Professional Documents
Culture Documents
612
ZHOU ET AL: GENETIC VARIATION IN PHOMA MACROSTOMA 613
tured on 2% V-8 juice agar medium for 14 d. On a fresh isolate. A sterile wooden toothpick was placed between the
agar plate, a 10 mm mycelial plug from each isolate in the two isolates at the junction where they would meet and
mating pair combination was placed ca. 7.5 cm apart. The merge (Mengistu et al 1993, 1995) and incubated at 10 C
cultures were incubated at 16 h photoperiod under cool with the same light conditions 4–7 wk. The toothpick and
white fluorescent light (100–150 mE/m2/s) at 22 C for 3 d the culture media were examined at 5, 6 and 7 wk for ma-
or until it was possible to determine the growth rate of each ture pseudothecia under a binocular microscope at 403
TABLE II. The 10-mer oligonucleotide primers selected for RAPD analyses
magnification. Pseudothecia that formed on toothpicks or herbarum were genetically distinct from the biocon-
culture medium in the plates were extracted and crushed trol isolates (FIG. 2B). The primers did not detect
on a glass slide in a drop of water. The slide was examined genetic variation among P. lingam Leroy, P. nebulosa
for asci containing ascospores with a light microscope at 92-74, P. pomorum 91-177, P. chrysanthemicola 90-64,
40–1003 magnification. The presence or absence of ma-
P. exigua 92-180-1 and P. medicaginis 94-335A1. These
ture pseudothecia, asci and ascospores was recorded.
latter species were more distantly related to the bio-
Phylogenetic data analyses.—The presence (1) or absence control isolates.
(0) of DNA bands in agarose gel were converted as 0–1
matrix. The data were analyzed by the phylogenetic soft- Genetic variation in Phoma isolates as revealed by
ware package TREECONt for Windows (Version 1.3b, Van PFGE.—Twenty-seven polymorphic chromosomal
de Peer and de Wachter 1994). The evolutionary distance DNA bands were generated with the CHEF analysis.
estimation was performed according to Nei and Li (1979). The chromosomal profiles of P. medicaginis and P.
An unweighted pair group cluster method with arithmetic herbarum were different from those of P. macrostoma
averages (UPGMA; Benzécri 1973) was used to infer tree (FIG. 3A) but exhibited some similarity to P. macros-
topology. Bootstrap analyses were included in the distance toma. However the biocontrol isolates of P. macrosto-
estimation and tree topology to place confidence intervals ma separated into two different categories of chro-
on phylogenies (Efron and Gong 1983, Felsenstein 1985,
mosomal profiles (Types I and II). Type I included
Sworfford et al 1996).
isolates 94-44B, 85-24B, 94-26, 95-268B and 95-54A1,
while the other five biocontrol isolates belonged to
RESULTS Type II (FIG. 3B). Similar to that revealed by RAPD
analysis, isolates from Ecozone 3 (94-44B, 85-24B, 95-
Genetic variation in Phoma isolates as revealed by
268B, 89-25A2, 94-359A, 97-12B and 97-15B2) and
RAPD.—A total of 96 polymorphic DNA bands were
Ecozone 4 (95-54A1, 94-26 and 94-134) were distrib-
produced by amplification with eight random prim-
uted randomly in these two chromosome profile
ers, and a phylogenetic tree was generated from the
types. The phylogenetic tree also showed that the iso-
data showing only the results from two primers (FIG.
lates of P. herbarum separated into two chromosome
2A, B). With primers 734 and 736, banding patterns
profiles (FIG. 3B).
