
epoxynagilactone A nagilactoside A
14 15
13
P. urbanii [34] P. nagi [35]
P. nagi [33]
O
3-deoxy- 1-deoxy-
nagilactone C 3-ephnagilactone C nagiiactone A
16 17 18
lleostylus micranthus [4] P. na^/ [36] P. nag/[16]
460
2,3-dehydro- R=p-D-glc
1-deoxy- 2,3-dehydro-
nagilactone A nagilactoside B
nagilactone A
20 21
19
P. na^/[16] P. nagi [37]
P. nag/[16]
R*,
epi-sellowin C R=p-D-glc-(1^^6)-
R=p-D-glc-(1 -•Sj-p-D-glc- p-D-glc-nagilactoside D
22
nagilactoside C 24
P. nagi [37]
23 P. nagi [38]
P. nagi [38]
TypeB
OH
SOMe
0 inumakilactone B ^ podolactone C
podolactone D
31 32
33
P. polystachyus, P. macrophyllus P. neriifolius
P. milanjianus [45-48] P. neriifolius [45-47]
P. neriifolius [23,44-45]
0
O O
'%^
O sellowin B nagilactone E
35 36
P. sellowii [29,47] P. nap/ [49]
462
SOaMe
::o I o;
0Glu(0H)4
O nagilactone Q O 2,3-dihydro-
16-hydroxypodollde
16-hydroxypodolide
40 (salignone H)
P. sellowii 42
41
P. milanjianus [50] P. nagi [52]
P. saligna [51]
K^
O 16-hydroxy-
O 3-deoxy-2a-hydroxy- salignone M nagiiactone E
nagiiactone E
47 48
46
P. saligna [55] P. nagi [56]
P. nagi
lleostylus micranthus [4,36]
TypeC
Gluc-0'
-O
d ' ip-hydroxy- O 3p-hydroxy-
nagilactone F nubilactone A nagilactone F
52 53 54
P. nubigena [58]
P. nagi P. naflf/ [33]
464
2,3-dehydro-16-hldroxi-
nagilactone F miianjilactone B nagilactone F
55 56 57
P. nagi, P. milanjianus, P. sellowii P. milanjianus [53] P. nagi [56]
P. macrophilus [49-50,25]
Ha,
nagilactone I 2a-hydroxynagilactone F
58 59
P. nagi [66] P. nagi
lleostylus micranthus [4,36]
465
-O
0^
PR 1388 Oidiolactone C oidiolactone D
60 (Oidiodendroiide C) (oidiodendroiide A)
Oidiodendron truncatum 61
Oidiodendron griseum [6,7] 62
Oidiodendron truncatum Oidiodendron truncatum
Oidiodendron griseum [7,11] Oidiodendron griseum [7,11]
O
'''OMe
O
wentilactone B oidiodendroiide B
66 67 Oidiodendron griseum [7]
Aspergillus wentii [8,20] Oidiodendron truncatum [11]
466
Miscellaneous
OH
'''OH HO'
OH
0^
C02Me V ^ ^ x * \ ^ COaMe
"'^^x^OH
H /
—0
saiignone B saiignone J saiignone K
72 73 74
P. saligna [61] P. sa//flfna [61] P. saligna [55]
C02Me
O dlhydrodeoxy-
saiignone L nagilactone J nubilactone A
75 76 77
P. sa//p/7a [55] P. /lagf/ [62] P. saligna [63]
467
Anti-tumoral Activity.
a) Yoshida Sarcoma.
H2O3PO'
468
Synthetic derivatives 92 and 93, which can not be not included in any
of the three A-C subgroups, turned out to be inactive against this cell line.
Podolide was the first dilactone reported to have antitumor activity in vivo
against P-388 leukemia in mice and citotoxycity in vitro towards cells
derived from P-388 murine leukemia [9]. More detailed reports on the
antileukemic activity of nagilactone C (3) and nagilactone E (36) was
given by Hayashi in 1975 [64]. Both lactones were effective with a dose
of 20 mg/kg/day (T/C 125%). Podolactone C also showed antineoplasic
activity against P 388 cells in vivo at 20 mg/kg/day (151% T/C) [48].
Finally, Bloor and Molly reported the cytotoxic activity of five
podolactones isolated from a New Zealand mistletoe. The more active
lactones were 3-deoxy-2a-hydroxynagilactone E (46), 2a-
hydroxynagilactone F (59) and podolactone E (51) showing IC50 (jxg/mL)
values of 0.06, 0.06 and <0.01 [big/mL, respectively [4].
Podolactones have also been reported to be active against the tumoral cell
line 9KB. Nagilactone G (40) and nagilactone F (55) exhibit a remarkable
in vitro activity against 9KB tumoral cells (ED50 '-lO"^ fxg/ml).
Milanjilactone A (44) and milanjilactone B (45) also showed a
significative in vitro activity (ED50 = 4 jig/ml y ED50 = 0 . 1 \ig/wl,
respectively) [53].
OMe
IC5o(|ig/ml)
Cellline G 68 94 95 96 97 98 99_
P-388 0.12 0.50 20 2.0 10 >10 0.10 >10
A-549 0.12 0.50 20 2.0 20 >10 0.10 >10
HT-29 0.25 1.0 >20 5.0 >20 >10 0.12 >10
MEL-28 0.25 1.0 >20 2.0 >20 >10 0.12 >10
Anti-inflamatory Activity
'OMe
OMe OlVIe
OMe
102
Antimicrobial Activity
103
474
' A: Enterococcusfaecalis S 48; B: Bacillus subtilis CECT 397; C: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 8. ^ D:
Salmonella typhymurium LT 2; E: Escherichia coli; F: Proteus s.'' G: Candida albicans CECT 1394; H:
Saccharomyces cerevisiae; I: Cryptococum neoformans.
MeO
anethoie
MIC (fig/ml)
Insecticidal Activity
TaMe 6. Toxicity of diffrent lactones to housefly, codling moth and lig^t-brown apple moth
LDsoCppm)
Light-brown
Compound Housefly Codling moth
apple moth
PodoIactoneA(29) <250
Nagilactone A ( l ) 135.0
Hallactone B (38) 48.2
Nagilactone E (36) 40.8
Podolide (39) 33.9
Sellowin A (34) 13.3
Nagilactone C (3) IZO <6.3 76.4
14-Epi-ponolactone A (104) 9.7
Podolactone C (32) 8.2
Hallactone A (7) 3.5
Podolactone E (51) <1.3 175.2
Nagilactone D (4) 0.7 7.3 63.8
Podolactone A (29) happened to be the less toxic lactone, and the most
active compounds are nagilactone D (4) and podolactone E (51). These
podolactones did not produce mortality when applied topically to larvae
or adults (5 |Lig per insect), which suggests that these compounds are not
478
toxic by cx)ntact. It appears that they are either toxic by oral ingestion or
are antifeedants.
0'
14-epi-ponalactone A (104)
Table 7. Activities of nagilactones C, D and F and podolide towards different lepidopterous agricultuinl
pest species.
In 1992, Kubo et al. [13] studied the effect of the four most abundant
nagilactones in Podocarpus nagi -l-deoxy-2p,3P-epoxynagilactone A
(13), l-deoxy-2a-hydroxynagilactone A (8), nagilactone C (3) and
nagilactone D (4)- on the feeding and growth of tobacco budwomi larvae,
Heliothis virescens. Nagilactone C and D exhibit strong inhibition to the
growth of the first instar larvae at 168 and 166 ppm respectively. At these
concentrations, none of the larvae fed with nagilactone D reached the
third instar, while, when nagilactone C was used, half of the larvae
reached the third instar but growth was delayed. Most first instar larvae
fed on diets containing l-deoxy-2p,3p-epoxynagilactone A or 1-deoxy-
2a-hydroxynagilactone A reached the third larval instar but development
took longer periods than the control. Finally, when fifth instar larvae were
fed on a diet containing nagilactone D at 160 ppm, most of the larvae
could not pupate. The three remaining tested compounds were much less
active than nagilactone D against H. virescens fifth instar larvae. On the
other hand, these investigations also concluded that growth inhibition is
caused by feeding deterrence, with nagilactone D being the most potent in
inhibiting the mouthpart sensory receptors.
480
The antifeedant activity of these compounds has been described not only
for insects, but these dilactones have also been reported as the active
principles causing anti-feedant activity for a herbivorous mammal, the
guinea pig. Thus, the antifeedant activity of these compounds has been
tested employing 1% acetone solutions of natural dilactones. Nagilactone
A (1), nagilactone C (3) and l-deoxy-2p,3p-epoxynagilactone A (13)
showed activity, whilst their acetate derivatives were inactive. On the
other hand, the dilactones were not active with deers, protected species in
Japanese forests, which do no eat Podocarpus nagi. The activity of the
dilactones seems not simply to have been repellent, but actually
poisonous or toxic to the animal, so, the animal supplied only with a
sample diet containing ca. 0.5% of a crude extract of the leaves
completely rejected the diet for two continuous weeks [12].
Table 8. Inhibitoiy activity of naturally occiirriiig lactones on hook segments Crom etiolated dwarf peas
inhibition at 3 \ig mU^ and when 30 \xg mL"^ was applied, a 41%
stimulation of root growth was caused.
Studying the effect of nagilactones on the growth of lettuce seedlings,
Kubo et al. [75] classified the active podolactones isolated from P. nagi
into two groups according to their bioactivity. Group I [l-deoxy-2p,3P-
epoxynagilactone A (13), l-deoxy-2a-hydroxynagilactone A (8),
nagilactone A (1), nagilactone C (3) and 15-methoxycarbonyl nagilactone
D (9)] consists of podolactones which stimulate lettuce radicle growth at
concentrations between 1 and 10 \ig mL"^ On the other hand, Group II
[nagilactone D (4) and nagilactone E (36)] is composed of podolactones
which show a significant inhibitory effect on the growth of the lettuce
radicle at less than 10 jxg mL"\ It is worth noting that dilactones
belonging to Group I were able to stimulate the growth of the radicle at
lower concentrations (<10 jxg mL"^) while they were shown to be
inhibitory at higher concentrations (>100 \ig mL"^). From the above
results, the relationship between the number of hydroxyl groups and the
inhibitory effects of podolactones can be inferred, resulting that the less
polar compounds possess higher activities. Since all Group I dilactones
are type A podolactones, these findings are in accordance with the
Hayashi conclusion on the different activity shown by each of the three
podolactone structural types.
In contrast with Hayashi's reports, findings described in different
Japanese patents [76] revealed that all three podolactone structural types
are able to stimulate plant growth. Thus, when cucumber seeds are soaked
in a 1 ppm type A nagilactone C (3) aqueous solution for 24 hours, and
then cultivated for 18 days, they experienced a 54% increase in dry
weight of stems and leaves when compared with untreated controls. When
type B podolactones were investigated, these authors claimed that the
cucumber seeds showed a 30% increase in dry weight of stems and leaves
after being soaked in a 1 ppm type B nagilactone E (36) aqueous solution
for 24 hours and cultivated for 18 days. Finally, type C dilactones also
proved to be stimulant. For instance, tomato seeds were soaked in a 1
ppm aqueous solution of type C nagilactone F (55) for 22 hours, and then
cultivated for 5 weeks to show a 31% increase in dry weight of stems and
leaves when compared with untreated controls.
The aforementioned capability of podolactones to inhibit or stimulate
plant growth was again verified in a study carried out by Macias and
Barrero's groups [14]. In this study the allelopathic activity of 11 natural
484
^\ l£pi&£^:^im^lt,' :
10^ M
10' M
n
i^^"=B
10 H I
'iBi:. 10-' M
f.^CJ.. 10-^ M
|f#>-v;i;;i'
10" M
I 10-" M
14'
10' M
Ri~
10" M
«3
485
CHEMICAL REACTIVITY
Before the work reported by Hayashi's group in 1982 [21], the study of
podolactones reactivities was limited to the preparation of analogs to
facilitate their structure determination. This limited study of reactivity
could be explained considering the poor content of podolactones in their
natural sources.
Thus, to confirm the location of the two hydroxyl groups in
inumakilactone A (28), this compound was selectively acetylated, and its
diacetate selectively saponificated. The thus obtained 15- and 3-
monoacetates were oxidized to the corresponding ketones with Jones
reagent (Scheme 3) [40].
^ % ^ mild *f '''''^^'Oones
:o I ^
'*^ OAc
HO'
AC2O I NaOAc
O
AcO'
Schemes
With respect to the side chain, although some standard reactions failed
[78], different correlation reactions assayed to confirm the structure of
new isolated members were achieved successfully, some examples
include oxidation of the podolactone C sulphoxide group to give the
corresponding sulphone (110), as well as the glycol oxidative cleavage of
487
S02Me
mCPBA Qi
podoiactona C
32
ROo
OH H2
Scheme 4
0 Podolide (39)
TsCI
AcO^
AcO
Scheme 5
491
Scheme 6
HCI
AcO'
132
Scheme 7
CrClg
Zn-Cu
Pd-C
^
Hz
Schemes
493
no I TsCI/PyrA mCPBA
^
orPGCIa/PyrA 4,4'-thiobis-
(6-rt)utyl-mcresol)
Nagilactone E (36)
Scheme 9
dimethyloxirane
O Oidiolactone C (61)
494
Synthesis of Podolactones
Few routes for synthesizing podolactones are known. Only the syntheses
of LL-Z1271a (63), nagilactone F (55) and 3p-hydroxynagilactone F
have been described, which are the molecules structurally more simple
than their other congeneric types but which, however, are biologically
much more active.
These syntheses are summarized below.
Synthesis of LL-Z1271a
In 1973, the group led by Prof. Adinolfi synthetized the antibiotic LL-
Z1271a (63) [81] starting from ketolactone 139, obtained, in turn, by
degradation of the diterpene marrabiin (9% overall yield). This synthesis
basically consists of the formation of the 8-lactone C ring by nucleophilic
addition to carbonyl group and subsequent lactonization (Scheme 11)..
Bromination of 139 in glacial acetic acid, followed by treatment with
1,5-diazabicycle [4.3.0]-5-nonene gives unsaturated ketone 140 in a yield
of 85%. The latter's reaction with lithium ethoxyacetylide in THF gives
ethynyl-carbynol 141 (90%), which, on being treated with concentrated
sulphuric acid in ethanol, gives conjugated ester 142 (65%). The
oxidation of 142 with Se02 (2 moles) in glacial acetic acid for between 20
and 40 hours produces a 1:3 mixture of a- and p-acetyllactols (143),
respectively (70%). Treatment of 143 with hydrogen chloride in absolute
methanol gives compounds 63 and 98 in a proportion of 1:2.5,
respectively.
COaEt
a,b
^
85%
139
496
(a) AcOH, HBr; (b) DBN; (c) U O COEt, THF; (d) H2SO4, EtOH; (e) SeOz, AcOH, reflujo; (f) MeOH, HCl.
Scheme 11.
b) StartingfromWieland-Miescher Ketone
7:3
(a) NaH, HMPA; (b) CHaOCHzQ; (c) U, NH3, DME; (d) CH3I; (e) UPrS, HMPA; (f) MeOH, H3O"; (g)
MeOH, APTS; (h) Jones; (i) AcOH, Brz; 0) CaCOa, DMA; (k) DCM, Brz; (1) K2CO3, DMF; (m) H2,
(Ph3P)3RhCl, benzene; (n) NaH, HCOOEt; (0) Et3N, PhSeCl, THF; (p) AMCPB, THF; (q) ethylene glycol,
H2SO4 cat, THF, CaS04; (r) LiC-COEt, THF; (s) H2SO4 5%, MeOH.
Scheme 12
498
C02Me ^COaMe
HgOAc
499
(a) i-m-CPBA, ii-HI04 (73%); (b) Jones reagent (90%); (c) CH2N2 (100%); (d) Hg(0Ac)2, toluene, A (100%);
(e) NaBH4, O2; (f) DDQ, dioxane, A (45% yield for steps e and f); (g) H2SO4, H2O (100%); (h) Pb(0Ac)4, hv
(45%); (i) Se02, dioxane, A (100%); (j) MeOH, H2S04,(85%).
Scheme 13.
Synthesis of Nagilactone F
The first synthesis of nagilactone F was carried out by Hayashi et al. [83]
starting from (+)-0-methylpodocarpic acid 158 in 23 steps (2% overall
yield). The main characteristics of this synthesis include the
transformation of the aromatic ring into the 8-lactone ring, the a
arrangement (equatorial) of the isopropyl group by photochemical
cyclization, as well as the construction of the y-lactone using radical
conditions (Scheme 14).
500
(a) Li, NH3, r-BuOH; (b) U3O*; (c) CH2N2; (d) H2, Pd-C; (e) LDA; (f) PhSeQ; (g) H2O2; (h) (i-Pr)2CuU; (i)
O3, MciS; 0) Jones reagent; (k) BjHe, THF; (I) APIS; (m) r-BuOK, DMSO; (n) hv, EtOH; (o) DDQ, BF3,
dioxane; (p) H2SO4, H2O; (q) Pb(0Ac)4, hv.
Scheme 14.
The same strategy used by Barrero et al. for synthesis of the fungic
metabolite LL-Z1271a (63) was used to synthesize nagilactone F (55).
Thus, starting from the mixture of communic acids, lactol 99 is achieved,
an immediate precursor of both 55 and epimer 165, which are obtained by
treatment with isopropylmagnesium bromide. Thus, the synthesis of
nagilactone F (55) is completed, with an overall yield of 10%. (Scheme
15).
o
c) Total Synthesis
MeaSi
(a) n-BuU; (b) (2-thienyI)Cu(CN)y; (c) BF3-Et20; d) TiCU, Ti(i-Pr0)4; (e) Swem oxidation; (f) AcOH,
piperidine; (g) RhCb•3H2O, CaCOa, i-PrOH; (h) PhI(0Ac)2,12, ciclohexane, hv; (i) H2, Pt02; Q) RuOsHaO,
NaI04, CH2N2; (k) PhNMeaBra, THF; 0) U2CO3, UBr; (m) DIBALH; (n) TPAP, NMO; (o) UHMDS, TMSQ,
PhSeQ; (p) Davis oxaziridine.
Scheme 17.
503
Synthesis of(±)'3j3'hidroxinagilactoneF(58)
^ C02CH2SPh ^ COaCHaSPh
MeO^
(a) BaO, Ba(0H)2, DMSO, Me2S04; (b) LDA, (CH3)2CHCHO; (c) UCH2CO2U; (d) TsOH; (e) n-PrSLi; (f) hv,
EtOH; (g) DDQ, MSA; (h) r-BuOK, PhSCH2a; (i) chromatographic separation; (j) CF3COOH; (k) piridine,
HBr, Br2, AcOH; (1) K2CO3; (m) BBrj.
Scheme 18.
The main drawback of the first method described by Barrero et al. [14] for
the synthesis of podolactones, lies in the presence of a mixture of three
isomers called "communic acids" (153), which requires a
chromatographic separation over silicagel impregnated with 20% silver
nitrate to eliminate mirceO'Communic acid to allow use of the 2-
component mixture of cis- and trans-isomors as starting material.
Furthermore, some steps in this former synthetic strategy, such as the
closure of the 8-lactone or the formation of the dienolide system need
improvement.
Studying the content in communic acids of the arcestides of different
Juniperus and Cupressus sempervirens (Mediterranean cypress), we
found the presence of only rrans-communic acid (180) in the arcestides of
cypress. Furthermore, this acid could easily be isolated from the acid
fraction on the hexane extract by crystallization of its sodium salt.
Starting with trans-communic acid, two diffrent strategies were
developed, the first one using diene 186 as the key intermediate, which is
summarized in Scheme 19.
506
CHO ^COaMe
VfJ^^^^'^'OCOCFa (70%)
COaMe
184
^COaMe CO2H
186 103
(a) O3, MezS (60%); (b) Jones, (c) CH2N2; (d) SeOj, r-BuOOH (67%); (e) TFAA, DMAP (86%); (f) Pd(PPh3)4
(70%); (g) NaCH3(CH2)2S (85%), (h) Pd(PPh3)4 (72%); (i) LDA, PhSeCl, H2O2 (80%); (j) DMDO (45%).
Scheme 19
There are three major achievements in this synthesis [20]. The first
consists of the selective degradation of 180 to 181 in 60% yield realized
via ozonolysis at low temperature. The second one was the allylic
elimination of trifluoroacetate 184 after exposure to Pd(PPh3)4, which
resulted in the formation of diene 185 in an acceptable yield (72% based
507
Figure (4)
103
(a) O3, MezS (76%); (b) Jones, CH2N2; (c) PhSeCl, H2O2 (77% for three steps); (d)
MeMgBr (84%);(e) NaS(CH2)2CH3 (83%); (f) LAH (88%); (g) PDC, DMF, CH2N2
(70%); (h) Se02, N B U O O H (51%).
Scheme 20
Synthesis of 3p-hydroxy-13,14,15,16-tetranorlabda-7,9(ll)-dien-
(19,6p),(12,17)-diolide
COOMe ^COOMe
.CH2OH
198-
COOMe
AcO^
205
207 R= COOH
208 R= COOEt
510
-^208 +
(a) (i). PBra, r-BuOMe, CPC, 25 min; (ii) 2. KCN, DMSO, 2 h, 80%; (b) (i) KOH 25%,
MeOH, 90^C, 9 h; (ii) CH2N2, ether, QPC, 5 min, 68% of 195 and 196 (ratio 4:1) in two
steps; (c) Se02, ^BuOOH, CH2a2, 5 ^C, 6 h, 65%; (d) LAH, THF, 0°C-*rt, 12 h, 86%
of 197 and 198 (ratio 4:1); e) (i) NCS, DMS, CH2CI2, O^C, 2.5 h, 85%; (f)
CHjCOCHCHsCOOEt, NaH, n-BuLi, THF, 2.5 h, 79%; (g) Mn(OAc)3-2H20,
Cu(OAc)2-H20, HOAc, 68%. (h) (i) PDC, DMF, 24 h; (ii) CH2N2, ether, 75% in two
steps; (i) (i) NaBH4, MeOH, 0°C, 15 min, 91%; (ii) ClOAc, DMAP, 20 h, 95%; (j) (i).
O3, CH2CI2, -78°C, 20 min; (ii) PPhj, -78^C-^rt, 2 h., 91%; (k) (i) PhSeCl, EtOAc, 60 h,
(ii) H2O2, Py, CH2CI2, 0°C^rt, 15 min, 77%; (I) Tebbe's reagent, THF, 0°C, 17 min,
69%; (m) NaSCH2CH2CH3, DMF, 50°C, 26 h, 60%; (n) Pd(0Ac)2, p-benzoquinone,
HOAc, acetone, 18 h, 78% of 209 based on the amount of 207 in the mixture of 207 and
208; (0) (i) LDA, -78°C, THF, 20 min; (ii) TMSCl; (iii) PhSeCl; (iv) H2O2, Py, CH2CI2,
1 min, 40°C, 36%.
Scheme 21
ABBREVATIONS
REFERENCES
[1] Carbon-13 NMR studies of the biologically active nor-diterpenoid dilactones
from Podocarpus plants. Hayashi, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Uemura, M.; Koreeda, M.
Org. Magn. Reson. 1980,14,86-91
[2] Jimenez, D. PhD, 2001.
[3] Norditerpene dilactones from Podocarpus plants. Ito, S.; Kodama, M.
Heterocycles, 1976,4,595-624.
[4] Cytotoxic norditerpene lactones from Ileostylus micranthus. Bloor, S.J.; MoUoy,
B.P.J. J. Nat Prod, 1991,54,1326-1330.
[5] The relative and absolute configuration of clerocidin and its cometabolites.
Andersen, N. R.; Rasmussen, P. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984,25, 469-472.
[6] Biologically active secondary metabolites from fungi. 12. Oidiolactones A-F,
labdane diterpene derivatives isolated from Oidiodendron truncata, John, M.;
Krohn, K.; Florke, U.; Aust, H-J.; Draeger, S.; Schulz, B. J. Nat. Prod. 1999, 62,
1218-1221.
[7] Terpenoid lactone compounds and their production process Ichikawa, K.;
Ikunaka, M.; Kojima, N.; Nishida, H.; Yoshikawa, N.. European Patent. 0 933
373 Al, 1999
[8] Isolation and identification of two new biologically active norditerpene dilactones
from Aspergillus wentiL Domer, J.W.; Cole, R.J.; Springer, J.P.; Cox, R.H.;
Cutler, H.; Wicklow, D.T. Phytochemistry 1980,19,1157-1161.
[9] Structure of a Cn antifungal terpenoid from an unindentified Acrostalamus
species. EUestad, G.A.; Evans, R. H., Jr; Kunstmann, M.P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1969,91,2134-2136.
[10] Podolide, a new antileukemic norditerpene dilactone from Podocarpus gracilior.
Kupchan, S.M.; Baxter, S. L.; Ziegler, M.F.; Smith, P.M.; Bryan, R.F.
Experientia 1975,31,137-138.
512
INTRODUCTION
fflSTORICAL BACKGROUND
is the lipidic component and is the structurally most stable part of LPS.
Lipid A consists of a diglucosamine backbone acylated by ester-linked
and amide-linked long chain fatty acids. The nature of the backbone
glycosyl residues is the same for a large number of LPS. The precise
structure of the lipids AfromEscherichia coli (E. coli) and Salmonella
typhimurium (S, typhimurium) were obtained at the beginning of the
years 1980 by Takayama, Kusumoto, Galanos and Rietschel [6-8]. The
first synthetic lipids A were chemically synthesized by Kusumoto and
collaborators in 1985 [9]. Since then it became feasible to prepare non-toxic
derivatives of lipid A.
A link between bacteria and tumor ther^ was found early, at the
beginning of the XVni century [10]. By the end of the XIX century, Coley
[11] developed a treatment for cancer with a mixture of bacterial toxins.
In 1943 Shear and Tumer [4] found that the antitumor effect of Coley's
toxin was due to endotoxins, and after several decades it was shown that
the biological activity of LPS was due to the lipid A [5]. We investigated
the structures of lipids A with regard to their antitumor activities [12],
finding that the optimum in vivo activity is obtained with diglucosamines
acylated by 3 long chain fatty acids.
Lipid A in vivo
LPS and lipids A alike, when injected in vivo interact with diverse serum
proteins which can be divided in 3 groups, depending on their capacity to
modify their activities. The first group of proteins which decrease the
activities of LPS consist of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density
lipoprotein (LDL), the bactericidal permeability-increasing (BPI) protein
[13], and the cationic protein CAP37 [14]. The proteins which do not
modify their activities are albumin, lactoferrin [13], transferrin,
hemoglobin [15], and lysozyme. Finally some proteins such as LPS
binding protein (LBP) augment their activities [16,17].
A few hours after its injection, circulating lipid A is found mainly in
liver, lung as well as in the spleen, adrenals and kidneys [18]. In these
520
organs and in the blood, lipid A will bind target cells via binding proteins
and receptors.
Different receptors for LPS have been identified, of which the scavenger
receptor and the CDl 1/CD18 receptor mediate uptake and detoxification
of LPS. In contrast CD14, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked
protein, initiates LPS signal transduction. Membrane-bound or soluble
CD 14 can bind LPS in the absence of LBP, however LBP increases this
binding. Lipids A also bind LBP, scavenger receptor [19], CD11/CD18
[20] and CD14 [21]. Of these, CD14 is likely to be the main pathway for
initiating downstream signaling events, although in some cases soluble
LPS-binding proteins permit lipid A signaling independently [22].
