Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- *
South San Francisco Library
3 9048 06663834 1
ucC m
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2017 with funding from
Kahle/Austin Foundation
https://archive.org/details/mushroomsdemystiOOaror_0
ushrooms
Demystified
S.s.F. Public Library
West Orange
840 West Orange Ave
Coin FrnnciSCO, CA 94Q8C
David Arora
Mushrooms
Demystified
A Comprehensive Guide
to the
Fleshy Fungi
SECOND EDITION
1€>
TEN SPEED PRESS
Post Office Box 7123
Berkeley, California 94707
www.tenspeed.com
Distributed in Australia by Simon and Schuster Australia, in Canada by Ten Speed Press Canada, in
New Zealand by Southern Publishers Group, in South Africa by Real Books, and in the United
Kingdom and Europe by Airlift Book Company.
Grateful acknowledgement is made to Alan Snitow of the San Francisco Bay Guardian and to the
Peoples Press, in whose pages some of the introductory material originally appeared.
Arora, David
Mushrooms demystified.
Bibliography.
Includes index.
l.Mushrooms-California-Identification.
2. Mushrooms-Pacific States-Identification.
I. Title
QK617 .A69 1986 589.2’223’09794 86-5917
ISBN-13: 978-0-89815-169-5
ISBN-10: 0-89815-169-4
11 12 13 14 15 - 10 09 08 07 06
The information in this book is accurate to the best of the author’s knowledge.
However, neither the author nor the publisher accepts responsibility for mistakes in
identification or idiosyncratic reactions to mushrooms. It is certainly not necessary to
eat mushrooms in order to enjoy them. People who choose to eat mushrooms do so
at their own risk.
I dedicate this book
with love
to my mother and father,
whose admonitions to me as a teen-ager
to stay away from mushrooms
inspired me to get closer
PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION
THE first edition of Mushrooms Demystified was designed primarily for
California. The second edition is useful throughout the United States and
Canada. The distinction is not as great as it sounds because most of the mush¬
rooms found in California are widely distributed; the text has undergone con¬
siderable change nevertheless. Prominent and distinctive species are included
from all parts of the continent: New England, the South, Midwest, Southwest,
Rocky Mountains, Pacific Northwest, and of course, California. In addition,
the nomenclature has been updated, over 200 new color plates have been added,
most of the original black-and-white photographs have been replaced, and
certain groups such as the truffles are treated in greater detail. One thing that
has not changed is the tone of the tome—I have once again made a special effort
to keep the terminology simple and the language entertaining. The result is a
bigger book, and I think, a better one.
Of course, in trying to become more things to more people, one runs the risk
of becoming less to some. Despite a California slant (intended or not, every
field guide has built-in geographical bias because every author has more field
experience in some regions than others), the inclusion of species from across the
country may disappoint Californians who found the limited scope of the first
edition reassuring. The text and keys are longer because of the larger number of
species covered, but they are not any more difficult to use. Simple geography,
in fact, often facilitates recognition (e.g., Suillus lakei of western North America
and S. pictus, its eastern counterpart).
I have, however, maintained a certain provincial flavor by providing detailed
season and habitat information for the Central California Coast (hereafter
referred to as “our area”). Southern Californians, northern Californians, eastern
Californians, non-Californians, and worldly central Californians may find this
disconcerting, but there are good reasons for doing so. The terrain, climate, and
vegetation of North America are remarkably varied. Anyone who has used or
written books of national scope knows that in striving to cover such a diverse
area, one is often forced to present information in an extremely generalized,
vague way. Just how useful is it to say of a particular mushroom, “found in woods
across the country in spring, summer, fall, or winter,” when in any one area it is
likely to have a favorite host tree and limited fruiting period? Instead of pro¬
viding information on habitat and season that is marginally useful to all readers,
I have decided to supply information that is very useful to readers fortunate
enough to live in or visit “our area,” and marginally useful (i.e., as useful as that
in any other national field guide) to the rest. Besides, any mushroom hunter
worth her salt-and-butter quickly learns when and where mushrooms grow in
her area.
I have tried to make Mushrooms Demystified as accessible as it is compre¬
hensive. For the uninitiated, there are special chapters on mushroom termi¬
nology and classification, when and where to find mushrooms, how to collect
and identify mushrooms, how to use the keys (which are the backbone of the
book), mushroom cookery and mushroom toxins, and what the scientific (Latin)
names of mushrooms mean. The book is comprehensive enough to interest
intermediate and advanced mushroom hunters. However, beginners intimidated
by its length can selectively ignore the more technical discussions and concentrate
on learning the “Seventy Distinctive Mushrooms” listed on pp. 48-51.
In using this book it is important to realize that the identification of mush¬
rooms differs in several key respects from the identification of, say, birds or
wildflowers. For one thing, there is no book that “has them all.” Over 2000
species are described, illustrated, or mentioned in this book—more than in any
other North American field guide—but you will quickly discover that many of
the mushrooms you find are not included in this book and many of the included
mushrooms do not occur in your area (unless it is “our area”). This will be truer
of some regions (e.g., the Southeast) than others, and there is no way it can be
avoided—there are just too many mushrooms! As consolation I offer the words
of Gary Lincoff (author of another national field guide): “It is better for a book
to contain good descriptions of mushrooms that don’t occur in your area than
bad descriptions of ones that do!” As every author has a different set of ex¬
periences to share, I recommend that all mushroom hunters, even those in
California, supplement this book with others, particularly regional guides
(if they exist) because their limited scope enables them to present more specific
information.
It will be many years before we have a complete inventory of North American
mushrooms. More than anything this is a tribute to the elusive nature of mush¬
rooms. They are difficult to study because they are ephemeral and unpredictable,
and so much depends on being in the right place at the right time. It is also a
comment on the fact that few people take mushrooms seriously. As a result, the
documented distribution of the lesser-known mushrooms corresponds to the
undocumented distribution of the better-known “mushroomologists.” Further¬
more, many mushroom species still await classification. While these factors
make identification more difficult, they also add an element of suspense to the
hunt. One is continually finding species that are new to science, or new to North
America, or new to one’s area, or at least new to oneself. Mycology (the study of
fungi) is a field to which discerning amateurs can make significant contributions!
Another important point to realize is that many mushrooms cannot be
positively identified unless you have access to a microscope and technical
literature and know how to use them. Microscopic characteristics are not
stressed in this book. This means that many of the species mentioned briefly are
merely suggestions as to what an unidentified mushroom might be, and many of
the species that are fully described are actually “complexes”—groups of closely
related species whose exact identities are a matter for the specialist.
In other words, I’ve chosen to sacrifice a certain degree of exactitude by inter¬
preting many species broadly. For instance, the description of Agaricus silvicola
embraces a confusing group of white woodland mushrooms with a sweet odor
and yellow-staining skin. Whether or not the “true” A. silvicola occurs in North
America, I see no harm in applying the name to the “complzx”providing readers
are made aware of the situation (for instance, by appending the word “group” to
the name) and any attendant risks. Purists may object to this approach, but there
are many amateurs who would like to apply names to these “complexes” even if
they are unequipped to make the subtler distinctions between species or varieties
within a complex. Those who wish to verify identifications, look up species’
authorities, or otherwise pursue the matter further can do so by making use of the
literature listed in the bibliography. Students and professionals interested in
the more unusual species I have collected can write to me care of the publisher—
I will be happy to furnish the names of herbariums to which specimens have been
sent.
I would also like to say a few words about the title of this book, since there
have been varied reactions to it. One person has stated publicly that mushrooms
cannot be demystified because there is nothing mystifying or mysterious about
them; others have questioned the desirability of demystification and suggested
that I call the second edition “Mushrooms demystified.” I, for one, was first
attracted to mushrooms because I found them mysterious. I still find them
mysterious and I see no danger that this book or any other will deprive them of
their mystery. Mushrooms, like other forms of life, are miracles—miracles
which we can explain but not fully comprehend. Anyone who has studied
anything knows that answers beget questions as surely as questions lead to
answers, that the more one knows about a subject, the larger and more chal¬
lenging it becomes. In addition to being an informative home and field com¬
panion, I hope Mushrooms Demystified will be an inspiration—to look more
closely, ask more questions, seek more answers. Identification, after all, is not
an end in itself, but a means toward acquiring a deeper knowledge and keener
appreciation of our co-inhabitants on this planet.
The selection of color plates reflects my hope that this book will be more than
a tool for identification. Many plates were chosen for their usefulness, but
some were picked for their beauty, dramatic effect, or charm. (A book does little
good if it does not invite one to take it off the shelf!) Mushrooms Demystified is
also a vehicle for expressing my love for (and exasperation with) mushrooms
and for people who love mushrooms, my respect for life and for people who
respect life. Much of the pleasure in getting to know wild mushrooms is directly
attributable to the “wild” companionship of fellow fungophiles, and I have paid
tribute to these folks wherever possible.
Acknowledgments
Mushrooms Demystified is a compilation of information from many diverse
sources. I have acted as assembler and interpreter, supplementing the infor¬
mation with my own knowledge, experience, keys, comments, and photographs,
and binding it together in an accessible, useful, and cohesive (assuming the
pages don’t fall out) form. I get credit for writing the book; the many mycologists
whose monographs and articles form its factual foundation do not. Yet com¬
pared to the vast fund of knowledge painstakingly accumulated by these
mycologists, my own two cents’ worth (15 years, actually) is insignificant. I have
provided a bibliography of primary references, but in the tradition of other field
guides, I have not made extensive use of footnotes or included species’ author¬
ities (the names of those who described them). I would like to express my
appreciation, then, to all the authors listed in the bibliography plus any I have
inadvertently omitted. I want them to know that they have my congratulations
and respect, and I want my readers to know that this book would not have been
possible without their dedicated efforts. If at times I seem irreverent in my
discussions of mushrooms and mycologists, it is only because I am so by nature,
and a sense of humor helps me to cope with the more exasperating aspects of
mushroom scrutiny and book-writing.
I want to extend special thanks to those mycologists who directly contributed
to this book by giving me their time and expertise, providing identifications of
“problem” mushrooms, and offering suggestions on the manuscript. These
mycologists are (in alphabetical order, with the areas in which they have helped):
Prof. Joseph Ammirati of the University of Washington, Cortinarius\ Chuck
Barrows of Santa Fe, New Mexico, mushrooms of the Southwest; Prof. Howard
Bigelow of the University of Massachusetts, Clitocybe and Marasmius; William
Burk of the University of North Carolina, stinkhorns; Dennis Desjardin of
San Francisco State University, Marasmius and Collybia; Prof. Robert Fogel
of the University of Michigan, Hymenogaster and Destuntzia; Prof. Robert
Gilbertson of the U niversity of Arizona, resupinate (crust) fungi and mushrooms
of southern Arizona; Bill Isaacs of Santa Fe, New Mexico, Agaricus and En-
doptychum\ Prof. David Jenkins of the University of Alabama-Birmingham,
Amanita; Rick Kerrigan of the University of California-Santa Barbara,
Agaricus; Prof. David Largent of Humboldt State University, Leptonia,
Nolanea, Entoloma, and Hygrophorus; Herb Saylor of San Francisco State
University, truffles, false truffles, and coral fungi; Prof. Robert Shaffer of the
University of Michigan, Russula,; Prof. Emeritus Alexander Smith of the
University of Michigan, Cortinarius and many other mushrooms; Prof. James
Trappe of the U.S.D.A. Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon,
truffles (especially Tuber) and false truffles; and Greg Wright of Claremont,
California, southern Californian and southwestern mushrooms. Although these
people have been of great assistance in the preparation of this book, any errors
of fact are my responsibility, not theirs.
I am also very grateful to Prof. Isabelle Tavares of the University of California-
Berkeley, for helping me to locate, examine, and photograph various Gastero-
mycetes in the herbarium there; Barbara Waaland and the biology department of
the University of California-Santa Cruz, for providing laboratory facilities;
John Anderson, Charles Prentiss, and John Lane of the Santa Cruz City
Museum, for their longtime support of my studies; Michael Cabaniss of Santa
Cruz, for his fine illustrations; and the many people who helped make this book
as comprehensive as it is by graciously providing the photographs which I lacked:
Chuck Barrows, Alan Bessette, Nancy Burnett, Bill Everson, Michael Fogden,
Ray Gipson, Dan Harper, Richard Homola, Nancy Jarvis, Rick Kerrigan, Joel
Leivick, Keith Muscutt, Herb Saylor, Phil Sharp, Bob Short, Bob Tally, Bob
Winter, Greg Wright, and Joan Zeller.
Many people have played a vital role in the production of the book. I want to
thank Phil Wood and George Young of Ten Speed Press for underwriting the
entire project and having faith in it; Neil Cossman of ASAP Typography for
three years of extraordinary patience and cooperation while the text was being
tyepset and corrected, typeset and corercted, typeset and corrected; Hal Hershey
of Hal Hershey Book Design & Production and Brenton Beck of Fifth Street
Design, for their advice and expertise on the design and layout; and Ralph and
Mildred Buchsbaum of Boxwood Press, whose initial interest in the first edition
made the second edition possible.
Also deserving recognition are the many friends and strangers wno nave neipea
me along in my research. Some have provided me with food, drink, housing, and
companionship during my travels; others have supplied valuable information
or opinions on mushrooms or clues to their whereabouts. Some have even risked
their health or that of their loved ones in order to determine the edibility of
untested mushrooms. Many have braved torrential downpours, suffered severe
cases of poison oak, fought off swarms of mosquitoes and ticks, and trudged
miles out of their way to bring me rare and interesting (as well as uncommonly
delicious) mushrooms. To Ed Aguilar, Mine and Marc Doolittle, Joe and Nancy
Haydock, Mark Hildebrand, Ginny and Rosalie Hunt, Luen Miller, Craig
Mitchell, Ciro and Rose Marie Milazzo, Suzanne and Beanie Rainbow, Bob
Sellers, Sue Willis, Bob Winter, Reggie, Willie, Duke, Max, Butch, Hank, and
all the rest—thank you from the bottom of my basket!
I would also like to thank my parents, Harbans and Shirley Arora, for their
encouragement in all phases of this lengthy project; my legion of ex-housemates
for putting up with my habit of lapsing into Latin monologues at the dinner table
and tolerating a chronic case of “There’s too many fungi in the refrigerator!”;
all those who contributed to the first edition (without which the second would not
be possible); the many readers of the first edition whose letters have brought me
such joy and satisfaction (readers of the second edition, take note!); and any and
all contributors I have forgotten to mention (my propensity for forgetting the
names of important people is equaled only by my propensity for remembering
the names of obscure mushrooms).
Finally, I would like to express the deepest gratitude to my wife, Judith Scott
Mattoon, who, I am pleased to say, did not type a single word of the manuscript
nor provide countless hours of selfless assistance without which this book would
not have been possible. This book, in fact, would have been possible without her,
but our marriage would not. She has been a lovely and lively companion,
steadfast friend, and ruthless editor on those occasions when my literary
capacities deserted me. True, she’d rather forage for Agaricus bisporus in a
grocery store than Craterellus cornucopioides in the forest, but I haven’t given
up on her yet!
David Arora
Santa Cruz
1985
CONTENTS
Fungophobia 1
What Is a Mushroom? 4
Mushrooms and the Environment 6
Names and Classification 8
Collecting Mushrooms 11
Identification and Terminology 14
How to Use the Keys 21
Questions About Mushrooms 23
Which Mushrooms Are Good to Eat? 23
What’s the Difference Between a Mushroom and a Toadstool? 25
When and Where Do Mushrooms Grow? 25
Can People Harm Mushrooms By Picking Them? 26
Can People Harm Themselves By Picking Mushrooms? 27
Do Other Animals Eat Mushrooms? 28
What Is the Nutritional Value of Mushrooms? 30
What Is the Medicinal Value of Mushrooms? 30
Can You Grow Wild Mushrooms? 30
Hey, Maaaaaaaaan, Do Any Psilocybin Mushrooms
Grow Around Here? 31
LBM’s: Little Brown Mushrooms 32
Habitats 34
Seventy Distinctive Mushrooms (A quick-reference check list) 48
Key to the Major Groups of Fleshy Fungi 52
Basidiomycotina (Basidiomycetes) 57
Hymenomycetes 57
Agaricales (Agarics or Gilled Mushrooms) 58
Russulaceae 63
Hygrophoraceae 103
Tricholomataceae 129
Entolomataceae 238
Pluteaceae 253
Amanitaceae 262
Lepiotaceae 293
Agaricaceae 310
Coprinaceae 341
Strophariaceae 367
Cortinariaceae 396
Bolbitiaceae 466
Paxillaceae 476
Gomphidiaceae 481
Boletaceae (Boletes) 488
Aphyllophorales 548
Polyporaceae & Allies (Polypores and Bracket Fungi) 549
Stereaceae & Allies (Crust and Parchment Fungi) 604
Hydnaceae (Teeth Fungi) 611
Clavariaceae (Coral and Club Fungi) 630
Cantharellaceae (Chanterelles) 658
Tremellales & Allies (Jelly Fungi) 669
Gasteromycetes 676
Lycoperdales& Allies (Puffballs and Earthstars) 677
Tulostomatales (Stalked Puffballs) 715
Podaxales & Allies (Gastroid Agarics) 724
Hymenogastrales & Allies (False Truffles) 739
Phallales (Stinkhorns) 764
Nidulariales (Bird’s Nest Fungi) 778
Ascomycotina (Ascomycetes) 782
Discomycetes 783
Pezizales 783
Morchellaceae (Morels and Allies) 784
Helvellaceae (False Morels and Elfin Saddles) 796
Pezizaceae & Allies (Cup Fungi) 817
Tuberales (Truffles) 841
Helotiales (Earth Tongues) 865
Pyrenomycetes (Flask Fungi) 878
Mushroom Cookery 888
Mushroom Toxins 892
What It All Means (A Short Dictionary of Scientific Names) 899
Glossary 913
Bibliography: Suggested Readings and Primary References 919
General Index 926
Genus and Species Index 936
FUNGOPHOBIA
BRING home what looks like a wild onion for dinner, and no one gives it a second
thought—despite the fact it might be a death camas you have, especially if you
didn’t bother to smell it. But bring home a wild mushroom for dinner, and watch
the faces of your friends crawl with various combinations of fear, anxiety,
loathing, and distrust! Appetites are suddenly and mysteriously misplaced, vague
announcements are hurriedly mumbled as to dinner engagements elsewhere, until
you’re finally left alone to “enjoy” your meal in total silence.
For there are few things that strike as much fear in your average American as
the mere mention of wild mushrooms or “toadstools.” Like snakes, slugs, worms,
and spiders, they’re regarded as unearthly and unworthy, despicable and inex¬
plicable—the vermin of the vegetable world. And yet, consider this: out of several
thousand different kinds of wild mushrooms in North America, only five or six
are deadly poisonous! And once you know what to look for, it’s about as difficult
to tell a deadly Amanita from a savory chanterelle as it is a lima bean from an
artichoke.
This irrational fear of fungi is by no means a universal trait. The media and
medical profession have done their part to perpetuate it, but they are certainly not
responsible for its origin. To a large extent, we inherited our fungophobia from
the British. William Delisle Hays, an astute Englishman writing in the 1800’s,
expressed it this way:
(All mushrooms) . . . are lumped together in one sweeping condemnation.
They are looked upon as vegetable vermin only made to be destroyed. No
English eye can see their beauties, their office is unknown, their varieties not
regarded. They are hardly allowed a place among nature’s lawful children,
but are considered something abnormal, worthless, and inexplicable. By
precept and example children are taught from earliest infancy to despise,
loathe, and avoid all kinds of “toadstools.” The individual who desires to
engage in the study of them must boldly face a good deal of scorn. He is
laughed at for his strange taste among the better classes, and is actually
regarded as a sort of idiot among the lower orders. No fad or hobby is
esteemed so contemptible as that of “fungus-hunter,” or “toadstool-eater.”
This popular sentiment, which we may coin the word “fungophobia” to
express, is very curious. If it were human—that is, universal—one would be
inclined to set it down as an instinct, and to revere it accordingly. But it is not
human—it is merely British. It is so deep and intense a prejudice that it
amounts to a national superstition . . .
It is a striking instance of the confused popular notions of fungi in England
that hardly any species have or ever had colloquial English names. They are
all “toadstools,” and therefore are thought unworthy of baptism. Can any¬
thing more fully demonstrate the existence of that deep-rooted prejudice
called here “fungophobia”? . . .
A century later, in America, Alan Snitow echoes similar sentiments in the
San Francisco Bay Guardian:
I wander through Bay Area woods and fields looking for mushrooms. When
I first started, I thought my new hobby offered final proof positive that I am
—well, a weird person. I didn’t know anyone else “into” mushrooms. My
2 FUNGOPHOBIA
friends’ puzzled looks seemed to confirm my view that I must suffer from a
form of repressed necrophilia, a perverse fascination with things rotted
and decayed . . .
(That some mushrooms can be eaten helps) . . . to justify the quest, espe¬
cially to friends who raise their eyebrows at the mention of fungi. If I am off
looking for mushrooms, they think I have a rational purpose to my actions.
Otherwise they would say: “He’s off walking around in the rain again.”
Rather than pitying looks at the soggy human who returns, they see a slightly
eccentric, but productive, worker, toiling to bring back something for the
evening’s table.
Mushrooms can be every bit as beautiful as birds, butterflies, shells, and flowers,
yet we never think to describe them in such flattering terms. When novelists or
poets want to conjure up an emotion of fear, loathing, total revulsion, and
imminent decay, they inevitably drag in the mushrooms and toadstools—
malignant instruments of death and disease that appear only in the dankest and
most abominable of situations. Witness Shelley:
... A sickly autumn shone upon the land. Wet and rotten leaves reeked and
festered under the foul haze. The fields were spotted with monstrous fungi of
a size and colour never matched before—scarlet and mauve and liver and
black—it was as though the sick earth had burst into foul pustules. Mildew
and lichen mottled the walls and with that filthy crop, death sprang also from
the watersoaked earth.
WHAT IS A MUSHROOM?
FUNGI are neither plants nor animals. They don’t contain chlorophyll like
green plants, and as a result cannot manufacture their own food. In this respect
they resemble animals, because they feed themselves by digesting other organic
matter. However, they lack the nervous system, specialized organs, and mobility
characteristic of most animals. Furthermore, fungi reproduce by means of
microscopic reproductive units called spores. These are far simpler in structure
than seeds or eggs, and in fact, usually consist of only one cell.
The term mushroom is most often used to describe the reproductive structure
(fruiting body) of a fungus. In this sense a mushroom, like a potato or
persimmon, is not an organism, but a part of an organism. However, the term
“mushroom” can also mean any fungus which produces a fleshy fruiting body
(that is, one that has substance). By this definition, not all fungi qualify as
mushrooms. Athlete’s foot fungus, bread molds, water molds, yeasts, and
mildews are examples of fungi which do not form fleshy fruiting bodies. The
term “mushroom” can also be applied in a more restricted sense to those fleshy
fungi like the cultivated mushroom whose fruiting bodies bear spores on
radiating blades called gills.
Many fungi are exquisitely constructed, and their life cycles are among the
most complex to be found. It is not the purpose of this book to explore their
biology, but it is necessary to consider briefly how mushrooms grow and
reproduce. All of the mushrooms in this book belong to two subdivisions of the
true fungi. Most of them produce their spores on the exterior of microscopic
club-shaped cells called basidia (singular: basidlum), hence they are called
Basidiomycetes. A smaller number produce their spores inside microscopic
saclike mother cells called asci (singular: ascus), hence they are called
Ascomycetes.
The fruiting bodies of the Basidiomycetes and Ascomycetes vary greatly in
detail and design, but their function is always the same—they perpetuate their
species by disseminating spores. A typical gilled mushroom (the most common
type of fruiting body) is a straightforward structure consisting of a cap, gills,
and (usually) a stalk (see diagram). A protective covering called a veil may also
be present, and if so, will frequently form a ring (annulus) and/or a volva when
it ruptures. The parts of a gilled mushroom are discussed in more detail on pages
14-18, and fruiting bodies of a radically different structure, such as puffballs, are
illustrated and discussed in their respective chapters.
basidium ascus
cap
annulus or ring
(partial veil remnants)
volva
(universal veil remnants)
Parts of a gilled mushroom. Mature Amanita at left has cap, stalk, gills, annulus, and volva. The
partial veil covers the gills when young and breaks to form a ring (annulus) on the stalk, while the
universal veil at first envelops the entire fruiting body and breaks to form a volva (sack, collar, or
series of concentric rings) at base of stalk. Development of fruiting body is shown on pp. 270-271.
At right is a mature Marasmius, which has neither annulus nor volva, but often has an umbo (knob)
on cap.
5
developing spores
basidioles
c^stidia
that after fusion. The four remaining nuclei migrate to the tip of the basidium,
and walls form behind them to produce four spores—two of each strain
(“sex”), each with one nucleus. With their subsequent discharge the life cycle
is completed.
The above life cycle is typical of most Basidiomycetes, except that it is
often complicated by the presence of more than two strains (just as our life cy¬
cle would be unimaginably complicated by the existence of more than two
sexes!). Also, some mushrooms are capable of forming spores asexually.
6
A large fairy ring of Marasmius oreades.
both have gills that deliquesce (liquefy) at maturity. However, the shaggy mane
has a tall, shaggy, cylindrical cap while the inky cap has a smoother, broader,
oval or conical cap; consequently they are recognized as distinct species.
Note the suffixes at the levels above genus: —ceae denotes a family; —ales
indicates an order; and —cetes denotes a class or larger category.
It must be remembered, however, that this elaborate classification scheme is
contrived. It is our attempt at boxing and categorizing nature. There are
common gene pools and definite lines of evolution, but no such clearcut
categories exist. Thus, the definition and interpretation of species, genera,
families, etc., is largely a matter of opinion. Disputes invariably arise, many of
which have not been resolved. For instance, at the genus level and above, there
is the problem of deciding which similarities among fungi are fundamental
(indicators of common origin), and which are coincidental or superficial, or the
result of convergent evolution.* The microscope has been a tremendous help in
uncovering “hidden” similarities, but it has also exacerbated the confusion by
introducing a vast new set of criteria on which to pass judgment. The result is a
nomenclatural nightmare, from the upper echelons of the hierarchy right on
down to the species level.
Mycological literature is as riddled with contradictions as a Suillluspungens is
with maggots. Anyone who has used more than one mushroom book can testify
to the frustration of finding different names applied to the same fungus
(synonyms), or one name applied to several different fungi (homonyms). For
instance, Clitocybe nuda (the blewit) is better known as Lepista nuda, and was
formerly known as Tricholoma nudum.lt has been incorrectly called Tricho-
loma personatum, and in Europe is also known as Rhodopaxillus nudus! For an
even more confusing example, see the list of synonyms for Trametes occidentalis
on p. 550.
This confusion is partly the result of disagreement as to what exacly con¬
stitutes a “genus” or “species”—a difference in philosophy that is known in
taxonomic circles as the battle between the “lumpers” and “splitters.” The
“lumpers” are conservative in their approach. They interpret genera or species
broadly, allowing for a good deal of variation—in other words, they tend to stress
similarities between mushrooms rather than differences. “Splitters,” on the other
hand, are forever describing new genera and species based on the most minute—
but not necessarily insignificant—differences. Both approaches have their
advantages and drawbacks, and both are self-defeating when carried to an
extreme.**
The important thing to realize is that the system of classification used in this
book is by no means definitive. It represents an amalgamation of various inves¬
tigators’ views of the fleshy fungi, plus the overriding consideration of usefulness
to the amateur (since this book is designed for amateurs). Some of the names
used will undoubtedly be invalidated in the near future. A few have not been
validly published and are therefore placed in quotation marks. Synonyms have
been provided and homonyms elucidated. But the inherent advantages of the
binomial system of nomenclature will not be fully realized until stabilization is
achieved and one name is agreed upon for each kind of mushroom. In
exceptional cases like that of the blewit, it is perhaps easiest in the meantime to
use the common English name—if there is one.
*The fins and torpedo-shaped bodies of sharks and killer whales are independent adaptations to a similar en¬
vironment, not indicators of common origin. This phenomenon is called convergent evolution.
**One radical “lumper” I know recognizes only two kinds of mushrooms—the “pickers” and the “kickers” (those
that deserve to be picked, and those that deserve to be kicked!).
11
COLLECTING MUSHROOMS
MUSHROOM hunting is not simply a matter of traipsing through the woods
after it rains. It is an art, a skill, a meditation, and a process. If you proceed at a
careful, deliberate rate, you’ll enjoy much more success than if you rush around
frantically picking whatever mushrooms you see, then stuff them in your basket,
bring the whole mess home and dump it on your table. Mushrooms collected
in this manner are likely to wind up in the garbage, unidentified and unappre¬
ciated.
Don’t just collect, but observe the mushrooms—and their surroundings. In
the process you’ll discover many other clandestine wonders you were previously
unaware of (see photographs on pp. 28-29). Be selective—pick only distinctive
species in good condition. Y ou enhance your chances of successful identification
immeasurably by collecting several specimens of each kind of mushroom. This is
absolutely essential, because you have no other means of assessing variation
within a given species. Since mushrooms decay rapidly and identification can
be a time-consuming process, don’t pick every kind you see. It’s better to fill your
basket with many good examples of a few distinctive species (in which case your
chances of identification are good) than with one or two specimens of many
species (in which case your chances of identification are very poor).
Don’t assume, however, that two mushrooms are the same species simply
because they’re growing together. Judge each on its own merits. If you’re
uncertain, assume for safety’s sake that they’re different, and treat them as such.
As you become more adept at observation, your ability to identify fleshy fungi
will “mushroom”—but only after a solid foundation or “mycelium” of ex¬
perience is laid.
It is far better to learn a few species well than a large number superficially. The
novelty of the “Easter egg” approach wears off quickly as its futility becomes
apparent. If possible, choose a specific quarry for each hunt. Suppose it’s
January and you’re going for a walk in a local live oak woodland. By using the
chart on pp. 48-51 and consulting the description of the blewit (Clitocybe nuda),
you find that the blewit is often abundant under oak in January. The next step is
to familiarize yourself with its fieldmarks: bluish-purple color, stocky stature,
absence of a veil, citrus odor, etc. Your mushroom hunt is thus transformed into
a blewit hunt. Of course, nothing stops you from gathering other interesting
fungi you encounter, but focusing your attention on the blewit insures that you’ll
learn something about blewits even if you don’t find any (namely, that the
locality and/or weather conditions were not conducive to its fruiting).
The desirability of this approach is underscored by the excitement it lends to
the hunt. It is much more gratifying to find something you are specifically trying
to find. And you’ll be more likely to remember what it looks like and where it
grows, so you can return to harvest more. By focusing on several species as the
season unfolds, you will develop a quicker and keener appreciation of what
grows where and what environmental factors they respond to. Many of the more
distinctive species occur throughout the world, so the knowledge you
accumulate will serve you elsewhere!
Always dig up unknown mushrooms so as not to miss the volva, if present. There’s no room for care¬
lessness, as shown here: Agaricus arvensis, at left, lacks a volva and is edible; Amanita ocreata, at
right, is furnished with a volva and is deadly poisonous!
EQUIPMENT
Foraging for fleshy fungi requires little in the way of sophisticated para¬
phernalia. The bare essentials are:
A rigid container for carrying the mushrooms. There’s no point in picking mushrooms
unless you transport them home in decent condition. A broad, shallow basket is best,but a
cardboard box or bucket will do unless it’s raining. Paper bags sag and the mushrooms
get crushed. DON’T USE PLASTIC BAGS! Mushrooms, like people, have to “breathe.”
Plastic bags trap moisture, making the mushrooms “sweat” and rot more rapidly.
Waxed paper is necessary when collecting mushrooms for identification. It provides
support for mushrooms within the basket and also keeps them separated. Never mix
unknown species together. Wrap each type separately and arrange them carefully in the
basket with the heavier ones on the bottom. Tall specimens like Agaricus and Amanita
species will bend unless placed upright (mushrooms exhibit negative geotropism: their
caps turn away from gravity so as to orient the gills downward). Small paper bags are
useful when harvesting familiar edible species, but again, don’t use plastic bags!
A knife or trowel is a must for digging up mushrooms or detaching them from trees. A
knife is also handy for cleaning edible species you are already familiar with, but always dig
up unknown mushrooms so as to ascertain whether or not a volva (sack) or “tap root” is
present. The telltale volva of the deadly Amanitas is usually buried in the ground!
A pencil and small notebook or index cards are useful for taking field notes and spore
prints.
Bread, cheese, and fruit are essential if you’re always hungry like I am. I make a practice
of stocking my basket generously. Then each time I put a mushroom in my basket, I’m
compelled to put something from the basket in my mouth! If you find some edible
Agaricus buttons, put them in a sandwich! Not known for wasting opportunities, the
French carry this tradition one step further—they bring wine, goblets, and a table cloth,
and pause for a picnic every half hour. The advantage of this strategy is obvious—you
needn’t find any mushrooms to have a good time!
12
EQUIPMENT 13
Binoculars are handy in open country (e.g., pastures). They enable you to distinguish at
a distance giant puffballs (Calvatia species) and horse mushrooms (Agaricus arvensis and
A. osecanus) from rocks and other assorted “pseudocarps.” And of course, they allow you
to watch birds and mammals as well.
A three- or four-pronged rake or cultivator and a small hand cultivator are necessary
if you want to find truffles and false truffles, unless you have the services of a truffle
hound or muzzled pig. The rakes will enable you to locate these elusive underground
fungi by sifting through the forest duff and scraping the topsoil beneath it. (But re¬
member: this practice can be unsightly as well as destructive, so don’t do it on a wide¬
spread basis, be discreet, and always cover up the holes you dig.) See the chapter on
truffles for more details.
Other optional equipment includes: a hand lens, compass, stick (for probing brambles
and “mushrumps”), a field guide (for leisurely use on a sunny day), small jars or vials (for
delicate specimens, such as Mycenas), a damp cloth or brush for cleaning edible species,
rainboots and other rain gear, gloves for frigid winter mornings, and photographic
equipment (usually too cumbersome except for special picture-taking expeditions).
FIELD NOTES
Is it growing on the ground or on a log? Is it near a tree? What kind(s)? Are
familiar types of mushrooms growing nearby? Which ones? If it’s growing on
wood, is the wood coniferous or hardwood? Living, recently felled, or in an
advanced stage of decay? If on the ground, is the humus layer deep? Is the ground
disturbed? Is there a road, trail, parking lot, or laundromat nearby?
You should automatically ask yourself these questions every time you find a
mushroom. Observation begins in the field. After all, in picking a mushroom
you are leaving behind the vegetative portion of the fungus. It is folly to depart
without some idea of the niche that fungus occupies in the larger scheme of
things. Field (or mental) notes should include:
Date, weather conditions, abundance (how many times you observed a
particular species), growth habit (solitary, scattered, gregarious, clustered,
in fairy rings, etc.), substrate (humus, soil, grass, moss, dung, wood, etc.),
vegetation (the kinds of trees and shrubs within 50 feet).
If growing on wood: stage of decomposition, type of wood (hardwood or
conifer), type of tree (if discernible), effects on the wood (see chapter on
polypores on p. 549).
If growing on dung: type of dung, stage of decomposition
If growing on ground: type of ground (disturbed, cultivated, hard-packed,
sandy, charred, etc.)
Don’t restrict your observations to specimens that you collect. After you’ve
gathered a representative sampling of a particular species, continue to note its
habitat each time you encounter it.
With terrestrial fungi, it is important to note all types of trees within 50 feet
because mycorrhizal species grow in association with rootlets that may be quite a
distance from the trunk of the host. Usually there are several kinds of trees in the
vicinity, and you have no way of knowing which (if any) is the mycorrhizal
associate. However, through repeated observation many possibilities can be
eliminated. For instance, if you find Suilluspseudobrevipes growing under pine,
you cannot conclude that there is a relationship between the two. But if you find
that Suillus pseudobrevipes always grows with pine and nowhere else, then an
intimate relationship of some kind can be inferred.
14
MACROSCOPIC CHARACTERISTICS
SIZE
Size is important for purposes of comparison. The terms large, medium, small, and
minute cannot be given absolute measurements, but they communicate a characteristic
size range that you will quickly learn to appreciate. The size of a fruiting body is
dependent on three major factors: age, amount of moisture available, and genes. Since
mushrooms grow very quickly, those that fruit during rainy weather are apt to be larger
than those that fruit during a dry spell—subject, of course, to genetic constraints.
The measurements given in descriptions and keys represent average size ranges; those
in parentheses indicate unusual dimensions, but do not take into account extremes due to
extraordinary conditions. The metric system is used, but a conversion rule is provided on
the back cover of this book. Also, it’s easy to remember that 1 inch equals approximately
2j/2 centimeters, or 2 inches equals 5 centimeters (or 50 millimeters).
COLOR
Color is one of the most noticeable features of any fungus, but is also one of the most
deceptive and variable. Unfortunately, beginners tend to attach undue importance to
color at the expense of more critical characteristics. This inevitably leads to
misidentification because many mushroom pigments are highly sensitive to
environmental influence. Direct sunlight or prolonged rain can bleach a mushroom
drastically, and I will never forget my experience following a prolonged rainy spell in
which practically every mushroom growing under redwood had a reddish cap!
(Apparently pigments from the redwood had dissolved in the drip-off and been absorbed
by the mushrooms.) None of these mushrooms would have keyed out properly unless this
phenomenon were taken into account! Color may also depend on age. An immature sea
MACROSCOPIC CHARACTERISTICS 15
gull is brown, while an adult is black and white. Likewise, an immature Hygrocybe conica
is red, orange, or yellow, but blackens as it ages.
Therefore, color should always be used in conjunction with other characteristics. The
most striking feature of Amanita muscaria is its bright red cap, but a slew of other mush¬
rooms are also bright red. Furthermore, Amanita muscaria has a yellow-capped and
white-capped form, and even the red-capped variety will fade to orange or even whitish. It
is the red cap combined with the presence of warts and a volva that render A. muscaria
distinct.
The color of the stalk is not as variable because it is sheltered by the cap, but the gill
color often changes as the spores mature. In fact, the disparity in gill color may be so great
that young and old specimens can be mistaken for different species unless intervening
stages are found.
Describing color is another problem. Color pictures are a great help, of course, but
even they can’t show the degree of variation within a given species. Standardized color
charts are available, but they represent an extra expense and pose problems of their own.
In this book, colors are described using familiar terms where possible, plus a few specific
ones (e.g., vinaceous) which are defined in the glossary.
COLOR CHANGES
The tissue of many mushrooms oxidizes when exposed to the air—that is, it undergoes
one or more color changes when bruised. This may occur instantaneously, like the blueing
of the tubes and flesh in Boletus erythropus, or slowly (over several hours), like the red¬
dening of the flesh in Amanita rubeseens. Bruising reactions should be looked for on the
surface of the cap, gills, and stalk, and on the cut flesh within the cap and stalk.
TEXTURE
The texture of the fruiting body is often significant—i.e., soft, watery, spongy, brittle,
tough, leathery, corky, woody, etc. The dried fruiting bodies of some types (notably
Marasmius) revive completely when moistened.
common lawn lover, is a good example). A dry cap is neither viscid nor hygrophanous. It
often has a dull, unpolished appearance, but will naturally be moist or soggy in wet weather.
Other features to note are: size, shape (p. 17), color and color changes, surface
characteristics (whether smooth, scaly, granulose, fibrillose, warty, etc.), and margin (inrolled,
incurved, straight, or uplifted; and striate, translucent-striate, or not striate).
FLESH
Note color, color changes, texture, thickness, odor when crushed, and taste (don’t
swallow!).
GILLS
Gills (or lamellae) are the thin, radiating blades found on the underside of most
mushrooms, including the commercially cultivated variety. Features to note include: mode of
attachment to the stalk (p. 17), spacing, thickness, depth, forking pattern (if any), and color (in
both immature and mature specimens). Shorter gills (lamellulae) are often interspersed with
longer ones, but they don’t usually have taxonomic significance.
STALK
The stalk is the stemlike structure on which the cap is mounted. Its function is to thrust the
cap above the ground so the spores can be discharged into the air. Many wood-inhabiting
forms lack a stalk because the wood serves the same purpose. The technical term for stalk is
stipe, but I see no reason to clutter our vocabulary with yet another monosyllable starting
with st-. Hereafter, the terms stalk and stem are used interchangeably.
Features to note include: size, color and color changes, shape (p. 17), position (p. 17),
texture (fleshy or cartilaginous, hollow or solid or stuffed with a pith), surface characteristics
(fibrillose, scaly, smooth, etc ), viscidity, and presence or absence of an annulus and volva
(see below). Stalk width should be measured at the top unless otherwise indicated.
VEIL
A veil is a layer of specialized tissue that initially protects the developing mushroom and
then breaks up or collapses so the spores can be released. Some mushrooms have more
than one veil, others have only one veil, and many lack a veil altogether. A persistent veil
leaves visible remnants on the stalk and/or the cap after breaking; an evanescent veil
disappears and consequently can only be detected in the button stage. A membranous veil is
skinlike or kleenexlike and usually persistent; a fibrillose veil is hairy (composed of fine
fibers) and either disappears or forms a belt of collapsed hairs on the stalk; a Cortina is a
cobwebby fibrillose veil; a glutinous (slimy) veil is either evanescent or deposits a layer of
slime on the stalk and/or cap.
There are two basic types of veils: a partial veil (or inner veil) extends from the margin of
the cap to the stalk; it covers the gills (or pores) when young and frequently forms an annulus
(collar or ring) on the stalk. A universal veil (or outer veil), on the other hand, surrounds
most or all of the button mushroom. Sometimes it forms a volva (see below) after breaking;
sometimes it adheres to the underside of the partial veil (as in Agaricus arvensis); in other
instances it forms a “stocking” of scales on the stalk (as in Lepiota clypeolaria), and in still
others it completely disappears. Needless to say, not all veils fit conveniently into one or the
other of these two categories, and in this book the all-encompassing term veil is used for both
universal and partial veils except when the difference between the two is clearcut and of critical
importance (e.g., in Amanita).
ANNULUS
If an annulus (ring) is formed by the veil, note the color, texture (whether membranous or
fibrillose), shape (collarlike, skirtlike, or sheathlike), and position on the stalk (superior or
apical, median, inferior or basal).
MACROSCOPIC CHARACTERISTICS 17
cylindrical
VOLVA
In some mushrooms the universal veil is developed to such an extent that, upon breaking, it
leaves visible remains at the base of the stalk in the form of a sack, free collar, or series of
concentric scales or rings. These remains are called the volva. The different types of volvas are
illustrated under Amanita on p. 264. Volvariella, the stinkhorns, and certain stalked
puffballs also have a volva. If small pieces of volval (universal veil) tissue adhere to the
cap, they are called warts; a large piece of tissue is called a volval patch.
MYCELIUM
The mycelium is a loosely organized mass of threadlike cells (hyphae) which are invisible
to the naked eye except when they bundle together to form thicker strands (called
rhizomorphs). Close scrutiny of the forest humus will usually reveal the presence of
numerous mycelial strands, but they are virtually indistinguishable from each other without
fruiting bodies present. There are a few exceptions, like Chlorosplenium aeruginascens, an
Ascomycete which stains its substrate (a log or piece of wood) bluish-green. As a rule,
however, it is the fruiting body alone that provides clues to the identity of a fungus. This is one
reason why the classification of mushrooms has lagged behind that of plants—we’re
handicapped at the outset because our studies are restricted to only one aspect of the
organism, its “fruit.”
down in the basket in such a way that it won’t be crushed. By the time you get home you’ll have
a spore print!
There are several short cuts for determining spore color, but I recommend them only for
experienced collectors because they are not completely reliable. When mushrooms grow in a
cluster, the lowermost caps will often be covered with spore dust from the upper ones (a wet
finger will remove it). Spores borne aloft by air currents will often coat the cap of any
mushroom, and falling spores are often trapped by the veil remnants (if present) or by the
stalk, especially if it is sticky.
Spore color is traditionally broken down into several broad categories, and assigning your
spore print to the correct category can be tricky at first. For instance, don’t expect “pink”
spores to be bright pink or “purple-brown” spores to be purple. “Pinkish” spores are really
closer to flesh-color, while “purple-brown” describes spores which could just as well be called
“oil-slick aubergine” (deep brown in mass and dark reddish-brown under the microscope).
Only through practice and comparison will you learn to assess the color of a spore print
correctly. The thickness of the spore print also affects the color (the heavier the deposit, the
darker it will be), as does the moisture content.
Always take a spore print on white paper (a colored background distorts color perception).
White spores will show up on white paper when viewed at an angle. Or you may wish to
position the cap so that half of it is on white paper and half on black. Special cards can be
designed for this purpose.
MICROSCOPIC CHARACTERISTICS
The microscope has had a great impact on the taxonomy of fungi, especially in the last fifty
years. However, the vast majority of people do not have access to a microscope, so
microscopic features are not stressed in this book. For those who do have a microscope, spore
characteristics (shape, size, and ornamentation) have been listed for each species, as spores are
the most easily seen microscopic cells. Spore size is measured in microns (or micrometers).
A micron is one thousandth of a millimeter. For each family or order of mushrooms, some
typical spores have been illustrated—not for the purpose of identification so much as to give
those without a microscope an idea of what they look like.
Other microscopic criteria used in the taxonomy of gilled mushrooms may be even more
divergent convergent
significant than spore characters, but are not as easily observed. These criteria include:
orientation of the hyphae in the gill tissue, structure of the cap cuticle, and shape and size of
cystidia (specialized sterile cells) on the gills, stalk, and cap.
Spores can be examined by taking spore dust from a spore print and mounting it on a slide
with a drop of water and a cover slip. Cystidia, basidia, and gill hyphae are best seen by
making a thin cross-section of a gill with a razor blade and mounting it in a similar manner
(it takes practice!). The cap cuticle, cap tissue, and stalk are also best observed
in cross-section
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The ways in which mushrooms react to different chemicals have also assumed great
importance in their classification. For instance, the genus Lyophyllum was erected to embrace
various white-spored agarics whose basidia contain granules that darken when heated in
aceto-carmine. Since most people are not equipped to conduct tests of this sort, they are not
stressed in this book. But there are two particularly useful chemicals that every serious
mushroom hunter should try to get: a 5-10% aqueous solution of potassium hydroxide
(KOH), and an iodine solution called Melzer’s reagent (see the glossary for formula). Spores
which stain bluish-gray to bluish-black in Melzer’s reagent are said to be amyloid. Spores
which turn brown or reddish-brown are dextrinoid. Many spores are neither amyloid nor
dextrinoid. The test is most useful on spores that are not deeply colored to begin with. It is
easily observed under the microscope, but can also be assessed by placing spore dust on a glass
slide (paper itself may be amyloid), treating it with Melzer’s reagent, then holding the slide
over a piece of white paper in order to easily see the color change, if any (the reaction
takes place within a few minutes). One of the ingredients in Melzer’s reagent, chloral hydrate,
is difficult to obtain, but other iodine solutions can be used in a pinch.
For ornamental purposes, mushrooms can be freeze-dried or encased in cubes ofplasticresin. Orthey
can be sliced and pressed in a book, like this Chroogomphus. Preserving mushrooms for consumption
is discussed in the chapter on mushroom cookery (p. 888).
21
5. Object moving of its own accord when poked, with four stumps or
projections on its underside . rabbit
5. Not as above.hat
Now let’s pretend you’re trying to identify a rabbit. You should always begin with
the first couplet, which in this case asks you to decide whether or not the object is
yellow. Presumably you’ll choose “not yellow.” Then, as indicated to the right of
“object not yellow,” you proceed to couplet #4 (thereby skipping #’s 2 and 3). Since
the object is not purple and spiny, you move on to #5. At this juncture you are
confronted with a more difficult decision. Does the object move of its own accord
when poked and have four “stumps” (legs)? If so, it is a rabbit, at least according to
the key.
But keys can be worthless unless accompanied by detailed descriptions. For
instance, if you tried to identify a tiger using this key, you would arrive at “rabbit.”
Unless a description of a rabbit is provided, you have no way of knowing whether it
22 HOW TO USE THE KEYS
is indeed a rabbit you have, or an entity not included in the key. Furthermore, if the
word “edible” or “harmless” appeared next to “rabbit,” you would find yourself in
serious trouble. Imagine the consequences of attempting to eat a tiger under the
mistaken impression that it is a rabbit (more likely the tiger would eat you!).
Similarly, a good key to mushrooms does not contain information on edibility.
Instead it refers you to a detailed description of the mushroom. Always compare the
mushroom you are trying to identify with the appropriate description as indicated in
the key (in a few cases, no page number is given, which means that the mushroom is
not treated or described beyond the key). Resist the urge to “fit” the mushroom to the
description or vice-versa. A major discrepancy between your mushroom and the
description has three possible explanations:
(1) IT IS THE MUSHROOMS’ FAULT. Mushrooms have not seen pictures or
descriptions of themselves, and do not know what they are “supposed” to look like
(even if they did know, why should they look the way they are supposed to—would
you?). We can only summarize what a given species usually looks like. A good key
will allow for a certain degree of variation. For instance, you will notice in the sample
key that “hat” appears twice, because some hats are yellow and others, thank God,
are not. The key does not account for other possibilities, however. Suppose you have
a dead rabbit. Since it does not “move of its own accord when poked,” it would be a
hat according to the key. Or supposing you find a peeled banana, or a blackened
banana (the kind my father likes to eat). It will not be yellow, and consequently will
not key out properly. A better key would account for these possibilities, but a key
cannot account for every possible variation without becoming hopelessly unwieldy.
At first you’ll have difficulty assessing just what is typical and what is not. The only
solution to this problem is to use several specimens of each type of mushroom—at
different stages of development if possible. You are then in a better position to decide
what is typical (i.e., if you have ten rabbits and one of them is dead, you conclude
there is something “wrong” with the dead one, and still use the key correctly.)
(2) IT IS YOUR FAULT. People often go astray because they misread a couplet
or inadvertently go to the wrong number, or exercise poor judgment. There are
several ways to minimize these mistakes. First and foremost, always read both
statements in a couplet before deciding which one is true. Second, if you are unsure
of your choice (as you undoubtedly will be at times), make a notation and choose the
one that seems most likely. If it later proves to be wrong, you can go back and try the
other choice. Remember the purpose of a key is not to identify, but to eliminate.
There are more than 1000 possibilities as to what any unknown mushroom can be. If
the keys eliminate 996 of these possibilities, they have done their job. It is then up to
you to carefully compare the descriptions of the remaining three or four species, and
decide which—if any—is the correct one. In this respect, keys are like mazes—if you
arrive at a dead end, you can always turn around and go back!
Another pitfall to be aware of is language. Watch for qualifiers such as and, if
usually, sometimes, generally, typically, when young, and at maturity; i.e., “often”
does not mean “always,” and “typically” means “most often.” Also watch out for the
statement “not as above,” as in the following excerpt from a dichotomous key to the
poems of an obscure but brilliant Santa Cruz poet.
1. Poem with a pointed social comment .2
1. Not as above.. .77
HOW TO USE THE KEYS 23
In this case, “not as above” means “social comment absent, or if present, then not
pointed.” However, if the first statement in the couplet said “social commment
present, often pointed,” then “not as above” would translate as “social comment
absent.”
(3) IT IS THE KEY’S FAULT. If you have followed the key correctly, and are
certain your mushroom(s) is not aberrant, then a discrepancy between the
mushroom and the description means either that the key is flawed (no key is perfect)
or that you have a mushroom that is not included in the keys (no mushroom book is
complete and none should pretend to be—our inventory of mushrooms is still in the
preliminary stages!). You may then either consult another book in hopes of finding
it, seek the counsel of a mushroom expert, discard it altogether, or give it an informal
name of your own.
In addition to aiding in identification, keys can be effective teaching devices. In
keying out a mushroom (instead of being told what it is or leafing through a bunch of
pictures), you are forced to judge critically and develop an eye for detail. By the time
you’ve keyed out a mushroom, you will have accumulated a considerable amount of
information on what it is, as well as what it is not. You learn things about it that
might otherwise go unnoticed. For instance, in keying out a banana slug using the
sample key, you must try to peel it—something you ordinarily would not do. You
would then learn that a banana slug does not peel easily. Another challenging
activity is to try devising keys yourself—to common mushrooms, household objects,
or people you know. You’ll discover that it’s not as easy as it looks!
* Mushroom hunters can be experienced without being knowledgeable. A knowledgeable hunter knows the names
of the mushrooms she eats as well as those of all poisonous look-alikes.
Even relatively sophisticated devices such as this “Toadstool Tester” are unreliable. There is no
substitute for caution, experience, and a fundamental familiarity with the fleshy fungi.
cardinal rule is: Don’t eat any mushroom unless you are absolutely sure of its
identity! Or—WHEN IN DOUBT, THROW IT OUT! In other words, you’re
better off not eating an edible mushroom than eating a poisonous one, and it’s
more important not to eat a poisonous mushroom than to eat an edible one.
Empirical approaches such as the “silver coin” test are without exception pure
poppycock. The lethal Amanitas do not blacken silver (fortunately, silver coins
are a rarity nowadays, so this fallacious test is more difficult to carry out).
Mushrooms partially eaten by mammals or insects are not necessarily fit for
human consumption (one animal’s meat is another’s poison). Mushrooms that
smell and taste good are not necessarily edible (again, the deadly Amanitas are
said to be delicious.
Most insidious of all is the “intuitive” approach now in vogue. Intuition can
play a part in finding mushrooms, but not in determining their edibility. It is a
sad comment on our times that intuition is so often peddled as a substitute for
critical observation. If our intuitions were infallible insofar as mushrooms are
concerned, there would be no need for books on the subject. It takes
commitment and a good deal of conscious effort to identify mushrooms
correctly. The “intuitive” approach is appealing, I suspect, precisely because it
promises a maximum amount of satisfaction for a minimum amount of effort.
24
25
number is fairly small), and they augment this claim with the specious argument
that they are providing a service to the public, i.e., making wild mushrooms
available to a larger audience, or at least to more than just a select few. (The
“select few”, in this case, is almost any ambulatory person who wants to learn
about mushrooms; the “larger audience” is anyone who has extra money with
which to buy wild mushrooms, which are never cheap!)
The “select few,” on the other hand, profess concern about over-picking and
the possibility that certain edible species will be driven to extinction. However,
there is no hard evidence to suggest that the latter is happening—or about to
happen. I suspect what is really upsetting these mushroom hunters is that
their habitual stomping grounds are being ravaged by commercial exploi¬
tation. This is a perfectly legitimate concern, if you ask me, for there is
hard evidence that some—perhaps only a few—commercial pickers have not
only “raided” but completely “cleaned out” areas where mushroom hunters with
less time or mobility have been foraging for years. There ought to be enough
mushrooms out there to support both commercial and personal picking, but
mushroom hunting is one of many activities where a single selfish, inconsiderate
boor can spoil it for everyone else. So, you selfish inconsiderate boors—you
know who you are! (Or if you don’t, we do!)
Returning, then, to the original question—mushrooms are a renewable
resource, and the only sure way to eradicate a species is to eliminate its habitat
(which, unfortunately, is becoming a common practice as wild areas succumb to
pollution and the appetite of developers). So don’t feel guilty about picking
mushrooms, but don’t, on the other hand, pick more than you can use (COLOR
PLATES 79, 81). Respect the environment and be considerate of those who
follow in your footsteps—you may be one of them!
Poison oak (left) and poison ivy are the banes of many a would-be mushroom hunter. The leaves grow
in threes, but are shed during the winter! If you’re allergic to them, shower thoroughly afterevery hunt
and put your clothes in the wash. Ticks (right) and boletivores (see p. 546) also cause problems.
Rattlesnakes are known to lurk near or under mushrooms, especially large boletes, and they do not
always take kindly to being disturbed. (Maybe that’s why boletivores carry long sticks!)
hands after prolonged contact with deadly Amanitas, but poisonous mush¬
rooms can cause harm only if ingested. There are, however, some corollary
dangers to mushroom hunting—see photos above and on previous page!
One of the unsung rewards of mushroom hunting is the discovery of a host of other fantastic clan¬
destine creatures. Some of these, like slugs, love to munch on mushrooms. Others, like mantises and
millipedes, use them for shelter or hiding places. Left: A banana slug grazing peacefully in a “fungal
jungle” of oyster mushrooms. Right: A praying mantis, up close and personal.
Close-up of a banana slug grazing on an oyster mushroom. Banana slugs can also be seen in Color
Plates 57 & 152, and at the bottom of p. 28.
along the way. Many other insects feed on fungi, including springtails and
various beetles, and flies like nothing better than to feast on stinkhorn slime.
Sowbugs seem to be very fond of Agaricus augustus. Slugs gormandize
mushrooms whenever possible (COLOR PLATES 57 & 152) and have special
“fungus-detectors” to aid them in the search. Tortoises have been known to
interrupt their imperturbable peregrinations to munch on a mushroom or two.
Rodents—particularly squirrels and chipmunks—ae confirmed fungophiles.
They’re fanatically fond of various boletes and agarics and those odoriferous
underground fungi called truffles and false truffles. (A study by Joseph Hall of
San Francisco State U niversity revealed that the summertime diet of the Kaibab
squirrel of Arizona consists almost entirely of fungi; during the summer captive
Kaibab squirrels rejected other food when mushrooms were made available.)
Pigs have a passion for true truffles. In Europe they are used to hunt them
down, but have to be muzzled so they don’t devour them (see p. 842)! Even the
ruminants—cattle, deer, etc.—occasionally indulge. I have seen cows grazing on
giant puffballs, and Siberian reindeer are addicted to Amanita muscaria (like
humans, they experience profound mental disturbances after eating it). They are
also said to be extremely fond of human urine, and is it coincidence that the
Siberians who ate A. muscaria also made a practice of drinking their own urine
in order to recycle the intoxicants? R. G. Wasson, in SOMA: The Divine
Mushroom of Immortality, quote Vladimir Jochelson, a Russian
anthropologist:
The reindeer have a keen sense of hearing and smell, but their sight is rather
poor. A man stopping to urinate in the open attracts reindeer from afar,
which, following the sense of smell, will run to the urine, hardly discerning
the man, and paying no attention to him. The position of a man standing up
in the open while urinating is rather critical when he becomes the object of
attention from reindeer coming down on him from all sides at full speed.
29
30
by no means the first. That honor belongs to certain ants and termites who raise
fungi in their nests. On almost any walk through a tropical rain forest you can
see long files of leaf-cutting ants carrying bits of leaves to their nests. These leaves
are not food for the ants, but food for fungi upon which the ants feed!
33
An oak woodland, with clusters of honey mushrooms (Armiliariella mellea) in the foreground.
(Nancy Burnett)
HABITATS
DEVELOPING an awareness of biological communities is essential to any
nature study. In this chapter, some of the more common or distinctive
mushrooms are grouped according to habitat—the type of place where they’re
most likely to be found, or the type of tree with which they commonly grow. The
environmental aspect of collecting is frequently neglected by mushroom
hunters, who eagerly remove mushrooms from their place of growth without
taking note of their surroundings. In many instances the place of growth will
provide clues to the identity of the mushroom—and you’ll soon discover that
certain mushrooms always seem to grow together; that is, they are indicators of a
certain habitat or biological community.
Most of the habitats discussed here are named according to dominant
vegetation (oak, redwood, grass, etc.). Since only a few of our local trees are
significant in mushroom identification, it makes a lot more sense to learn those
trees before you learn the mushrooms, rather than trying to differentiate
between several hundred kinds of mushrooms before learning the basic trees.
Always bear in mind that the different habitats discussed here overlap, so that
in a given area there are usually several habitats present. For instance, a lawn with
a Monterey pine will feature grass-loving fungi as well as species mycorrhizal with
pine. And a road through the woods will offer many types of mycorrhizal or
humus-inhabiting mushrooms plus those that grow in disturbed ground (the
roadside). Be sure to check the list of cosmopolitan mushrooms (“Anywhere and
Everywhere”), for these will turn up in almost any habitat. Also remember that
mycorrhizal fungi do not necessarily grow under their host—they are associated
with the tree’s rootlets, which may be quite a distance away from the trunk. The
habitats described in the following pages include several widespread ones (e.g.,
lawns or disturbed ground) and several specific to our area (e.g., cypress and
redwood). Space does not permit an exhaustive discussion of forest trees outside
our area, but a few are briefly dealt with under the heading “Other Trees.”
34
35
The name “Douglas-fir” is hyphenated in this book because it is not really a fir. It is
easily told from redwood (with which it often occurs locally) by its browner bark, spurred
cones, and habit of dropping needles without twigs intact (redwood drops twigs with
the reddish needles intact).
copelandi), which is often smelled before it is seen. The best edibles are Agaricus
silvicola, Armillaria ponderosa, Pleurotus ostreatus (on decaying logs), Boletus aereus,
Boletus appendiculatus, Russula cyanoxantha, and Craterellus cornucopioides.
RIPARIAN WOODLAND
Streams and rivers being indisputably damp, many people assume they constitute an
ideal setting for mushrooms. The mixed hardwoods (alder, cottonwood, willow, maple,
etc.) of our stream valleys and ravines do indeed support a characteristic fungus flora, but
it is a surprisingly modest one that does not yield the bountiful harvests of our oak and
pine forests. Log-rotters abound (Pholiota, Psathyrella, Naematoloma, Armillariella,
Pleurotus, etc.), while the best edibles are Armillariella mellea and Pleurotus ostreatus in
the fall and winter, Verpa and Morchella species in the spring.
Armillariella mellea Marasmiellus candidus Pluteus species
Clathrus archeri Morchella species Psathyrella species
Clavaria vermicularis Mycena species Sarcoscypha coccinea
Coprinus micaceus Naematoloma species Stropharia ambigua
Disciotis venosa Pholiota species Verpa bohemica
Flammulina velutipes Pleurotus ostreatus Verpa conica
39
40 HABITATS
OTHER TREES
Only a few of our native trees have been discussed so far, but the remaining types are
not particularly significant from a mushroom identification standpoint. That is, the
mushrooms they harbor (either beneath or on them) are likely to be cosmopolitan (see the
“Anywhere and Everywhere” category). For instance, almost nothing fungal grows
under bay laurel, but the Ganoderma applanatum group (especially G. brownii) is
abundant on bay laurel as well as many other trees. Similarly, species of Laccaria
(omnipresent mushroom “weeds”) occur in droves under acacia, while the bush lupines
along the coast harbor nice crops of Flammulina velutipes and a brown-capped form of
Pleurotus ostreatus (both edible), and huckleberry is home to Cortinarius balteatus and
the C. cylindripes group.
A few trees of special interest to mushroom hunters that do not occur locally are
discussed briefly below, but space does not permit a detailed listing of their fungal
associates.
SPRUCE (Picea)—The Sitka spruce stands of coastal northern California and the
Pacific Northwest and the spruce forests of the North, Southwest, and Rocky Moun¬
tains are phenomenally rich in mycorrhizal mushrooms, particularly species of Russula
and Cortinarius and the delectable Boletus edulis. A sizable number of spruce addicts
have already been listed under pine; these species are excluded from the following list.
Agaricus smithii Clavariadelphus species Lactarius scrobiculatus
Albatrellus confluens Clitocybe odor a Leccinum species
Albatrellus ovinus Cortinarius species Macowanites americanus
Armiliaria albolanaripes Gomphidius glutinosus Phaeocollybia species
Armillaria caligata Gomphus species Phellodon species
Boletus pulcherrimus Hydnum species Polyozellus multiplex
Boletus rubripes Hygrophorus agathosmus Rhizopogon parksii
Calvatia fumosa Hygrophorus capreolarius Russula species
Calvatia subcretacea Hygrophorus olivaceoalbus Russula xerampelina
Cantharellus cibarius Hygrophorus pudorinus Tricholoma saponaceum
Catathelasma imperialis Lactarius alnicola Tricholoma virgatum
Catathelasma ventricosa Lactarius representaneus Tylopiluspseudoscaber group
Clavaria purpurea
OTHER TREES 41
FIR (Abies)—Firs, like hemlocks, usually occur in association with other conifers.
They feature many of the same fungi as their close relatives, the spruces. Some species,
however, seem to favor fir over other conifers. These include:
JUNIPER (Juniperus)—Junipers favor arid habitats (at least in the West) and have
few if any mycorrhizal mates. Therefore, as might be expected, they offer a rather meager
selection of fleshy fungi: a few saprophytes (e.g., Geastrum and Tulostoma species) plus
some wood-rotters (e.g., Daedalea juniperinus, Gloeophyllum striatum, Truncospora
demidoffii). Several of the species listed under cypress and “Sand and Deserts” also
occur under juniper.
CEDAR and INCENSE CEDAR (Thuja and Libocedrus)—Cedars and incense cedars
are not “true” cedars. The “true” or Old World cedars are members of the pine family,
whereas American cedars have scales rather than needles and are more closely related
to juniper and cypress. Our “cedars” harbor several unique fungi (e.g., Tyromyces
amarus, which causes a heart rot of incense cedar), but they have few if any mycorrhizal
mates. Like redwood and cypress, they are blessed mostly with puny saprophytes that
grow best in a mushroom-poor environment (e.g., Leptonia and Hygrocybe species).
BIRCH (Betula)—As any northerner will tell you, birch has dozens of mycorrhizal
associates. In California it does not occur naturally, but planted trees in lawns
and parks often feature Lactarius torminosus, Lactarius pubescens, and/or Paxillus
involutus. Birch forests, on the other hand, are rich in other Lactarii as well as Russulas,
Amanitas, and tasty Leccinums. Several of the more distinctive birch lovers are:
Lactarius pubescens (see comments under L. torminosus on p. 73), left, and Paxillus involutus
(see p. 477), right, commonly grow on lawns where birches have been planted. Both are poisonous,
at least raw, and both have a strongly inrolled cap margin when young.
Polyporus badius (p. 562) is a small polypore that commonly grows on dead aspen. Note dark cap,
dark stalk, and minute whitish pores.
ASPEN, POPLAR, and WILLOW (Populus and Salix)—In summer the aspen forests of
northern and western North America are excellent foraging grounds for fungi, and in the
fall they put on a dazzling display of leaf color (COLOR PLATE 25). Aspens are not close
relatives of birches, but resemble them in several ways. For instance, both kinds of trees
tend to have whitish bark and a northern distribution, and both feature many species of
Leccinum (all edible) as well as the usual panoply of Russulas and Cortinarii. Cotton¬
woods (poplars) are in the same genus (Populus) as aspens, but usually occur near water.
Among their mycorrhizal mates are the edible Tricholoma populinum; wood-rotters
include Pholiota destruens and sometimes massive clumps of delectable oyster mush¬
rooms (Pleurotus ostreatus). Willows (Salix) are closely related to cottonwoods and
often mingle with them; consequently their fungal flora is similar. A few of the more
distinctive and prominent species associated with aspen, poplar, and willow are:
42
Left: This “meadow muffin” (chunk of cow dung) shows extensive mycelial growth. The mushrooms
belong to the Agrocybe pediades group (p. 468). Right: This is one clump of Lentinusponderosus
(p. 143) that won’t be eaten!
PASTURES
Pastures and meadows offer a wide selection of easily identified edible mushrooms,
notably Agaricus campestris, A. cupreobrunneus, A. arvensis, A. crocodilinus, and the
A. osecanus group, plus Lepiota naucina and Calvatia species. Every fall there is a period
of about one month when our grazed pastures are chock-full of mushrooms, and
there is often another crop in the spring. The following list excludes mushrooms
associated with trees (such as Amanita velosa), which frequently fruit at the edges of
pastures, as well as those that grow on dung. It’s interesting to note that several species
which appear in pastures do not often grow on lawns (and vice versa).
43
Don’t overlook your toolshed when looking for mushrooms! This hefty morel would have rotted
away uneaten if my wife hadn’t insisted that it was my turn to mow the lawn.
INDOORS
In some cases a mushroom hunt can begin inside your house. The brown cup fungus,
Peziza domiciliana, is commonly found on walls, floors, carpets, tile, and plaster. Lepiota
lutea consistently pops up in flower pots, though it sometimes finds its way outdoors.
44
INDOORS 45
Several fungi are pests of structural timber (e.g., Serpula lacrymans), and a mysterious
Coprinus invaded the floor of my ’67 Chevy Nova. However, the majority of fungi found
indoors occur outside as well.
DISTURBED GROUND
“Disturbed” ground means roadsides, pathsides, gardens, vacant lots, building sites,
and the perimeters of parking lots. Of course, it overlaps with lawns and gardens (or
“cultivated ground”), but we do have a very distinct roadside fungus flora exemplified by
the shaggy mane (Coprinus comatus).
Just what makes certain mushrooms prefer (or even require) disturbed ground is a
mystery. Obviously, the process of disrupting, overturning, or paving the soil must release
certain otherwise inaccessible nutrients, and perhaps the moisture-absorbing properties
and/or pH of the soil are changed. An unsurpassed edible mushroom like Agaricus
augustus could be raised commercially if this puzzle were solved. Some mushrooms, such
as the Lyophyllum decastes group, seem to require disturbed ground whereas other
mushrooms only prefer it. Some show a liking for asphalt and will even poke up through
it—notably Coprinus comatus, Lyophyllum decastes, Agaricus bitorquis, Pisolithus
tinctorius, and Scleroderma geaster. Shaggy manes have even ruined tennis courts!
One asset of these fungi is that they’re easily spotted from the road (or trail).
Consequently, they are tailormade for people who have an extreme allergy to poison oak.
And many are worth stopping for!—Agaricus augustus, A. bitorquis, Coprinus comatus,
Lepiota naucina, Lepiota rachodes, and Lyophyllum decastes. The following list does
not include species that commonly occur in undisturbed as well as disturbed ground.
BURNED AREAS
Many plants are adapted to growing in burned-over areas. The cones of the knobcone
pine, for instance, release their seeds only when subjected to extreme heat. Similary,
certain mushrooms fruit only in burnt ground, and others show a definite fondness for it.
After the eruptions of Mt. St. Helens, mushrooms were among the first organisms to
“colonize” the devasted slopes of the volcano, and the most reliable way to cultivate
morels is still to set fire to some woods and return the following spring! (This practice
actually had to be outlawed in Europe.)
SNOWBANKS
The mountains of western North America feature a very characteristic collection of
spring fungi. Some are popularly known as “snowbank mushrooms” because they fruit
around the edges of melting snowbanks; others are more common shortly after the snow
has disappeared. The “snowbank mushrooms” and other spring fungi are more
dependent on snowmelt than rain for their moisture, but the latter can also have a
stimulating effect. Obviously, the higher you go, the later the snow melts, so that in some
areas the spring “snowbank” flora doesn’t appear until early or even mid-summer.
This is one category in which Ascomycetes are more preponderant than
Basidiomycetes. Morels (Morchella species) and false morels (Gyromitra and Helvella
species) are what make the spring fungus flora famous, but dozens of other species occur
also. Many of the larger agarics develop under the duff and show themselves only as low
mounds or “mushrumps” in the humus. The following list includes some typical
“snowbank mushrooms,” plus many that fruit within a month after the snow disappears.
The list does not include fungi with perennial fruiting bodies or species such as Boletus
edulis that may occur in the spring but are more common in the summer and fall.
Lyophyllum montanum (p. 175) usually grows nearly melting snow in the spring.
SNOWBANKS 47
SPECIALIZED HABITATS
Without specialization there would be far less diversity and little—if any—evolution.
All fungi are to some extent specialized, but in some cases the specialization is more
bizarre or extreme—or at least more apparent to us. For instance, it is said that certain
poorly known Laboulbeniomycetes grow only on the left anterior appendage (left front
foot) of their insect host!
Some kinds of fleshy fungi grow only in deep moss or in Sphagnum bogs. Others
grow exclusively on other mushrooms: Asterophora species, Claudopus parasiticus,
Collybia tuberosa, Collybia racemosa, Collybia cookei, Collybia cirrhata, Volvariella
surrecta, Boletus parasiticus, Psathyrella epimyces, and Hypomyces species. Cordyceps
species parasitize insects and certain truffles; and several Omphalina species are asso¬
ciated with algae. Many wood-rotters can grow on cones, but Auriscalpium vulgare
(as well as Baeospora myosura and several Strobilurus species) are restricted to cones.
The very specialized niche has helped Auriscalpium to survive, but if and when conifers
disappear from the earth (as they are slowly doing), so will Auriscalpium!
49
Boletus aereus is one of many delectable boletes. These young specimens are easily recognized by
their white pore surface and dark cap that is covered with a fine whitish bloom.
50
SEVENTY DISTINCTIVE MUSHROOMS 51
BASIDIOMYCETES
longitudinal section
showing the tube layer
ASCOMYCETES
56
57
Basidiomycetes
BASIDIOMY COTIN A
THE Basidiomycetes are a large group (subdivision) of fungi that bear spores on (but not
inside) specialized cells called basidia. Two major classes of Basidiomycetes produce
fleshy fruiting bodies or “mushrooms”—the Hymenomycetes and the Gasteromycetes,
keyed below. Other classes of Basidiomycetes, such as the rusts and smuts, are not treated
in this book.
Key to the Basidiomycetes
1. Basidia and spores borne externally (on the exposed surfaces of gills, tubes, spines, branches,
lobes, etc.); spores forcibly discharged at maturity, i.e., a spore print often (but not always)
obtainable; fruiting body with a cap and stalk, or clublike, or branched, orbracketlike, or crust¬
like (without a stalk or sometimes without a cap) or lobed or bloblike, etc.2
1. Basidia and spores borne internally (inside the fruiting body or inside a spore case or small cap¬
sules); spores not forcibly discharged, thus a spore print unobtainable Gasteromycetes, p. 676
2. Fruiting body at first egglike with a gelatinous interior, the outer skin then breaking and an
unbranched (often phallic), branched, or lattice-like fruiting body emerging; spores contained
in a greenish to brown or black, foul-smelling slime that coats all or part of the fresh fruiting
body (but slime dispersed by flies or rain); gills and tubes absent .. . Gasteromycetes, p. 676
2. Not as above .Hymenomycetes, below
HYMENOMYCETES
IN this large divison of the Basidiomycetes the spore-bearing cells (basidia) form a layer
or palisade (hymenium) on an exposed surface or surfaces of the fruiting body, and the
spores are forcibly discharged at maturity. Terrestrial forms are usually furnished with a
cap and stalk, but many of the wood-inhabiting types are shelflike, hooflike, bracketlike,
crustlike, or bloblike. In the more primitive forms the hymenium is smooth to slightly
wrinkled or warted, while in the more specialized (advanced?) types it takes the form of
gills, tubes, spines, or upright branches.
The Hymenomycetes are traditionally divided into two orders: the Agaricales include
the gilled mushrooms (agarics) and fleshy tube fungi (boletes), while the Aphyllophorales
are an artificial group embracing the polypores, crust fungi, coral fungi, chanterelles,
and teeth fungi. A third group, the jelly fungi (Tremellales, Dacrymycetales, and Auri-
culariales), are treated in this book as Hymenomycetes, although some taxonomists
consider them to be only distantly related.
In the absence of a detailed fossil record, there is a great deal of speculation as to
whether the Hymenomycetes evolved from the Gasteromycetes or vice-versa. It may
actually be that evolution has flowed both ways. Spore dispersal is enhanced if the spores
are actively (forcibly) discharged as in the Hymenomycetes, but the enclosed fruiting body
of the Gasteromycetes is advantageous to spore development because it affords greater
protection against the environment. Thus, many Hymenomycetes have adapted to
inhospitable (cold, hot, or arid) environments by fruiting underground and/or never
exposing their hymenium—thus becoming “gastroid” and losing their ability to discharge
spores in the process. On the other hand, there may be lines of evolution leading from
primitive Gasteromycetes to certain Hymenomycetes through the incremental develop¬
ment of a hymenium, stalk, and cap.
♦Since most fungi decay quickly, they are far less apt to be fossilized than plants.
58 HYMENOMYCETES
AGARICALES
THE agarics, or gilled mushrooms, bear their spores on radiating blades or plates called
gills. They are by far the most familiar, numerous, and complex group of fleshy fungi, and
are thought to have arisen from several different ancestors. All of the gilled mushrooms
were originally grouped in a single massive genus, Agaricus, but in the 19th century a
Swedish naturalist, Elias Fries (the “father” of mushroom taxonomy), divided Agaricus
into a number of smaller genera based on easily ascertained features such as attachment
of the gills, texture of the stalk, presence versus absence of a veil, and color of the spores.
In the ensuing years, agaricologists have tried to achieve a more “natural” classification
(i.e., one that reflects common ancestry rather than superficial similarities), and in so doing
have come to rely heavily on microscopic and chemical characters, such as the shape and
arrangement of the cells in the gill tissue and cap cuticle and the shape, ornamentation, and
amyloidity of the spores. Over one hundred genera of gilled mushrooms are now recog¬
nized, including most of Fries’ original genera, albeit often in modified form (for example,
Agaricus (not to be confused with the term “agaric”), in its modern sense, is restricted to
the cultivated mushroom and its close relatives). The “Friesian” system, however, has
remained popular among amateurs or “toadstool-testers” because of its simplicity.
Since modern agaric taxonomy is based on so many seemingly esoteric characters, and
since most people have neither a microscope, nor the requisite chemical reagents, nor the
necessary training to correctly use a microscope and reagents if they had them, a com¬
promise between the modern and Friesian systems has been used in this book, to wit: most
of the modern genera and families have been recognized, but the characters used to dis¬
tinguish them are largely Friesian (macroscopic). The Agaricales have been divided into
fourteen families, which are keyed out here. The boletes constitute a fifteenth family, but
are treated separately. In order to use the key it is necessary to know the spore color—
preferably by taking a spore print. It is also necessary to have some patience—or at least
to realize that subjectivity (e.g., waxy versus non-waxy gills) and fallibility are the ineluc¬
table byproducts of any key that relies on macroscopic (field) characters, when the critical
distinctions between the different entities are in fact microscopic.
AGARICALES 59
A pictorial chart of gilled mushroom genera has also been provided on pp. 61-62,
thereby circumventing the family category. It is by no means infallible, but as already
pointed out, neither is the dichotomous key, nor for that matter, are you and I.
Key to the Agaricales
l. Gills deformed or contorted or branched to form large cavities, sometimes never exposed; spores
not forcibly discharged, hence spore print not obtainable; found mostly in deserts and
mountains .(see Podaxales & Allies, p. 724)
1. Not as above; spores forcibly discharged, hence a spore print obtainable if spores are being
produced; gills exposed at maturity; common and widespread.2
2. Spore print white to buff, yellow, yellow-orange, or lilac-tinged . 3
2. Spore print some other color (pinkish, salmon, yellow-brown, brown, rusty-orange, rusty-
brown, chocolate-brown, purplish, greenish, black, etc.) . 10
3. Universal veil enveloping young specimens and forming a volva at base of stalk when it ruptures
and/ or leaving numerous remnants (warts or flat patches) on cap .... Amanitaceae, p. 262
3. Neither volva nor warts present (but cap and stalk may have scales or fibrils) .4
4. Gills typically free and veil present; veil usually forming an annulus (ring) on stalk, or if not then
stalk typically scaly or slimy below the veil . 5
4. Not as above; veil absent, or if present then gills normally attached to stalk .6
5. Cap slimy or viscid when moist; stalk sometimes viscid also; gills tissue divergent (under the
microscope); not common .Amanitaceae, p. 262
5. Cap dry or only slightly viscid when moist; stalk dry; gill tissue not divergent; common .
.Lepiotaceae, p. 293
6. Gills decurrent and foldlike (at least when young), i.e., gills thick, blunt, shallow, and usually
forked or with cross-veins .(see Cantharellaceae, p. 658)
6. Not as above; gills usually platelike or bladelike .. 7
7. Gills and/ or flesh exuding a latex (milk or juice) when broken; stalk typically more than 3 mm
thick; spores with amyloid warts or ridges .Russulaceae, p. 63
7. Not as above . 8
8. Fruiting body brittle and rather rigid, the stalk snapping open cleanly like a piece of chalk (i.e.,
without fibrous context); cap usually plane to depressed at maturity; stalk typically at least
3 mm thick; veil absent; usually but not always terrestrial; cap and stalk tissue typically con¬
taining nests of sphaerocysts; spores with amyloid warts or ridges .Russulaceae, p. 63
8. Not with above features . 9
9. Gills soft and clean, with a waxy appearance or texture; cap often brightly colored; stalk more
or less central; usually terrestrial; basidia long and narrow (at least six times as long as the
spores); spores smooth .Hygrophoraceae, p. 103
9. Not as above; gills not normally waxy; stalk central to lateral or absent; on ground or wood
.Tricholomataceae, p. 129
10. Spore print pinkish to flesh-colored, salmon, pinkish-cinnamon, or sordid reddish . 11
10. Spore print some shade of orange, brown (including cinnamon-brown), green, purple, gray, or
black . 16
11. Universal veil present, usually forming a saclike volva at base of stalk .... Pluteaceae, p. 253
11. Not as above; volva typically absent . 12
12. Gills typically free at maturity; growing on wood (but wood sometimes buried!) or sawdust or
sometimes in lignin-rich humus; spores not angular .Pluteaceae, p. 253
12. Not as above . 13
13. Odor strong (fishy or like cucumber) and stalk velvety or arising from an underground, often
hollow “tuber” or found on wood and fruiting body pinkish to yellow-orange with a reticulate
(veined) cap surface; spores not angular; not common .Tricholomataceae, p. 129
13. Not as above; common . 14
14. Spore print pale pinkish, pinkish-buff, or pinkish-cream; gills sometimes purple or purple-tinged
when fresh; spores not angular .Tricholomataceae, p. 129
14. Spore print usually deeper in color (flesh-colored to sordid reddish, salmon, etc.); gills not often
purple; spores usually angular in end and/or side view .15
60 AGARICALES
15. Usually growing in clusters; flesh fragile; spores not angular; not common, at least in the western
states . Coprinaceae, p. 341
15. Not as above; spores typically angular in end and/or side view; very common and widely
distributed . Entolomataceae, p. 238
16. Spore print greenish to grayish-olive . 17
16. Not as above . 19
17. Gills adnate to decurrent .Gomphidiaceae, p. 481
17. Gills free or only slightly attached . 18
18. Gills blood-red to reddish to dark brown .Agaricaceae, p. 310
18. Gills white to dull greenish or grayish .. Lepiotaceae, p. 293
19. Spore print purple-brown to purple-gray, purple-black, smoky-gray, black, chocolate-brown,
or deep brown . 20
19. Spore print rusty-orange to rusty-brown, cinnamon-brown, yellow-brown, dull brown, bright
brown, cigar-brown, etc. (but may appear darker in heavy deposits!). 26
20. Gills usually decurrent (but sometimes adnate); spore print smoky-olive to smoky-gray to black;
associated with conifers .Gomphidiaceae, p. 481
20. Not as above; gills free to adnexed, adnate, or occasionally decurrent . 21
21. Gills and/ or cap auto-digesting (i.e., turning into an inky black mass) at maturity; spore print
black . Coprinaceae, p. 341
21. Not as above . 22
22. Veil present, usually forming an annulus (ring) on stalk; gills free or nearly free at maturity,
whitish to pinkish when young but becoming chocolate-brown or darker in age; cap not deeply
striate; spore print chocolate-brown .Agaricaceae, p. 310
22. Not as above . 23
23. Cap brightly colored (yellow, green, orange, red, etc.) .Strophariaceae, p. 367
23. Cap dull (some shade of brown, buff, gray, white, etc.) .24
24. Gills decurrent; cap margin inrolled when young; spore print reddish-brown or cocoa-brown
. Paxillaceae, p. 476
24. Not as above . 25
25. Cap usually viscid when moist (but may dry out!); fruiting body fragile or not fragile; cap cuticle
typically filamentous (under microscope).Strophariaceae, p. 367
25. Cap usually not viscid; fruiting body usually quite fragile; cap cuticle typically cellular (see
illustrations on p. 19) . Coprinaceae, p. 341
26. Growing on other mushrooms . Tricholomataceae, p. 129
26. Not as above . . 27
27. Stalk absent or rudimentary; usually growing shelflike on wood . 28
27. Stalk present; on wood or ground . . 30
28. Fruiting body very tough, leathery, or corky .(see Polyporaceae & Allies, p. 549)
28. Not as above; fruiting body fleshy . 29
29. Gills forked or with cross-veins or even with pores near base of cap . Paxillaceae, p. 476
29. Not as above . Cortinariaceae, p. 396
30. Fruiting body small, fragile, often withering quickly; cap usually oval to conical or bell-shaped;
usually growing in grass, dung, or gardens; cap cuticle typically cellular (see illustrations on
p. 19) .Bolbitiaceae, p. 466
30. Not with above features . 31
31. Gills typically decurrent, often forked (or even forming pores near stalk)and often peeling easily
from cap; margin of cap usually inrolled when young; veil absent; spore print yellowish to
brown; stalk fleshy . Paxillaceae, p. 476
31. Not as above; gills occasionally decurrent but usually not; veil present or absent; spore print
variously colored (rusty-orange, rusty-brown, dull brown, etc.); very common .
.. Cortinariaceae, p. 396
61
PICTORIAL KEY TO GILLED MUSHROOMS
Spore print black
3
to gray, purple-
3
brown, or deep
t § 5-
Spore print brown to rusty-brown, gray, purple-
sf.S «5 Is
is
tk. V.
3 3,
bo C>
©
< o 3^ ®
sr 3 © S'
S ©g
-3
X Cj ^ <J ^ £ a, £
3
yellow-brown, cinnamon-brown,
.© to
&
to
IO -ft
ft,-3
| 5 8 -3 .O ^ £
^ S3 -"IS 3
2 © n < H O
2 -3 © |5 3
^ ft, ^ ^ € ft, ^
or rusty-orange
to to
to
to
J3 3
ao •3 -3 3 3 S Ig
'o -C> I- s -3 ft, 5 3
:§ 2 I ^
*•«« 5 .3 & S-S 5 & | -2 -ft
o ^ <4> O 3 ft &
3 V, h. -3 3 -3
o O oo 3 bo
— - o
O ft. O X X <J ^ ^ 3
•a ■a ^
Spore print
to to
3ft
flesh-color
pinkish to
reddish to
©
•»-*
V,
ft
3
«s I
■§!■§ 3
© ft -3
Jo ft, ft;
©
3
-ft 3S
<0 ^
(V
Tricholomopsis
*4
orange, greenish, or tinged lilac
pinkish-buff, yellowish, yellow-
Spore print white to buff, pale
to
3
■Ki ft,
5 3
to
I 5 13^
3
to
=§1
to 52 -2I X
3
-2
■^■2 3
Russula
3 3 3 ft 3 'ft
3 "s
Allies
-3 g
C/5
0-> ft 3 •5 S ft §■ f s 3 -3 ®
3 3 -tu 3 *3 ■*« 3 ft -« & 3
& 3 r-* 3 3 .ft 3 ft 3
5 -2 fe A> ft 3-Jk ft hj ft 5^
O ft. ^ ,-q co h. O hi O ft,
to
5 to
=3 w
Hygrophorus
to
J3 to
s 3
Co
S
§■
5 o ft
3 •2 ft
CL ft -3
Lactarius
(75 ■St
.2 I 3 t *5
Laccaria
to ft
3 3 « 3 h
.3 ’-ft
-s* s:
to
3 ft ft $ * ^ *1^ .a
^ ft cS
-I
3 < &
ft
tft 8*
ft ft
3 3 ^ g 6 3 ^ So ^0 5 3 5 S« Sb
5 55 & ^ 3 <j- ft, 3 S3 < C ft
3
X X o xx <o ^ (J CJ <o ^ ^ 5; U;
to to to
V * ^ -ft to . ^ ■3
a £ s 5 2 ft t/f c/f
■d a
J3 ft s * ft
fc
ft, 5
IO e ^ C/5 O
3 « 3 ^ c J=
Characteristics
O 3
fO) £ c «a
u
C 5 M
° c « ’> « rt ’> « aj cd
« <u S
A 3 C9 ft o *-
~C c
ft H ft OJ & 0> C2 k* 3 « •fc-
to ft n t^—1
* .s
ft 53d >+<
eft
ft (O t)
jG s ^
to 3Z^ u <L> 3 — ft 3 ft
p*
"S -s C
to
> o c« >
.2 « J= ^ 0 5
tO .
^ 3
s ft
«g
ft c
_
G
C
0>
cfi qd
3
s!oj c to "53d
JS
X)
**
C
>>
X)
SI ft ft 3 £
§ O OS) 3 t to & JZ {^5 to • «N to cti ft c to cti
ft o. ft ftb ft 3 £ o s: ft "3 U ft
tm c X JO 2 C
ft X
w •3 to * 2 «* Q. S
C
« a.
3
m a ■*-»
« fc • -♦-»
pH
S3
«
l- £ 'Z
ft
> o, oj — « <* A (/5 u — 3 £
-2 ~ o z: > ft c e 3 i-* "ft e c -♦-> o> 2 "3 -*->
cn J2 on cd > O o >■ « o )3 o > rt 0 to O > -S to O
> a c C
^-H <HH
ro HH HH
■'sr •/
Spore print black
Spore print to gray, purple-
62
Spore print white to buff, pale pinkish to Spore print brown to rusty-brown, gray, purple-
Characteristics pinkish-buff, yellowish, yellow- reddish to yellow-brown, cinnamon-brown, brown, or deep
orange, greenish, or tinged lilac flesh-color or rusty-orange brown
PICTORIAL KEY TO GILLED MUSHROOMS
63
spores
RUSSULACEAE
THIS family differs fundamentally from all other gilled mushrooms in the anatomy of
the cap and stem tissue: nests or rosettes of large, roundish cells called sphaerocysts are
interspersed with the usual filamentous hyphae, giving the mushroom a characteristic
brittle, granular texture. In addition, the spores are conspicuously ornamented with
strongly amyloid warts, spines, and/or ridges. These unique features suggest that the
Russulaceae evolved independently from other agarics—perhaps from underground
ancestors. Some toadstool taxonomists consequently place them in a separate order,
the Russulales, rather than in the Agaricales.
There are two large genera in the Russulaceae: Lactarius, which exudes a milk or juice
(latex) when broken, and Russula, which does not. Though they’re often characterized as a
“white-spored” family, their spore color ranges from white to yellow, buff, or ochraceous.
Lactarius and Russula are mycorrhizal and often fruit together in spectacular abun¬
dance. From an edibility standpoint they are good for beginners because few, if any, of the
mild-tasting species are dangerous. Those species with an acrid or bitter taste are best
avoided since many are poisonous or indigestible, at least raw. To determine whether or
not a species is acrid, chew on a small piece of the cap and gills for a minute, then spit it
out. If it is acrid, you’ll experience a burning sensation on your tongue—in fact, you may
have to wash out your mouth to get rid of the taste! If you’re not sure whether it’s acrid,
then it’s probably “mild.” Be careful—some species really pack a wallop!
Key to the Russulaceae
1. Fresh fruiting body usually exuding a latex (milk or juice) when broken (the latex is best seen
by cutting the gills near the stalk)* .Lactarius, p. 64
1. Latex absent* .Russula, p. 83
*In dry or very wet weather, Lactarius species with a scanty latex may exhibit none at all. The following
characteristics will help distinguish such specimens from Russula:
If the fruiting body has greenish stains and colored flesh, it is probably a Lactarius.
If the cap is brightly colored and has white flesh, it is probably a Russula.
If the cap margin is striate, it is probably a Russula.
If the gills, stalk, or flesh are some color besides white or yellow when fresh, it may well be a
Lactarius. (Some Russulas, however, discolor reddish, gray, brown, or black in age.)
If the stalk is scrobiculate (pitted with darker spots), it is a Lactarius.
If the cap margin is bearded, it is a Lactarius.
If none of the above are applicable, try Russula first, then Lactarius.
The latex which distinguishes Lactarius from Russula is best seen by cutting the mushroom near the
juncture of the gills and stalk. In many species, such as L. argillaceifolius var. megacarpus, shown
here, the latex is milky white, but in some species it is brightly colored and in others practically absent.
■
64
LACTARIUS species are called milk caps because they exude a milky or juicy fluid
(latex) when broken (see Color Plate 6 and photo on p. 63). In dry or very wet weather
they may lack a distinct latex (especially if old), but their crisp or brittle flesh distinguishes
them from all but the Russulas (see footnote at bottom of p. 63 for a more detailed
comparison). A few Mycenas possess a latex, but they strike a radically different pose:
a conical to bell-shaped cap perched on a long, thin, fragile stalk.
The most important features to note on any Lactarius are the color of the latex, and
the color changes the latex undergoes or produces on surrounding tissue when exposed
to the air. The colors should always be noted on fresh material. The latex may react with
the air rapidly (within 45 seconds) as in L. vinaceorufescens, or slowly (within 5 hours)
as in L. deliciosus, or not at all, as in L.fragilis. The taste—whether mild or acrid (peppery)
—is also significant, as are microscopic features such as the structure of the cap cuticle
and pattern of ornamentation on the spores. It is also helpful to note whether or not the
stalk is scrobiculate (pitted with darker spots).
Lactarius contains a number of delectable collectables. The candy cap (L.fragilis) is the
tastiest of the local species, besides being one of the most abundant. The green-staining
milk caps (L. deliciosus, L. indigo, et al) are edible and popular, and in eastern North
America, L. volemus, L. corrugis, and L. hygrophoroides are very good. Many species,
on the other hand, are poisonous or indigestible. As a rule, the peppery-tasting ones
should be avoided as well as those with yellow- or purple-staining latex. In Europe, some of
the acrid species are eaten after pickling or parboiling, but it hardly seems worth the effort
or risk to do so.
Lactarius is a very large and complex genus, with over 200 species described from North
America. It is especially diverse in eastern—and more specifically southeastern—North
America. In fact, the milk caps are roughly to eastern hardwood forests what the
Russulas are to the coniferous forests of the West—so exceedingly diverse and ubiquitous
as to seem like “mushroom weeds.” In California, however, there are fewer than 50 re¬
corded species of Lactarius, and in our area there are only about a dozen. As a result,
they are much easier to identify than their bewildering brethren, the Russulas. Like the
Russulas, they are mycorrhizal, mostly terrestrial woodland fungi, but often appear at the
edges of woods or on tree-studded lawns. Many are specific to certain hosts—e.g., L.
torminosus grows with birch. In California the milk caps fruit from late summer through
the winter and sometimes rival the Russulas in abundance.
The publication in 1979 of The North American Species of Lactarius byL. R. Heslerand
Alexander Smith has resulted in a large number of name changes. For instance, the edible
species widely known as L. sanguifluus is now L. ruhrilacteus and our L. trivialis has
become L. argillaceifolius. Those of you who find it hard enough to master one scientific
name for a mushroom without being responsible for two or three can salvage some solace
in the fact that while the names have changed, the mushrooms haven’t. In other words,
so long as you know how to recognize a particular species, it hardly matters what you call
it—unless you are living with a taxonomist! Twenty-one species of Lactarius are de¬
scribed here and many others are keyed out and/ or mentioned.
LACTARIUS 65
Key to Lactarius
l. Latex colored (red, orange, blue, brown, etc.), but often scanty or even absent; fruiting body
often (but not always) staining greenish in age or where bruised (slowly, within 5 hours) . 2
1. Latex white to buff or clear (but may stain yellow or some other color when exposed!) .... 9
2. Latex blue; entire fruiting body blue to bluish-gray (or greenish-stained) . . . L. indigo, p. 69
2. Fruiting body not blue (may be greenish-stained), or if partly blue then latex not blue .... 3
3. Latex carrot-orange to salmon-orange, yellow-orange, or rusty-orange (but may darken to
red after exposure to air) . 4
3. Not as above; latex red, purplish, brown, etc., or if orange in base of stalk then bluish in cap 5
4. Cap whitish when fresh; found in southeastern U.S. . . L. salmoneus (see L. deliciosus, p. 68)
4. Not as above; widespread and common .L. deliciosus & others, p. 68
5. Latex dark red to purplish; fruiting body never bluish (but often greenish-stained) . 6
5. Latex purple-brown to reddish-brown to brown or yellow-brown, or bluish in cap and red
or orange in stalk; fruiting body sometimes with blue tints (especially young cap) . 7
6. Associated with western conifers (mainly Douglas-fir and pine) .8
6. Associated with eastern conifers (mainly hemlock) L. subpurpureus (see L. rubrilacteus, p. 68)
7. Latex when present yellowish to brown or the color of grasshopper juice; found in eastern North
America and the Southwest .L. chelidonium (see L. indigo, p. 69)
7. Not as above.L. paradoxus & others (see L. indigo, p. 69)
8. Cap whitish to pinkish-brown; found in Southwest .. L. barrowsii (see L. rubrilacteus, p. 68)
8. Not as above; cap reddish-brown to orangish or tan.L. rubrilacteus, p. 68
9. Latex quickly becoming yellow upon exposure to air (usually within 45 seconds) . 10
9. Not as above (but latex may slowly stain yellow or stain wounded tissue yellow) . 15
10. Cap pinkish to pinkish-cinnamon to reddish or vinaceous L. vinaceorufescens & others, p. 74
10. Cap differently colored (white to yellowish, ochre, orange, etc.) . 11
11. Cap white to yellowish to dark ochre; margin of cap bearded with woolly hairs (at least when
young) or if not then associated with northern or mountain conifers.12
11. Not with above features . 13
12. Cap pale yellow to dark ochre; stalk usually scrobiculate. L. scrobiculatus, p. 73
12. Cap whitish when young (but often pale yellowish or yellow-stained in age); stalk not scrobi¬
culate or somewhat so only at maturity .L. resimus (see L. scrobiculatus, p. 73)
13. Cap orangish; associated with conifers or birch in northern and western North America . 53
13. Not as above; either differently colored or associated with hardwoods such as oak . 14
14. Cap orange to bright yellow-orange .L. croceus (see L. vinaceorufescens, p. 74)
14. Not as above .L. chrysorheus & others (see L. vinaceorufescens, p. 74)
15. Cap (and often stalk) with a velvety texture or appearance (use hand lens if unsure); cap gray
to smoky-brown to dark brown or black, not viscid and not very large . 16
15. Not as above (if velvety, then differently colored—white, orange, red-brown, etc.) . 17
16. Gills close to crowded; associated with western conifers.L.fallax, p. 77
16. Not with above features .L. lignyotus & others (see L.fallax, p. 77)
17. Latex drying purplish or stained wounded areas purplish to dull lilac (often slowly); cap not
whitish, or if whitish then also viscid or slimy when moist . 18
17. Not as above . 21
18. Cap distinctly hairy or fibrillose at or near the margin; cap yellow, ochre, buff, or dull orange
.L. representaneus & others, p. 75
18. Not as above; margin of cap naked . 19
19. Cap pale yellow; cap and stalk viscid when moist L. aspideoides {see L. representaneus, p. 75)
19. Not with above features . 20
20. Cap and stalk white and slimy, at least when young and moist; common under conifers in the
Pacific Northwest .L. pallescens (see L. uvidus group, p. 75)
20. Not as above; cap usually buff, gray, brown, purplish, etc. . . L. uvidus group & others, p. 75
21. Cap dark green to sordid greenish- or olive-brown (at least at center), sometimes honey-colored
at margin; stalk similarly colored; latex white; taste acrid; cap staining magenta in KOH 22
21. Not with above features . 23
66 RUSSULACEAE
22. Cap and stalk dark or dull greenish; associated with hardwoods (especially oak) in eastern
North America . L. atroviridis (see L. olivaceoumbrinus, p. 70)
22. Cap and stalk usually browner; found mainly with conifers L. olivaceoumbrinus & others, p. 70
23. Margin of cap distinctly bearded with woolly hairs, at least when young; cap sometimes whitish,
but usually pale pinkish to pinkish-orange (at least at center); taste very acrid; associated
with birch or sometimes aspen .L. torminosus & others, p. 73
23. Not as above; if margin bearded then cap differently colored or habitat different . 24
24. Gills well-spaced; cap whitish to pale grayish- or pinkish-tan or yellowish; latex and wounded
areas staining rosy-salmon to rusty-orange (especially gills and stalk base); found under
hardwoods in eastern North America (especially common in Southeast) L. subplinthogalus
24. Not as above . 25
25. Cap pinkish-gray to purplish-gray to vinaceous-gray or vinaceous-buff (or brown tinged with
these colors), not viscid; odor distinctly coconut-like; found mainly with birch (often in
parks) or alder; northern . L. glyciosmus
25. Not as above . 26
26. Gills pinkish to pale pinkish; cap viscid when moist, white or with pinkish to lavender stains;
taste acrid; associated with aspen, poplar, and willow .L. controversus, p. 70
26. Not as above (cap if whitish usually not viscid) . 27
27. Margin of cap with cottony tissue (at least when young); cap usually whitish when young, but
may discolor yellowish, tan, etc. in age .L. deceptivus & others (see L. piperatus, p. 71)
27. Margin of cap naked or bearded with hairs but not as above . 28
28. Cap predominantly whitish (but may discolor in age), not viscid; taste distinctly acrid (some¬
times extremely so!); found mostly with hardwoods in eastern North America. 29
28. Not as above (if cap whitish, then taste not acrid) . 31
29. Latex staining wounded tissue pinkish; especially common in Southeast.L. subvernalis
29. Not as above . 30
30. Cap and stalk minutely velvety; gills close to well-spaced L. subvellereus (see L. piper atus, p. 71)
30. Cap and stalk not velvety; gills crowded to very crowded.L. piperatus & others, p. 71
31. Cap whitish to olive-buff (often with darker and paler areas); latex white, scanty, staining
tissue reddish to pinkish-gray or pale yellow; taste not acrid; favoring pine L. pallidiolivaceus
31. Not as above . 32
32. Latex white and very copious, staining wounded tissue brown (often slowly); taste mild; cap
and/ or stalk minutely velvety, never viscid; cap white to yellow, orange, red-brown, etc. (never
grayish or olive); common under hardwoods in eastern North America. 33
32. Not as above (but may have some of above features) . 35
33. Cap and stalk whitish to buff or slightly yellowish .L. luteolus (see L. volemus, p. 78)
33. Cap and stalk tawny to orange-brown, reddish-brown, or brown . 34
34. Cap brown to reddish-brown or rusty-brown, often wrinkled; stalk typically 1-3 cm thick; odor
usually mild .L. corrugis (see L. volemus, p. 78)
34. Cap tawny, orange-brown, rusty-brown, or sometimes yellowish, not normally wrinkled;
stalk typically less than 1.5 cm thick; odor often fishy in age .L. volemus, p. 78
35. Cap with various shades of yellow, pale buff, ochre, copper, orange, or pinkish-orange, often
(but not always) concentrically zoned; taste very acrid (peppery or burning). 36
35. Not with above features (but may have some of them) . 40
36. Cap with various shades of yellow, ochre, dark ochre, buff, etc. 37
36. Cap oranger, pinker, or more coppery than above . 38
37. Cap margin with fibrils which are brown to grayish in age L.payettensis(see L. alnicola, p. 71)
37. Not as above .L. alnicola & others, p. 71
38. Margin of cap bearded when young L. subvillosus & L. psammicola (see L. torminosus, p. 73)
38. Not as above; margin of cap naked even when young . 39
39. Associated with northern conifers .L. olympianus (see L. alnicola, p. 71)
39. Associated with southern hardwoods (mainly oak).L. yazooensis (see L. alnicola, p. 71)
40. Cap cinnamon to butterscotch-brown or buffy-brown; cap and stalk slimy or viscid when moist;
taste acrid; common in eastern North America (rare or absent in West).L. affinis
40. Not with above features . 41
LACTARIUS 67
41. Cap and stalk viscid or slimy when moist; cap dark brown to smoky-brown to charcoal-gray
(without orangish, reddish, yellowish, or purplish shades), but may fade in age; associated
with conifers . 42
41. Not as above; cap viscid or dry; stalk not viscid and/or fruiting body differently colored . 43
42. Stalk more or less tan or paler .L. kauffmanii (see L. pseudomucidus, p. 77)
42. Stalk darker or grayer (colored like cap or slightly paler) . . L. pseudomucidus & others, p. 77
43. Taste distinctly to excruciatingly acrid (sometimes latently so); cap pinkish-tan to reddish-tan
to reddish-brown or brick-red (at least in age) or sometimes orangish . 44
43. Not as above; cap differently colored and/or taste mild to only slightly acrid . 48
44. Found under manzanita; cap small and viscid when moist L. manzanitae {see L. rufus, p. 79)
44. Not with above features .45
45. Associated with hardwoods in eastern North America . 46
45. Not as above; usually but not always associated with conifers . 47
46. Cap 6-20 cm or more broad, pinkish-tan to reddish-tan to brick-red (but whitish when young
or where covered by humus), not zoned concentrically; gills white to buff.L. allardii
46. Cap 5-15 cm broad, orange-brown to reddish-brown, often zoned concentrically; mature gills
reddish-brown to dull purple-brown .L. peckii
47. Cap dull or dark reddish to brick-red, vinaceous, or dark brown . . . . L. rufus & others, p. 79
47. Cap oranger or more brightly colored than above. 48
48. Odor distinctly fragrant (sweet), at least when dried or cooked (and often when fresh) ... 49
48. Odor not fragrant or sweet, even when dried or cooked . 52
49. Cap viscid, orange-brown to caramel-colored; odor coconut-like when dried; known only
from California .L. cocosiolens (see L. subflammeus, p. 79)
49. Not with above features . 50
50. Latex clear (colorless); cap 4-15 cm broad; associated with northern conifers and especially
common in boggy areas . ..L. helvus(-L. aquifluus)
50. Latex white or watery white; cap 2-10 cm broad; widespread in many habitats .51
51. Stalk solid or stuffed (but sometimes with a central hollow in age), typically 0.5-3 cm thick; cap
usually reddish but sometimes orangish; known only from California .L. rufulus, p. 82
51. Stalk often (not always!) hollow or partly hollow, especially in age, and usually slender (0.4-1
or occasionally 1.5 cm thick); cap usually burnt orange but sometimes redder, browner, or
tawnier; widely distributed (including California) .L. fragilis & others, p. 80
52. Cap small and olive-brown to dark grayish-brown or dark brown when young (but often tawny
to cinnamon in age); common under alder in N. Calif, and Pacific Northwest L. occidentalis
52. Not with above features . 53
53. Cap orange to reddish, pinkish, reddish-brown, or liver-colored . 54
53. Cap grayish to violet-gray, dingy brown, olive brown, or dark brown . 59
54. Cap viscid or slightly viscid when moist . 55
54. Cap not viscid, often with a dull (matte) appearance . 56
55. Cap scarlet to orange, orange-brown, or tawny .L. subflammeus & others, p. 79
55. Cap pinkish to reddish to reddish-brown or liver-colored .... L. subviscidus & others, p. 80
56. Cap and stalk minutely velvety, orange to orange-brown; gills widely spaced, pallid; latex
very copious; common under eastern hardwoods L. hygrophoroides (see L. volemus, p. 78)
56. Not as above . 57
57. Associated with oak; mainly but not exclusively southern . 58
57. Not as above; northern . L. alpinus, L. thejogalus, L. oculatus & others (see L. rufulus, p. 82)
58. Found in California .L. rufulus & others, p. 82
58. Found in eastern North America.L. subserifluus & others (see L. rufulus, p. 82)
59. Cap medium-sized to large (4 cm or more broad), at least slightly viscid when moist .60
59. Not as above; cap small and violet-gray to gray or ochre-gray, usually with small scales at least
in age; found in eastern North America, often on or near rotten wood .L. griseus
60. Latex often discoloring injured tissue slowly; gills often dingy yellowish or yellow-brown in old
age; found with hardwoods (mainly oak) L. argillaceifolius var. megacarpus & others, p. 76
60. Not as above .L. circellatus & others (see L. argillaceifolius var. megacarpus, p. 76)
68 RUSSULACEAE
hollow, colored like cap or paler, sometimes scrobiculate. SPORE PRINT pale yellowish
or buff; spores7.5-10 * 6-8 microns, broadly elliptical to nearly round, withamyloid ridges.
HABITAT: Scattered or in large troops under conifers throughout the West; associated
in our area with Douglas-fir and abundant in the fall and early winter. Where pines pre¬
dominate it is largely supplanted by L. deliciosus, and where pine and Douglas-fir grow
together, the two milk caps often mingle. In Europe, L. sanguifluus (which may be the
same as L. rubrilacteus) is mycorrhizal with pine.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but not pleasing to everyone because of its granular texture; usually
better, however, than L. deliciosus (see comments on edibility of that species).
COMMENTS: The dark red latex is the telltale trait of this handsome fungus, which for
many years has been known to fungophiles as L. sanguifluus. In dry or very wet weather
the latex may be absent, but in these conditions the greenish stains are usually quite
pronounced. In fact, as with L. deliciosus, weathered fruiting bodies may be entirely
green, and mature specimens often have tiny, aborted green “buttons” at their bases. Be
sure not to confuse this species with the similarly colored L. vinaceorufescens and
L. chrysorheus—they often grow with L. rubrilacteus, but have a white latex that quickly
turns yellow. Other species: L. barrowsii has dark red latex, but its cap is much paler
(whitish to pinkish-brown) and it occurs mainly with ponderosa pine. Another similar
edible species, L. subpurpureus of eastern North America, has wine-red latex and a wine-
red to silvery cap, and favors hemlock. See also L. paradoxus (under L. indigo).
Lactarius controversus has pinkish gills, white latex, acrid taste, and inrolled cap margin when young.
LACTARIUS 71
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious under aspen, poplar, and willow; widely distributed.
It can be found in the aspen forests of the Sierra Nevada in the late summer and fall. I
have seen large fruitings in New Mexico in the late summer.
EDIBILITY: To be avoided due to the acrid taste.
COMMENTS: This handsome milk cap is one of several large, whitish species with white,
unchanging latex and a very peppery taste. The viscid cap when moist and pinkish-tinted
gills plus the association with aspen, poplar, and willow distinguish it from the other
large white Lactarii (see L. piperatus), while the presence of a latex places it in Lactarius.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious under spruce and other conifers (despite the species
epithet, which implies alder) in the Rocky Mountains and Pacific Northwest in the late
summer and fall, and also abundant (a slightly different form—see comments) in our live
oak woodlands in the fall and winter. Still another variant occurs in coastal sand dunes
with willow and bush lupine.
EDIBILITY: Not edible. The excruciatingly peppery taste is a formidable deterrent.
COMMENTS: The overall yellowish-ochre color and zoned, non-bearded cap plus
the frequently scrobiculate stalk, acrid taste, and white latex typify a very confusing group
of milk caps which have traditionally passed under the European names of L. insulsus and
L. zonarius. There is still doubt, however, as to just what those species are. The common
member of this group in central and southern California differs from typical L. alnicola in
its mycorrhizal mate (oak), somewhat smaller size and paler cap (yellowish-buff),
frequently short, off-center stem, and latently acrid taste. Its latex usually stains
surrounding tissue dingy yellow but does not turn yellow itself. Forms are encountered,
however, in which the latex does yellow slowly, and forms in which it discolors tissue buff or
grayish-buff, thus muddling the picture so thoroughly that I begin to yearnfor the baseball
season. (Ah, the simplicity, security, and symmetry of baseball, where each participant has
a fixed name, number, and position, and a unique and indisputable set of statistics and
characteristics.) Other species with a more or less zoned, non-bearded cap and acrid white
latex include: L. olympianus, a common western conifer-lover, typically with an oranger
cap and non-scrobiculate stalk; and two oak-loving easterners,L. psammicolaf glaber,
with a yellowish cap and latex that stains wounded tissue buff to pinkish-cinnamon, and
L. yazooensis, a southern species with an orangish cap. Similar species that are bearded
are listed under L. torminosus and L. scrobiculatus. They include L. subvillosus, a com¬
mon local species whose cap is often naked in age, but pinker or oranger than that of L.
alnicola. Also worth mentioning is L. payettensis, a western conifer-lover with white
scanty latex that yellows slowly and brownish to grayish fibrils on the cap margin. N one of
the above species should be eaten, at least until they are better known.
72
LACTARIUS 73
be recognized by its overall pale yellow to dark ochre color, scrobiculate stalk, and white
latex that quickly turns yellow or stains exposed tissue yellow. The latter feature distin¬
guishes it from L. alnicola, which stains yellow slowly or not at all. Other species: L.
resimus is a bearded, yellow-staining species whose stalk is scrobiculate only in age if at
all. Its cap is white when young but often pale yellowish in age. It favors birch, aspen,
alder, manzanita, and conifers. Also see L. payettensis (under L. alnicola).
74
LACTARIUS 75
species with yellow-staining latex include: L. maculatipes and L. croceus, found under
hardwoods in eastern North America, the first with a whitish to creamy-yellow, often
spotted cap and slimy stalk when fresh, the latter with a bright saffron to yellow-orange or
orange, viscid cap; and L. xanthogalactus of California, probably the same as L. chry-
sorheus or L. vinaceorufescens. For other yellow-staining species, see L. scrobiculatus.
EDIBILITY: Not recommended. The taste is not appealing and it may be poisonous.
COMMENTS: This often large, impressive milk cap is easily identified by its yellowish
cap with the hairy margin, and purple-staining latex. It resembles L. scrobiculatus and
L. alnicola in appearance, but those species have unchanging or yellow-staining latex.
Other purple-staining species (see L. uvidus) are differently colored and do not have a
bearded cap. Similar species include: L. speciosus, with a dull buff to tan cap and hairy
margin, common under hardwoods in eastern North America (especially the South); and
L. aspideoides, with a viscid, pale yellow cap that is not bearded. Neither should be eaten.
Lactarius argillaceifolius var. megacarpus can be told by its relatively large size, dingy color, and
white latex that slowly stains the gills brownish. For a close-up of the latex, see photo on p. 63.
Lactariuspseudomucidus, a conifer loving milk cap with a dark cap and stem that are slimy when wet.
fers and often has a lilac- or vinaceous-tinged cap;L. cinereus has a gray to olive-gray cap,
non-staining gills and stalk apex often tinged pale pinkish, and grows with beech; L. cir-
cellatus favors birch and northern conifers, but has non-staining gills and a brownish-gray
to bluish-gray or lavender-tinged cap, and zebra-like amyloid stripes on the spores. For
years L. argillaceifolius has been called//, trivialis, a similar slimy-stalked species whose
gills discolor scarcely if at all; it occurs in the Pacific Northwest, usually under conifers.
thick, rather slender, more or less equal, colored like cap or somewhat paler; dry and
unpolished or velvety. SPORE PRINT yellowish; spores 9-12 * 8-11 microns, more or
less round, with amyloid warts and ridges.
HABITAT: Scattered or in small groups under conifers (especially fir) or occasionally on
rotting wood; fairly common in the late summer and fall in the Pacific Northwest and
northern California. I have yet to find it in our area.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This species is one of several milk caps with a brown to nearly black,
velvety cap. Though not good edibles, they are notable for their beauty, and therefore likely
to attract the attention of even the casual collector. L.fallax is the most common member
of the group in the West, and is easily distinguished from the similarly colored L. pseudo-
mucidus, by its dry, velvety rather than smooth, slimy cap and stem. There are several
closely related species found mainly in eastern North America, including: L. lignyotus,
with broader, more widely-spaced gills; L. gerardii, with very well-spaced (distant) gills;
L. fuliginellus, a hardwood-lover with close gills; and L. fumosus, with close gills and
a paler (smoky-brown) cap. None of these are worth eating.
79
80 RUSSULACEAE
EDIBILITY: Not recommended. Like several other peppery milk caps, it is harvested
and canned commercially in Scandinavia. However, North American variants have not
been thoroughly tested and it may be poisonous raw.
COMMENTS: This species occurs in droves under northern conifers. It can be told from
other reddish milk caps by its red-hot taste, unchanging white latex, and fondness for
conifers. Fresh young specimens are among the most acrid of all mushrooms. When you
taste one, take only a small bite, and remember: the burning sensation can be delayed!
Other species: L. manzanitae has a small (2-5 cm), viscid, orangish to coppery-red or
brick-red cap, strongly acrid taste, and unchanging latex; it occurs under manzanita in
California. L. hysginus var. americanus has a brown to dark vinaceous-brown, viscid
cap and viscid stalk; it grows under conifers. For similar species with a milder taste, see
L. subviscidus, L. subflammeus, and L. rufulus.
Lactarius subviscidus
CAP 1-4 (5) cm broad, shallowly depressed becoming broadly or more deeply depressed in
age; surface smooth, viscid to thinly slimy when wet, dark reddish or reddish-brown
to brick-red or paler (pinkish) in age, not normally zoned; margin sometimes faintly striate.
Flesh thin, tinged cap color, fragile; odor mild, taste mild to slightly acrid. LATEX white,
rather scanty, unchanging. GILLS close, adnate to decurrent, pinkish-buff to pinkish-
cinnamon, or darker in age. STALK 2-5 cm long, 4-8 mm thick, more or less equal, usually
hollow; smooth, not viscid, colored like cap or gills. SPORE PRINT white to yellowish;
spores 8-10 * 7-8 microns, broadly elliptical, with amyloid ridges.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious on ground or rotten wood under conifers (spruce,
pine, etc.) in the Pacific Northwest and California. It is fairly common in our area in the
fall and early winter under pine, Douglas-fir, and manzanita.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This small species looks like a candy cap (L.fragilis or L. rufulus), but the
thinly viscid cap (often with debris stuck to it), mild odor, and white (rather than watery
white) latex distinguish it. The latex does not stain yellow as in L. vinaceorufescens, but
may slowly stain white paper yellow (overnight). The cap is not orange as in L. subflam¬
meus and not as acrid (peppery) as L. manzanitae (see L. rufus). Similar species include:
L. riparius, common under conifers, alder, and willow in seepage areas in the Sierra
Nevada, with a brownish-red to brick-red cap that is slightly viscid when moist, mild
taste, and copious unchanging white or watery-white latex; L. atrobadius, with a viscid
liver-colored to blackish-red cap and non-yellowing latex; and L. hepaticus, with a viscid
or dry cap and yellowing latex. For similar species with dry caps, see L. rufulus.
cap; often hollow in age, with hairs at base. SPORE PRINT white to pale yellowish;
spores 6-9 microns, more or less round, with amyloid warts and ridges (reticulate). Cap
and stalk tissue containing numerous nests of sphaerocysts.
HABITAT: Widely scattered to densely gregarious or in small clumps on ground in
woods (often along trails and in other damp places, sometimes on wood). It is apparently
confined to the Pacific Coast and Southeast, but the very similar L. camphoratus (see
comments) occurs elsewhere. In our area it is normally abundant from the late fall through
early spring, especially under oak but also with other trees (pine, Douglas-fir, etc.).
EDIBILITY: Edible and one of the very best of our late season mushrooms. Fresh speci¬
mens can be sauteed and used like any other mushroom; when chopped up and slowly
dried, however, their flavor becomes sweet and they are great in pancakes, cookies, on
cinnamon toast with sesame seeds, or even in ice cream! Fortunately, they are plentiful
enough to merit collecting in spite of their small size, but be sure of your identification!
A few poor souls, alas, are allergic to them.
COMMENTS: The most remarkable feature of candy caps is the sweet, persistent fra¬
grance they develop when cooked or dried. If just a few candy caps are sauteed, their odor
will permeate the entire house and linger for days. Stranger still, when eaten in quantity
they imbue one’s perspiration and bodily exudates with the unmistakable aroma of maple
syrup—thereby provoking some puzzled stares! Their odor has also been likened to that
of butterscotch, fenugreek, burnt sugar, and sweet clover. Fresh specimens may have
only a slight odor, in which case the mild taste, watery-white unchanging latex, and overall
burnt orange or “ferruginous” color separate them from most other mushrooms (but see
below). In dry weather the latex is often absent, leading to confusion with Laccaria laccata,
Clitocybe inversa, Rhodocybe nuciolens, Collybia and Cortinarius species, and various
other similarly colored mushrooms. Fortunately, the odor is usually quite pronounced
under those conditions. Be sure the latex does not stain yellow—L. vinaceorufescens often
mingles with it and can be practically the same color.
The typical variety of L. fragilis occurs in the Southeast and is slightly tawnier. The
western version, L. fragilis var. rubidus, may actually be a distinct species. For years it has
passed as L. camphoratus. That species, however, is found in northern coniferous and
hardwood forests and has a slightly redder, frequently nippled (umbonate) cap and non-
reticulate spores. Still another candy cap, L. rufulus, occurs in California under oak,
but tends to be larger, is often redder, usually has a thicker and firmer stem, and contains
few if any sphaerocysts in its tissue(see description of L. rufulus). For similar species with
a mild odor, see L. subviscidus and comments under L. rufulus.
81
Lactarius rufulus. This west coast native resembles L.fragilis, but differs microscopically and usually
has a solid, thicker stem (as shown here) and larger cap. Color is variable but usually reddish.
RUSSULA is distinct by virtue of its brittle (dry or granular) flesh, rigid fruiting body,
white to yellow-orange spore print, and warty amyloid spores. “Brittle,” of course, is a
subjective term, but the crisper Russula species will snap audibly when broken, and in
both the crisp and fragile types the stalk is fleshy and snaps open cleanly like a piece of
chalk—i.e., there is no fibrous tissue present as in most fleshy-stemmed mushrooms.
Lactarius species also snap open like chalk, but usually exude a latex when broken, while
Leucopaxillus is somewhat brittle but has a tough, fibrous stem that does not break like
chalk and often has white mycelium at the base. In addition to their brittle texture, the
Russulas have a characteristic appearance that, though difficult to describe, makes them
one of the easiest groups to recognize. The cap is plane to depressed at maturity and often
broader than the length of the stem—with exceptions, of course.
Though Russula as such is a very clearcut group, mastering their identification is almost
to be despaired of, for Russulas come in a bewildering panoply of reds, purples, pinks,
yellows, oranges, browns, greens, and whites that is at once their most attractive and
deceptive feature. The color pigments are unusually sensitive to environmental and genetic
caprice, so that no two mushrooms look quite alike. Identification is made even more
difficult by the fact that many species produce only a few fruiting bodies per mycelium—
making it hard to gauge accurately the degree of color variation. The result is that many
species are still poorly known or unclassified, while synonyms and homonyms abound.
.Ktmw/tf-researchers have resorted to examining the spore ornamentation of different
species with an electron microscope in an effort to establish fixed criteria for each species
and dispel some of the confusion.
Russula xerampelina is one of the few Russulas worth gathering for the table. Note the shape, which is
fairly typical of the genus Russula, and note how the stalk fractures like a piece of chalk.
84 RUSSULACEAE
The task of getting to know the Russulas is expedited by assigning them to groups. For
instance, the section Compactae includes several large, hard-stemmed species with
gills that usually alternate long and short (R. albonigra and R. densifolia are good
examples). Another group, centered around R. fragrantissima and R. sororia, has a
yellow-brown to brown, conspicuously striate cap and a strongly fragrant to unpleasant
odor. A third group, mainly northern in distribution, has flesh which turns grayish when
exposed (e.g, R. claroflava). The remaining Russulas can then be divided into four large,
artificial groups based on spore color and taste: to wit, spores white and taste mild (e.g., R.
cyanoxantha), spores white and taste acrid (e.g., R. emetica), spores yellow and taste acrid
(e.g., R. rosacea), and spores yellow and taste mild (e.g., R. xerampelina).
Russulas are mycorrhizal with a broad range of hardwoods and conifers, and are almost
always terrestrial. They grow not only in woods, but at the edges of pastures, in brushy
areas, and on lawns near trees. They are among the most omnipresent mushrooms of our
western coniferous forests, but are often concealed by leaves and needles and evident only
as low mounds (“mushrumps”) in the humus.
In eastern North America the Russulas, like the milk caps (Lactarius), are often
prominent during muggy weather when other mushrooms are relatively scarce, while in
the Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountains their season more closely coincides with that
of other fungi. In our area Russulas run rampant throughout the mushroom season,
subject, of course, to the whim of the weather. A metagrobolizing melange of species (R.
albonigra, R. xerampelina, R. cyanoxantha, et al) usually erupts after the first fall rains,
followed by another burst (spearheaded by R. emetica) in the winter.
Russulas are among the most maligned of all mushrooms. Even veteran mushroom
hunters treat them mercilessly—throwing them over their shoulder or crushing them
underfoot with disparaging remarks like “Oh, it’s a JAR” (“Just Another Russula”). Their
omnipresence, anonymity, and poor culinary reputation are partly responsible, I am sure.
Also, their brittle flesh is irresistible to those who like to smash things. Furthermore, they
have a habit of forming “mushrumps” in the humus which resemble those made by Boletus
edulis. Frustrated boletivores can be uncompromisingly brutal (see p. 546), and their
habitual hunting grounds are inevitably strewn with the broken bodies of Russulas.
However, mushrooms were not created for the exclusive enjoyment of Homo sapiens, and
it is wrong to judge them accordingly. T ry to resist the sharp temptation to mash, maim, and
mutilate them. Those who follow in your footsteps will appreciate your sensitivity and
self-restraint.
Most of the mild-tasting Russulas are edible, but this should not be taken as a signal to
sample them indiscriminately. Always identify what you intend to eat! Those which red¬
den or blacken and/ or have a peppery (acrid) taste should be avoided—at least some cause
vomiting and diarrhea or worse. Thorough cooking may render them edible, but it hardly
seems worth the effort or risk. Russulas are not widely revered as esculents, and it is
true that their dry, granular flesh does not blend well with some dishes. However, R.
xerampelina and R. cyanoxantha (to name just two of the local species) are marvelous
delicacies in their own right, and R. virescens and R. crust osa of eastern North America are
also excellent.
About 200 species of Russula are reported from North America, but the vast majority of
them are “JAR’s”—i.e., depressingly difficult to demystify. Only some of the more
distinctive types are described here. You will doubtlessly encounter many, many more—
some of them unclassified. If your “JAR” does not key out convincingly, you can send
it to a specialist, or better yet, the nearest compost pile.
RUSSULA 85
Key to Russula
l. Fruiting body medium-sized to very large, hard (especially the stalk); cap white to brown, black,
or grayish (never brightly colored); gills typically adnate to decurrent and usually alternating
long and short; cap cuticle (skin) not peeling easily, margin not striate .2
1. Not with above combination of characteristics . 10
2. Fruiting body basically white (but often with brown to yellowish stains); flesh and stalk surface
not staining when bruised or cut . 3
2. Flesh and stalk surface changing color when bruised (within 10 minutes) and/ or fruiting body
not white .4
3. Cap 5-10 cm broad; taste very acrid; gills and stalk never blue-green .
. R. cascadensis(see R. brevipes, p. 87)
3. Cap 7-20 cm or more broad; taste mild to slightly acrid, or if distinctly acrid then gills and/ or
stalk apex usually tinged blue-green or green.R. brevipes & others, p. 87
4. Fruiting body turning dark gray to black Ji'recr/y whenbruised(within5-10 minutes), withoutan
intermediate reddish phase; fruiting body blackening in age .../?. albonigra & others, p. 89
4. Not as above; if staining black, then with a preliminary reddish phase . 5
5. Flesh and stalk surface distinctly staining reddish to orange when scratched or bruised (within
5 minutes), then eventually darkening to dark gray, dark brownish-gray, or black .6
5. Not as above (but may stain reddish without blackening afterward or may stain smoky-brown
directly) . 8
6. Gills thick and widely spaced .R. nigricans (see R. densifolia, p. 90)
6. Not as above . 7
7. Cap viscid when moist; taste usually acrid .R. densifolia, p. 90
7. Cap not viscid; taste typically mild .R. dissimulans (see R. densifolia, p. 90)
8. Gills usually with sordid reddish stains, often entirely reddish in old age; fruiting body not
blackening; associated with oak in California and southern U.S. R. subnigricansgroup, p. 90
8. Not as above .9
9. Flesh typically staining faintly reddish when cut (within 20 minutes), and then eventually pale
smoky-brown (or at times without reddish phase) R. adusta( see R. subnigricans group, p. 90)
9. Not as above . 10
10. Fruiting body very firm and stalk hard; cap whitish becoming ochre, rusty-brown, or reddish-
brown, margin not striate; all parts bruising or discoloring ochraceous to cinnamon-brown;
odor often unpleasant in age, never sweet; spore print white; common in eastern North
America .R. compacta (see R. subnigricans group, p. 90)
10. Not as above . 11
11. Odor heavy and sweet (like maraschino cherries or benzaldehyde), but in age often becoming
fetid; cap medium-sized to large (5-15 cm broad), yellow-brown to straw-color, dull ochre, or
yellow-orange .R. fragrantissima group, p. 92
11. Not as above . 12
12. Cap 5-12 cm broad, typically dark red with a nearly blackish center; taste usually acrid but some¬
times mild; spore print whitish; common under hardwoods in eastern North America .
. R. atropurpurea (-R. krombholzii)
12. Not as above . 13
13. Flesh and stalk surface staining gray to ashy or black (sometimes slowly and sometimes with
an intermediate reddish phase) . 14
13. Not as above . 17
14. Cap yellow to ochre . 15
14. Cap orange to red, coppery, purple-red, etc. (sometimes mixed with yellow) .. 16
15. Taste mild .R. claroflava, p. 92
15. Taste acrid .R. ochroleuca{see R. claroflava, p. 92)
16. Cap red to orange or coppery-brown; flesh bruising gray directly . R. decolorans group, p. 91
16. Cap purplish, greenish, brownish, etc. (often a mixture of colors); flesh usually turning reddish
before graying . R. occidentalis & others (see R. decolorans group, p. 91)
86 RUSSULACEAE
17. Cap bright yellow to golden-yellow; mature gills yellowish R. lutea (see R. claroflava, p. 92)
17. Not as above . 18
18. Cap white or whitish to yellowish-white or pale yellow . 19
18. Cap some other color (including yellow-brown) when fresh, but may fade to whitish in age 23
19. Cap cuticle (skin) thick and rubbery .R. crassotunicata (see R. cremoricolor, p. 97)
19. Not as above . 20
20. Spore print and gills white or whitish . 21
20. Spore print and mature gills yellowish . 22
21. Cap pale yellow to yellowish-white, viscid when moist, the margin usually striate in age; taste
acrid; usually scattered to gregarious .R. cremoricolor & others, p. 97
21. Cap dull white or tinged buff or pink at center, often dirty, viscid or dry; taste mild or acrid;
usually occurring in small numbers .R. albidula group, p. 96
22. Stalk typically staining yellow and then brown when scratched; odor fishy in age .
.R. sp. (unidentified) (see R. xerampelina, p. 102)
22. Not as above .R. maculata group, p. 100
23. Taste of flesh and/ or gills distinctly acrid (taste them both!) .24
23. Taste mild or nearly so . 32
24. Stalk white (but sometimes with stains or discolorations, especially at base) .25
24. Stalk red or flushed pink to rose .31
25. Cap yellow-brown to dull straw-color, hazel-brown, grayish-brown, or even darker at center;
margin striate and with small bumps, at least in age; odor usually rather unpleasant; very
common .R. sororia group, p. 93
25. Not as above . 26
26. Spore print and gills white or whitish . 27
26. Spore print yellow to ochre; gills yellowish at least in age .
. Various JARs (see R. alutacea group, p. 102 & R. maculata group, p. 100)
27. Stalk and flesh often slowly staining orange or pink when bruised (sometimes with an inter¬
mediate yellowish phase); cap typically multicolored (usually yellowish at center and splotched
with yellow, orange, or red toward margin) .R. bicolor
27. Not as above . 28
28. Cap red suffused with gray or brown; associated with western conifers and especially common
in the Rocky Mountains .R. montana
28. Not as above (but cap may be bright red) . 29
29. Cap bright red when fresh, but often fading to pink, orange, or sometimes even white .
. R. emetica group, p. 97
29. Not as above; cap variously colored but not bright red . 30
30. Many gills forked at quite a distance from the stalk; stalk firm, 1-3 cm thick, cap 5-15 cm broad
.R. variata(see R. cyanoxantha, p. 94)
30. Gills not forked, or forked only near stalk; stalk usually less than 1.5 cm thick, often quite fragile;
cap up to 7 cm broad .R.fragilis & others, p. 98
31. Stalk red to pink; cap dark red to bright red (but often fading in age) .R. rosacea, p. 99
31. Cap pink, olive-gray, etc., or a mixture of these colors; stalk usually tinged rose or grayish-rose
.R. gracilis group & others, p. 99
32. Cap surface dry and soon areolate (cracked into scales or plaques), greenish to blue-gray or with
buff, yellowish, or even brownish tones; common under hardwoods in eastern U.S.33
32. Not as above . 34
33. Cap usually greenish or greenish-gray .R. virescens, p. 95
33. Cap buff to yellowish or brownish, with green tones sometimes present also.
.R. crustosa & others (see R. virescens, p. 95)
34. Cap predominantly greenish or grayish-green (sometimes mixed with other colors); stalk
white or whitish (or sometimes brownish-stained, but never pink); odor not fishy in age; spore
print white to creamy (pale yellow), not ochre or dark yellow . 35
34. Not with above combination of characteristics; cap may have greenish tones, but typically the
greenish tones not predominating . 38
RUSSULA 87
35. Spore print white; fruiting body often robust (stalk 1.5-3 cm thick or more); stalk not staining
salmon in ferrous sulfate . R. cyanoxantha, p. 94
35. Spore print pale cream; stalk typically 0.7-2 (2.5) cm thick, staining salmon in ferrous sulfate 36
36. Cap bluish-green to greenish, with a matt (dull) appearance .
. R. parazurea (see R. aeruginea, p. 95)
36. Cap greenish to grayish, often with yellowish, rusty, or brownish areas, and viscid when
moist . 37
37. Cap usually greenish; found with aspen, birch, oak, and conifers .R. aeruginea, p. 95
37. Cap often with other colors; found with oak and beech . . . R. grisea (see R. aeruginea, p. 95)
38. Cap small to medium-sized (2-7 cm broad); surface dry, reddish to purple, but overlaid with
a fine whitish powder or velvety bloom .R. mariae, p. 96
38. Not as above; cap lacking whitish bloom . 39
39. Spore print and gills white or whitish .40
39. Spore print yellow to ochre; gills yellowish in age .42
40. Cap typically with purplish, pinkish-lilac, bluish, and/or yellow tones; fruiting body some¬
times large; gills often slightly greasy to the touch; stalk not staining salmon in ferrous sulfate
. R. cyanoxantha, p. 94
40. Cap usually browner, grayer, redder, or more flesh-colored than above; fruiting body usually
medium-sized; stalk staining salmon in ferrous sulfate .41
41. Predominant color of cap typically flesh-color or reddish; cuticle (skin) often wrinkled; found
mainly in eastern North America .R. vesca(see R. cyanoxantha, p. 94)
41. Predominant color of cap typically some shade of brown, olive-brown, gray, or gray-brown;
widespread . R. brunneola(see R. cyanoxantha, p. 94)
42. Stalk typically staining yellow when scratched, then slowly becoming brownish; stalk usually
rose-colored or at least with a blush of pink, but white in some forms; fruiting body medium¬
sized to very large; odor shrimpy or fishy in old age .R. xerampelina, p. 102
42. Not as above . 43
43. Cap red to pink, orange, or whitish, or a mixture of these colors; associated with hardwoods,
especially oak; stalk white .R. maculata group, p. 100
43. Not as above .44
44. Cap 2-6 cm broad, markedly fragile, variously colored but usually with at least some purple
. R. placita group & others, p. 100
44. Not as above; larger and/ or not markedly fragile .45
45. Cap large, firm, sometimes massive (up to 35 cm broad!); stalk often tinged pinkish .
.R. olivacea(see R. alutacea group, p. 102)
45. Not as above; medium-sized to fairly large, but not massive; stalk usually white .46
46. Spores and mature gills creamy; found with hardwoods . . R. grisea (see R. aeruginea, p. 95)
46. Spores and mature gills yellow to ochre; found with hardwoods or conifers . 47
47. Cap medium-sized (3-12 cm broad), burgundy to livid red, purple, or rusty-red, or with a
brownish center, or with reddish-buff tones; fruiting body quite firm R. integragroup, p. 101
47. Not as above; medium-sized to fairly large (cap 5-20 cm broad) and often fragile in old age
.R. alutacea group & assorted JARs, p. 102
“Better kicked than picked,” Russula brevipes is one of the most common and mundane of all the
Russulas. Note the centrally depressed or vaselike white cap. The stem can be slightly longer—or
considerably shorter—than shown here and the cap is often incrusted with dirt.