were detected for all isolates of P. macrostoma, P. lin-
gam and one isolate of P. chrysanthemicola. Other Genetic variation in Phoma isolates as revealed by cross-
primers (not shown) detected P. exigua, P. medicagin- ing studies.—The crossing pair combinations and for-
is, P. nebulosa or P. pomorum, but not P. macrostoma, mation of asexual or sexual reproductive structures
which was the species of prime interest. Both inter- are presented (TABLE III). Only mycelial growth and
and intraspecific genetic variation in the Phoma spe- asexual sporulation from pycnidia were observed
cies and isolates was observed for all primers. when all P. macrostoma isolates were crossed with
All 10 biocontrol isolates of P. macrostoma were re- themselves, among each other or with the different
lated closely and clustered within the group desig- mating types of P. lingam. Pseudothecia containing
nated as ‘‘P. macrostoma Biocontrol Isolates’’ (FIG. ascospores were formed only by crossing different
2B). The isolates were somewhat variable from each mating type isolates of P. lingam.
other, to a limited extent within this group. For ex-
ample 97-15B2 had a banding pattern slightly differ-
DISCUSSION
ent than the other biocontrol isolates using Primer
734 (FIG. 2A). However the biocontrol isolates did Genetic variation in the population of a biocontrol
not form distinct subgroups based on their geograph- fungus must be assessed to understand the affect of
ic origins because the isolates from Ecozone 3 (94- a specific strain on the natural population after the
44B, 85-24B, 95-268B, 89-25A2, 94-359A and 97-12B) release (Hintz et al 2001). Concerning the release of
and Ecozone 4 (95-54A1, 94-26 and 94-134) were dis- a bioherbicide across ecozones, the biocontrol isolate
tributed within the same cluster. should be genetically similar to local populations to
The RAPD fragment patterns from the biocontrol reduce the potential unexpected affects, such as in-
isolates were different when compared to the other troducing new alleles that could alter host range or
isolates of P. macrostoma var. macrostoma, P. macros- pathogen growth and survival. Various approaches
toma var. incolorata and the other isolates of various have been adopted for such assessment. Recent re-
Phoma species (FIG. 2A, B). The isolates of P. macros- ports on the mycoherbicide Chondrostereum purpu-
toma var. macrostoma originating from Larix, Forsyth- reum (Pers. : Fr.) Pouzar by biochemical and molec-
ia, Philadelphus and Triticum were more similar to P. ular marker analyses showed no host or geographic
dennisii from Solidago than to the biocontrol isolates specialization in this fungus and that the introduc-
from Canada thistle (FIG. 2B). Also the isolates of P. tion of rare pathogenicity alleles from isolates used
616 MYCOLOGIA
ZHOU ET AL: GENETIC VARIATION IN PHOMA MACROSTOMA 617
as biocontrol agents was unlikely (Shamoun and Wall into a local population. Genetic variation in fungal
1996; Ramesfield et al 1996, 1999; Gosselin et al populations is common as illustrated by P. lingam
1999; Hintz et al 2001). In our present study molec- ( Johnson and Lewis 1990, McGee and Petrie 1978,
ular and genetic tools were used to investigate the Petrie 1969, Hassan et al 1991, Kuusk et al 2002).
genetic variation of a potential broadleaf biocontrol Our RAPD study also showed that the genetic dis-
fungus, P. macrostoma. tances among three P. lingam isolates were signifi-
RAPD has been used widely as an effective molec- cantly different based on the confidence intervals
ular tool to evaluate genetic variance at or below the used for bootstrap analyses. This demonstrated that
species level. In our RAPD analyses different species these P. lingam populations were genetically diverse
and isolates of the genus Phoma produced different and movement of these populations likely would in-
DNA profiles on the gels denoting significant inter- troduce new alleles into an area. With P. macrostoma
and intraspecific genetic variation. The biocontrol there was obvious genetic variation among isolates
isolates of P. macrostoma were most similar to each from different continents, although the isolates from
other but uniquely different than other isolates with- the two Canadian ecozones were relatively similar.
in the same species (P. macrostoma var. macrostoma PFGE also was effective in distinguishing among
and P. macrostoma var. incolorata) and quite different different species and isolates according to chromo-
from other Phoma species, including P. lingam, P. her- somal profiles. The phylogenetic analysis indicated
barum, P. denisii var. denisii, P. medicaginis, P. nebu- that P. macrostoma may be more closely related to P.