Membrane bound CD 14 receptors are found on the surface of
monocyte/macrophages. The soluble CD 14 is capable of binding to
CD14-negative cells such as endothelial [23] or smooth muscle cells [24]
and of inducing several signaling pathways. CD14 lacks transmembrane
and intracellular domains, probably acting through the binding of distinct
transmembrane proteins, such as the Toll Like Receptors (TLR), which
transduce the signal. A general agreement is that TLR4 mediates the lipid
A signaling pathway initiated by the binding of lipid A to CD 14, since
TLR4-deficient mice are unresponsive to LPS in vivo [25]. In contrast,
the role of TLR2 in lipid A (and LPS) transduction is debated [26].
TLR4 requires the presence of the MD-2 surface molecule to transduce
the lipid A signal and probably of one additional molecule. MD-2 is co-
expressed with TLR4 on the cell surface.
The TLRs have an intracellular domain (TIR) which binds to a
homologous domain in the adaptor protein, MyD88. This protein
contains a death domain which interacts with the death domain of the
mammalian Interleukine-1 Receptor- (IL-IR)-Associated kinase (IRAK).
IRAK binds another adaptor, TRAF6 which seems to bridge 2 signaling
pathways: a) through the adaptor TAB2 activates the nuclear factor
(NF)kB-inducing kinase (NIK) and IkB kinase (KK); b) through the
recently identified Evolutionarily-Conserved Signaling Intermediate in
the Toll pathway (ECSIT) protein, activates another cascade of kinases:
521
Lipid A tolerance
Some long term effects of LPS in vivo are vasodilation and hypotension.
These phenomena are of great relevance in cancer since they modulate
tumor blood flow and consequently the availability of oxygen and
nutrients needed for tumor growth. They also modulate access of
circulating toxic cytokines and immune cells to the tumor. According to
MacPherson and North [111], LPS act at two levels: general by
decreasing cardiac output and intratumoral by affecting the endothelium.
Injection of DT-5461 decreases blood flow in Meth A fibrosarcoma
subcutaneous nodules in BALB/c mouse [112] and in VX2 carcinoma
liver nodules in the rabbit [113]. This decreased blood flow involves
TNF-a, IFN-a/p and IFN-Y [112], and cannot be reproduced by
intravenous (i.v.) injections of TNF-a [113].
Another effect of LPS may be the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis.
This was evidenced in melanoma B16- bearing C57BL/6 mice treated i.v.
with the lipid A GL-60, after an IFN-y injection [114]. It was confirmed
in the same model using DT-5461 alone injected i.v. [94]. This effect of
LPS is likely to be due to the production of TNF-a. This cytokine may be
toxic for the endothelium [64], inhibiting at the same time the motility
and proliferation of endothelial cells [59]. Sato et al. [115] showed that
TNF-a inhibits tumor-induced angiogenesis in a rabbit comeal pocket
assay. On the contrary, Vukanovic and Isaacs [116] concluded that TNF-
529
Effect on NO production
LPS can also have a role in the acquired immunity against cancer.
530
LYMPHOCYTE!
LPS treatments
In animals, the first in vivo experiments were performed with bacterial
extracts in a guinea pig sarcoma model by Gratia and Linz [88], and with
LPS in mouse primary subcutaneous tumors by Shear and Turner [4].
The antitumoral effect of LPS on the growth of subcutaneous or
intramuscular tumors has been extensively investigated [61,147-153]. On
ascitic tumors, treatment with LPS was shown to be efficient in some
cases [153-155] while failing in others [61,156].
We tested the effect of LPS in a model of peritoneal carcinomatosis
(solid tumor) induced by PROb colon cancer cells in syngeneic BDIX
rats. We showed that i.p. injections of LPS from E. coli can cure 20 % of
the rats [157]. Comparing the effect of LPS from different strains in this
model, we found that the efficacy depends on the bacterial strain and on
the structure of the lipid A used. Whatever the lipid A used, we have
shown a correlation with in vitro macrophage secretion of IL-ip but not
with NO, TNF-a or IL-6 [83].
Lipids A treatments
Here, we will emphasize on treatments with lipid A, considering only
curative treatments beginning after tumor cell injection. After a review of
the literature, we will detail the effects and mechanisms of DT-5461,
ONO-4007 and OM-174, the three lipids A which have been mostly
documented.
Parr et al. [61] showed that lipid A has the same antitumoral effect
as whole endotoxin preparations on murine L5178Y lymphoma. The
effects of LPS and synthetic lipid A treatments were compared by
Shimizu et al. [158-161] on Meth A fibrosarcoma in BALB/c mouse. The
antitumoral activity of different lipids A has also been investigated. Ribi
et al. [162] used an extract from S, typhimurium containing lipid A,
which when injected directly into hepatocarcinoma line 10 tumors in
guinea pigs shows an antitumoral effect. This activity is attributed to a
monophosphoryl diglucosamine derivative of lipid A [163]. Synthetic
lipid A analogs also proved to be active in this system [164], as well as
534
Therapeutic vaccination
Conciusion
CLINICAL STUDIES
Several phase I trials have been performed with LPS from Salmonella
abortus equi administered i.v. in patients who suffered from
disseminated cancer. White blood cell number decreased after each
injection and retumed to basal level by 24 hours. There were no changes
in coagulation parameters, and no disseminated intravascular coagulation
was observed. After the first injection of LPS, increases in TNF-a
concentration and IL-6 activity in serum were detected. However LPS
tolerance which is accompanied by a decrease in TNF-a and IL-6
production depended on the intervals between repeated injections, but it
was not determined whether it was a benefit or a draw-back. Injections of
IFN-y prevented this decrease in TNF-a and IL-6, and ibuprofen
attenuated LPS toxicity [183,186].
In a phase II trial, patients with colorectal cancer or non-small cell
lung cancer, LPS showed a low grade toxicity and induced a reduction of
TNF-a concentration in serum. One complete remission, stable for 36
months, was achieved [187].
In another phase I trial, i.d. injections of LPS from Pantoea
agglomerans were given to patients who suffered from disseminated
cancer and received cyclophosphamide, and ibuprofen, to attenuate
fever. Increases in the serum concentrations of TNF-a, IL-6 and G-CSF
were observed, without tolerance [188].
540
Table 1. List of tfie clinical tiiab performed with LPS or lipids A injected to cancer patients.
Therapeutic vaccines
Melacine
The first phase I trial, performed by Mitchell et al. [191] and several
further phase I and II trials by the same group, studying different
parameters [192,193] are summed up by Mitchell et al. [194].
Homogenates of 2 melanoma cell lines, mixed with Detox were injected
s.c. to melanoma patients. Toxicity was minimal and local. There was no
correlation between the antibody response against melanoma
determinants and the clinical response. The remissions were correlated
with the presence of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) precursors. Most of
the CD8+ and CD4+ isolated clones lysed MHC-matched melanoma
target cells. Histological studies of regressing lesions showed the
presence of CD3+ lymphocytes, mostly CD4H-, perivascularly and at the
periphery of the tumor as well as the presence of macrophages
throughout the lesions. Cyclophosphamide did not improve the number
of responding patients, however lESf-a given to non-responding patients
led to a clinical response.
The vaccine, referred to as Melacine (Ribi Immunochemical
Research, Inc.), contains homogenates of melanoma cells mixed with
0.25 ml Detox. In a multicenter phase II trial, with patients with
543
Jheratope
OncoVax
Conclusion
The phase I and phase II trials of therapeutic vaccines (Table 3.) show a
weak toxicity of lipids A, furthermore they show a stimulation of the
acquired antitumoral immune response. CTL responses correlate better
than antibody responses to clinical outcomes, in agreement with current
concepts of antitumor immunity. Phase HI trials are now necessary to
determine the effective protocol.
546
Table 3. List of clmical trials performed with lipids A as adjuvant of therapeutic vaccines
administered to cancer patients.
CONCLUSION
ABBREVIATIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[7] Imoto, M.; Shiba, T.; Naoki, H.; Iwashita, T.; Rietschel, E.T,; Wollenweber, H.-
W.; Galanos, C ; Luderitz, O.; Tetrahedron Lett, 1983, 24,4017-4020.
[8] Westphal, O.; Luderitz, O.; Galanos, C ; Mayer, H., Rietschel, EX.; In Adv.
Immunopharmacol, Chedid, Hadden, Spreafico, Dukor, Willoughby, Ed.,
Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1985; pp. 13-34.
[9] Imoto, M.; Yoshimura, H.; Sakaguchi, N.; Kusumoto, S.; Shiba, T.; Tetrahedron
Lett,, 19SS, 26, 1545-1548.
[10] Deidier, A., Deux dissertations medicinales et chirurgicales, I 'une sur la maladie
venerienne, Vautre sur la nature et la curation des tumeurs. 1725, D'Houzy,
CM., Imprimeur: Paris.
[11] Coley, W.B.;y. Am, Med Assoc,, 1898, 31, 589-595.
[12] Jeannin, J.F.; Onier, N.; Lagadec, P.; von Jeney, N.; Stiitz, P.; Liehl, E.;
Gastroenterology, 1991, 101, 726-733.
[13] Appelmelk, B.J.; An, Y.Q.; Thijs, B.G.; MacLaren, D.M.; de GraaflF, J.;
InfecUmmun., 1994, 62, 3564-3567.
[14] Brackett, D.J.; Lemer, M.R.; Lacquement, M.A.; He, R.; Pereira, H.A.; Infect,
Immun., 1997, 65, 2803-2811.
[15] Belanger, M.; Begin, C ; Jacques, M.; Infect, Immun., 1995, 63, 656-662.
[16] Tobias, P.S.; Soldau, K.; Ulevitch, R.J.; J. Biol. Chem., 1989, 264, 10867-10871.
[17] Taylor, A.H; Heavner, G.; Nedelman, M.; Sherris, D.; Brunt, E.; J, Biol, Chem.,
1995,270,17934-17938.
[18] Reddy, T.S.; Kishore, V.; Immunopharmacol. ImmunotoxicoL, 1996, 18, 145-
159.
[19] Hampton, R.Y.; Golenbock, D.T.; Penman, M.; Krieger, M.; Raetz, C.R.; Nature,
1991, 352, 342-344.
[20] Ingalls, R.R.; Monks, B.G.; Savedra, R.; Christ, W.J.; Delude, R.L.; Medvedev,
A.E.; Espevik, T.; Golenbock, D.T.,J. Immunol., 1998, 161, 5413-5420.
[21] Delude, R.L.; Savedra, R.; Zhao, H.; Thieringer, R.; Yamamoto, S.; Fenton, M.J.,
Golenbock, D.T. ; Proc, Natl. Acad, Sci, USA, 1995, 92, 9288-9292.
[22] Ingalls, R.R.; Monks, B.G.; Golenbock, D.T.; J. Biol, Chem., 1999, 274, 13993-
13998.
[23] Arditi, M.; Zhou, J.; Torres, M.; Durden, D.L.; Stins, M.; Kim, K.S.; J.
Immunol, 1995, 155, 3994-4003.
[24] Loppnow, H.; Stelter, F.; Schonbeck, U.; Ernst, M.; Schutt, C ; Flad, H.D.;
Infect Immun., 1995, 63, 1020-1026.
[25] Takeuchi, O.; Hoshino, K.; Kawai, T.; Sanjo, H.; Takada, H.. Ogawa, T.;
Takeda, K.; Akira, S., Immunity, 1999, 11, 443-451.
[26] Hirschfeld, M.; Ma, Y.; Weis, J.H., Vogel, S.N.; Weis, J.J.; J, Immunol., 2000,
165, 618-622.
[27] Simard, J.M.; Tewari, K.; Kaul, A ; Nowicki, B.; Chin, L.S.; Singh, S.K.; Perez-
Polo, J.R; J, Neurosci. Res., 1996, 45, 216-225.
[28] Ogawa, T.; Shimauchi, H.; Uchida, H.; Mori, Y.; Immunobiol, 1996, 196, 399-
414.
[29] Chow, C.W.; Grinstein, S.; Rotstein, O.D.; NewHoriz., 1995, 3, 342-351.
551
[30] Akahane, K.; Someya, K.; Tsutomi, Y.; Akimoto, T.; Tohgo, A.; Cell Immunol,
1994, 155,42-52
[31] Ogawa, T.; Nagazawa, M.; Masui, K.; Vaccine, 1996, 14, 70-76.
[32] Golenbock, D.T.; Hampton, R.Y.; Qureshi, N.; Takayama, K.; Raetz, C.R.; J.
Biol Chem., 1991, 266, 19490-19498.
[33] Lien, E.; Means, T.K.; Heine, H.; Yoshimura, A.; Kusumoto, S.; Fukase, K.;
Fenton, M.J.; Oikawa, M.; Qureshi, N.; Monks, B.; Finberg, R.W.; Ingalls, R.;
Golenbock, D.T.; J. Clin Invest,, 2000, 105, 497-504.
[34] Henricson, B.E.. Manthey, C.L.; Perera, P.Y.; Hamilton, T.A.; Vogel, S.N.;
Infect. Immun., 1993, 61,2325-2333.
[35] Madonna, G.S.; Peterson, J.E.; Ribi, E.E.; Vogel, S.N.; Infect. Immun., 1986, 52,
6-11.
[36] Henricson, B.E.; Perera, P.Y.; Qureshi, N.; Takayama, K.; Vogel, S.N.; Infect.
Immun., 1992, 60, 4285-4290.
[37] Kiani, A.; Tschiersch, A.; Gaboriau, E.; Otto, F.; Seiz, A.; Knopf, H.-P.; Stutz,
P.; Farber, L.; Haus, U.; Galanos, C; Mertelsmann, R.; Engelhardt, R,; Blood,
1997,90,1673-1683.
[38] Astiz, M.E.; Rackow, E.C.; Kim, YB.; Weil, M.H.; Circ. Shock, 1991, 33, 92-
97.
[39] Astiz, M.E.; Rackow, E.C.; Still, J.G.; Howell, S.T.; Cato, A.; Von Eschen, K.B.;
Ulrich, J.T.; Rudbach, J.A.; McMahon, G.; Vargas, R.; Stem, W.; Crit. Care
Aferf.,1995,23,9-17.
[40] Matsuura, M.; Kiso, M.; Hasegawa, A.; Nakano, M.; Eur. J. Biochem., 1994,
221,335-341.
[41] Carpati, CM.; Astiz, M.E.; Rackow, E.G.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, Y.B.; Weil, M.H; J.
Lab. Clin. Med, 1992, 119, 346-353.
[42] Henricson, B.E.; Benjamin, W.R.; Vogel, S.N.; Infect Immun., 1990, 58, 2429-
2437.
[43] Lam, C; Schutze, E.; Quakyi, E.; Liehl, E; Stutz, P.; Can. J. Infect. Dis., 1992,
3, 94-100.
[44] Yao, Z.; Foster, P.A.; Gross, GJ.; Circ. Shock, 1994,43, 107-114.
[45] Salkowski, C.A.; Detore, G.; Franks, A.; Falk, M.C.; Vogel, S.N.; Infect.
Immun., 1998, 66, 3569-3578.
[46] Zuckerman, S.H.; Qureshi, N.; Infect. Immun., 1992, 60, 2581-2587.
[47] Ishida, H.; Irie, K.; Suganuma, T.; Fujii, E.; Yoshioka, T.; Muraki, T.; Ogawa, R.
Inflamm. Res., 2002, 51, 38-43.
[48] Beutler, B; Krochin, N.; Milsark, I.W,; Luedke, C; Cerami, A.; Science, 1986,
232, 977-980.
[49] Amano, Y.; Lee, S.W.; AUison, A.C.; Mol Pharmacol, 1993,43, 176-182.
[50] Ziegler-Heitbrock, H.W.; Wedel, A.; Schraut, W.; Strobel, M.; Wendelgass, P.;
Stemsdorf, T; Bauerle, PA.; Haas, J.G; RiethmuUer, G; J. Biol Chem., 1994,
269, 17001-17004.
[51] Knopf, H.P.; Otto, F.; Engelhardt, R.; Freudenberg, M.A.; Galanos, C;
Herrmann, F.; Schumann, R.R.; J. Immunol, 1994, 153,287-299.
552
[52] Goldring, C.E.; Reveneau, S.; Pinard, D.; Jeannin, J.-F.; Eur. J. Immunol, 1998,
28, 2960-2970.
[53] Kitchens R.L.; Ulevitch, RJ.; Munford, R.S.; J, Exp. Med., 1992, 176, 485-494.
[54] Fahmi, H; Chaby, R.; Cell. Immunol, 1993, 150, 219-229.
[55] LaRue, K.E.; McCall, C.E.; J.Exp. Med., 1994, 180, 2269-2275.
[56] Jin, F.Y.; Nathan, C ; Radzioch, D.; Ding, A. Cell 1997, 88, 417-426.
[57] Reisser, D.; Pance, A.; Jeannm, J.-F.; Bioessays, 2002, 24, 284-289.
[58] Christophi, C; Winkworth, A; Muralihdaran, V; Evans, P.; Surg. Oncol, 1998, 7,
83-90.
[59] Pober, J.S. In Tumour necrosis factor and related cytoxins. Bock, G., Marsh, J.
(eds) Chichester. Wiley, 1987; pp. 170-185.
[60] Sarraf, C.E.; Int. J. Oncology, 1994, 5, 1333-1339.
[61] Parr, L; Wheeler, E.; Alexander, R; Br. J. Cancer, 1973, 27, 370-389.
[62] Yamaguchi, N.; Sakai, T.; Yoshida, S.; Katayama, Y.; Kawai, K.; Gastroenterol
Jpn., 1983, 18, 436-439.
[63] Schumann, R.R.; Kirschning, C.J.; Unbehaun, A ; Aberle, HP.; Knope, H.P.;
Lamping, N.; Ulevitch, R.J.; Herrmann, F.; Mol Cell Biol, 1996, 16, 3490-
3503.
[64] Gaynor, E.; Blood, 1973, 41, 797-808.
[65] Choi, K.B.; Wong, F.; Harlan, J.M.; Chaudhary, P.M.; Hood, L.; Karsan, A.; J.
Biol Chem., 1998, 273, 20185-20188.
[66] Renzi, P.M.; Lee, C,-H.; Shock, 1995, 3, 329-336.
[67] Beck-Schimmer, B; Schimmer, R.C.; Warner, R.L.; Schmal, H.; Nordblom, G.;
Flory, CM.; Lesch, M.E.; Friedl, HP.; Schrier, D.J.; Ward, PA.; Am. J. Respir.
Cell Mol Biol, 1997, 17, 344-352.
[68] Taichman, D.B.; Cybulsky, M.L; Djaffar, L; Longenecker, B.M.; Teixido, J.;
Rice, GE.; ArufFo, A ; Bevilacqua, M.P.; Cell Regul, 1991, 2, 347-355.
[69] Jibu, T.; Koike, S.; Ando, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Kimoto, M.; Kanegasaki, S.; Clin.
Exp. Metastasis, 1993, 11, 306-312.
[70] Huang, K.T.; Kuo, L.; Liao, J.C; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1998, 245,
33-37.
[71] Rocha, M.; Kruger, A ; Van Rooijen, N.; Schirrmacher, V.; Umansky, V.; Int. J.
Cancer, 1995, 63, 405-411.
[72] Cybulsky, M.L; McComb, D.J.; Dinarello, C.A.; Movat, H.Z.; In Leukocyte
emigration and its sequelae; Movat H.Z., Ed. Karger, 1987, pp. 38-50.
[73] Pickaver, A G ; Ratcliflfe, N.A.; Williams, AE.; Smith, H.; Nature New Biol,
1972,235,186-187.
[74] Fady, C ; Reisser, D.; Martin, F.; Immunobiology, 1990, 181, 1-12.
[75] Movat, H.Z.; Burrowes, C.E. In Handbook of endotoxins. Proctor, R.A. ed.;
Elsevier: Amsterdam 1985; Vol. 3, pp. 260-302.
[76] Inagawa, H.; Nishizawa, T.; Takagi, K.; Goto, S.; Soma, G.-I.; Mizuno, D.;
Anticancer Res., 1997, 17, 1961-1964.
[77] Inagawa, H.; Nishizawa, T.; Noguchi, K.; Minamimura, M.; Takagi, K.; Goto, S.;
Soma, G.-I; Mizuno, D.; Anticancer Res., 1997, 17, 2153-2158.
553
[78] Alexander, P.; Evans, R.; Nat New Biol, 1971; 232: 76-78.
[79] Mannel, D.N.; Rosenstreich, D.L.; Mergenhagen, S.E.; Infect Immun., 1979, 24,
573-576.
[80] Yang, D.; Satoh, M.; Ueda, H.; Tsukagoshi, S.; Yamazaki, M.; Cancer Immunol
Immunother, 1994, 38, 287-293.
[81] Onier N.; Hilpert, S.; Amould, L.; Saint-Giorgio, V.; Davies, J.G.; Bauer, J.;
Jeannin, J.F.; Clin. Exp. Metastas., 1999, 17, 299-306.
[82] Lagadec, P., Jeannin, J.F., Pelletier, H., Reisser, D., Olsson, N.O.; Anticancer
Res. 1989, 9, 421-425.
[83] Blondiau, C ; Lagadec, P.; Lejeune, P.; Onier, N.; Cavaillon, J.M.; Jeannin, J.F.;
Immunobiology, 1994, 190, 243-254.
[84] Herberman, R.B.; Ortaldo, J.R.; Science, 1981, 214, 24-30.
[85] Ogawa, T.; Uchida, H.; Amino, K.; Microbiol, 1994, 140, 1209-1216.
[86] Nakatsuka, M.; Kumazawa, Y.; Homma, J.Y.; Kiso, M.; Hasegawa, A.; Int J.
Immunopharmacol, 1991, 13, 1119.
[87] Takahashi, M.; Ogasawara, K.; Takeda, K.; Hashimoto, W.; Sakihara, H.;
Kumagai, K.; Anzai, R ; Satoh, M.; Seki, S.; J. Immunol, 1996, 156, 2436-2442.
[88] Gratia, A.; Linz, R.; C R. Soc. Biol, 1931, 108, 427-428.
[89] Schwartzman, G., Michailovski, N.; Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol Med, 1932, 29, 737.
[90] Andervont, H.B.; Am. J. Cancer, 1936, 27, 77-83.
[91] Seligman, A.M.; Shear, M.J.; Leiter, J.; Sweet, B.; J. Natl Cancer Inst., 1948, 9,
13-18.
[92] Carswell, E.A.; Old, L.J.; Kassel, R.L.; Green, S.; Fiore, N.; Williamson, B.;
Proc. Natl Acad Set USA, 1975, 72, 3666-3670.
[93] Van de Wiel, P. A.; van der Pijl, A.; Bloksma, N.; Cancer Immunol Immunother.,
1991,33,115-102.
[94] Sato, K.; Yoo, Y.C.; Mochizuki, M.; Saiki, I.; Takahashi, T.A.; Azuma, I.; Jpn.
J. Cancer Res., 1995, 86, 374-382.
[95] Berendt, M.J.; North, R.J.; Kirstein, D.P.; J. Exp. Med., 1978, 148, 1550-1559.
[96] Onier N.; Lejeune, P.; Martin, M.; Hanmiann, A.; Bauer, J.; Hirt, P.; Lagadec, P.;
Jeannin J.F.; Eur. J. Cancer, 1993, 29A, 2003-2009.
[97] Larrick, J.W.; Wright, S.C; FASEBJ., 1990, 4, 3215-3223.
[98] Dighe, A.S.; Richards, E.; Old, L.J.; Schreiber, R.D.; Immunity, 1994; 1, 447-
456.
[99] Matsumoto, N.; Oida, H.; Aze, Y.; Akimoto, A.; Fujita, T.; Anticancer Res.,
1998, 18,4283-4289.
[100] Salkowski, C.A.; Detore, G.R.; Vogel, S.N.; Infect Immun., 1997, 65, 3239-
3578.
[101] Puren, A.J.; Fantuzzi, G.; Dinarello, C.A.; Proc. Natl Acad. Set USA, 1999, 96,
2256-2261.
[102] Tennenberg, S.D.; Weller, J.J.; J. Surg. Res., 1996, 63, 73-76.
[103] Brunda, M.J.; Wright, R.B.; Luistro, L.; Harbison, M.L.; Anderson, T.D.;
Mclntyre, K.W.;y. Immunother. Emphasis Tumor Immunol, 1994, 15, 233-241.
554
[104] Onier, N.; Hilpert, S.; Reveneau, S.; Amould, L.; Saint-Giorgio, V.; Exbrayat, J.-
M.; Jeannin, J.F.; Int, J, Cancer, 1999, 81, 755-760,
[105] Kumazawa, E.; Akimoto, T.; Kita, Y.; Jimbo, T.; Joto, N.; Tohgo, A.; J.
Immunother. Emphasis Tumor Immunol, 1995, 17, 141-150.
[106] Cavaillon, J.M. Interleukin-l. In Les cytokines, Cavaillon, J.M., Ed. Masson:
Paris. 1996; pp. 93-117.
[107] Lagadec, P.; Raynal, S.; Lieubeau, B.; Onier, N.; Amould, L.; Saint-Giorgio, V.;
Lawrence, D.A.; Jeannin, J.F.; Am. J, Pathol, 1999, 154, 1867-1876.
[108] Inagawa, H.; Nishizawa, T.; Honda, T.; Nakamoto, T.; Takagi, K.; Soma, G.I.;
Anticancer Res., 1998, 18, 3957-3964.
[109] Sousa, C.R.; Hieny, S.; Sharton-Kersten, T.; Jankovic, D.; Charest, H.; Germain,
R.N.; Sher, A.; J, Exp, Med., 1997, 186, 1819-1829.
[110] Gallagher, G.; Stimson, W.H.; Findlay, J.; al-Azzawi, F.; Cancer, Immunol
Immunother., 1990, 31, 49-52.
[ I l l ] MacPherson, G.G.; North, R.J.; Cancer Immunol Immunother., 1986, 21, 209-
216.
[112] Akimoto, T.; Kumazawa, E.; Jimbo, T.; Joto, N.; Tohgo, A.; Anticancer Res.,
1995, 15, 105-107.
[113] Jimbo, T.; Akimoto, T.; Tohgo, A.; Anticancer Res., 1996,16, 359-364.
[114] Saiki, I.; Sato, K.; Yoo, Y.C.; Murata, J.; Yoneda, J.; Kiso, M.; Hasegawa, A.;
Azuma, L; Int, J, Cancer, 1992, 51, 641-645.
[115] Sato, N.; Takishima, H.; Okisaka, S.; Sawasaki, Y.; Goto, T.; In Tumor necrosis
factor/cachectin and related cytokines. Bonavida, B., GiflFord, G.E., Kirchner, H.,
Old, L.J., Eds.; Karger: Basel, 1988; pp.93-101.
[116] Vukanovic, J.; Isaacs, IT.; Cancer Res., 1995, 55, 14991504.
[117] Jenkins, D.C.; Charles, I.G.; Thomsen, L.L.; Moss, D.W.; Holmes, L.S.; Baylis,
S.A.; Rhodes, P.; Westmore, K.; Emson, P.C.; Moncada, S.; Proc, Natl Acad
ScL USA, 1995, 92, 4392-4396.
[118] Okamura, H.; Tsutsi, H.; Komatsu, T.; Yutsudo, M.; Hakura, A.; Tanimoto, T.;
Torigoe, K.; Okura, T.; Nukada, Y.; Hattori, K.; Akita, K.; Namba, M.; Tanabe,
F.; Konishi, K.; Fukuda, S.; Kurimoto, M.; Nature, 1995, 378, 88-91.