88
Russula albonigra is a hard, robust species that is decidedly schizophrenic: white in youth, black in age
(note the young whitish cap at the bottom). It also blackens when bruised.
89
90 RUSSULACEAE
texture, large size, coarse appearance, and reddening of the gills in age or where wounded.
The staining reactions elsewhere on the fruiting body are rather variable, but at no point
does it blacken as in R. albonigra, R. densifolia, R. dissimulans, or R. nigricans. The cap
color is rather amorphous—generally an unbecoming blend of murky gray, smoky-brown,
and sordid reddish or ochraceous—but in one collection I made the fruiting body had
bluish-green tinges as in R. brevipes var. acrior. Another interesting feature is its affinity for
chanterelles, one or more of which will often grow right out of the base of its stem—or if not,
then in the immediate vicinty! Other species: R. adusta is a somewhat similar, widespread
species which has rather erratic staining reactions (the flesh normally bruises smoky-
brown or grayish-black, but may show a slight reddish intermediate phase); its gills,
however, do not redden in age. R. compacta of northern and eastern North America is
also somewhat similar, but stains ochre or brown and has a pallid to rusty- or reddish-
brown to ochre-brown cap. Both of these are “better stomped than chomped.”
91
92 RUSSULACEAE
COMMENTS: The graying flesh, reddish to orange cap, and mild taste are the fallible
fieldmarks of this firm, rather robust Russula, which is actually a close-knit “complex” of
species. One striking form found in our coastal pine forests is very firm and has a somewhat
shiny cap in dry weather. Other species: R. paludosa has a reddish cap and flesh that grays
somewhat, but the taste is usually slightly bitter or acrid. R. obscura has a darker (purple-
red to brownish) cap, mild taste, and flesh that stains pinkish or reddish before blackening.
Both of the above species are quite firm and robust, have ochre spores, and grow with
conifers. Another distinctive species,/?, occidentals, has a grayish to olive-brown to buff,
brownish, or vinaceous cap (usually a mixture of these colors) and mild taste. Its stalk
and flesh are white but usually stain reddish and then gray (or gray directly) when bruised.
It is fairly common under mountain conifers in the Pacific Northwest.
Russula sororia is abundant under both hardwoods and conifers. The yellow-brown to grayish-
brown cap has a striate margin in age.
94 RUSSULACEAE
EDIBILITY: Better stomped than chomped—it might be poisonous and doesn’t taste
good anyway.
COMMENTS: The brown to grayish-brown to dingy straw-colored cap, tuberculate-
striate margin in age, peppery-tasting gills, unpleasant odor, and moderate size typify a
group of Russulas that are at times exceedingly abundant. They differ from the R.fragran-
tissima group in their smaller size, grayer color, and different odor. They have passed under
the names R. peciinata, a European species with a yellower cap, and R. pectinatoides,
a North American species that is also yellower than R. sororia, and has a less acrid taste
and darker (yellower) spores. Other species: R. amoenolens is the same as R. sororia
(as defined here); R. cerolens is practically the same but has partially reticulate spores;
R. granulata and R. pulverulenta have scurfy-granulose caps.
confused with each other (as well as with R. cyanoxantha) when not “typically” colored.
Both are edible, however, so it hardly matters. For similar species with creamy or yellow-
tinged spores, see R. parazurea and R. grisea (under R. aeruginea).
Russula albidula group. A dingy and often dirty whitish “JAR” of moderate size. R. cremoricolor
(illustrated on next page) is usually much cleaner.
Russula cremoricolor resembles R. emetica except for its cap color, which is yellowish-white.
COMMENTS: This species looks like an albino R. emetica, and save for the whitish cap,
there is little difference. The cap, although whitish, is slightly yellower than that of R.
albidula, and is usually cleaner and more markedly striate. Also, R. cremoricolor tends to
fruit in larger numbers. Other species: R. crenulata and R. raoultii are two very similar
species that are yellower (cap more or less pale yellow); the latter also has smaller spores.
Another pale capped, bitter- or acrid-tasting species, R. crassotunicata, can be distin¬
guished by its thick, rubbery or leathery cap cuticle that is often slightly scurfy and its
white stalk that frequently develops brownish spots in age. It occurs under northern
conifers. “Eating raoultii” (or any of the other species discussed here) is not recommended.
97
Russula emetica group. The bright red cap (that often fades), white gills, white stem, and peppery
taste make this an easy mushroom to identify.
98
RUSSULA 99
Russula gracilis group. Our member of this species “complex” (shown here) is abundant under
Douglas-fir. Note the slightly colored (pinkish-tinged) stalk.
100 RUSSULACEAE
to decurrent, close, brittle. STALK 4-10 cm long, 1 -2.5 cm thick, equal or with a narrowed
base, smooth, dry, pink or red, or at times only with a blush of red; hollow in age. SPORE
PRINT pale yellow; spores 7-9 * 6-8 microns, nearly round with amyloid warts.
HABITAT: Scattered or in large troops under conifers, especially pine. Abundant on the
Pacific Coast from fall through early spring, fruiting in our area mainly in coastal stands
of Monterey pine, often in the company of Lactarius deliciosus.
EDIBILITY: To be avoided because of the acrid taste.
COMMENTS: This common, conspicuous, colorful inhabitant of our coastal forests is
readily recognized by its red cap, red to rosy stem, creamy gills, and acrid (peppery) taste.
It is one of our prettiest mushrooms—the clean, pale gills contrasting beautifully with the
red cap and stem. At a distance it is sometimes mistaken for Amanita muscaria, which also
grows commonly with pines but has a white stem with a ring (annulus) and volva. The pale
yellow spores and red or pink stem distinguish R. rosacea from R. emetica, while the acrid
taste separates it from R. xerampelina and the R. alutacea group. Other species: R. san¬
guined is probably a synonym. A form with reddish-purple cap and stem—possibly
distinct—is sometimes found in our area growing with R. rosacea.
101
102 RUSSULACEAE
COMMENTS: This beautiful but extremely variable species can be recognized by the
following combination of characteristics: (1) cap viscid when wet, usually with adhering
debris when dry (2) stem usually—but not always—tinted pinkish and always staining
yellowish and finally brown when handled or bruised (3) yellow spore print (4) mild (not
peppery) taste (5) fishy odor at maturity, which is accentuated by cooking or drying
(6) tendency of the gills to age or dry brownish to grayish. In addition, the young buttons
are remarkably rotund and symmetrical—but this character can be appreciated only by
religiously observing a large number of Russulas. Given the extreme variation in color and
size, R. xerampelina may well be a composite species. At least two distinctive—but
intergrading—varieties occur: one with a red to purple cap and lovely rosy stem, the other
with a brownish-olive cap and white or nearly white stem (in addition to the color plate,
there is a black-and-white photo on p. 83). Another distinctive variety occurs in our area
with oak and manzanita; it differs in having a pale greenish-yellow to buff or whitish cap.
Small to medium-sized, mostly terrestrial mushrooms. CAP typically smooth, often viscid and
brightly colored. GILLS soft, waxy, usually thick and well-spaced, usually attached. ST^LK
central; fleshy or hollow. VEIL absent or evanescent, rarely forming a slight ring (annulus).
VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT white. Spores round to elliptical, but often shaped like corn
kernels when immature; typically smooth and not amyloid. Basidia long and narrow. Gill tissue
interwoven, parallel, or divergent.
THESE are attractive, often colorful, white-spored mushrooms with soft, clean, waxy-
looking gills. The flesh is not dry and brittle or chalky as in the Russulaceae, and the gills,
though often thick, do not have the blunt edges typical of the chanterelles (Cantharella-
ceae). However, there is little aside from the “waxy” gills to separate them from the
numerous white-spored genera in the Tricholomataceae (particularly Clitocybe, Mycena,
Omphalina, Laccaria, and Marasmius). The “waxiness” is admittedly an ambiguous
character, but with a little experience is readily apparent—the gills are characteristically
soft, clean, fleshy, and . . . they look (and often feel) waxy. (The cap sometimes also has a
waxy appearance, hence the common name “waxy caps.”) Laccaria species have somewhat
waxy gills, but they have tough, fibrous stems and spiny spores. Chroogomphus and
Gomphidius also have waxy gills, but their spores are smoky-black.
The waxy caps have traditionally been grouped together in a single large and diverse
genus, Hygrophorus, but most mycologists now split them into two or more genera based
primarily on the arrangement of the hyphae in the gill tissue (see illustrations, p. 19). As
this character can only be determined with a microscope, the family is treated as one entity
here, but three genera are recognized:
Camarophyllus (hyphae in gill tissue intricately interwoven): Fruiting body small to
medium-sized, usually white or dull colored; cap usually not viscid or only slightly so;
gills typically decurrent, thick, well-spaced, somewhat waxy; stalk dry; veil absent.
Hygrocybe (hyphae in gill tissue more or less parallel): Fruiting body small to medium¬
sized, usually brightly colored and quite waxy; cap dry to moist, viscid, or slimy; gills
free to adnexed, adnate, or sometimes decurrent, obviously waxy; stalk dry or viscid
or slimy, often slender and hollow; veil absent.
Hygrophorus in restricted sense (hyphae in gill tissue divergent from a central strand):
Fruiting body medium-sized to fairly large, usually white or dull colored; cap viscid or
slimy; gills typically adnate to decurrent, well-spaced or close, often only slightly
waxy, usually white or pale colored; stalk slimy, viscid or dry, often fleshy (rarely
hollow), apex often punctate (adorned with pointlike scales or granules); slimy or
fibrillose veil sometimes present.
104 HYGROPHORACEAE
Hygrocybe species are the mushrooms most easily identified as “waxy caps,” while
Hygrophorus and Camarophyllus species are more likely to be confused with other genera,
particularly Clitocybe, because their gills are not so obviously waxy. Some investigators
still recognize only one genus, Hygrophorus, while others recognize only two by throwing
Camarophyllus in with Hygrocybe. Several small, rare “satellite” genera also occur, but are
not treated here.
The long, narrow protruding basidia that give the gills their “waxiness” are reminiscent
of those in Cantharellus, leading some mycologists to infer that Camarophyllus (the most
primitive genus of waxy caps) evolved from Cantharellus-Mkt ancestors. (Camarophyllus
pratensis, in fact, slightly resembles the chanterelle, Cantharellus cibarius.) A relation¬
ship with Omphalina and Clitocybe of the Tricholomataceae has also been suggested.
The waxy caps occur throughout the mushroom season but are partial to cold weather.
In colder climates they may continue to fruit after the first frosts, while in our area they
normally peak in the cold winter months (December-February). Camarophyllus and
Hygrocybe species are mostly saprophytic. Like Leptonia species, they are particularly
abundant in environments where other fleshy fungi are few. In coastal California
this means under redwood and to a lesser extent cypress, but in other regions they are
common in ungrazed fields, heaths, and boggy areas. Hygrophorus species, on the other
hand, are largely mycorrhizal—hence in our area they occur with other mycorrhiza-
formers under oak, madrone, pine, and Douglas-fir, rather than with redwood or cypress.
Hygrophorus and Hygrocybe each contain about 100 species in North America, while
Camarophyllus has about 40. Most waxy caps have wide distributions, and at least half of
the North American species occur in California.
Waxy caps are without a doubt among our most colorful mushrooms, with virtually
every hue in the rainbow represented: blue or green in Hygrocybe psittacina, pink in
Hygrocybe calyptraeformis, bright yellow, orange, or red in a great many species, black in
Hygrocybe conica, white in Hygrophorus eburneus. None are thought to be dangerously
poisonous, and some species are rated highly as edibles. However, I have yet to find one
to my liking. By and large they are too bland or too watery or too bland and too watery
to be worth eating. (See comments on the edibility of Hygrophorus sordidus and H.
russula).) Also, a few species (e.g., Hygrocybe conica and H. punicea) may cause illness.
However, their beauty is reason enough for getting to know them, and they have the
added attraction of being relatively easy to identify in the field! Consequently, a fairly
extensive selection of species is offered here.
Key to the Hygrophoraceae
1. Fruiting body whitish except for yellow to golden-orange powder, flakes, or granules on the cap
and/ or stalk apex (but powder may smear in wet weather) Hygrophorus chrysodon, p. 119
1. Not as above (if fruiting body white, then lacking yellow to golden-orange granules) . 2
2. Fruiting body white to creamy, buff, or pale yellow when fresh . 3
2. Fruiting body at least partially darker or differently colored (including bright lemon-yellow) 17
3. Stalk viscid or slimy when moist, at least over lower portion .4
3. Stalk not viscid . 7
4. Cap tinged buff to yellowish or pale yellow, at least at center; especially common under pine
(but not restricted to it).Hygrophorus gliocyclus & others, p. 120
4. Not as above . 5
5. Stalk usually at least 1.5 cm thick; cap fairly large (5-15 cm broad) .
.Hygrophorusponderatus (see H. sordidus, p. 122)
5. Stalk usually (but not always) less than 1.5 cm thick; cap medium-sized to fairly small .... 6
6. Cap conical when young, usually with a prominent umbo in age; gills not decurrent; found in
eastern North America, rarely in California (mostly under cypress) .Hygrocybepura
6. Not as above; gills adnate to decurrent; widespread .Hygrophorus eburneus, p. 119
HYGROPHORACEAE 105
7. Cap not conical; stalk 1 -7 cm thick, or if thinner then cap viscid when moist and developing dis¬
tinct yellow-brown to reddish-brown, peachy, salmon, or ochre tones in age .8
7. Not as above; stalk typically less than 1 cm thick and/ or cap distinctly conical. 10
8. Stalk often with an annulus (ring) or “volva” that is easily obliterated; typically found under
mountain conifers .Hygrophorus subalpinus, p. 121
8. Not as above; annulus or “volva” absent .9
9. Fruiting body white or discoloring slightly yellowish or buff; associated mainly with oak,
occasionally with conifers .Hygrophorus sordidus & others, p. 122
9. Either fruiting body discoloring more dramatically in age or else associated with conifers and
possessing a densely scurfy stalk apex. 74
10. Growing in grass; stalk tough and pliant; cap often umbonate (seeMarasmius oreades, p. 208)
10. Not as above . 11
11. Odor sharp and cedarlike or fragrant .Camarophyllus russocoriaceus & others, p. 109
11. Odor mild or not distinctive (or merely fungal) . 12
12. Cap conical when young and/ or gills typically notched oradnexed orattimesadnate;gillhyphae
parallel .Hygrocybe subaustraliga& H. albinella (see Camarophyllus borealis, p. 109)
12. Cap not normally conical; gills typically adnate to decurrent; gill hyphae not parallel .... 13
13. Cap viscid when moist . 14
13. Cap not viscid ... 15
14. Cap thin and often translucent-striate when moist, usually less than 3 cm broad; found in
many habitats; gill tissue interwoven .Camarophyllus niveus (see C. borealis, p. 109)
14. Not as above; found mainly under conifers; gill tissue divergent .
.Hygrophoruspiceae (see H. eburneus, p. 119)
15. Growing in groups or troops on pine needles; gills very widely spaced and usually with veins in
between; cap broadly convex soon becoming plane or umbilicate (see photo at top of p. 207)
..(see Marasmius sp. (unidentified), p. 206)
15. Not as above (see top right photo on p. 109) . 16
16. Fruiting body often developing a slightly yellowish tinge in age; cap dry .
.Camarophyllus virgineus(see C. borealis, p. 109)
16. Not as above; cap sometimes slightly lubricous .... Camarophyllus borealis & others, p. 109
17. Cap small (up to 6 cm broad but usually less), dry, honey-colored or yellowish to orange or
scarlet beneath a layer of small, gray to dark brown or blackish fibrillose scales . 18
17. Not as above; either cap viscid or larger or lacking dark scales or differently colored. 19
18. Background of cap scarlet to orange when fresh Hygrocybe turunda (see H. miniata, p. 113)
18. Background of cap buff to dull yellowish or honey-colored; found in eastern North America
.Hygrocybe caespitosa
19. Fruiting body staining gray to black when handled (often slowly); cap conical, at least when
young; common.Hygrocybe conica & others, p. 116
19. Not as above; fruiting body not blackening when handled . 20
20. Cap bright red, yellow, or orange, at least when fresh (but may fade to whitish) . 21
20. Cap some other color (including pink, salmon, vinaceous, purple-red, pale dull orange, etc.) 42
21. Cap and lower portion of stalk viscid to slimy when moist; stalk typically 4 mm thick or more
and not hollow; gills adnate to decurrent; gill tissue divergent . 22
21. Not as above; if both cap and stalk'viscid, then stalk typically slender, hollow, and fragile 23
22. Cap red to orange when young, at least at center.Hygrophorus speciosus, p. 126
22. Cap at first dark brown to olive-brown at center, the brighter colors developing in age and the
center often remaining brownish .Hygrophorus hypothejus, p. 126
23. Cap dark to bright red when fresh (but may fade in age or as it dries to orange or yellow) . 24
23. Cap orange to yellow (sometimes fading to whitish), never bright red . 31
24. Cap conical, up to 5 cm broad, bright red and not usually fading, viscid when moist; stalk also
red and usually viscid; found in eastern North America .Hygrocybe ruber
24. Not as above . 25
25. Cap and stalk distinctly viscid to slimy when moist; cap usually small or minute .
.Hygrocybe reai & others (see H. miniata, p. 113)
25. Not as above . 26
106 HYGROPHORACEAE
26. Cap distinctly conical when young and usually retaining a pointed umbo in age; stalk yellow
.Hygrocybe cuspidata (see H. acutoconica, p. 115)
26. Not as above . 27
27. Gills usually distinctly decurrent; cap typically small or minute (less than 4 cm broad) ... 40
27. Not as above . 28
28. Cap small (1-4 cm), not viscid, red to scarlet when moist but fading drastically as it dries to
orange or even yellow .Hygrocybe miniata & others, p. 113
28. Not as above (if cap not viscid, then cap not fading drastically or cap larger) . 29
29. Stalk white (base may be colored) .Hygrocybe laetissima (see H. punicea, p. 114)
29. Stalk yellow to orange or red . 30
30. Cap viscid when moist; stalk typically (0.5)1-2 cm or more thick, usually yellow or reddish fading
to orange-yellow; base of stalk often whitish .Hygrocybe punicea & others, p. 114
30. Cap not viscid or only slightly viscid; stalk typically 3-8 mm thick, usually red to reddish-orange
with a yellow to orange base .Hygrocybe coccinea & others, p. 114
31. Cap and stalk slimy or very viscid when moist; cap generally 4 cm broad or less . 32
31. Not as above (cap may be slimy, but stalk dry to only slightly viscid) . 35
32. Fruiting body showing pink, flesh-colored, or greenish (rarely bluish) tones somewhere on
fruiting body; gills not normally decurrent.Hygrocybepsittacina, p. 118
32. Not as above; fruiting body yellow to orange (but may show some white or have a lilac tinge) 33
33. Growing on rotting conifers . (see Mycena lilacifolia, p. 236)
33. Not as above; usually found on the ground . 34
34. Gills typically decurrent and cap usually depressed centrally .
.Hygrocybe nitida (see H.flavescens, p. 115)
34. Not as above .Hygrocybe chlorophana & others (see H.flavescens, p. 115)
35. Cap distinctly viscid or slimy when moist, 2-7 cm broad or more when expanded; gills not
decurrent . 36
35. Cap not viscid, or if slightly viscid then less than 3 cm broad or gills decurrent . 37
36. Cap distinctly conical, at least when young .Hygrocybe acutoconica, p. 116
36. Cap broadly convex to plane, not conical ..Hygrocybe flavescens & others, p. 115
37. Gills brilliant orange to yellow-orange, retaining their color even after the cap fades; common
in eastern North America, occasional in the Pacific Northwest Hygrocybe marginata, p. 112
37. Not as above; common and widespread . 38
38. Gills usually not decurrent; cap red to orange-red when fresh and moist (but fading).
.Hygrocybe miniata & others, p. 113
38. Not as above; gills usually decurrent . 39
39. Found in humus; cap yellow to orange-yellow (never scarlet, red, or orange) .
.Hygrocybe parvula & others (see H.flavescens, p. 115)
39. Not as above . 40
40. Stalk usually quite long (4-10 cm); found mainly in eastern North America on ground, in moss,
or on rotten wood .Hygrocybe cantharellus (see H. miniata, p. 113)
40. Not as above; found on ground, or if in lichen, moss, or wood, then stalk not so long .... 41
41. Typically found in humus or soil; cap red or scarlet when fresh.
.Hygrocybe subminiata (see H. miniata, p. 113)
41. Not as above; often found on wood, lichens, moss (see Omphalina & Xeromphalina, p. 221)
42. Cap sharply conical when young, usually retaining a pointed umbo in age, coral-pink to pink,
pinkish-orange, or salmon; gills pink .Hygrocybe calyptraeformis, p. 117
42. Not as above .43
43. Entire stalk or at least the lower part distinctly viscid to slimy when moist; cap also viscid 44
43. Stalk dry to slightly lubricous but not viscid; cap dry or viscid . 54
44. Cap small; stalk slender (usually less than 6 mm thick), hollow, not white; veil absent .... 45
44. Cap usually medium-sized to fairly large; stalk typically at least 5 mm thick, sometimes white;
veil present or absent . 47
45. Cap blackish to dark brown or grayish .Hygrocybe unguinosa (see H. psittacina, p. 118)
45. Not as above; cap brighter or lighter in color . 46
HYGROPHORACEAE 107
46. Cap sometimes green or greenish-tinged; gills typically adnate . Hygrocybepsittacina, p. 118
46. Green shades absent; gills often decurrent . Hygrocybe laeta (see H. psittacina, p. 118)
47. Cap dull yellowish becoming browner or grayer in age; stalk at least 1 cm thick; gills white or
developing greenish stains, but not yellow; found mainly under hardwoods in eastern North
America .Hygrophorus paludosus
47. Not as above .48
48. Cap (or center of cap) chestnut-brown to cinnamon-brown, reddish-brown, pinkish-tan,
salmon, or yellow-brown . 49
48. Cap olive-brown to grayish-brown, gray, blackish, etc. 51
49. Cap and gills rufous to rusty-orange, apricot, or salmon-buff; growing under oaks in eastern
North America .Hygrophorus subsalmonius
49. Not as above . 50
50. Odor fragrant, like almond extract . Hygrophorus variicolor (see H. bakerensis, p. 126)
50. Odor more or less mild . Hygrophorus laurae & others (see H. roseibrunnehs, p. 125)
51. Lower portion of stalk sheathed with gray to brown, olive-brown, or blackish fibrils, scales,
or granules; cap, gills, or stalk not yellow.Hygrophorus olivaceoalbus & others, p. 127
51. Not as above . 52
52. Gills creamy to yellow or orange; cap and stalk often exhibitng some yellow or orange tones
.Hygrophorus hypothejus, p. 126
52. Yellow and orange tones absent . 53
53. Cap evenly blackish to deep olive-brown when young; found mainly in eastern North America
.Hygrophorusfuligineus (see H. hypothejus, p. 126)
53. Cap paler when young or with a paler margin; widespread .
. Hygrophorus fuscoalbus & others (see H. hypothejus, p. 126)
54. Gills persistently bright orange to yellow-orange, even after cap fades; cap 1-5 cm broad, stalk
less than 6 mm thick . Hygrocybe marginata, p. 112
54. Not as above . 55
55. Cap green (citrine-green), at least when mature . ..Hygrocybe virescens, p. 118
55. Not as above . 56
56. Cap gray to grayish-brown, dark grayish-brown, olive, deep olive-brown, blackish, or umber;
gills and cap lacking violet or blue tones. 57
56. Cap differently colored (tan, reddish-brown, vinaceous, etc.), or if colored as above then cap
or gills with a violet, lilac, or bluish tinge when fresh . 63
57. Cap conical or with a pointed umbo, dull or dark gray.
.Hygrocybe acuta (see Camarophyllus recurvatus, p. 112)
57. Not as above . 58
58. Odor fragrant (like almond extract), but sometimes faint .
.Hygrophorus agathosmus & others, p. 128
58. Odor mild or not as above . 59
59. Base of stalk usually pale pinkish to pinkish-orange (especially interior) .
.(see Tricholoma saponaceum, p. 184)
59. Not as above . 60
60. Stalk sheathed by grayish to dark grayish-brown fibrils, scales, or granules .
. Hygrophorus inocybiformis 8c others (see H. olivaceoalbus, p. 127)
60. Not as above . 61
61. Fruiting body rather small (cap typically less than 5 cm broad, stalk typically less than 1 cm
thick and sometimes hollow) .Camarophyllus recurvatus & others, p. 112
61. Not as above; fruiting body medium-sized; stalk usually 1 cm thick or more . 62
62. Cap viscid to slimy when moist; gills white or pink . Hygrophorus calophyllus, p. 129
62. Cap viscid or dry, often appearing streaked; gills white or gray .
. Hygrophorus camarophyllus & others (see H. calophyllus, p. 129)
63. Stalk rooting deeply or with a “tap root” encased by grayish-brown volva-like material; cap
white becoming pinkish to vinaceous-red; gills white; known only from southern California
under oak; solitary or clustered .Hygrophorus marianae
63. Not as above; widespread and common . 64
108 HYGROPHORACEAE
64. Gills (or entire fruiting body) soon streaked or stained coral-red to vinaceous, pinkish-red, or
purple-red (especially in age), sometimes also with yellow stains.65
64. Not as above (but gills may be naturally pinkish) . 68
65. Associated with hardwoods (mainly oak and tanoak) .Hygrophorus russula, p. 123
65. Associated with conifers (mainly pine and spruce) . 66
66. Cap reddish at first but staining yellow and becoming pale to bright yellow in age; taste bitter;
especially common in the Rockies.Hygrophorus amarus (see H. purpurascens, p. 124)
66. Not as above (but fruiting body may yellow somewhat); widespread (including Rockies) . 67
67. Fibrillose veil present, at least when young .Hygrophorus purpurascens, p. 124
67. Veil absent .Hygrophorus erubescens & H. capreolarius (see H. purpurascens, p. 124)
68. Gills lilac or violet or pinkish to dingy flesh-colored, attached and sometimes slightly decurrent
but not deeply decurrent; stalk tough and fibrous, pliant, often fibrillose; cap often minutely
scaly or scurfy, not viscid; spores usually spiny . (steLaccaria, p. 171)
68. Not as above; spores smooth . 69
69. Gills and/ or cap with a violet, purple, or bluish tinge when fresh .
.Camarophyllus subviolaceus & others, p. 111
69. Not as above . 70
70. Gills brown to vinaceous-brown, adnate to decurrent; cap some shade of brown when moist,
fading as it dries; found with hardwoods in eastern North America Hygrophorus kauffmanii
70. Not as above; gills paler ... 71
71. Growing in grass; cap buff to tan, often umbonate; gills whitish; stalk thin, tough, pliant ....
.(seeMarasmius oreades, p. 208)
71. Not as above . 72
72. Cap 4.5 cm broad or less, translucent-striate when moist . 73
72. Not as above; cap typically opaque . 74
73. Stalk 4-7 mm thick; cap vinaceous-brown to pinkish-gray or buff, slightly viscid when moist;
gills pinkish-gray or paler, distinctly decurrent; terrestrial .
. Camarophyllus colemannianus (see C. subviolaceus, p. Ill)
73. Not as above; growing on ground or wood . (see Tricholomataceae, p. 129)
74. Stalk 1 -3 cm thick, the apex distinctly scurfy (punctate); cap 5-20 cm broad, pale tan to pinkish,
flesh-colored, pinkish-orange, or occasionally whitish; gills usually tinged pink(but sometimes
whitish); cap viscid when moist, the margin inrolled until maturity; odor not like almond
extract; associated with conifers (especially spruce) .Hygrophoruspudorinus, p. 124
74. Not with above combination of characteristics . 75
75. Gills distinctly paler than center of cap (white to creamy or pale yellow) . 76
75. Gills colored like the cap or slightly paler or darker (pinkish to salmon, etc.) . 79
76. Odor faintly fragrant (like almond extract) to strongly aromatic . 77
76. Not as above; odor usually mild or somewhat potato-like . 78
77. Odor like almond extract . Hygrophorus bakerensis & others, p. 126
77. Odor strongly aromatic (but not as above) Hygrophoruspacificus (see H. bakerensis, p. 126)
78. Cap pink or rose (but may fade!), stalk lacking sordid yellowish patches below; found under
mountain conifers, often near melting snow Hygrophorus goetzii(see H. pudorinus, p. 124)
78. Not with above features .Hygrophorus roseibrunneus & many others, p. 125
79. Odor sickeningly sweet; fruiting body pinkish-buff to pinkish-cinnamon; cap not viscid .
. Camarophyllus graveolens
79. Not as above . 80
80. Cap whitish to buff, sometimes with darker spots or zones; odor often faintly fruity (if kept in
a closed space); gills pinkish-cinnamon to salmon or ochre-salmon; associated with conifers
(but not redwood); gill hyphae divergent . Hygrophorus saxatilis (see H. pudorinus, p. 124)
80. Not with above features . 81
81. Cap whitish when young Hygrophorus albicastaneus & others (see H. roseibrunneus, p. 125)
81. Cap not white when young (but may be quite pale in age or after fading). 82
82. Gills adnexed to adnate or slightly decurrent; stalk 1 -4 cm thick, cap 5-13 cm broad; odor mild or
radish- to cucumberlike; gill hyphae divergent; usually associated with oak .
.Hygrophorus nemoreus(see Camarophylluspratensis, p. 110)
82. Not as above; gills usually decurrent .Camarophyllus pratensis, p. 110
Left: Hygrophorus subalpinus is a robust whitish conifer-loving waxy cap (see description on p.
121). Note the slight annulus (ring) on specimen at left. Right: Camarophyllus borealis and its close
relatives are white to yellowish with a slender build, decurrent gills, and little or no odor.
HABITAT: Widely scattered or in small groups in woods or at their edges, known only
from the west coast (in addition to Europe). Common in our area in the fall and winter,
especially at higher elevations in the coastal mountains, but rarely in large numbers.
EDIBILITY: Not recommended—it has a slightly medicinal flavor, at least raw.
COMMENTS: The piquant cedarlike odor distinguishes this plain-looking waxy cap
from C. borealis Sind other look-alikes. Other species: Hygrophoruspusillus is a somewhat
similar species with a viscid cap that is usually tinged cream or pale brownish-flesh-color.
It has a slight fragrant odor, divergent to nearly parallel gill tissue, and occurs in groups or
troops under conifers in northern California and the Pacific Northwest.
110
Camarophylluspratensis is variable in both shape and color, but the gills are nearly always decurrent
and widely spaced, and the cap is never slimy.
color and decurrent gills. The cap and stem are not viscid, but the gills are thick and rather
waxy. Robust individuals are slightly reminiscent of chanterelles (Cantharellus cibarius),
but differ in their duller color and broad, well-developed gills with acute rather than blunt
edges. A similarly colored species, Hygrophorus nemoreus, is fairly common in our area
with oak in the fall and winter. It is larger and fleshier than C.pratensis{ cap5-l 3 cm broad,
stalk 1.5^1 cm thick) and has a slightly viscid to dry, orangish or cinnamon-orange cap,
adnexed to adnate or slightly decurrent gills, a mild to radish- or cucumberlike odor, and
divergent gill tissue. It is large enough and common enough to be worth sampling, but
I can find no information on its edibility.
Camarophyllus subviolaceus has widely spaced decurrent gills that are violet-gray when fresh.
112 HYGROPHORACEAE
HABITAT: Scattered or in small groups in woods and swamps throughout northern North
America, late summer through early winter. I have found it several times in the
Pacific Northwest but it is not particularly common.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: Better known as Hygrophorus subviolaceus, this beautiful species has
been included because its violet-tinged gills are unusual for a waxy cap. There are several
similarly-colored species, including: C. pallidas, with smaller, round or nearly round
spores and a viscid, violet-gray cap; C. angelesianus, with amyloid spores and a viscid
cap that does not fade appreciably, usually found at high elevations in the spring and
summer; C. rainierensis, with a strong green corn odor and slightly viscid cap; and C.
cinereus, with a non-viscid cap, mild taste, and larger spores. Other species include:
C. colemannianus, closely related, but with a viscid, brown to pinkish-gray to buff cap
and pinkish-gray to pale buff colors; Hygrocybe caerulescens, a bluish-tinged species
with parallel gill tissue; and Hygrocybe purpureofolia, with lavender to dull purplish
gills and a brown cap that fades to yellow-orange, found in eastern North America.
Hygrocybe miniata has a bright red cap that fades to orange or yellow as it loses moisture. Note
small size (the largest is 2 cm broad) and convex (not conical) cap.
114 HYGROPHORACEAE
minute brown to grayish squamules (scales) on a red to yellow background. There are also
several minute species with a slimy-viscid cap and stalk when fresh, including: H. reai, with
a bitter-tasting cap; H. minutula, with a stalk that fades to yellowish in age; and H. sub-
minutula, whose stalk scarcely fades from red. All of the above species have a red to scarlet
cap when moist, and all were originally placed in Hygrophorus. None are worth eating.
waxy gills make it stand out vividly in the dim, damp milieu where it thrives. It is just as
common in our wintertime woods as H. coccinea, but much more conspicuous because of
its larger size. Fora comparison of the two, see comments under H. coccinea. Other species
in the H. punicea “complex” include: H. laetissima, with an even brighter red cap plus a
white stalk when young; H. splendidissima, stalk white becoming reddish-striate in age;
and H. aurantiosplendens, whose cap fades more markedly. All of these favor redwoods
in California and could just as well be treated as variations of H. punicea.
116
Hygrocybe conica (better known as Hygrophorus conicus) is one of our most common waxy caps.
Note conical cap (which may expand somewhat in age) and tendency to blacken.
H. acutoconica, is usually the first of the brightly colored waxy caps to appear. Bob
Winter says it often grows on lawns in Fresno, California.
EDIBILITY: Not recommended. It was once considered poisonous, perhaps due to its
blackening qualities, but also because four deaths in China were (mistakenly?) attributed
to it. Now it’s generally regarded as harmless, but Larry Stickney, chef extraordinaire,
meandering mainstay of the Mycological Society of San Francisco, and an inimitable
mushroom-loving marvel of a man, says it “elicited an odd sensation of lightheadedness
and numbness” when he tried it. At any rate, it hardly seems worth experimenting with
such a thin-fleshed, watery, tasteless morsel.
COMMENTS: The conical cap and tendency of all parts to blacken when handled im¬
mediately identify this cosmopolitan mushroom. It is likely to be among the first waxy caps
encountered by beginners and is quite beautiful and waxy-looking when growing in the
woods. By time it is brought home, however, it is often barely recognizable because of the
gray and black stains that develop. Old, withered, completely black speimens are
sometimes found growing alongside vividly colored fresh ones. When growing in deep
humus (e.g., redwood duff) the stalk is often quite long, but when growing in bare soil or
grass or shallow humus it is apt to be shorter and/ or siouizr,Hygrophorus conicus is a syn¬
onym. The “splitters” recognize several closely related blackening species, including: Hy¬
grocybe nigrescens, with a bluntly conical, red to scarlet cap, often found under oak;//.
singeri, cap and stalk distinctly viscid; and H. olivaceoniger, small, thin, and olive-green.
117
118 HYGROPHORACEAE
most of our Hygrocybes it favors redwood, but also occurs under other trees as well as on
mossy roadbanks or in grass. The largest fruiting I’ve seen was in a swampy hardwood
forest in Pennsylvania.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but slimy and insubstantial. Raw specimens make a colorful but
slippery supplement to salads, sliding down your throat before you can savor them.
COMMENTS: Also known as Hygrophorus psittacinus, this slippery little fungus is a
cinch to recognize when young and fresh—there is no other small green agaric with a
glutinous cap and stem! As it dries out, however, it changes color drastically, and faded
specimens have been known to fool the most seasoned Hygrocybe-hound. The rate,
extent, and nature of the color changes seem to vary according to environmental condi¬
tions, but close inspection will often reveal a faint olive tinge somewhere on the fruiting
body. Even when there is no green present, the small size and slimy-viscid stalk will dis¬
tinguish it from all but H. laeta (see below). The stalk can be so slimy that it is difficult to
pluck. Other species: H. psittacina var. californica is a rare fungus with a beautiful blue
rather than gorgeous green cap in youth. H. laeta is a widely distributed species of variable
color (violet-gray to pinkish, orange, vinaceous, etc.), but is never green when young and
usually has decurrent gills. It, too, has a slimy-viscid cap and stalk. H. unguinosa has a
slimy-viscid, gray to dark brown to nearly black cap and stem, and is also widely dis¬
tributed. For viscid-stalked Hygrocybes with bright yellow to orange or red caps, see
comments under H. flavescens and H. miniata.
120
Hygrophorus gliocyclus, mature specimens. This species is just as slimy as H. eburneus, but is
stockier and slightly yellower. It is common under pine.
EDIBILITY: Edible and “choice,” according to some, but like H. eburneus, disagreeable
to collect because of the copious slime (see comments on edibility of H. sordidus). One
book describes how to remove the slime from the mushrooms, but says nothing about
removing the slime from your hands.
COMMENTS: The creamy-white to yellowish cap, stocky stature, thick layer of slime on
the cap and stem (when moist), somewhat waxy gills, and association with pine are the
hallmarks of this humdrum Hygrophorus. It is thicker, squatter, and yellower than H.
eburneus, and the stalk is indisputably viscid, in contrast to H. sordidus. A closely-related,
equally slimy pine-lover, H. flavodiscus, is also widespread but has pinkish gills in youth;
H. glutinosus of eastern North America and the Pacific Northwest is the same color as
H. gliocyclus but favors hardwoods and shows reddish-brown spots on the stalk apex as it
dries; H. whileii of northern California has the color of H. gliocyclus but the stature of
H. eburneus; H. cossus is a slimy white species that develops ochraceous tones on the cap
as it ages and has a distinctive odor (like “goat moth larvae”), but is more common in
Europe than North America; H. chrysaspis also discolors in age but has no odor and gills
that dry dark brown. H. ponderatus (see H. sordidus) is large and white.
121
122 HYGROPHORACEAE
and about, it decays quickly and does not have the greatest texture and flavor (see com¬
ments on edibility of H. sordidus).
COMMENTS: This hefty white Hygrophorus is easily told from other waxy caps (H.
sordidus, et al) by its thick dry stalk and whitish color, the presence of a veil that often
forms an annulus (ring), and association with mountain conifers (see photograph at top of
p. 109). The annulus, when present, can mimic the volva of an Amanita because it tends
to sit so low on the stalk. Amanitas, however, do not have decurrent gills and are rarely as
robust. The presence of an annulus can also lead to confusion with Armillariaponderosa
and A. olida (another springtime conifer-lover), but both of those mushrooms have strong
odors. Russula brevipes is also somewhat similar, but has brittle flesh and lacks a veil.
Hygrophorus sordidus. A robust white waxy cap with a viscid cap, dry stem, and white gills that are
only slightly waxy. H. ponderatus (not illustrated) is an equally robust, viscid-stalked white species.
HYGROPHORUS 123
Russula because of its fleshiness, but the gills are soft, and at least to the experienced
Hygrophorus-hunter, waxy. H. penarius has a slightly darker cap but is otherwise similar.
H. perfumus of the Sierra Nevada has a fragrant odor. H. ponderatus is a similar but
slightly more flavorful, widespread species whose stalk is viscid or lubricous (at least over
the lower portion); in California it usually grows with conifers.
Hygrophorus russula, mature specimens. The entire fruiting body develops dark red streaks and
stains; the gills are close together and only slightly waxy.
124 HYGROPHORACEAE
adnate, well-spaced, thick, soft, waxy, at first pallid but soon becoming pale yellow, and in
age sometimes brightly colored (like margin of cap). STALK (3) 5-15 cm long, 0.5-1.5 (2)
cm thick, equal or tapered downward; yellow at apex, otherwise pallid or variously colored
(like cap) and viscid or slimy when moist. VEIL evanescent, leaving slime on stalk and
sometimes an obscure fibrillose ring. SPORE PRINT white; spores 7-9 * 4-5 microns,
elliptical, smooth. Gill tissue divergent.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious or in troops under conifers, particularly pine—very
widely distributed and often abundant in cool weather. It is common from late fall through
early spring in our coastal pine forests.
EDIBILITY: Bountiful, but bland. See H. sordidus for details.
COMMENTS: This waxy cap is best recognized by its olive-brown to olive-yellow cap
when young which is sticky or slimy and convex to depressed in age, the decurrent gills, and
association with pine. The colors are extremely variable, especially in age, and young
specimens bear little resemblance to old ones until you find stages in between. Both slim and
relatively robust specimens can be found. Other species with an olive-brown to grayish cap
and viscid stalk include: H. fuligineus, very similar but with a darker (olive to blackish)
cap, common in cool weather under conifers (mainly in eastern North America); H.fusco-
albus, with larger spores (9-13 microns long) and H. limacinus, with even larger (10-17
microns) spores; and two species which lack an inner (fibrillose) veil: H. occidentalis,
small-spored, cap brown to grayish with a pallid margin, often under oak; and H. mega-
sporus, with spores 12-18 microns long. All of these species favor conifers and have white
to grayish gills; none develop the bright colors typical of mature H. hypothejus.
Hygrophorus agathosmus, mature specimens. Note the Douglas-fir needles stuck to the cap, indi¬
cating that it was viscid. Cap is grayish, gills white and waxy, odor almondy. It also grows with spruce.
HYGROPHORUS 129
TRICHOLOMATACEAE
THIS is by far the largest and most diverse family of pale-spored agarics. The spore print
is usually white, but ranges to buff, yellowish, pale lilac, or pinkish. A stem is normally
present, but in several of the shelflike, wood-inhabiting species it is rudimentary or even
absent. The gills are typically attached to the stem, but in some of the smaller forms they
are free. Though most of the species are terrestrial, many grow on wood—whereas other
pale-spored families are almost exclusively terrestrial. They are largely woodland fungi,
but a few, such as Marasmius oreades, grow in grass.
The best way to recognize the family is to eliminate the other pale-spored families. The
gills are not normally soft, thick, and waxy as in the Hygrophoraceae, nor shallow, blunt,
and foldlike as in the Cantharellaceae; the fleshy forms do not have noticeably dry, brittle
flesh as in the Russulaceae (and their tissue lacks sphaerocysts—a microscopic feature),
nor do they have a volva as in the Amanitaceae, and the few species with a veil do not have
the free gills typical of the Lepiotaceae. (There are some exceptions to the above, but they
are discussed under individual species or genera.)
The size and complexity of the Tricholomataceae are such that no generalizations can be
made regarding edibility—other than that some are poisonous and some are not. Many
have not been adequately tested and others are too small to be of value. The safest approach
is to learn the distinguishing characteristics of each edible species—and there are some
plentiful collectable delectables that are well worth getting to know! The most notable
are the oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus), man-on-horseback (Tricholoma flavo-
virens), honey mushroom (Armiliariella mellea), matsutake (Armillaria ponderosa),
fairy ring mushroom (Marasmius oreades), and blewit (Clitocybe nuda). Several lesser-
known species (e.g., Lentinusponderosus) are also excellent.
130 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
The Tricholomataceae embraces more genera than any other family of gilled
mushrooms, and its taxonomy is still in a state of flux. Many of the genera are defined by
esoteric chemical and anatomical (microscopic) characteristics, which presents obvious
problems when attempting to construct (or use) a key based solely on field characters. It
helps to break down the genera into three large groups: wood-inhabiting, shelflike forms
(typified by Pleurotus)\ fleshy-stalked, mostly terrestrial forms (typified by Tricholoma
and Clitocybe), and thin, fragile- or cartilaginous-stalked, terrestrial or wood-inhabiting
types (typified by Mycena, Collybia, and Marasmius).
In the following key, only the more distinctive genera are included; the more difficult or
obscure ones are then keyed out under the distinctives ones, sometimes on a species-
by-species basis.
14. Spore print white, yellowish, or buff (or in one case brownish) . 15
14. Spore print pinkish to pinkish-buff. 27
15. Typically growing in dense clusters in disturbed soil (along roads, paths, etc., but sometimes also
in woods); gills whitish to gray; stalk at least 1 cm thick; caps typically at least 3 cm broad; spore
print white (not buff); basidia with siderophilous granules . . . Lyophyllum & Allies, p. 173
15. Not with above features . 16
16. Gills pinkish, flesh-colored, cinnamon, or somewhat vinaceous, thickish and fairly well-spaced;
cap up to 6 cm broad; stalk rather tough and fibrous, not white; spores spiny Laccaria, p. 171
16. Not with above features . 17
17. Gills typically adnate to decurrent. 18
17. Gills typically notched, adnexed, or even free (occasionally adnate but not decurrent) ... 21
18. Gills and flesh olive-yellow to yellow to orange; cap not viscid; gills not repeatedly forked;
growing on or near wood (but wood often buried or not visible) or from roots . 19
18. Not with above features ... 20
19. Fruiting body orange to yellow-orange or with olive tones; cap and stalk smooth, without
scales; associated with hardwoods. Omphalotus, p. 146
19. Fruiting body pale yellow to yellow, often with differently colored scales or fibrils on cap or
stalk; associated mainly with conifers .Tricholomopsis, p. 144
20. Cap viscid or slimy when moist and/or gills thick, widely spaced, and clean or waxy-looking
. (see Hygrophoraceae, p. 103)
20. Not as above . .Clitocybe & Allies, p. 148
21. Growing on or near wood (sometimes very rotten or buried); flesh and gills often (but not
always!) yellow to pale yellow .Tricholomopsis, p. 144
21. Not as above .22
22. Cap smooth, without fibrils or scales, usually white to gray to grayish-brown or dark brown
when fresh and moist; gills crowded; found in many habitats but especially in grassy or land¬
scaped areas or in mountains soon after snow melts; spores amyloid . . Melanoleuca, p. 169
22. Not as above; cap variously colored (yellow, greenish, brown, grayish, white, reddish-brown,
etc.); found in woods or with trees; spores not amyloid .Tricholoma, p. 176
23. Spore print pinkish to ochre-brown; cap bell-shaped to conical when young, reddish-brown to
dark brown to blackish (the margin often paler); stalk similarly colored, minutely velvety;
odor usually strong and fishy or reminiscent of cucumber; giant cystidia present on gills; not
common in our area (but widespread) . Macrocystidia cucumis
23. Not as above . 24
24. Cap conical or bell-shaped when young (but may expand in age), often translucent-striate when
moist, margin not usually incurved when young; stalk not polished or tough Mycena, p. 224
24. Not as above .25
25. Gills purple to pinkish, flesh-colored, or dingy cinnamon, rather thick and well-spaced; cap
convex to plane or uplifted, not conical or bell-shaped; stalk tough, fibrous, not white; growing
on ground; spores usually spiny.Laccaria, p. 171
25. Not as above . 26
26. Cap small (up to 2.5 cm broad), cap and stalk golden-yellow to pale yellow and covered with
scurfy or mealy particles; gills creamy to yellow, usually adnate to decurrent; growing on logs
and sticks of hardwoods in eastern North America and on aspen in the Southwest and Rocky
Mountains .Cyptotrama chrysopeplum (-Xerulina chrysopepla)
26. Not as above . 27
27. Gills typically adnate to decurrent. 28
27. Gills notched to adnexed or free, or sometimes adnate Marasmius, Collybia, & Allies, p. 201
28. Gills and/or cap pale yellowish to yellow, orange, pinkish, or greenish when fresh (may fade!);
fruiting body small or minute (cap often less than 2.5 cm broad); stalk usually 1-3 mm thick;
cap usually depressed centrally in age; often found on logs or with grass, moss, or lichen
.Omphalina& Xeromphalina, p. 221
28. Not as above . 29
29. Stalk thin, tough, and pliant or if thick then with a tough outer cartilaginous rind; gills usually
adnate, if decurrent then usually widely spaced .Marasmius, Collybia, & Allies, p. 201
29. Not as above; gills often decurrent, usually close or crowded .Clitocybe & Allies, p. 148
132 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
13. Cap densely hairy or fuzzy; stalk absent or rudimentary .Phyllotopsis nidulans, p. 140
13. Not as above; cap not hairy, or if hairy then stalk present ... 14
14. Cap hairy and taste bitter-acrid or cap viscid when moist or old and flesh white . 26
14. Cap not hairy; flesh not white .(see Omphalotus, p. 146)
15. Cap fairly large to very large (10-50 cm broad when mature); either growing on hardwoods and
cap coarsely hairy or found on or near conifers and stalk usually well-developed . 16
15. Cap smaller, or if large then not as above . 17
16. Cap coarsely hairy; growing on hardwoods .Panus strigosus, p. 140
16. Stalk well-developed; growing on or near conifers .(see Lentinusponderosus, p. 143)
17. Cap with dense brown hairs and fibrils, funnel-shaped or with a deeply depressed center; gills
decurrent, very crowded, pallid; stalk well-developed; common in the tropics and also along
the Gulf of Mexico .Panus (-Lentinellus) crinitis
17. Not as above . 18
18. Cap only 2-4 cm broad, viscid when moist, pallid to pale orange becoming pinkish to caramel-
brown; gills close to fairly well-spaced (not crowded); spores amyloid . Panellus longinquus
18. Not with above features; common. 19
19. Gills pallid (white to creamy, yellowish, or gray) . 20
19. Gills darker (tan to brown, reddish-brown, violet-tinted, etc.) . 26
20. Gills narrow (shallow) and crowded; fruiting body small to medium-sized . 21
20. Gills broad or fairly broad (deep), well-spaced to close, but not crowded; fruiting body medium¬
sized to large . 23
21. Cap pure white when fresh, but may become creamy in age.Pleurotusporrigens, p. 135
21. Not as above . 22
22. Cap dark grayish-brown to bluish-black; usually found in the wild .
.Hohenbuehelia atrocaerulea (see H. petaloides group, p. 136)
22. Cap some shade of brown or paler; found in wild or often in gardens, flower pots, etc.
.Hohenbuehelia petaloides group & others, p. 136
23. Stalk absent or rudimentary, not well-developed; cap with ridges and/or spines; taste un¬
pleasant .Hohenbuehelia mastrucatus (see H. petaloides group, p. 136)
23. Not as above . 24
24. Cap white to tan or pinkish-tinged, often breaking up into scales in age; stalk present; found
on living hardwoods (elm, etc.), often high up in the tree; widespread but not yet reported
from California; edible but rather tough .... Hypsizygus tessulatus (-Pleurotus ulmarius)
24. Not as above . 25
25. Stalk well-developed and often long (4-22 cm); gills usually adnexed or notched; cap creamy or
tinged pinkish, often with watery spots; usually on living hardwoods . Pleurotus elongatipes
25. Stalk absent, or if well-developed then gills typically decurrent; cap white, gray, brown, greenish,
etc.; very common, especially on hardwoods ..Pleurotus ostreatus & others, p. 134
134 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
26. Cap small (3 cm broad or less); gills ochre-buff to brownish to pale cinnamon or tawny-olive in
old age; taste usually acrid or bitter.Panellus stipticus, p. 138
26. Not as above; usually larger . 27
27. Cap densely hairy .Panus rudis, p. 139
27. Not as above; cap more or less smooth (or breaking up into scales) . 28
28. Cap viscid when moist or in age, yellow-green to olive-green, olive-brown, or with violet tones;
stalk absent or lateral; growing shelflike .Panellus serotinus, p. 137
28. Cap not viscid, violet to reddish-brown, tan, etc., but never greenish or yellow; stalk often well-
developed, lateral to off-center or central .Panus conchatus, p. 138
the Rocky Mountains and probably elsewhere. It has a lined or ridged, nearly central stalk
and depressed or funnel-shaped cap that is open (incised) on one side. It is edible when
young but often develops a bitter or unpleasant taste in age. For a smaller, thinner, white
species growing on conifers, see P. porrigens.
Left: Pleurotus porrigens, a thin white cousin of the oyster mushroom that grows on dead conifers.
Right: Pleurotus dryinus (see p. 136) resembles other oyster mushrooms, but boasts a veil, remnants
of which can be seen clinging to the margin of the cap.
136 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
Hohenbuehelia petaloides group. Note the crowded gills and shoehorn-shaped fruiting body. The
white specks on the caps at left are an abnormality (probably a fungal parasite).
Hohenbueheliapetaloides group. Left: Close-up of gills. The edges often become wavy as the gills dry
out, but are not serrated (toothed). Right: These young specimens remind me of penguins. They
came up in a potting mix composed largely of wood chips.
HABITAT: Usually ingroups or small clusters on rotting or buried wood, sawdust mulch,
etc.; widely distributed. This species “complex” is common year-round in our area in
nurseries, flower pots, landscaped areas where wood chip mulch has been used, etc. It
occurs less commonly in the wild, usually on rotting conifers such as hemlock. I have seen
it in Yosemite National Park in the spring and fall.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but not choice (according to most sources); I haven’t tried it.
COMMENTS: Also known as Pleurotus petaloides, this species and its close relatives
are best distinguished by their crowded gills, brown cap, white spores, and lateral stem
or stemlike base. Terrestrial fruiting bodies are often reminiscent of upright, rolled-up
leaves or shoehorns, while those that grow shelflike on wood are usually fan-shaped as in
other oyster mushrooms. The gelatinized layer of tissue beneath the surface of the cap is
seldom evident unless the specimens are waterlogged. U nder the microscope, however, it is
often discernible. H. geogenia is a very similar species with a hazel-brown to yellow-brown
cap that differs microscopically. Like H. petaloides, it is apt to be looked for in Clitocybe,
but the cap is open or split on one side and the stalk is usually off-center. Other species:
H. atrocaerulea has a brown to bluish-black, mussel-shaped cap which is felty at least
toward the base; it grows on wood, including yucca. H. angustatus has a pale (pinkish-
buff) cap and round spores. H. mastrucatus has a grayish cap, unpleasant taste, and broad
gills that are fairly well-spaced. All of these species were formerly included in Pleurotus.
HABITAT: Scattered or in shelving groups on dead hardwood logs and branches (espe¬
cially wild cherry), sometimes also on conifers; widely distributed. Fairly common in the
Pacific Northwest in the fall and winter, but I have yet to find it in our area. Like Flammu-
lina velutipes, it is a cold-weather fungus, and its appearance is usually a sign that the
mushroom season is almost over.
EDIBILITY: Edible but mediocre; it sometimes develops a bitter taste as it ages.
COMMENTS: The viscid, greenish to yellowish or violet-tinted cap and pale yellow to
orange gills, plus the short, stubby stem and growth on wood make this an easy mushroom
to recognize. According to Alexander Smith, the spores of some forms do not display
the amyloid reaction until dried out or stored in a herbarium.
Panellus stipticus
CAP 0.5-3 cm broad, spatula-, kidney-, or fan-shaped, convex to plane or depressed near
the stalk; surface dry, minutely hairy or scurfy, buff to ochre-buff, tan, brownish, or
cinnamon-brown, sometimes concentrically zoned. Flesh thin, tough, white or pale
yellowish; taste usually acrid or astringent. GILLS close, narrow, often forked, brownish
to pale cinnamon or ochre-buff; adnate to decurrent, often luminescent. STALK 0.5-2 cm
long, 3-8 mm thick, off-center to lateral, usually narrowed at base, often somewhat
flattened; same color as cap or paler (to nearly whitish). VEIL absent. SPORE PRINT
white; spores 3-5 * 1.5-3 microns, elliptical to oblong or sausage-shaped, smooth, amyloid.
HABITAT: Usually gregarious or in clusters or overlapping tiers on dead hardwoods;
widely distributed, more common in eastern North America than in the West. It occurs in
California but I have yet to find it in our area. It usually fruits in the fall, but the fruiting
bodies do not rot quickly and consequently can be found practically year-round.
EDIBILITY: Inedible due to its small size, tough texture, and bitter taste.
COMMENTS: But for its luminescent gills, this listless little wood-rotter wouldn’t
attract enough attention to merit mention. Because of the brownish gills it can be mistaken
for a Crepidotus or small Paxillus, but the spore print is white and the texture much
tougher. The species epithet refers to its use as a styptic (blood-clotter). For other listless
Panellus species, see the key to Pleurotus and Allies.
central, leading to confusion with Clitocybe, and it is consequently keyed out under that
genus. The cap is not hairy as in P. rudis, nor do the gills have serrated edges as in
Lentinus.
Panus rudis grows on hardwood stumps and logs. The cap is hairy, the stalk off-center to lateral.
Young specimen at left has a violet cap, mature individuals at right are tan.
140 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
COMMENTS: The hairy cap, tough texture, white spores, and short lateral to off-center
stem set this singular fungus apart. As in P. conchatus, fresh wet caps are a gorgeous deep
violet, but soon fade to reddish- or pinkish-brown.
Phyllotopsis nidulans
CAP 2-8 cm broad, more or less fan-shaped to scallop-shaped in outline, broadly convex
to plane; surface dry, often covered at first with a white chamois-like, cottony pubescence,
otherwise pale orange to orange-buff, yellow-orange, or fading to buff, and densely hairy
or fuzzy; margin at first inrolled. Flesh colored like cap or paler; odor typically strong and
disagreeable (like sewer gas or rotten eggs), but sometimes mild. GILLS close, narrow,
orange-buff to orange-yellow or pale orange. STALK absent or rudimentary. VEIL
absent. SPORE PRINT pale pinkish to apricot-pink to pinkish-brown; spores 5-8 x
2-4 microns, sausage-shaped, smooth, not amyloid.
HABITAT: In groups or shelving masses on rotting logs and stumps(of both hardwoods
and conifers); widely distributed. In our area it is common on dead oaks in the fall and
Phyllotopsis nidulans. A common wood-inhabitor, easily told by its hairy or fuzzy cap, orangish to
yellow-orange gills, and obnoxious odor. Note the absence of a stalk.
PHYLLOTOPSIS 141
winter, and in the Sierra Nevada and Rocky Mountains I have seen it on aspen.
EDIBILITY: Unknown. The odor is so disgusting that only a zealot with the iron con¬
stitution of Charles Mcllvaine would consider eating it.
COMMENTS: Formerly known as Claudopus nidulans and Panellus nidulans, this
rather attractive pale orange shelving mushroom is easily recognized by its peach-fuzz¬
like cap and obnoxious odor (the latter feature, however, is lacking in some collections).
Paxillus panuoides is somewhat similar, but has yellowish-buff spores and veined or
forked gills. Crepidotus species have brown spores, Panellus species have white to yel¬
lowish spores, while Claudopus species have pinkish spores but do not have orange gills.
6. Cap more than 8 cm broad when mature; stalk over 1 cm thick; fruiting body tough or hard;
found on or near conifers (but wood sometimes buried!) .Lentinusponderosus, p. 143
6. Not as above; smaller . 7
7. Growing in clusters on hardwoods, stalks often fused; caps some shade of brown, often
irregular or misshapen and deeply depressed in age; not uncommon in eastern North America,
much rarer in the West .Lentinellus cochleatus
7. Not as above . 8
8. Stalk usually grooved and stuffed (inside) with soft whitish tissue; cap and stalk reddish-brown
to pinkish-brown, smooth; taste usually acrid; found on ground or woody debris; spores
amyloid .Lentinellus omphalodes
8. Not with above features . 9
9. Cap 3-8 cm broad, pinkish-tan to tan; found on conifers (e.g., Sitka spruce) along the Pacific
Coast .L entinus kauffmanii
9. Cap up to 4 cm broad, brown to orange-brown or cinnamon; found on hardwoods; widely
distributed .Lentinus sulcatus
142
Lentinus ponderosus. Left: Mature specimens growing from a log buried by a landslide. Exposed caps
are apt to be scalier than sheltered ones. (Bob Winter) Right: Young specimens. Note decurrent gills.
See p. 142 for close-up of the serrated gills, and p. 43 for a picture of a clump growing in a lake!
Lentinellus ursinus
CAP 3-10 x 2-5 cm, kidney- to fan-shaped in outline, broadly convex becoming plane;
surface dry, dark brown to brown, yellow-brown, or reddish-brown, with sparse to dense,
brown to dark brown pubescence (fine hairs), at least toward the stalk; margin usually
smooth, often paler and lobed, at first incurved. Flesh thin; taste slowly acrid or bitter.
GILLS decurrent (if stalk present), close, broad, dingy white to pinkish-brown with ragged
or coarsely toothed edges. STALK absent or rudimentary. VEIL absent. SPORE PRINT
white; spores 2.5-5 x 2-3.5 microns, nearly round, with minute amyloid spines.
HABITAT: On rotting logs and stumps, usually in groups or shelving clusters; widely
distributed. It grows on both hardwoods and conifers but is not common in our area. I
have found it in the late fall and winter on Douglas-fir and live oak.
EDIBILITY: Inedible due to the bitter or acrid taste.
COMMENTS: This flaccid, fleshless, featureless fungus could carelessly be mistaken for
for a decrepit oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) were it not for the ragged gills and
hairy cap. L. flabelliformis is a similar but slightly smaller species with whitish pubesence
on the cap. Another widespread species, L. vulpinus, also has whitish pubescence (at least
at the base of the cap), but is often ribbed or reticulate and sometimes has a stalk; it favors
hardwoods. Still another species, L. montanus, can be told by its well-spaced gills and
tendency to fruit on dead conifers, usually at higher elevations after the snow melts.
TRICHOLOMOPSIS
Medium-sized mushrooms usually found on or near rotting wood. CAP smooth orscaly, not viscid.
Flesh often yellow. GILLS attached, usually yellow. STALK typically central, fleshy. VEIL absent
or evanescent. VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT white. Spores smooth, not amyloid. Cystidia
abundant on the edges of the gills.
144
TRICHOLOMOPSIS 145
terrestrial, but the yellow gills and yellow flesh, absence of a veil, and central, fleshy stalk are
distinctive. None of its members are particularly good eating. Of the species keyed below,
only T. rutilans is common in our area.
Key to Tricholomopsis
l. Lower portion of stalk dark rusty-brown to blackish-brown and velvety from a coating of
minute hairs; usually growing in tufts or clusters. (see Flammulina velutipes, p. 220)
1. Not as above . 2
2. Cap and stalk yellow, or yellow beneath a layer of colored fibrils or scales; flesh and gills pale
yellow to yellow . 3
2. Not as above . T. platyphylla & others, p. 146
3. Cap grayish to black at the center or with small grayish-brown to olive-brown to blackish
scales. T. decora (see T. rutilans, below)
3. Not as above . 4
4. Cap and/or stalk with reddish to purple-red scales or fibrils . Tricholomopsis rutilans, below
4. Cap basically yellow, without differently colored scales or fibrils, at least when young (but
may have brownish fibrils or streaks in age) T. sulfureoides & others (see T. rutilans, below)
Tricholomopsis rutilans is a beautiful wood-loving agaric with dark red scales on the cap and stalk.
The scales are not always as dense or prominent as those on the young specimens pictured here. Also,
the cap tends to broaden with age. T. decora( not illustrated) has olive-brown to blackish scales that
are much sparser than those of T. rutilans.
146 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
COMMENTS: A real beauty when fresh, this mushroom is easily recognized by the dark
red or purple-red fibrillose scales on a yellow background (hence its British name, “plums
and custard”). This color combination is practically unique among fleshy-stemmed,
white-spored agarics. If you find what looks to be a small T. rutilans with an entirely
yellow stem, you probably have T. flammula, a questionably distinct species. T. decora
is also quite similar, but has gray to brownish or black cap center and/ or scales. I find it
occasionally on rotting redwood, but it is more common farther north. Finally, there are
several entirely yellow species also found on rotting conifers, including: T.flavissima, with
a fibrillose, fringed cap margin; and T. sulfureoides, partial to hemlock, with an evanescent
veil, and a cap that develops small brownish scales or streaks in age. T. rutilans was origi¬
nally placed in Tricholoma, T. decora in Clitocybe, and T. sulfureoides in Pleurotus.
OMPHALOTUS
Golden-yellow to olive-yellow to bright orange mushrooms growing from hardwood trees, stumps,
and roots; often clustered. CAP smooth. GILLS well-developed, with acute edges, typically
decurrent, often luminescent when fresh. STALK central or off-center, fleshy. VEIL and VOLVA
absent. SPORE PRINT white or tinged yellow. Spores smooth, not amyloid.
Key to Omphalotus
1. Fruiting body pumpkin-colored (bright yellow-orange to orange); common in eastern North
America, Mexico, possibly the Southwest .O. olearius(see O. olivascens, below)
1. Fruiting body golden-yellow to yellow-orange, but usually toned with olive (sometimes
other colors also present); restricted to the west coast.O. olivascens, below
Omphalotus olivascens often—but not always—grows in clusters. The gills are well-developed,
decurrent, and have thin edges. Entire fruiting body is golden-yellow to orange or olive (see color
plates), including the flesh.
148 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
white flesh; the false chanterelle (Hygrophoropsis aurantiacus) is smaller and has oranger,
repeatedly forked gills, while Gymnopilus species have dark orange to rusty-brown spores.
All lack the olive tones characteristic of mature O. olivascens.
The common jack-o-lantern mushroom of eastern North America is essentially the same
as O. olivascens except that it is pumpkin colored (bright orange to yellow-orange, without
any olive tones). Formerly called Clitocybe illudens, it is now called O. olearius (or O. il-
ludens by those who consider it distinct from the O. olearius of Europe). According to one
report, its luminescence is sometimes bright enough to read a newspaper by. And then
there’s the tale of the shipwrecked sailor on an uninhabited island, who wrote a last message
by the light of a jack-o-lantern mushroom, using the ink from a shaggy mane and the stalk
of an Agaricus as a pen. Unfortunately, he starved to death because he was afraid to eat any
of the mushrooms he found!
THIS is a large and complex group of soft, fleshy, pale-spored mushrooms with no veil
and a central, usually fleshy stem. The spore color is typically white, buff, or yellowish, but
in some species—at one time honored with their own genus, Lepista—it is dull or pale
pinkish. How, then, can you separate Clitocybe from other pale-spored mushrooms?
Mostly by a process of elimination: the gills are not soft and waxy as in the Hygrophora-
ceae, nor orange as in Hygrophoropsis and Omphalotus, nor thick, blunt, shallow, and
foldlike as in Cantharellus; the flesh is not granular and brittle as in Russula, there is no
latex as in Lactarius, and the white-spored species do not have the notched gills
characteristic of Tricholoma—though this is a somewhat capricious character, since the
attachment depends to some extent on the age and shape of the cap; the “Lepistas” are easily
confused with the Entolomataceae (particularly the genus Entoloma), but the latter have
deeper, more vividly colored spores which are angular or longitudinally ridged under the
microscope; the wood-inhabiting Clitocybes generally have a central stalk, thus
eliminating Pleurotus, Panus, and other shelflike types; the smaller Clitocybes with slender
stems are apt to be mistaken for Omphalina, in which the fruiting body is very small, and
Colly bia, which has a cartilaginous stem of a different texture from the cap, and adnexed to
adnate but not decurrent gills; finally, there are a number of small but common genera
(e.g., Laccaria, Leucopaxillus, Lyophyllum) that are best distinguished by learning the
individual species. Whew!!
Except for the blewit (C. nuda) and its close relatives, Clitocybe is a lackluster group
whose aesthetic and gustatory value is practically nil. Confirmed Clitocybe experts will
be the first to admit that the anonymous throngs of white to grayish Clitocybes that litter
our wintertime woods are exceedingly difficult to differentiate. Clitocybes are most preva¬
lent in coniferous forests, but also occur under hardwoods and in grass or manure. Like
the Tricholomas, they are largely cold weather fungi, most abundant in our area from
December through February.
Though the blewit is a safe and popular edible mushroom, several Clitocybes are
poisonous, including the small grass-inhabiting species, C. dealbata. The larger forms
are slightly easier to identify but may be just as difficult to digest. Several have a disagree-
CLITOCYBE & ALLIES 149
able odor, notably C. nebularis and C. robusta. On the other hand, the anise-scented types
(e.g., C. deceptiva and C. odora) are edible and quite good.
Over 200 species of Clilocybe occur in North America. About 50 are listed for California,
but a diligent effort to catalog our Clitocybes would probably double that number. Only
some of the more easily identified species are described here, including a few smallish
types with amyloid spores that are now placed in the genera Myxomphalia, Clitocybula,
and Cantharellula. If your “Clitocybe” does not key out satisfactorily, check the Hygro-
phoraceae (if the spores are white) or the Entolomataceae (if the spores are pinkish).
17. Fruiting body entirely or partially vinaceous, purplish, or reddish-tinged when fresh and moist
.(seePleurotus& Allies, p. 132)
17. Not as above . 18
18. Cap open or incised on one side; gills very crowded, narrow . (seePleurotus& Allies, p. 132)
18. Not as above . 19
19. Gill edges serrated or eroded and/ or fruiting body tough, hard, fairly large to very large (cap
10-50 cm broad when mature; stalk 2-5 cm thick) .(seeLentinus& Lentinellus, p. 141)
19. Not as above . 20
20. Cap ochre-brown to pinkish-brown or cinnamon when fresh, not typically growing in clumps or
dense clusters .C. americana& others (see C. inversa, p. 156)
20. Not as above; cap differently colored (brownish to gray or white), or growing in clumps . 21
21. Stalk white, usually tough and short, at least 1 cm thick; cap without hairs or scales, often pale;
spore print frequently tinged lilac .(seePleurotus ostreatus, p. 134)
21. Not as above . 22
22. Typically growing in clumps or dense clusters on wood; cap not white(or if watery whitish, then
stalk usually rather long and less than 5 mm thick) . 23
22. Typically growing solitary, scattered, or in small groups but not clumps; cap variously colored
.24
23. Stalk typically less than 5 mm thick; growing on rotting conifers .
.(see Clitocybulafamilia& C. abundans under Collybia acervata, p. 215)
23. Stalk generally thicker than above; found in southern United States, usually on hardwoods .
. (see A rmillariella tabescens under A. mellea, p. 196)
24. S pore print brownish; fruiting body small and white or grayish; cap often somewhat hairy, espe¬
cially toward margin; not common Ripartites (R. tricholoma is the most widespread species)
24. Not as above . 25
25. Stalk thin (usually 1-3 mm thick); fruiting body small; cap white or yellow, pinkish, vinaceous,
or tinged faintly gray.26
25. Not as above; stalk thicker or fruiting body differently colored.27
26. Growing on ground in groups or troops under pine or other conifers or growing on logs, sticks,
berry canes, etc.; gills very widely spaced .(steMarasmius, Collybia, & Allies, p. 201
26. Not as above .(see Omphalina& Xeromphalina, p. 221)
27. Cap orange-buff to orange-brown to reddish-brown, cinnamon, purplish-brown, pinkish-
brown, pinkish-tan, or tan when fresh . 28
27. Cap white to buff, grayish, olive-gray, olive-brown, greenish, brown, or darker .34
28. Gills widely spaced . (see Camarophylluspratensis, p. 110)
28. Gills fairly close to crowded . 29
29. Fruiting body medium-sized to large; stalk 1 -4 cm thick; cap usually 7 cm or more broad when
mature and at that stage usually depressed or funnel-shaped .C. maxima, p. 157
29. Fruiting body smaller, thinner, or differently shaped; not as above . 30
30. Usually growing in grassy areas or lawns; stalk typically 5 mm thick or less; cap not usually
depressed .(ste Calocybe carnea, p. 176)
30. Not as above; growing in woods . 31
31. Cap vinaceous-red to purplish-red, gills yellow-ochre; growing at high altitudes under conifers
. (see Calocybe onychina under C. carnea, p. 176)
31. Not as above . 32
32. Gills white to pale buff; cap tan to pinkish-tan, flesh-colored, etc.33
32. Gills often pale pinkish-cinnamon or colored like cap in age; cap orange to orange-brown,
cinnamon, reddish-brown, reddish-tan, etc.C. inversa & others, p. 156
33. Stalk white, buff, or tinged only slightly with the cap color .C. gibba, p. 157
33. Stalk colored like cap or darker. C. squamulosa (see C. gibba, p. 157)
34. Spore print pale yellowish to buff; odor rancid; stalk at least 1 cm thick . 35
34. Spore print white, or if yellowish to buff, then not as above . 36
35. Cap white .C. robusta(see C. nebularis, p. 159)
35. Cap grayish to buff or brownish .C. nebularis, p. 159
CLITOCYBE & ALLIES 151
36. Growing in grass, straw, or compost, often in groups or rings but not in massive clusters; cap
usually less than 5 cm broad, white to grayish, buff, or tinged pinkish . 37
36. Not as above; growing in woods or under trees, or differently colored . 38
37. Cap broadly convex to plane or umbonate; gills usually notched but sometimes adnate or very
slightly decurrent; spores amyloid; not often growing in rings .... (seeMelanoleuca, p. 169)
37. Cap convex becoming plane or depressed; gills adnate to decurrent, grayish-white to buff or
pinkish-buff; spores not amyloid; often growing in rings .C. dealbata & others, p. 163
38. Cap white or whitish . 39
38. Not as above .41
39. Typically growing in large clusters along roads and paths in the Pacific Northwest and Rocky
Mountains .C. dilatata, p. 159
39. Not as above .40
40. Cap medium-sized to very large (8 cm broad or more) . . C. candidate C. gigantea, p. 158)
40. Cap smaller, generally less than 8 cm broad . . C. variabilis & others (see C. albirhiza, p. 161)
41. Cap and/ or gills greenish to bluish-green, more than 2 cm broad; growing in woods in eastern
U.S. or under western mountain conifers .... C. aeruginosa & others (see C. odora, p. 161)
41. Not as above .42
42. Growing in tight clumps (occasionally solitary) from a fleshy mass of tissue which is often buried
. C. sclerotoidea, p. 164
42. N ot growing in clumps from a fleshy mass of tissue .43
43. Base of stalk or surrounding humus with conspicuous white mycelial threads; common under
mountain conifers, especially as or just after the snow melts .C. albirhiza, p. 161
43. Not as above .44
44. Gills gray; cap with a hoary bloom when young; growing under mountain conifers, usually near
melting snow . (seeLyophyllum montanum, p. 175)
44. Not as above .45
45. Base of stalk (or flesh in base) pinkish to pale orange . . (see Tricholoma saponaceum, p. 184)
45. Not as above .46
46. Gills forked repeatedly; cap grayish to grayish-brown; gills sometimes reddish-stained; usually
growing in moss in northern and eastern North America .
.Cantharellula umbonata(see Clitocybe cyathiformis, p. 164)
46. Not as above .47
47. Stalk very thick (2-5 cm); gills whitish to buff to dingy tan or yellowish, but not gray .... 48
47. Not as above . 50
48. Cap 10-40 cm broad, white becoming buff or dingy brownish in age, thin and easily broken at
maturity, margin often obscurely ribbed . C. gigantea, p. 158
48. Not as above .49
49. Odor strongly unpleasant; cap grayish to dingy tan C. septentrionalis(see C. gigantea, p. 158)
49. Not as above; cap more or less grayish-brown . C. crassa(see C. nebularis, p. 159)
50. Stalk less than4 mm thick; cap small(up to 5 cm broad but usually less than3 cm), dark greenish
to olive-brown, sooty-brown, ashy-gray, or blackish . 51
50. Not as above; usually larger .53
51. Cap minutely scaly or scurfy at center .... C. epichysium(see Myxomphalia maura, p. 165)
51. Not as above . 52
52. Cap and gills yellow-green to green, dark green, olive, etc.
.C. atroviridis & others (see C. odora, p. 161)
52. Not as above; not greenish . Omphaliaster & Fayodia spp. (see Myxomphalia maura, p. 165)
53. Stalk clothed with dark scurfy scales; gills well-spaced; cap dark brown to blackish; growing on
rotten wood or in rich humus.Clitocybula atrialba(see Clitocybe cyathiformis, p. 164)
53. Not as above; stalk not clothed with dark scurfy scales . 54
54. Cap typically incised or open on one side; gills crowded and narrow (shallow) .
.(see Hohenbueheliapetaloides group, p. 136)
54. Not as above . 55
152 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
Clitocybe tarda
CAP 1-6 (9) cm broad, convex with an incurved margin, then plane to broadly funnel-
shaped or at times umbonate; surface smooth, not viscid, flesh-colored to brownish or
grayish with a faint lilac or vinaceous tinge when moist, fading as it dries. Flesh thin, odor
mild or slightly fragrant. GILLS adnate to slightly decurrent or at times notched, close,
grayish to brownish-buff or pinkish-buff, often with a lilac tint when fresh. STALK 2-6 cm
long, 3-8 mm thick, usually slender, equal or slightly thicker below, colored more or less
like cap or paler, fibrillose. SPORE PRINT dingy pale pinkish; spores 6-8 * 3-5 microns,
elliptical, finely roughened.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious or clustered or sometimes in rings in grass, dung,
manure, straw heaps, old fields, compost piles, etc. Widespread and not uncommon in
our area after heavy rains, late fall through spring.
EDIBILITY: Edible but thin-fleshed and not particularly easy to identify. I haven’t tried it.
COMMENTS: Also known as Lepista tarda and Tricholoma sordidum, this is a smaller,
slimmer version of the blewit. It isn’t purple, but when fresh and moist it often has a slight
lilac or vinaceous hue—especially the gills. It can easily be mistaken for a Melanoleuca,
but the spore print is pale pinkish. The cap color is difficult to characterize but is generally
some shade of buff, brown, or even gray. Two other pinkish-spored “Lepistas” with subtle
purple tints are: C. graveolens, with a strong, disagreeable odor (like “moldy hay”), and
C. glaucocana. Both of these are much larger and more robust than C. tarda, and in fact
they closely resemble the blewit (C. nuda) but for their subtler color (older specimens can
scarcely be distinguished). Both species are rare and fortunately, not poisonous.
Clitocybe tarda is a slim, trim version of the blewit, but has only a slight violet tinge (if any), and is
thus easily confused with other grayish or brownish Clitocybes. The spore print, however, is pinkish.
Clitocybe (-Lepista) nuda, the blewit, has a characteristic shape that is hard to describe but easy
to recognize. Note stocky build and inrolled margin when young. The monstrosity on the left is a stem
which kept growing after the cap was cut off.
153
154 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
to grow as if nothing had happened—a new cap will not form, and a grotesque (but edible)
cancerous-looking pale purple growth will take its place. The blewit’s trademarks are its
beautiful purple to bluish-purple color with inrolled cap margin when young, stout stature,
absence of a veil, faintly fruity fragrance, and dull pinkish spores. The cap has a character¬
istic lubricous feel when moist, but may look quite different—polished and silvery-violet—
when dry. The amount of purple present varies considerably depending on the age and
moisture content of the mushroom, and possibly the habitat or geographical area (some
forms, such as the one commonly found under cypress, tend to be quite pale, with only a
slight violet tinge). Old faded blewits are barely recognizable, but by that stage are usually
bug-bitten anyway.
Other purple mushrooms include: Inocybe lilacina, with brown gills (when mature),
brown spores, and a small umbonate cap; many Cortinarius species, with a cobwebby veil
when young and rusty-brown spores; Mycena pura, small and slender with white spores;
the Laccaria amethystina group, with white or lilac-tinged spores and a long, tough,
fibrous stem. Of these, only the Inocybe and possibly the Mycena are poisonous. There are
also several bluish Entoloma and Leptonia species, but they are not nearly as purple.
Synonyms for the blewit are almost as numerous as the blewit itself. They include:
Tricholoma nudum, Rhodopxillus nudus, Lepista nuda, and incorrectly, Tricholoma
personatum. “Blewit,” incidentally, is a corruption of “blue hat”—though the blewit is
more purple than blue. In Europe the blewit is often called the“ wood blewit,” to distinguish
it from the “field blewit” or “blue-leg,” C. saeva (-Lepista saeva, Tricholoma personatum).
The latter is very similar to C. nuda in shape and stature and is equally delicious, but shows
purple only on the stem—the cap and gills being grayish to pinkish-buff to watery tan (or
the gills tinged vinaceous). Also, it tends to grow in pastures or grass rather than in the
woods. It is infrequent in North America but has been reported from California. See also
C. tarda, and the species discussed under it.
Clitocybe brunneocephala
CAP 4-13 cm broad, convex with an inrolled margin becoming broadly umbonate to plane
or uplifted; surface moist or lubricous but not viscid, smooth, watery brown to tan, hazel,
buff, or even whitish (usually darker when young). Flesh thick, pallid, odor mild or
pleasant. GILLS usually notched but often adnate or slightly decurrent, close, buff to
grayish-buff or pale brown, then dusted pinkish with spores. STALK 2-5(10) cm long, 1-3
(4) cm thick (usually about 2); equal or enlarged below, often stout and relatively short,
solid, dry, smooth, buff or colored like the cap (but usually paler). SPORE PRINT rosy-
buff or dull pinkish; spores 5-8 * 3-4 microns, elliptical, minutely roughened.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious, often forming fairy rings, late fall through early
spring, mainly in lawns and pastures, but also at the edges of woods or under trees (cypress,
oak, etc.); known only from California. It was very abundant in our area during the warm
and wet winter of 1977-78, but has been rather rare since.
EDIBILITY: Edible and quite good—I have tried it. Be sure not to confuse it with
poisonous Entolomas, however, or C. olesonii (see comments below).
COMMENTS: Listed in the first edition as “Lepista sp. (unidentified),” this interesting
relative of the blewit has recently been rechristened C. brunneocephala by clitocybiologist
Howard Bigelow. The shape, stature, and characteristically lubricous feel of the cap when
moist are very reminiscent of the blewit and blue-leg, but there is no purple anywhere on
the fruiting body. The gills are usually notched, but as in most “Lepistas” their attachment
varies considerably. I nearly always find it growing in grass, but a very similar species with
a pungent or unpleasant odor, C. olesonii, is common under oak in southern California
Clitocybe brunneocephala is built like a blewit but is never purple. It is sometimes common locally
in lawns and pastures as well as under oaks.
and the Sierra Nevada foothills. Both C. brunneocephala and C. olesonii (whose edibility
I haven’t determined) are larger and stouter than C. tarda, and do not grow in clusters
like C. subconnexa and C. densifolia. They can be separated from most Entolomas by their
duller spore color, non-angular spores, and in the case of C. brunneocephala, by the grass¬
land milieu. Other pinkish-spored species: C. praemagna, a western prairie and sagebrush
species, is quite similar but has a white cap when young that becomes tan to dull brownish
in old age; C. (-Lepista) irina is a widespread woodland species that often has a fragrant
blewit-like odor. Its cap is white to pinkish-buff, dingy buff, or pale tan, and its spores
are slightly larger than those of C. brunneocephala.
155
Clitocybe subconnexa group gives a dull pinkish spore print, has adnate to decurrent gills, and
grows in clusters in a wide variety of habitats.
also very similar, but has a rancid-farinaceous odor and taste and tends to grow in clusters
along roads; C. subalpina is a brown to dark brown clustered species known from the
Pacific Northwest; C. polygonarum has a tan to brown or purple-brown cap, but has
off-white to pale buff spores; it also grows in clusters and is common in Alaska.
Clitocybe inversa
CAP 2-10 cm broad, broadly convex or centrally depressed with an incurved margin,
becoming broadly depressed or even funnel-shaped in age; surface dry, dull orange to pale
orange-brown, orange-tan, tan, reddish-tan, ochre-buff, or cinnamon-brown; margin
often paler. Flesh thin; odor mild or sharp. GILLS distinctly decurrent, close, buff to pale
pinkish-cinnamon or colored like cap but paler. STALK 3-10 cm long, 4-8 mm thick, equal
or thickened below, typically rather slender and often curved, colored like cap or paler,
smooth or with whitish hairs at base. SPORE PRINT white to creamy-yellowish; spores
4-5 x 3.5-4 microns, nearly round, minutely prickly (or appearing smooth).
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious or tufted on ground in woods; widespread but
particularly common on the west coast, from Alaska to southern California. In our area it is
fairly common in the late fall and winter in mixed woods and under oak or pine, sometimes
in large fairy rings.
EDIBILITY: Not recommended
Clitocybe inversa is a cheerful orange-brown to cinnamon color. Left: Several typical examples.
Right: Close-up of the decurrent gills.
CLITOCYBE 157
COMMENTS: Also known as Lepista inversa, this species can be told by its cheerful
color, depressed cap, decurrent gills, and white or pale spores. C. gibba is rather similar
but differently colored, while Rhodocybe nuciolens has pinkish spores. The common form
of C. inversa in our area has a slightly yellowish spore print and sharp, spicy or pepperlike
odor. It may actually be C. flaccida, a very similar species. In eastern North America C.
gilva is quite common; it differs in having a plane to only slightly depressed, yellowish to
dull pinkish cap. Other similarly- colored Clitocybes include: C. sinopica, in humus or on
burnt ground, with an orange-brown to rusty-cinnamon cap, yellowish spores, and
farinaceous odor and taste; C. ectypoides, northern, growing on rotting conifers, with a
minutely scaly ochre-brown cap; and C. americana, the most common and widespread
wood-inhabiting Clitocybe, with a watery brown to pinkish-brown or cinnamon cap that
fades to whitish as it dries, growing on hardwood stumps and logs.
Clitocybe dilatata
CAP 2-15 cm broad, convex to plane or often somewhat misshapen; surface dry, smooth,
gray when young, but soon white or chalky-white, sometimes with buff areas; margin at
first incurved, often wavy in age. Flesh white to grayish, firm; odor mild, taste typically
somewhat sour or disagreeable. GILLS adnate to decurrent, whitish to buff, close. ST ALK
5-12 cm long, 0.5-3 cm thick, equal or enlarged below, whitish, fibrillose, fibrous, often
curved. SPORE PRINT white; spores 4.5-6 x 3-3.5 microns, elliptical, smooth. Basidia
lacking siderophilous granules.
HABITAT: In densely-packed groups or clusters in sandy or gravelly soil along roads,
trails, etc.; very common in the fall in the Pacific Northwest and Y ukon. I have not seen it in
California, but it may occur in the northern part of the state, and Chuck Barrows reports it
from New Mexico.
EDIBILITY: Probably poisonous—it is thought to contain muscarine.
COMMENTS: The white spores and growth habit in clusters (often quite large) in dis¬
turbed ground is unusual for a Clitocybe and serves to distinguish this species from its
brethren. It is most likely to be confused with the Lyophyllum decastes group (espe¬
cially L. connatum), which also grows along roads, and with the C. subconnexa group,
which has pinkish spores. C. cerussata var. difformis is a synonym.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious, often in large rings, under both hardwoods and
conifers; widely distributed but especially common on the west coast. It is fond of cold
weather and in our area seldom appears before December.
EDIBILITY: Edible but far from incredible. It is indigestible unless thoroughly cooked,
its flavor is said to be poor, and its rank odor doesn‘t exactly make you want to rush home
and throw it in the frying pan.
Clitocybe nebularis is a common large cold-weather Clitocybe. Note decurrent gills and grayish cap
which is broadly convex at first but becomes depressed in age (the ones on left look darker than they
are because of shadow). Cap margin is often frilled or lobed and the skunklike odor can’t be missed.
COMMENTS: The outstanding feature of this large, drab, cold-weather Clitocybe is the
unpleasant odor, which has been likened to that rancid flour, rotting cucumbers, skunk
cabbage, mice cages, and beer barf. In size and stature it is reminiscent of Leucopaxillus
albissimus, but is grayer, decays much more rapidly, and has pale yellowish spores.
C. robusta(-C. alba) is a closely related species with the same stature, spore color, and
rancid odor. However, it has a pure white, sometimes lustrous cap. I have found it several
times in our area in mixed woods but it is more common in eastern North America. There
are also a number of large, undistinguished grayish Clitocy bes that have white spores and a
more or less mild odor. These include: C. harperi, with darker (grayish) gills, fairly
common in our area and throughout the West under conifers; and C. crassa, a springtime
Rocky Mountain species with a thick, massive stalk.
160
Clitocybe clavipes has a swollen stem base, decurrent gills, and grayish-brown cap, but there are
dozens of similar, difficult-to-differentiate Clitocybes.
more or less similar species. One of these, C. avellaneialba, is fairly common in the Pacific
Northwest and northern California in humus or near decayed logs. It is somewhat larger,
with a darker cap, white gills and stem, and elongated spores (8-10 microns long). Another
western species, C. leopardina, is also similar but has a viscid, watery-spotted cap and
more or less equal stalk. It has been found by Greg Wright in southern California.
162
CLITOCYBE 163
Clitocybe dealbata is a small poisonous grass-inhabiting mushroom with closely spaced, adnate to
decurrent gills. Overall color is dingy gray to buff, leading to confusion with the edible fairy ring
mushroom (Marasmius oreades).
Clitocybe sclerotoidea. Note growth habit in small, tight clumps. Each clump arises from a mass of
tissue thought to be aborted Helvetia lacunosa.
Clitocybe cyathiformis
CAP 2.5 -8 cm broad, centrally depressed with an inrolled margin, becoming funnel-
shaped in age; surface smooth, not viscid, dark brown to dark gray-brown, but fading in
age to grayish or paler brown. Flesh thin, pallid; odor mild. GILLS at first adnate but soon
deeply decurrent, pallid becoming grayish or grayish-brown, close. STALK 5-12 cm long,
0.4-1 cm thick, equal or thicker below, often rather long, colored like cap or paler, fibrillose,
often with whitish down at base. SPORE PRINT white; spores 7-11 * 5-6 microns,
elliptical, smooth, amyloid.
164
CLITOCYBE 165
HABITAT: Solitary or in small groups in humus or on rotten logs, in woods and at their
edges; widely distributed. Not uncommon in our area in the fall and winter, especially
under redwood.
EDIBILITY: Not recommended. It is said to be edible, but there are many very similar
species of unknown edibility.
COMMENTS: This species is one of numerous small to medium-sized, grayish, white-
spored agarics with decurrent gills and a depressed to funnel-shaped cap. Because of its
amyloid spores it has been placed in several different genera, including Cantharellula and
Pseudoclitocybe. Similar species with amyloid spores include: Cantharellula umbonata,
common in moss beds in northern and eastern North America, with crowded, narrow,
whitish, forked gills that stain reddish in age; and Clitocybula atrialba, cap 2-10 cm broad
and blackish-brown, gills well-spaced and white to grayish, stalk clothed with dark scurfy
scales, growing in rich humus or on rotting hardwoods in the Pacific Northwest. The first of
these were formerly placed in Cantharellus, the second in Clitocybe. Also see Myx-
omphalia maura and Clitocybe albirhiza.
Myxomphalia maura
CAP 1-3.5 (5) cm broad, convex or centrally depressed with an incurved margin, be¬
coming plane or centrally depressed; surface viscid when moist but soon dry and often
shiny, smooth, dark grayish-brown or olive-brown to blackish-brown, fading to gray or
paler as it dries. Flesh thin, white to grayish. GILLS adnate to slightly decurrent, close,
white to pale grayish (usually paler than cap). ST ALK 2-6 cm long, 2-5 (6) mm thick, more
or less equal, smooth, colored more or less like cap or slightly paler, but not fading as
quickly. SPORE PRINT white; spores 4.5-6.5* 3.5-4.5 microns, broadly elliptical
to nearly round, smooth or very minutely ornamented, amyloid.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups on burnt soil and debris, especially under
conifers; widely distributed and fairly common in our area in the appropriate habitat, fall
through spring. I often find it with Pholiota brunnescens and Psathyrella carbonicola.
EDIBILITY: Unknown, but too puny to be of value.
Left: Clitocybe cyathiformis, mature specimens. Right: Myxomphalia maura, a small mushroom
that favors recently burned areas. Note the adnate to decurrent gills.
166 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
LEUCOPAXILLUS
Medium-sized to large terrestrial mushrooms. CAP convex to plane or depressed, margin usually
inrolled when young; surface dry, unpolished. Flesh rather tough and dry. GILLS attached, close,
usually white or yellowish. STALK typically central, fleshy, tough, often with a conspicuous white
mycelial mat at base. VEIL and VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT white. Spores amyloid, rough.
THIS is a small but very conspicuous group of robust mushrooms with a dry, unpolished
cap, white to pale yellow gills, a tough, fleshy stem, and white, amyloid spores. In some
species the gills peel rather easily from the cap (as in the brown-spored genus Paxillus). The
flesh is rather dry and brittle as in Russula, but the stature of the fruiting body is quite
different and the fibrous stalk does not snap open cleanly like chalk. Also, most Leuco-
paxillus species have a copious white mycelium that permeates the surrounding duff and
frequently adheres to the base of the mushroom when it is plucked—a character not found
in Russula.
Confusion with Clitocybe and Tricholoma is also likely (Leucopaxillus species were
originally placed in those genera), but they are not so tough and rot more readily. In
contrast, Leucopaxillus species are remarkably resistant to bacterial decay—antibiotic
substances have been isolated in some of them and their fruiting bodies, like those of
Laccaria, persist for weeks and thus appear to be more common than they actually are.
Leucopaxillus albissimus, mature and dried-up specimens. Note the tremendous variation in size,
shape, and stature. Some of these are quite old and shrivelled.
Leucopaxillus albissimus. Young white specimens. (Ralph Buchsbaum)
Less than ten species of Leucopaxillus are known from North America. The two
common ones in our area fruit prolifically and are likely to be among the first agarics you
encounter. They are strictly woodland fungi and may be mycorrhizal. Though alluringly
large and firm, they are difficult to digest because of their toughness. However, they are
not known to be poisonous, so intrepid toadstool-testers may opt to experiment with
the mild-tasting forms. They have one compelling advantage—a single large specimen
can fill a basket!
Key to Leucopaxillus
1. Gills pale clear yellow when young; cap 9-30 cm broad, buff to dingy tan or yellow-brown;found
under hardwoods in eastern North America and southern Arizona . L. tricolor
1. Not as above; gills not yellow when young (but may be dingy yellowish in old age) . 2
2. Cap brown to reddish-brown, medium-sized; taste bitter. L. amarus, p. 168
2. Cap white, buff, pale tan, yellowish, etc; medium-sized to very large; taste mild or bitter ... .
.L. albissimus & others, below
EDIBILITY: A tempting specimen, but I don’t recommend it—even the non-bitter forms
are coarse and difficult to digest. Thorough cooking would be necessary.
COMMENTS: Several varieties of this widespread species have been described based on
differences in cap color, taste, and spore characters. The above description is based
primarily on the variety common in our area, var. paradoxus (-L. paradoxus). It has a
rather strong but not unpleasant odor and a distinctive but not usually bitter taste. It is
white when young, but usually becomes dingy yellowish, buff, or pale tan as it ages or
dries out. A white mycelial mat can usually be seen permeating the duff around the mush¬
room or adhering to its base. However, its most outstanding attributes are the large size,
tenacious toughness, and resolute resistance to decay, as evidenced by the following two
“tried and true” methods for distinguishing it from Clitocybe nebularis and other large
look-alikes:
1) Choose a firm (not waterlogged) specimen and throw it against a wall, housemate’s
head, or other dense, hard, thick object. If it (the mushroom) remains more or less intact,
it is probably L. albissimus; if it shatters, chances are it was a Clitocybe.
2) Choose a firm (not waterlogged) specimen and leave it out on the porch, or hide it
in your housemate’s closet. If after one week it (the mushroom) shows no visible signs of
decay, it is probably L. albissimus; if unchanged after one month it is definitely L. albis¬
simus. If, on the other hand, it shows visible or smellable signs of decay (i.e., has begun
to rot or is reduced to a heap of writhing maggots), chances are, once again, that it was a
Clitocybe. (Note: L. albissimus can behave like a Clitocybe if too old or maggot-riddled.)
Other species: L. albissimus var. lentus is quite similar to var .paradoxus, but is usually
smaller (stalk only 0.8-1.5 cm thick and smooth); var. piceinus is similar in color, but has
a bitter taste; var. typicus also has a bitter taste but is pure white; L. laterarius is a hard¬
wood-loving species with a very bitter taste, pinkish-buff-tinged cap, and round spores; it
is particularly common in eastern North America.
MELANOLEUCA
Small to medium-sized terrestrial mushrooms. CAP usually smooth, broadly convex to plane or
often umbonate; often hygrophanous. GILLS close or crowded, attached (usually adnate or
notched), usually white. STALK central, typically rather stiff, straight, semi-cartilaginous; often
slender. VEIL and VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT white or creamy. Spores minutely warted or
roughened, amyloid. Cystidia often present on gill edges.
THESE rather unimposing whitish to gray or brownish mushrooms have been aptly
characterized as “overgrown Colly bias,” for the stature of the fruiting body is intermediate
between that of Tricholoma and Collybia. The straight, semi-cartilaginous stem, close to
crowded (and often notched) gills, and smooth, dull-colored, frequently umbonate cap
are the principal fieldmarks.
Melanoleucas can grow almost anywhere, but in our area are found most often on lawns
or shaded areas in pastures and parks. They are also quite common under conifers in the
Sierra Nevada and other mountain ranges. I can find no mention of poisonings attributed
to Melanoleuca, but the North American species are not well known. Two widespread
species are described here, and several others are keyed out.
Key to Melanoleuca
1. Gills tan to ochre, creamy-ochre, or pale pinkish-cinnamon, at least in age; cap 5-13 cm broad;
stalk usually quite tall .M. cognata, p. 170
1. Not as above; gills typically whitish, sometimes with a slight yellow or pinkish tinge .2
2. Cap viscid when moist, 4-8 cm broad, white or in age often tinged or stained yellow; stalk white,
usually scurfy, 0.7-1.5 cm thick; fairly common in central and southern California in a variety
of habitats .M. lewisii
2. Not as above . 3
3. Cap yellowish-brown fading to yellowish-white; fairly common under hardwoods in eastern
North America .M. alboflavida
3. Not as above; cap some shade of brown or gray when moist (but may fade in age) .4
4. Growing under mountain conifers, usually shortly after the snow melts . 5
4. Growing in lawns, pastures, etc., sometimes also in woods, but not typically as above.
.M. melaleuca group, below
5. Stalk fleshy, usually more than 1 cm thick; cap medium-sized to fairly large.
.M. evenosa group, p. 171
5. Stalk usually less than 1 cm thick; cap medium-sized to fairly small .
.M. graminicola & others (see M. melaleuca group, below)
EDIBILITY: Edible. The caps are delicious fried in butter, but since it is not an easy
mushroom to recognize, I hesitate to recommend it. Also, the edibility of closely related
species has not been adequately ascertained.
COMMENTS: The above description will actually fit a number of closely related
Melanoleucas whose exact identities are best left to Melanoleuca-masters. As a group they
are characterized by a smooth, hygrophanous, dark brown to grayish (or paler) cap, close
white gills, straight stalk, and strongly amyloid, warted spores. Specimens growing in
the open are generally much paler than their counterparts growing in the shade. Related
species include: M. brevipes, common on lawns, with a short brown to whitish stalk and
abundant cystidia on the gills; and M. polioleuca, with a hoary bloom on the cap when
fresh. There are also several species that fruit prolifically in the spring and early summer
in the coniferous forests and alpine meadows of western and northern North America. The
most common of these, M. graminicola, is similar to M. melaleuca in color and stature,
but lacks cystidia on the gills. Another, M. evenosa, is larger and more robust (see descrip¬
tion). Although probably harmless, none of these species should be eaten until better
known. M. vulgaris is a synonym for the tongue-twisting M. melaleuca.
Melanoleuca cognata
CAP (5) 7-13 cm broad, broadly convex to plane, usually with a broad umbo, sometimes
becoming slightly depressed in age; surface smooth and sometimes shiny, dry or slightly
viscid, brown to ochre-brown, fading to pale tan in age, the center sometimes darker. Flesh
whitish; odor often slightly sweet, rancid, or “peculiar” (Smith). GILLS pallid becoming
tan, creamy-ochre, deep ochre, or pale pinkish-cinnamon; crowded, attached (usually
notched). STALK 6-12 cm long, 1-2 cm thick, equal or with a swollen base, longitudinally
lined or twisted-striate, straight, colored more or less like cap or paler, the base some¬
times brownish-stained. SPORE PRINT creamy or yellowish; spores7-10 * 4.5-6 microns,
elliptical, minutely warted, amyloid. Cystidia abundant on edges and faces of gills.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in small groups on ground in mixed woods and under
conifers in the spring, summer, and early fall; widely distributed but not common. It does
not occur in our area but is to be looked for in the Sierra Nevada. It is fairly frequent in the
spruce-fir-aspen forests of the southern Rocky Mountains and Southwest.
EDIBILITY: Edible. I haven’t tried it.
COMMENTS: In contrast to many of its kin, this Melanoleuca is fairly easy to recognize.
The broad, frequently umbonate brown to ochre-tan cap, tall straight stem, and brown to
tan or ochre mature gills are good fieldmarks.
170
MELANOLEUCA 171
LACCARIA
Small to medium-sized terrestrial mushrooms. CAP convex to plane, centrally depressed, or
uplifted; not viscid. GILLS attached, rather thick, slightly waxy, pinkish to flesh-colored, cinna¬
mon, purple, or lilac. STALK tough and fibrous, elastic, often slender, more or less central. VEIL
and VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT white to pale lilac. Spores usually spiny, not amyloid.
THIS small but common genus can be distinguished in the field by its thick, purple to
pinkish or flesh-colored gills and tough, fibrous stem. The gills may be somewhat waxy-
looking as in the waxy caps (Hygrophoraceae), but the tough stalk is distinctive and the
spores are usually spiny under the microscope. I n small individuals the stalk may be slender
but is not noticeably fragile, and the cap is not conical or bell-shaped as in Mycena.
Laccarias form mycorrhizae with many kinds of trees and shrubs, and are among the
few mycorrhizal species that are easily raised to fruition in the laboratory. Their omni¬
presence in coniferous forests has caused them to be called “mushroom weeds.” However,
they also grow with hardwoods. They seem particularly fond of sandy, boggy, or other
poor soils, and are a conspicuous fungal feature of our coastal pine forests. They persist
for weeks without decaying, and thus appear to be more plentiful than they actually are.
About 16 species of Laccaria occur in North America. M ost are quite variable in shape
and color and thus difficult to distinguish in the field, but they split nicely into two groups
—the ones that are purple and the ones that aren’t. All are thought to be edible and most
are fairly good, or at least better than some authorities would have us believe. Two repre¬
sentative species are described here.
Key to Laccaria
1. Downy mycelium at base of stalk and/ or gills purple to lilac when fresh (may fade in age!) 2
1. Violet tones completely absent, even when fresh (but may be vinaceous-tinged) .
.L. laccata & others, p. 172
172 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
2. Growing in sand (often buried); spores smooth L. trullisata(see L. amethystina group, below)
2. Not as above (but may grow in sandy soil); spores spiny .3
3. Fruiting body medium-sized to large (cap 5-20 cm broad; stalk 1-3 cm thick); common under
hardwoods (especially oaks) in eastern North America .L. ochropurpurea
3. Not as above; small to medium-sized (cap usually less than 7 cm broad; stalk usually less than
1 cm thick, but at times up to 1.5 cm); widespread in many habitats .4
4. Gills distinctly purple when fresh .L. amethystina group, below
4. Gills with only a tinge of violet (if any) when fresh L. bicolor (see L. amethystina group, below)
what waxy, deep or bright amethyst-purple when fresh, gradually fading to dull purple or
grayish-purple and eventually dusted white by spores; attachment variable but usually
adnate to slightly decurrent. STALK 5-12 cm long, 0.3-1 (1.5) cm thick, more or less equal,
typically rather long and slender, often curved or twisted; tough and fibrous, elastic,
usually conspicuously fibrillose, colored more or less like moist cap or browner, fading as
it dries; base usually covered with downy purple or white mycelium. SPORE PRINT
white or tinged lilac; spores 7-11 microns, round, spiny (but see comments!).
HABITAT: Scattered to densely gregarious onground in forests and at their edges; wide¬
spread and common. In our area this species and its look-alikes (see comments) are par¬
ticularly abundant under coastal pines. They can fruit most any time but are partial to cold
weather and are often abundant when other collectable delectables are scarce.
EDIBILITY: Edible, and a good choice for beginners because of its distinctive color and
convenient availability. It has a nice texture but not much flavor, so try mixing it with
potatoes and seasoning it with garlic. The tough, hairy stems should be discarded.
COMMENTS: The lovely amethyst-purple gills when fresh combine with the rather long
and tough, fibrous-hairy stem to set apart this cosmopolitan mushroom and its close rela¬
tives. The color fades rather dramatically as the mushroom loses moisture, but the gills
usually retain their purple tint well into maturity. The common11 Amethyst Laccaria” along
the west coast has recently been given a new name,L. amethysteo-occidentalis, based on
its broadly elliptical (rather than round) spores and the tendency of its cap to fade to brown
rather than buff or gray as in the “true” L. amethystina (or L. amethystea). Our local
variety, however, sometimes fades to buff or even white, so that microscopic examination
is often necessary to distinguish it from L. amethystina (the latter may occur in our area,
but if so is uncommon). The specimens in the color plate are probably L. amethysteo-
occidentalis, but are labeled L. amethystina group because their spores were not examined.
To muddle matterseven more,L. bicolor is also common in our area, especially under pine.
It has broadly elliptical spores, but has only a slight violet or vinaceous tinge (if any)
when fresh, except for the violet downy mycelium at the base of the stalk (which may,
however, fade to white in age, leading to confusion with L. laccata). Other purple-gilled
species: L. trullisata has long( 16-22 microns) smooth spores and grows only in sand or sand
dunes (often buried!). L. ochropurpurea is a robust eastern species (see key to Laccaria).
been recognized on the basis of cap color: L. connatum has a white or whitish cap; L. lori-
catum has a blackish-brown to dark brown cap when young, often with a hoary sheen or
metallic luster, and a thick cartilaginous cap cuticle; as it ages, however, it fades to paler
brown or tan, and is then indistinguishable from “typical” L. decastes, which has a brown
to grayish-brown to tan cap. L. loricatum is the most common of the three in our area,
but L. decastes also occurs. A fourth, unidentified species is fairly common in our
live oak woodlands. It has a grayish cap and grayish gills and its edibility is unknown.
Still another species grows under mountain conifers soon after the snow melts.
Though all of these species tend to grow in clusters, solitary individuals occasionally
occur, and these are apt to baffle the beginner. Since the cap color and gill attachment are
so variable, it is best only to eat those growing in large clumps in disturbed ground. Make
sure the spore deposits on the lower caps of mature clusters are white. Poisonous Ento-
lomas sometimes grow in clusters, but have deep pinkish spores. The Clitocybe sub-
connexa group also grows in clusters and has pinkish spores, while C. dilatata is white-
spored with a whitish cap and disagreeable taste. Most other fleshy, clustered terrestrial
mushrooms have darker spores and/ or a veil.
175
176 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
COMMENTS: There are a number of nondescript grayish Lyophyllums that are very
difficult to identify. This one, however, can be told by its snowbank milieu and hoary cap
surface when young (see photo on p. 46). Other species: L. semitale is one of more than 50
difficult-to-differentiate Lyophyllums that stain gray, black, or brown when bruised
(often slowly). Its cap and gills are grayish and it is widespread under conifers or less com¬
monly hardwoods. L. infumatum also blackens, but has whitish gills when young.
Calocybe carnea
CAP 1.5-4 cm broad, convex to plane or slightly umbonate; surface dry, more or less
smooth, usually pinkish to pinkish-brown, but varying to dark reddish or fading to pale
tan. Flesh thin, whitish. GILLS crowded, narrow, white, adnate to slightly decurrent or
notched. STALK 1.5-4 cm long, 2-5 mm thick, equal, colored more or less like cap,
smooth or finely fibrillose. SPORE PRINT white; spores 4-6 * 2-3 microns, elliptical,
smooth. Basidia with siderophilous granules.
HABITAT: Scattered or in groups in lawns, grassy clearings in woods, and other open
places; widely distributed but not common. I have found it only once, on a lawn in Santa
Cruz, California, during the seventh inning stretch of the fourth game of the 1978
World Series (I don’t remember the date).
EDIBILITY: Not recommended. It is said to be edible but is easily confused with
poisonous species.
COMMENTS: Formerly known as Clitocybe socialis and Lyophyllum carneum, this
pretty little lawn-lover can be recognized by its pinkish cap, crowded white gills, and white
spores. It appears to have a wide distribution but nowhere does it seem to be common.
A similar but slightly larger species with a purple-red cap and yellow-ochre gills, C.
onychina, occurs in the spruce-aspen forests of the Rocky Mountains in the summer.
TRICHOLOMA
Medium-sized to large terrestrial, mostly woodland fungi. CAP viscid or dry, smooth, fibrillose,
or scaly. GILLS typically notched or adnexed, occasionally adnate. ST ALK central, fleshy. VEIL
absent (except in T. zelleri and a few others). VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT white. Spores
smooth, not amyloid. Gills only rarely with cystidia.
Tricholomas are almost exclusively woodland fungi. Most species are mycorrhizal—
especially with pine and oak, but also with spruce, aspen, fir, and other trees. They are
partial to cold weather and in our area reach their peak in December or January. In colder
regions they may continue to fruit after there is snow on the ground!
Though Tricholoma is an easy genus to recognize, its species are perplexing even to the
professional. Several kinds are known only from a single locality and microscopic charac¬
teristics are not as helpful as in, say, Mycena. Over 100 species occur in North America
and perhaps 50 in California. Fifteen are described here.
Key to Tricholoma
l. Cap yellow to greenish-yellow, at least at margin, or yellow overlaid with purple-red fibrils 2
1. Cap not yellow at margin . 8
2. Stalk sheathed with cottony or shaggy scales . (seeArmillaria& Allies, p. 189)
2. Not as above . 3
3. Cap and/ or stalk with reddish-purple fibrils or scales; flesh pale yellow to yellow .
. (see Tricholomopsis rutilans, p. 145)
3. Not as above .4
4. Flesh yellow; odor typically unpleasant and pungent (like coal-tar gas); gills yellow, widely
spaced; cap not viscid .T. sulphureum, p. 179
4. Not as above . 5
5. Cap with blackish to dark brown to purple-gray or grayish center and/ or radiating fibrils . 6
5. Cap lacking dark radiating fibrils, entirely yellow or yellow at the margin and reddish-brown to
brown toward the center. 7
6. Cap yellow to greenish-yellow with blackish to dark brown center and radiating fibrils .
. T. sejunctum & others, p. 180
6. Not as above; cap streaked with grayish to purple-gray fibrils .T. portentosum, p. 180
7. Gills yellow . T. flavovirens, p. 179
7. Gills white .T. leucophyllum (see T. flavovirens, p. 179)
8. Veil present, usually forming a distinct annulus (ring) on stalk .9
8. Veil absent or evanescent, not forming an annulus ... 11
9. Cap small (up to 5 cm broad), gray to brownish-gray or bluish-gray; associated mainly with
willow; odor usually farinaceous . T. cingulatum
9. Not as above (but may have farinaceous odor) . 10
10. Stalk rather slender and fragile; veil fibrillose, usually forming only a slight ring on stalk . .. .
.(see Limacella glioderma, p. 291)
10. Stalk usually at least 1 cm thick; veil membranous, forming a persistent ring T. zelleri, p. 188
11. Stalk belted with rusty-orange scales or scurf up to a well-defined line near apex, sometimes
also beaded with orange droplets; cap viscid when moist, yellow-orange to tawny, orange,
rusty-brown, or greenish .T. aurantium & others, p. 187
11. Not as above . 12
12. Base of stalk(or interior at base) usually pale pinkish to pinkish-orange; cap not viscid, its color
variable but usually greenish to olive-gray, sometimes shaded with brown, or grayish at center
and pallid at margin; surface smooth or cracking, but without differently colored fibrils or
hairs . T. saponaceum, p. 184
12. Not as above . 13
13. Stalk with a tapered “tap root” extending deep into humus; stalk usually with a tough or carti¬
laginous outer rind .(see Caulorhiza umbonata&others, p. 218)
13. Not as above . 14
14. Odor pungent and very unpleasant(like coal-tar gas); cap pallid; gills widely spaced; associated
with conifers .T. platyphyllum (see T. sulphureum, p. 179)
14. Not as above . 15
15. Cap white to creamy when fresh (but may discolor or age yellow, reddish, tan, brown, etc.);
stalk lacking small yellow dandruffy scales or granules at apex . 16
15. Cap distinctly colored or at least with colored scales or fibrils, even when young, or if cap white
then stalk with yellow scales or granules at apex or growing under mountain conifers soon
after the snow melts .. 21
178 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
16. Fruiting body often huge (15-75 cm broad!); known from Florida .T. titans
16. Not as above . 17
17. Fruiting body soon developing reddish or rusty stains; taste often bitter; stalk usually longer
than width of cap.(see Collybia maculata, p. 217)
17. Not as above . 18
18. Cap with at least a few scattered grayish scales or a grayish center . T. pardinum, p. 183
18. Not as above . 19
19. Cap viscid when moist, white or in age often tinged or stained yellow,4-8 cm broad; stalk usually
scurfy-scaly; spores amyloid .(see M elanoleuca, p. 169)
19. Not as above; spores not amyloid . 20
20. Stalk usually hollow and as long or longer than width of cap, often slender; usually growing
under redwood (in California) . (see Flygrophoraceae, p. 103)
20. Not as above; stalk not hollow; occurring with various trees but not redwood .
.T. resplendens & others, p. 183
21. Found under mountain conifers in spring; odor strongly cucumber-like or fishy .
. (see Armillaria & Allies, p. 189)
21. Not as above . 22
22. Cap black to gray, grayish-brown, or purplish-gray, or whitish with gray to blackish scales or
fibrils . 23
22. Not as above . 32
23. Cap viscid when moist (but may dry out), often streaked . . . T. portentosum & others, p. 180
23. Cap not viscid . 24
24. Cap whitish with scattered pale gray to dark gray scales, at least at center; stalk thick (1.5-3 cm)
and fleshy . T. pardinum, p. 183
24. Not as above; cap usually darker ... 25
25. Taste acrid . T. acre (see T. virgatum, p. 181)
25. Taste not acrid . 26
26. Cap densely hairy, scaly, or fibrillose-scaly (scales sometimes sparse in age); cap not usually
umbonate at maturity; veil sometimes present when very young . 27
26. Cap smooth to radially fibrillose or streaked, sometimes conical or umbonate at maturity; veil
absent . 29
27. Fruiting body fairly small (cap usually less than 8 cm broad; stalk less than 1.5 cm thick) . 28
27. Fruiting body fairly robust (cap 5-18 cm broad; stalk typically at least 1 cm thick).
.T. atroviolaceum & others (see T. virgatum, p. 181)
28. Stalk with small grayish to blackish scales . . T. squarrulosum (see T. terreum group, p. 182)
28. Stalk lacking grayish to black scales .T. terreum group & others, p. 182
29. Growing on or near wood, or if not then stalk usually attached to white mycelial cords that
arise from wood; gills broad (deep) .(see Tricholomopsisplatyphylla, p. 146)
29. Not as above; typically terrestrial . 30
30. Cap streaked with radiating fibrils, conical when young, often with a pointed umbo in age . .
.T. virgatum, p. 181
30. Not as above; cap without fibrils, broadly convex to plane or with a low umbo . 31
31. Cap with a hoary bloom when young; gills grayish; growing under mountain conifers, usually
near melting snow; spores not amyloid . (see Lyophyllum montanum, p. 175)
31. Not with above features (but may grow near snow); gills usually white or whitish .32
32. Gills crowded, pale; spores amyloid, or if not then odor often heavy and sweet .
.(see Marasmius, Collybia, & Allies, p. 201)
32. Not as above . 33
33. Fibrillose veil present when young, sometimes forming a slight ring on stalk . 34
33. Veil absent . 35
34. Cap at least slightly viscid when moist; growing with both hardwoods and conifers .
. (see Limacella glioderma, p. 291)
34. Cap dry, not viscid; associated with conifers (mainly pine and spruce) . . . T. vaccinum, p. 186
35. Stalk apex with small yellow scales or granules .
.T. acerbum & others (see T. pessundatum group, p. 185)
35. Not as above . 36
TRICHOLOMA 179
36. Cap viscid when moist, dark to medium reddish-brown to reddish-tan, the margin often paler;
gills often developing reddish-brown spots or stains in age . 37
36. Cap not viscid (but may be colored as above) .39
37. Associated with poplar or cottonwood, usually in sandy soil. T. populinum, p. 185
37. Not as above; associated with other trees . 38
38. Odor distinctly farinaceous or cucumberlike .T. pessundatum group & others, p. 185
38. Odor more or less mild .T. ustale (see T. pessundatum group, p. 185)
39. Spore print creamy to yellowish; gills tan to ochre or pale pinkish-cinnamon in age; stalk
straight, usually long; cap smooth, without scales; spores amyloid (seeMelanoleuca, p. 169)
39. Not as above; spore print white; spores not amyloid .40
40. Typically growing in disturbed soil (along roads, paths, etc.); cap smooth, grayish-brown to
dark brown to brown or tan, etc. (but never reddish-brown) .(see Lyophyllum, p. 173)
40. Not as above; growing in woods .41
41. Cap grayish-olive-brown . T. sp. (unidentified) (see T. virgatum, p. 181)
41. Cap brown to reddish-brown, cinnamon-brown, pinkish-brown, flesh-colored, etc.42
42. Stalk 1 -3 cm thick; cap often smooth when young and scaly in age, especially toward the margin;
margin naked . T imbricatum, p. 186
42. Stalk usually less than 1.5 cm thick; cap scaly or fibrillose-scaly even when young; margin
usually with hairy or woolly veil remnants when young .T. vaccinum, p. 186
our area in the late fall and winter, usually in grassy, sandy, or shrubby areas with pine
present; however, a bright yellow form is found occasionally with madrone, and in the
Southwest it is quite common under aspen.
EDIBILITY: Edible and excellent—one of the least appreciated and most flavorful of our
fleshy fungi, though a few people are adversely affected by it. The viscid cap should be
brushed clean in the field or the skin peeled off, and the sand removed (if it is present).
COMMENTS: Formerly known as T. equestre, this delectable mushroom is as depen¬
dably yellow as the blewit is purple. It lacks the blackish radial fibrils at the center of the cap
characteristic of T. sejunctum, and it also lacks the veil characteristic of Armillaria albo-
lanaripes and various yellow Cortinarius species. T. sulphureum is similarly colored but
has a dry rather than viscid cap and usually smells awful. The yellow color plus the sticky
cap (when moist), absence of a veil, white spores, and habit of hiding under pine needles
combine to make it one of the safest—as well as tastiest—of gilled mushrooms. None of
which explains the misnomer “Man On Horseback”—it doesn’t look anything like a horse,
and most of the horseback riders I see are women ...
One local patch of T. flavovirens produces crops that sometimes have a very strong
coconut odor and taste, and at other times have the usual mealy(farinaceous) odor. A very
similar edible species, T. leucophyllum, is common under aspen in the Rocky Mountains
and Southwest, and may actually mingle with T. flavovirens. It differs only in having white
rather than yellow gills.
Tricholoma sejunctum
CAP 3-8 (10) cm broad, convex to plane or broadly umbonate; surface slightly viscid or
tacky when moist, smooth, yellow or greenish-yellow with dark innate (flattened) fibrils
or streaks radiating from the blackish to brown center; sometimes with small scales in age.
Flesh white or tinged yellow; odor farinaceous, taste often bitter or nauseating, but in some
forms mild. GILLS fairly close, typically notched; at first whitish or creamy-white, but
often becoming yellow near the margin of the cap or occasionally yellowish throughout.
STALK 5-8 (12) cm long, 1-2(3) cm thick, more or less equal or somewhat swollen below,
firm, smooth, whitish, but often developing yellowish tints. VEIL absent. SPORE PRINT
white; spores 5-7 * 4-5.5 microns, broadly elliptical or elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Scattered or in groups under both hardwoods and conifers, fruiting mainly
in the fall; widely distributed. It is fairly common in the Pacific Northwest, and I have seen
luxuriant fruitings in California in mixed woods and under manzanita.
EDIBILITY: Not recommended—it is insipid at best and poisonous at worst.
COMMENTS: This species is likely to be mistaken for the edible Tricholoma flavovirens
because of its yellowish cap color, but the radiating blackish or dark brown fibrils or
streaks at the center of the cap and the tendency of the gills to show yellow only near the cap
margin should distinguish it. Other species: T. cheilolamnium is very similar but has a
dry cap; it is fairly common in the Pacific Northwest under conifers.
fairly close. STALK 5-10 cm long, 1-2.5 cm thick, more or less equal, firm, smooth,
dry, white or sometimes tinged yellow. VEIL absent. SPOREPRINT white; spores5-7 * 3-
5 microns, elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious on ground in woods, widely distributed. In most
regions it occurs with conifers, particularly pine, but in our area it favors live oak and
tanoak. It fruits in the late fall and winter and is one of the last Tricholomas to appear.
EDIBILITY: Edible and excellent, with a strong hearty flavor—but be sure of your
identification before eating it!
COMMENTS: The viscid cap separates this species from a multitude of grayish, dry-
capped Tricholomas, some of which are poisonous (see T. pardinum and T. virgatum).
The notched gills, fleshy white stalk, white spore print, absence of a veil, and gray to purple-
gray streaked cap are also important fieldmarks. T. sejunctum is somewhat similar, but
much yellower as a rule. Entoloma madidum is also similar, but has pinkish spores (and
mature gills) and usualy has a darker (cap-colored) stalk. T. niveipes is a very similar
edible pine-loving easterner; it never develops yellow tones and has narrower spores.
Tricholoma virgatum
CAP 3-8 (10) cm broad, conical to broadly conical to nearly plane with a pointed umbo;
surface dry, grayish to grayish-brown or grayish-purple (the center often darker, margin
paler), streaked with radiating fibrils or fibrillose scales. Flesh thin, white becoming
grayish; odor mild or earthy, taste usually sharp or acrid. GILLS adnexed or notched,
white to grayish, close. STALK 6-12 (15) cm long, (0.5) 1-2 cm thick, more or less equal,
solid, smooth or fibrillose, white or tinged gray. VEIL absent. SPORE PRINT white;
spores 6-7.5 * 5-6 microns, elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Solitary or scattered to gregarious in mixed woods and under conifers, widely
distributed; occasionally found in our area in the winter.
EDIBILITY: Not recommended—it may be poisonous, and it resembles T. pardinum,
which is definitely poisonous.
COMMENTS: The dry, fibrillose-streaked grayish cap which is conical when young
affords a good means of recognizing this species, which is also known as T. subacutum. The
cap is never viscid as in T. portentosum, and the fibrils and/or scales are radially arranged,
in contrast to the T. terreum group. Other species: T. atroviolaceum is a large (cap 5-18
cm), robust species with a convex to plane (not conical), densely fibrillose-scaly, blackish
181
182 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
Two small, common, mouse-colored conifer-lovers. Left: Tricholoma squarrulosum (see comments
above) has a fibrillose-scaly cap and stalk. Right: Close-up of the smooth white stalk of T. terreum
(left hand specimen) and the scaly stalk of T. squarrulosum (on right).
TRICHOLOMA 183
184
TRICHOLOMA 185
Tricholoma vaccinum
CAP 4-7 (10) cm broad, broadly conical to convex, becoming umbonate or plane; surface
dry, covered with dark reddish-brown to rusty-cinnamon-brown to pale pinkish-brown,
tan, or flesh-colored fibrils or scales on a buff background; often darker at center; margin
with hairy veil remnants at least when young, often splitting in age. Flesh white or pallid;
odor usually farinaceous but sometimes mild. GILLS adnate becoming notched, close,
whitish or buff when young, but usually tinged flesh-color to pale cinnamon in age; some¬
times also with darker stains. STALK 3-8 cm long, 0.8-1.5 cm thick, equal or thicker at
either end, dry, smooth or with brownish to reddish-brown fibrils or small scales, usually
hollow at least in age. VEIL woolly-fibrillose, not forming an annulus (ring) on stalk, but
usually leaving traces on cap margin. SPORE PRINT white; spores (4) 6-7.5 * 4-5
microns, elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Scattered or in small tufts, groups, or large troops under conifers, especially
pine and spruce; common and very widely distributed, fruiting from late summer through
early winter. I have seen enormous fruitings under spruce in the Rocky Mountains
and under pine on the northern California coast.
EDIBILITY: Listed as mildly poisonous by some authors. Like cheap coffee and frozen
French fries, it is best avoided.
COMMENTS: One of the commonest Tricholomas of the coniferous forests of North
America, this species often fruits with T. imbricatum, but is apparently replaced by that
species in our local coastal pine forests. The two are quite similar, but T. vaccinum has a
scalier cap, frequently hollow stalk, and woolly veil which normally leaves hairs on the
cap margin. Several color forms occur, ranging from dark reddish-brown to pale pinkish-
brown, and the size is also variable. Usually it is smaller and more slender than T. imbrica¬
tum, but in northern California and Oregon a fairly robust, reddish-brown form occurs.
Tricholoma imbricatum
CAP 4-12 (20) cm broad, convex with an inrolled margin, becoming convex-umbonate
to plane or uplifted; surface dry, dark brown to brown or cinnamon-brown, with flattened
fibrils that may break up into scales in age, especially toward margin (which may be ob¬
scurely ribbed). Flesh thick, firm, white; odor mild or faintly farinaceous. GILLS adnexed,
notched, or even adnate; close, white or tinged flesh-color, often discoloring brown in age,
especially on the edges. STALK 4-12 cm long, 1-3 cm thick, solid, firm, dry, equal or
swollen below with a tapered, sometimes rooting base; white or buff becoming brownish in
age, especially over lower portion (apex usually pallid); fibrillose or minutely scaly in age.
VEIL absent. SPORE PRINT white; spores 5-7 * 3.5-5 microns, elliptical, smooth.
Tricholoma imbrication, young specimens. This very common conifer-lover has a dull brown dry cap.
In age the cap often flattens out or becomes wavy. For close-up of gills, see photo on next page.
Tricholoma aurantium
CAP 4-10 cm broad, convex becoming obtusely umbonate or plane; surface viscid when
moist, smooth or breaking into small scales (especially at center); color variable: yellow-
orange to tawny, bright rusty-orange, orange-brown, orange-tan, or even orange-red,
sometimes splashed with olive-green or in one form entirely deep olive-green when young;
margin at first inrolled, sometimes beaded with orange droplets when moist. Flesh thick,
white; odor and taste strongly farinaceous and disagreeable (like rancid oil or cucumber).
GILLS adnate to adnexed or notched, close, whitish, often developing rusty-brown or
reddish-brown spots and stains. STALK 3-8 cm long, 0.8-2 cm thick, equal or thicker at
either end, solid, firm, belted with rusty-orange scales or scurfy flakes up to a well-defined
line near apex, pallid above the line; in wet weather sometimes beaded with orange droplets
near the line. VEIL absent or very rudimentary. SPORE PRINT white; spores 4-6 * 3-5
microns, elliptical to nearly round, smooth.
HABITAT: Solitary or scattered to gregarious on ground in woods, widely distributed.
Throughout most of the West it is common under conifers or sometimes aspen; in our area
it can be found under madrone in the winter, but is fairly rare.
EDIBILITY: Indisputably unpalatable due to the obnoxious odor and taste.
COMMENTS: This species strongly resembles T. zelleri but lacks a membranous veil. Its
sharply defined line near the stalk apex, however, is suggestive of a veil and probably
represents a rudimentary one. The viscid, orange to orange-brown or olive-splashed cap,
rusty-spotted gills, and strong odor help distinguish it. Our local form(var. olivascenf!)
187
Left: Tricholoma imbricatum, close-up of gills. Right: Tricholoma aurantium, showing charac¬
teristic belts of scales or granules on stalk.
is frequently a deep olive-green when young, and when beaded with orange droplets is
quite striking. T. aurantio-olivaceum is similar in many respects, but is smaller and odor¬
less, and often has olive-stains on the gills in age; it occurs in the Pacific Northwest.
Tricholoma zelleri
CAP 4-15 cm broad, convex becoming plane or broadly umbonate; surface viscid when
moist, bright orange to yellow-orange, or orange-brown, or sometimes splashed with
olive-green; margin at first hung with veil remnants. Flesh thick, white, slowly bruising
orange-brown; odor and taste strongly rancid-farinaceous. GILLS white, developing
rusty-orange-brown stains, close, adnate or notched. STALK 4-13 cm long, 1-3 cm thick,
usually tapered downward, solid, dry, pallid above the ring, usually somewhat scaly or
with orange or brown stains below. VEIL white, membranous, forming a flaring or ragged,
median to superior ring on stalk which frequently collapses in age. SPORE PRINT white;
spores4-5.5 x 3-4 microns, elliptical, smooth, not amyloid.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious on ground in woods, northern North America.
Tricholoma (-Armillaria) zelleri has the stature of a typical Tricholoma, but possesses a well-
developed membranous veil that usually forms an annulus (ring) on the stalk.
TRICHOLOMA 189
Extremely abundant under conifers in the Pacific Northwest (often in the same areas as the
matsutake, Armillaria ponderosa), but rather rare in our region and fruiting mainly in
tanoak-madrone woods at higher elevations in the coastal mountains (like A. ponderosa),
in the late fall and early winter. I have also seen it fruiting in large numbers with A rmillaria
caligata under spruce in the southern Rockies.
EDIBILITY: Not edible because of the unpleasant taste and smell; however, it is a good
matsutake-indicator!
COMMENTS: This is essentially a veiled version of T. aurantium—same color, odor,
taste, and habitat. It is better known as Armillaria zelleri, but because of the obvious
affinity with T. aurantium, it is now placed in Tricholoma. The sticky yellow-orange to
orange, brown, or greenish-splashed cap, plus the attached gills, presence of a membranous
veil, and white spores are diagnostic. It might possibly be confused with Limacella glio-
derma, which has a redder cap, fibrillose veil, and fragile stem. Other species: T. robustum
and T. focale are very similar if not the same (they are said to be reddish-brown in color).
Medium-sized to very large, fleshy mushrooms found on ground or wood. CAP convex to plane.
GILLS attached. STALK central, fleshy. VEIL typically present, well-developed, usually forming
an annulus (ring) on stalk. VOLV A absent. SPORE PRINT white or tinged yellow. Spores smooth,
amyloid (Catathelasma), to weakly amyloid or not amyloid (Armillaria and Armillariella).
GROUPED here are three small genera of fleshy, white-spored mushrooms with a cottony
or membranous veil that usually forms a distinct ring on the stem. There are no warts on
the cap nor is there a volva on the stalk as in Amanita, the gills are not free as in Lepiota
and Limacella, nor soft and waxy as in Hygrophorus, and the cap and stalk are not covered
with mealy granules as in Cystoderma. Tricholoma intergrades somewhat with Armil¬
laria, but as defined here does not usually have a veil (but see T. zelleri!).
The principal genus, Armillaria, is comprised of terrestrial forest mushrooms. The
honey mushrooms, Armillariella, somewhat resemble Armillaria but grow on wood, often
in large clusters. They were originally placed in Armillaria and some mycologists retain
them in that genus while transferring the Armillarias of this book to Tricholoma and a
separate genus, Floccularia. The third genus, Catathelasma, is terrestrial like Armillaria,
but has a double-layered veil, decurrent gills, amyloid spores, and a hard, often massive
fruiting body. It seems to be restricted to coniferous forests and is rather rare.