losa, P. pomorum, P. chrysanthemicola and P. exigua. A herbarum than other Phoma spp. The present study
related study on molecular monitoring of the biocon- showed two distinctly different chromosomal profiles
trol isolates of P. macrostoma in plant and soil envi- within the species P. macrostoma. However it is inter-
ronments also supported our findings. In that study esting to note that the 10 biocontrol isolates of P.
a pair of PCR primers designed from the genomic macrostoma orginating from two different ecozones
DNA of the biocontrol isolates was found to be spe- were distributed into the two chromosomal sub-
cific to only the biocontrol isolates and no bands groups. At this time no other biological traits (such
were generated from other common soil fungi such as host range or growth characteristics) have been
as Cochliobolus, Epicoccum, Fusarium, Penicillium, associated with these two subgroups (personal obser-
Pythium, Sclerotinia and Septoria (Zhou et al 2004). vation based on unpublished data).
The intraspecific variation occurring in P. macrostoma Studies of mating types of fungal isolates also may
may be due to either geographic origin (Europe vs. be useful for subspecies classification and evaluation
Canada) or a unique trait (i.e. bioherbicidal activity) of genetic variation. In the case of P. macrostoma it
that evolved with a host-pathogen interaction. Al- was demonstrated that the biocontrol isolates did not
though some variation occurred within the 10 bio- produce a sexual state in mating studies among
control isolates, their distribution in the phylogenetic themselves or when paired with known mating types
tree generated from the RAPD data were not based from another Phoma species possessing the capability
on geographic origin. This suggested that the P. ma- of sexual reproduction. Other researchers also have
crostoma biological control isolates, which were iso- noted that P. macrostoma has no known teleomorph
lated from Ecozone 3 or Ecozone 4, are genetically (Boerema et al 2004). The use of a crossing strategy
similar, so the use of those isolates across these two was used to demonstrate to regulators that Canadian
ecozones has little risk of introducing novel alleles isolates of P. macrostoma were unable to reproduce
←
FIG. 2. A. RAPD analyses of genetic variations among Phoma isolates with two 10-mer oligonucleotide primers (734 on
top and 736 on bottom). Lanes 1 and 31, GeneRulery 1kb DNA Ladder (MBI Fermentas); Lanes 2–11, Phoma macrostoma
isolates 85-24B, 89-25A2, 94-26, 94-44B, 94-134, 94-359A, 95-54A1, 95-268B, 97-12B, and 97-15B2; Lane 12, P. dennisii var.
dennisii CBS135.96; Lanes 13–16, P. macrostoma var. macrostoma isolates CBS154.83, CBS482.95, CBS488.94 and CBS837.84;
Lane 17, P. macrostoma var. incolorata CBS839.84; Lanes 18–20, P. lingam isolates Leroy, Peace-3 and Pl86-12; Lanes 21–
23, P. herbarum isolates AI, AIV and G/5/2; Lanes 24–25, P. chrysanthemicola 90-64 and 91-27I; Lanes 26–29, P. exigua 92-
180-1, P. medicaginis 94-335A1, P. nebulosa 92-74, and P. pomorum 91-177; Lane 30, Blank. B. Phylogenetic relationship
among the biocontrol isolates of 10 Phoma macrostoma and 18 reference Phoma isolates generated by TREECONt for
Windows with RAPD data. The biocontrol isolates were clustered together and genetically distant from the reference
isolates. Within the cluster of biocontrol isolates, the isolates originating from two Canadian ecozones were scattered
randomly. The evolutionary distance scale was placed on the top of the figure and a bootstrap value was presented on
each node of the tree.
618 MYCOLOGIA
FIG. 3. A. Electrokaryotypes of P. macrostoma and several other Phoma isolates separated by pulsed field gel electro-
phoresis. Lane M corresponds to Saccaromyces cerevisiae marker; Lanes 1–10 to the P. macrostoma isolates 85-24B, 89-25A2,
94-26, 94-44B, 94-134, 94-359A, 95-54A1, 95-268B, 97-12B, and 97-15B2, respectively; Lane 11 to P. medicaginis 94-335 A1;
and Lanes 12–14 to P. herbarum isolates AI, AIV and G5/5/2, respectively. B. Phylogenetic relationship among several
Phoma isolates revealed by CHEF profiles. Two distinct subgroups were clustered within which limited variation was found.