[119] Cao, R.; Famebo, J.; Kurimoto, M.; Cao, Y.; FASEB J,, 1999, 13, 2195-2202.
[120] Hibbs, J.B.; Taintor, R.R.; Vavrin, Z.; Rachlin, E.M.; Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun,, 1988, 157, 87-94.
[121] Alleva, D.G.; Burger, C.J.; Elgert, K.D.; J. Immunol, 1994,153, 1674-1686.
[122] Lejeune, P.; Lagadec, P.; Onier, N.; Pinard, D.; Oshima, H.; Jeannin, J.F.; J,
Immunol, 1994, 152, 5077-5083.
[123] Dong, Z.; Staroselsky, A.H.; Qi, X.; Xie, K.; Fidler, I.J.; Cancer Res., 1994, 54,
789-793.
[124] Tsung, K.; Meko, J.B.; Peplinsky, G.R.; Tsung, Y.L.; Norton, J.A.; J, Immunol,
1997, 158, 3359-3365.
[125] Kundu, N.; Dorsey, R.; Jackson, M.J.; Guiterrez, P.; Wilson, K.; Fu, S.;
Ramanujam, K.; Thomas, E.; Fulton, A.M.; Int, J, Cancer, 1998, 76, 713-719.
555
[126] Ambs, S.; Merriam, W.G.; Ogunfusika, M.O.; Bennett, W.P.; Ishibe, N.; Hussain,
S.P.; Tzeng, E.E.; Geller, DA.; Billiar, T.R.; Harris, C.C.; Nat Med, 1998, 4,
1371-1376.
[127] Amigorena, S.; Medecine/Sciences, 1999; 15: 931-938.
[128] De Smedt, T.; Pajak, B.; Muraille, E.; Lespagnard, L.; Heinen, E.; De Baetselier,
P.; Urbain, J.; Leo, O.; Moser, M.; J. Exp, Med., 1996, 184, 1413-1424.
[129] Matzinger, ?.;Anrm. Rev, Immunol., 1994, 12, 991-1045.
[130] Vogel, S.N.; Hilfiker, M.L.; Caulfield, M.J.;y. Immunol., 1983, 130, 1774-1779.
[131] Bismuth, G.; Duphot, M.; Theze, J.; J. Immunol., 1985, 134: 1415-1421.
[132] Mattem, T.; Flad, H.-D.; Brade, L.; Rietschel, E.T.; Ulmer, A.J.; J, Immunol.,
1998, 160,3412-3418.
[133] Tough, D.F.; Sun, S.; Sprent, J.; J, Exp. Med., 1997, 185, 2089-2094.
[134] Satake, K.; Yokomatsu, H.; Hiura, A.; Pancreas, 1996, 12, 260-266.
[135] Matsumoto, N.; Aze, Y.; Akimoto, A.; Fujita, T.; Immunopharmacology, 1997,
36, 69-78.
[136] Sinkovics, J.G.; Aheam, M.J.; Shirato, E.; Shullenberger, C.C; J.
Reticuloendothel Soc., 1970, 8, 474-492.
[137] Dye, E.S.; North, R.J.; J. Exp, Med., 1981, 154, 1033-1042.
[138] Berendt, M.J.; Newborg, M.F.; North, R.J.; Infect, Immun., 1980, 28, 645-647.
[139] Burger, C.J., Elgert, K.D.; Immunol. Commun., 1983, 12, 285-290.
[140] Walker, T.M.; Burger, C.J.; Elgert, K.D.; Cell, Immunol, 1994, 154, 342-357.
[141] Alleva, D.G.; Burger, C.J.; Elgert, K.D.; J, Leukoc, Biol, 1993, 53, 550-558.
[142] Gardner, T.E.; Naama, H.; Daly, J.M.; J. Surg, Res., 1995, 59, 305-310.
[143] Kumar, A.; Singh, S. M.; Sodhi, A.; Int. J. Immunopharmacol, 1998, 20, 99-
110.
[144] Ueda, H.; Yamazaki, M.; J. Immunother., 1997, 20, 65-69.
[145] Grossie, V.B.; Mailman, D.; J, Cancer Res, Clin, Oncol, 1997, 123, 189-194.
[146] Rofe, A.M.; Bourgeois, C.S.; Coyle, P.; Immunol Cell Biol, 1992, 70, 1-7.
[147] Strausser, H.R.; Bober, LA.; Cancer Res., 1972, 32, 2156-2159.
[148] Berendt, M.J.; North, RJ.; Kirstein, D.P.; J, Exp. Med., 1978, 148, 1560-1569.
[149] Abe, S.; Yoshioka, O.; Masuko, Y.; Tsubouchi, J., Kohno, M.; Nakajima, H.;
Yamazaki, M.; Mizono, D.; Gann, 1982, 73, 91-96.
[150] Bloksma, N.; Kuper, C.F.; Hofhuis, F.M.; Benaissa-Trouw, B.; Willers, J.M. ;
Cancer Immunol Immunother., 1983, 16, 35-39.
[151] Ribi, E.; Cantrell, J.L.; Takayama, K.; Amano, K. In Beneficial effects of
endotoxin. Nowotny, A., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York; 1983; pp. 529-554.
[152] Freudenberg, N.; Joh, K.; Westphal, O.; Mittermayer, C; Freudenberg, M.A.;
Galanos, C; Virchows Arch, A Pathol Anat, Histopathol, 1984, 403, 377-389.
[153] Miyamoto, K.; Koshiura, R.; Hasegawa, T.; Kato, N,; Jpn. J, Pharmacol, 1984,
36,51-57.
[154] Dye, E.S.; North, R.J.; J. Immunol, 1980, 125, 1650-1657.
[155] Nowotny, A.; Butler, R.C.; Adv, Exp. Med Biol, 1979, 121, 455-469.
[156] Shinoda, H.; Yamazaki, M.; Mizuno, D.; Gann, 1977, 68, 567-571.
556
[157] Lagadec, P.; Jeannin, J.F.; Reisser, D.; Pelletier, H.; Olsson, O.; Invasion
Metastasis, 1987, 7, 83-95.
[158] Shimizu, T.; Iwamoto, Y.; Yanagihara, Y.; Ikeda, K.; Achiwa, K.; Int. J.
ImmunopharmacoL, 1992, 14, 1415-1420.
[159] Shimizu,!.; Sugiyama, K.; Iwamoto, Y.; Yanagihara, Y.; Asahara, T.; Ikeda, K.;
Achiwa, K.;Int, J. Immunopharmac, 1994, 16, 659-665,
[160] Shimizu, T.; lida, K.; Iwamoto, Y.; Yanagihara, L; Ryoyama, K.; Asahara, T.;
Ikeda, K., Achiwa, K.; Int, J. Immunopharmacoi, 1995, 17, 425-431.
[161] Shimizu, T.; Iwamoto, Y.; Yanagihara, Y.; Ryoyama, K.; Suhara, Y.; Ikeda, K.;
Achiwa, K.; ImmunobioL, 1996, 196, 321-331.
[162] Ribi, E.; Amano, K.; Cantrell, J.; Schwartzman, S.; Parker, R.; Takayama, K.;
Cancer Immunol Immunother, 1982, 12, 91-96.
[163] Qureshi, N.; Takayama, K.; Ribi, E.; J. Biol. Chem., 1982, 257, 11808-11815.
[164] Ukei, S.; lida, J.; Shiba, T.; Kusumoto, S.; Azuma, L; Foccme, 1986,4, 21-24.
[165] Nakatsuka, M.; Kumazawa, Y.; Ikeda, S.; Yamamoto, A ; Nishimura, C ;
Homma, J.Y.; Kiso, M.; Hasegawa, A.; J. Clin. Lab. Immunol., 1988, 26, 43-47.
[166] Jimbo, T.; Akimoto, T.; Tohgo, A ; Cancer Immunol Immunother., 1995, 40,
10-16.
[167] Shimizu, T.; Ohtsuka, Y.; Yanagihara, Y.; Itoh, H.; Nakamoto, S.I.; Achiwa, K.;
Int. J. Immunopharmacoi, 1991, 13, 605-611.
[168] Kumazawa, E.; Tohgo, A.; Soga, T; Kusama, T.; Osada, Y.; Cancer Immunol
Immunother., 1992, 35, 307-314.
[169] Sato, K.; Yoo, Y.C.; Matsuzawa, K.; Watanabe, R.; Saiki, I.; Tono-Oka, S.;
Azuma, I.; Int. J. Cancer, 1996, 66, 98-103.
[170] Joto, N.; Akimoto, T.; Someya, K.; Tohgo, A.; Cell Immunol, 1995, 160, 1-7.
[171] Kuramitsu, Y.; Nishibe, M.; Ohiro, Y.; Matsuhita, K.; Yuan, L.; Obara, M.;
Kobayashi, M.; Hosokawa, M, Anti-Cancer Drugs, 1997, 8, 500-508.
[172] Matsushita, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Totsuka, Y.; Hosokawa, M.; Anticancer Drugs,
1998, 9, 273-282.
[173] Morita, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Kamigaki, T.; Saitoh, Y.; Kobe J. Med Sci., 1996,
42,219-231.
[174] Kobayashi, M.; Nagayasu, H.; Hamada, J.I.; Takeichi, N.; Hosokawa, M.; Exp.
Hematol, 1994, 22, 454-459.
[175] Mizushima, Y.; Sassa, K.; Fujishita, T.; Oosaki, R.; Kobayashi, M.; J.
Immunother, 1999, 22, 401-406.
[176] Ishida, H.; Fujii, E.; Irie, K.; Yoshioka, T.; Muraki, T.; Ogawa, R.; Brit. J.
Pharmacol, 2000, 130, 1235-1240.
[177] Hattori, Y.; Szabo, C ; Gross, S.S.; Thiemermann, C ; Vane, J.R.; Eur. J.
Pharmacol, 1995, 291, 83-90.
[178] Chaufifert, B.; Martin, F.; Caignard, A; Jeannin, J.-F.; Leclerc, A ; Cancer
Chemother. Pharmacol, 1984, 13, 14-18.
[179] Pelletier, H.; Olsson, N.O.; Shimizu, T.; Lagadec, P.; Fady, C ; Reisser, D.;
Jeannin, J.F., Immunobiology, 1987, 175, 202-213.
557
[180] Brandenburg, K.; Lindner, B.; Schromm, A.; Koch, M.H.; Bauer, J.; Merkli, A.;
Zbaeren, C; Davies, J.G.; Seydel, U.; Eur. J. Biochem., 2000, 267, 3370-3377.
[181] Lagadec, P.; Reveneau, S.; Lejeune, P.; Pinard, D.; Borman, T.; Bauer, J.;
Jeannin, J.F.; J. Pharmacol Exp, Ther., 1996, 278, 926-933.
[182] Fung, P.Y.; Madej, M.; Koganty, R.R.; Longenecker, B.M.; Cancer Res., 1990,
50,4308-4314.
[183] Engelhardt, R.; Mackensen, A.; Galanos, C; Andreesen, R.; J. Biol. Response
Aforf., 1990,9,480-491.
[184] Engelhardt, R; Mackensen, A.; Galanos, C; Cancer Res., 1991, 51, 2524-2530.
[185] Mackensen, A.; Galanos, C; Engelhardt, R.; Blood, 1991, 78, 3254-3258.
[186] Mackensen, A.; Galanos, C; Wehr, U.; Engelhardt, R.; Eur. Cytokine Netw.,
1992, 3, 571-579.
[187] Otto, P.; Schmid, P.; Mackensen, A; Wehr, U.; Seiz, A.; Braun, M.; Galanos, C;
Mertelsmann, R.; Engelhardt, R.; Eur. J. Cancer, 1996, 32, 1712-1718.
[188] Goto, S.; Sakai, S.; Kera, J.; Suma, Y.; Soma, G.-I.; Takeuchi, S.; Cancer
Immunol Immunother., 1996, 42, 255-261.
[189] Vosika, G.J.; Barr, C; Gilbertson, D.; Cancer Immunol Immunother., 1984, 18,
107-112.
[190] De Bono, J.S.; Dalgleish, A.G.; Carmichael, J.; Diffley, J.; Lofts, F.J.; FyfFe, D.;
EUard, S.; Gordon, R.J.; Brindley, C.J.; Evans, T.R.; Clin. Cancer Res., 2000, 6,
397-405.
[191] Mitchell, M.S.; Kan-MitcheU, J.; Kempf, R.A.; Hard, W.; Shau, H.Y.; Lind, S.;
Cancer Res., 1988, 48, 5883-5893.
[192] Mitchell, M.S.; Hard, W.; Kempf, RA.; Hu, E.; Kan-Mitchell, J.; Boswell, W.D.;
Dean, G., Stevenson, L.; J. Clin. Oncol, 1990, 8, 856-869.
[193] Mitchell, M.S.; Int. Rev. Immunol, 1991, 7, 331-347.
[194] Mitchell, M.S.; Harel, W.; Kan-MitcheU, J.; LeMay, L.G.; Goedegebuure, P.;
Huang, X.-Q.; Hofinan, F.; Groshen, S.; Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1993, 690,153-
166.
[195] Elliott, G.T.; McLeod, R.A.; Perez, J.; Von Eschen, KB.; Semin. Surg. Oncol,
1993, 9, 264-272.
[196] Helling, F.; Zhang, S.; Shang, A.; Adluri, S.; Calves, M.; Koganty, R.;
Longenecker, B.M.; Yao, T.-J.; Oettgen, H.F.; Livingston, P.O.; Cancer Res.,
1995, 55, 2783-2788.
[197] Schultz, N.; Oratz, R.; Chen, D.; Zdeniuch-Jacquotte, A.; Abeles, G.; Bystryn, J.-
C; Vaccine, 1995, 13, 503-508.
[198] Eton, O.; Kharkevitch, D.D.; Gianan, M.A.; Ross, M.I.; Itoh, K.; Pride, M.W.;
Donawho, C; Buzaid, A.C.; Mansfield, P.P.; Lee, J.E.; Legha, S.S.; Plager, C;
Papadopoulos, N.E.; Bedikian, AY.; Benjamin, R.S.; Balch, CM.; Clin. Cancer
Res., 1998, 4, 619-627.
[199] O'Boyle, K.P.; Zamore, R.; Adluri, S.; Cohen, A.; Kemeny, N.; Welt, S.; Lloyd,
K.O.; Oettgen, H.F.; Old, LJ.; Livingston, P.O.; Cancer Res., 1992, 52, 5663-
5667.
558
[200] MacLean, G.D.; Reddish, M.; Koganty, R.R.; Wong, T.; Gandhi, S.; Smolenski,
M.; Samuel, J.; Nabholtz, J.M.; Longenecker, B.M.; Cancer Immunol
Immunother., 1993, 36, 215-222.
[201] Longenecker, B.M.; Reddish, M.; Koganty, R.; MacLean, G.D.; Arm. N, Y, Acad.
5c/., 1993, 12,276-291.
[202] Longenecker, B.M.; Reddish, M.; Koganty, R.; MacLean, G.D.; Adv. Exp. Med.
Biol., 1994, 353, 105-124.
[203] Adluri, S.; Helling, F.; Ogata, S.; Zhang, S.; Itzkowitz, S.H.; Lloyd, K.O.;
Livingston, P.O.; Cancer Immunol. Immunother., 1995,41, 185-199.
[204] Miles, D.W.; Towlson, K.E.; Graham, R.; Reddish, M.; Longenecker, B.M.;
Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.; Rubens, R.D.; Brit. J. Cancer, 1996, 74, 1292-1296.
[205] MacLean, G.D.; Reddish, M.A.; Koganty, R.R.; Longenecker, B.M.; J.
Immunother. Emphasis Tumor Immunol, 1996, 19, 59-68.
[206] MacLean, G.D.; Miles, D.W,; Rubens, R.D.; Reddish, M.A.; Longenecker, B.M.;
J. Immunother. Emphasis Tumor Immunol., 1996, 19, 309-315.
[207] MacLean, G.D.; Reddish, M.A.; Longenecker, B.M.; J. Immunother., 1997, 20,
70-78.
[208] Reddish, M.A.; MacLean, G.D.; Poppema, S.; Berg, A; Longenecker, B.M.;
Cancer Immunol Immunother., 1996, 42, 303-309.
[209] Reddish, M.A.; MacLean, G.D.; Koganty, R.R.; Kan-Mitchell, J.; Jones, V.;
Mitchell, M.S.; Longenecker, B.M.; Int. J. Cancer, 1998, 76, 817-823.
[210] Sandmaier, B.M.; Oparin, D.V.; Holmberg, L.A.; Reddish, M.A.; MacLean,
G.D.; Longenecker, B.M.; J. Immunother., 1999, 22, 54-66.
[211] Holmberg, L A ; Oparin, D.V.; Gooley, T.; Lilleby, K.; Bensinger, W.; Reddish,
M.A.; MacLean, G.D.; Longenecker, B.M.; Sandmaier, B.M.; Bone Marrow
Transplant., 2000, 25, 1233-1241.
[212] Woodlock, T.J.; Sahasrabudhe, D.M.; Marquis, DM.; Greene, D.; Pandya, K.J.;
McCune, C.S.; J. Immunother., 1999, 22, 251-259.
[213] Khleif, S.N.; Abrams, ST.; Hamilton, J.M.; Bergmann-Leitner, E.; Chen, A;
Bastian, A.; Bernstein, S.; Chung, Y.; Allegra, C.J.; Schlom, J.; J. Immunother.,
1999,22, 155-165.
[214] Harris, D.T.; Matyas, G.R.; Gomella, L.G.; Talor, E.; Winship, M.D.; Spitler,
L.E.; Mastrangelo, M.J.; Semin. Oncol, 1999, 26, 439-447.
[215] Meidenbauer, N.; Harris, D.T.; Spitler, L.E.; Whiteside, T.L.; Prostate, 2000, 43,
88-100.
Atta-ur-Rahman (Ed.) Studies in Natural Products Chemistryy Vol. 28
© 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. 559
YOSHIYUKI KIMURA
ABSTRACT: Although it has recently been thought that a number of medicinal plants
and foodstuffs have antitumor and antimetastatic activities, the basis for this hearsay is
unclear. Therefore, to clarify whether natural products have antitumor and antimtastatic
actions, I have been using biochemical and pharmacological approaches to study the
natural products isolated from various medicinal plants and foodstuffs. In the review, we
will introduce the biological and pharmacological actions of various components isolated
from some medicinal plants and foodstuffs on tumor growth and metastasis in
tumor-bearing mice. Chitosan and fish oils prevented the adverse reactions such as
gastrointestinal toxicity and myelotoxicity caused by cancer chemotherapy drugs without
interfering the antitumor activity of chemotherapy drugs. Stilbenes derivatives isolated
from Cassia or Polygonum species inhibited the tumor growth and metastasis to the lung
in highly metastaic tumor-bearing mice. Furthermore, I found that stilbenes inhibited the
angiogenesis in in vivo and in vitro models.
INTRODUCTION
Cancer is the largest single cause of death in both men and women,
claiming over 6 million lives each year v^orldwide. Cancer
chemotherapy drugs such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) derivatives, cisplatin
(CDDP), mitomycin, doxorubicin, taxisol, etc. have been used extensively
for the treatment of certain types of cancer. However, with these
treatments, severe gastrointestinal toxicity with diarrhea and mucosis, and
hematologic toxicity with leukopenia and immunosuppression, appear to
be dose-limiting factors. Furthermore, the removal of malignant tumor by
surgical operation, radiation therapy and/or adjuvant therapy with cancer
chemotherapy drugs may be curative. However, the removal of certain
cancers, for example, breast carcinoma, colon carcinoma and osteogenic
sarcoma, may be followed by the rapid growth of distant metastases to
lung, liver etc. Therefore, efforts are underway to develop new modulators
that inhibit the adverse reactions without loss of antitumor activity and
new drugs having antitumor and antimetastatic activities without adverse
560
E
o
E
51
5 2<)|- I I ii iii i -a
^- m
' LM
a 0.0"-
5-FU(12.5 mg/kg x2)
Chitosan(ing/kg x2)
-V—1—J—^^^1.
- +
21 <id 0 I-
5-FU(12.5mg/kgx2)
Chitosan(mg/kg x2)
-
-
+
-
+
150
+
375
+
750
Fig. 3. Inhibitory effect of chitosan on gastrointestinal toxicity P»g -*• Inhibitory effect of chitosan on immunocompetent organ
(reduction ofsucrase activity in small intestinal mucosa) toxicity (reduction of spleen weight) induced by 5-FU in
induced by 5-FU in sarcoma 180-bearing mice. sarcoma 180-bearing mice.
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 9 mice. KtsnlXs are expressed as means ± S.E. of 9 mice.
•a
I I
I E
5-FU(12 5mg/kgx2)
Chitosan(ing/kg x2)
mm
Fig. 1. The combined antiitumor activity of 5-FU and chitosan
in sarcoma 180-bearing mice.
750
8
p<0.05
4.0
3.0
H
+
WD
2.0
o
s
0)
u
+ 1.0
00
Q
U
0.0
5-FU(12.5mg/kgx2) + +
Chitosan(mg/kg x2) 150 750
Fig. 5. Combined effects of S-FU and chitosan on the numbers ofCD8^ andNKLl.^
Tcells in spleen ofC57BL/6 mice.
5-FU or 5-FU plus chitosan was administered orally twice daily for 7 days.
On day 8, the mice were killed by cervical dislocation and their spleens were
quickly removed. CD8"^ and NKl. 1 ."^ cell populations were analyzed by
flow cytometry.
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 5 mice.
I I I I I.. • • I I I I i I
10 12 14
it
10 12 14 Day Day
j DXR(5mg/kg,ip) DXR(5mg/kg,ip)
TDXF
I
it
, DXR(5mg/kg,ip)DXR(5mg/kg,ip)
yoxR
SarcomalSO
Sarcoma 180
Inoculation inoculation
Fig. 6. The combined effects doxorubicin and chitosan Fig. 7. The combined effects ofdoxorubicin and chitosan
on tumor volume in sarcoma 180-bearing mice. on body weight in sarcoma 180-bearing mice.
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 10-20 mice •P<0.05. Significantly different from sarcoma 180-bearing mice.
I.
I
I
DXR DXR
(5 mg/kg/wcek, ip) (5 mg/kg/wcek. ip)
P<0.05 p^o.o.
12 16 20
•
Day
0.0
5.FU(12.5mg/kgx2)
Carp extract
(m^mouse x 2)
Mlii
Fig. 9. Effect of carp extract on survival time in asccites-type
sarcoma 180-bearing mice. Fig. 10. Antitumor effect of 5-FU and 5-FU plus carp extract.
5-FU or 5-FU plus carp extract were administered orally twice
Carp extract was administered orally twice daily until death, daily for 8 days. On day 9, blood and tissues were obtained.
starting 12 h after implantation of tumor cells.
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 10 mice.
and Fig. (12)". These findings indicate that carp extract could be
beneficial as health food source for the prevention of adverse reactions
such as myelotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by the cancer
chemotherapy drug 5-FU.
565
5-FU(12.5mg/kgx2) . + + + 5-FU(12.5mg/kgx2) . + + +
Carp extract Carp extract
(mg'mousex2) 50 100 (mg/mousex2) 50 100
Fig. 11. Inhibitory effect of carp extract on myelotoxicity (reduction Fig. 12. Inhibitory effect of carp extract on gastrointestinal toxicity
of leukocyte number) induced by 5-FU. (reduction of the weight of the small intestine) induced by
5-FU.
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 10 mice.
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 10 mice.
Mean ± SE
Final body weight (g) Final tumor weight (g) (T/C)
Sarcoma 180-bearing mice 35.5 ± 1.06 3.29 ± 0.78 (100%)
(Control)
Carp oil (0.2 ml/mouse) 36.8 ± 0.89 2.26 ± 0.54 (68.7%)
(0.4 ml/mouse) 37.5 ± 0.55 2.40 ± 0.77 (72.9%)
Tuna oil (0.2 ml/mouse) 38.7 ± 0.68 2.54 ± 0.80 (77.2%)
(0.4 ml/mouse) 36.1 ± 1.21 2.59 ± 0.73_(78.7%)
Results are expressed as mean ± SE of 10 mice in each group.
h)t
Sarcoma 18(M)earing mice (control)
1000 W
5-FU(12.5mg/kg)
1000
Sarcoma 18&4)earmginice(coiiirol)
5-FU(12.5mgAg)
1 5-FU + tuna oiK0.2ml)
5-FU + tuna oiK0.4ml)
800 V
5-FU + carp cMl(0.2inJ/inousc)
S-FU + carp oil(0.4 mlAnousc)
\
' %
!
i^
r'
/
'
1
h-
600 k
400 1
^^
1• 200 1
*Jm
^m* 0'
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Day 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Day
Fig. 13. Effects of the combination of5-FUplus carp oil (a) and 5-FUplus tuna oil (b) on
tumor growth in sarcomaJSO- bearing mice.
5-FU, 5-FU plus carp oil or 5-FU plus tuna oil was admnistered orally daily for 14 days.
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 9-10 mice.
*P<0.05, Significantly different from sarcoma 180-bearing mice.
Next, I examined the combined effects of 5-FU plus two fish oils (carp
oil and tuna oil) on the antitumor activity and adverse reactions compared
to the effects of 5-FU alone (12.5 mg/kg). I found that carp oil (0.4
ml/mouse) or tuna oil (0.2 or 0.4 ml/mouse) enhanced the ability of 5-FU
(12.5 mg/kg) to prevent tumor growth, without increasing adverse
567
400
I 200
20 40 60 100 120
Time (min)
Fig. 14. 5-FU levels in the plasma of mice after oral co-administration of 5-FU plus carp oil or
5-FUplus tuna oil
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 5 mice in each group.
•P<0.05, Significantly different from the administration of 5-FU (12.5 mg/kg) alone.
As shown in "Fig. (14)", the 5-FU levels in the blood of mice were
about 133.8 ± 27.5 and 285.0 ± 19.3 ng/ml, respectively at 5 and 15 min
568
after the oral administration of 5-FU (12.5 mg/kg) and then decreased
rapidly. On the other hand, the blood 5-FU levels after the
co-administration of 5-FU plus carp oil (0.4 ml/mouse) were 99.7 ± 42.4,
48.9 ± 15.6, 39.9 ± 17.2 and 18.6 ± 9.75 ng/ml, respectively, at 5, 15, 30
and 60 min. The blood 5-FU levels after the co-administration of 5-FU
plus tuna oil (0.2 ml/mouse) were 376.4 ± 172.1, 182.6 ± 113.0, 33.9 ±
2.10 and 22.8 ± 5.73 ng/ml, respectively, at 5, 15, 30 and 60 min. The area
under the curve (AUC) (0-120 min) of blood 5-FU levels was reduced by
the oral co-administration of 5-FU with carp oil or tuna oil. Apparent Tmax
was shortened by the oral co-administration of 5-FU with carp oil or tuna
oil. However, AUC (0-4 h) of [6-^H]5-FU incorporation into RNA
fraction of tumor after the co-administration of 5-FU plus carp oil or tuna
oil was similar to that of 5-FU alone "Fig. (15)". These results suggest that
the co-administration of 5-FU plus carp oil or tuna oil enhanced the
5-FU-induced antitumor activity without adverse reactions.