Several mushrooms in this group are prized edibles. The matsutake of Japan (Armillaria
matsutake) and its magnificent North American counterpart (A. ponderosa) are highly
esteemed by Japanese- and Korean-Americans. The honey mushroom (Armillariella
mellea) is well known and popular among fungophiles, while being well known and
singularly unpopular among gardeners and farmers. It grows wherever there are trees and
shrubs (even grape vines) and is almost as common in towns as in the woods. It has been
called the most serious plant disease in California gardens, because once it has infected a
bush or tree, there is no cure. One can only hope that it will co-exist with— rather than kill—
its host, and make the best of a sad situation by harvesting the mushroom bounty when it
appears! Six species of Armillaria, Armillariella, and Catathelasma are depicted here.
Key to Armillaria & Allies
1. Growing on wood (may be buried!) or at the bases of trees, sometimes in large clusters .... 2
1. Growing widely scattered to gregarious on ground (not normally in large clusters) .5
2. Cap with rusty-brown scales; stalk sheathed with similarly colored fibrils below the veil; gills
typically not decurrent; found on hardwoods in eastern North America; rare .. A. decorosa
2. Not as above; common . 3
190 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
3. Cap some shade of yellow, tan, or brown; taste usually bitter (but not detectable by everyone);
stalk fibrous, with a stringy white pith inside, often long . 18
3. Not as above; cap paler in color or the stalk solid and hard .4
4. Cap often scaly; nearly always on or near conifers .(seeLentinus& Lentinellus, p. 141)
4. Not as above; usually found on hardwoods .(see P leurotus& Allies, p. 132)
5. Gills typically decurrent; fruiting body hard and thick-fleshed, often large (cap 7 -40 cm broad!);
odor variable but not spicy-fragrant; spores amyloid; found with northern conifers .6
5. Gills not decurrent, or if decurrent then not as above (not hard and thick-fleshed, etc.) .... 7
6. Cap dull white to grayish . Catathelasma ventricosa(see C. imperialis, p. 195)
6. Cap dingy yellowish to olive-brown to dark brown . Catathelasma imperialis & others, p. 195
7. Odor pleasingly spicy-fragrant (somewhat like cinnamon); fruiting body whitish when young,
but often developing cinnamon-brown or yellowish stains in age .A. ponderosa, p. 191
7. Not as above; not spicy-fragrant, or if so then fruiting body darker when young .8
8. Lower portion of stalk shaggy or conspicuously scaly and fruiting body showing at least some
yellow .9
8. Not with above combination of characteristics . 10
9. Cap smooth or with flattened fibrils .A. albolanaripes& others, p. 194
9. Fresh cap with yellow scales, at least near margin A. straminea (see A. albolanaripes, p. 194)
10. Cap and stalk covered with cinnamon-brown to chestnut-brown or vinaceous-brown threads
(fibrils) which may break up into scales; veil membranous, usually forming a ring (annulus)
on stalk; odor sometimes spicy-fragrant; typically found in summer or fall A. caligata, p. 192
10. Not as above; differently colored or veil not membranous or found in spring and early summer
(shortly after snow melts); odor not spicy-fragrant . 11
11. Odor typically farinaceous, cucumberlike, fishy, or like raw peanuts, or unpleasantly pungent
(crush flesh in the cap if unsure) . 12
11. Odor typically mild, not distinctive, or merely fungal. 15
12. Found under mountain conifers shortly after the snow melts; cap becoming ochre-buff to
grayish, brownish, violet-gray, etc. (occasionally whitish) .A. olida, p. 193
12. Not as above (habitat or season usually different) . 13
13. Cap bright yellow-orange to orange-brown, reddish-brown, rusty, pinkish-brown, brick-red
or splashed with green; odor farinaceous or rancid . 14
13. Not as above .20
14. Veil fibrillose, often disappearing; stalk up to 1.5 cm thick, often fragile (seeLimacella, p. 291)
14. Veil membranous, forming a ring; stalk not fragile .(see Tricholoma zelleri, p. 188)
15. Fruiting body white and gills usually decurrent or fruiting body developing reddish to vinaceous-
red stains or streaks and veil fibrillose, evanescent; found with conifers, especially at higher
elevations . (see Hygrophoraceae, p. 103)
15. Not as above . 16
16. Stalk with cottony or shaggy scales below the veil; fruiting body grayish or paler; found under
mountain conifers, especially in Rockies . . A.fuscaSc others (see A. albolanaripes, p. 194)
16. Not as above . 17
17. Stalk tough and fibrous, usually with a stringy white pith inside; cap usually with small dark
hairs or scales, especially toward center; taste usually latently bitter (but not detectable by
everyone); gills usually decurrent (but sometimes adnate); on wood or ground; common 18
17. Not as above; on ground .20
18. Veil absent .Armillariella tabescens( see A. me Ilea, p. 196)
18. Veil present, at least when young. 19
19. Stalk usually bulbous or thicker at base; veil cottony, not typically forming a prominent ring;
often on ground, not in large clusters . . Armillariella bulbosa (see A. mellea group, p. 196)
19. Not as above; often with a prominent ring, often clustered Armillariella mellea group, p. 196
20. Stalk viscid; odor alkaline; fruiting body whitish; rare . A. viscidipes
20. Not as above; stalk not viscid; fruiting body white or variously colored; common .21
21. Cap 2-4 (6) cm broad, not white; stalk 3-6 mm thick; odor usually farinaceous; usually found
with willow; spores not amyloid; not common .(see Tricholoma, p. 176)
21. Not with above features; common.(see Amanita, p. 263)
Armillariaponderosa, showing the veil that sheathes the stalk. Also see the color plate and the photo
on p. 49. (The latter photo shows a young specimen with an unbroken veil.)
Armillaria caligata
CAP 4-12 cm broad, broadly convex becoming plane or with uplifted margin; surface
dry, covered with flattened cinnamon-brown to chestnut or vinaceous-brown fibrils
which typically separate and cluster in age to form small scales or patches, revealing the
whitish to pinkish flesh beneath. Flesh thick, white; odor variable: distinctly spicy-fragrant
to fruity, mild, or unpleasant; taste mild to nutty, bitter, or disagreeable. GILLS close,
adnexed to adnate (rarely slightly decurrent); white, the edges developing brownish
stains. STALK 4-9 cm long, 1-3 cm thick, more or less equal, solid, firm, white or pallid
above the ring, fibrillose or scaly below and colored like cap. VEIL membranous, sheath¬
ing the stalk, forming a distinct flaring ring which collapses in age; underside colored like
cap, upper surface white. SPORE PRINT white; spores 5-8 * 4-5.5 microns, broadly
elliptical, smooth, not amyloid.
HABITAT: Solitary to scattered or in groups on ground in woods, widely distributed.
In the West, it fruits mainly under mountain conifers in the summer and fall, but isn’t com¬
mon. In eastern North America it occurs under oaks and ericaceous shrubs. The largest
fruiting I’ve seen was under spruce in the Rocky Mountains. I haven’t found it in our area.
EDIBILITY: Edible—the forms which do not have a disagreeable taste and/ or odor are
said to be as good as A. ponderosa!
COMMENTS: Also known as Tricholoma caligatum, this species is easily separated from
its cousin A. ponder osa by the cinnamon-brown to purple-brown fibrils on the cap and
stalk. It might be confused with Hygrophoruspurpurascens, but the latter has a fibrillose,
evanescent veil and a redder (not as brown) cap, plus slightly waxy gills. The above
description encompasses several varieties and forms of A. caligata. The western version
typically has dark fibrils and the spicy-cinnamon odor of A. ponderosa. Eastern material,
on the other hand, is apt to be more cinnamon-colored with a mild to fruity to pungent
or downright disgusting odor. Other species: The matsutake of Japan, A. (-Tricholoma)
matsulake, is very close to the fragrant western variety of A. caligata and may actually
be the same species. It is edible, of course, and highly prized.
192
Armillaria olida is a prominent “snowbank” mushroom of the Sierra Nevada and Cascades. These
specimens are fairly typical, except that the cap is sometimes paler. Note slight annulus formed by
the veil. The odor is also distinctive (see description).
193
Armillaria albolanaripes, mature specimens. The golden to yellow-brown color (see color plate)
and the shaggy stalk are distinctive. A. straminea (not illustrated) is similar, but has a scaly cap.
195
196 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
pinkish-brown to reddish-brown or dingy brown cap with a white cottony veil and
frequently enlarged stem base. It grows scattered or in small tufts, often on the ground.
This form, which is close to A. bulbosa {a European species), is especially confounding
to beginners. Intermediate forms abound also. In view of the extreme variability, be¬
ginners should eat only those clearly growing in clusters on wood, and be certain that the
spores are whitish. The poisonous Galerina autumnalis grows on wood and has a ring on
the stalk, but is smaller and more fragile, with a smoother cap and brown spores. Pholiota
species also have brown spores, while Gymnopilus has rusty-orange spores. In the eastern
and southern United States you may encounter^, tabescens, a very similar, clustered,
wood-inhabiting, white-spored mushroom that lacks a veil (and annulus) and has a dry
cap. It is also edible.
SQUAMANITA
Fairly small to medium-sized terrestrial, mainly woodland mushrooms. CAP usually scaly,
fibrillose-scaly, or granulose. GILLS usually attached. STALK typically central, arising from a
conspicuous, cylindrical to bulbous, often hollow, underground"tuber.” VEIL typically present,
sometimes forming a slight annulus (ring) on stalk. VOLV A absent or present as a collar or scaly
rings above the “tuber.” SPORE PRINT white or pink. Spores smooth, thin- or thick-walled;
amyloid, dextrinoid, or neither. Hyphae in gill tissue typically parallel or nearly so.
THIS small, rare, oddball genus is distinct by virtue of the underground bulb or “tuber”
from which the stem arises. Many mycologists place it in the Agaricaceae (along with
Lepiota, Agaricus, and Cystoderma) rather than in the Tricholomataceae, but its affinities
are unclear. Since some Amanita species have a swollen, rooting stem base that could be
mistaken for a “tuber,” Squamanita has been keyed out under that genus. Amanitas,
however, differ fundamentally in their divergent rather than parallel gill tissue (a micro¬
scopic feature, see p. 19).
Squamanita is unlikely to be encountered by the average mushroom hunter. One
odoriferous species is described here and two others are keyed out.
197
198 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
Key to Squamanita
1. Cap and stalk grayish to purple-gray, lilac-gray, or darker, but covered with an ochre-brown
granulose coating, at least when fresh.S. paradoxum{see S. odorata, below)
1. Not as above; cap and stalk often scaly, but granulose layer absent .2
2. Fruiting body purple-gray to purple-brown except for the yellowish to buff tuber; odor dis¬
tinctly fruity (somewhat like grape soda) .S. odorata, below
2. Purplish tones absent; cap ochre to ochre-brown to buff, with a whitish or grayish tuber (or
clusters of tubers); found in eastern North America .N. umbonata
Squamanita odorata
CAP 1-4.5 cm broad, obtusely bell-shaped or convex, expanding somewhat in age but
usually retaining a broad umbo; surface dry, densely and coarsely scaly or fibrillose-scaly,
the scales often erect; usually more fibrillose toward margin; brownish-purple to purplish-
gray or lilac-gray, often darker in age. Flesh colored like cap; odor strongly and persistently
fruity-fragrant (like grape soda or grape juice). GILLS adnate or notched, fairly well¬
spaced, colored more or less like cap. STALK 1-3.5 cm long,(2)3-10 (15) mm thick, arising
from a swollen, sometimes hollow, juglike underground “tuber” 1-2.5 cm high and up to
2 cm thick; colored more or less like cap and covered with conspicuous scales like those on
the cap, except for the smooth, sometimes silky apex and yellowish to buff-colored
“tuber”; hollow or partially hollow in age. VEIL not forming a distinct ring on stalk.
SPORE PRINT pinkish; spores 6.5-9 * 4-6 microns, elliptical, smooth, not amyloid.
HABITAT: Usually in groups or clumps on ground in woods; widely distributed but
apparently very rare. I have examined specimens collected under conifers in Washington.
EDIBILITY: Unknown. Although too rare to be of value, the odor is certainly intriguing.
COMMENTS: Formerly known as Coolia odorata, this little mushroom is as bizarre as
it is rare. The coarsely scaly purplish cap and stalk, similarly colored gills, yellowish-buff
“tuber,” and strong grapelike odor make a most distinctive set of features. Other species:
S. paradoxum(-Dissodermaparadoxum) is gray to lilac- or purplish-tinted in age beneath
an ochre-brown granulose coating. It also occurs in the Pacific Northwest, but is rare.
CYSTODERMA
Small to medium-sized, terrestrial or wood-inhabiting mushrooms. CAP dry, with a coating of
mealy or powdery granules, at least when fresh. GILLS typically whitish or pallid, usually attached.
STALK central, lower portion sheathed with mealy granules or scales. VEIL present, oftenforming
an annulus (ring) on stalk. VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT white. Spores smooth, sometimes
amyloid but not dextrinoid.
THE outstanding feature of this small genus is the layer of mealy granules that coats the
cap and lower stem. Rain may wash the granules off the cap, but the stem normally retains
them. A veil is always present and in several species it forms a prominent ring. Armillaria,
Armillariella, and Catathelasma have a veil and attached gills, but are larger and lack the
granulose coating. Most Cystodermas were originally placed in Lepiota and some myco¬
logists retain them in the same family. Lepiotas, however, typically have free gills, while
in Cystoderma the gills are usually attached to the stalk.
Cystodermas are common in northern coniferous forests, especially in beds of moss.
About 20 species occur in North America. Several are very attractive but little is known of
their edibility. Two species are described here; both are rare in our area.
Key to Cystoderma
1. Stalk generally 8 mm thick or more; fruiting body medium-sized . 2
1. Stalk generally less than 8 mm thick; fruiting body rather small or sometimes medium-sized 5
Cystodermafallax, mature specimen. Note the umbonate cap, prominent annulus (ring), and coating
of granules on the stalk and cap. It grows singly as well as in small groups or clusters.
Cystoderma fallax
CAP 2 -5 cm broad, convex to plane or frequently with an umbo; surface dry, with con¬
spicuous mealy granules which are erect at first but flattened and more powdery inage(or
often wear away completely); cinnamon-brown to rusty-orange to tawny-ochre; margin
often hung with remnants from the veil. Flesh thin, whitish or tinged cap color. GILLS
adnexed to adnate, close, white to pale pinkish-buff or tinged yellow. ST ALK 3-7 cm long,
3-5(7) mm thick, equal or enlarged below, smooth and pallid above the ring, sheathed with
cinnamon-brown to rusty-ochre granules or flaky scales below. VEIL forming a large,
delicate but persistent, often flaring ring on the stalk; ring median to superior, smooth and
pallid on upper side, colored like the cap underneath. SPORE PRINT white; spores
3.5-5.5 x 3-4 microns, broadly elliptical to nearly round, smooth, amyloid.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in small groups or tufts onground under conifers or in
mixed woods, sometimes also on rotting wood; widely distributed and common in the
199
200 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
summer and fall in the Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountains. Fruiting in the fall and
early winter in our area, but rather rare.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: One of the most attractive and delicately adorned of our woodland fungi,
this Cystoderma is easily identified by its rusty-orange to cinnamon color, prominent ring
on the stalk, whitish gills which are attached to the stem, and granulose coating on the cap
and stem (rain may wash the granules off the cap, but not the stem). The illustration does
not do it justice, but since when is justice usually done?
Cystoderma amianthinum
CAP 2-5 cm broad, bell-shaped or somewhat conical becoming convex or umbonate to
nearly plane; surface dry, prominently wrinkled (radially) in one form; covered with mealy
or powdery granules which may wear off in age, tawny-ochre to ochre-brown, ochre-buff,
or yellowish; margin often hung with veil remnants. Flesh thin, odor mild or strongly
pungent. GILLS adnexed to adnate, crowded, white or creamy or tinged yellow-orange.
STALK 2.5 -7 cm long, 3-8 mm thick, equal or slightly enlarged below, smooth and whitish
above the veil, sheathed with granules or granulose scales below and colored like the cap.
VEIL fragile, forming a slight ring on stalk or often disappearing. SPORE PRINT white;
spores 4-7 * 3-4 microns, elliptical, smooth, amyloid. Cap cuticle staining rusty-brown
to reddish-brown in KOH (potassium hydroxide).
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups under or near conifers, especially in moss;
widely distributed in northern regions and probably the most common member of the
genus. I have seen it in late summer, fall, and early winter in northern California and the
Pacific Northwest, but it does not seem to occur south of San Francisco.
EDIBILITY: Not recommended. Some sources list it as edible, but it doesn’t have much
substance and can be confused with poisonous species (e.g., Lepiota castanea).
COMMENTS: This petite mushroom is quite attractive when growing amongst colorful
lichens or in beds of bright green moss. It is best recognized by its granulose cap and stalk,
ochre color, and fragile veil which disappears or forms only a slight ring on the stalk (rather
than a prominent one, as in C.fallax). It is easily mistaken for a small Lepiota, but the gills
are usually attached to the stem rather than free. In one variety the cap is conspicuously
wrinkled, in another it is not. Other species: C. granulosum is similar, but has a reddish-
brown to tawny, non-wrinkled cap and non-amyloid spores; C. gruberianum is a small
species that grows on rotten wood; C. cinnabarinum is a larger, farflung species with a
rusty-orange to beautiful cinnabar-red or Vermillion cap and stalk. Whitish-capped
forms of C. amianthinum and C. granulosum also occur, but are rare.
ASTEROPHORA
Small mushrooms parasitic on other mushrooms. CAP often powdery. GILLS thick and well¬
spaced or poorly formed to practically absent. STALK present. VEILand VOLV A absent. SPORE
PRINT white to brownish when obtainable. Spores mostly produced asexually, smooth or spiny.
THIS small genus contains a staggering total of two species. Both are outlandish oddballs
that grow exclusively on other agarics, particularly Russula and Lactarius species. They
differ from Collybia tuberosa and other mushroom-inhabiting mushrooms in having
thick and well-spaced or poorly formed gills. They are also unique in that they produce
very few spores on basidia. Instead the hyphae block off to form asexual spores called
chlamydospores. Asterophora is listed in some books as Nyctalis.
ASTEROPHORA 201
Key to Asterophora
1. Cap more or less round and puffball-like, white becoming brownish and powdery as spores
mature; gills often malformed or practically absent .A. lycoperdoides, below
1. Not as above; cap not powdery; gills thick, well-spaced, usually decurrent, eventually disinte¬
grating into powdery spores .A. parasitica (see A. lycoperdoides, below)
Asterophora lycoperdoides
CAP 0.5 -2 cm broad, nearly round; surface dry, whitish becoming brown and powdery
from spores. Flesh thin, odor farinaceous. GILLS often malformed or barely present;
well-spaced, thick, whitish. STALK 1-3 cm long, 3-8 mm thick, more or less equal, white
becoming brownish. SPORE PRINT white when obtainable; spores 5-6 * 3.5^1 microns,
elliptical, smooth. Chlamydospores 12-18 microns, round, bumpy or spiny, thick-walled,
brownish.
HABITAT: In colonies on old mushrooms, particularly species in the Russula densifolia
group. Widely distributed but not common; very rare in our area.
EDIBILTY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This oddball might be mistaken for a puffball because of its poorly formed
gills and powdered round cap. However, no puffballs are known to be parasitic on gilled
mushrooms! A. parasitica is also widely distributed, but even rarer than A. lycoperdoides.
It has thick, well-spaced, decurrent gills and a white to grayish, brownish, or lilac-tinged
cap, plus smooth and elliptical chlamydospores.
Minute to medium-sized mushrooms, some of which shrivel up in dry weather and then revive when
moistened, others of which do not. CAP usually convex to plane, but sometimes bell-shaped;
not viscid in most cases; margin usually incurved when young. GILLS usually free, adnexed, or
notched, but sometimes adnate(or in Marasmius, even decurrent). STALK usually thin and pliant,
tough, cartilaginous, or wiry; usually central. VEIL and VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT white to
buff or rarely tinged pinkish. Spores smooth, usually not amyloid. Cells in the upper layer of the
cap cuticle usually forming a palisade (Marasmius), or not forming a palisade (Collybia).
THESE minute to medium-sized mushrooms typically have adnexed to free gills and a
cartilaginous or wiry stem. The cap is typically convex to plane or if conical then with an
incurved margin when young (rather than straight as in Mycena). Two large genera
{Marasmius and Collybia) plus several smaller ones are treated together here because
they are difficult to separate in the field. The traditional trademark of Marasmius is its
astonishing reviving ability. If dried-up specimens are placed in a bowl of water they will
quickly swell up, magically reassuming their original shape and dimensions. In the wild,
species of Marasmius often seem to spring up in droves right after or during a rain, when
in fact they were already there, shrivelled up and inconspicuous. I n addition, they can often
be told by their tough texture and wiry or hairlike stem. {Xeromphalina is somewhat
similar, but usually has decurrent and/ or more brightly colored gills.)
Collybia has traditionally been separated from Marasmius on the basis of its slightly
fleshier, non-reviving fruiting body. However, some species have been shuttled back and
forth between Marasmius and Collybia because they revive somewhat when moistened.
Recognizing the arbitrary nature of this character, taxonomists now differentiate
Collybia from Marasmius primarily on microscopic features such as the structure of the
cap cuticle. As a result, Collybia, as currently defined, includes a few species which do
revive, while Marasmius includes some that do not. The gills in Collybia are usually ad¬
nexed or even free; in some cases they are more broadly attached, leading to confusion
with Clitocybe. The stalk is usually thin and pliant; if thick, it has a cartilaginous outer
202 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
13. Odor fetid; stalk velvety; gills yellowish to brown or tinged reddish; cap and stalk brown to red-
brown; found on sticks or bark in eastern U.S. Micromphalefoetidum (-Marasmiusfoetidus)
13. Not as above . 14
14. Odor sweet and heavy (like benzaldehyde); cap brown to reddish-brown, vinaceous-brown, or
dark brown, at least toward the center; stalk usually at least 5 mm thick . 15
14. Not as above . 16
15. Stalk white (but may develop vinaceous or brownish stains below) ... C. oregonensis, p. 218
15. Stalk brown to dark brown or vinaceous-brown C. subsulcatipes(see C. oregonensis, p. 218)
16. Growing in grass, often in arcs or rings; stalk tough; gills fairly well-spaced (not crowded or
close); cap white to tan, buff, or brownish but not gray or vinaceous, usually less than 6 cm
broad; spore print white; very common and widespread .M. oreades, p. 208
16. Not as above . 17
17. Stalk with a tapered underground “tap root”(dig up carefully!); spore print white; fruiting body
without reddish or rusty stains; cap opaque (not normally translucent-striate when moist) 18
17. “T ap root” lacking or not well-developed, or if present then cap translucent-striate when moist or
fruiting body often reddish-stained and spore print pinkish-buff . 19
18. Cap blackish, dark brown, grayish, whitish, or yellowish-brown (but if the latter then usually
viscid when moist); found from the Rockies eastward Oudemansiella radicata& others, p.219
18. Not as above; cap chestnut-brown to warm tan or yellow-brown, not viscid .
.Caulorhiza umbonata & others, p. 218
19. Spore print pinkish; growing in grass, straw, or manure .(see Clitocybe tarda, p. 152)
19. Not with above combination of features.20
20. Gills yellow; cap and stalk olive to olive-brown or yellowish (but may develop dark reddish-
brown tones as it dries); usually on rotten wood . . Callistosporium luteo-olivaceum, p. 211
20. Not as above .21
21. Stalk dark, stiff, bristle-like, lessthan 1 mm thick; cap typically less than 1 cm broad (rarely 2 cm);
cap not whitish when fresh (but may fade!); substrate (twigs, needles, leaves) usually with black
horsehair-like rhizomorphs (mycelial threads) .... M. androsaceus group & others, p. 208
21. Not with above features (but may have some of them) . 22
22. Gills adnate to decurrent and fairly well-spaced; cap 2-4 cm broad and predominantly whitish
(may be slightly darker at center), usually wrinkled; stalk becoming brownish from the base
upward; terrestrial in the forests of the Pacific Northwest .M. umbilicatus
22. Not as above .23
23. Gills adnate to decurrent, white, very widely spaced; cap white or tinged gray to olive-gray or
even slightly yellowish, translucent-striate when moist; stalk whitish; found under pine in
coastal California, often in large numbers .M. sp. (unidentified), p. 206
23. Not as above .24
24. F ruiting body small or minute (cap usually2 cm broad or less); cap white or whitish or tinged pale
yellowish (the center may be tinged brown), but may develop reddish or pinkish stains in age;
stalk less than 3 mm thick. 25
24. Not as above; either differently colored or larger . 29
25. Gills free or nearly free; margin of cap usually with veil remnants andl or the cap and stalk
minutely powdered; stalk whitish; growing on ground . (szeLepiota seminuda, p. 307)
25. Not as above . 26
26. Stalk black beneath a coating of minute white hairs; cap 1 -2 cm broad; found on leaves or twigs
in eastern North America .Marasmiellus nigripes{see M. candidus, p. 206)
26. Not as above ... 27
27. Growing on fallen leaves .M. delectans & others (see Marasmiellus candidus, p. 206)
27. Growing on sticks, berry canes, wood, etc.28
28. Gills very widely spaced; stalk relatively shortness than3 cm long); abundant on the west coast,
infrequent elsewhere .Marasmiellus candidus, p. 206
28. Not as above; abundant in eastern North America, rare or absent elsewhere on continent . . .
.M. rotula{see Marasmiellus candidus, p. 206)
29. Growing in compact bundles on rotting conifers (the wood sometimes buried or very decom¬
posed—see Color Plate 49); margin of cap incurved when young .30
29. Not as above (but may grow tufted on rotting conifers or in dense clusters on ground) ... 31
204 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
30. Stalk white to grayish .... Clitocybulafamilia& C. abundans(see Collybia acervata, p. 215)
30. Stalk vinaceous-brown to reddish-brown (or somewhat paler when dry), at least at apex . 55
31. Stalk solid or firmly stuffed (not hollow), straight and equal except for very base (which may be
slightly swollen), sometimes scurfy or dandruffy at apex or throughout, or longitudinally lined
(but without hairs); gills crowded, white (except for one large species with tan to pinkish-
cinnamon gills); cap typically rather flat (broadly convex to plane, sometimes with a blunt
umbo); surface of cap usually smooth and dark brown to grayish, sometimes ochre-brown,
yellowish, or whitish (but not reddish-brown or vinaceous-brown); spores amyloid, usually
roughened; found in many habitats, but especially in grass or landscaped ground or under
mountain conifers soon after the snow melts .(see Melanoleuca, p. 169)
31. Not as above; spores typically neither amyloid nor roughened; stalk sometimes hollow, some¬
times clothed with minute hairs but not often scurfy; gills crowded to widely spaced; usually
found in woods or near trees (but not always) . 32
32. Cap with gray to black hairs or fibrillose scales .(see Tricholoma terreum group, p. 182)
32. Not as above . 33
33. Stalk very thin (less than 1.5 mm); cap flesh-colored to light brown, often wrinkled, up to 12
mm broad; stalk very minutely hairy (pubescent), not shiny; found on needles and twigs of red¬
wood, spruce, fir Micromphale sequoiae & others (see Marasmius androsaceus group, p. 208)
33. Not as above . 34
34. Cap grayish to dark brown, olive-brown, or black; growing in moss, Sphagnum bogs, or on
burnt ground, or sometimes simply associated with conifers . 59
34. Not as above; cap differently colored or habitat different . 35
35. Stalk smooth (hairless) or finely powdered, or with hairs only at the base . 36
35. Stalk pubescent or velvety (covered with minute hairs) over at least the lower half by maturity
(use hand lens if unsure) . 51
36. Gills reddish-brown to dark brown or blackish-brown; cap and stalk similarly colored (but cap
may fade); flesh staining green in KOH; fairly common in eastern North America and the
Pacific Northwest .C. alkalivirens
36. Not as above; gills typically paler .37
37. Base of stalk with a litter-binding mycelial pad; cap yellowish-brown to reddish-brown; stalk
1-3 mm thick, shining; growing in groups or dense clusters on hardwoods leaves and debris
in eastern North America .M. cohaerens& others
37. Not as above . 38
38. Growing in grass; fruiting body small (cap usually less than 2.5 cm broad) and vinaceous- or
reddish-tinged; stalk not tough and polished; cap not pleated .
.Mycena sp. (unidentified) (see Marasmius oreades, p. 208)
38. Not as above . 39
39. Cap and stalk pale or whitish (cap may have grayish-brown center); gills fairly well-spaced;
known from California and South America.M. albogriseus(see M. oreades, p. 208)
39. Gills close or crowded, or if well-spaced then cap and stalk differently colored .40
40. Gills widely spaced; stalk usually polished; cap often (but not always) pleated .41
40. N ot as above; gills typically fairly close or crowded .42
41. Cap bay-brown to reddish-brown, brown, or wine-red; stalk 5-13 cm long; common on west
coast .M. plicatulus, p. 209
41. Not as above; either cap differently colored or stalk shorter or found elsewhere .
.M. siccus & others (see M. plicatulus, p. 209)
42. Cap striate when moist and often translucent; cap typically conical or bell-shaped when young
.(seeMycena, p. 224)
42. Not as above .43
43. Stalk tough, grooved or twisted, often with a rooting base, tan to brown (not white!); growing
on hardwoods; rare (not positively known from North America) .C. fusipes
43. Not as above; common . 44
44. Stalk 0.5-2.5 cm thick, often with a rooting base, white or yellowish (but may develop reddish
stains below); cap usually over 4 cm broad and whitish, but often becoming reddish, pinkish, or
vinaceous-brown at the center and sometimes entirely those colors from the beginning; found
under conifers, usually on decayed wood or lignin-rich humus .C. maculata, p. 217
44. Not as above; either differently colored, smaller, or with a different habitat . 45
MARASMIUS, COLLYBIA, & ALLIES 205
45. S talk dark red except at apex; cap tan to buff, often plane at maturity; growing in tufts or clusters
in humus and under trees; not common . C. marasmioides(see C. acervata, p. 215)
45. Not as above (if tufted or clustered then stalk differently colored, including reddish-brown) 46
46. Gill edges coarsely ragged or toothed, even when young; spore print white; spores amyloid;
widespread (but not reported from California) .(seeLentinus& Lentinellus, p. 141)
46. Gill edges entire or finely serrated (or in age sometimes coarsely serrated); spore print white or
slightly colored; spores rarely amyloid; very common in California and elsewhere.47
47. Cap yellowish to light brown, often fading to whitish; stalk whitish or tinged yellow; found under
eastern hardwoods (or mixed woods) M. strictipes& M. nigrodiscus (see M. oreades, p.208)
47. Not as above .48
48. Usually growing in grass and cap typically pinkish or growing under mountain conifers and cap
vinaceous-red to purplish-red with ochre-yellow gills .... (see Lyophyllum &, Allies, p. 173)
48. Not as above .49
49. Spore print white to pale cream; cap averaging 1-5 cm broad (occasionally larger); cap color
variable but often tawny; gills white or pale yellow, their edges often entire; spores not
dextrinoid; common under hardwoods and conifers.C. dryophila & others, p. 215
49. Spore print cream to buff or pinkish-buff; cap averaging 3-8 cm broad (sometimes larger),
various shades of brown but not tawny; gills white or with reddish stains, the edges often finely
scalloped at maturity; at least some of the spores dextrinoid; found mainly(but not exclusively)
under conifers . 50
50. Cap vinaceous- to reddish-brown, not fading appreciably; gills sometimes reddish-stained . .
.C. extuberans & others (see C. butyracea, p.216)
50. Cap reddish-brown, brown, tan, or even grayish; gills not reddish-stained C. butyracea, p.216
51. Cap velvety, more or less orange-brown; gills adnate to decurrent; growing on hardwoods in
eastern North America .(see Omphalina&Xeromphalina, p. 221)
51. Not as above; stalk may be velvety but cap not velvety and gills not decurrent .52
52. Cap usually viscid when moist (but may dry out!); lower portion of stalk rusty-brown to
blackish-brown and velvety when mature (usually smooth and pallid when young); found on
wood (sometimes buried!) .Flammulina velutipes, p. 220
52. Not as above; cap not normally viscid .53
53. Odor garlicky or taste distinctly acrid (burning) .
.C. polyphylla& C. peronata{see C. confluens, p. 213)
53. Not as above (but taste may be somewhat bitter) . 54
54. Gills usually crowded (sometimes merely close), white or tinged flesh-color; cap not prominently
wrinkled; stalk pubescent (covered with minute white hairs) at least over the lower half; usually
growing in tufts or clusters . 55
54. Not as above; gills darker or more widely spaced or hairs on stalk brown to gray or tawny or
cap distinctly wrinkled, etc. 57
55. Stalk reddish to reddish-brown or vinaceous-brown beneath the pubescence (may fade slightly
in age), 2-6 mm thick; found on ground or wood but not normally on lawns .56
55. Stalk buff or whitish (or pale brown toward base), (2) 5-10 mm thick; growing on rotten wood,
wood chips, or lawns; not common . C. luxurians(see M. oreades, p. 208)
56. Growing in compact bundles on rotting conifers, the wood often buried or decomposed (see
Color Plate 49) . C. acervata, p. 215
56. Found on ground under both hardwoods and conifers, often clustered but not in compact
bundles; base of stalk often with a litter-binding mycelial mat. C. confluens, p. 213
57. Stalk with an enlarged, spongy base; cap and stalk reddish-brown to tan; restricted to eastern
North America . C. spongiosa
57. Not as above . 58
58. Gills white or pallid .C. spp. (unidentified) (see C. confluens, p. 213)
58. Gills soon darker (but may be dusted white by spores) .C. fuse op urp urea group, p. 214
59. Gills usually adnate to decurrent; odor usually mild; on burnt ground, moss, etc., but not
normally in Sphagnum .(see Myxomphalia maura & others, p. 165)
59. Gills usually adnexed to adnate; often in Sphagnum bogs, or if not then odor often rank or
rancid .(see LyophyllumSt Allies, p. 173)
206 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
because it has been “identified” by Dennis Desjardin, Rolf Singer, Howard Bigelow,
and other mycologists as an undescribed species. It is not as tough as most Marasmius
species and does not revive when moistened, but is assigned here to Marasmius for lack
of a better alternative. According to Desjardin, it may be the prototype for a “new” genus.
Marasmius copelandi is one of several small brownish species with a strong garlic- or onionlike odor.
It has passed under several names, but marasmiologist D. Desjardin says that M. copelandi is correct.
s -
208 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
there is little else to separate them from other“LBM,s.” The mycelium must also smell like
garlic, because in wet weather our tanoak humus will often have a distinct garlic odor—
even when no fruiting bodies are present! There are several very similar “garlic mush¬
rooms,” including: M. olidus, found on oak leaves in eastern North America, with slightly
shorter spores; M. prasiosmus, a European species with whitish gills and even smaller
spores (of uncertain occurrence in North America); M. scorodonius, widespread, with a
reddish-brown to pallid cap and smooth (hairless) stem, found on needles, twigs, grass
stems, etc.; M. alliaceus, a European species with a long black, minutely hairy stalk; and
M. thujinus, with a minute (1-3 mm broad) cap and garlic odor if crushed, found under
northern conifers. Several of these names have been applied to our local garlic mushroom,
but marasmiologist Dennis Desjardin says that M. copelandi is the correct name.
HABITAT: Gregarious in grass, usually in arcs or rings; widely distributed and very
common in lawns, parks, cemeteries, etc.; also common in pastures in the Pacific North¬
west, but rarely straying far from suburbia in our area. Found year-round except during
MARASMIUS 209
cold spells, but most abundant in California in late spring, summer (on watered lawns),
and fall. Several crops are produced each year, but its presence can be detected even when it
isn’t fruiting—just look for “fairy rings” (patches of brown grass rimmed by a lush zone of
darker green grass). The living mycelium on the periphery of the ring stimulates the grass to
grow, while the dried-up mycelial matter within the circle inhibits growth.
EDIBILITY: Delectably delicious—one of the few “LBM’s” worth learning. What it
lacks in substance it makes up for in abundance. Discard the tough stems and use the caps
whole. They’re superb is just about anything—omelets, soups, sauces, stir-fried dishes,
even cookies. Or simply saute in butter and serve on toast! What’s more, they dry easily,
don’t decay quickly, and are usually free of maggots. Don’t pass up shrivelled, sun-dried
specimens—they are easily resurrected or can be stored in an airtight jar for later use.
COMMENTS: At first glance this seems like yet another Boring Ubiquitous Mushroom
(“BUM”). However, a closer look reveals that it is really quite attractive, with a lean, clean,
subtle symmetry all its own. Many “BUM’s” and “LBM’s” grow on lawns, but the fairy
ring mushroom can be distinguished by the following features: (1) cap obtusely umbonate
in many specimens (2) white spores (the grass beneath mature caps is often dusted with
white spore powder) (3) broad (deep) white to buff gills which are fairly well-spaced and
not decurrent (4) thin, tough stem (5) growth in grass (6) the ability of dried specimens to
revive dramatically when moistened. Be especially careful not to confuse it with the
poisonous Clitocybe dealbata, which is white-spored and grows in grass (often with M.
oreades), but has thin, crowded, adnate to decurrent gills and a convex to plane(not umbo¬
nate) cap. The growth in rings is not a good means of distinguishing it, as many mushrooms
are capable of growing in circles, including C. dealbata. Other species: M. albogriseus is
fairly common in central and southern California under trees, shrubs, and chaparral or
even in grass. It tends to have a grayer or browner or yellower cap than M. oreades, at least
at the center, and a hollow stem (the stalk of M. oreades is usually stuffed with a white pith),
but is otherwise quite similar. M. (-Collybia) strictipes of eastern North America is also
somewhat similar but grows in the woods and has closer gills and a yellowish cap. Another
woodland easterner, M. nigrodiscus, is larger (cap up to 11 cm broad) and often has a
striate stalk, but is similar in color to M. albogriseus. Collybia luxurians sometimes grows
in grass but has close gills and a reddish-brown cap. Finally, there is an unidentified Mycena
that often grows in grass. However, it is smaller than M. oreades, its stalk is not as tough,
it is usually reddish- or vinaceous-tinged, and its cap is convex to plane (not umbonate).
distinctive. The stalk is so brittle that the mushroom must be dug up (rather than plucked)
to keep it intact. The conical cap may lead to confusion with Mycena, but the tough,
polished stem is characteristic of Marasmius. There are several similar and equally
exquisite species with distant gills, including: M. bellipes, with smaller spores and a small
cap (up to 15 mm broad) and short stalk; M. borealis, whose cap is not pleated or striate;
M. siccus and M.fulvoferrugineus of eastern North America, with even more distant gills,
a shorter (2-7 cm) stalk, an orange-brown to ochre-tawny to rusty-brown, deeply ribbed
or pleated cap (like a miniature umbrella) and spores 15-21 microns long (I have seen the
oranger of the two, M. siccus, preserved nicely in plastic cubes); and M. haematocephalus
(see photo above), a gorgeous tropical leaf-inhabitor with a dark red cap.
Crinipellis piceae
CAP 3-7 (10) mm broad, convex to broadly convex or nearly plane, the center sometimes
slightly depressed; surface whitish to buff or tinged tawny except for the dark (tawny-
brown to brown or blackish) center, which is often surrounded by a dark circle; covered
with coarse tawny to brownish hairs and sometimes minute scales, not viscid; margin often
ciliate (fringed with projecting hairs). Flesh very thin, white. GILLS white, close, adnexed
or free. ST ALK 2-6 cm or more long, up to 1 mm thick, more or less equal, very thin and
tough, brown to blackish-brown beneath a coating of minute hairs. SPORE PRINT white;
spores 7-10 x 3-4.5 microns, cylindrical, smooth, not amyloid. Hairs on cap dextrinoid.
HABITAT: Solitary, widely scattered, or in groups on twigs, needles, and debris of
conifers, especially spruce; known only from the west coast (and Asia). It fruits practically
year-round in damp weather and is, according to Dennis Desjardin, the most numerous
“marasmioid” fungus of the coastal forests of northern California. It does not seem to
occur in our area, but neither does spruce.
EDIBILITY: Much too miniscule to merit attention.
COMMENTS: This minute Marasmius-like mushroom is easily told by the coarse dex¬
trinoid hairs on the cap, frequently ciliate cap margin, and thin, dark stalk. Other species:
C. campanella is a slightly larger northern species with a rusty-orange to chestnut-brown
hairy cap and stem and a tendency to grow on conifer twigs (especially cedar) that are
still on the tree. C. zonata of eastern North America is a “large” (cap 1-2.5 cm) species
with coarse tawny hairs; it grows on dead wood. C. stipitaria has a minute central nipple
on the cap. None of these are worth eating.
CALLISTOSPORIUM 211
Callistosporium luteo-olivaceum
CAP 1.5-6.5 cm broad, convex or slightly umbonate becoming plane or shallowly
depressed; surface not viscid, often minutely scurfy at first but becoming smooth; dark
olive to olive-brown or olive-yellow, often becoming yellower (yellow-brown to honey-
colored) in age and developing dark reddish-brown tones when dried. Flesh thin, pallid
or yellow or tinged cap color; odor mild to pungent or slightly fruity; taste mild or slightly
bitter. GILLS yellow to golden-yellow, tending to redden when dried; close, notched or
adnexed or at times adnate. STALK 2.5-7 cm long, 0.3-1 cm thick, equal or slightly thicker
at either end, often flattened, smooth to fibrillose or scurfy (especially over the lower
portion), sometimes streaked in age; colored like cap or slightly darker, tending to turn
deep reddish-brown from the base upward as it dries. SPORE PRINT white; spores
4.5-6.5 x 3-4.5 microns, elliptical to nearly round, apiculate, smooth, not amyloid but
many of them staining vinaceous in KOH (potassium hydroxide).
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in small groups or tufts on rotten wood (often buried!)
under conifers; widely distributed but not common. I have found it in our coastal pine
forests in the winter. It is said to occur on hardwoods also, particularly in the tropics.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This distinctive mushroom has the stature of a Collybia and was originally
placed in that genus. However, the olive and yellow coloration plus the tendency to grow
on rotten wood (sometimes very decomposed!) distinguish it. C. graminicolor is a similar
but smaller (cap up to 2 cm broad) northwestern species with larger spores.
Strobilurus trullisatus
CAPO. 5-1.5 cm broad, convex to plane or slightly depressed; surface dry, often striate or
wrinkled, minutely granular, white to pinkish-buff or brownish. Flesh very thin. GILLS
typically adnate to adnexed, close, white or tinged pinkish-buff. STALK 2-5 cm long,
1-1.5 mm thick, equal, dry, minutely granular; apex white, lower portion yellowish to
brownish or tawny; base with yellow to tawny-orange hairs and mycelial threads. SPORE
PRINT white; spores 3-6 x 1.5-3 microns, elliptical, smooth, not amyloid.
HABITAT: In colonies (usually 4-10) on old Douglas-fir cones or rarely cones of other
conifers; common throughout the range of Douglas-fir. In our area it usually fruits after
the first fall rains.
EDIBILITY: Who knows? Who cares?
COMMENTS: Also known as S. kemplonae and Colly bia trullisata, this little mushroom
is one of several species that grow only on rotting cones. (Some wood-inhabiting mush¬
rooms, such as Mycenapurpureofusca, may grow on cones but are not restricted to them.)
Other Strobilurus species include: S. conigenoides, a whitish species that grows only on
the fallen seed pods (“cones”) of magnolias in eastern North America; S. occidentalis,
which occurs on the cones of Sitka spruce; S. albipilatus (-Collybia albipilata), with a
pinkish-buff to brown or dark brown cap, commonintheSierraNevadaandotherwestern
mountains on pine cones and other coniferous debris; and S. lignitilis, which tends grow
on buried decaying wood and has a grayish-brown cap. Finally, there is Baeospora
myosura (-Collybia conigena), which is slightly larger than S', trullisatus and has a smooth,
buff or tan to pinkish-brown cap, very crowded gills, a coarsely hairy stem base, and
amyloid spores. It grows on the cones of various conifers but favors Douglas-fir, at least
in California.
Collybia tuberosa
CAP 3-10 mm broad, convex to plane or centrally depressed; surface smooth, dry, whitish
to buff, sometimes with a darker (yellowish to brownish or pinkish-buff) center. Flesh very
thin, white. GILLS white or rarely tinged pinkish, adnate to adnexed, close or crowded.
STALK 1 -3 cm long, up to 1 mm thick, equal, dry, minutely downy, white or tinged brown,
often arising from a small orange-brown to reddish-brown to blackish, appleseed-like
body or “tuber” (sclerotium). SPORE PRINT white; spores 3-6 * 2-3 microns, elliptical,
smooth, not amyloid.
HABITAT: In colonies on the blackened remains of old mushrooms, particularly larger
Russula and Lactarius species (e.g., R. albonigra), occasionally in humus; widely distri¬
buted. I have found it only once in our area, in December, but the very similar C. cookei
and C. cirrhata (see comments) are fairly common.
EDIBILITY: Unequivocally inconsequential.
COMMENTS: This dainty little Collybia is one of four widespread species that colonize
decayed mushrooms. The host may be so deteriorated, however, that it is not recognizable
as a mushroom. The other three species are: C. cookei, practically identical but with
rounder, more prominent, tan to yellow or yellow-orange sclerotia (and occasionally
found on rotten wood or in humus); C. cirrhata, also very similar but with white mycelial
threads instead of sclerotia, found in humus as well as on old mushrooms (and particularly
common in the Sierra Nevada); and C. racemosa, which has stubby lateral branches on the
stem (see description). All of these are placed in Microcollybia by some taxonomists.
Left: Collybia tuberosa and its close relatives grow in colonies on decaying mushrooms and other
debris. Sclerotia (beadlike bodies from which the mushrooms arise) are not visible in this picture.
Right Collybia racemosa is easily told by its small size and unique branching stalk.
COLLYBIA 213
214
COLLYBIA 215
COMMENTS: The appearance of this species in large fairy rings under oaks is a sure sign
that the coastal California mushroom season is under way. The hygrophanous reddish-
brown to tawny, rusty, or tan cap, more or less adnexed gills, growth on the ground, and
smooth (hairless) stalk distinguish it from all but C. butyracea, which has a greasier
(buttery) cap, buff-colored spores, and ragged gill edges. Both species are reminiscent of the
fairy ring mushroom (Marasmius oreades), but grow under trees and have crowded gills;
neither grows in the tight bundles characteristic of C. acervata, and neither has downy hairs
on the stem like C. confluens. In some regions C. dryophila is frequently covered by lumps
or masses of somewhat jelly- or tumorlike tissue, caused by the fungus Christiansenia
mycetophila. However, I have not observed this phenomenon in California. The yellow-
gilled form of C. dryophila is sometimes listed as a separate species, C. sub sulphur ea.
216
Collybia butyracea is often confused with C. dryophila, but is slightly different in color and slightly
larger, and often has a club-shaped stalk (thicker at base).
not develop reddish stains in age. Both favor conifers and grow in humus or on rotten
wood. The former occurs in coastal California and the Pacific Northwest while the latter
is more common in eastern North America. Another species with a vinaceous-brown cap,
C. extuberans, has elliptical spores and is widely distributed.
217
Left: Collybia oregonensis is an amazingly fragrant mushroom. Right: Oudemansiella radicata
(p. 219), a common mushroom in eastern North America, is rather variable in color but always has
broad gills (as shown here) and a deeply rooting stalk (not visible).
EDIBILITY: Unknown. Despite its sweet odor it has a somewhat bitter taste.
COMMENTS: The strong, heavy benzaldehyde or almond extract odor and vinaceous-
brown cap are distinctive. The fragrance is reminiscent of Russula fragrantissima, but
without the fetid component of that species. The stalk often roots deeply but does not form
a true pseudorhiza (“tap root”) as in Caulorhiza umbonata. The gills are not waxy as in the
almond-smelling Hygrophorus species (e.g., H. bakerensis) and the odor is usually thicker
and more pronounced. C. subsulcatipes, known only from Washington, has a similar but
weaker odor, a brown to dark vinaceous-brown stalk with a “tap root,” a brown to vina-
ceous-buff cap, and dull vinaceous gills in age. Both of these species are placed in a separate
genus, Rhodocollybia, by some collybiologists.
218
Caulorhiza (- Collybia) umbonata is a flagrant fungal feature of our redwood forests. Note the conical
or umbonate cap and long “tap root” which may extend as much as three feet into the humus.
(2) cm thick, most of it underground in the form of a long, tapered “tap root”; smooth,
twisted-striate, buff to tan or colored like cap but paler; rather tough and cartilaginous.
SPORE PRINT white; spores 5-8 * 3-5 microns, elliptical, smooth, amyloid.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups near or under redwood (rarely elsewhere);
restricted to the range of coastal redwood (Sequoia sempervirens). It is very common in
our area in the fall and winter.
EDIBILITY: Like myself, not firmly established. H owever, if it were poisonous we would
probably know by now. I’ve sampled small quantities without ill effects.
COMMENTS: Anchored by its long “tap root,” this distinctive species, like a dandelion,
resists being uprooted. The “tap root,” pallid gills, umbonate cap, and white spore print,
plus the association with redwood distinguish it. The “tap root” is brittle, however, and
will break off and stay behind in the ground unless it is dug up very carefully. Collybia
umbonata is a synonym. Collybia subsulcatipes (see comments under C. oregonensis) is
somewhat similar but has a sweet odor. Caulorhiza hygrophoroides is a closely related
hardwood-lover with a smaller (up to 5 cm) cap. None of these have the grayish-brown
colors and exceptionally broad gills of Oudemansiella radicata and its relatives.
219
220 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
Flammulina velutipes is easily told by velvety brown stalk, sticky cap, cheerful color (see color plate),
and growth on wood.
221
OMPHALINA& XEROMPHALINA
Small to minute, often brightly colored, saprophytic mushrooms. CAP usually plane to depressed
or umbilicate at maturity, not conical; margin often incurved when young. GILLS often yellow,
orange, or pinkish, typically adnate to decurrent. ST ALK usually central, thin, cartilaginous, often
pliant or rather tough, hollow. VEIL and VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT white to pale yellow.
Spores smooth, amyloid (Xeromphalina) or not amyloid (Omphalina).
THESE are dainty, brightly colored mushrooms with decurrent gills and a cartilaginous
stem. They were originally grouped together in the obsolete genus Omphalia, but
Xeromphalina was created for the species with a dark stem, tougher texture, ability to
revive somewhat when moistened, and amyloid spores.
Omphalina is interesting from a botanical standpoint because several species grow only
with lichens. It is now thought that the mushrooms are actually the fruiting bodies of the
fungal component of the lichen (a lichen is a symbiotic relationship between an alga and a
fungus). Other Omphalinas grow in grass, moss, or on soggy logs. They are easily confused
with Mycenas (which usually have a conical or bell-shaped cap), while even experts cannot
agree on the distinction between Omphalina and some of the small, slender Clitocybes.
Xeromphalinas occur on logs and in humus and are more common than Omphalinas,
at least in California. Their tough, usually dark stem and ability to revive after being dried
are reminiscent of Marasmius, but their yellow to orange gills and amyloid spores are
distinctive. In addition to Xeromphalina and Omphalina, the genus Gerronema is recog¬
nized by some mycologists; it embraces several Omphalinas not specifically associated with
lichens. None of these mushrooms are large enough to eat. If your mushroom does not key
out convincingly below, check Mycena, Marasmius, and the Hygrophoraceae.
Xeromphalina cauticinalis
CAP 0.5 -2.5 cm broad, convex becoming plane or with a small central depression; surface
smooth, not viscid, reddish-brown to tawny or ochraceous-tawny, fading to yellowish.
Flesh very thin, pliant; taste mild. GILLS adnate to decurrent, yellow, with veins between.
STALK 2-8 cm long, 1-2.5 mm thick, equal or more often with a small bulb at the base;
pliant, tough, tawny or yellowish above, dark brown below; base with tawny mycelium.
SPORE PRINT white; spores 5.5-7 x 3-4 microns, elliptical, smooth, amyloid.
HABITAT: Scattered to densely gregarious on conifer needles and debris; common in
western North America. In our area it appears (along with X. fulvipes—see comments) in
the late fall and winter under redwood and other conifers.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This is one of several terrestrial Xeromphalinas. The decurrent yellow gills
distinguish it from Mycena, and the stalk is much tougher than in Hygrocybe. Other
species: X. fulvipes is similar but has a bitter taste, adnate gills, and minute orange hairs on
the stem. I have found it under redwood several times, but it is not as common as X.
cauticinalis;X. picta is a minute terrestrial species with a greatly swollen stalk apex.
222
OMPHALINA & XEROMPHALINA 223
COMMENTS: The yellow to orange, decurrent gills plus the thin polished stem and small
size typify this dainty mushroom. Its occurrence on conifers is so dependable that its pre¬
sence can be taken as “proof’ that its host is some type of conifer. It might be mistaken
for a Mycena, but the shape of the mature cap is quite different. Galerina autumnalis
is also somewhat similar, but has a veil and brown spores. The cluster pictured in the color
plate is darker (browner) than normal, but shows the shape and growth habit quite well.
Other species: X. kauffmanii is very similar but occurs with hardwoods in eastern North
America; X. orickiana has a dark reddish-brown cap, grayish to brownish gills, and grows
grows on redwood.
Two small Omphalinas with different habitats (both are discussed above). Left: Omphalina erice¬
torum is associated with lichens (which, however, are often very inconspicuous). Right: Omphalina
pyxidata grows in moss, grass, and soil. Note how both species have decurrent gills. Similar greenish
species are discussed under Clitocybe odora (p. 162).
224 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
MYCENA
Small to minute saprophytic mushrooms that do not revive when moistened (after being dried).
CAP typically conical to bell-shaped when young, but often expanding in age; often translucent-
striate; margin usually straight when young, rarely incurved. GILLS usually attached. STALK
central, thin, usually hollow;fragile or cartilaginous. VEIL and VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT
white. Spores smooth, amyloid or not amyloid. Cystidia usually present on gills.
THIS is a very large group of very small mushrooms with a thin, fragile or cartilaginous
stem and bell-shaped to conical cap (at least when young). The gills are not waxy as in the
Hygrophoraceae; the dried fruiting body does not revive when moistened as in Marasmius,
and is not particularly tough; Collybia and Omphalina are similar but usually have a
convex to plane or umbilicate cap. Other small mushrooms with conical to bell-shaped
caps (Coprinus, Conocybe, Nolanea, etc J do not have white spores.
In sheer numbers Mycenas are more abundant than any other mushrooms, but because
of their diminutive dimensions, most people are oblivious to their presence. In the wake
of heavy rains they fruit in untold quantity in the woods, especially on needle beds under
conifers, where they form thick carpets of delicate domes. They are strictly saprophytic—
on logs, stumps, sticks, leaves, soil, and humus. They turn up occasionally in lawns,
gardens, and flower pots, but do not grow in dung like Coprinus and Bolbitius.
The most common forms are gray or brown, but a few, such as M. acicula, are brightly
colored. Alexander Smith’s monumental monograph lists 218 North American species,
but dozens more occur. The overwhelming majority cannot be identified positively without
a microscope (some are so small they can barely be seen with the naked eye!). The size and
shape of the sterile cells (cystidia) on the gills plays a particularly important role in their
identification. However, Mycena can be divided into manageable groups based on gross
features such as size, color, odor, habitat, and viscidity. In addition, a few species exude a
juice or latex when the base of the stem is broken and squeezed. Lactarius species also
possess a latex, but are much larger and fleshier with thicker stems.
In every mixed bag of individuals I take mushroom hunting, there’s always one or two
with a keen eye for detail. I n the normal course of events, I begin with a brief spiel about the
marvels of the mushroom world before dispatching the group to rush about madly in
search of the elusive 25-lb. Boletus edulis (trampling myriad Mycenas with every step),
while I make a sly beeline for my secret Boletus patch. These one or two keen-eyed
individuals, however, are content to remain where they are, meticulously examining every
leaf, twig, and cone, and uncovering in the process not only a multitude of marvelously
minute Mycenas, but an astonishing assortment of other clandestine creatures—slugs,
centipedes, spiders, snakes, salamanders, etc.
As I am rather small myself, I harbor a profound respect for these exceptional indivi¬
duals. In a society where we are taught from birth to think big, it is encouraging to find
some who are still able to make the distinction between quality and quantity, who appre¬
ciate the fact that size alone is not a measure of intrinsic worth.
My lust satiated and my basket laden with Boletus, I return later to find these patient
and perceptive souls sprawled out on their bellies in the exact spot where I left them—for
they consider the day well spent if they discover fifty Mycenas whose combined mass is no
bigger than their thumb! Finding myself in good company, I bring out the cheese and bread
—and if I’m lucky they bring out the wine—and we proceed to have an impromptu picnic,
sharing our discoveries, then savoring the silence around us while awaiting the riotous
return of the rest of the group.
For the benefit of these discerning individuals I have included nineteen species of
Mycena in this chapter, which is nineteen more species than the average individual cares
to know. Of course, they constitute only a fraction of the “YAM’s” (“Yet Another My-
MYCENA 225
cena”) that can be found. They are much too small to eat, and some may actually be
poisonous, but they deserve to be better known. They are exquisite in their daintiness and
are among the most attractive of the fleshy (fleshless?) fungi. If your “Mycena” does not
key out convincingly, check Marasmius & Collybia, Omphalina & Xeromphalina, and
the waxy caps (Hygrophoraceae).
Key to Mycena
1. Base of stalk exuding a red to blackish-red juice when cut or squeezed .2
1. Not as above .4
2. Growing on wood ...M. haematopus, p. 231
2. Growing on ground or humus .3
3. Flesh in cap exuding a reddish juice when cut and squeezed .M. sanguinolenta, p. 232
3. Flesh in cap exuding a watery orange-yellow juice when cut and squeezed .
.M. subsanguinolenta (see M. sanguinolenta, p. 232)
4. Fruiting body bright orange to yellow; gills yellow with orange margins; found on hardwoods
in eastern North America (usually clustered) .M. leaiana{ see M. lilacifolia, p. 236)
4. Not as above . 5
5. Stalk (and often the cap) viscid or slimy when fresh and moist .6
5. Stalk not viscid or slimy; cap not normally viscid either . 10
6. Stalk yellow, orange, greenish-gray, or lilac-tinged when fresh, at least at the apex .7
6. Stalk white, gray, or brown (not brightly colored) .9
7. Gills usually decurrent; found on rotting conifers ...M. lilacifolia, p. 236
7. Not as above .8
8. Cap olive-brown to blackish; stalk discoloring brown from the base upward;
common under mountain conifers when or shortly after the snow melts .
.M. griseoviridis(see M. epipterygia, p. 237)
8. Not as above .M. epipterygia & others, p. 237
9. Cap dry (not viscid) .M. rorida, p. 237
9. Cap viscid or slimy, at least when moist . M. vulgaris & others (see M. rorida, p. 237)
10. Fruiting body minute (cap typically less than 1 cm broad and stalk less than 1 (2) mm thick), or if
slightly larger then growing on bark (often mossy) of living trees . 11
10. Fruiting body small but not minute (stalk gene rally at least 1 mm thick; cap at least 5 mm broad
and often larger); growing in a variety of habitats but not usually on bark of living trees . 14
11. Cap brightly colored (red, pink, orange, or yellow).M. acicula & others, p. 228
11. Not as above (cap white, gray, brown, vinaceous, etc.) . 12
12. Typically growing on the bark of trees . 13
12. Typically growing on leaves, twigs, humus, stems, or occasionally on bark ..
.M. capillaris & others, p. 227
13. Cap brownish to vinaceous-brown or vinaceous-buff.
.M. corticola& M. madronicola (see M. clavularis group, p 227)
13. Cap white to grayish or grayish-brown .M. clavularis group & others, p. 227
14. Gills marginate (the edges of at least the larger ones significantly darker and differently colored
than the faces—use hand lens if unsure!) . 15
14. Gills not marginate (edges same color or paler than the faces) .22
15. Gill edges scarlet to bright orange . 16
15. Gill edges pink, dark reddish, purple, yellowish, etc., but not scarlet to bright orange .... 17
16. Gill edges scarlet; hairs at base of stalk orange . M. strobilinoides, p. 228
16. Gill edges orange; hairs at base of stalk yellow-orange .
.M. aurantiomarginata(see M. strobilinoides, p. 228)
17. Gill edges greenish-yellow to yellow to yellow-brown .
.M. citrinomarginata & others (see M. capillaripes, p. 229)
17. Gill edges pink to reddish, purplish-red, reddish-brown, etc. 18
18. Edges of at least the larger gills pink to rosy; growing on ground .... M. capillaripes, p. 229
18. Gill edges darker than above (but faces may be pink or rosy); growing on ground or wood 19
226 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
19. Gills pink to rosy with sordid reddish edges; growing on ground under conifers .
.M. rosella(see M. capillaripes, p. 229)
19. Not as above .20
20. Odor radishlike; typically growing on ground . M. pelianthina & others (see M. pura, p. 230)
20. Odor not radishlike; growing on wood, cones, wood chips, or in lignin-rich humus .21
21. Gill edges very dark purple or grayish-purple .M. purpureofusca, p. 229
21. Gill edges rosy to vinaceous-brown . . M. elegantula & others (see M. purpureofusca, p. 229)
22. Lilac, purplish, blue, or bluish-green tints usually present somewhere on fruiting body ... 23
22. Not as above .24
23. Lilac or bluish tints often present; odor radishlike .M. pura, p. 230
23. Blue or bluish-green tints usually present when fresh; odor more or less mild .
.M. amicta& M. subcaerulea(see M. pura, p. 230)
24. Cap brightly colored (bright coral-pink to orange or yellow) when fresh (may fade in age) 25
24. Cap typically some shade of gray, white, brown, dull vinaceous, etc. (not brightly colored) 26
25. Growing on walnut or hickory nut shells .... M. luteopallens (see M. strobilinoides, p. 228)
25. Growing on ground or in humus . . . M. amabilissima & others (see M. strobilinoides, p. 228)
26. Typically growing on ground, needles, twigs, leaves, etc.27
26. Typically growing on logs, stumps, branches, etc.35
27. Found in grass or disturbed soil; cap brick-red to vinaceous-tinged, soon convex or plane, less
than 2 cm broad.Mycena sp. (unidentified) (see Marasmius oreades, p. 208)
27. Not as above .28
28. Found in grass; stalk tough; cap white to brown, never grayish (seeMarasmius oreades, p. 208)
28. Not as above . 29
29. Extreme base of stalk exuding a droplet of milky fluid when squeezed (fresh specimens only!)
. M. galopus, p. 232
29. Not as above . 30
30. Odor of crushed flesh distinctly alkaline, bleachlike, antiseptic, or at least sharp .
.M. leptocephala & others (see M. alcalina, p. 234)
30. Odor mild or farinaceous, but not as above . 31
31. Stalk with whitish fibrils or particles; cap olive-brown when fresh .M. scabripes, p. 233
31. Not as above . 32
32. Cap margin not often incurved at first; cap often translucent-striate when moist, up to4 (5) cm
broad, grayish to buffy-brown; stalk usually less than4 (6) mm thick; spores often amyloid 33
32. Not as above; margin of cap usually incurved when young and I or cap opaque or differently
colored; spores typically not amyloid .(seeMarasmius, Collybia, & Allies, p. 201)
33. Stalk often with a tapered underground rooting portion; cap sordid tan to buffy-brown; usually
growing near hardwood stumps . M. galericulata& others, p. 235
33. Not as above . 34
34. Stalk base typically exuding a droplet of clear liquid when squeezed; gills often reddish-stained
in age .M. atroalboides(see M. galopus, p. 232)
34. Not as above . . . M. murina group & sundry assorted YAMS (see M. murina group, p. 234)
35. Gills (and often cap) developing sordid pink to reddish spots or stains in age .
. M. maculata & others, p. 235
35. Not as above (but gills may be tinged evenly pinkish in age) .36
36. Growing solitary or in rows, pairs, or groups, but not normally clustered M. subcana, p. 233
36. Not as above . 37
37. Usually growing on hardwood stumps; stalk often rooting in substrate M. galericulata, p. 235
37. Not as above; usually on conifers . 38
38. Fruiting body relatively large (cap 2-5 cm broad), grayish; usually growing near melting snow
(or shortly after snow melts) in mountains .M. overholtsii(see M. subcana, p. 233)
38. Not as above . 39
39. Cap translucent-striate at maturity (when moist), gray to brownish-gray or paler; flesh very
thin .M. occidentalis & many others (see M. subcana, p. 233)
39. Not as above .(see Marasmius, Collybia, & Allies, p. 201)
MYCENA 227
Mycena acicula
CAP 3-7 (10) mm broad, convex or bell-shaped, but sometimes expanding in age; surface
not viscid, coral-red when young, soon fading( often from margin inward) to bright orange-
yellow or yellow. Flesh very thin, yellow, odor mild. GILLS attached (usually adnate), pale
orange to yellow or whitish. ST ALK 1 -7 cm long, less than 1 mm thick, threadlike, equal,
brittle, orange-yellow to yellow, smooth except for hairy base. SPORE PRINT white;
spores 9-11 * 3.5^U5 microns, elongated-elliptical, smooth, not amyloid.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in small groups on leaves and debris in woods, especially
along streams and in other wet places; widely distributed. Common throughout the
mushroom season in our area, but easily overlooked. I have seen it in large numbers in a
thicket of oak saplings and blackberries along a stream.
EDIBILITY: Unknown, but a great many would be needed for a mouthful!
COMMENTS: This minute Mycena is a delight to behold, its coral-red to yellow cap
contrasting vividly with the dim backdrop of decaying leaves and humus. One usually has
to get down on hands and knees to find it! M. oregonensis is a similar miniature species
whose cap is yellow to yellow-orange from infancy; it grows on needle carpets as well as oak
leaves. For larger brightly colored Mycenas, see M. strobilinoides.
Mycena capillaripes
CAP 0.5-2.5 cm broad, oval becoming bell-shaped or conical, often with a blunt umbo,
sometimes nearly plane in age; surface smooth, not viscid, usually some shade of vina-
ceous-gray or gray, the center often browner; translucent-striate when moist, usually
wrinkled or furrowed when dry. Flesh thin; odor typically nitrous or bleachlike(especially
when crushed), but sometimes radishlike. GILLS attached (usually adnate), well-spaced,
typically pallid or vinaceous-gray, at least the longer ones with pale pink or rosy edges(use
hand lens!). STALK 3-10 cm long, 1-3 mm thick, equal or slightly thicker at either end,
hollow, smooth, fragile, colored more or less like cap or paler above, sometimes slightly
yellower in age; base with coarse white hairs. SPORE PRINT white; spores 7-12 * 4-6
microns, elliptical, smooth, amyloid.
HABITAT: Scattered to densely gregarious on conifer duff (but occasionally also under
hardwoods); widely distributed. In our area it often occurs in droves under Monterey pine
in the fall and winter.
EDIBILITY: Inconsequential.
COMMENTS: This is one of several Mycenas that carpet our pine forests with a miniature
“fungal jungle” of petite parasols. The faint reddish or vinaceous tints on the cap plus
the pink-margined gills are distinctive. M. rosella is a widely distributed pink to grayish-
rose species with pale to bright rosy gills that have darker (pale to dark reddish) edges. It
is uncommon in our area but often abundant under pine and other conifers farther north.
Other terrestrial species with colored gill margins include: M. citrinomarginata, with pale
yellow to yellow-brown gill edges and spores 8-11 microns long;M. olivaceobrunnea, with
smaller spores, a smaller cap, and yellowish gill edges; andM. elegans, with pale greenish-
yellow gill edges. In these species the cap is typically some shade or mixture of olive-brown,
gray, and/ or yellow.
Mycena purpureofusca
CAP 0.5-2.5 cm broad or occasionally larger, obtusely conical with a slightly incurved
margin, becoming broadly conical or bell-shaped or sometimes expanding to nearly plane
in old age; surface smooth, not viscid, dark purplish with a paler (lilac) margin when young,
fading to purplish-gray or vinaceous-lavender; translucent-striate when moist and mature.
Flesh thin, pliant, odor mild. GILLS attached (usually adnate), fairly close, pallid to
Mycenapurpureofusca commonly grows on pine cones and other woody debris.
grayish with dark grayish-purple edges. STALK 3-1 Ocm long, 1-3 mm thick, equal, hollow,
cartilaginous, colored more or less like cap or paler above; base with white hairs and some¬
times rooting. SPORE PRINT white; spores 8-14 * 6-8.5 microns, broadly elliptical,
smooth, not amyloid.
HABITAT: Solitary or in small groups or tufts on conifer wood and debris; widely
distributed and frequent in our area in the fall and winter. I find it often on old pine cones.
EDIBILITY: Unknown, and like myself, likely to remain so.
COMMENTS: The purplish conical cap, dark purplish gill edges, and growth on wood
or cones typify this species. The stalk does not exude a red latex like M. haematopus. The
color and stature are reminiscent of Marasmiusplicatulus, which has a very tough, brittle
stalk and pallid gill edges and grows on the ground. Collybiafuscopurpurea has a similar
name but has a convex to plane cap and is also terrestrial. Other species: Mycena elegantula
is closely related, but has a vinaceous-brown to pinkish cap and pale pink to vinaceous gill
edges; it also grows on coniferous wood and debris, including cones. M. rubromarginata
grows on spruce and fir and has a browner cap and reddish-brown gill edges.
230
Mycena pur a is a terrestrial species that sometimes resembles a miniature blewit. Note how the cap
becomes convex or plane in age.
COMMENTS: This is one of the larger Mycenas as well as one of the more beautiful. The
color is exceedingly variable, but there is usually a trace of lilac somewhere on the fruiting
body, especially the stem. The convex rather than conical cap is atypical for a Mycena,
and for this reason it is keyed out under Collybia. The radishlike odor is another important
fieldmark. The gill edges are not purple or pink as in M. capillaripes and M. purpureofusca,
and it is strictly terrestrial. It never grows in huge clusters and does not normally fruit in
dense troops either. I have seen fairly robust specimens which could have been mistaken for
blewits (Clitocybe nuda). Inocybe lilacina is similarly colored, but has brown spores.
M. pelianthina and M. rutilantiformis are two very similar species with a radishlike odor.
They differ in having dark reddish to purple gill edges, and the latter typically shows yellow
at the apex of the stalk. They are not as highly colored as M. pura and both grow on the
ground under hardwoods. M. amicta is a western species whose cap and stalk are blue to
blue-green or tinged those colors. It grows on coniferous debris, while M. subcaerulea is
its eastern, deciduous- woodland counterpart.
231
Left: Mycena sanguinolenta is a common terrestrial species that “bleeds” when broken. Right:
Mycena galopus looks like numerous other grayish or brownish Mycenas, but its base exudes a milky
droplet when squeezed.
232
MYCENA 233
Left: Mycena scabripes is a nondescript species with a minutely scaly or dandruffy stalk. Right:
Mycena subcana typically grows singly or in pairs or groups (but not clusters) on sticks and branches.
234 TRICHOLOMATACEAE
sometimes fading to whitish; not viscid, translucent-striate nearly to center when moist.
Flesh thin, grayish, odor mild. GILLS attached (usually adnate), well-spaced, whitish to
pale gray. STALK 1.5-6 cm long, 1.5-3 mm thick, equal or enlarged at base, smooth, same
color as cap or paler, with downy white hairs at base. SPORE PRINT white; spores
8-10 * 5-6 microns, elliptical, smooth, amyloid.
HABITAT: Solitary or in small groups (not large clusters!) on dead sticks and branches,
sometimes on living trees; fairly common on the west coast. In our area it fruits in the fall
and winter on conifers (especially redwood); I have also found it on tanoak.
EDIBILITY: Who knows? Who cares? I don’t.
COMMENTS: This grayish species is representative of a multitude of indifferent grayish,
wood-inhabiting “YAM’s.” The salient macroscopic features of M. subcana are its
color, its translucent-striate cap, and its preference for dead sticks and branches
rather than stumps or logs (a completely different niche!). Unlike many of its kin, it does
not grow in clusters, but instead fruits alone or in attractive rows of solitary or sometimes
paired specimens. Typifying those that grow in clusters on stumps or logs is M. occiden-
talis, a grayish species found throughout the West on conifers. Also clustered on conifers
is M. laevigata, a whitish species with grayish-black to bluish-gray tints on cap and stalk
when very young and yellowish discolorations in age; and M. overholtsii, a large grayish
species found in clumps near melting snow in the spring. Another species,M. parabolica,
has a growth habit in between that of M. subcana and M. occidentalis—it grows in groups
or small clusters on rotting wood and has a sooty black cap that fades to gray in age.
HABIT AT: Scattered to densely gregarious by the hundreds on needle duff under conifers,
widely distributed. This species and its look-alikes are often abundant in our coastal pine
forests in the late fall and early winter. They also appear under hardwoods, in grass, even
in planter boxes and flower pots—i.e., wherever there is organic matter to nourish them.
EDIBILITY: Who knows? Who cares? I don’t. Do you? Do you care if I do?
COMMENTS: This species, which has passed under the name M. stannea, is one of a slew
of nondescript, odorless, gray to brownish, terrestrial Mycenas that are very prevalent
under conifers. They are differentiated from each other largely on the basis of microscopic
characteristics such as the size and shape of spores and sterile cells (cystidia). The one pic¬
tured in the color photograph is not quite as gray as typical M. murina and may well be a
distinct species, but to the average mushroom hunter it is a “YAM” (“Yet Another My-
cena”), and thus hardly worth the time and trouble to distinguish. Other “Y AM’s” include
M. latifolia, M.fHopes, M. abramsii,M. pseudotenax, M. atroalboides, ad infinitum. For
those species with a sharp or bleachlike odor, see comments under M. alcalina, and for
those with colored gill margins, see M. capillaripes.
Mycena galericulata
CAP 2-5 (7) cm broad, conical when young becoming broadly bell-shaped to umbonate
to plane or with an uplifted margin in age; surface moist but not viscid, often radially
wrinkled nearly to center; buffy-bro wn to grayish, dingy tan, cinnamon-brown, or grayish-
brown. Flesh watery gray; odor faintly to distinctly farinaceous or radishlike. GILLS
adnate to adnexed, often with cross-veins between, white to grayish or in age flushed pale
Left: Mycena maculata (see p. 235) is one of many Mycenas that grow in clumps on rotten wood.
Center: Mycena galericulata, young specimens with broadly conical caps; note how stalk roots deeply.
Right: Mycena galericulata, mature specimens which have opened up so as to resemble Collybias.
pinkish, but not spotted or stained. STALK 5-10 (14) cm long, 2-4 (6) mm thick, equal,
cartilaginous, hollow, smooth, often rooting; grayish-white or colored more or less like
cap, often darker below. SPORE PRINT white; spores 8-11 * 5.5-7 microns, elliptical,
smooth, amyloid.
HABITAT: Solitary to scattered, gregarious, or in small clusters on decaying hardwood
stumps, logs, and debris; widely distributed and not uncommon in our area in the fall and
winter. One form—possibly a distinct species—grows on manzanita burls.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but not recommended—it is one of the few Mycenas large enough
to eat, but many of its difficult-to-distinguish relatives have not been tested.
COMMENTS: This widespread species can be mistaken for a Collybia because the cap
is convex to plane in age. The telltale traits are its pale color, frequently long, rooting stem,
and penchant for growing scattered or in small, loose clusters. The gills are often tinged
pinkish in age, but do not become reddish-spotted as in M. maculata. Other species:
M. vitilis has a long stem that often has a rooting base that is covered with white hairs
below the ground. It grows in humus under hardwoods, especially alder.
Mycena lilacifolia
CAP 0.8 -2.5 cm broad, convex to helmet-shaped, the center slightly depressed in age;
surface viscid to slimy and translucent-striate when moist, smooth, lilac when very young,
but soon bright to pale yellow. Flesh thin; odor mild. GILLS well-spaced, usually
decurrent, pale lilac becoming whitish to pale yellow or pinkish. STALK 1 -4 cm long, 1 -2
mm thick, equal or enlarged at the base, smooth, slimy-viscid when moist, same color as
gills but soon yellow; base often with lilac mycelium. SPORE PRINT white; spores
6-7 x 3-3.5 microns, elliptical, smooth, not amyloid.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups on rotting conifers, widely distributed.
It usually fruits in cool weather and is fairly common in our coastal pine forests.
EDIBILITY: Unknown, but too slippery to be of value.
COMMENTS: This species is best distinguished from other viscid Mycenas by its yellow
color and growth on conifers. The gills will sometimes retain their lilac tint longer than
the cap and stalk, but I have found specimens which showed absolutely no trace of their
original lilac color. It might be looked for in Omphalina because of the decurrent gills
(see photo on p. 237), but the slimy stem and cap distinguish it. Viscid, brightly colored
wood-inhabiting species with non-decurrent gills include: M. leaiana, bright orange to
yellow, growing in clusters on hardwoods in eastern N orth America, and certain varieties
of M. epipterygia(see description on next page), which grow on conifers.
236
Mycena lilacifolia (p. 236) is one of several Mycenas with a slimy cap and stem. Note decurrent gills.
237
spores
ENTOLOMATACEAE
THIS is the largest family of pinkish-spored mushrooms and also the most difficult. It
is unusual among agarics in having spores which are distinctly angular (several-sided) in
side and/ or end view. The gills are typically attached to the stalk (in contrast to the other
major pinkish-spored family, the Pluteaceae), and the stalk is not cleanly separable from
the cap. The spore color, though characterized as “pinkish,” actually ranges from deep
flesh-color to salmon- or rosy-pink to dull reddish or sordid pinkish-cinnamon, whereas
the pinkish-spored members of the Tricholomataceae (e.g., Clitocybe) have pale or dull
pinkish, non-angular spores.
The Entolomataceae have a very confusing nomenclatural history. Four principal
genera have traditionally been recognized—Clitopilus, Entoloma, Nolanea, and Leptonia
—but the presence of intermediate forms has led some mycologists to consolidate all but
Clitopilus in a single giant genus, Entoloma, while recognizing a few smaller genera (e.g.,
Rhodocybe) that differ microscopically. To muddle matters more, the name Rhodophyllus
is often used instead of Entoloma, and Rhodophyllaceae instead of Entolomataceae.
The result is that each species has a surfeit of superfluous synonyms—for instance,
Leptonia sericella, Alboleptonia sericella, Entoloma sericellum, and Rhodophyllus
sericellus are all names for the same fungus! (Human beings are certainly a confusing—and
confused—lot!)
The mushrooms do little to ameliorate matters, for they are exasperatingly difficult to
demystify. Some Entoloma-experts have resorted to such abstruse activities as measuring
the urea concentration of the fruiting body or determining the type of symmetry exhibited
by the spores in their efforts to delineate the various genera and species!
In North America the Entolomataceae are largely woodland fungi, but some species
grow in open or grassy areas. The vast majority are terrestrial (in contrast to the wood-
inhabiting genus Pluteus), but a few occur on rotting wood. Several species are poisonous,
and in view of the difficulty in identifying them, beginners should avoid the entire group.
Particularly dangerous are some of the large fleshy Entolomas—a fact which clearly
invalidates the old adage that “any mushroom with pink gills is edible” (a reference, no
doubt, to Agaricus).
From two to nine genera are recognized, depending on whether a “lumper” or “splitter”
is doing the recognizing. Several of the genera are small and rare (e.g., Claudopus and
Pouzarella)\ these are included in the following key but not treated beyond it.
8. Gills often decurrent(but sometimes adnate or even notched); cap and stalk never bluish, violet,
or black; spores warted or longitudinally lined in side view, angular only in end view .
. Clitopilus& Rhodocybe, below
8. Not as above; spores usually angular in side view or not angular at all .9
9. Cap and/ or stalk blue, blue-black, blue-gray, violet, steel-gray, or black, at least when young
and fresh. 10
9. Not as above . 12
10. Stalk usually 5 mm thick or more; usually growing on ground . 11
10. Stalk slender, usually hollow and fragile or cartilaginous, typically 1.5-5 mm thick at apex, or if
thicker then growing on wood .Leptonia & Allies, 248
11. Stalk fibrillose-scaly, often with a metallic luster or iridescence; cap usually fibrillose-scaly
also .LeptoniaSi Allies, p. 248
11. Stalk smooth to finely fibrillose, or if fibrillose-scaly then cap smooth.Entoloma, p. 242
12. Fruiting body small and white (or in age tinged yellowish or pinkish) LeptoniaSi Allies, p. 248
12. Not as above . 13
13. Cap hairy and/ or scaly and base of stalk with coarse, stiff hairs; not common .. . Pouzarella
13. Not as above . 14
14. Stalk fleshy, 4 mm thick or more . 15
14. Stalk slender, usually hollow and fragile or cartilaginous, usually less than 5 mm thick ... 17
15. Spore print pale to dull pinkish; spores not angular . (see Tricholomataceae, p. 129)
15. Spore print deep flesh-color to salmon-pink to pinkish-cinnamon or darker; spores angular
under the microscope . 16
16. Cap conical to bell-shaped or with a pointed umbo (but may expand with age) Nolanea, p. 245
16. Not as above (but cap may be bluntly conical when young) .Entoloma, p. 242
17. Growing on or near wood; spores smooth or at least not angular . 18
17. Usually terrestrial (but occasionally on wood); spores angular under microscope . 19
18. Gills usually free (or nearly free) and close together . (seePluteus, p. 254)
18. Not as above . (see Tricholomataceae, p. 129)
19. Stalk yellow-green or gills pale with pink edges.. LeptoniaSi Allies, p. 248
19. Not as above .20
20. Cap conical to bell-shaped or umbonate, or if convex to plane then smooth or silky; cap not
umbilicate .Nolanea, p. 245
20. Cap convex to plane or umbilicate and usually finely fibrillose, scurfy, scaly, or fibrillose-scaly,
at least at the center (and particularly in age) .Leptonia & Allies, p. 248
21. Parasitic on other mushrooms (mostly chanterelles and polypores); fruiting body minute,
grayish to white; small stalk usually present. Claudopusparasiticus
21. Not as above; growing on dung . Clitopilus& Rhodocybe, p. 239
CLITOPILUS& RHODOCYBE
Small to medium-sized, mostly terrestrial mushrooms. CAP convex to plane or depressed. GILLS
usually adnate to decurrent. STALK thick or slender, fleshy or rather fragile, central or off-
center. VEIL and VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT pinkish to salmon, flesh-colored, or pinkish-
cinnamon. Spores angular in end view only; in side view longitudinally ridged (Clitopilus) or
bumpy to warty (Rhodocybe).
THESE two small genera of pinkish-spored mushrooms typically have adnate to decurrent
gills and spores which are angular only in end view. They are a rather lackluster lot, most
likely to be confused with species of Entoloma, which usually have notched gills, and
Clitocybe, which have paler, non-angular spores. Several small species of Leptonia and
Eccilia have decurrent gills, but their spores are angular in both side and end view. There
are also several Rhodocybes with notched gills; these are likely to be confused with Colly-
bia or Entoloma unless their spores are examined under the microscope.
Both Clitopilus and Rhodocybe are small genera, but some of their species are quite
common. Two are described here (one from each genus) and several others are keyed out.
240 ENTOLOMATACEAE
Clitopilus prunulus looks like a Clitocybe with its decurrent gills and white to gray color, but its
spores are pinkish and show ridges under the microscope. The tree frog shown here is very tiny!
CLITOPILUS 241
HABITAT: Solitary to scattered or in small groups on ground in open woods and grassy
places near trees; widely distributed. It is fairly common in our area in the fall and winter,
usually under oak or pine.
EDIBILITY: Edible and choice, but not recommended. It is rated highly in Europe but is
easily confused with poisonous mushrooms such as Clitocybe dealbata.
COMMENTS: The pinkish spores, decurrent gills, white to grayish cap, and strong odor
of meal are the fallible fieldmarks of this unremarkable fungus. The poisonous Clitocybe
dealbata closely mimics it but is somewhat smaller and has white spores. Clitocybe sub-
connexa and its close relatives have pinkish spores, but grow in clusters and are more
robust. The name Clitcopilus orcellus has been given to forms of C. prunulus with a white,
slightly sticky cap, but it is no longer regarded as a distinct species by most mycologists.
Rhodocybe nuciolens
CAP 2-7 (11) cm broad, broadly convex becoming plane or slightly depressed or some¬
times slightly umbonate; surface smooth, not viscid, dull pinkish to pinkish-brown,
pinkish-tan, or sometimes cinnamon-brown to brick-colored, fading as it dries (especially
toward margin), sometimes with watery spots or bands. Flesh white or pale ochre; odor
usually rather spicy. GILLS whitish becoming pinkish as spores mature; close, adnate or
notched or sometimes slightly decurrent. STALK 2-8 (15) cm long, 0.4-1.5 (4) cm thick,
equal or occasionally thicker at base, whitish or colored like cap (but usually paler).
SPORE PRINT rosy-buff; spores 5.5-7.5 * 3.5-4.5 microns, elliptical and warty in side
view, angular in end view.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups or tufts in humus or on rotten wood; common
in central and southern California in the fall and winter, but more widely distributed. It
occurs under both hardwoods and conifers; I find it most often with redwood.
EDIBILITY: Uncertain. Greg Wright of Los Angeles says it has an excellent flavor, but
that one collection caused sweating, chills, and other symptoms of muscarine poisoning.
COMMENTS: The dull pinkish to brick-colored cap and pinkish spores are the distin¬
guishing features of this eminently undistinguished fungus. The gill attachment is quite
variable, leading to confusion with Clitocybe inversa (which has white or buff spores),
candy caps (Lactarius fragilis and L. rufulus), and various Collybias, but the pinkish
spores and pinkish gills at maturity are distinctive. There are several other Rhodocybes
that are difficult to key to genus without examining the spores. These include: R. nitellina,
cap up to 5 cm broad and orange-brown to reddish-brown to pinkish-cinnamon or ochre
with a translucent-striate margin when moist; R. roseiavellanea, one of several uncommon
wood-inhabiting species with a more or less tan cap; R. mundula, cap 3-7 cm broad,
grayish, and bitter-tasting; R. caelata, with a small(l-3 cm) grayish cap and decurrent gills;
and/?, aureicystidiata, also small, but with a darker cap that bruises dark or dingy reddish.
Rhodocybe nuciolens is variable in size, shape, and color, but always has pinkish spores. These are
rather small specimens.
242 ENTOLOMATACEAE
ENTOLOMA
Medium-sized to fairly large terrestrial mushrooms. CAP typically convex to plane or uplifted,
usually not sca/y.GILLS typically attached (usually notched), fairly close to well-spaced, usually
pinkish or flesh-colored in old age. STALK fleshy, smooth or slightly scaly, central. VEIL and
VOLYA absent. SPORE PRINT pinkish to flesh-colored or cinnamon-pinkish. Spores angular.
NOLANEA
Smallish, mostly saprophytic, terrestrial mushrooms. CAP usually smooth, often silky when dry,
typically conical, bell-shaped, or distinctly umbonate, at least when young, but sometimes convex.
GILLS typically attached (adnate to adnexed or sometimes decurrent), but sometimes appearing
free. STALK typically slender and fragile or cartilaginous; usually hollow and easily splitting;
central. VEIL and VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT pinkish to flesh-colored to salmon- or
cinnamon-pinkish. Spores angular (sometimes shaped like jacks or ice cubes!), not amyloid.
THESE are small, drab, gray to brownish mushrooms with a thin, cartilaginous or fragile
stem and a conical to bell-shaped or distinctly umbonate (“nippled”) cap. The shape and
stature of the fruiting body are reminiscent of the white-spored genus Mycena, but the
spore color, of course, is pinkish. The cap is convex to plane in a few species, but never
(or only rarely) umbilicate as in Leptonia. Entoloma differs by its fleshy stem, but this is a
somewhat ambiguous character, and the two genera intergrade.
Nolanea species are differentiated largely on microscopic characteristics such as the
presence or absence of cystidia (sterile cells) on the edges of the gills. They are especially
common under conifers, but also occur with hardwoods and in lawns and pastures.
Most are of unknown edibility but some, such as N. verna, are said to be poisonous.
Three widely distributed species are described here. They are similar to one another in
appearance but differ in habitat and season. Two colorful and distinctive eastern species
are also included in the key, plus the infrequently encountered genus Eccilia.
Key to Nolanea
1. Odor sweet, like a candy store or bubble gum (break open the cap if unsure) .2
1. Odor mild or distinctive, but not as above . 3
2. Stalk (and usually the cap) yellowish . N. icterina(see N. verna group, p.247)
2. Cap and stalk more or less grayish-brown .... N. fructufragrans(see N. verna group, p. 247)
3. Cap pink to yellow or orange and conical or bell-shaped (or if expanding in age then retaining
a distinct umbo); found in eastern North America .4
3. Not as above; cap not usually brightly colored . 5
4. Cap yellow to yellow-orange .N. murraii
4. Cap more or less salmon-colored .N. salmonea
246 ENTOLOMATACEAE
5. Stalk minutely velvety; cap reddish-brown to blackish (at least at center); odor usually strong,
like cucumber or fish. (see Tricholomataceae, p. 129)
5. Not as above . 6
6. Fruiting mainly in the spring, especially in areas with snowfall .TV. verna group, p. 247
6. Not as above . 7
7. Usually growing in grass or open areas; odor of crushed flesh farinaceous (like raw meal or
cucumber) .TV. sericea & others, below
7. Usually growing in woods or under trees; odor mild or various, sometimes farinaceous ... 8
8. Cap conical to bell-shaped, or if expanding somewhat then usually retaining a distinct umbo
.TV. staurospora & others (see TV. sericea, below & TV. verna group, p. 247)
8. Cap broadly conical to convex or plane . 9
9. Gills decurrent . Eccilia
9. Gills not decurrent . TV. stricta & others, below
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: Only when this species is found in grassy places can the beginner hope to
distinguish it from the throngs of other brown to grayish Nolaneas, Entolomas, and
Leptonias. Be sure to look for the characteristic silky sheen that develops in dry weather or
as the cap loses moisture. The cap is not normally conical or bell-shaped as in many Nola¬
neas (see N. verna), but may have a slight umbo (the very similar TV. hirtipes has a more
prominent umbo or “nipple” and features cystidia on the gill edges). The pinkish spores and
gray-brown to brown color help separate N. sericea from our other common grass-
inhabiting mushrooms. Other species: N. edulis is a very similar but smaller species that is
common in open places in southern California; N. staurospora grows in grassy as well as
shaded or wooded areas and has a conical to bell-shaped cap that may become convex or
umbonate as it matures, and ranges in color from dark brown to date-brown,
grayish-cinnamon, or grayish-brown, but fades as it dries to tan or paler. Furthermore, it
has “cruciate-nodulose” spores (shaped like stars or jacks). I mention this feature because it
is impossible to appreciate the relief they (the spores) provide unless you’ve spent many
long, tedious hours scrutinizing the round to elliptical spores sported by the overwhelming
majority of fleshy fungi. Apart from the spores, however, it is just another “LBM” that is
easily confused with dozens of other “LBM’s.” Enough said.
247
Nolanea verna group is common during the spring, especially under mountain conifers (often when
the morels are out). Note the conical cap when young.
COMMENTS: Also known as Entoloma vernum, this species or species “complex” has
many look-alikes in the genus Nolanea, but fruits almost exclusively in the spring.
The pinkish spores distinguish it from Mycena, and the slender, cartilaginous stem
separates it from Entoloma. The yellowish form that is common in the Sierra Nevada may
actually be TV. cuneata (according to David Largent). Similar Nolaneas include: N. holo-
coniota, also common in western mountains, with a brown to yellow-brown cap and pale
yellow to pale orangish stalk that is minutely powdered above; theN. mammosa-N. papil-
lata group, with a small (1-4 cm) nippled, bell-shaped to conical cap and long thin stalk,
usually fruiting in the late summer, fall, or winter; andiV. staurospora, with star-shaped
spores (see comments under N. sericea). Also worth mentioning are two small species that
smell like a candy store or “tooty-fruity gum” (Largent): N. fructufragrans, with a more
or less grayish-brown cap and stalk; and N. icterina, with a yellowish to olive-yellow cap
and stalk and adnexed to slightly decurrent gills. None of these are worth eating.
I
IN stature Leptonia corresponds roughly to the white-spored genera Collybia and
Omphalina. The cap is typically convex to plane or umbilicate, rather than conical as in
Nolanea, and the stalk—with a few exceptions—is thin and fragile rather than fleshy as in
Entoloma. Leptonias can sometimes be recognized by their color alone: many species are
breathtakingly blue, vividly violet, or beautifully black, and some, such as L. carnea, have
an iridescent quality that makes them among the most striking of all mushrooms. Others,
however, are gray or brownish like umpteen Entoloma and Nolanea species.
Leptonias fruit throughout the mushroom season, but tend to be most abundant when
or where other mushrooms are scarce. Fairly few fleshy fungi, for instance, are fond of
fruiting under fern fronds in redwood duff, but that is precisely the niche in which Leptonia
thrives in California. In the Pacific Northwest, on the other hand, it is frequent under
alder and western red cedar (also rather unfruitful foraging grounds for fleshy fungi), and
248
LEPTONIA& ALLIES 249
in England and Scotland it is said to favor heaths. Most of the species are terrestrial; a few
grow on rotten wood, but can be separated from small species of Pluteus by their attached,
more widely spaced gills.
Though Leptonias are among our most beautiful mushrooms, little is known of their
edibility. David Largent recognizes over 100 species in his monograph on Leptonia, but
even the distinctively colored ones are rather difficult to identify. A mere four species
are described here, plus one species of Alboleptonia, a small genus of whitish mushrooms
often included in Leptonia.
Key to Leptonia & Allies
1. Cap and/ or stalk blue, blue-black, blue-gray, steel-gray, violet, or black, at least when young
and fresh.2
1. Not as above . 12
2. Cap smooth (not scaly!) and brown to dark brown; stalk blue or violet-blue and often iridescent,
usually at least 4-5 mm thick .(seeEntoloma, p. 242)
2. Not with above features . 3
3. Growing on wood; cap usually fibrillose-scaly; rare L. cyanea& others (see L. carnea, p. 250)
3. Growing on ground and/ or cap smooth .4
4. Stalk slender, hollow, and either fragile or cartilaginous, usually 1-5 mm thick at apex .... 5
4. Stalk usually 5 mm thick or more . 11
5. Fresh stalk fibrillose-scaly and iridescent or metallic . . L. occidentalis(see L. carnea, p. 250)
5. Not as above .6
6. Gills pallid or grayish with distinctly darker (blue-gray to black) edges .
.L. serrulata(see L. parva, p. 251)
6. Not as above (but gills may be entirely blue-gray) . 7
7. Cap and/ or stalk with distinct violet or purple tints when fresh . 8
7. Not as above .9
8. Gills pale yellow when young.L. zanthophylla(see L. nigroviolacea, p. 250)
8. Not as above . L. nigroviolacea & others, p. 250
9. Cap bluish-black to black when fresh (but may fade to brownish or gray in age) . 10
9. Cap yellow-brown to reddish-brown to grayish-brown when fresh L. gracilipes& others, p. 252
10. Gills blue-gray to blue.L. nigra (see L. parva, p. 251)
10. Gills whitish or tinged gray .L. parva & others, p. 251
11. Cap and stalk deep indigo-blue (or stalk apex sometimes with violet tints); known only from
the west coast .L: carnea, p. 250
11. Cap grayish-brown to deep violet; stalk usually paler; found mainly in eastern North America
.L. porphyrophaea (-Entoloma violaceum)
12. Fruiting body entirely white when fresh (but may develop yellowish, ochraceous, or pinkish
tones in age) .A Iboleptonia sericella & others, p. 252
12. Not as above . 13
13. Gills whitish with brown to gray-brown edges L. fuligineomarginata(see L. gracilipes, p. 252)
13. Not as above . 14
14. Edges of gills pink; cap rose-tinted when fresh; rare . L. rosea
14. Not as above . 15
15. Stalk yellow-green, usually staining blue-green when bruised; cap greenish-yellow to yellow-
brown to olive-brown; rare .L. incana
15. Not as above . 16
16. Stalk white; cap umbilicate in age .L. exalbida(see L. gracilipes, p. 252)
16. Not as above . 17
17. Gills decurrent . Eccilia
17. Gills adnexed to adnate or with a very slight decurrent tooth . 18
18. Cap striate and usually umbilicate in age .L. undulatella (see L. gracilipes, p. 252)
18. Not as above; cap not umbilicate.(see AJolanea, p. 245)
250 ENTOLOMATACEAE
Left: Leptonia nigroviolacea, a dainty violet-tinged species. Right: Leptonia parva, a common black
or steel-gray species.
Left: Leptonia parva, or a very similar species. Right: Gill detail in Leptonia serrulata, showing the
finely scalloped black edges characteristic of that species.
rectangular in profile when young and deeply depressed (but not umbilicate) in age, and
gray gills; L. nigra, a beautiful species with evenly blue-gray gills and minutely hairy blue-
black cap that is convex to plane but never umbilicate, fairly common; L. serrulata, gills
white to gray with dark blue to blue-black, minutely serrated edges (see above photo¬
graph), common and widely distributed; and L. cupressa, cap blackish but gills and
stalk brownish-gray, found mainly under cypress, not common. All of these are typically
terrestrial. For similar wood-inhabiting species or those with iridescent, fibrillose-scaly
stalks, see comments under L. carnea, and for small terrestrial species with a distinct violet
tinge, see L. nigroviolacea.
Leptonia gracilipes
CAP 1.5 -5 cm broad, convex becoming plane to shallowly depressed or umbilicate; sur¬
face dry, minutely scaly toward the center, the margin finely fibrillose or smooth; dark
yellow-brown to grayish-brown or dark brown, often fading in age to paler brown or even
orange-brown, the center usually darker. Flesh thin, fragile, grayish- or olive-tinted.
GILLS adnexed to adnate or with a slight decurrent tooth, white or pallid when young,
becoming pinkish in age from maturing spores, or sometimes brownish. STALK 2-8 cm
long, 1-5 mm thick, equal, often flattened or grooved, smooth, dark blue-gray fading to
blue-gray or gray in age. SPORE PRINT rosy-pinkish; spores 8-12 * 6.5-8 microns,
elliptical-angular.
HABITAT: Scattered or in small groups in humus under ferns, alder, and conifers; widely
distributed. I have found it several times in our area under redwood, in the fall and winter,
when few other mushrooms were out and about.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: The slender blue-gray stalk and yellow-brown to grayish-brown cap
characterize this rather forgettable species. Its stature is similar to that of L. parva, but the
cap is never bluish-black. Other species: L. asprella is similar, but has grayer gills and a
grayer cap; L. vinaceobrunnea has a blue-gray stalk and reddish-brown to vinaceous-
brown cap; L. fuligineo-marginata has a violet-brown to dark reddish-brown to grayish-
brown cap and stalk, but its gills are white with dark reddish-brown to grayish-brown
edges; L. undulatella is brown to yellow-brown with a striate cap; and L. exalbida has an
umbilicate, dark yellow-brown cap and white stalk.
252
Wm.
Alboleptonia sericella is a nondescript fragile whitish mushroom with pinkish gills at maturity.
PLUTEACEAE spores
FORMERLY called the Volvariaceae, these are small to medium-sized mushrooms with
a central stem, free gills at maturity, and smooth, pinkish to sordid reddish spores. In
the other major pinkish-spored family, the Entolomataceae, the gills are usually attached
to the stem and the spores are angular or longitudinally ridged under the microscope.
There are two principal genera in the Pluteaceae: Volvariella has a volva; Pluteus does
not. A third genus, Chamaeota, is extremely rare and not treated in this book. It lacks a
volva, but has a partial veil that usually forms an annulus (ring) on the stalk.
Because of the free gills and volva in Volvariella, the Pluteaceae are thought to be related
to the white-spored Amanitaceae. Besides the disparity in spore color, however, there is
a fundamental anatomical difference: the gill tissue is convergent in the Pluteaceae,
divergent in the Amanitas (see p. 19).
Key to the Pluteaceae
1. Universal veil and volva absent . 2
1. Universal veil present, typically forming a volva (sack) at base of stalk .4
2. Partial veil present, usually forming an annulus (ring) on the stalk . 3
2. Veil and annulus absent .Pluteus, p. 254
3. Spore print white or with only a slight pinkish tinge . (see Lepiotaceae, p. 293)
3. Spore print distinctly pinkish or deep flesh-color; mainly tropical; rare . Chamaeota
253
254 PLUTEACEAE
4. Spore print pale, with only a slight pinkish tinge; volva whitish .(set Amanita, p. 263)
4. Spore print distinctly pinkish to reddish-cinnamon; volva variously colored Volvariella, p. 258
PLUTEUS
Small to medium-sized, wood-inhabiting mushrooms. CAP convex to plane. Flesh usually soft.
GILLS typically close or crowded and free (at least at maturity), usually pinkish in old age. STALK
typically central and cleanly separable from the cap. VEIL and VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT
flesh-colored to deep pinkish, pinkish-cinnamon, or sordid reddish. Spores smooth, usually
elliptical. Gill tissue convergent.
THESE pinkish-spored mushrooms have a central stalk and free, close gills and grow
almost exclusively on wood. The wood, however, may be buried or decomposed, making
the mushrooms appear terrestrial. They are most often confused with the pinkish, angular-
spored Entolomataceae, which are usually terrestrial with gills attached to the stem.
Pluteus is frequently encountered but rarely abundant. Most species have soft flesh and
decay rapidly. However, the larger types such as P. petasatus and P. cervinus are good
edibles when fresh and firm. P. salicinus and P. cyanopus may contain traces of psilocybin
and/ or psilocin; the edibility of many of the smaller species is unknown.
It is a fairly sizable genus, with over 50 species in North America and more than 20 in
California. As they are segregated primarily on microscopic features such as the structure
of the cap cuticle and the shape of sterile cells (cystidia) on the gills, only five species are
described here.
Key to Pluteus
l. Cap red to orange, fading to yellow .P. aurantiorugosus(see P. lutescens, p. 257)
1. Not as above (cap may be yellow but never red or orange) .2
2. Stalk yellow . 3
2. Stalk not yellow. 5
3. Cap velvety or granulose; stalk white or pinkish when young, yellowish only in age.
.P. flavofuligineus, p.258
3. N ot as above; stalk yellow even when young .4
4. Cap brown or olive-brown .P. lutescens, p. 257
4. Cap yellow or ochre .P. admirabilis(see P. lutescens, p. 257)
5. Cap white . P. pellitus (see P. cervinus, p. 255)
5. Cap not white (but may have colored fibrils or scales on a whitish background) .6
6. Gill edges dark brown to nearly black; usually found on conifers .
.P. atromarginatus (see P. cervinus, p. 255)
6. Not as above; gill edges same color as gills or paler (whitish, pinkish, etc.) . 7
7. Base of stalk blue- or greenish-stained in age or when bruised .
.P. salicinus & P. cyanopus (see P. longistriatus, p. 257)
7. Not as above . 8
8. Cap plushlike, velvety, or granulose but not conspicuously striate .
. P. flavofuligineus & others, p. 258
8. Cap not velvety or granulose, or if so, then also conspicuously striate .9
9. Cap 3-12 cm broad or more, not striate; stalk 4 mm thick or more . 10
9. Cap 5 cm broad or less, sometimes striate; stalk 5 mm thick or less . 11
10. Cap whitish or pallid with brownish fibrils or scales; often growing in clusters (and often
appearing terrestrial) .P. petasatus, p. 255
10. Cap dark brown to pale brown, grayish-brown, etc., sometimes with a fibrillose-streaked
appearance .P. cervinus & others, p. 255
11. Cap yellow or yellowish .P. leoninus(see P. lutescens, p. 257)
11. Cap not yellow.P. longistriatus & many others, p. 257
Pluteus petasatus is a robust species with small scales or fibrils on the cap. It often grows in clusters,
and like other species of Pluteus, has free crowded gills.
Pluteus petasatus
CAP 4-15 (20) cm broad, convex, or becoming broadly umbonate to plane in age; surface
usually not viscid, whitish with a brownish to grayish center or with darker (brown to
grayish-brown) fibrils or scales; margin usually whitish. Flesh fairly thick and firm, white;
odor mild or radishlike. GILLS crowded, broad, free at least in age, whitish for a long time,
then eventually pinkish. STALK 4-10 cm long, 0.7-3 cm thick, equal or swollen above or in
the middle; firm, whitish or discoloring below in age; sometimes streaked with fibrils.
SPORE PRINT pinkish to deep flesh-color; spores 6-10 * 4-6 microns, elliptical, smooth.
Cystidia on faces of gills with long necks and “horns.”
HABITAT: Gregarious or clustered on sawdust or wood chips in gardens, along roads,
etc. (often appearing terrestrial); widely distributed. It is fairly common in our area
during the mushroom season and sometimes even fruits in the summer.
EDIBILITY: Edible and very good—the best of the genus for the table. It is much firmer
and meatier than the better known P. cervinus.
COMMENTS: The robust stature, pale cap with darker fibrils or scales (or a darker
center), and tendency to grow in clusters distinguish this species from P. cervinus. Because
the gills remain white for so long it is liable to be mistaken for a white-spored mushroom,
but the free crowded gills and absence of a veil point to Pluteus. P. magnus (see P. cer¬
vinus) can also be robust, but has a dark brown to nearly black cap.
255
Pluteus cervinus, often called the deer mushroom, is a common species with a brown cap and free
crowded gills that turn pinkish in old age.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups on decaying wood, debris, sawdust piles, or humus rich
in lignin; widely distributed and common. In our area it usually appears with Pleurotus
ostreatus after the very first fall rains, then continues to fruit sporadically through the
remainder of the mushroom season. It is partial to (but not restricted to) hardwoods,
but P. atromarginatus (see comments) is common in our area on conifers.
EDIBILITY: Edible and quite good when fresh and firm, but the flaccid or waterlogged
specimens one usually finds are apt to be insipid.
COMMENTS: Also known as P. atricapillus, the deer mushroom is our most common
and conspicuous Pluteus. It is rather nondescript, but can be safely identified by its brown
cap, pinkish spores, close free gills, absence of a veil, and growth on wood. The cap color
is quite variable, but typically some shade of brown. Special care should be taken not to
confuse it with poisonous Entoloma species, which typically have attached (often notched)
gills and grow on the ground. P. cervinus, however, may appear terrestrial and have gills
which are slightly attached when young, so it’s a good precaution to eat only those that
are clearly growing on wood. There are several similar Pluteus species, all apparently
edible, including: P. magnus, more robust (stalk 1-3 cm thick) and with a dark, frequently
wrinkled cap, often growing in clusters on sawdust piles, etc.; P. atromarginatus, common
throughout much of the West on wood and debris of conifers, with a brown to dark brown
cap and dark brown to black gill edges (see photograph!); and P. pellitus, which has a
white cap (sometimes brown at center) and grows on dead hardwoods. The latter looks
like a destroying angel (A manita ocreata, A. virosa, etc.) from a distance, but lacksa volva
and has pinkish gills in age (and pinkish spores). It occurs in our area, but is rare.
Gill detail in Pluteus atromarginatus. This species resembles P. cervinus, but has dark-edged gills,
as shown here.
Left: Pluteus lutescens, a yellow-stemmed species. Right: Pluteus longistriatus, one of several
small and nondescript, infrequently-encountered species.
257
258 PLUTEACEAE
COMMENTS: This is one of many small, nondescript Pluteus species that are unlikely
to catch the eye of the average mushroom hunter except when they are sharing a log with
more spectacular fare (such as Pleurotus ostreatus). The conspicuously striate cap is the
principal fieldmark of this species. Others include: P. californicus, cap hazel to hazel-
brown or greenish-gray, with a striate margin when moist and a reddish-brown spore
print; P. seticeps, with a brown striate cap; P. cyanopus, with a chestnut- to cinnamon-
brown, faintly striate cap and hazel to grayish-olive stalk; andP. salicinus, with a grayish-
brown to greenish- or bluish-gray, non-striate cap and whitish stalk that stains blue at the
base. None of these are worth eating. P. chrysophaeus should also be mentioned.
Pluteus flavofuligineus
CAP 2-7 cm broad, convex becoming broadly umbonate or broadly convex to plane;
surface not viscid, appearing velvety to minutely granulose; dark brown or olive-brown
when young, developing yellow tones in age from the margin inward (eventually often
entirely yellow or ochre-yellow or yellowish with a brownish center). Flesh thin, pallid;
odor mild. GILLS free but sometimes appearing adnexed; close, whitish or tinged yellow
when young, becoming pinkish as spores mature. STALK 4-11 cm long, 4-6 (8) mm
thick, equal or tapering upward, smooth; whitish or pinkish when young, usually becoming
yellowish in old age. SPORE PRINT pinkish to deep flesh-color; spores 6-7 * 4.5-6
microns, nearly round, smooth. Cystidia on gills flask-shaped.
HABITAT: Solitary or in small groups on rotting hardwood logs, branches, etc.; widely
distributed, but not common in the West. I find it every winter in our oak woodlands.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: The velvety to granulose, brown or yellow cap combined with the free gills,
pinkish spores, and growth on dead wood are good field marks. The stalk is often rather tall
for a Pluteus—as much as three times as long as the diameter of the cap! P. lutescens is
somewhat similar, but has a clear yellow stalk even when young, and does not have a velvety
cap. Other species: P. granularis is also similar, but has a velvety brown cap and stem.
VOLVARIELLA
Small to medium-large, saprophytic or parasitic mushrooms found on wood, soil, humus, or other
mushrooms. CAP oval to convex or plane, sometimes viscid. GILLS free at maturity, close, pallid
becoming pinkish to flesh-colored or sordid reddish at maturity. STALK central, usually hollow,
cleanly separable from cap. VEIL universal, membranous, forming a saclike volva at base of stalk.
SPORE PRINT pinkish to deep flesh-color or sordid reddish. Spores smooth, usually elliptical.
Gill tissue convergent.
THE pinkish to reddish spores and presence of a volva separate Volvariella (formerly
Volvaria) from all other mushrooms. The volva is always saclike and there is no partial
veil or annulus. But for the spore color this genus resembles A manita, and young specimens
with pallid gills are often mistaken for that genus. Confusion with Pluteus is also possible
if the volva is overlooked or destroyed.
Several Volvariellas are edible. In fact, the paddy straw mushroom, V. volvacea, is to the
tropics what Agaricus bisporus is to the temperate zone—the principal mushroom of
commerce. It is cultivated widely in southern Asia—usually on straw in rice paddies—and
shipped abroad so you can pay exhorbitant prices for it in exotic food stores. I was
presented a can of it ten years ago, on some unforgettable occasion I can no longer
remember. I am sorry to say it has languished in the back of my cupboard ever since—
there are always so many fresh mushrooms in my refrigerator!
VOLVARIELLA 259
Volvariella is principally a tropical genus, and fewer than a dozen species occur in
temperate North America. They frequent forests, cultivated fields, gardens, straw heaps,
and greenhouses; a few grow on wood and one is parasitic on other mushrooms. Only
one species, V. speciosa, is truly common; several others are encountered infrequently.
Key to Volvariella
1. Growing on other mushrooms . V. surrecta(see V. bombycina, p. 261)
1. Growing on ground, wood, compost, in greenhouses, etc. 2
2. Cap typically 5-20 cm broad when mature . 3
2. Cap typically 2-5 (6) cm broad when mature . 5
3. Growing on wood; cap covered with silky fibrils; rare . V. bombycina, p. 261
3. Not as above . 4
4. Volva brown or grayish-brown (at least the upper portion or edge); cap not normally viscid;
found in tropics, subtropics, and warm environments V. volvacea{see V. bombycina, p,261)
4. Volva white to pale gray; cap viscid when moist; very common in temperate zone in cultivated
fields, gardens, roadsides, manure, etc.V. speciosa, below
5. Volva white, with long hairs; cap gray to grayish-brown V. villosavolva(see V. smithii, p. 261)
5. Not as above; volva without long hairs . 6
6. Cap gray to pinkish-gray; volva brown to grayish .V. taylori(see V. smithii, p. 261)
6. Cap whitish when fresh, but may discolor overall in age and center often tinged another color 7
7. Volva ochre-stained to brownish .V. smithii, p. 261
7. Volva white to grayish . 8
8. Stalk minutely hairy (pubescent); cap margin not striate . V. hypopithys, p. 260
8. Stalk not pubescent; cap margin often striate in age ... V. pusilla (see V. hypopithys, p. 260)
in a smelly old Brussels sprouts field yielded the following: twenty soggy specimens with
pale pileus and non-striate margin; six soggy specimens with dark pileus and striate
margin; five soggy specimens with dark pileus and non-striate margin; and eleven soggy
specimens with pale pileus and striate margin. If you can detect a meaningful mycelial
thread running through all of this, then you are a better mycologist than I... *
260
Volvariella smithii is a small rare species with a prominent volva. Note size in relation to cypress
cone at upper right.
261
262 PLUTEACEAE
AMANITACEAE
MEMBERS of this family have white spores, white to pale-colored gills, a universal veil
that envelops the young mushrooms, and in most cases, a volva. Many are also furnished
with a partial veil and the stalk is cleanly separable from the cap.
There are two genera: In Amanita the universal veil is membranous, warty, powdery,
or cottony; in Limacella it is glutinous, manifesting itself as a layer of slime on the cap
and sometimes the stalk.
The Amanitaceae are most likely to be confused with the white-spored Lepiotaceae,
which have neither volva nor viscid cap. Microscopically the two families are distinct by
virtue of the amyloid or non-amyloid (but not dextrinoid) spores and divergent gill tissue
of the Amanitaceae, as opposed to the typically dextrinoid spores and parallel to inter¬
woven gill tissue of the Lepiotaceae (see p. 19).
Amanita is of paramount importance to toadstool-testers because it contains the
deadliest of all mushrooms, as well as some of the most delicious and beautiful. Limacella
is too rare to be of culinary value.
Amanita “eggs” resemble puffballs while still enveloped by the universal veil. However, when sliced
open lengthwise (perpendicular to the ground), they reveal the embryonic outline of cap, gills, and
stalk (left and center), while a puffball (right) is solid within. Note difference in shape between the
deadly poisonous A. phalloides “egg” (center) and the edible A. calyptrata “egg” (left).
AMANITACEAE 263
LEARNING to recognize this genus should be an overriding priority for all mushroom
hunters, since Amanitas are responsible for 90% of mushroom-induced fatalities. The
outstanding attributes of any Amanita—what makes even a rotten Amanita not just
another rotten mushroom, but a rotten AMANITA (and therefore worthy of your
attention and respect)—are the white spores, pallid gills, and presence of a universal veil.
The universal veil completely envelops the young mushroom, but breaks as the stalk
elongates, usually forming a volva (sack or collar or scales) at the base of the stalk and often
depositing remnants on the cap in the form of a single large piece of tissue (volval patch) or
many smaller pieces (warts). Obviously, it is important to carefully dig up any unfamiliar
mushroom so as not to miss the volva, if it is present. It is also a good idea to examine the
surrounding soil to be doubly sure pieces of the volva aren’t left behind.
Most Amanitas—including the most dangerous ones—are also furnished with a partial
veil which, upon breaking, often forms a skirtlike ring (annulus) near the top of the stalk.
At one time those species without a partial veil were placed in a separate genus, Amanitop-
sis. A feature emphasized by most mushroom books is that the gills in Amanita are free.
This is not necessarily the case, however, and this feature is not stressed here.
The only other genus of agarics consistently equipped with a volva is Volvariel/a, which
has pinkish spores. Agaricus, Coprinus, and Cortinarius occasionally form a volva, but
have brown to black spores, while Lepiota superficially resembles Amanita but typically
lacks a volva and nearly always has free gills.
Amanita is divided into two large groups (subgenera) based on whether or not the spores
are amyloid. Half of the species described here (including the most dangerous ones!) have
amyloid spores. It should be emphasized, however, that some species with non-amyloid
spores are also poisonous. These two large groups are in turn subdivided according to the
type of volva (see p. 264). If the universal veil is membranous (skinlike), a loose sack or cup
is formed at the base of the stalk and the cap is usually bald or adorned with a volval patch.
If the universal veil is friable (easily crumbling), it manifests itself as a series of concentric
scales or rings around the base of the stem. If the universal veil is semi-friable and
interwoven with the base of the stalk, it will form a collar or free rim (as in A. pantherina),
but not a true sack. When the universal veil is friable or semi-friable, numerous pieces of
tissue (warts) are usually deposited on the cap. These warts are typically white, gray, or
yellow and with a few exceptions (e.g., A. magniverrucata) are readily removable—unlike
the colored scales of an Agaricus or Lepiota. In fact, they are often washed off by rain.
In some Amanitas, such as A. rubescens and A. silvicola, a distinct volva is not formed.
264
However, vestiges of the universal veil on the cap (in the form of warts or cottony tissue)
signify Amanita. In the rare instances in which neither volva nor universal veil remnants are
visible, Amanitas can still be recognized by their uncanny “Amanita aura.” They are so
unequivocally elegant and graceful that you quickly learn to tell an Amanita without
having to dig it up!
Amanita is a study in antithesis. At one extreme are the most poisonous of all
mushrooms—the death cap and destroying angels (A. phalloides, A. ocreata, A. virosa,
etc.). Every fungophile should learn the telltale signs of these deadly fungi (for more de¬
tails, see pp. 892-893). At the other end of the spectrum are three of the most exquisitely
flavored of the fleshy fungi—A. caesarea, A. calyptrata, and A. velosa. The rest of the
Amanitas fall somewhere between these extremes: several are hallucinogenic and/or
poisonous but not normally fatal (A. muscaria and A. pantherina); others are edible but
scarcely incredible (A. pachycolea and A. rubescens)’, still others are of unknown edibility
{A. aspera and A. magniverrucata).
I for one do not subscribe to the wholesale philosophy (as expounded by many
mushroom mentors) that Amanitas should not be eaten under any circumstances. In my
humble fungal opinion, it is just as easy to carelessly overlook the volva and mistake a
deadly A manita for an edible mushroom of another genus as to mistake a deadly Amanita
for the coccora (A. calyptrata) or grisette (A. vaginata). True, it is sheer stupidity to risk
your life for the sake of a single meal, however delectable it may be. But the key word here is
risk—and in the case of a few species such as A. calyptrata, A. caesarea, and A. vaginata, I
don’t consider it a risk for discriminating amateurs to eat them, provided they become
thoroughly familiar with their characteristics and those of their lethal counterparts.
Simplistic slogans or catchwords such as “Do not eat-a the Amanita" often accomplish the
precise opposite of what they intend. Rather than encouraging people to use their eyes and
nose and the gray mass between their ears, to approach each and every mushroom with
discrimination, intelligence, and respect, such adages reinforce people’s desire for
expediency by fostering an unhealthy, mindless reliance on shortcuts and glib generali¬
zations. Those who need simple rules should learn how to play dominoes or Scrabble
rather than eat wild mushrooms. Adages such as the above can even be misconstrued to
read: “If a mushroom isn’t an Amanita it won’t kill you”—a dangerous assumption!
AMANITA 265
Too many people eat and enjoy edible Amanitas for me not to recommend them. But at
the risk of being redundant, let me reiterate some rules of the trade. Unless you are
ABSOLUTELY, INDISPUTABLY, and IRREFUTABLY sure of your Amanita’s
identity, don’t eat it! (The one adage with which I wholeheartedly concur is: “When in
doubt, throw it out!”). If possible, have an experienced collector verify your identification,
and collect the species several times before venturing to eat it. Above all, don’t rely on a
single characteristic (such as striate vs. non-striate margin—see photo on p. 286) to dis¬
tinguish between edible and deadly poisonous species. Each individual mushroom is
subject to a different set of environmental and genetic factors—therefore each will be
slightly different. Only by using a combination of critical characteristics can you rest as¬
sured that you have a savory coccora or grisette instead of a death cap or destroying angel.
Furthermore, don’t assume that two or more Amanitas growing together are the same spe¬
cies. Judge each and every mushroom on its own merits. Finally, always keep in mind the
possibility of encountering a species not described in this book—or any other book!
My reason for lecturing on the Amanitas at such length is that they never fail to attract
attention and admiration. You certainly needn’t eat them to enj oy them, for they are among
the most beautiful and graceful of all fungi, the epitome of impeccability and elegance.
The fly agaric (A. muscaria), with its fiery red cap and white “stars” is the most
spectacular example, of course. Down through the ages it has been compared to bull
testicles and male genitalia and worshipped as the earthly incarnation of infinity, divinity,
and virility (more for its appearance, I suspect, than for its properties). It is one of the
commonest mushrooms of our pine forests, yet one never tires of finding it. The variation in
color, size, shape, and “constellations” is such that each and every one presents a new and
deliciously different feast for the eye. It’s hard to resist taking one or two home to show off to
impressionable neighbors or friends, but never is the ephemerality of life so emphatically
underscored as when they come over the next day to pay their respects, only to find a
writhing mass of beatific maggots where your blazing incarnation of the cosmos had been!
In contrast to the flamboyant splendor of the fly agaric is the subdued and radiant
warmth of the coccora (A. calyptrata). I say “warmth” because the huge eggs are so soft
and cottony that they look positively warm inside. Finding a family of them in rich red
madrone humus is like stumbling onto the nest of a rare and secretive woodland bird. And
watching a coccora “hatch”—the round, orange head emerging from its cottony cocoon—
is like watching the sun rise from a blanket of clouds, a quietly inspiring reaffirmation
of life best experienced alone.
M ost Amanitas are mycorrhizal. As a result, they are most common in the woods or near
trees. Some, however, grow in grass or open ground. Amanita attains its greatest
diversity in the warm temperate zone. In the southeastern United States, for instance, there
is a very diverse and bewildering Amanita flora that is beyond the scope of this book. The
west coast has fewer species but several are endemic. In our region two distinct floras can be
recognized. The first, comprised of northern species, occurs primarily with madrone and
conifers in the late fall and winter. A. muscaria, A. calyptrata, and A. silvicola are
prominent examples. The second group has a more southerly distribution and is associated
with oak. Some members of this group fruit in the fall (e.g., A. phalloides), others in the
late winter and spring (e.g., A. velosa, A. rubescens, A. ocreata—see photo on next page).
Amanita is a far more diverse genus than once thought. Despite a wealth of studies
conducted on the genus, no all-encompassing monograph has been published. (A volume
by David Jenkins is in press.) Particularly perplexing are the “Lepidellas”: those species
with amyloid spores and a friable universal veil that leaves remnants on the cap margin.
Several hundred species of Amanita occur in North America, including many poorly
known or unnamed ones; California has over 25 species. Twenty Amanitas are described
here and many others are keyed out. Their elegance and individuality make them a
fascinating and rewarding group to study, even for those not armed with a microscope. If
your “Amanita” doesn’t key out convincingly, try Cystoderma, Armillaria, and Lepiota.
Three species of Amanita that commonly fruit in the spring in association with live oak: Amanita
velosa (two at left), a small specimen of A. ocreata (top), and A. rubescens (three at right).
Key to Amanita
1. Volva saclike (i.e., forming a true sack that sheathes base of stalk as shown on p. 264); cap
usually bald or with a cottony or membranous patch of universal veil tissue or occasionally
with several patches or non-friable warts . 2
1. Volva collarlike (i.e., intergrown with base of stalk but with a free rim), scaly, warty, powdery, or
indistinct but not saclike (see p. 264); cap often with many small pieces of universal veil tissue
(warts), powder, etc., occasionally with larger pieces . 15
2. V olva tough, thick, large; cap and / or stalk often shaggy, fibrillose, or with cottony patches of veil
tissue; cap white or tinged brown (especially at center), often bruising brown or reddish, margin
often striate in age; stalk similarly colored; annulus (ring) absent; spores oblong or elliptical,
amyloid; fairly common in eastern North America, rare in West A. volvata& close relatives
2. Not with above features . 3
3. Margin of cap distinctly striate (at least when mature); spores not amyloid .4
3. Margin of cap not striate or only faintly so (occasionally striate in age); spores amyloid . . 12
4. Partial veil present when young, usually (but not always!) forming an annulus(ring) on stalk 5
4. Partial veil and annulus absent or rudimentary (but stalk sometimes scaly) . 8
5. Gills and stalk yellow to yellow-orange; cap bright red to orange (but may fade to yellow or
paler in age or sunlight) .A. caesarea group & others, p. 284
5. Not as above; gills and stalk typically white to creamy or very pale yellow .6
6. Volva often small and inconspicuous; cap brown to gray or sometimes nearly white; growing
in mixed woods and under hardwoods in eastern North America . A. spreta
6. Not as above; known only from western North America . 7
7. Cap brown to yellow or whitish, but if brown then usually with a yellow margin; partial veil typi¬
cally (but not always!) forming a prominent skirtlike annulus on stalk A. calyptrata, p. 284
7. Cap variously colored, but the margin not yellow; annulus (ring) usually pressed closely to the
stalk or poorly defined . 48
8. Cap dark brown to gray or grayish-brown . 9
8. Cap white to pale tan, beige, orangish, pinkish, orange-brown, or reddish-brown . 10
9. Fruiting body medium-sized to large; cap dark gray to dark brown when young, often paler
in age and often developing a darker band near inner edge of striations; gill edges usually brown;
known only from the West .A. pachycolea, p. 290
9. Fruiting body medium-sized to rather small and slender; cap usually gray, but sometimes
grayish-brown or brown; gill edges not brown; widely distributed .49
10. Cap white with long striations; widespread, but rare in West A. alba (see A. vaginata, p. 288)
10. Not as above; if cap white then with shorter striations and usually found near western oaks in
winter and spring (or even summer); common . 11
Cap pinkish-tan to orangish, beige, or paler .A. velosa & others, p. 286
Cap orange-brown to reddish-brown, tawny, etc.; common in eastern North America, infrequent
in West .A.fulva, p. 287
12. Cap greenish to yellow-green, brownish-olive, grayish-olive, or nearly white when young,
often duller (dingy tan, etc.) or with a metallic luster in age .A. phalloides, p. 269
12. Not as above; cap usually white or whitish when fresh (but may discolor by maturity) ... 13
AMANITA 267
13. Cap white, but discoloring pinkish, brownish, or yellowish (at least centrally) in age; asso¬
ciated with oak; found in California and the Southwest and Texas.A. ocreata, p. 271
13. Cap usually remaining white or found elsewhere. 14
14. Cap white; partial veil usually forming a distinct annulus (ring) on stalk (which may disappear
in age!); very common in eastern North America, also found in the Pacific Northwest .
.A. virosa& others (see A. ocreata, p. 271)
14. Not as above; partial veil absent or evanescent; found in eastern North America (do not eat!)
.A. peckiana & others
15. Universal veil remnants yellow to grayish-yellow (check cap for warts and base of stalk for
volva); cap not whitish . 16
15. Universal veil remnants not yellow; cap may or may not be whitish .22
16. Partial veil absent; gills yellow; found in eastern North America .
. A. parcivolvata (see A. caesarea, p. 284)
16. Not as above . 17
17. Cap bright red to orange-red (but may fade in age); stalk white .A. muscaria, p.282
17. Cap orange to yellow, yellow-brown, or dark brown; stalk white or yellow. 18
18. Lower stalk sheathed with shaggy scales . (see Armillariak. Allies, p. 189)
18. Not as above . 19
19. Cap salmon to salmon-pink when fresh; found in mountains of eastern U.S.A. wellsii
19. Not as above . 20
20. Base of stalk staining reddish in age or where bruised; found in eastern North America .
.A. flavorubescens (see A. aspera, p. 278)
20. Not with above features (if staining as above, then found in West) . 21
21. Cap yellow to yellow-brown to dark brown; stalk usually white; common along the Pacific
Coast .A. aspera, p. 278
21. Cap yellow-orange to yellow; stalk often colored similarly; fruiting body rather small; common
in eastern North America, rare in the West .A.flavocortia, p. 278
22. Cap pale yellow-green to pale yellow to nearly whitish with thin grayish, whitish-buff, or pinkish
to lavender-gray warts (which may wash off); cap margin not striate; stalk with an abrupt, soft,
rounded bulb at base; spores amyloid; common in eastern North America, especially under
hardwoods but also with conifers .A. citrina (see A. porphyria, p. 279)
22. Not as above . 23
23. Cap brown to olive-brown or paler; stalk lacking grayish patches, terminating in an abrupt basal
bulb that is usually split or chiseled longitudinally; flesh usually staining reddish-brown;
spores amyloid; common in eastern North America (especially under hardwoods); also
reported from the Pacific Northwest (but rare) . . A. brunnescens(see A. porphyria, p. 279)
23. Not as above .24
24. Cap brightly colored (red, orange, or yellow); partial veil present, usually forming an annulus
(ring) on stalk . 25
24. Not as above (cap may be sordid reddish or reddish-brown, pinkish-tan, etc.) .26
25. Volva usually a series of concentric rings at apex of bulbous stalk base, but sometimes only a
single ring or collar; cap medium-sized to large and bright red to orange, apricot, yellow-
orange, or yellow (yellow form rare in coastal California, but common in the Sierra Nevada
and most of eastern North America) .A. muscaria, p. 282
25. Volva usually a single collarat top of basal bulb or often indistinct, but sometimes consisting of
several rings; cap small to medium-sized (occasionally large), usually pale yellow (but some¬
times brighter), at times completely covered by veil material; widespread A. gemmata, p. 281
26. Partial veil absent (check young specimens if possible); cap margin distinctly striate; spores not
amyloid . 27
26. Partial veil present, or if absent, then cap margin not striate; spores amyloid or not .31
27. Cap gray to grayish-brown, brown, or darker . 28
27. Cap pale yellow, orange-buff, salmon, pinkish, tan, or nearly white. 30
28. Cap powdery-mealy; volva if present also mealy A. farinosa(see A. sp. (unidentified), p. 275)
28. Not as above . 29
268 AMANITACEAE
29. Cap gray or sometimes grayish-brown, with or without warts; upper limb of volva usually well-
developed (but falls off easily); common in California .A. constricta, p. 289
29. Cap gray to brown to dark brown to nearly black, usually with warts; upper limb of volva not
well-developed; widespread, but rare in California . . . A. inaurata(see A. constricta, p. 289)
30. Cap yellow to creamy to whitish; volva usually collarlike (with free rim) . A. gemmata, p. 281
30. Cap orange-buff to pale pinkish-orange to pinkish-tan, beige, or sometimes whitish; volva
not typically collarlike; often growing in the open (but near trees) .A. velosa, p. 286
31. Cap entirely brown when young, breaking up into large brown scales in age; flesh in stalk usually
staining orange or saffron (and eventually reddish) when cut (see Lepiota rachodes, p. 297)
31. Not as above . 32
32. Cap with erect, often pyramidal brown warts which usually come off easily; stalk and/ or under¬
side of veil with similar warts; spores usually dextrinoid, not amyloid . (ste Lepiota, p. 293)
32. Not with above features (but may have some of them); common . 33
33. Some part of fruiting body usually with sordid reddish stains (especially the stalk); flesh slowly
staining dingy reddish when bruised or cut; maggot tunnels also reddish A. rubescens, p. 276
33. Not as above .. 34
34. Fresh fruiting body white or whitish (but may age buff, yellowish, brownish, pinkish, etc.) 35
34. Not as above; cap distinctly colored or with colored veil material even when young.42
35. Stalk terminating in a fairly conspicuous bulb, not typically with a rooting portion below the
bulb . 36
35. Stalk without bulb, or if with a bulb, then also with a tapered rooting base below the bulb 40
36. Volva typically present as a distinct free rim (collar) or series of concentric rings at apex of basal
bulb; spores not amyloid .37
36. Not as above; spores amyloid . 38
37. Volva typically consisting of a single tight-fitting collar around bulb apex; cap often tinged
yellowish or brownish at center; often rather slender A. cothurnata(see A. pantherina, p. 280)
37. Volva usually a series of concentric rings; cap white to grayish-white or tinged buff; not
unusually slender.A. muscaria, p. 282
38. Cap surface with rather soft and cottony universal veil tissue, lackingconspicuous warts; known
only from western North America .A. silvicola, p. 273
38. Not as above (if cap cottony, then found elsewhere) . 39
39. Cap usually with brown warts; stalk often rather stout (up to 8 cm long); known only from
California, associated with live oak. A. sp.(unidentified)(see A. rubescens, p. 276)
39. Not as above .40
40. Cap without warts or warts obscure; growing in sand .A. baccata, p. 273
40. Not as above; cap usually with distinct, well-developed warts .41
41. Cap covered with large, exaggerated warts; fairly common with oak and pine, known only from
California .A. magniverrucata, p.274
41. Found elsewhere, or if found in California then warts smaller and often concentrated at center
of cap .A. cokeri & many others (the “Lepidellas”) (see A. magniverrucata, p. 274)
42. Stalk arising from a well-developed cylindrical tojug-shaped, sometimes hollow, underground
“tuber”; rare . (see Squamanita, p. 197)
42. Not as above (but stalk may root deeply or have a bulbous base) .43
43. Cap yellow to creamy, the margin usually striate or tuberculate-striate . . A. gemmata, p. 281
43. Not with above features .44
44. Volva indistinct, powdery, or scaly; cap margin not normally striate .45
44. V olva usually present as a free rim or collar on basal bulb and/ or margin of cap striate in age 47
45. Found in California .46
45. Found in eastern North America (especially common in Southeast) .50
46. U sually found in open ground (pastures, etc.); partial veil often disappearing; cap grayish-white
to gray to brownish-gray, small .A. sp. (unidentified), p. 275
46. Associated with oak; partial veil usually forming a persistent, prominent annulus; cap white
to brownish . A. sp.(unidentified)(see A. rubescens, p. 276)
47. Warts gray and/or stalk gray or with grayish patches; spores amyloid . . A. porphyria, p. 279
47. Stalk white; warts usually white or pallid; spores not amyloid .A. pantherina, p. 280
AMANITA 269
Amanita phalloides, showing the classical features of the deadly Amanitas: presence of a sack (volva)
at the base of the stalk and a skirt or ring (annulus) near the top of the stalk, plus white or whitish gills.