Biocontrol agents 94-44B, 85-24B, 94-26, 95-268B and 95-54A1 were clustered in subgroup I (Type I profile), while isolates
89-25A2, 94-134, 94-359A, 97-12B, and 97-15B2 in subgroup II (Type II profile). The evolutionary distance scale (placed
on the top of the figure) and bootstrap values (presented on nodes of the tree) were calculated with TREECONt for
Windows software.
sexually thus reducing the risk of developing new al- not consider the occurrence of other mechanisms of
leles through recombination and to demonstrate to genetic exchange such as mutation or the parasexual
plant breeders that there was no exchange of genetic cycle. This would require the use of a visible marker
material with an economically important plant path- strategy, such as deploying antibiotic resistance in
ogen, P. lingam. However the crossing approach did one isolate and the green fluorescent protein marker
ZHOU ET AL: GENETIC VARIATION IN PHOMA MACROSTOMA 619
TABLE III. Presence (1) or absence (0) of pseudothecia and ascospores after crossing biocontrol isolates of Phoma macro-
stoma (PM) among themselves and with P. lingam (PL) tester isolates with different mating types (Mat1 or Mat2)
PL 186-12
Phoma species and isolate PM 94-44B PM 85-24B PM 95-54A1 PM 94-26 PM 97-15B2 PM 94-134 (Mat2)
P. macrostoma 94-44B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P. macrostoma 85-24B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P. macrostoma 95-54A1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P. macrostoma 94-26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P. macrostoma 97-15B2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P. lingam PL189-21 (Mat1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
P. lingam PL189-19 (Mat1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
P. lingam PL186-12 (Mat2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
in another isolate, and then subculturing the inter- specific and infra-specific taxa in culture. Wallingford,
mingled colonies to determine which clones now UK: CABI Publishing.
possessed both marker traits. Chang TT, Yang WW, Wang WY. 1996. Use of random am-
In conclusion P. macrostoma may be distinguished plified polymorphic DNA markers for the detection of
genetic variation in Phytophthora cinnamomi in Taiwan.
genetically from other Phoma spp. Ecological zones
Bot Bull Acad Sin 37:165–171.
have not attributed to the genetic variation in the Charudattan R. 1988. Inundative control of weeds with in-
biocontrol isolates of P. macrostoma, as determined digenous fungal pathogens. In: Burge MN, ed. Fungi
by molecular and genetic approaches. Therefore any in biological control systems. New York: Manchester
P. macrostoma weed biocontrol isolates originating University Press. 269 p.
from Ecozone 3 and Ecozone 4 could be considered Chen CY, Séguin-Swartz G. 1999. Reaction of wild crucifers
by the regulators for release across these ecozones as to Leptosphaeria maculans, the causal agent of blackleg
a biopesticide with low risk of gene flow from asexual of crucifers. Can J Plant Pathol 21:361–367.
or sexual interactions. , Plummer KM, Howlett BJ. 1996. Ability of a Leptos-
phaeria maculans isolate to form stem cankers on In-
dian mustard segregates as a single locus. Eur J Plant
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Pathol 102:349–352.
Cook RJ, Bruckart WL, Coulson JR, Goettel MS, Humber
The authors are grateful to AAFC-SRC staff members YB RA, Lumsden RD, Maddox JV, McManus ML, Moore
Fu, A Hannoufa, SR Rimmer, J Derby, J Nettleton and R L, Meyer SF, Quimby PC Jr, Stack JP, Vaughn JL. 1996.