OL
Time (h)
Fig. 15. [6'^H] 5'FU incorporation into RNAfractionsof tumor after oral co-administration of
[6'^H]5'FUplus carp oil or [6-3 H]5-FU plus tuna oil
Table 4. Effects of various lifnd fractions of chloroform : methanol extract (l:l^v/v) (a), acetone- soluble
and -insoluble fractions (b), and n-hexane-soluble and -insoluble fractions (c) on tumor volume at 20 d
and tumor weight at 21 din sarcoma 180-bearing mice^
(a)
\^rious lipid Tumor volume Inhibition Tumor weight Inhibition
fractions mm^ % mg %
Control 4826.9±1150.6 - 4470.0±870.6 -
Chloroform 1087.3± 567.6* 77.5 844.2±425.1* 81.1
methanol extract
(b)
"Various lipid Tumor volume Inhibition Tumor weight Inhibition
fractions mm^ % mg %
Control 928.81250.9 - 827.7±381.2 -
Acetone-soluble 124.1+83.6* 86.6 108.6+83.4* 86.8
fraction
-insoluble 649.1+140.9 30.1 490.5±382.3 40.7
fraction
570
(c)
Various lipid Tumor volume Inhibition Tumor weight Inhibition
fractions mm^ % mg %
Control 766.9±302.9 - 812.0±277.2 -
Hexane-soluble 152.0±74.6* 80.2 163.9±150.7* 79.8
fraction
-insoluble 75.7±24.6* 90.1 54.6±21.4* 93.3
fraction
^Various lipid fractions (800 mg/kg) were orally administered for 20 day in sarcoma 180-bearing mice.
Inhibition ratio (%) was measured as tumor volume or tumor weight of various lipid fraction-treated mice/
tumor volume or tumor weights of control mice. Each value represents the means ± S.E. of 10 mice. *P<0.05,
Significantly different from sarcoma 180-bearing mice.
Ergosterol
F i g . 16. Antitum or substance of Agaricus blazei
3000
<D
4 2000 h
1000
Table 5. Effects of ergosterol on the weights and hemoglobin contents in the gels 5d after implantation of
Matrigel supfdemented a FGF and heparin^
1 cm
Matrigel atone Matrigel
a FGF{1 ng/ml) Matrigel/a FGF/Heparin
Heparin(64 unrts/ml) + Ergosterol
(400^g/ml) (800^g/ml)
PR
OH
OH
Piceatannol: R=H
Piceatannol acetate: R=COCH3
OH
Cassigarcl A
Fig.20. Antitumor and antimetastaic substances of Cassia garrettiana heartwood
2000
1500
Q 1000
500
0
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Day
Fig. 21. Effects of cassigarol A on tumor growth in LLC-bearing mice.
Solid-type LLC was prepared by subcutaneous transplantation into the right backs of mice
on day 0. Cassigarol A (50 or 100 mg/kg) was administered orallt twice daily for 14 days.
L L C - b e a r i n g m i c e (control)
LLC-bearing mice (control)
piceatannol a c e t a t e ( 5 0 m g / k g x 2 / d a y )
— piceatannol(50mg/kg x 2/day)
piceatannol(100mg/kg x 2/day) piceatannol a c e t a t e ( 1 0 0 m g / k g x 2 / d a y )
0 2 4 6 8 10 1 14 Day 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Day
2
Fig. 22. Effects of piceatannol (a) and piceatannol acetate (b) on tumor growth in LLC-bearing mice.
On day 15, tumor weight reduced by piceatannol acetate (100 mg/kg twice
daily), but piceatannol did not affect "Fig. (23)".
g H LLC-bearing mice
j g a l piceatannol-treated mice
Y^ piceatannol acetate-treated mice
p<0.05
100 . »
I
1
1
i
LLC-removed mice
+ Cassigarol A(50mg/kg x 2/day)
+ Cassigarol A(100mg/kg x 2/day)
0
Piceatarmol ^/^ ^r^
(A <A 6 8 10 12 14 16 Day
(mg/kg x 2/day) ' 5U luu -
Piceatannol acetate
Survival time
(mg/kg X 2/day) " 50 100
Fig. 24. Effects of cassigarol A on survival time and survival rate in
carcinectomized mice
Fig. 23. Effects of piceatarmol and piceatannol acetate on tumor weight
On day 15, the solid tumor tissues were removed imder anesthetic
in LLC-bearing mice.
pentobarbital and w e i r e d . Thereafter, cassiagarol A w a s again
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 4-7 mice in each group. administered orally twice daily for 17 days, starting 24h after resection
of tumor tissues on day 0. T h e survival time and numl>er of surviving
*P<0.05, Significantly diffaent from LLC-bearing mice (control). tumor-removed mice were determined.
577
p<0.05
-•••BlfBa- • Q - - - ! l -
30 h
73
40
• carcinectomized mice
• piceatannol (SOmg/kg x2/day)i
• piceattannol(100mg/kgx2/day)
20
piceatannol acetate(50mg/kg x 2/day)
piceatannol acetate(100mg/kg x 2/day)
0»-
Carcinectomized mice
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Casigarol A 50 mg/kg x2 100 mg/kg x2
Survival time (day)
Fig. 26. Effeas of cassigarol A on the number of colonies oflung
Fig. 25. Effects of piceatannol and piceatannol acetate on
metastasis in carcinectomized mice.
survival time and survival rate in carcinectomized
Chi day 15, the solid tumor tissues were removed under anesthetic pentobarbital and weighed. Thereafter, piecatannol, piceataimol acetate
"Fig. (25)" or casssigarol A 'Tig. (26)" was again administered orally twice daily for 17 days, starting 24 hours after resection of tumw tissues
on day 0. The survival time and number of surviving tumor-removed mice were determined.
Resuhs are expressed as means ± S.E. of 4-7 mice in each group.
p<0,05
10
p<0.05
o
*5 \p<0.05
cd
OL
Normal Carcinectomized mice
mice
piceatamiol
50 100
(mg/kg X 2/day)
piceatamiol acetate 50 100
(mg/kg X 2/day)
Fig. 27. Effects ofpiceatannol andpiceatannol acetate on the number of
metastatic colonies in the lungs of carcinetomized mice.
On day 15, the solid tumor tissues were removed, and then cassigarol A was again
administered orally twice daily for 17 days, starting 24 h after resection of tumor
tissues on day 0. On day 18, the surviving tumor-removed mice were killed and the
metastasis to the lung were observed.
Results are expressed as means A} S.E. of 4-7 mice in each group
579
p<0.05
i! 20
11 « 10
10 50 100
Piceatannol (>xM)
Cassigarol A ( M M ) Piceatannol acetate (M M)
Fig. 28. Effects ofcassigarol A on Matrigel-induced capillary- pig. 29. Effects of piceatannol andpiceatannol acetate on Matrigel-induced
like tube formation by HUVEC capillary-like tube formation by HUVEC.
HUVECs were seeded on the Matrigel in 270 (d of DMEM supplemented with 20% FBS and incubated with the indicated amounts of
cassigarol A, piceattanol or piceatannol acetate for 24 h in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 4 experiments.
OH
HO
Resveratrol
CH2OH
OH
+ Piceid
(100 mg/kg X 2/day) 5/5(100) 129.9 ± 45.55 30.79 ± 5.26
(300 mg/kg X 2/day) 1/5 (20) 78.74± 11.58 42.78 ± 7.81
Values are expressed as means ± S.E. from 4 - 5 animals. *P<0.05, significantly different from LLC-bearing
mice (control mice).
581
a) b)
3500 LLC-bearing mice (control)
3500
+ 2,3,5,4'-tetrahydroxystilbene-
2-O-D-glucoside
(50 mg/kg X 2/day)
LLC-bearing mice (control)
+ 2,3,5,4'-tetrahydroxystilbene-
Piceid (100 mg/kg x 2/day)
2-0-D-glucoside
2500 X Piceid (300 mg/kg x 2/day)
(150 mg/kg X 2/day) I
E
I 2000 2 2000
1500
>
o 1500
1000 1000
I t i I I
8 12 16 20 24 28 32 Day 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 Day
Solid-type LLC was prepared by subcutaneous transplantation into the right hind paw on
day 0.2,3,5,4'-Tetrahydroxystilbene-2-6>-D-glucoside or piceid was administered orally
twice daily for 32 consecutive days, starting 12 h after tumor implantation.
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 4-5 mice in each group.
*P<0.05, Significantly different from LLC-bearing mice (control).
a)
LLC-bearing mice (control)
+ Resveratrol(0.6 mg/kg)
5000 Y
+ Resveratrol(2.5 mg/kg)
+ ResveratroK 10 mg/kg)
3000
1000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Day
Fig. 32. £;|^c/5 ofresveratrol on tumor volume (a) andfinaltumor weight (b) in LLC-bearing
mice.
Solid-type LLC was prepared by subcutaneous transplantation into the backs on day 0.
Resveratrol was administered intraperitoneally once daily for 21 consecutive days, starting
12 h after implantation of the tumor cells.
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 7 mice in each group.
*P<0.05, Significantly different from LLC-bearing mice (control).
Table 8. Effects ofresveratrol on apoptosis Go/Gl, S and G2/M phase of cell cycle in LLC cells^
% of total cells
Concentration Apoptosis Go/Gi S Gz/M
(HM)
None 12.1±0.36 50.0±L97 35.2±L72 14.8±0.29
Resveratrol (5) 9.43±0.51 44.6±0.75 37.9±L25 17.5±0.49
(10) 9.65±0.61 39.9±1,54 43.8±2.12 16.3±0.70
(50) 12.5±0.97 46.8±L15 22.1+1.03* 31.1±0.26*
(100)) 20.6+L35* 52.9±L16 29.2+0.27* 17.8±1.42
^\^lues are expressed as means ± S.E. of 3 experiments. *P<0.05, Significantly different from medium alone.
583
10 r
o 8
o ;7<a05
8 6
cd
0 ^
Resveratrol 0.6 2.5 10
mg/kg
Fig. 33. Effects of resveratrol on the numbers of colonies ofLLC cells
metastasizing to the lung on day 22 in LLC-bearing mice.
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 7 mice in each group.
*P<0.05, Significantly different from LLC-bearing mice.
584
&
20
3 ,
10 100 1000
luuu - Q 5 JO 5Q 100
Resveratrol ( M M ) Resveratrol ( M M )
Fig. 34. i ^ c / s of resveratrol on ^H-thymidine incorporation into DNA Fig. 35. Effects of resveratrol on Matrigel-induced capillary-
ofLLC cells. like networkformation by HUVEC.
Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 4 experiments. Results are expressed as means ± S.E. of 4 experiments.
*P<0.05, Significantly diflFerent from medium alone. *P<0.05, Significantly different from medium alone
585
REFERENCES
[1] Kimura, Y. & Okuda, H. Prevention by chitosan of myelotoxicity, gastrointestinal
toxicity and immunocompetent organic toxicity induced by 5-fluorouracil without
loss of antitumor activity in mice. Jpn. 7. Cancer Res, 1999, 90, 765- 774.
[2] Kimura, Y.; Sawai, N.; Okuda, H. Antitumor activity and adverse reactions of
combined treatment with chitosan and doxorubicin intumor-bearing mice. / . Pharm.
Pharmacol 2001,53, 1373-1378.
[3] Kimura, Y & Okuda, H. Prevention by carp extract of myelotoxicity
and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by 5-fluorouracil without loss ofantitumor
activity in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol 1999, 68, 39-45.
[4] Kimura, Y; Takaku, T.; Nakajima, S.; Okuda, H. Effects of carp and tuna oils on
5-fluorouracil-induced antitumor activity and side effectsin sarcoma 180-bearing
mice. Lipids 2001,36, 353-359.
[5] Takaku, T.; Kimura, Y; Okuda, H. Isolation of an antitumor compound from
Agaricus blazei Murill and its mechanism of action./. Nutr, 2001,131,1409-1413.
[6] Kimura, Y; Baba, K.; Okuda, H. Inhibitory effects of active substances isolated from
Casssia garrettiana heartwood on tumorgrowth and lung metastasis in Lewis lung
carcinoma-bearing mice (Part \). Anticancer Res. 2000,20, 2899-2906.
[7] Kimura, Y; Baba, K.: Okuda, H. Inhibitory effects of active substances isolated from
Casssia garrettiana heartwood on tumor growth and lung metastasis in Lewis lung
carcinoma-bearing mice (Part 2), Anticancer Res, 2000,20, 2923-2930.
[8] Kimura, Y & Okuda, H. Effects of naturally occurring stilbene
glucosides from medicinal plants and wine, on tumor growth and lung metastasis in
Lewis lung carcinoma-bearing mice. J. Pharm, Pharmacol, 2000,52, 1287-1295.
[9] Kimura, Y & Okuda, H. Resveratrol isolated from Polygonum
cuspidatum root prevents tumor growth and metastasis to lung and tumor-induced
neovascularization in Lewis lung carcinoma-bearing mice. / . Nutr, 2001, 131,
1844-1849.
[10] Kubo, M.; Kimura, Y; Shin, H.; Haneda, T.; Tani, T.; Namba, K.
Studies on the antifrmgal substance of crude drugs (II). On the roots of Polygonum
cuspidatum Sieb.et Zucc. (Polygonaceae). Shouyakugaku Zasshi, 1981, 35, 58-64.
[11] Kimura, Y; Kozawa, M.; Baba, K.; Hata, K. New constituents of
roots of Polygonum cuspidatum, Planta Med. 1983, 48, 164-169.
[12] Arichi, H.: Kimura, Y; Okuda, H.; Baba, K.; Kozawa, M.;
Arichi, S. Effects of stilbene componets of the roots of Polygonum cuspidatum Sieb.
Et. Zucc. On lipid metabolism. Chem. Pharm, Bull 1982,30, 1766-1770.
[13] Kimura, Y; Ohminami, H.; Okuda, H.; Baba, K.; Kozawa, K.;
Arichi, S. Effects of stilbene components of roots of Polygonum species on liver
injury in peroxizied oil-fed rats. Planta Med 1983,49, 51-54.
[14] Kimura, Y; Okuda, H.; Arichi, S. Effects of stilbenes on
arachidonate metabolism in leukocytes. Biochim Biophys, Acta 1985,834, 275-278.
[15] Kimura, Y; Okuda, H.; Arichi, S. Effects of stilbene derivatives on
archodoudlc metabolism in leukocytes. Biochim, Biophys, Acta 1985,837, 209-212.
[16] Kimura, Y; Okuda, H.; Kubo, M. Effects of stilbenes isolated from
586
INTRODUCTION
TRITERPENOID GLYCOSIDES
22 24
o^ ^o
R—a
30 31
CHEMICAL STRUCTURES
3p-Hydroxyholost-9(ll)-ene aglycones
R—a
HO O
HO O
OH
R O'
OAc
HO O^ ^O
Fig. (8). Structures of glycosides isolatedfromtbe sea cucumbers Holothuria leucospilota and Holothuria
forskalii
3P-HydroxyhoIost-7-ene aglycones
Frondoside B (9a), Cucumariosides A2-4 (9b) and A7-3 (9c), Fig. (9) as
well as several triterpene glycosides isolated from the sea cucumbers
Stichopus chloronotus (lOa-lOh) and Thelenota ananas (lOi, lOj), Fig.
(10) contain the simple 3P-hydroxyholost-7-ene as the aglycone. An
additional acetoxyl group in the side chain is present in compounds 10a-
lOj.
Fig. (9). Structures of glycosides isolatedfromthe sea cucumbers Cuctanariafrondosa and Cucumaria
japonica
594
Fig. (10). Structures o f glycosides isolated fixjm the sea cucunibers Stichopus chloronotus and Thelenota
ananas
R—a
Fig. (11). Structures of glycosides isolated from the sea cucumber Cucumariajaponica
Another structural feature that has been found only in this series of
aglycones is the presence of an acetoxyl group at C-16. Glycosides with a
p-configuration for this group are shown in Fig. (12).
o^ ^o
R—a
OH
Fig. (15). Structures of glycosides isolated fix>tn the sea cucumbers Cucumaria echinata and Pentamera
calcigera
H%o<^^-
Fig. (16). Structure of patagonicoside A, an antifungal oligoglycoside isolated fixxn the sea cucumber Psolus
patagonicus
Non-holostane aglycones
598
^N^^
•iiiH
Fig. (18). structures of noo4iolostane glycosides isolated fixxn the sea cucumbers Et^ntacta fraudatrix and
Pentamera cahigera
OAc
R-
IIH
Fig. (21). Structures of tiOQ4K>lostane glyoosides isolated from the sea cucumbers Pentacta australis and
Cucumariafrondosa
groups at C-6 of the 3-0-Me-glucose unit and at C-6 of the glucose unit
have been found in trisulfeted tetraglycosides.
Pentaglycosides isolated from sea cucumbers show a variety of
carbohydrate chains, Fig. (22). Most glycosides contain chains I-IV.
Chain IV is typical for glycosides isolated from the sea cucumber
Pentamera calcigera: Calcigerosides Ci (18c), C2 (15c), Di (18d), D2
(15d) and E (13c). Cucumarioside Ai-2 (lid) is the only example of a
triterpene glycoside containing an acetate group at C-6 of the terminal
glucose unit (chain XII). Pentasaccharide chains with glucose as the
terminal sugar are uncommon and were found in a few glycosides, such
as Cucumarioside A4-2 (Hi) (chain VII), Cladoloside B (3i) (chain X)
and Holothurinoside A (8c) (chain XT).
[3-^-M&<51o<l-^3)-acKl->4)]-pfyHl->2)]<^ii<l-^2)]-Xyl-aglyoonea)
[3-a]Vfe<jlc^l-^3>XyKl-^4)]-pfyl-(l-^2)]<^ii-(l-^2)]-Xyl^ycoi»
[3-0-Me-XyKl-^3)-Glo<l->4)HGl(Kl->2)]<^-(l->2)]-Xyl-aglyconea^^^
[3^-Me-Xyl-<l->3)-Glc<l->4)HQui-<l->2)]<^ii<l->2)]-Xyl-aglyooiie(rV0
[3-O.I^Xyl-(l-^3Kjlo<l-^4)]-pfyK1^2)]<^ji<l->2)]-Xyl-aglycQne(^
[3^-Me-Glc-(l-^3>Glc<l->4)]4Glo<l->4)]<^ii-(l-^2)]-Xyl^ycoDe(^
[GlcKl->3Hjlo<l->4)]-pCyKl-^2)]<^ii-<l-->2)]-Xyl-aglycone(VII)
[3-aMe-XyHl->3)-C]ao<1^4)HQui<l-^2)]-<^Kl->2)].Xyl-aglycc3oe(Vm^
[3^-Me<jlc^l->3)-Glc<l->4K^ii-(l-^2)HGl<>(l-^4)]- Xyl^ycone (IX)
[Glo<l->4)H3-a.M©<Ho<l->3)-XyKl->4)-Qui-<l->2)]- Xyl-agjycone (X)
[Glo<l->4)]43-^-Me-Gl(Kl-->3)-Glo<l->4)-Qui-<l-^2)]- Xyl-aglycone (XI)
[6-aAc<j!c<l->3)-CHo<l->4)]-pfyl-(1^2)]<^ii<l->2)]-Xyl-aglycone(XII)
STRUCTURAL ELUCIDATION
H-3 with H-1', H-la, H-5a and H-31 confirmed the ^-configuration at C-
3. Of particular interest is the p-configuration of H-9 in 3(3-
hydroxyholost-7-ene based aglycones instead of the characteristic 9a-
configuration in natural steroids and triterpenoids. This proton showed a
characteristic broad doublet at 6 3.02 ppm (in CD3OD) and a strong NOE
correlation with H-19 and H-12p. This last correlation revealed the a-
configuration of the hydroxyl group at C-12. Correlations between H-12
and H-21 evidenced the a-configuration of the hydroxyl group at C-17
and consequently the S configuration at C-20. In this way we were able to
confirm the stereochemistry assigned previously to these carbons by
Kitagawa et al. [27, 28] only on the basis of solvent-induced shifts in the
^H-NMR spectra of the corresponding sapogenols obtained by hydrolysis
of the native saponin.
9(ll).double bond at 5 151.0 ppm (s, C-9) and 111.0 ppm (d, C-11). The
presence of an allylic hydroxyl group at C-12a shifts the resonance of C-
11 to 6 ca. 116 ppm (glycosides 4e, 5b, 6 and 8e). Besides, aglycones
with a trisubstituted 7(8)-double bond, as in glycosides 9b, llf, 12a, 13c,
15c and 16, show typical resonances at 6 ca. 120-121 ppm (d, C-7) and
143-148 ppm (s,C-8).
Table 1. ^^C NMR chemical shifts of holostane aglycones
c 3k' 4e^ 5b ^ 6' 8e^ 9b* llf 12a' 13c* 15c* 16^
1 36.1 36.8 36.4 36.1 36.4 36.0 36.8 36.0 35.8 36.0 37.3
2 26.8 27.3 27.0 27.1 27.3 26.9 27.7 26.8 26.6 26.8 27.8
3 88.4 89.1 88.5 88.8 88.8 88.9 90.0 89.2 88.9 88.7 90.8
4 39.5 40.2 39.9 40.1 40.1 39.5 40.4 39.5 39.2 39.4 40.4
5 52.7 53.2 52.7 52.8 52.8 47.9 49.5 48.0 47.7 47.8 50.2
6 20.9 21.4 21.2 21-3 21.2 23.2 24.2 23.3 23.0 23.2 24.0
7 28.3 29.0 28.2 28.4 28.7 119.8 122.7 120.4 120.2 119.8 121.4
8 38.6 40.4 40.8 41.0 40.8 146.6 144.8 145.8 143.2 146.5 148.4
9 151.0 153.6 154.0 154.1 153.5 47.2 48.2 47.2 47.3 47.2 46.1
10 39.7 39.8 39.6 39.8 40.1 35.4 36.7 35.5 35.2 35.4 36.4
11 111.0 116.4 115.6 115.7 116.1 22.8 23.3 22.6 22.3 22.7 35.9
12 31.9 68.5 71.3 71.5 71.5 30.2 30.7 31.4 31.0 30.0 73.6
13 55.7 64.4 58.5 57.8 63.7 58.6 57.9 59.5 59.1 57.5 60.2
14 41.9 46.8 46.3 46.5 46.2 51.2 46.7 47.5 46.9 51.2 52.0
15 51.9 24.3 27.0 36.5 23.6 24.4 53.0 43.6 43.4 34.0 35.7
16 213.4 37.3 35.8 36.8 38.4 34.2 215.3 75.4 74.9 25.5 36.5
17 61.2 47.2 89.1 89.5 47.6 53.0 64.6 54.5 54.2 53.4 90.7
18 176.1 177.5 174.7 174.8 177.5 180.2 180.3 180.6 180.1 179.8 178.5
19 21.9 18.3 20.0 20.1 22.0 23.9 25.0 24.0 23.7 23.9 24.4
20 83.2 84.7 86.9 87.4 83.6 84.1 84.9 85.9 84.9 82.5 88.0
21 26.7 26.4 23.0 23.3 18.7 25.9 27.2 28.4 28.7 27.1 23.0
22 38.3 39.6 36.5 35.2 80.2 39.2 39.2 39.1 41.7 51.8 39.2
23 22.2 23.4 22.2 30.7 28.7 22.9 23.2 22.8 143.2 207.5 23.0
24 37.9 124.5 38.8 75.4 36.7 123.3 38.8 39.6 120.5 52.0 40.7
25 145.4 132.1 28.2 150.0 81.2 131.8 146.5 28.1 70.0 24.3 29.0
26 110.4 25.7 22.6 110.6 28.7 25.5 111.4 22.4 29.6 22.3 23.0
27 22.1 17.7 22.6 18.2 28.0 17.8 23.2 22.9 29.8 22.3 22.9
30 16.4 16.8 16.7 16.8 16.7 17.3 18.4 17.5 17.2 17.3 29.3
31 27.8 28.3 28.0 28.2 27.2 28.6 29.8 28.8 28.1 28.6 17.7
32 20.5 22.1 22.7 22.7 20.1 30.8 32.8 32.4 32.0 30.6 31.2
AcO 171.0 171.0
21.5 21.1
"InPynfi^j-DzO/lnPy-^/s/InCDaOD
605
considerably from those calculated for the 16a-isoiner (4.1, 6.9 and 1.2
Hz, respectively) [42].
1 -2
• 1179(+H+Na) 945(-Hf>fe)
'915(+HfNa) ^534(4Na)
-898(+Na)
-768(+Na)
i-518(4Na)
—••lieiC-HfNa) -752(+Na)
partially methylated alditol acetates [21, 28, 31] has also been used in
order to determine the interglycosidic linkages.
Table 3 shows the ^^C-NMR data for the sugar units of sea cucumber
glycosides containing different pentasaccharide chains.
Table 3. "C-NMR data for the sugar moieties of holotliurins with pentaglycosidic chains
Table 4. *H- and "C-IVMR data for the Sugar Moieties of Patagonicoside A (16),
Hemoiedemoside A (3k) and LiouviUoside A (12g).
16 3k 12g
c Sc*-' SH'(«/mHz) 5c ^'^ 5H"(./inHz) Sc^-^ SH'(>/mHz)
r 105.6 4.46 d (7.9) 104.9 4.69 d (7.1) 104.2 4.32 d (7.3)
T 82.7 3.55 m 82.4 3.69 m 82.0 3.36 m
3' 75.1 (+2.3) 3.78 m 74.8 (+2.6) 4.27 dd (9, 8.7) 14.1 (+2) 3.54 m
4' 77.1 (-6) 4.23 m 75.8 (-5.5) 5,11m 74.4 (-4.8) 3.97 m
5' 63.8 (+2.6) 3.37 m; 63.9 (+2.3) 3.72 m 63.2 (+2.3) 3.19 m
4.17 m 4.75 m
r" 104.8 4.45 (6.9) 104.6 4.76 d (7.7) 103.1 4.40 d (7.8)
ij'i'tt
74.3 3.41m 74.3 3.95 72.6 3.25 m
3'" 87A 3.60 m 86.5 4.25 85.9 3.49 m
4»»» 10.2 3.42 m 69.9 3.79 68.7 3.20 m
5'" 75.2 (+2.7) 3.69 m 74.7 (+2.7) 4.21 74.2 (+2.1) 3.53 m
6'" 68.5 (-6.1) 4.12 m; 67.5 (-5.7) 4.68 m, 5.14 dd 65.9 (-4.9) 3.78 m, 4.04 dd
(2,10.7) (18,10)
4.38 m
1»»9
105.2 4.57 d (7.9) 104.9 5.29 d (7.8) 103.8 4.47 d (7.9)
2"" 75.4 3.31m 74.5 3.96 m 73.6 3.15 m
3"" 87.6 3.10 m 87.4 3.71m 85.8 3.00
4"" 71.1 3.34 m 70.3 4.02 dd (8.9, 69.3 3.21m
9.3)
«9»»
78.1 3.32 m 113 3.95 m 75.1 (+1.8) 3.34 m
6"" 62.5 3.65 m; 3.85 bd 61.8 4.19 m, 4.43 dd 65.6 (-4.6) 3.83m,4.04dd
(10.5) (2,11.9) (18,10)
OCH3 61.1 3.62 s 60.6 3.85 s 60.1 3.49 s
' Reoofxied at 125 MHz in Me^hanoW4; ^ Italics = interglycx)sidic positions, bold = sul&te positions; (Ac =
6c - ScdesDtfated andog); *" Rfiootded at 500 MHz in Metbanol-</4; ** Recorded at 125 MHz in Vy-dyJhO (5:1); *
RecQided at 500 MHz in Py^5:D20 (5:1); ^ Recorded at 125 MHz in DMSO^;« ReoQided at 500 MHz m
DMSO^
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
[1] Stonik, V.A.; Elyakov, G.B. In Bioorganic Marine Chemistry; Scheuer P.J., Ed.;
Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1988; Vol. 2, pp. 43-86.