(Don’t expect every specimen to be so “classical,” however!)
Fruiting body development in the deadly Amanita phalloides. At first it is enclosed by the universal
veil, which ruptures to form a volva at the base of the stem as the stalk elongates.
270
Maturing specimens of Amanita phalloides. Note how cap opens out and the partial veil breaks to
form an annulus (ring) high up on the stalk. Cap color is variable: green, yellow, brownish, even white.
The cap is usually bald, but sometimes has a thin white patch of universal veil tissue (as shown here).
collapsed against the gills!). The ring is sometimes obliterated and the volva can be
carelessly overlooked, so just to be safe, don’t eat mushrooms with any two of these
characteristics unless you are absolutely sure what they are. Your life is at stake! The
cap color—usually greenish, but extremely variable—and the pungent odor in age (it
reeks of death) plus the association with live oak (in our area) are good secondary field-
marks. In eastern North America, A. phalloides can be confused with A. citrina and A.
brunnescens (see the key to Amanita and comments under A. porphyria).
271
Amanita ocreata. This deadly poisonous Amanita is pure white when young but usually discolors
(pinkish, brownish, ochre, etc.) on the cap as it ages. Note the fragile partial veil, voluminous volva,
and white gills. See Color Plate 53 for its eastern counterpart.
usually after A. phalloides has finished fruiting. It is quite numerous, but doesn’t normally
produce the huge crops typical of the latter species. Related “destroying angels” are abun¬
dant under hardwoods and conifers in eastern North America, and to a lesser extent, the
Pacific Northwest (see comments).
Amanita ocreata varies greatly in stature, as shown here. Left: A robust specimen that could easily
be mistaken for the pale form of A. calyptrata (and is just as big). Right: A slender, graceful mature
specimen that could be mistaken for a washed-out A. velosa.
AMANITA 273
the stalk, though it is often much smaller. The partial veil is quite fragile, however, and
often turns to shreds rather than forming a distinct ring (annulus). The sinister name
“destroying angel” also embraces three closely related, deadly poisonous, pristine-white
“veiled threats”—A. virosa (COLOR PLATE 53), A. verna, and A. bisporigera. All three
are common in eastern North America — especially under hardwoods — and have been
reported from the Pacific Northwest, but not from California. They closely resemble A.
ocreata, but are often more slender and do not discolor as much in age; also, A. verna
supposedly doesn’t yellow in KOH. A. virosa is distinguished by its round spores and scalier
stalk, while A. verna has elliptical spores and A. bisporigera has 2-spored basidia and
round spores. A. alba and the pale (white to creamy) form of A calyptrata are easily con¬
fused with these species, but always have a striate cap margin and non-amyloid spores. Be
very careful—A. ocreata sometimes has a striate cap margin (see photo on p. 286)! Other
species: A. mutabilis is an eastern species with a white or pinkish-tinged cap. It has a sac-
like volva and amyloid spores, stains pinkish when bruised, and often smells like anise.
an indistinct volva or a scaly zone just above the bulb. SPORE PRINT white; spores
10-15 x 4-6.5 microns, more or less cylindrical, smooth, amyloid.
HABITAT: Solitary or in small groups in sand or sandy soil (often buried), associated with
oak and/or pine; distribution spotty—reported from southern Europe, northern Africa,
and Michigan—frequent in our area in the fall and winter, but never in large numbers.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: Also known as A. boudieri, this is an inelegant but oddly charming
Amanita. The tapered, rooting stem base, soft flesh, absence of prominent warts on the
cap, cylindrical spores, and habitat in sand form a most distinctive combination of
features. The cap may scarcely poke above the ground and along with the rooting base, is
usually covered with dirt or sand (see photo). The fruiting body decays rapidly and is hard
to keep in one piece. For these reasons and many more, it is one of my favorite Amanitas.
274
Left: Amanita magniverrucata, top view of cap. Note the exaggerated warts. Right: Amanita cokeri
is a somewhat similar whitish species with smaller warts on the cap.
::
Amanita sp. (unidentified). An odd, unimposing species that is locally abundant in pastures and open
ground. Note the small size, stocky stature, and grayish warts on the cap. The fragile partial veil and
volva are easily obliterated.
276
Amanita rubescens is extremely variable in size, stature, and color, but always stains dingy reddish
(often slowly). These whitish-capped specimens are small; more can be seen below and on p. 266.
COMMENTS: The “blushing” of the cap, stem, and flesh is the one infallible fieldmark
of this fickle fungus. The blushing process is slow to manifest itself and is best seen on the
lower stalk or around the edges of maggot tunnels (see photograph below). In other
respects it is an exasperatingly variable Amanita. Young specimens may be pure white
(in our form), while older individuals usually develop strong reddish or brownish tones.
The warts may be evenly disposed over the entire cap surface, or concentrated at the center,
or more prevalent toward the margin, or completely absent (especially in rainy weather).
Mature specimens are sometimes mistaken for A. pantherina (if they are brownish), or even
A. muscaria (if they are reddish), but the indistinct volva, reddish stains, and amyloid
spores separate it. Pure white buttons, on the other hand, resemble the A. strobiliformis
group (see A. magniverrucata), but lack the tapered, rooting base of those species. They can
also be confused with the “false blusher” (see below). The attached gills and absence of a
volva can lead to confusion with Armillaria, but once again the reddish stains distinguish it.
The “true” A. rubescens that is so common in eastern North America differs from our
form in several respects. Its universal veil is grayish to dirty pinkish and its cap is soon
reddish-brown to flesh-color to brown or olive-tinged, while ours is often white. Also, it is
a much larger, taller, and more stately fungus, and is often parasitized by a pallid to pinkish
mold (see photo onp. 884), whereas ourform is not. Infact,aboutall that ourversionhasin
common with the “true” A. rubescens is its blushing behavior—and it may eventually
prove to be a distinct variety or species. (Perhaps we should appoint an ad hoc committee
to investigate the problem!)
Also common under live oak in our area is the “false blusher”—an unidentified and
probably unnamed species that closely mimics our A. rubescens in every respect save one:
it does not “blush.” Its bulb is often brownish-stained, however, and like A. rubescens it
is whitish when young, browner in age, and has warts on the cap. Its edibility is unknown
—another good reason not to eat A. rubescens!
Amanita rubescens. Left: Mature brown-capped specimens; note warts on cap and indistinct volva.
Right: Even the maggot tunnels stain reddish, as shown in this close-up.
278 AMANITACEAE
A manita flavoconia
CAP 2.5-7.5 (10) cm broad, nearly oval becoming convex or plane; surface viscid when
moist, bright orange to yellow-orange or yellow, or orange at the center and yellow at the
margin; adorned with scattered yellow warts which may disappear in age or rainy weather;
margin not striate or only faintly so. Flesh rather thin, white. GILLS adnate to adnexed or
free, close, white, sometimes with yellow edges. STALK 4-10 cm long, 0.5-1.5 cm thick,
tapering upward or equal with an enlarged base; smooth or somewhat scaly, yellow or
sometimes white. PARTIAL VEIL membranous, forming a superior, skirtlike ring which
usually has a yellow underside. UNIVERSAL VEIL friable, forming a scaly volva consis¬
ting of powdery yellow scales and patches at base of stalk which wear off easily or disappear
in age. SPORE PRINT white; spores 7-11 * 3.5-5 microns, elliptical, smooth, amyloid.
HABITAT: Solitary to scattered or gregarious in woods (mainly under hardwoods, but
also with conifers); often abundant in summer and early fall in eastern North America, but
rare in the West. (It occurs in Arizona and has been found in northern California.)
EDIBILITY: Unknown. Do not experiment!
COMMENTS: This beautiful Amanita looks like a miniature A. muscaria, and is often
mistaken for the yellow-orange form of that species. However, it does not have concentric
AMANITA 279
rings at the base of the stalk and is much smaller. The yellow veil remnants are reminiscent
of A. aspera, but the cap is orange to yellow rather than yellow to brown, and the stalk is
often yellow as well. Other species: A.frostiana of eastern North America is similar, but
has whitish to buff warts, a more distinct volva, and non-amyloid spores.
Amanita porphyria. Note large basal bulb and grayish patches on stalk. Cap is purple-gray to brown.
Amanita pantherina, young button at right, mature specimen at left, intermediate stages between.
Note the collarlike volva (i.e., the free rim of the basal bulb).
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups in woods or along forested paths and roads;
widely distributed. I n our area it occurs in mixed woods and under live oak shortly after the
first fall rains and less commonly thereafter. In the Sierra Nevada and Pacific Northwest
it is common under conifers in the spring as well as the summer and fall. The mountain form
differs slightly from the typical form and may eventually be classified as a separate species.
EDIBILITY: Poisonous! Some books list it as edible, but other sources say it contains
the same toxins as A. pantherina and A. muscaria.
COMMENTS: Also known as^4. junquillea, this attractive Amanita can be distinguished
from typical A. pantherina by its yellow to creamy cap and more modest size. (A. pan¬
therina ranges from small to very large.) However, a confusing series of “hybrids” exist
whose cap color and degree of toxicity are intermediate between the two species. A. aspera
and A. flavoconia differ by having yellow veil remnants, while the yellow-capped form of
A. muscaria is larger, with a volva composed of concentric rings. Sometimes the universal
veil of A. gemmata forms a continuous layer over the entire cap, but does not peel off easily
like the volval patch of A. calyptrata. The latter also differs in its large, thick, saclike volva.
Other species: A. russuloides of eastern North America is a similar, slimmer version of
A. gemmata and may just be a regional variation. A. breckoniihas a double, nearly basal
annulus (ring) and a short, tapered, rooting base beneath the bulb. It occurs in our area
under pine and perhaps oak, but is rare. A small species with an orange cap (sometimes
yellow toward margin) and no partial veil also occurs rarely in our area. It may be a form
of var. exannulata or it may be an undescribed species.
Amanita gemmata. Left: Typical specimens; note collarlike volva. Right: A vernal mountain form
that may actually be a distinct species. It also has a yellow cap, but is often stockier. It usually
appears when the morels are out.
282 AMANITACEAE
Amanita muscaria. Left: A button completely covered with white warts (the universal veil). Right:
“Bloody mirror of the galaxy.” This large button was frisbee-sized when fully expanded. (J oel Leivick)
■A
•L>
■
Amanita muscaria var. alba closely resembles the more common red-and yellow-capped varieties,
but has a white to grayish-buff cap.
ranges. The grayish-white form (var. alba) is more common in northern regions. It has been
found in northern California, but is rare. The peach-centered variety (var. persicina) is
most common in the S outheast. It is interesting to note that wherever A. muscaria grows it
is often accompanied by Boletus edulis, and can serve as a “red flag” indicator for that
species. I’ve even seen a very large ring of A. muscaria locally that numbered over 100
fruiting bodies, with three bulky B. edulis growing right in the middle of it!
283
284 AMANITACEAE
forming a large but fragile, superior, skirtlike ring on stalk which is easily obliterated.
UNIVERSAL VEIL membranous, white, forming a large saclike volva that sheathes the
stalk base; volva thick, ample, felty or cottony, often lobed, often with a collar or flange
within. SPORE PRINT white; spores 8-11* 5-6 microns, elliptical, smooth, not amyloid.
HABITAT: Solitary to widely scattered or gregarious on ground in woods; known only
from the west coast. The distribution of the typical (darker) form parallels that of its
favorite mycorrhizal mate, madrone: it is common in northern California and southern
Oregon, where madrone is also common, less frequent in Washington, where madrone is
likewise less numerous, then common again on Vancouver Island in British Columbia,
where madrone is abundant. In our area it usually fruits after the first fall rains, sometimes
in tremendous quantity. The pale form, on the other hand, is a late winter and spring
mushroom. In our area it favors oak, but never fruits in the large quantities characteristic
of the fall (typical) form. In the Sierra Nevada the pale form is prevalent under pine and
other conifers, often forming “mushrumps” (especially in the spring).
EDIBILITY: Edible and popular, but with a rather strong, fishy flavor that doesn’t appeal
to everyone. Too many people eat and enjoy the typical form for me not to recommend it.
However, be absolutely sure of your identification, review the comments on pp. 264-265,
and avoid the pale and greenish forms, which are easily confused with poisonous species
(see photo on next page!). The caps are superb stuffed and then broiled. The hollow stems
can be sliced crosswise (to make rings) and marinated. The flesh does not keep well, so use
what you pick as soon as possible. Italian-Americans stalk it with a passion, undoubtedly
because of its resemblance—in both appearance and flavor—to their beloved A. caesarea
of Italy. “Coccora,” “coccoli,” and “cocconi” (another nickname) are presumably derived
from an Italian word for cocoon—a very apt description of the large, soft, cottony “eggs.”
COMMENTS: For many years this species has been called A. calyptroderma, but the
name A. calyptrata, first applied to the greenish form, may be the correct one according
to the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (whose purpose it is to dispel con¬
fusion) because it was published first. The typical(darker) formand the pale formarequite
different in color, as evidenced by the color plates. I n my opinion they merit at least varietal
status (just like the varieties of A. muscaria) because they do not appear to intergrade and
are ecologically distinct (see comments above). The rare greenish form, on the other hand,
may be environmentally-induced (mycologist Harry Thiers suggests it is caused by cold
temperatures). The typical form of this magnificent mushroom is distinguished by its
(1) large size (2) orange to brown or yellow-brown cap with a yellow margin (3) cottony
285
Left: The pale winter-spring form of Amanita calyptrata. Right: Close-up of cap in Amanita ocreata
(p. 271-272). The pale form of A. calyptrata is easily confused with the deadly A. ocreata (see photos
on p. 272). A. ocreata usually lacks striations (fine lines) on the margin of the cap, but as evidenced
here, striate or partially striate specimens do occur—some of them with volval patches!
white volval patch or “skullcap” on the cap (4) striate cap margin (5) creamy or pale yellow
tints to the stalk and veil (6) thick, voluminous, saclike volva(7) non-amyloid spores. Even
beginners have little trouble recognizing the typical (darker) form once they’ve seen it
several times. In the deadly poisonous A. phalloides the cap is usually (but not always)
greenish to greenish-yellow or paler, there is no volval patch or if one is present it is very
thin, the cap margin is only very rarely striate, the spores are amyloid, and an unpleasant
pungent odor often develops in age. Veteran toadstool-testers can differentiate them at a
glance by their color, but beginners should not place undue emphasis on such a capricious
character. The veil tissue on the cap of A. gemma ta and A. pantherina can mimic a“patch,”
but does not peel off easily, and the volva in those species is collarlike or indistinct, not sac¬
like. The pale form of A. calyptrata is easily confused with poisonous Amanitas such as
A. ocreata and A. gemmata, and I cannot recommend it to any but the most seasoned and
intrepid toadstool-tester. The same goes for the greenish form. Another variety, originally
called A. calyptratoides, may be a distinct species. I have found it only once in our area, but
it is quite common in southern California under oaks. It sometimes approaches A. velosa in
size and stature, and has a very poorly formed, appressed or evanescent annulus (ring), a
brown cap without a yellow margin, and a modest volval patch. It is edible, but care must be
taken in identification!
EDIBILITY: Edible and incredible! Most “objective’’ fungophiles rate it far superior to
the better-known A. calyptrata and A. caesarea. At any rate, it is far sweeter. As a bonus,
it fruits in the spring when there is a paucity of other collectable delectables. However,
it is not a good choice for beginners. Faded specimens should be avoided, as they are
easily confused with A. ocreata and other poisonous Amanitas.
COMMENTS: The pinkish-tan to orange-buff, beige, or paler cap with striate margin and
volval patch or large warts, absence of a partial veil, saclike volva and habit of fruiting in the
open (unusual behavior for an Amanita!) are the fallible fieldmarks of this handsome but
variable fungus. In our area it is the last of its clan to appear—often not showing up until
February—but as if to make up for its tardiness, it lingers on through April or even May.
A. calyptrata and A. calyptratoides both have volval patches but are differently colored,
tend to grow in the woods, and have a partial veil. However, A. velosa often has a
rudimentary ring and one specimen I found had a full-fledged membranous partial veil that
covered the gills when young and broke to form an annulus (ring). This lends credence to
the modern trend toward de-emphasizing gross structural (“Friesian”) features and paying
more attention to chemical and anatomical (microscopic) similarities. The obsolete genus
Amanitopsis (Amanitas without a partial veil) was incorporated into Amanita onjust such
a pretext. The trend may bode ill for the multitudes without microscopes, but it better
reflects natural relationships. A. crocea, an eastern and Rocky Mountain species, is similar
and equally delicious, but has an oranger, usually bald cap and orangish scales on the stalk.
reddish-tan, markedly grooved cap, absence of a partial veil, large “bag” at the base of the
stem, and rather tall, slender stature distinguish it. It is quite handsome when fresh. Other
species: A. crocea is similar but has an oranger cap and pale orange scales on the stalk.
289
Amanita pachycolea is easily told by its large size and dark brown to grayish-brown striate cap.
The cap is often darkest at the inner edge of the striations (a feature also shown in the color plates).
290
291
LIMACELLA
Medium-sized, mostly terrestrial fungi. CAP usually smooth and viscid or slimy. GILLS free or
nearly free, close, white or pallid. STALK typically central, hollow or stuffed, dry or viscid.
PARTIAL VEIL present, sometimes forming a ring, sometimes evanescent. UNIVERSAL VEIL
slimy, not forming a volva. SPORE PRINT white. Spores smooth, not amyloid (but rarely dex-
trinoid). Gill tissue divergent, at least when young.
THE viscid to slimy cap, presence of a veil, typically free gills, and absence of a volva typify
this small, rather rare genus. Many Limacellas used to be placed in Lepiota, but the
divergent gill tissue suggests a closer relationship to Amanita. The stature of the fruiting
body is somewhat like Amanita, but the universal veil takes the form of a layer of slime
that coats the cap and often the stem, and does not form a volva.
About a dozen species are known from North America. They are woodland fungi with
whimsical fruiting habits. Generally they are rare, but every so often there is a large,
localized fruiting. Little is known of their edibility. Five species are keyed here and two are
described.
Key to Limacella
1. Stalk distinctly viscid or slimy .2
1. Stalk not viscid (but patches of slime from cap may drip onto it) .4
2. Partial veil forming a distinct membranous annulus (ring) L. roseicremea(see L. illinita, p.292)
2. Veil slimy, not forming a membranous annulus . 3
3. Cap (and slime) entirely brown to bright reddish-brown to golden-brown.6
3. Cap white to creamy, or brownish at center and white toward margin .L. illinita, p. 292
4. Partial veil fibrillose, disappearing or forming a slight ring or ragged zone on stalk; cap reddish-
brown, chestnut-brown, pinkish-brown, or orange-brown .L. glioderma, below
4. Not as above; partial veil forming a distinct membranous (flaring or skirtlike) ring .5
5. Cap white or pale buff .L. solidipes(see L. illinita, p. 292)
5. Cap dull ochre to pale tan to creamy-pink; gills developing olive-gray stains in age or upon
drying in one variety, not developing them in another .L. guttata (-L. lenticularis)
6. Cap and stalk bright reddish-brown .L. glischra(see L. glioderma, below)
6. Cap and stalk more or less golden-brown.L. kauffmanii{see L. glioderma, below)
Limacella glioderma
CAP 3-8 cm broad, convex to plane or broadly umbonate; surface viscid to nearly dry,
bright to dull brick-red, reddish-brown, cinnamon, chestnut-brown, or at times orange-
brown, sometimes fading in age to pinkish-tan; cuticle often breaking up into small fibril¬
lose scales or pulling away from the margin, revealing the pinkish flesh underneath; margin
often hung with veil remnants. Flesh thin, tinged pinkish; odor distinctly but pleasantly
farinaceous. GILLS adnexed or notched, or in age becoming free; close, whitish or tinged
cap color. STALK 4-12 cm long, 0.5-1 (1.5) cm thick, often rather slender and fragile,
equal or slightly thicker at either end; dry or occasionally with a few patches of slime from
the cap; whitish or pallid above the ring, with cap-colored scales, patches, and/ or fibrils
below. PARTIAL VEIL fibrillose, whitish, forming a slight superior ring or ragged zone
on stalk or disappearing entirely. UNIVERSAL VEIL evanescent (usually not visible),
not forming a volva. SPORE PRINT white; spores 3-5 microns, round, smooth, not
amyloid. Gill tissue divergent.
COMMENTS: The viscid reddish-brown cap, evanescent veil, and dry fragile stem
distinguish this species from other Limacellas. Because the gills may be slightly attached
to the stalk, this fungus has been placed in Tricholoma and Armillaria. However, the
divergent gill hyphae (a microscopic feature) indicate Limacella. The prevalent form in
our area has only a slightly viscid cap, but fairly glutinous specimens are also encountered.
L. glischra is a widespread but rare species with a bright reddish-brown cap and stalk, both
of which are very slimy when moist. L. kauffmanii is a southern species with a more or less
golden-brown, viscid-slimy cap and stalk. Neither of these is worth eating.
292
spores
LEPIOTACEAE (Parasol Mushrooms)
Saprophytic, mostly terrestrial mushrooms of variable size. CAP typically dry or only slightly
viscid, often scaly with a smooth center when mature. GILLS typically free, white to pallid or
yellow, close. STALK cleanly separable from cap, central, base often enlarged. VEIL present,
usually forming a ring (annulus) on stalk, or if not then stalk usually scaly below the veil. VOLVA
typically absent. SPORE PRINT white to pale buff or dull greenish. Spores smooth, usually
dextrinoid, but not amyloid. Gill tissue parallel or interwoven.
THIS family is defined here to include one very large and diverse genus, Lepiota, plus a
single green-spored mushroom, Chlorophyllum molybdites, which could just as well be
considered an aberrant species of Lepiota. The “splitters” have erected several additional
genera for Lepiotas with thick-walled spores (e.g., Leucocoprinus, Leucoagaricus, and
Macrolepiota), but until one system of classification is firmly agreed upon, it seems best
for the purposes of this book to retain them in Lepiota.
Among the white-spored genera, Lepiota is most likely to be confused with Cystoderma
and Limacella—both of which were originally included in Lepiota. Cystoderma, however,
has attached rather than free gills plus a granulose cap and stalk, while Limacella has a
sticky or slimy cap. Lepiota also bears a superficial resemblance to Amanita, but lacks a
volva.* There are also fundamental microscopic differences: the gill tissue is parallel to
interwoven in Lepiota, divergent in Amanita (see p. 19), and the spores are typically
dextrinoid in Lepiota, while in Amanita they are frequently amyloid but never dextrinoid.
Aside from spore color, Lepiota closely resembles the common genus Agaricus (which
has chocolate-brown spores) in having free gills, a veil, and no volva. (Some taxonomists
even consider the Lepiotas to be a subfamily of the Agaricaceae.) There are ecological
similarities between Lepiota and Agaricus, as well as morphological ones. Both are large
genera centered in the warm temperate zone and tropics. (Lepiota is one of the largest and
most bewildering genera of tropical agarics.) And both are at their best in moist, relatively
warm weather. Furthermore, both are largely if not exclusively saprophytic—in contrast to
the Amanitas, which are mostly mycorrhizal. The larger Lepiotas or “parasol mushrooms”
frequent roadsides, waste places, lawns, gardens, pastures, and open woods. Many of the
smaller species occur in both heavily forested and cultivated areas. In our area, cypresses
are unusually rich in Lepiota (and Agaricus) species—some of them unclassified.
The large, white-spored parasols are among our most delicious edible mushrooms.
However, allergic reactions are reported for virtually every edible Lepiota, and extreme
care must be taken not to confuse them with poisonous species. L.procera of eastern North
America is the best of the best, L. rachodes and L. barssii are the best in the West, while L.
naucina is the best of the rest. The dozens of smaller Lepiotas should be strictly avoided.
Not only are they devilishly difficult to differentiate, but several (e.g., L. josserandii,
L. helveola, and L. castanea) are said to contain potentially fatal amanita-toxins! The
green-spored parasol, Chlorophyllum molybdites, can cause severe gastrointestinal
distress, and the powdery yellow greenhouse species, L. lutea, is also said to be poisonous.
At least 200 species of Lepiota are thought to occur in N orth America. Many have very
limited or erratic distributions. Only some of the larger or more distinctive species are
presented here. The diligent Lepiota-lover will doubtlessly uncover many species that
cannot be identified, particularly in California and the southern United States.
2. Both scales and background of cap white or whitish, the center often tinged yellow or yellow-
brown; margin distinctly striate at maturity; common in Gulf Coast region in many habitats;
spore print white; (may be very poisonous!) .L. humei
2. Not as above . 3
3. Cap (and often stalk or underside of veil) covered with pointed, often pyramidal warts (at least
when young) that usually rub off easily . 11
3. Not as above; scales on cap absent, or if present then caused by the breaking up of the cap cuticle
and not rubbing off easily. 4
4. Spore print greenish or grayish-green; usually growing in grass or gardens; fruiting in warm
or hot weather .Chlorophyllum molybdites, p. 295
4. Spore print white or pallid, not greenish or grayish . 5
5. Fruiting body tall (12-40 cm), cap 7-25 cm broad; stalk brown or breaking up into delicate brown
scales or granules below the ring (which may wear off); found in woods, old pastures, etc., in
eastern North America (also in southern California and the Southwest?) L. procera, p. 298
5. Not as above . 6
6. Cap smooth when young, but soon breaking up into brown to reddish scales or fibrils .... 7
6. Not as above; cap white to gray, grayish-brown, or buff . 9
7. Cap red to reddish-brown, pink, pinkish-orange, or cinnamon-buff, at least at center; fruiting
body not staining when bruised or in age; stalk typically up to 1 cm thick L. rubrotincta, p. 305
7. Not as above; stalk interior usually staining yellow-orange to reddish when cut or bruised . 8
8. Fruiting body aging or drying dark reddish-brown to vinaceous; stalk often spindle-shaped
(i.e., swollen above the base) .L. americana, p. 301
8. Not as above; stalk terminating in a swollen base or bulb .L.rachodes, p.297
9. Cap covered with flattened gray to grayish-brown fibrils when young, sometimes scaly in age
.L. barssii, p. 303
9. Cap white to gray or buff, usually smooth (but sometimes breaking up into small scales in age
and typically without fibrils when young) .L. naucina, p. 299
10. Cap (and sometimes stalk) covered with small, erect, pointed or pyramidal scales which rub off
easily; cap not striate. 11
10. Not as above . 13
11. Stalk with pointed scales below the veil . 12
11. Stalk with few if any scales (but underside of veil often has them); mainly found ineastern North
America and the Southwest .L. acutesquamosa (see L. eriophora, p. 303)
12. Veil usually forming a distinct annulus (ring) on stalk; stalk 1-2 cm thick .
.L. asperula (see L. eriophora, p. 303)
12. Veil disappearing in age; stalk 4-8 mm thick . L. eriophora, p. 303
13. Cap conspicuously striate, at least in age, the surface usually powdery or mealy or with small
scales when young; flesh thin and fragile; veil usually (but not always) forming a distinctive
sleevelike or collarlike annulus (ring) on stalk (examine several specimens) . 14
13. Not with above features; cap not normally striate . 16
14. Fruiting body yellow or mostly yellow, at least when fresh .L. lutea & others, p. 302
14. Fruiting body not yellow (but may stain yellow) . 15
15. Cap and base of stalk purplish to pinkish-brown or purple-brown when young, the cap surface
breaking up into purplish scales; found in nurseries and greenhouses.
. L. lilacinogranulosa (-Leucocoprinus lilacinogranulosus)
15. Not as above . L. cepaestipes& others, p. 301
16. Stalk shaggy or cottony below the veil; cap margin often shaggy also; growing in woods; spores
12-20 microns long .L. clypeolaria & others, p. 309
16. Not with above features . 17
17. Fruiting body whitish or with a brownish cap, the stalk typically staining reddish; common
in grazed pastures (but not on dung) in Florida . L. sp. (unidentified)*
17. Not as above . 18
18. Veil usually forming a distinct collarlike annulus (ring) on stalk (examine several specimens) 19
18. Veil usually disappearing or forming only a fibrillose or cottony zone or obscure annulus 29
* Popularly known as “Peele’s Lepiota” because it was discovered by Stephen Peele of Florida, this species is said
to be hallucinogenic; it should not be eaten until better known, because several similar species are poisonous!
LEPIOTA& ALLIES 295
19. Cap, stalk, and/or flesh staining bright orange to red (or staining yellow and then orange to
reddish) when bruised or rubbed, then often discoloring to dark brown or purplish.20
19. Not as above . 24
20. Fruiting body aging or drying dark reddish to vinaceous; stalk usually spindle-shaped (i.e.,
swollen above or at the base); cap often with coarse scales; growing in compost, sawdust,
around old stumps, etc., usually in groups or clusters .L. americana & others, p. 301
20. Not as above . 21
21. Tropical or found along Gulf of Mexico; staining yellow before reddening or darkening . 22
21. Not as above; not staining yellow . 23
22. Gills tinged pale yellow; center of cap and scales on cap blackish-brown .L. sanguiflua
22. Not as above .L. tinctoria & others (see L. americana, p. 301)
23. Gills bruising pinkish or red-orange . . . . L. roseifolia & others (see L. flammeatincta, p. 304)
23. Gills not staining when bruised .L. flammeatincta & others, p. 304
24. Cap black or dark gray at center, usually with scattered gray to greenish-gray scales .
...L. atrodisca, p. 304
24. Not as above; cap scales not gray or black . 25
25. Cap white to yellowish or pale tan . 26
25. Cap purple, red, pink, reddish-brown, or brown, at least at the center . 27
26. Taste strongly acidic; cap typically with small scales in age; usually growing with alder.
. L. pulcherrima
26. N ot as above; cap usually smooth, yellowish to tan or grayish at center and paler toward margin
.L. sequoiarum & others, p. 307
27. Cap or fibrils on cap purplish . L. roseilivida(see L. rubrotincta, p. 305 & L. cristata, p. 306)
27. Not as above; cap (or scales) some shade of red, pink, orange, brown, etc.28
28. Cap 3-8 cm broad, typically with radiating fibrils .L. rubrotincta & others, p. 305
28. Cap usually 5 cm broad or less, with small scattered or concentrically arranged scales ... 32
29. Gills yellow .L. luteophylla (see L. lutea, p. 302)
29. Gills not yellow . 30
30. Cap and stalk tinged lavender to lilac, without scales; odor unpleasant; growing in woods;
rare . L. bucknallii
30. Not as above . 31
31. Cap small (usually 2.5 cm broad or less), white or tinged pinkish to pinkish-cinnamon; smooth
or minutely powdery but without contrasting colored scales .L. seminuda, p. 307
31. Not as above . 32
32. Stalk typically without scales; cap small (usually 1-5 cm broad); annulus (ring) often present
on stalk .L. cristata & others, p. 306
32. Stalk typically with scales below the veil or cap larger; distinct annulus usually lacking . . 33
33. Stalk and often the cap developing strong ochraceous to rusty-orange tones in age or after
handling; fruiting body small (stalk typically 1-3 mm thick) . L. castanea, p. 307
33. Not as above (but reddish tones may develop); fruiting body small to medium-sized . 34
34. Scales on cap and stalk blackish to dark brown.L. felina (see L. josserandii, p. 308)
34. Not as above; scales brown to reddish .L. josserandii & others, p. 308
movable in age. SPORE PRINT grayish-olive to greenish; spores 8-13 * 6.5-9 microns,
elliptical, smooth, thick-walled, with an apical pore, dextrinoid. Cap cuticle composed
of narrow, interwoven, mostly repent hyphae (but often upright at center of cap).
HABITAT: Solitary to scattered or in groups or large rings on lawns and other grassy
places, also in gardens; fruiting in summer or during warm weather and widely distributed
in the tropics and warm temperate zone. It is common in most of eastern and southern
North America as well as inland northern California. I have seen enormous fruitings on
lawns in Fresno, Los Angeles, Palo Alto, and San Diego, but have never seen it on the
central California coast, perhaps because of the cool summers.
EDIBILITY: Poisonous! Some people eat it without ill effect but many suffer severe
gastrointestinal distress. It is probably the most common cause of mushroom poisoning in
the U nited States, a tribute to its growth on lawns, tempting size(it borders on being irresis-
Chlorophyllum molybdites growing on a lawn. N ote broadly cone-shaped cap of mature specimen at
top right, and drumstick shape of buttons in foreground. Gills at far right have started to darken.
CHLOROPHYLLUM 297
tible) and resemblance to Lepiota rachodes, Coprinus comatus, Agaricus species, etc.
COMMENTS: This distinctive summer mushroom always attracts attention because of
its large size and handsome appearance (frisbee-sized specimens are commonplace). In
much of inland and southern California and the Southwest, it is one of the commonest
urban lawn mushrooms or “toadstools.” It so closely resembles other large Lepiotas that
some lepiotologists merely consider it an aberrant species with greenish spores (i.e.,
Lepiota molybdites). It is most likely to be mistaken for Lepiota rachodes, especially in the
button stage. It differs, however, in its habitat (usually grass), fondness for hot weather, less
pronounced staining reactions (though this character is variable), and less bulbous stem.
The only completely reliable feature, however, is the spore color. But beware—the gills may
remain whitish well into maturity, so that making a spore print is the only sure way to
determine the spore color! Young buttons look like drumsticks when they first emerge from
the ground. They may not show any white on the cap, whereas adults may be almost entirely
white. Lepiota morgani is an older name for it.
Lepiota rachodes var. hortensis differs from the typical variety (shown in color plate) by having a
more abrupt and pronounced, even rimmed (volva-like) basal bulb. N ote how cap cuticle is smooth at
first, then cracks into scales. Specimen at far right has been sliced to show the staining of the flesh.
298 LEPIOTACEAE
the woods; widely distributed, but most common in western North America. It fruits
whenever conditions are favorable, i.e. moist and mild, and often produces several crops a
year. “Patches” are not particularly numerous, but can be very prolific—I’ve seen several
hundred specimens under a single tree! Variety hortensis is quite common in our area,
especially under planted conifers (e.g., cypress) and in sandy soil along the coast (I have
found it on Ano Nuevo Island in sand and elephant seal dung, and in the splash zone at
Pebble Beach!). The typical variety is more common in the Pacific Northwest.
EDIBILITY: Edible and excellent, with caution. A number of people have had severe
“allergic” reactions to it, particularly on the west coast, and it is easily confused with
Chlorophyllum molybdites. It has an exceptionally strong, nutty flavor but the water
content is high. For the best and safest results, fry it on high heat in an open pan. Delicious!
COMMENTS: The outstanding features of this outstanding mushroom are the large
brown scales on the cap, free white gills, prominent collarlike ring (not skirtlike as in
Amanital), basal bulb or thickened stem base, and brusing of the flesh to orange and then
reddish. (The latter feature is best seen by cutting the stem.) The brightness and duration
of the color changes vary according to the moisture content and age of the mushroom. In
variety hortensis (the common one in our area), the basal bulb may have a raised rim which
can be mistaken for a volva. However, the brown cap scales and collarlike ring point to
Lepiota. The poisonous Chlorophyllum molybdites looks very similar, but has dull
greenish spores. L. rachodes (sometimes spelled L. rhacodes and also known as Macro-
lepiota rachodes and Leucoagaricus rachodes) can also be mistaken for an Agaricus
(especially A. augustus), but the white spores and gills distinguish it.
rachodes, and doesn’t stain red or orange when cut. The spore print is white (not greenish
as in Chlorophyllum molybdites), and the brown stalk that breaks up into delicate
branlike scales (which may wear away) is also distinctive. There is no volva at the base of the
stalk as in Amanita, and the solid brown “nipple” or umbo at the center of the cap is also
distinctive. The stalk is so slender in relation to its height that it is not uncommon for large
specimens to topple over in old age from the weight of the cap.
COMMENTS: The white to grayish cap, membranous annulus (ring), free gills, white
spores, and fondness for grass are the hallmarks of this cosmopolitan mushroom. Its
appearance on lawns and in cemeteries marks the beginning of our fall mushroom season.
A good way to become acquainted with it is to bicycle around town: there it will be—tall,
white, stately, in graceful groups on lawns. Later it appears in pastures. It is a beautiful
mushroom when young, the smooth unexpanded cap being reminiscent of a motorcycle
helmet. The shape, though difficult to describe, is very distinctive (see photographs).
Though the stalk base is often enlarged, there is never a sack (volva) as in the deadly
Amanitas, and the ring is not skirtlike, nor is the cap viscid as in Limacella. The staining
reactions are also an important fieldmark. In some specimens the cap and stem stain yellow
quite dramatically in the tradition of Agaricus xanthodermus. Usually, however, they
discolor yellow-brown to brown after handling and in age—especially on the stem. The
frequent darkening of the old gills to pink or brown leads to confusion with Agaricus,
and once again points out the folly of equating gill color with spore color. I have also seen
buttons of Agaricus californicus interspersed with L. naucina that were virtually indis¬
tinguishable. A final hint: If your “L. naucina” fails to turn brown when cooked, double¬
check your identification, because you may have something else! Lepiota leucothites,
L. naucinoides, and Leucoagaricus naucinus are synonyms.
Lepiota naucina, sometimes called the “ Woman on Motorcycle” because of the helmet-shaped young
caps.
Lepiota americana, a distinctive reddening species with a spindle-shaped stalk.
301
302 LEPIOTACEAE
white, but may discolor yellowish when handled. VEIL white, forming a persistent,
superior but easily detachable ring on stalk. SPORE PRINT white; spores 6-10 x 5-8
microns, elliptical, with an apical pore, smooth, thick-walled, weakly dextrinoid.
HABITAT: In groups or clusters in rich soil, wood chips, around old stumps, straw piles,
gardens—in other words, in decomposing organic matter of almost any kind; widely
distributed, but much more common in eastern North America than in the West. In our
area it fruits in the summer or during warm, moist weather.
EDIBILITY: Not recommended. Though traditionally listed as edible, it has adverse
effects on some people and is very thin-fleshed besides.
COMMENTS: Also known a.s Leucocoprinus cepaestipes, this species is easily recognized
by its mealy, whitish, striate cap. It is essentially a whitish version of L. lutea, and the two
used to be considered color forms of the same species. There are many closely related tropi¬
cal and southern species, including: L. breviramus, similar but with soft warts on the cap
(including the center) and usually growing scattered or tufted; L. longistriatus, with a tan
to pale tan fibrillose cap; and L. brebissonii, with a small (2-3 cm) white cap with a dark
gray to brownish center. I have found the latter on lawns in Berkeley, California, in the
summer. Because of their mealy, striate caps, all of these species are placed in their own
genus, Leucocoprinus, by many mycologists.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This is one of our most striking Lepiotas because of the spectacular scarlet-
304
Vm
Lepiota flammeatincta. Surface of cap and stalk stain bright reddish-orange when rubbed, but gills
do not. A very similar species, L. roseifolia (not illustrated) has pinkish-staining gills.
staining (“flaming”) of the cap and stem. The dark brown color that wounded areas sub¬
sequently assume is also characteristic. L. roseifolia is a very similar species whose gills
turn pinkish or red-orange when bruised (within five minutes); it favors cypress in our area.
An unidentified local species with a lovely purple to vinaceous-pink cap when young
(browner in age) also occurs, usually under oak. Its cap and especially the stalk sometimes
stain orange or orange-red when rubbed. L. brunnescens and L. roseatincta are two
eastern scarlet-staining species; the latter has a pinkish-red cap.
thin, white, not bruising. GILLS free, white, close, not bruising. STALK 4-16 cm long,
0.4-1 cm thick, usually rather slender and equal or thicker below, often extending fairly
deep into the humus; smooth, white, discoloring somewhat in age and becoming hollow.
VEIL membranous, white, forming a thin, fragile but persistent ring on stalk; ring median
to superior, typically sleevelike above and flaring below. SPORE PRINT white; spores
6-10 * 4-6 microns, elliptical, smooth, dextrinoid(?).
HABITAT: Solitary to scattered or in small groups in humus, usually in woods; widely
distributed and sometimes common in our area, especially after the first fall rains.
EDIBILITY: Not firmly established. Katy Caldwell of Santa Cruz claims to have eaten
a small quantity without ill effect, but it is easily confused with other Lepiotas, some of
which are poisonous.
COMMENTS: This beautiful mushroom is one of our more common and easily identified
woodland Lepiotas. It is larger and taller than L. cristata, and has a more persistent ring.
The color of the cap fibrils varies considerably, but usually has a reddish tone. The smooth,
dark center is suggestive of a human breast. Other species: L. roseilivida is somewhat
similar but smaller, has a purplish cap, and occurs under various western conifers;/,, glat-
felteri has a vinaceous-brown fibrillose cap and has been found in rich soil and under
cypress in Santa Barbara. Also similar is the beautiful unidentified species mentioned
under L. flammeatincta; its cap is purple or pink at first and its stalk often bruises orange.
Left: Lepiota cristata. Note absence of prominent scales on stalk. Right: Lepiota seminuda, our
smallest Lepiota. Note the free whitish gills and fragile veil that leaves remnants on cap margin.
LEPIOTA 307
COMMENTS: The chestnut to dark brown cap center, fragile ring, small size, and smooth
stem characterize a number of Lepiotas which can only be differentiated microscopically.
L. castaneidisca, for instance, has elliptical rather than bicornute spores but is otherwise
identical. In my experience it is just as common in our area as L. cristata. There are many
other similar species too numerous to mention. They include: L. decorata, with reddish to
pink scales; L. roseilivida, with a purplish or purplish-pink, fibrillose cap; andL. “tomen-
todisca,” with pale to dark reddish-brown scales. In all three of these species the center
of the cap is minutely hairy (tomentose), a character best seen with a hand lens.
VEIL fibrillose, evanescent, not forming a distinct ring on stalk, but sometimes leaving
remnants on cap margin. SPORE PRINT white; spores 9-13 x 3.5-5 microns, bullet¬
shaped, smooth, dextrinoid.
HABITAT: Solitary to widely scattered or in small groups in rich humus in woods, espe¬
cially under conifers. It has a wide distribution and is not uncommon in our area in the fall
and winter, but never seems to fruit in large numbers and is likely to be overlooked.
EDIBILITY: POISONOUS! Like L. josserandii, it contains deadly amanita-toxins.
COMMENTS: The rusty-orange to chestnut-colored scales on cap and stem, free or
nearly free gills, and lack of a distinct annulus (ring) typify this petite Lepiota. It
might be mistaken for a Cystoderma, but the gills are usually free and the spores are
dextrinoid. It is quite fragile and difficult to transport home in one piece.
Lepiota clypeolaria, mature specimens. The shaggy stalk plus the smooth dark cap center typify this
beautiful woodland mushroom. The cap is oval or convex before it expands.
Lepiota clypeolaria (form “nabiscodisca”). This form is not as shaggy as the one shown on the previous
page, and does not show as much yellow. In our area it favors oak.
AGARICACEAE (Agaricus)
Mostly medium-sized to large, terrestrial, saprophytic mushrooms. CAP smooth or scaly, typically
neither brightly colored nor viscid. Flesh usually white. GILLS close, free or nearly free (at least at
maturity), pallid or pinkish when young, chocolate-brown to blackish-brown in age. STALK
central, fleshy, cleanly separable from cap. VEIL present, membranous or cottony, usually forming
an annulus (ring) on stalk. VOLVA typically absent (except mA. bilorquis and relatives). SPORE
PRINT chocolate-brown. Spores smooth, mostly elliptical or almond-shaped.
FROM both an economic and gastronomic standpoint this is unquestionably the most
important group of gilled mushrooms, for it includes the familiar cultivated or “grocery
store” mushroom as well as a large number of other delectable collectables. As defined here,
the Agaricaceae include only one common genus, Agaricus (sometimes listed in older
books as Psalliota). It is a remarkably clearcut, “natural” genus, and as such is a cinch to
recognize: the stalk is typically furnished with an annulus (ring) but lacks a volva, the gills
are pinkish or pallid when young but become chocolate-brown and are free at maturity, and
the spore print is always chocolate-brown (the color of dark chocolate, not milk chocolate).
Stropharia is somewhat similar to Agaricus, but usually has a viscid cap and attached gills
that are never pink, while Amanita has white spores and white or pallid gills plus (usually) a
volva. Lepiota and Chlorophyllum are very similar in general appearance, but have white
and greenish spores respectively. (The Lepiotas and several miscellaneous smaller genera
are included in the Agaricaceae by many mycologists.)
310
These photographs show the key fieldmarks of any Agaricus: presence of a veil that usually forms
an annulus on the stalk plus gills that are free and chocolate-brown at maturity. Left: Close-up of a
mature Agaricus augustus (p. 337). Right: Mature specimens of A. arorae{an unusual species—see
p. 325). Note how cap separates easily from stalk.
Because so many of its species are edible, one often hears Agaricus characterized as a
“safe” genus. This is hardly the case, however.True, no Agaricus is deadly poisonous, but
some species produce mild to severe vomiting and diarrhea in most people, and most of the
edible species (including the cultivated mushroom, A. bisporus) produce mild to severe
vomiting and diarrhea in some people. In fact, Agaricus species are the most frequent cause
of mushroom poisoning in our area, if not in California—not a very good track record for a
“safe” genus! It therefore behooves you Agaricus-eaters to sample each and every species
cautiously to determine your reaction to it, and to be absolutely sure of your identification!
Unfortunately, being “absolutely sure of your identification” is easier said
than done, because Agaricus species are perplexingly polymorphic (variable in size, shape,
color, etc.), and as a result, devilishly difficult to differentiate from each other. In view of the
frequency with which Agaricus species are eaten, and the fact that there is no single “Simple
Simon” rule for distinguishing the edible ones from the poisonous, it seems prudent to
detail some of the more important characters used in separating them:
1) Staining reactions should be noted when fresh on the surfaces of the cap (near the
margin) and stalk, the flesh in both the cap and stalk, and the flesh in the extreme base of the
stalk. Some species do not stain at all; others are rufescent, (i.e., they stain red to orange or
vinaceous when cut) or lutescent (i.e., they stain yellow to yellow-orange when bruised or
rubbed repeatedly); still others are latently lutescent (i.e., they stain yellow only when a
drop of 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) or sodium hydroxide (NaOH) is applied to the
surface of the cap near the margin).* Actually, potassium and sodium hydroxide drama¬
tize the yellow-staining of all the naturally lutescent species, but in our area are especially
useful for distinguishing the edible, non-staining A. campestris from the inedible or
poisonous, latently lutescent A. californicus.
2) Odor should be noted by gently crushing the cap tissue as well as the flesh in the very
base of the stalk. Three odors are especially prevalent in Agaricus: mild (or “fungal”) to
faintly fruity, as in the cultivated mushroom, A. bisporus; sweet (like anise or almond
extract) as in A. augustus; and phenolic (an unpleasant chemical odor reminiscent of
phenol, carbolic acid, creosote, library paste, ink, tar, or bleach), as in A. xanthodermus.
However, these odors, when present, are not always obvious and it sometimes takes an
experienced nose to detect them. It is interesting to note that there is often a correlation
between the degree of lutescence and strength of odor—as a rule, the more quickly and
brightly an Agaricus stains yellow, the stronger it will smell!
*Many household cleaning agents contain potassium or sodium hydroxide and can be substituted successfully.
Drano (one teaspoon per % cup water) and Lysol both work, but don’t eat the tissue tested with these chemicals!
Veil detail in Agaricus. Left to right: A. campestris, with a thin cottony veil; A. californicus, with a
thicker membranous veil and inrolled, lobed cap margin; and A. arvensis, whose membranous veil
shows a cogwheel pattern of patches on its underside. (Ralph Buchsbaum)
3) Veil characteristics: The veil in Agaricus is actualy composed of two layers of tissue.
In some species only one layer is clearly visible, while in others the lower layer (universal
veil) can be seen as distinct patches of tissue on the underside of the upper layer (partial
veil), as shown in the photograph above. The type of annulus(ring) formed by the ruptured
veil is also significant: whether skirtlike (pendant), sheathlike(peronate), or intermediate
between the two (see illustrations on this page).
4) Spore size is extremely useful in delimiting species, as are reactions to other chemicals
besides potassium and sodium hydroxide. However, these features are not stressed here
since most people will be unable to ascertain them. The best spores for measuring purposes,
incidentally, are those that are deposited naturally (in the wild) on the annulus or stem.
What makes identification of Agaricus species so difficult is that all of the above charac¬
ters with the exception of spore size are easily influenced or altered by the environment, as
are grosser features such as the size, shape, color, and degree of scaliness of the fruiting
body. Specimens growing intheopen,forinstance,can be differently colored orsquatteror
more scaly than specimens of the same species growing in deep shade. Dry or old specimens
are apt to manifest their staining reactions and odors much more slowly or subtlely than
young, fresh individuals, and soggy specimens may not display their normal odor and
staining reactions at all! It is obvious, then, that habitat and environmental conditions
are among the first things to be taken into account when you are attempting to identify an
unfamiliar Agaricus.
312
AGARICUS 313
One practical way for beginners to overcome some of the vagaries and difficulties dis¬
cussed is to approach the genus Agaricus at the level of section (subgroup) rather than
species. The overwhelming majority of North American species will fit into one of seven
groups or “sections.” A few, such as A. subrutilescens and A. arorae, do not fit con¬
veniently into any of them, and may well represent “bridges” between them. The seven
sections are:
Section Agaricus: Not staining; annulus thin and slight or even absent (when present
usually intermediate); KOH-negative; edible.
Section Hortenses: Not staining or rufescent; annulus skirtlike or intermediate; stature
usually rather squat; KOH-negative; edible.
Section Bitorques: Not staining or rufescent; annulus sheathlike; flesh hard; stalk
solid; KOH-negative; edible or sometimes too tough to eat.
Section Sanguinolenti: Rufescent; annulus skirtlike; stature usually erect; KOH-
negative; edible.
Section Xanthodermati: Latently or strongly but fleetingly lutescent (i.e., staining
yellow, then eventually discoloring brownish or vinaceous); annulus skirtlike or
intermediate; odor phenolic (sometimes faint!); KOH-positive; poisonous!
Section Arvenses: Latently or strongly but persistently lutescent; annulus skirtlike;
odor usually sweet; veil typically with two distinct layers; KOH-positive; edible.
Section Minores: Very much like section Arvenses and sometimes grouped with it, but
with a small, usually slender and fragile fruiting body, and veil often with only one
distinct layer.
Learning to recognize these “sections” has several advantages. The most obvious is
that it hones critical skills while dealing with only seven entities instead of dozens.
Moreover, you learn to group species according to their chemistry, which is precisely what
edibility is all about! For instance, it appears that the phenol-smelling species (section
Xanthodermati) poison a majority of people who eat them. The phenol odor is not always
evident in the field, but usually becomes quite pronounced if the mushrooms are cooked.
(The taste of these species is rather astringent or metallic, yet there are people who eat them
not only with impunity, but with gusto!) It is also interesting to note that people who have
an allergy to an edible species are likely to have allergies to other members of the same
section, but not necessarily to species in other sections . For instance, someone allergic to
A. augustus is likely to be adversely affected by A. arvensis also. Similarly, someone who
can eat the cultivated mushroom (A. bisporus) will probably not have trouble with other
species in the section Hortenses. Thus it clearly pays for prospective Agaricus-eaters to
learn something of the chemistry and interrelationships of the common species, in addi¬
tion to their critical fieldmarks.
The best known—and perhaps the most mediocre—of the edible Agaricus species is
undoubtedly the cultivated mushroom, A. bisporus. The meadow mushroom or
“champignon,” A. campestris, is also very popular, but the best species are somewhat lesser
known—A. augustus, A. subrufescens, A. arvensis, A lilaceps, and A bernardiiare choice
mushrooms if there are any, and A. bitorquis has few peers. Agaricus species are also
notable for their beauty. Some rival the Amanitas for stateliness and elegance, while
others are as plump and meaty as boletes.
Agaricus species are saprophytic and are among the most conspicuous urban and
suburban mushrooms. Not only is the cultivated or “button” mushroom, A. bisporus, to be
found in practically every grocery store and produce stand, but its untamed (and in some
cases unnamed) cousins fruit prolifically on lawns (where they are often kicked over like
other “toadstools”), in cemeteries, under hedges and shrubbery, along roads and sidewalks,
in gardens, and on compost piles. Many species are rural as well, fruiting by the bushel in
pastures and fields, and some also favor the woods, but comprise a much smaller
314 AGARICACEAE
percentage of the fleshy fungi found there. Few, if any, are mycorrhizal. It is interesting to
note that in our area cypresses—particularly old ones—harbor a remarkable wealth of
species, including both cosmopolitan and rare or endemic ones.
Agaricus species fruit whenever conditions are favorable—that is, moist and mild. In our
area the greatest variety can be found shortly after the first fall rains, but another crop
appears in the spring, and if it is mild enough, in the winter. Some species also fruit on
watered lawns in the summer, and A. augustus is a common summertime mushroom in
the coastal fog belt.
Agaricus is a large genus centered in the tropics and subtropics, hence one would expect
to find more species in the southern United States than in the north. About 200 species
are estimated for North America, but no all-encompassing critical study has been made.
In California the total number of known species is about 60, most of which occur in our
area. Many of the 24 species described here have wide distributions, but some are presently
known only from California.* Readers outside “our area” will undoubtedly enounter
several species they can’t identify, but with a good nose and a keen eye they should be able to
assign most of them to one of the seven “sections” already described.
1. Very base of stalk giving off an unpleasant odor (like phenol or library paste) when crushed;
base sometimes also staining yellow when cut or crushed . 2
1. Not as above; odor not phenolic; base of stalk typically not staining yellow (but may stain orange
or yellow-orange), or if staining yellow then odor sweet . 7
2. Extreme base of stalk staining bright yellow when cut or nicked; other surfaces often staining
yellow also . 3
2. Base of stalk not staining bright yellow (but may stain faintly yellow) .4
3. Cap with inky-gray to grayish-brown to brown or dark brown fibrils or fibrillose scales; surface
of cap not bruising yellow or only sometimes bruising yellow .6
3. Cap white or discoloring grayish to buff or tan; surface usually bruising bright yellow when
rubbed repeatedly, especially near margin .A. xanthodermus, p. 329
4. Cap with pale pinkish-brown to fawn-colored, tan, or reddish-brown fibrils (or at times nearly
white); annulus (ring) on stalk thick and feltlike; stalk 1-3 cm thick at apex, the base enlarged;
cap 6-15 cm or more broad; growing in woods or under trees .A. hondensis, p. 326
4. Not with above features.5
5. Cap 3-9 cm broad, entirely white or whitish with a brown center, or sometimes brownish
throughout; stalk 0.5-1 (1.5) cm thick; found in many habitats on west coast, but especially
common in urban and suburban areas, in grass, under cypress and oak, etc.52
5. Not as above; if found in West then cap (4) 5-25 cm broad, with inky gray to grayish-brown,
brown, or dark brown fibrils or fibrillose scales (never entirely white) and stalk 1 -3 cm thick,
and usually growing in woods or along roads and paths through the woods .6
6. Found in eastern North America; cap typically finely fibrillose.
.A. placomyces& A. pocillator(sQe A. praeclaresquamosus, p. 329)
6. Widespread but most common in West; cap fibrillose to scaly A. praeclaresquamosus, p. 329
7. Some part of fruiting body (especially cap surface) staining yellow when bruised and/or
the flesh smelling sweet when crushed (like almond extract or anise); cap surface typically
yellowing in KOH . 8
7. Not as above (odor rarely slightly almondy, but if so then flesh reddening when cut) .25
*Several of the species depicted or mentioned in this chapter have been named and described by Rick Kerrigan in
an article which, at the time of this writing, is about to be published. The provisional names he has given them are
used here with his permission. They are: A.fuscovelatus, A. arorae, A. sequoiae, A. vinaceovirens, A. blandianus,
A. smithii, A. summensis, A. perobscurus, and A. rubronanus. Another provisional name, A. pinyonensis,
is used here with the permission of Bill Isaacs and Chuck Barrows.
AGARICUS 315
8. Cap white or whitish when young and fresh (but may discolor yellow to buff or amber in age) 9
8. Cap not white (i.e., with distinctly colored cuticle, fibrils, or scales, at least at center) .... 16
9. Growing in grass (lawns, pastures, etc.) or in pinyon-juniper forests . 10
9. Not typically growing in above habitats . 12
10. Cap small (2-5 cm broad), often with a brownish to buff-tinged center; stalk less than 1 cm thick;
spores 5.5 microns long or less .A. comtulus(see A. micromegathus, p. 340)
10. Not as above; usually larger and spores larger . 11
11. Stalk stuffed or sometimes hollow; fruiting body medium-sized, or if large than not particularly
squat; cap surface usually smooth (or with a few fissures); widely distributed, but favoring
lawns over pastures in California; spores 7-8.5 microns long .A. arvensis, p. 332
11. Not as above; either growing in pinyon-juniper forests or if growing in grass, then stalk usually
solid, fruiting body often large (cap 7-50 cm broad), the cap smooth to conspicuously scaly or
warty, stature often robust or squat; especially common in pastures and prairies but also on
lawns; spores either smaller or larger than above .41
12. Fruiting body often robust, quickly staining amber when bruised (especially the cap surface)
and often aging amber overall; cap often fibrillose; odor strongly almondy or anise-like; im¬
mature gills often staining yellow; known only from the West.A. albolutescens, p. 335
12. Not as above ... 13
13. Fruiting body robust (stalk 2 cm thick or more); cap typically with slightly colored (yellowish)
fibrils; rare .A. summensis& A. augustus(white form) (see A. augustus, p. 337)
13. Not as above; common . 14
14. Cap surface typically staining distinctly yellow when rubbed repeatedly, at least at the margin;
common and widespread .A. silvicolagroup, p. 334
14. Not as above; yellow-staining weak or erratic; found in eastern North America or in western
mountains . 15
15. Cap white, 4-8 (15) cm broad; odor pungent or faintly sweet; spores only 4-5 microns long; fairly
common in woods of eastern North America.A. cretacellus
15. Cap white or silvery; gills remaining pink for a long time; found in western mountains .
. A. chionodermus(see A. silvicola group, p. 334)
16. Fruiting body fairly small; cap 1-5 (7) cm broad; stalk usually less than 1 cm thick . 17
16. Fruiting body medium-sized to very large; not as above. 19
17. Growing in grass; odor usually anise-like .A. micromegathus & others, p. 340
17. Growing in woods or under trees; odor mild or aniselike . 18
18. Odor distinctly anise-like; cap fibrils brown to reddish-brown .
.A. semotus(see A. micromegathus, p. 340)
18. Odor faint or absent; cap fibrils pink, purple, purple-gray, or vinaceous when fresh .
.A. diminutivusgroup, p. 340
19. Growing in pastures or grass; fruiting body robust, often squat; cap often with large warts or
scales, but sometimes smooth, whitish becoming yellowish or pale brownish .
. A. crocodilinus (see A. osecanus group, p. 333)
19. Not growing in grass, or if growing in grass then not as above . 20
20. Growing in compost or rich soil; cap with pallid to pale brown to faintly grayish, pale pinkish-
brown, fawn-colored (or sometimes brown or tawny) fibrils, sometimes slightly ruddy or
yellowish in age; stalk not scaly or shaggy(or only obscurely so) below the veil; stalk often with
a swollen base; odor strongly sweet; spores 5.5-7 microns long .A. subrufescens, p. 336
20. Not as above; often but not always growing in woods . 21
21. Cap with pink or purple tints; not common .A. lilaceps, p. 323
21. Not as above . 22
22. Stalk typically rather slender(l -1.5 (2) cm thick at apex), but usually with a bulb at base; fibrils on
cap ochraceous-orange to tawny; found in the coastal forests of northern California and the
Pacific Northwest, especially under Sitka spruce .A. smithii(see A. augustus, p. 337)
22. Not as above . 23
23. Fibrils on cap yellow when young, ochraceous or tawny in age; rare .
. A. summensis{see A. augustus, p. 337)
23. Not as above; fibrils brown to gray to tawny, but not yellow . 24
316 AGARICACEAE
24. Fibrils on cap distinctly gray to grayish-brown to nearly black (at center) when young, but often
paler in age; scales on stalk below the veil often scanty; gills usually passing through a pinkish
phase as they mature; known only from California .A. perobscurus, p. 339
24. Not as above; fibrils on cap brown to tawny; stalk usually conspicuously shaggy or scaly below
the veil, at least when young; gills rarely pink; widely distributed .A. augustus, p. 337
25. Flesh normally staining red to orange or vinaceous when cut or rubbed repeatedly .26
25. Not as above (but cap and flesh may have reddish stains in old age or wet weather) .38
26. Flesh in base of stalk staining orange to yellow-orange when cut; flesh elsewhere reddening at
least somewhat; cap with broad, flattened, chocolate-brown scales, often depressed centrally
at maturity; growing in woods, very rare (reported from the Pacific Northwest) .. A. lanipes
26. Not as above . 27
27. Unbroken veil (i.e., underside of broken veil) soon brown to grayish-brown, purple-brown, or
chocolate-brown to nearly black . 28
27. Not as above . 30
28. Stalk averaging 2.5-4 cm thick at apex, often bulbous A. pattersonae (see A. lilaceps, p. 323)
28. Stalk usually more slender, or if thick then without a bulb at base.29
29. U nderside of unbroken veil soon purple-gray to brown or dark brown; flesh staining only slightly
(often orangish) when cut; stalk typically less than 2 cm thick .A. fuscovelatus, p. 324
29. Not as above . 30
30. Veil forming a sheathlike annulus(ring) on stalk; cap whitish to buff or sometimesdingy brown¬
ish, sometimes cracked into scales; stalk solid; fruiting body very firm or hard; growing in
disturbed soil, mud flats, on lawns near ocean, etc.; coastal in distribution A. bernardii, p. 322
30. Not as above; veil forming a skirtlike to intermediate annulus . 31
31. Growing in compost or manured soil .A. bisporus, p. 319
31. Not as above . 32
32. Fruiting body large and dense (cap 8-25 cm broad when mature, stalk2-7 cm thick; cap brown or
sometimes with pinkish, purplish, and/ or ochre or yellow-orange tones; veil often yellow-
tinged before breaking, forming a skirtlike annulus (ring) on stalk; found mainly under cypress
and other planted trees, but not in manure .A. lilaceps, p. 323
32. Not as above . 33
33. Margin of cap inrolled when young; stature of fruiting body usually rather stout or squat;
annulus (ring) on stalk intermediate or skirtlike . 54
33. Not as above; annulus usually skirtlike. 34
34. Flesh staining distinctly red . 35
34. Flesh staining dingy vinaceous or vinaeous-brown or dingy reddish (usually weakly) .... 38
35. Cap white or whitish, sometimes with faintly grayish or brownish fibrils .
.A. benesi(see A. fuscofibrillosus, p. 325)
35. Not as above; cap darker . 36
36. Common under mountain conifers (especially spruce and fir) in southern Rocky Mountains and
Southwest .A. amicosus (see A. arorae, p.325)
36. Not as above .37
37. Stalk usually less than 1 cm thick; cap 3-7 (10) cm broad; cap surface yellowing in KOH; known
only from California, usually growing in mixed woods and under oak .... A. arorae, p. 325
37. Not as above; stalk usually thicker and! or growing under cypress; cap surface not yellowing
in KOH; widespread .A. fuscofibrillosus & others, p. 325
38. Veil forming a sheathlike or even volva-like annulus on stalk or a large collarlike band (with
both upper and lower edges free from stalk); found in hard-packed or disturbed soil or some¬
times in grass or under cypress; texture very firm; stalk solid . . A. bitorquis & others, p. 321
38. Not as above; veil not sheathlike or bandlike and/ or stalk with a central hollow in age ... 39
39. Cap white or whitish when fresh (but may discolor tan, yellowish, or buff in age) .40
39. Cap colored at least at the center, or with colored fibrils or scales.42
40. Cap medium-sized to very large (10-50 cm broad when mature); either growing in grass or in
pinyon-juniper forests.41
40. Not as above; smaller and/or habitat different .42
AGARICUS 317
41. Found with pinyon and juniper in the Southwest . A. pinyonensis, p. 331
41. Found in grassy places A. osecanusgroup & A. crocodilinus(see A. osecanus group, p. 333)
42. Cap 1 -4 cm broad when expanded; stalk 2-6 mm thick; fruiting body fragile.43
42. Not as above; typically larger (cap 3 cm broad or more; stalk 5 mm thick or more) .44
43. Cap grayish to grayish-brown, granular or powdery; margin usually hung with veil remnants;
gills deep pink to blood-red, then darker; spore print reddish or tinged greenish when moist,
drying darker brown; growing in greenhouses, leaf litter, rich soil, bogs, etc.; widely distributed
but not common .Melanophyllum echinatum
43. Not as above; cap with reddish-brown to pinkish or purplish fibrils, not granular or mealy;
growing in woods .A. diminutivusgroup, p. 340
44. Cap silvery-white or white; fruiting body often rather erect and slender; growing in mountain
forests of the West . A. chionodermus(see A. silvicola group, p. 334)
44. Not as above .45
45. Cap covered with dark brown to purple-brown or wine-colored fibrils or fibrillose scales; stalk
shaggy or sheathed by cottony white scales below the veil, at least when young; common in
woods .A. subrutilescens, p. 326
45. Not as above .46
46. Growing in the open (usually in grass, occasionally in hard-packed soil); veil typically thin and
somewhat cottony, forming only a slight annulus (ring) on stalk or disappearing (annulus
usually intermediate, not skirtlike); gills usually pink or brownish in button stage; cap surface
not yellowing in KOH .47
46. Not as above; habitat different and/or veil typically membranous and forming a distinct
intermediate to skirtlike annulus; gills pinkish, brown, or white in button stage .49
47. Cap white or sometimes with pale brown to grayish fibrils or scattered scales; very common and
widespread .A. campestris& others, p. 318
47. Cap covered with brown to grayish-brown or reddish-brown fibrils, even when young ... 48
48. Cap often ruddy or reddish in age or after handling; growing in lawns or hard-packed soil along
roads; not common .A. rutilescens(see A. cupreobrunneus, p. 319)
48. Not as above; growing in lawns or pastures; common . . A. cupreobrunneus & others, p. 319
49. Stature erect (stalk more than 5 cm long); cap white or pallid (pale buff) .50
49. Not as above; cap darker and/ or stature rather robust and stocky .52
50. Stalk 8-30 cm long; found in redwood and mixed forests of coastal northern California, usually
near rivers or in bottomlands .A. sequoiae(see A. pinyonensis, p. 331)
50. Not as above; stalk generally up to 9 cm long; habitat usually different . 51
51. Veil usually disappearing or leaving scaly zones on mid- or lower stalk rather than forming a
distinct annulus (ring); found under trees or on coastal bluffs; rare .A. altipes
51. Not as above; common . 52
52. Cap white or pallid; veil ample, usually with a cogwheel pattern of patches on underside; stalk
rather stout (3-b cm long); growing in pastures, sometimes in rings; known only from the central
California coast; not common .A. sp. (unidentified)(see A. campestris, p. 318)
52. Not as above; very common . 53
53. Cap covered with purplish to purple-gray or purple-brown fibrils, the margin usually white;
found in woods and under trees in southeastern North America .A. rhoadsii
53. Not as above . 54
54. Gills pinkish to brownish in button stage; fruiting body usually stout, stalk usually 1 -4 cm thick;
found in manure, compost, rich soil, hard-packed ground, and under cypress (or rarely in the
woods); odor never phenolic; cap surface not yellowing in KOH or rarely yellowing slightly
. 55
54. Gills pallid or whitish in button stage (but often pink after veil breaks); stalk0.5-1 (1.5)cm thick;
found almost anywhere (including lawns, gardens, woods, under cypress), but only rarely in
manure or compost piles; odor sometimes phenolic; cap surface yellowing in KOH .
.A. californicus, p. 327
55. Growing in hard-packed ground, often in towns or cities (often developing underground, then
pushing through); veil thick, often forming a double ring; cap surface usually breaking up in
age to form large brown to reddish-brown scales . A. vaporarius
55. Not as above; found in compost, manure, under cypress, or occasionally in other habitats; cap
white or with brown fibrils or fibrillose scales; common. A. bisporus& others, p. 319
318 AGARICACEAE
The cultivated or “button” mushroom, Agaricus bisporus. Large specimens from a mushroom farm.
Agaricus bitorquis (-A. rodmani), mature specimens. Note prominent, flaring bandlike annulus. The
flesh is exceptionally firm, especially in the stalk.For a view of it in its natural habitat, see color plate.
EDIBILITY: Edible, and in my fickle fungal opinion, the best of all Agaricus species. In
Europe it is cultivated commercially because of its immunity to the virus disease that
plagues A. bisporus. It is larger, meatier, and much firmer than either A. bisporus or A.
campestris. One devotee goes so far as to say: “Life is like an Agaricus bitorquis—all good
except for a few gills.” Life may not be so consistently good, but A. bitorquis certainly is!
COMMENTS: The white cap, bandlike or sheathing ring (see photographs), and un¬
changing flesh plus the solid stem, firm texture, and fondness for hardpacked soil distin¬
guish this hardy, handsome fungus from other species of Agaricus. There is no anise or
phenol odor and it does not stain yellow or red. W hen it fruits underground you must search
321
Agaricus bitorquis is common inland in disturbed or hard-packed soil. Note how the large bandlike
ring can mimic a volva (specimens at top and far right). A. bernardii(not illustrated) is a similar species
that is common along the coast. It has reddening flesh and often has a scaly cap.
very carefully for the telltale cracks in the soil that mark its presence (see color plate!).
When the annulus (ring) is sheathlike it sometimes resembles a volva, but the chocolate-
brown spores and gills prevent confusion with Amanita. For years it has been called
Agaricus rodmani; A. edulis is another name for it. A. chlamydopus is a similar species
with a cottony white cap, sheathing veil, stout stature, and larger spores. It is particularly
common in the southern U nited States on lawns and along roads, and is edible. ^4. vinaceo-
virens is a cypress-loving species with a repulsive briny odor and a slightly scaly or scurfy
whitish to light brown cap. It often develops vinaceous tints in age and sometimes stains
greenish as well. Its edibility is unknown.
HABIT AT: Solitary or scattered to densely gregarious in sand, sandy soil, disturbed areas,
on lawns, and in various saline habitats; occurring along the Atlantic and Pacific coasts
and in Europe. In our area it is quite common in thefalland winter, usually appearingafter
the first soaking rains. In Santa Monica, California, I have seen it in the summer on lawns.
It apparently has an even greater tolerance (or liking) for salt than does A. bitorquis,
and like that species, sometimes fruits underground.
EDIBILITY: Edible and choice—almost the equal of A. bitorquis, but a little chewier and
sometimes with a slightly salty or briny taste.
COMMENTS: Also known as A. halophilus and A. maritimus, this is a characteristic
coastal species. It has the general appearance of its close relative, A. bitorquis, (i.e., hard
flesh, sheathing or even bandlike veil, and whitish color), but differs in staining reddish
when cut and is more apt to have a warty or scaly cap. In dry weather, however, the staining
may be slow and/or slight.
Agaricus lilaceps is one of the largest and firmest of its tribe. Note thick stalk, skirtlike annulus (ring),
and tendency of the flesh to darken (redden) when cut. The veil is often tinged yellow before it breaks.
323
324 AGARICACEAE
recognizable by their size, stature, and color. The common brown-capped form was provi¬
sionally called A. “luteovelatus” by Rick Kerrigan until it became evident that it was
actually A. lilaceps. Another large edible cypress-lover with reddening to barely reddening
flesh, A. pattersonae, has a scalier, darker brown cap. Its veil is brownish on the underside
rather than yellow, and frequently separates into two distinct rings. It is slightly smaller
than A. lilaceps (stalk 2.5-4 cm thick) and sometimes grows with other trees (e.g., redwood).
Agaricus fuscovelatus. Note the dark color of the unbroken veil and the more or less equal (cylin¬
drical) stalk. The flesh turns orange or reddish when cut.
AGARICUS 325
Agaricus arorae
CAP 3-7 (10) cm broad, convex to plane; surface dry, with brownish to reddish-brown
fibrils or fibrillose scales, at least at the center, on a white to reddish background; staining
reddish when rubbed. Flesh white, reddening when cut (usually quickly, but sometimes
slowly); odor mild or faintly fruity. GILLS free at maturity, close, pinkish becoming
purple-brown, then chocolate-brown or darker. STALK 5-14 cm long, 0.5-1.5 (2) cm
thick, equal or enlarged at base, hollow in age; white, sometimes with scaly zones, staining
reddish when bruised and often aging reddish-brown or vinaceous. VEIL membranous,
thin, white (or dingy in age), forming a median to superior, skirtlike, fragile ring on stalk.
SPORE PRINT chocolate-brown; spores 4-5.5 * 3-4 microns, broadly elliptical, smooth.
Cap surface staining yellow in KOH.
HABITAT: Solitary to widely scattered or in small groups on ground in mixed woods and
under oaks, fruiting mainly in October and November, sometimes common. It is known
only from Santa Cruz County, California, but probably has a wider distribution.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This odd species appears to be a compromise or “bridge” between the red-
stainingand yellow-staining (rufescent and lutescent) sections of A garicus. The flesh when
326 AGARICACEAE
fresh bruises red quite dramatically, but the surface of the cap turns yellow in potassium
hydroxide! In the field it can be separated from other“bleeding” species such as A.fusco-
fibrillosus by its slimmer build (see photo on p. 311) and fondness for oak. A. amicosus
also reddens when cut and yellows in KOH; it is common under mountain conifers in the
Southwest and southern Rockies, and is edible. A. spissicaulis has a stocky stature like A.
bisporus (and is sometimes mistaken for that species) and slowly reddening flesh, yellows
somewhat in KOH, has a slight almond odor, and is widely distributed but rare.
but often flaring outward instead of collapsing against stalk. SPORE PRINT
chocolate-brown; spores 4.5-6 * 3-4 microns, elliptical, smooth. Cap surface staining
yellow in KOH.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups, troops, or rings in woods, particularly where there are
thick accumulations of fallen twigs and other debris. Very common in our area in the late
fall and winter under both hardwoods and conifers; like A. subrutilescens, which grows
in similar habitats, it is apparently restricted to the west coast. The main fruiting typically
follows close on the heels of A. praeclaresquamosus. It was originally described from
La Honda, California.
EDIBILITY: Poisonous to many people, causing stomach distress, vomiting, etc. It’s
difficult to imagine a more delicious-looking mushroom, but it has an unpleasant, astrin¬
gent-metallic taste even when cooked.
COMMENTS: This handsome, alluring woodland Agaricus is distinguished by the pale
cap fibrils which often darken in age, the thick felty annulus(ring), smooth naked stalk, and
chocolate-brown spores. The phenol odor is often absent in the cap but usually quite
pronounced when cooked or if the base of the stalk is broken open and crushed. It is
frequently mistaken for edible species, particularly A. subrutilescens and A. augustus,
both of which have cottony scales on the stem when young. It has also been confused
with A. silvaticus, a species with reddening flesh (see A. fuscofibrillosus).
327
Agaricus californicus is often confused with A. campestris and A. bisporus. Note how the gills are
whitish in the button stage, and how the veil forms a thick persistent annulus (ring) on the stalk. Also
compare the shape of the young caps to that of A. campestris and A. bisporus.
superior to median ring on stalk or occasionally clinging to cap margin; ring skirtlike or
intermediate. SPORE PRINT chocolate-brown; spores 5-7 * 4-5 microns, elliptical,
smooth. Cap surface staining yellow in KOH.
HABITAT: Solitary to scattered or densely gregarious (but not often in rings) onground,
growing anywhere and everywhere, but especially abundant in suburbia—on lawns,
in gardens, parks, under trees (eucalyptus, acacia, oak, cypress, etc.), also in the woods,
but only rarely in pastures (except under trees). Found year-round in our area, but most
abundant in the fall, when it often mingles with Lepiota naucina and other Agaricus
species. It is known only from the west coast, but may very well have a wider distribution.
EDIBILITY: Mildly poisonous to some people (causing stomach upsets), and frequently
mistaken for the common meadow mushom (A. campestris), with which it often grows.
COMMENTS: This ubiquitous mushroom gives my students more trouble than any
other, not only because it closely mimics edible species, but also because of the endless
variation it exhibits. “Typical” forms—if they can be said to exist—do not stain bright
yellow like A. xanthodermus, but yellow slightly in cooking, in addition to giving off a
phenol odor. The persistent membranous ring, modest size, rather long stalk, slight
phenol odor when fresh (often not evident to those unfamiliar with the odor) and whitish
(not pinkish!) gills in the button stage (i.e., before the veil breaks) help distinguish it from
A. campestris, A. cupreobrunneus, and A. bisporus. The cap varies tremendously in color
and scaliness, but is usually brownish at least at the center, and often somewhat shiny. As
a rule, specimens growing in sheltered situations (such as under oak) are paler or even pure
white, while those growing in the open can be quite dark. Specimens on lawns are usually
rather firmly rooted in the ground and often have to be dug up to avoid breaking the stem.
For a comparison with A. campestris, see that species and the key to Agaricus. Since it is
the most ubiquitous Agaricus in coastal California (one quickly tires of finding it), the
name A. californicus is certainly appropriate. It has also been called the “Fool’s Agaric,”
but I don’t care for this name because fools aren’t the only ones to be fooled by it!
328
AGARICUS 329
close, free at maturity, at first white, then pinkish or grayish-pink, finally chocolate-
brown to blackish-brown. STALK 5-12 (18) cm long, 1-2 (3) cm thick, equal or with an
enlarged base, smooth, stuffed or hollow, without scales; white, usually bruising yellow,
then brownish; in age often discolored brownish; flesh in very base turning bright yellow
when cut. VEIL membranous, white or yellow-stained, usually with patches on underside;
forming a large, thick, feltlike, median to superior ring on stalk; ring skirtlike or inter¬
mediate, often flaring at first. SPORE PRINT chocolate-brown; spores 4.5-6 * 3^1.5
microns, broadly elliptical, smooth. Cap surface staining yellow in KOH.
HABITAT: Scattered to densely gregarious under trees and hedges, in yards, on lawns,
along roads and paths, also in woods, pastures, and under cypress; widely distributed.
Abundant in our area from fall through spring and even showing up in the summer. I have
seen stupendous fruitings in an old olive orchard, under acacia and eucalyptus, and in
numerous cypress plantations as well as with oak.
EDIBILITY: Poisonous to many people—causing headaches, nausea, vomiting, and
diarrhea. It is a very tempting, meaty mushroom but the unpleasant odor becomes
unbearably obnoxious when the mushroom is cooked, and the taste is awful as well.
Yet there is no accounting for taste. I know one person who gathers it—and nothing else!
COMMENTS: The tendency of all parts to stain bright yellow, the phenolic odor, and the
white to grayish or tan cap plus the presence of a veil and chocolate-brown spores are the
trademarks of this cosmopolitan and variable species. The yellow-staining is usually most
dramatic on the margin of the cap, but is most reliable in the extreme base of the stalk, which
turns bright chrome-yellow when nicked. The latter is perhaps the best fieldmark, since
Agaricus xanthodermus. Note yellow stains on cap and the prominent annulus in mature specimens.
These handsome white examples of Agaricus xanthodermus might easily be mistaken for Agaricus
arvensis or another edible species. Their phenolic odor, however, is usually quite pronounced and the
very base of the stalk turns bright yellow when cut.
only the equally poisonous A. praeclaresquamosus stains so brilliantly in the base of the
stalk. Several edible Agaricus species, such as A. augustus and A. albolutescens, stain
yellow on the cap, but do not subsequently discolor brownish. The edible horse mushroom
(A. arvensis) and giant horse mushroom (A. osecanus groupj superficially resemble A.
xanthodermus, but do not stain yellow at the base of the stalk and do not smell like phenol.
331
Left: Agaricus pinyonensis is a robust whitish species of the Southwest. Note how thick the flesh is!
Right: Agaricus arvensis is a sweet edible species with a distinct anise odor and a tendency to discolor
yellow in age. For close-up of unbroken veil in this species, see photo on p. 312.
sis, but does not normally smell sweet and does not necessarily stain yellow when bruised.
Other species: A medium-sized to fairly large (cap 4-14 cm) whitish species, A. sequoiae,
grows solitary to gregarious or in large clusters in the redwood and mixed forests of
coastal northern California, usually near rivers or at least in bottomlands. It has a longer
(8-30 cm) and more slender stem that is usually equal, and it does not stain yellow when
bruised or in KOH, but sometimes has a yellow-tinged veil. It has a mild odor and is edible
according to Rick Kerrigan, who named it.
332
AGARICUS 333
dilinus and A. osecanus. However, the base of the stalk does not stain bright yellow when
cut—an easy way to distinguish it from the poisonous, yellow-staining A. xanthodermus.
The stature of A. arvensis is generally more robust than that of A. silvicola, its smaller-
spored sylvan look-alike, but it is not nearly as ponderous as that of the giant horse mush¬
room (A. osecanus groupj or A. crocodilinus. The growth in grass is quite characteristic,
though a swamp-inhabiting form (var. palustris) has been described. There are numerous
variants around A. arvensis that have not been critically evaluated, including a small,
slender form (cap only 3-9 cm broad) that occasionally occurs in our area on lawns.
A. fissuratus is a very similar coastal species with a frequently cracked (fissured), white
to yellowish cap and slightly larger spores. It is common in the Puget Sound area of
Washington, but probably has a wider distribution, and is edible.
s- *
•••• •%
;
■ - ,. - / -T > ** ^^ v
m*w
W^sSmSSSBBmSBMS^m^
Agaricus crocodilinus, mature specimens. It is common for the caps to be warty, but they can also
be smooth. Note the squat stature. Each of these caps is about one foot across. (Bill Everson)
yellow in the base of the stem. An equally edible but larger-spored species, A. crocodilinus
(“Crocodile Agaricus”—see photo above) is common in parts of northern California
and the Pacific Northwest, and has also been reported from the prairies of eastern New
Mexico and Colorado. It is just as large or even larger than the giant horse mushroom, and
looks virtually the same. True, it is more apt to be warty or scaly and is often slightly
browner in age, but it can also be perfectly smooth and pure white, so that in regions where
both occur the two species can only be separated with certainty by measuring the spores
(in A. crocodilinus they are 8-11 (14) microns long). Our giant horse mushroom,
incidentally, may very well be an unnamed, endemic species. It belongs to a group or
“complex” that is very confused taxonomically, and is listed here as a member of the
A. osecanus group largely because of its spore size. However, it differs somewhat from the
“true” A. osecanus of Europe, and could just as well be called A. nivescens—another
European species with a solid stem and a shade smaller spores. Until a critical study of this
group is completed, it is perhaps best to call it “giant horse mushroom,” because its
common name cannot be subsequently invalidated or proved “incorrect!” Since all of
these species are equally and unequivocally edible, the exact (or inexact) differences
between them needn’t concern you. At least, they don’t concern me! Other species:
A. macrosporus (-A. villalicus) of Europe is a large-spored species very similar to, if not
identical with, A. crocodilinus; the suggestive moniker/l. urinescens has been given to still
another large-spored variant—a fitting tribute to the indiscreet odor that frequently
develops in old age.
334
Left: This stately member of the Agaricus silvicola group is fairly common in our area under tanoak.
Cap is white and stains yellow. Right: Agaricus albolutescens, also common, resembles A. silvicola
but is usually more robust, has a stronger odor, and stains more dramatically.
yellow, with patches on underside that sometimes form a cogwheel pattern; forming a
prominent, superior, skirtlike ring on stalk. SPORE PRINT chocolate-brown; spores
5-6.5 x 3.5-4.5 microns, elliptical, smooth. Cap surface staining yellow in KOH.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in small groups in woods; widely distributed and
common, but rarely fruiting in large numbers. In our area it is fairly common in the fall
and winter under oak, tanoak, and conifers; at higher elevations it fruits under conifers.
EDIBILITY: Edible (for most people) and choice, with caution. Make sure there is no
volva and that the mature gills are not white—I have seen it mix company with deadly
Amanitas that were very similar in size, shape, and color!
COMMENTS: Also spelled A. sylvicola, this species or species “complex” is recognized
by its white cap, tendency to stain or age yellow, anise odor (sometimes faint, but usually
detectable when the young flesh is crushed), skirtlike annulus (ring), chocolate-brown
spores, and woodland milieu. It rather closely resembles A. arvensis, but is usually more
erect and less robust, has smaller spores, and does not grow in grass. There are several
variants in need of critical study. The “typical” A. silvicola grows mainly under conifers,
at least in the West, but a large, very stately and striking variety (see photo) is fairly common
in our area under tanoak, while a form with an abruptly bulbous stem^zl. abruptibulbus)
occurs in California as well as in eastern North America. None of these forms stain as
dramatically as A. albolutescens, and they do not smell as strong nor are they as robust as
that species. Other species: A. chionodermus looks similar, but has bright pink to reddish
gills for a long time, a mild odor, and a white to silvery-white, often fibrillose cap. It grows
mainly under conifers and is edible and apparently widely distributed—I have seen it in
New Mexico. See also A. sequoiae (under A. pinyonensis), A. summensis (under A.
augustus), and A. albolutescens.
335
This squat fragrant Agaricus is common in the Sierra Nevada during the spring and early summer. It
appears to be a form of A. albolutescens.
thick), firm, white or discoloring yellowish, smooth above the ring, smooth or slightly
cottony-scaly below; flesh in base not usually bruising bright yellow, but exterior of base
may. VEIL membranous, white or yellow-stained, with patches on underside that some¬
times form a cogwheel pattern; rupturing to form an ample, superior, skirtlike ring on
stalk. SPORE PRINT chocolate-brown; spores 5-7 x 3.5-4.5 microns, elliptical, smooth.
Cap surface staining yellow in KOH.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or gregarious on ground in woods; known only from the
West. In our area it is quite common from late fall through early spring under oak(often
in the company of A. hondensis). In the Sierra Nevada a vernal variant occurs.
EDIBILITY: Delectably delicious, with a strong sweet flavor. As with most Agaricus
species, some people are adversely affected by it.
COMMENTS: This woodland species is reminiscent of A. silvicola, but is easily distin¬
guished by its squatter or more robust stature, much stronger odor, and amber-staining
cap. It also tends to occur in larger numbers than A. silvicola, at least in my experience.
(I have seen fairy rings containing nearly 100 specimens!) The rapid yellow-staining of the
cap can lead to confusion with the poisonous A. xanthodermus, which eventually discolors
brownish after staining yellow, smells like phenol, and stains bright yellow in the base of
the stalk. A. arvensis is also somewhat similar but usually grows in open, grassy places. In
the Sierra Nevada and other mountain ranges, what appears to be a variant of A. albo¬
lutescens is often common (especially in the spring). It has a fibrillose cap and its stem is
tougher and more cylindrical (less bulbous) than the coastal version, but it is otherwise
quite similar (see photograph above).
336
Agaricus subrufescens is a rare but remarkable species. The odor and flavor are strongly almondy, but
the stalk is not nearly as shaggy as that of A. augustus, and the cap is paler.
337
Agaricus augustus. Note the marshmallow-shaped caps of these unexpanded buttons. In this stage
they are delicious! See also Color Plate 79, photo on front cover, and photo on p. 311.
scales below (but these often wearing away in age); rather tough and fibrous. VEIL
membranous, with white to brown cottony patches on underside (but these sometimes
disappearing); forming a large, ample, superior, skirtlike ring on stalk. SPORE PRINT
chocolate-brown; spores 7.5-10 x 5-6 microns, elliptical, smooth. Cap surface staining
yellow in KOH.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups or clumps on ground in the woods (especially under
redwood), but usually near roads and paths, in clearings, and other places where the soil
has been disturbed; sometimes also in flower beds, composted areas, under trees in towns,
in arboretums, etc.; widely distributed, but frequent only along the Pacific Coast and
perhaps more common in our area than anywhere else. It shows a definite preference for
warm weather, fruiting in the spring, summer, and fall—or in the winter if it’s mild enough.
Several crops are produced each year, so visit your patches regularly. It is curious that such
a large mushroom requires so little moisture to fruit—a little fogdrip is all it needs!
EDIBILITY: Edible (for most people) and one of the very best! It’s especially significant
because it fruits in the spring and summer, when edible fungi are scarce in our area. It’s like
getting two mushrooms in one: delectably sweet and almondy when young, strong and
mushroomy at maturity. Unfortunately maggots, slugs, sowbugs, and centipedes are fond
of it too!
COMMENTS: This prince of a mushroom is distinguished by its large size—caps of “LP”
dimensions (one foot) are not uncommon—almond extract odor, yellow-staining cap with
brown fibrils or scales, prominent annulus (ring), chocolate-brown spores, and shaggy
stem (when young) which is usually buried in the ground. The veil is large and exquisitely
constructed, and the marshmallow shape of the young caps (i.e., somewhat flattened on
top) is also characteristic, though several other mushrooms (e.g., A. praeclaresquamosus,
Lepiota rachodes) hae the same shape. The gills remain whitish for a long time—falsely
suggesting that the spores are white—but eventually they will darken to brown and finally
chocolate-brown. The poisonous A. praeclaresquamosus is often common in the same
habitats, but has grayer cap fibrils, a smoother stem, and smells like phenol. A. hondensis
also has a smooth stem, while the edible A. perobscurus has darker cap fibrils when young, a
smoother stem, and subtler odor. Other species: A. smithii (also called A. perrarus) is a
338
AGARICUS 339
similar but somewhat smaller, more slender version with an ochraceous to ochraceous-
brown cap and almondy odor. It is common in northern California and the Pacific
Northwest under coastal conifers, particularly Sitka spruce. A pale form of A. augustus
also occurs, but is rare. It resembles the typical form but has pale yellow cap fibrils which
give the cap an overall creamy-white appearance. Somewhat similar to this pale form is A.
summensis—a large, robust species whose cap is whitish with yellowish to ochraceous-
ta wny fibrils. It has a thick, often bulbous stem(2.5 cm thick or more) and is rare. I have seen
it in our area under forest trees along roads. Finally, A. augustus has a smaller-spored look-
alike in eastern North America (see comments under A. subrufescens). All of the above
species are edible and delicious.
Left: Agaricus perobscurus is a smoother-stalked version of A. augustus. Note how cap is quite dark in
these young specimens. Right: Agaricus semotus (see comments under A. micromegathus on p. 340)
is a small woodland species with a distinct anise odor and pinkish to reddish to brownish cap fibrils.
340 AGARICACEAE
(less shaggy) stalk, and consistently smaller spores. In addition, the gills pass through a
more marked pinkish phase before turning brown, and the fibrils on the cap are much
darker when young(the fibrils may be quite sparse in age, however, giving the cap an overall
paler appearance). It is also likely to be mistaken for the poisonous A. praeclaresquamosus,
but that species has a totally smooth stalk, a phenol odor, often stains bright yellow in
the base of the stem, and is more common in habitats characteristic of A. augustus than
those favored by A. perobscurus.
Agaricus diminutivus group. Note small size, slender stature, and fragile veil that may or may not
form a distinct ring on the stalk.
EDIBILITY: Presumably edible, but too small to be of value and sometimes confused
species of Inocybe (e.g., I. pudica), most of which are poisonous.
COMMENTS: Members of this species “complex” are easily distinguished from other
Agaricus species by their petite size, reddish-pink to purplish cap color, and woodland
habitat. The form illustrated is the common one in our area. It has a beautiful amethyst-
tinged cap and seems to fit descriptions of A. purpurellus (a member of the A. diminuti¬
vus group) quite well. However, there are probably more names (e.g., A. dulcidulus, A.
amethystina) in this group than there are species, so a critical study is necessary before
any positive identifications can be made.
COPRINACEAE
THIS is a large family of fragile mushrooms with deep brown to black spores and a carti¬
laginous or fragile stem. The gills are not decurrentasin Gomphidiusand Chroogomphus,
and those species with dark brown spores do not normally have free gills and an annulus
(ring) on the stalk, as in Agaricus. The cap cuticle is cellular(composed of round or pear-
shaped cells) as opposed to filamentous as in the Strophariaceae, but since this distinction
is microscopic, it is better to learn the characteristics of each genus than attempt to distin¬
guish the two families in toto (for instance, Coprinus has gills that digest themselves, and
Panaeolus usually grows on dung or manure). As a rule, however, the fragile white to
brown species with a dry or only slightly tacky cap belong to the Coprinaceae, while those
with a viscid and/or brightly colored cap belong to the Strophariaceae. Both families
should be checked when in doubt. There are three common genera in the Coprinaceae,
keyed below.
341
342 COPRINACEAE
MEMBERS of this genus are called inky caps because the gills and often the cap digest
themselves at maturity, turning into an inky black fluid that drips to the ground. The auto¬
digestion or deliquescing of the gills plus the black spore print are the main diagnostic
features of Coprinus. In Bolbitius the gills sometimes liquefy but the spore print is rusty-
brown, while in Psathyrella and Panaeolus the spore print may be black but the gills do
not deliquesce.
The autodigestion process is a unique method of spore dispersal that should not be
confused with the normal process of decay that occurs in most mushrooms. Rather than
maturing at an even rate, the spores near the margin of the cap ripen first. Enzymes are
simultaneously released which dissolve the surrounding tissue, causing the edge of the cap
to spread out and curl back. This pulls the gills apart, enabling the spores to be discharged
into the air. If you look at the gills of a shaggy mane (Coprinus comatus), you’ll see that
they are crowded together like the pages of a book. If autodigestion did not occur, the
spores would be discharged onto adjoining gills and their dispersal would be greatly
impeded. Of course, many spores are trapped in the inky liquid that drips to the ground,
but millions more are successfully discharged into the air.
In the larger inky caps, both the cap and gills dissolve, leaving nothing but a few rags of
tissue stuck to the top of the stalk. This phenomenon was undoubtedly the inspiration for
Shelley’s memorable lines:
Their mass rotted off them flake by flake
Til the thick stalk stuck like a murderer’s stake,
Where rags of loose flesh yet tremble on high
Infecting the winds that wander by.
In the smaller species, such as C. plicatilis, an inky fluid is not necessarily formed. There
is so little substance to the gills that they wither instead of liquefying, and the cap may be so
thin that it is translucent-striate (the gills can be seen through it as radiating lines).
Inky caps frequent areas inhabited by livestock and human beings. They fruit whenever
it is moist and mild enough, and are among our most common urban and suburban
mushrooms. The smaller types are especially prevalent on dung and manure, while the
larger ones crop up in gardens, cellars, along roads, on or around stumps, in disturbed
soil, and humus. A few grow in the woods. As we alter the environment and create new
“niches,” we can expect new species to evolve. One winter, following three weeks of rain,
an unidentified Coprinus sprouted from the orlon carpet of my leaky ’67 Rolls Canardly
(it rolls down one hill and canardly make it up the next). My friends naturally assumed it
was the result of carrying around so many mushrooms in my car, yet it was a species I had
never seen before!
Several of the larger inky caps are good edibles, and the shaggy mane, C. comatus, is a
popular and unmistakable favorite. Most species, however, are much too thin and insub¬
stantial to warrant collecting. A few are said to be poisonous, and the common inky cap,
C. atramentarius, contains a compound which reacts with alcohol in the body to produce a
very peculiar set of symptoms (see p. 896). Coprinus species should be eaten before they
Autodigestion in Coprinus comatus. Left: The gills have just begun to blacken and liquefy at the
cap margin. Right: Dry weather has caused the autodigestion process to cease with a few rags of tissue
left. In wet weather it continues until only the stalk remains. (Rick Kerrigan)
deliquesce, and consequently should not be kept overnight. They are among the most easily
digestible of all fungi, but their high water content makes them unsuitable for some dishes.
As they frequently occur in large numbers, you may wish to preserve them for later use.
This is best effected by marinating, drying, or sauteeing and then freezing. The “ink” from
the fleshier species, incidentally, makes a very passable ink if diluted with a little water.
Coprinus is a large genus, with over 200 species known. It is a difficult group to study
because the fruiting bodies are so ephemeral (sometimes lasting only a few hours) and
because many species fruit where you don’t normally look for mushrooms. Consequently,
the North American species are not well known. As their favored habitats (dung, asphalt,
etc.) are ubiquitous, most inky caps are widely distributed and likely to occur in California.
The smaller ones are especially difficult to identify—even with the aid of a microscope. A
few distinctive and/ or common types are presented here.
Key to Coprinus
1. Growing on dung, manure, straw, or compost. 2
1. Growing on ground, wood chips, wood, or indoors . 9
2. Partial veil typically forming a distinct annulus (ring) on stalk . 3
2. Annulus absent or rudimentary . 5
3. Cap minute (usually less than 1 cm broad); annulus disclike or saucerlike, sometimes as large
as the cap; common on horse dung . C. ephemeroides, p.352
3. Not as above; fruiting body larger . 4
4. Cap 2-5 cm high when unexpanded, at first entirely white or white with brownish scales.
. C. sterquilinus & others (see C. comatus, p. 345)
4. Not as above . 9
5. Cap at first covered with white to buff or gray universal veil remnants (hairs, fibrils, or powdery
or flaky scales) . 6
5. Universal veil absent; cap hairless or with only a few minute hairs . 8
6. Cap white or pallid with white to pale gray powdery or mealy scales .
.C. niveus & others (see C. radiatus group, p. 351)
6. Not as above (but cap may be covered at first with white fibrils or hairs) . 7
343
344 COPRINACEAE
7. Cap minute (usually less than 8 mm high before expansion)' .C. radiatus group, p. 351
7. Cap usually larger than above .C.fimetarius & others (see C. lagopus group, p. 350)
8. Cap minute (1-5 mm high before expansion) .C. miser (see C. plicatilis, p. 352)
8. Cap small, but typically larger than above .C. ephemerus (see C. plicatilis, p. 352)
9. Cap cylindrical before expansion and 4-25 cm or more tall, usually at least somewhat shaggy,
entirely white or with a brown center and/ or brownish scales; partial veil present when young,
often forming a movable annulus (ring) that may drop off; cosmopolitan C. comatus, p. 345
9. Not as above . 10
10. Stalk tough and woody.(see Podaxales & Allies, p. 724)
10. Not as above . 11
11. Growing in deserts or arid regions, typically terrestrial (not on dung); cap usually with one or
more thick, feltlike, persistent patches of universal veil tissue; stalk sometimes with a volva
at the base . 12
11. Not as above . 14
12. Volval patch (veil tissue) on cap usually single and stellate (with starlike arms or points) . 13
12. Volval patch or patches irregular, not stellate; base of stalk bulbous with a volva-like rim . . .
.C. xerophilus
13. Stalk typically with a volva-like basal bulb . C. asterophora
13. Basal bulb and volva lacking or rudimentary, at least at maturity.C. asterophoroides
14. Gills with yellow edges; stalk with yellow hairs . C. sulphureus
14. Not as above . 15
15. Base of stalk or immediate vicinity with cinnamon to yellow-brown or yellow-orange mycelial
threads or a woolly mycelial mat (oozonium); growing on wood (often indoors) .
. C. radians (see C. micaceus, p. 348)
15. Not as above . 16
16. Cap typically 5 cm broad or more when expanded, dark brown (or becoming black) beneath a
layer of whitish universal veil tissue which breaks up into discrete patches or flakes or “spots”;
stalk fairly thick (usually 0.5-1.5 cm); terrestrial . C. picaceus, p. 346
16. Not as above (cap may have a coating of whitish hairs, but if so, then differently colored or stalk
thinner). 17
17. Cap at first clothed with white to grayish hairs (see Color Plate 86), gray to dark brown or black
beneath the hairs; stalk typically long, slender, fragile . . . C. lagopus group & others, p. 350
17. Not as above . 18
18. Cap with large flaky patches or flat scales which may wear off in age; growing in clusters (occa¬
sionally scattered) on dead hardwoods (but wood may be buried) in eastern North America
. C. quadrifidus, C. variegatus, & C. americanus (not good edibles—some variants are bitter)
18. Not as above . 19
19. Cap whitish except at center; partial veil usually forming a membranous ring on stalk; growing
on rotting wood . C. alnivorus (see C. comatus, p. 345)
19. Not as above . 20
20. Cap at first with a dense coating of white universal veil fibrils, whitish to pale tawny beneath the
fibrils or if darker then growing in ashes; stalk 3-10 mm thick C. domesticus & others, p. 349
20. Not as above; cap bald or With whitish particles, or if with whitish fibrils then usually darker
or brighter than above (beneath the fibrils) and not found in ashes; stalk thin or thick . . 21
21. Stalk typically 6 mm thick or more; cap 2-8 cm broad and/ or high, brown to grayish .
.C. atramentarius, p. 347
21. Stalk typically 1-6 mm thick; cap up to 5 cm broad or high, but if larger than 3 cm then typically
buff to yellow-brown or reddish-brown when fresh . 22
22. Cap conspicuously pleated in age (see Color Plate 87) and often expanding to plane; usually
growing scattered or at least not in clumps. C. plicatilis, p. 352
22. Not as above; often in clumps or clusters . 23
23. Stalk typically 3-8 cm long and 2-6 mm thick .C. micaceus & others, p. 348
23. Stalk typically 1-4 cm long and 1-2 mm thick . 24
24. Gills crowded .C. impatiens (see C. disseminatus, p. 352)
24. Gills well-spaced or fairly close but not crowded .C. disseminatus, p. 352
Shaggy manes in egg batter and bread crumbs, anyone? This beautiful cluster of Coprinus comatus
is at the perfect stage for eating. How do they taste? See photo on p. 890 for the answer.
345
346 COPRINACEAE
succulent as in octopus. For a delicious snack, slice them in half and dip them in egg batter
and bread crumbs (or flour), then saute them briefly and serve hot! Use only young caps—
darkened ones are mostly water—and don’t pick more than you can eat in two meals unless
you plan to preserve them, for they will deliquesce quickly. In rare instances they may
react with alcohol in the body to produce effects similar to those of C. atramentarius.
However, I have cooked them in wine many times with no ill effects.
COMMENTS: Shaggy manes are the soldiers among mushrooms, the sentinels of the
roads. Their tall, shaggy cylindrical heads are distinctive even in silhouette, and when inky
individuals are found in the vicinity of young ones, there can be no doubt as to their identity.
The poisonous Chlorophyllum molybdites can be similar when young, but expands in age
and doesn’t deliquesce. Podaxispistillaris is quite similar in shape and color, but lacks gills.
“Shags” are as pleasing to the eye as to the palate, especially in the delicate reddish tints the
gills assume as they mature. “Shags” also possess a special spontaneity—seemingly
popping up overnight after a rain, while most mushrooms fruit several days after. Extreme
aridity may arrest development so that the spores never mature and the gills remain white,
or the gills blacken and then shrivel up rather than deliquescing. Several forms and varieties
of the shaggy mane have been described, including a small, oval one only 5-6 cm high. The
height of the larger forms seems to depend partially on the depth of the humus they must
transcend—I have found specimens in redwood duff by a road that were two feet tall—but
the “normal” height is 6-20 cm. Other species: C. colosseus is a giant version of the shaggy
mane with stalk 35-50 cm long and spores 17-20 microns long; it has been described from
Washington by Fred Van De Bogart, but is rare. Several small (cap less than 5 cm high)
versions of the shaggy mane also occur, including: C. palmer anus, terrestrial; C. alnivorus,
wood-inhabiting; C. sterquilinus and C. umbrinus, on dung or compost piles, the former
with large spores and the latter with a brownish stem base; and C. spadiceisporus, on the
dung of wild animals (rabbit, deer, etc.). All of these have the ring (annulus) characteristic
of the shaggy mane and are too small and rare to be worth eating.
Coprinus atramentarius usually grows in groups, tufts, or clusters. Left: These specimens have
rounded smooth caps. Right: A large scaly-capped cluster.
348 COPRINACEAE
COMMENTS: The lead-gray to brownish, bell-shaped caps of this species are a familiar
sight in vacant lots and gardens. Several varieties occur, including one with a pointed or
umbonate cap (var. acuminatus) and one with a copious universal veil. The typical variety,
however, has a non-umbonate cap and only slight universal veil remnants on the cap (if
any). The young unexpanded buttons provide an unexpected visual treat when sliced open
lengthwise, but true to their name, they turn into an unsightly inky black mess as they
mature, suitable for writing but not biting. The inky cap sometimes rivals the shaggy mane
in size and abundance and may even mix company. I have seen gigantic 10-lb. clusters
fruiting from an old cut stump in a field, but it does not necessarily grow in clumps. Other
species. C. insignis (-C. alopecia) of eastern North America is a similar species with rough
spores. It grows on hardwood stumps, especially maple, and is poisonous to some people.
349
Left: Coprinus domesticus, immature specimens. Cap is grayish-buff to whitish and conspicuously
striate. Right: An unidentified charcoal-loving Coprinus (see comments under C. domesticus).
Note striations and prominent universal veil remnants on cap.
350
COPRINUS 351
center and translucent at maturity. Flesh very thin, soft. GILLS adnate to adnexed or
appearing free, fairly well-spaced, at first white but soon gray, finally black or slightly
paler; not deliquescing. ST ALK 1.5-4 cm long, 1 -2 mm thick, equal, white or buff, hollow,
fragile, smooth, often curved. PARTIAL VEIL absent. SPORE PRINT dark brown to
black; spores 7-10 * 4-5 microns, elliptical, smooth, with a large apical germ pore.
HABITAT: Densely gregarious (sometimes hundreds) on or near decayed wood and
debris, or on buried wood; usually found in woods or grassy areas, widely distributed.
It fruits throughout the mushroom season in our area, but is not particularly common.
In eastern North America it is often abundant.
EDIBILITY: Too small to be of any value.
COMMENTS: This dainty little fungus grows in troops that do indeed resemble “little
helmets” or “fairy bonnets.” Because the gills do not deliquesce, the “splitters” have
rewarded it with the name Pseudocoprinus disseminatus. It has the general aspect of C.
micaceus, but is much smaller. The translucent, pleated cap separates it from Psathyrella,
(to which it has also been assigned); it is also reminiscent of Mycena, but the spore print is
black or nearly black, not white. Other species: C. impatiens is a similar but slightly larger
species with crowded, at least somewhat deliquescent gills; it usually occurs in smaller
groups of up to one dozen individuals.
PANAEOLUS
Small to medium-sized, fragile, dung- or grass-inhabiting mushrooms. CAP usually bell-shaped or
conical when young (but sometimes convex). GILLS typically attached, gray to deep brown to black
when mature; sides (faces) often mottled. STALK typically thin, brittle or fragile. VEIL present or
absent, but not usually forming an annulus (ring). VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT typically
black (but dark brown in P. foenisecii). Spores mostly elliptical, with a germ pore; retaining their
color in concentrated sulfuric acid. Cap cuticle cellular.
THIS is a small genus of little brown mushrooms (“LBM’s”) with a bell-shaped to conical
cap and thin, brittle stalk. The sides (faces) of the gills often have a mottled appearance
(see photograph on p. 356) due to uneven maturation of the spores, but they do not deli¬
quesce as in Coprinus. Psathyrellas are similar but do not typically grow in dung, and those
that grow in grass tend to have a convex cap and/or dark brown spores. Psilocybe and
Conocybe are common in dung, but do not have black spores.
353
354 COPRINACEAE
Panaeolus is abundant in pastures, lawns, dung, and manure heaps, fruiting whenever
it’s moist. It often mixes company with other nondescript“LBM’s”(Co/7ocy6e, Agrocybe,
Stropharia, etc.), and would rapidly be relegated to the ranks of fungal forgetability were
it not for the fact that some of its members contain traces of psilocybin and other pupil-
dilating (the term “mind-expanding” being open to debate) compounds. However, in their
search for a more promising and less painful reality, people will stoop to anything, even if
it grows on cow patties and is only two inches tall. Thus, after every rain, our pastures are
marred by hordes of “magic mushroom” hunters, inevitable plastic bags in hand.
Actually, there is considerable confusion as to which species are pupil-dilating. Traces
of psilocybin have been isolated in virtually every species, but its presence and concentra¬
tion is contingent upon a number of genetic, geographic, and environmental factors. My
own experience with the P. campanulatus-P. sphinctrinus complex indicates that a sizable
amount may produce mild hilarity, or even a transitory state of pseudoerotic effervescence.
More often, however, it will produce a queasy stomach and if gulped down too eagerly,
hiccups. It hardly seems worth the effort to harvest and digest the necessary number of
fungal fructifications (30-50), but some people will do anything to “alter” reality, and it can
be argued, I suppose, that doing anything is better than doing nothing.
Indiscriminate sampling of “LBM’s” is foolish, of course, since some are poisonous, so
care must be taken to identify your Panaeolus correctly. Six species are described here.
Key to Panaeolus
1. Cap andlor stalk staining blue to blue-green when bruised or in age . 2
1. Not as above . 3
2. Fruiting body staining blue to blue-green only at base of stalk (or mycelium) and only faintly;
common in temperate regions . P. subbalteatus group, p. 358
2. Fruiting body staining blue to blue-green in most parts (cap, stalk, flesh); largely tropical and
subtropical .P. cyanescens & others, p. 358
3. Cap striate or pleated and/ or very tiny (less than 5 mm broad or high) . (see Coprinus, p. 342)
3. Not as above . 4
4. Partial veil present (covering the gills when young), either forming an annulus (ring) or fibrillose
zone on stalk or leaving toothlike remnants on cap margin . 5
4. Veil absent (check several specimens in different stages if possible) . 7
5. Veil usually forming a distinct annulus on stalk; cap pale (white to buff or pale tan), often viscid
when moist .P. semiovatus, p. 355
5. Veil typically leaving remnants on cap margin (but stalk sometimes with a black ring of spore
dust); cap usually darker than above, not viscid . 6
6. Cap reticulate (netted) or coarsely wrinkled (see photo at bottom of p. 357) .
.P. retirugis (see P. campanulatus group, p. 356)
6. Not as above .P. campanulatus group, p. 356
7. Mature gills and spore print dark brown; growing in grass but not on dung P.foenisecii, p. 360
7. Mature gills and spore print black (gills may be brown when young); in dung, grass, etc. . . 8
8. Cap whitish to buff or dingy yellowish when fresh, 4-10 cm broad; stalk solid, usually at least
4 mm thick . P. solidipes, p. 355
8. Not as above (but cap may fade to whitish as it dries out) . 9
9. Fruiting body very small; stalk whitish or nearly translucent; on dung (seePsathyrella, p. 361)
9. Not as above; common . 10
10. Cap typically bell-shaped or conical, even at maturity .
. P. acuminatus & others (see P. campanulatus group, p. 356)
10. Cap typically convex to plane, at least in age . 11
11. Gills brown before becoming black; cap often with a darker marginal band as it begins to dry
out; often but not always growing in small clusters; common P. subbalteatus group, p. 358
11. Not as above; not common .P.fimicola (see P. campanulatus group, p. 356)
PANAEOLUS 355
COMMENTS: The gray to brown, more or less bell-shaped cap, long thin brittle stalk,
mottled gray to black gills, and toothlike veil remnants on the margin of the cap when
young are characteristic of a closely-knit group of dung-lovers: P. campanulatus,
356
Panaeolus campanulatus group. Conical to bell-shaped cap, black gills, long brittle stalk, and growth
on or near dung typify this common species.
P. sphinctrinus, and P. papilionaceus. Since even the experts cannot agree on the exact
differences (if any) between them, it would be presumptuous to attempt to differentiate
them here. At any rate, they are among our most common cow patty (“meadow muffin”)
mushrooms, along with Psilocybe coprophila and Stropharia semiglobata. The stalk is so
fragile that it is difficult to bring home a specimen in one piece. Similar species include: P.
retirugis, a smaller species with an often conspicuously veined or reticulate cap (see photo¬
graph),.also found in our area, but not nearly as common and seemingly partial to horse
dung; the P. acuminatus-P. rickenii group, with a conical to bell-shaped cap and no veil
(check young specimens!); and P. fimicola, which also lacks a veil, but has a more convex
or hemispherical (domed) cap. None of these are worth eating.
Two common inhabitants of horse dung. Left: Panaeolus retirugis (see comments above) is easily
distinguished by its wrinkled or netted (reticulate) cap. Right: Panaeolussemiovatus (-P. separatus)
has a smooth, pale cap and a veil that usually forms a distinct annulus (ring) on the stalk (see de¬
scription on p. 355).
358 COPRINACEAE
Panaeolus subbalteatus group growing on a lawn fertilized with horse manure. The cap is convex
to plane or wavy rather than conical, and usually develops a dark marginal band (as shown at left)
when it begins to lose moisture.
Panaeolus subbalteatus group. Note clustered growth habit, relatively thick stem (for a Panaeolus),
and convex cap. These were growing in a garden fertilized with compost from a mushroom farm.
broad, at first pale watery brown or reddish-brown, darkening gradually to black; edges
whitish, faces usually mottled in age. STALK 4-10 cm long, (1) 3-6(10) mm thick, equal or
tapered at either end, hollow but not fragile, brown to reddish-brown, but often appearing
whitish from a fine powder, or dusted gray by spores; apex often paler; usually longitudi¬
nally striate throughout; base (and mycelium) occasionally staining faintly bluish when
bruised. VEIL absent. SPORE PRINT black; spores 10-14 * 7-9 microns, elliptical,
smooth.
360
361
PSATHYRELLA
Small to medium-sized mushrooms found mostly on wood or in humus. CAP conical to convex or
plane, often hygrophanous, not usually viscid, typically some shade of brown, buff, or gray. Flesh
markedly fragile. GILLS typically dark brown to black at maturity, usually attached but not de¬
current. STALK usually slender, fragile, and white or pallid. VEIL absent or present, usually not
forming an annulus (ring) on stalk. VOL VA absent. SPORE PRINT deep brown to purple-brown
or blackish, or rarely reddish. Spores smooth or rough, with a germ pore; discoloring in concen¬
trated sulfuric acid. Cap cuticle cellular.
FEW fleshy fungi have less to offer the average mushroom hunter—not to mention the
average human being—than the Psathyrellas. They constitute an immense, monotonous,
and metagrobolizing multitude of dull whitish, buff, grayish, or brownish mushrooms with
a fragile stem, fragile flesh, and purple-brown to blackish spores. Psathyrellas are so
nondescript and unassuming that it’s much easier to define what they are not than what they
are: their gills d o not deliquesce as in Coprinus, their flesh never bruises blue as in Psilocybe,
their cap is not colorful as in Stropharia and Naematoloma, and only rarely is it viscid; and
they don’t grow in dung like Panaeolus. Some Psathyrellas are quite attractive, however,
and all have their indispensable “roles” to fulfill.
Psathyrellas are largely wood inhabitors, but often appear terrestrial because they feed
on wood in the final stages of decay, after all the other wood-lovers have had their fill.
Some species, such as P. candolleana, are ubiquitous, but most favor damp, shady situa¬
tions, especially along trails or streambeds. In California, a very good place to look for
them is in stands of willow and alder, and a very good time to look for them is in the late fall
or early winter, but I can’t think of a very good reason to look for them.
Psathyrellas are listed in older books under several different genera, including Psathyra
and Hypholoma. Several are edible, but most have not been tested and few are fleshy or
distinctive enough to warrant collecting. Alexander Smith has authored an abstruse
monograph in which he describes more than 400 North American species. Most of them
can only be identified if one has a microscope plus a special fondness for esoteric under¬
takings. My advice is to leave the Psathyrellas to professional psathyrellologists, who
are paid to wrestle with such matters. A mere seven species are described here.
Key to Psathyrella
l. Growing either in sand dunes or on burnt ground or burnt debris or on other mushrooms . 2
1. Not as above; growing in grass, humus, wood chips, on wood, dung, etc.5
2. Growing on shaggy manes (Coprinus comatusf northern in distribution .P. epimyces
2. Not as above . 3
3. Growing in sand dunes or sand, often barely poking above ground . P. ammophila & others
3. Growing on burnt ground or debris . 4
4. Cap with whitish fibrils when young (but these soon wearing away) . . . P. carbonicola, p. 366
4. Not as above . 5
5. Stalk usually with a membranous, well-defined ring (annulus) after veil breaks .
.P. longistriata & others, p. 362
5. Not as above; ring absent or fibrillose and evanescent . 6
6. Cap (2) 5-10 cm broad and distinctly fibrillose or fibrillose-scaly, at least when young, yellow-
brown to rusty-brown or sometimes dark brown to blackish-brown; stalk typically at least
5 mm thick .P. velutina & others, p. 366
6. Not as above . 7
7. Cap distinctly striate or pleated nearly to the center; usually growing in groups or clusters . . .
.(see Coprinus, p. 342)
7. Not as above; if growing in clusters then not striate or striate only near margin when moist 8
8. Clustered on ground or wood chips, each cluster arising from a buried “tap root”; stalks usually
at least twice as long as widths of caps .P. multipedata (see P. hydrophila, p. 364)
8. Not as above . 9
362 COPRINACEAE
Left: Psathyrella uliginicola or a similar species (see couplet #13 on p. 362) occurs under oak in Cali¬
fornia; it is unusually robust for a Psathyrella, with a convex to plane cap that is striate in old age.
Right: A cluster of Psathyrella candolleana with clearly visible universal veil remnants. (Greg Wright)
Psathyrella hydrophila commonly grows in clusters on wood. Left: A large clump growing from an
old (buried) stump. Right: Close-up showing the white stalk, dark gills, and fragile veil remnants
on margin of cap.
364
Left: Psathyrella longipes group, mature specimens. Note relatively large size (fora Psathyrella) and
widely spaced veil fragments on margin of cap. Right: Psathyrella gracilis, or one of its numerous
look-alikes. Note hygrophanous bell-shaped cap and long, slender, fragile stem.
somewhat membranous, but soon disappearing except for remnants on margin of cap.
SPORE PRINT deep brown to blackish; spores 10-15 x 6.5-9 microns, elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in small groups on ground or debris in woods; found
mostly in the West. Fairly common in our area from fall through early spring, under both
hardwoods and conifers.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: The broadly conical to bell-shaped cap, long white fragile stalk, small veil
remnants on the cap margin, relatively large size (for a Psathyrella), and dark brown to
almost black spores are characteristic, but there is a multiplicity of Psathyrella look-alikes
that are best identified with a microscope. In the “true” P. longipes, the spores are slightly
flattened in end view; in the very similar but more common P. elwhaensis, they are not.
Other species include: P. atrofolia, widely distributed and common, cap honey-brown
fading to buff, with veil remnants on the margin (but not widely spaced or toothlike) and
spores 8-10 microns long; P. subnuda, slightly larger, with a more cinnamon-colored
convex cap when moist and practically no veil; andP. conopilea, with a reddish-brown to
orange-brown conical cap that fades to buff, and spores 14-18 microns long, especially
common in southern California under oaks and in gardens, but widely distributed. All of
the above species tend to grow scattered to gregarious on the ground or in lignin-rich
humus, rather than in clusters on wood. They do not grow in dung or manure like
Panaeolus. See also P. gracilis, which lacks a veil.
Psathyrella velutina
CAP (2) 5-10 cm broad, obtuse to convex or broadly umbonate, becoming nearly plane;
surface dry, densely fibrillose or fibrillose-scaly but sometimes nearly smooth in age; dull
yellow-brown to tawny to rusty-brown or sometimes darker brown; margin often paler,
splitting in age, and hung with veil remnants. Flesh rather thick, brownish to ochre. GILLS
crowded, adnate to notched or seceding, pale yellowish becoming light brown to rusty-
brown, finally deep brown as spores mature; faces usually mottled in age, edges white and
sometimes beaded with droplets. STALK 5-15 cm long, (0.3) 0.5-1.5 (2) cm thick, equal or
swollen at base, fibrillose or scaly, dry, whitish above, light brown to dingy tawny or ochre
below. VEIL fibrillose-cottony, usually forming an obscure superior hairy or cottony ring
or zone on stalk which is darkened by spores. SPORE PRINT blackish-brown; spores
8-12 * 5-8 microns, elliptical, minutely roughened, with a prominent snoutlike germ pore.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups or small clusters in grassy places, roadsides, around
sawdust and compost piles, on gravelly ground, or sometimes in the woods; widely dis¬
tributed, but infrequent in our area. I have found it in the fall and spring.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but not recommended.
COMMENTS: Also known as Lacrymaria velutina, this species is unusually large and
sturdy for a Psathyrella, and is likely to be looked for in another genus. The fibrillose to
fibrillose-scaly cap and stalk, obscure hairy annulus (ring), and blackish-brown spores
are distinctive. P. lacrymabunda is often listed as a synonym, but has smooth spores
according to Smith. Both species are sometimes placed in a separate genus, Lacrymaria.
Other species: P. maculata is somewhat smaller, has blackish- to grayish-brown fibrillose
patches on the cap, and grows in clumps on alder in the Pacific Northwest. Also see
P. uliginicola (couplet #13 of the key) and P. carbonicola.
367
oj
STROPHARIACEAE
THIS is a fairly common family of saprophytic mushrooms with brown to purple-brown
to purple-black spores and attached gills. A veil is usually present, but does not necessarily
form an annulus (ring) on the stalk. The gills are not normally decurrent as in Gomphidius
and Chroogomphus, nor are they usually free as in Agaricus, nor do they deliquesce as in
Coprinus. The small, fragile species resemble Psathyrella and Panaeolus, but tend to have a
viscid and/ or brightly colored cap. (For a comparison of the brown-spored species with
genera in the Cortinariaceae, see comments under the genus Pholiota.) The mushrooms in
this family also share several anatomical (microscopic) characteristics: the cap cuticle is
usually filamentous rather than cellular (see p. 19), the spores are smooth and often have a
germ pore, and the gills frequently feature special sterile cells (chrysocystidia) which have a
highly refractive golden content when mounted in potassium hydroxide (KOH).
Four genera are recognized here, all of which intergrade to some extent: Pholiota has dull
brown to rusty-brown spores and is consequently placed in the Cortinariaceae by some
mycologists; Stropharia, Psilocybe, and Naematoloma have deep brown to purplish
or black spores, and are sometimes lumped together (by the “lumpers,” of course) in a single
giant genus, Psilocybe. The latter three genera are differentiated largely on microscopic
characteristics such as the presence or absence of chrysocystidia, but can usually be told in
the field by the combination of characteristics outlined in the key.
This is not an important family from a gastronomic standpoint. However, it is the most
significant group for “magic mushroom” hunters, because Psilocybe is the principal genus
of hallucinogenic or “pupil-dilating” mushrooms. The active principles are psilocybin
and psilocin (see p. 895 for details, and also read comments on pp. 31-32).
PSILOCYBE
Small to medium-sized, saprophytic mushrooms found in a variety of habitats. CAP smooth, with
a viscid (when moist), often separable pellicle (skin); usually some shade of brown, gray,
yellow-brown, or buff GILLS typically attached, dark at maturity. STALK usually slender, often
turning blue or green when handled. VEIL often present, but not usually forming a distinct annulus
(ring) on stalk (except P. cubensis). VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT purple-gray to purple-brown
to nearly black. Spores mostly elliptical, smooth, with a germ pore. Chrysocystidia typically absent
on the gills. Cap cuticle filamentous.
seen people mistake the staining reactions of other mushrooms (for instance, the black¬
ening of the flesh in Hygrocybe conica) for the blueing reaction in Psilocybe. All the more
reason to develop a systematic knowledge of mushrooms’ habits and characteristics
before venturing into the realm of the “LBM’s.”
Psilocybe is a fairly large and difficult genus. Only a few species are “pupil-dilating,”
and those that aren’t are too small or too rare to be of food value. Five species are
described here and several others are keyed out.
Key to Psilocybe
1. Some part of fruiting body aging or bruising blue to green (check cap, veil, stalk base, flesh) 2
1. Not aging or bruising blue or green . 8
2. Fruiting in warm, muggy weather; mainly tropical and subtropical . 3
2. Fruiting in cool or cold weather; mainly temperate. 4
3. Growing on or near dung or manure; cap whitish to yellowish or yellow-brown .
.P. cubensis, p. 373
3. Not as above .P. caerulescens & others (see P. cubensis, p. 373)
4. Cap narrowly conical to bell-shaped and not expanding much, usually less than 2.5 cm broad;
veil absent or rudimentary . 5
4. Not as above; cap usually expanding, at least in age; veil present, at least when young .... 6
5. Growing mostly in grass .P. semilanceata, p. 370
5. Growing mostly under conifers .P. pelliculosa & others (see P. semilanceata, p. 370)
6. Growing on hardwood logs and debris in eastern North America; blueing only very slowly when
bruised .P. caerulipes {see P. stuntzii, p. 372)
6. Not as above; found mainly on west coast . 7
7. Most parts of fruiting body staining distinctly blue to blue-green when bruised; veil usually
disappearing or forming only a very slight ring on stalk .P. cyanescens & others, p. 371
7. Fruiting body blueing only slightly if at all; veil often forming a distinct (but small and fragile)
ring on stalk that is sometimes greenish- or bluish-tinged . P. stuntzii, p. 372
8. Growing on dung or manure . 9
8. Not as above (but may grow in grass) . 10
9. Veil absent or rudimentary.P. coprophila & others, p. 370
9. Veil present, often forming a slight fibrillose ring on stalk P. merdaria(see P. coprophila, p. 370)
10. Cap convex to plane, 1.5-4 cm broad, dark reddish-brown to brown (but often paler toward
margin or fading overall in age to pale tan); stalk 2-4 mm thick, usually with white mycelium
at base; typically growing in dense groups or clusters on lawns or in other disturbed areas . .
.P. castanella (-P. californica)
10. Not as above; cap differently shaped and/or habitat or color different . 11
11. Veil present, usually forming a small annulus (ring) on stalk . P. stuntzii, p. 372
11. Not as above; veil absent or if present, usually disappearing . 12
12. Cap typically conical or bell-shaped and scarcely expanding; usually growing in grassy areas
.P. semilanceata, p. 370
12. Cap differently shaped and/or growing in moss or wet places . 13
13. Growing in woods or grass in eastern North America (especially the South); cap dark brown to
rusty-brown, fading to ochre or yellow-brown, bell-shaped to convex .
.(set Naematoloma ericaeum under N. dispersum, p. 384)
13. Not as above . 14
14. Cap tawny to dull orange-brown; base of stalk with hairs; found in wet areas, especially common
in the Pacific Northwest .P. (-Galerina) corneipes
14. Not as above . 15
15. Growing in swamps or bogs; stalk very long (5 cm or more) and thin; cap reddish-brown to
blackish-brown .P. atrobrunnea
15. Growing in moss; stalk usually less than 6 cm long; cap dark reddish-brown to tawny or yellow-
brown .P. montana
Psilocybe coprophila is the most common and widespread member of its genus. Note small size and
growth on dung. Cap is brown to red- or orange-brown and viscid when moist.
370
PSILOCYBE 371
curved or sinuous, pliant, whitish or with brownish base, sometimes with a bluish or blue-
green tinge in age, especially at base. VEIL absent or rudimentary. SPORE PRINT purple-
brown; spores 11-14 * 7-9 microns, elliptical, smooth. Chrysocystidia absent on gills.
HABITAT: Widely scattered to gregarious in pastures, tall grass, etc., but not on dung;
widely distributed. It is especially common west of the Cascades from northern California
to British Columbia. It fruits from late summer through early winter or sometimes in the
spring. I have not found it in our area.
EDIBILITY: Hallucinogenic (see p. 895), and often gathered for recreational use despite
its small size. It is not as potent as P. cyanescens, but is much stronger than P. pelliculosa.
COMMENTS: The liberty cap is one of the most distinctive “pupil-dilating” Psilocybes.
The sharply conical or “peaked” cap, dark spore print, small size, and growth in grass
(often tall) make it distinct. The flesh and stalk bruise blue only slightly, if at all, but may age
olive or slightly bluish. Another “liberty cap,” P. pelliculosa, is often mistaken for P. semi-
lanceata. It is common under conifers in the Pacific Northwest and northern California.
In addition to its different habitat, it is not quite as conical and has a more pronounced
tendency to bruise or age blue-green. It is only mildly hallucinogenic, with 20-40 caps
constituting an “average” dose. A third species, P. silvatica, has spores less than 10 microns
long; it also grows under conifers and occurs across the northern half of the continent.
There are also a number of small to minute, more or less conical, brown orgray Psilocybes
(e.g., P. montana) that do not contain psilocybin. They grow mostly in bogs or in beds of
moss and are very difficult to distinguish (see key to Psilocybe). All of the species discussed
above, including the liberty cap, resemble Panaeolus species, but have a viscid pellicle
(skin) that peels easily from the cap, slightly paler spores, and do not grow in dung.
HABITAT: Widely scattered to densely gregarious on wood chips, sawdust, mulch, and
humus, and on lawns rich in lignin; partial to coniferous debris, but also fond of alder
and eucalyptus. It is fairly common in the San Francisco Bay area in cold weather
(December-February), especially in landscaped areas and mulched flower beds, and is
also fairly common in Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia. It is easily cultivated,
and its aggressive mycelium responds readily to transplanting—given the proper
conditions.
EDIBILITY: Hallucinogenic (see p. 895) and extremely potent, especially raw. Along with
P. baeocystis and P. strictipes (see comments), it is the most powerful known hallucino¬
genic mushroom in the north temperate zone. Only one or two caps are needed to induce
marked changes in perception and sensation. Psilocin is primarily responsible, with
psilocybin and possibly other compounds contributing to the effects. Together they are
said to constitute 0.6% of the mushroom on a dry weight basis—substantially more than the
372 STROPHARIACEAE
better known P. cubensis. A six-year-old Washington boy died after ingesting an unknown
quantity of P. baeocystis along with other unidentified mushrooms. However, effects on
adults other than those typical of psilocybin- and psilocin-ingestion have not been
reported.
COMMENTS: The dark spores, viscid caramel-brown cap that fades as it dries, evanescent
veil, and blueing of the stalk and flesh are the fallible fieldmarks of this potent Psilocybe.
There are two very similar, closely-related, equally potent species on the west coast: P.
baeocystis, with a less copious veil and more conical cap that is usually olive-brown when
young; and P. strictipes, with a long, slender stalk (10-13 cm long, 2-3 mm thick). They may
well occur in California, but earlier reports of P. baeocystis from San Francisco were
apparently based on P. cyanescens. Spore prints should be taken to distinguish all three of
these species from deadly Galerinas and other “LBM’s.”
Psilocybe stuntzii growing in a flower pot mulched with fir bark. Note the annulus (ring) on stalk
and the viscid cap (at least when moist). The white globules are fertilizer pellets.
PSILOCYBE 373
the University of Washington campus in Seattle more than a decade ago helped spur the
“magic mushroom” craze that subsequently swept the Pacific Northwest.) In our area I
have found it in mulched flower pots.
EDIBILITY: Weakly hallucinogenic (see p. 895), but popular with “magic mushroom”
hunters because it often fruits in large numbers. Be sure not to confuse it with deadly
Galerina species, which can look quite similar, but have rusty-brown spores—they will
even grow intermixed with P. stuntzii!
COMMENTS: Like the liberty cap (P. semilanceata), this “LBM” contains psilocybin,
but bruises blue only weakly if at all. However, the dark spore print and ring on the stalk
plus the viscid cap when moist are distinctive. It is named after the late, great Dr. Daniel
Stuntz of the University of Washington, who was the first person to collect it—or more
precisely, the first to collect specimens for the herbarium rather than for consumption!
The common name, which was coined by Gary Lincoff, is apparently a reference to the
tendency of the stalk or “leg” to stain bluish, though it often won’t stain. Other species: P.
caerulipes of eastern North America also blues only slightly if at all; it has a more or less
evanescent veil and grows on hardwood logs and debris. Like P. stuntzii, it is weakly
hallucinogenic.
COMMENTS: This is the largest, handsomest, and best known of all the “psilocybin”
mushrooms. The brownish to yellow or pallid cap, membranous ring on the stem, and
tendency to bruise blue are the main fieldmarks—plus its growth in fields, usually on cow
patties. It resembles the yellow-capped Stropharias (e.g., S. semiglobata) so closely that
it is called Stropharia cubensis by many mycologists. The Stropharias, however, do not
stain blue. In shape it resembles Agrocybe praecox, but the spore print is darker, and it
has a decidedly different “aura”—or so I’m told by at least one certified fruitcake! Other
species. The “Landslide Mushroom,”/5, caerulescens, is another common, blue-staining,
hallucinogenic species that occurs along the Gulf Coast as well as in Mexico. It has an
evanescent veil, bitter taste, and an olive-black cap when young that may become redder
(e.g., reddish-brown) in age. As its name implies, it grows in recent landslides, as wellas on
sugar cane mulch and other debris. P. tampanensis, discovered in Florida, is a slender¬
stemmed hallucinogenic species that forms 1-2” underground “tubers.”
STROPHARIA
Small to medium-sized, saprophytic mushrooms. CAP usually viscid when moist and often brightly
colored; typically convex to plane or umbonate. GILLS typically attached, dark brown to gray,
purple-gray, or black at maturity. STALK often fleshy, but sometimes slender; central. VEIL
present, usually forming an annulus (ring) on stalk. VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT deep brown
to purple-brown, purple-black, or black. Spores typically elliptical and smooth, with a germ pore.
Chrysocystidia usually present on gills. Cap cuticle filamentous. Acanthocytes usually present in
mycelium.
374
STROPHARIA 375
browner (never purple-brown) spore print and dry to only slightly viscid cap. Stropharia
intergrades to some extent with Psilocybe, but in the latter (as defined here) either the stalk
bruises bluish-green or the veil does not form an annulus or the cap is brownish to buff.