Underwood for their kind assistance concerning research Safety of microorganisms intended for pest and plant
facilities, fungal cultures or figure preparation. We also disease control: a framework for scientific evaluation.
thank Dr Greg Boland, University of Guelph, for providing Biol Control 7:333–351.
cultures of Phoma herbarum. This research was supported Cozijnsen AJ, Popa KM, Purwantara A, Rolls BD, Howlett
by a grant from Saskatchewan Agriculture Development BJ. 2000. Genome analysis of the plant pathogenic as-
Fund through the ADF Project 20010062-33AD. A visiting comycete Leptosphaeria maculans; mapping mating
fellowship in a Canadian government laboratory from the type and host-specificity loci. Mol Plant Pathol 1:293–
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Can- 302.
ada to Dr Lecong Zhou is acknowledged. Efron B, Gong G. 1983. A leisurely look at the bootstrap,
the jacknife, and cross-validation. Am Stat 37:36–48.
LITERATURE CITED
Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an
approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791.
Arisan-Atac I, Heidenreich E, Kubicek CP. 1995. Randomly Gosselin L, Jobidon R, Bernier L. 1996. Assessment of ge-
amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting identifies netic variation with Chondrostereum purpureum from
subgroups of Trichoderma viride and other Trichoderma Québec by random amplified polymorphic DNA anal-
sp. capable of chestnut blight control. FEMS Microbiol ysis. Mycol Res 100:151–158.
Lett 126:249–255. Hassan AK, Schulz C, Sacristan MD, Wöstemeyer J. 1991.
Bailey KL, Derby J. 2001. Fungal isolates and biological con- Biochemical and molecular tools for the differentiation
trol compositions for the control of weeds. US Patent of aggressive and non-aggressive isolates of the oilseed
Application Serial No. 60/294,475. Filed 20 May 2001. rape pathogen, Phoma lingam. J Phytopathol 131:120–
Benzécri JP. 1973. L’analyse des données. Tome I. La tax- 136.
onomie. Paris, France: Dunod. Hintz WE, Becker EM, Shamoun SF. 2001. Development of
Boerema GH, de Gruyter J, Noordeloos ME, Hamers MEC. genetic markers for risk assessment of biological con-
2004. Phoma identification manual: differentiation of trol agents. Can J Plant Pathol 23:13–18.
620 MYCOLOGIA
Howlett BJ. 1997. Genome analysis of the fungal plant path- Plummer KM, Howlett BJ. 1993. Major chromosomal length
ogen, Leptosphaeria maculans using pulsed field gel polymorphisms are evident after meiosis in the phyto-
electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 18:1544–1547. pathogenic fungus Leptosphaeria maculans. Curr Genet
Johnson RD, Lewis BG. 1990. DNA polymorphism in Lep- 24:107–113.
tosphaeria maculans. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 37:417– , Howlett BJ. 1995. Inheritance of chromosomal
424. length polymorphisms in the ascomycete Leptosphaeria
Koch E, Song K, Osborn TC, Williams PH. 1991. Relation- maculans. Mol Gen Genet 247:416–422.
ship between pathogenicity and phylogeny based on Ramsfield TD, Becker EM, Rathlef SM, Tang Y, Vrain TC,
restriction fragment length polymorphism in Leptos- Shamoun SF, Hintz WE. 1996. Geographic variation of
phaeria maculans. Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 4:341– Chondrostereum purpureum detected by polymorphisms
349. in the ribosomal DNA. Can J Bot 74:1919–1929.
Kuusk A-K, Happstadius I, Zhou L, Steventon LA, Griese H, , Shamoun SF, Punja ZK, Hintz WE. 1999. Variation
Dixelius C. 2002. Presence of Leptosphaeria maculans in mitochondrial DNA of the potential biological con-
group A and group B isolates in Sweden. J Phytopathol trol agent Chondrostereum purpureum. Can J Bot 77:
150:349–356. 1490–1498.
Lim L, Howlett BJ. 1994. Linear plasmids, pLm9 and Shamoun SF, Wall RE. 1996. Characterization of Canadian
pLm10, can be isolated from the phytopathogenic as- isolates of Chondrostereum purpureum by protein con-
comycete Leptosphaeria maculans by pulsed-field gel tent, APIZYM and isozyme analysis. Eur J For Pathol
electrophoresis. Curr Genet 26:276–280. 26:333–342.