[2] Minale, L.; Riccio, R.; ZoUo, F. In Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural
Products; Herz, W.; Kirby, G.W.; MOOTC, R.E.; Steglich, W.; Tamm CR, Eds.;
Springer-Verlag: New York, 1993; Vol. 62, pp. 65-308.
[3] Minale, L.; Riccio, R.; Zollo, F. In Bioactive Natural Products - Studies in
Natural Products Chemistry; Atta-iff-Rahman., Ed.; Elsevier Science Publishers:
Amsterdam, 1995; Vol. 75, pp. 43-110.
[4] D'Auria, M.V.; Minale, L.; Riccio, R.; Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 1839-1895.
[5] lorizzi, M.; De Marino, S.; Zollo, F.; Curr. Org Chem., 2001, 5, 951-973.
[6] Verbist, J.F. In Echinoderm Studies; Jangoux, M.; Lawrence, J.M., Eds.; A.A.
Balkema: Rotterdam, 1993; Vol. 4, pp. 111-186.
[7] Chludil KD.; Seldes, A.M.; Maier, M.S. In Research Advances in Lipids; Mohan,
R.M., Ed.; Global Research Network: India, 2002; in press.
[8] Roccatagliata, A.J.; Maier, M.S.; Seldes, A.M.; Pujol, C.A.; Damonte, E.B.; J.
Nat Prod., 1996, 59, 887-889.
[9] Roccatagliata, A.J.; Maier, M.S.; Seldes, A.M.; J. Nat. Prod., 1998, 61, 370-374.
[10] Riccio, R.; D'Auria, M.V.; Minale, L.; J. Org Chem., 1986, 51, 533-536.
614
[11] Kalinin, V.I.; Avilov, S.A.; Stonik, V.A. In Saponins in Food, Feedstuffs and
Medicinal Plants; Oleszek, W.; Marston, A., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers:
The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 155-162.
[12] Kalinin, V.I.; Anisimov, M M ; Prokofieva, N.G.; Avilov, S.A.; Afiyatullov,
Sh.Sh.; Stonik, V.A. In Echinoderm Studies; Jangoux, M ; Lawrence, J.M, Eds.;
A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam, 1996; Vol. 5, pp. 139-181.
[13] Kalinin, V.I.; J, theor, Biol, 2000, 206, 151-168.
[14] Stonik, V.A.; Kalinin, V.I.; Avilov, S.A.; J. Nat. Toxins, 1999, S, 235-248.
[15] Kobayashi, M.; Okamoto, Y.; Kitagawa, I.; Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1991, 39, 2867-
2877.
[16] Kalinin, V.I.; Volkova, O.V.; Likhatskaya, G.N.; Prokofieva, N.G.; Agafonova,
I.G.; Anisimov, M M ; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Avilov, S.A.; Stonik, V.A.; J. Nat
Toxins, 1992,1, 31-37.
[17] Makarieva, T.N.; Stonik, V.A.; Kapustina, I.I.; Boguslavsky, V.M; Dmitrenoik,
A.S.; Kalinin, V.I.; Cordeiro, ML.; Djerassi, C ; Steroids, 1993, 58, 508-517.
[18] Kitagawa, I.; Kobayashi, M ; Hori, M.; Kyogoku, Y.; Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1989,
37, 61-67.
[19] Miyamoto, T.; Togawa, K.; Higuchi, R.; Komori, T.; Sasaki, T.; J. Nat. Prod,
1992; 55, 940-946.
[20] Maltsev, I.I. ; Stonik, V.A.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Elyakov, G.B.; Comp. Biochem.
Physiol. 1984, 78B,A2\.
[21] Kitagawa, I.; Yamanaka, H ; Kobayashi, M ; Nishino, T.; Yosioka, I.; Sugawara,
T.; Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1978, 26, 3722-3731.
[22] Zurita, M.B.; Ahond, A.; Poupat, C ; Potier, P; Menou, J.L.; J. Nat. Prod, 1986;
49, 809-813.
[23] Kalinin, V.L.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Stonik, V.A.; Khim. Prirodn. Soedin, 1985, 2,
212-217.
[24] Avilov, S.A.; Stonik, V.A.; Khim. Prirodn. Soedin, 1988, 5, 764-766.
[25] Chludil, H.D.; Muniain, C.C; Seldes, A M ; Maier, M.S.; J. Nat. Prod., 2002; in
press.
[26] Kalinin, V.I.; Malutin, A.N.; Stonik, V.A.; Khim. Prirodn. Soedin, 1986, 3, 378-
379.
[27] Kitagawa, L; Kobayashi, M ; Son, B.W.; Suzuki, S.; Kyogoku, Y.; Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1989, 37, 1230-1234.
[28] Kitagawa, I.; Kobayashi, M.; Inamoto, T.; Fuchida, M ; Kyogoku, Y.; Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 1985, 33, 5214-5224.
[29] Bhatnagar, S.; Dudouet, B.; Ahond, A ; Poupat, C ; Thoison, O.; Clastres, A ;
Laurent, D.; Potier, P.; Bull. Soc. Chim. France, 1985,1, 124-129.
[30] Oleynikova, G.; Kuznetsova, T.; Ivanova, N.; Kalinovsky, A.; Rovnikh, N.;
Elyakov, G.; Khim. Prirodn. Soedin, 1982, 4,464.
[31] Kitagawa, I.; Kobayashi, M ; Kyc^oku, Y.; Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1982, 30, 2045-
2050.
[32] Rodriguez, J.; Castro, R ; Riguera, R ; Tetrahedron, 1991, 47,4753-4762.
[33] Encamacion, R ; Murillo, J.; Nielsen, J.; Christophersen, C ; Acta Chem. Scand.
1996, 50, 848-849.
615
[34] Kitagawa, I.; Nishino, T; Kobayashi, M; Kyc^oku, Y.; Chem. Pharm. Bull
1981,29,1951-1956.
[35] Findlay, J.A.; Yayley, M; Radios, L.; J. Nat Prod, 1992, 55, 93-101.
[36] EJrozdova, O..A.; Avilov, S.A.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Stonik, V.A.; Mlgrom, Y.;
Rashkes Y.; Khim. Prirodn, Soedin, 1993, 5, 369-31A,
[37] a) Kitagawa, I.; Kobayashi, M.; Inamoto, T.; Yasuzawa, T.; Kyogoku; Y., Chem.
Pharm, Bull. 1981, 29, 2387-2391. b) Stonik, V.A; Maltsev, I.I.; Kalinovsky,
A.I.; Elyakov, G.B.; Khim. Prirodn. Soedin, 1982,2, 200-204. c) Sharipov, V.F.;
Chumak, A.D.; Stonik, V.A.; Elyakov, G.B.; Khim. Prirodn. Soedin, 1981, 2,
181-184. d) Stonik, V.A.; Maltsev, I.I. ; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Konde, K.; Elyakov,
G.B.; Khim. Prirodn. Soedin, 1981, 2, 194-199.
[38] Drozdova, O..A.; Avilov, S.A.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Stonik, V.A.; Mlgrom, Y.;
Rashkes Y.; Khim. Prirodn. Soedin, 1993,2, 242-248.
[39] Drozdova, O.A.; Avilov, S.A.; Kalinin, V.I.; Kalinovsky, A.L; Stonik, V.A.;
Riguera, R; Jimenez, C; Liebigs Ann./Recueil 1997, 2351-2356.
[40] Girard, M.; Bflanger, J.; ApSimon, J.; Gameau, F.; Harvey, C; Brisson, J.; Can.
J. Chem.; 1990, 68, 11-18.
[41] Avilov, S.A.; Kalinin, V.I.; I>rozdova, O.A.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Stonik, V.A.;
Gudimova, E.N.; Chem. Nat. Comp., 1993,29,216-218.
[42] Maier, MS.; Roccatagliata, A.J.; Kuriss, A.; Chludil, HD.; Seldes, A.M.; Pujol,
C.A.; Damonte, E.B.; J. Nat. Prod., 2001, 64^ 732-736.
[43] Avilov, S.A.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Stonik, V.A.; Chem. Nat. Comp. 1990,26,42-45.
[44] Afiyatullov, S.S.; Tishchenko, L.Y.; Stonik, V.A.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Elyakov,
G.B.; Khim. Prirodn. Soedin, 1985, 2, 244-248.
[45] Afiyatullov, Sh.Sh.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Stonik, V.A.; Khim. Prirodn. Soedin, 1987,
6, 831-837.
[46] Kalinin, V.I.; Afiyatullov, Sh.Sh.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Khim. Prirodn. Soedin, 1988,
2,221-226.
[47] Kalinin, V.I.; Avilov, S.A.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Stonik, V.A.; Mlgrom, Y.M.
Rashkes, Y.N.; Khim. Prirodn. Soedin, 1992, 6, 691-694..
[48] Kalinin, V.I.; Avilov, S.A.; Kalinina, E.Y; Korolkova, O.G.; Kalinovsky, A.I.
Stonik, V.A.; Riguera, R.; Jimenez, C; J. Nat. Prod., 1997, 60, 817-819.
[49] Avilov, S.A.; Antonov, A.S.; I>rozdova, O.A.; Kalinin, V.I.; Kalinovsl^^, A.I.
Riguera, R; Lenis, L.A.; Jimenez, C; J. Nat. Prod., 2000, 63, 1349-1355.
[50] Rodriguez, J.; Riguera, R; J. Chem. Res., 1989, 2620-2636.
[51] Myamoto, T.; Togawa, K.; Hguchi, R; Komori, T.; Sasaki, T.; Liebigs Ann.
Chem., 1990,453-460.
[52] Avilov, S.A.; Antonov, A.S.; Drozdova, O.A.; Kalinin, V.I.; Kalinovsky, A.L;
Stonik, V.A.; Riguera, R; Lenis, L.A.; Jimenez, C; J. Nat. Prod, 2000, 63, 65-
71.
[53] Murray, A.R; Muniain, C.C; Seldes, A.M.; Maier, M.S.; Tetrahedron, 2001,57,
9563-9568.
[54] Kalinin, V.I.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Stonik, V.A.; Dmitrenok, RS.; Elkin, I.N.; Chem.
Nat. Comp., 1989, 25, 311-317.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Atta-ur-Rahman (Ed.) Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, Vol 28
© 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. 617
MICHELER.PRINSEP
INTRODUCTION
very high concentrations of chloride, bromide and iodide ions (559 mM,
0.86 niM and 0.45 |iM respectively) [1]. Sulfur is the fourth most
common element in seawater after chlorine, sodium and magnesium and
the sulfate anion is the second most abundant after chloride [2].
There are many excellent reviews available on marine natural
products in general. The annual reviews by Faulkner [3-20] cover all
secondary metabolites from the major marine phyla. Very few reviews
however, deal solely with sulfur-containing marine metabolites. The
first of these to be published arranged compounds according to structural
types [21]. Another review covers sulfated marine compounds only and
these are arranged by phylum [2]. The most recent review deals with
marine sulfur-containing natural products excluding sulfates and
metabolites are organised according to the sulfur functional groups that
they contain [22]. This review will discuss all sulfur-containing natural
products from the main marine invertebrate phyla studied by natural
product chemists: Bryozoa, Chordata, Cnidaria, Mollusca, Porifera and a
selection of those from the Echinodermata. The vast majority of sulfur-
containing metabolites that have been isolated from echinoderms are
sterol sulfates and saponins and this review will not include coverage of
these but will only deal with other types of sulfur-containing metabolites
from echinoderms. For discussions of the sterol sulfates and saponins of
echinoderms, the reader is referred to other sources [2,3-20]. The
current review concentrates on isolation and biological activity of sulfur-
containing metabolites and covers the literature up to the end of 2001.
As pointed out by Christophersen [21], the distinction between primary
and secondary metabolites is somewhat blurred, therefore, some
compounds that could perhaps be classified most readily as primary
metabolites are included, but macromolecules are specifically excluded.
Every endeavour has been made to be comprehensive, but inevitably
some metabolites may have been overlooked. Metabolites are organised
by phylum and within phyla, compounds are arranged in families, or by
structural type.
Bryozoans
OH X"
Me-S
6 R = CH2OH
7 R = C02Me
8 R = CO2H
11 12 13
Tunicates (Ascidians)
class are often referred to as tunicates or sea squirts, because their body
is covered with a sack or tunic and many species expel water through a
siphon when disturbed [39]. There are approximately 2,000 living
species of tunicate and of these, ascidians are the most abundant. They
may be solitary or colonial and are sessile, filter-feeding organisms [39].
Biologically active metabolites are quite conmionly found in ascidians
and many of these compounds are derived from amino acids.
Ascidiacyclamide (14), a cytotoxic, cyclic peptide, was isolated from
an unidentified species of ascidian [40]. The absolute configuration was
determined and the structure confirmed by total synthesis [41]. An X-
ray crystal structure was carried out [42] and further X-ray
crystallographic studies determined the conformation of the molecule in
the solid- and solution-states [43].
VN H V
o=< y/^
\ NH HN \
14
'•\. K'\
O Ph O \ ^ O
15 16 R = CH2CHMe2
20 R = CH2Ph
Y ^
17 18 Rj = Me, R2 = H
19Ri=H,R2 = Me
21 22 R = CH2CHMe2
23 R = CH(Me)Et
The spectral data of the patellamides was also reasssigned and the
new assignments used for elucidation of the structures of three new
metabolites, the octapeptide prepatellamide B formate (24) and the
heptapeptides, prelissoclinamide 2 (25), and preulicyclamide (26) [58].
The molecular conformation of patellamide A (21) was determined by
X-ray crystallography [59,60] and the solution conformations of
patellamides B (22) and C (23) were determined by NMR spectroscopy
and molecular dynamics [61]. The octapeptide preulithiacyclamide (27)
is a potent inhibitor of Macrophage Scavenger Receptor and was
isolated from L. patella from Palau along with other known cyclic
peptides [62].
\=M H ^U
>=0
o\"r<:/-
25
625
PK
26 27
2o R} — H, R.2 — H
29 Ri = H, R2 = OH
30 Ri = OH, R2 = OH
^6^^.\ ^ a \ ^'^\\
P h / s ^ - / ^P^
31 32 X = thiazoline 34
33 X = thiazole
: o Y
f^N^O HN O-l"" HN /
^ JL N / VN H "^^Q
ph-^ °
35 X = thiazoline 37
36 X = thiazole
627
38 39
I O N ^ OH O ;
•^ NH HN ^ NH HN
f~f H VP fll H Yp
40 Rj = CH(Me)Et, R2 = Me 42
41 Rj = CHMe2, R2 = H
628
- - O
OH f ^ OH O (^ ^ O f ^
"V^N^S "S^N^S ^ ^ ^ N \ ^S
O^IH H J > o^L H JJ oCj fi T
"" /^^ H
HN\ """VN A)
J^ """VN H HN\
S^NYJ>^. ^^Jl^N^^^ S ^ N ^ ^
Ph-^ O OH p^/^ O p ^ ^ O OH
43 44 45
46 X = thiazoline 48 49
47 X = thiazole
L. patella from Fiji contained patellins 1-5 (50-54) [82] and earlier,
solution- and solid-state conformational studies were carried out on
patellin 2 (51), and the structure was determined by X-ray analysis [83].
A Lissoclinum sp. from the Great Barrier Reef yielded patellins 3 (52), 5
(54) and 6 (55) and the heptapeptide trunkamide A (56) [82].
Compounds 50-56 were all identified by interpretation of spectral data
and through use of Marfey's method to determine the absolute
stereochemistry of the constituent amino acids [82]. A total synthesis of
the proposed structure of trunkamide A (56) revealed that the structure
629
of the natural product should be reinvestigated [84] and the structure was
indeed later revised as the result of a total synthesis [85]. Another total
synthesis was later reported [86].
50 51
0 - ^ N - ""
52 R = CH2CHMe2 54
53 R = CHMe2
55 56
630
57 R = CH2Ph
58 R = CH2CHMe2
r~^ k^O
0=( O " N=r
>-NH HN-< ^^
\ P - - O Ph
59 60
631
o o o" o
Me02C>,,^s!>s^AA,^^.->^^ -^Ov.^ OSOjNa
HO-^JUQ;^ OSOsNa
NaOsSO-^^"^"^^
66
R,0. .O^^O
R7O
R.O
OH o R i OMe OR4 OMeORs
67 Ri
Ell = Me, R2 = OMe, R3 = H 71 ^5, R^ = SOsNa, R2 = Me, R3 = H, R4 = Me, R5 = Me, R^ = OMe,
68 Ri = Me, R2 = H, R = H 72 RJ = SOaNa, R2 = Me, R3 = H, R4 = Me, R5 = Me, Re = OMe
69 Ri = Me, R2 = OMe, R3= OH 73 R^ = S03Na, R2 = Me, R3 = Me, R4 = H, R5 = H, R^ = H
70 Ri = H, R2 = H, R3= H 74 Ri = Me, R2 = H, R3 = Me, R4 = H, R5 = S03Na, Re = H
75 Ri = S03Na, R2 = Me, R3 = H, R4 = Me, R5 = Me, Rg = H
f^ N o NH2
. N O "
NH
H H »03? 9 f H U
H2N N^ 'N NH2
H ^
NH O R " O
77 R = C7H15
78R = C8Hn
79R = C9Hi9
OSOaNa
NHS03Na
NaOSOj^
80
633
cxA:^ 81
N
V .Me
Me
82 Ri = H, R2 = OH, R3 = Br, R4 = H 87 89
83 R, = Br, R2 = OH, R3 = H, R4 = H
84 Ri = H, R2 = OH, R3 = Br, R4 = C2H3O2
85 R, = H, R2 = H, R3 = Br, R4 = H
86 Ri = H, R2 = Br, R3 = H, R4 = H
88 Rj = H, R2 = H, R3 = H, R4 = H
SMe
'NH
k / S f .2HC1
N
H
94
MeS^N
1 H
Me
95 R = Br 97 R = Br
96R = H 98 R = H
o
Me0s.^x^^x::^>s^^^^0^.Av^'<^^-^j^A^NHCH0
»X
0S03Na
S MeO.
J U
OMe
NH2
OMe OMe OMe
S-S^ HOY^'SMe HO^iyS-S,
S'S
OMeO OMe
111 R = COMe
RoQ
NR4 NR2
114 Ri = Me, R2 = Me, R3 = H, R4 = H2 116 Rj = SMe, R2 = Me2
115 Rj = Me, R2 = Me, R3 = SMe, R4 = Me2 119 Rj = SMe, R2 = Hj
117 Ri = H, R2 = H, R3 = H, R4 = H2 120 R, = H, R2 = H2
118 Ri = Me, R2 = Me, R3 = SMe, R4 = H2
OMe o
's
121
638
MeS"
OMe
123 R = Me
124 R = H
126
129R = NMe2
130R = N(O)Me2
OH 0;5s^N.
NMe2
132
133
640
NHR
134 R = COCH2CHMe2
135 R = COEt
136 R = Ac
MCO^'YTC^
MeSS R OMe MeSS R MeOS OMe
NH2
OMe
c Me
01U'
MeO Me^^^Y
NH2
jr^'^" ..o^^
VN
OMe OMe
H0,^Js^Me HO^ Js^^Me
MeO. J ^ -NH
147 Ri = H, R2 = OH 153
148 Rj = Me, R2 = OH
149Ri=Me, R2 = H
150 Ri = Me, R2 = OH, TV-oxide
151 Ri = Me, R2 = OH, N-oxide
152Ri=Me,R2 = CN
Ecteinascidins 597 (154), 583 (155), 594 (158) and 596 (158) are
putative biosynthetic precursors of ecteinascidins and were isolated
from £". turbinata from the Caribbean [158]. A recent review on the
chemistry and pharmacology of the ecteinascidins has been published
[159].
642
MeO
^OSOjNa ^OSOjNa
162 163
^OSOgNa
OSO.Na
164
NaO^;
165
166
NaO.SO NaOiSO
167 168
^0S03Na Na03S0
NaOaSO
169 170
OH
^CHO
^OSOsNa
OH
171
644
OH
A^A^ O SMe
H
172 173
,0Ac ,0Ac
SCN
NCS" RH2C
C^Hv
NCS.
deduced from NMR spectral data and confirmed using Marfey's procedure
[173]. Virenamides D (183) and E (184) were also obtained from D.
virens from the Great Barrier Reef [174] and virenamide B (181) has been
synthesised [175].
^ . \ ,,
183 184
NHC02Me
HO-^'
wo o^
Y
OH HN.,
185
646
Cnidaria (Coelenterates)
The Cnidaria comprise about 8,000 living species and include jellyfish,
corals, soft corals or gorgonians, sea anemones and hydrozoans. They are
the lowest members of the animal kingdom with cells organised into
specialised organs [177]. Cnidarians have a single internal cavity, which
acts as a stomach and a single opening above, which is encircled by
tentacles and through which food enters and waste escapes [178]. Some
Cnidaria are solitary and consist of a single polyp such as sea anemones
and others are colonial such as corals but all Cnidaria are radially
symmetrical [178]. Many have nematocysts or stinging cells but these
organisms are less likely to contain secondary metabolites for use in
chemical defence, as they are not really required. Terpenoids are very
commonly isolated from this phylum but very few sulfur-containing
compounds have been found in Cnidarians.
The marine hydroid Tridentata marginata contained the aromatic
alkaloids tridentatols A-C (186-188). Tridentatol A (186) inhibited
feeding by the planehead filefish. The structure of tridentatol C (188) was
elucidated by a single crystal X-ray diffraction study [179].
A zoanthid from the Indian Coast, Zoanthus sp., contained the sulfated
sphingolipid hariamide (189) [180].
o
C9H19
jj OMe
R OH yC
HO ^OSOjH
190R=Me
191 R = H
HOH2CJ X ^ SOH
H
192
Molluscs
.CO2H . ro^H
193 Ri= ^-S^ R,= f - S /-< R3 = H
NH NH9
R4N^N R4N^N
R4 = H or Me R4 = H or Me
CO2H .CO2H .CO2H
194Ri = H. R2= ^-S^ R3= ^
^pNH2 =( NH2 NH2
R4N^N
R4 = H or Me R4 = H or Me
h
.CO2H ,C02H
195 R R2 = H, R3= ^-S
=( NH, NH2
R4Nv^N R4N.^N
R4 = H or Me R4 = H or Me
OMe
Me2N
196
CONH9
•X"vA
Me, A . , N . ^ ^.j^N-
Me O yK^ Me OMeO M^
198
CI CI
OH
OH
199
H NT H ^ 1
-V- "-^^
yN " N O r^
Ph
'NH HN'^^0
201 202
p? -^r?
i^ ^p
X" HN'A X"
204 205
OH
206
SCN
210
O
211
^^^SMe
ax ^
212
Me
0=As.
HO OH
213
653
214 Ri = SOgNa, R2 = \
215Ri = S03Na,R2= V
OH
216Ri = S03Na,R2= \'^^^''^tx'^
220Ri = H,R2= V
222Ri = S03Na,R2 =
HO.SO'
HO3SO'
217 R = H
218 R = OH
OSOaNa
219
CO2H
NaOgSO'
111
NaO^SO*
NaO.SO'
223
224R = S03H
656
NaOaSO
CO2H
H '-'iV ^ H
226 R = COC13H27, COC15H31
HQ q
)-C02H
227
657
Sponges (Porifera)
The phylum Porifera comprises about 5000 living species [177]. Porifera or
"pore-bearers" are filter-feeding organisms, which consist of a main body
cavity perforated by holes. They are considered to be the most primitive of
marine invertebrates, with littie internal organisation [178]. The supporting
skeleton of a sponge consists of spicules composed of calcium carbonate or
silica or of silica spicules and spongin fibres [183]. Sponges in general, and
in particular those without the physical protection of spicules, produce
secondary metabolites that are thought to provide protection against
predation, overgrowth or fouling. Many sponges contain symbiotic
658
"K4N^^CS
230
SCN
239
NCS
SCN
242
NCS
NCS
244 245
249
NCS SCN
SCN\
NCS , . H '
258 Ri = SCN, R2 = H
^^' 259Ri=H,R2 = SCN ^60 261 262
SCN
CO
w 263
662
. .Ncs
SCN»
.-'^"S"'^
CQ
^K!^
w)
^
240 R = NCS 232 R = NCS
274 R = NHC(S)NHCH2CH2Ph 275 R = NHC(S)NHCH2CH2Ph
NCS
276
HOJ 1 HJ HOj 1 HJ
C N ^ THJ[>
A^^ H CI NCS
277 Ri = NC, R2 = NCS 279 280 281
278 Ri = NCS, R2 = NC
H\.NHCHO NCS
^K - ^
SCN V C SCN ^yJC CN
P V Q
CI NCS
282 283
HO-
289
NCS NCS
291
665
NCS NCS
Me Me
^H JL Q H *^ -^H J ^ Q H '^
H OMe
Acs
^o
^""YT^^) ^""^^ O
HA ^
320 209 R = SAc 321
208 R = -S-S- (dimer)
HS^V^r^^x
326
H/
327
H OH W NH
329 330
XCI2C. CCI2Y
Me
^ C ^ N ^ , CHCI2
NFP
NHMe
337 y 338
SOaH
340
Dysidea sp. from Bararin Island in the Philippines, has yielded the
dysideaprolines A-F (341-346), proline-derived analogues of dysidenin
(318). The barbaleucamides A (347) and B (348), which are structural
analogues of the cyanobacterial metabolite barbamide, were also isolated.
The structures were elucidated by NMR spectroscopic analysis. It is most
probable that all of these compounds are derived from a symbiotic
cyanobacterium found in close association with the Dysidea sp. [306].
669
OMe R
^^A,
X2HC' " ^ ^N Cl^C
.^N,^-^CCl3
R2 O
Na03S0,^^^CH0 Na03S0 OH
349 350
Na03S0^^ Na03S0-f3-0S03Na
"CH2OH
351
670
353
O'^O
NH
356 357
+
Me, NHo
Me NHo
359 360
NaOgSO-
CH20S03Na-0
361 362
672
NaOaSO'
OSOa
^O Me
367
OS03Na
NaO^SO^
oso
370R = H
371 R = OH
NaOsSO-f VoSOgNa
379
NaOaSO-ZT^OSOsNa
HO^:
380Ri = SO3Na,R2 = SO3Na 381R = S03Na 382
386 Ri = H, R2 = SOsNa
675
H0-/^-0S03Na
OSOaNa
383 387
NaOaSO. COoH
OSOaNa
388 389
Shaagrockols B (390) and C (391) from the Red Sea sponge Toxiclona
toxius, are antifungal hexaprenylhydroquinone disulfates and were
identified by spectral data interpretation [337]. Toxicols A (392), C (393)
and toxiusol (394) are hexaprenoid hydroquinones that were also isolated
from Toxiclona toxius. The structures were determined by spectral data
examination [338].