Most Stropharia species are found in humus, grass, or dung, but a few grow on decayed
wood or wood chips. Woodland species can be mistaken for Naematoloma, but as a rule
they rarely grow in the clusters typical of that genus, and their veil is more persistent.
Many Stropharias are attractive, but only the large and distinctive S. rugoso-annulata
is commonly eaten. Some species may actually be poisonous, though there are conflicting
opinions on this point. Seven representatives of the genus are described here.
Key to Stropharia
1. Cap brick-red to reddish to orange and small (typically less than 6 cm broad) .
. (see Naematoloma aurantiaca Sc others, p. 382)
1. Differently colored and/or larger . 2
2. Cap and/or stalk blue to green when fresh (or partially so), but often fading or developing
yellowish tones in age .S. aeruginosa Sc others, p. 380
2. Not as above . 3
3. Growing in dung, manure, grass, compost, or mulched or landscaped areas . 4
3. Not as above; usually growing in woods . 9
4. Veil membranous, usually forming an annulus (ring) that is often striate or grooved (on upper
surface); stalk generally 1-2 cm thick or if thinner then usually rather short . 5
4. Not as above; stalk usually at least 5 cm long and slender . 7
5. Cap 4-15 cm or more broad, wine-red to reddish-brown to tan, yellow-brown, or even grayish-
brown; stalk at least 1 cm thick .S. rugoso-annulata, p. 378
5. Not as above; usually smaller and more slender; cap white to yellowish or yellow-brown . . 6
6. Cap white or tinged yellowish to ochre at center . . S. melanosperma (see S. coronilla, p. 377)
6. Cap golden-brown to yellowish or creamy ..S. coronilla, p. 377
7. Stalk viscid or slimy below the veil, at least when moist .S. semiglobata Sc others, p. 376
7. Stalk not viscid . 8
8. Cap smooth (without scales) and white to yellowish when fresh, and usually less than 6 cm broad;
stalk neither cottony nor scaly .S. umbonatescens Sc others (see S. semiglobata, p. 376)
8. Not as above . 9
9. Cap scaly or fibrillose and not viscid; stalk thick (at least 1 cm) and scaly below the ring
(annulus) . S. kauffmanii, p. 380
9. Not as above . 10
10. Cap small (less than 5 cm broad), without scales, chestnut-brown to olive-brown or olive-gray
when moist, sometimes fading to yellow-brown or buff as it dries; stalk only 2-4 mm thick;
annulus (ring) often greenish- or bluish-tinged .(see Psilocybe, p. 368)
10. Not as above . 11
11. Stalk slender, brownish, with small scales below the annulus (ring); cap tawny-orange to yellow¬
ish to brown or olive-brown, small (less than 8 cm broad), often umbonate and with small,
often concentrically arranged scales (but these sometimes washed off); growing on rotten
wood, sawdust, debris, etc.; especially common in the Pacific Northwest .
.S', squamosa (see S. kauffmanii, p. 380)
11. Not as above . 12
12. Cap typically some shade of yellow or cream; veil typically shredding, most of it remaining on
cap margin or forming only a slight annulus (ring) on stalk . 13
12. Not as above; veil usually forming a large annulus on stalk . 14
13. Stalk usually at least 0.6 cm thick, often cottony or shaggy; found in woods S. ambigua, p. 377
13. Stalk more slender (less than 1 cm thick), not shaggy or only slightly so; growing in a wide
variety of habitats .S. riparia (see S. ambigua, p. 377)
14. Cap yellowish, often with darker (brownish) spots; found under hardwoods and in lawns and
other open places in eastern U.S. (especially the South) . . S. hardii(see S', coronilla, p. 377)
14. Cap dull brown or shaded with gray, purple, etc.; found in northern North America, usually
under conifers .S. hornemannii, p. 379
Stropharia semiglobata. Left: Small specimens. Right: A larger one. It resembles Psilocybe cubensis,
but does not stain blue. The veil does not always form a distinct ring on stalk. Note long slender stem.
377
378 STROPHARIACEAE
delicate, cottony white scales below (but these sometimes wearing off); often yellowish
toward base in age; base often with white mycelial threads attached. VEIL soft, white,
cottony, leaving shreds or strands on the cap margin and sometimes a superior ring or
ragged zone on the stalk. SPORE PRINT dark purplish to nearly black; spores 11-14*6-
7.5 microns, elliptical, smooth. Chrysocystidia present on gills.
HABITAT: Solitary to scattered or in groups in rich humus, usually under conifers, but
also with alder and other hardwoods; known only from the Pacific Coast. It is fairly
common in our area from late fall through early spring, especially in dank, cold places (in
rain forests, along woodland streams and gullies, etc.).
EDIBILITY: Edible ? According to one authority, it tastes “like old leaves.” As I do not
make a habit of chewing on old leaves, I cannot attest to the validity of this comparison.
COMMENTS: There is nothing ambiguous or questionable about this elegant, stately
fungus. It is our most common woodland Stropharia and at its best is one of the most
exquisitely beautiful of all mushrooms—well worth seeking out. The soft, delicate white
scales that sheathe the stem and the strands of veil tissue on the cap margin are very striking.
Amanita gemmata is somewhat similar in color but has white gills; S. hornemannii has a
duller cap and more prominent ring. Other species: S. riparia (=S. magnivelaris?) is a
somewhat similar but slightly smaller and slimmer (stalk less than 1 cm thick) species that is
fairly common in the West in a variety of habitats (under aspen and alder, along streams,
under mountain conifers, etc.). Its veil is thinner than that of S. ambigua and more kleenex-
like, and often leaves remnants on the cap near the margin rather than dangling from the
margin itself. Also, the stalk is not nearly so shaggy as that of S. ambigua, and the cap,
although similar in color, is more apt to be slightly umbonate.
Left: Close-up of the shaggy veil of Stropharia ambigua. Right: Stropharia rugoso-annulata. Cap
color ranges from wine-red to tan. The cultivated version is often much more robust.
STROPHARIA 379
VEIL membranous, white; forming a thick, persistent, superior ring on stalk that is soon
blackened by falling spores; ring grooved or lined (striate) on upper surface and often split
radially into segments. SPORE PRINT deep purple-brown to black; spores 10-15 x 6-9
microns, elliptical, smooth. Chrysocystidia present on gills.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious in mulch, wood chips, straw, lawns, gardens, and
other cultivated areas; widely distributed. It is quite common in New England and has
also turned up in Washington. I have yet to find it in our area, but it is bound to turn up
sooner or later (probably sooner).
EDIBILITY: Edible, and the best of the genus for the table. It is easily grown at home and
widely cultivated in Europe (particularly eastern Europe). The flavor is fairly good—
reminiscent of “undercooked potatoes soaked in burgundy,” according to Rick Kerrigan.
COMMENTS: This large, handsome Stropharia is easily recognized by its wine-red to tan
cap, purple-black spores, and grooved, often segmented or clawlike annulus (ring). Its
growth in planted areas suggests that it is an “alien,” but its origin is unknown. The gills are
never pink as in Agaricus, and they are attached to the stalk—at least when young—and the
spores are purple-black rather than chocolate-brown.
Stropharia hornemannii
CAP 4-12(15) cm broad, obtuse to convex, becoming broadly umbonate or plane; surface
viscid or slimy when moist, smooth or with a few whitish scales (veil remnants) near margin;
dull brown to dingy purple-brown, grayish-brown, grayish-purple, or smoky reddish-
brown, often fading in age to yellow-brown or grayish-tan. Flesh thick, soft, white; taste
rather disagreeable. GILLS typically adnate but sometimes seceding, broad, close, pale
gray becoming purple-gray to dull purple-brown to nearly black. STALK 5-15 cm long,
0.5-2.5 cm thick, more or less equal, silky-smooth above the ring, sheathed with soft, dry,
delicate, cottony white scales below, at least when young; base often with white mycelial
threads. VEIL membranous, white, forming a persistent, flaring or skirtlike, superior ring
on stalk which is darkened by falling spores. SPORE PRINT purple-brown to purple-
black; spores 10-14 x 5.5-7 microns, elliptical, smooth. Chrysocystidia present on gills.
Stropharia hornemannii has a shaggy stalk like that of S. ambigua, but its veil is much more mem¬
branous and forms a prominent annulus (ring) on the stalk.
380 STROPHARIACEAE
which is soon darkened by falling spores, or often disappears in age. SPORE PRINT dark
purple-brown to purple-black; spores 6-8 x 4-4.5 microns, elliptical, smooth, apical germ
pore absent or minute. Chrysocystidia present on gills.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups in rich humus, around brush piles and decayed
woody debris, etc.—usually under hardwoods such as alder, cottonwood, and aspen,
spring through fall. It occurs in northern California and the Pacific Northwest, but in my
experience is more common in the aspen forests of the Southwest and southern Rockies
than anywhere else. There it fruits, like most other mushrooms, in the summer.
EDIBILITY: A tempting mushroom, but I can find no information on it.
COMMENTS: The dry (non-viscid) scaly cap is unusual for a Stropharia, and combines
with the scaly stem and violet-gray gills to distinguish this beautiful species. Its closest
relative is probably Pholiota fulvosquamosa, which differs in having brown gills and
brown spores. Both species are in some respects more typical of Agaricus than of the
Strophariaceae, but have gills attached to the stem (at least when young). Another species
with a scaly stalk, 5. (-Psilocybe) squamosa, has a smaller, viscid cap (see key to Stro¬
pharia). It is widely distributed, but particularly common in the Pacific Northwest.
NAEMATOLOMA
Small to medium-sized mushrooms found mostly on wood. CAP smooth, often brightly colored,
usually not viscid. GILLS attached, dark at maturity. STALK usually slender, more or less central.
VEIL typically present but evanescent or forming only a slight annulus (ring) on stalk. VOLVA
absent. SPORE PRINT usually deep brown to purple-brown, rarely cinnamon-brown. Spores
typically elliptical, with a germ pore. Chrysocystidia present on gills. Cap cuticle filamentous.
Key to Naematoloma
1. Cap more or less brick-red, the margin usually pallid; typically growing in clumps on dead
hardwoods in eastern North America .N. sublateritium (see N. aurantiaca, p. 382)
1. Not as above . 2
2. Cap orange to red or sometimes reddish-brown to brick-red; growing scattered to gregarious
or tufted on ground, in wood chips, mulch, etc.N. aurantiaca & others, p. 382
2. Not as above (but cap may be orange or tawny at center and yellow at margin) . 3
3. Stalk white; fruiting body fragile; cap cuticle cellular .(see Psathyrella, p. 361)
3. Not as above . 4
382 STROPHARIACEAE
appearing terrestrial; widely distributed. It is abundant in our area in the fall and winter,
less so in the spring, and is one of the first woodland mushrooms you’re liable to encounter.
EDIBILITY: Poisonous. In Europe and Asia it has caused several deaths; in America only
gastrointestinal upsets have been reported. Fortunately, the bitter taste is a deterrent.
COMMENTS: The yellow to greenish-yellow gills, dark spores, bitter taste, and clustered
growth habit are the principal fieldmarks of this attractive, cosmopolitan mushroom
Hypholoma fasciculare is a synonym. In age the clustered caps often assume a grayish or
purple-brown tinge from a coating of spore dust. N. capnoides is quite similar in cap
color, but its gills are gray to purple-brown (never yellow), and it has a mild taste and grows
only on conifers. Several similar Naematolomas grow on the ground (see N. dispersum).
Other species: N. subviride is a small southern version of N. fasciculare;N. dispersum var.
idahoense has a tawny to cinnamon-brown cap and bitter taste, and grows in clusters on
conifers. For similar brown-spored species, see comments under Pholiotamalicolagroup.
PHOLIOTA
Mostly medium-sized mushrooms found on wood or woody debris or sometimes on ground. CAP
usually viscid and/or scaly. GILLS typically adnexed to adnate to slightly decurrent. STALK
central to somewhat off-center but not lateral, usually fleshy but frequently slender; often scaly
below the veil. VEIL present; membranous, slimy, or fibrillose, disappearing or often forming an
annulus (ring) on stalk. VOLV A absent. SPORE PRINT dull brown to cinnamon-brown or some¬
times rusty-brown. Spores mostly elliptical, smooth, usually with a germ pore. Chrysocystidia
often present on faces (sides) of gills. Cap cuticle typically filamentous.
more difficult to distinguish. In the field they can usually be told from Cortinarius and
Hebeloma by their viscid or slimy cap, presence of a veil, frequently slender build (only
rarely is the stalk bulbous), and sometimes clustered growth habit; microscopically they
are distinct by virtue of their smooth spores.
Many Pholiotas qualify as“LBM’s” and are not likely to interest the average mushroom
hunter. However, some are quite striking (e.g., P. squarrosa and the P. aurivella group).
As few are worth eating and several are mildly poisonous, the genus is best avoided by
beginners. (Some species listed as edible in older books have since been shuffled to genera
such as Rozites and Agrocybe.) In their monograph on North American Pholiotas,
Alexander Smith and L.R. Hesler recognize over 200 species. Since microscopic exami¬
nation is required to determine the shapes or types of sterile cells (cystidia) on the gills,
many of these species cannot be identified in the field. The coniferous forests of the West
are uniquely rich in Pholiota species, but for some reason our area is poorly represented.
Key to Pholiota
1. Growing on recently charred soil or wood (ashes) . 2
1. Not typically growing in ashes . 3
2. Stalk typically 5-10 mm thick .P. brunnescens, p. 393
2. Stalk thinner (2-6 mm) P. highlandensis, P. carbonaria, & others (see P. brunnescens, p. 393)
3. Cap blue to blue-green when fresh (but may discolor yellowish or tan in age); found in the West,
usually under conifers .P. subcaerulea (see Stropharia aeruginosa, p. 380)
3. Not as above (if blue or greenish-blue when young, then found in eastern North America) . 4
4. Growing on wood (occasionally buried) or in wood chip mulch . 5
4. Growing on the ground . 15
5. Cap more or less bright orange-pink when fresh and lacking scales; taste bitter .
... P. astragalina, p. 387
5. Not as above . 6
6. Growing on dead wood of mountain conifers in the spring( when or shortly after the snow melts);
cap and veil viscid to slimy; cap and stalk lacking prominent scales; stalk typically at least
6 mm thick; cap yellowish to rusty-tawny but not brightly colored; known only from the West
.P. sp. (unidentified) (“Snowbank Pholiota”—see photo below)
6. Not growing when the snow is melting, or if so then not as above . 7
Left: These young specimens of Pholiota squarrosoides (see comments under P. squarrosa) are
flagrantly scaly, but older caps are viscid and not as scaly (see color plate).Right “Snowbank
Pholiota.” This unidentified (and probably unnamed) species is common in the northern Sierra
Nevada and Cascades on dead conifers soon after the snow melts. The yellowish-buff to tawny or rusty
cap is viscid or slimy and has few if any scales; the veil is also viscid.
STROPHARIACEAE
Growing on poplar, cottonwood, aspen, or willow; stalk 1 -4 cm thick at apex, usually thicker
at base, lacking large erect scales (but may have patches of tissue); cap white to creamy or
buff when fresh (but may darken to ochre or brownish in age) .P. destruens, p. 395
Not as above; color or habitat different or stalk thinner and/or scalier . 8
Both cap and stalk yellowish-brown to dark rusty-brown and covered with powdery or
granulose scales when fresh (those on cap may wash off or disintegrate); cap 1-4 cm broad
and dry (not viscid!); stalk slender (1.5^4 mm thick); taste usually bitter or metallic; odor not
distinctive .Phaeomarasmius erinaceellus (-Pholiota erinaceella)
Not with above features . 9
Cap bright yellow to orange, bright tawny, golden, or bright rusty-brown when fresh (but
sometimes darker rusty-brown when very young); cap usually decorated with large scales,
spots, patches, or “straps” of tissue (which may be darker and may wash off) . 10
Not as above; if brightly colored then cap bald or with a few scattered fibrillose veil remnants
(one species tawny to whitish with erect or recurved scales) . 11
Scales on cap and stalk bright yellow; cap dry to slightly viscid .P. flammans, p. 391
Scales usually darker than background color; cap distinctly viscid to slimy when moist, often
shiny in dry weather .P. aurivella group & others, p. 390
Cap and lower stalk becoming reddish-brown to dark vinaceous-brown at maturity (but often
orange-brown when young) and decorated with brown fibrillose scales; cap viscid; usually
solitary or in twos or threes, mainly in eastern North America and the Southwest .
.P. albocrenulata, p. 392
Not with above features . 12
Cap and stalk with prominent erect or recurved scales (which may be obliterated or flattened
somewhat in age); stalk typically less than 1.5 cm thick . 13
Not as above (but cap or stalk may have recurved scales and both may have flattened scales 15
Cap never viscid; gills often (but not always) greenish-tinged in age; odor mild or garlicky;
growing on hardwoods (especially aspen) and conifers.P. squarrosa, p. 389
Cap often dry at first but a viscid layer beneath the scales usually evident in age; gills not greenish-
tinged; odor mild or slightly fruity; on wood or ground . 14
Typically found on hardwood stumps or logs; cap and stalk very scaly when young, the scales
tawny or paler .P. squarrosoides (see P. squarrosa, p. 389)
Usually growing on the ground, less commonly on wood; cap and stalk very scaly to only slightly
so, the scales some shade of brown (darker than in above species) .P. terrestris, p. 389
Growing in deep moss, bogs, or mucky places; stalk equal and usually hollow, long and thin
(length usually at least 40 times the width); cap small, yellow or olive; mostly northern . . 34
Not as above . 16
Lower stalk (i.e., below the veil) with distinct scales (at least in most specimens), the scales some¬
times recurved but often small . 17
Not as above . 19
Cap smooth (without scales) and hygrophanous: rusty-brown to reddish-brown or orange-
brown and striate when moist, fading to yellowish, ochre, or buff as it loses moisture (often
two-toned in intermediate stages); often found in large clusters .P. mutabilis, p. 395
Not as above . 18
Growing on ground or wood chips (often along roads or trails), usually in tufts or clusters; cap
with scales at first (which may wash off or wear away), dark brown to light brown, grayish-
brown, yellow-brown, or tawny; common .P. terrestris, p. 389
Not as above . 19
Cap yellow to bright ochre or orange when fresh . 20
Cap some other color . 23
Cap distinctly viscid when moist . 21
Cap not viscid . 22
Lower portion of stalk (i.e., below the veil) with distinct scales . 23
Not as above .P. malicola group & others, p. 388
Fruiting body staining orange-brown when bruised P. multifolia (see P. malicola group, p. 388)
Not as above .P. malicola group & others, p. 388
Cap viscid or slimy when moist, often with adhering debris when dry, not hygrophanous . 24
Cap dry or hygrophanous or sometimes slightly viscid (but if so, then soon drying out) . . 30
PHOLIOTA 387
COMMENTS: The brilliant pinkish-orange cap plus the yellow gills, brown spores, and
growth on conifers make this one of our most distinctive as well as beautiful Pholiotas. It
is reminiscent of Naematoloma, but has paler (browner) spores and a viscid cap when wet.
389
390 STROPHARIACEAE
and often fringed copiously with veil remnants. Flesh pale yellowish, rather pliant; odor
mild in some forms, distinctly garlic- or onionlike in others; taste mild or rancid. GILLS
crowded, adnexed to adnate to slightly decurrent, pale yellowish to buff or tinged gray,
then often developing a greenish tinge before finally becoming brown or dull rusty-brown.
STALK 4-12 cm long, 0.5-1.5 cm thick, equal ortapered downward, solid, smooth above
the veil, covered with erect or recurved scales below (like on cap); colored like cap or
becoming darker brown or reddish-brown below. VEIL membranous-fibrillose, forming
a fragile, often torn, superior ring on stalk or only leaving shreds on cap margin. SPORE
PRINT dull rusty-brown; spores 5.5-9 * 3.5-5 microns, elliptical, smooth, with a germ
pore. Chrysocystidia present on gills.
HABITAT: In tufts or dense clusters on wood, usually at the bases of trees (both hard¬
woods and conifers); widely distributed. It is very common on aspen and spruce in the
Rocky Mountains and Southwest during the summer. It is also common on aspen in the
Sierra Nevada in the summer and fall, but I have never seen it on the coast.
EDIBILITY: Not recommended. Some people eat it regularly but others have suffered
severe stomach upsets and old specimens are often rancid-tasting.
COMMENTS: A beautiful and memorable mushroom in its prime, the erect or recurved
scales on the cap and stalk plus the tan to pale tan color and brown spore print set this
species apart. The cap is not viscid as in most Pholiotas and the garlic odor, when present, is
also distinctive. It is usually found on wood, whereas P. terrestris, which is closely related,
typically grows on the ground. Other species: P. squarrosoides (COLOR PLATE 98)
is a very similar and edible scaly species with a somewhat paler (whitish to pale tawny or
yellowish or light brown) cap and mild odor. Its gills are never greenish and in age or wet
weather the cap becomes viscid from a gelatinous layer beneath the scales. It occurs on
hardwoods such as maple and alder, and is much more common than P. squarrosa in
northern California and the Pacific Northwest. In addition to the color plate, a young
cluster is shown on p. 385. Another similar but unidentified species with a very distinctive
citrus fragrance occurs in New Mexico.
EDIBILITY: To be avoided. Some books list it as edible, but many people have suffered
gastric upsets after eating members of this species “complex.” The texture is rather soft
and gelatinous anyway, and it is said to taste “like marshmallows without the sugar.”
COMMENTS: This striking mushroom and its look-alikes (see below) are easily recog¬
nized by their scaly stalk, brown spores, and yellow to orange, viscid cap with large
spotlike darker scales. The honey mushroom (Armillariella mellea) is somewhat similar,
but is not as brightly colored and has white spores. Distinguishing species within the
P. aurivella “complex,” however, is not so easy. Many variants have been described (e.g.,
P. connata, with a thinly viscid stalk and P. abietis, with pale brown immature gills), but
recent cultural studies have revealed the presence of three widespread, non-interbreeding
species which differ principally in spore size: P aurivella, with spores 8.5-10 x 5-6.5
microns, P. limonella (-P. squarroso-adiposa), with spores 6.5-9.5 * 3.5-5.5 microns
and apparently the most common of the three in North America; and P. adiposa, a hard¬
wood-lover with even smaller spores (5-6 * 3-4 microns) and often viscid scales on the
stalk. To complicate matters, there are some other closely related species, including:
P. aurivelloides, with even larger spores than P. aurivella;P. hiemalis, found on northern
conifers usually late in the fall, with viscid scales on the stalk and pallid, yellow-edged gills
when young; and P. filamentosa, with a lemon-yellow to greenish-yellow cap and a thick,
persistent annulus (ring) on the stalk, also found with conifers. Whew!
391
392 STROPHARIACEAE
HABITAT: Solitary or tufted on conifer logs and stumps; widely distributed in northern
North America, not common. In California it fruits in the fall and winter, but is rare.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but not choice (see comments on edibility of P. aurivella).
COMMENTS: The brilliant yellow color sets apart this beautiful mushroom. It is most
likely to be confused with the P. aurivella group, but the cap is dry to only slightly viscid and
the scales on the stalk and cap are yellow rather than rusty, cinnamon, or brown. P. adiposa
(see comments under the P. aurivella group) is somewhat similar, but favors hardwoods.
Pholiota albocrenulata
CAP 3-10 (15) cm broad, broadly conical or convex becoming broadly umbonate to nearly
plane; surface viscid or slimy when moist, orange-brown to dark rusty-brown or reddish-
brown, becoming dark vinaceous-brown in age, and adorned with scattered brown fibril-
lose scales (veil remnants); margin often fringed with veil remnants. Flesh thick, whitish;
taste mild or bitter. GILLS close, notched or adnate to slightly decurrent, whitish be¬
coming grayish and finally brown, the edges finely scalloped and white or beaded with
tiny white droplets. STALK 3-10 (15) cm long, 0.5-1.5 cm thick, more or less equal, rather
fibrous, stuffed or hollow; pallid or grayish above, brown to reddish-brown (like cap)
below, with scattered brown scales below the veil; often curved. VEIL fibrillose-cottony,
forming a slight superior fibrillose ring or zone on stalk, or disappearing. SPORE PRINT
brown; spores 10-15 (18) * 5-8 microns, elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Solitary or in small groups (twos and threes) on stumps, logs, and living trees,
usually of hardwoods (especially maple and elm); widely distributed, but seldom found
in quantity and apparently absent on the west coast. I have collected it twice in New Mexico
in August—once on a ponderosa pine and once on an aspen.
EDIBILITY: Said to be harmless, but seldom eaten.
COMMENTS: Though not often encountered, this is a striking mushroom by virtue of
its reddish-brown to dark brown, scaly, viscid cap and white-edged gills. Microscopically
it is close to Stropharia, and is placed in that genus by some mycologists (along with
several other Pholiotas, e.g., P. subcaerulea and P. albivelata).
COMMENTS: The above description will more or less fit a large number of Pholiotas with
a viscid-slimy cap and scaly stalk that grow solitary to gregarious (but not often clustered)
in humus or on rotting wood. They are particularly prevalent under conifers but also occur
with hardwoods, and their identification is best left to pholiotologists. The “true” P.
lubrica is said to have a dark brown to reddish-brown cap with a paler or whitish margin.
Some of the other commoner species or variants are: P. ferruginea, with an oranger cap;
P. ferrugineo-lutescens, occasional in our area, with a slightly oranger cap and a thicker
white stem that stains yellow; P. sublubrica, with brownish veil remnants on the cap and
a thicker (1-1.5 cm) stem; P. velaglutinosa, with a bright to dark reddish-brown or brown
cap that lacks veil remnants and a viscid or glutinous veil, sometimes abundant in our
coastal pine forests (see photograph);/*, lenta, with a pale cap (whitish to buff or sometimes
tinged ochre or gray or pinkish) that features whitish veil remnants; andP. decorata, with
a fibrillose-streaked cap that is dark vinaceous-brown to reddish-brown with a paler
margin and has rows of concentrically-arranged veil remnants when young, common in
the Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountains. Also see P. spumosa, which lacks scales on
stalk, and P. albivelata (under Stropharia hornemannii), which has a membranous ring.
393
Pholiota brunnescens is one of several charcoal-loving Pholiotas. Note slimy cap and the scales
on the stalk. The scales are yellow when young but turn brown as they trap discharged spores.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This is one of several closely-related Pholiotas that fruit only on charred
soil or wood. It is distinguished by its sticky-slimy, tawny to orangish to dark reddish-
brown cap, scaly stem, brown spores, and yellow veil. The other common ash-lovers
have slimmer stems (2-6 mm thick). They include: P. highlandensis (-P. carbonaria of
Europe), widely distributed, with a whitish veil and slightly smaller cap,P. carbonaria, with
a rusty-red to reddish veil; P. fulvozonata, with an orange-brown or russet-colored veil;
and P. subangularis, with a small cap that is only slightly viscid (if at all) and a pallid veil.
394
PHOLIOTA 395
are also similar but have darker spores. Other species: P. vernalis is closely related and
similar, but lacks scales on the stem (or has only a few patches) and does not grow in such
large clusters. It is common in the mountains of western North America shortly after
the snow melts in the spring, but occurs elsewhere also.
CORTIN ARIACEAE
ALMOST every brown-spored, terrestrial, woodland mushroom you find will belong to
the Cortinariaceae, and many wood-inhabiting ones will also. Like their white-spored
counterparts, the Tricholomataceae, they are a vast, diverse, and baffling group—with
even more species, but fewer genera. The gills are not deeply decurrent and/ or poroid as in
the Paxillaceae, and the cap cuticle is typically filamentous and the spores pore-less, in
contrast to the Bolbitiaceae. The latter characters are microscopic, but with a little practice
the two can be distinguished in the field. The Cortinariaceae are primarily woodland fungi,
a dominant fungal feature of cool temperate forests, whereas the Bolbitiaceae are warm-
weather fungi found mostly in grass, gardens, and dung. Also, with the exception of
Galerina and Tubaria, the Cortinariaceae tend to be larger, fleshier, and/or less fragile
than the Bolbitiaceae.
As applied to the Cortinariaceae, the term“brown-spored” is somewhat misleading. The
spore color actually ranges from orange or bright rusty-orange (Gymnopilus) to rusty-
brown (Cortinarius) to dull brown, ochre-brown, or yellow-brown. Mushrooms with a
filamentous cap cuticle and purple-brown to purple-black spores are traditionally placed
in the Strophariaceae. However, the difference between “brown” and “purple-brown” is
not always clearcut, and the two families seem to intergrade via Pholiota (a brown-spored
member of the Strophariaceae that is keyed out here in the Cortinariaceae) and Galerina.
Another family, the Crepidotaceae, is recognized by some authorities; it is largely tropical
and composed almost entirely of “LBM’s” included here under the Cortinariaceae.
396
CORTINARIACEAE 397
There are very few esteemed edibles in the Cortinariaceae. The gypsy mushroom
(Rozites caperata) is perhaps the best known and most widely collected, but there are many
more species that are definitely known to be poisonous (particularly in Galerina,
Cortinarius, Hebeloma, and Inocybe), and hundreds of others have yet to be tested.
Identification is very difficult in this family, and having access to a microscope does little
to expedite the tedious and labyrinthine identification process, because so little has been
published on the family and so many species are poorly known or still unnamed. Several
representatives from each common genus are included in this book.
14. Gills brightly colored (yellow, orange, red, blue, green, purple), at least when young; cap not
typically translucent-striate when moist . 15
14. Gills not brightly colored (but may be dingy yellow, tawny, etc.) and/ or cap translucent-striate
when moist . 17
15. Cobwebby, silky, or hairy veil present when young; cap viscid or dry; spore print rusty-brown
to cinnamon (but not rusty-orange); gills variously colored; common . . Cortinarius, p. 417
15. Veil absent; cap not typically viscid; spore print orange to rusty-orange or dull brown to yellow-
brown or olive-brown; gills yellow to orange or rusty-orange; not very common . 16
16. Spore print orange to rusty-orange or bright rusty-brown .Gymnopilus, p. 407
16. Spore print brown to olive-brown .(see Paxillaceae, p. 476)
17. Volva present at base of stalk; spore print reddish or pinkish-cinnamon (seePluteaceae, p. 253)
17. Not as above; volva absent or spore color browner or rustier . 18
18. Cap typically viscid or slimy when moist, usually smooth (bald) or with a few scattered scales
or veil remnants . 19
18. Cap typically not viscid, but sometimes slightly tackyin wet weather; cap surface smooth or silky
to fibrillose, woolly, scaly, or powdery . 24
19. Stalk distinctly viscid or slimy from the remains of a slimy veil; spore print typically rusty-brown
to cinnamon . Cortinarius, p. 417
19. Not as above . 20
20. Cap usually small (up to 4 cm broad) and striate when moist; stalk thin, i.e., 1-3 (5) mm thick;
fruiting body fragile; often found in moss .Galerina, Tubaria, & Allies, p. 399
20. Not as above . 21
21. Veil present, at least when young (check several specimens if unsure), usually but not always
leaving traces on the stalk in the form of hairs, scales, or an annulus (ring) . 22
21. Veil absent in all stages .Hebeloma, p. 463
22. Spore print typically rusty-brown to cinnamon-brown; veil cobwebby or silky; stalk usually
lacking scales below the veil, usually (but not always) at least 1 cm thick; spores roughened
. Cortinarius, p. 417
22. Not as above ... 23
23. Odor often radishlike or spermatic and/ or taste bitter; gill edges often whitish; stalk apex often
powdery, scurfy, or with small flakes; cap viscid but not often slimy; spore print dull brown
(not cinnamon- or rusty-brown); not typically growing in large clusters from a common base
.Hebeloma, p. 463
23. Not as above; sometimes growing in clusters .(see Strophariaceae, p. 367)
24. Spore print yellow-brown to tan to dull brown, or if rusty-brown or cinnamon then fruiting body
often tawny or yellowish, translucent-striate when moist, and often growing in moss; spores
smooth or roughened . 25
24. Spore print typically rusty-brown to cinnamon-brown; cobwebby or silky veil present when
young, often leaving hairs on stalk; stalk thick or thin but not usually fragile; spores roughened
. Cortinarius, p. 417
25. Odor spermatic or like green corn (crush the cap if unsure!); spore print dull brown or dull yellow-
brown .Inocybe, p. 455
25. Not as above . 26
26. Spore print dull brown or dull yellow-brown; cap usually opaque and small or medium-sized,
often umbonate and/ or with easily-splitting margin (especially in age); surface of cap usually
silky, hairy, or scaly; gill edges often whitish; gills typically not decurrent; very apex of stalk
often minutely powdered, flaky, or scurfy; often growing in groups but not usually in clusters
.Inocybe, p. 455
26. Not as above . 27
27. Veil present at least when very young; stalk with small scales (often somewhat concentrically
arranged) below the veil .(see Strophariaceae, p. 367)
27. Not as above; veil absent or present; stalk not normally scaly, but may have fibrils .28
28. Stalk typically 4 mm or more thick; cap typically 4-10 cm broad .29
28. Not as above (usually smaller) .Galerina, Tubaria, & Allies, p. 399
29. Spore print reddish- or pinkish-cinnamon .(see Entolomataceae, p. 238)
29. Not as above . (see Bolbitiaceae, p. 466)
399
8. Stalk with small or prominent scales or patches of veil remnants below the veil; spores smooth
. (seePholiota, p. 384)
8. Not as above; spores usually roughened .Galerina marginata (see G. autumnalis, p. 401)
9. Cap reddish-cinnamon when moist; often growing on lawns; known only from the Pacific
Northwest .Galerina venenata (see G. autumnalis, p. 401)
9. Not as above; usually growing in moss, grass, or swampy ground and/ or differently colored 10
10. Cap translucent-striate when moist.Galerinapaludosa (see G. autumnalis, p. 401)
10. Not as above . (seeAgrocybe, p. 467)
11. Gills usually slightly decurrent; cap convex to plane or slightly depressed (not conical and
not typically tawny or yellow) . 12
11. Not as above . 13
12. Cap and stalk white to grayish; cap often somewhat hairy, especially toward margin; found
in woods; widespread but not common .(see Clitocybe & Allies, p. 148)
12. Cap brown when fresh but often fading to buff or whitish as it dries; found in many habitats
. Tubaria furfuracea & others, p. 402
13. Cap more or less olive-brown; growing on wood; spores smooth .... Simocybe centunculus
13. Not with above features . 14
14. Stalk or base of stalk blue to blue-green in age; growing in moss or grass (see Conocybe, p. 470)
14. Not as above . 15
15. Cap bright yellow when fresh (but often fading) and conspicuously striate and viscid; entire
fruiting body withering or dissolving quickly...(see Bolbitius, p. 473)
15. Not as above . 16
16. Spore print ochre-brown to pinkish; odor usually strong and fishy or cucumberlike; cap bell¬
shaped to conical when young, reddish-brown to dark brown or blackish (margin often paler);
stalk also dark, minutely velvety; gills with giant cystidia . . . (see Tricholomataceae, p. 129)
16. Not as above . 17
17. Growing on decaying wood; cap hairy or scaly or silky and/ or odor spermatic; cap not viscid
.(seelnocybe, p. 455)
17. Not as above . 18
18. Cap convex to plane or broadly umbonate . 19
18. Cap conical to bell-shaped or acutely umbonate . 24
19. Lower stalk usually with small scales or veil remnants; veil present at least in young specimens;
cap often viscid when moist; spores smooth; usually found on wood, sometimes on ground, but
not usually in moss . (see Pholiota, p. 384)
19. Not as above; spores smooth or roughened; growing in many habitats, often in moss .... 20
20. Cap viscid when moist and conspicuously striate; flesh very thin; stalk white or yellow and very
fragile (2-3 mm thick); entire fruiting body withering or decaying quickly; cap cuticle cellular
.(see Bolbitius, p. 473)
20. Not as above . 21
21. Gills adnate; cap brown but often fading to tan, buff, or even whitish as it loses moisture; spore
print ochre to dull brown or tan; spore walls nearly colorless and thin, easily breaking; common
. Tubaria furfur acea & others, p. 402
21. Not as above . 22
22. Spore print brown; found mostly under alder and willow .23
22. Spore print usually rusty-brown to cinnamon-brown (brighter than above); found in many
habitats. 24
23. Cap dark reddish-brown .Alnicola scolecina
23. Cap brown to tan or yellow-brown .Alnicola melinides, A. escharoides, & others
24. Cap usually yellowish to yellow-brown or tawny or sometimes rusty-brown; veil present or
absent; usually growing in moss or grass or on wood; cap usually translucent-striate when
moist; stalk fragile; spores roughened or smooth . . . Galerina heterocystis & others, p. 402
24. Not as above; sometimes growing in moss, but usually on ground and not normally in grass or
on wood; veil always present (at least when very young); stalk not often fragile; spores
roughened .(see Cortinarius, p. 417)
Galerina autumnalis is a deadly poisonous “LBM.” Growth on wood, brown spores, and scale-less
stalk with a small annulus (ring) are the main features.
401
402 CORTINARIACEAE
Galerina heterocystis
CAP 5-20 mm broad, bluntly conical becoming bell-shaped or convex or sometimes
umbonate; surface smooth, hygrophanous: pale yellow to pale cinnamon to tawny and
translucent-striate when moist, paler(more or less buff) when dry. Flesh very thin, fragile.
GILLS close, usually attached but not decurrent, pale yellowish becoming pale cinnamon-
brown. STALK 1-8 cm long, 1-3 mm thick, more or less equal, tubular, fragile, pallid to
pale yellowish darkening to brown or cinnamon; lower portion faintly fibrillose. VEIL
absent or rudimentary. SPORE PRINT pale cinnamon-brown; spores 11-17 * 6.5-8.5
microns, more or less elliptical, roughened to nearly smooth.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious in damp mossy or grassy places (usually in or near
woods); widely distributed. In our area this species and its numerous look-alikes are
especially common during relatively dry weather when other mushrooms are scarce.
EDIBILITY: Unknown. Do not experiment!
COMMENTS: There are dozens of Galerinas that will more or less fit the above descrip¬
tion, and they can only be differentiated microscopically. Unlike G. autumnalis, the veil is
evanescent or even absent, but like that species the cap is usually translucent-striate when
fresh. Some are found in the woods or at their edges, others frequent seepage areas, still
others grow on logs or in bogs; most are moss-inhabiting. Conocybe species may also
key out here, but are generally more sharply conical, not as translucent, and have a cellular
cap cuticle; they favor lawns, dung, or cultivated ground, but a few grow in moss. Psilo-
cybe and Psathyrella species are also similar, but have darker spores. Other Galerinas
with an evanescent or absent veil include: G. semilanceata, with a fibrillose veil, usually
found on the ground; G. cedretorum, larger (cap 1-3 cm), with a more or less convex cap
and no veil, found in humus or debris under conifers; G. hypnorum, minute, with a rudi¬
mentary veil, found on mossy logs; G. triscopa, also minute, but with a sharply conical
cap when young, growing on logs; and G. tibicystis, growing only in Sphagnum bogs.
None of these should be eaten.
Tubaria furfuracea, the “Totally Tedious Tubaria.” Note adnate to slightly decurrent gills and ten¬
dency of cap to fade as it loses moisture. A similar viscid-capped species is also common locally.
Tubaria furfuracea is a quintessential “LBM.” These specimens are taller than most and their gills
are rather widely spaced. Could they be a distinct species? Does anyone know? Does anyone care?
woods, vacant lots, landscaped areas, along trails, etc.; common and widely distributed. It
seems to be most abundant when and where other mushrooms are scarce—perhaps
because it is only likely to be noticed when and where other mushrooms are scarce. I have
seen enormous fruitings in wood chip mulch at Golden Gate Park in San Francisco.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This is it, folks—your quintessential “LBM” (see p. 32)—as boring as it is
ubiquitous and as innocuous as it is inconspicuous. The brownish spores, adnate to
decurrent gills, thin stalk, and whitish-flecked, hygrophanous cap are the most distinctive
(or least undistinctive) fieldmarks. To say more about it would do the more interesting
mushrooms in this book an injustice. Other species: The “Totally Tedious Tubaria” is
easily mistaken for the “Truly Trivial Tubaria,” T. pellucida, which, however, is slightly
smaller (cap 0.5-1.5 cm broad) and has slightly smaller spores. T. tenuis, otherwise known
as the “Truly Trivial AND Totally Tedious Tubaria,” is also smaller, but has a completely
glabrous (bald) cap and widely spaced gills. A small unidentified viscid-capped species
also occurs in our area. There are various other “LBM’s” belonging to obscure genera
such as Simocybe and Alnicola. You can find more information on these in the key to
Galerina, Tubaria, & Allies, but don’t you have something more exciting to do?
403
Tubaria confragosa, the “Not So Tedious Tubaria,” is reminiscent of the more common “Totally
Tedious Tubaria” (T. furfuracea), but usually has an annulus (ring) on the stalk.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: The presence of a well-defined annulus (ring)—at least in many specimens
—rescues this “LBM” from the obscurity it so richly deserves. It is slightly larger than
T. furfuracea, and is more likely to be cespitose (clustered). It is also known asPhaeo-
marasmius confragosus and Pholiota confragosa, but the hygrophanous, non-viscid cap
and smooth to only slightly scaly stalk separate it from the Pholiotas of this book.
HABITAT: In small tufts or clusters (or sometimes solitary) on dead wood; known only
from California, but perhaps more widely distributed. I have found it several times on oak
in the fall and winter, but it is rare.
EDIBILITY: Too rare to be of value. Greg Wright, who has found it in Los Angeles
County, reports that it is harmless, with a “mealy, moderately mushy” texture and a flavor
“that suggests bland beef.” (I just can’t wait to try it! Can you?)
COMMENTS: This interesting mushroom was originally described in 1909. It does not
belong to the genus Naucoria in its modern sense, but has not officially been transferred to
another genus—perhaps because of its rarity, but perhaps also because its “correct” genus
is in doubt! The fibrillose veil and cinnamon-brown spores give it the aspect of a small
Cortinarius (e.g., C. sanguineus), but it always seems to grow on wood, usually in small
clusters. Its wine-red color and small size plus the spore color and growth on wood are the
distinguishing field marks. Lactarius fragilis sometimes grows on wood but has a latex
and/ or a fragrant odor, lacks a veil, and has white or yellowish spores. Naematoloma
aurantiaca is similarly colored but has darker spores and is usually terrestrial.
404
405
CREPIDOTUS
Small to medium-sized mushrooms typically growing shelflike on wood. CAP usually round to
kidney-shaped in outline, surface smooth or hairy. Flesh soft, thin. GILLS usually brownish at
maturity. STALK usually absent or rudimentary, or if present then lateral or off-center. VEIL and
VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT dull brown to yellow-brown, cinnamon-brown, or pinkish-
brown. Spores smooth or roughened, lacking an apical germ pore. Cystidia often present on gills.
Cap cuticle filamentous.
THIS is a fairly common but lackluster group of wood-inhabiting mushrooms with little
or no stem. They superficially resemble the oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus) as well as
Phyllotopsis and Claudopus, but have brown spores. Other brown-spored, wood-
inhabiting mushrooms (Pholiota, Galerina, etc.) have well-developed stems. Crepidotus
is given its own family, the Crepidotaceae, by some mycologists.
Crepidotus species are worthless as food—they are flaccid and decay rapidly. They
favor decaying hardwood logs, branches, and twigs (especially oak), but a few species
occur on conifers or even in soil—in which case they may have a lateral to off-center (but
not central) stem. Two widespread representatives are depicted here.
Key to Crepidotus
l. Fruiting body tough and leathery or woody.(see Polyporaceae& Allies, p. 549)
1. Not as above; fruiting body fleshy . 2
2. Cap white or whitish . 3
2. Cap tawny to pale ochre, brownish, or red (but may sometimes fade to whitish in age) .... 4
3. Cap 1-4 cm broad and nearly smooth (bald) C. applanatus & others (see C. herbarum, below)
3. Cap smaller (up to 2 cm broad) and distinctly hairy or downy . C. herbarum & others, below
4. Cap bright red (scarlet to cinnabar-red), small (up to 15 mm broad); gill edges also scarlet to red;
found on hardwoods in eastern North America; rare .C. cinnabarinus
4. Not as above; cap not red . 5
5. Found on fabrics or old carpets, seat covers of abandoned cars, mattresses, “rotting blue jeans,”
or on wood; fruiting body yellow-brown to brown or cinnamon; stalk present, often darker,
usually off-center, curved, and slender .Melanotus textilis
5. Not as above; found on wood or lignin-rich humus .6
6. Gills often forked or veined, especially near base of cap .(see Paxillaceae, p. 476)
6. Not as above . 7
7. Gills yellow to orange or ochre-orange . C. crocophyilus(see C. mollis, p. 406)
7. Gills whitish to grayish, brownish, or dull cinnamon . C. mollis, p. 406
Crepidotus variabilis (see comments under C. herbarum) is one of several small whitish shelving
species with brown or pinkish-brown spores.
406 CORTINARIACEAE
Crepidotus mollis is a common shelving mushrooms with a flabby cap and brown spores. Youngcaps
shown here are covered with brown fibrils or scales, but older or rain-battered caps can be bald.
407
GYMNOPILUS
Medium-sized to large mushrooms found mostly on wood. CAP smooth or scaly, dry. GILLS
notched to slightly decurrent, usually yellow to rusty-orange. STALK more or less central, fleshy.
VEIL usually (but not always) present, sometimes forming an annulus (ring). VOLVA absent.
SPORE PRINT orange to rusty-orange to bright rusty-brown. Spores typically elliptical and
roughened, without an apical pore. Cystidia present, at least on gill edges. Cap cuticle filamentous.
Key to Gymnopilus
1. Cap usually tinged or variegated with blue or blue-green when young (sometimes also with
other colors) or staining bluish when bruised .2
1. Not as above; blue or blue-green shades absent . 3
2. Cap with fibrils or scales; veil present, at least when young . G. aeruginosus, p. 409
2. Cap nearly smooth; veil absent .G. punctifolius(see G. aeruginosus, p. 409)
3. Cap with fibrils or scales of a radically different color than the background(i.e., reddish, pinkish,
brownish, etc.); not common .4
3. Cap smooth or with fibrils or scales that are roughly the same color as background (i.e., some
shade of yellow, orange, rusty-orange, or reddish-brown); common . 6
4. Cap scales or fibrils red to purple-red, reddish-brown, or pink . 5
4. Cap scales or fibrils tawny to dark brown to blackish-brown .
.G. fulvosquamulosus& G. parvisquamulosus(see G. luteofolius, p. 409)
5. Fruiting body (especially cap) sometimes with bluish or blue-green stains (examine several
specimens!); veil evanescent, not typically forming a distinct annulus (ring) .
.G. aeruginosus & others, p. 409
5. Not as above; veil often forming a slight annulus .G. luteofolius & others, p. 409
6. Cap medium-sized togigantic(up to 40 cm broad or more!); stalk 1-7 cm thick; veil membranous
or fibrillose, often forming an annulus (rng) on stalk; usually growing in clusters (but occa¬
sionally solitary) .G. spectabilis group, p. 410
6. Not as above; smaller and veil absent or evanescent; not often clustered .7
7. Veil present when young (but often disappearing in age) . 8
7. Veil absent(check young specimens!) . 10
8. Veil whitish .G. penetrans & G. flavidellus (see G. sapineus, p. 408)
8. Veil pale yellow or yellowish .9
9. Cap golden-yellow to tawny-orange, often with minute scales or scattered fibrillose patches
. G. sapineus, p. 408
9. Cap darker (tawny to cinnamon, russet, or reddish-brown), smooth .
.G. luteocarneus(see G. sapineus, p. 408)
10. Usually growing on ground; taste mild . G. terrestris(see G. sapineus, p. 408)
10. Typically found on wood; taste usually bitter G. liquiritae& G. beltulus( see G. sapineus, p.408)
Gymnopilus luteocarneus (see comments under G. sapineus, below) is one of several small orangish
species with an evanescent veil or no veil at all. Mature caps can be somewhat larger than the ones
shown here, but never approach the size of the G. spectabilis group. Left: A young specimen on wood
and an older one on a cone. Right: Mature specimen; note how stalk base is darkened by falling spores.
Gymnopilus aeruginosas
CAP (2) 5-15 (23) cm broad, convex to nearly plane; surface dry, fibrillose-scaly (or
cracked in age); color variable: at first dull bluish-green or variegated with green, yellow,
salmon, red, or vinaceous, sometimes fading to buff or pinkish-buff in age; scales tawny to
reddish to dark brown. Flesh whitish or tinged blue or green; taste bitter. GILLS adnexed
to adnate or slightly decurrent, often seceding; buff to yellow-orange or ochre, close.
STALK (3) 5-12 cm long, (0.4) 1 -1.5 (4) cm thick, more or less equal, colored more or less
like the cap, smooth or fibrillose, dry. VEIL yellowish, fibrillose, often scanty, leaving an
evanescent zone of hairs near top of stalk. SPORE PRINT rusty to rusty-orange or rusty-
cinnamon; spores 6-9 * 3.5^4.5 microns, elliptical, roughened.
HABITAT: In groups or clusters on stumps, logs, and sawdust of both hardwoods and
conifers; widely distributed, but most common in the Pacific Northwest. I have seen large
fruitings in the fall, winter, and spring in wood chip mulch.
EDIBILITY: Hallucinogenic. The blue-green tones are indicative of psilocybin and/
or psilocin, as in Psilocybe.
COMMENTS: The tendency of the cap to exhibit a blue-green tinge when young (often
variegated with pink, vinaceous-red, and/ or other colors) plus the scaly cap, yellowish
gills, rusty-orange spores, and growth on wood make this species quite distinctive. G.
harmoge may be a synonym. A similar unidentified species (perhaps the same?) with
vinaceous-red fibrils on the cap and stalk when young (see photo) is common on wood
chips. Its cap often shows bluish or blue-green stains and it is hallucinogenic. G. puncti-
folius is colored like G. aeruginosus, but has a nearly smooth (bald) cap and no veil.
Gymnopilus luteofolius
CAP 2-12 cm broad, convex or obtuse becoming nearly plane; surface dry, at first covered
with dense, dark red to purple-red or reddish-brown, fibrillose scales, these fading slowly
to pinkish-red or yellowish-red; surface finally yellowish in old age as scales disperse;
margin inrolled at first. Flesh thick, reddish to lavender, then fading to yellowish; taste
bitter. GILLS notched to adnate or slightly decurrent, fairly close, yellow becoming bright
rusty-orange or rust-colored as spores mature. STALK 3-10 cm long, 0.3-2 cm thick,
fleshy, equal or enlarged below (or tapered downward if clustered); solid, dry, fibrillose,
more or less colored like cap, becoming yellowish or rusty-stained. VEIL fibrillose to
somewhat membranous, yellowish; forming a hairy, superior ring on stalk which may
disappear or trap falling spores. SPORE PRINT bright rusty-orange; spores 5.5-8.5 *
3.5-4.5 microns, elliptical, roughened.
409
410 CORTINARIACEAE
HABIT AT: In groups or clusters on decaying coniferous wood, sawdust, and humus rich in
lignin (rarely on hardwoods); widespread, but not common. I have seen one fantastic
local fruiting, under pine at New Brighton Beach State Park, with Pluteus cervinus and
large clusters of Pholiota terrestris and Naematoloma fasciculare (all certified wood-
lovers) also present.
EDIBILITY: U nknown, but the closely related G. aeruginosus is said to be hallucinogenic.
COMMENTS: This distinctive mushroom can be told by the dark red fibrils or scales on
the cap (and often the stem), plus the yellow gills, rusty-orange spores, and relatively
persistent veil. The much more common Tricholomopsis rutilans features the same at¬
tractive color combination, but has white spores and lacks a veil, while G. aeruginosus and
relatives have a transient veil and often have bluish stains. G. pulchrifolius is a smaller spe¬
cies with a pink to pale pink cap. Others with distinctively colored cap scales include: G.
fulvosquamulosus, with tawny to brown scales on a yellow background; and G.
parvisquamulosus, with dark brown to blackish-brown scales on an ochraceous-tawny
background. Both have a mild taste and fibrillose to slightly membranous veil. I have
found them in our area, but they are rare.
(Omphalotus) have white or yellow-tinted spores, lack a veil, and grow only on hardwoods.
“Typical” G. spectabilis grows on both hardwoods and conifers and has a somewhat
fibrillose veil. It was originally called Pholiota spectabilis and is also known as G.junonius
(probably its “correct” name). The large, non-hallucinogenic, conifer-loving westernform
with a swollen stalk and membranous veil is called G. ventricosus {if truly distinct). It is
one of our largest and most spectacular mushrooms, commonly attaining pizza size(more
than one foot in diameter) with clusters weighing 10 pounds or more. Young specimens
present an entirely different appearance: squat and compact with hard, very thick, yellow
flesh and very narrow (shallow) gills. Other species in the G. spectabilis^complex” include:
G. subspectabilis, with larger spores; and G. validipes of eastern North America, a hallu¬
cinogenic species with a mild to only slightly unpleasant taste and a fibrillose veil.
THOUGH not closely related, these two small genera are treated together here because
they have a number of features in common: both grow on the ground, both have yellow-
brown to rusty-brown spores and a well-developed membranous veil that forms a distinct
annulus on the stalk, and both were originally placed in the genus Pholiota.
Rozites has somewhat wrinkled or roughened spores and has been aptly characterized
as “a Cortinarius with a membranous veil.” Phaeolepiota, on the other hand, has a granu-
lose or powdery cap and stem and has consequently been called “a brown-spored Cysto-
derma.” (Some mycologists go so far as to place it alongside Cystoderma in the Agari-
caceae; others retain it in Pholiota of the Strophariaceae.)
Each genus includes a single well-known species. Both are edible and quite good, but
some people are apparently “allergic” to Phaeolepiota.
411
412 CORTINARIACEAE
Phaeolepiota aurea
CAP 6-20 (30) cm broad, obtuse to convex becoming broadly convex, plane, or broadly
umbonate; surface dry, granular to somewhat powdery (the granules sometimes wearing
away in age), orange to orange-tan, tawny-yellow, or golden-brown, often somewhat paler
PHAEOLEPIOTA 413
in age; margin usually hung with veil remnants. Flesh thick, pallid or yellowish. GILLS
adnate to notched or free, close, pallid or pale yellowish becoming tawny to orange-
brown. STALK 5-15 (25) cm long, (1)2^4 (6) cm thick, thicker toward base, orange to buff
or colored like cap and granulose or powdery below the ring. VEIL membranous, colored
like cap, sheathing the stalk and breaking to form a superior flaring or funnel-like ring
which eventually collapses or becomes skirtlike; ring smooth on upper surface and granu¬
lose on underside. SPORE PRINT pale yellow-brown to orange-buff; spores 10-14 * 5-6
microns, elliptical, smooth to minutely roughened.
HABITAT: In groups or clusters in rich humus and soil under both hardwoods and
conifers; known from the Pacific Northwest and Alaska (also Europe), fruiting in the
late summer and fall. It is rather rare, but when it fruits it often does so in large quantities.
An ideal place to look for it is under alder along roads and trails.
EDIBILITY: Edible for most people, but mildly poisonous to some. It is a tempting
specimen, but try it cautiously if you must.
COMMENTS: Also known as Pholiota aurea and Togaria aurea, this large, beautiful
mushroom is as distinctive as it is rare. No other large, brownish-spored mushroom is
golden-brown to pale orange with a granulose coating on both the cap and stem.
Cystoderma species are granulose but much smaller and have white spores; Agaricus
augustus is similarly colored but has chocolate-brown spores and an almondy odor, while
Pholiota species, Rozites caperata, and Agrocybe praecox lack the granulose coating.
PHAEOCOLLYBIA
Medium-sized, terrestrial, woodland mushrooms. CAP usually viscid or slimy when moist. GILLS
adnexed to free, usually rusty-brown or cinnamon at maturity. STALK with along, tapered, deeply
rooting base or “tap root. ” VEIL and VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT cinnamon- to rusty-brown.
Spores elliptical, roughened, without an apical germ pore. Cystidia present, at least on gill edges.
THE presence of a “tap root” and absence of a veil distinguish this small, well-marked
genus from its closest relative, Cortinarius. The “tap root” (pseudorhiza) is merely an
extension of the stem that roots deeply in the humus. It gradually tapers to a point, be¬
coming so thin and fragile that it can’t be traced to its origin (probably tree roots). Most
other agarics with “tap roots” (e.g., Caulorhiza and Oudemansiella) have white spores.
Phaeocollybias are quite rare in most regions(including ours), but where they do occur
they often fruit in large numbers. The Pacific Northwest is an exception, for it is there
that the genus is most common and diverse. Many types seem to occur only with Sitka
spruce, while several favor western hemlock, redwood, or Douglas-fir; few, if any, occur
with hardwoods. About two dozen species are known from N orth America, many of them
restricted to the Pacific Northwest. Little is known of their edibility. Three representatives
are described here and several others are keyed out.
Key to Phaeocollybia
1. Cap dark green to olive, at least when fresh and moist (but may fade as it loses moisture) .. 2
1. Cap never greenish or olive .4
2. Gills violet or lilac when young .P. fallax (see P. o/ivacea, p. 414)
2. Gills whitish to pale brown when young, or at least not violet . 3
3. Stalk typically slender (less than 1 cm thick at apex); cap 1 -6 cm broad .
.P. festiva& P. pseudofestiva (see P. olivacea, p. 414)
3. Stalk typically about 1 cm thick (or more) at apex; cap 3-11 cm broad . . .. P. olivacea, p. 414
414 CORTINARIACEAE
415
Phaeocollybia californica. Note conical cap, “tap root,” and absence of veil. Also see color plate.
not markedly redden with age. Finally, there is a group of species (e.g., P. radicata, P.
jennyae, P. christianae, P. sipei) with a slender (3-6 mm) stem, small cap, and smaller
spores (less than 8 microns long) that are best differentiated from each other microscopi¬
cally. Nearly all of the above occur in the Pacific Northwest; a few are more widely dis¬
tributed or have counterparts (e.g., P. rufipes) in eastern North America. None are as
large as P. kauffmanii and none show the olive or grayish tones of P. olivacea and the
species listed under it.
EDIBILITY: Unknown. Its large size is tempting but the glutinous cap is not.
COMMENTS: This giant of the genus can usually be recognized by its size alone. The
colors are quite variable depending on age and moisture, but are usually darker and
redder than those of P. calif ornica and the species discussed under it. No other Phaeo¬
collybia has a stalk so consistently thick nor a cap so broad. The obtuse rather than conical
shape of young caps is also distinctive. Other species: P. oregonensis is a very similar but
slightly smaller species with smaller spores; P. spadicea is a fairly large species (cap 4-12
cm broad, stalk 1 -2 cm thick) with a dark brown to umber cap when moist. Both occur in
the Pacific Northwest.
416
417
CORTINARIUS
Woodland fungi nearly always growing on the ground. CAP viscid or dry, smooth to fibrillose or
scaly. GILLS typically attached but not often decurrent; variously and often brightly colored when
young but usually rusty-brown to cinnamon-brown in age. ST ALK thick or thin but usually fleshy,
central, the apex typically not powdery or dandruffy. VEIL present as a cobwebby or silky cortina
which often leaves hairs on stalk; fibrillose or slimy universal veil often present also. VOLVA
typically absent (but rimmed bulb sometimes present). SPORE PRINT rusty-brown to cinnamon-
brown or at times ochraceous-tawny. Spores round to elliptical, roughened, lacking an apical pore.
Cystidia usually absent on faces (sides) of gills but sometimes present on the edges. Cap cuticle
typically filamentous.
*Note: These lines were composed at 3:00 A.M. under the influence of severe boredom.
CORTINARIACEAE
418
seldom bother to name the multitudes of Cortinarii they encounter, and why Elias Fries,
the “father” of mushroom taxonomy, said in 1838: No genus is more natural nor more
sharply distinguished from others . . . but the species are so intimately related among
themselves that to distinguish the separate ones is almost to be despaired of. Cortinarius
species deserve to be better known, however, so don’t let your inability to name them
prevent you from learning to recognize them. Naming them, after all, is not an end in itself,
but a means of expediting the recognition process. If you really must have labels, you can
give them descriptive nicknames of your own.
The labyrinthine process of identifying a Cortinarius can be shortened to some extent
by learning to place each species in its proper subgenus. Five (or sometimes seven) large
subgenera have traditionally been recognized, and even raised to the rank of genus by
some mycologists:
Subgenus Myxacium: both cap and stalk viscid or slimy.
Subgenus Bulbopodium: only the cap viscid; stalk with an abrupt, often rimmed basal
bulb (see photograph on p. 439 and Color Plate 105).
Subgenus Phlegmacium: only the cap viscid; stalk equal to club-shaped or swollen, but
lacking a rimmed bulb.
Subgenus Telamonia: neither the cap nor the stalk viscid; cap hygrophanous and
smooth or occasionally fibrillose.
Subgenus Cortinarius (now divided into four subgenera—see below): neither the cap
nor the stalk viscid; cap often fibrillose or scaly but not typically hygrophanous.
The three subgenera with viscid caps are the easiest to recognize. Myxacium is especially
distinctive by virtue of the slimy universal veil that coats the cap and stalk. Bulbopodium
and Phlegmacium feature many large and/ or colorful species but intergrade somewhat
(the bulb can be somewhat abrupt or slightly rimmed), causing some investigators to
recognize only the latter.
The hygrophanous-capped subgenus Telamonia is the largest and most difficult group
of Cortinarii, with at least 400 species—most of them brownish or cinnamon-brown and
many of them small and nondescript (in other words, typical“LBM’s” in the grand, bland
tradition of Inocybe, Galerina, and Tubaria).
Members of the dry-capped subgenus Cortinarius are now divided up by Cortinarius-
categorizers into four subgenera, based largely on the types of pigments they contain:
Subgenus Cortinarius (in its most restricted sense): contains a single striking deep
violet, fibrillose-scaly species (C. violaceus).
Subgenus Sericeocybe: has violet to pale violet or lilac-white colors.
Subgenus(or genus) Dermocybe: composed mainly of small, slender-stemmed, bright¬
ly colored, conifer-loving species with yellow, olive, orange, or red pigments called
anthraquinones (which are water-soluble and hence make wonderful dyeing agents).
Subgenus Leprocybe: a large and diverse group whose color ranges from olive to yellow,
yellow-brown, rusty-orange, or brown, but whose pigments differ from those found
in Dermocybe.
Cortinarius is one of the most prominent features of our woodland fungal flora, but its
fruiting behavior is notoriously erratic. Sometimes there is one sudden spectacular,
Russula-like eruption of Cortinarii; at other times they fruit in a rather uninspired,
desultory fashion throughout the rainy season. A few species, such as C. glaucopus, are
common every year, but many types will be exceedingly abundant one season, then rare
or absent for the next two or ten (or even twenty!) years.
Most if not all Cortinarii are mycorrhizal. They attain their maximum numbers and
diversity in the cool coniferous forests of the north temperate zone, but are also common
under hardwoods (particularly “Bulbopodiums” and “Phlegmaciums”). In our area each
Cortinarius crocolitus (see comments under C. collinitus, p. 431) is one of hundreds of Cortinarii. Its
stalk is marked by yellow-brown or ochre belts formed by the universal veil.
forest type offers its own characteristic clique of Cortinarii: e.g., C. infractus, C. cotoneus,
and C. collinitus with tanoak; C. glaucopus, C. regalis, and C. sodagnitus with live oak;
C. cinnamomeus, C. phoeniceus var. occidentalism and C. obtusus with pine; and C.
balteatus, C. cylindripes, and C. vibratilis with ericaceous trees and shrubs (huckleberry,
manzanita, and madrone). It is in northern latitudes or higher altitudes(i.e., with northern
conifers, especially spruce), however, that the Cortinarii come into their own, and their
astonishing diversity becomes overwhelming.
Some of the older popular mushroom manuals list Cortinarius as a “safe” (albeit
mediocre*) genus—but nothing could be farther from the truth. Cortinarius, in fact,
contains several deadly poisonous species (particularly in the subgenus Leprocybe—see
C. gentilisl) whose effects on the human body are greatly delayed (for up to three weeks!).
Therefore it is best not to eat ANY Cortinarius, especially in view of the large number of
poorly known or difficult-to-identify species. (Even some of those proclaimed to be edible
may not be safe, since there is no assurance that the eater identified them correctly.)
Cortinarius is a tempting potential food source, however, so if you are adamant about
experimenting, then stick to the ones with viscid caps (none of which, as yet, are known
to be deadly poisonous), and wait at least two weeks—rather than the usual two days—
after your first “test” before indulging in more.
Because Cortinarii are so prominent and colorful, the selection of species in this book
is fairly sizable, at least in comparison to other giant—but more mundane—genera such as
Inocybe and Psathyrella. Over 130 species of Cortinarius are mentioned (not all of them
native to California) and 34 are fully described. Remember, however, that these 130+
species represent only a fraction of the total number that occur. The fieldmarks listed are
often insufficient for positive identification, and many of the descriptions are meant to
serve as models or “archetypes” for a large number of species (e.g., brown “Telamonias”
with a club-shaped stalk and medium-sized cap are typified by C. laniger). Thus most of the
names in this chapter should be seen as suggestions—rather than statements—as to what
your mysterious Cortinarius might be. Those wishing to verify their identifications should
consult a more definitive source, such as Alexander Smith’s keys to North American
Cortinarii (which are not available to the public), or Daniel Stuntz’s key to species of the
Pacific Northwest and Meinhard Moser’s keys to those of Europe, which are (see Sug¬
gested Readings and Primary References).
*Even Captain Charles Mcllvaine, that intrepid turn-of-the-century toadstool-tester who sung the praises of such
flaccid, featureless, fleshless fungi as Coprinus ephemerus (“choice as a flavoring”) and Psathyrella candolleana
(“tender one of the best”), was non-plussed by the Cortinarii, for on more than one occasion he characterized their
flavor as “more or less that of rotten wood.” However, one colleague of mine has a dissenting interpretation of
Mcllvaine’s comparison: he reasons that Mcllvaine’s tastes (which included a fondness for stinkhorns) were so
bizarre and eccentric that “rotten wood” was undoubtedly high up on his list of“best edibles,” and consequently,
so were the Cortinarii!
420 CORTINARIACEAE
Key to Cortinarius
l. Fruiting body typically developing underground (but cap may surface in wet weather), the veil
membranous or somewhat membranous and persistently covering the gills (i.e., either re¬
maining intact through maturity or shredding radially but not rupturing); found mostly under
mountain conifers ..2
1. Not as above; if developing underground then veil not persistent and membranous .4
2. Cap purplish or lavender-tinged .C. velatus{see C. magnivelatus, p. 442)
2. Cap white to yellow, ochre, or yellow-brown (not purplish) .3
3. Cap whitish when fresh; veil tough, often not rupturing . C. magnivelatus, p. 442
3. Cap yellow to yellow-brown or tan (or rusty-stained); veil not as tough or thick as above, often
shredding radially .C. verrucisporus & others (see C. magnivelatus, p. 442)
4. Cap viscid or slimy when moist (it may dry out, but look for adhering debris) . 5
4. Cap not normally viscid (in wet weather it may be slightly viscid or tacky but never slimy) 61
5. Cap radially corrugated or coarsely wrinkled, yellow-brown to ochre, tawny, or rusty-brown;
gills purplish at first but soon brown to rusty-cinnamon; stalk with a basal bulb when young,
but bulb often obscure in age; found under hardwoods in eastern North America, often in
large numbers .C. corrugatus
5. Not as above .6
6. Fruiting body massive; stalk 3-7 cm thick and lacking a basal bulb; flesh also very thick; cap
brownish to russet at the center (often with small flattened scales) and yellowish at margin
(lacking pronounced violet tones) . C. ponderosus & others, p. 432
6. Not as above; either smaller or with violet on cap or stalk with a basal bulb .7
7. Stalk (at least the lower part) viscid or slimy when moist, sometimes enlarged below but typically
without an abrupt, rimmed basal bulb (in very wet or very dry weather the viscidity may not be
evident) . 8
7. Stalk typically not viscid (but if cap is slimy, some of the slime may drip off onto stalk base);
stalk with or without an abrupt, rimmed basal bulb . 21
8. Fruiting body small (cap 2-5 cm broad) and gray, the cap and young gills with a slight lilac tinge
that often disappears in age; stalk whitish with a bluish-tinged apex when young; found under
conifers; rather rare. C. sterilis
8. Not as above .9
9. Fruiting body purple, violet, or bluish in some part, at least when young and fresh . 10
9. Violet or bluish shades completely absent . 17
10. Stalk typically club-shaped (thicker at base) . 11
10. Stalk equal, tapered downward, or spindle-shaped (swollen slightly in the middle and tapered
below) . 13
11. Cap violet or lavender well into maturity C. iodes& others (see C. cylindripes group, p. 430)
11. Not as above . 12
12. Center of cap rusty or tawny becoming chestnut-brown in age, the margin paler; gills violet-
tinged when very young . C. castaneicolor (see C. cylindripes group, p. 430)
12. Not as above .C. griseoluridus & others (see C. cylindripes group, p. 430)
13. Lower portion of stalk with conspicuous transverse or concentric bands, plaques, or scaly belts
formed by the universal veil; cap yellow-brown to rusty-orange or rusty-brown at maturity
(margin may be bluish or violet when young) . C. collinitus group, p. 431
13. Not as above (stalk occasionally with some scaly belts, but if so then cap darker or differently
colored) . 14
14. Cap purple or lilac, at least when young .C. cylindripes group & others, p. 430
14. Not as above . 15
15. Cap blackish to deep chestnut-brown to dark olive-brown, often fading to cinnamon-brown or
yellowish-brown in age, the margin often becoming radially wrinkled or grooved; stalk long,
usually rooting deeply in soil; common under northern conifers . 16
15. Not as above; cap differently colored, at least when young (i.e., paler or brighter) .
. C. pseudosalor & C. delibutus (see C. cylindripes group, p. 430)
CORTINARIUS 421
16. Cap blackish to deep chestnut-brown when young, fading to cinnamon in age; gills not violet
or bluish when young .C. vanduzerensis, p. 432
16. Cap colored as above or ranging to olive- or yellow-brown; gills violet or bluish-tinged when
young . C. elatior(see C. collinitus group, p. 431)
17. Stalk usually club-shaped or thickened below, at least when young; fruiting body sometimes
rather small . 18
17. Stalk more or less equal or tapered downward; fruiting body medium-sized or larger .... 20
18. Fruiting body medium-sized (cap usually 5 cm broad or more); stalk usually at least 1 cm thick
at apex, typically with ochre-brown patches of veil tissue below; odor and taste not distinctive
.C. pallidifolius(see C. collinitus group, p. 431)
18. Not as above; fruiting body rather small (cap usually less than 5 cm broad); odor typically
fragrant or taste of cap surface bitter . 19
19. Odor fragrant; flesh, young gills, and stalk yellow . . C. ciirinifolius(see C. percomis, p. 436)
19. Odor typically mild but taste very bitter (at least of the cap surface); flesh and stalk whitish
.C. vibratilis, p. 429
20. Lower portion of stalk typically with transverse or concentric bands, plaques, or scaly belts
of universal veil tissue; found under both hardwoods and conifers C. collinitus group, p. 431
20. Not as above; associated principally with conifers . C. mucosus, p. 429
21. Immature gills sooty olive to olive, greenish, or yellow-green, or soon becoming these colors 22
21. Immature gills differently colored (including yellow) . 28
22. Stalk lacking an abrupt, rimmed basal bulb; cap sooty-olive when young (may be browner or
tawnier in age), the skin often bitter-tasting; gills usually sooty-olive also .
. C. infractus& others, p. 435
22. Not as above; stalk usually with an abrupt, often rimmed basal bulb, at least when young 23
23. Immature gills with violet faces or entire gills with a fleeting violet phase at first .24
23. Gills never violet .25
24. Gills at first with violet faces and olive edges C. montanus& others(see C. cedretorum, p.439)
24. Gills violet-tinged when very young but soon entirely olive to greenish or greenish-yellow . . .
.C. scaurus group, p. 440
25. Cap reddish to reddish-brown or orange-brown when fresh, at least at the center .
.C. orichalceus& C. rufo-olivaceus (see C. scaurus group, p. 440)
25. Not as above ..'. 26
26. Cap olive; gills olive to olive-yellow; stalk yellowish or olive-tinged; found mainly under conifers
in the Pacific Northwest . C. prasinus (see C. scaurus group, p. 440)
26. Not as above; usually more brightly colored, at least in part; widespread .27
27. Gills green; stalk pale bluish when fresh; found in eastern North America under hardwoods
.C. virentophyllus (see C. scaurus group, p. 440)
27. Not as above; especially common in the West .C. scaurus group, p. 440
28. Some part of fruiting body lilac, violet, purple, or bluish when fresh and young(check cap sur¬
face, stalk, immature gills, and flesh) .. 29
28. Fruiting body completely lacking violet, lilac, or bluish tones .48
29. Flesh (at least in base of stalk) staining wine-red when bruised . 72
29. Not as above (but flesh may stain purple or dull lilac) . 30
30. Gills and/or flesh staining purple or dull lilac when bruised (if already purple, then staining
darker purple) . C. mutabilis group & others, p. 437
30. Not as above . 31
31. Immature gills yellow or purplish with yellow or olive edges . 32
31. Not as above . 33
32. Flesh partly violet or lilac and partly yellowish or whitish when fruiting body is sliced open
lengthwise (see Color Plate 105); stalk apex not bluish.C. cedretorum & others, p. 439
32. Not as above; stalk apex often bluish; gills entirely olive or with olive edges .
.C. montanus (see C. cedretorum, p. 439)
33. Whitish fibrillose or felty veil remnants usually present on cap (often in the form of a patch)
.C. calyptratus & C. calyptrodermus (see C. rega/is, p. 443)
33. Not as above . 34
422 CORTINARIACEAE
34. Stalk with an abrupt, rimmed basal bulb, at least when young .
34. Stalk merely equal or club-shaped, lacking a sharply defined, rimmed basal bulb
35. Basal bulb with a whitish volva- like sheath; cap grayish to bluish-gray; growing mainly under
spruce . .C. volvatus(sQQ C. regalis, p. 443)
35. Not as above . 36
36. Cap bright yellow to yellow-brown or ochre (the center sometimes oranger), even when young
and fresh.C. calochrous & others (see C. fulmineus, p.441)
36 Cap differently colored (but may develop ochre or yellowish shades in age) .37
37. Cap dark reddish-brown to chestnut, becoming paler reddish-brown in age; gills pale lilac at
first, darkening to reddish-brown; found mainly under conifers, especially in southern Oregon
and northern California .C. subpurpureophyllus
37. Not as above . 38
38. Cap dark olive or greenish to steel-gray or brown, often streaked or mixed with ochre, blue, or
gray, and often developing rusty to fulvous tones when older (especially toward center);
immature gills gray to bluish-gray to bluish-violet (or occasionally violet) .
.C. glaucopus group & others, p. 437
38. Not as above; immature gills lilac, violet, or lavender, or if bluer then cap typically bluish to
bluish-gray or at least differently colored from above. 39
39. Associated with conifers in the Pacific Northwest; fruiting body modest in size (stalk typically
less than 1.5 cm thick at apex); gills lilac to pinkish-lilac when young . C. olympianus, p. 439
39. Not as above; especially common under hardwoods .40
40. Fruiting body (or at least the immature gills and stalk apex) with a bluish tinge when fresh
... C. caesiocyaneus (see C. olympianus, p. 439)
40. N ot as above (gills and stalk apex more violet or purple than blue) .41
41. Mature fruiting body with a small but sharply defined basal bulb; taste usually bitter (at least
of the cap cuticle); cap with violet or lilac tones at least at the margin; common under oak in
California .C. sodagnitus group, p.438
41. Not as above; found mainly under hardwoods in eastern North America .42
42. Cap and basal bulb discoloring ochre or buffy-tan fairly quickly .
.C. velicopia(see C. olympianus, p.439)
42. Not as above . C. michiganensis, C. aggregatus, & others (see C. olympianus, p. 439)
43. Cap usually lilac or lavender at least at the margin; stalk usually very thick (2-5 cm) or if not then
odor usually sweetish (like overripe pears) . 44
43. Not as above .45
44. Stalk very thick (2-5 cm); flesh thick and firm .C. balteatus&i others, p. 433
44. Stalk typically 2 cm thick or less; odor usually sweetish .C. subfoetidus, p. 434
45. Stalk with pale tawny patches or fibrils, thinly viscid at first; cap tawny to chestnut-brown with
a paler (buff-colored) margin . C. castaneicolor (see C. cylindripes group, p. 430)
45. Not as above .46
46. Cap yellow to yellow-brown, tawny, or fulvous C. varius & others (see C. multiformis, p. 442)
46. Cap differently colored . 47
47. Cap reddish-brown to liver-brown or dull purplish; gills usually violet or lilac when young . .
. C. variicolor & others (see C. multiformis, p. 442)
47. Not as above; gills usually bluer or grayer . C. glaucopus group, p. 437
48. Odor distinctly fragrant and sweet (break open the flesh if there is any doubt) .49
48. Not as above (but odor may be distinctive) . 51
49. Odor aniselike; stalk with a basal bulb, at least when young C. odorifer(see C. percomis, p. 436)
49. Not as above . 50
50. Stalk and flesh yellow or yellowish .C. percomis, p. 436
50. Stalk and flesh white or whitish .C. luteoarmillatus (?) (see C. percomis, p. 436)
51. Odor strongly pungent(like green corn or corn silk); gills and cap yellowish when young, thecap
becoming browner or redder in age; stalk usually with darker fibrillose patches or zones; found
under conifers in the Pacific Northwest .C. superbus
51. Not as above . 52
CORTINARIUS 423
52. Gills yellow to yellow-orange or yellow-brown when young and stalk with an abrupt, usually
rimmed basal bulb (at least when young) . 53
52. Not as above . 54
53. Cap bright green to citrine-green when fresh (sometimes brownish at the center); common
under oak in California .C. sp. (unidentified) (see C. scaurus group, p. 440)
53. Cap not green . C. fulmineus & others, p. 441
54. Cap brownish to dingy-flesh colored, but usually with a patch or patches of white fibrillose
or felty veil material, only slightly viscid; stalk with a basal bulb; found under oak in California
.C. regalis, p. 443
54. Not as above . 55
55. Cap white or whitish (or at times ranging to buff or pale tan) . 56
55. Cap darker or brighter than above . 57
56. Stalk with a basal bulb; found under hardwoods in eastern North America .C. albidus
56. Not as above; stalk equal or club-shaped (thicker below) but lacking a prominent basal bulb;
often found under conifers . 138
57. Lower portion of stalk with concentric belts or transverse bands of colored (usually ochre)
veil tissue .C. crocolitus(see C. collinitus group, p. 431)
57. Not as above . 58
58. Cap radially corrugated or wrinkled, cinnamon to pinkish-cinnamon to cinnamon-brown;
found in the Pacific Northwest under conifers ..C. corrugis
58. Cap not radially corrugated . 59
59. V eil copious, usually leaving remnants on cap margin and/ ora fibrillose white sheath or patches
on the stalk (and often a slight ring or annulus) .... C. turmalis{see C. multiformis, p. 442)
59. Not as above; veil not so copious (but may leave a few remnants) .60
60. Stalk 1-4 cm thick and very firm, usually stout, more or less equal or narrowed slightly at the
base .C. crassus (see C. balteatus, p. 433)
60. Stalk with a basal bulb (at least when young) or not as thick and stout as above.
...C. multiformis & others, p. 442
61. Fresh fruiting body at least partially purplish, bluish, lilac, lavender-gray, lavender-white,
etc. (check immature gills, stalk apex, flesh, and cap) .62
61. Fresh fruiting body completely lacking violet, bluish, or pale lavender shades .87
62. Lower part of stalk with reddish bands, patches, or “bracelets” formed by the universal veil
or stalk with a fiery orange to red base .. .. 63
62. Not as above (but upper stalk may have a ring of rusty hairs from the cortina) . 64
63. Stalk 3-7 mm thick at apex, with reddish to vinaceous patches, fibrils, or “bracelets”; cap 2-5
cm broad .C. boulderensis (see C. armillatus, p. 448)
63. Usually larger than above; stalk with a bright orange or red base .C. rubripes, p. 449
64. Stalk typically with a persistent, somewhat membranous annulus (ring) formed by the veil,
usually club-shaped or bulbous; gills broad, well-spaced, deep purplish becoming dark
cinnamon-brown; cap deep purplish to brownish to copper-brown, often fibrillose or hoary;
found mainly under hardwoods in eastern North America C. torvus (see C. evernius, p. 450)
64. Not as above . 65
65. Cap hygrophanous (fading markedly as it loses moisture) and smooth (bald) or at most with a
few whitish veil remnants near the margin . 66
65. Cap smooth, silky, fibrillose, hairy, or scaly, but if smooth then not markedly hygrophanous 72
66. Fruiting body small (cap 1-3 cm broad; stalk less than 5 mm thick) .
.C. pulchellus & C. subflexipes (see C. obtusus group, p. 452)
66. Fruiting body medium-sized (larger than above). 67
67. Fresh fruiting body violet-tinged only at apex of stalk . . . C. brunneus (see C. laniger, p. 451)
67. Fresh fruiting body showing more violet than above (but violet tones may fade) . 68
68. Stalk with conspicuous remnants from the universal veil . 69
68. Stalk with inconspicuous veil remnants (or lacking them) .
. C. impennis & C. adustus(see C. evernius, p. 450)
Cortinariuspholideus occurs mostly with birch. Note prominent scales on cap and stalk.
69. Universal veil remnants on stalk yellowish to buff . C. subpurpureus (see C. evernius, p. 450)
69. Not as above . 70
70. Stalk more or less club-shaped (thicker at base) .C. lucorum (see C. evernius, p. 450)
70. Stalk equal or tapering downward . 71
71. Stalk often with a narrow, flaring annulus (ring); cap pale when fresh .
.C. urbicus (see C. evernius, p. 450)
71. Not as above .C. evernius & others, p. 450
72. Flesh bluish or violet but staining wine-red to wine-brown when cut or bruised, at least in base of
stalk; cap bluish or bluish-gray to grayish-lavender becoming deep purplish-brown in age;
cap surface usually fibrillose or with flattened scales; gills dark bluish or bluish-violet when
young; stalk with a basal bulb which often disappears in age; not common .C. cyanites
72. Not as above; flesh not staining wine-red when bruised; common. 73
73. Cap distinctly hairy, scaly, or fibrillose-scaly . 74
73. Cap smooth or silky or very slightly scaly (but may have universal veil remnants on it) ... 78
74. Stalk with only a tinge of violet or bluish-gray and soon fading to whitish; cap brownish to buff
beneath a white to grayish-white fibrillose-hairy layer (cap lacking violet or bluish shades);
found under conifers .C. plumiger (see C. evernius, p. 450)
74. Not as above . 75
75. Entire fruiting body deep violet (sometimes nearly black) when fresh (the gills may be rusty-
dusted in age) .C. violaceus, p. 446
75. Not as above; fruiting body paler, browner, or with only a tinge of violet . 76
76. Cap and stalk with brown to cinnamon-brown scales; stalk not radically bulbous (see above
photo); fairly common under hardwoods (especially birch) in eastern North America, rarely
in the Pacific Northwest .C. pholideus (see C. squamulosus, p. 445)
76. Not with above features; stalk not usually conspicuously scaly . 77
77. Stalk radically bulbous; cap with brown to dark chocolate-brown scales; found under hard¬
woods in eastern North America, rare (or absent) in West .C. squamulosus, p. 445
77. Not as above; stalk not radically bulbous and/or habitat different . 78
78. Flesh in stalk rusty-brown to cinnamon-, tawny-, or yellow-brown (often marbled); associated
with conifers . C. traganus, p. 447
78. Not as above (flesh in stalk usually white to buff or tinged violet) . 79
424
Cortinarius bolaris favors beech and other hardwoods in eastern North America. Note distinctive
red fibrils or scales on the cap and stalk.
79. Stalk with buff to tan, ochre, or brownish-yellow patches, zones, or “bracelets” formed by
the universal veil .C. anomalus & C. caninus (see C. alboviolaceus, p. 447)
79. Not as above; universal veil remnants differently colored (if present) . 80
80. Odor distinctive: either sweetish (like overripe pears), spermatic, or very unpleasant.81
80. Not as above; odor mild, radishlike, or merely fungal . 83
81. Odor sweetish, resembling overripe pears .C. fragrans (see C. traganus, p. 447)
81. Odor unpleasant or spermatic . 82
82. Odor usually spermatic; fruiting body rather small, the cap often umbonate; spore print dull
brown .(see Inocybe, p. 455)
82. Odor unpleasant but not spermatic; fruiting body medium-sized; spore print rusty-brown to
cinnamon-brown .C. camphoratus & others (see C. traganus, p. 447)
83. Stalk very thick (2-5 cm thick at apex) and firm; cap viscid when moist (but soon dry and often
shiny) .C. balteatus, p. 433
83. Stalk typically 2 cm thick or less at apex and/ or cap not viscid when young . 84
84. Cap and lower stalk viscid when very young, often with brown or olive-brown patches or spots
(of dried slime) when older; found under conifers; rare .
.C. griseoviolaceus (see C. cylindripes group, p. 430)
84. Cap and stalk not viscid (or cap only very slightly so in wet weather) and not spotted as above
(but may develop ochre, tan, buff, or brownish discolorations in age); found under both
hardwoods and conifers; common . 85
85. Cap predominantly pale violet to lilac-white or silvery-violet or pale bluish-violet (but buff to
ochre stains may develop in age) . 86
85. Cap differently colored (either grayish-buff or soon becoming brown to ochre throughout)
. C. subpulchrifolius & C. malachius (see C. alboviolaceus, p. 447)
86. Lower portion of stalk sheathed with conspicuous white universal veil tissue (fibrils); stalk often
rather long and club-shaped (thicker below but not abruptly bulbous) C. alboviolaceus, p. 447
86. Stalk often thick and stout with a prominent basal bulb and/or lacking conspicuous white
universal veil tissue .C. argentatus & C. subargentatus (see C. alboviolaceus, p. 447)
87. Growing in sand (but associated with pine); gills rusty-orange to brownish-orange when young
...C. aureifolius (see C. cinnamomeus group, p. 453)
87. Not with above combination of characteristics . 88
88. Cap olive-brown to olive-yellow to yellow-brown with small darker (often blackish) hairs
or fibrillose scales, especially toward center . C. cotoneus group, p. 445
88. Not as above . 89
89. Cap and stalk with reddish scales, fibrils, and/or streaks on a paler (whitish to yellowish)
background; found under hardwoods, especially beech, in eastern North America (see above
photo) . C. bolaris (see C. squamulosus, p. 445)
89. Not as above (but cap and stalk can be entirely reddish or the stalk can have reddish universal
veil remnants) ... 90
425
426 CORTINARIACEAE
90 Stalk white to brownish with 1 -4 reddish to reddish-brown bands or belts of universal veil tissue
over the lower portion or stalk with a bright red to orange base or a sheath of vermilhon fibrils
(universal veil remnants) .^1
90. Not as above (but stalk may be entirely red or orange or the stalk may have a single zone of rusty
hairs formed by the cortina, usually near apex) .94
91. Cap 1 -3 cm broad; stalk wholly or partially sheathed by vermillion fibrils .
.C. miniatopus (see C. rubripes, p. 449)
91. Not as above; cap usually larger . 92
92. Stalk base red to bright orange; associated with hardwoods, especially oak C. rubripes, p. 449
92. Stalk with 1-4 reddish bands or “bracelets”; associated with conifers or birch . 93
93. Typically associated with birch .C. armillatus, p. 448
93. Typically associated with conifers (especially in the Pacific Northwest) or with hardwoods
other than birch .C. haematochelis & C. subtestaceus (see C. armillatus, p. 448)
94. Stalk 6-18 cm long and 0.5-2 cm thick at apex, usually whitish and club-shaped (thicker at base);
gills pale yellow when young; cap creamy to pale buff to yellowish or tawny-brown (often
darkest at center), silky or minutely scaly; found under hardwoods (especially beech) in eastern
North America . C. flavifolius
94. Not as above . 95
95. Growing on lawns or buried wood; stalk typically 3-5 mm thick and often with a small annulus
(ring); cap typically less than 4 cm broad, reddish-brown to cinnamon, fading to more or less
buff as it loses moisture; found in the Pacific Northwest .
.(see Galerina, Tubaria, & Allies, p. 399)
95. Not as above . 96
96. Stalk yellow to bright yellow but the gills whitish to brown (i.e., not brightly colored) when
young; cap smooth and hygrophanous, fading to yellowish as it loses moisture . 97
96. Not as above; stalk not yellow (but may have yellowish veil remnants), or if stalk yellow then
immature gills usually brightly colored also or cap minutely scaly . 98
97. Gills whitish when young; cap brown to tan when moist .C. renidens
97. Gills brownish or cinnamon when young; cap bronzy-brown to deep olive-brown when moist
. C. angulosus
98. Gills colorful (yellow, greenish, orange, red, dark red, or bright rusty-orange) when young;
stalk often colorful also; cap usually not hygrophanous . 99
98. Gills dull (whitish, grayish, brownish, or dull cinnamon) when young; stalk usually dull also
(brownish, gray, white, etc.); cap usually hygrophanous . 110
99. Immature gills orange-red to rusty-orange; cap hygrophanous (dark rust-red but fading as it
loses moisture); stalk usually paler than cap and gills; found only on the west coast in mixed
woods and under conifers.C. californicus (see C. phoeniceus var. occidentalis, p. 454)
99. Not as above (if colored as above, then cap not hygrophanous or found elsewhere) .... 100
100. Immature gills red to dark red . 101
100. Immature gills some shade of yellow, olive, orange, or bright cinnamon . 104
101. Entire fruiting body orange-red to red, dark red, or rust-red . 102
101. At least the stalk (and sometimes cap) yellowish or ochre to yellow-brown . 103
102. bruiting body cinnabar-red to rusty-red or dark red; found mainly in eastern North America,
especially under hardwoods .C. cinnabarinus & others (see C. sanguineus, p. 454)
102. Fruiting body blood-red to dark red; found mainly under conifers in northern and western
North America . C. sanguineus, p. 454
103. Cap red to dark red or reddish-brown .C. phoeniceus var. occidentalis, p. 454
103. Cap ochre to brown or yellowish .
. C. semisanguineus (see C. phoeniceus var. occidentalis, p. 454)
104. Cap orange-red to bright rusty-red to coppery-red (or occasionally orange-brown); immature
gills bright yellow to greenish-yellow or sometimes orangish; associated mainly with conifers
and willow; not common .C. uliginosus
104. Not as above; cap not reddish . 105
105. Cap tawny to rusty-orange and covered with numerous minute, erect scales .
.. rainierensis (see C. gentilis, p. 444)
105. Not as above; cap smooth to fibrillose or with a few scales only . 106
CORTINARIUS 427
106. Cap smooth and hygrophanous, orange-brown to yellow-brown or ochre when moist, fading
as it loses moisture; gills ochre-yellow to cinnamon-brown or brown (not particularly bright);
stalk deep orange-brown or cinnamon-colored, often with a few yellow veil remnants when
young; fruiting body small (stalk less than 5 mm thick) .C. gentilis, p. 444
106. Not as above; cap smooth to fibrillose or slightly scaly, not hygrophanous; fruiting body
variously colored but often brighter or more olive than above (especially the stalk) .... 107
107. Immature gills yellow to olive-yellow or greenish . 108
107. Immature gills saffron (orange-yellow) to orange or rusty-orange . 109
108. Stalk club-shaped and at least 2.5 cm thick at base; fruiting body bright yellow becoming
oranger or browner in age . C. callisteus (see C. cinnamomeus group, p. 453)
108. Not as above; stalk more slender and/or equal; fruiting body sometimes with olive tones
(but sometimes without) . C. cinnamomeus group & others, p. 453
109. Cap 3-9 cm broad; stalk usually 0.5-1.5 cm thick; gills ochre to tawny or orangish-cinnamon
when young; occurrence in North America questionable .
. C. orellanus & C. speciosissimus (see C. gentilis, p. 444)
109. Not as above; usually smaller or more slender; gills sometimes brightly colored (saffron,
orange, etc.); common in North America .
.C. croceofolius & others (see C. cinnamomeus group, p. 453)
110. Cap and stalk whitish to grayish or pale tan, but the flesh staining yellow when bruised and
finally turning (or aging) reddish; widely distributed, but especially common along the west
coast under conifers . C. rubicundulus (-C. pseudobolaris)
110. Not as above . Ill
111. Fruiting body small and rather fragile; cap sometimes umbonate, averaging 1 -4 (5) cm broad;
stalk averaging 2-6 mm thick (examine several specimens if unsure!) . 112
111. Fruiting body medium-sized or larger; cap not umbonate or only very broadly so, averaging
4-15 cm broad; stalk averaging 0.5-3 cm thick (check several specimens if unsure) . 121
112. Stalk usually with yellow or yellowish veil remnants, at least when young (check several speci¬
mens); gills ochre-yellow to cinnamon-brown when young .C. gentilis, p. 444
112. Not as above . 113
113. Gills staining black when bruised . C. washingtonensis (see C. obtusus group, p. 452)
113. Not as above . 114
114. Cap with a prominent black umbo (otherwise slightly paler) .
.C. nigrocuspidatus (see C. obtusus group, p. 452)
114. Not as above (but cap may be entirely blackish) . 115
115. Cap very dark when moist (deep vinaceous-brown to blackish-brown or black), but often paler
as it loses moisture . 116
115. Cap paler than above when moist . 119
116. Stalk with conspicuous white universal veil material, at least when young and fresh ... 117
116. Stalk with only slight universal veil remnants (if any) . 118
117. Odor geranium-like (at least when flesh is crushed); found in bogs or other wet places .
.C. paleaceus (see C. obtusus group, p. 452)
117. Not as above .C. stemmatus (see C. obtusus group, p. 452)
118. Cap blackish-brown when moist; gills and stalk also very dark; found under conifers .
. C. uraceus
118. Cap dark vinaceous-brown when moist; gills tawny-yellowish to pale brownish when young
. C. decipiens (see C. obtusus group, p. 452)
119. Cap (and sometimes stalk) minutely scaly .
.C. psammocephalus & C. incisus{see C. obtusus group, p. 452)
119. Cap more or less smooth . 120
120. Cap typically with an acute (sharp) umbo C. acutus & others (see C. obtusus group, p. 452)
120. Cap typically with an obtuse (blunt) umbo or with none at all C. obtusus group & others, p.452
121. Fruiting body (including stalk) rusty-orange to yellowish or yellow-brown; cap minutely scaly
and not hygrophanous; not definitely known to occur in North America .
. C. orellanus & C. speciosissimus (see C. gentilis, p. 444)
121. Not as above; very common in North America . 122
428 CORTINARIACEAE
122. Cap brownish to dingy flesh-colored, but often with a whitish patch of universal veil tissue;
stalk thick (1.5-3.5 cm at apex), with a large, abrupt, often rimmed basal bulb; fairly common
in California under oak . ^ regalis, p. 443
122. Not as above . 123
123. Cap covered with cinnamon-brown to chocolate-brown scales, not markedly hygrophanous;
either stalk also with scales or stalk radically bulbous; common under hardwoods in eastern
North America, rare in the West . 124
123. Not as above . 125
124. Stalk radically bulbous and smooth to fibrillose or only slightly scaly C. squamulosus, p. 445
124. Stalk equal or slightly thicker below, with brown scales like those on cap .
.C. pholideus (see C. squamulosus, p. 445)
125. Cap broadly cone-shaped and finely silky-scaly from the universal veil when young; stalk
equal, sheathed with white universal veil remnants, soon becoming hollow; cap dark to pale
cinnamon .C. hemitrichus
125. Not as above (but may be similar in some respects, such as color). 126
126. Cap blackish-brown when moist; gills and stalk also very dark; found under conifers .
. C. uraceus
126. Not as above; usually paler or brighter in color . 127
127. Stalk typically tapered downward or spindle-shaped (swollen near ground and tapered below),
the base often rooting . 128
127. Stalk typically equal to club-shaped or bulbous . 130
128. Cap cinnamon-brown when moist ..C. duracinus (see C. laniger, p. 451)
128. Cap vinaceous-brown to cocoa-colored when moist . 129
129. Stalk with conspicuous white universal veil remnants C. damascenus (see C. laniger, p. 451)
129. Universal veil remnants on stalk absent or evanescent .
.C. privignus & C. cacao-color (see C. laniger, p. 451)
130. Cap silky to fibrillose or fibrillose-scaly and white to silvery-gray or pale brownish-gray or
cap brown beneath a whitish to grayish fibrillose layer. 131
130. Cap darker, at least when moist, and usually more or less smooth or minutely scurfy (but cap
may fade to buff or paler as it loses moisture) . 133
131. Cap brown to buff beneath a fibrillose-scaly layer . ... C. plumiger (see C. evernius, p. 450)
131. Cap paler than above and silky to fibrillose (but sometimes becoming pale brownish-gray in
age) . 132
132. Cap silky-fibrillose, white to silvery, sometimes becoming pale brownish in age .
.C. pinetorum (see C. laniger, p. 451)
132. Cap whitish or silvery, usually with a faint hint of lavender or violet (examine several specimens
if unsure), silky; flesh and stalk apex often with a violet tinge also .
. C. alboviolaceus & others, p. 447
133. Cap yellow-brown when moist, fading to pale yellow-orange or orange-buffasit loses moisture
.C. armeniacus (see C. laniger, p. 451)
133. Cap redder or darker than above, at least when moist . 134
134. Gills widely spaced; cap smooth or scurfy .C. distans (see C. laniger, p. 451)
134. Not as above . 135
135. Stalk more or less equal .C. biformis& C. dilulus (see C. laniger, p. 451)
135. Stalk usually club-shaped or swollen below, at least when young (but sometimes equal, so
examine several specimens if unsure) . 136
136. Stalk with conspicuous universal veil remnants, at least when young . 137
136. Stalk with only slight traces of the universal veil, if any (but may have remnants from the
cortina) . C. triformis & others (see C. laniger, p. 451)
137. Cap dark or dull brown when moist; stalk similarly colored beneath whitish to brownish veil
remnants, the apex sometimes vinaceous- or violet-tinged C. brunneus (see C. laniger, p. 451)
137. Cap cinnamon to reddish-brown or chestnut-brown when moist; stalk similarly colored be¬
neath whitish veil remnants, not vinaceous- or violet-tinged at apex C. laniger & others, p. 451
138. Cap surface or cuticle bitter-tasting .C. crystallinus (see C. vibratilis, p. 429)
138. Not as above .C. lustratus & others
Cortinarius vibratilis. Note small size, slimy cap, and viscid stalk that is swollen at base.
429
CORTINARIACEAE
430
ceous or tawny, then cinnamon-brown from ripening spores. STALK 4-15 cm long, 1-2
(2.5) cm thick, more or less equal, slimy or viscid when moist, white or whitish but. some¬
times rusty-stained from spores; not breaking up into conspicuous scaly belts. UNI¬
VERSAL VEIL whitish, slimy, disappearing or leaving indistinct remains on stalk.
CORTINA usually forming a superior, hairy-fibrillose zone on stalk which is stained rusty-
brown by spores. SPORE PRINT rusty-brown; spores 11-18 x 5-7.5 microns, elongated-
elliptical, roughened.
HABITAT: Widely scattered to gregarious in mixed woods and under conifers (parti¬
cularly pine and spruce); widely distributed, but especially common in the West in the late
summer and fall, and in the southern United States. I have seen large fruitings in Wash¬
ington, New Mexico, Arizona, and northern California, but not in our area. Cortinarius-
classifier Joe Ammirati says it has been found under birch and willow in the Brooks Range
in northern Alaska; it also occurs with hemlock.
EDIBILITY: Better eschewed than stewed. It is too slippery to be worthwhile, and its
edibility is unknown.
COMMENTS: The smooth, viscid, tawny to orange-brown or reddish-brown cap and
viscid, whitish, equal stalk are the distinguishing features of this “slimy sucker.” The cap
color is reminiscent of C. collinitus, but the stalk lacks the scaly belts characteristic of that
species, and the taste is not bitter nor the stalk club-shaped as in C. vibratilis. Phaeocollybia
species are somewhat similar, but lack a cortina and have a long, rooting stalk. C. turmalis
(see comments under C. multiformis) is also similar, but has a dry stalk.
C. griseoviolaceus, a small violet-tinged conifer-lover whose cap and stalk are only thinly
viscid (if at all); and C. griseoluridus, with a club-shaped stalk when young and a violet
to olive or ochre cap, found under conifers in the Rocky Mountains. All of these have
viscid, violet-tinged stalks that lack the distinctive belts characteristic of C. collinitus,
and none have caps as dark or as wrinkled as those of C. vanduzerensis and C. elatior.
Other violet-tinged Myxaciums include: C. castaneicolor, found under northern conifers,
with a whitish to tawny, club-shaped stalk, pale violet gills when very young, and a buff
to tawny to chestnut-brown (darker at the center) cap; and C. delibutus and C. sphaero-
sporus (two very similar if not identical species), with a bright yellow to ochre or straw-
colored cap, violet-tinged gills at first, and an equal to club-shaped whitish stalk that
often has yellowish veil patches (or slime) below and often has a violet-tinged apex.
431
432 CORTINARIACEAE
the variants which differ in color and spore size. Our local version, which might be C.
trivialis, does not show violet on the stem, and neither does the common aspen-loving
form. C. elatior is a similar species that is not so strikingly banded. It has a dark brown to
olive-brown or yellow-brown cap that is often radially wrinkled or grooved at the margin
in age, violet or bluish-tinged gills when young, and a tapered, rooting stalk that is also
bluish- or violet-toned (and slimy). It favors conifers and is fairly common in northern
California and the Pacific Northwest. Other species: C. pallidifolius has pallid gills
when young and a viscid club-shaped stalk with ochre-brown patches or zones; it is also
found under conifers in the Pacific Northwest, especially fir. C. crocolitus (-C. trium-
phans?) and close relatives have a yellowish to brown viscid cap and a dry stalk marked
with yellow-brown to ochre belts or patches (see photo on p. 419); they favor hardwoods.
Cortinarius vanduzerensis
CAP 4-10 cm broad, somewhat conical becoming broadly conical or convex; surface
smooth, very slimy when moist, deep chestnut-brown to nearly black when young, be¬
coming paler chesnut and finally cinnamon-brown in age, often wrinkled radially or
corrugated at maturity, especially toward margin. Flesh pallid to cinnamon-buff; odor
mild. GILLS close, adnate or adnexed, pallid or buff becoming pale brown and finally
dull cinnamon-brown. STALK 8-20 cm long, 1-2 cm thick, equal or often tapered slightly
toward the base, often deeply rooted, viscid to very slimy, bluish-violet to violet to dark
lavender above, paler below, often fading in age. UNIVERSAL VEIL slimy, sheathing at
least the lower half of the stalk and occasionally breaking up into concentric zones.
CORTINA forming a ring of hairs near top of stalk or disappearing. SPORE PRINT
rusty-brown; spores 11-15 * 7-9 microns, elliptical, roughened.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups under conifers; known only from northern
California and the Pacific Northwest, where it is fairly common in the fall and early winter.
I have found it several times under Sitka spruce.
EDIBILITY: Unknown, but much too slippery to be of value.
COMMENTS: The dark slimy cap, slimy violet or bluish-violet stalk, and pallid to brown
gills when young form a distinctive combination of features. It closely resembles C. elatior
(see comments under the C. collinitus group) in shape, size, and the wrinkled cap at
maturity, but does not have the bluish-violet immature gills of that species. The stalk
often roots deeply in the ground, but the presence of a veil distinguishes it from Phaeo-
collybia. The stalk occasionally shows concentric ring-zones, but not to the extent of
C. collinitus. (Violet-stalked forms of the latteralsohaveabrighterorpalercap.)Forother
similar “Myxaciums” with paler caps, see C. cylindripes group. Also see photo on p. 433.
slime on stalk. CORTINA often leaving a hairy zone on upper stalk. SPORE PRINT
rusty-brown; spores 8.5-11 * 5-6 microns, elliptical, roughened.
Cortinarius balteatus
CAP (3) 6-20 (25) cm broad, broadly convex with an inrolled margin becoming plane in
age; surface viscid when moist but soon dry and often shiny, smooth, without scales but
sometimes appearing streaked or blotched; dull violet or lavender to lavender-gray when
young (but sometimes whitish while still covered by humus), soon becoming tawny to
tawny-olive or brown from the center outward, the margin usually remaining lavender
until old age. Flesh thick, firm, whitish to grayish to buff or slightly violet-tinted under the
cuticle; odor mild. GILLS adnate to adnexed or notched, close, whitish or tinged violet
to violet-gray when young, gradually becoming brown as spores mature. STALK 5-12 cm
long, (1) 2-4 (5) cm thick, equal above, often slightly narrowed at base (but sometimes
thicker); firm, solid, dry, pallid or lavender becoming brownish-stained in age, especially
below (or staining yellow in one form). CORTINA disappearing or leaving hairs on stalk
which trap falling spores.-SPORE PRINT dull cinnamon-brown; spores 9-11 * 5-6
microns, elliptical, roughened.
433
Cortinarius balteatus is a large firm purple-tinged species. Note how the stalk lacks a basal bulb
Cortinarius subfoetidus
CAP 2.5-10 cm broad, broadly umbonate to convex or plane in age; surface viscid orslimy
when moist, smooth or appearing fibrillose, bright lavender or violet or at times bluish-
lavender, in age sometimes fading at the center to buff or paler. Flesh tinged cap color, paler
in age; odor distinctly fragrant, but with a fetid (nauseating) component. GILLS close,
adnexed or notched to adnate, at first lilac or violet, but becoming pale to dull brown and
finally rusty-brown in age. STALK 5-8 cm long, 0.7-2 cm thick, more or less equal, colored
like cap or paler (often fading), the apex often whitish; not viscid. UNIVERSAL VEIL
fibrillose, forming a pale lavender to violet sheath over lower portion of stalk. CORTINA
transient, sometimes leaving a few hairs at stalk apex which trap falling spores. SPORE
PRINT rusty-brown; spores 7-10 * 5-5.5 microns, elliptical, roughened.
434
CORTINARIUS 435
HABITAT: Solitary to widely scattered or in small groups in duff and moss under conifers;
known only from the Pacific Northwest, fruiting primarily in the fall, especially with
hemlock and/ or fir. I have seen it in northern Idaho, where, according to Alexander Smith,
it is more common than anywhere else.
EDIBILITY: Better wasted than tasted.
COMMENTS: The sickeningly sweet odor (which has been likened to that of overripe
pears) and bright lavender to violet color combine to make this one of the easiest of all
Cortinarii to recognize. Alas, the casual hunter may not get a chance to recognize it
because it is not a very common species. The viscid cap distinguishes it from C. traganus,
C. camphoratus and other “Sericeocybes,” while the stalk is neither viscid as in the C.
cylindripes group nor bulbous as in C. olympianus and other purplish “Bulbopodiums.”
Although uncommon, it attracts more than its share of attention because of its beautiful
color. C. balteato-cumatilis (see comments under C. balteatus) in similar in odor and
color but is much more robust (stalk typically at least 2 cm thick).
Cortinarius infractus is a common sooty-olive species with a viscid cap when moist. Note collapsed
hairs (cortina) on stalk. These are fairly mature specimens; young ones have smaller caps.
\ , '♦ "V
436 CORTINARIACEAE
COMMENTS: A distinctive Cortinarius by virtue of the sooty-olive color of its cap and
gills. The cap is viscid when moist, but there is no abrupt bulb at the base of the stalk as in
the C. scaurus group. A number of varieties have been recognized, some of which show
violet in the stalk apex and/ or immature gills. The common version in our area, however, is
violet-less. C. immixtus is a similar species with brighter (yellowish-olive-green) immature
gills, a mild taste, and larger spores; it has been reported from the Pacific Northwest.
Cortinarius luteoarmillatus (or a very similar species—see above comments) is common in California
under oak. Note how stalk is club-shaped (thicker below) but not bulbous. Sweet odor is distinctive.
CORTINARIUS 437
438
Cortinarius sodagnitus group. Note small but very prominent basal bulb. Common in California
under oak.
Cortinarius olympianus
CAP 3-7 (10) cm broad, convex becoming plane, the margin inrolled at first; surface
smooth, slimy or viscid when moist, pale violet or lilac, sometimes fading to lilac-white,
or sometimes tinged yellowish at center. Flesh fairly thick, white to grayish. GILLS pale
lilac to pinkish-lilac when young, becoming browner in age but usually retaining a lilac
tinge for a long time; notched or adnexed to adnate, close, not staining when bruised.
STALK 3-7 cm long, 0.7-1.2 cm thick at apex, solid, firm, not viscid, with a distinct basal
bulb that is rimmed, at least when young; lilac or pale violet above, often brownish-stained
at base. CORTINA scanty, lilac-white, often leaving a few hairs on stalk which trap falling
spores. SPORE PRINT rusty-brown; spores 8-10 x 5-6 microns, elliptical, slightly
roughened.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious on ground under conifers, fairly common in the
Pacific Northwest in the late summer and fall, especially where there is fir, spruce, and/ or
hemlock. I have seen large fruitings in Mt. Rainier National Park in late September.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This is one of several viscid-capped Cortinarii with a rimmed bulb and
overall lilac to violet-white color. There are several similarly colored species that favor
hardwoods and are especially prominent in eastern North America. These include:
C. michiganensis and C. caesiocyaneus, both larger with conspicuous bulbs and pale violet
to pale bluish-violet overall color (when fresh), the latter with a whitish universal veil;
C. velicopia, similar to the previous two species but discoloring ochre to buff or tan on the
cap and basal bulb with age (often rather quickly); C. aggregatus, with darker violet gills
when young and only a small, oblique bulb at the stem base; C. caerulescens, with a darker
blue or violet-blue cap when young; and C. cyanites (see couplet #72 of the key to
Cortinarius). There are also several species that are very similar in size, shape, and color
but do not have viscid caps, e.g., C. argentatus and C. subargentatus (see comments under
C. alboviolaceus and photo on p. 448).
439
440 CORTINARIACEAE
stalk; odor mild. GILLS close, adnate to adnexed, yellow or sometimes greenish-yellow
when young, dull cinnamon-brown in age, but often with an intermediate lavender to dull
purple phase. STALK 4-12 cm long, 1.5-3 cm thick at apex, with a conspicuous, abrupt
basal bulb which is rimmed, at least when young and is 3-7 cm broad; solid, not viscid,
color variable: pale lavender or yellow at apex or throughout, becoming dingy or often
rusty-stained in age, the bulb usually yellow. CORTINA pale yellow to greenish-yellow,
usually leaving hairs on the stalk which trap falling spores. SPORE PRINT rusty-brown;
spores 11-14 * 6.5-8 microns, elliptical, roughened.
HABITAT: Solitary to scattered or gregarious on ground in woods, mainly in western
North America. It is sometimes common in our area under oak in the late fall and winter; in
the Pacific Northwest it favors conifers and in the Southwest I’ve seen it in mixed woods of
aspen, spruce, and fir.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: The yellow gills and viscid yellow cap when young plus the beautiful violet-
tinged flesh (see color plate!) and bulbous stalk form a distinctive set of characteristics.
In our local form the purplish phase of the gills is often transient and difficult to detect.
C. aureofulvus is a similar oak-loving species which may show violet in the flesh but not
in the gills. C. atkinsonianus shows the same transient violet gill phase as C. cedretorum,
but has an olive-yellow to yellowish to deep reddish-brown cap and grows with hard¬
woods in eastern North America. C. montanus has violet-tinged gills with olive or yel¬
lowish-olive edges when young, and a rusty-brown to olive-brown, yellow-brown, or varie¬
gated/ streaked cap. It is often common under old-growth conifers in western mountains,
particularly the Cascades.
young). Mycologists prefer to refer to them collectively as the C. scaurus group (when
they refer to them at all, which is seldom), for they are a confusing lot, both in the field
and in the literature. They are readily distinguished as a group, however, by their color.
The “true” C. scaurus of Europe is said to have a spotted cap, slender stalk (less than 1 cm
thick), and grow with conifers. Some of the other species in the group include: C. herpe-
ticus, very similar but with a thicker stalk and often with violet-tinged immature gills and
flesh and a whitish basal bulb; C. prasinus, with an olive-colored cap, olive to olive-yellow
gills, and yellowish or olive-tinged stalk, fairly common in the Pacific Northwest under
conifers; C. virentophyllus, with a deep green cap that fades to yellow as it ages, green gills,
and a pale bluish stem, found under hardwoods in eastern North America; C.flavovirens,
with a farinaceous odor, greenish-yellow gills, and yellow stalk, reported from southern
California; C. orichalceus and C. rufo-olivaceus, with a reddish to reddish-brown cap (at
least at center), and greenish to yellowish stalk (the latter species is quite large and robust,
the former is smaller and can have an oranger cap); and finally, a distinctive but
unidentified species which is sometimes common under live oak in California. It has a
bright citrine-green cap (sometimes shaded with brown at the center), yellow gills when
young, and a yellowish stalk with a bulb at the base. Whether it is one of several similar
European species, or is unnamed and endemic to California is unclear, but it is definitely a
member of the C. scaurus group, which should satisfy all but the most hardcore Cortinarius
-categorizers. See also C. montanus (under C. cedretorum).
Cortinarius fulmineus
CAP 5-15 cm broad, convex becoming plane, the margin at first incurved; surface viscid
when moist, entirely yellow or with only the margin yellow and the center fulvous to ochre
to orange-brown, sometimes with small spotlike scales. Flesh thick, firm, yellow to
yellowish-white or buff; odor and taste mild or radishlike. GILLS close, adnate or
notched, yellow to yellow-brown or ochre, becoming ochre-cinnamon and finally rusty-
brown as spores mature. STALK 3-7 cm long, 1-3 cm thick at apex, often rather short and
stout, with a large rimmed bulb at the base; solid, firm, not viscid; yellowish-white or
yellow, sometimes becoming ochraceous in age. CORTINA pallid or yellowish, often
leaving hairs on stalk which turn rusty-brown from falling spores. SPORE PRINT rusty-
brown; spores 8-10 * 4.5-6 microns, elliptical, roughened.
HABIT AT: Solitary to widely scattered or gregarious on ground under hardwoods; widely
distributed. It is not uncommon in our area in the fall and winter in mixed woods and
under live oak.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This species typifies a number of yellowish to rusty-orange Cortinarii with
a viscid cap, yellowish to orange gills, and a distinctly rimmed bulb when young. The
rimmed bulb places it in the colorful subgenus Bulbopodium, and the yellowish or pallid
flesh separates it from another “Bulbopodium,” C. cedretorum. Other species: C.fulgens
is similar but brighter orange in color; C. elegantior is also similar but has larger spores
(12-16 microns long), while C. elegantioides has even larger spores and a decidedly bitter
taste. There are also several beautiful “Bulbopodiums” with a bright yellow cap (or yellow-
margined with a redder, browner, or oranger center) and lilac to violet gills at first. These
include: C. metarius, common under spruce and fir in western North America, with a
fairly broad basal bulb; C. calochrous, widespread under both hardwoods and conifers
and very similar to C. metarius, but with a smaller bulb and slightly shorter spores; C.
citrinipedes, cap yellowish with a darker brown margin; and C. cyanopus (-C. amoene-
lens), widespread, with an ochre cap, bitter-tasting cap cuticle, and deep violet gills when
young.
442 CORTINARIACEAE
Cortinarius multiformis
CAP 4-12 cm broad, convex becoming plane or broadly umbonate, the margin at first
inrolled; surface smooth, viscid when moist, ochre to ochre-buff to tawny oryellow-brown
or occasionally more reddish or fulvous and sometimes becoming rustier in age, often with
a whitish silky bloom when young. Flesh thick, firm, pallid; odor mild or slightly pungent.
GILLS adnate to adnexed or notched, close, at first whitish, then tan or watery brown,
finally rusty-cinnamon. STALK 4-10 cm long, 1-2 (2.5) cm thick at apex, usually with a
bulb at the base that is abrupt when young but often obscure or even absent in age; dry,
solid, firm, white or discoloring tan or ochre. UNIVERSAL VEIL disappearing or leaving
a thin whitish film on cap. CORTINA scanty, white, disappearing or leaving a few hairs
on stalk which trap falling spores. SPORE PRINT cinnamon-brown; spores 7-11 x 4-6
microns, elliptical, minutely roughened.
HABITAT: Solitary to scattered or gregarious on ground in woods (mainly under coni¬
fers); widely distributed. It is common throughout much of the West, but infrequent or
absent in our area. I have seen large fruitings under spruce near Santa Fe, New Mexico.
EDIBILITY: Unknown. It is eaten in Europe, but I can find no information on the North
American version, and there are too many similar species for me to recommend it.
COMMENTS: The viscid, ochre to tan cap and pallid to tan immature gills serve to dis¬
tinguish this species from most other Cortinarii. The cap and gill color suggest a Hebeloma,
but the spores are cinnamon-brown and the odor is not radishlike. The hoary white film on
young caps is reminiscent of the gypsy mushroom (Rozites caperata), but the veil is not
membranous. There are many similar Cortinarii with non-viscid caps that sometimes
mingle with C. multiformis (see C. laniger). Other viscid-capped species with an equal to
club-shaped (but not abruptly bulbous) stalk include: C. turmalis, with a tawny to fulvous
or yellow-brown to darker brown cap and a well-developed white veil that usually leaves
a distinct fibrillose sheath and/or ring on the stalk; C. cliduchus and C. lalus, without
such a copious veil but otherwise similar to C. turmalis (the latter with a paler cap); C.
crassus, a stout, thick-stemmed species (see comments under C. balteatus); C. varius,
a widespread species with a fulvous to bright yellow-brown or ochre cap and violet gills
when young plus a white stalk; C. variicolor, with a purplish to brownish cap, lilac gills
when young, and a fibrillose, whitish or lilac-tinged stalk; and C. claricolor, with bluish-
gray to brownish gills, a yellower cap, and more copious universal veil. All but the last
species favor conifers and occur fairly commonly in the Pacific Northwest and/ or Rocky
Mountains.
Cortinarius magnivelatus
CAP 3-10 cm broad, convex becoming plane or irregularly undulating; surface moist or
dry but not viscid, smooth or fibrillose, entirely white or white at margin and ochre toward
the center, often stained buff or ochraceous in age or in bruised areas; margin incurved.
Flesh thick, firm, white to buff; odor mild. GILLS close, slightly decurrent to adnate or
adnexed, whitish when very young, becoming buff and then tawny-brown to brown; often
forked near the stalk. STALK 4-6 cm long, 1-3 cm thick at apex, often (but not always)
enlarged below, colored like cap or whiter, solid. VEIL thick, tough, membranous, elastic,
whitish, typically covering the gills through maturity or shredding radially but not
normally detaching from the cap and stalk. SPORE PRINT rusty-brown; spores 9-14
x 6-8 microns, elliptical, roughened.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious under mountain conifers (especially fir and pine),
usually buried in the duff; fairly common throughout the higher mountains of California,
particularly in the late spring and summer, but probably more widespread.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
Two conifer-loving Cortinarii with persistent veils. Cortinarius magnivelatus (two at right) has a
tough, whitish veil that is reminiscent of a rubber band. Cortinarius verrucisporus (three at left)
is yellower and has a short stalk and thinner veil that tends to tear radially (see comments below).
COMMENTS: The whitish color, underground growth habit, and tough, thick, persistent
veil distinguish this Cortinarius from most others. Presumably the latter features are adap¬
tations to the pendulum-like changes of weather that occur in our western mountains.
Many Cortinarii (particularly “Bulbopodiums”) tend to fruit under the duff in dry
weather, but they do not have the persistent membranous veil of this species. That the veil
does not break suggests that this species is on its way to becoming “gastroid.” The spores,
however, are forcibly discharged (hence a spore print is obtainable), unlike the truly
gastroid genus Thaxterogaster (see p. 734). The membranous nature of the veil can
lead to confusion with other brown-spored genera, but the overall aspect is clearly “cor-
tinarioid.” Several other semi-gastroid Cortinarii occur in western North America. Like
C. magnivelatus, they have a persistent veil and tend to grow under the duff, although
the mature caps may surface if conditions are wet enough. These species include: C.
wiebeae, discovered in the Cascades, similarly colored but larger with thin, fragile gills
that are brown or rusty (not whitish) when young; C. verrucisporus, fairly common in
the Sierra Nevada, with a yellow to yellow-brown or rusty-stained cap and a thinner
yellowish veil that stretches from the stalk or stalk base to the cap margin and usually tears
radially (see above photo), plus broad gills, a frequently underdeveloped stalk, and very
coarsely warted spores; C. bigelowii, fairly common in Idaho, with a pale yellow-brown
to yellowish cap, whitish veil, and a short, fat bulbous stalk; and C. velatus of the Sierra
Nevada, easily distinguished by its purplish to lavender-tinged cap and somewhat thinner,
semi-cobwebby (but persistent) veil. Other semi-gastroid species undoubtedly occur in the
West but have yet to be described.
Cortinarius regalis
CAP (4) 6-15 cm broad, convex with an inrolled margin, becoming broadly umbonate to
plane or with margin slightly uplifted in age; surface dry or very slightly tacky, usually with
a large patch or patches of white fibrillose universal veil tissue at first; background
brownish to dingy flesh-colored to dull brown with a vinaceous tinge, often appearing
somewhat streaked. Flesh thick, pallid or tinged vinaceous or cap color; odor mild to some¬
what musty or sometimes fruity. GILLS usually adnexed or notched, pallid in button
stage, becoming grayish-brown to dull watery-brown and eventually dark brown. STALK
6-16 cm long, (1) 2-3.5 cm thick at apex, with a large, abrupt and/ or rimmed bulb at base
(3-6 cm thick); dry, solid, firm pallid or tinged cap color, fibrillose. UNIVERSAL VEIL
443
444 CORTINARIACEAE
whitish, felty-fibrillose, often leaving remnants on cap and fibrils or hairs on stalk which
become rusty-stained. CORTINA white, disappearing or also leaving hairs on stalk.
SPORE PRINT dull rusty-brown; spores 7-11 * 5-6 microns, elliptical, finely roughened.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups on ground in woods; known only from Cali¬
fornia, where it usually grows with oak. I find it regularly in the fall and winter.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: The fairly large size, thick bulbous stalk, absence of distinct violet hues,
and whitish veil material on the cap combine to distinguish this Cortinarius. The bulb is
typical of the subgenus Bulbopodium, but the cap is not truly viscid, making this species
something of an anomaly. Viscid-capped species with conspicuous whitish veil remnants
on the cap and a prominent bulb at the base of the stalk include: C. calyptratus, medium¬
sized, with violet gills when young, occurring under conifers in northern California; and
C. calyptrodermus, larger, with deep violet gills when young, occurring under hardwoods
in eastern North America. Another viscid-capped species with purplish (or purplish-blue)
gills when young, C. volvatus, has a universal veil which forms a whitish sheath or “volva”
on the basal bulb, but does not normally leave conspicuous remnants on the cap.
radically bulbous stem are its main features. Another scaly-capped species, C. pholideus,
is common under birch in the Northeast, often on or near rotten logs, and also occurs
rarely in the Pacific Northwest. Its stalk is equal or only slightly thicker at the base and
is decorated with distinctive brown to cinnamon-brown scales like those on the cap (see
photo on p. 424) and the fruiting body is slightly more cinnamon-colored overall than
C. squamulosus. It might be mistaken for a Pholiota because of the brown scales on the
stem and tendency to grow on or near rotting logs, but the dry scaly cap, violet-tinged
stalk apex (when young), and roughened, cinnamon-brown spores distinguish it. Still
another distinctive hardwood-loving easterner, C. bolaris, is quite different: its cap and
stalk feature reddish scales, fibrils, and/ or streaks on a whitish to yellowish background
(see photo on p. 425 and couplet #89 of the key to Cortinarius).
COMMENTS: The beautiful silvery-violet to lilac-white overall color plus the dry silky
cap, mild odor, and whitish universal veil sheath on the stem distinguish this attractive
mushroom from its close relatives in the subgenus Sericeocybe (a closely-knit group of
dry-capped Cortinarii with violet to pale lilac pigments). The flesh is never rusty-brown or
tawny as in C. traganus, and the gills are violet-tinged when young. Inocybe lilacina is
somewhat similar but smaller and more umbonate, with dull brown spores and a spermatic
odor. Similar species include: C. argentatus, lilac-blue to violet-gray but with a thicker,
stouter, prominently bulbous stalk (see above photo) that lacks a silky white sheath and
with a radishlike odor and tendency to turn ochre in age, found mostly under hardwoods
(especially eastern); C. subargentatus, favoring hardwoods, very similar to C. argen¬
tatus, but lacking the odor; C. subpulchrifolius, with a grayish-buff cap that often
develops ochraceous or rusty stains in age, dull purplish immature gills, and a dull purplish,
equal or club-shaped stalk that is sheathed by veil remnants, found under hardwoods in
eastern North America; C. malachius, favoring conifers, violet-tinged at first but its cap
soon becoming ochre or brownish; and C. caninus and C. anomalus, growing under both
hardwoods and conifers, the former with a violet-tinged cap that becomes reddish-brown
and buff to tan universal veil zones on the stalk, the latter with a violet-tinged to gray or
brown cap, distinctly violet flesh and violet stalk apex, and ochre veil zones on the stalk.
For more odoriferous and/ or brightly colored “Sericeocybes,” see C. traganus, and for
violet or violet-tinged hygrophanous Cortinarii, see C. evernius.
448
Left: Cortinarius armillatus, a birch-lover with reddish bracelets on stalk. Right: Cortinarius boulder-
ensis (see comments below) has reddish or vinaceous bracelets but is smaller and purple-tinged.
449
450 CORTINARIACEAE
Cortinarius evernius
CAP 3-10 cm broad, conical to bell-shaped at first (and scarcely wider than the stalk), then
becoming convex or obtusely umbonate to plane; surface smooth, markedly hygro-
phanous: violet or brown with a purple tinge when moist, quickly fading to vinaceous or
reddish-brown or paler as it loses moisture; margin at first with whitish silkiness. Flesh thin,
at first violet or violet-tinged, but fadingas it dries or ages. GILLS at first violet with whitish
edges, but quickly fading to brown and then darkening to cinnamon-brown; adnate or
becoming notched, well-spaced. STALK 7-15 (20) cm long, 0.8-2 cm thick, equal or
narrowed toward base, usually rather long and often extending deep into the humus or
moss; not viscid; pale to deep violet when fresh (darker below), but often covered with veil
material at first, and fading as it dries. UNIVERSAL VEIL whitish or violet-tinged,
forming fibrillose patches or zones on stalk which may disappear in age. CORTINA
whitish, often disappearing. SPORE PRINT rusty-brown; spores 8-10 * 5-6 microns,
elliptical, slightly roughened.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups under conifers, often in moss; widely distri¬
buted but mainly northern. It is not a common species, but several difficult-to-distinguish
look-alikes (see comments) are quite ubiquitous, including at least two species in our area.
EDIBILITY: Unknown. Do not experiment!
COMMENTS: This species has been included to represent a large number of medium¬
sized, hygrophanous Cortinarii in the subgenus Telamonia that are violet or violet-tinged
when fresh and moist. They are very difficult to identify and some are so markedly hygro¬
phanous that they lose their original color in an hour or two—or in the time it takes to bring
them home! Other “Telamonias” showing violet shades when fresh and moist include:
C. lucorum, a fairly common conifer-lover that differs from C. evernius only in having
a more or less club-shaped stem; C. saturninus, with a brown cap and more or less equal
stalk that is violet above and whitish below; C. brunneus, which sometimes shows violet
at the stalk apex (see comments under C. laniger) and has an equal to club-shaped stalk;
C. subpurpureus, with yellow or yellowish-buff veil patches on the lower portion of the
stalk; C. adustus and C. impennis, with little or no veil remnants on the stalk; and C.
plumiger, with a grayish-violet to watery violet or grayish-blue-tinged stalk that quickly
fades to whitish and a cap that is brownish to buff beneath a white to grayish-white,
fibrillose-hairy layer. All of these are partial to conifers, but another species, C. torvus,
favors hardwoods and is the most distinctive of the lot. It has broad, widely-spaced gills
that are deep purplish when young, a brownish to deep purplish cap, sweetish odor, and
club-shaped or bulbous stalk that often has a well-formed annulus (ring)—an unusual
feature for a Cortinarius! It is fairly common in eastern North America but I can find no
mention of it being found in the West. Another species that tends to form an annulus,
C. urbicus, does occur in the West, but it has a much paler cap than C. torvus.
CORTINARIUS 451
Cortinarius stemmatus (see comments under C. obtusus) is one of dozens of small, brownish, difficult-
to-demystify Cortinarii. The cap is blackish-brown when moist but turns reddish-brown as it loses
moisture. Note umbonate cap.
CORTINARIUS 453
margin and stalk (at least when young), and a geranium-like odor; it grows in mossy bogs
or other wet places under spruce. C. decipiens also has a dark cap (vinaceous-brown or
darker when moist), but it lacks white veil remnants on the stalk, while C. washingtonensis
can easily be told by its black-staining gills. All of the above species are especially common
under northern conifers, but some may also occur with hardwoods. Finally, there are a
number of small “Telamonias” that are distinctly violet or violet-tinged when fresh and
moist, including: C. pulchellus, violet overall when young and especially fond of alder;
and C. subflexipes, which has a rusty-brown to ochraceous cap but shows violet in the
gills and stalk apex when young. For larger “Telamonias,” see C. laniger and C. evernius.
Cortinarius cinnamomeus group is common under conifers, but identifying the various species
in the “complex” is very difficult. Some forms have sharply conical caps (right), others do not (left).
454 CORTINARIACEAE
EDIBILITY: Unknown. Do not experiment! Like many species in the subgenus Dermo-
cybe, it can be used to dye wool or yarn, yielding a brilliant array of pinks, reds, and purples.
COMMENTS: Also known as Dermocybe sanguined, this beautiful mushroom is easily
recognized by its blood-red to dark red color, small size, and evanescent cortina. It might
be mistaken for a brightly colored Hygrocybe, but the spores are not white and the gills
are not waxy. There is no yellow in the capand/ orstalkasin C.phoeniceusv ar. occidentalis
and C. semisanguineus, and the cap is not hygrophanous as in C. californicus (see
comments under C. phoeniceus var. occidentalis). Other completely red Dermocybes
include: C. puniceus, said to differ by its ochraceous to golden-brown cortina, dark red to
purple-red color, and preference for hardwoods; and C. cinnabarinus, also favoring
hardwoods (but not limited to them), with a slightly larger, cinnabar-red to rusty-red
or dark red fruiting body and larger spores. The latter species has often been reported from
eastern North America, but according to Cortinarius-experts Alexander Smith and
J oseph Ammirati, American material differs slightly from the European version. (At least
one common hardwood-lover has been recognized as a “new” species, C. marylandensis.)
INOCYBE
Small to medium-sized, typically terrestrial mushrooms. CAP often umbonate or conical; surface
typically dry and silky, woolly, scaly, or radially fibrillose; margin often splitting at maturity; odor
of flesh often distinctive (usually unpleasant). GILLS adnate to adnexed or free, usually brown at
maturity (but often with whitish edges). STALK central, often rather slender; apex often powdery
or with small flakes. VEIL absent, or if present then fibrillose or cobwebby and usually evanescent.
VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT brown. Spores smooth, warty, angular, or nodulose, lacking an
apical germ pore. Gills with cystidia, at least on edges. Cap cuticle filamentous.
Key to Inocybe
l. Odor fragrant or fruity (though sometimes sickening, as in rotten fruit) .2
1. Odor spermatic, pungent, fishy, like green corn, mild, etc., but not fragrant or fruity . 5
2. Cap olive to olive-brown at center./. corydalina (see I. pyriodora, p. 459)
2. Not as above . 3
3. Either cap conical with reddish-brown to wine-red radiating fibrils or cap with a whitish
patch of universal veil tissue and odor with a green corn component . 7
3. Not as above . 4
4. Odor of sweet peas .I. suaveolens (see I. pyriodora, p. 459)
4. Odor spicy or fruity or otherwise (but not of sweet peas) .I. pyriodora & others, p. 459
5. Stalk base or lower portion dull bluish-green, olive, or dull greenish . . I. calamistrata, p. 462
5. Not as above . 6
6. Cap grayish-lilac to grayish-brown or pinkish-brown with a smooth white or creamy, umbonate
center (or in one form cap entirely whitish and stalk pinkish); stalk typically pruinose(granular-
dandruffy) most of its length, with a bulb at base .I. albodisca (see I. maculata, p. 458)
6. Not as above (but may have some of above features) . 7
7. Cap small (2-5 cm broad) and yellowish to brown, but with a patch of whitish universal veil
tissue at the center (or sometimes overall), at least in most specimens; stalk white when young
and not shaggy or woolly ./. lanatodisca & others (see I. maculata, p. 458)
7. Not as above . 8
8. Cap 3-8 cm broad, at first covered with a whitish universal veil that leaves patches of tissue near
margin; stalk 5-10 mm thick, also sheathed with woolly remnants of the veil, dingy brownish
beneath the remnants; widespread, but especially common in the Rockies . . . /. leucoblema
8. Not as above . 9
9. Stalk smooth or fibrillose or occasionally with a few small fibrillose patches or scales .... 10
9. Stalk distinctly scaly (i.e., with numerous small scales similar in color to those on cap) ... 25
10. Some part of fruiting body lilac to violet when fresh (but may fade or discolor in age).
. /. lilacina& others, p. 461
10. Not as above (but stalk or cap may be pink, carmine, vinaceous, etc.) . 11
11. Cap white, smooth to very finely silky and not discoloring appreciably in age or when bruised;
stalk not pruinose (granular-dandruffy) or pruinose only at apex.I. geophylla, p. 460
11. Not as above (but cap may be white initially and then discolor in age, or cap may have white veil
remnants) . 12
12. Cap and stalk whitish at first, but usually developing pink, red, or orange tones as it ages; very
common, especially under conifers .I. pudica, p. 460
12. Not as above . 13
13. Cap conical when young, often with a pointed umbo in age, the surface radially fibrillose (and
often splitting in age) but not woolly or scaly, creamy to straw-colored, yellow-brown or brown
(but not reddish); gills sometimes with an olive or greenish tinge . 14
13. Not as above . 15
14. Odor resembling that of fresh green corn; cap creamy to straw-colored .... I. sororia, p. 457
14. Odor spermatic; cap usually somewhat darker (yellow-brown to brown), at least at the center
.I.fastigiata & others (see /. sororia, p. 457)
15. Cap brownish with a very prominent gray to dark brown or black “nipple” (umbo) at center;
widely distributed .I. fuscodisca
15. Not as above . 16
16. Cap with reddish-brown to carmine or wine-red fibrils, more or less conical when young; stalk
whitish at least at apex; found mainly with oak (in California) ./. jurana, p. 458
16. Not as above . 17
17. Stalk pale pink to salmon-pink; cap reddish-brown, at least at center .
.I. laetior&I. oblectabilis (see I. jurana, p. 458)
17. Not as above . 18
INOCYBE 457
18. Stalk entirely pruinose (minutely granular-scurfy-dandruffy) and discoloring dark gray to dark
brown or vinaceous-brown from the base upward in age .