McDermott JM, Brandle U, Dutly F, Haemmerli UA, Keller Slatkin M. 1987. Gene flow and the geographic structure of
S, Muller KE, Wolfe MS. 1994. Genetic variation in natural populations. Science 236:787–792.
powdery mildew of barley: development of RAPD, Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM. 1996. Phy-
SCAR, and VNTR markers. Phytopathology 84:1316– logenetic inference. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK,
1321. eds. Molecular Systematics. Sinauer Associates, Sunder-
land, USA. p 407–514.
McGee DC, Petrie GA. 1978. Variability of Leptosphaeria ma-
Taylor JL, Pedras MSC, Morales VM. 1995. Horizontal trans-
culans in relation to blackleg of oilseed rape. Phyto-
fer in the phytopathogenic fungal genus Leptosphaeria
pathology 68:625–630.
and host-range expansion. Trends Biotechnol 3:202–
Mengistu A, Hill CB, Williams PH. 1995. A toothpick meth-
206.
od for mating Leptosphaeria maculans, the causal agent
TeBeest DO, Yang XB, Cisar CR. 1992. The status of bio-
of blackleg of crucifers. Plant Dis 79:755–756.
logical control of weeds with fungal pathogens. Annu
, Rimmer SR, Williams PH. 1993. Protocols for in
Rev Phytopathol 30:637–657.
vitro sporulation, ascospore release, sexual mating and
Templeton GE. 1992. Regulations and guidelines: critical
fertility in crosses of Leptosphaeria maculans. Plant Dis
issues in biological control. In: Proceedings of the
77:538–540.
USDA–CSRS National Workshop. 10–12 Jun 1991, Vi-
Morales VM, Séguin-Swartz G, Taylor JL. 1993. Chromo- enna, Virginia. p 63.
some size polymorphism in Leptosphaeria maculans. , TeBeest DO, Smith RJ Jr. 1979. Biological weed con-
Phytopathology 83:503–509. trol with mycoherbicides. Annu Rev Phytopathol 17:
Moreno-Rico O, Séguin-Swartz G, Nettleton JA, Luna-Ruiz 301–310.
JJ, Frias-Treviño AG, Romero-Cova S. 2002. Mexican Teng PS, Yang XB. 1993. Biological impact and risk assess-
isolates of Leptosphaeria maculans belong to the ag- ment in plant pathology. Annu Rev Phytopathol 31:
gressive strain of the fungus. Can J Plant Pathol 24:69– 495–521.
73. Van Acker RC, Thomas AG, Leeson JY, Knezevic SZ, Frick
Nei M, Li WH. 1979. Mathematical model for studying ge- BL. 2000. Comparison of weed communities in Mani-
netic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. toba ecoregions and crops. Can J Plant Sci 80:963–972.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269–5273. Van de Peer Y, de Wachter R. 1994. TREECON for Win-
Nicholson P, Rezanoor HN. 1994. The use of random am- dows: a software package for the construction and
plified polymorphic DNA to identify pathotype and de- drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Win-
tect variation in Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides. My- dows environment. Comput Applic Biosci 10:569–570.
col Res 98:13–21. Wapshere AJ. 1974. A strategy for evaluating the safety of
Pest Management Regulatory Agency 2001. Regulatory Di- organisms for biological weed control. Ann Appl Biol
rective DIR 2002–02 Guidelines for the registration of 77:201–211.
microbial pest control agents and products. Website: Zhou L, Bailey KL, Derby J. 2004. Plant colonization and
www.hc-sc.gc.ca environmental fate of the biocontrol fungus, Phoma
Petrie GA. 1969. Variability of Leptosphaeria maculans macrostoma. Bio Control 20:634–644.
(Desm.) Ces. & de Not., the cause of blackleg of rape Zimand G, Valinsky L, Elad Y, Chet I, Manulis S. 1994. Use
[Doctoral thesis]. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: University of RAPD procedure for the identification of Trichoder-
of Saskatchewan. ma strains. Mycol Res 98:531–534.