OSOaNa GSOsNa
0S03Na OSO^Na
390
676
OSOsNa
OSOgNa
NaOaSO'
.rd"*^"
396 n = 5
397 n = 6
398 n = 7
OSOaNa
399 R = H, n = 6
400R = SO3Na,n = 7
401 R = H, n = 8
OSO^Na
402
0S03Na
ry^^^yiry^ OSO^Na
407
The yellow pigment halenaquinol sulfate (410) has been isolated from
the Okinawan sponge Xestospongia sapra and is a pentacyclic
hydroquinone [345]. The absolute stereochemistry was determined to be
65 by comparing the CD spectrum of a derivative with a theoretically
calculated spectrum [346]. Theoretical calculation of CD spectra of
halenaquinol sulfate (410) isolated from X exigua and X sapra
determined that the absolute stereostructure was 12b5' [347]. The
pentacyclic compound, xestoquinol sulfate (411) has been isolated from an
Okinawan collection of X. sapra and its structure was elucidated on the
basis of spectroscopic data and a chemical conversion [348].
NaOjSO.
OSOaNa
HN"^ H 0 3 S ' ^
0<^^ SO3H 0,s^.x<^^NH
02S^
.If! ° rV^o
rxT y^^-^
^0
l y^o0
415 R = H2 416
417 R = 0
CONHj
o N>' ^ . ,-^5 ^ .
OH
NH
^N'
"7
Me NH
NH9
1^
H2NOC
N
H
O
O HzN^NH
OHC^J^IJ^ t H
HNv
N' > ' "SOjNa
NH
HNO'ITV
^ , ^ C O N H
426
680
H
***,
V. . O / „ ' O ^ ^ ° / O rf^ H Ph
CONH2
427 Ri = H, R2 = Me
428 Ri = Me, R2 = H
429 Ri = Me, R2 = Me
j ^ O^^NHCHO r S ?ONH2
Ph
O u ^NH
H2N N
" -^ O
H2NOC
430
O. NHCHO
Br-f V-, A-< V-\ CONH2
CONH9
O .-\_Me ^ .pj^
H2N N
^ H
431
f^'^^NH 0w,^^^N H 2
. j^ O O^ H ^ ^ H ^ ''^T ^ f^ H I
OHC.
/=< OH
NH
H9N
O
432
O O
OHC.
^ OH " Q^ ^ O^X^O KJ
NH
HN N. J w .OMe
OMe
433
682
OHC
^ ^OMe
435Ri = Br,R2 = OH 437
436Ri = H,R2 = H
438 R = Me
439 R = Et
MeOS
V - NH HN^C
: sV-T-
0 ^cyK^
440
NH
X ^ ^
n I
-OSOaNa
' HNy.0 0;:yJ--y'
HO>^A.„, NH O
441 442
MeS^ H
V^' H ^^-^
H2N-C . . . ^, ^
^ Ph MeS
443 444
' > .
445 446
Ph"
U l^ "U
V
Me^%
447 448 R = SMe
449 R = S(0)Me
685
SMe SMe
H,N
o
X
N NH
N
H
463
466 R = NMe2
467 R = NHMe
135 R = NHCOEt
469
688
MeS^ NH2 O Me
471 472
H2N-H ^ \ \ HN-<
NH Ky
474 n = 3
475 n = 2
.c^
478
B O B ^^
Me
N O ^^ AcO O.
Ct^H
16'^32
H03S
484 485
SO3H
486
"V'^^^'^^^OSOsH
487 488
691
.N^^O
NH
489
490 R = Na 492
491 R = H
MeS.
N N.
Me" ^ Me
493
692
1
^N-^(CH2)i2SR
+^ 1 H
N
I^SO-
494 495 R = Ac
496 R = H
S0.H
/olfO'
497
o o
o
498 499
693
There have been three reports of the same dimeric disulfide. It was
first isolated from an unidentified sponge from Guam and the structure
elucidated by analysis of spectral data. The (E,E) stereochemistry of the
disulfide (500) was defined by comparing the ^^C NMR spectroscopic data
with those of the (E,Z)Asomer (501) that was obtained as an unstable
minor product [425]. Compound 500 was isolated from a species of
Psammaplysilla and was called psammaplin A [426]. It was also isolated
from Thorectopsamma xana, collected from the same location in Guam,
together with a minor dimeric metabolite bisaprasin (502). Both
compounds inhibited growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus
subtilis [427]. Psammaplin A (bisprasin) (500) was later isolated from a
Dysidea species of sponge and shown to act on Ca^^-induced Ca^"^ release
channels of skeletal muscle [428].
500n= !(£,£)
501 n = 1 (E,Z)
502n = 2
O
H
H T
0
HO'
503 R = SCN 506
504 R = SO2NH2 o
505 R= —S-S^^^^^ A
N OMe
H
507 Ri = H, R2 = SO3', n = 1
508 Ri = SO3-, R2 = 503', n = 2
511 Ri = H, R2 = S03Na, n = 0
^^H OH HO2C
Br Br^
695
NOH
ON,5j^^Na03SO ^>Ss^Br
NOH
NOH
NOH NOH
514 515
516
517 R = S03Na
MeO
N^xv^O .SOgNa
H
OMe
518
Br, i)H
MeO-
Br
HN^^^^^Oyk Hj^^S03Na
B,A:A^C02H
519
H0^^^5yx%^OS03-R H0.,^<^^^^^
"""ij HO^^^XAcHO
"^ 524 "^ ^ SIS
HOsSOv^O,
"^^^ 526
528R = Et
529 R = Me
530 R = H
No Sterols with sulfate groups in the sidechain have been isolated from
sponges to date. This contrasts with echinoderms. Many of the sterol
sulfates isolated from echinoderms, especially from ophiuroids (brittle
stars) contain sulfate groups in the sidechain [2].
Halistanol sulfate (532) from Halichondria cf. moorei is a tris-sodium
sulfate salt, which possesses antimicrobial, hemolytic, and ichthyotoxic
activity [444]. It was later isolated from two sponges of the genus
Topsentia as the free sterol and found to inhibit pp60v-src protein tyrosine
kinase activity [445]. The tris(2-aminoimidazolium) salt of halistanol
sulfate (533) was isolated from Topsentia sp. from Japan and is also
antimicrobial [446].
^K^^lX^X)
RO3SO,
I I I R: [ > - !NH2
R= ^ - - NT
ROsSO'
OSO:.Na 6SO3R
532 533
H4N"'03SO' .-kAJ
OSOsNa
534 535
Na03S04>s.-4Ct/
3380
H •
0S03Na
b=
536 Ri = a, R2 = H
c=
537 Ri = b, R2 = H
538 Ri = c,R2 = H
539 Ri = d, R2 = H d=
540 Ri = e, R2 = O H
Na03Sa
I I J H
NaOjSO'
OSOgNa
546 R = ^^Y^
'VV,
547 R = f
HOaSQ
HO3SO'
OSOjNa
548
0S03Na
550
701
Na03S04
I^T'TI''^
NaOjSO''
HO ^ OSOjNa
551 R =
^ "r"^^
'^ o V-OH
552 R =
^^t^^r=\
-OH
HO^O
553 R =
o-^^o
554 R =
il \
O
555 R =
OSOaNa
556
702
NaOjSQ
HO Y Y ^OH
GSOsNa OH OH
557 558 R = a-H
559 R = P-H
NaOaSO^i 4 y . ^ L i x ^
Na03S0'
OSOjNa
560
RjO.
^ T1 l Tii
R20^
0S03Na OSOsNa OSOaNa
561 562Ri=H,R2 = Ac 564 Ri = H, R2 = Ac
563Ri = H,R2 = H 566 Ri = H, R2 = H
568Ri=Ac,R2 = H 569 Ri = Ac,R2 = H
R,0, NaOjSOi
HI H
v^
OH'
OAc I JL J
«^jdb
NaO^SO' " ^ ^^ NaOaSO^^-^^^
0S03Na
574R= .
-O
•bP02H0Me
NaOsSO' Y Y ^OR
OH OH
575 R = H
576R = P03H2
704
HO3SO'
NaOaSa '^OAc
578
'CO2H
NaOsSO'^ > MeO NaOjSa
O CO2H
^x:!;55^^\^NH3 0380^
585
NaOaSa
I I J H
NaOjSO'
586R= / .
587 R=c5^0C
588R:
c^^
706
589Ri = H,R2 = OH
590Ri = OH,R2 = H
,0S03Na
592 Ri = OH, R2 = OH
593 Ri = H, R2 = OH
594 Rj = OH, R2 = H
595 Ri = H, R2 = H
707
,0S03Na
596
.OSOaNa
597 R = OH
598 R = H
.OSOjNa
OSOjNa
600
708
^OSOjNa
^OH
r^^.
602
,0S03Na
OSO^Na
^OH
OSOjNa
Ph
O S^ OH
00
605
CH20S03"Na'"
OH hOR
607 ^O"^
R = (a:b=l:2)
a =C0(CH2)6CH=CHC7Hi5
b = C0Ci5H3i
710
HQH
NHC02Me
609
Toxadocials A-C (613-615) and toxadocic acid (616) are sulfated long
chain alcohols isolated from Toxadocia cylindrica that inhibit thrombin.
Their structures were determined by chemical and spectral means
[491,492].
614
NaOsSO OSOaNa
615
"OSO^Na
617 R = SGjNa
618 R = H
OHC
^o
HO2C NH
HO2C o'^-'^s^ I VQ
O OMe
o
619R = 0
620 R = H, 0C0CH(0Me)CH20Me
713
O C4H9 o c.H
•3"7
NCS^
SCN ^SCN
623 624
"'SCN
625
NaOjSO.
NaOjSi
714
NaOaSO.
Irciniasulfonic acid (629) was obtained from Ircinia sp. from Japanese
waters. Spectroscopic and chemical analyses revealed it to consist of three
different kinds of acids; common fatty acids, a novel unsaturated branched
CIO fatty acid and an isethionic acid. Irciniasulfonic acid (629) reverses
multidrug resistance in human carcinoma cells caused by overexpression
of membrane glycoprotein [498].
R=
629
(!)
636 637
HO-
pH HOAOH
638
716
Echinoderms
CO2H NNf--^NH2
HS /—< S-S
NH2 H2N Y\
N^N-Me H02C^^-^N
639 640 ^^
CO2H
641 R = H
642 R = Me
OH ^^ OH^
643 644R = Ci5H3i
645R = Ci3H27
NaOsSO
HO-
MO
647
NaOaSO
OSOgNa
648
OSOjNa
719
NaOsSO'
OH O
NaOgSO. .OMe
NaOsSO'
OR2 0 ORi 0
654 Ri = H, R2 = H 657R = H
655 Rj = Me, R2 = H 658R = OH
656 Ri = Me, R2 = Me
HO 0 OH HO 0 OH HO O OH
Brv
HO"
fWS -%H Brv
HO"JLX
riT if' ^
II ""^
,Br
9SO3H
HO.
TI T11 TL HOs II
rl 1 11^ ^
Br'' Wy^
OH 0 OH
^B,6S03H
\J
Br^
OH 0 OH
JS ^ 'Br
PSO3H
OH O OH
PSO3H
LAjJx.' OSOsNa
662 R = H
663 R = Me
0SO3H
HO^^^A^OH
HN^3H
..OH
HO' ^ *OHHO^
OH
664
721
OH
loX>^2C0^0.
H03SO'
HO' ^ 'OHHO^
OH
665
ABBREVIATIONS
REFERENCES
[24] Ryland, J.S. Bryozoans, Hutchinson and Co. Ltd: London, 1970.
[25] Gordon, D.P. In New Zealand Coastal Invertebrates, de Cook, S. Ed.;
Canterbury University Press, Christchurch, 2002. In press.
[26] Christophersen, C ; Carle, J.S.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1980,102, 5107-5108.
[27] Prinsep, M.R.; Blunt, J.W.; Munro, M.H.G.; /. Nat. Prod., 1991, 54, 1068-
1076.
[28] Blackman, A.J.; Ralph, C.E.; Skelton, B.W.; White, A.H.; Aust. J. Chem., 1993,
^6,213-220.
[29] Choi, Y.-H.; Park, A.; Schmitz, F.J.; J. Nat. Prod., 1993, 56, 1431-1433.
[30] Rizvi, S.K.; Hossain, M.B.; van der Helm, D.; Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C, 1993,
49,151-154.
[31] Park, A.; Schmitz, F.J.; Tetrahedron Lett,, 1993,34, 3983-3984.
[32] Shindo, T.; Sato, A.; Kasanuki, N.; Hasegav^a, K.; Sato, S.; Iwata, T.; Hato, T.;
Experientia, 1993,49, \11-\1%.
[33] Sato, S.; Shindo, T.; Hasegawa, K.; Sato, S.; Chem. Abstr., 1991,116,
67164p.
[34] Kelly, T.R.; Fu, Y.; Sieglen, J.T. Jr.; De Silva, H.; Org. Lett., 2000,
2,2351-2352.
[35] Dakaira subovoidea is a synonym for Watersipora subovoidea. See Gordon,
D.P.; New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir 97\ New Zealand
Oceanographic Institute, Wellington, 1989, pg 16.
[36] Morris, B.D.; Ph.D. thesis. Studies of Natural Products from New
Zealand Marine Bryozoans, University of Waikato, 1998.
[37] Ojika, M.; Yoshino, G.; Sakagami, Y.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1997,38, 4235-4238.
[38] Morris, B.D.; Prinsep, M.R.; J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 9545-9547.
[39] Davidson, B.S.; Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 1771-1791.
[40] Hamamoto, Y.; Bndo, M.; Nakagawa, M.; Nakanishi, T.; Mizukawa, K,; J.
Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1983, 323-324.
[41] Hamada, Y.; Kato, S.; Shioiri, T.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26, 3223-3226.
[42] Ishida, T.; Inoue, M.; Hamada, Y.; Kato, S.; Shioiri, T.; J. Chem. Soc. Chem.
Commun., 1987, 310-371.
725
[43] Ishida, T.; Tanaka, M.; Nabae, M., Inoue, M.; Kato, S.; Hamada, Y.; Shioiri, T.;
J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53, 107-112.
[44] Ireland, C ; Scheuer, PJ.; /. Am. Chem. Soc, 1980,102, 5688-5691.
[45] Wasylyk, J.M.; Biskupiak, J.E.; Costello, C.E.; Ireland, CM.; J. Org. Chem.,
1983,48,4445-4449.
[46] Hamamoto, Y.; Endo, M.; Nakagawa, M.; Nakanishi, T.; Mizukawa, K.; J.
Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1983, 323-324.
[47] Schmidt, U.; Weller, D.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1986, 27, 3495-3496.
[48] Kato, S.; Hamada, Y.; Shioiri, T.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1986, 27, 2653-2656.
[49] Sugiura, T.; Hamada, Y.; Shioiri, T.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, 28, 2251-2254.
[50] Ishida, T.; Ohishi, H.; Inoue, M.; Kamigauchi, M.; Sugiura, M.; Takao, N.;
Kato, S.; Hamada, Y.; Shioiri, T.; J. Org. Chem., 1989, 54, 5337-5343.
[51] Williams, D.E.; Moore, R.E.; J. Nat. Prod., 1989, 52, 732-739.
[52] Ireland, CM.; Durso, A.R.; Newman, R.A.; Hacker, M.P.; / Org. Chem., 1982,
47,1807-1811.
[53] Schmidt, U.; Utz, R.; Gleich, P.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26, 4367-4370.
[54] Hamada, Y.; Shibata, M.; Shioiri, T.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1985,26,5155-5158.
[55] Hamada, Y.; Shibata, M.; Shioiri, T.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26, 6501-6504.
[56] Schmidt, U.; Griesser, H.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1986, 27, 163-166.
[57] Hamada, Y.; Shibata, M.; Shioiri, T.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26, 5159-5162.
[58] Sesin, D.F.; Gaskell, S.J.', Ireland, CM.; Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg., 1986, 95, 853-
867.
[59] In, Y.; Doi, M.; Inoue, M.; Ishida, T.; Hamada, Y.; Shioiri, T.; Chem. Pharm.
Bull., 1993,41, 16S6-1690.
[60] In, Y.; Doi, M.; Inoue, M.; Ishida, T.; Hamada, Y.; Shioiri, T.; Acta
Crystallogr., Sect. C, 1994, 50, 432-434.
[61] Ishida, T.; In, Y.; Shinozaki, P.; Doi, M.; Yamamoto, D.; Hamada, Y.; Shioiri,
T.; Kamigauchi, M.; Sugiura, M.; /. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 3944-3952.
[62] Patil, A.D.; Freyer, A.J.; Killmer, L.; Chambers-Myers, C ; Johnson, R.K.; Nat.
Prod. Utt., 1997, 9, ISl-lSl.
[63] Zabriskie, T.; Mayne, C ; Ireland, C ; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1988,110, 7919-7920.
726
[64] Corley, D.; Moore, R.; /. Am. Chem. Soc, 1988,110, 7920-7922.
[65] Degnan, B.M.; Hawkins, CJ.; Lavin, M.F.; McCaffrey, EJ.; Parry, D.L.; van
den Brenk, A.L.; Walters, D.J.; J. Med. Chem., 1989,52, 1349-1354.
[66] Schmitz, F.J.; Ksebati, M.B.; Chang, J.S.; Wang, J.L.; Hossain, M.B.; van der
Helm, D.; J. Org. Chem., 1989, 54, 3463-3472.
[67] Williams, A.B.; Jacobs, R.S.; Cancer Utt., 1993, 71,97-102.
[68] Boden, C ; Pattenden, G.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1994,35, 8271-8274.
[69] Boden, C.D.J.; Pattenden, G.; Tetrahedron Utt., 1995, 36, 6153-6156.
[70] Boden, C.D.J.; Pattenden, G.; J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 2000, 875-882.
[71] Hawkins, C.J.; Lavin, M.F.; Marshall, K.A.; van den Brenk, A.L.; Walters,
D.J.; J. Med Chem., 1990, 33, 1634-1638.
[72] Wipf, P.; Fritch, P.C; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1996,118, 12358-12367.
[73] Morris, L.A.; Kettenes van den Bosch, J.J.; Versluis, K.; Thompson, G.S.;
Jaspars, M.; Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 8345-8353.
[74] Fu, X.; Su, J.; Xeng, L.; Sci. China, Ser. B: Chem., 2000,43, 643-648.
[75] McDonald, L.A.; Ireland, CM.; / Nat. Prod., 1992, 55, 376-379.
[76] Rashid, M.A.; Guslafson, K.R.; Cardellina, J.H. II.; Boyd, M.R.; /. Nat. Prod.,
1995, 58, 594-597.
[77] Fu, X.; Do, T.; Schmitz, F.J.; Andrusevich, V.; Engel, M.H.; /. Nat. Prod.,
1998,67,1547-1551.
[78] Degnan, B.M.; Hawkins, C.J.; Lavin, M.F.; McCaffrey, E.J.; Parry, D.L.;
Wallers, D.J.; J. Med Chem., 1989,32, 1354-1359.
[79] Foster, M.P.; Concepcion, G.P.; Caraan, G.B.; Ireland, CM.; J. Org. Chem.,
1992,57,6671-6675.
[80] Aguilar, E.; Meyers, A.I.; Tetrahedron Utt., 1994,35, lAll-lA^Q.
[81] Downing, S.V.; Aguilar, E.; Meyers, A.I.; / Org. Chem., 1999,64, 826-831.
[82] Carroll, A.R.; Coll, J.C; Bourne, D.J.; Macleod, J.K.; Zabriskie, T.M.; Ireland,
CM.; Bowden, B.F.; Aust. J. Chem., 1996,49,659-667.
[83] Zabriskie, T.M.; Foster, M.P.; Stout, T.J.; Clardy, J.; Ireland, CM.; J. Am.
Chem. Soc, 1990,112, 8080-8084.
[84] Wipf, P.; Uto, Y.; Tetrahedron Utt., 1999,40, 5165-5169.
727
[85] Wipf, P.; Uto, Y.; J. Org, Chem., 2000, 65, 1037-1049.
[86] McKeever, B.; Pattenden, G.; Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 2573-2577.
[87] McDonald, L.A.; Foster, M.P.; Phillips, D.R.; Ireland, CM.; Lee, A.Y.; Clardy,
J.; / Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 4616-4624.
[88] Carroll, A.R.; Bowden, B.F.; Coll, J.C; Hockless, D.C.R.; Skelton, B.W.;
White, A.H.; Aust. J. Chem., 1994, 47, 61-69.
[89] McKeever, B.; Pattenden, G.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 9317-9320.
[90] Toske, S.G.; Fenical, W.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 8355-8358.
[91] Boden, C.D.J.; Norley, M.C.; Pattenden, G.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 57, 9111-
9114.
[92] Norlay, M.C.; Pattenden, G.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 3087-3090.
[93] Boden, C.D.J.; Norley, M.C.; Pattenden, G.; J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1,
2000, 883-888.
[94] Rudi, A.; Aknin, M.; Gaydou, E.M.; Kashman, Y.; Tetrahedron, 1998, 54,
13203-13210.
[95] Pika, J.; Faulkner, D.J.; Nat. Prod Lett., 1995, 7, 291-296.
[96] Riccio, R.; Kinnel, R.B.; Bifulco, G.; Scheuer, P.J.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1996,
37, 1979-1982.
[97] Reddy, M.V.R.; Faulkner, D.J.; Venkateswarlu, Y.; Rao, M.R.; Tetrahedron,
1997,53, 3457-3466.
[98] Davis, R.A.; Carroll, A.R.; Pierens, G.K.; Quinn, R.J.; J. Nat. Prod., 1999, 62,
419-424.
[99] Reddy, M.V.R.; Rao, M.R.; Rhodes, D.; Hansen, M.S.T.; Rubins, K.; Bushman,
F.D.; Venkateswarlu, Y.; Faulkner, D.J.; /. Med Chem., 1999, 42, 1901-1907.
[100] Vasquez, M.J.; Quifioa, E.; Riguera, R.; Ocampo, A.; Iglesias, T.; Debitus, C ;
Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 8853-8856.
[101] Exposito, M.A.; Lopez, B.; Fernandez, R.; Vazquez, M.; Debitus, C ; Iglesias,
T.; Jimenez, C ; Quinoa, E.; Riguera, R.; Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 7539-7550.
[102] Mitchell, S.S.; Rhodes, D.; Bushman, F.D.; Faulkner, D.J.; Org. Lett., 2000, 2,
1605-1607.
728
[103] Heitz, S.; Durgeat, M.; Guyot, M.; Brassy, C ; Bachet, B.; Tetrahedron Lett.,
1980,27,1457-1458.
[104] Hogan, I.T.; Sainsbury, M.; Tetrahedron, 1984,40, 681-682.
[105] Rinehart, K.L.; Kobayashi, J.; Harbour, G.C.; Hughes, R.G.; Mizsak, S.A.;
Scahill, T.A.; / Am. Chem. Soc, 1984,106, 1524-1526.
[106] Blunt, J.W.; Lake, R.J.; Munro, M.H.G.; Toyokuni, T.G.; Tetrahedron Lett.,
1987,28,1825-1826.
[107] Lake, R.J; Brennan, M.M.; Blunt, J.W.; Munro, M.H.G.; Pannell, L.K.;
Tetrahedron Lett., 1988, 29, 2255-2256.
[108] Lake, R.J.; McCombs, J.D.; Blunt, J.W.; Munro, M.H.G.; Robinson, W.T.;
Tetrahedron Lett., 1988,29, 4971-4972.
[109] Lake, R.J.; Blunt, J.W.; Munro, M.H.G.; Aust. J. Chem., 1989,42, 1201-1206.
[110] Ibanez-Calero, S.; Rinehart, K. L.; Rev. Boliv. Quim., 1998, 75, 39-51.
[Ill] Liu, J.-J.; Nakagawa, M.; Harada, N.; Tsuruoka, A.; Hasegawa, A.; Ma, J.;
Hino, T.; Heterocycles, 1990, 31,229-232.
[112] Nakagawa, M.; Liu, J.; Hino, T.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1989, 777, 2721-2722.
[113] Liu, J.-J.; Hino, T.; Tsuruoka, A.; Harada, N.; Nakagawa, M.; J. Chem. Soc.
Perkin Trans. 1, 2000, 3487-3494.
[114] Kobayashi, J.; Cheng, J.-F.; Ohta, T.; Nozoe, S.; Ohizumi, Y.; Sasaki, T.; J.
Org. Chem., 1990,55, 3666-3670.
[115] Murata, O.; Shigemori, H.; Ishibashi, M.; Sugama, K.; Hayashi, K.; Kobayashi,
J.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1991, 32, 3539-3542.
[116] Rashid, M.A.; Gustafson, K.R.; Boyd, M.R.; J. Nat. Prod., 2001, 64, 1454-
1456.
[117] Roll, D.M.; Ireland, CM.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1985,26,4303-4306.
[118] Moriarty, R.M.; Roll, D.M.; Ku, Y.-Y.; Nelson, C ; Ireland, CM.; Tetrahedron
Utt., 1987,28,749-752.
[119] Schumacher, R.W.; Davidson, B.S.; Tetrahedron, 1995,57, 10125-10130.
[120] Schumacher, R.W.; Davidson, B.S.; Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 935-942.
[121] Kikuchi, Y.; Ishibashi, M.; Sasaki, T.; Kobayashi, J.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1991,
32, 797-798.
729
[122] Arabshahi, L.; Schmitz, FJ.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1988, 29, 1099-1102.
[123] Copp, B.R.; Blunt, J.W.; Munro, M.H.G.; Pannell, L.K.; Tetrahedron Lett.,
1989,30, 3703-3706.
[124] Pearce, A.N.; Babcock, R.C.; Battershill, C.N.; Lambert, G.; Copp, B.R.; /
Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 8257-8259.
[125] Litaudon, IVl.; Guyot, M.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1991, 32, 911-914.
[126] Litaudon, M.; Trigalo, F.; Martin, M.T.; Frappier, F.; Guyot, M.; Tetrahedron,
1994, 50, 5323-5334.
[127] Searle, P.A.; Molinski, T.F.; / Org. Chem., 1994,59, 6600-6605.
[128] Charyulu, G.A.; McKee, T.C.; Ireland, CM.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1989, 30,
4201-4202.
[129] Szczepankiewicz, B.G.; Heathcock, C.H.; / Org. Chem., 1994,59, 3512-3513.
[130] Patil, A.D.; Freyer, A.J.; Killmer, L.; Zuber, G.; Carte, B.; Jurewicz, A.J.;
Johnson, R.K.; Nat. Prod Lett., 1997,10, 225-229.
[131] Davidson, B.S.; Molinski, T.F.; Barrows, L.R.; Ireland, CM.; J. Am. Chem.
Soc.,1991, J 1,4709-4710.
[132] Behar, V.; Danishefsky, S.J.; /. Am. Chem. Soc, 1993, 775, 7017-7018.
[133] Ford, P.W.; Davidson, B.S.; /. Org. Chem., 1993, 58, 4522-4523.
[134] Ford, P.W.; Narbut, M.R.; Belli, J.; Davidson, B.S.; /. Org. Chem., 1994, 59,
5955-5960.
[135] Toste, F.D.; Still, I.W.J.; / Am. Chem. Soc, 1995, 777, 7261-7262.
[136] Compagnone, R.S.; Faulkner, D.J.; Carte, B.K.; Chan, G.; Freyer, A.; Hemling,
M.E.; Hofmann, G.A.; Mattern, M.R.; Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 12785-12792.
[137] Makar'eva, T.N.; Stonik, V.A.; Dmitrenok, A.S.; Grebnev, B.B.; Iskov, V.V.;
Rebachyk, N.M.; J. Nat. Prod., 1995,58, 254-258.