./. picrosma, I. leucomelaena, & others
18. Not as above . 19
19. Fruiting body fairly small (cap typically up to 4 cm broad; stalk less than 5 mm thick) ... 20
19. Fruiting body medium-sized (cap usually at least 3 cm broad and stalk at least 5 mm thick 23
20. Cap with loosely-arranged or torn-up fibrils that give it a shaggy or ragged appearance, espe¬
cially at margin; color more or less dark brown./. lacera (see I. lanuginosa, p. 462)
20. Not as above; cap usually woolly or scaly or differently colored . 21
21. Cap conical to bell-shaped, the surface often splitting radially but not scaly; stalk with a basal
bulb./. mixtilis (see I. sororia, below)
21. Not as above; cap usually scaly or woolly. 22
22. Cap dark brown to blackish, with small erect scales; often growing on rotten wood; spores
warty./. lanuginosa, p. 462
22. Not as above; usually terrestrial .I.flocculosa & many others (see /. lanuginosa, p. 462)
23. Cap yellow-brown to ochre or dull cinnamon (sometimes darker at center), fibrillose or in age
becoming somewhat scaly; stalk similarly colored at first but becoming brown to smoky-brown
from the base upward; common under conifers in the Pacific Northwest.I. olympiana
23. Not as above; cap usually brown to dark brown or chestnut-brown (but sometimes overlaid
with whitish veil remnants) . 24
24. Stalk with a large turniplike bulb at base; cap usually silky-fibrillose or smooth; spores angular
.I. nap ip es (see I. sororia, below)
24. Stalk equal or with small bulb; cap sometimes scaly; spores smooth I. maculata & others, p. 458
25. Cap relatively large (5-12 cm broad); stalk fairly thick (at least 5 mm); both cap and stalk with
dark brown scales (those on stalk arranged in more or less concentric rings) .
./. sp. (unidentified) (see I. calamistrata, p. 462)
25. Not as above; smaller . 26
26. Cap and stalk yellowish to yellow-brown to cinnamon.
.I. terrigena & I. caesariata (see I. calamistrata, p. 462)
26. Cap and stalk with darker brown scales ./. hystrix(see I. calamistrata, p. 462)
brownish cap, a cortina (cobwebby veil) when young, a turniplike bulb at the base of the
stem, and warty (nodulose) spores; /. mixtilis also has warty spores, but is smaller than
/. napipes and lacks a cortina. The latter two species are fairly common under conifers in
the Pacific Northwest, but I have not seen them locally. All of the above are poisonous.
458
INOCYBE 459
460
Inocybe geophylla is small but common. Note silky white cap and brown gills; odor is spermatic.
COMMENTS: The small size, white umbonate cap, and dull brown gills at maturity
characterize this ubiquitous little Inocybe. It might be mistaken at first glance for a small
waxy cap (Camarophyllus), Mycena, or Alboleptonia, but the spores and mature gills
are brown. It also resembles I. pudica, but does not “blush.”
Inocybe lilacina is lilac-tinged when fresh. Note umbonate cap of most specimens.
462 CORTINARIACEAE
COMMENTS: The blue-green to olive-green stem base and scaly convex cap which does
not split radially in age are the main features of this uninteresting agaric. It is included here
as a representative of those Inocybes with scales on both the cap and the stem. Others
include: /. hystrix, with small, brown to dark brown scales on both the cap and stalk; I.
terrigena, larger and fleshier (in fact, somewhat reminiscent of a Pholiota), with golden-
brown to cinnamon scales on the cap and stalk and sometimes a slight annulus (ring), wide¬
spread but especially common under aspen in the southern Rocky Mountains;/, caesar-
iata, somewhat similar in color to I. terrigena but with smaller scales, fairly common in
eastern North America; and finally, a very robust, unidentified local species with a dark
brown scaly cap and several zones of concentrically-arranged dark brown scales on the
stem (cap 5-12 cm broad, stalk 0.5-1.5 cm thick!). None of these have the blue-green or
olive-green stem base of I. calamistrata.
463
HEBELOMA
Small to medium-sized, terrestrial mushrooms. CAP typically viscid when wet and more or less
smooth; white to buff, tan, or some shade of brown. Flesh often with a radishlike odor. GILLS
adnate to adnexed or notched, usually brown at maturity; often with whitish edges. STALK fleshy,
central; apex often powdery or with small flakes. VEIL usually absent or if present thencobwebby-
fibrillose and evanescent. VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT brown (or rarely reddish-brown).
Spores typically elliptical, smooth or roughened, lacking a germ pore. Cystidia typically present on
gill edges, often conspicuous. Cap cuticle filamentous.
THIS is yet another faceless and featureless collection of brownish mushrooms. Those
that are too large to qualify as “LBM’s” most certainly fall into the category of “BUM’s”
(“Boring Ubiquitous Mushrooms”). The stalk is fleshy and the gills attached but not
decurrent, giving the fruiting body the stature of a Tricholoma or Entoloma. The odor
is usually mild or radishlike, not spermatic as in Inocybe, and the cap is typically smooth
and viscid rather than dry and fibrillose or scaly. Hebeloma is closely related to Cortinarius,
but that genus has rusty-brown spores and a cobwebby veil (cortina). Some Hebelomas
have a cortina, but can be distinguished by their duller spore color and/or the presence of
sterile cells (cystidia) on the edges of the gills, plus the frequently powdered or flaky stem
apex. Agrocybe is also similar, but has a cellular cap cuticle and usually grows in grass,
dung, wood or wood chips, or cultivated soil. Hebelomas, in contrast, are largely mycor-
rhizal. As a result, they are found in forests or at their edges or on tree-studded lawns and
cemeteries. (However, H. syriense feeds on decaying corpses and is said to have led to
the discovery of at least one crime!)
About 200 species of Hebeloma occur in North America, but none are exceptionally
distinctive or colorful. Whites, browns, tans, and buffs predominate, making identification
on the basis of color hopeless. More minute measures of individuality must be taken into
account, such as the size and shape of the cystidia and spores. Many mushroom-hunters,
however, prefer to recognize only two varieties—the big brown ones and the not-so-big
brown ones! Hebelomas should not be eaten, as some are definitely poisonous and the
group as a whole is poorly known. Three widespread species are described here.
Key to Hebeloma
1. Spore print reddish to pinkish-brown or pinkish-cinnamon . 2
1. Not as above; spore print dull brown or at times rusty-brown . 3
2. Cap whitish when fresh, but often aging ochre, gray, or brownish; spores elliptical {not angular)
.H. sarcophyllum (see H. crustuliniforme, p. 464)
2. Not as above; spores more or less angular . (seeEntoloma, p. 242)
3. Odor spermatic; cap often (but not always) umbonate and rather small . (see Inocybe, p. 455)
3. Not as above . 4
4. Veil present when young, disappearing or leaving remnants on the cap margin and/or a slight
ring (annulus) or fibrillose sheath on the stalk . 5
4. Veil absent or rudimentary. 6
5. Lower portion of stalk sheathed with conspicuous veil remnants; cap often with veil remnants
also, especially near margin .H. strophosum (see H. mesophaeum group, p. 465)
5. Stalk not conspicuously sheathed with veil remnants .H. mesophaeum group, p. 465
6. Cap small (typically less than 4 cm broad) and white to grayish, often hairy at margin; gills
adnate to decurrent and peeling easily from cap . (see Clitocybe& Allies, p. 148)
6. Not as above . 7
7. Growing on or near corpses, mainly in eastern North America; cap brown to reddish-brown .
.H. syriense
7. Growing in woods, near trees, etc., but not on corpses; cap variously colored (including brown
or reddish-brown); common and widespread . 8
464 CORTINARIACEAE
8. Cap typically brown to cinnamon-brown or dark reddish-brown (but sometimes paler brown
and often shaded with gray or overlaid with a pallid sheen); stalk usually with small protruding
scales.H. sinapizans group & others, p. 465
8. Cap white to buff, pale brown, tan, crust-colored, or yellow-brown; stalk often with a dandruffy
or scurfy apex but not normally with scales . 9
9. Odor sweet .H. sacchariolens (see H. crustuliniforme, below)
9. Odor typically mild or radishlike, etc., but not sweet . 10
10. Cap viscid or slimy when wet; stalk apex usually dandruffy (with small white flakes); gills often
with white edges; odor usually (but not always) radishlike; found in woods or on lawns near
trees . H. crustuliniforme & others, below
10. Not as above; cap only slightly viscid; found in wood chips, gardens, etc. (see Agrocybe, p. 467)
Hebeloma crustuliniforme is a common poisonous species with a whitish to pale tan cap, brown
gills (at least at maturity), and radishlike odor. For photo of young buttons, see p. 466.
1. A “toadstool,” Lactarius atroviridis (see comments under
L. olivaceoumbrinus, p. 70).
15. Hygrophorus speciosus, p. 126; a beautiful larch- and pine-loving waxy cap
ISiP
24. Omphalina
luteicolor (see
comments under
O. ericetorum, p.
223) grows in
groups on rotting
conifers.
23. Hygrocybe ( = Hygrophorus) calyptraeformis
(Salmon Waxy Cap), p. 117; pointed pink or
salmon-colored cap is distinctive.
25. Aspens and cottonwoods (p. 42) supply Pleurotus
and Flammulina in the fall and winter, morels in the
spring, Leccinum in the summer.
43. Armillaria
albolanaripes, p. 194.
viv..
44. Xeromphalina campanella, 45. Marasmius plicatulus, p. 209;
p. 222; these specimens are one of our most beautiful
somewhat browner than normal. mushrooms.
CD
Q_
03
X
c
03
O
77. Agaricus augustus (The Prince), p. 337; it is also shown on the front cover.
Mr* J
78. Agaricus osecanus group (Giant Horse Mushroom), p. 333, differs
microsopically from the better known A. arvensis.
79. A Greedy Person (see p. 27) laden with giant horse mushrooms
(Agaricus osecanus group, p. 333). Turn to next page to see what happens
to Greedy People.
knhmwm
80. Crack in the soil caused by
Agaricus bitorquis ( = A.
rodmani), p. 321, a delicious
edible mushroom that often
grows underground. This picture
is dedicated to those purists
who insist that mushrooms must
be photographed exactly as
they occur in nature.
84. A long-stemmed
form of Endoptychum
depressum, p. 730; it looks
like an Agaricus but lacks
gills.
Wr Bn i
v t 3
! ‘ ti
['* '> Jj ■ % '4 ** ✓ \
.Ak f *0 M
rV.
Wan
101. Rozites caperata
(Gypsy Mushroom),
p. 412; note wrinkled
cap.
&S£jk
, i. V
112. Gomphidius subroseus (Rosy Gomphidius), p. 483, is
associated with Douglas-fir.
122. Suillus cavipes, p. 494, is common under larch; note hollow stem.
123. Fuscoboletinus
ochraceoroseus
(Rosy Larch
Bolete), p. 506,
may be hard to
pronounce but is
easy to see.
124. Suillus lakei, p. 495, is common under Douglas-fir.
137. Boletus satanas (Satan’s Bolete), p. 527, a poisonous and bulbous oak-lover.
143. Boletus edulis (King Bolete), p. 530. This red-capped variety is abundant in
the Rocky Mountains in late summer when many of the wildflowers bloom.
144. Boletus edulis (King Bolete), p. 530; the typical brown-capped form.
145. Leccinum manzanitae
(Manzanita Bolete), p. 539.
149. Tylopilus
gracilis (see
comments under
T. chromapes,
p. 533) is a
common eastern
bolete.
gf a **
1 W&L
152. Fistulina hepatica (Beefsteak Fungus), p. 553, with banana slugs and
chinquapin; this is a mature individual.
157. Hydnellum
zonatum (see comments
under H. scrobiculatum,
p. 627) has a zoned cap
with spines on the
underside.
ft ' W
ft E * E'P’k -I
1 » ft \ f P® w Bf- f 11
w mw ft 1 k ® H
l \ |V: 1: ft»v' * ft
MV
| mm'A IV- ft ft . InE fU |v IjiS *
159. Close-up of the
spines of Hydnum
imbricatum, p. 619.
161. Dentinum ( = Hydnum)
repandum (Hedgehog
Mushroom), p. 618. In coastal
California it can often be found
when the wild irises are in
bloom.
164. Hericium ramosum, p. 615, is more delicate than the above species
165. Hydnum scabrosum group (Bitter Hedgehog), p. 620.
178. Cantharellus cibarius (Chanterelle), p. 662; the large orange form common
on the west coast.
179. Cantharellus subalbidus (White Chanterelle), p. 662, a common western species.
188. Calostoma
cinnabarina,
p. 718, a colorful
stalked puffball.
187. Battarrea
phalloides, p. 717,
usually grows in deserts
or sandy soil.
Phil Sharp
199. In Oregon, black morels (Morchella elata group, p. 790) are often found
with calypso orchids.
200. Neolecta irregularis
(Irregular Earth Tongue),
p. 871.
(usually notched) brown gills, absence of a veil, and radishlike odor (which is usually quite
pronounced but sometimes slight) are the important fieldmarks. You will undoubtedly
encounter several subtlely different species which more or less fit the above description,
but they can only be differentiated microscopically. Other species: H. hiemale is smaller
(cap about 3 or 4 cm broad), with only a slight radish odor and gills not beaded with drop¬
lets. H. sacchariolens is distinguished by its strong sweet or fruity odor. H. albidulum is
one of several species with a white or whitish cap and little or no odor. H. sarcophyllum
is an unusual but distinctive mushroom with a chalk-white cap that may become reddish-
gray or brownish-tinged in age, deep flesh-colored gills, and reddish-brown spores. It
resembles Pluteus pellitus, but has attached gills and grows on the ground. It could also
be mistaken for an Entoloma, but does not have angular spores. N one of the above species
should be eaten.
BOLBITIACEAE spores
TWO microscopic features separate this rather small brown-spored family from the
Cortinariaceae: the cap cuticle is typically cellular (composed of round to pear-shaped
cells) and the spores are smooth and usually furnished with a large germ pore that gives
them a truncate (chopped-off) appearance. People not armed with a microscope are better
off learning the three genera in the Bolbitiaceae (Bolbitius, Agrocybe, and Conocybe)
individually, rather than trying to devise an unwieldy set of ifs, buts, and ands for
distinguishing them as a unit in the field. The Coprinaceae also have a cellular cap cuticle
and spores with a germ pore, but give a much darker(purple-brown to black) spore print.
Like the Coprinaceae, the Bolbitiaceae are mostly frail, saprophytic fungi. They grow in
466
BOLBITIACEAE 467
grass, dung, decaying wood, and humus and are among our most common suburban
mushrooms. In contrast, the bulk of the Cortinariaceae are mycorrhizal sylvan fungi.
Owing to their fragile consistency, the Bolbitiaceae have little food value. The three
common genera are keyed below. If your “LBM” does not key out persuasively, check
Galerina, Tubaria, & Allies (p. 399), and see comments on p. 32
AGROCYBE
Small to medium-sized, saprophytic mushrooms. CAP convex to plane or broadly umbonate,
smooth or cracked but not truly scaly, dry or slightly tacky, rarely striate. GILLS typically attached,
brown to rusty-brown at maturity. STALK central, thick or thin, not markedly fragile (usually
pliant). VEIL present or absent, sometimes forming an annulus (ring) on stalk. VOLVA absent.
SPORE PRINT brown. Spores smooth, usually with a germ pore. Cap cuticle typically cellular.
AGROCYBE is a difficult genus to characterize. The most common species are best
recognized by their smooth or cracked (but not scaly), convex to plane cap, brown spores,
and occurrence in grass, manure, wood chips, or cultivated ground. In some types a
membranous veil is present and in others it is not. Some species resemble Hebeloma and
Pholiota and have been keyed out with those genera (several Agrocybes were originally
placed in Pholiota); others resemble Stropharia, but can be distinguished by their browner
or brighter spore color.
Several Agrocybes are edible, but extreme care must be taken not to confuse them with
the metagrobolizing masses of nondescript brown-spored mushrooms—particularly the
poisonous Hebelomas. The two species described here are among our most common
urban and suburban fungi, but also grow in rural and wooded habitats.
Key to Agrocybe
1. Stalk 5-15 mm thick, with a prominent basal bulb; found in manure, greenhouses, mushroom
farms, etc.(see Conocybe, p. 470)
1. Not as above (but may grow in manure) . 2
2. Partial veil present and membranous or kleenexlike (check young specimens if unsure!), often
(but not always!) forming a ring on stalk or leaving pieces of tissue on cap margin.3
2. Not as above; partial veil absent or rudimentary and evanescent .8
3. Growing on ground in woods; cap dark brown to rusty-brown, often viscid or slimy when moist;
cap margin often striate in age, gills often decurrent A. erebia (see A. praecox group, p. 469)
3. Not as above . 4
4. Cap margin striate when moist; cap usually less than 5 cm broad and usually hygrophanous
(fading markedly as it dries) .(see Galerina, Tubaria, & Allies, p. 399)
4. Not as above . 5
5. Found in swamps and other wet places; cap typically 3 (4) cm broad or less; stalk 2-4 mm thick
.A. paludosa
5. Not as above . 6
6. Growing on hardwoods, often clustered; southern A. aegerita(see A. praecox group, p. 469)
6. Not as above . 7
468 BOLBITIACEAE
Agrocybe pediades group. A nondescript little agaric common in dung, lawns, and other grassy areas.
AGROCYBE 469
Panaeolus foenisecii, and Conocybe lactea; in cool weather it associates with Psilocybe
coprophila, Stropharia semiglobata, and the Panaeolus campanulatus group.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but not recommended; it is easily confused withpoisonous“LBM’s.”
COMMENTS: The yellowish cap, brown spores, absence of a ring, and small size typify
this commonplace, lawn-loving “LBM” and its close relatives. The cap is not conical as in
Conocybe and Panaeolus, and the spores are neither purple-brown nor purple-black
as in Stropharia, nor white as in Marasmius. Small Hebeloma species are similar, but
generally grow near trees or in the woods and have a filamentous cap cuticle. Other species:
A. pediades var. platysperma has larger spores and frequently has watery spots or streaks
on the cap; A. semiorbicularis (-Naucoria semiorbicularis) is said to have a slightly viscid
cap and broader spores, but is otherwise identical;^. arvalis(-A. tuberosa) is a rare species
that arises from a small, black, easily-overlooked “tuber” (sclerotium); A. amara has a
bitter taste and grows in dense groups in manure or greenhouses; A. sororia is a much larger
species (cap 5-15 cm broad, stalk 0.5-1.2 cm thick) with a tan to tawny cap and bitter taste.
It resembles A.praecox but lacks a veil. I have found it fruiting abundantly on wood chips
in a garden. For another photo of the A. pediades group, see p. 43.
time, but usually leaves at least some vestiges on the cap margin or gills. The “typical”
form has a creamy cap (see color plate) and ranges from slender to fairly robust. Another
common form (probably a distinct species) favors wood chips, is usually gregarious or
clustered, has a darker (hazel-brown to olive-brown) cap when young, and is fairly robust
(see photo above). Also similar are: A. acericola, with a yellow-brown cap when young
and better-formed ring, growing on decayed wood; and A. dura (formerly Pholiota ver-
miflua), with a whitish to ochre-tinged, often cracked cap and slightly larger spores, found
in cultivated and disturbed ground. Other species with a membranous veil include: A.
erebia, a terrestrial woodland species with a dark brown, often viscid cap and/or slightly
decurrent gills (see above photo); and A. aegerita (-A. cylirtdracea), a medium-sized to
large edible southern species that usually grows in clusters on hardwoods (often living)
such as willow, poplar, and box elder. The latter species is prized in Europe and grown
there commercially. It has a yellowish to grayish-brown to fulvous-tinged, often wrinkled
cap and typically has a well-formed annulus (ring) on the stalk.
CONOCYBES are often called “dunce caps” or “cone heads” because they usually have a
conical or bell-shaped cap. They are mostly fragile, often ephemeral, MycenaAike mush¬
rooms with a slender stem and rusty-brown to ochre-brown spores. They are some¬
times confused with Psilocybe, but have brighter brown spores. Among the brown-
spored mushrooms, they are apt to be confused with Bolbitius, which usually has a dis¬
tinctly viscid, striate cap, and Galerina, which has a filamentous rather than cellular cap
cuticle and an often viscid and/ or translucent-striate cap. One prominent exception to the
above is C. intrusa (keyed below), a rather fleshy mushroom with a thick stalk and convex
cap. It resembles a Hebeloma and was originally classified as a Cortinarius, but micro¬
scopic characteristics plus its rusty-colored spore print relate it to Conocybe.
The “cone heads” are partial to warm weather and fruit in great abundance on watered
470
CONOCYBE 471
lawns. Some, such as C. lactea, are so frail that they shrivel up or topple over a few hours
after appearing. The edibility of most Conocybes is unknown, but they are much too small
to be of food value and at least one species, C.filaris, is dangerously poisonous. Conocybe
is a fairly large genus with over 50 species in North America. As these are largely differ¬
entiated on microscopic characters, only three are described here.
Key to Conocybe
1. Veil present, usually forming a distinct ring (annulus) on stalk . 2
1. Veil absent or evanescent, not forming an annulus .4
2. Growing on dung or manure .C. stercoraria (see C. filaris group, below)
2. Growing in grass, woody chips, moss, etc... 3
3. Cap tawny-brown to orange-brown to brown; annulus often prominent and movable .
. C. filaris group, below
3. Cap reddish-brown to reddish-cinnamon when moist or sometimes yellower, fading as it dries;
annulus not movable, usually small or obscure .... (see Galerina, Tubaria, & Allies, p. 399)
4. Stalk 0.5-1.5 cm thick, usually with a bulbous or thickened base; cap convex to nearly plane,
2.5-9 cm broad, viscid when moist, whitish to tawny to ochre-brown or even reddish-brown;
growing in hothouses, mushroom farms, compost, etc.C. intrusa
4. Not as above . 5
5. Base of stalk aging or slowly bruising blue to bluish-green.
.C. smithii& C. cyanopus{see C. tenera group, p. 472)
5. Not as above . 6
6. Gills crisped, with prominent veins in between; found on lawns C. crispa{see C. lactea, p. 472)
6. Not as above . 7
7. Cap white to buff (or often darker at center), often wrinkled; fruiting body lasting only a few
hours before toppling over or withering ..-.C. lactea, p. 472
7. Cap brown to tan, yellow-brown, or cinnamon, but often fading to buff, more or less smooth 8
8. Cap 3-6 cm broad, broadly conical to bell-shaped or convex; growing in compost in a garden
. C. sp. (unidentified)
8. Cap typically smaller and/or habitat different. 9
9. Cap convex; growing in dung or manure . C. coprophila(see C. tenera group, p. 472)
9. Cap conical to bell-shaped; growing in many habitats . 10
10. Cap translucent-striate when moist, not growing in dung or manure .
.(see Galerina, Tubaria, & Allies, p. 399)
10. Not as above; growing in many habitats .C. tenera group, p. 472
toxins, and 20-30 caps are equivalent to about half of one cap ofAmanita phalloides—
a compelling reason not to eat “LBM’s!”
COMMENTS: Also known as Pholiotina filaris, this species and its close relatives are
distinguished from other Conocybes by the membranous ring on the stalk. In age, however,
the ring may fall off or be otherwise obliterated. Several poisonous Galerina species have
a ring, but they usually grow on wood and/or have a somewhat viscid, translucent-striate
cap (see G. autumnalis). There are also several Conocybes with an annulus (ring) that grow
on dung and manure (especially of horses), including C. stercoraria, fairly common,
with a yellow-brown to buff-colored cap.
EDIBILITY: Unknown, but worthless as food—to say it lacks substance is a gross under¬
statement. As Alexander Smith points out, toddlers would be the only ones tempted to
eat it, and if it were poisonous, we would probably know by now.
COMMENTS: This frail mushroom is easily told by its pallid “dunce cap” and thin, fragile
stem. The striate or wrinkled cap is not as viscid as in Bolbitius, and is paler than that of the
C. tenera group. The stem is so feeble that it is practically impossible to bring home speci¬
mens without breaking them. C. crispa is a somewhat similar widespread species with an
ochre-tinged cap and crisped, veined gills.
BOLBITIUS
Small, fragile, rapidly-decaying mushrooms found on dung, humus, grass, or wood. CAP viscid
when moist and usually conspicuously striate at maturity; usually yellow, white, or purple-gray.
GILLS typically adnexed or free at maturity, often dissolving somewhat in wet weather. STALK
slender, fragile, hollow. VEIL and VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT rusty-brown to ochraceous.
Spores smooth, with a germ pore. Cap cuticle cellular.
THIS small genus of fragile, flaccid, putrescent fungi is reminiscent of Coprinus (particu¬
larly in the striate cap and tendency of the gills to liquefy somewhat), but has rusty-brown to
bright yellow-brown rather than black spores. The viscid striate cap separates Bolbitius
from Conocybe. The cap is rarely brown as in Galerina and the habitat is quite different.
Bolbitius species are worthless as food. The most common types fruit during wet weather
in dung, manure heaps, straw, tall grass, and other vegetable matter; a few grow on wood.
Two species are described here.
Key to Bolbitius
1. Cap bright yellow to pale yellow, at least when fresh .B. vitellinus, p. 474
1. Cap differently colored . 2
2. Usually growing on lawns or dung, rarely in woods . 3
2. Growing in woods or on rotten wood . 6
473
474 BOLBITIACEAE
Bolbitius vitellinus varies considerably in size and shape, as evidenced by these photographs and
the one on p. 475. However, it is always viscid, yellow (when fresh), and very fragile. Left: Slender,
long-stemmed specimens such as these are common in lawns and other grassy areas. Right: Relatively
robust specimens found on horse dung. In old age the cap often becomes plane (flat).
BOLBITIUS 475
clusters of Peziza vesiculosa (a cup fungus). Greg Wright, who coined the common name,
says that in southern California it commonly occurs on decayed wood.
EDIBILITY: Harmless, but fleshless and flavorless.
COMMENTS: This fragile ephemeral mushroom varies greatly in size, shape, and habitat
but can generally be recognized by its viscid, yellow, striate cap, plus its rust-colored gills
(in age) and soft, fragile texture. The stems often collapse of their own accord, and in wet
weather the cap and gills tend to dissolve, much as in Coprinus (but not as the result of an
autodigesting enzyme). As a rule, those growing ingrass tend to be quite slender and fragile
(see photo), while those growing in a nitrogen-rich environment such as horse manure are
larger and more robust. Other species include: B. coprophilus, with a grayish-pinkish-
cinnamon cap in age, usually found on dung; and B. lacteus, with a small whitish or buff-
tinged cap, found in dung, grass, straw, etc., but not nearly as common as B. vitellinus.
Bolbitius aleuriatus
CAP 15 -4 cm broad, soon broadly convex to broadly umbonate or plane; surface smooth,
viscid when moist, gray to grayish-brown, often with a purplish or lilac tint (center some¬
times darker); sometimes fading in age; conspicuously striate, at least at margin. Flesh
very thin, whitish. GILLS adnexed to free, narrow, close, pallid soon becoming pinkish to
brown or cinnamon-brown. STALK 2.5-7 cm long, 2-3 mm thick, equal or thicker at base,
very fragile, smooth or minutely scurfy or powdery; entirely white or tinged yellow at base.
SPORE PRINT rusty-brown; spores 9-12 * 4-6 microns, elliptical, smooth, with an
apical germ pore.
HABITAT: Solitary or in small groups (rarely more than three) on rotting wood, sawdust,
and humus. It is fairly common in our area in the fall and winter, mainly under oak and
madrone, and probably has a much wider distribution.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: Also known as Pluteolus aleuriatus, this species is a fairly frequent but
oft-overlooked fungal feature of our oak wondlands. When the gills are free and pinkish,
confusion with Pluteus is likely. However, its extreme fragility and viscid, striate cap are
good fieldmarks. A form with a yellow stem—possibly distinct—also occurs in our area.
Other woodland species include: B. reticulatus, similarly colored but with a reticulate
(veined or netted) cap; and B. (-Pluteolus) callisteus, with a yellow stalk and a yellow-
olive to rusty-orange cap.
Left: Bolbitius vitellinus, young specimens with rounded yellow caps. (Nancy Burnett) Right:
Bolbitius aleuriatus is a fragile, slender-stemmed woodland species with a grayish to purple-gray cap
that is prominently striate (lined).
PAXILLACEAE spores
Fleshy medium-sized mushrooms growing on wood or ground. CAP convex to plane or depressed,
margin sometimes strongly inrolled. GILLS typically decurrent, often forked or veined, yellow to
orange or dull-colored; often peeling easily from cap (Paxillus). ST ALK fleshy;, central or off-center
to lateral or even absent. VEIL and VOLV A absent. SPORE PRINT yellowish to brown(Paxillus &
Phylloporus), or white (Hygrophoropsis). Spores mostly elliptical, smooth, without a germ pore,
often dextrinoid.
THIS is a small family of medium-sized mushrooms with decurrent gills and yellowish to
brown (or in Hygrophoropsis, white) spores. The flesh is not dry, white, and brittle as in
Russula, and there is no latex as in Lactarius. The spore print is not rusty-orange as in
Gymnopilus, the stem is much fleshier than in Tubaria, and other brown-spored agarics
without a veil do not normally have decurrent gills.
There are three genera in the Paxillaceae. In the central genus, Paxillus, the margin of the
cap is usually inrolled when young and the gills are often veined or poroid near the stem and
peel rather easily from the cap. Like the dark-spored genera Chroogomphus and Gom-
phidius, Paxillus is thought to be closely allied to the boletes. The second genus, Phyllo¬
porus, includes several species which, despite the presence of gills, are considered true
boletes by many mycologists. The gills are bright yellow and often bruise slightly bluish
like the tubes in many species of Boletus, and the spores are “boletoid” (narrowly
elliptical to spindle-shaped). The third genus, Hygrophoropsis, resembles Paxillus but
has unpigmented (white) spores. It includes the fungus popularly known as the false
chanterelle, and has traditionally been placed in the Tricholomataceae (it is also keyed
out there).
The Paxillaceae are woodland fungi like the boletes, but are not nearly as numerous or
conspicuous. In South America the situation is reversed—Paxillus is a fairly prominent
group while the boletes are few and far between. In case you hadn’t noticed, this is not a
field guide to the fleshy fungi of South America, so only five members of the Paxillaceae
are described. They are not particularly good eating and at least one species, Paxillus
involutus, can be very poisonous.
Key to the Paxillaceae
1. Gills yellow and rather thick, broad, and widely spaced, often staining blue or greenish (some¬
times slowly) when bruised.Phylloporus rhodoxanthus, p. 480
1. Not as above; gills usually close or crowded. 2
2. Stalk velvety from a dense coating of rusty-brown to brown or blackish-brown hairs, typically
1-3 cm thick; growing on or around conifer stumps, logs, etc. Paxillus atrotomentosus, p. 478
2. Not as above; stalk not brown and velvety . 3
3. Odor fragrant (reminiscent of root beer); fruiting body pinkish to whitish .
.Hygrophoropsis olida (see H. aurantiaca, p. 479)
3. Odor mild or at least not fragrant . 4
4. Spore print white or creamy; stalk normally present; gills usually orange or orangish (but some¬
times differently colored) .Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca, p. 479
4. Spore print yellowish to brown; stalk present or absent; gills not orange . 5
5. Stalk lateral to absent; found on wood or lignin-rich humus .Paxilluspanuoides, below
5. Stalk present, central to off-center; usually terrestrial . . . Paxillus involutus & others, p. 477
base of cap, close, pale or dingy yellowish to ochre or pinkish-buff, often crimped and
forked or connected by cross-veins, especially toward base. STALK absent or present
only as a small, narrowed, lateral base. SPORE PRINT yellowish-buff to brown or dingy
ochraceous; spores 4-6 x 3-4 microns, elliptical, smooth, many of them dextrinoid.
HABITAT: Solitary or ingroups or clumps on coniferous logs, stumps, debris, and humus
rich in lignin; widely distributed but not particularly common. In our area I have found it
several times on dead pine in the fall and winter. It is also said to occur on mine timbers,
causing a bright yellow discoloration in its host.
EDIBILITY: Unknown—do not experiment!
COMMENTS: The fan-shaped cap and absence or near absence of a stalk rescue this
listless little brown mushroom from the obscurity it so richly deserves. It might be mis¬
taken for a Crepidotus or Phyllotopsis, but the gills are usually forked or veined. The latter
feature can lead to confusion with the chanterelles, but the growth on wood, dingy color,
and poorly-developed stalk distinguish it. The false chanterelle (Hygrophoropsis
aurantiaca) is also somewhat similar, but has oranger gills, white spores, and a stalk.
Paxillus involutus is easily told by the strongly inrolled cap margin when young and the tendency
of the entire mushroom (especially the gills and flesh) to stain dark brown. Birch is one of its favorite
tree associates. See p. 41 for another photo, and see p. 478 for close-up of gills.
Left: The close relationship of Paxillus to the boletes is suggested by this close-up of the gills (and
“pores”) of Paxillus involutus. Right: Paxillus atrotomentosus is a wood-inhabiting species with
decurrent gills and a dark velvety stalk.
age; often forking and/or forming pores near the stalk. STALK 2-7 (10) cm long, 0.5-4
cm thick, usually shorter than width of mature cap, equal or tapered at either end, central
to somewhat off-center, solid, firm, dry, smooth; colored like cap or paler, often with dingy
reddish to dark brown stains. SPORE PRINT brown to yellow-brown; spores 7-10 x 4-6
microns, elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Usually scattered to densely gregarious on ground in woods, around the edges
of bogs, and in tree-studded parks or lawns; widely distributed, and by far the most
common member of the genus. Two possibly distinct forms occur in our area: the typical
one (shown in photo at bottom of p. 477) fruits mainly with planted birch trees in the fall,
while a larger form occurs with oak and pine in the late fall and winter.
478
PAXILLUS 479
stalk. ST ALK 2-9 (12) cm long, 1 -3 (5) cm thick, often short and usually off-center or even
lateral; solid, tough, densely velvety from a coating of brown to dark brown or blackish-
brown, often matted hairs; apex often paler or yellowish. SPORE PRINT yellowish to
brownish; spores 5-6.5 * 3-4.5 microns, elliptical, smooth, many of them dextrinoid.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups or tufts on oraround conifers(usually dead) or madrone;
northern in distribution. It is fairly common in the Pacific Northwest in the late summer
and fall, but rare in our area. It causes a carbonizing decay (brown rot) in its host.
EDIBILITY: Not recommended. Some people apparently collect it for the table, but the
same can be said of P. involutus, which has caused several deaths! (See comments on
edibility of that species.)
COMMENTS: The combination of brown cap, dark brown velvety stem, decurrent gills,
and growth on rotting conifers makes this one of the Pacific Northwest’s most distinctive
agarics. It does not discolor as much as P. involutus, and is quite attractive when fresh.
Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca. The cap is usually brown at the center and lighter or brighter toward
the margin, but in some forms it is completely brown (or even black) and in others it is whitish. For
a close-up of the forked gills, see color plate.
480 PAXILLACEAE
COMMENTS: The typically bright orange, decurrent, dichotomously forked gills (see
color plate) and white spore print are the principal fieldmarks of this attractive but variable
fungus. In spite of its common name, it is difficult to confuse with the true chanterelle
(Cantharellus cibarius) if the following is kept in mind: the gills are thinner, crowded, and
bladelike at maturity (but often blunter when young), and are usually oranger than those
of the chanterelle. In other words, the false chanterelle has “true” gills while the true
chanterelle has “false” gills. Also, Hygrophoropsis has flimsier flesh, a browner cap, is less
robust, differently shaped (not as wavy or frilled) and sometimes grows on rotten wood.
The jack-o-lantern mushrooms (Omphalotus species) are also similar, but have brightly
colored flesh, typically grow in clusters on or under hardwoods, and do not have forked
gills. The false chanterelle was originally placed in Cantharellus, and is listed in many
mushroom books as Clitocybe aurantiaca, but the forked gills, frequently off-center stalk,
and dextrinoid spores connote a closer kinship to Paxillus. Other species: H. olida (-Cli¬
tocybe morganii) is a small (cap 1 -4 cm) species with a pinkish cap and stalk (that may fade
to buff), whitish to pinkish gills, and a flagrantly fragrant odor that is reminiscent of root
beer or cinnamon candy. At least some of its gills are forked and/or have cross-veins, its
stalk can be central or off-center, and its spores are white and dextrinoid. Like H. auran¬
tiaca, it favors conifers and is widely distributed, but seems to be rather rare. I have seen
it only once in California, near Mount Shasta, in June.
GOMPHIDIACEAE spores
THIS is a small but prominent family of fleshy-stemmed mushrooms with decurrent gills
and smoky-olive to black spores. No other group of black-spored mushrooms has con¬
sistently decurrent gills. Gomphos, meaning “peg” or “stake,” refers to the shape of the
young mushrooms, which look like tent stakes with their long stems and small, rounded to
conical caps. The spores are typically “boletoid”—i.e., long, narrow, and more or less
spindle-shaped, and the Gomphidiaceae are thought to be more closely related to the
boletes than to other gilled fungi. They are mycorrhizal exclusively with conifers and often
occur with the bolete genus Suillus. This may be purely coincidental, since Suillus is also
mycorrhizal with conifers, or it may be that the fungal mycelia are in some way associated
with each other as well as with their mutual host.
As far as is known the family is completely safe from an edibility standpoint. There are
two common genera, Gomphidius and Chroogomphus, but the latter is listed under
Gomphidius in many older books. A closely related gastroid genus, Brauniellula (see
p. 732) also occurs, but it often grows underground and does not have true gills.
GOMPHIDIUS
Fairly small to medium-large terrestrial mushrooms associated with conifers. CAP viscid or slimy
when moist, usually smooth. Flesh white to grayish. GILLS decurrent, soft or somewhat waxy,
fairly close to well-spaced, pallid or white when young but blackening in age. STALK fleshy, more
or less central; lower portion or base usually bright yellow( especially within). VEIL usually present,
but often disappearing or leaving only a slight ring (annulus) on stalk. VOLVA absent. SPORE
PRINT smoky-gray to black. Spores narrowly elliptical, smooth. Cap tissue not amyloid.
THIS genus is readily recognized by its soft, somewhat waxy decurrent gills, slimy-viscid
cap, white or pallid flesh, and smoky-black spores. In addition, the base or lower portion of
the stem is brilliant yellow in most species—a very striking and telltale feature. Gomphidius
is most likely to be confused with Chroogomphus, which has orange to yellowish or pinkish
flesh, and the waxy caps(Hygrophoraceae), which have white spores.
Gomphidius species are mycorrhizal exclusively with conifers—particularly fir,
spruce, Douglas-fir, hemlock, and larch—but in pine forests they are largely supplanted by
Chroogomphus. November rains can mean Gomphidius galore in our area, with large
numbers of the glutinous fruiting bodies littering our Douglas-fir forests, along with
maggoty Suillus species and assorted Russulas.
Gomphidius species are edible but not often collected—perhaps because they are soft,
sluglike, insipid, and putrescent. Also, they do not dry nicely like Chroogomphus, and
often blacken when cooked—but some people relish them nonetheless (maybe they can’t
find anything better!). About ten species occur in North America, all of them rather similar
in appearance. Two are described here and several others are keyed out.
Key to Gomphidius
1. Slimy veil present in young specimens; stalk usually viscid when moist (from veil remains);
associated with various conifers . 2
1. Veil absent; stalk not viscid; associated primarily (but not exclusively) with larch or tamarack;
found in northern North America . 5
482 GOMPHIDIACEAE
2. Cap pink to rosy-red or red, not large (up to 7 cm broad); stalk usually 1.5 cm thick or less . .
. G. subroseus, p. 483
2. Cap sometimes pinkish or salmon, but usually dingier or darker in color (whitish, grayish,
brownish, vinaceous, purplish, etc.); small to large . 3
3. Stalk with little or no yellow at base; fruiting body medium-sized to fairly small .
.G. smithii(see G. subroseus, p. 483)
3. Base or lower portion of stalk typically bright yellow; medium-sized to fairly large . 4
4. Often growing in small clumps, stalk often rooted deeply in soil; associated primarily with
Douglas-fir; spores typically less than 14 microns long. G. oregonensis, below
4. Not as above; found with various conifers (including Douglas-fir); spores longer than 14
microns; widely distributed .G. glutinosus & others (see G. oregonensis, below)
5. Cap whitish to yellowish when young; found in eastern North America; rare . . . G. nigricans
5. Cap pale cinnamon to brownish, etc., when young; widely distributed in northern latitudes
. G. maculatus {see G. oregonensis, below)
COMMENTS: The intensely yellow flesh in the lower stem plus the whitish flesh elsewhere,
viscid-slimy cap, soft decurrent gills, and smoky-black spores immediately identify this
mushroom as a Gomphidius. However, distinguishing it from its brethren (see below),
especially when it is not growing in clumps, can be difficult unless the spores—the shortest
in the genus—are measured. In age the fruiting body is often quite murky and insidious-
looking, hence its common name. The cap is quite variable in color but is usually dingier
and dirtier than that of G. subroseus, and the stalk is usually thicker—but not necessarily
slicker. Other species: The “Glutinous Gomphidius,” G. glutinosus, is probably the most
common and widespread member of the genus. It is mycorrhizal with a variety of
conifers, including spruce, fir, and in our area, Douglas-fir. It is quite similar to G. oregon¬
ensis, but has longer spores (over 14 microns), does not often grow in clumps, and usually
has a darker cap when young (purplish to purple-brown, brownish-gray, purplish-gray,
etc.). Another western species, G. largus, is essentially a giant version of G. glutinosus, and
also grows with spruce and fir, mainly at higher elevations. Finally, there is the “Hideous
Gomphidius,” G. maculatus, which has a pale cinnamon to reddish-brown to murky brown
Gomphidius oregonensis, a common associate of Douglas-fir. Gills are decurrent and darken in old
age, a veil is present when young (visible in specimen on right), and cap is slimy when moist. Specimen
at lower left has been sliced open to show the flesh, which is white in the cap and brightyellowinlower
part of stalk. Buttons (top left) of this species are often found in tight clumps.
or blackish-spotted cap and dark-fibered stalk. It lacks the slimy veil characteristic of
other Gomphidii and features both robust and very slender forms. It is a northern species
that grows mainly with larch, often in the company of Suillus cavipes and S. grevillei.
Chroogomphus vinicolor is a common sight in pine forests and on lawns where pines have been
planted. Note the shape, which is very characteristic.
CHROOGOMPHUS 485
Key to Chroogomphus
1. Fruiting body robust (stalk at least 2 cm thick); cap and/ or stalk usually decorated with orange
to reddish to wine-colored fibrillose or felty patches or zones; cap convex (not umbonate),
not viscid or only very slightly so; spore print often olive-tinged . C. pseudovinicolor, p. 486
1. Fruiting body not so robust, or if so then not as above . 2
2. Cap not viscid or only slightly so, covered with flattened woolly or felty fibrils or fibrillose
scales; often associated with conifers other than pine (but also with pine) . 3
2. Cap usually smooth and viscid when moist, often lustrous when dry (but sometimes minutely
scaly or faintly fibrillose); associated principally with pine . 4
3. Cap pale to dull orange, yellow-orange, or ochraceous .C. tomentosus, p. 487
3. Cap usually grayish, at least at margin .C. leptocystis (see C. tomentosus, p. 487)
4. Cap small (1-4 cm broad) and usually pinkish- or vinaceous-tinged when young; restricted to
eastern North America; rare . C.flavipes
4. Not as above; widespread and common . 5
5. Cap often brightly colored (buff, yellow-orange, orange, ochre) until fairly mature; cystidia
thin-walled . C. ochraceus(see C. vinicolor, below)
5. Not as above (but cap may be orangish when very young); cystidia thin- or thick-walled .. 6
6. Cap often vinaceous (wine-colored) in old age; cystidia thick-walled .... C. vinicolor, below
6. Cap usually dull reddish-brown in age; cystidia thin-walled C. rutilus (see C. vinicolor, below)
decurrent gills, and smoky-black spores make it as distinctive as it is attractive. The fruiting
body is often quite slender and long-stemmed, but robust forms also occur. C. rutilus
(formerly Gomphidius viscidus) is a very similar, widespread species with thin-walled
rather than thick-walled cystidia. It can often be told in the field by its slightly duller or less
vinaceous color and broader or flatter cap, but both species are so variable in shape and
color that a microscopic examination is often necessary to positively distinguish them.
Both differ from C. tomentosus and C. pseudovinicolor in their smoother cap that is viscid
or slimy when wet and often shiny when dry. Other smooth, viscid-capped species: C.
ochraceus, widely distributed, is closely related to C. rutilus (i.e., it has thin-walled cysti¬
dia), but is smaller, with a yellow-orange to buff, ochre, orange, or grayish cap, at least
when young; it also occurs in our area with pine. See also C.flavipes (in the key).
486
Left: Chroogomphus pseudovinicolor, a robust orange to reddish species with patches of fibrils on
the cap and stalk. Right: Chroogomphus tomentosus has a dry fibrillose, orangish to ochraceous
cap. It is very common under northern conifers.
COMMENTS: This robust but relatively rare Chroogomphus is a very beautiful mush¬
room when fresh—easily distinguished from other Chroogomphus species by its dry,
convex (never conical or umbonate) cap and thick, woolly-scaly stalk. Also, the spore
print is usually greener than that of its brethren, and it often grows in small clumps of
2-4 individuals rather than in the scattered fashion typical of other pine spikes.
COMMENTS: The dry, woolly-fibrillose cap, overall dull orange to ochraceous color,
decurrent gills, smoky-black spores, and growth with conifers form a distinctive set of
characteristics. The cap is drier and woollier than that of C. vinicolor and C. rutilus, and
not as variable in color, while the stalk is not as thick as that of C. pseudovinicolor. Also, it
seems to favor mixed coniferous forests, whereas the others grow almost exclusively with
pine. Other species: C. leptocystis of western North America tends to have a grayer cap
and thin-walled cystidia, but is otherwise quite similar.
487
488
Boletes
BOLETACEAE
BOLETES have a spongelike layer of tubes on the underside of the cap instead of gills.
Otherwise they resemble agarics: medium-sized to large, mostly terrestrial fungi with a
cap and central stalk. Polypores also possess a tube layer, but are tough or leathery and
usually grow on wood. The few polypores that are fleshy and terrestrial typically have an
off-center stalk and tubes which do not peel easily from the cap.
The tube layer in the boletes, on the other hand, usually peels away cleanly from the cap.
The spores are produced on basidia which line the inner surfaces of the tubes, which are
vertically arranged so that the spores, when discharged, drop into the air. The mouths
of the tubes are known as pores. They are sometimes stuffed with a pith when young,
making the pore surface appear smooth. In some species the pores are radially arranged
(arranged in rows which radiate from the stalk), giving a somewhat gill-like effect. This
is carried to an extreme in Phylloporus rhodoxanthus (p. 480), a “bolete” with true gills,
which serves to illustrate why boletes are thought to have more in common with gilled
mushrooms than with, say, the coral fungi, teeth fungi, or polypores.
Boletes used to be lumped together in one giant and unwieldy genus, Boletus. Several
genera are now recognized, the most prominent being Suillus, Leccinum, Tylopilus, and
Boletus. The common term “bolete,” however, is still applicable to any member of the
Boletaceae, not just those still retained in Boletus.
The salient characters for identification are much the same as for agarics. It is particu¬
larly important, however, to note color changes on the pore surface, cap, stalk, and flesh.
Many boletes will stain blue or greenish-blue when bruised (see Color Plate 135); a few will
stain brown or some other color, while others will not stain at all. In a number of boletes
the cap is typically areolate, i.e., it develops an extensive system of shallow cracks or
fissures as it matures, exposing the flesh beneath.
Another important feature to note is the type of stalk ornamentation, if any. In Boletus
and Tylopilus, the upper portion or sometimes the entire stalk is frequently reticulate
or “netted”: covered with a network of veins. Some species are coarsely reticulate (see
Color Plate 139), others are very finely so (see photo on p. 489). In Leccinum, the stalk is
Close-up of the pores (tube mouths) in Boletus subtomentosus. Boletes are one of two groups of
fungi that produce their spores in tubes. The other group is the polypores (p. 549).
Close-up of the finely reticulate (netted) stalk of a young Boletus edulis.
always scabrous: decorated with tufted hairs or rough, scurfy scales (scabers) which
typically darken at maturity (see Color Plates 145-147). In Suillus, on the other hand, the
stalk is often speckled or smeared with glandular dots (see Color Plate 120). These pinkish
to brown or blackish spots exude a resinous substance that will stain your fingers brown.
Spore color ranges from yellow to olive, brown, reddish-brown, chocolate-brown, or
black. A spore print is easily obtained, but pigmentation in the tubes may stain the paper,
making the spore color look brighter (usually yellower or greener) than it actually is. The
spore shape is characteristically “boletoid”: long and narrowly elliptical or spindle-shaped
in face view, inequilateral in profile. Viewed through the microscope, a bolete spore is an
unusually large, handsome, and healthy-looking specimen, somewhat reminiscent of a
surfer with a good tan.
The boletes are one of the safest groups for the table, as wellas one of the most substantial
and rewarding. A few members of the genus Boletus are poisonous, but the majority are
edible (though some are distinctly better than others). Since they are large and fleshy,
boletes are a popular picnicground for maggots. These may enter in the usual manner, via
the stem, or surreptitiously, through the tubes. Always check for maggots in the field, and
cut away soggy or infested areas (assuming you already know the species) before popping
them in your basket. That way you are less likely to have a maggot-infested mush two days
later. Some people peel off the tubes—when old and spongy they are mostly wateranyway.
Also, boletes are vulnerable to attack by a variety of moldy-looking parasites. Discard
all such individuals when picking for the table. For more on hunting boletes, see p. 546.
The boletes attain their greatest diversity in the deciduous forests of eastern North
America, but are also a conspicuous and colorful component of the West’s woodland
fungi. The cap can be very hefty and the pores are often brightly colored. The vast maj ority
are mycorrhizal. Several hundred species occur in North America, more than 80 on the
west coast. Though not complete (what book is?) and more than a trifle expensive (what
book isn’t?), Harry Thiers’ California Mushrooms: A Field Guide to the Boletes is a
definitive must for the serious and self-respecting bolete buff. (Thiers hasalso co-authored,
with Alexander Smith, the bolete bible for easterners, entitled The Boletes of Michigan.)
489
490 BOLETACEAE
2. Cap and stalk shaggy or coarsely scaly, the scales gray to brown or black; pores whitish becoming
gray or black in age; veil present when young; spore print dark brown to black; spores spiny,
warty, or reticulate; found in eastern North America and Southwest . Strobilomyces, p. 543
2. Not as above . 3
3. Stalk roughened by small tufted hairs or scales (scabers) which are usually gray to dark brown
or black by maturity (but differently colored or remaining pallid in a few species); stalk not
glandular-dotted and typically not reticulate; pores rarely yellow .Leccinum, p. 536
3. Not as above; stalk typically without scabers ..4
4. Bright yellow, dry, cottony-powdery or cobwebby veil present when young, usually leaving
cottony remnants on cap and/or stalk; pores and flesh usually blueing (sometimes slowly)
when bruised .Pulveroboletus, p. 509
4. Veil absent, or if present then not as above . 5
5. Veil present when young, sometimes forming a ring (annulus) on stalk, at other times clinging
to the margin of cap, and in still other cases disappearing in age .9
5. Veil absent (check young specimens if unsure), but cap sometimes fringed with sterile tissue 6
6. Stalk with glandular dots or smears at least when mature (the dots often slightly resinous to the
touch); stalk usually more or less equal or at least not markedly bulbous; cap often (but not
always) viscid; spore print olive to brown or dull cinnamon .Suillus, p. 491
6. Stalk not glandular-dotted (or very rarely so, but then with much darker spores).7
7. Pores often radially elongated, sinuous, arranged in rows, and/or veined; tubes often (but not
always) decurrent; taste of cap not peppery .8
7. Pores not as above, or if so then taste peppery .10
8. Veil absent when young; tube layer often difficult to separate from cap; stalk often short,
curved, and/or off-center; spores broadly elliptical to nearly round; associated with hard¬
woods (mainly ash and alder); common in eastern North America, rare in the West .... 14
8. Not with above features; veil present or absent; spores elliptical to spindle-shaped; associated
with conifers or less commonly hardwoods; widespread and common .9
9. Spore print dark grayish-brown to dark reddish-brown, chocolate-brown, or vinaceous-brown;
veil typically present (at least when young) and glandular dots typically absent(rarely present);
associated with larch and other northern conifers .Fuscoboletinus, p. 505
9. Spore print olive-brown to brown, yellowish, or dull cinnamon; veil present or absent; stalk
glandular-dotted or not; found with many kinds of trees (including larch) .. Suillus, p. 491
10. Cap viscid to very slimy when moist; stalk glandular-dotted or if not then stalk typically white
to yellow and not reticulate; associated with conifers .Suillus, p. 491
10. Not with above features . 11
11. Spore print flesh-colored to pinkish-brown, reddish-brown, vinaceous, or chocolate-brown;
pores typically white to pinkish, vinaceous, gray, or brown but not red and only rarely yellow
(pores if pallid often but not always staining brown when bruised); common in eastern North
America but rather infrequent in the West .Tylopilus, p. 532
11. Not as above; spore print yellow to yellow-brown, olive-brown, olive, brown, or more rarely
cinnamon-brown; pores white, yellow, olive, red, orange, or sometimes gray or brown (but if
pallid then not typically staining brown when bruised) . 12
12. Spore print pale yellow to yellow; stalk often hollow or partially hollow at maturity (especially
near the base); common in eastern North America, rare in the West.Gyroporus, p. 510
12. Spore print olive-brown to olive or brown, or occasionally yellow-brown or cinnamon-brown;
stalk not normally hollow; common and widespread . 13
13. Spores ornamented with ridges, grooves, pits, etc.; stalk usually relatively long(7 cm or more)
and slender and coarsely reticulate or conspicuously lined with jagged ridges for most of its
length; pores yellow to greenish-yellow, not usually blueing when bruised; typically terrestrial;
found in eastern North America and the Southwest .... Boletellus& Austroboletus, p. 508
13. Not with above combination of features; spores typically smooth; widespread Boletus, p. 511
14. Common under hardwoods (especially ash) in eastern North America; cap olive to dingy yellow-
brown or brown; flesh not blueing or blueing only slightly; stalk often quite dark in old age,
off-center or lateral .Boletinellus(-Gyrodon) merulioides
14. Associated with alder; known from southern California (and Europe), apparerltly rare; cap
yellowish to reddish-brown; flesh usually blueing when bruised . Gyrodon lividus
491
MOST slippery jacks have a veil or a glandular-dotted stem (see Color Plate 120) or both.
In addition, the cap is often “slippery” (viscid or slimy), the pores are radially elongated
in some species (that is, in rows radiating from the stalk toward the cap margin), the
stalk is neither conspicuously bulbous nor reticulate as is commonly the case in Boletus,
and they are mycorrhizal almost exclusively with conifers. Suillus is a genus of exceptions,
however: several species are not slippery, others lack a veil, still others are not glandular-
dotted, many do not have radially-arranged pores, and two or three species in eastern
North America occur with hardwoods. However, by using the above features in combi¬
nation, you should have little trouble distinguishing Suillus from other bolete genera with
the exception of Fuscoboletinus, which has darker spores and doesn’t occur in California.
Like other boletes, Suillus can be found in older mushroom books under Boletus. It is
perhaps the most primitive genus in the Boletaceae, leading to Boletus on the one hand and
to the Gomphidiaceae (via Fuscoboletinus) on the other. Suillus splits neatly into two
groups. In the first (the genus Boletinus of some authors), a veil is always present and the
cap is frequently dry and fibrillose, thus belying the moniker“slippery jack.” Also, the stalk
is not glandular-dotted and the pores are often elongated and/ or radially arranged. In our
area this group occurs only with Douglas-fir, where it is often accompanied by species of
Gomphidius. Elsewhere it also occurs with larch and various pines. The second group
includes the “true” slippery jacks—or “slippery jills” as they are sometimes called. They
have a slimy cap or glandular-dotted stem or both, and a veil may or may not be present.
They occur principally with pines, often mingling with species of Chroogomphus.
Slippery jacks are remarkable for their fecundity. Under favorable conditions they
fruit in quantities that must be seen to be believed. Bushels can be harvested from a single
row of pine trees and truckloads from a pine plantation. They are indisputably among
the most prominent fungal facets of temperate coniferous forests, and in fact, wherever
there are conifers of the pine family (Pinaceae)—be it in a forest or park, on a lawn or by a
freeway—there are bound to be one or more Suillus species also. They are partial to cool
weather and generally fruit later than Boletus and Tylopilus species, which like it warmer.
In our area they can be found most any time but peak in the late fall and winter.
None of the slippery jacks is known to be poisonous, but a few have caused “allergic”
reactions. In my experience even the so-called “choice” species are insipid and slimy when
cooked, but one novel solution is to take advantage of their inherent wetness by using
them as an escargot substitute. (You can boil them, flavor them with herbs, stuff them into
empty snail shells, and call it “Parsley, Sage, Rosemary, and Slime.”) Slippery jacks also
tend to be wormy and do not dry well in the tasty tradition of Boletus edulis. They are
indisputably available, however, so I heartily recommend that you try them. If you find a
species that pleases you, you’ll never have to worry about a mushroom shortage again!
Nearly half of the 70+ North American species of Suillus have been found in California.
As they pose a threat to those who don’t watch where they step (they are at least as
dangerous as banana peels!) and inevitably arouse the curiosity of fungophiles and other
weird elements (for their prodigious numbers as well as their slipperiness). I’m offering a
generous selection here. Fourteen species are described and many others are keyed out.
492 BOLETACEAE
Key to Suillus
l. Veil present (check young specimens if possible!), either completely covering the pores when
young (and often forming an annulus or ring on stalk after rupturing) or present only as a roll
of cottony tissue on cap margin or patches on cap (and not forming an annulus) .2
1. Veil and annulus absent; margin of cap naked, even when young .28
2. Glandular dots or smears present on stalk and conspicuous at least in age; associated mainly
with pine, sometimes with spruce . 11
2. Stalk lacking glandular dots (or occasionally with a few visible in old age); found with Douglas-
fir, larch, hemlock, or sometimes pine in the West and with larch, pine, and oak in East . . 3
3. Stalk usually hollow or partially hollow, at least at base; cap not viscid; associated only with
larch .S. cavipes, p. 494
3. Not as above; stalk not normally hollow .4
4. Cap with tawny to orangish, red, reddish-brown, pink, or purple-red scales or fibrils, dry or with
a viscid layer beneath the scales (i.e., can be viscid in wet weather if fibrils are obliterated) 5
4. Cap more or less smooth (but sometimes streaked) and viscid to slimy when moist . 7
5. Found in eastern North America, mainly with pine .43
5. Found in western North America, principally with Douglas-fir ..6
6. Cap fibrillose or fibrillose-scaly, the fibrils reddish-brown to brick-red or pinkish, or sometimes
orange-buff or tawny; surface dry, or viscid only in wet weather or old age . . S. lakei, p. 495
6. Cap with only scattered fibrils, but often streaked; surface usually viscid when moist, not reddish
but often cinnamon-brown, orangish, greenish, etc.S. caerulescens & others, p. 496
7. Associated with hardwoods (e.g., oak) in Great Fakes region; veil thick, tough, often gelatinous;
spore print olive-yellow to yellow-brown; spores more or less round .N. sphaerosporus
7. Not as above . 8
8. Base or lower portion of stalk often (but not always) staining blue or green when cut (often
staining slowly or weakly); associated primarily with Douglas-fir. 9
8. Not as above; stalk not blueing and/or associated with larch or pine . 10
9. Veil viscid and yellow to bright orange while still covering the pores; cap more or less smooth
.S. ponderosus & others (see V. caerulescens, p. 496)
9. Veil dry and whitish while covering the pores; cap smooth or fibrillose S. caerulescens, p. 496
10. Cap yellow to golden-yellow to dark red or bay-red; flesh usually yellow when young; associated
with larch .S. grevillei, p. 497
10. Cap duller (honey-colored to dingy yellow-brown, brown, etc.); flesh white becoming pale
yellow in age; associated primarily with pine . 11
11. Cap at first covered with a whitish veil that usually leaves small patches or scales on the surface
of cap, especially near margin; found mostly with white (5-needle) pines in northern Rocky
Mountains (particularly common in northern Idaho).S. albivelatus
11. Not as above . 12
12. Pores large (many of them typically 1 mm or more broad at maturity), often (but not always!)
elongated and at least somewhat radially arranged (in radiating rows). 13
12. Pores mostly less than 1 mm broad and not radially arranged . 15
13. Veil typically forming a gelatinous annulus(ring) on stalk; cap often umbonate, dingy-colored,
and rather small; found mainly with lodgepole and beach pines .S. umbonatus, p. 498
13. Not as above; veil not forming a gelatinous annulus or forming only a very slight one .... 14
14. Stalk often short, poorly developed, and/or off-center; pores often elongated and irregular;
associated with pines and other conifers in the Sierra Nevada and other mountains.
. S. riparius& S. megaporinus(see S. sibiricus, p. 498)
14. Not as above; stalk typically well-developed; found with 5-needle (white) pines; widespread 45
15. Veil usually forming a distinct annulus (ring) on stalk . 16
15. Veil typically attached only to margin of cap or if attached to stalk when young then typically
forming only a slight or very obscure annulus . 20
16. Annulus usually thin and/or fibrillose; glandular dots on stalk often inconspicuous until old
age .S. pseudobrevipes, p. 500
16. Annulus usually well-formed; stalk with conspicuous glandular dots (unless very young) . 17
SUILLUS 493
17. Stalk and/ or underside of veil (annulus) often with purplish or dull lilac shades; cap reddish-
brown to dark reddish-brown or sometimes yellow-brown .S. luteus, p. 500
17. Not as above; purplish shades absent; cap white to dingy yellowish, olive-brown, etc.18
18. Found in eastern North America (including the Gulf Coast) . 19
18. Found in the West (especially common in Pacific Northwest) .S. subolivaceus, p. 499
19. Annulus tall (i.e., broad) and baggy or bandlike (both lower and upper edges often flaring
out) .S', subluteus & others (see S. subolivaceus, p. 499)
19. N ot as above; annulus not baggy; stalk slender; cap whitish to pale yellow, pale cinnamon, etc.,
the slime strongly acidic-tasting.S. acidus
20. Veil purplish to lilac-brown on its underside; cap soon brown to dark brown; associated mainly
with western white pine .S. borealis (see S. pseudobrevipes, p. 500)
20. Not as above .21
21. Cap white becoming olive-gray or olive, then spotted, streaked, or becoming entirely yellow,
cinnamon, orange, etc.; common with various pines in central and southern California, and in
regions where Monterey pine has been planted .S. pungens, p. 503
21. Not as above; cap not olive or grayish-olive when young .22
22. Veil rudimentary (not well-developed); cap yellow to dingy yellowish, mustard-yellow, or
orange-buff, often with brown to reddish spots, streaks, or scales or with well-developed brown
to grayish fibrils; known only from eastern North America and the Southwest.34
22. N ot as above; if similarly colored then veil well-developed at least when young(asa roll of cottony
tissue extending from cap margin toward stalk, or as a true partial veil covering the pores) 23
23. Cap yellow to dingy olive-yellow or mustard-yellow (even in age), often with reddish to brown
scales, spots, or streaks; stalk markedly glandular-dotted; found with 5-needle pines ... 45
23. Not with above features . 24
24. Young specimens with yellowish to pale tan caps and very dense, conspicuous glandular dots on
stalk .S. glandulosipes (see S. pseudobrevipes, p. 500)
24. Not as above; young specimens differently colored or with inconspicuous glandular dots . 25
25. Slime on cap becoming chocolate-brown in age; associated mainly with sugar pine on the west
coast, lodgepole pine in Rocky Mountains . S', brunnescens(see S. pseudobrevipes, p. 500)
25. Not as above .26
26. Growing in volcanic soil, often buried; cap yellow to tawny, often fibrillose or streaked and
often developing pinkish to reddish-brown areas S. volcanalis(see S. pseudobrevipes, p. 500)
26. Not as above; habitat different . 27
27. Veil material present only on margin of cap, never attached to stalk; cap whitish to buff‘or at
times brown to tawny or cinnamon .S. albidipes(see S. pseudobrevipes, p. 500)
27. Veil attached to the stalk when young; cap dingy yellowish to honey-colored or brown, but
not whitish .S. pseudobrevipes, p. 500
28. Pores large (many of them 1-3 mm in widest dimension), often elongated radially or arranged
in radiating rows and often decurrent . 29
28. Not as above . 30
29. Cap hairy or velvety and brown to vinaceous-brown; found under hardwoods in southeastern
United States .S. castanellus
29. Not as above .46
30. Cap dry to viscid but not thickly slimy, with hairs, fibrils, or scattered fibrillose scales when
young (but these often absent in age or rainy weather); pores typically dark brown to yellow-
brown, pale cinnamon, or orangish when young (but often dingy yellowish in age) .31
30. Cap viscid to very slimy when moist, smooth (bald) or streaked; fibrils typically absent on cap
(occasionally present, but if so then pores typically white to pale yellow when young) ... 35
31. Flesh and/ or pores staining blue when bruised or cut (but sometimes staining slowly or only
slightly—check several specimens if unsure!) .S. tomentosus, p. 504
31. Not as above . 32
32. Found in eastern North America and the Southwest; cap sometimes yellow or orangish . . 33
32. Found in California and the Pacific Northwest; cap not yellow . S. fuscotomentosus, p. 504
33. Pores dark brown when young; cap soon more or less bald; associated with conifers, often in
boggy areas; odor often fragrant when several specimens are put together . ... S. punctipes
33. Not as above; cap usually with scales or colored fibrils; found with hardwoods and conifers 34
494 BOLETACEAE
34. Associated with conifers (mainly pine); cap scales or fibrils usually conspicuous and glandular
dots on stalk prominent at maturity .S. hirtellus
34. Favoring hardwoods; scales on cap usually small and glandular dots obscure . S’, subaureus
35. Glandular dots or smears present on stalk and usually conspicuous by maturity . 36
35. Glandular dots absent or obscure (in old age sometimes visible at apex) .40
36. Cap white when young, whitish to pale yellowish in age (or with darker slime); associated with
white pines in eastern North America; common .S. placidus(see S. granulatus, p. 502)
36. Not as above; cap darker, at least in age, and/or found in the West .37
37. Cap smooth, at first white but soon becoming olive to olive-gray and then orange, cinnamon,
yellow, brown, etc. (or splashed with these colors); found with various pines in coastal central
and southern California, or in regions where Monterey pine is planted . . S. pungens, p. 503
37. Not with above features; cap variously colored but lacking an olive or olive-gray phase . . 38
38. Cap with grayish to dark brown streaks, fibrils, or scales; found with pine (especially Monterey
pine) in California; taste harsh, unpleasant . ... S. acerbus(see S. fuscotomentosus, p. 504)
38. Not as above . 39
39. Cap buff to yellowish or pale cinnamon at maturity; common with ponderosa pine in the
Southwest .S. kaibabensis(see S', granulatus, p. 502)
39. Not as above; either found elsewhere or cap darker at maturity S’, granulatus & others, p. 502
40. Taste peppery (chew on a small piece of cap) and base of stalk usually bright yellow or pores
brilliant yellow to intense greenish-yellow and associated with hardwoods (see Boletus, p.511)
40. Not as above .41
41. Stalk typically white to yellow (not brown or red) and not viscid or slimy; associated with
conifers (mainly pine); pores not blueing when bruised .42
41. Stalk viscid or slimy and cap sometimes yellow, or if not then not as above (see Boletus, p. 511)
42. Cap dark brown to reddish-brown to dull cinnamon when young .S. brevipes, p. 501
42. Cap whitish or at least paler than above when young .
.S. pallidiceps & S. occidentals (see 5. brevipes, p. 501)
43. Pores and flesh typically blueing when bruised; spores ridged or otherwise ornamented .
.(see Boletellus& Austroboletus, p. 508)
43. Pores and flesh not blueing; spores smooth .44
44. Cap fibrils pink to reddish to purple-red; growing with white pine S.pictus(see S', lakei, p. 495)
44. Not as above; cap dull yellowish to orangish or pinkish-orange; especially common along the
Gulf Coast .S. decipiens (see S. lakei, p. 495)
45. Veil sometimes forming a slight annulus (ring) on stalk; base of stalk often vinaceous-stained;
common in western North America, including the Southwest .S. sibiricus, p. 498
45. Not as above; veil typically not forming an annulus; common in eastern North America and
also found in the Southwest .S. americanus (see S. sibiricus, p. 498)
46. Cap small (up to 5 cm broad) and stalk slender .S. helenae (see S. umbonatus, p.498)
46. Cap medium-sized to large; stalk usually quite thick S. punctatipes(see S. granulatus, p. 502)
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious on ground in late summer and fall, associated with
larch trees; common throughout the northern hemisphere wherever larch occurs. I have
seen it in Oregon and Idaho, but not in California.
EDIBILITY: Edible and “choice” according to some sources, but I find it bland. Its one
saving grace is that it isn’t as slimy as many slippery jacks.
COMMENTS: Also known as Boletinus cavipes, this is the only Suillus with a consistently
hollow stem and dry, densely hairy, brown to tawny cap. Its growth with larch is also diag¬
nostic. Fresh specimens have an unusually clean, pristine appearance that is readily notice¬
able but difficult to describe (see color plate); the pale pores contrast strikingly with the
darker cap, making it one of our most beautiful boletes. Since larch does not occur in
California, S. cavipes probably doesn’t either. However, it is a prominent feature of the
coniferous forests of Idaho, Montana, and the Cascades, as well as the northeastern
United States and Canada. For other larch-loving boletes, see S. grevillei and the genus
Fuscoboletinus (particularly F. ochraceoroseus and F. aeruginascens).
size, and not to the fact that it isn’t associated with ponderosa pine. In fact, it is associated
with Douglas-fir just like S. caerulescens, and the two sometimes mix company. A third
very similar species, S. imitatus, has a smooth viscid cap and shorter spores; it occurs
under conifers in the Pacific Northwest. A dark or dingy greenish variety (S. imitatus var.
viridescens) also occurs, and both S. caerulescens and S. ponderosus can develop greenish
stains on the cap and stalk in cold weather. This in no way affects their edibility, however.
Suillus grevillei, a slippery jack that grows only with larch. Note slimy cap and prominent annulus
(ring). This is the eastern form with a golden cap; in the West the cap is usually reddish-brown.
m
Suillus umbonatus is a small slippery jack that favors lodgepole pine. Note the glutinous (slimy)
ring on the stalk and the rather large pores.
498
SUILLUS 499
COMMENTS: The combination of viscid yellow cap with reddish to brown spots or
plaques, cottony veil, and glandular-dotted stalk make this one of the most distinctive of
all the slippery jacks. The cap is usually bright yellow in dry weather and duller or dingier
when moist. The closely related S. americanus is often abundant with eastern white pine
and also occurs in the Southwest. Its cap is often more streaked than spotted and its stalk
is usually thinner (3-10 mm), plus it lacks an annulus because its veil normally doesn’t come
into contact with the stalk (instead it extends in from the cap margin as a roll of cottony tis¬
sue). In the S outhwest the two species seem to intergrade; the color plate may represent one
such “hybrid.” In the Sierra Nevada two somewhat similar species, S. riparius and S.
megaporinus, are often common. Both have very large, irregular or even gill-like pores
(up to 5 mm long and 3 mm broad) and yellow to brownish caps with brown to rusty-brown
scales, streaks, and/or fibrils. S. riparius usually has a well-developed stalk while in S.
megaporinus the stalk is often poorly developed and off-center and the cap is usually small.
EDIBILITY: Edible and widely collected, though some people are apparently “allergic” to
it. According to one source it is “the best of the slippery jacks”—a classic case of damning
with faint praise, if you ask me. As in most slippery jacks, the slimy skin peels off easily.
COMMENTS: This species is the “original” slippery jack, i.e., the one from which all the
others take their name. It can be told by its reddish-brown cap, glandular-dotted stem, and
sheathing veil which typically forms a prominent annulus (ring) on the stalk. The dull
purplish color of the lower stalk or underside of the ring is also distinctive. S. borealis
(see comments under S. pseudobrevipes) is a closely related westerner with no annulus.
thick, often rather short and thick, equal or tapered downward, solid, firm, white when
young, yellowish in age; glandular dots absent or obscure when young but tending to
become brown and more visible in age. VEIL white to dingy lavender or lavender-brown,
usually forming a median fibrillose ring on stalk, but the ring often slight or collapsed;
sometimes forming a sheath over the base of stalk or merely leaving remnants on cap
margin. SPORE PRINT brown to pale brownish; spores 7-9 * 2.54 microns, spindle-
shaped to elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious under pines (mainly ponderosa and lodgepole);
known only from western North America. In our area it fruits only in scattered localities
with ponderosa pine, in the fall and winter. In the Southwest and Rocky Mountains it is
quite abundant, however, and I’ve also seen it in the Sierra Nevada.
EDIBILITY: Edible.
COMMENTS: This slippery jack tends to have a short, stocky stem like its namesake,
V. brevipes, but the presence of a veil and paler cap color distinguish it. Sometimes the veil
persists as a roll of cottony tissue on the cap margin instead of forming a distinct annulus
(ring), leading to confusion with several species that typically boast veil remnants on the
margin of the cap but not the stalk. These species include: S. volcanalis, glandular dots
obscure, cap yellowish or tawny (or often with pinkish to reddish-brown areas), growing
in volcanic soil (often buried) with Jeffrey pine in Mt. Lassen National Park, California;
S. brunnescens, cap white with the slime becoming chocolate-brown, glandular dots small,
associated with sugar and lodgepole pines; S. borealis, cap dark brown, veil dull lavender
or purplish (as in S. luteus), stalk glandular^dotted in age, associated with western white
pine; S. glandulosipes, cap fibrillose and pale ochre to cinnamon, glandular dots very
conspicuous, locally common in northern coastal California; and S. albidipes, whose cap
is whitish to buff, brownish, or dull cinnnamon and has a roll of cottony veil tissue on the
margin when young. I have seen enormous fruitings of the latter species under lodgepole
pine in Oregon and Washington.
501
502 BOLETACEAE
pines, also spruce); very widespread and common. In the West it is especially abundant
with lodgepole and bishop pines. In our area it fruits in the fall and winter but is en¬
countered infrequently, perhaps due to the superabundance of S. pungens.
EDIBILITY: Edible and perhaps the best of our local slippery jacks—which is hardly a
compliment. Peel the slimy pellicle (skin) before cooking it.
COMMENTS: This widespread and often abundant slippery jack is best recognized by
its smooth, slimy, dark brown to reddish-brown cap (which may fade in age), absence of a
veil, and absence of obvious glandular dots on the stem. True to its name, the stalk is often
rather short, but it is a variable species and longer-stemmed individuals are not unusual.
The viscid cap and non-reticulate, more or less equal stalk distinguish it from Boletus; the
cap is never olive-gray as in S. pungens, and there is no veil as in S. pseudobrevipes, while
5. granulatus and its relatives have a distinctly glandular-dotted stem. Other species witha
smooth viscid cap, no veil, and absent or inconspicuous glandular dots include: S. pallidi-
ceps of the Rocky Mountains, with a white cap when young that becomes pale cinnamon
or yellowish in age; and S. occidentalis, common under ponderosa pine in the Southwest,
with a paler (buff to light brown or pinkish-brown) cap that is not white when young.
503
504 BOLETACEAE
in Idaho, Washington, northern California, and the Sierra Nevada, especially with lodge-
pole pine and in mixed forests of aspen and pine. In our area, however, it is largely re¬
placed by the similar S.fuscotomentosus.
EDIBILITY: Edible, and every bit the equal of S. fuseotomentosus (see comments on
the edibility of that species).
COMMENTS: The fibrillose to scaly cap, brownish pores when young, absence of a veil,
glandular-dotted stem, and tendency of the poresand/ orthe flesh tostainblue orgreenish-
blue when bruised form a distinctive combination of characters. It is one of the commonest
and most variable slippery jacks, with several slightly different color forms. Other species:
S. variegatus of Europe is very similar if not the same; S', reticulatus is a rare, reticulate-
stalked species that stains blue.
Medium-sized, fleshy, terrestrial boletes associated mainly with larch. CAP viscid, or if dry then
fibrillose. PORES pallid to yellowish, gray, or grayish-brown, often large and radially arranged.
STALK not usually reticulate or glandular-dotted; not scabrous. VEIL present, frequently forming
an annulus (ring) on stalk. SPORE PRINT dark grayish-brown to dark reddish-brown to
chocolate-brown or chocolate-gray. Spores elliptical to spindle-shaped, smooth. Cystidia on inner
surfaces of tubes staining dark brown in KOH (potassium hydroxide).
THIS small genus is an off-shoot of Suillus. It differs principally in its darker spore color,
and is included in Suillus by some boletologists. A veil is present in all species but the stalk
usually lacks glandular dots. The cap varies from smooth and slimy to dry and fibrillose.
Fuscoboletinus species are mycorrhizal mainly with larch or tamarack (Larix). This is a
helpful feature in identification, though several Suillus species (e.g., S. grevillei and S.
cavipes) also grow with larch. Some Fuscoboletinus species grow with other northern
conifers, but their geographical range still corresponds to that of larch. As larch does not
occur in California, Fuscoboletinus probably doesn’t either. However, it could con¬
ceivably appear where larches have been planted. Only two species are known from the
western United States, and they are described here; most of the other species occur in the
Northeast and Canada. Like slippery jacks, they are edible but of mediocre quality.
505
506 BOLETACEAE
Key to Fuscoboletinus
1. Stalk distinctly glandular-dotted (the dots dark); known from Minnesota; rare . F. weaverae
1. Stalk not glandular-dotted (but may have reddish spots when young); common .2
2. Tubes and pores yellow to yellow-brown or yellow-olive when fresh . 3
2. Tubes and pores whitish to grayish or grayish-brown, not yellowish . 10
3. Cap 4-10 cm broad, at first covered by cottony grayish to yellow or red veil material which breaks
up to form coarse scales, streaks, or plaques; cap viscid beneath the veil material and usually
dark red to brownish or red-and-yellow in age; partial veil with both a cottony and a viscid or
gelatinous layer; stalk with veil remnants (like cap), usually a mixture of red, yellow, and/ or
gray; pores and tubes yellow; associated with larch (tamarack), usually growing in bogs;
found in the northeastern United States and Canada (a very striking mushroom—see Color
Plate 126) .F. spectabilis
3. Not as above .4
4. Cap viscid or slimy when moist and more or less smooth . 5
4. Cap dry (not viscid) and fibrillose or scaly . 8
5. Flesh in lower stalk staining greenish when cut (see Suillusproximus under S', grevillei, p.497)
5. Not as above .6
6. Very common with larch in both eastern and western North America; spore print olive-brown
to dull cinnamon .(see Suillus grevillei, p. 497)
6. Found in northeastern U .S., Canada, and Alaska, usually with conifers other than larch; spore
print darker than above . 7
7. Veil(and stalk below veil) viscid; cap red-brown to mahogany, the stalk often with reddish spots
when young; found under conifers in Alaska, Canada, and northeastern U.S. F. glandulosus
7. Not as above; stalk dry (not viscid) .F. sinuspaulianus
8. Stalk typically becoming hollow in lower portion; cap color variable: dark brown to reddish-
brown, tawny, etc.; spore print dark olive-brown to brown .... (see Suillus cavipes, p. 494)
8. Stalk not normally hollow; cap rosy to dark red (but sometimes overlaid with white) when
fresh; spore print dark reddish-brown to dark vinaceous-brown . 9
9. Stalk typically 1-3 cm thick and cap 6-20 cm broad; known only from western North America
.F. ochraceoroseus, below
9. Not as above; typically smaller and eastern .F. paluster (see F. ochraceoroseus, below)
10. Cap only slightly viscid; flesh not blueing when bruised; pores usually elongated near the stalk
or forming gill-like rows; found in the eastern United States and Canada, usually in bogs
.F. grisellus(see F. aeruginascens, p. 507)
10. Not as above; cap viscid to slimy when moist; flesh often (but not always) staining bluish or
bluish-green when exposed; found in both eastern and western North America . 11
11. Cap more or less chocolate-brown when fresh; known from the eastern United States and
Canada .F. serotinus (see F. aeruginascens, p. 507)
11. Not as above; widespread .F. aeruginascens, p. 507
fibrillose; apex often slightly reticulate from tubes; glandular dots absent. VEIL
membranous, white or yellowish, thin, sometimes forming a slight ring on stalk but more
often clinging to margin of cap. SPORE PRINT dark reddish-brown to dark vinaceous-
brown; spores 7.5-9.5 * 2.5-3 microns, elliptical to spindle-shaped, smooth.
HABITAT: Solitary to scattered or in groups on ground under conifers, associated with
larch; known only from the northern Rocky Mountains and Pacific Northwest. I have seen
large fruitings in Idaho in September, but apparently it isn’t common every year.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but of very poor quality due to the slightly bitter taste.
COMMENTS: The beautiful rosy-red to pink cap, radially arranged pores, presence of a
veil, and association with larch are the most distinctive characters of this most distinctive
bolete. Its color is somewhat reminiscent of Suilluspictus, which grows with eastern white
pine, and S. lakei, which grows with Douglas-fir, but the spore print is darkerand the stalk
usually thicker. Other species: F. paluster of northeastern North America is somewhat
similar (cap deep red) but much smaller and more slender, with even larger pores; it grows
in swamps and bogs. Another very striking bog-lover, F. spectabilis (COLOR PLATE
126), is also restricted to the Northeast and Canada. One glance is usually sufficient to
identify it (as evidenced by the color plate), but see the key to Fuscoboletinus for details.
HABITAT: Scattered to densely gregarious in woods and around the edges of bogs, asso¬
ciated with larch (or tamarack) and common wherever larch occurs—the most widespread
member of the genus. In the Pacific Northwest it is often common in the spring and again in
the late summer and fall; it probably does not occur in California.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but unappealing because of its sliminess, thin flesh, and dingy color.
COMMENTS: The whitish to grayish to yellowish cap, white (never yellow!) pores that
become grayish in age, presence of a veil, and tendency to bruise weakly bluish-green are the
distinguishing fieldmarks of this undistinguished larch-lover. It is likely to be mistakenfor
a Suillus (and is even placed in that genus by some mycologists), but the spore print is
vinaceous-brown. In eastern North America it often grows with F. spectabilis, a very
striking species described in the key to Fuscoboletinus and shown in Color Plate 126.
F. serotinus is a similar species with chocolate-brown slime on the cap; F. grisel/us is
colored like F. aeruginascens but does not normally bruise bluish-green, has a more conical
and less viscid cap, and more elongated pores. Both species are associated with tamarack
(eastern larch) and are fairly common in the northeastern U.S. and Canada.
508 BOLETACEAE
BOLETELLUS& AUSTROBOLETUS
Medium-sized woodland boletes. CAP fleshy, dry or viscid, sometimes areolate or scaly. PORES
and tubes usually (but not always) yellow, sometimes blueing when bruised. STALK fleshy but
usually long, slender, and more or less equal; lacking glandular dots or dark scabers but often
longitudinally ridged or jaggedly reticulate. VEIL absent (except in B. ananas). SPORE PRINT
olive to brown or cinnamon-brown. Spores elliptical to spindle-shaped, longitudinally wrinkled,
ridged, grooved, or “winged" (Boletellus) or minutely pitted (AustroboletusJ.
THESE are gracile (slender-stemmed) boletes with ornamented spores (ridged or wrin¬
kled in Boletellus, pitted in Austroboletus). The stalk is usually long in relation to the cap
and not bulbous as in many species of Boletus. In addition, it is often raggedly or jaggedly
reticulate or ridged. Both genera are centered in the tropics. In the U nited States they are
most prevalent in the southeastern sector and along the Gulf of Mexico. A few species
range north to Canada and west to southern Arizona, but none have been found in Cali¬
fornia. One Boletellus is depicted here; several other species are keyed out.
PULVEROBOLETUS
AS DEFINED here, Pulveroboletus contains an awesome total of one common species.
The prefix pulvero means pulverulent, which in turns means “powdery.” It pertains to
the powdery to somewhat cottony or cobwebby consistency of the bright yellow veil that
covers the cap and stalk of the young fruiting body—a unique feature among the boletes.
Some mycologists, however, broaden the genus concept to include veil-less species such
as P. auriporus and P. hemichrysus (treated in this book under Boletus).
An unusually gracile (long and slender) example of Pulveroboletus ravenelii. The distinctive
yellow veil is not clearly visible in this picture.
510 BOLETACEAE
GYROPORUS
Small to medium-sized, terrestrial boletes. CAP typically dry. PORES pallid or whitish when
voung, pale yellow to yellow in age. STALK lacking scabers and glandular dots and typically not
reticulate; usually hollow at maturity, at least toward the base. VEIL absent or rudimentary.
SPORE PRINT pale yellow to yellow. Spores elliptical to spindle-shaped, smooth.
THE pale yellow spore print and hollow or partially hollow stem are the distinctive
features of this small genus. Four species—all choice edibles—are included in the key, but
only one, G. castaneus, has been found in California. In addition to the generic charac¬
teristics, G. castaneus can be told by its chestnut-brown to orange-brown cap, white to pale
yellow pores, and often slender, uneven, similarly-colored, non-reticulate stalk plus its
“failure” to stain blue when bruised.
Key to Gyroporus
1. Flesh and pores quickly turning deep indigo-blue or violet-black when bruised or cut; cap
yellowish to buff, dry, often somewhat fibrillose; pores whitish becoming yellowish; stalk
colored like cap, often thicker toward base, smooth or fibrillose; common in sandy soil and
woods in eastern North America (also said to occur rarely in Pacific Northwest) G. cyanescens
1. Flesh and pores not blueing when bruised . 2
2. Cap and stalk white to yellowish or tinged pink or apricot, sometimes spotted with cinnamon or
brown in age; common under oak and pine in southeastern North America . G. subalbellus
2. Cap and stalk darker (tawny to orange-brown, chestnut-brown, wine-red, etc.) . 3
3. Cap more or less wine-red to burgundy; found under hardwoods in eastern North America
. G. purpurinus
3. Cap brown to chestnut-brown to orange-brown or tawny; widespread . G. castaneus, below
BOLETUS
Medium-sized to very large, mostly terrestrial and mycorrhizal, woodland boletes. CAP fleshy,
usually dry (but sometimes viscid), sometimes areolate. PORES and tubes typically white, yellow,
orange, red, brown, or gray, often blueing when bruised. STALK fleshy, sometimes bulbous, thick
or slender, often reticulate but not glandular-dotted and without dark scabers. VEIL absent.
SPORE PRINT usually olive to olive-brown or brown, but sometimes yellow-brown or cinna¬
mon-brown. Spores spindle-shaped to elliptical, smooth.
manzanitae). Pine forests, on the other hand, are favored by B. edulis, which can be har¬
vested by the bushel under favorable conditions. Boletus species are easily preserved by
slicing and drying, but remember: if you should stumble into a“Boletus bonanza,” take
only as many as you can use. This will allow others (namely me) to share your luck, and
aside from the good social practice it builds, it will test your will power to its limits!
More than 30 species of Boletus occur in California. Nineteen are described here, plus
three extralimital species. Don’t be intimidated by the apparent length of the key—it is
actually composed of two separate keys that diverge at couplet #7: one key to western
species and another to eastern ones. (Since Boletus is such a prominent group in eastern
North America, I have keyed out many of the more distinctive and common species that
occur there.) If you happen to be in southern Arizona, southern New Mexico, Mexico,
or other regions where the eastern and western fungal floras overlap, try the key to western
species first; if that doesn’t work, then try the key to eastern ones (couplet #42).
Key to Boletus
1. Growing on earthballs (Scleroderma species); fruiting body small to medium-sized, usually
rather soft; especially common in southern latitudes .B. parasiticus
1. Growing on ground or wood, not on earthballs . 2
2. Taste distinctly acrid (peppery) when a small piece of the cap is chewed; fruiting body typically
rather small, with bright yellow mycelium at base of stalk .... B. piperatus & others, p. 517
2. Not as above (but taste may be bitter or sour) . 3
3. Growing on or near wood or in sawdust (especially coniferous) .4
3. Growing on ground . 7
4. Cap yellow to ochre (or developing rusty-orange tones toward center in age); pores and flesh
blueing when bruised; often in groups or clusters; spores short-elliptical . 5
4. Not as above . 6
5. Pores reddish to reddish-brown when young; cap at first powdery .B. hemichrysus
5. Not as above; pores typically yellow .B. sphaerocephalus
6. Cap and stalk dark reddish-brown to maroon-brown or chocolate-brown; cap plushlike or
fibrillose-scaly; stalk usually long and often streaked or lined; pores yellow to olive-yellow,
not blueing when bruised; found on or near northern conifers .B. mirabilis, p. 521
6. Not as above . 7
512
BOLETUS 513
*In regions where the eastern and western fungal floras overlap (e.g., southern Arizona), try both choices!
514 BOLETACEAE
25. Fruiting body medium-sized to large (cap 6-18 cm broad); flesh in base of stalk not normally
reddish; spores not truncate; found under mountain conifers .B.fragrans
25. Not as above; fruiting body small to medium-sized, or if larger than more common along the
coast and flesh in base of stalk often reddish; spores truncate or not truncate; common . 26
26. Cap when areolate usually showing pink or reddish tints in the cracks; stalk typically rather
slender (less than 2 cm thick); cap medium-sized (usually less than 9 cm broad); spores
not truncate .B. chrysenteron, p. 519
26. Not as above; cap when areolate may or may not show pink or reddish tints; size and shape
of fruiting body variable, but sometimes more robust than above species (stalk 1 -3 cm thick,
cap 5-15 cm broad); spores often amyloid or truncate (appearing chopped off at one end) when
viewed under the microscope .B. truncatus & others (see B. chrysenteron, p. 519)
27. Fruiting body medium-sized to large; stalk 2 cm thick or more, often bulbous or thicker below
(but often not); pores small (mostly less than 1 mm broad) . 28
27. Fruiting body small to medium-sized; stalk usually 2 cm thick or less at apex, or if thicker
then pores at least 1 mm broad; stalk usually equal or tapered below (not bulbous) .38
28. Pore surface whitish when young, becoming yellowish, greenish, or brown inage and not blueing
when bruised; stalk distinctly reticulate (netted) at least over upper portion; flesh white or
tinged reddish, not blueing (or sometimes blueing slightly when tubes are peeled off) ... 29
28. Not as above; if stalk reticulate then pores not white when young and/ or pores blueing when
bruised . 31
29. Cap white to pale grayish or dingy buff, usually dry; associated mainly with oak in central
California, with pine and other conifers in the Southwest .B. barrowsii, p. 529
29. Not as above; cap typically darker (but may be whitish while still under the duff) .30
30. Cap dark brown to blackish-brown beneath a thin whitish bloom when young(but often fading
to cinnamon-brown or paler in age); associated with hardwoods . B. aereus, p. 531
30. Not as above; cap biscuit-brown to yellow-brown, cinnamon-brown, brown, or dark red;
associated mainly with conifers but also with oak and other trees . B. edulis & others, p. 530
31. Taste distinctly bitter (chew on a small piece of the cap), even when cooked; stalk typically at
least 2 cm thick at apex . 32
31. Not as above (but may taste slightly sour or acidic) . 33
32. Found under northern conifers; stalk usually reticulate B. coniferarum(see B. calopus, p.523)
32. Found mostly with oak in California; stalk not reticulate .B. “marshii, ”p. 524
33. Stalk distinctly reticulate, at least over upper portion. 34
33. Stalk typically not reticulate; found under mountain conifers .B.fragrans
34. Stalk yellow to buff (at least when fresh), sometimes with reddish stains below .35
34. Stalk brown, or white with brown fibrils (apex sometimes yellow) .B. fibrillosus, p. 523
35. Cap dark brown when fresh; pores and flesh not blueing when bruised .
.B. sp. (unidentified) (see B. fibrillosus, p. 523)
35. Not as above; pores normally turning blue when bruised (but may not blue in button stage);
flesh in very base of stalk often tinged pinkish or vinaceous; cap pink, red, brown, tan, or
yellowish, but not normally dark brown. 36
36. Cap with distinct fibrillose scales, especially in age; associated with mountain conifers (parti¬
cularly fir) . B. abieticola(see B. appendiculatus, p. 525)
36. Associated with hardwoods, or if with conifers then cap lacking obvious scales .37
37. Cap usually brown to reddish-brown, sometimes yellowish .B. appendiculatus, p. 525
37. Cap reddish to pink or rose-colored, sometimes with yellow .B. regius, p. 526
38. Flesh, stalk, and pores staining dark blue almost instantly when exposed; cap dull brown to
dark brown; stalk usually yellow at apex and brown or reddish-brown at base; pores yellow to
olive; rare in California, more common in the Pacific Northwest .B. pulverulentus
38. Not as above . 39
39. Spore print amber-brown to bright yellow-brown; cap vinaceous-brown to dark brown, yellow-
brown, tan, etc., often with paler spots; pores whitish to buff or pale tan; reported from the
Southwest (but mainly eastern in distribution) .B. affinis
39. Not as above; spore print typically brown to olive or olive-brown .40
BOLETUS 515
40. Cap brown to dark brown or blackish; stalk pallid to buff (or yellowish at apex); pores brilliant
yellow, not blueing when bruised .B. citriniporus (see B. fibrillosus, p. 523)
40. Not as above; pores typically yellow but not as brilliantly colored as above .41
41. Cap usually extensively fissured (areolate) by maturity . . . . B. chrysenteron & others, p. 519
41. Cap not usually areolate, but sometimes showing a few cracks in age, especially near margin
.B. subtomentosus & others, p. 517
42. Pore surface dark red to bright red, orange, orange-brown, red-brown, or dark yellow-brown
when fresh (may fade to yellow in age) .43
42. Pore surface white to yellow, olive, grayish, etc. when fresh (but sometimes brown in age) 49
43. Pore surface reddish-brown to dark yellow-brown or orange-brown when young, or if not then
fruiting body rather small and not blueing when bruised . 73
43. Pore surface dark red to red, brick-red, or orange; medium-sized to large, usually blueing 44
44. Cap whitish to buff, grayish-olive, or sometimes tinged pink; stalk neither bulbous nor mar¬
kedly reticulate; found under southern hardwoods .B. piedmontensis
44. Not as above; cap typically darker or brighter than above .45
45. Stalk typically reticulate, at least over upper portion .46
45. Stalk not reticulate or sometimes slightly so at apex, but often scurfy from numerous minute
granules or dots .48
46. Cap yellow to olive-brown, brown, or reddish-brown B. luridus{ see B. pulcherrimus, p. 528)
46. Cap deep red to bright red to rosy-red, at least when fresh .47
47. Cap viscid when moist; pores dark red, sometimes with yellow droplets; stalk very coarsely
reticulate nearly to the base .B.frostii, p. 528
47. Not as above; cap not viscid or only slightly so; stalk only finely reticulate .
.B. flammans & B. rubroflammeus (see B.frostii, p. 528)
48. Cap red or rosy-red . B. bicolor var. borealis (see B. bicolor, p. 521)
48. Cap yellowish to brown or reddish-brown .
.B. erythropus, B. subvelutipes, & others (see B. erythropus, p. 526)
49. Cap white or pallid, at least until old age . 50
49. Cap more highly or deeply colored, at least when young . 51
50. Stalk white or whitish, usually not reticulate (but sometimes slightly so); very common under
hardwoods; taste mild to bitter .B. pallidus
50. Stalk at least partially red or with bright red to pink reticulation; taste bitter .... B. inedulis
51. Pore surface and/ or flesh typically staining blue, blue-green, or blue-black when bruised or
cut (but sometimes slowly or weakly) . 52
51. Neither the pore surface nor the flesh blueing when bruised .60
52. Fresh fruiting body bright yellow to lemon-yellow (but cap may be yellow-brown at center or
streaked with red), quickly staining blue or blue-black when bruised or cut; stalk sometimes
reticulate but usually not . B. pseudo sulphur eus
52. Not as above . 53
53. Cap bright red to rose, pink, or rusty-red when fresh (may fade in age) .54
53. Not as above (but cap may show slight red or pinkish tints) . 56
54. Stalk slender (usually less than 1 cm thick) .B. rubellus& others (see B. bicolor, p. 521)
54. Stalk usually 0.8-3 cm or more thick . 55
55. Stalk distinctly reticulate, at least over upper portion.B. speciosus(see B. regius, p. 526)
55. Stalk not reticulate or only slightly so from decurrent tube walls . B. bicolor Si others, p. 521
56. Taste decidedly bitter (chew on a small piece of the cap), even when cooked; stalk typically
at least 2 cm thick; not common . B. calopus, p. 523
56. Not as above (but taste may be slightly acidic or sour) . 57
57. Flesh, stalk, and pores staining dark blue almost instantly when exposed; cap dull brown to
dark brown; stalk usually yellow at apex and brown or reddish-brown toward base; pores
fairly small, yellow to olive-yellow; stalk typically not reticulate .B. pulverulentus
57. Not as above (but may stain blue to blue-green) . 58
58. Cap typically areolate (extensively fissured or cracked) at maturity; stalk entirely or partially
red to dark red (or with red fibrils or granules) . 59
58. Not as above; cap not areolate or only occasionally so andjor stalk lacking red .66
516 BOLETACEAE
59. Stalk scurfy from small rough scales; spores striate under the microscope; often growing at
the bases of trees .(see BoletellusSc A ustroboletus, p. 508)
59. Not as above; spores not striate; usually found on ground . . B. chrysenteron & others, p. 519
60. Cap rosy or pink when fresh (but often fading to tan in age); stalk not reticulate; stalk base bright
yellow inside and out; pores whitish when young .(see Tylopilus, p. 532)
60. Not as above .*.61
61. Pore surface white to grayish when young(but usually yellowish, brownish, grayish, or greenish
in age); stalk distinctly reticulate (netted), at least over upper portion; flesh white or tinged
reddish; spore print olive to brown but not yellow-brown .62
61. Not as above; pores differently colored and/ or stalk not reticulate or only faintly so at apex 64
62. Cap grayish (or with darker fibrils) when fresh; pores white becoming gray to grayish-brown
in age; common under hardwoods .B. griseus(see B. ornatipes, p. 522)
62. Not with above features; pores not typically grayish in age .63
63. Cap tan to gray-brown, dark brown, or yellow-brown, dry, often areolate in age; cap and stalk
without purplish tones; associated with hardwoods.B. variipes (see B. aereus, p. 531)
63. Not with above combination of features (but may have some of them); found with hardwoods or
conifers .B. edulis & others, p. 530
64. Cap and stalk bright orange-brown to golden-orange; fairly common in North Carolina and
adjacent areas, but exact distribution uncertain . .B. auriflammeus (see B. ornatipes, p. 522)
64. Not as above .65
65. Cap and stalk viscid or slimy and yellow, or if not then pores brilliant yellow to bright greenish-
yellow; not large.75
65. Not as above (pores often yellow but not intensely so).66
66. Stalk typically long, relatively slender, and scurfy or minutely scaly as in Leccinum; cap yellow
to ochre, reddish-orange, or cinnamon; pores yellow, not normally blueing when bruised 67
66. Not with above features . 68
67. Dots or minute scales on stalk reddish; cap usually viscid (sometimes thinly so) when moist
.B. longicurvipes & B. rubropunctus
67. Not as above; stalk yellow .B. subglabripes
68. Stalk largely yellow to buff when fresh (but may develop brownish to cinnamon stains from
the base upward, especially in age) . 69
68. Stalk typically brownish to reddish, tan, etc., or white with brown tones, even when fresh 71
69. Stalk prominently reticulate throughout or nearly throughout; pores small (about 2 per mm);
taste mild or bitter; found under hardwoods .B. ornatipes & others, p. 522
69. Not as above; stalk not reticulate and/ or pores larger; taste usually mild .70
70. Cap often with brownish to reddish hairs or small scales on a yellowish to orange-buff back¬
ground, usually viscid beneath hairs when wet (hairs may be absent in age) (seeSuillus, p. 491)
70. Not as above .B. subtomentosus & others, p. 517
71. Spore print yellow-brown or amber-brown; cap yellow-brown to reddish-brown or dark brown,
often with paler spots; pores white to buff or pale tan or yellow .B. affinis
71. Not as above; spore print olive to brown or olive-brown; pores yellow to olive . 72
72. Stalk with prominent raised ridges and/ or coarsely reticulate, often long and slender in relation
to cap; cap grayish or olive-tinged when young but usually reddish-brown to dark reddish-
brown or bay-red in age; pores not blueing .B. projectellus (see B. mirabilis, p. 521)
72. Not as above; cap slightly viscid when young or wet, usually reddish-brown to bay-red to
chestnut-brown, but at times yellow-brown or olive-tinged; pores may or may not stain blue
when bruised; stalk not coarsely reticulate or strongly ridged B. badius(see B. zelleri, p. 518)
73. Pores and/ or flesh not blueing when bruised; under hardwoods or conifers . . . B. rubinellus
73. Pores and/ or flesh staining blue to blue-black when cut; usually under hardwoods .74
74. Pore surface dark reddish-brown to orange-brown when young; stalk typically not reticulate
.B. vermiculosus & others
74. Pore surface dark yellow-brown when fresh; stalk often reticulate .B.fagicola
75. Fruiting body mostly bright yellow to lemon-yellow (including cap); cap and stalk viscid or slimy;
stalk usually with a white cottony base; common in South .B. curtisii
75. Not as above; pores brilliant yellow when fresh; cap and stalk viscid or dry.
.B. viridiflavus & B. auriporus (see B. flaviporus, p. 522)
Boletuspiperatus is our smallest species of Boletus. It has a peppery taste and bright yellow mycelium
at the base of the stalk.
EDIBILITY: Questionable. It’s not as bitter as some of the peppery R ussula and Lactarius
species, and therefore could be useful as a spice. However, according to one source the
peppery taste disappears when thoroughly cooked, and according to another it is mildly
poisonous unless thoroughly cooked.
COMMENTS: Our smallest Boletus, this species is suggestive of a Suillus (a.nd was once
placed in that genus), but has neither glandular dots nor a veil. Some view it as a possible
“missing link” between Suillus and Boletus. If you have any doubt as to its identity, just
chew a small piece of the cap for a couple minutes! The bright yellow mycelium and yellow
flesh at the base of the stalk are also characteristic. B. piperatoides is a similar widespread
peppery species with blue-staining pores.
517
Boletus subtomentosus is a boring brown and yellow bolete with large yellow pores (see p. 488 for a
close-up of the pores).
brown); sometimes with pallid, yellow, or reddish-tinged cracks, especially near margin.
Flesh pallid to pale yellow, sometimes blueing slightly when exposed. PORES large (1-3
mm in diameter), dull yellow to bright yellow, blueing weakly or not at all when bruised.
STALK 4-14 cm long, 1-2 (3) cm thick, equal or tapered either way, smooth or scurfy, the
apex often coarsely reticulate from downward-extending tube walls; firm, yellow to buff,
or often stained brown to dull cinnamon (especially below), but never red. SPORE
PRINT olive-brown; spores 10-16 * 3.5-5 microns, elliptical to spindle-shaped, smooth.
HABITAT: Solitary to widely scattered or in small groups on ground in woods; widely
distributed and very common, but not often occurring in large numbers. In our area
it fruits throughout the mushroom season with a variety of tree hosts (oak, conifers, etc.).
EDIBILITY: Edible, but definitely not choice. In blind tastings of local boletes it has
consistently placed near the bottom.
COMMENTS: This boring but ubiquitous bolete with the boring brown cap does not
show red on the stem, in contrast to B. zelleri and B. chrysenteron. In addition, the cap
is not often as conspicuously areolate as that of the latter species, and the pores are larger.
Xerocomus subtomentosus is a synonym. B. spadiceus is an equally boring but ubiqitous
bolete. It has the same general appearance and grows in the same places at about the same
time. True, its cap may be more reddish-brown and its pores may blue more readily, but
the only way to separate it with certainty is by applying a drop of ammonium hydroxide
to the cap surface. A fleeting blue-green to blue-black reaction means B. spadiceus;
otherwise, it’s B subtomentosus. Since neither is wortheating, thedistinctionisacademic.
Inundating boring brown boletes with ammonia may be your idea of fun, but it’s not
mine!
518
BOLETUS 519
yellow, often blueing when bruised (but often not blueing). STALK 4-12 cm long,0.5-3 (5)
cm thick, equal or slightly thicker at either end; firm, yellow to tan with delicate red
granules when young, usually dark red above or throughout in age. SPORE PRINT
olive-brown; spores 12-16 * 4-5.5 microns, spindle-shaped to elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups on ground or rotten wood; very common
along the Pacific Coast in woods of all kinds. In our area it fruits in the fall, winter, and
early spring and is one of the few boletes with a tolerance for redwood (I have even found
it growing on a redwood stump!). It is also abundant under oak and farther north, under
alder.
EDIBILITY: Edible and highly rated by some sources. In my experience, however, it
cooks up slimy and tasteless.
COMMENTS: The sensational combination of black, yellow, red, and often blue makes
this our most colorful bolete. The color plate shows specimens whose caps have begun to
develop a reddish tinge, but perfectly fresh caps can be coal-black or deep gray. B. chry-
senteron and B. truncatus often have a more copiously cracked (areolate) cap that is
usually paler or duller in color. B. citriniporus has a dark cap, but its stem is not red.
In eastern North America, B. zelleri is supplanted by B. badius, a common edible species
with a dark yellow-brown to bay-red cap. Like B. zelleri, it grows on rotten wood (as well
as on the ground), usually under conifers.
Boletus chrysenteron is one of several species that has a conspicuously cracked (areolate) cap at
maturity. Others include B. truncatus, B. porosporus, and Tylopilus amylosporus (not illustrated).
520 BOLETACEAE
with reddish fibrils or yellow above and red to dark rhubarb-red below). SPORE PRINT
olive-brown; spores 10-15 * 3.5-6 microns, spindle-shaped to elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Solitary or in small groups under trees and in wooded areas, often near trails
or on roadbanks; widely distributed and ubiquitous, but rarely fruiting in large numbers.
In our area it can be found throughout the mushroom season.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but not choice. It is rather mushy and insipid when cooked.
COMMENTS: The conspicuously fissured (areolate) cap with pinkish-tinted cracks
plus the yellow pores that usually bruise blue are the hallmarks of this cosmopolitan
bolete. Also known asXerocomus chrysenteron, it is sometimes confused with B. zelleri,
which has a darker cap that is not usually areolate. There are several very similar“cracked-
cap” boletes that are difficult to distinguish in the field, including: Tylopilus amylosporus,
with dark reddish-brown, erratically amyloid spores and pallid (not pink or red) flesh in
the cracks; B. mendocinensis, with pinkish to reddish pores; B. truncatus, with truncate
(“chopped off’) spores; and B. porosporus, with truncate spores and no pinkish tints
in the cracks. The latter two species are particularly widespread and common, and seem to
intergrade. A robust form (cap 5-15 cm broad, stalk 1-3.5 cm thick) of B. truncatus bears
special mention because it occurs commonly in our coastal forests. Its cap is often only
slightly areolate and shows little or no pink in the cracks. Since none of the above species
are worth eating, it hardly matters whether or not you identify them correctly, unless
you aspire to be a professional boletologist (or plan on entertaining a professional bole-
tologist). All of them, along with B. zelleri and B. dryophilus, are prone to attack by a
powdery white to bright yellow parasitic fungus (Hypomyces chrysospermum) which
eventually engulfs the entire fruiting body, making it look like a very sick puffball.
pores that do not stain blue and growth on or near rotting conifers form a unique set of
characters. Other species: B. projectellus of eastern North America is a closely related,
terrestrial species that favors sandy situations under pine.
Boletus fibrillosus
CAP 6-17 cm broad, convex to more or less plane; surface dry, minutely velvety becoming
fibrillose or sometimes fibrillose-scaly at the center; brown to dark brown to cinnamon-
brown, sometimes with paler blotches or paler at the margin (but not yellow). Flesh thick,
white or buff, not blueing when bruised; taste mild. PORES and tubes pale yellow to
yellow or dingy olive-yellow (occasionally pallid when very young), not bruising blue.
ST ALK 8-16 cm long, 2 A cm thick at apex, equal or thicker below(but sometimes pinched
at base); solid, firm; light brown to brown(often paler than cap); apexoftenyellowand/ or
base whitish; usually lined or fibrillose, reticulate at least at the top. SPORE PRINT
dark olive-brown; spores 13-17.5 x 3.5-5.5 microns, spindle-shaped to elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious on ground in mixed woods and under conifers;
known only from the west coast, sometimes common in the fall in coastal northern
California and the Cascades. A similar species (see below) occurs in our area.
EDIBILITY: Edible and fairly good, but certainly not the equal of B. edulis or B. aereus.
COMMENTS: The dark brown frequently fibrillose cap, yellow pores, brown reticulate
stalk, and “failure” of all parts to turn blue when bruised are the telltale traits of this
northern bolete (see photo on p. 529). It resembles B. edulis and B. aereus, but its cap is
more fibrillose and its pores are often yellow even when young. Tylopilus pseudoscaber
is also somewhat similar, but does not have yellow pores. Both T. pseudoscaber and B.
fibrillosus have passed under the defunct name B. olivaceobrunneus. A similar, uniden¬
tified Boletus occurs rarely in our area under live oak, but differs in having a yellow stalk.
B. citriniporus is a smaller Californian species with a brown to blackish cap, brilliant
yellow pores that do not bruise blue, a whitish to buff (or yellow at apex) stalk that is not
reticulate or only slightly so, and mild taste. I have found it in mixed woods and under oak.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious on ground near or under live oak in the summer and
early fall (before the onset of the fall rainy season); common in the vicinity of Santa Cruz,
California, and also reported by several collectors from the foothills of the Sierra Nevada.
This bitter-tasting bolete is known locally as Boletus “marshii’' (or the “Shucks Bolete,” because
that’s what you say when you taste it!). Note pale cap, blue-staining pores, and non-reticulate stalk.
BOLETUS 525
EDIBILITY: Sauteed delicately in butter with a pinch of pepper and a clove of garlic,
served steaming hot on toast with cream cheese and celery, broiled belligerently on a
skewer with spiced lamb and bell peppers, or layered lovingly in a casserole with parmesan
cheese, egg noodles, and onions, Boletus “marshii” is still inedible.
COMMENTS: This bulky bolete with the bitter taste appears to be unnamed. However,
it is known to local yokels as B. “marshii” because it bears an uncanny resemblance to
its discoverer, Ben Marsh, who is also dense, bulky, bitter, and bulbous, and who spent
many fruitless hours (and ruined many otherwise marvelous meals) in a highly commen¬
dable if ill-conceived attempt to make it palatable. It is easily distinguished from B. calopus
by the non-reticulate stalk, from B. appendiculatus by the paler cap, non-reticulate stalk,
and bitter taste, from B. rubripes by the paler cap and absence of red on the stalk, and
from B. barrowsii by the bitter taste, blue-staining pores that are yellow when young, and
non-reticulate stalk. Its habit of fruiting before the rains arrive is odd, but quite reliable.
A European species,!?, albidus(-B. radicans), is similar in color and taste, but is usually
described as having a reticulate stalk with a rooting base. Although B. “marshii” never
seems to have a reticulate stalk, it often has a rooting base, and a critical comparison may
reveal that the two species are one and the same.
a few minutes frenzied handling will render it unrecognizable. A very similar species that is
apparently unique to California, B. amygdalinus, has oranger pores and grows under
hardwoods. Another look-alike, B. subvelutipes (COLOR PLATE 136), is quite common in
the Southwest as well as eastern North America. It can have a somewhat yellower cap and
often has dark red hairs at the base of the stalk. B. hypocarycinus is a very similar south¬
eastern species with a dark red to carmine stalk base and shorter spores. B. orovillus is a
rare but striking bolete with a large brilliant yellow cap, bright red pores that may or may
not bruise blue, and a thick, non-reticulate stalk. It has been taken in a few widely scattered
localities in northern California and the Pacific Northwest. None of these should be eaten.
sometimes fades in old age, but the pronounced bulb and blue-staining tubes signify B.
satanas. I found one specimen at the edge of a meadow that weighed six pounds, and half of
it had been eaten by a cow! B. pulcherrimus is the only other red-pored, reticulate-stalked
bolete in coastal California, but it is not so bulbous and has a brown to reddish-brown cap.
HABIT AT: S olitary to gregarious in mixed woods and under conifers in the summer and
fall; endemic to western North America, rather rare but sometimes fruiting in quantity.
I’ve seen it in northern California and New Mexico, but have yet to find it in our area.
EDIBILITY: Poisonous! Like B. satanas, it is especially dangerous raw.
COMMENTS: Listed in older books as B. eastwoodiae, this large and beautiful bolete is
easily told by its red to dark red pores, reticulate stalk, and brown to reddish-brown cap. It
is the principal red-pored bolete of the Pacific Northwest, but does not fruit every year.
In our area it is replaced by B. satanas, which is differently colored and much more obese.
A very similar species, B. haematinus (COLOR PLATE 138) is common under western
mountain conifers. It has a yellow-brown to olive-brown or brown cap, sometimes has a
yellower stalk, and often has yellow pores when very young (the pores at the cap margin
of older specimens can also be yellow). A similar but unidentified species with a pallid cap
has been found by Greg Wright under conifers in southern California. Another reticulate-
stalked species, B. luridus, grows under hardwoods and conifers in eastern North America
and the Southwest. It has a slimmer (1-3 cm) stalk, red to orange pores, and a yellowish to
olive-brown, brown, or reddish-brown cap. All of the above species are poisonous and all
lack the exaggerated bulb of B. satanas. For species with bright red caps, see B.frostii.
COMMENTS: One of the most beautiful and memorable of all boletes, this species is
easily told by its viscid red to dark red cap, dark red pores, and coarsely reticulate stalk.
The stalk may be thickened downward, but is never bulbous as in B. satanas. The tendency
of the young pores to exude yellow droplets is also distinctive. In Mexico it is sometimes
called panza agria, which means “sour belly.” Other species: B. flammans and B. rubro-
flammeus, both poisonous, have a non-viscid red to dark red cap and finely to scarcely
reticulate stalk and red pores (at least when young). The first favors eastern conifers, the
second grows with hardwoods in eastern North America and southern Arizona.
COMMENTS: For many years this handsome, meaty bolete has passed as a “white”
B. edulis, and is listed as such in the first edition of Mushrooms Demystified. However,
it does not intergrade with B. edulis and lacks the clearly differentiated, often viscid cap
cuticle (skin) of that species. Result: it is now recognized as a distinct species.
530 BOLETACEAE
Tylopilus species can be somewhat similar, but have pinker pores, pinkish- to reddish-
brown spores, stain dark brown when bruised, and/ or are bitter-tasting. B. fibrillosus is
another look-alike, but its cap is darker and hairier. See also B. aereus and B. barrowsii.
531
532 BOLETACEAE
TYLOPILUS
Medium-sized to large, fleshy, mostly terrestrial boletes. CAP usually dull colored and typically not
viscid. PORES and tubes typically pallid to pinkish, vinaceous, gray, or brown. STALK fleshy,
sometimes reticulate, but not glandular-dotted and not usually with dark scabers. VEIL absent.
SPORE PRINT flesh-colored to pinkish-brown, reddish-brown, cinnamon-brown, vinaceous,
or chocolate-brown. Spores elliptical to spindle-shaped, smooth (except T. gracilis).
Key to Tylopilus
1. Tubes yellow; pores yellow to brownish or reddish, often blueing when bruised; cap usually
areolate (cracked) in age; western .T. amylosporus(see Boletus chrysenteron, p. 519)
1. Not as above; tubes not yellow, or if so then found in eastern North America .2
2. Stalk white or creamy (but staining dark brown); pores white when fresh but quickly staining
dark red and then dark brown when bruised; flesh in cap and upper stalk often blueing slightly
when cut, then turning reddish or brown; found in eastern North America; rare . . T. snellii
2. Not as above; staining reactions different, or if similar then stalk not whitish; common ... 3
3. Pores and/ or flesh staining blue or blue-black when bruised or at least staining waxed or white
paper blue or blue-green when wrapped in it; fruiting body dark T. pseudoscaber group, p.534
3. Not as above; not staining waxed paper blue or blue-green; fruiting body dark or light .... 4
4. Cap and stalk dark gray to brownish-black or black, but the pores white when youngand pinkish
in age; pores and flesh staining reddish or vinaceous when bruised, then often blackening;
fruiting body usually robust; spore print pinkish or vinaceous; found ineasternNorth America
and the Southwest, usually under hardwoods such as oak; edible .T. alboater
4. Not as above; differently colored or with darker (chocolate-brown, etc.) spores or pores .. 5
5. Pore surface dark gray to dark brown or blackish, even when young; stalk densely scurfy from
numerous minute scales or granules; cap and stalk chocolate-brown to dark brown or with a
purple or bluish tinge; spore print pinkish-brown to vinaceous; found in eastern North
America, mainly under northern conifers. T. eximius
5. Not as above (if dark, then spore print chocolate-brown or stalk not densely scurfy) .6
6. Cap and stalk dark (olive-brown to grayish-brown, dark brown, or blackish); pores usually
gray to brown, at least in age; spore print chocolate-brown . . T. pseudoscaber group, p. 534
6. Not as above; differently colored and/ or spore print pinkish to vinaceous or cinnamon ... 7
7. Found in eastern North America (east of the Rocky Mountains)* .8
7. Found in western North America (from the Rocky Mountains westward)* . 18
8. Stalk base bright yellow; cap pink when fresh (but fading to tan or paler) T. chromapes, p. 533
8. Not as above . 9
9. Cap whitish to buff or pale yellow, sometimes dingy tan in age .21
9. Not as above; cap darker or brighter. 10
*In regions where the eastern and western fungal floras overlap (e.g., southern Arizona), try both choices!
TYLOPILUS 533
10. Cap broadly conical and shaggy-fibrillose (or pitted in age), yellow to bright yellow-brown or
tinged pink, margin often fringed; found in southern bottomlands T. (-Mucilopilus) conicus
10. Not as above; cap not shaggy . 11
n. Cap bright orange to dull orange (but may become cinnamon or browner in age); stalk white to
yellow or orange (or aging brownish) .T. ballouii(see T. chromapes, below)
11. Not as above; cap yellow-brown to cinnamon, brown, purplish, etc., but not truly orange 12
12. Flesh very bitter-tasting (but some people have trouble detecting the bitterness) . 13
12. Taste not bitter or only slightly or sporadically so. 16
13. Stalk purple or purple-and-white when fresh (but may fade in age!); cap purplish to brown;
pores white when young, dingy pinkish in age; stalk not reticulate or only slightly so at apex;
usually found under hardwoods; common . T. plumbeoviolaceus
13. Not as above; cinnamon to brown or dark brown but not purple when fresh . 14
14. Stalk clearly reticulate; usually (not always) under conifers T.felleus(see T. indecisus, p. 535)
14. Stalk not reticulate or only slightly so at apex; usually associated with oak . 15
15. Stalk thick (1-5 cm at apex); cap medium-sized to large; widespread .T. rubrobrunneus
15. Stalk thinner than above; cap often rather small; southern .T. minor
16. Stalk typically long and slender (less than 1 cm thick at apex), often curved at base; cap and stalk
reddish-brown to cinnamon or tawny (see Color Plate 149); found in many habitats but partial
to hemlock; many spores minutely roughened or pitted T. gracilis (see T. chromapes, below)
16. Not as above; stalk usually at least 1 cm thick; spores smooth . 17
17. Cap more or less maroon-red . T. badiceps
17. Not as above .24
18. Stalk distinctly reticulate over upper portion; associated mainly with oak T. indecisus, p. 535
18. Stalk not reticulate or only obscurely so at apex from decurrent tube walls. 19
19. Stalk often short, poorly-developed, and sometimes off-center; margin of cap often incurved
even at maturity; fruiting body often partly buried in soil . T. humilis, p. 535
19. Not as above . 20
20. Cap dark brown .T. ferrugineus(?)
20. Cap tan to dull brown or vinaceous-tinged . T. ammiratii(see T. indecisus, p. 535)
21. Stalk distinctly reticulate or reticulate-ridged; mainly southern . 22
21. Stalk not reticulate or only slightly so at apex; southern or northern .23
22. Reticulation on stalk coarse and raised; stalk usually long in relation to cap; cap often areolate
in age; spores pitted or roughened .(see Boletellus& Austroboletus, p. 508)
22. Not as above; taste bitter or mild; fruiting body often robust .T. rhoadsiae
23. Cap typically wrinkled; northern.T. intermedius
23. Cap not normally wrinkled; southern .T. peralbidus
24. Fruiting body medium-sized to large, tawny to orange-brown to brown (including the pores!);
stalk usually reticulate; taste mild to slightly bitter; mainly southern .T. tabacinus
24. N ot as above; pores usually paler when fresh . T. indecisus & others, p. 535
frequent throughout eastern North America in the summer and fall. It is especially
common under birch, aspen, and conifers in northern latitudes in June and July.
EDIBILITY: Edible and quite good, but often riddled with maggots.
COMMENTS: Formerly known as Boletus chromapes and Leccinum chromapes, this
lovely bolete is easily recognized by its pink cap and white pores when young and its
scurfy stalk with a bright yellow base. (The color scheme is reminiscent of Gomphidius
subroseus, a gilled mushroom closely related to the boletes.) It is one of several very
striking species of Tylopilus that are native to eastern North America. Others include:
T. plumbeoviolaceus, a beautiful but bitter-tasting violet to purple-brown species; T.
(-Austroboletus) gracilis, a slender-stemmed species (COLOR PLATE 149); and T.
ballouii, with an orange, Leccinum-like cap when fresh. For more details on these and
other distinctive eastern species, see the key to Tylopilus.
535
Tylopilus humilus is a small, rare, often misshapen bolete. Note how stalk is often poorly developed.
tubes whitish when young, becoming pale flesh-color or dull pale pinkish, staining brown
when bruised. STALK 2-5 cm long, 1-3 cm thick, usually rather stocky and sometimes
off-center; equal or swollen below, but the base often pinched; firm, solid, white at apex,
usually brownish- or vinaceous-stained below, especially when handled; not reticulate or
only very slightly so at extreme apex. SPORE PRINT dull reddish-brown; spores 8-12 *
x 3-4 microns, spindle-shaped to elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious or in small clumps on ground (often partially buried),
fruiting in the fall and winter; known only from California, rare. It appears every year in
sandy soil in a burned-over area near Santa Cruz, apparently in association with manzanita
or live oak, but with knobcone pine also in the general vicinity. It was originally discovered
by Harry Thiers in Mendocino County under pines near a destroyed dormitory.
COMMENTS: This bashful bolete is easily separated from other Tylopilus species by its
semi-underground habit, i.e., it tends not to expose itself until fully mature, and even then
may remain half-buried. The stocky or poorly-developed stem is reminiscent of Gastro-
boletus, but the spores are forcibly discharged and the tubes are arranged vertically.
LECCINUM differs from other boletes by virtue of the tufted hairs or small rough scales
(scabers) on the stalk. The scabers may be pallid when young, but usually darken to brown
or black by maturity. They should not be confused with the resinous or sticky glandular
dots found in Suillus, which do not protrude as scabers do and are not composed of hairs.
Leccinums also have a characteristic appearance which makes them recognizable from a
distance: the cap is typically some shade of orange, reddish-brown, brown, or white; the
pores are usually white or dingy-colored (not yellow or red) and do not stain blue; and the
stalk is usually whitish or pale colored except for the scabers, and usually much tougher
and more fibrous than the cap. Also, the stalk sometimes stains blue when cut or handled,
and in many species is rather long in relation to the cap.
Leccinums are good boletes for beginners because they are widespread, often abundant
536
LECCINUM 537
(in Alaska they are said to outnumber all other boletes), and edible (though a few, like
L. atrostipitatum, reportedly cause stomach upsets in some people). Nearly all Leccinums
have a tendency to blacken when cooked or dried, but in no way does this affect their
flavor. They dry quite nicely and are less apt to be maggoty than other boletes, at least
in our area. Some species, such as L. insigne, are delicious fresh. Others, like L. man-
zanitae, are watery and bland unless dried first. Even the less savory ones, however, have
an important role to fulfill—they help stuff the buckets and bellies of boletivores (see
p. 546) who might otherwise grow despondent and dangerous!
Like most boletes, Leccinums are mycorrhizal. Their favorite hosts are aspen and birch,
but they also occur with conifers and oaks, and in California—where birch is not native
and aspen is restricted to the Sierra Nevada—they link up with madrone and manzanita,
masquerading under the moniker “manzanita boletes.” Over 100 species of Leccinum have
been described from North America (most of them from the northern part), but many are
very similar in appearance and can only be distinguished with a microscope. For instance,
L. aurantiacum differs from L. discolor by the presence of minute pigment globules in the
hyphae of the cap cuticle, while L. discolor differs from L. rufescentoides in its smaller
cuticular hyphal end cells! The staining reactions of the flesh upon exposure to air—
particularly at the juncture of the cap and stalk—are also significant and should be
determined by slicing open the fruiting body lengthwise, rubbing the flesh a couple times,
then observing it at 5-minute intervals for a period of !^-l hour.
Fortunately, Leccinum is such a safe genus that boletivorous bipeds such as you and I
can leave such dubious and esoteric distinctions to professional boletologists, and con¬
centrate on learning a few common “prototypes”—e.g., the L. manzanitae group that is
so common with manzanita and madrone; the orange to reddish-brown-capped L. insigne-
L. aurantiacum group that grows profusely wherever there are aspens; and the white-
capped L. holopus and dingy colored L. scabrum groups that favor birch. Three “proto¬
types” are described here and several others are keyed out.
Key to Leccinum
1. Pores and tubes yellow when fresh .2
1. Pores and tubes not yellow.3
2. Scabers on stalk brown to blackish in age; cap yellow to ochraceous to brown or dark brown;
found under hardwoods (mainly oak) in eastern and southern North America .29
2. Not as above; scabers reddish or paler, not darkening appreciably in age (see Boletus, p. 511)
3. Base of stalk bright yellow and cap pink when fresh (but fading!) or cap and stalk chocolate-
brown to purplish to dark blue-gray and pores chocolate-brown to dark gray to blackish at
maturity; restricted to eastern North America .(see Tylopilus, p. 532)
3. Not as above ..4
4. Margin of cap lacking sterile flap(s) of tissue; cap white to buff, grayish, brown, dingy yellow-
brown, olive-tinged, or even black when fresh . 5
4. Cap pink to apricot-buff, orange, red, reddish-brown, orange-brown, or rusty-brown, or if
colored as above then margin of young cap rimmed with a sterile flap of tissue 2-6 mm wide, the
flap breaking up into segments as the cap expands, or disappearing. 12
5. Cap white or whitish (but sometimes tinged buff, pinkish-buff, brown, or olive in age) .... 6
5. Cap more highly or deeply colored (pink, orange, red, brown, gray, black, etc.) .8
6. Associated with aspen; known only from California L. californicum (see L. scabrum, p. 541)
6. Not as above . 7
7. Cap often olive-tinged in age, sometimes viscid; common under birch in northern and eastern
North America .L. holopus & others (see L. scabrum, p. 541)
7. Not as above; cap not viscid; associated with hardwoods (especially oak) in southern and
eastern North America (especially common in the South) L. albellum(see L. scabrum, p. 541)
8. Cap bluish-black to dark grayish-brown to black when fresh (but often fading in age); asso¬
ciated with aspen and birch in eastern North America .9
8. Not as above; cap dull brown to gray-brown, dingy yellow-brown, olive-tinged, etc.10
538 BOLETACEAE
9. Found with birch; flesh in stalk apex reddening when bruised L. snellii( see L. scab rum, p. 541)
9. N ot as above; associated with aspen .L. griseonigrum (see L. scab rum, p. 541)
10. Cap yellow-brown when young becoming duller or grayer in age and usually prominently
cracked (areolate); associated with oak and other hardwoods; especially common in south¬
eastern North America .L. griseum(see L. scab rum, p. 541)
10. Not as above; cap not usually areolate; associated with birch or aspen. 11
11. Associated with birch; widely distributed .L. scabrum & others, p. 541
11. Associated with aspen; common in the Sierra Nevada L. montanum{see L. scabrum, p. 541)
12. Veil present, covering the young cap, then breaking up into whitish patches; associated with
aspen in the Great Lakes region.L. potteri
12. Not as above; veil absent(but margin of cap may have sterile flap(s) of tissue) . 13
13. Scabers on stalk dense and coal-black even in the button stage and black or dark brown in age;
associated mainly with birch in eastern and northern North America, but also found with
aspen in Southwest .L. atrostipitatum& L. testaceoscabrum(see L. insigne, p. 540)
13. Not as above . 14
14. Associated with manzanita and madrone(and possibly toyon); cap often (but not always) viscid
when moist; common in west coast states, especially Oregon and California . 15
14. Associated with aspen, conifers, or other trees; cap viscid or dry; widely distributed but not
found in coastal California . 18
15. Cap dark red to brown or sometimes orange-brown .L. manzanitae & others, p. 539
15. Cap bright orange to pink or apricot-buff .16
16. Scabers on stalk orange; bruised or cut flesh usually reddening somewhat before darkening . .
.L. “aurantioscaber” (see L. manzanitae, p. 539)
16. Not as above .17
17. Cap pinkish to apricot; flesh not staining when bruised L. constans (see L. manzanitae, p. 539)
17. Cap orange; flesh usually reddening or darkening L. armeniacum (see L. manzanitae, p. 539)
18. Flesh (especially at juncture of cap and stalk) not changing color appreciably when cut or
bruised, or staining only very slightly (but lower stalk may stain blue); found with conifers 19
18. Flesh (especially at juncture of cap and stalk) staining purple-gray, bluish-gray, smoky, reddish,
vinaceous, etc. when cut or bruised (but often slowly or erratically); lower stalk may stain
blue as well . 20
19. Fruiting body medium-sized to very large (mature cap 10-30 cm broad); found in the Pacific
Northwest .L. ponderosum & others (see L. manzanitae, p. 539)
19. Fruiting body smaller (cap usually less than 10 cm broad); known from the Southwest and
eastern North America .L. vulpinum
20. Flesh staining purple-gray to bluish-gray or smoky (fuscous) directly when bruised or cut (but
often staining slowly or erratically) . 21
20. Flesh staining reddish, vinaceous, or burgundy when bruised or cut (but often staining purple-
gray to bluish-gray or fuscous after that) . 23
21. Cap whitish when young but becoming brownish in age; stalk thick and club-shaped (thicker or
swollen below); associated with western conifers (mainly in mountains) .L. clavatum
21. Not as above . 22
22. Cap orange to rusty-orange to reddish when young (may become browner in age), or if brown
when young then tubes often staining vinaceous or purplish when bruised L. insigne, p. 540
22. Cap dark brown to dull reddish-brown or dull brown; tubes not staining vinaceous or purplish
when bruised .L. brunneum (see L. manzanitae, p. 539)
23. Cap liver-colored to liver-brown and fibrillose to fibrillose-scaly; associated with conifers
in the Pacific Northwest . L. fibrillosum(see L. manzanitae, p. 539)
23. Not as above; cap typically reddish to rusty-orange, brownish, or paler. 24
24. Cap pale tan to pale dingy orange-brown or yellow-brown; associated with aspen and birch in
northern and eastern North America, and in the Southwest .L. cinnamomeum
24. Not as above; cap usually darker or brighter . 25
25. Cap pinkish- or vinaceous-tinged when young; known only from Idaho under whitebark pine
.L. incarnatum
25. Not as above . 26
LECCINUM 539
26. Stalk more or less equal or narrowed near apex; associated mostly with aspen or pine; very
widely distributed and common . 27
26. Stalk distinctly and consistently club-shaped (thicker below); associated with conifers (mainly
spruce and fir) in the Rocky Mountains and Southwest . 28
27. Cap typically reddish to orange to brick-red when young (often somewhat duller in age); asso¬
ciated with aspen and conifers (pine, etc.) .L. aurantiacum(see L. insigne, p. 540)
27. Cap somewhat similar in color to above or often duller even when young (brown to orange-
brown, pale cinnamon, etc.); associated only with aspen . L. discolor(see L. insigne, p. 540)
28. Cap fibrillose or fibrillose-scaly .L. subalpinum{see L. insigne, p. 540)
28. Not as above .L.fallax(see L. insigne, p. 540)
29. Stalk often robust and swollen in the middle or below; cap yellow-brown to dark brown ....
.L. crocipodium
29. Stalk long and more or less equal; cap yellow-brown to ochre, often wrinkled or finely pitted
in age .L. rugosiceps
flesh and a buff to pale brown cap; L. aeneum, with a non-viscid, oranger cap;/,, largentii,
possibly associated with toyon, with a dry cap, dark olive-gray pores, and very dense
scabers; L. constans, with a pale pink to apricot-colored cap and unchanging flesh; L.
armeniacum, a common species with an orangish cap and somewhat paler scabers (especially
when young); and L. arctostaphylos, an Alaskan species associated with bearberry (a type of
manzanita). Other species: L.ponderosum(COLOR PLATE 146) is a sometimes massive
species that looks like L. manzanitae, but typically has unchanging (or only slightly
staining) flesh and is associated with conifers in the Pacific Northwest; it is quite tasty.