[138] Molinski, T.F.; Ireland, CM.; /. Org. Chem., 1989, 54, 4256-4259.
[139] Cooray, N.M.; Scheuer, P.J.; Parkanyi, L.; Clardy, J.; J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53,
4619-4620.
[140] Carroll, A.R.; Cooray, N.M.; Poiner, A.; Scheuer, P.J.; /. Org. Chem., 1989, 54,
4231-4232.
[141] Rudi, A.; Kashman, Y.; J. Org. Chem., 1989, 54, 5331-5337.
730
[142] McDonald, L.A.; Eldredge, G.S.; Barrows, L.R.; Ireland, CM.; /. Med. Chem.,
1994,57,3819-3827.
[143] Koren-Goldshlager, G.; Aknin, M.; Gaydou, E.M.; Kashman, Y.; / Org.
C/i^m., 1998,65,4601-4603.
[144] Koren-Goldshlager, G.; Aknin, M.; Kashman, Y.; / Nat. Prod., 2000, 63, 830-
831.
[145] Carroll, A.R.; Scheuer, P.J.; J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 4426-4431.
[146] Kitahara, Y.; Nakahara, S.; Yonezawa, T.; Nagatsu, M.; Kubo, A.;
Heterocycles, 1993, 36, 943-946.
[147] Lindsay, B.S.; Pearce, A.N.; Copp, B.R.; Synth. Comm., 1997, 27, 2587-2592.
[148] Lindquist, N.; Fenical, W.; Tetrahedron Lett, 1990, 31, 2389-2392.
[149] Kang, H.; Fenical, W.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 2369-2372.
[150] Abas, S.A.; Hossain, M.B.; van der Helm, D.; Schmitz, F.J.; Laney, M.;
Cabuslay, R.; Schatzman, R.C.; 7. Org. Chem., 1996,61, 2709-2712.
[151] Radchenko, O.S.; Novikov, V.L.; Willis, R.H.; Murphy, P.T.; Elyakov, G.B.;
Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 3581-3584.
[152] Sigel, M.M.; Welham, L.L.; Lichter, W.; Dudeck, L.E.; Gargus, J.L.; Lucas,
L.H.; in Food-Drugs from the Sea, Proceedings, 1969, Youngken, W.H., Ed.;
Marine Technology Society, Washington, DC, 1970, pp. 281-295.
[153] Wright, A.E.; Forleo, D.A.; Gunawardana, G.P.; Gunasekera, S.P.; Koehn, F.E.;
McConnell, O.J.; / Org. Chem., 1990, 55,4508-4512.
[154] Rinehart, K.L.; Holt, T.G.; Fregeau, N.L.; Stroh, J.G.; Keifer, P.A.; Sun, F.; Li,
L.H.; Martin, D.G.; / Org. Chem., 1990,55, 4512-4515.
[155] Guan, Y.; Sakai, R.; Rinehart, K.L.; Wang, A.H.J.; J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.,
1993,70,793-818.
[156] Corey, E.J.; Gin, D.Y.; Kania, R.S.; / Am. Chem. Soc, 1996,118, 9202-9203.
[157] Cuevas, C ; Perez, M.; Martin, M.J.; Chicharro, J.L.; Fernandez-Rivas, C ;
Flores, M.; Francesch, A.; Gallego, P.; Zarzuelo, M.; de la Calle, F.; Garcia, J.;
Polanco, C ; Rodriguez, I.; Manzanares, I.; Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 2545-2548.
[158] Sakai, R.; Jares-Erijman, E.A.; Manzanares, I.; Silva Elipe, M.V.; Rinehart,
K.L.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1996,118, 9017-9023.
731
[159] Manzanares, I.; Cuevas, C ; Garcia-Nieto, R.; Marco, E.; Gago, F.; Curr. Med.
Chem.: Anti-Cancer Agents, 2001, 7, 257-276.
[160] Tsukamoto, S.; Kato, H.; Hirota, H.; Fusetani, N.; J. Nat. Prod., 1994, 57,
1606-1609.
[161] Crispino, A.; de Giuiio, A.; de Rosa, S.; de Stefano, S.; Milone, A.; Zavodnik,
N.; J. Nat. Prod., 1994, 57, 1575-1577.
[162] de Rosa, S.; Milone, A.; Crispino, A.; Jaklin, A.; de Giuiio, A.; / Nat. Prod.,
1997, 60, 462-463.
[163] Aiello, A.; Carbonelli, S.; Esposito, G.; Fattorusso, E.; luvone, T.; Menna, M.;
J. Nat. Prod., 2000, 63, 1590-1592.
[164] Aiello, A.; Fattorusso, E.; Menna, M.; Carnuccio, R.; Dacquisto, F.;
Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 5877-5882 .
[165] Aiello, A.; Fattorusso, E.; Menna, M.; Carnuccio, R.; luvone, T.; Tetrahedron,
1997,55,11489-11492.
[166] Aiello, A.; Carbonelli, S.; Fattorusso, E.; luvone, T.; Menna, M.; J. Nat. Prod.,
2001,6^,219-221.
[167] Lindquist, N.; Fenical, W.; Parkanyi, L.; Clardy, J.; Experientia, 1991, 47, 503-
504.
[168] McCoy, M.C.; Faulkner D.J.; / Nat. Prod., 2001,64, 1087-1089.
[169] Li, C ; Blackman, A.J.; Aust. J. Chem., 1994,47, 1355-1361.
[170] Li, C ; Blackman, A.J.; Aust. J. Chem., 1995,48, 955-965.
[171] Patil, A.D.; Freyer, A.J.; Reichwein, R.; Carte, B.; Killmer, L.B.; Fucette, L.;
Johnson, R.K.; Faulkner, D.J.; Tetrahedron Lett.', 1997, 38, 363-364.
[172] Abe, H.; Aoyagi, S.; Kibayashi, C ; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2000,122, 4583-4592.
[173] Carroll, A.R.; Feng, Y.; Bowden, B.F.; Coll, J.C; J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61,
4059-4061.
[174] Feng, Y.; Bowden, B.F.; Aust. J. Chem., 1997,50, 337-339.
[175] Moody, C.J.; Hunt, J.C.A.; J. Org. Chem., 1999,64, 8715-8717,
[176] McDonald, L.A.; Capson, T.L.; Krishnamurthy, G.; Ding, W.-D.; Ellestad,
G.A.; Bernan, V.S.; Maiese, W.M.; Lassota, P.; Discafani, C ; Kramer, R.A.;
Ireland, CM.; / Am. Chem. Soc, 1996,118, 10898-10899.
732
[195] Pettit, G.R.; Kamano, Y.; Herald, C.L.; Tuinman, A.A.; Boettner, F.E.; Kizu,
H.; Schmidt, J.M.; Baczynskyj, L.; Tomer, K.B.; Bontems, R.J.; J. Am. Chem.
Soc, 1987, 709, 6883-6885.
[196] Pettit, G.R.; Singh, S.B.; Hogan, F.; Lloyd-Williams, P.; Herald, D.L.; Burkett,
D.D.; Clewlow, PJ.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1989, 777, 5463-5465.
[197] Hamada, Y.; Hayashi, K.; Shioiri, T.; Tetrahedron Lett.. 1991, 32, 931-934.
[198] Tomioka, K.; Kanai, M.; Koga, K.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1991, J2, 2395-2398.
[199] Shioiri, T,; Hayashi, K.; Hamada, Y.; Tetrahedron, 1993, 49, 1913-24.
[200] Sone, H.; Kondo, T.; Kiryu, M.; Ishiwata, H.; Ojika, M.; Yamada, K.; J. Org.
a ^ m . , 1995, 60, 4774-4781.
[201] Ojika, M.; Nemoto, T.; Nakamura, M.; Yamada, K.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1995,
36, 5057-5058.
[202] Nakamura, M.; Shibata, T.; Nakane, K.; Nemoto, T.; Ojika, M.; Yamada, K.;
Tetrahedron Lett., 1995,36, 5059-5062.
[203] Sone, H.; Kigoshi, H.; Yamada, K.; Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 8149-8154.
[204] Kigoshi, H.; Yamada, S.; Tetrahedron, 1999,55,12301-12308.
[205] Pettit, G.R.; Xu, J.-P.; Williams, IVI.D.; Hogan, F.; Schmidt, J.IVl.; Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett., 1997, 7, 827-832.
[206] Cimino, G.; Crispino, A.; Spinella, A.; Sodano, G.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1988, 29,
3613-3616.
[207] De Medeiros, E.F.; Herbert, J.M.; Taylor, R.J.K.; /. Chem. Soc, Perkin Trans.
1,1991, 2725-30.
[208] Mebs, D.; / Chem. EcoL, 1985, 77, 713-716.
[209] Okuda, R.K.; Scheuer, P.J.; Experientia, 1985,4, 1355-1356.
[210] Kashman, Y.; Groweiss, A.; Shmueli, U.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1980, 27, 3629-
3632.
[211] Groweiss, A.; Shmueli, U.; Kashman, Y.; / Org. Chem., 1983,48, 3512-3516.
[212] Kakou, Y.; Crews, P.; Bakus, G.J.; J. Nat. Prod., 1987,50, 482-484.
[213] Cimino, G.; Crispino, A.; de Stefano, S.; Gavagnin, M.; Sodano, G.;
Experientia, 1986, 42, 130M302.
[214] Ksebati, IVI.B.; Schmitz, F.J.; / Nat. Prod., 1988,57, 857-861.
734
[215] Kazlauskas, R.; Murphy, P.T.; Wells, RJ.; Daly, J.J.; Schonholzer, P.;
Tetrahedron Lett., 1978,4951-4954.
[216] Kassuhlke, K.E.; Potts, B.C.M.; Faulkner, DJ.; J. Org, Chem., 1991, 56, 3747-
3750.
[217] Wesson, K.J.; Hamann, M.T.; J. Nat, Prod., 1996, 59, 629-631.
[218] Edmonds, J.S.; Francesconi, K.A.; Healy, P.S.; White, A.H.; /. Chem. Soc.
Perkin Trans, 1,1982, 2989-2983.
[219] Murata, M.; Kumagai, M.; Lee, J.S.; Yasumoto, T.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1987,
28, 5869-5872.
[220] Satake, M.; Terasawa, K.; Kadowaki, Y.; Yasumoto, T.; Tetrahedron Lett.,
1996,37, 5955-5958.
[221] Takahashi, H.; Kusumi, T.; Kan, Y.; Satake, M.; Yasumoto, T.; Tetrahedron
Lett., 1996, 37, 7087-7090.
[222] Morohashi, A.; Satake, M.; Oshima, Y.; Yasumoto, Y.; BioscL, Biotechnol.
Biochem., 2000, 64, 1761-1763.
[223] Satake, M.; Tubaro, A.; Lee, J.-S.; Yasumoto, T.; Nat. Toxins, 1997, 5, 107-
110.
[224] Ciminiello, P.; Fattorusso, E.; Forino, M.; Magno, S.; Poletti, R.; Viviani, R.;
Tetrahedron Utt., 1998, 39, 8897-8900.
[225] Daiguji, M.; Satake, M.; Ramstad, H.; Aune, T.; Naoki, H.; Yasumoto, T.; Nat.
Toxins, 1998, 6, 235-239.
[226] Ciminiello, P.; Fattorusso, E.; Forino, M.; Poletti, R.; Viviani, R.; Chem. Res.
Toxicol„2000,13,770-774,
[227] Ciminiello, P.; Fattorusso, E.; Forino, M.; Poletti, R.; Viviani, R.; Eur. J. Org.
Chem., 2000, 291-295
[228] Ciminiello, P.; Fattorusso, E.; Forino, M.; Poletti, R.; Chem. Res. Toxicol.,
2001,14,596-599.
[229] Ciminiello, P.; Fattorusso, E.; Forino, M.; J. Org. Chem., 2001,66, 578-582.
[230] Ishida, H.; Nozawa, A.; Totoribe, K.; Muramatsu, N.; Nukaya, H.; Tsuji, K.;
Yamaguchi, K.; Yasumoto, T.; Kaspar, H.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 725-
728.
735
[231] Morohashi, A.; Satake, M.; Murata, K.; Naoki, H.; Kaspar, H.F.; Yasumoto, T.;
Tetrahedron Lett, 1995,36, 8995-8998.
[232] Murata, K.; Satake, M.; Naoki, H.; Kaspar, H.F.; Yasumoto, T.; Tetrahedron,
1998, 54, 735-742.
[233] Morohashi, A.; Satake, M.; Naoki, H.; Kaspar, H.F.; Oshima, Y.; Yasumoto, T.;
Nat, Toxins, 1999, 7, 45-48.
[234] Chou, T.; Kuramoto, M.; Otani, Y.; Shikano, M.; Yazawa, K.; Uemura, D.;
Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 3871-3874.
[235] Jones, R.M.; Bulaj, G.; Curr. Pharm. Des., 2000, 6, 1249-1285.
[236] Olivera, B.M.; Cruz, L.J.; Toxicon., 2000, 39, 7-14.
[237] Hagadone, M.R.; Scheuer, P.J.; Holm, A.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1984,106, 2447-
2448.
[238] Cafieri, P., Fattorusso, E.; Magno, S.; Santacroce, C ; Sica, D.; Tetrahedron,
1973, 29, 4259-4262.
[239] Fattorusso, E.; Magno, S.; Mayol, L.; Santacroce, C ; Sica, D.; Tetrahedron,
1975,57,269-270.
[240] Di Blasio, B.; Fattorusso, E.; Magno, S.; Mayol, L.; Pedone, C ; Santacroce, C ;
Sica, D.; Tetrahedron, 1976, 32, 473-478.
[241] lengo. A.; Mayol, L.; Santacroce, C ; Experientia, 1977, 33, 11-12.
[242] Adinolfi, M.; De Napoli, L.; Di Blasio, B.; lengo. A.; Pedone, C ; Santacroce,
C ; Tetrahedron Lett., 1977, 2815-2816.
[243] Chenera, B.; Chuang, C.-P.; Hart, D.J.; Lai, C.-S.; /. Org. Chem., 1992, 57,
2018-2029.
[244] Da Silva, C.C.', Almagro, V.; Marsaioli, A.J.; Tetrahedron Lett.; 1993, 34,
6717-6720.
[245] Ciminiello, P.; Fattorusso, E.; Magno, S.; Mayol, L.; /. Org. Chem., 1984, 49,
3949-3951.
[246] Ciminiello, P.; Fattorusso, E.; Magno, S.; Mayol, L.; /. Nat. Prod., 1985, 48,
64-68.
[247] Ciminiello, P.; Fattorusso, E.; Magno, S.; Mayol, L.; Experientia, 1986, 42,
625-627.
736
[248] Burreson, B.J.; Christophersen, C; Scheuer, P.J.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1975, 97,
201-202.
[249] Thompson, J.E.; Walker, R.P.; Wratten, S.J.; Faulkner, D.J.; Tetrahedron,
1982,55,1865-1873.
[250] Wratten, S.J.; Faulkner, D.J.; Van Engen, D.; Clardy, J.; Tetrahedron Lett.,
1978,16, 1391-1394.
[251] Nakamura, H.; Kobayashi, J.; Ohizumi, Y.; Hirata, Y.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1985,
25,5401-5404.
[252] Ciminiello, P.; Fattorusso, E.; Magno, S.; Mayol, L.; Can. J. Chem., 1987, 65,
518-522.
[253] Ciminiello, P.; Magno, S.; Mayol, L.; Piccialii, V.; J. Nat. Prod., 1987,50, 217-
220.
[254] Mayol, L.; Piccialii, V.; Sica, D.; Tetrahedron, 1987,43,5381-5388.
[255] Sullivan, B.W.; Faulkner, D.J.; Okamoto, K.T.; Chen, M.H.M.; Clardy, J.; /.
Org. Chem., 1986,51,5134-5136.
[256] Tada, H.; Tozyo, T.; Shiro, M.; J. Org. Chem., 1988,53, 3366-3368.
[257] Capon, R.J.; MacLeod, J.K.; Aust. J. Chem., 1988,41,979-983.
[258] He, H.Y.; Faulkner, D.J.; Shumsky, J.S.; Hong, K.; Clardy, J.; J. Org. Chem.,
1989,54,2511-2514.
[259] Iwasawa, N.; Funahasi, M.; Narasaka, K.; Chem. Lett., 1994, 1697-1700.
[260] Marcus, A.H.; Molinski, T.F.; Fahy, E.; Faulkner, D.J.; Xu, C ; Clardy, J.; /
Org. Chem., 1989,54, 5184-5186.
[261] Pham, A.T.; Ichiba, T.; Yoshida, W.Y.; Scheuer, P.J.; Uchida, T.; Tanaka, J.;
Higa, T.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1991,32, 4843-4846.
[262] He, H.Y.; Salva, J.; Catalos, R.F.; Faulkner, D.J.; / Org. Chem., 1992, 57,
3191-3194.
[263] Srikrishna, A.; Gharpure, S.J.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1999,40, 1035-1038.
[264] Skririshna, A.; Gharpure, S.J.; J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 2000, 3191-3193.
[265] Nakamura, H.; Deng, S.; Takamatsu, M.; Kobayashi, J.; Ohizumi, Y.; Hirata,
Y.;Agric. Biol. Chem., 1991,55, 581-583.
[266] Nakamura, H.; Ye, B.; Murai, A.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1992,33, 8113-8116.
737
[267] Ye, B.; Nakamura, H.; Murai, A.; Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 6361-6372.
[268] Alvi, K.A.; Tenenbaum, L.; Crews, P.; /. Nat. Prod., 1991, 54, 71-78.
[269] Konig, G.M.; Wright, A.D.; Sticher, O.; Fronczek, F.R.; J. Nat. Prod., 1992,
55, 633-638.
[270] Fusetani, N.; Wolstenholme, H.J.; Shinoda, K.; Asai, N.; Matsunaga, S.; Onuki,
H.; Hirota, H.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1992, 33, 6823-6826.
[271] Burgoyne, D.L.; Dumdei, E.J.; Andersen, R.J.; Tetrahedron, 1993, 49, 4503-
4510.
[272] Konig, G.IVl.; Wright, A.D.; / Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 3837-3840.
[273] Simpson, J.S.; Garson, M.J.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Cline, E.I.; Angerhofer, C.K.;
Aust. J. Chem., 1997, 50, 1123-1127.
[274] Clark, R.J.; Stapleton, B.L.; Garson, IVI.J.; Tetrahedron, 2000,56, 3071-3076.
[275] Tada, H.; Yasuda, F.; Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1985, 33, 1941-1945.
[276] Da Silva, C.C.; Almagro, V.; Zukerman-Schpector, J.; Castellano, E.E.;
Marsaioli, A.J.; J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 2880-2881.
[277] Burreson, B.J.; Scheuer, P.J.; J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1974, 1035-1036.
[278] Chang, C.W.J.; Patra, A.; Baker, J.A.; Scheuer, P.J.; /. Am. Chem. Soc, 1987,
79,6119-6123.
[279] Trimurtulu, G.; Faulkner, D.J.; /. Nat. Prod., 1994,57, 501-506.
[280] Hirota, H.; Tomono, Y.; Fusetani, N.; Tetrahedron, 1996,52, 2359-2368.
[281] Wolf, D.; Schmitz, F.J.; /. Nat. Prod., 1998, 61, 1524-1527.
[282] Miyaoka, H.; Shimomura, M.; Kimura, H.; Yamada, Y.; Kim, H.-S.; Wataya,
Y.; Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 13467-13474.
[283] Sharma, H.A.; Tanaka, J.; Higa, T.; Lithgow, A.; Bernardinelh, G.; Jefford,
C.W.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1992,33, 1593-1596.
[284] Rodriguez, J.; Nieto, R.lVl.; Hunter, L.M.; Diaz, IVL.C; Crews, P.; Lobkovsky,
E.; Clardy, J.; Tetrahedron, 1994,50, 11079-11090.
[285] Konig, G.IVI.; Wright, A.D.; Angerhofer, C.K.; J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 3259-
3267.
[286] Ciavatta, JVl.L.; Fontana, A.; Puliti, R.; Scognamiglio, G.; Cimino, G.;
Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 12629-12636.
738
[306] Harrigan, G.G.; Goetz, G.H.; Luesch, H.; Yang, S.; Likos, J.; J. Nat. Prod.,
2001,64,1133-1138.
[307] Sullivan, B.W.; Faulkner, DJ.; Matsumoto, G.K.; Cun-Heng, H.; Clardy, J.; /
Org. Chem., 1986, 57, 4568-4573.
[308] Killday, K.B.; Wright, A.E.; Jackson, R.H.; Sills, M.A.; J. Nat. Prod., 1995, 58,
958-960.
[309] Nakamura, H.; Wu, H.; Kobayashi, J.; Ohizumi, Y.; Hirata, T.; Higashijima, T.;
IVIiyazawa, T.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1983, 24, 4105-4108.
[310] Ichikawa, Y.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1988, 29, 4957-4958.
[311] Ichikawa, Y.; Kashiwagi, T.; Urano, N.; / Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1989,
987-988.
[312] Ichikawa, Y.; Kashiwagi, T.; Urano, N.; / Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. I, 1992,
1497-1500.
[313] Nakamura, H.; Wu H.; Kobayashi, J.; Kobayashi, M.; Ohizumi, Y.; Hirata, Y.;
J. Org. Chem., 1985, 50, 2494-2497.
[314] Asao, K.; lio, H.; Tokoroyama, T.; Chem. Lett., 1989, 1813-1814.
[315] Morales, J.J.; Rodriguez, A.D.; J. Nat. Prod., 1992,55, 389-394.
[316] Manes, L.V.; Naylor, S., Crews, P.; Bakus, G.J.; J. Org. Chem., 1985, 50, 284-
286.
[317] Manes, L.V.; Crews, P.; Kernan, M.R.; Faulkner, D.J.; Fronczek, F.R.;
Candour, R.D.; J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53, 570-573.
[318] Kernan, M.R.; Faulkner, D.J.; J. Org. Chem., 1988,53, 4574-4578.
[319] Muller, E.L.; Faulkner, D.J.; Tetrahedron, 1997,53, 5373-5378.
[320] Fu, X.; Ferreira, M.L.G.; Schmitz, F.J.; Kelly, M.; /. Nat. Prod., 1999, 62,
1190-1191.
[321] Kimura, J.; Ishizuka, E.; Nakao, Y.; Yoshida, W.Y.; Scheuer, P.J.; Kelly-
Borges, M.; / Nat. Prod., 1998,61, 248-250.
[322] Loukaci, A.; Le Saout, I.; Samadi, M.; Leclerc, S.; Damiens, E.; Meijer, L.;
Debitus, C ; Guyot, M.; Bioorg. Med Chem., 2001, 9, 3049-3054.
[323] Poigny, S.; Nouri, S.; Chiaroni, A.; Guyot, M.; Samadi, M.; /. Org. Chem.,
2001, 66, 7263-7269.
740
[324] Wright, A.E.; McCarthy, P.J.; Schulte, O.K.; / Org. Chem., 1989, 54, 3472-
3474.
[325] Musman, M.; Ohtani, I.L; Nagaoka, D.; Tanaka, J.; Higa, T.; J. Nat. Prod.,
2001, 64, 350-352.
[326] Fukami, A.; Ikeda, Y.; Kondo, S.; Naganawa, H.; Takeuchi, T.; Furuya, S.;
Hirabayashi, K.; Shimoike, K.; Hosaka, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Umezawa, K.;
Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 1201-1202.
[327] Kawai, N.; Takao, K.; Kobayashi, S.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1999,40,4193-4196.
[328] de Rosa, S.; Milone, A.; de Giulio, A.; Crispino, A.; lodice, C ; Nat. Prod. Lett.,
1996,5,245-251.
[329] de Rosa, S.; de Giulio, A.; Crispino, A.; lodice, C ; Tommonaro, G.; Nat. Prod.
Lett., 1997,10,1-12.
[330] Coll, J.C; Kearns, P.S,; Rideout, J.A.; Hooper, J.; /. Nat. Prod., 1997, 60,
1178-1179.
[331] Blackburn, C.L.; Hopmann, C ; Sakowicz, R.; Berdelis, M.S.; Goldstein,
L.S.B.; Faulkner, D.J.; J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 5565-5570.
[332] Sakowicz, R.; Berdelis, M.S.; Ray, K.; Blackburn, C.L.; Hopmann, C ;
Faulkner, D.J.; Goldstein, L.S.B.; Science, 1998, 280, 292-295.
[333] Kalaitzis, J.A.; de Leone, P.; Harris, L.; Butler, M.S.; Ngo, A.; Hooper, J.N.A.;
Quinn, R.J.; J. Org. Chem., 1999,64, 5571-5574.
[334] Kalaitzis, J.A.; Quinn, R.J.; J. Nat. Prod., 1999, 62, 1682-1684.
[335] Bogenstatter, M.; Limberg, A.; Overman, L.E.; Tomasi, A.L.; J. Am. Chem.
Soc, 1999, 727, 12206-12207.
[336] Blackburn, C.L.; Faulkner, D.J.; Tetrahedron, 2000,56, 8429-8432.
[337] Isaacs, S.; Kashman, Y.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1992,33,2227-2230.
[338] Isaacs, S.; Hizi, A.; Kashman, Y.; Tetrahedron, 1993,49,4275-4282.
[339] Fusetani, N.; Sugano, M.; Matsunaga, S.; Hashimoto, K.; Shikama, H.; Ohta,
A.; Nagano, H.; Experientia, 1987,43, 1233-1234.
[340] Stonik, V.A.; Makar'eva, T.N.; Dmitrenok, A.S.; J. Nat. Prod., 1992, 55, 1256-
1260.
[341] Venkateswarlu, Y.; Reddy, M.V.R.; / Nat. Prod., 1994, 57, 1286-1289.
741
[342] de Rosa, S.; Crispino, A.; de Giulio, A.; lodice, C ; Milone, A.; / Nat. Prod.,
1995,58,1450-1454.
[343] Bifulco, G.; Bruno, I.; Minale, L.; Riccio, R.; Debitus, C ; Bourdy, G.; Vassas,
A.; Lavayre, J.; J. Nat. Prod., 1995, 5S, 1444-1449.
[344] Wakimoto, T.; Maruyama, A.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; Shinoda, K.;
Murphy, P.T.; Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1999, 9, 727-730.
[345] Kobayashi, M.; Shimizu, N.; Kyogoku, Y.; Kitagawa, I.; Chem. Pharm. Bull,
1985, i i , 1305-1308.
[346] Kobayashi, M.; Shimizu, N.; Kitagawa, L; Kyogoku, Y.; Harada, N.; Uda, H.;
Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26, 3833-3836.
[347] Harada, N.; Uda, H.; Kobayashi, M.; Shimira, N.; Kitagawa, I.; J. Am. Chem.
5oc., 1989, 777, 5668-5674.
[348] Kobayashi, J.; Hirase, T.; Shigemori, H.; Ishibashi, M.; Bae, M.A.; Tsuji, T.;
Sasaki, T.; J. Nat. Prod., 1992,55, 994-998.
[349] Alvi, K.A.; Rodriguez, J.; Diaz, M.C.; Moretti, R.; Wilhelm, R.S.; Lee, R.H.;
Slate, D.L.; Crews, P.; J. Org. Chem., 1993, 58, 4871-4880.
[350] Concepcion, G.P.; Foderaro, T.A.; Eldredge, G.S.; Lobkovsky, E.; Clardy, J.;
Barrows, L.R.; Ireland, CM.; / Med. Chem., 1995,38,4503-4507.