L. fibrillosum also grows with conifers in the Pacific Northwest, but it has a fibrillose
to fibrillose-scaly, liver-brown cap and its flesh stains reddish or vinaceous when cut.L.
idahoensis has a roughened, liver-colored cap but does not stain appreciably when
bruised, while L. brunneum has a dark brown to reddish-brown cap, stains directly to
fuscous, and is quite common under aspen in the Sierra Nevada and Southwest. See also
L. insigne and the species listed under it.
540
LECCINUM 541
There are also several species with a whitish or pallid cap, including: L. holopus and L.
rotundifoliae, both fairly common in northern North America under birch, the former
often developing olive tinges on the cap in age and the latter usually growing in bogs;
and L. albellum, a slender-stemmed, dry-capped eastern species that favors southern oaks.
L. californicum has a whitish to buff cap, but grows with aspen in the Sierra Nevada, while
L. cretaceum has a pale buff cap and flesh that stains vinaceous-pink erratically. L. roseo-
fracta has a dark brown cap and reddish- or pinkish-staining flesh and is associated with
birch. Finally, there is L. griseum, an eastern species that somewhat resembles L. scabrum
but usually has an areolate (cracked) cap in age and favors oak and other hardwoods over
birch. All of these species lack the flaps of sterile tissue on the cap margin characteristic of
L. insigne, L. manzanitae, and the species discussed under them.
Left: Leccinum holopus, a white-capped birch-loving species. Note dark scabers on stalk. Right:
Strobilomyces confusus (see comments under S. floccopus, p. 543, for details).
1
“Old Man of the Woods,” Strobilomyces floccopus, is easily told by its shaggy black or gray fruiting
body. Note cottony veil in young specimen at center and dark gray to black pores in older one at left.
STROBILOMYCES
THIS small genus is unique among the boletes in having a shaggy or scaly gray to black
fruiting body, gray to black pores when mature, and blackish-brown, reticulate or warty
spores. It is so unique, in fact, that some mycologists place it in a separate family. A woolly
veil is present when young, and may form a slight annulus(ring) on the stem. Since only one
species is described here, a key is not included.
Small to medium-sized boletes usually buried or partially buried in humus. CAP convex to some¬
what irregular in shape. PORES variously colored; tubes often irregularly arranged, i.e., not all
vertically oriented. STALK usually short, poorly developed, sometimes off-center. VEIL absent
or present as persistent membrane that covers the tubes. SPORE PRINT unobtainable. Spores
elliptical to spindle-shaped, smooth, brown to golden-brown under the microscope.
THESE funky fungi have been modified or “reduced” from normal, everyday, upright
boletes to abnormal, semi-underground, “decadent” ones. They resemble puffballs in that
they do not forcibly discharge their spores, yet they retain a modicum of respectability in
the form of a rudimentary stalk and definite tube layer arranged rather haphazardly
within the misshapen cap.
Gastroboletus is a small genus, with only one species common along the coast. How¬
ever, several species occur in the Sierra Nevada and Cascades—perhaps in response to
the more severe and unpredictable weather. Fruiting underground helps the mushrooms
to withstand the pendulum-like hot-and-cold or warm-and-dry spells. None are known to
be poisonous, yet none are known to be edible, since none are known to have been tried.
Key to Gastroboletus
1. Tubes and flesh blueing when bruised or cut .G. turbinatus & others, below
1. Not as above .2
2. Stalk relatively long (6-10 cm) and roughened by small scales or scabers; known only from
eastern North America . G. scabrosus
2. Not as above . 3
3. Cap whitish to buff or pale tan (sometimes slightly darker in age); tubes whitish to buff to olive-
brown, or grayish-yellow; stalk averaging 2-5 cm thick . G. subalpinus, p. 545
3. Not as above; cap pale or dark; tubes yellow to olive-yellow; flesh often yellow; stalk typically
1.5 cm thick or less .G. suilloides& G. amyloideus (see G. turbinatus, below)
Many agarics have been “reduced” to gastroid forms (see Podaxales & Allies, p. 724);
this is one instance in which a bolete has. Most of the other members of the genus have
limited distributions. Several occur under conifers in the Sierra Nevada, including:
G. xerocomoides, which blues only slightly and has mostly truncate spores, and three
species which do not blue when bruised: G. suil/oides, with a brown cap; G. amyloideus,
with a yellow, buff, or reddish-spotted cap and amyloid spores; and G. subalpinus{bz\ovi).
COMMENTS: This gastroid bolete is easily told from its brethren by its pale color and
white, non-blueing flesh. It is likely to be mistaken for an aborted button of Boletus edulis,
or more likely still, B. barrowsii. However, the disoriented tube layer, tendency to develop
underground, and refusal to give a spore print are distinctive. The thin layer of tissue
which at least partially covers the tubes of young specimens may represent a more elabo¬
rate version of the whitish pith that plugs the tubes of young B. edulis and B. barrowsii.
546
BOLETIVORES
THESE curious creatures, as their name suggests, are a major predator of Boletus edulis.
Since they are likely to be encountered by anyone who looks for mushrooms, it seems
appropriate to describe them and include a few observations on their habits.
Boletivores appear shortly after the onset of the rainy season, not coincidentally, at
the same time Boletus edulis appears. As a group they share a number of telltale traits
which the experienced observer can discern at a glance. Their overall appearance is rather
dingy and disheveled, their color drab. The cap is quite variable, ranging from depressed or
deflated to uplifted, ecstatic, or inflated; its surface may be dry and distinctly tomentose
or smooth and somewhat viscid. The flesh is normally pallid, becoming blue when bruised
and exuding a red latex when cut, but it is most often obscured by a ragged woolly cuticle
which is typically appressed above and baggy below. The stalk may be fleshy or cartilagi¬
nous, and more often than not, bent. The odor varies considerably from individual to
individual; the taste is unpleasant, and a spore print is not obtainable, at least with normal
methods. Boletivores are strictly terrestrial, and are invariably equipped with a long
pointed stick, rapacious eye, and capacious bucket or “universal pail.” At least two
distinct species occur in our area; these are keyed below.
but fortunately, is not as common. Invariably there is a rusty pick-up truck, station
wagon, or ’65 Dodge Dart nearby, parked in the middle of the road, and the discarded
tubes and wormy stalks of its quarry are apt to be haphazardly strewn about rather than
stacked in the “middens” characteristic of B. clandestinus.
Boletivorus clandestinus is probably harmless, though I haven’t been able to get close
enough to find out. Boletivorus brutalosipes, on the other hand, has a well-deserved
reputation for unprovoked acts of aggression. If you have some Boletus edulis in your
basket, watch out!
Between these extremes, as might be expected, “hybrids” occur, in addition to possibly
autonomous species* (I have even seen a skinny, blonde, bare-stemmed variety). However,
further study—and preferably, a critical comparison with European specimens—is
necessary before a definitive and natural classification can be worked out. Both species
occur throughout the range of Boletus edulis. On weekends they are particularly abundant
on lower Empire Grade above Santa Cruz, California, where their crafty cousin, Pseudo-
boletivorus incognitus, is also in evidence. (The latter closely mimics Boletivorus clandes¬
tinus, but only pretends to be stalking Boletus edulis—the true object of its desires being
Amanita calyptrata.)
As a final note, I might add that what boletivores do during the summer is a mystery. It
has been suggested by one colleague of mine that they hibernate in the trunks of their cars.
Another possibility is that they follow the bolete season up and down the coast. A third is
that they migrate east—or west. But perhaps the most reasonable hypothesis is that they
are like squirrels—they stash away what they gather in hedges, holes, nests, or sheds,
for when the hunting is good, they have neither the time nor the inclination to eat. Then,
in the summer, when they have nothing but time, they do nothing but eat.
*In the newsletter of the Mycological Association of Washington, D.C., Anne Dow announces the discovery of
a third species, Boletivorus europaeus, in the Tetons of Wyoming. Like B. brutalosipes, it “advances boldly when
approached,” but it “fills [rather than empties] the baskets [sic] of other boletivores” (or does she mean other
bolete hunters?). I have never encountered such a species in California, but would welcome its introduction!
547
548
APHYLLOPHORALES
THIS large and diverse assemblage of fleshy—and not-so-fleshy— fungi includes all the
Hymenomycetes (p. 57) with the exception of the agarics, boletes, and jelly fungi. The
fruiting body is not normally gelatinous (as in the jelly fungi), there is no veil (as in many
agarics and boletes), and the basidia are typically simple and clublike. The hymenium
(spore-bearing surface) can be completely smooth and unspecialized as in the crust and
parchment fungi, or it can take the form of tubes (the polypores), spines or “teeth” (the
teeth fungi), upright clubs or branches (the coral fungi), or veins, wrinkles, or even rudi¬
mentary gills (the chanterelles).
More than twenty families in the Aphyllophorales are now recognized, but many of
the distinguishing criteria are esoteric. To facilitate field identification, the Aphyllo¬
phorales have been divided into five major groups (plus one aberrant species), keyed
below. The coral fungi and chanterelles (Clavariaceae and Cantharellaceae) are placed
in a separate order, the Cantharellales, by some taxonomists.
Bondarzewia montana (see description on p. 565). When these compound fruiting bodies were
younger, they were whitish and resembled coral fungi (e.g., Sparassis) but for the presence of pores.
As they mature, however, the upper lobes or “branches” broadened into tan or brown caps. This
species is also capable of producing simple fruiting bodies (with just one cap and stalk).
549
the slightest provocation. (So remember not to breathe too hard when picking polypores
from a standing tree!) A few species, such as Heterobasidion annosum, are virulent
parasites, destroying both the sapwood and the heartwood.
Spores generally gain access to living trees through wounds in the bark. Trees bruised or
battered by wind, nearby construction, careless machinery, or mindless vandalism (“Jody
loves Judy”) are especially vulnerable. Sometimes spores enter through holes bored by
grubs or beetles, which may in turn munch on mycelium growing in their tunnels.
Heart rot continues after the tree dries, and sap rot sets in. On fallen logs and branches
you will find large clusters of colorful bracket fungi (e.g., Trametes versicolor and
Trichaptum abietinus) which are digesting the sapwood. Several varieties may simul¬
taneously or successively inhabit the same log. Recently felled timber is also susceptible
to attack. Only complete immersion in water will prevent infection.
Wood is composed largely of dead, empty cells from which the fungus extracts nutrients.
The cell walls have two principal constituents: cellulose, which makes the wood soft and
tough, and lignin, which makes the wood hard and brittle. Fungi which digest the cellulose
and leave the lignin behind are called carbonizing decays or brown rots because they
render the wood dry, brittle, and darker than normal wood. Fungi which digest cellulose
and lignin are called delignifying decays or white rots because they make the wood soft,
spongy, and whiter than normal wood. Some species may completely hollow out the trunk
or produce small, hollow pockets called pocket rot. The mycelial threads of bracket fungi
can often be seen if the wood is broken open and examined closely. But if more than one
species inhabit the same piece of wood, interpretation and diagnosis become complicated.
Only repeated observation can tell you which ones produce which types of rot.
The part of the tree infected should also be noted. Butt rots such as Phaeolus schweinitzii
are confined to the roots and base of the tree and the fruiting bodies are often found on the
ground. Trunk rots like Phellinus pini infect the entire trunk, while top rots such as
Fomitopsis rosea inhabit the top of the trunk.
Practically all of the polypores were originally lumped together in one giant genus,
Polyporus. Dozens of families and genera have subsequently been proposed in a laudable
effort to break the group down. As usual, however, there are widely divergent opinions on
exactly how the task should be accomplished. The result is scholarly chaos, and the goal
of arriving at one name for each kind of organism is still a long way off. T o give you an idea
of the difficulties faced by a prospective polyporologist (or any toadstool taxonomist)
when she sets about consulting the literature on her pet polypore, here is a list of names
given to Trametes occidentalis by various investigators:
Polyporus occidentalis, Coriolus occidentalis, Polystictus occidentalis, Microporus
occidentalis, Coriolopsis occidentalis, Boletus sericeus, Trametes lanata, Polystictus
lanatus, Microporus lanatus, Polyporus lanatus, Polyporus lenis, Polystictus lenis,
Microporus lenis, Trametes wahlenbergii, Trametes scalaris, Polystictus scalaris,
Polystictus cyclodes var. homoporus, Polystictus scorteus, Microporus scorteus,
Polyporus gourliaei, Fomes gourliaei, Scindalma gourliaei, Trametes hispidula,
Trametes devexa, Polystictus malachodermus, Polystictus substrigosus, Polyporus
illotus, Polystictus illotus, Microporus illotus, Daedalea subcongener, Polystictus
subcongener, Trametes heteromalla, Polystictus extensus, Polyporus badiolutescens
. . . (I’m suddenly very grateful that I’m not a taxonomist!)
Several hundred different polypores are known from North America; perhaps half of
them occur in California. Unfortunately, the vast majority are too tough or too bitter
(or too tough and too bitter) to eat. Two happy exceptions are the sulfur shelf (Laetiporus
sulphureus), a succulent and unmistakable treat, and the beefsteak fungus (Fistulina
hepatica), which looks like a slab of steak. The hen of the woods, Grifola frondosa, and its
look-alike, G. umbellata, are also excellent, but do not seem to occur in our area. A few
polypores, however, may actually be poisonous (e.g., Phaeolus schweinitzii), and even
the edible species are difficult to digest unless cooked thoroughly.
POLYPORACEAE & ALLIES 551
Since so few bracket fungi are edible, they are ignored by most people and barely
mentioned in many popular mushroom books. As I am also ignored by most people (and
have yet to be mentioned in any kind of book), I feel I have something vital in common
with these unheralded but indispensable organisms. Therefore, a fairly extensive (but by
no means comprehensive) treatment is offered here, in hopes that readers will at least learn
to notice polypores, if not identify them. In the following key they are broken down into
several groups based on field characters. If you have trouble with some of the choices, you
can take solace in the fact that almost everyone finds the polypores difficult to identify!
11. Fruiting body punky, corky, or hard and woody even when fresh, medium-sized to very large
and often thick; usually perennial, i.e., with more than one tube layer, but if annual then often
with a varnished surface crust . Ganoderma, Fomitopsis, Phellinus, & Allies, p. 574
11. Not as above; fruiting body usually annual, small to medium-sized or if large then usually fleshy
or spongy when young and fresh; if tough when fresh then cap usually fairly thin and lacking
a highly varnished surface crust . 12
12. Flesh soon red to orange, rusty-brown, tawny, yellow-brown, or dark brown and darkening
(staining red to vinaceous-brown to black) in potassium hydroxide (KOH); pores variously
colored (including red, orange, and mustard-yellow), but not rosy, purple, or bright sulfur-
yellow)* .Phaeolus, Inonotus, Coltricia, & Allies, p. 566
12. Not as above; flesh white to yellow, yellowish, beige, or sometimes light brown or salmon-
tinged, not darkening in KOH* . 13
13. Underside of cap with elongated pocketlike or mazelike pores (see photos on pp. 586, 588)
.Lenzites, Daedalea, & Allies, p. 586
13. Not as above (but pores may break up to form “teeth”) . 14
14. Fruiting body usually preceded by a small, often zoned cup- or saucerlike “nest” (0.5-2 cm
broad) from which small whitish to yellowish shelves (fruiting bodies) develop; common on
dead hardwoods, especially elm, in eastern North America ...Poronidulus conchifer
14. Not as above . 15
15. Cap only 1-5 mm broad, with a stubby or knoblike stalk attached to the top; fruiting body white
to brownish; common on hardwoods (rarely conifers) in eastern states Porodisculuspendulus
15. Not as above; usually larger, widely distributed . 16
16. Pore surface white to buff to yellowish or bright sulfur-yellow when fresh (but may stain blackish
or rusty-reddish in age or when bruised) . 17
16. Pore surface red to orange, orange-yellow, lavender- or violet-tinged, rosy, gray, black, or
brown, or soon becoming these colors .Trametes & Allies, p. 592
17. Pore surface bright sulfur-yellow when fresh (or rarely white, and if so then cap salmon-colored);
cap orange-red to bright orange, bright yellow, or salmon-colored (but fading), usually at least
6 cm broad when mature .Laetiporus, p. 572
17. Not as above . 18
18. Cap thin and tough (but pliant) even when fresh, typically tearing easily in a radial direction;
cap surface usually hairy or velvety and often concentrically zoned; often fruiting in large
masses; very common, especially on hardwoods .Trametes & Allies, p. 592
18. Cap soft, watery, spongy, or fleshy when fresh (but often tough in age), or if tough when fresh
then not as above; cap often but not always thick, the surface sometimes hairy but not usually
zoned; usually (but not always) found in smail numbers . Tyromyces & Allies, p. 597
19. Pores averaging 4-8 per mm; found mainly on hardwoods Caloporus (-Gloeoporus) dichrous
19. Pores averaging 2-4 per mm; tubes very shallow; found on dead conifers Skeletocutis amorpha
*Several household cleaning agents (e.g., Drano, 1 teaspoon per % cup water) can be substituted for KOH, but
unless the flesh is borderline in color (i.e., dark yellow or light brown) the test is usually unnecessary. If there’s
any doubt, simply try both choices!
552
Left: A close-up of the tubes in Fistulina hepatica. Note how bruised area is darker. Right: An even
closer view, in which the tubes can be seen as discrete units or “pipes”—a unique feature of Fistulina.
FISTULINA
THIS genus contains only one common species, the beefsteak fungus, F. hepatica. It is not
a “true” polypore because the tubes, though packed together closely, are discrete units
arranged like the bristles of a brush (see above photos). This character, which is best ob¬
served with a hand lens, has led polyporologists to give Fistulina a family of its own.
553
Fistulina hepatica, sliced open to show the streaked, meatlike flesh. Fresh specimens even exude a
bloodlike juice. For other views of this photogenic fungus, see color plate and photos on pp. 552-553.
COMMENTS: This remarkable fungus looks like a slab of raw meat, especially after it
is sliced open and starts oozing “blood.” The streaked or marbled flesh is very distinctive,
plus it never becomes as tough as other polypores and bracket fungi. The fruiting bodies
seem to develop very slowly and are rarely attacked by maggots. Other species: Pseudo-
fistulina radicata (-F. pallida) of eastern North America and Mexico also has discrete
tubes, but the cap is grayish-brown to pale reddish and the stalk is usually longer(to 15 cm)
and somewhat rooting. It is edible also.
THESE are fleshy to rather tough polypores with a clearly defined cap, pore surface,
and stalk. As such they are easy to recognize—the presence of a stalk separates them from
most other polypores, and confusion with the boletes is unlikely because boletes have a soft,
fleshy texture, central stalk, and tubes which are usually longer (deeper) and peel away
easily from the cap (and often from each other).
The genus Polyporus once embraced practically all the polypores or woody pore fungi.
The “splitters” have steadily whittled away at it, however, so that it now contains a modest
number of stalked polypores with white, cylindrical, smooth, non-amyloid spores. Most
of its species grow on dead hardwoods, but some arise from roots or underground “tubers”
and thus may appear terrestrial. Albatrellus, on the other hand, is one of the few groups
of polypores that is truly terrestrial, fruiting in sometimes massive numbers under both
hardwoods and conifers. Microscopically it differs from Polyporus in having elliptical
to nearly round spores which may or may not be amyloid.
To facilitate identification, a number of other stalked polypores are treated here as well,
though their similarity to Polyporus and Albatrellus may be entirely superficial. These
include: Boletopsis, terrestrial like Albatrellus, but with warted spores; Heteroporus, with
a frequently misshapen fruiting body that is often entirely covered with pores; Grifola, with
a compound, intricately branched fruiting body that gives rise to many small overlapping
caps; and Bondarzewia, with a frequently compound fruiting body and warted amyloid
554
POLYPORUS, ALBATRELLUS, & ALLIES 555
spores. The latter two genera can be reminiscent of coral fungi (especially Sparassis), but
are easily differentiated by the presence of pores on the underside of each cap or “lobe.”
Tender specimens of Grifola are delicious when thoroughly cooked, but most of the
other polyporps treated here are too tough or chewy to be more than marginally edible.
None are known to be dangerously poisonous, however. Fourteen species are described
here and several others are keyed out.
17. Found under eastern hardwoods (occasionally conifers); pores 1-3 per mm, yellow to greenish or
if white then cap yellowish, ochre, or greenish; spores smooth A.cristatus{see A. ellisii, p. 559)
17. Not as above; differently colored or pores smaller or spores not smooth . 18
18. Fruiting body with many yellowish petal-shaped caps arising from a common base; found under
western conifers; apparently rare. A. dispansus
18. Not as above . 19
19. Cap and stalk grayish to purple-gray, black, vinaceous, or with olive, pinkish, or brownish tones
(sometimes whitish when young), but not typically yellow-stained; cap often with a somewhat
streaked appearance; pores small(M per mm), white when fresh butoftendiscoloringgrayish,
vinaceous, etc., in age and usually staining olive to black in KOH; spores angular-warty under
the microscope, not amyloid .Boletopsis subsquamosa group, below
19. Not as above; pores larger and/ or cap and stalk differently colored and/ or developing yellowish
tones in age or after handling; spores smooth and/or amyloid . 20
20. Pores small (2-5 per mm); cap white to yellow, pinkish-tan, or pinkish-cinnamon (occasionally
darker), not hairy or scaly (but may be cracked); stalk not blackish at base; tuber absent 21
20. Not as above; pores larger or stalk darker or tuber present or cap hairy or scaly, etc.22
21. Cap or entire fruiting body often developing reddish or orangish stains in age or when dried;
taste usually bitter .A. confluens& others (see A. ovinus, p. 557)
21. Not as above; taste mild or bitter.A. ovinus &. others, p. 557
22. Cap and stalk brown to grayish-brown and covered with small hairs; taste very bitter (chew on a
small piece of cap); odor sometimes (but not always!) like iodine; stalk with neither a tuber nor
a gnarly rooting base; spores smooth; found in western North America . . . . P. hirtus, p. 560
22. Not as above .23
23. Fruiting body arising from a large, swollen, brown to black underground “tuber”(sclerotium);
cap often with fibrils or scales; spores smooth .P. tuberaster, p. 563
23. Not as above (but fruiting body may have a rooting base); spores smooth or warted .24
24. Found at or near bases of trees or stumps; fruiting bodies often clustered or compound (with one
to many caps), usually arising from a gnarly, rooting base; caps pallid to tan, ochre, or brown,
but usually lacking darker scales; spores with amyloid warts or spines .29
24. Not as above; fruiting body typically not compound (but may be clustered); spores smooth 25
25. Stalk with a black rooting base; pores usually 2-3 per mm P. radicatus(see P. tuberaster, p.563)
25. Not with above features . 26
26. Cap dark brown to brown, reddish-brown, or pinkish-brown; terrestrial A. pescaprae, p. 560
26. Found on wood, or if terrestrial then cap usually paler, oranger, or yellower than above . 27
27. Cap with brown scales, often large; pores often more than 1 mm in widest dimension; stalk often
blackish or dark brown at base; found on wood, widespread but especially common in eastern
North America .P. squamosus(see P. decurrens, p. 561)
27. Not as above; usually medium-sized; if found on wood then pores averaging 1 mm wide or
smaller; cap smooth or scaly; stalk base not normally blackish P. decurrens & others, p. 561
28. Caps usually spoon-or fan-shaped; stalks off-center to lateral .Grifolafrondosa, p.564
28. Caps more or less circular; stalks central .Grifola umbellata (see G.frondosa, p. 564)
29. Each fruiting body with one to many caps; favoring conifers . . Bondarzewia montana, p. 565
29. Favoring hardwoods, with one to several caps Bondarzewia berkeleyi(see B. montana, p. 565)
Albatrellus flettii. The blue-gray to blue-green cap, white pore surface (the pores are too tiny to see
here), and well-developed stalk distinguish this beautiful species. (Ralph Buchsbaum)
ALBATRELLUS 559
Albatrellus ellisii. This terrestrial species is especially common under conifers in the Pacific North¬
west and Sierra Nevada. Note hairy-scaly cap. The pore surface usually stains greenish when bruised.
560 POLYPORACEAE & ALLIES
COMMENTS: Also known as Scutiger ellisii, this impressive conifer-lover is easily told by
its yellow-green to yellow-brown color, fairly large size, growth on the ground, and ten¬
dency to stain greenish (especially the pores). Its close relative, A. pescaprae, is browner or
redder in color and more southern in distribution. A. sylvestris is a somewhat similar
species with a smoky-olive or darker pore surface and roughened spores. A. cristatus of
eastern North America is similar in color but has a less hairy cap and favors hardwoods.
Polyporus decurrens
CAP 4-14 cm broad, convex to plane or slightly depressed; surface dry, yellowish to yellow-
brown to ochre or dull orange (rarely reddish-brown), with darker (usually brown) erect
fibrillose scales which become flattened in age. Flesh thick, white, tough. PORES fairly
large (0.5-2 mm in diameter), angular or becoming torn or toothlike in age, white, but
sometimes discoloring when dried; tubes 2-6 mm long, usually decurrent. STALK 2-10
cm long, (0.5) 1 -3 cm thick, equal or thicker at either end, solid, tough; white or somewhat
brownish, usually reticulate above from the decurrent tube walls. SPORE PRINT white;
spores 10-18 * 4-6 microns, cylindrical, smooth.
HABITAT: Solitary or in small groups or tufts on the ground (usually originating from
buried wood) or sometimes on dead wood, fall through spring; known from California,
occasional. It favors hardwoods, but I have found it in a variety of habitats. It is the most
common terrestrial polypore of southern California.
EDIBILITY: Unknown. The closely related P. squamosus (see comments) is edible
when thoroughly cooked, but is thoroughly mediocre.
COMMENTS: The dull orange to yellowish-brown to ochre scaly cap with fairly large
decurrent pores distinguish this species from Albatrelluspescaprae and others. It is also
known as P. mcmurphyi. The “Dryad Saddle,” P. squamosus, is a better-known, closely
Polyporus decurrens has large pores, a scaly cap, and may or may not be terrestrial. P. squamosus
(not illustrated) is a similar but larger wood-inhabiting species.
562 POLYPORACEAE & ALLIES
related species. It is larger (cap 6-30 (60) cm broad and stalk up to 5 cm thick) and paler
with dense, flattened brown to dark brown scales (but may become darker brown overall
in age) and very large pores (1 -10 mm each in largest dimension). It usually grows solitary
or clustered on hardwoods (often living) rather than on the ground and its stem, when
well-developed, usually has a black base. In N orth America it is most common east of the
Rocky Mountains, but occurs occasionally in Washington and California. (I’ve seen what
might be a photograph of this species from Fresno.) Another related species,P. fagicola
(-P. lentus) of eastern North America, occurs on hardwoods but is smaller and less scaly.
Polyporus elegans, a common wood-inhabitor. Note pale cap and black lower half of stalk. Compare
it to the photo of P. badius on p. 42.
Polyporus arcularius grows on hardwoods. Note ciliate (hairy) cap margin and stalk that is not black.
winter and spring, especially on willow, alder, poplar (cottonwood), and oak.
EDIBILITY: Too tough to eat, but dries nicely for decorative purposes.
COMMENTS: This dainty polypore is easily recognized by its tan to whitish cap, small
size, and black “foot.” P. varius is sometimes listed as a synonym, but is also applied to a
form with a radially streaked cap that is intermediate in color between P. elegans and P.
badius. T he latter species is usually larger than P. elegans, and has a darker cap and entirely
black stem. Another species, P. melanopus, grows on the ground or from buried wood; it
has a velvety stem and velvety-scurfy cap, at least when young.
563
564 POLYPORACEAE & ALLIES
HABITAT: Solitary or in twos or threes on ground in woods; widely distributed, but not
common. I have found it several times in our area in mixed woods and under oak and
madrone. It fruits in the fall, winter, and spring.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but tough unless young, fresh, and thoroughly cooked. Native
Americans ate an underground sclerotium which they called “tuckahoe.” It was once
thought to be this species (as reported in the 1 st edition of Mushrooms Demystified), but is
now believed to be the sclerotium of another polypore (see Poria cocos, p. 604). The
“tubers” of P. tuberaster are inedible because they are full of dirt. However, they are sold
in southern Italy under the name pietra fungaia (“Stone Fungus”). Buyers plant the
“tubers” in flower pots, water them regularly, and then eat the fruiting bodies that result.
Left: The “Hen ol the Woods,” Grifola frondosa, is a prized edible mushroom in eastern North
America. The olten massive fruiting body is composed ol numerous petal- or lan-shaped caps arising
Irom a common base. Right: Grifola umbellata mimics G. frondosa, but each of its caps has a more
or less central (rather than lateral) stalk, as shown here. It is also delicious.
GRIFOLA 565
America. It has been reported from Idaho, but is rare in the West and apparently absent in
our area. It causes a delignifying butt rot of both the heartwood and sapwood of its host.
EDIBILITY: Edible and choice—along with the sulfur shelf and beefsteak fungus, the best
of the polypores for the table. Long, slow cooking is recommended and only the young,
tender caps are worth eating. “Allergies” have been reported. It is excellent pickled.
COMMENTS: The numerous overlapping, more or less spoon-shaped caps are remi¬
niscent of a fluffed-up hen, making this one of the safest and most easily recognized of all
edible mushrooms. Clusters weighing 100 pounds have been recorded, but 5-10 pound
specimens are the norm. There are usually more caps per cluster than in Bondarzewia, and
the stems are attached to the sides of the caps rather than being central. Polyporus or
Polypilus frondosus are synonyms. G. umbellata(-P. umbellatus), also edible, is a similar
species with whitish to gray to smoky-brown, circular caps with central stems. Its fruiting
bodies arise from sclerotia (“tubers”) that have been used by the Chinese as an immune
system stimulant. It occurs across the northern half of the continent, but is not common.
Bondarzewia montana
FRUITING BODY simple (with a cap and stalk) or compound (with numerous caps and
stalks arising from a common base), but often fingerlike when first emerging or taking
the form of a lumpy, misshapen, or rosette-like mass (when compound); often massive
when mature (up to 1 m (3 ft.) broad if compound); usually arising from a rooting base.
CAP(s) 5 -25 cm broad when mature, convex to irregular or depressed; surface dry, finely
velvety to fibrillose, or becoming smooth; tan or ochre to brown or dark brown, sometimes
paler when immature. Flesh fairly thick, white, firm but brittle when fresh; taste mild or
sometimes bitter in age. PORES fairly large (0.5-2 mm broad), usually angular or irregular
in shape or breaking up to form “teeth”; pore surface often lumpy or nodulose in compound
fruiting bodies, white to creamy or buff, dingier when dried or in age; tubes 1-6 mm long,
usually decurrent. STALK(s) central to lateral, continuous with individual caps and simi¬
lar in color and texture, usually arising from a tapered, underground, gnarly rooting base
that is 4-12 cm long and 2-5 cm thick. SPORE PRINT white; spores 5-7 microns, round,
with conspicuous amyloid warts.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups under conifers, usually near stumps or trunks (pre¬
sumably arising from roots or buried wood); locally common in the late summer and fall
in western North America, particularly at higher elevations. I have found it in quantity
near Lake Tahoe under fir and white pine, but have not seen it on the coast. The very similar
B. berkeleyi (see comments) favors living hardwoods, producing a serious delignifying
butt rot of the heartwood (“string and ray rot”) that completely hollows out its host.
EDIBILITY: Tempting because of its size, but rather tough and sometimes bitter to boot.
It is probably harmless, but certainly not the equal of Grifola frondosa.
COMMENTS: The warted amyloid spores, often compound fruiting body, and gnarled
rooting base are characteristic of the genus Bondarzewia. The spores are unique among
the polypores, leading some investigators to suggest a relationship to the agaric genera,
Russula and Lactarius. When B. montana has a massive compound fruiting body (see
photo on p. 548) it is reminiscent of the hen of the woods, Grifola frondosa, an eastern
hardwood-loving species with smooth spores. Fruiting bodies with one to several caps, on
the other hand, are more likely to be confused with Polyporus hirtus, a bitter-tasting,
smooth-spored polypore. Its only close relative, B. berkeleyi, is quite similar but usually
has fewer (one to five), broader, paler (whitish to grayish or yellowish-tan) caps and slightly
larger spores, plus it favors hardwoods (especially oak and maple). It seems to intergrade
with B. montana, and is very widely distributed. Another sometimes gigantic polypore,
Meripilus giganteus, occurs at the bases of hardwoods in eastern North America. It stains,
566 POLYPORACEAE & ALLIES
ages, or dries gray to dark brown or black on the pore surfaceand/ or marginand has much
smaller pores (3-7 per mm). Like Bondarzewia, it often has a compound fruiting body, but
has smooth, non-amyloid spores. The individual caps in all of these species are usually
larger than those of Grifola.
Heteroporus biennis
FRUITING BODY arising from a poorly developed stalk or fleshy base, with one cap or
several fused together in an overlapping rosette, or very distorted with most of the
surface covered with pores. CAP 3-9 (20) cm broad when well-developed, plane to de¬
pressed; surface dry, woolly-hairy or felty, white to tan or aging pinkish to reddish. Flesh
tough, duplex, white or pinkish. PORES 1-3 per mm, angular, irregular, or mazelike, or
becoming toothlike; whitish, but often discoloring or bruising reddish, dingier in age;
tubes 2-6 mm long, usually decurrent. STALK central to off-center, poorly developed or
even absent, continuous with and colored like the cap; hairy. SPORE PRINT white; spores
4-8 x 3-5 microns, elliptical, smooth; thick-walled, nearly round spores (chlamydo-
spores) often present also.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups on ground around hardwood stumps and trees (pre¬
sumably growing on the roots), occasionally under conifers; widely distributed, but not
common. I have found it in our area under oak and pine in the fall and winter.
EDIBILITY: Unknown; too tough to be worthwhile.
COMMENTS: Misshapen fruiting bodies are usually found with pores covering much or
most of the mushroom—the best fieldmark of this otherwise unimposing, profoundly
forgettable, pitiful excuse for a polypore. The growth habit is sometimes reminiscent of
Phaeolus schxveinitzii. Abortiporus biennis and Polyporus biennis are synonyms.
Fruiting body usually annual, small to large, often soft and spongy when fresh but tough or corky-
woody in age; growing shelflike to bracketlike to practically resupinate on wood or growing on
ground and possessing a stalk and one to several caps. CAP usually hairy, fuzzy, or velvety. Flesh
orange to yellow-brown, rusty-brown, or brown. PORES orange to greenish-yellow, rusty-brown,
brown, or grayish (but not white) at maturity; small or large. STALK present or absent. SPORE
PRINT whitish to yellow or brown when obtainable. Spores usually elliptical, smooth. Setae
(large brown sterile cells) often present among basidia. Cap tissue darkening (turning red to black)
in potassium hydroxide (KOH).
16. Cap tan to pale brown (or weathering grayish) and distinctly hairy, usually 2 cm thick or less;
pores whitish to gray, grayish-brown, or even blackish; found mainly on dead cottonwood
(Populus) or willow, often in confluent rows . Funalia hispida & relatives
16. Not as above; if growing on cottonwood or willow, then differently colored, etc. 17
17. Fruiting body soft and watery when fresh, entirely tawny-yellow to cinnamon or yellow-brown
and staining red or vinaceous (not black) in KOH; typically found on dead hardwoods in
eastern North America (reported rarely from the West on conifers) . . Hapalopilus nidulans
17. Not as above (but may have some of above features) . 18
18. Fruiting body tough and corky or woody even when fresh; cap surface not hairy or only slightly
so; usually found on dead trees . (ste Phellinus gilvus, p. 582)
18. At least the upper layer of fruiting body usually fleshy (watery or spongy) when young; cap
surface often (but not always) hairy; often on living trees Inonotus hispidus & others, p. 569
Left: Coltricia cinnarpomea has a small silky cap, brownish pores, and thin rusty-brown flesh. Right:
Coltricia perennis is often larger and more strongly zoned. Note tough central stalk in both species.
INONOTUS 569
Inonotus hispidus
FRUITING BODY annual, growing shelflike or bracketlike on wood, at first soft and
spongy but tough in age and rigid when dry. CAP 5-20 (30) cm broad and 2-10 cm thick,
convex or plane; surface at first densely covered with stiff or bristly hairs, the hairs
tending to wear away in age; bright reddish-orange to yellowish-brown to rusty-yellow
when fresh, becoming brown to dark reddish-brown or even blackish in age. Flesh up to
5(10) cm thick, at first watery or spongy (but fibrous), tougher in age; rusty to rusty-yellow
to dark reddish-brown; odor often rather pleasant when fresh. PORES 1-3 (4) per mm,
yellowish to brown or rusty-yellow, sometimes with an olive tinge and sometimes beaded
with droplets, darkening with age or where bruised; tubes 0.5-3 cm long. STALK absent.
SPORE PRINT ochre- to chestnut-brown; spores7.5-11 * 6-9 microns, broadly elliptical
to nearly round, smooth. Flesh darkening (staining red to black) in KOH.
HABITAT: Usually solitary (occasionally several) on living or recently dead hardwoods
or rarely conifers; fruiting mostly in the summer and fall but occurring year-round, widely
distributed. It is a destructive parasite of oak and walnut (causing a white rot of the heart-
wood), but occurs on a wide range of other trees, including mulberry and willow. The
fruiting bodies usually emerge from the wounds of trees, often at a considerable distance
from the ground. I have not seen this species locally but it occurs in southern California.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This species and its close relatives (see below) are reminiscent oil. tomen-
tosus and Phaeolus schweinitzii, but are strictly shelving species with no stalk. They can
also be confused with species of Phellinus, but are soft and spongy when fresh and are not
perennial. Similar species include: I. cuticularis, with a woolly-matted to nearly smooth
(not bristly) cap, found on various hardwoods such as willow, cottonwood, and pepper
trees; /. dryophilus, with a thick granular core between the upper fibrous tissue and the
tube layer, found on hardwoods (especially oak); I. texanus, found on desert legumes
(particularly acacia and mesquite); I. arizonicus, found on sycamore; /. dryadeus (see
comments under I. tomentosus)', and I. radiatus, widespread (but especially common in
eastern North America) on hardwoods such as birch and alder, with a rather thin, firm,
brightly colored (golden to rusty-brown or even yellowish-green) cap that is often zoned
and radially fibrillose plus unpigmented spores. See also I. tomentosus, which some¬
times grows shelflike on conifers.
Inonotus tomentosus
FRUITING BODY usually terrestrial with a cap and a short or rudimentary stalk, but
sometimes lacking a stalk and growing shelflike on wood. CAP 3 -12 (18) cm broad, circular
to fan-shaped in outline, convex to plane to centrally depressed; surface dry, soft and hairy
(tomentose) or velvety, whitish when very young but soon yellowish-brown to tan, dull
ochre, brown, or rusty-brown, sometimes with faint concentric zones. Flesh yellow-brown
to brown, duplex: upper layersoftand spongy when fresh, lower layer rather thin, firm, and
fibrous. PORES round to angular or irregular becoming torn or sometimes toothlike in
age, 2 A per mm, pale buff to grayish or beige or becoming brownish, but often with a hoary
sheen or surface covering; darker brown where bruised; tubes 1.5-7 mm long, usually
decurrent. STALK often rudimentary, when present short(1-5 cm long), 0.5-2 cm thick,
central to off-center or lateral, continuous with cap and more or less same color and texture,
or darker. SPORE PRINT pale yellow to pale brown; spores 4.5-7 * 2.5-4 microns,
elliptical, smooth, hyaline under the microscope. Brown sterile cells (setae) abundant
among basidia, straight and pointed. Cap tissue blackening in KOH (sometimes with a
fleeting red intermediate phase).
Inonotus tomentosus is reminiscent of Phaeolus schweinitzii, but is usually smaller and paler in
color. In addition, the fruiting body is usually simple (with one cap rather than several). Note how
pine needles and sticks are incorporated into the fruiting bodies.
570
Phaeolus schweinitzii, a common conifer-lover. Note compound fruiting body; these are rather small
specimens.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups on or around dead and living conifers, usually but not
always appearing terrestrial (originating from the roots); widely distributed and very
common throughout the West. In our area it favors pine and Douglas-fir, the fruiting
bodies usually appearing after the first fall rains but persisting year-round. The mycelium
attacks the roots and heartwood of its host, causing a serious carbonizing decay known as
“red-brown butt rot.” It fractures the wood into cubical blacks as high as fifteen feet up the
trunk, weakening the tree so that it blows over easily. It also occurs on coniferous slash,
in which case it is more apt to be shelflike than terrestrial. In the West it is one of the two or
three most prevalent brown rot fungi. There is one report of it growing on eucalyptus.
EDIBILITY: Possibly poisonous. It contains a stimulant found in the roots of the kava
kava plant, but apparently some toxic substances as well. It is too tough and hairy to be
of food value anyway. However, it is prized by dye-makers for the rich and varied hues
it imparts to yarn.
COMMENTS: One of the most common and conspicuous of the larger polypores, this
cosmopolitan species is apt to confuse the beginner because of the color and texture
changes it undergoes as it ages. However, the yellowish to greenish-yellow pores when
young, yellow to rusty-orange tones in the caps of young specimens, and growth at the base
of or near conifers are diagnostic. (The color plate shows young specimens that are pre¬
dominantly orange rather than greenish-yellow.) It grows gradually, engulfing pine
needles, sticks, plants, and other debris in its way, as shown in the color plate. Old,
weathered fruiting bodies are quite light in weight and entirely dark brown in color.
Inonotus tomentosus is somewhat similar, but has a tan to dull brown cap and brownish or
hoary pore surface. Hydnellum species are superficially similar, but have short, blunt
spines or “teeth” on the underside of the cap instead of pores.
571
572 POLYPORACEAE & ALLIES
HABITAT: On fallen logs of conifers, usually on the undersides and often developing
in snow; common in the subalpine forests of the West, fruiting mainly in the spring but
persisting into summer, fall, or even winter. It is quite common in the southern Rocky
Mountains, and I have also seen it in the Sierra Nevada. It produces a brown rot(carbon-
izing decay) and is said to occasionally occur on aspen.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This species, which has also been placed in Pycnoporellus and Aurantio-
porellus, is easily told by its large pores and orange spongelike fruiting body that peels off
in one continuous felty layer. P. fibrillosus is a somewhat similar species that is shelflike
(i.e., with a well-defined fiery red to orange or brownish-orange cap). It has creamy to
orange pores and grows on conifer slash or rarely aspen. Pycnoporus, Aurantioporus, and
several Porias are also brightly colored, but are tougher and/ or have much smaller pores.
LAETIPORUS
THIS is a small genus of large, fleshy, shelflike fungi. Only one colorful species—the
well-known and edible sulfur shelf—is described here. A key hardly seems necessary.
ISCHNODERMA
THIS genus is easily recognized by its roughened, resinous, dark brown to blackish,
shelflike fruiting body. A single species is described here.
THESE are the tough, woody, hoof-shaped or shelflike growths you see so often on the
trunks of dead trees or in the wounds and crotches of living ones. They are commonly called
“conks” because of their woody to corky texture and the frequent presence of a hard
surface crust. Conks are larger and thicker than the other tough bracket fungi (e.g.,
Trametes) and usually—but not always—have perennial fruiting bodies (i.e., each year a
new tube layer is added onto the already-existing ones). In many species these tube layers
are distinctly stratified so that the age of the fruiting body can be determined by
counting the number of layers (just like counting the growth rings on a tree). Ages of 50-70
years have been recorded! If the yearly tube layers are not stratified, the age can often be
estimated by the number of growth zones (represented by ridges or furrows) on the cap. A
new zone is “issued” each year as an outer or downward extension of the cap in conjunction
with the new tube layer.
Most conks have at one time or another been classified in the genus Fomes. However
Fomes, like Polyporus, has been obliterated by the “splitters,” so that it now contains
only one common species (F. fomentarius). The principal genera recognized here are
Ganoderma, with a hard, sometimes shiny surface crust, whitish to pallid pore surface
when fresh, and minutely prickly, double-walled spores; Fomitopsis, with whitish to pale-
colored flesh and smooth spores; and Phellinus, with rusty-brown to yellow-brown flesh
that darkens in potassium hydroxide (KOH), and smooth spores. Several small genera
(e.g., Fomes in its residual sense and Heterobasidion) are also described and/ or keyed out.
Conks are responsible for many serious rots. Phellinuspini, Fomitopsis officinalis, and
Heterobasidion annosum are especially destructive to living or standing conifers, Fomi¬
topsis pinicola to dead ones, and the Ganoderma applanatum group to living and dead
hardwoods.
Conks are obviously far too tough or woody to eat (see comments on the edibility of
Fomitopsis pinicola!), but several enjoy other uses (see in particular Ganoderma lucidum,
G. applanatum, and Fomitopsis officinalis). Only some of the more distinctive and/ or
common species in North America are treated here.
5. Stalk usually absent; flesh up to 10 cm thick; known only from western North America .
. Ganoderma oregonense (see G. lucidum, p. 577)
5. Stalk usually present; flesh up to 3 cm thick.Ganoderma tsugae(see G. lucidum, p. 577)
6. Flesh bright reddish-orange to rusty-orange; fruiting body often thick (tall) in relation to
diameter; restricted to juniper .Truncospora demidoffii (see Phellinuspini, p. 582)
6. Not as above . 7
7. Flesh bright yellow-brown to rusty-brown, brown, or dark brown when fresh . 8
7. Flesh whitish to yellowish or straw-colored (or light brown to dingy yellow-brown in age) 18
8. Pore surface white when fresh but turning brown when scratched (or in old age); cap with a hard
surface crust; very common .Ganoderma applanatum group, p. 576
8. Not as above . 9
9. Fruiting body annual (though sometimes large), i.e., with only one tube layer; usually soft or
spongy or exuding water droplets when fresh, but usually tough in age; if found on hardwoods,
the hardwoods usually living .(seePhaeolus, Inonotus, Coltricia, & Allies, p. 566)
9. Not as above; fruiting body very tough (corky or woody) even when fresh, usually with more
than one tube layer (perennial), especially if growing on living hardwoods . 10
10. Typically growing on conifers .Phellinus pini 8c others, p. 582
10. Typically growing on hardwoods . 11
11. Fruiting body typically without a cap (resupinate) or with only a rudimentary one . 12
11. Fruiting body with a cap (upper sterile surface), usually hooflike or shelflike . 13
12. Fruiting body hard and woody; free margin (“cap”) when present often with a surface crust
. . . ..Phellinus laevigatus & P. pomaceus (see P. igniarius, p. 581)
12. Fruiting body corky or fibrous-tough but not woody; free margin when present not incrusted
.Phellinus ferruginosus& P.ferreus (see P. gilvus, p. 582)
13. Fruiting body with a clearly differentiated hard surface crust (at least in older specimens), or
if not then the older (buried) tube layers showing whitish flecks or streaks when sectioned; cap
gray, brown, or black; pore surface brown or gray; especially common in northern regions 14
13. Not with above features . 15
14. Older (buried) tube layers typically stuffed with white hyphae that show as white streaks or
flecks when broken open; old caps often black and cracked.Phellinus igniarius, p. 581
14. Not as above .Fomesfomentarius (see Phellinus igniarius, p. 581)
15. Typically growing on locust or other legumes .Phellinus rimosus(see P. gilvus, p. 582)
15. Not as above . 16
16. Cap ochraceous to rusty-brown (sometimes blackish in old age); flesh usually less than 1.5 cm
thick; usually found on dead wood .:.Phellinus gilvus 8c others, p. 582
16. Cap differently colored and/or flesh thicker; usually found on living trees . 17
17. Flesh bright yellow-brown .Phellinus robustus(see P. gilvus, p. 582)
17. Flesh rusty-brown or darker .Phellinus everhartii(see P. gilvus, p. 582)
18. Growing on incense cedar; pore surface usually yellow or yellowish when fresh; typically with
only one layer of tubes ...(see Tyromyces amarus, p. 601)
18. Not as above; usually growing on a different host . 19
19. Cap distinctly hairy and white to pale ochraceous (or greenish from algae and moss) .... 20
19. Not as above . 21
20. Fruiting body often massive; cap surface coarsely hairy “like a doormat” (Stuntz); found on
conifers in western North America; rare .Oxyporus nobilissimus
20. Not as above; found on hardwoods (especially maple) in eastern states . Oxyporuspopulinus
21. Flesh cheesy when young but soon becoming chalky, very bitter-tasting; cap white to yellowish
or becoming grayish or greenish in old age; found on conifers . Fomitopsis officinalis, p. 579
21. Not as above . 22
22. Underside of cap with mazelike or elongated pores or sometimes even gills; cap 5-15 cm broad,
tube walls often thick; found mainly on hardwoods (see Lenzites, Daedalea, & Allies, p. 586)
22. Not as above . 23
23. Cap surface usually (but not always) partly or entirely reddish to reddish-brown or reddish-
black; cap smooth or grooved; tube layers stratified .Fomitopsispinicola, p. 578
23. Cap surface usually roughened, pitted, knobby, ridged, etc., not normally reddish; tube layers
not usually stratified . . Heterobasidion annosum 8c others (see Fomitopsis pinicola, p. 578)
Artist’s Conk (Ganoderma applanatum group), with my wife Judith Mattoon included for scale.
This large specimen shows ridges and furrows characteristic of many perennial polypores (conks).
The underside is white when fresh and turns brown when scratched (see photo on next page).
576
Ganoderma applanatum group, underside (pore surface). It is sometimes called the “Artist’s Conk”
because the white pore surface turns brown when scratched. This means you can draw pictures on it, or
better yet, leave messages such as this one in the woods!
577
578 POLYPORACEAE & ALLIES
range of hosts, but in North America is partial to maple. The very similar G. tsugae and
G. oregonense occur on conifers (see comments). It is sometimes parasitic, but can also
be saprophytic, producing a wet white rot in its host.
EDIBILITY: Too tough to be edible, but in the Orient it is pictured in many classical art
works and has been revered for centuries as a symbol of success and well-being(Ling Chih
means “marvelous herb” or“mushroom of immortality”). It has been used in the treatment
of cancer and various other maladies, and is believed by some to have the power of arousing
the dead. One method of preparation is to soak the fruiting body in wine for several
months. The resulting liquid “essence” or elixir is then drunk or put into candies. The
varnished fruiting bodies are also used for decorative purposes.
COMMENTS: This striking polypore and its close relatives are easily recognized by
their shiny ochre to reddish-black caps that look as if they had been artificially varnished
or shellacked (see Color Plate 156) unless old or covered by spore powder. Like Piptoporus
betulinus, the fruiting bodies are annual (with one tube layer) but persist for months.
T wo extreme growth forms occur: one is fairly large, often sessile( with little or no stalk) and
particularly common in North America. The other is smaller(cap rarely over 15 cm broad),
has a long slender stalk, and appears to be more common in the tropics and Old World.
H owever, a large number of intermediate forms also occur, plus occasional abnormal ones
in which the fruiting body is branched and antler- or tree-like, and these are all currently
thought to be forms of one highly variable, farflung species. G. curtisii is a similar species
with an ochre to whitish or only partly reddish cap that often lacks the varnish in age. It
typically has a stalk and grows on hardwoods in eastern (especially southeastern) North
America. G. tsugae (COLOR PLATE 156) is also very similar to G.lucidum, but has
white flesh and grows only on conifers, particularly hemlock, in northern North America.
Still another similar species, G. oregonense, also grows on conifers, but is usually
larger (cap 5-100 cm broad, 2-20 cm thick!), with larger spores and a somewhat darker or
slightly duller cap. It is the most common “Varnished Conk” of Washington, Oregon, and
California. All of these can be distinguished from Fomitopsis pinicola by their punkier
(softer) flesh, annual fruiting body, and brown-staining pore surface (when fresh).
EDIBILITY: This woody conk is not often eaten, but in a pinch you can use the following
recipe developed by my wife: “Saw into 2-inch cubes, then marinate in olive oil and
dandelion wine for at least 48 hours (be sure to use LOTS of garlic!). Roast slowly on
skewers over charcoal indefinitely (minimum time: 20 hours). Cool. Pound vigorously
with a large mallet between two pieces of thick leather. Pulverize in a meat grinder and
then force through a braced sieve (allow several hours for this step). Wrap the resulting
mess in several thicknesses of cheesecloth and hang up someplace high and out of the way
(on a clothesline or TV antenna). Allow to dangle thus for at least one week. (Aging has
a mellowing effect, so you may want to try one year.) Wring periodically, making sure
to reserve the drippings for gravy or as a motor oil additive. To eat, boil for twenty-four
hours, squeeze thoroughly, garnish with gravel, and serve forth.”
COMMENTS: This beautiful but cosmopolitan conk is a major destroyer of dead coni¬
ferous timber. The reddish or partially reddish cap with a brightly colored margin (when
growing) and pallid pores that do not bruise brown are good fieldmarks. Varnished spe¬
cimens might be confused with Ganoderma tsugae or G. oregonensis{see G. lucidum), but
are perennial and much harder and denser. Fomespinicola and Ungulina marginata are
synonyms. Another common, widespread woody conk with whitish flesh and white to
yellowish pores is Heterobasidion annosum (-Fomes annosus). It has a bracketlike to
shelflike to resupinate or irregularly knobby fruiting body that, when shelflike, is usually
thinner and rougher (knobby, pitted, grooved, etc.) than F. pinicola. The cap is usually
brown to grayish-brown with a pallid growing margin, but is sometimes reddish-brown
(and can be whitish when very young) and its flesh does not redden in KOH. It is a frequent
parasite of conifers (or occasionally hardwoods) and usually grows at the base of the trunk
or from its roots. It is especially common on second-growth mountain conifers(e.g., pon-
derosa and Jeffrey pines). Two other species with whitish to yellow-brown flesh,F.fraxi-
nophilus and F. ellisianus, somewhat resemble H. annosum but have different hosts:
the first favors ash trees, while the second grows on buffalo berry (a shrub).
579
580 POLYPORACEAE & ALLIES
white to yellowish, but aging grayish and sometimes with a greenish covering of algae.
Flesh thick, white, cheesy when young but chalky or friable (crumbly) in mature or old
specimens; odor farinaceous; taste very bitter. PORES 34- per mm, white or whitish when
fresh, discoloring in age or drying; tube layers each 3-20 mm long, often stratified. ST ALK
absent. SPORE PRINT whitish; spores 4-5.5 * 3-4 microns, broadly elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Solitary or several on living and dead conifers; common year-round
throughout much of the W est, especially on larch and pine, but also on spruce, fir, hemlock,
and Douglas-fir. It apparently does not occur in our area, but I have seen it on sugar pine
and ponderosa pine on the slopes of theSierraNevada.Itis said to be one of the three major
destroyers of standing coniferous timber in the West (Phellinus pini and Phaeolus
schweinitzii are the other two). It causes “felted heart rot,” an extensive carbonizing trunk
rot with thick mycelial mats often several feet long.
EDIBILITY: Friable but not fryable—it is inedible due to the bitter taste and tough
texture, but has been used as a laxative and quinine substitute. (It does not have anti-
malarial properties, but was thought to because of its taste.) Since the fruiting bodies often
grow high above the ground, commercial “quinine” collectors used to dislodge them with
rifles.
COMMENTS: Also knownas Laricifomes officinalis and Forties officinalis, this destruc¬
tive conifer-killer is easily recognized by its pale color, chalky white flesh, bitter taste,
and sometimes massive size. New fruiting bodies are convex, but add layers yearly until
they are hoof-shaped if growing on slash or vertically elongated (cylindrical) if growing
high up on living trees (see photo at top of p. 579). Specimens 60 cm (2 ft.) in height with
more than 70 tube layers have been recorded!
581
582 POLYPORACEAE & ALLIES
applanatum, its pore surface is not white and does not turn brown when scratched. As its
name implies, it has been used for centuries to ignite fires. Since the tubes are not stratified,
they are quite long and readily soak up liquids through capillary action. Chunks of the
tube layer were soaked in a salt peter solution, then dried and used as “matches.”
conifers; widely distributed and common, infecting all important members of the pine
family (pine, Douglas-fir, etc.). Perennial, in our area occurring mainly on pine. It attacks
the heartwood and sometimes the sapwood of living trees, resulting in a delignifying pocket
rot known as “conch rot.” The fruiting bodies are largely confined to older trees, partly
because years of growth must take place before the mycelium can fruit. As a result, the
appearance of a single fruiting body means that extensive heart rot has already taken place
10-15 feet above and below it. This fungus is said to cause more timber loss than any other.
EDIBILITY: Inedible (but see comments on edibility of Fomitopsispinicola).
COMMENTS: The rough unpolished cap, frequently sinuous pores, ochraceous to rust-
colored flesh, and growth on conifers are the fallible fieldmarks of this destructive fungus.
It varies considerably in size, from large hoof-shaped specimens to moderately sized ones
(see photo), to a small thin shelving form that often occurs in fused masses and is considered
a distinct species, P. chrysoloma, by many investigators. Other species: Truncosporademi-
doffii (also known asPulvifomes, Pyrofomes, or Forties juniper inus) is somewhat similar,
but has rusty to reddish-orange flesh and grows only on juniper;/*, texanus resembles a
small P. robustus( see comments under P. gilvus) but also grows on juniper, while a resu-
pinate form of P. robustus with bright yellow-brown flesh often grows on conifers; P.
taxodii causes heart rot in bald cypress; P. nigrolimitatus, common on conifers in the
Rocky Mountains, usually has a spongy upper layer of tissue and fine black lines running
through its flesh; P. torulosus looks like P. gilvus, but has yellow-brown pores and grows
on conifers in Arizona. For hardwood-loving species, see P. gilvus and P. igniarius.
An old Phellinus everhartii(see comments under P. gilvus). Bark protects a tree from infection, but
nailing a signboard to a tree (as shown here) or otherwise defacing it can allow fungal spores to enter!
584 POLYPORACEAE& ALLIES
Piptoporus betulinus. Note the thick blunt margin and recessed pore surface of this unique birch-
loving polypore.
PIPTOPORUS 585
tinder, as a razor strop, and as a mounting medium for pinned insect specimens.
COMMENTS: Formerly known as Polyporus betulinus, this common and distinctive
polypore is easily told by its recessed pore surface with a curblike margin (see photo) plus
its white to tan or grayish-tan color and growth on birch. The fruiting bodies are annual
in the sense that they possess only one tube layer; however, they remain intact for many
months and as a result can be found year-round.
Cryptoporus volvatus can be hoof-shaped (like these specimens here) or spherical. The tube layer is
inside the fruiting body, as shown in sectioned specimen at right.
Close-up of the pore surface in Daedaleopsis confragosa (p. 588). Note how the pores range from
round (bottom left) to elongated or mazelike.
THESE corky or leathery fungi can be told from Trametes and other bracketlike polypores
by the configuration of their spore-producing surface. In Daedalea and Daedaleopsis
(derived from the Greek word daedalus, meaning “maze”) the pores are usually long and
sinuous or mazelike and have relatively few cross-walls. In Lenzitesand Gloeophyllum, on
the other hand, the cross-walls have all but disappeared, leaving plate-like gills instead of
pores! However, the configuration varies considerably, especially in Daedalea and
Daedaleopsis, leading to confusion with numerous other polypores (when the pores are not
distinctly mazelike), and with species such as Phellinus pini, a “conk” with somewhat
sinuous pores.
Like most polypores, the species treated here are too tough to eat. If your polypore has
gills, it should key out here. If it has mazelike pores, however, it may not key out
convincingly, in which case other groups of polypores should be checked.
586
LENZITES, DAEDALEA, & ALLIES 587
4. Underside of cap usually with gills; cap surface often (but not always) with white, yellow, or
orange tones or zones when fresh; very common Gloeophyllum saepiarium & others, p. 590
4. Underside of cap usually with sinuous or mazelike pores; cap dark or dull brown .
.Daedalea berkeleyi (see D. quercina, below)
5. Cap surface decidedly hairy, woolly, or velvety when fresh (but may be nearly smooth in old
or very weathered specimens) .6
5. Cap surface not hairy or only very slightly so when young . 11
6. Underside of cap typically composed of gills or plates (but sometimes varying to mazelike) 7
6. Underside of cap typically composed of elongated pockets or mazelike pores (but sometimes
forming gills or regular pores) .9
7. Gills crisped (crimped), usually forked or shallow and veinlike; cap up to 2.5 cm broad, typically
not zoned concentrically; found on hardwoods in eastern North America .
. (see Plicaturopsis crispa under Schizophyllum commune, p. 590)
7. Not as above; larger or cap concentrically zoned or found on conifers or in West.8
8. Gills often violet-tinged when fresh; cap often grayish to blackish in old age, zoned or unzoned;
typically found on conifers (see Trichaptum abietinus var. abietis under T. abietinus, p. 593)
8. Not as above; cap usually zoned; usually found on hardwoods .Lenzites betulina, p. 589
9. Fruiting body soft or watery when fresh, discoloring rusty or reddish after handling, or if not,
then often quite thick (3-8 cm); fresh pore surface whitish . (see Tyromyces& Allies, p. 597)
9. Not as above; fruiting body usually quite thin and tough when fresh, not soft and watery; pore
surface often gray to brown or blackish, at least in age . 10
10. Cap brown to blackish and velvety when fresh; tubes often unequal in length or appearing slot¬
like (see photo on p. 596) .(see Datronia mollis, p. 595)
10. Cap white to grayish, brown, greenish, etc., usually hairy; tubes often breaking up in age to
form “teeth” . Cerrena unicolor (see Daedaleopsis confragosa, p. 588)
11. Gills when present thick, blunt, and widely spaced (1 mm or more apart); pores when present
1 mm or more broad, the walls thick and blunt . 12
11. Gills when present thinner and closer (less than 1 mm) than above; pores when present smaller
(averaging 1-3 per mm), the walls thin . 14
12. Typically found on hardwoods .Daedalea quercina, below
12. Typically found on conifers (occasionally on hardwoods) . 13
13. Found on juniper .Daedalea juniperina (see D. quercina, below)
13. Found on other conifers; cap often poorly developed .
.(see Coriolellus heteromorpha under Poria corticola, p. 603)
14. Cap white, at least when fresh .Daedaleopsis ambigua (see D. confragosa, 588)
14. Cap pallid to brown, grayish, reddish-brown, etc.Daedaleopsis confragosa, p. 588
588
DAEDALEOPSIS 589
The configuration of the pores is extremely variable, however, leading to confusion with
Lenzites and Gloeophyllum (when they form gills), and dozens of other polypores (when
they are not noticeably daedaloid). This species can usually be recognized, however,
by its relatively thin, corky, fan-shaped, brown to grayish cap with a bald, often zoned
surface. The depth of the tubes and thickness of the cap are also quite variable, depending
on how old the fruiting body is, but the tube walls are never as thick as those of Daedalea
quercina (see photo at top of p. 586). Daedalea confragosa is an older name for it. Other
species: Daedaleopsis ambigua is a similar southern species with a whiter cap. Cerrena
(-Daedalea) unicolor has a thin, hairy, white to grayish (or greenish from a coating of
algae) cap and pallid to grayish or even blackish mazelike pores that often break up to
form small “teeth.” It is common on dead hardwoods in many regions, but not ours. For
other “daedaloid” species, see Daedalea quercina and Gloeophyllum saepiarium.
Lenzites betulina is a common hardwood-loving polypore with a hairy zoned cap and gills instead
of pores. It is often found with Trametes versicolor.
590 POLYPORACEAE & ALLIES
SCHIZOPHYLLUM
SCHIZOPHYLLUM is unique by virtue of its longitudinally split or grooved gills (see
description and photographs). It has few close relatives and is placed in its own family,
the Schizophyllaceae, by most taxonomists. It looks like a polypore, however, and is
treated as one here. One cosmopolitan species is described here.
logs, etc.; distribution worldwide. It survives dry spells by folding back its gills, and hence
can be found practically year-round. In our area it is common on oak, producing a white
rot (delignifying decay) in its host.
EDIBILITY: Too small and tough to be of value. However, some natives of Madagascar
are said to chew them, for reasons unknown.
COMMENTS: The hairy white to grayish cap of this farflung fungus is reminiscent of the
common bracket polypores in the genus Trichaptum. However, the peculiar manner in
which the gills split lengthwise is unique. The “split” gills are actually two adjacent plates
which separate and roll up in dry weather, thus protecting the spore-bearing surface
(see photographs). Specimens sealed in a tube in 1911, then moistened 50 years later,
unrolled their gills and began shedding spores! Schizophyllum has been widely used in
genetic studies because it fruits readily in the laboratory. Trogia(-Plicaturopsis) crispa of
eastern N orth America is a related mushroom with crisped (wavy) gills and a tough, hairy,
tan to yellowish cap.
Schizophyllum commune. Left: Mature specimens. Cap color ranges from pure white to brownish or
grayish. Right: A close-up of the “split” gills.
Pits
592 POLYPORACEAE & ALLIES
GROUPED here are a number of smallish tough or leathery bracket fungi. The fruiting
bodies are much thinner than those of the perennial polypores or “conks,” and are not soft
and spongy when fresh as in Tyromyces. In age the tube walls may break up to form small
“teeth,” but do not normally form the mazelike pattern characteristic of Daedalea and
Daedaleopsis.
The various genera treated here are not closely related and can easily be distinguished
by pore (not spore!) color. The most common genus, Trametes, usually has a zoned cap
and white to dingy buff pores. Trichaptum, also abundant, has violet to brownish pores,
while Bjerkandera and Datronia, with brownish to gray or black pores, and Pycnoporus,
with brilliant red to orange pores, are less frequent.
All five genera feed largely on dead wood—logs, branches, even twigs. They are by
far the most numerous polypores, often completely smothering their substrate in hundreds
of shelving fruiting bodies arranged in attractive clusters or rosettes. Unfortunately, they
are not tender enough to eat. Six widespread species are described here.
10. Cap smooth (bald) or nearly so, or if not then growing on living cypress or juniper and causing
a brown rot .(see Tyromyces & Allies, p. 597)
10. Not as above; cap hairy or velvety; very common, usually on dead wood . 11
11. Cap typically lacking marked concentric zones, grayish to ochraceous to tan or tawny; found
mainly on poplar, willow, or birch; not common .(see Tyromyces & Allies, p. 597)
11. Cap usually zoned and/or differently colored; very common on many trees (including poplar,
willow, and birch) . 12
12. Cap typically 2-7 (10) cm broad, usually with zones of contrasting colors; surface velvety or
with velvety zones alternating with silky-smooth zones . Trametes versicolor, p. 594
12. Cap 2.5-10 cm broad or more, usually hairy throughout, the zones not sharply contrasting
in color .Trametes hirsuta & others, p. 595
Trichaptum (-Hirschioporus) abietinus is abundant on rotting conifers. Note hairy white cap. The
fertile surface is violet-tinged when fresh and features pores, tiny spines, or even gills!
Trametes (- Coriolus) versicolor. This picture shows why it is called the “Turkey Tail.” Multi-colored
zones on the cap are distinctive.
594
Trametes hirsuta. This species resembles T. versicolor, but is not as colorful and is often larger.
HABIT AT: S olitary or more often in groups, fused rows, or overlapping clusters on dead
hardwoods (or occasionally conifers); widely distributed throughout the northern hemis¬
phere. It occurs year-round in our area on oak, alder, and other hardwoods, but is rather
uncommon, at least in comparison to T. versicolor. Like the latter species, it causes a
general delignifying decay of the sapwood and sometimes parasitizes fruit trees.
EDIBILITY: Tough and hairy (but see T. versicolor for cooking suggestions).
COMMENTS: This lesser known cousin of T. versicolor is thicker and often larger than
that species, but not as brightly colored. Also, the cap is hairier. T. occidentalis is a very
similar, slightly larger species with a southern and tropical distribution. It is so similar,
in fact, that the two may very well be forms of a single wide-ranging species. For a list of
synonyms for T. occidentalis, see p. 550. Lenzites betulina looks quite similar from the top,
but has gills on the underside of the cap. Other species: T. velutina is very similar, but has a
more velvety cap and its pores are often smoky-tinged; T. pubescens is smaller and has a
white to grayish-yellow, silky-hairy cap with a radially striate margin plus a somewhat
fleshier texture when fresh; both occur on hardwoods and are widely distributed.
Datronia mollis
FRUITING BODY annual; bracketlike or at times resupinate; tough when fresh or dry.
CAP (when present) 1-7 cm broad, shelflike and often wavy; surface umber-brown and
velvety when fresh but becoming smooth and dark brown to blackish in age; usually zoned
concentrically. Flesh thin, tough, pale brown, often separated from the velvety surface
595
Left: Close-up of slotlike pores of Datronia mollis. Right: Dark gray pore surface of Bjerkandera
adusta.
by a thin dark line. PORES 1-2 per mm, often becoming elongated and sinuous (slot¬
like); brown, but covered with a hoary bloom when fresh that gives them a grayish appear¬
ance, the bloom rubbing off easily (i.e., surface bruising brown); tubes 0.5-5 mm long.
STALK absent. SPORE PRINT whitish; spores 8-11 * 2.5-4 microns, cylindrical, smooth.
HABITAT: Usually in groups on dead hardwoods, but also reported on conifers; widely
distributed and fairly common, but often overlooked because of its small size. In our area
I have found it several times in the winter and spring on dead oak. It causes a delignifying
decay of the sapwood.
EDIBILITY: Unknown, but like myself, too small, thin, and tough to bother with.
COMMENTS: Formerly known as Trametes mollis and Daedalea mollis, this small,
nondescript hardwood-lover is best recognized by its thin, tough, velvety cap and grayish
to brown, slotlike pores (see photograph). It is most likely to be confused with Bjerkandera
species, but has larger pores and a thinner cap.
In both species, but particularly B.fumosa, a thin dark line separates the pores from the
flesh. Intermediate forms occur, however, and it is questionable whether the two are
distinct. Cerrena unicolor (see comments under Daedaleopsis confragosa) is somewhat
similar, but its grayish to blackish spore-bearing surface usually breaks up into small
flattened “teeth”; it is widely distributed on hardwoods.
Fruiting body typically small to medium-sized (occasionally large) and annual; usually soft, watery,
spongy, or cheesy when fresh, becoming tougher in age; growing shelflike or bracketlike on wood.
CAP usually dull colored (white, gray, etc.), cottony or hairy to smooth, usually not zoned. Flesh
usually white, pallid, or pale brown. PORES minute to fairly large, usually white, pallid, or yellow
when fresh, but sometimes bruising darker. STALK absent or rudimentary or present only as a
narrowed, lateral extension of the cap. SPORE PRINT white or bluish (when obtainable); spores
usually smooth and cylindrical or sausage-shaped.
Fruiting body spongy, watery, or cheesy when fresh and quickly staining rusty-reddish or red¬
dish-brown when handled or in age (especially the pore surface) or staining yellow and then
rusty-reddish; usually found on dead conifers . 3
Not as above (but pore surface may stain pinkish-red if found on dead hardwoods) .4
Pores averaging 3-5 per mm, usually staining yellow before reddening .... T.fragilis, p. 600
Pores averaging 1-3 per mm, reddening directly . . . T. mollis & others (see T. fragilis, p. 600)
Upper layer of cap very soft(marshmallow-like) whenfresh(but may toughen in age); cap often
elongated and narrow, its margin often projecting below the pore surface; found only on dead
mountain conifers (usually above 4,000 ft.) .T. leucospongia, p. 600
Not as above . 5
Tube walls soon breaking up to form spines or “teeth”; cap white to ochre .6
Not as above (but tube walls may sometimes be toothlike or partially toothlike in old age) . 7
Found on conifers; “teeth” 5-10 mm long Spongipellis pachyodon(see T. leucospongia, p. 600)
Found mainly on hardwoods (rarely conifers); “teeth” 1-5 mm long; cap hairy, white, leathery;
flesh very thin .Irpex lacteus
Either pore surface staining dark brown to gray or black when bruised or dried and fruiting body
often large or forming white to creamy rosettes on tropical and subtropical hardwood stumps
and roots or fruiting body with very dense, heavy flesh that dries bone-hard; usually growing
in groups or clusters . (see Polyporus, Albatrellus, & Allies, p. 554)
Not as above . 8
Cap small (up to 4 cm), with a narrowed stemlike base T.floriformis (see T. chioneus, p. 599)
Not as above . 9
Found on incense cedar; fruiting body fairly large (7 cm broad or more when mature) and pore
surface usually yellow or yellowish when fresh . T. amarus, p. 601
Not as above (usually found on a different host) . 10
Found on cypress or juniper (usually living); fruiting body very tough or corky, even when
fresh .T. basilaris(see T. chioneus, p. 599)
Not as above; usually found on a different host . 11
Fruiting body leathery or corky when fresh; cap lacking scales and usually bald or nearly bald,
often concentrically zoned or furrowed near margin; pores varying from mazelike to round,
sometimes staining pinkish-red when bruised; found almost exclusively on hardwoods ....
.(see Daedaleopsis confragosa & others, p. 588)
Not as above . 12
Pores fairly large (usually averaging 1 mm broad or more in widest dimension) . 13
Pores smaller (averaging 1-5 per mm) . 15
Pores hexagonal or angular and usually arranged in radiating rows, or if not then cap ochre-buff
to tan, often with darker scales; rudimentary stalk often present; found on or near hardwoods
.. (seePolyporus, Albatrellus, & Allies, p. 554)
Not as above; cap smooth or hairy but not normally with scales . 14
Cap 4-30 cm broad and 3-8 cm thick, spongy or watery when fresh, the margin usually thick;
found on hardwoods. T. unicolor (see T. leucospongia, p. 600)
Not as above . 15
Cap often poorly developed or rudimentary; tubes often unequal in length; pores large or
small .(seePoria& Allies, p. 602)
Not as above; cap usually well-developed and pores small . 16
Fruiting body tough (corky or leathery) even when fresh; pore surface often grayish to smoky-
brown in age or when dry; found mainly on poplar, willow, or birch . 17
Not as above; fruiting body usually watery, spongy, or cheesy whenyoung( but often toughening
in age); found on a variety of hosts . 18
Odor aniselike when fresh; cap hairy or smooth . Coriolellus (-Trametes) suaveolens
Odor not aniselike; cap hairy . Funalia trogii
Odor fragrant when fresh and taste not bitter; usually found on hardwoods T. chioneus, p. 599
Odor not fragrant and/ or taste bitter; found on hardwoods or conifers . 19
TYROMYCES & ALLIES 599
19. Taste bitter; usually found on conifers .. T. guttulatus & T. stipticus (see T. chioneus, below)
19. Taste not bitter; on hardwoods or conifers T. tephroleucus & others (see T. chioneus, below)
600
Tyromyces (-Spongiporus) leucospongia has a unique cottony or marshmallow-like texture. Note
how the margin of the cap extends over the pore surface.
601
602 POLYPORACEAE & ALLIES
THIS large group of polypores is distinguished by its resupinate fruiting body: a simple
layer of tubes devoid of cap and stem. In several other genera the fruiting body is some¬
times resupinate—especially when growing on the undersides of logs—but in Poria it is
nearly always resupinate.
Because they lack both a cap and stem, Porias are among the most lackluster of fleshy
fungi—they just lie there on their logs, listless and limpetlike, unobtrusively going about
their business while boletivores and polypores blatantly go about theirs. They usually
grow on dead wood and play an important role in the forest ecosystem. A few are pests of
structural timber in mines, cellars, and other dank places where the dismal, abysmal
conditions are to their liking.
More than 150 species of Poria have been described from North America, but identi¬
fication is a difficult, tedious, and time-consuming task. Like Polyporus and Pomes,
Poria has been split into several smaller genera on the basis of microscopic and chemical
characters beyond the scope of this book. Two representative species are described here,
and a few others are keyed out plus several resupinate species that belong to other genera.
They represent but a fraction of the total number, however, and serious students will want
to consult the technical literature on the subject. If the fruiting body is tough and possibly
perennial, check the key to the conks (Ganoderma, Fomitopsis, Phellinus, & Allies).
Key to Poria & Allies
1. Spore-bearing surface composed of meandering veins that form shallow pits .
. (see Stereaceae & Allies, p. 604)
1. Spore-bearing surface composed of a layer of tubes (pores) or sometimes “teeth” . 2
2. Spore-bearing surface soon breaking up into small “teeth” and/ or violet-tinged when fresh 3
2. Spore-bearing surface not normally violet-tinged or composed of “teeth” .4
3. Spore-bearing surface violet-tinged when fresh . (see Trametes & Allies, p. 592)
3. Spore-bearing surface white or pallid .(see Tyromyces & Allies, p. 597)
4. Pore surface and/or flesh pink to orange, salmon, or reddish . 5
4. Not as above; pore surface white to yellow or some shade of brown or gray . 7
5. Pores large (typically at least 1 mm broad); found on conifers (see Phaeolus alboluteus, p. 571)
5. Pores minute (3-7 per mm); found on hardwoods or conifers . 6
6. Pore surface dark reddish-orange; fruiting body cheesy when fresh; pores scarcely visible
(averaging 7-9 per mm); found mainly on hardwoods .P. spissa
6. Not as above; pore surface pink to salmon or brick-red .Chaetoporus euporus & others
7. Flesh yellow-brown to rusty-brown, dark brown, etc. 8
7. Flesh white to creamy, straw-colored, yellowish, or beige (at least when fresh) . 10
8. Found on charred conifers; pores fairly large (1 -2 per mm) and usually hexagonal; fruiting body
not normally perennial . Coriolellus carbonarius (see Poria corticola, p. 603)
8. Not as above . 9
9. Fruiting body either dark brown to black, hard, often cracked and cankerlike, and usually found
on birch or fruiting body growing in sheets under the bark of living oak .
.(see Phaeolus, Inonotus, Coltricia, & Allies, p. 566)
9. Not as above; fruiting body usually perennial, quite tough or woody .
.(see Ganoderma, Fomitopsis, Phellinus, & Allies, p. 574)
10. Found on living cypress or juniper (causing a brown rot) . . . (see Tyromyces & Allies, p. 597)
10. Not as above . 11
A member of the Poria corticola group. Note the absence of both cap and stem—most Porias consist
solely of a layer of tubes.
11. Fruiting body hard or woody even when fresh, the margin often incrusted; usually perennial
.(see Ganoderma, Fomitopsis, Phellinus, & Allies, p. 574)
11. Not as above . 12
12. Rudimentary cap often present; tubes often unequal in length . 13
12. Not as above . 14
13. Pores large (1-3 mm in diameter) .... Coriolellus heteromorpha (see Poria corticola, below)
13. Pores smaller .Coriolellus sepium & others (see Poria corticola, below)
14. Pore surface bright yellow; found on dead conifers.P. xantha(see P. corticola, below)
14. Not as above (pore surface may be yellowish, but not bright yellow) . 15
15. Fruiting body sometimes growing from an underground “tuber”; uncommon P. cocos, p. 604
15. Not as above; very common . 16
16. Pores averaging 4-6 per mm; fruiting body often perennial (with more than one tube layer)
. Perenniporia subacida (see Poria corticola, below)
16. Pores larger than above and/ or fruiting body not perennial P. corticola & many others, below
603
604 POLYPORACEAE & ALLIES
THIS is a very difficult and immense group of very simple, less-than-immense fungi with a
smooth to wrinkled, veined, or warty spore-bearing surface. They can be found almost
anywhere, at almost any time, and play an integral role in the breakdown of wood and
plant material. Some forms, such as Stereum, mimic polypores by fruiting in shelving
masses on wood, but the majority (Corticium, Peniophora, etc.) are resupinate, i.e., they
form crust- or parchment-like sheets on logs or stumps. Others form small, tile-like
plaques (Xylobolus), “whitewash” sticks and branches, or cause dark discolorations on the
bark of trees. Still others cause serious damage to structural timber (e.g., rickety bridges
and rotting rafters), and a few, such as Cotylidia, are stalked or branched and/ or grow
on the ground. Whatever their shape and growth habit, however, they all differ
fundamentally from the polypores by virtue of their relatively unspecialized spore-
producing surface—in other words, they lack a layer of tubes and pores.
Most of the crust and parchment fungi were originally classed together in a single
family, the Thelephoraceae. On the basis of various chemical and microscopic features
several families are now recognized: the Stereaceae, Corticiaceae, Coniophoraceae,
Hymenochaetaceae, etc. As relatively few are conspicuous or fleshy enough to warrant
attention from the average mushroom hunter and even fewer can be accurately identified
without painstaking microscopic examination and still fewer are edible, only a very very
few are described here.
STEREACEAE & ALLIES 605
away in narrow zones to reveal the reddish-brown to dark chestnut-brown cap cuticle;
margin often orange to golden or tawny, especially when young or growing; overall color
thus variable: orange-brown to reddish-brown to cinnamon when moist, but appearing
buff to grayish or paler from the hairs when dry; in old age sometimes greenish from algae
or even blackish. Flesh thin, tough. UNDERSIDE smooth to slightly bumpy or cracked
(when dry), sometimes exuding a red or yellow liquid when cut (fresh); color variable:
orange to dull orange-buff or tawny to ochraceous, varying to buff or pinkish-buff, some¬
times zoned concentrically, often browner or darker toward the base; in old age often dark
brown to chestnut-brown. STALK absent or present only as a narrowed lateral base.
SPORE PRINT white; spores 5-8 * 2-3.5 microns, cylindrical, smooth.
HABITAT: In groups, rows, fused masses, or dense overlapping clusters on hardwood
sticks, fallen branches, logs, stumps, etc., occasionally on living trees or conifers; widely
distributed and extremely common. Found in our area year-round, especially on dead oak.
Trametes, Lenzites, and/or Tremella species often co-inhabit the same piece of wood.
EDIBILITY: Like myself, too thin and too tough to be edible.
COMMENTS: This omnipresent little bracket fungus can be mistaken for the turkey tail
(Trametes versicolor), but a close inspection of the spore-bearing surface reveals the
complete absence of tubes or pores. The above description is rather lengthy because it
encompasses a number of confusing forms that are sometimes recognized as distinct
species. For instance, the common North American variety with a bright orange to
orange-buff spore-bearing surface has been called S. complicatum and S. rameale.
Another variety, S. gausapatum, “bleeds” red when cut, others exude a yellow juice,
while typical S. hirsutum does not bleed at all. However, these “species” grade into each
other, making a neat, clean separation almost impossible. As a group they can be
recognized easily by their omnipresence (in the hardwood forests of California they
outnumber even Trametes versicolor), the reddish-brown cap cuticle (best seen by sec¬
tioning the fruiting body) beneath the hairs, the frequent orange to yellowish tones on
the cap margin or underside, and the smooth spore-bearing surface.
Other species: S. fasciatum (-S. ostrea, S. lobatum) differs microscopically, but can
usually be told by its slightly larger caps (1 -7 cm broad) that are more prominently zoned
(dark reddish and brown) and usually form individual brackets rather than fusing, and
buff to cinnamon-buff underside; it, too, is common on hardwoods, especially oak.
S. (- Haemalostereum) sangunolentum is one of the few widespread Stereums to grow on
conifers. When fresh its fertile surface “bleeds” dramatically when cut, sometimes even
staining one’s hand. Hymenochaete tabacina resembles the S. hirsutum group in shape
and color, but its tissue blackens in potassium hydroxide (KOH). H. rubiginosa also
blackens in KOH but has a velvety, rusty-brown to chestnut-brown to blackish cap and
rusty-brown underside. Both of these favor oak. Chondrostereum purpureum is purple
when fresh and often resupinate; it parasitizes apple and plum trees, causing “silver leaf’
606
STEREUM 607
disease, but is also frequent on other trees (including oak in our area). Laxitextum bicolor,
found on hardwoods, has a brown cap and white to pale buff fertile surface. Peniophora
gigantea forms a paper-thin crust on dead conifers. Veluticeps berkeleyi has a minutely
bristly fertile surface and grows on both hardwoods and conifers, but favors ponderosa
pine. Dozens of other species also occur.
Stereum striatum
FRUITING BODY very thin, leathery and pliant when fresh, annual but persistent;
bracketlike to cuplike. CAP 0.3-3 (4) cm broad but sometimes fused laterally to form lines
10 cm long or more; flat and circular to fan-shaped in outline or if small, often conical
(inverted cup-shaped); surface dry, whitish to buff or pale brown, sometimes zoned con¬
centrically when moist; covered with long, loosely-arranged white hairs which usually
point toward the margin (var. ochraceoflavum) or the hairs pressed against the cap to give
it a silky-shiny striate appearance (var. striatum). Flesh very thin, tough. UNDERSIDE
(fertile surface) smooth, buff to pale brown or in some forms yellow to yellow-brown,
sometimes fading in age to whitish, sometimes zoned concentrically. STALK absent or
present only as a small knob or “umbo” on top of the cap. SPORE PRINT whitish; spores
5-8.5 * 2-3.5 microns, cylindrical, smooth.
HABITAT: In groups or masses on dead branches and twigs (rarely logs) of hardwoods;
widely distributed. Variety ochraceoflavum can be found year-round in our oak wood¬
lands, but is shrivelled up and inconspicuous in dry weather. Variety striatum occurs in
eastern North America on hornbeam (Carpinus).
EDIBILITY: Not edible.
COMMENTS: Like myself, this species is too tough, too thin, and too small to be edible.
Unlike myself, it contents itself with unambitious undertakings—decomposing branches,
sticks, and lopped-off limbs—while leaving the larger stumps, logs, and standing trees
to the polypores and other bracket fungi. Variety ochraceoflavum (-S. ochraceoflavum)
can be distinguished from the more common S. hirsutum group by its duller, paler color
and thinner, more pliant cap with long white hairs pointing toward the margin, plus the
absence of a red-brown cap cuticle. V ariety striatum(-S. sericeum) is easily told by its silky-
striate cap. At least two growth forms of var. ochraceoflavum occur in our area: a small
one with a concave spore-bearing surface and a somewhat conical cap less than 1 cm
broad that is usually attached by its top to small twigs; and a larger one with a flatter cap
that usually inhabits larger sticks and branches and is often partially resupinate.
Stereum striatum is common on sticks and branches of various hardwoods. Note the long hairs that
protrude from cap.
Left: Top view of Cotylidia diaphana (this specimen has several caps). Center: Underside of Cotylidia
diaphana. Right: Thelephora terrestris group. Note how underside is darker than that of Cotylidia.
608
Left: Thelephora terrestris group, top view of a compound fruiting body. Right: At top is Thelephora
pa/mata—note its flattened branches. At bottom are small specimens of the Thelephora terrestris
group.
609
Left: Radulum orbiculare (see comments below) forms sheets of irregularly warted or lumpy tissue.
Right: The veined underside of Merulius tremellosus (see comments under Serpula lacrymans).
Phlebia radiata
FRUITING BODY annual, resupinate (lying flat on substrate), sometimes with a free
margin but no cap or stalk; soft when fresh, tough in age. FERTILE SURFACE usually
fused to form patches 30 cm or more long, but often with smaller, discrete systems of
radiating wrinkles or warty veins 1 -4 cm broad; flesh-colored to bright orange to pinkish-
red, fading to whitish in old age. U nderside of margin (if free) with white woolly hairs. Flesh
thin, rather soft or slightly gelatinous when fresh, tough in age or when dry. SPORE
PRINT whitish; spores 3.5-7 * 1-3 microns, sausage-shaped or elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: On fallen logs and branches of both hardwoods and conifers; widely dis¬
tributed. I find it occasionally on oak logs in the fall and winter.
EDIBILITY: Inedible. It looks as if it has already been eaten (see comments).
COMMENTS: Also known as P. merismoides, this species is unique by virtue of its
resupinate, orange to pinkish fruiting body with radiating wrinkles. Its overall appearance
is somewhat reminiscent of regurgitated dog food, and a similar species, Radulum
orbiculare, has an irregularly lumpy or warty spore-producing surface that is distinctly
reminiscent of regurgitated dog food. Other species: Punclularia strigoso-zonata is also
similar, but has concentric wrinkles and furrows instead of radiating ones; it grows on
dead hardwoods.
610
SERPULA 611
cubical blocks, eventually reducing it to a fine, dark powder. A related species, S. himan-
tioides, turns up occasionally in the wild (on dead conifers), as do Merulius species (see
comments).
EDIBILITY: Utterly and indisputably inedible.
COMMENTS: One of the few fleshy fungi that lives up to the label fungus in its most
pejorative sense—odious, insidious, hideous, obnoxious, downright abominable. Once it
gains a foothold it is hard to eradicate because the often gigantic, padlike fruiting bodies
exude great quantities of water, stimulating further fungal growth. The mycelial strands
spread with astonishing rapidity. Like a horde of hungry army ants in search of food, they
will overrun anything and everything in their way: bricks, stones, tiles, plaster, drain
pipes, wires, leather boots, cement floors, books, tea kettles, evencorpses. Forafascinating
account (and pictures) of some of its more heroic feats, see John Ramsbottom’s
mycological treasure trove, Mushrooms and Toadstools.
The veined or honeycombed network of large, irregular, shallow “pores” is characteristic
of Serpula (colored spores) and Merulius (white spores). Both are now quite rightfully
placed in families of their own, apart from other crust and parchment fungi. Other species:
Cortiophora puleana (“Wet Rot”) is another pest of structural timber; it has a similar
growth habit but has an irregularly wrinkled to bumpy fertile surface. Merulius tremellosus
(see photo on p. 610) has an orange to orange-buff to pinkish, veined or honeycombed fer¬
tile surface and a hairy white cap or free margin; it grows in the wild, mainly on dead hard¬
woods. M. incarnatus is an eastern species with a bright coral-pink cap and paler, duller,
honeycombed or veined fertile surface. Several other species differ microscopically.
Teeth Fungi
HYDNACEAE spores
As their name implies, the teeth fungi produce their spores on pendant spines or “teeth”
(see Color Plate 159). The fruiting body is usually stipitate (equipped with a cap and stem),
with the spines lining the underside of the cap. Hericium, however, grows on wood and has
spines which hang like icicles from a rooting base or network of branches, and several
others are shelflike, i.e., with a cap but no stalk. Those that grow on the ground can be tough
and quite reminiscent of polypores (Hydnellum and Phellodon) or fleshy, brittle, and
agaric-like (Hydnum and Dentinum).
The teeth fungi include many highly distinctive mushrooms and some strikingly
beautiful ones. They are most common and diverse in northern pine and spruce forests, but
relatively sparse in our area. Hericium and Dentinum are excellent eating and have the
added advantage of being virtually unmistakable. Most of the others are either too tough or
too bitter (or too tough and too bitter) to eat.
Just as all the boletes were once lumped together in Boletus, so all the teeth fungi were
originally placed in a single genus, Hydnum. Several families and genera are now
recognized based on differences in the shape and texture of the fruiting body and color and
ornamentation of the spores. However, to facilitate identification all of the teeth fungi
have been retained here in a single family, divided into the five groups keyed below.
2. Fruiting body rubbery and flexible, small (cap typically 5 cm broad or less), translucent white
to watery gray or with a brownish cap; stalk lateral (attached to side of cap); spines minute
and very short . (see Pseudohydnum gelatinosum, p. 671)
2. Not as above . 3
3. Growing on wood .4
3. Growing on ground (or rarely on very rotten wood) . 5
4. Fruiting body a branched framework or unbranched cushion of tissue from which spines are
suspended (i.e., icicle-like); lacking a distinct cap .Hericium, p. 613
4. Fruiting body resupinate (i.e, crustlike or sheetlike) or more often with a cap (clearly defined
upper sterile surface), the spines lining the underside of the cap Echinodontium Sc Allies, below
5. Fruiting body tough and fibrous or woody or if soft and spongy then with a tough, fibrous inner
core (especially in stalk); fruiting body sometimes encompassing needles and other debris as it
grows; surface of cap often roughened irregularly by projecting spikes, lumps, warts, ridges,
pits, etc.; stalk continuous with cap and sometimes not well-defined; flesh sometimes showing
zones or lines when fruiting body is sliced open lengthwise Hydnellum& Phellodon, p. 622
5. Not as above; fruiting body fleshy and usually brittle (not spongy or woody), not typically
absorbing needles and other debris as it grows; cap smooth, cracked, or scaly but not normally
roughened by projecting spikes, lumps, pits, or ridges; stalk usually well-defined; flesh not
often zoned by lines.Hydnum, Dentinum, & Allies, p. 616
THESE shelving mushrooms are more likely to be mistaken for polypores than for other
teeth fungi. However, they bear their spores on numerous downward-pointing spines
instead of in tubes or pores. They differ from the genus Hericium in possessing a clearly
defined, sterile upper surface (cap) and fertile lower surface (spine layer). Several diverse
genera are keyed below. They are not closely related but share a similar growth habit. Only
one species is described, the others being rare or absent in the West. None are wortheating.
HERICIUM
Medium-sized to very large fleshy fungi growing on wood. FRUITING BODY usually white to
yellowish or pale salmon, branched or unbranched but lacking a distinct cap; spores borne on
clusters or rows of delicate hanging spines. SPORE PRINT white. Spores more or less round,
smooth or minutely roughened, amyloid.
Key to Hericium
1. Fruiting body unbranched, consisting of a tough cushion of tissue from which long (2-7 cm)
spines are suspended (but spines short in one eastern variety); found on hardwoods, especially
oak .H. erinaceus, 615
1. Fruiting body branched, the spines hanging from the branches or branch tips (sometimes
scarcely branched and very compact, but if so, then usually growing on conifers) .2
2. Growing on conifers in western North America; fruiting body white to salmon- or yellowish-
tinged when fresh .H. abietis, below
2. Growing mainly on hardwoods; fruiting body white when fresh (but may turn yellowish in
age); widely distributed . 3
3. Spines rather short (3-10 mm), arranged in rows along the branches (like teeth on a comb);
branching usually open rather than compact; fruiting body often delicate H. ramosum, p. 615
3. Not as above; spines often long (up to 4 cm), arranged mostly in tufts or clusters, especially
at the branch tips; branching open or compact .H. coralloides {see H. abietis, below)
Left: Hericium ramosum is the most delicate species in its genus. It favors dead hardwoods. Right:
Hericium erinaceus has long spines hanging from an unbranched cushion of tissue. It favors living or
recently killed hardwoods.
Hericium erinaceus. Note how long the spines are in this rather small specimen.
developing a rather sour, unpleasant taste in age. Slow cooking is called for and the base
should not be eaten—it’s so tough that it’s difficult to remove from the tree without a knife!
COMMENTS: The unbranched white to yellowish fruiting body and long, slender spines
distinguish this impressive fungus from its relatives. Though hardly common, it is more
numerous in our area than the branched Hericiums and is one of our most distinctive
wood-inhabiting fungi. Gigantic specimens weighing several pounds each are not un¬
common. An unbranched version completely covered with small short spines occurs on
hardwoods in eastern North America, but I have not seen it in the West.
HEDGEHOG mushrooms are the best known and most common of the teeth fungi, and
as a group are easy to recognize. The fruiting body has a well-defined cap and stalk and
might be mistaken for a gilled mushroom but for the layer of delicate spines or “teeth”
on the underside of the cap. Also significant is the texture of the flesh: fleshy or firm but
brittle, rather than tough and pliant or leathery or woody as in the other major genera of
terrestrial teeth fungi (Hydnellum and Phellodon).
In the small but common genus Dentinum, the spores are white and smooth, the spines
white to pale orange, and the cap usually smooth. In the larger genus Hydnum, the spores
are brown and warty, the spines are variously colored but usually darker than in Dentinum,
and the cap is often scaly. A third genus, Bankera, has a brownish fruiting body and white
roughened spores but is relatively rare, at least in the West.
Although there is no doubt as to what hedgehog mushrooms are, there is, as usual,
considerable controversy as to what hedgehog mushrooms should be called. Some
mycologists campaign for the use of Hydnum instead of Dentinum, and the creation
of the genus Sarcodon to account for the Hydnums of this book. A “correct” classi¬
fication of the teeth fungi may not be essential to your well-being (it certainly isn’t to
616
HYDNUM, DENTINUM, & ALLIES 617
mine), but please bear in mind that the exacting specialists owe their livelihoods to the
resolution of such matters—and that they are doing their best. Giving even tacit approval
to one system of classification at the expense of another is thus transformed into an act of
inordinate importance, with the taxonomist’s professional reputation at stake. Why they
can’t arrive at a consensus is anyone’s guess—but since when do human beings agree on
anything? I for one find them (human beings, that is) even more perplexing and mystifying
than mushrooms!
Dentinums are delicious and a good choice for beginners since nothing poisonous
remotely resembles them. Hydnums, on the other hand, though sometimes beautiful,
are mostly bitter-tasting or of unknown edibility.
Both Dentinum and Hydnum species are strictly woodland fungi with rather erratic
fruiting habits. Lor instance, in Lebruary and March of 1975 Dentinums were out¬
rageously abundant on the poison-oak-shrouded hillsides of our coastal pine forests.
While barely denting the crop I managed to harvest and can over 200 pounds, which I am
still enjoying today. Lor several years thereafter, however, they were practically absent
in the same area, then produced another stupendous crop in 1981. Similarly, I did not find a
single Hydnum fuscoindicum in our area until 1979, when it fruited by the dozens under
tanoak and madrone. Live distinctive hedgehog mushrooms are described here and
several others are keyed out.
11. Fruiting body developing greenish-olive tones in old age or when dried; flesh often becoming
greenish also; not common.H. fumosum
11. Not as above . 12
12. Flesh staining lilac, purplish, purple-gray, pinkish, or vinaceous when cut (quickly or quite
slowly) and/ or fruiting body often with vinaceous or purplish tints; widely distributed but
especially common in the West ... 13
12. Not as above; cap pale to dull brown or dark reddish-brown, quite hard and woody when dried;
fairly common under conifers in eastern North America, also reported from the Pacific
Northwest and California.H. stereosarcinon
13. Cap smooth to felty or conspicuously cracked but not truly scaly, reddish-brown to grayish-
brown, vinaceous, grayish, or darker; taste mild to somewhat farinaceous or occasionally
bitter . 14
13. Cap usually with scales, brownish-orange to dark brown, grayish-brown, or pinkish-brown;
taste usually bitter .H. subincarnatum (see H. scabrosum group, p. 620)
14. Cap and stalk often with vinaceous or purplish tints; cap often conspicuously cracked(areolate)
in age; common in western North America . . H. rimosum (see H. scabrosum group, p. 620)
14. Cap grayish to grayish-brown or reddish-brown, smooth to minutely areolate (cracked) in age;
widespread but not common (at least in West) H. laevigatum{ see H. scabrosum group, p. 620)
15. Cap some shade of brown at maturity (the margin often paler), not normally scaly but usually
with needles and other debris adhering to the surface; found under conifers (usually pine) in
eastern North America, but rare in West .Bankera fuligineo-alba
15. Not as above; cap more or less grayish-brown, often cracked or scaly in age; widespread but
not common. Bankera carnosa(-B. violescens?)
colored chanterelle when first spotted amongst the needles and humus. However, the
white to pale orange spines on the underside of the cap immediately distinguish it, making it
one of the safest of all edible mushrooms. The cap color, though variable, is typically some
shade of pale orange to pinkish-orange to reddish-tan, with wounded areas darker orange.
The white form (var. album) does not seem to occur in our area, but is common farther
north under conifers, especially Sitka spruce. Other species: Var. macrosporum has larger
spores but is otherwise similar; D. umbilicatum is a closely related, equally edible conifer-
lover with a smaller (usually less than 5 cm) umbilicate cap, a slimmer stalk (typically less
than 1 cm), and larger spores. It is similar in color and widely distributed, and sometimes
mingles with D. repandum. Two edible white or whitish southern species should also be
mentioned: D. albomagnum and D. albidum. The first has a mild taste and non-staining
flesh, while the latter has an acrid taste and smaller spores.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but of poor quality. Many collections have a bitter taste and par¬
boiling does not necessarily help, plus it causes indigestion in some people. The European
version is apparently better because it is often sold in markets there.
Hydnum imbricatum is easily told by the large brown to blackish scales on the cap, which make it look
like a charred macaroon. See color plate for close-up of spines, which range from grayish to brown.
620 HYDNACEAE
Hydnum rimosum (see comments under H. scabrosum group) is not nearly as scaly as H. imbricatum,
but the surface of its cap often cracks in age.
HYDNUM 621
acrid) taste, is not normally olive at the stem base, and has a vinaceous- or purple-tinged
cap that usually develops cracks in age but is not scaly when young. It is fairly common
under conifers in the Pacific Northwest, and I have found it in our area in the winter and
in the Sierra Nevada in the spring. Finally, there is H. laevigatum, a widespread but
infrequently-encountered species that has a smooth to minutely cracked cap and, like
H. rimosum, often stains purplish when cut open. None of these are worth eating.
Left: Hydnum calvatum group. Note small flattened scales on cap. Right: Underside of Hydnum
fuscoindicum (see description on p. 622). Entire fruiting body is deep purple to black in this beautiful
and unmistakable hedgehog mushroom.
622 HYDNACEAE
THESE tough or woody, terrestrial teeth fungi occur primarily in coniferous forests.
They have both a cap and stalk, but the latter is sometimes present only as a poorly-defined
tapered base. Many species have the general aspect of a polypore, but a closer look reveals
the presence of spines rather than pores on the underside of the cap, although the spines
are sometimes so short and blunt that they look like minute warts.
The fruiting body develops and decays over a long period of time, frequently engulfing
needles, twigs, and other debris in the growth process. If there is a dry spell, growth may
cease, then begin anew around the margin of the cap when it is damp again. As a result the
cap frequently has an irregular or somewhat misshapen appearance; several caps may fuse
HYDNELLUM & PHELLODON 623
together or arise in a rosette from a common stem, and their surfaces are often pitted,
ridged, or lumpy. This indeterminate growth pattern plus the tough and pliant to fibrous
or woody texture separate Hydnellum and Phellodon from the fleshier, more brittle
hedgehog mushrooms (Hydnum and Dentinum). In many Hydnellums and some Phello-
dons the cap is spongy or felty to the touch when young or actively growing, and is
sometimes beaded with colored droplets. However, beneath or within the spongy-felty
outer layer there is a tougher, corky or woody-fibrous core, particularly in the stalk. The
flesh thus has two distinct layers of different textures, i.e., it is duplex.
Hydnellum contains about 50 species in North America. They are medium-sized to
fairly large and have brown spores. Phellodon includes only a handful of species, but some
of them are quite common. They are distinguished from Hydnellum by their white spores
and smaller size. Neither genus is common in our area but both are prominent farther
north. Because of their indeterminate growth most species vary tremendously in their
appearance according to environmental conditions. It is therefore imperative, when using
the following key, to have several specimens in hand if at all possible. Seven species are
described fully and others are keyed out. All are much too tough and/or bitter to eat.
12. Odor sweet and/or taste of flesh very acrid (peppery); cap beaded with bright red to dark red
droplets in wet weather .H. peckii &l others, p. 627
12. Cap not beaded with red droplets, or if so then taste not typically acrid nor odor sweet ... 13
13. Cap usually small (6 cm or less); stalk often slender (less than 1 cm thick); spore print white 14
13. Mature cap often more than 5 cm broad; stalk often thick; spore print brown or brownish 15
14. Spines pale cinnamon to brown at maturity; cap usually zoned .P. tomentosus, p. 628
14. Spines grayish at maturity .P. confluens{see P. tomentosus, p. 628)
15. Stalk exuding yellow juice when broken or crushed (if fresh); cap pale to dark brown, or some¬
times also with yellow-brown tones and exuding a brownish juice when fresh . . H. mirabile
15. Not as above . 16
16. Cap smooth or radially ridged but not lumpy, warty, or spongy, often zoned concentrically (see
Color Plate 157) with various shades of brown, cinnamon-brown, pinkish-brown, etc.; stalk
not spongy or bulbous .H. zonatum (see H. scrobiculatum, p. 627)
16. Not as above . 12
17. Associated with hardwoods (mainly oak) in eastern North America . 18
17. Associated principally with conifers; widely distributed . 19
18. Stalk very spongy and swollen or bulbous; cap and stalk brown to rusty-brown or cinnamon-
brown and finely hairy or velvety; common .H. spongiosipes
18. Not as above; cap very dark brown to blackish in old age .H. piperatum
19. Cap sometimes beaded with pinkish droplets in wet weather; odor typically mild or faint but
not farinaceous; common under pines in northeastern North America .
. H. pineticola (see H. peckii, p. 627)
19. Cap sometimes beaded with red to dark red droplets in wet weather; odor usually farinaceous;
widely distributed under various conifers . H. scrobiculatum & others, p. 627
625
Hydnellum aurantiacum looks like a terrestrial polypore, but has minute spines on underside of cap
instead of pores. Lumpy specimen on right is young and actively growing.
626
HYDNELLUM 627
AURISCALPIUM
THIS genus contains a single odd species with a worldwide distribution. It is not closely
related to other stalked teeth fungi. In fact, microscopic characters suggest a possible
relationship to the agaric genus Lentinellus.
COMMENTS: The small size and growth on decaying cones plus the thin, hairy, lateral
stem and fine spines that line the underside of the cap are the forthright fieldmarks of
this unique, petite fungus. The stem, though lateral, may occasionally appear to be central
when the cap is deeply indented. The stem is usually longer than the width of the cap and
far thinner than that of any other fungus with spines. The dark color and small size make
it very difficult to see unless you are specifically looking for it.
630
Left: Clavaria vermicularis has unbranched but clustered fruiting bodies (it is also shown on p. 637).
Right: Ramaria stricta, one of many species with a branched fruiting body.
2. Fruiting body entirely brownish-black to black or blackish beneath a white powdery coating or
entirely green to olive or blue-green or interior with large chambers or compartments or para¬
sitic on insects, spiders, or truffles; spores borne asexually or inasci (see Ascomycetes, p. 782)
2. Not as above (may be white, but if so then not powdery); spores borne on basidia . 3
3. Fruiting body tough, the flesh pithy, stringy, or punky; apex often enlarged; usually 7 mm thick
or more .Clavariadelphus, p. 632
3. Fruiting body typically fragile or if tough then much smaller; mostly less than 7 mm thick; apex
acute or blunt or occasionally enlarged . Clavaria & Allies, p. 634
4. Fruiting body small and tough with very thin, almost hairlike branches, brown to grayish-brown
to dark brown or purple-brown; growing on twigs, needles, etc.; rare (mostly tropical) Pterula
4. Not as above; common . 5
5. Fruiting body consisting of numerous flattened, wavy, ribbonlike, or leafy segments or lobes
arising from a common base; rather tough; overall color white to creamy, yellowish, or tan;
growing at or near the bases of trees and stumps . 6
5. Not as above . 7
6. Found on hardwood stumps or roots in tropics and along Gulf Coast; fertile surface usually
developing pores, spines, or “teeth” in age . . . (seePolyporus, Albatrellus, & Allies, p. 554)
6. Not as above; common and widespread .Sparassis, p. 657
7. Fruiting body bright yellow to orange; spore print white, or if not then branches usually viscid;
spores smooth; typically growing on wood . Clavaria & Allies, p. 634
7. Not as above . 8
8. Branch tips crownlike (in the form of small fringed cups); spore print white; growing on wood
. Clavulina& Allies, p. 640
8. Not as above .9
9. Fruiting body bright yellow to orange when fresh and small (typically 2-7 (10) cm high) . . 10
9. Not as above . 11
10. Stalk slender and not particularly fleshy; branches often hollow and/or viscid; spore print
white or yellowish; extensive mycelial mat typically absent . Clavaria & Allies, p. 634
10. N ot as above; stalk thick and fleshy or if not, then an extensive mat of mycelial threads usually
present at base and in substrate; spore print buff to tan, yellowish, or ochre Ramaria, p. 645
11. Branches tough, usually flattened, grayish-brown to dark brown to purple-brown (but tips
often pallid when growing); odor typically garliclike or fetid (see Thelephorapalmata, p. 609)
11. Not as above . 12
631
632 CLAVARIACEAE
12. Spore print creamy to yellow, tan, yellow-orange, or ochraceous (rarely white); fruiting body
medium-sized to fairly large, often brightly colored, or if dull colored then usually with a large
fleshy base (stalk); fertile surfaces staining greenish to blue in ferrous sulfate Ramaria, p. 645
12. Spore print typically white; fruiting body rather small to medium-sized, white or dull-colored
(grayish, brownish, tan, bluish-gray, or tinged purple); base typically not large and fleshy; fertile
surfaces typically not staining green or blue in ferrous sulfate . . . Clavulina & Allies, p. 640
THESE are rather tough, club-shaped fungi with a smooth or somewhat wrinkled spore¬
bearing surface. They are larger and thicker than most fairy clubs (Clavaria & Allies)
and not nearly so fragile. In C. truncatus and its close relatives the apex of the club
is flattened and sterile—in other words, a rudimentary cap—but in the other species it is
typically rounded, pointed, or only slightly flattened.
Club corals are harmless but rather tough, stringy, and/ or bitter-tasting. They grow
only in the woods and in our area fruit mostly during cold weather. Three widespread
species are described here. If your “club coral” is small and irregularly shaped, check the
earth tongues (on p. 865) as well as Clavaria & Allies (p. 634).
Key to Clavariadelphus
1. Fruiting body with a consistently flattened (truncate) or depressed apex or even a rudimentary
cap; associated with conifers . 2
1. Not as above; apex of fruiting body rounded to obtuse or pointed, or if sometimes flattened
then associated with hardwoods .4
2. Upper portion of fruiting body red to reddish-orange C. lovejoyae (see C. truncatus, p. 634)
2. Not as above; upper portion of fruiting body orange to yellow, ochre, etc.3
3. Spore print pale ochre .C. truncatus, p. 634
3. Spore print white.C. borealis (see C. truncatus, p. 634)
4. Apex of fruiting body usually with a sharply defined point or “nipple”; associated with conifers
. C. mucronatus (see C. ligula, p. 633)
4. Not as above; apex rounded to bluntly pointed or somewhat flattened .5
5. Associated mainly with hardwoods; mature fruiting body 1-3 cm thick and 6-20 cm or more
high .C. pistillaris & others, below
5. Associated with conifers; mature fruiting body up to 1.5 cm thick and typically 2-10 cm high
.C. ligula & others, p. 633
EDIBILITY: Harmless. The taste and texture are reminiscent of stale rope.
COMMENTS: The ochre-brown to flesh-colored, club-shaped fruiting body that stains
brown when handled is characteristic of this cosmopolitan club coral. It is the commonest
Clavariadelphus in our area and the only one found under hardwoods. Its apex is some¬
times quite broad, but not as flagrantly flattened as that of C. truncatus. Other species:
C. subfastigiatus is a brownish-orange species found under conifers in northern California
and elsewhere; it does not discolor as much when handled and turns bright green in
potassium hydroxide (KOH).
THESE are primitive fungi with an erect, relatively unspecialized fruiting body. The most
common forms are unbranched and smaller, slimmer, and frailer than the club corals
(Clavariadelphus). They are sometimes confused with earth tongues—which are tougher,
often flattened and velvety, and capitate (with a cap distinct from the stalk)—and which
belong to an entirely different group of fungi, the Ascomycetes. Fairy clubs often grow in
clumps, but the individual clubs do not usually arise from a fleshy base as in the branched
corals (Clavulina, Ramaria, etc.). The few branched species are not as fleshy as Ramarias
and usually more vividly colored than Clavulina, Ramariopsis, and Clavicorona.
Clavaria and Clavulinopsis are the two most common genera of fairy clubs, but their
defining features are esoteric, involving the presence or absence of carotenoid pigments,
clamp connections, and the behavior of nuclei in the basidia. For the sake of convenience
they are treated together here, along with several other small, miscellaneous genera (Multi-
clavula, Macrotyphula, and Typhula).
Fairy clubs are too small and fragile to have any food value, but they are an attractive
addition to our woodland decor. They are saprophytic on humus, soil, or occasionally grass
and decaying wood. In our area they fruit—as do most of the Clavariaceae—from late fall
through early spring. Seven species are described here.
CLAY ARIA & ALLIES 635
15. Fruiting body branched .Clavulinopsis umbrinella & others (see C. corniculata, p. 639)
15. Fruiting body unbranched or occasionally branched very sparingly (but often growing in
tufts or clusters) . 16
16. Fruiting body small (up to 2 cm tall), white, the apex broadly enlarged; growing on needles,
twigs, etc. Clavicorona taxophila(see Multiclavula mucida, p. 636)
16. Not as above . 17
17. Fruiting bodies very fragile, crumbling easily, pure white to translucent white or yellow-stained,
not prominently wrinkled; tip acute or sometimes blunt but not broadly enlarged; often
growing in tufts or clusters; very common .Clavaria vermicularis, p. 637
17. Not with above features . 18
18. Fruiting body very long (tall) and narrow (7-30 cm high; 2-8 mm thick); yellowish to brown;
not normally growing in clusters .Macrotyphula fistulosa(see M. juncea, p. 636)
18. Not as above . 19
636 CLAY ARI ACE AE
19. Growing on wood; fruiting body more or less clublike, the surface often roughened, 1-4 cm high
and 0.5-1 cm thick; spores borne inside asci .(seePodostroma alutaceum, p. 879)
19. Not as above; usually growing on ground . 20
20. Fruiting body 0.3-1.5 cm thick, texture tough; flesh white and pithy or stringy; color variable:
buff to yellowish or some shade of brown, but not white orgray; typically growinginduff under
conifers, often in troops .(see Clavariadelphus, p. 632)
20. Fruiting body usually 2-7 mm thick and/or differently colored, usually fragile.21
21. Fruiting body white and sparingly branched; branches thick, hollow, blunt, somewhat gelati¬
nous; found under hardwoods in eastern North America .. (see Tremellales& Allies, p. 669)
21. Not as above .22
22. Fruiting body fragile, usually tufted or clustered, grayish to yellowish-gray to pinkish-gray
or dingy flesh-colored; basidia typically 4-spored . Clavaria fumosa & others, p. 638
22. Not as above; fruiting body tough, or if fragile then differently colored (white or tinged gray or
buff); basidia typically 2-spored .(see Clavulina & Allies, p. 640)
small beadlike body or sclerotium); it has also been placed in Clavaria and Clavariadelphus
and may eventually merit a genus of its own. Other species: M. fistulosa (-Clavaria¬
delphus fistulosus) has a very long (7-30 cm), slender (2-8 mm), hollow fruiting body
that is yellowish to brownish; it grows on dead sticks and debris, especially of alder.
637
638 CLAVARIACEAE
Clavulinopsis corniculata
FRUITIN G BODY branched (sometimes sparingly) from a common base or stalk, usually
small and delicate-looking; 2-9 cm high and broad (but usually 2-5 cm). BRANCHES
smooth, mostly hollow, bright yellow to yellow-orange or egg-yellow to deep ochraceous,
sometimes fading when dry or in age to creamy-buff; tips acute. STALK 2A mm thick,
colored like branches or duller, often with a coating of downy mycelium at base. Flesh
rather tough, thin, whitish; odor mild or farinaceous; taste mild or bitter. SPORE PRINT
white; spores 4.5-7.5 microns, round or nearly round, smooth, apiculate.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups on ground or dead wood in forests and at
their edges, in grassy areas, etc.; widely distributed. I have found it locally under cypress
and oak in December and January, accompanied by C. laeticolor and numerous waxy
caps (Hygrocybe and Camarophyllus species).
EDIBILITY: Probably edible, but too small to be of value.
Clavulinopsis corniculata is a small brightly colored branched species. Both specimens shown here
are elaborately branched, but some specimens havea well-developed“stalk” with only a few branches.
640 CLAVARIACEAE
COMMENTS: The bright yellow to ochre color and modest size make this branched coral
fungus fairly easy to recognize. Other yellow to orange coral and club fungi are either
unbranched (see C. laeticolor) or much larger and fleshier (see Ramaria). The jelly fungus
genus Calocera is somewhat similar, but usually has a viscid fruiting body. Other small
branched species include: C. umbrinella (-Clavaria cineroides), a dingy buff to grayish
or brownish species with round spores and several primary branches that arise from a
common base or “trunk,” occasional in our area in the fall and winter(usually in forests),
but more widely distributed; C. holmskjoldii, which resembles C. umbrinella but has
purplish branch tips and an aniselike odor when fresh; C. dichotomaand C. subtilis, which
are both white to faintly yellowish; and Clavulina (-Clavaria) ornatipes, with pallid to
pinkish-gray to brownish branches and a hairy brown stalk or “trunk.”
THIS is a motley, artificial grouping of mostly white or dingy colored, branched coral
fungi. Their overall aspect is intermediate between that of the fairy clubs (Clavaria &
Allies) and the Ramarias. The pale or dingy color, white spores, and moderate size dis¬
tinguish them from most Ramarias, while the branched fruiting body separates them
from most fairy clubs.
The most common of the genera treated here is Clavulina, which has smooth spores and
2-spored basidia. In Ramariopsis, also common, the spores are minutely ornamented and
the basidia are 4-spored. In Clavicorona the fruiting body grows on wood and typically has
crownlike branch tips and amyloid spores, while Tremellodendropsis has tough, usually
flattened branches and basidia which appear partially partitioned.
The species treated here are probably edible, but are not as fleshy or desirable as the
Ramarias. In addition, some are quite tough while others are exceedingly fragile. They fruit
primarily in the woods. Five species are described and several others are keyed out.
6. Fruiting body branched, but stalk usually at least half the total height; color of brownish; taste
often bitter and/ or stalk with brown hairs; basidia 4-spored . (see Clavaria & Allies, p. 634)
6. Not as above . 7
7. Fruiting body white or pallid (or tinged buff, gray, or pinkish) .8
7. Fruiting body darker (gray to brownish-gray, bluish-gray, purplish-gray, etc.).
. Clavulina cinerea, below
8. Fruiting body unbranched or sparingly so .. Clavulina rugosa(see C. cristata group, below)
8. Fruiting body branched .9
9. Fruiting body profusely branched, fragile; branch tips typically neither toothed nor enlarged
.Ramariopsis kunzei, p.643
9. Fruiting body branched (but at times rather sparingly so), fragile to rather tough; branch tips
often toothed and / or enlarged . Clavulina cristata group, below
Tremellodendropsis tuberosa
FRUITING BODY rather sparsely branched from a tough base (stalk) or sometimes
scarcely branched; 2-7 (10) cm high, 0.5-4 cm broad. BRANCHES usually somewhat
flattened (especially the lower ones), erect, tough, whitish to buff, brownish, or grayish,
sometimes with a purple or pinkish tinge (caused by a parasite?); tips often paler and
brighter (whiter) when actively growing. ST ALK well-developed, usually one-third to one-
half the height of fruiting body; colored like branches or paler, often with a coating of
white mycelial down. Flesh white, tough, not staining. SPORE PRINT white; spores
13-20 x 4.5-6.5 microns, elongated-elliptical or spindle-shaped, smooth. Many or all of
the basidia appearing partially septate (partitioned) longitudinally at their apices.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups on ground in woods or clearings; widely distributed. Itis
fairly common in coastal California in the late fall and winter, especially with bracken fern,
redwood, or cypress, but is easily overlooked because of its humble appearance.
643
Tremellodendropsis tuberosa is best recognized by its tough texture, pale color, and upright branches.
THESE are brittle or pliant fungi with elaborately branched fruiting bodies. They repre¬
sent an evolutionary advancement over the simpler coral fungi or fairy clubs (Clavaria
& Allies) insofar as branching greatly increases the available surface area on which to
produce spores. (The same can be said for the teeth fungi (Hydnaceae), except that their
“branches” hang downward and are called spines.)
Ramaria can be distinguished from other branched coral fungi (see Clavulina & Allies)
by its tan to ochraceous or orange-yellow spores (which are usually ornamented with
minute warts, spines, or ridges) and frequently colorful fruiting body. Virtually every hue
is represented, with yellow, orange, red, pink, and tan predominating. It is easily the most
attractive and prominent group of coral fungi, and never fails to attract the attention of
collectors. However, it is also the largest and most complex group, with over 35 species
in California, many more in the Pacific Northwest, and at least 100 in North America.
To facilitate identification, Ramaria can be crudely divided into two groups: medium¬
sized to large, terrestrial species with a fleshy, gelatinous, or brittle fruiting body (e.g.,
R. botrytis)\ and wood- or duff-inhabiting species with a fairly small, slender, pliant-tough
fruiting body (such as R. stricta, and the small, smooth-spored “satellite” genus Lenlaria,
which intergrades with Ramaria). However, pinpointing the exact identity of a species
within either group is a difficult task, even for a specialist. In part this is because of
the nature of the fruiting body—aside from color and texture, there are few criteria by
which to separate species in the field. As a result, certain names have been applied indis¬
criminately to a slew of similar—but autonomous—species. Any attempt to correct this
trend short of an exhaustive study of Ramaria would only contribute to the confusion.
Therefore, the descriptions offered here are rather broad in scope. This may not satisfy
/fa ma n'tf-researchers, but it will enable collectors to refer most of the Ramarias they find to
a species group or “complex” without resorting to detailed microscopic study and special
chemical tests. Besides, it is not necessary to know the exact identities of these coral fungi
to appreciate their beauty. The manner in which they arise from the murky depths of the
forest floor is indeed reminiscent of corals.
Ramarias are a popular group for the table, probably because they are so distinctive
and none are known to be dangerously poisonous. Only the large, fleshy species are worth
collecting, but some are bitter or prone to attack by fungal parasites such as Hypomyces
transformans, and all are apt to be riddled with maggots and are difficult to clean. A few
(notably R. gelatinosa and the R. formosa group) are mildly poisonous, and even the
so-called “edible” species have a laxative effect on some individuals. Therefore it is best
to sample each type cautiously (if at all) and not to overindulge.
Ramarias are woodland fungi. The slender, pliant forms are saprophytic on humus and
wood and are especially common under conifers. The large fleshy types are usually terres¬
trial and may or may not be mycorrhizal. In the Pacific Northwest they are partial to
hemlock and other conifers, in our area they favor tanoak, and in the Rocky Mountains
they gravitate toward spruce, but are by no means restricted to these habitats. Only eleven
species are described here but a number of others are keyed out. Most of them occur in the
Pacific Northwest because that region is particularly rich in Ramarias. (The key is based
on my own field experience plus information in The Ramarias of Western Washington by
Currie Marr and Daniel Stuntz, and Trial Key to the Species of Ramaria in the Pacific
Northwest, by Kit Scates.)
646 CLAVARIACEAE
Key to Ramaria
1. Growing on wood . 2
1. Growing on ground (or occasionally on very rotten wood) . 5
2. Branches pale yellow to tawny-buff, orangish, or pinkish-tan, the tips yellow at first; spores
warty.R. stricta, p. 648
2. Not as above; fruiting body pallid to buffy-tan, pinkish-tan, reddish-brown, brown, or darker,
(occasionally yellowish but then spores smooth); branch tips not usually yellow when fresh 3
3. Taste acrid (peppery); branches usually with a pinkish tinge, becoming darker (reddish-brown)
in age .R. acris (see R. stricta, p. 648)
3. Not as above; branches pallid to pinkish-tan, buffy-tan, brown, greenish-tinged, etc.4
4. Fruiting body creamy to yellowish or pinkish-tan (branch tips sometimes greenish); spore print
whitish and spores smooth . . . Lentaria byssiseda & L. pinicola (see Ramaria stricta, p. 648)
4. Fruiting body buffy-tan to pinkish-tan to brown or darker (sometimes greenish-tinged); spore
print yellowish to ochraceous and spores ornamented . . R. apiculata (see R. stricta, p. 648)
5. Fruiting body pliant and rather tough, small or medium-sized (rarely taller than 10 cm); stalk
or “trunk” slender to practically absent, with a mat of conspicuous white mycelial threads
attached to the base and/ or permeating the substrate (see photo on p. 650) . 6
5. Fruiting body medium-sized to large; mycelial mat absent, or if present then not as above
(sometimes tough and pliant but usually fleshier) . 8
6. Spore print whitish; fruiting body creamy to pinkish-tan or yellowish, sometimes with greenish
tips; often found near wood or in lignin-rich humus .
.Lentaria byssiseda & L. pinicola (see Ramaria stricta, p. 648)
6. Spore print yellowish to ochraceous; fruiting body pallid to yellowish, ochraceous, cinnamon-
tan, etc., sometimes with greenish stains; found in duff . 7
7. Fruiting body (or at least the lower branches) bruising or aging blue-green to olive-green,
especially in cold weather .R. abietina, p. 650
7. Not as above . R. myceliosa & others, p. 649
8. Flesh in base of stalk rusty to rusty-brown when cut open lengthwise (i.e., vertically) .9
8. Not as above . 11
9. Branches orange to pinkish or pinkish-red .R. amyloidea
9. Branches creamy to yellow or yellow-orange . 10
10. Branches whitish to pale yellow with whitish tips . R. velocimutans
10. Branches yellowish to yellow-orange with yellow tips. R. celerivirescens
11. Branches white to creamy when fresh', tips similarly colored or pinkish to purplish, brick-red,
orangish, brownish, or yellowish-buff (but not yellow); fruiting body often (but not always)
compact when young; flesh in base not gelatinous or semi-gelatinous .40
11. N ot as above; branches darker or more brightly colored when young and fresh or tips yellow or
flesh gelatinous to semi-gelatinous . 12
12. Odor fragrant, like cocoa butter; branches pinkish-lavender to vinaceous or duller; found in
eastern North America .R. cacao
12. Not as above . 13
13. Branches dingy-colored (yellow-brown to olive-brown or olive-gray, etc.) with a distinct violet
tinge to lowermost ones (when fresh) and/or upper stalk; base (stalk) usually well-developed
and fleshy (see photo on p. 651) . R.fennica, p. 650
13. Not as above (but branches may be entirely violet or have violet to vinaceous stains) .... 14
14. Branches entirely violet to lavender when fresh (but may fade or discolor in age) . 15
14. Branches differently colored (but may have some vinaceous or purplish stains) . 16
15. Spore print white; base not particularly fleshy.(see ClavulinaSt Allies, p. 640)
15. Spore print yellowish to ochre; base usually fleshy .R. fumigata & others, p. 651
16. Branches red to coral-red, rose-pink, scarlet, or magenta when fresh; branch tips not yellow,
of if yellow then branches red ... 17
16. Branches differently colored (pink to orange, salmon, yellow, brown, etc.); tips yellow or not
yellow . 18
RAMARIA 647
17. Branches usually red to coral-pink when fresh; flesh in base of stalk not amyloid .
.R. araiospora & others, p. 655
17. Not as above .R. stuntzii& others (see R. araiospora, p. 655)
18. Branch tips blunt and conspicuously swollen (like the fruiting body of a Clavariadelphus) 19
18. Not as above . 20
19. Branches white to yellowish or becoming tan; widespread but not common . . R. obtusissima
19. Branches tan to dull grayish-orange; taste often bitter; found in the Pacific Northwest .
.R. claviramulata
20. Base or lower branches covered with a cottony white tomentum (fuzz), or if not then branches
or stalk often hollow . 21
20. Not as above . 23
21. Fruiting body consisting of a dense bundle of upright, slender, sparsely or densely branched
“stems” arising from a common base; branches (“stems”) salmon to yellow-orange to peachy
with yellow tips when fresh (sometimes with purplish stains), pliant to somewhat waxy and
often hollow; widely distributed under both hardwoods and conifers.R. conjunctipes
21. Not as above . 22
22. Branches yellow or pale yellow; odor often fragrant or pungent-sweet .
.R. cystidiophora & R. synaptopoda (see R. sanguinea group, p. 653)
22. Not as above; differently colored or soon becoming so. 23
23. Flesh in base (stalk) gelatinous or showing gelatinous streaks or pockets when sliced open or
if not gelatinous then cartilaginous (tough and brittle) . 46
23. Flesh in base firm or fibrous or with watery areas, but not gelatinous or cartilaginous ... 24
24. Branches brown to dark brown with white or pallid tips when fresh; found in eastern North
America . R. grandis
24. Not as above . 25
25. Base or stalk (and sometimes the branches) staining brown to reddish-brown to wine-red,
violet, or blackish when bruised (often already with vinaceous to reddish-brown stains) . 26
25. Not as above; fruiting body not staining appreciably when bruised . 30
26. Branches becoming yellow-brown to reddish-brown in age; branches and base staining reddish-
brown to brown when bruised; found under conifers in the Pacific Northwest .
. R. testaceoflava (see R.formosa group, p. 654)
26. Not as above; branches usually lighter or brighter in color, at least when fresh; common . 27
27. Branches and tips yellow to creamy . R. sanguinea group, p. 653
27. Branches pinkish to orangish or yellow-orange, the tips sometimes yellow . 28
28. Fruiting body with a yellow zone or band near ground level (on lower branches or just below),
at least when young and fresh .R. sandaracina (see R. gelatinosa, p. 655)
28. Not as above . 29
29. Fruiting body staining brown to blackish, at least at base .R.formosa group, p. 654
29. Fruiting body staining wine-red to burgundy, at least at base .
. R. rubribrunnescens & R. maculatipes (see R.formosa group, p. 654)
30. Fresh branches and branch tips bright orange to yellow-orange with a distinct yellow zone or
band just below them (near ground level) . . R. aurantiisiccescens (see R. rasilispora, p. 652)
30. Not with above features (but may have some of them) . 31
31. Branches and branch tips bright orange to deep orange to yellow-orange or pinkish-orange 32
31. Not as above (but branches may be pinkish or orangish with yellow tips) . 34
32. Branches yellow-orange when young and fresh, becoming pale or dull orange in age. 37
32. Branches bright orange to deep orange or pinkish-orange when fresh but not yellow-orange 33
33. Branches bright orange to deep orange in all stages R. largentii (see R.formosa group, p. 654)
33. Branches usually scarlet to pinkish or pinkish-orange, at least when young and fresh .
.R. stuntzii, R. subbotrytis, & R. cyaneigranosa (see R. araiospora, p. 655)
34. Odor usually fragrant; branches yellow becoming yellow-brown in age; fruiting mainly in the
fall under conifers . R. flavobrunnescens (see R. rasilispora, p. 652)
34. Not as above . 35
648 CLAVARIACEAE
35. Branches orange to pinkish or pinkish-tan, the tips usually yellow or yellowish when fresh
.R. formosa group & others, p. 654
35. Not as above . 36
36. Branches yellow to yellow-orange or whitish with yellow tips (when fresh) . 37
36. Branches differently colored (usually dull) . 39
37. Found under hardwoods in eastern North America .... R. aurea (see R. rasilispora, p. 652)
37. Found under both hardwoods and conifers; common in western North America . 38
38. Fruiting body with a large, broad, conical or steeply tapered, rooting base; upper branches
never orange when fresh; found under northern and mountain conifers in the spring or
summer.R. magnipes (see R. rasilispora, p. 652)
38. Not as above; fruiting body with a large or small base and with yellow to orangish branches;
found in above habitat and season as well as many others .R. rasilispora, p. 652
39. Branches yellow-brown to orangish-brown or duller even when fresh (sometimes with a purplish
tinge); branches typically erect and slender; taste usually bitter when cooked; common under
conifers in the Pacific Northwest .R. acrisiccescens (see R.fennica, p. 650)
39. Not as above . 40
40. Fruiting body compact, creamy to tan, dingy yellow-brown, or cinnamon-buff; taste mild;
spores not striate; found in eastern North America . R. caulifloriformis
40. Not with above features; widespread and common . 41
41. Branch tips typically pinkish when young but soon fading so that the mature fruiting body is
entirely white or creamy; spores striate; found under conifers in the Pacific Northwest .