[351] Schmitz, FJ.; Bloor, S.J.; J. Org. Chem., 1988,53, 3922-3925.
[352] Harada, N.; Sugioka, T.; Soutome, T.; Hiyoshi, N.; Uda, H.; Kuriki, T.;
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1995, 6, 375-376.
[353] Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; Konosu, S.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26, 855-856.
[354] Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; Konosu, S.; /. Nat. Prod., 1985,48, 236-241.
[355] Ryu, G.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1994,35, 8251-8254.
[356] Ryu, G.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 13409-13416.
[357] Gulavita, N.K.; Gunasekera, S.P.; Pomponi, S.A.; Robinson, E.V.; J. Org.
Chem.,1992, 57, 1161A112.
[358] Li, H.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; J. Med. Chem., 1995,38, 338-343.
[359] Li, H.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; J. Nat. Prod., 1996,59, 163-166.
[360] Rashid, M.A.; Gustafson, K.R.; Gartner, L.K.; Shigematsu, N.; Pannell, L.K.;
Boyd, M.R.; J. Nat. Prod., 2001, 64, 117-121.
742
[361] Itagaki, F.; Shigemori, H.; Ishibashi, M.; Nakamura, T.; Sasaki, T.; Kobayashi,
J.; J. Org. Chem,. 1992, 57, 5540-5542.
[362] Kobayashi, J.; Itagaki, F.; Shigemori, H.; Takao, T.; Shimonishi, Y.;
Tetrahedron, 1995, 57, 2525-2532.
[363] Uenoto, H.; Yahiro, Y.; Shigemori, H.; Tsuda, M.; Takao, T.; Shimonishi, Y.;
Kobayashi, J.; Tetrahedron, 1998,54, 6719-6724.
[364] Tsuda, M.; Ishiyama, H.; Masuko, K.; Takao, T.; Shimonishi, Y.; Kobayashi,
J.; Tetrahedron, 1999,55, 12543-12548.
[365] Tsuda, M.; Shimbo, K.; Kubota, T.; Mikami, Y.; Kobayashi, J.; Tetrahedron,
1999,55,10305-10314.
[366] Sowinski, J.A.; Toogood, P.L.; Chem. Commun., 1999, 981-982.
[367] Chill, L.; Kashman, Y.; Schleyer, M.; Tetrahedron, 1997,53, 16147-16152.
[368] Bonnington, L.S.; Tanaka, J.; Higa, T.; Kimura, J.; Yoshimura, Y.; Nakao, Y.;
Yoshida, W.S.; Scheuer, P.J.; 7. Org. Chem., 1997,62, 7765-7767.
[369] Pettit, G.R.; Xu, J.; Cichacz, Z.A.; Williams, M.D.; Dorsaz, A.-C; Brune, D.C.;
Boyd, M.R.; Cemy, R.L.; Chapuis, J.-C; Cerny, R.L.; Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Utt.,\994,4,209\'2096.
[370] Pettit, G.R.; Toki, B.E.; Xu, J.-P.; Brune, D.C.; J. Nat. Prod., 2000, 63, 22-28.
[371] Kobayashi, J.; Nakamura, T.; Tsuda, M.; Tetrahedron, 1996,52, 6355-6360.
[372] Tan, L.T.; Williamson, R.T.; Gerwick, W.H.; Watts, K.S.; McGough, K.;
Jacobs, R.; J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 419-425.
[373] Mau, C.M.S.; Nakao, Y.; Yoshida, W.Y.; Scheuer, P.J.; Kelly-Borges, M.; /.
Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 6302-6304.
[374] Rashid, IVI.A.; Gustafson, K.R.; Boswell, J.L.; Boyd, M.R.; /. Nat. Prod., 2000,
63, 956-959.
[375] Kobayashi, J.; Cheng, J.; Ishibashi, M.; Nakamura, H.; Ohizumi, Y.; Hirata, Y.;
Sasaki, T.; Lu, H.; Clardy, J.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1987,28,4939-4942.
[376] Cheng, J.; Ohizumi, Y.; Walchli, M.R.; Nakamura, H.; Hirata, Y.; Sasaki, T.;
Kobayashi, J.; J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53, 4621-4624.
[377] Perry, N.B.; Blunt, J.W.; Munro, M.H.G.; Tetrahedron, 1988,44, 1727-1734.
743
[378] Perry, N.B.; Blunt, J.W.; Munro, M.H.G.; Higa, T.; Sakai, R.; J. Org. Chem.,
1988,55,4127-4128.
[379] Kobayashi, J.; Cheng, J.-F.; Yamamura, S.; Ishibashi, M.; Tetrahedron Lett.,
1991,32, 1227-1228.
[380] Dijoux, M.-G.; Gamble, W.R.; Hallock, Y.F.; Cardellina, J.H. II; van Soest, R.;
Boyd, M.R.; /. Nat. Prod., 1999,62, 636-637.
[381] Ford, J.; Capon, R.J.; J. Nat. Prod., 2000,63, 1527-1528.
[382] Sakemi, S.; Sun, H.H.; Jefford, C.W.; Bernardinelli, G.; Tetrahedron Lett.,
1989, JO, 2517-2520.
[383] Sun, H.H.; Sakemi, S.; Burres, N.; McCarthy, P.; / Org. Chem., 1990, 55,
4964-4966.
[384] Alvarez, M.; Bros, M.A.; Gras, G.; Ajana, W.; Joule, J.A.; Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
1999,1173-1183.
[385] Radisky, D.C.; Radisky, E.S.; Barrows, L.R.; Copp, B.R.; Kramer, R.A.;
Ireland, CM.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1993, 7/5,1632-1638.
[386] Kita, Y.; Egi, M.; Tohma, H.; Chem. Commun., 1999, 143-144.
[387] Kita, Y.; Egi, M.; Takada, T.; Tohma, H.; Synthesis, 1999, 885-897.
[388] Mancini, I.; Guella, G.; Debitus, C; Duhet, D.; Pietra, F.; Helv. Chim. Acta,
1994, 77, 1886-1894.
[389] Gunawardana, G.P.; Kohmoto, S.; Gunasekera, S.P.; McConnell, O.J.; Koehn,
F.E.; / Am. Chem. Soc., 1988,110,4856-4858.
[390] Burres, N.S.; Sazesh, S.; Gunawardana, G.P.; Clement, J.J.; Cancer Res., 1989,
49, 5267-5274.
[391] Gunawardana, G.P.; Kohmoto, S.; Burres, N.S.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1989, 30,
4359-4362.
[392] Gunawardana, G.P.; Koehn, F.E.; Lee, A.Y.; Clardy, J.; He, H.Y.; Faulkner;
D.J.; J. Org. Chem., 1992,57, 1523-1526.
[393] Bishop, M.J.; Ciufolini, M.A.; / Am. Chem. Soc, 1992,114,10081-10082.
[394] Salomon, C.E.; Faulkner, D.J.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 9147-9148.
744
[395] Eder, C ; Schupp, P.; Proksch, P.; Wray, V.; Steybe, K.; Muller, C.E.;
Frobenius, W.; Herderich, M.; van Soest, R.W.M.; J. Nat. Prod., 1998, 67, 301-
305.
[396] Debitus, C ; Cesario, M.; Guilhem, J.; Pascard, C ; Pais, M.; Tetrahedron Lett.,
1989,30,1535-1538.
[397] de Silva, E.D.; Racok, J.S.; Andersen, R.J.; Allen, T.M.; Brinen, L.S.; Clardy,
J.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1991,32, 2707-2710.
[398] Kourany-Lefoll, E.; Pais, M.; Sevenet, T.; Guittet, E.; Montagnac, A.; Fontaine,
v.; Guernard, D.; Debitus, C ; J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 3832-3835.
[399] Kourany-Lefoll, E.; Laprevote, O.; Sevenet, T.; Montagnac, A.; Pais, M.;
Debitus, C ; Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 3415-3426.
[400] Kashman, Y.; Groweiss, A.; Lidor, R.; Blasberger, D.; Carmely, S.;
Tetrahedron, 1985, 41, 1905-1914.
[401] Spector, I.; Shochet, N.R.; Kashman, Y.; Groweiss, A. Science, 1983, 219, 493-
495.
[402] Zibuck, R.; Liverton, N.J.; Smith, A.B. Ill; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1986,108, 2451-
2453.
[403] Blasberger, D.; Green, D.; Carmely, S.; Spector, I.; Kashman, Y.; Tetrahedron
Lett., 1987, 28,459-462.
[404] White, J.D.; Kawasaki, M.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1990,112,4991-4993.
[405] Smith, A.B. Ill; Noda, I.; Remiszewski, S.W.; Liverton, N.J.; Zibuck, R.; J.
Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 3977-3979.
[406] Smith, A.B. Ill; Leahy, J.W.; Noda, I.; Remiszewski, S.W.; Liverton, N.J.;
Zibuck, R.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1992,114, 2995-3007.
[407] White, J.D.; Kawasaki, U.', J. Org. Chem., 1992,57, 5292-5300.
[408] Blasberger, D.; Carmely, S.; Cojocaru, M.; Spector, I.; Shochet, N.R.;
Kashman, Y.; LiebigsAnn. Chem., 1989, 1171-1188.
[409] Jefford, C.W.; Bernardinelli, G.; Tanaka, J.; Higa, T.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1996,
37, 159-162.
[410] Tanaka, J.; Higa, T.; Bernardinelli, G.; Jefford, C.W.; Chem. Lett., 1996, 255-
256.
745
[430] Shin, J.; Lee, H.-S.; Seo, Y.; Rho, J.-R.; Cho, K.W.; Paul, V.J,; Tetrahedron,
2000,56,9071-9077.
[431] Pham, N.B.; Butler, M.S.; Quinn, R.J.; 7. Nat. Prod., 2000, 63, 393-395.
[432] Gulavita, N.K.; Wright, A.E.; McCarthy, P.J.; Pomponi, S.A.; Kelly-Borges,
M.; Chin, M.; Sills, M.A.; / Nat. Prod., 1993,56, 1613-1617.
[433] Franklin, M.A.; Penn, S.G.; Lebrilla, C.B.; Lam, T.H.; Pessah, LN.; Molinski,
T.F.; J. Nat. Prod., 1996, 59, 1121-1127.
[434] Okamoto, Y.; Ojika, M.; Sakagami, Y.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1999,40, 507-510.
[435] Okamoto, Y.; Ojika, M.; Suzuki, S.; Murakami, M.; Sakagami, Y.; Bioorg.
Med Chem.; 2001, 9, 179-183.
[436] Okamoto, Y.; Ojika, M.; Kato, S.; Sakagami, Y.; Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 5813-
5818.
[437] Cerda-Garcfa-Rojas, CM.; Harper, M.K.; Faulkner, D.J.; J. Nat. Prod., 1994,
57, 1758-1761.
[438] Ohta, S.; Kobayashi, H.; Ikegami, S.; Biosci. Biotech. Biochem., 1994, 58,
1752-1753.
[439] Ohta, S.; Kobayashi, H.; Ikegami, S.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35,4579-4580.
[440] Tsukamoto, S.; Kato, H.; Hirota, H.; Fusetani, N.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35,
5873-5874.
[441] Tsukamoto, H.; Kato, H.; Hirota, H.; Fusetani, N.; Tetrahedron, 1994, 50,
13583-13592.
[442] Gulavita, N.K.; Pomponi, S.A.; Wright, A.E.; J. Nat. Prod., 1995, 58, 954-957.
[443] Ovenden, S.P.B.; Capon, R.J.; /. Nat. Prod., 1999, 62, 1246-1249,
[444] Fusetani, N.; Matsunaga, S.; Konosu, S.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1981, 22, 1985-
1988.
[445] Slate, D.L.; Lee, R.H.; Rodriguez, J.; Crews, P.; Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun., 1994,203, 260-264.
[446] Tsukamoto, S.; Kato, H.; Hirota, H.; Fusetani, N.; Fish. Sci., 1997,63, 310-312.
[447] Makar'eva, T.N.; Shubina, L.K.; Kalinovskii, A.I.; Stonik, V.A.; Khim. Prir.
Soedm., 1985,272-273.
747
[448] Makar'eva, T.N.; Shubina, L.K.; Stonik, V.A.; Khim. Prir, Soedin., 1987, 107,
111-115.
[449] Kanazawa, S.; Fusetani, N.; Matsunaga, S.; Tetrahedron, 1992,48, 5467-5472.
[450] Bifulco, G.; Bruno, I.; Minale, L.; Riccio, R.; J. Nat Prod., 1994, 57, 164-167.
[451] Patil, A.D.; Freyer, A.J.; Breen, A.; Carte, B.; Johnson, R.K.; J. Nat. Prod.,
1996.59, 606-608.
[452] Makar'eva, T.N.; Stonik, V.A.; Dmitrenok, A.S.; Krosokhin, V.B.; Svetashev,
V.I.; Vysotskii, M.V.; Steroids, 1995, 60, 316-320.
[453] Makar'eva, T.N.; Kalinovskii, A.I.; Zhakina, T.I.; Stonik, V.A.; Khim. Prir.
Soedin., 19S3, 114-115.
[454] Makar'eva, T.N.; Shubina, L.K.; Kalinovskii, A.I.; Stonik, V.A.; Elyakov, G.B.;
Steroids, 19S3,42, 261-2SI.
[455] Ilyin, S.G.; Reshetnyak, M.V.; Schedrin, A.P.; Makar'eva, T.N.; Shubina, L.K.;
Stonik, V.A.; Elyakov, G.B.; Sobolev, A.N.; J. Nat. Prod., 1992, 55, 232-236.
[456] Makar'eva, T.N.; Dmitrenok, P.S.; Shubina, L.K.; Stonik, V.A.; Khim. Prir.
Soedin., 19S8,37U375.
[457] McKee, T.C.; Cardellina, J.H.I.; Tischle, M.; Snader, K.M.; Boyd, M.R.;
Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 389-392.
[458] Fusetani, N.; Takahashi, M.; Matsunaga, S.; Tetrahedron, 1994,50, 7765-7770.
[459] Gunasekera, S.P.; Sennett, S.H.; Kelly-Borges, M.; Bryant, R.W.; J. Nat. Prod.,
1994,57,1751-1754.
[460] Aiello, A.; Fattorusso, E.; Menna, M.; Carnuccio, R.; luvone, T.; Steroids,
1995.60, 666-673.
[461] Fu, X.; Ferreira, M.L.G.; Schmitz, F.J.; Kelly, M.; J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64,
6706-6709.
[462] Umeyama, A.; Adachi, K.; Ito, S.; Arihara, S.; J. Nat. Prod., 2000, 63, 1175-
1177.
[463] Tsukamoto, S.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; / Nat. Prod., 1998, 61, 1374-
1378.
[464] Rudi, A.; Yosief, T.; Loya, S.; Hizi, A.; Schleyer, M.; Kashman, Y.; J. Nat.
Prod., 2001, 64,1451-1453.
748
[465] Nakatsu, T.; Walker, R.P.; Thompson, J.E.; Faulkner, DJ.; Experientia, 1983,
59,759-761.
[466] Qureshi, A.; Faulkner, DJ.; Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 8323-8330.
[467] Fujita, M.; Nakao, Y.; Matsunaga, S.; Seiki, M.; Itoh, Y.; van Soest, R.W.M.;
Heubes, M.; Faulkner, D.J.; Fusetani, N.; Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 3885-3890.
[468] Prinsep, M.R.; Blunt, J.W.; Munro, M.H.G.; /. Nat. Prod., 1989, 52, 657-659.
[469] Makar'eva, T.; Stonik, V.A.; D'yachuk, O.G.; Dmitrenok, A.S.; Tetrahedron
Lett., 1995, 36, 129-132.
[470] Kong, F.; Andersen, R.J.; J. Org. Chem., 1993, 58, 6924-6927.
[471] Kong, F.; Andersen, R.J.; J. Nat. Prod., 1996, 59, 379-385.
[472] Li, H.Y.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; Fujiki, H.; Murphy, P.T.; Willis, R.H.;
Baker, J.T.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 5733-5736.
[473] Koehn, F.E.; Gunasekera, M.; Cross, S.S.; J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 1322-1325.
[474] Sun, H.H.; Cross, S.S.; Gunasekra, M.; Koehn, F.E.; Tetrahedron, 1991, 47,
1185-1190.
[475] Sperry, S.; Crews, P.; / Nat. Prod., 1997, 60, 29-32.
[476] D'Auria, M.V.; Giannini, C ; Zampella, A.; Minale, L.; Debitus, C ; Roussakis,
C ; J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 7382-7388.
[477] Zampella, A.; Giannini, C ; Debitus, C ; Roussakis, C ; D'Auria, M.V.; Eur. J.
Org. Chem., 1999, 949-953.
[478] Giannini, C ; Zampella, A.; Debitus, C ; Menou, J.-L.; Roussakis, C ; D'Auria,
M.V.; Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 13749-13756.
[479] Lam, H.W.; Cooke, P.A.; Pattenden, G.; Bandaranayake, W.M.;
Wickramasinghe, W.A.; J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1,1999, 847-848.
[480] Northcote, P.T.; Blunt, J.W.; Munro, M.H.G.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1991, 32,
6411-6414.
[481] Rzasa, R.M.; Shea, H.A.; Romo, D.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1998,120, 591-592.
[482] Romo, D.; Rzasa, R.M.; Shea, H.A.; Park, K.; Langenhan, J.M.; Sun, L.;
Akhiezer, A.; Liu, J.O.; /. Am. Chem. Soc, 1998,120, 12237-12254.
[483] Remuinan, M.J.; Pattenden, G.; Tetrahedron Lett., 2000,41, 7367-7371.
749
[484] Kikuchi, H.; Tsukitani, Y.; Manda, T.; Fujii, T.; Nakanishi, H.; Kobayashi, M.;
Kitagawa, I.; Chem. Pharm. Bull, 1982, 30, 3544-3547.
[485] Schmitz, FJ.; Prasad, R.S.; Gopichand, Y., Hossain, M.B.; van der Helm, D.;
Schmidt, P.; / Am. Chem. Soc, 1981,103, 2467-2469.
[486] Tachibana, K.; Scheuer, P.; Tsukitani, Y.; Kikuchi, H.; Van Engen, D.; Clardy,
J.; Gopichand, Y.; Schmitz, F.J.; /. Am. Chem. Soc, 1981,103, 2469-2471.
[487] Crews, P.; Kakou, Y.; Quinoa, E.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1988,110,4365-4368.
[488] Sugiyama, H.; Yokokawa, F.; Shiori, T.; Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 2149-2152.
[489] Kobayashi, J.; Kondo, K.; Ishibashi, M.; Walchli, M.R.; Nakamura, T.; J. Am.
Chem. Soc, 1993,115, 6661-6665.
[490] Kondo, K.; Ishibashi, M.; Kobayashi, J.; Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 8355-8362.
[491] Nakao, Y.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 1511-
1514.
[492] Nakao, Y.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; Tetrahedron, 1993, 49, 11183-11188.
[493] Uno, M.; Ohta, S.; Ohta, E.; Ikegami, S.; /. Nat. Prod., 1996, 59, 1146-1148.
[494] Matsunaga, S.; Nogata, Y.; Fusetani, N.; J. Nat. Prod., 1998, 61, 663-666.
[495] Nakao, Y.; Maki, T.; Matsunaga, S.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Fusetani, N.;
Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 8977-8987.
[496] Capon, R.J.; Skene, C ; Liu, E.H.-T.; Lacey, E.; Gill, J.H.; Heiland, K.; Friedel,
T.; J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 7765-7769.
[497] Nakao, Y.; Takada, K.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; Tetrahedron, 2001, 57,
3013-3017.
[498] Kawakami, A.; Miyamoto, T.; Higuchi, R.; Uchiumi, T.; Kuwano, M.; van
Soest, R.W.M.; Tetrahedron Lett., 2001,42, 3335-3337.
[499] Ramdahl, T.; Kazlauskas, R.; Bergquist, P.; Liaaen-Jensen, S.; Biochem. Syst.
£c^/., 1981, 9, 211-13.
[500] Hertzberg, S.; Ramdahl, T.; Johansen, J.E.; Liaaen-Jensen, S.; Acta Chem.
Scand. Ser. B, 1983,37, 267-280.
[501] Hertzberg, S.; Bergquist, P.; Liaaen-Jensen, S.; Biochem. Syst. EcoL, 1989,17,
51-53.
[502] Casapullo, A.; Minale, L.; Zollo, F.; Tetrahderon Lett., 1994,35, 2421-2422.
750
[503] Barrow, R.A.; Capon, R.J.; / Nat. Prod., 1992, 55, 1330-1331.
[504] Capon, RJ.; MacLeod, J.K.; J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1987, 1200-1201.
[505] Yuasa, H.; Izukawa, Y.; Hashimoto, H.; J. Carbohydr. Chem., 1989, S, 753-
763.
[506] Warabi, K.; Nakao, Y.; Matsunaga, S.; Fukuyama, T.; Kan, T.; Yokoshima, S.;
Fusetani, N.; Comp. Biochem. Phys., B, 2001,128B, 27-30.
[507] Palumbo, A.; d'Ischia, M.; Misuraca, G.; Prota, G.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1982, 23,
3207-3208.
[508] Palumbo, A.; Misuraca, G.; d'Ischia, M.; Donaudy, F.; Prota, G.; Comp.
Biochem. Physiol, 1984, 78, 81-83.
[509] Holler, T.P.; Ruan, F.; Spaltenstein, A.; Hopkins, P.B.; J. Org. Chem., 1989,54,
4570-4575.
[510] Rohl, I.; Schneider, B.; Schmidt, B.; Zeeck, E.; Z Naturforsch., Sect. C: J.
Biosci., 1999,54,1145-1147.
[511] Turner, E.; Klevit, R.; Hopkins, P.B.; Shapiro, B.M.; J. Biol. Chem., 1986, 261,
13056-13063.
[512] Turner, E.; Klevit, R.; Hager, L.J.; Shapiro, B.M.; Biochemistry, 1987, 26,
4028-4036.
[513] Kitagawa, I.; Hamamoto, Y.; Kobayashi, M.; Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1979, 27,
1934-1937.
[514] Murata, Y.; Sata, N.U.; J. Agric. Food Chem., 2000,48,5557-5560.
[515] Pathirana, C ; Andersen, R.J.; J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1986,108, 8288-8289.
[516] Elliott, J.K.; Ross, D.M.; Pathirana, C ; Miao, S.; Andersen, R.J.; Singer, P.;
Kokke, W.C.M.C; Ayer, W.A.; Biol. Bull, 1989,776, 73-78.
[517] Burgoyne, D.L.; Miao, S.; Pathirana, C ; Andersen, R.J.; Ayer, W.A.; Singer,
P.P.; Kokke, W.C.M.C; Ross, D.M.; Can. J. Chem., 1991, 69, 20-27.
[518] Findlay, J.A.; He, Z.-Q.; Calhoun, L.A.; / Nat. Prod., 1990, 53, 1015-1018.
[519] Utkina, N.K.; Maksimov, O.B.; Khim. Prir. Soedin., 1979, 148-151.
[520] Kent, R.A.; Smith, I.R.; Sutherland, M.D.; Aust. J. Chem., 1970, 23, 2325-
2335.
[521] Smith, I.R.; Sutherland, M.D.; Aust. J. Chem., 1971, 24,1487-1499.
751
[522] Rideout, J.A.; Sutherland, M.D.; Aust J. Chem., 1981, 34, 2385-2392.
[523] Lee, N.K.; Kim, Y.H.; Bull. Korean Chem. Soc, 1995, 76, 1011-103.
[524] De Riccardis, F.; lorizzi, M.; Minale, L.; Riccio, R.; Richer de Forges, B.;
Debitus, C; J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 6781-6787.
[525] Findlay, J.A.; Yayli, N.; Calhoun, L.A.; J. Nat. Prod., 1991, 54, 302-304.
[526] Yamada, K.; Hara, E.; Nagaregawa, Y.; Miyamoto, T.; Higuchi, R.; Isobe, R.;
Honda, S.; Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1998, 371-378.
[527] Yamada, K.; Harada, Y.; Nagaregawa, Y.; Miyamoto, T.; Isobe, R.; Higuchi,
R.; Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1998, 2519-2525.
[528] D'Auria, M.V.; Riccio, R.; Minale, L.; Tetrahedron Lett., 1985,26, 1871-1872.
[529] DAuria, M.V.; Minale, L.; Riccio, R.; Uriarte, E.; J. Nat. Prod., 1991, 54, 606-
608.
[530] Roccagliata, A.J.; Maier, M.S.; Seldes, A.M.; Zea, S.; Duque, C; /. Nat. Prod.,
1997, 60, 285-286.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
753
from 705
Paraherquamides 331,332 orthoesterol disulfate B
fromMFA 332 from 705
synthesis of 332 orthoesterol disulfate C
Paraherquamide A 331,367 from 705
antiparasitic activity of 332 weinbersterol disulfate A
asymmetric synthesis of 367 from 706
conversion of PHB to 335 Phakellistatin 5 683
from Penicillium paraherquei 331 as cytotoxic heptapeptide 683
hydroxylationofMFA 335 from Phakellia costata 683
structures of 332 methyl sulfide group of 683
total synthesis of 367 solid-phase synthesis of 683
(+)-Paraherquamide B 359 Phase I trial 540
conversion of MFA to 333 with monophosphoryl lipid A 540
stereocontrolled synthesis of 358 Phenolic compounds 200
Patagonicoide A 603 from Morus alba 200
NOESY correlations of 603 from Morus bombycis 200
Pateamine 709 from Morus Ihou 200
as cytotoxin 709 kuwanon G as 200
dilactone functionality of 709 Pheromones 428
from New Zealand species of against Tetranychus mites 428
Mycale 709 famesol as 428
total synthesis of 709 naphthoquinones as 428
Patellamides 624 nerolidolas 428
as macrophage scavenger receptor structure of 428
inhibitor 624 Phomasetin 122
from Lissoclinum patella 624 as HIV inhibitor 122
X-ray crystallography of 624 from P/zowa sp. 122
p-Coumaric acid 262 PhylUdia pustulosa 651
in cereals brans 262 4a-isothiocyanogorgon-l 1-ene
in spinach 262 from 651
in sugar beet fibre 262 Phyllospongia foliascens 709
p-Coumaroylquinic acids 262 in serological reactions 709
in sweet cherries 262 sulfated galactolipid M-6 from
Penares sp. 713 709
as a-glucosidase inhibitor 713 Phylum echinodermata 587
penarolide sulfate A from 713 asteroideain 587
Pentaglycosides 601 crinoideain 587
from sea cucumbers 601 echinoideain 587
Pentamera calcigera 598 holothuroidea in 587
from calcigeroside B 598 ophiuroidea in 587
from calcigeroside Ci 598 secondary metabolites from 587
from calcigeroside Di 598 Physarorubinic acid 133
from cucumarioside G2 598 from Physarum polycephalum 13 3
Petrosia weinbergi 705,706 Phytolacca dodecandra 400
antiviral activity of 705 tick toxicity of 400
antiviral metabolites from 706 Piericidinas 435
orthoesterol disulfate A as inhibitor of 435
788
Waiakeamide 684
as cyclic hexapeptide 684
from Ircinia dendroides 684
Watersipora subtorquata 620
5,7-dihydroxy-6-oxo-6//-
anthra[ 1,9-6c]thiophene-1 -
carboxylic acid from 620
Wentilactone A 465
from Aspergillus wentii 465
Wentilactone B 465
from Aspergillus wentii 465
This Page Intentionally Left Blank