.R. rubrievanescens (see R. botrytis, p. 656)
41. Tips never pinkish, or if pinkish when young then retaining their color longer; spores striate
or not striate . 42
42. Base with reddish-brown or vinaceous stains or staining these colors when bruised; branch
tips whitish to yellow; spores not striate R. vinosimaculans (see R. sanguinea group, p. 653)
42. Not as above . 43
43. Odor usually pungently sweet; branch tips dull orange to brownish, yellowish-buff, or whitish
when fresh; spores striate .R. strasseri & others (see R. botrytis, p. 656)
43. Odor mild, or if sweetish then branch tips differently colored; spores striate or not . 44
44. Fruiting body whitish with yellow to creamy-yellow tips, at least while under the duff (often
yellower or brighter in color when exposed); spores not striate R. rasilispora & others, p. 652
44. Not as above; branch tips usually pinkish to reddish or purplish, at least when young .... 45
45. Taste typically mild (occasionally bitter or acrid); spores striate; very common .
.R. botrytis & others, p. 656
45. Taste typically bitter to very bitter; spores not striate or only obscurely so; widespread but not
particularly common .R. botrytoides (see R. botrytis, p. 656)
46. Fruiting body brownish-yellow to tan or yellowish-tan; flesh cartilaginous.
.R. cartilaginea (see R. gelatinosa, p. 655)
46. Not as above; differently colored and/ or flesh in base gelatinous or semi-gelatinous .47
47. Branches usually yellow or yellow-orange .R. flavigelatinosa (see R. gelatinosa, p. 655)
47. Branches creamy to pinkish, orangish, brownish, etc., but not yellow (but fruiting body may
have a yellow zone just below branches) . 48
48. Fruiting body usually with a yellow zone or band near ground level (near bases of branches),
at least when young.R. gelatiniaurantia & R. sandaracina (see R. gelatinosa, p. 655)
48. Fruiting body lacking marked yellow zone .R. gelatinosa, p. 655
staining slowly brown or vinaceous-brown when bruised; branch tips fine, pale yellow to
pale greenish-yellow when fresh. STALK rudimentary or practically absent, not well-
developed. Flesh tough, pliant; odor often faintly sweetish; taste often somewhat metallic
or bitter. SPORE PRINT cinnamon-buff to yellowish; spores 7-10 * 3.5-5.5 microns,
elliptical, minutely roughened.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups or tufts on rotting logs and branches (mostly of hard¬
woods but also conifers); widely distributed. It is common in our area in the late fall and
winter, but seldom fruits in large numbers.
EDIBILITY: Inedible—there is very little flesh and the flavor is not pleasing.
COMMENTS: This is one of several Ramarias that grow on wood, though it may form
“log lines” (i.e., grow in rows originating from buried or extremely decomposed logs). The
upright, parallel orientation of the branches (see photo on p. 631) plus the yellowish branch
tips are distinctive. The form that grows on conifers is often rather bushy and yellowish
when young, while the one that grows on hardwoods is usually oranger. Other wood-
inhabiting species: /?. apiculata favors conifers but is dull buffy-tan to dull orange-brown
or vinaceous-cinnamon (often with whitish tips when young). It is widespread and
common, also bruises brown, and in one form exhibits green to blue-green tints on the
branch tips and/or stalk base. R. acris(-R. rubella) is usually acrid-tasting and pinkish-
tinged when young with paler tips but becomes reddish-brown or darker throughout
in age. Lentaria pinicola and L. byssiseda (both placed in Ramaria by some authorities)
grow on logs (mostly coniferous) or lignin-rich humus and have smooth whitish spores.
The former is tan to yellowish with spores shorter than 10 microns, while the latter is
pallid to pinkish-tan, sometimes has greenish branch tips, and has longer spores. Both
species have white mycelial threads or cottony material at the base; L. byssiseda is espe¬
cially common in the Sierra Nevada (but is widespread). None of these are worth eating.
Ramaria myceliosa
FRUITING BODY abruptly and profusely branched from a slender base (stalk); 2-6 (10)
cm high and broad. BRANCHES slender, spreading, pliant, yellowish to tan, ochraceous,
olive-ochre, cinnamon-buff, or dull orange, etc.; tips same color. STALK slender, pliant,
not very fleshy; same color as branches or paler, with abundant white mycelial threads
(rhizomorphs) attached to base and/or permeating the surrounding humus. Flesh thin,
whitish, pliant; taste usually bitter. SPORE PRINT yellowish or pale ochraceous; spores
3.5-6 * 2-4 microns, elliptical to nearly round, minutely spiny.
HABITAT: Scattered to densely gregarious in duff under conifers; known only from the
west coast, but similar species (see comments) are more widely distributed. In our area it
is often abundant under redwood in the fall, winter, and early spring.
EDIBILITY: Unknown, but hardly worth experimenting with because of its small size
and bitterish taste.
COMMENTS: This is one of several small (usually less than 10 cm high), dull, pliant,
terrestrial Ramarias with a conspicuous white mycelial mat and minutely spiny spores.
Other members of the club include: R. pusilla, an eastern version of R. myceliosa; R.
invalii, with golden to dull yellowish-orange branches and spores 6-8.5 * 4-6 microns;/?.
flaccida, pale creamy-ochre with paler tips and spores 5-8 microns long;/?, suecica, pallid
to pinkish-tan with spores 8-10 microns long;/?, gracdis, with minutely roughened rather
than spiny spores and a frequent licorice-like odor; and/?, murrillii, with cinnamon-brown
to dark reddish-brown branches and a whitish base plus spiny spores, found in south¬
eastern North America. None of these grow on wood like R. stricta and relatives, nor
do they develop the greenish or blue-green stains typical of R. abietina.
Ramaria abietina (-R. ochraceovirens) is an ochraceous species that develops greenish stains in age
or cold weather. Note the extensive mat of white mycelial threads at base of fruiting body.
650
Ramaria fennica is a handsome upright coral fungus. Note the well-developed fleshy base or “trunk.”
Fresh specimens are usually tinged purple at base of branches.
COMMENTS: One of our most lovely coral fungi, this species is easily told by its overall
shape (see photograph) and dull color, plus the subtle violet tinge to the lower branches and
top of the trunk (when fresh). In contrast to many of the larger Ramarias, it is typically taller
than it is wide. R.fennnica var. violaceibrunnea is a more precise name for the west coast
variant. Other species: R. fumosiavellanea is a rare similarly-colored species with a much
smaller base. R. acrisiccescens, called the “Blah Ramaria” by Kit Scates in her extensive
key to Ramarias of the Pacific Northwest, is a common dull-colored species with slender,
erect branches and a slim, tapered base plus an acrid or bitter taste, at least when cooked.
It is common under conifers in the Pacific Northwest, but I have not seen it in our area.
651
Ramaria rasilispora is the most common of several yellow to pale orange coral fungi. Note that the
flesh in sliced specimen is solid and white, not gelatinous.
652
Ramaria sanguinea group. Branches are yellow to nearly white and the base stains reddish or bur¬
gundy when bruised.
653
Ramaria formosa group. Branches are pinkish to orangish and tips are usually yellow when fresh.
654
RAMARIA 655
Medium-sized to large fungi parasitic on the roots of trees (especially conifers). FRUITING BODY
typically a compact mass of flattened, wavy, ribbonlike branches or leafy lobes, often with a tough
rooting base; white to buff or tan. SPORE PRINT white. Spores smooth, elliptical.
THE branched fruiting body with wavy, flattened, leafy or ribbonlike lobes is unique to
Sparassis, and most mycologists now sequester it in a family of its own. Despite the
common name, our species looks more like a giant brain than a cauliflower. It fruits at the
bases of trees (another distinctive feature), appearing year after year in the same spots.
From a size and edibility standpoint, Sparassis is indisputably the king (or queen) of
the coral fungi. It is highly esteemed for its fragrance, flavor, and keeping quality, and I
found it to be a staple item in the monsoon diet of many Himalayan villagers. Only two
species occur in North America, one western and one eastern; a key hardly seems necessary.
COMMENTS: Better known as S. radicata, this fantastic fungus looks more like a
sea sponge or “bouquet of egg noodles” (Alexander Smith) than a cauliflower. The
flattened, ribbonlike lobes or “branches”, plus the overall white to yellowish color and
tough, rooting base distinguish it from other coral fungi. The spicy odor is also distinctive,
but difficult to characterize. In the Pacific Northwest, 20-30(oreven50!) pound specimens
are not unheard of, but in our area the size range is generally 1 -5 pounds—or about the size
of a human head (a cross-section, coincidentally, reveals brainlike convolutions or
“canals”). Certain cup fungi(e.g., Pezizaproteana form sparassoides and Wynneasparas-
soides) sometimes mimic it, but are brown or lilac-tinted and/ or smaller and bear their
spores in asci rather than on basidia (a microscopic distinction). The name S. crispa has
also been applied to the equally edible cauliflower mushroom of eastern North America,
which favors oak and pine, has thicker, more erect, rigid-looking branches or lobes, and
lacks a rooting base. However, recent studies indicate that its “correct” name isS. spathu-
lata or S. herbstii, and that the western species, which has been called S. radicata, is the
“true” S. crispa. (I’m tempted to say that mushroom taxonomy is as intricately twisted
and convoluted as a cauliflower mushroom, but I won’t!)
658
Chanterelles spores
CANTHARELLACEAE
Fairly small to medium-large, mostly terrestrial woodland fungi. FRUITING BODY with a cap
and stalk. CAP typically depressed to vase-shaped or trumpet-shaped at maturity, surface not
typically viscid. UNDERSIDE smooth, wrinkled, veined, or with primitive foldlike, forking,
shallow, blunt, decurrent gills. STALK fleshy or hollow, continuous with cap. VEIL and VOLV A
absent. SPORE PRINT white to buff, yellowish, pinkish, salmon-tinged, or tan. Spores smooth
or roughened, not amyloid. Basidia long and narrow.
THESE are colorful and conspicuous mushrooms with a more or less vase-shaped to
funnel-shaped fruiting body differentiated into an upper or inner sterile surface (the cap)
and lower or outer spore-bearing surface (the hymenium). The latter may be smooth,
wrinkled, veined, or gilled, but the gills when present are foldlike (thick, shallow, blunt,
and usually joined by connecting veins) rather than bladelike and/ or thin-edged as in the
true agarics. The long, narrow basidia and relatively unspecialized hymenium suggest a
kinship between the chanterelles and coral fungi. In fact, if the flattened apex of a club coral
(Clavariadelphus) were broadened into a cap and the wrinkles on its sides amplified, you
would essentially have a chanterelle!
The three principal genera in the Cantharellaceae are treated together here. In
Craterellus the fruiting body is more or less trumpet-shaped and dark brown to gray or
black, and the spores are smooth; in Cantharellus it is broadly convex to plane or vase¬
shaped and often brightly colored, gills are usually present, and the spores are smooth; and
in Gomphus the fruiting body is cylindrical to vase-shaped with a veined or wrinkled
hymenium, and the spores are warted or wrinkled. A fourth genus, Polyozellus, is also
included here though it is usually relegated to a family of its own.
The chanterelles are great favorites with fungophiles. With the exception of the G.
floccosus group, all are apparently edible and many are excellent. The best (and most
plentiful!) of the local species are the renowned chanterelle (Cantharellus cibarius)a.nd the
unheralded but far tastier horn of plenty (Craterellus cornucopioid.es). Both refrigerate
well and are usually maggot-free, and since large crops are commonplace, they can be
preserved for later use. The horn of plenty is excellent dried. Chanterelles, on the other
hand, dry miserably (they become as tough as leather), but can be pickled, canned, or
sauteed and frozen. (Enormous quantities of chanterelles are gathered in the Pacific
Northwest and shipped in brine to Germany—five million pounds annually according to
one estimate!)
The chanterelles are strictly woodland fungi and are saprophytic or mycorrhizal with a
broad range of tree hosts. They are not a particularly large group, but are quite conspi¬
cuous, easy to identify, and have an interesting distribution pattern. Many species are
characteristic components of cold northern and montane coniferous forests—e.g., Gom¬
phus clavatus, G. floccosus, and Cantharellus infundibuliformis. A slew of others favor
the warm hardwood forests of eastern North America—e.g., Cantharellus cinnabarinus,
C. ignicolor, and C. lateritius. But there is a puzzling paucity of species in our area, with
only a few of the truly cosmopolitan ones (like the chanterelle) represented. Nine species
are depicted here (most of them with color plates) and several others are keyed out.
2. Fruiting body small or minute (usually less than 2 cm broad), typically white to grayish- or
brownish-tinged; stalk absent, or if present often short and off-center to lateral; fertile surface
(underside of cap) with meandering veins or shallow gills; growing on sticks, moss, etc.
(not often terrestrial); especially common in northern regions (see Pleurotus &. Allies, p. 132)
2. Fruiting body medium-sized to large, or if small then not as above .3
3. Fruiting body a gilled mushroom (usually Laetarius or Russula) covered by a layer of minutely
pimpled tissue that completely engulfs the gills or makes them look blunt and chanterelle-like;
flesh crisp, brittle, usually white; spores borne inside asci .(see Pyrenomycetes, p. 878)
3. Not as above; surface not finely pimpled; spores borne on basidia . 4
4. Cap dark when fresh (dark gray to dark brown, black, violet-black, or bluish-black) .5
4. Cap brighter or lighter than above (including olive-buff, tan, light brown, etc.) . 11
5. Entire fruiting body deep blue to blue-black or violet-black, usually compound (a cluster of
spoon- or fan-shaped caps); found under northern and montane conifers (especially spruce
and fir) .Polyozellus multiplex, p. 668
5. Not as above (but fruiting body may be black or bluish-gray or more or less funnel- to trumpet¬
shaped, and may occur in clusters) . 6
6. Underside of cap (fertile surface) with distinct gills, the gills often forked .7
6. Underside of cap smooth to wrinkled or with sinuous (squiggly) veins, but lacking gills ... 8
7. Entire fruiting body dark when fresh (colored more or less like cap or the fertile surface some¬
times paler) . Craterellus cinereus & others, p. 665
7. Not as above; either the stalk or gills (or both) yellowish to orange (or stalk with a yellowish to
orange undersurface and darker fibrils) . 17
8. Underside of cap (fertile surface) with prominent veins (at least at maturity); odor sickeningly
sweet in age, or if not then fertile surface usually developing a strong yellowish tinge as spores
mature; not common .Craterellusfoetidus& C. sirtuosus (see C. cinereus, p. 665)
8. Not as above; underside of cap smooth to slightly wrinkled; common .9
9. Fruiting body typically 4 cm or more high when mature, trumpet-shaped to petunia-shaped
or tubular (i.e., hollow nearly to base) . Craterellus cornucopioides & others, p. 666
9. Fruiting body smaller and/ or differently shaped (not hollow); cap margin sometimes white or
pale when actively growing . 10
10. Cap typically less than 2 cm broad and stalk 1 -3 mm thick; fruiting body grayish to brown or
blackish but not chocolate-brown or purple-brown; spores smooth; found in eastern North
America (especially the Southeast) . . . Craterellus calycuius (see C. cornucopioides, p. 666)
10. Not as above; cap up to 5 cm broad (or larger if compound), usually purple-brown to chocolate-
brown (but sometimes grayish-brown) and/ or compound (with more than one cap); cap
margin often fringed; spores often angular or warty . (see Stereaceae & Allies, p. 604)
659
660 CANTHARELLACEAE
11. Fruiting body more or less vaselike and coarsely scaly at the center (or throughout), at least
in age (see Color Plate 174) . 12
11. Not as above; cap smooth or breaking up to form small scales, but not coarsely scaly .... 13
12. Cap reddish to bright orange to orange-buff, at least when fresh (may fade to tan or paler) . .
.Gomphusfloccosus group, p. 661
12. Cap with tan to brown scales, never brightly colored .
.Gomphus kauffmanii(see G. floccosus group, p. 661)
13. Flesh and gills (or underside of cap) white or whitish, but staining purplish to purple-brown
when bruised; cap usually salmon-colored to orange; known only from the Southeast, not
common .Cantharellus (-Gloeocantharellus)purpurascens
13. Not as above (but gills or fertile surface may be purple or purple-tinged). 14
14. Fertile surface and/ or upper stalk purple or with a purplish tinge when fresh\ cap tan to olive-
buff, olive-brown, yellow-brown, or purplish; stalk thick and solid, firm, continuous with cap
(i.e., fruiting body resembling a chopped-off, often lopsided club, at least when young);
found under conifers, often (but not always) in fused clusters . . . Gomphus clavatus, p. 661
14. Not with above features (differently colored or stalk slender and hollow in age, etc.) . 15
15. Fertile surface (underside of cap) with gills (or lacking them only in the button stage), the gills
often forked or with connecting veins . 16
15. Fertile surface (underside of cap) smooth to slightly wrinkled or at times developing shallow
veins at maturity, but lacking gills . 22
16. Fresh fruiting body bright red to pink to orange-red .Cantharellus cinnabarinus, p. 664
16. Fruiting body differently colored (white, yellow, orange, salmon-orange, brown, etc.) ... 17
17. Either growing on wood (or lignin-rich humus) and stalk absent or rudimentary or gills orange
to deep orange and usually dichotomously forked and fairly thin inage and cap often brownish,
at least at the center.(see Paxillaceae, p. 476)
17. Not as above; gills usually blunt and thick (at least when young) and often forked irregularly
(rather than dichotomously), orange to yellow-orange, white, or differently colored .... 18
18. Cap grayish to brown or yellow-brown when young (but may break up into scales or fibrils,
revealing the yellowish to orangish undersurface); stalk often hollow, at least in age .... 19
18. Not as above; cap white, yellow, or orange when fresh (unless faded); stalk hollow or solid 20
19. Stalk brown or with brownish fibrils when young; gills yellowish to orangish; found in eastern
North America . Cantharellus appalachiensis
19. Stalk usually yellowish to orange when young and fresh; gills often with a grayish, brownish, or
purplish tinge; widespread .Cantharellus infundibuliformis group, p. 665
20. Cap white or whitish, sometimes with orange or yellow stains Cantharellus subalbidus, p. 662
20. Cap orange-buff to salmon-buff to ochre-tawny to bright yellow or orange, at least when fresh
(may fade to whitish in sunlight) . 21
21. Stalk slender (usually less than 1 cm thick) and usually hollow in age; flesh very thin; cap smallish;
common in eastern North America .
.Cantharellus ignicolor & C. minor (see C. inf undibuliformis group, p. 665)
21. Stalk slender to very thick (0.5-2 cm or more), solid (unless maggot-eaten); cap medium-sized to
very large or sometimes small; flesh thick; common, widespread Cantharellus cibarius, p. 662
22. Mature fruiting body with a flattened top, but without a true cap (i.e., cap margin blunt or non¬
existent—see Color Plate 166); flesh often punky or stringy . . (see Clavariadelphus, p. 632)
22. Not as above; fruiting body normally with a cap that has a well-defined, acute edge (margin) 23
23. Fruiting body whitish or dull-colored; stalk thin (1-3 mm); cap usually small, often rosette-like
(with petal-like lobes) in age; flesh very thin and tough . . . (see Stereaceae & Allies, p. 604)
23. Not as above; fruiting body fleshy though sometimes thin-fleshed, usually brightly colored
at least in part . 24
24. Cap brown to ochre-brown or yellow-brown, or sometimes more brightly colored; flesh very
thin; odor typically mild . . Cantharellus xanthopus (see C. infundibuliformis group, p. 665)
24. Cap brightly colored (usually yellow to orange or pinkish-orange); flesh fairly thick (at least
at center of cap); odor often fruity or fragrant . 25
25. Fruiting body more or less trumpet-shaped, usually clustered and fragrant.
.Cantharellus odoratus (see C. cibarius, p. 662)
25. Not as above .Cantharellus lateritius & C. confluens (see C. cibarius, p. 662)
GOMPHUS 661
COMMENTS: Also known as Cantharellus floccosus, this striking mushroom and its
close relatives are easily told by their vase-shaped fruiting body with a reddish-orange to
orange-buff scaly cap and pallid veined exterior. The name G. bonari has been given to the
western variety with milky white exterior, smaller spores, tendency to grow in clusters, and
duller, paler, or more cinnamon-colored cap; it is oftencommon under mountainconifers.
Another western conifer-lover, G. kauffmanii, is similar but has a tan to brown or ochre-
tawny cap up to 35 cm broad with very prominent, brittle scales. It is sometimes common
in northern California and the Sierra Nevada as well as in the Pacific Northwest and
Southwest. Like G. floccosus and G. bonari, it should be eaten very cautiously if at all.
equal or tapered downward or sometimes enlarged at base, solid, dry, firm, colored like cap
or paler, often staining ochraceous to orange-brown. SPORE PRINT creamy or yellowin
most forms, but pinkish in one variety; spores 7-11 * 4-6 microns, elliptical, smooth.
HABITAT: Widely scattered to gregarious on ground in woods, occurring throughout the
north temperate zone and very common on the west coast in the fall, winter, and spring.
In northern California and the Pacific Northwest it grows mainly with conifers, but in our
area it favors live oaks, especially those at the edges of pastures. It has a long growing season
and is a joy to find—brilliant splashes of gold against the subdued backdrop of decaying
leaves. If you see one, probe around and you’ll probably uncover more—they often hide
under the humus. If rainfall is sufficient, successive crops are produced over a long period
of time, so check your patches regularly (but don’t check mine!).
EDIBILITY: Edible and choice—the best known wild mushroom in California, if not in
North America. Itissoplentifulandpopularonthe west coast that it is now being harvested
commercially and shipped abroad or sold to restaurants and markets. A few tips for the
uninitiated: Chanterelles should always be cooked as they are somewhat fibrous raw. Pick
selectively—firm specimens will keep in the refrigerator for a week, whereas waterlogged
individuals will rot rapidly and cook up slimy. Even firm ones have a high water content
and should be sauteed slowly and thoroughly in an open pan. You waste them if you can’t
taste them, so don’t just mix them in with a bunch of other vegetables. They are best in
simple dishes that highlight their delicate flavor and fruity fragrance—cream of chanterelle
soup is a traditional favorite. On the west coast chanterelles are virtually free of maggots,
an asset keenly appreciated by those who hunt them—but they’re often full of dirt, a quality
deeply detested by those who have to clean them! (If your “chanterelles” are pristine and
wormy, they may not be chanterelles!). Curiously, it’s just the opposite in the eastern
United States, where they are usually quite spotless, but often lunched on by maggots!
Imported chanterelles can be purchased in small tins at delicatessens—for an outrageous
price, of course. They are low in protein but high in vitamin A. Attempts to cultivate
them commercially have not been successful.
663
664 CANTHARELLACEAE
and “primitive” gills (blunt, thick, shallow, veined or forking, and foldlike rather than
bladelike). The firm whitish flesh and wavy cap margin are also characteristic. On the west
coast it fruits in cool weather and is often very large and thick-stemmed (one pound
specimens are not uncommon), with an orange cap, faintly fruity odor, and pale, copiously
veined gills (although a smaller, slimmer, cleaner form grows under Sitka spruce). In
eastern North America it is commonest in the summer and is usually much smaller (caps
average 3-6 cm broad) and often yellower, with a slender, well-developed stalk and little
or no odor (see Color Plate 175). Also, the gills may be less “primitive” (deeper, with
thinner edges and few if any cross-veins, as shown in Color Plate 177), and are sometimes
brightly colored. In the southern Rocky Mountains, on the other hand, the fruiting bodies
are often packed closely together and are small and stubby, with bleached-out caps
(if growing in sunlight) and brilliant yellow to yellow-orange gills.
Mushrooms most likely to be mistaken for the chanterelle include the false chanterelle
(Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca), various waxy caps (Camarophylluspratensis, Hygrocybe
flavescens, etc.), Lactarius alnicola, Leucopaxillus albissimus, the Gymnopilus
spectabilis group, Hypomyces lactifluorum, and the jack-o-lantern mushrooms
(Omphalotus speciesj. The latter are poisonous, but have brightly colored flesh and thin,
crowded, unforked, bladelike (“true”) gills, and usually grow in clusters on or near wood.
Except for the Hypomyces, which is a parasitized gilled mushroom, the others also have
bladelike gills. (It is sometimes said that true chanterelles have “false” gills, while false
chanterelles have “true” gills.) Aside from the many variations within C. cibarius, there is
C.formosus, a northern conifer-lover with a convex, yellow to brownish cap and pinkish-
tinged gills, and three similar edible species with a smooth to only slightly wrinkled
fertile surface. These are common in eastern North American and are often mistaken for
C. cibarius. The most common and widespread of the three, C. lateritius (-Craterellus
cantharellus) has a yellow-orange to pinkish-orange fruiting body; C. confluens has a
yellower, often compound fruiting body and a tropical-subtropical distribution; C.
odoratus (-Craterellus odoratus) is a gorgeous trumpet-shaped, yellow-orange-capped
southern species that is usually strongly fragrant and cespitose (clustered). C. lateritius
has also been reported (but not verified) from the Pacific Northwest.
666
Craterellus cornucopioides. This delicious mushroom is easily recognized by its dark trumpetlike
fruiting body. The undersides of these mature specimens are dusted white or buff by spores. Note
complete absence of gills.
it is largely replaced by C.fallax{see comments), which also occurs in our area. Though
terrestrial, it often fruits near fallen branches or at the bases of trees or manzanita burls.
EDIBILITY: One of my fifteen “five favorite flavorful fleshy fungal fructifications.” Like
myself, it is thin, tough, and dark, and like myself, it goes largely unappreciated. It is
forever being passed up in favor of the larger, fleshier, more colorful and impressive types,
yet its flavor is superb and its potential unlimited. It is partly to blame for this sad state of
affairs, for its appearance is admittedly drab and rather somber, and it shuns attention,
blending unobtrusively into the dark, secretive situations where it thrives.
But though it takes an accomplished eye to detect its presence in the woods(from the top
it looks like a hole in the ground), anyone can detect its presence in a dish—for it cooks up
black, announcing itself with unmistakable earthy authenticity. It can play any culinary
position with equal finesse, from first base to second fiddle, enhancing practically any dish,
be it soup, souffle, or sauce. Like its more popular cousin the chanterelle, it is not often
Craterellus cornucopioides (right) often grows in clusters, blending into its surroundings so
uncannily that you have to search for black holes in the ground, as shown on left (actually a photo of
Craterellus fallax, essentially the same but for its salmon-tinged spores).
668 CANTHARELLACEAE
inhabited by maggots. Dried and powdered it has a cheesy odor and is known, quite
appropriately, as “Poor People’s Truffle.”
COMMENTS: This cryptically-colored fungus usually occurs in large groups. It is hard to
pick out in the forest gloom, but once you locate one, you’re bound tofind more. In France
it is sometimes called trumpet de mort (trumpet of death)—a tribute to its somber ap¬
pearance, not its edibility. Actually, it is quite lovely when fresh—fully-grown specimens
look more like black or brown petunias than anything else, and clusters often have a lacy
look. The horn of plenty that is so common in the summer and fall in eastern North Amer¬
ica, C. fallax, looks and tastes identical but has a salmon- or yellow-tinted underside in
age and longer, salmon or ochre-yellow spores; it also occurs in California. Otherwise,
there is little that C. cornucopioides can be confused with—the dark trumpet-shaped
fruiting body with smooth or slightly wrinkled exterior and hollow center is unique. C.
cinereus (the black chanterelle) is somewhat similar but has primitive gills; Polyozellus
multiplex is also similar but is dark blue or violet-tinted, while C. sinuosus (see comments
under C. cinereus) has yellowish-ochre spores and a more copiously wrinkled or veined
hymenium (underside). Several Ascomycetes are black, but not trumpet-shaped
(Plectania species are cup-shaped; Urnula is urn-shaped). Thelephora terrestris is
sometimes funnel-shaped but is thinner, smaller, and purple-brown rather than gray or
black. Occasionally hollow, deformed, clublike specimens of C. cornucopioides occur
alongside normal ones. These are identical in color and edible. Other species: C. calyculus
of eastern North America is one of several similar but much smaller and thinner(cap less
than 2 cm broad, stalk 1-3 mm thick), solid-stemmed, mostly southern species.
Jelly Fungi
Small to medium-sized fungi found mostly on wood. FRUITING BODY typically gelatinous or
rubbery when fresh; variously shaped, but most often lobed, convoluted, or bloblike. SPORE
BEARING SURFACE smooth, warty, lobed, or with small spines, covering the outer or lower
surfaces of the fruiting body. SPORE PRINT white to yellowish, but difficult to obtain. Spores
smooth, sometimes septate. Basidia septate or forked.
JELLY fungi differ fundamentally from other Basidiomycetes in the structure of their
basidia, which are partitioned (septate) or forked rather than simple and clublike. The
rust and smut fungi also have partitioned basidia, butarenotconsidered to be mushrooms.
Although the basidia are microscopic, jelly fungi can usually be told in the field by the
gelatinous (jellylike) or rubbery texture that gives them their name. The most familiar
types are collectively called “witch’s butter.” They have lobed to convoluted or rather
amorphous (shapeless) fruiting bodies that look—at least to the hungry mushroom hunter
staggering home under a basketful of boletes—like lumps of melting butter. Other jelly
fungi have a cap and stalk, still others are cuplike, and a few are tough, branched, and coral¬
like. The spore-bearing surface ranges from smooth to veined, lobed, or in one case,
toothed, and is always exposed (hence the jelly fungi are classed here as Hymenomycetes).
The design of the basidium (see illustration) forms the basis for dividing the jelly fungi
into three separate groups. The Tremellales, which are the most common, have obliquely
or longitudinally septate basidia that look like hot cross buns when viewed from above, the
Auriculariales have transversely septate basidia (i.e., with cross walls), and the Dacrymy-
cetales have Y-shaped basidia that look like tuning forks. As these distinctions are micro¬
scopic, the three groups are treated as one unit in this book.
Most of the jelly fungi grow on rotten wood. They thrive in cool wet weather, shrinking
down to almost nothing when it dries out, then swelling up again as soon as it rains. None
are known to be poisonous, but most are very watery and flavorless. Some species,
however, can be marinated, candied, or even eaten raw, and in the Orient two types are
very popular: a translucent white species called Tremella fuciformis, and the brown to
black “tree ears” or “cloud ears” (Auricularia). The latter can be purchased in dried form
in many specialty stores. Eight jelly fungi are described here and several others are keyed
out. Tremella mesenterica is the most common of the lot, at least in our area.
3. Fruiting body erect, either simple and clublike (unbranched) or antlerlike or branched, or with a
cap and stalk . 4
3. Not as above; fruiting body cup-shaped to cone-shaped, cushion-shaped, irregularly lobed and
contorted, or amorphous (bloblike) . 6
4. Fruiting body with a yellow-orange to greenish “head” or cap .(see Helotiales, p. 865)
4. Not as above; fruiting body simple and unbranched or antlerlike to coral-like . 5
5. Fruiting body branched, usually more than 15 mm high .Calocera viscosa, p. 674
5. Fruiting body unbranched (but may be clustered), or if sparingly branched then typically less
than 15 mm high .Calocera cornea (see C. viscosa, p. 674)
6. Fruiting body cup-shaped to cone-shaped (with a narrowed base or point of attachment); usually
found in the spring (often near melting snow) . Guepiniopsis alpinus & others, p. 674
6. Not as above; fruiting body bloblike to cushion-shaped to irregularly lobed or brainlike . . 7
7. Fruiting body 1-5 mm broad, drop-like, usually growing in large masses or rows .
. Dacrymyces deliquescens (see Tremella mesenterica, p. 673)
7. Not as above; fruiting body usually larger . 8
8. Typically growing on hardwoods; bone-hard when dry; basidia shaped like hot-cross buns in
top view .Tremella mesenterica, p. 673
8. Usually growing on conifers; collapsing when dry, but with a tough whitish basal point of
attachment; basidia Y-shaped . . . Dacrymyces palmatus (see Tremella mesenterica, p. 673)
9. Fruiting body translucent to whitish, grayish, or brownish, with a cap (and usually a stalk),
the underside of the cap lined with tiny spines or “teeth” Pseudohydnum gelatinosum, p. 671
9. Not as above; underside of cap lacking minute spines or “teeth” . 10
10. Fruiting body tough, erect, and usually branched (coral-like), white or pallid; found mainly on
ground under hardwoods in eastern North America . 11
10. Not as above; usually found on wood or plants . 12
11. Branches few and very thick, blunt, hollow, and somewhat gelatinous . . . Tremella reticulata
11. Not as above; texture very tough, branches often flattened .
.Tremellodendronpallidum & T. candidum (see Tremellodendropsis tuberosa, p. 643)
12. Fruiting body black (or nearly black) when fresh . 13
12. Not as above (but fruiting body may be dark brown and/ or may blacken as it dries out) . 14
13. Fruiting body small and cushion-shaped, warty, or lobed, but often fusing to form large con¬
tinuous patches or sheets; growing on dead hardwoods .Exidia glandulosa, p. 672
13. Not as above; fruiting body broadly top-shaped to cuplike and not fusing to form sheets . . . .
. (see Pezizacaceae & Allies, p. 817)
14. Fruiting body a gelatinous mass of wavy or leafy lobes up to 20 cm broad (or sometimes larger),
some shade of brown; spores borne on basidia . Tremella foliacea, p. 673
14. Not as above (if brown and leafy, then fruiting body thin and rubbery instead of gelatinous) 15
15. Fruiting body reddish to brown or dark brown and bracketlike to cuplike, ear-shaped, broadly
top-shaped, or occasionally forming a cluster of earlike lobes . 16
15. Not as above . 17
16. Fruiting body cup-shaped to broadly top-shaped, reddish to purplish to brown or dark brown;
flesh thick or thin; usually on hardwoods; spores borne in asci .(see Helotiales, p. 865)
16. Fruiting body bracketlike to earlike or cuplike (or with several earlike lobes); flesh thin; on
hardwoods or conifers; spores borne on basidia .Auricularia auricula & others, p. 675
17. Fruiting body containing whitish granules; overall color whitish becoming pinkish- to reddish-
brown or vinaceous-brown . Exidia nucleata (see E. glandulosa, p. 672)
17. Not as above . 18
18. Fruiting body white or pallid when fresh (may be tinged tan in age) . 19
18. Fruiting body not white or pallid . 21
19. Fruiting body gelatinous or tough and usually hollow; growing on herbaceous stems and other
vegetable matter in eastern North America .Tremella concrescens
19. Not as above; usually growing on wood; widespread . 20
TREMELLALES & ALLIES 671
20. Fruiting body lobed or convoluted, 1.5-7 cm broad (or merging to form larger patches up to
12 cm or more); spores elliptical; found in the southern U nited States and warmer parts of the
world (including the Orient) . Tremellafuciformis
20. Not as above; smaller and/ or spores sausage-shaped . Exidia alba (see E. glandulosa, p. 672)
21. Fruiting body more or less brownish-yellow and top-shaped or cone-shaped .
. Exidia recisa (see Guepiniopsis alpinus, p. 674)
21. Fruiting body bloblike to lobed, convoluted, or brainlike and flesh-colored to brownish,
yellowish, or buff. Tremella encephala & T. frondosa(see T. foliacea, p. 673)
Pseudohydnum gelatinosum. Underside (left) is lined with tiny “teeth.” Cap (right) is whitish to
grayish or brown. Entire fruiting body is rubbery.
Left: A mature, flabby specimen of Phlogiotis helvelloides. Note how it is split down one side. Right:
Exidia glandulosa, whose small fruiting bodies often fuse to form black rubbery or gelatinous sheets.
HABITAT: Scattered to densely gregarious or in fused rows and masses on rotting hard¬
wood logs and branches; widely distributed. It is fairly common in our area throughout the
mushroom season, but is usually overlooked because of its dark color.
EDIBILITY: Unknown, and like most of us, likely to remain so.
COMMENTS: This sinister-looking black jelly fungus can be confused with little else.
Individual fruiting bodies are quite small but usually fuse to form rows or sheets that look
like black gelatin or slime. The frequently roughened spore-bearing surface and sausage¬
shaped spores help distinguish the genus Exidia from Tremella. Other species: E. alba is
small and whitish; E. nucleata varies from white or colorless to pinkish- or vinaceous-
brown, but is sprinkled with small white granules or “nuclei.” Both are widely distributed.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups on hardwood sticks, logs, etc.; very common and wide¬
spread. In our area it favors dead oak and fruits throughout the mushroom season, often
on the same branches as Stereum species. Shrivelled up specimens are inconspicuous, but
usually revive in wet weather. In colder climates it may appear during winter thaws.
EDIBILITY: Harmless but flavorless (see comments on edibility of T. foliacea)—it is
mostly water. My one attempt at cooking it was a failure: most of it evaporated!
674 TREMELLALES & ALLIES
COMMENTS: Also known as T. lutescens, this fungus and its look-alikes (see below) are
a familiar sight in rainy weather across the continent. At first the fruiting body is lobed or
brainlike and relatively firm, but as it swells with water it often loses its original shape and
looks like a dollop of melting butter on a log. Also common is Dacrymyces palmatus,
which closely mimics T. mesenterica but is slightly smaller (1-6 cm broad), tends to be
oranger in color, favors conifers, and has a small, tough, whitish, basal point of attachment.
The resemblance is only superficial, however, for Dacrymyces species have Y-shaped
basidia and long narrow spores that develop cross walls, while Tremella species have
longitudinally septate basidia and simple (non-septate) spores. Other species: T.frondosa
is buff to yellowish but larger and leafier (like T. foliacea); D. deliquescens is a small (1-5
mm broad), yellow-orange to reddish species that grows on decaying wood, usually in
large masses or rows. Like most jelly fungi, the above species are not worth eating.
Left: Guepiniopsis alpinus looks like a gumdrop. Right: Calocera viscosa. (Herb Saylor)
CALOCERA 675
2-3 tips); bright yellow to deep yellow to orange. ST ALK present as a yellow to whitish base
or “trunk”, often rooting. Flesh tough but often somewhat gelatinous. SPORE PRINT
dingy yellowish to ochraceous; spores produced on the branches, 9-14 * 3-5 microns,
elongated-elliptical to sausage-shaped, smooth, developing one cross wall at maturity.
Basidia Y-shaped.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in small groups on or near coniferous logs, stumps,
roots, and debris; widely distributed. I have found it several times in our coastal pine
forests in the winter and spring, but never in quantity.
EDIBILITY: Inconsequential.
COMMENTS: This dainty little jelly fungus looks like a coral mushroom (especially
Clavulinopsis corniculata) and is keyed out as one. However, it is usually viscid and has
Y-shaped basidia, plus it typically grows on or near wood. Another widespread species,
C. cornea, is smaller (up to 15 mm high), yellow, and clublike or very sparingly branched;
it grows in groups or clusters on twigs and branches of both hardwoods and conifers. The
forked basidia place Calocera in the Dacrymycetales.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups or clusters on logs, dead branches, stumps, etc. (attached
centrally or laterally); very widely distributed on both hardwoods and conifers, and often
common in cool weather. I have seen it in the springtime in the Cascades, but it seems to
be rare in our area.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but I haven’t tried it. A similar but hairier species, A. polytricha, is
prized in the Orient and can be purchased dried in many stores. Along with the shiitake
(Lentinus edodes) it is the mushroom most often served in Chinese restaurants, usually
under the name Y ung Ngo or Muk Ngo. Dried specimens of A. auricula and A. poly tricha
are quite dark, hard, and unappetizing, but billow up like clouds when soaked in water,
showing off their delicate curves and convolutions to great effect.
COMMENTS: This species can be mistaken for a cup fungus, but has a more rubbery
texture, bears its spores on basidia (a microscopic feature), and usually—but not always—
grows with its fertile (concave) surface facing downward. Cup fungi, on the other hand,
bear their spores in asci with the concave (fertile) surface facing upward, and usually have
a brittle or fragile texture. Sometimes Auricularia is irregularly lobed rather than cuplike,
and I have found old specimens which looked more like pieces of soggy seaweed than
anything else. Hirneola auricula-judae is a sinister-sounding synonym. It also used to be
called “Judas’ Ear” because it was believed that when Judas’ hanged himself on an elder
tree, these ear-shaped “excrescences” were condemned to appear on elders thereafter.
Auricularia is the most prominent genus in the Auriculariales. It embraces several similar
brownish species, including: A. mesenterica, which is more or less bracketlike with a
hairy, concentrically zoned sterile surface and veined fertile surface; and A. delicata,
a striking gelatinous tropical species with large honeycomb-like pits or “pores.” For a
photo of Auricularia, see p. 958.
676
GASTEROMYCETES
THIS large division of the Basidiomycetes includes those fungi better known as puffballs,
earthstars, stinkhorns, bird’s nest fungi, false truffles, and gastroid agarics. Gastero-
(meaning “stomach”) describes the manner in which the spores are produced—internally,
rather than externally as in the Hymenomycetes (agarics, boletes, coral fungi, etc.). The
Gasteromycetes are also unique in that their spores are not forcibly discharged. Instead
the basidia disintegrate and the leftover spore mass is dispersed by wind, rain, and animals.
The most familiar fungi in this group are the puffballs and earthstars. They bear spores
in a round to oval “stomach” or spore case. The mature spore mass is powdery and easily
dispersed. The false truffles are similar, but their spore mass remains intact and does
not become powdery, while the gastroid agarics resemble gilled mushrooms that haven’t
opened. The stinkhorns strike a decidedly different pose—their slimy spore mass is
initially enclosed by a membrane, but later it is elevated on a stalk, arms, or latticed ball,
with the membrane forming a volva at the base. Last and least, there are the bird’s nest
fungi, which look like tiny nests with spore-containing eggs or peridioles.
Gasteromycetes occur in a wide range of habitats. They are especially prominent in
arid regions where there is a selective advantage to producing spores internally (it affords
protection from moisture loss and heat). They are notable more for their size range (giant
puffballs weigh up to 50 pounds each, bird’s nest fungi are only a few millimeters broad)
and different strategies for spore dispersal than for their colors. Only the puffballs are
of importance to the mushroom-eater. Six major groups are keyed below.*
Vertical sections of two puffballs and one stalked puffball. Left to right: Calvatia{stalk and sterile
base absent), Tulostoma(stalk present), and Lycoperdon{sterile base present).
Make sure every puffball you eat is firm, white, and solid( homogeneous) inside. These are rather scaly
specimens of coastal California’s giant puffball (see Calvatia gigantea group, p. 682). (Joel Leivick)
Besides the Lycoperdales, which includes the true puffballs such as Calvatia and
Lycoperdon and the earthstar genus Geastrum, a superficially similar order, the Sclero-
dermatales, is traditionally included under the title “puffballs and earthstars.” This
group differs microscopically in lacking capillitium and/ or a hymenium. It includes
the earthballs (Scleroderma), which can usually be separated from puffballs by their
hard, one-layered peridium and purple-black spore mass, certain earthstars (e.g., As-
traeus), and two dusty monstrosities that bear their spores in small chambers within the
spore case (Pisolithus and Dictyocephalos). A third group, the Tulostomatales (stalked
puffballs), differs in possessing a true stalk. It is treated separately here, although micro¬
scopically it shares features of both the Lycoperdales and Sclerodermatales.
It is often said that all puffballs are safe to eat so long as they’re firm and white inside.
This is not necessarily the case, however. Several species of Scleroderma are poisonous,
some of the so-called edible puffballs have purgative effects on certain individuals, and
others don’t taste good. Therefore, it behooves you puffball-pickers to identify each
puffball before you eat it and to sample it cautiously. Once picked, puffballs must be
refrigerated or they will ripen rapidly. Any showing the slightest traces of color (usually
yellow or green) should be discarded, as they become bitter and indigestible. Also be
sure that you don’t inadvertently mistake a deadly poisonous Amanita ^ egg" fora puff¬
ball. When sliced open lengthwise (i.e., perpendicular to the ground), puffballs are solid
and homogeneous within (see above photo), whereas Amanita “eggs” or other agaric but¬
tons reveal the outline of cap, gills, and stalk (see photo at top of p. 679). False truffles are
sometimes mistaken for puffballs, but they usually grow underground and do not have a
powdery spore mass at maturity, while stinkhorn “eggs” are gelatinous within.
Puffballs and earthstars can be found almost anywhere at any time, but are especially
prominent in prairies, deserts, and high mountains, where other fungi are not so plentiful.
Though they form a distinctive group, identifying the various species can be difficult be¬
cause you often have to know the characteristics of both mature and immature fruiting
bodies, as well as microscopic features such as the size and shape of the spores and capil¬
litium. It is tempting to eat puffballs without bothering to identify them, but indiscrimi¬
nate sampling of any mushrooms—even puffballs—is poor practice, so at least make an
attempt to key out each kind you find, even if you have only young (or old) specimens at
hand. In the following key, the various genera in the Lycoperdales and Sclerodermatales
have been grouped into several categories.
678
Amanita''1’ eggs” can look like puffballs, but reveal a mushroom“embryo” of cap, gills, and stalk when
sliced open lengthwise (perpendicular to the ground). Although this Amanita calyptrata “egg” is
edible, the “eggs” of several Amanitas are deadly poisonous!
679
680 LYCOPERDALES & ALLIES
9. Fruiting body medium-sized to quite large, rupturing (in old age) irregularly or through radial
tears or general disintegration; peridium (skin) thick or thin .Calvatia & Allies, below
9. Fruiting body small to medium-sized (usually smaller than a baseball), typically rupturing
through an apical pore, slit, or large mouth; usually thin-skinned Lycoperdon& Allies, p. 690
10. Fruiting body golfball-sized to very large, rupturing (in old age) irregularly or through radial
tears or general disintegration; peridium (skin) thick or thin; found in many habitats .
.Calvatia & Allies, below
10. Fruiting body usually marble- to golfball-sized or occasionally as large as a baseball, usually
rupturing through a pore or large mouth (and often blowing about in the wind when old); peri¬
dium usually rather thin; found mostly in grassy or open places Bovista& Disciseda, p. 696
THESE are baseball- to basketball-sized puffballs that disintegrate in old age, i.e., a dis¬
tinct apical pore is not formed as in Lycoperdon. In some species the outer layer of the
peridium takes the form of large warts which break up into plates and then flake off, but
in other species it is smooth and in many it adheres to the inner layer so that the two are
indistinguishable. Calvatias with a thick peridium are sometimes mistaken for earth-
balls (Scleroderma species), but are usually whiter (both inside and out) when immature
and not as hard-fleshed. The texture (whether powdery or cottony) and color of the
mature spore mass are important features in the identification of Calvatias, as is the
presence or absence of a sterile base.
Calvatias are among the most prolific of living organisms. It has been calculated that
an average-sized (30 cm) specimen of the giant puffball (Calvatia gigantea) contains
7,000,000,000,000 (7 trillion) spores! In these inflationary times that may not sound like
much, but consider this: if all 7 trillion spores (each one measuring 1/200 of a millimeter)
were lined up in a row, they would circle the earth’s equator! If each spore produced a
30 cm offspring, the resulting puffballs would stretch from the earth to the sun and back,
and if their spores were equally successful, the formidable puffball mass would weigh 800
times as much as the earth! Each spore is theoretically capable of germinating, yet very
few (obviously!) do. It would be interesting to know why so many don’t, or conversely,
why such a surplus of spores is (needlessly?) produced.
The truly giant puffballs (the C. gigantea group and C. booniana) are among the best
known and most popular of all edible mushrooms. In fact, they are eaten by people who
don’t know a gill from a gall. Some of the smaller species (e.g., C. sculpta and C. cyathi-
formis) are also excellent, but a few (e.g., C.fumosa) are bitter. None are known to be
poisonous, but the edible species have purgative or laxative effects on some people. Each
kind should be tested cautiously and eaten in moderation, and specimens that have begun
to ripen should be discarded.
Calvatia species are partial to arid climates, which is ironic considering the gigantic
size of some. It is a large and complex genus, especially in the prairies of the Midwest and
the sagebrush deserts and mountains of the West, where many endemic species still await
classification. (In our area there are several odd species which I haven’t been able to
identify to my satisfaction.) Only a handful of the more common or easily recognized
Calvatias are described here, and three small, superficially similar genera, Mycenastrum,
Calbovista, and Abstoma, are also treated.
CALVATIA& ALLIES 681
15. Warts usually pyramidal or pointed when young and sometimes very exaggerated, their tips
sometimes joined; usually found in forests; capillitium not thorny .C. sculpta, p. 684
15. Warts often flattened or truncated but sometimes pointed, not joined at their tips; usually found
in open places or edges of woods, roadsides, etc.; capillitium thorny .
.Calbovista subsculpta (see Calvatia sculpta, p. 684)
16. Outer surface of fruiting body staining yellow when bruised or rubbed, at least when young;
found mainly in cultivated soil. C. rubroflava (see C. lycoperdoides, p. 687)
16. Not as above . 17
17. Outer surface of fruiting body with red or reddish spots when fresh; mature spore mass pur¬
plish; found under pine and perhaps other trees; not common .
.C. rubrotincta (see C. cyathiformis, p. 687)
17. Not with above features . 18
18. Spore mass distinctly purple when mature (powdery); common in grass or other open areas
.C. cyathiformis, p. 687
18. Mature spore mass ochre to brown, etc., but not purple. 19
19. Spore mass cottony at maturity and persisting for a long time (remaining intact); peridium (skin)
smooth or granular to very wrinkled but lacking distinct warts, plaques, or spines; fairly com¬
mon in eastern and southern North America . C. craniiformis (see C. lycoperdoides, p. 687)
19. Not as above . 20
20. Sterile base very prominent and elongated (up to 12 cm long) to form a stalklike base; spore
case typically less than 8 cm broad and usually smaller in height than sterile base .
.C. elata& C. excipuliformis (see C. bovista, p. 686)
20. Sterile base sometimes prominent but not as above, and/ or spore case larger . 21
21. Typically found in pastures, lawns, roadsides, and other grassy or open places; common at low
elevations . 22
21. Typically found in arid regions (deserts, sagebrush flats, etc.) or under conifers, sometimes also
in mountain meadows. 23
22. Fruiting body rather small, typically less than 5 (rarely 7) cm broad.
.(see Lycoperdon & Allies, p. 690)
22. Fruiting body medium-sized to large (5-25 cm broad) unless very young .. C. bovista, p. 686
23. Fruiting body typically developing warts or blunt spines (at least on top) when young or as it
matures; found under western conifers, mainly in mountains C. lloydii(see C. bovista, p. 686)
23. Not as above; fruiting body lacking distinct warts and/or habitat different . 24
24. Fruiting body averaging 5-10 cm broad; base often wrinkled or furrowed and found in arid
habitats, or if not wrinkled, then found under conifers .. C. tatrensis(see C. bovista, p. 686)
24. Not with above features; usually smaller; if growing in arid habitats, then base not usually
wrinkled, and if growing in woods then base usually wrinkled .
.C. pallida & C. Candida (see C. bovista, p. 686)
woods, cemeteries, on exposed hillsides, along roads, in drainage ditches, etc.; fairly
common in eastern North America and the Midwest. The west coast form, which is slightly
different (see comments), is sometimes abundant in our area after the first fall rains and
again in the spring. In fact, when conditions are favorable it is not unusual to find 30-40
pounds on a casual jaunt through a “puffball pasture.” Because of its preference for open
hillsides, it can often be spotted from the road. Large specimens, in fact, have been mis¬
taken by passersby for herds of grazing sheep! (Mushroom hunters, on the other hand,
are more likely to mistake grazing sheep for giant puffballs.) Dried specimens found
under houses have been mistaken for bleached skulls, while a sinister-looking individual
found in England during the war was labelled “Hitler’s Secret Weapon” and used for
propaganda purposes at an exhibition to raise war funds!
EDIBILITY: Edible and choice when the flesh is firm and white, but with laxative
effects on certain individuals. It can be sliced and fried like pancakes, or better yet, cubed
like tofu and dropped into clear soups or eaten raw in salads. The tough outer skin should
be peeled and those which have begun to ripen should be discarded. Size it not necessarily
an indication of maturity, so slice them open in the field. This will enable you to check for
maggots, which are fanatically fond of them. Infested areas can be trimmed away and the
solid portions carried home. Dried giant puffballs have been used as sponges, tinder
(before matches were invented), toys, and dyes. They were burned under beehives to
stupefy bees and used to squelch bleeding.
COMMENTS: The giant puffball is one of the best known and most familiar of all the
fleshy fungi—and it is fleshy—5 foot, 50 pound specimens have been recorded! (Alas,
the largest one I’ve found weighed “only” 7 pounds.) The exact identity of our local giant
puffball, strangely enough, is a minor mystery. It does not seem to be either the “true”
C. gigantea of Europe and eastern North America, or C. booniana of arid regions. The
former is smoother and whiter than our giant puffball, while the latter is wartier and
broader. To most people, however, its “true” identity is an academic problem best left
to the puffball pundits, who are paid to pore over such matters—after all, any large puff¬
ball is a giant puffball, and any giant puffball is a giant meal! Langermannia gigantea
and Calvatia maxima are synonyms for C. gigantea. C. bovista can also be quite large, but
has a prominent sterile base, while C. cyathiformis has purple spores at maturity. Also see
C. pachyderma and C. lepidophora (under C. fumosa).
683
Immature western giant puffball, Calvatia booniana. Note the shape (longer than it is high) and
large warts on the surface. See color plate for mature specimens. (Chuck Barrows)
684
The Sierran puffball, Calvatia sculpta, is easily recognized by its enormous pyramidal or polygonal
warts. Note sterile base beneath spore case (right); specimen on left is being viewed from the top.
a purplish interior (especially in age). SPORE MASS white and firm at first, turning
yellow and then deep olive-brown as it ripens, eventually powdery. Spores 3.5-6.5 microns,
round or nearly round, minutely spiny.
HABITAT: Solitary or in small groups under conifers or sometimes in the open; known
only from the mountains of the West. It is fairly common in the Sierra Nevada in the late
spring, summer, and fall; I have not seen it on the coast.
EDIBILITY: Edible when immature, and better than most puffballs.
COMMENTS: This is easily the most spectacular of all the puffballs, and is well known
to hikers in the Sierra Nevada. The white pyramidal “peaks” make fresh specimens look
like a cross between a geodesic dome and a giant glob of meringue. Amanita magni-
verrucata can sometimes resemble it superficially (especially in the egg stage), but has
gills and a stalk. Other species; Calbovista subsculpta is a common edible western moun¬
tain puffball that is similar in size but has flatter (but sometimes pointed), less flagrant
warts. It used to be placed in Calvatia, but its capillitium have thornlike branches—a mo¬
mentous enough difference in the eyes of puffball specialists to merit a genus of its own.
It is quite common in the spring, summer, and early fall in open and grassy places or at the
edges of woods in the Sierra Nevada, Cascades, and other western mountains.
Left Calvatia sculpta in the bush(Bob Winter). Right Calvatia sculpta in the hand (Nancy Jarvis).
Calvatia bovista, immature specimens. N ote large size and prominent sterile base. S pecimen in center
is being viewed from above, hence the sterile base is not visible.
Calvatia bovista
FRUITING BODY 10-25 cm high and 5-25 cm broad, top-shaped or pear-shaped with a
broad, often flattened top in age and a large, prominent stemlike sterile base. Outer layer
of peridium (skin) white to grayish or occasionally yellowish-brown, covered with pointed
scurfy warts or soft particles, slowly breaking up into flat scales that slough off, exposing
the thin inner layer which soon disintegrates. STERILE BASE very large, constituting
up to one half the total height of the fruiting body; chambered; exterior white when young,
brown in age; smooth, persisting long after the spore case has decomposed. SPORE
MASS white and cheesy, then yellow or olive and finally olive-gold to olive-brown or
dark brown and powdery. Spores 4-6.5 microns, round, minutely warted or spiny.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups in pastures, exposed soil, open woods, etc.;
widely distributed. It is fairly common in our coastal pastures from fall through spring,
sometimes mingling with the giant puffball (Calvatia gigantea groups
EDIBILITY: Edible when immature, but rather soft and in my experience insipid or even
bitter. According to puffball scholar William Burk, it has been used to stop up holes in
drafty dwellings as well as nosebleeds.
COMMENTS: Also known as C. utriformis and C. caelata, this is the second largest of
our local puffballs and is easily recognized by its flattened top and large sterile base (see
photograph). It looks something like a gigantic Lycoperdonperlatum, but does not form a
pore at the top. The bowl-shaped base persists long after the rest of the spore case has
disintegrated, and old bowls are often found filled with rainwater, mosquito larvae, and
spores, or they may be windblown and completely empty. In the latter condition you may
not recognize them as puffballs, but don’t let this faze you—a special genus, Hippoperdon,
was once erected based on these empty bowls!
C. excipuliformis (-C. saccata) and C. data are two similar species which have a nar¬
rower spore case (3-10 cm broad) that is granular or coated with small spines and pale buff
to brownish, plus a narrower and greatly elongated (stemlike) sterile base. Both are wide¬
spread in wooded and open areas; the latter has practically smooth spores. C. tatrensis
is a western species with a purplish to purple-brown sterile base; it occurs under sagebrush
and in other arid waste places, or occasionally under conifers, and usually has a wrinkled
or furrowed base. C. pallida and C. Candida are two small species (up to 5 cm broad) with
a sterile base and powdery spore mass; the former has a wrinkled base and grows in woods
and mountain meadows, while the latter prefers more arid habitats. Finally, there is C.
lloydii, a fairly common species in the dry coniferous forests of the Sierra Nevada and
other western mountains. It is also rather small (less than 10 cm broad) and has a sterile
base, but features warts or blunt spines on the top, at least in age. It sometimes grows
with C.fumosa and C. subcretacea, but is easily separated from those species by its thinner
skin, and from C. sculpta and Calbovista subsculpta by its smaller warts.
686
Calvatia cyathiformis. Left: Immature specimen (turned sideways) with a well-developed sterile base.
Right: Mature specimen in which the outer layer of the peridium (spore case) is disintegrating. The
purplish color of the mature spores is the most distinctive characteristic of this species.
687
688 LYCOPERDALES & ALLIES
HABIT AT: S olitary or in small groups on ground in woods and under trees; known only
from western N orth America, but C. craniiformis{see comments) is common in the eastern
states. It can be found in our area in the late fall, winter, and spring, but is not common.
EDIBILITY: Presumably edible when immature, but not big or plentiful enough to
warrant collecting. I haven’t tried it.
COMMENTS: This is one of several Calvatias with a cottony(instead of powdery) mature
spore mass. Others include: C. umbrina, a dark brown to black species; C. diguetii, a
smooth-spored westerner with an ochre gleba; and C. rubroflava, with a greenish-orange
mature spore mass and yellow-staining exterior, found mostly in cultivated soil(especially
in southern latitudes). In these species an apical pore is not formed as in Lycoperdon, and
there is no sterile base (except in C. rubroflava). Another species with a cottony spore mass,
C. craniiformis, is often wrinkled, softball-sized, and white to tan when young, with a
well-developed sterile base and yellow-green to yellow-brown spores. It is quite common in
southern and eastern North America in open areas and under hardwoods, but to my
knowledge does not occur on the west coast. It is edible, like most Calvatias, when firm
and white inside. There are several other species with a sterile base that may or may not
have a cottony spore mass when mature. These include C. elata, C. excipuliformis, and
C. lloydii(sQQ comments under C. bovista for more details).
Calvatia fumosa
FRUITING BODY golfball- to baseball-sized, round to oval, 3-8 (10) cm broad.
Outer and inner layers of peridium (skin) adhering to each other, thick (1-5 mm) and
persistent (not disintegrating); at first smooth and white, but soon becoming grayish to
brownish and often areolate (cracking to form small scales), the undersurface and cracks
white. STERILE BASE absent or rudimentary, but a mycelialcord often present. SPORE
MASS firm and white at first, then yellowish or olive, finally dark brown and powdery (or
yellow-brown in one variety); odor often unpleasant (“a combination of sour milk, diesel
oil, and pit toilet”—Robert Ramsey). Spores4.5-8 microns, round or nearly round, spiny.
Calvatia fumosa (two specimens in center) and Calvatia subcretacea (specimens at far left and far
right) are common under mountain conifers and sometimes grow together. Both have a thick, tough
skin. C. subcretacea has a warty exterior, while C. fumosa is smoother and has a cord at the base.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious in duff (sometimes buried) under spruce, fir, and other
mountain conifers; common in the western United States, spring through early fall. A
similar species occurs in our area under cypress, and others occur in cultivated or hard-
packed soil (see comments).
EDIBILITY: Bitter-tasting according to Orson K. Miller; I haven’t tried it.
COMMENTS: The thick, tough, persistent skin (peridium) and modest size plus the
absence of warts distinguish this Calvatia from most others. Old specimens might be
mistaken for Sclerodermas, but possess capilliitum and are differently colored. The
peridium seldom disintegrates of its own accord, but rodents are apparently fond of
chewing on it, thus enabling the spores to escape. There are several similar Calvatias
with a thick, persistent peridium, including: C. hesperia, similar in size but white to gray¬
ish, with smooth spores and growing mostly in open places (farmland, deserts, etc.); C.
pachyderma, larger (5-15 cm in diameter) and whitish when young, with smooth to
minutely warted spores, found in open, cultivated, and arid places; and C. lepidophora of
the Midwest prairies, which is even larger(15-20 cm) and has densely warted spores. See
also Mycenastrum corium.
Mycenastrum corium
FRUITING BODY 4-20 cm broad or more, round to somewhat pear-shaped when young,
eventually rupturing in irregular fissures to form rays or plates which may bend back
somewhat in a star-shaped pattern. Outer layer of peridium (skin) a thick, white, felty
coat which becomes areolate (separates into blocklike areas), forming thin, grayish, fibril-
lose patches which eventually wear away to expose the tough, hard, persistent, smooth
inner layer, which is brown to purple-brown and about 2 mm thick. STERILE BASE
rudimentary or absent, but mycelial fibers often present. SPORE MASS firm and white
becoming olive-yellow to olive-brown and finally dark brown to purple-brown and
powdery. Spores 8-12 microns, round, warted-reticulate. Capillitium branched, thorny.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious on ground (sometimes partially buried) in horse
corrals, composted areas, and fields where livestock have been grazing; widely distributed,
but especially common in the West. In our area it occurs year-round. The tough spore
cases persist for months, sometimes breaking loose to blow about in the wind.
EDIBILITY: Presumably edible when firm and white inside; I haven’t tried it.
Mycenastrum corium, immature specimens. These were found in a horse corral, a favorite haunt of
this species. Note the thick skin and white felty material on exterior.
690 LYCOPERDALES & ALLIES
COMMENTS: This peculiar puffball is easy to recognize but difficult to describe. The
thick, tough inner peridium (skin) distinguishes it from Bovista and the thin-skinned
Calvatias, while the white, felty outer layer separates it from Scleroderma and the thick-
skinned Calvatias. The presence of capillitium in the spore mass indicates a much closer
kinship to the true puffballs (Calvatia, etc.) than to the earthballs (Scleroderma). Its
tendency to fruit in localities where livestock loiter is another helpful (but fallible) field-
mark. A bstoma townei and A. reticulalum are smaller and dirtier puffballs (2-6 cm broad)
with reticulate spores and unbranched capillitium. The first is said to occur in old pastures
and other waste places; the latter has been found in coastal California under cypress.
Small to medium-sized puffballs found mostly on rotten wood or on ground in woods (Lyco-
perdon), or in grass (Vascellum). FRUITING BODY round to pear-shaped or top-shaped; peri¬
dium two-layered, the outer layer usually with spines, warts, granules, or particles; usually rup¬
turing through an apical pore. STERILE BASE usually present and often conspicuous or stem¬
like. SPORE MASS firm and white when young, becoming powdery and olive-brown to brown or
purplish in old age. Spores more or less round, smooth to warted or spiny, sometimes pedicellate.
Capillitium present (Lycoperdon) or replaced by paracapillitium (septate, colorless hyphae) in
Vascellum.
THESE are small to medium-sized puffballs that rarely exceed 10 cm (4 inches) in dia¬
meter. In contrast to Calvatia and Scleroderma, the spores are usually released through
an apical pore (a hole, slit, or mouth that forms at the top of the mature spore case). The
frequent presence of a well-developed, often stemlike sterile base distinguishes Lyco¬
perdon from Bovista, but the two genera intergrade through a series of forms with a slight
sterile base. In most species the spore case is initially coated with a layer of spines, warts,
or fine particles, but these eventually fall away to expose the inner layer of the peridium,
in which the pore forms.
Lycoperdons are our most common woodland puffballs, but also grow in open areas,
waste places, and sawdust piles. In our area the major fruiting is in the fall and winter, but
old weathered specimens can be found at any time. All Lycoperdons are thought to be
edible when firm and white inside, but some taste better than others and it is imperative
to discard any specimens that have begun to ripen. (In Charles Mcllvaine’s words, “one
ageing L. pyriforme will embitter a hundred.”) The various species are rather difficult
to distinguish—particularly when immature—but it is always a good practice to identify
each type before eating it. Five representative species are described here, plus one species
of Vascellum, a small “satellite” genus that differs microscopically. Two other small
genera, Bovistella and Morganella, are included in the key.
4. Fruiting body often broader than it is tall, white or pinkish-tinged when young; outer layer of
skin peeling away in sheets at maturity (see photo on p. 695) L. marginatum & others, p. 694
4. Not as above (if peeling in sheets, then much taller than it is broad) .5
5. Fruiting body 3-12 (14) cm broad, with a narrowed rooting base; outer layer of peridium(skin)
composed of spines and granules, the spines often tufted or joined at their tips; usually in open,
sandy, or cultivated ground . . . Bovistella radicata (see Lycoperdon puleherrimum, p. 694)
5. Not with above features; rooting base absent and/ or fruiting body considerably smaller . . 6
6. Fruiting body golden-orange to bright yellow when young . (set Bovista& Disciseda, p. 696)
6. Not as above; differently colored .7
7. Fruiting body lavender-tinged or with lavender-tinged spines when young; found mainly in
eastern North America .L. peckii (see L. perlatum, p. 693)
7. Fruiting body not lavender-tinged when young . 8
8. Typically growing in grass, prairies, and other open areas; either paracapillitium present or
capillitium with small round pits . 9
8. Not as above; typically growing in woods and at their edges, under trees, on roadsides, etc. 11
9. Sterile base very small or rudimentary; spore case rupturing through an apical pore; usually
densely gregarious or in clusters . Vascellum curtisii (see V. pratense, p. 695)
9. Not as above . 10
10. Fruiting body typically with a large mouth at maturity (the top disintegrating); very common
on lawns, golf courses, etc.Vascellum pratense & others, p. 695
10. Fruiting body typically rupturing through a slit or tear at maturity; widespread but not common
.(see Bovista & Disciseda, p. 696)
11. Spines on exterior of young fruiting body 2-6 mm long and often joined at their tips . 12
11. Spines absent, or if present not as above (usually shorter and sparser) . 13
12. Spines white becoming brown, leaving small scars or pockmarks on the inner peridium when
they fall off.L. americanum (see L. puleherrimum, p. 694)
12. Spines remaining white until they fall off, not leaving scars (i.e., inner peridium smooth) ....
.L. puleherrimum, p. 694
13. Outer layer of peridium (skin) sloughing off in sheets or chunks at maturity; known only from
the Pacific Northwest; rare (?) .L. nettyana (see L. marginatum, p. 694)
13. Not as above; very common and widespread . 14
14. Mature spore mass olive-brown to brown; spines leaving pockmarks on inner peridium when
they fall away (but marks may disappear, leaving inner peridium smooth) L.perlatum, p. 693
14. Mature spore mass purple-brown; spines not leaving scars .
.L. umbrinum (see L. perlatum, p. 693)
EDIBILITY: Edible when young, but only worth collecting when it occurs in quantity.
In my fickle fungal opinion it is one of the better puffballs, but is not as good as “a loaf of
bread” and is apt to be bitter if not absolutely white and firm inside.
COMMENTS: The tendency to grow on rotting wood is a distinctive feature of this pear-
shaped puffball, but it often appears to be terrestrial (when growing from buried wood
or humus rich in lignin). The white rhizomorphs or “roots” that emanate from the base of
the fruiting body plus the narrowed or stemlike base and absence of prominent spines
are also good fieldmarks. It is one of the few Lycoperdons that occurs in sufficient quantity
to merit collecting for the table. Other species: L.pedicellatum also grows on rotten wood,
but has longer spines and ornamented spores.
Lycoperdon foetidum, immature specimens. Note the dark brown to blackish color—its principal
fieldmark. A pore forms at the top in old age.
LYCOPERDON 693
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups in humus and debris in deep woods along
the west coast (also Europe). Fairly common in our area from fall through early spring—
especially under conifers—but easily overlooked because of its dark color.
EDIBILITY: Presumably edible when firm and white inside; I haven’t tried it.
COMMENTS: Also known as L. nigrescens, this attractive puffball is our only Lyco-
perdon with dark brown to black spines when immature (several species may be quite
dark in age, however—see L. perlatum). The dark spines contrast nicely with the white
flesh, and the yellowish background color that develops in age is also distinctive. The
species epithet is something of a misnomer, for I have never found it to have an odor other
than the usual slightly unpleasant smell that all ripening puffballs develop.
Lycoperdon perlatum, maturing specimens. If you look closely you can see some of the spines and
the small scars they leave when they fall off. Younger specimens usually lack the apical pore that is
beginning to form in these; older ones are often smooth (without scars or pockmarks).
694 LYCOPERDALES & ALLIES
EDIBILITY: Edible when young, but too small and infrequent to be of value.
COMMENTS: The long white spines that are frequently joined at their tips distinguish
this small puffball from the more common L. perlatum and other small species. L. echi-
natum (now called L. americanum by some puffball pundits) is a similar but more common
species with white spines that soon turn brown and leave small marks or reticulations on
the inner layer of the spore case when they fall off. A third puffball that often has united
—albeit shorter—spines, Bovistella radicata, strikes a much different pose: it is larger
(3-10 (14) cm), with a thick, rooting base and preference for disturbed or open ground.
Though widespread, it is not particularly common, at least in our area.
EDIBILITY: Edible when firm and white inside. In Mexico, this species and L. mizte-
corum are used to induce auditory hallucinations. It is known as “gi-i-sa-wa,” meaning
“fungus of the second quality” {L. miztecorum being the fungus of first quality). H owever,
no intoxicating substances were found when these puffballs were analyzed.
COMMENTS: The peculiar manner in which the outer layer of the peridium separates
completely from the inner layer and peels off in sheets is the hallmark of this pleasing
puffball. L. candidum is a synonym./,, nettyana, known only from the Pacific Northwest,
also peels off in sheets, but is more or less pear-shaped (with a well-developed, stalklike
sterile base). Vascellum (-Lycoperdon) curtisii is also quite similar, but usually grows
in grass and has little or no sterile base. L. rimulatum (see comments under L. perlatum)
sometimes peels off in sheets, but has a smooth (spineless) peridium.
Vascellum pratense is a small grassland puffball with a conspicuous sterile base. Specimens at left
are immature; bowl-shaped specimen at right is quite old.
Hi
696 LYCOPERDALES & ALLIES
THESE small (marble- to baseball-sized) puffballs usually lack the sterile base charac¬
teristic of Lycoperdon and are smaller and/ or smoother than most Calvatia species. In
old age they often break loose from the soil so that the thin, lustrous, papery spore cases
tumble about freely in the wind.
Bovista species release their spores through an apical pore or large mouth, and are
probably the most common puffballs of our lawns and pastures. Disciseda, on the other
hand, is as rare as it is bizarre. In the most common species, D. Candida, the tough outer
peridium splits around its “equator” and the papery inner layer ruptures basally, then
the spore case breaks loose and flips over so as to resemble an acorn in a cup.
Bovistas are edible when firm and white inside, but are bland at best and bitter at worst.
Discisedas are too rare to be of food value and are not normally found until they are old
and powdery. One representative of each genus is described here.
Bovista plumbea, immature specimens. This common small round puffball of lawns and pastures
lacks a sterile base. Note the patch of dirt-bound fibers below. B. pila (not illustrated) is similar but
slightly larger and has a rootlike cord at the base rather than a patch of fibers.
Bovista plumbea, mature specimens. Note metallic lustre, thin skin, and the large mouth that is
starting to form in each one.
698
699
EARTHSTARS are modified puffballs in which the thick outer skin splits into starlike
rays which unfold and often recurve, exposing the spore case (inner skin) to the elements.
Some puffballs and earthballs (e.g., Scleroderma geaster, Mycenastrum corium) rupture
in starlike fashion, but only the earthstars have a discrete spore case intact within the rays.
Some earthstars are hygroscopic; the rays open in wet weather to expose the spore case
to raindrops, and then close up in dry weather to protect it. This phenomenon can be
observed at home by placing a closed-up earthstar in a shallow bowl of water. If hygro¬
scopic, it will open up in a few minutes—even if it is a year or two old! Earthstars are also
accomplished acrobats, coming in an amazing assortment of unorthdox and extra¬
ordinary poses. Geastrum fornicatum in particular is so prodigious a contortionist
that it is difficult to find two that are alike.
The earthstars are comprised of three genera: Geastrum (-Geaster), Astraeus, and
Myriostoma. Geastrum embraces a sizable number of small to medium-sized, difficult-
to-identify earthstars that rupture through a distinct apical pore and have small spores
(typically less than 7 microns long). Some Geastrums are hygroscopic, but most are not.
Astraeus, on the other hand, is always hygroscopic. It includes two species (one quite
large) that rupture irregularly or through a large apical pore or slit, and have relatively
large spores (typically more than 7 microns in diameter). The third genus, Myriostoma,
includes a single rare species whose spore case is perforated by many holes (like a salt-
shaker) instead of just one. Most puffball pundits place the latter two genera alongside the
earthballs in the Sclerodermatales because of certain microscopic features. However, they
are grouped here with Geastrum because of their superficial similarity.
Fruiting body development in Geastrum fornicatum. Earthstars resemble puffballs when very young
(specimen at bottom left), but their outer skin splits into rays and unfolds (bottom right), revealing
the inner skin or spore case (specimens at top). See p. 701 for another photo of this species.
700 LYCOPERDALES & ALLIES
Earthstars occur in a variety of habitats (pastures, woods, waste places, etc.), but like
many of the Gasteromycetes, they are especially prevalent and diverse in arid and semi-
arid regions. The Southwest, for instance, is unusually rich in Geastrum species. They
are real crowdpleasers, but have no culinary value because of their tough or woody
texture.* Several earthstars are described and/ or keyed out here, but in the case of Geas¬
trum, they represent only a fraction of the total number.
*Captain Charles Mcllvaine, as usual, casts a dissenting opinion, sayingof Astraeus hygrometricus: “when young**
it is, when cooked, soft and creamy inside. The outer part is tough and semi-glutinous but of pleasant texture. It
has not a marked flavor, but makes a succulent dish.” (Does this make any sense to you?)
**Immature earthstars are not commonly found because they’re inconspicuous and often develop underground.
GEASTRUM, ASTRAEUS, & MYRIOSTOMA 701
15. Fleshy upper (inner) layer of rays often breaking away to form a broad cup or saucer around
the base of spore case .Geastrum triplex, p. 703
15. Not as above; spore case not seated in a saucer . 16
16. Mouth area sharply delimited (i.e., with a circular zone around it) . 17
16. Mouth not sharply delimited .Geastrum fimbriatum (see G. saccatum, p. 703)
17. Mouth with distinct radial grooves Geastrum campestre (see Astraeus hygrometricus, p. 705)
17. Mouth not grooved, but often silky-fibrillose . Geastrum saccatum, p. 703
18. Spore case mounted on several pedicels (short stalks) .Myriostoma coliforme, p. 704
18. Spore case sessile (stalkless) .Geastrumpluriosteum (see Myriostoma coliforme, p. 704)
Geastrum fornicatum, mature specimens perched on the tips of their rays. Note how the rays peel
in patches and how the specimens at left are firmly attached to a mat or cup of mycelium and debris.
See p. 699 for another photograph of this acrobatic species.
702 LYCOPERDALES & ALLIES
pedicel. It is fairly large (5-10 cm broad) and is more common in eastern North America
than in the West. All of these are better eyed then fried.
706
707
SCLERODERMA (Earthballs)
Medium-sized to fairly large fungi found in humus, soil, sand, or on rotten wood. FRUITING
BODY more or less round to oval, lobed, or with a stemlike base; rupturing irregularly in old age
or splitting into starlike rays or sometimes forming an apical pore or tear. PERIDIUM usually
one-layered and typically thick, tough, and rigid when fresh; smooth or wrinkled or with scales,
typically yellowish to brown but sometimes whitish. STERILE BASE absent, but a stalklike base
composed of tough mycelial fibers often present. SPORE MASS initially white and very firm,
but in most cases soon becoming gray to purple-black (sometimes marbled with paler veins) and
remaining firm, then eventually becoming powdery and sometimes browner. Spores more or less
round, spiny and/ or reticulate, not borne in a hymenium. Capillitium absent or rudimentary.
Key to Scleroderma
1. Spore mass (interior) divided into large irregular chambers by tough cordlike veins (which may
turn into coarse black mycelial cords at base); fruiting body 2-9 cm broad, oval to cushion¬
shaped; exterior often pitted or split in age, whitish to grayish to olive-buff or yellowish (but
often blackening in age); spore mass black and powdery to slightly gelatinous when mature;
spores 20-28.5 * 11-16 microns, smooth; widespread under western conifers (especially in
mountains), but rather rare; usually growing underground .Sedeculapulvinata
1. Not as above; mature spores ornamented; found underground or above; common . 2
2. Fruiting body growing underground, typically without an obvious basal point of attachment to
substrate; peridium (skin) sometimes marbled in cross-section; spores borne inside asci (but
asci soon disintegrating) . (set Elaphomyces, p. 862)
2. Not as above; fruiting above the ground, or if underground then usually with an obvious base or
point of attachment; peridium not marbled in cross-section; spores borne on basidia .... 3
708 LYCOPERDALES & ALLIES
3. Peridium (skin) very thick (3-10 mm), rupturing into starlike lobes in old age; fruiting body
medium-sized to large; spores partially reticulate .S. geaster& others, p. 710
3. Not as above; either peridium thinner (averaging 1-4 mm) or not rupturing into starlike lobes;
fruiting body fairly small to medium-sized (rarely large) .4
4. Fruiting body with a long “stalk” composed of tough strands and fibers that totals at least half
(and usually three-quarters) of the fruiting body’s total height; spores reticulate; found in
sand dunes or sandy soil .S'. macrorhizon(see S. citrinum, below)
4. N ot as above (“stalk” if present shorter and/ or habitat different) . 5
5. Peridium (skin) covered with prominent inherent rosette-like scales (i.e., each scale often with
a central wart); widespread, but especially common in forests (see Color Plate 190).6
5. Not as above; peridium typically smooth (at least when young) but often becoming fissured
or cracking and peeling to form scales in age . 7
6. Peridium (skin) rather thin (typically lessthan2 mm), usually rupturing in old age through a pore
or slit at top; spores spiny.S'. verrucosum & S. areolatum (see S. citrinum, below)
6. Peridium fairly thick (usually 1-4 mm), rupturing into lobes in age or forming an irregular
pore; spores reticulate ..S', citrinum, below
7. Spores spiny but not reticulate . S.cepagroup, p. 709
7. Spores reticulate or partially reticulate . S. bovista& others (see S. cepa group, p. 709)
Scleroderma cepa group. Note thick, relatively smooth skin and dark (purple-black) interior when
young. Also note how the older specimen at right is beginning to split open. These specimens stained
burgundy when rubbed, especially near base (staining is visible in middle specimen).
Scleroderma cepa group. These specimens differ from those in above photo in their more highly
developed “stalk” composed of tough fibers. Microscopically, however, they are indistinguishable.
Left: Fairly young specimens. Right: An older individual which has split into lobes or “rays.”
710 LYCOPERDALES & ALLIES
is exposed (the scales are not inherent as in S. citrinum), by their tough rindlike skin, and
by their firm purple-black spore mass when young. Features such as the tendency of the
peridium to stain reddish when rubbed and the presence or absence of a “stalk” composed
of mycelial fibers seem to vary according to environmental conditions. Other species:
S. flavidum is considered by some Scleroderma-scholars to be a form of S. cepa. It is
microscopically identical, but does not usually bruise reddish and normally splits open
into starlike lobes which bend back to expose the spore mass. S. laeve closely resembles
the “true” S. cepa, but has slightly larger spores (9-15 microns); it appears to be the most
common Scleroderma in our area. S. albidum is also similar, but has even larger spores
(12-17 microns). S’, reae, which favors arid habitats and ruptures irregularly, can be dis¬
tinguished microscopically by its partially reticulate spores (9-18 microns). S.floridanum
also has partially reticulate spores, but is tropical and subtropical and ruptures stellately
(i.e., splits into starlike lobes). There are also four farflung Sclerodermas with completely
reticulate spores: S. bovista, which sometimes develops blackish spots or stains in old
age and has spores 9.5-16 microns broad;S. fuscum, which favors conifers and has spores
averaging 13.5-19.5 microns; S. hypogaeum (-S. arenicola), a common vinaceous-
staining conifer-lover that often grows underground and has an unusually thick peridium
and spores 18-23 microns broad; andS. michiganense, which has spores like-S', hypogaeum
and often grows underground, but has a thinner peridium and favors hardwoods. All of
the above species are widespread and vary considerably in size, form, and scaliness, and all
but the latter species may stain reddish or vinaceous when bruised. They should be con¬
sidered poisonous until proven otherwise. Also see the species listed under S. citrinum.
Scleroderma geaster (-S. polyrhizon), mature but rather small specimens that have split into rays.
In this stage they might be mistaken for old cup fungi, but usually contain traces of spore powder.
■V
Scleroderma geaster (=S. polyrhizon), young specimens which have yet to split open. Note how thick
the skin is! These were found along a road with Pisolithus tinctorius {p. 712).
and powdery. Spores (5) 6-11 (12) microns, round, with warts or spines that often form
incomplete lines or ridges (i.e., partially reticulate). Peridium containing few if any thick-
walled hyphae.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups on hillsides, along roads, in ditches, poor
soil, sand, asphalt, gravel, etc.; often buried or partially buried before maturity. It is
widely distributed and quite common in our area, especially in sandy soil. It usually ap¬
pears in the fall, but the thick tough skins take a long time to decompose.
EDIBILITY: Poisonous? This is one fleshy fungus I’ve never been tempted to eat!
COMMENTS: The large size and tough skin that splits into coarse, thick rays are the
telltale traits of this bizarre fungus. It is also known (more correctly) as S. polyrhizon
or S. polyrhizum. It rivals Pisolithus tinctorius (“Dead Man’s Foot”) for grotesque¬
ness. The two thrive in similar milieu—asphalt, sand, poor soil, etc.—and make a well-
matched if not exactly charming couple. It might be mistaken for a large cup fungus (e.g.,
Sarcosphaera), but it usually has traces of the powdery spore mass to distinguish it. The
rays lack the intact inner spore case characteristic of the earthstars, and there may or
may not be a stemlike base of mycelial fibers. It can also be confused with Mycenastrum
corium, but that puffball has a thick white felty outer peridium and a smooth, purple-
brown inner one which splits into lobes at maturity. Other species: S. texense (-S. fur-
furellum) is a very similar, thick-skinned species with a scalier (often shingled) exterior
and thick-walled hyphae in the peridium; it hasa moresoutherly(tropicaland subtropical)
distribution but also occurs on the west coast. S.flavidum(see comments under the S. cepa
group) also splits in starlike fashion, but is muchsmaller, withathinner(about 1 mm thick)
peridium that is tawny and more or less smooth.
THESE two oddballs are easily distinguished from puffballs and earthballs by the struc¬
ture of their spore mass. In Pisolithus there are hundreds of small spore-containing cap¬
sules (peridioles) imbedded in the fruiting body. The peridioles disintegrate, however,
so they are best seen by making a lengthwise section of a fairly young specimen. The
711
712 LYCOPERDALES & ALLIES
fruiting body is internally sticky when young, but at maturity it becomes crumbly and
protrudes from the ground like a dusty stump, half-rotted root, or ball of dried-up dung.
Dictyocephalos is just as unsightly, but has a long, woody stalk. It is likely to be mistaken
for a stalked puffball at first glance, but its spore mass is divided into numerous “cells”
or chambers. Most of the chamber walls disintegrate, but the lowermost ones can often
be seen after the spore mass has dispersed. In each genus there is a single variable species
with a worldwide distribution.
contact with, and the dry spore dust coats everything in the vicinity. This species has a
penchant for adversity, inevitably fruiting in poor soil, ditches, chaparral, or road cuts
(often in the company of “Dead Man’s Hand,” Scleroderma geaster), or even bursting up
through asphalt. As might be expected, it is disdained by many mycologists (“It is the most
objectionable of all fungi“This ugly, stinky fungus...”), but to me it is one of the most
enthralling—if not beautiful—of all fungi (I call it “Dead Man’s Foot” not to demean it,
but because it looks like one). Its wide distribution and variable features have resulted
in a plethora of aliases, including/*. arenarius,P. arrhizus, and Polysaccumpisocarpium.
713
Dictyocephalos attenuatus. Left: Two typical dusty, mature specimens. The one on the left has lost
most of its spore case but retains its volva, while the one on the right still has its spore case but has
lost its volva. Note the well-developed stalk in both specimens. Right: A close-up of the lower part of
a mature spore mass, showing the hairy or fibrous remains of the walls that originally divided the
spore mass into numerous small chambers (a feature which separates it from the stalked puffballs).
SPORE MASS divided up into numerous whitish-walled “cells” (peridioles), but all but
the lowermost “cell” walls disintegrating, so that the mature spore mass is brown and
powdery, usually with an unpleasant odor (like decaying fish); lowermost “cell” walls
often persisting after the spores have been dispersed as flattened, pointed “teeth” on the
inner surface of the spore case, giving it a pitted or reticulate appearance. Spores 5-7
microns, round or nearly round, warted or spiny.
HABITAT: Solitary, widely scattered, or in small groups(often in tufts of 2-5 individuals
and occasionally two emerging from a single volva) in barren sandy soil or clay, waste
places, etc. It is widespread in the arid and semi-arid parts of the West, but is most com¬
mon in the deserts of southern California, the Four Corners area, and the Southwest—
often near or under saltbush (Atriplex) or along washes. It fruits after seasonal rains, but
the fruiting bodies are practically impervious to bacterial and fungal decay, persisting
for as long as 30 years in their natural environment! Mature specimens can protrude
from the soil like dusty roots (in the grand tradition of Pisolithus tinctorius), or remain
underground, depending on the hardness of the soil and weather conditions. W. H. Long,
who gathered a gaggle of them near Antelope Valley, California, reports that developing
specimens raised hard blocks of soil weighing 15 pounds each!
EDIBILITY: Much too crusty, musty, and dusty to be worthwhile, but possibly useful
as a dye (see Pisolithus tinctorius).
COMMENTS: As can be surmised from the description, this “oddball,” like Pisolithus
tinctorius, exhibits a great deal of variation in size, shape, color, and degree of scaliness
—in other words, it is not difficult to identify but is easy to misidentify. Its polymorphism
has resulted in the naming of dozens of “new” species, when in fact there is only one highly
variable one. It can be distinguished from the stalked puffballs and other desert fungi by
714
DICTYOCEPHALOS 715
its chambered spore mass, the pitted-reticulate upper surface of old (empty) spore cases,
the long and tough or woody stalk, plus the frequent presence of a volva and irregular
breaking up of the peridium (a distinct apical pore is not formed). Its closest relative,
Pisolithus tinctorius, lacks the well-developed stalk and volva, and does not usually
grow in such desolate places.
Stalked Puffballs
spores
TULOSTOMATALES
Small to medium-sized puffballs often found in arid habitats or in sand or poor soil. FRUITING
BODY with a spore case mounted on a well-developed, differentiated stalk. SPORE CASE typi¬
cally with a two-layered peridium, rupturing apically, peripherally, stellately, or irregularly.
STERILE BASE absent. STALK not percurrent; usually tough or woody and often hairy or scaly
(but gelatinous in Calostoma). VOLVA present or absent. SPORE MASS powdery at maturity
and buff to rusty-salmon to cinnamon-brown or dark brown. Spores typically round and orna¬
mented, but occasionally smooth. Capillitium usually present, well-developed.
THESE are puffballs with a clearly differentiated, well-defined stalk. As in the true
puffballs (Lycoperdales), the mature spore mass is powdery and the peridium (skin) that
encloses it is composed of at least two layers. The presence of a stalk can lead to confusion
with the gastroid agarics (Podaxales & Allies, p. 724), but in those fungi the stalk is per¬
current, i.e., it extends through the spore mass to the top of the spore case or “cap,”
just like the stalk of a gilled mushroom. In the stalked puffballs, on the other hand, the
stalk terminates at the spore case rather than extending through it.
Tulostoma, with over 30 species, is the largest and most cosmopolitan genus of stalked
puffballs, yet it is by no means common. It can aptly be characterized as “a puffball on a
stick” because that’s just what it looks like, with its slender stalk and its small round spore
case with an apical pore. There are six other genera of stalked puffballs, none with more
than five North American species and several with only one. Calostoma is the most out¬
landish of the lot, with its brightly colored gelatinous fruiting body. Battarrea is also
unmistakable, for its outer peridium forms a volva at the base of the stalk and the spore
case ruptures around its rim or through several holes. Chlamydopus, like Tulostoma,
forms an apical pore, but lacks the ball-and-socket relationship of stalk to spore case
that characterizes that genus. Schizostoma ruptures stellately (that is, splits into several
lobes), while Phellorina and Queletia rupture irregularly. An eighth genus, Podaxis, is
often treated as a stalked puffball, but in this book is grouped with the gastroid agarics
because it has a percurrent stalk.
With the notable exception of Calostoma, the stalked puffballs tend to grow inenviron¬
ments that most fleshy fungi find inhospitable—sand, poor soil, waste places, etc. Several
like it hot and are found strictly in the desert, where they form a fairly large percentage of
the fungi in the arid wastelands of the Great Basin and Southwest. Calostoma, as already
noted, is the exception. It prefers the humid forests of eastern North America and is
particularly common in the southern Appalachians.
None of the stalked puffballs are known to be poisonous. None are known to be edible
either, because most of them spend their youth underground (a necessary adaptation to
their harsh environment). As a result, they are invariably encountered after their spore
mass is mature and powdery (and thus inedible), and the stalks are much too tough to eat,
unless you’re starving and barefoot (in other words, you’re better off chewing on a shoe!).
Six stalked puffballs are fully described here, and several others are keyed out.
716 TULOSTOMATALES
11. Spore case rupturing through several holes (pores); volva usually present when fresh; found
in deserts .Battarrea digueti (see B. phalloides, p. 717)
11. Spore case disintegrating, rupturing irregularly, or splitting into several lobes; volva present
or absent; found in many habitats (including deserts) . 12
12. Stalk continuous with spore case (i.e., bottom of spore case merely an expansion of stalk) 13
12. Stalk and spore case distinct, with a ball-and-socket-like attachment. 15
13. Fruiting body full of spore-containing capsules when young and protruding from ground like a
dusty stump in old age or spore mass composed of numerous cells or chambers (when young)
whose walls usually give a pitted, reticulate, or hairy appearance to inside surface of bottom of
spore case in old specimens; volva present or absent (see Pisolithus& Dictyocephalos, p. 711)
13. Not as above; spore mass lacking capsules, chambers, or “cells”; volva typically absent . . 14
14. Stalk composed of tough rootlike strands or fibers; spore mass often purplish to black when
young and firm (but often browner when powdery); found in many habitats .
.. (see Scleroderma, p. 707)
14. Not as above; found in deserts . Phellorina strobilina, p. 723
15. Spore case rupturing Stellately (i.e., splitting into several starlike rays or lobes) when old; found
in deserts .Schizostoma laceratum (see Chlamydopus meyenianus, p. 721)
15. Spore case rupturing irregularly or disintegrating; very rare (reported from Pennsylvania)
.Queletia mirabilis (see Chlamydopus meyenianus, p. 721)
Battarrea phalloides. Left: A mature specimen in which the spore case has ruptured around its
perimeter and the top has fallen off. Note large volva at base. Right: Old specimens, some of which
have lost their volvas. Note how stalks vary considerably in thickness and degree of scaliness.
717
Battarrea phalloides, old specimens bereft of volva and spores. Only the bottom of the spore case
remains, forming a thin “cap” on the stem. In this condition they are as light as straws.
COMMENTS: The fibrous-scaly stalk, presence of a volva (which, however, often rots
away or can be left behind in the ground), and curious manner in which the spore case
ruptures around its periphery are the telltale traits of this intriguing fungus. The flattened
or concave, veil-like underside of the spore case is also unique. The upper portion or“lid”
usually detaches completely; it can often be found on the ground nearby, but is some¬
times blown away by the wind. The volval patch (when present) may tear away from the
“lid,” leaving a gaping hole as shown in the photograph. The stature of the fruiting body
varies considerably according to soil and weather conditions. Some specimens(especially
the coastal ones) have relatively thick, coarsely scaly stalks, whereas others (particularly
desert dwellers) have longer, thinner stalks. All sorts of intergradations can be found,
however. Some authorities claim that the “true” B. phalloides of Europe has a gelatinous¬
layered volva in the egg stage. If this is really the case, then the American species, which
lacks the gelatinous layer, is more correctly called B. stevenii. (Since the “eggs” develop
deep in the ground, they are rarely encountered and it is difficult to know whether or not
this distinction is a valid one.) Another questionably distinct species, B. laciniata, has a
more persistent, multi-layered volva with inner, concentrically-arranged “leaflets”
around the stalk base. It usually has a white to buff or reddish volval patch on top of the
spore case and tends to be more robust (stalk 2A cm thick at apex and spore case 4-8 cm
broad, 2-4 cm high). It occurs in southern California and the Southwest, usually in “rich
loamy alkaline soil” in the open desert (not under trees). Still another species, B. digueti,
is definitely distinct, for it does not rupture by peripheral cleavage. Instead, its outer
peridium ruptures apically (thus never leaving a volval patch) and its spore case remains
intact, with several holes forming in the upper (convex) portion. It also has longer elators
than B. phalloides, but in other respects (shape and overall appearance) is quite similar.
It appears to be strictly a desert fungus. I have found it in Baja California, and it is also
known from southern California, mainland Mexico, and the Southwest.
718
Calostoma cinnabarina. Since these mature specimens are dried out, the gelatinous layers evident in
the color plate do not show. The bright red color (when fresh) and thick, fibrous stalk are distinctive.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious in soil and humus in woods, along roadcuts, under
trees, etc.; fairly common in the late summer and fall in the southern and eastern United
States, especially at higher elevations. It occurs as far west as Texas, and is to be looked
for in southern Arizona and New Mexico, where several “eastern” mushrooms occur.
EDIBILITY: Unknown—but too small and slimy to merit experimentation.
COMMENTS: In a group (the puffballs) not noted for its bright colors, the genus Calo¬
stoma stands out. The complex structure of the outer and inner peridiums (each has at
least two layers) and peculiar microscopic features such as the absence of capillitium in
the mature spore mass have made it difficult for taxonomists to relate it to other puffball
genera. The thick gelatinous outer layer, which can be likened to a universal veil, dis¬
tinguishes Calostoma from other stalked puffballs, and the powdery spore mass separates
it from the stinkhorns, which may also be slimy. C. cinnabarina is the only red Calostoma.
Others—all southeastern in distribution-—include: C. lutescens, with a longer stalk that
usually elevates the spore case above the ground, and a light to bright yellow spore case
(except for the red mouth or pore) that usually has a wide collar at its base formed by the
outer peridium; C. ravenelii, a smaller species with a gelatinous-fibered stalk and non-
gelatinous spore case that is tan to yellowish (with a red mouth) and often decorated with
warts left by the outer peridium; and C. microsporum, rather similar to C. ravenelii but
slightly larger, with smaller spores (up to 11 microns long).
719
Tulostoma berteroanum (see comments under T. brumale group) is probably the most common
stalked puffball in coastal California. Left: Stocky specimens. Right: More slender ones. Note the
small pore that forms at the top of each spore case.
In our area this species and its close relatives (see comments) fruit mainly in the fall and
winter, but the weathered fruiting bodies can be found most any time.
EDIBILITY: Inedible when mature, and rarely found in the immature stage.
COMMENTS: Tulostoma species are easily recognized by their slender stalk, small
spore case, and rusty-salmon spores. The fruiting body develops underground as in Bat-
tarrea, and the stalks of mature specimens are often buried so that only the spore case
is visible. The absence of a volva in most species plus the small size and formation of an
apical pore distinguish Tulostoma from Battarrea, and the stalk is not as consistently
thickened at the apex as it is in Chlamydopus. There are several closely related Tulostomas
that will more or less fit the above description, including T. berteroanum (see photo), the
most common in our area. They are partial to sandy soil and are best differentiated
microscopically (in other words, leave them to the Tulostoma taxonomists). Some of the
more widespread species are: T. striatum, which has ridged spores and an outer peridium
that leaves an acornlike cup around the lower half of the spore case; T. simulans, in which
the spore case is persistently covered by adhering sand particles and other debris; T.
campestre, also sand-incrusted, but lacking a well-defined tube around the apical pore; and
T. fibrillosum, a fairly common species which also lacks a tube but has practically smooth
spores and a longer, coarsely hairy stalk.
There are also several species apparently endemic to the Southwest (or at least to arid
regions), including: T. involucratum, common, with a membranous (not granular) outer
peridium that often forms a frilled cup around the inner peridium plus a tubular apical
pore; T. opacum, a rare species with large spores (7-11 microns); T. meristostoma, small,
with a slit or irregular tear instead of a raised apical pore or tube even when freshen many
species the pore becomes slitlike or irregularly torn after weathering); T. cretaceum, a
common and highly distinctive sand-loving species with a chalk-white spore case and a
stalk that tapers downward to a volva beneath which are one or more rootlike processes
(at least in most specimens); and T. excentricum, with an off-center tubular mouth and
inconspicuous volva plus a spore case which is not white unless weathered. All of these
species differ from Chlamydopus meyenianus in the ball-and-socket relationship between
the spore case and stalk (though the two may be firmly attached), and all are rather small
and slender-stemmed. For larger species, see T. macrocephalum.
720
Left: Tulostoma macrocephalum has a thicker stem and larger “head” than most Tulostomas.
Right: Chlamydopus meyenianus, rather small specimens in which the rough outer peridium(skin)
has completely worn away, leaving the beautiful smooth inner layer. Note volva in specimen on right.
at maturity. STALK 5-15 cm long, 0.5-1.5 cm thick, usually rather long, equal or tapered
slightly toward the base, which usually has a bulb; tough or woody, usually scaly and/ or
transversely cracked. VOLVA absent or present only as a small fragile dirt-incrusted
sack or collar at base of stalk. SPORE MASS rusty-salmon to cinnamon-brown and
powdery at maturity. Spores 4-5.5 microns, round, warted. Capillitium present.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious in sand or sandy soil in arid regions, fruiting most any
time if rainfall is sufficient. It was originally found in the gypsum dunes of White Sands
National Monument in southern New Mexico (I have seen it there), but has also turned
up in southern California and can probably be found throughout the Southwest.
EDIBILITY: Inedible because of its toughness.
COMMENTS: The broad head, scaly stalk, and relatively large size (for a Tulostoma)
are the hallmarks of this distinctive stalked puffball. The presence of an apical pore dis¬
tinguishes it from Battarrea, and the equal or only slightly tapered stalk separates it from
Chlamydopus. It is not likely to be found by the average mushroom hunter, but any mush¬
room willing to grow in gypsum crystals warrants attention. Another robust southwestern
species, T. lysocephalum, has a coarser, dirtier appearance and its soil-incrusted “head”
topples off easily and is often found beside the stalk. It grows under mesquite and other
desert shrubs, but is not common.
case. Mature fruiting body consisting of a spore case (inner peridium) mounted on a stalk.
SPORE CASE round to somewhat flattened, 1-3.5 cm broad and 0.5-2 cm high, tough,
persistent, attached firmly to the stalk; surface smooth or slightly roughened, pallid to
buff, pinkish-buff, yellowish, or sometimes cinnamon, developing an apical pore at
maturity which may enlarge in age to form a“mouth.” STALK4-15 (35) cm long,0.2-1.5
(3.5) cm thick at apex, tapering downward, usually solid and tough or rather woody, often
curved and/ or flattened; usually longitudinally striate or grooved, smooth to silky-
fibrillose or sometimes fibrillose-scaly; colored more or less like spore case or browner;
not percurrent. VOLVA at base of stalk saclike, two-layered, thick, often rotting away
or staying behind in the ground; white to brownish, usually incrusted with dirt or sand.
SPORE MASS rusty to ochraceous to brown and powdery at maturity. Spores 5.5-9
microns, round, spiny (or rarely smooth). Capillitium present.
HABITAT: Solitary to scattered or in small groups in sandy, gravelly, or volcanic soil,
sand dunes, gypsum flats, and other barren places; sometimes also in adobe soil. It is
found throughout the arid and semi-arid regions of the world (Australia, North Africa,
etc.) and was originally described from Peru. It is widespread in western North America,
but is common only in the Southwest—and then only sporadically. I have seen it near the
Painted Hills in eastern Oregon and outside San Bernardino in southern California. It
fruits after heavy rains but, like other stalked puffballs, persists for months afterward.
EDIBILITY: Worthless—it is much too tough and fibrous, even as a substitute for beef
jerky.
COMMENTS: Like other desert-dwelling stalked puffballs, this species is quite variable
in size and appearance but still easy to recognize. When still covered by the warty outer
peridium it is reminiscent of Phellorina strobilina, but the presence of a volva (in most
specimens) distinguishes it. Once it has shed its outer coat (as shown in photo on previous
page), it resembles the cosmopolitan genus Tulostoma, but is slightly larger, lacks the
ball-and-socket connection of spore case to stalk typical of that genus, and is characteristi¬
cally thickened at the apex of the stalk and tapered downward. The presence of a volva is
also noteworthy, but it decays more quickly than the rest of the fruiting body and is not
always evident in older specimens. The tendency of the spore case to rupture through a
single pore distinguishes it from Battarrea, which also has a volva. Two other distinctive
stalked puffballs should also be mentioned. Schizostoma laceratum is a desert dweller
whose spore case ruptures along sutures to form rays or lobes which subsequently spread
out somewhat (see photo). The spore case is attached firmly to the stalk via a ball-and-
socket arrangement (as in Tulostoma) and there is no volva, though the base of the stalk
may split to form a free rim or collar. Queletia mirabilis resembles Schizostoma, but
has a spore case that ruptures irregularly. It is widely distributed but rare—there is one
report of it from Pennsylvania.
Schizostoma laceratum (see comments above) is easily distinguished from other stalked puffballs
by the way in which its spore case ruptures into rays in old age.
Phellorina strobilina. This desert dweller releases its spores through general disintegration of the
spore case, leaving an urnlike structure behind (specimen at far right). Note presence of large warts
in the youngest individual (far left).
5. Fruiting body Russula- or Lactarius-like: mature spore mass or “gills” white to yellowish, ochra-
ceous, or pinkish; stalk also pale in color; fruiting body crisp, brittle orfragile, the stalk typically
snapping open cleanly like a piece of chalk; sporescolorless under the microscope, withamyloid
ornamentation; found in forests or under trees Macowanites, Arcangeliella, & Allies, p. 736
5. Spore mass brown to black at maturity, or if paler then not as above .6
6. Flesh in stalk orange to ochraceous to vinaceous when fresh and mature spore mass smoky
to gray or black; found under conifers .Brauniellula, p. 732
6. Not as above (but flesh may stain yellow). 7
7. Flesh white in upper part of stalk, bright yellow in base; spore mass minutely chambered; found
under conifers .Gomphogasler leucosarx (see Brauniellula nancyae, p. 732)
7. Not as above .8
8. Growing on hardwoods in Midwest; spore mass or“gills” white; cap usually with small brownish
scales.Lentinus tigrinus (gastroid form) (see Lentinus & Lentinellus, p. 141)
8. Growing on ground, or if on wood then not as above .9
9. Cap narrowly conical and not expanding appreciably (see photo on p. 734, top right); usually
found in grass or alpine meadows .Thaxterogaster, Nivatogastrium, & Allies, p. 733
9. Not as above . 10
10. Fruiting body Agaricus-\\ke or Coprinus-like; mature spore mass or “gills” dark brown to
black; terrestrial .Endoptychum & Allies, p. 727
10. Not as above (mature spore mass may be paler brown or grayish); found on wood or ground 11
11. Fruiting body somewhat Lepiota- or puffball-like, at least when young; spore mass often white
at first but yellowish to brown or grayish and often powdery in age; fruiting body sometimes
broadly conical but not narrowly conical; growing mainly in grass, cultivated earth, deserts,
open places, etc.; terrestrial .Endoptychum & Allies, p. Ill
11. Not as above; spore mass soon yellow-brown to cinnamon-brown or reddish-brown; cap very
narrowly conical, or if not then usually found on wood or on ground in forests and under
trees (including eucalyptus) .Thaxterogaster, Nivatogastrium, & Allies, p. 733
PODAXIS
THIS genus occurs throughout the hotter parts of the world. It displays several interesting
protective adaptations which enable it to survive in its hostile environment, e.g., the spores
are thick-walled to prevent moisture loss and the cap never opens out. The single species
described here is easily recognized by its tough, shaggy mane-like fruiting body and
powdery mature spore mass. The presence ofcapillitium(seecomments)isalsodistinctive.
ENDOPTYCHUM& Allies
Medium-sized to fairly large, terrestrial fungi found mostly in arid places. FRUITING BODY with
a cap and stalk. CAP variously shaped. Flesh usually white when fresh, but often staining or dis¬
coloring. SPORE MASS typically composed of plates, irregularly contorted gills that may branch
to form cavities, etc.; enclosed or exposed, typically brown to deep brown or black at maturity
and sometimes powdery. STALK percurrent, long to very short. VEIL and/ or VOLVA typically
present when fresh, but sometimes disintegrating or easily overlooked. SPORE PRINT not ob¬
tainable. Spores yellow-brown to dark brown under the microscope, round to elliptical, smooth.
Capillitium absent.
THESE dark-spored fungi are remarkably reminiscent of Agaricus and Coprinus, but
do not forcibly discharge their spores. Five genera are treated here. The central genus,
Endoptychum, may someday be divided into two genera because some of its species (e.g.,
E. depressum) are obviously related to Agaricus, while others (e.g., E. agaricoides) may
be closer to the parasol mushrooms (Lepiota and Chlorophyllum). In Endoptychum the
spore mass is typically enclosed by the cap and becomes rather powdery in old age. A
similar genus, Longula, usually has an exposed spore mass at maturity. It also resem¬
bles Agaricus, but has congested or disfigured “gills.” Neosecotium is a small genus
which, like Endoptychum, is probably related to the Lepiotas. The other two genera,
Montagnea and Gyrophragmium, have blackish spores and very small, disclike caps with
a fully exposed spore mass. They are thought to be related to the genus Coprinus, although
the name Gyrophragmium has also been used for Agaricus-hkt forms.
Most of the above fungi fruit in hot, open, arid or semi-arid habitats (E. depressum,
however, favors mountain conifers). None are known to be poisonous, but they are usually
found after the spore mass has matured and the fruiting body has toughened.
and are entirely free from the stalk; plates often wavy or curled, up to 3.5 (6) cm long,
reddish-black to blackish at maturity, eventually falling off the cap or disintegrating,
but not deliquescing. STALK (5) 8-30 cm long, 0.2-1.5 (2.5) cm thick, percurrent, more
or less equal or often tapering downward, hollow, tough or almost woody when old and
dry (but very light); smooth or longitudinally fibrillose-striate, often splitting or cracking
into fibrillose or shaggy scales, white to buff or sometimes discoloring darker in old age.
VEIL absent or rudimentary. VOLVA at base of stalk saclike, usually buried in soil,
loose (often remaining in ground), two-layered, the outer layer white and ample, the
inner layer composed of tough fibers. SPORE PRINT not obtainable; spores (7.5) 12-20
(28) * (4.5) 6-11 (14) microns, elliptical to nearly round, smooth, with a germ pore. Capil-
litium absent.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or gregarious in sandy soil, old fields, and other waste
places; widely distributed and fairly common in the arid and semi-arid parts of western
North America (from Mexico and Texas to California and eastern Washington). It has
been found high up on the slopes of Mount Shasta, and by the hundreds in fields in eastern
Oregon. In California it is quite common inland. I have yet to find it in our area, but the
very similar Gyrophragmium californicum (see comments) does occur rarely in sandy soil.
EDIBILITY: Like myself, too thin and tough to be of value.
COMMENTS: This odd but interesting fungus can be told by its long stalk and thin
disclike cap from whose margin the spore-bearing plates are suspended. The presence
of a volva is also distinctive, but the volva is deeply buried and easily left behind in the
ground (or sometimes rots away). The size and stature vary considerably—those from
Oregon and north-central California being rather small and slender (usually less than 20
cm tall), and those from southern California and the Southwest being somewhat taller
(20-30 cm) and often thicker. The blackish spores and thin spore-bearing plates suggest
that Montagnea evolved from Coprinus, but the fruiting body does not deliquesce, nor
does it have true gills. A similar but much rarer fungus, Gyrophragmium calif ornicum, has
dark brown to blackish spore-bearing plates that hang from the underside of the disclike
cap rather than from the margin. It also has a loose volva plus a double-layered partial
veil that either disappears or forms an annulus (ring) on the stalk. It is known only from
the San Francisco Bay region of California, and appears to be quite rare. In both of these
728
MONTAGNEA 729
species the volva and spore mass disintegrate or rot away, while the light woody stalk
and thin disclike cap remain intact and persist for months without decaying. In this
condition they can be mistaken for old specimens of Battarrea phalloides (a stalked puff¬
ball) whose spore mass has dispersed. In the latter species, however, the disc at the top of
the stalk represents the underside of the old spore case rather than the cap.
Longula texensis looks like an aborted or deformed Agaricus. Note wide variation in size and shape.
At left a stout button has been sliced open to show the dark spore mass inside; at far right are two slim
buttons; at center are three small, mature, dried-up individuals (two with a fully exposed spore mass).
Longula texensis. These large specimens were found near Coalinga, California. The cap can be scaly
or smooth (see photo on previous page).
Endoptychum depressum, the widespread short-stalked form. Specimen at right isbeingviewed from
top, the specimen next to it from the bottom. Specimen at far left has been cut open to show the dark
mature spore mass. Specimen next to it is being viewed from side. See color plate for long-stalked form.
ENDOPTYCHUM 731
firm, white or stained like the cap, smooth, percurrent. VEIL rather tough, covering the
juncture of cap margin and stalk, not normally rupturing but sometimes breaking away
from the stalk in age. VOLVA typically absent. SPORE PRINT not obtainable; spores
variable in size but usually averaging 6-10 * 5.5-8 microns, round to broadly elliptical,
smooth, thick-walled. Capillitium absent.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious or clustered in duff or soil under conifers (or some¬
times aspen); common in the mountains of western North America, especially in the late
summer and fall. The short-stemmed form typical of the Sierra Nevada often develops
underground but usually pokes through the surface by maturity. A long-stemmed version
(see comments) is sometimes abundant under ponderosa pine in the Southwest.
EDIBILITY: Said to be edible (use only firm specimens); I haven’t tried it.
COMMENTS: This mushroom is closely related to the section Arvenses of the genus
Agaricus by virtue of its sweet odor when young, tendency to stain or age yellow, and
dark spores. However, the veil doesn’t normally break until after the spores are mature(if
it breaks at all) and the gills are misshapen to practically absent. The stalk is usually quite
short (as shown in the black-and-white photo), but the long-stemmed variety (which may
or may not be distinct) shown in the color plate is the prevalent one in the Southwest.
Several other species may occur in the West, but have not been formally described. The
names Secotium and Gyrophragmium are used by some authors instead of Endoptychum.
This immature Endoptychum agaricoides has been sliced open to show the percurrent stalk and white
spore mass. Later the spores turn yellowish or brown and may become powdery. Note the Lepiota-
like scales on cap.
732 PODAXALES & ALLIES
cap (i.e., underside or “margin” of cap joined to stalk). VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT
not obtainable; spores 6-9 (11) * 5-7 microns, elliptical, smooth, with a thick inner wall
that has an apical pore. Capillitium absent.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or ingroups or clusters in lawns, fields, flower beds, waste
places, etc.; widely distributed. It is fairly common in the Southwest and Rocky Mountain
region in the summer and early fall, but I have not seen it in coastal California. It is one of
the few gastroid agarics to be found in eastern North America.
BRAUNIELLULA
EASILY recognized by its orangish to vinaceous flesh and gastroid appearance, this
small genus is clearly related to the pine spikes (Chroogomphus). Like the latter, it has
grayish-black spores and amyloid flesh and grows exclusively with conifers. As there is
only one common species, a key hardly seems necessary.
Brauniellula nancyae (-B. albipes) is common under mountain conifers throughout the West. Note
short stalk. It is closely related to Chroogomphus. (Herb Saylor)
BRAUNIELLULA 733
America. It is common in the Sierra Nevada and Cascades as well as in Idaho; it is also
said to occur in northern Arizona.
EDIBILITY: Unknown, but probably edible.
COMMENTS: This curious mountain fungus is an almost exact replica of a Chroo-
gomphus, except that it has only rudimentary gills (if any) and does not open out, and is
often buried or half-buried in the humus layer. Note that it is the same color as Chroo-
gomphus (dull or pale orange to ochraceous, becoming vinaceous in age) and has the same
spore color (gray to black) and habitat. The grayish fibrils on the cap are suggestive of C.
leptocystis (see comments under C. tomentosus). According to Eric Gerry, B. albipes
is an earlier (more correct) name for B. nancyae. Other gastroid members of the Chroo-
gomphus-{2im\\y (Gomphidiaceae) include: an undescribed species (or perhaps just a
“freak”) found under a pine in southern California (larger than B. nancyae, and lacking
the grayish fibrils on the cap); and Gomphogaster leucosarx, described from Idaho, which
has white flesh in the upper stalk and a bright yellow stem base (like the agaric genus
Gomphidius), but which has a minutely chambered spore mass instead of gills.
SIX miscellaneous genera of gastroid agarics are treated here. All have brown spores
and are thought to have evolved independently from various brown-spored gilled
mushrooms. Nivatogastrium, for instance, is closely related to Pholiota; like that genus,
it grows on wood. Thaxterogaster, on the other hand, is terrestrial and allied to Cor-
tinarius; Weraroa and Galeropsis, with their distinctive pointed caps, may be derived
from Psilocybe or possibly Conocybe; Setchelliogaster and Gastrocybe are both sug¬
gestive of the Bolbitiaceae. All six are small genera and none are worth eating. Three
characteristic species of our western mountains are described here.
734
WERAROA 735
age and retracting slightly from the stalk. SPORE MASS composed of crisped or con¬
torted gills that may or may not branch to form cavities; brown to reddish-brown. ST ALK
long and thin (5-12 cm long, 1 -4 mm thick), equal or with a small bulb at base, hollow or
stuffed, rather tough, smooth or fibrillose, colored like cap, dry. VEIL (partial) absent
or evanescent. VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT not obtainable; spores 11-14 (16) x 6-8
(10) microns, elliptical, smooth, with a germ pore; tawny to brown under the microscope.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious on ground, usually among grasses in wet alpine
meadows; widely distributed in the mountains of western North America. It occurs in the
Sierra Nevada and I have found it in the southern Rockies in August.
EDIBILITY: Utterly and irrefutably inconsequential.
COMMENTS: The narrowly conical, pointed cap perched on a long thin stalk plus the
rudimentary gills make this a most distinctive mushroom. It is reminiscent of a liberty cap
(Psilocybe semilanceata), but does not have true gills. Galeropsis cucullata is an older
name for it. Galeropsis polytrichoides, found in the same habitats, may be a smaller-
spored version of the same species. G. angusticeps is an eastern species. Gastrocybe
lateritia is also similar but grows on lawns and, like Conocybe, collapses or dissolves
very quickly (within a few hours). Also deserving mention is Setchelliogasler tenuipes,
a small species probably related to the Bolbitiaceae. It has a convex to round or cylindrical,
yellow-brown to brown or reddish-brown, non-viscid cap with a chambered or gill-like,
exposed spore mass and a short or long but slender stalk. It is associated with eucalyptus
and is either especially fond of erudite settings or is only sought for by “academia nuts.”
(It has been found on the Stanford and University of California campuses.)
Nivatogastrium nubigenum grows on dead mountain conifers in the spring. Spore mass is composed
of contorted gills and is sometimes exposed in old age (large specimen). Note pale color.
736 PODAXALES & ALLIES
mature, composed of irregularly contorted gills that often form chambers; exposed only
in old age if at all. STALK 0.5-2.5 cm long, 0.5-2 cm thick, equal or thicker at either end,
percurrent, usually short and stout, quite tough (difficult to section); white or stained
brownish to rusty-bfown, not viscid. VEIL present as whitish fibrillose tissue that extends
from the cap margin to the stalk; often disappearing in age, not forming an annulus (ring).
VOLVA absent. SPORE PRINT not obtainable; spores(3)7-9 (12) * (3)5.5-6.5 microns,
elliptical, smooth, brown in mass, honey-colored under the microscope.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious or in small clusters on rotting conifers, often near
melting snow or shortly after the snow disappears; fairly common in the mountains of
the West in the spring and early summer, especially on fir and lodgepole pine. I have seen
large fruitings in the Sierra Nevada and Cascades, but have yet to find it on the coast.
EDIBILITY: I can find no information on it.
COMMENTS: This distinctive member of the “snowbank” mushroom flora is easily
identified by its pale color, growth on wood, and irregularly contorted or chambered
brown “gills” which remain enclosed by the cap or are exposed only in old age. Like other
gastroid or “reduced” agarics, it is apt to be mistaken for an unopened gilled mushroom.
Its occurrence on wood and brown “gills” plus the color and shape of the spores relate it
to the agaric genus Pholiota. Another P/20/iota-relative, N. wrightii, has been found in
the mountains of southern California.
THESE curious fungi look like disfigured specimens of Russula and Lactarius, which is
essentially what they are. Like those genera, they have white to ochre gills, a crisp or brittle
texture, and ornamented amyloid spores. However, as in other gastroid agarics, the
cap does not expand fully and the gills are irregularly contorted or aborted and have lost
the ability to forcibly discharge spores. Furthermore, while they are not truly hypogeous
(subterranean), they exhibit a tendency in that direction, i.e., they are frequently only
partially exposed at maturity. In other words, they are intermediate in aspect between the
Russulaceae (Russula and Lactarius) and certain genera of false truffles (Martellia,
Gymnomyces, and Zelleromyces). (The latter are microscopically similar but have gone
completely underground, lost their stalk, and typically have a chambered rather than
gilled spore mass.)
In Macowanites the fruiting body is Russula-like (i.e., the cap is sometimes brightly
colored and there is no latex). In Arcangeliella, on the other hand, a latex is usually present
as in Lactarius (the latex is best seen by slicing open a fresh fruiting body). A third genus,
Elasmomyces, closely resembles Macowanites, but has spores which are not modified for
forcible discharge (thus it is a step closer to the false truffles) and lacks sphaerocysts in the
gills. (Macowanites has sphaerocysts in the gills and its spores are modified for forcible
discharge though they are not actually discharged.)
Like Russula and Lactarius, these mushrooms are strictly mycorrhizal. They are
MACOWANITES, ARCANGELIELLA, & ALLIES 737
especially common and diverse under conifers in the mountains of western N orth America,
but several (e.g., Macowanites magnus) occur in our area. They are not often collected
for food and those with an acrid (peppery) taste or unpleasant odor should be avoided.
Over 25 species of Macowanites have been described from the U nited States. Most of them
are difficult to identify without a microscope. Arcangeliella and Elasmomyces have
fewer species, but are still not easy to identify. One Macowanites and one Arcangeliella
are described here.
Left: Macowanites sp. (perhaps Macowanites magnus), a Russula-like fungus with deformed gills.
Right: Arcangeliella crassa has short stalk plus white latex which is not visible here. (Herb Saylor)
ARCANGELIELLA 739
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious in duff under conifers and in mixed woods; known only
from the mountains of western North America. It is sometimes common (along with A.
tenax—see comments) in the Sierra Nevada in the spring, summer, and fall. Like many
gastroid agarics, it does not seem to occur on the coast.
EDIBILITY: Unknown, but the acrid taste is a deterrent.
COMMENTS: The genus Arcangeliella is closely related to Lactarius, and this species
looks like an aborted milk cap. The overall buff to pinkish-buff color and white acrid
latex are important field characters. A. tenax and A. lactarioides (the latter with a
gelatinous cap cuticle) have also been described from the mountains of Oregon and Cali¬
fornia; they are very similar if not the same. Other species: A. variegata is a coastal species
with a grayish-buff to olive-buff cap that is often yellowish-spotted in age plus a copious
white to almost clear, acrid latex and well-developed white stalk. It occurs in our area but
is more common northward. Still another species, A. (-Elasmomyces) camphorata of
Washington, is remarkable for its strong fragrant odor like that of candy caps (Lactarius
fragilis and relatives), especially when dry. As in candy caps, its latex is often absent, but
the odor and overall tan to rusty-brown color distinguish it. See also Zelleromyces(under
Martellia & Allies).
False Truffles
spores
*For some fairly reliable ways to distinguish the Tuberales (truffles) from the false truffles in the field, see the ex¬
tensive footnote at bottom of p. 844.
740
HYMENOGASTRALES & ALLIES 741
3. Columella short and stumplike or branched, usually prominent; peridium (skin) typically
yellow to olive; spore mass composed of empty tubular chambers, not blueing whencut; spores
smooth, yellowish to pale brown under the microscope; associated mainly if not exclusively
with Douglas-fir . Truncocolumella, p. 752
3. Not as above .4
4. Outline of gills and cap present in longitudinal (perpendicular) section (see Agaricales, p. 58)
4. Not as above . 5
5. Peridium (skin) 2-5 mm thick; columella fairlv thick (sometimes rounded or cushion-shaped),
not percurrent; spore mass lacking chambers but with radiating lines or plates when young;
white becoming brown or black; firm to gooey or in old age powdery .... Radiigera, p. 760
5. Not as above .6
6. Spore mass usually (but not always) greenish to olive-gray or olive-brown, typically tough or
cartilaginous when young but often slimy in old age; columella often translucent (but some¬
times whitish), branched or unbranched; peridium (skin) usually well-developed; spores
smooth or enclosed in a wrinkled outer coat .Hysterangium & Allies, p. 762
6. Not as above . 11
7. Spore mass white even in age, the chambers usually gel-filled or exuding a white latex when cut;
spores with a gelatinous sheath, not amyloid .Leucophleps& Leucogaster, p. 759
7. Mature spore mass darker (may be white when young), or if white then not as above .8
8. Peridium (skin) thick (occasionally 1 mm, usually 2-5) and tough or leathery; spore mass at first
white but soon black, purplish, or dark brown, remaining firm for a long time but finally pow¬
dery, sometimes with veins but lacking gel-filled chambers .(sqq Scleroderma, p. 707)
8. Not as above; peridium usually thinner; spore mass only rarely powdery .9
9. Spore mass typically marbled with paler veins, the chambers usually gelatinous or gel-filled;
spores smooth .Alpova& Melanogaster, p. 756
9. Not as above (but may have some of above features) . 10
10. Spores smooth (not ornamented), elliptical to oblong, sometimes amyloid but not dextrinoid,
spore mass composed of minute chambers; outer surface often (but not always) with mycelial
threads; very common, especially under conifers. Rhizopogon, p. 753
10. Not as above; spores typically ornamented with lines, warts, wrinkles, spines, etc., or showing
dextrinoid “stripes” . 11
11. Spores round, elliptical, or elongated, colorless to yellowish or brown under microscope, not
amyloid; spore mass variously colored (sometimes dark); peridium absent or present ... 12
11. Spores round to elliptical with amyloid or partially amyloid warts, rods, ridges, or spines;
spores usually colorless or nearly so under the microscope; spore mass variously colored but
often white at first and not typically dark brown to blackish; peridium usually present . . 16
12. Spores round to broadly elliptical and ornamented with large warts, cones, or spines; spores
usually colorless under the microscope but sometimes brown; found in many habitats but
especially common under eucalyptus . HydnangiumSc Allies, p. 744
12. Spores nearly round to elliptical, spindle-shaped, or elongated and typically wrinkled, warted, or
longitudinally lined (rarely smooth or honeycombed), yellow-brown to rusty-brown or brown
under the microscope; common in many habitats (including eucalyptus) .13
13. Spores appearing smooth except in iodine solution(and then showing prominent brown bands
or stripes, i.e., dextrinoid); spore mass white to yellow or yellowish . 14
13. Not as above; spores typically ornamented (rarely smooth, but if so then not as above) . . 15
14. Peridium white to brownish; found in Sierra Nevada .Protogautieria substriata
14. Peridium absent or practically so; known from eastern Washington . .. Protogautieria lutea
15. Peridium (skin) often thin and soon wearing away; spore mass quite tough and crisp when
young; spores ornamented with longitudinal lines .Gautieria, p. 746
15. Not as above; peridium usually well-developed, persistent . . . Hymenogaster& Allies, p. 748
16. Outer layer of each spore consisting of amyloid rods imbedded in non-amyloid material;
sphaerocysts absent; fruiting body \-4 cm broad, usually irregular in shape, white becoming
yellowish to olive-yellow or olive-gray; spore mass white and very dry, becoming olive in age;
found under conifers, not common but sometimes fruiting prolifically Mycolevis siccigleba
16. Not as above; spores ornamented with free spines, warts, and/ or ridges; sphaerocysts usually
(but not always) present somewhere in fruiting body; mature spore mass variously colored but
not often olive; widespread and fairly common .Martellia& Allies, p. 742
742 HYMENOGASTRALES & ALLIES
THESE are poorly known, difficult-to-identify false truffles with a white to yellow-
or cinnamon-brown spore mass and amyloid spores. Like the gastroid agarics Maco-
wanites, Arcangeliella, and Elasmomyces* they are thought to be closely related to
Russula and Lactarius, but are one step farther removed (i.e., they lack the cap and stalk
of those genera, grow underground, and typically have a chambered rather than plated or
gilled spore mass).
The most common genus, Martellia, lacks a latex and is thought to be related to Russula.
A second genus, Gymnomyces, mimics Martellia but differs microscopically (the central
strata of tissue in the walls between the chambers contain sphaerocysts; in Martellia they
do not). A third genus, Zelleromyces, is probably closer to Lactarius than to Russula
because the fresh fruiting body often exudes a latex (juice) when cut. (A Zelleromyces
recently discovered in Yosemite National Park has a scanty dark red latex and stains
greenish—just like Lactarius rubrilacteus\)
Unless the spores are examined, all three genera are easily confused with other false
truffles such as Hymenogaster and Octavianina. However, theyareoftencrisperorfleshier
(or not as tough) as many false truffles and often paler in color, at least when young.
Martellia and Gymnomyces, and to a lesser extent, Zelleromyces, are fairly common
in our area under oak, madrone, and various conifers. However, they do not normally fruit
in the large numbers characteristic of some of the other false truffles (e.g., Rhizopogon
and Gautieria). All three genera need critical study, especially Martellia, which is fairly
sizable. As the various species are differentiated almost exclusively on microscopic charac¬
teristics, only two are described here.
Key to Martellia & Allies
1. Fruiting body with a scanty dark red latex; wounded tissue usually staining greenish (within
several hours); columella present but stalk absent; spore mass chambered; peridium (skin)
practically absent; known only from Yosemite National Park.
.Zelleromyces sp. (name soon to be published by Harry Thiers and Herb Saylor)
1. Not as above . 2
2. Columella and/ or stalk present, usually percurrent (extending clear through spore mass) . 3
2. Stalk absent; columella absent or rudimentary . 5
3. Fruiting body exuding a latex when cut; columella thin, branching; found mainly under oak
along the west coast .Zelleromyces gardneri
3. Latex absent .4
4. Spore mass rosy to pinkish to pinkish-buff .Gymnomyces socialis, p. 743
4. Mature spore mass more or less cinnamon-buff Martellia cremea (see M. brunnescens, p. 743)
5. Fruiting body exuding a white latex when cut; exterior cinnamon to reddish; spore mass (interior
of fruiting body) pale cinnamon-buff; widespread in eastern North America, especially under
pine . Zelleromyces cinnabarinus
5. Not as above; latex absent . 6
6. Exterior tinged or spotted rose or red . Gymnomyces roseomaculatus (see G. socialis, p. 743)
6. Not as above . 7
* Macowaniles, Arcangeliella, Elasmomyces, Zelleromyces, Gymnomyces, and Martellia constitute the so-called
“astrogastraceous series.” In modern classifications they are usually placed alongside Russula and Lactarius
in the Russuiales and/ or Russulaceae.
Martellia fallax (see comments under M. brunnescens). Specimen at upper right is immature, as
evidenced by white interior. Specimen at upper left is mature and distinctly fragrant. Since many
species share these features, a microscope is usually needed to distinguish them.
7. Walls of the spore-bearing chambers containing sphaerocysts in their central layers (a micro¬
scopic feature); uncommon . Gymnomycesferruginascens& others (see G. socialis, below)
7. Walls of the spore-bearing chambers lacking sphaerocysts in their central layers (sphaero¬
cysts may or may not be present elsewhere) . . Martellia brunnescens & many others, below
Martellia brunnescens
FRUITING BODY 1 -3 cm broad, round to oval or irregularly knobby (potato-like).
Outer surface white when young, developing ochre- to rusty-brown or brown stains in age
or after handling, and usually entirely brownish in old age; smooth or pitted. SPORE
MASS (interior) composed of small chambers, crisp and white when young, but dis¬
coloring brown to rusty-brown when cut (often slowly) and becoming ochre-brown to
brown at maturity; odor often sweet (somewhat reminiscent of vanilla), at least in age.
STALK and columella absent. SPORES 8-11 * 8-9 microns, broadly elliptical to round,
with strongly amyloid warts and spines; hyaline (colorless) under the microscope. Cystidia
absent. Walls of tissue between the chambers lacking sphaerocysts in their central layers.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups in soil or humus (buried) in woods; known
only from western North America. It favors conifers and is one of the most common
Martellias of Oregon and California. I have found it in mixed woods and under Douglas-
fir in April, July, and October.
EDIBILITY: I can find no information on it.
COMMENTS: There are many Martellias that will more or less fit the macroscopic
features of the above description. The sweet odor which develops in age might seem to be
a distinctive feature, but is found in a number of other species (e.g., M.fragrans of Idaho,
which has a strong vanilla-like odor). Another common western species,M. fallax, smells
like Russula fragrantissima (at least to me). It is quite common in our area under hard¬
woods, and differs microscopically from M. brunnescens in having cystidia which are
golden in potassium hydroxide (KOH). Also worth mentioning are M. foetens, an Idaho
species that smells like M. fallax;M. cremea, which has a percurrent columella; andM. cal¬
if ornica, M. boozeri, M. parksii, M. ellipsospora, et al, which differ microscopically.
Gymnomyces socialis
FRUITING BODY 1 -2 cm broad (but several sometimes tightly clustered to form larger
masses), roundish to somewhat irregular. Outer surface pallid to creamy or pinkish,
usually staining ochraceous to rusty-brown when handled or dried; more or less smooth.
743
744 HYMENOGASTRALES & ALLIES
THREE miscellaneous genera with spiny or warted, non-amyloid spores are treated here.
The most common genus, Hydnangium, is easily told by its pinkish to flesh-colored spore
mass and frequent association with eucalyptus. Sclerogaster also has a distinctively
colored spore mass: bright golden-yellow to orange-yellow at maturity. It favors conifers.
Octavianina, on the other hand, is variable in color and cannot reliably be distinguished
from other false truffles without examining its spores. Its spore mass, however, is not
normally pinkish or orange-yellow.
Hydnangium is thought to be closely related to the agaric genus Laccaria. The affinities
of Sclerogaster and Octavianina are unclear.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious in soil or humus under trees in woods (usually buried);
widely distributed but rare. Specimens tentatively identified as this species have been
found near Santa Cruz, California, under redwood and Douglas-fir in June and July.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: Most species of Octavianina are rare, and this one is no exception. It was
originally collected in Europe and described as exuding a latex when cut. Local material
seems nearly identical to the European version, but shows no sign of a latex. Var. potteri,
described from Michigan, also lacks a latex, but has a paler spore mass and blackens when
bruised. The large, relatively few, non-amyloid warts or spines on the spores are the out¬
standing feature of the species. Hymenogaster utriculatus (see comments under H. sub-
lilacinus) looks quite similar in the field, but has ridged or honeycombed spores. There
are several Octavianinas with a paler (pallid to cinnamon-brown) spore mass, including:
O. papyracea, with an abundant cream-colored latex and a papery peridium when dry,
originally found in northern California under redwood; O. rogersii, with smaller warts
on its spores and no latex; and O. macrospora, with elliptical spores. All of these are rare.
GAUTIERIA
Small to medium-large woodland fungi usually found underground. FRUITING BODY roundish
to oval to lobed or knobby (potato-like). Peridium (outer skin) absent or poorly-developed in many
species. SPORE MASS (interior) composed of small to large cavities or chambers, usually ochre-
yellow to yellow-brown, cinnnamon-brown, or dull brown; firm and tough or rubbery when
fresh, often rubbery-gelatinous and strong-smelling in age. STALK absent or rudimentary;
columella often present, well-developed, and branched. SPORES typically elliptical and yellowish
to rusty-cinnamon under the microscope, longitudinally striate or ridged (or even “winged”), not
amyloid. Basidia borne in a hymenium lining the walls of the chambers. Capillitium absent.
THE ochre to cinnamon to dull brown overall color and tendency of the outer skin to wear
away (thereby exposing the inner cavities) are the main field characters of this distinctive
genus of false truffles. Those few species with a persistent peridium (skin) can be distin¬
guished from Hymenogaster and other false truffles by their brownish, longitudinally
lined spores. Gautieria is a common genus (if you’re looking for truffles), but the various
species are difficult to distinguish from each other and several are still undescribed. One
representative is described here.
Key to Gautieria
1. Peridium (skin) well-developed and persistent, i.e., the spore mass not exposed .2
1. Peridium absent or present only as a thin layer of tissue that soon wears away, i.e., the spore
mass (spore-bearing chambers or cavities) usually exposed at maturity . 3
2. Peridium whitish when young .G. gautierioides (see G. monticola, p. 747)
2. Not as above . G. parksiana (see G. monticola, p. 747)
3. Spore-bearing cavities quite large (2-10 mm broad); columella typically absent or rudimentary;
found under hardwoods .G. morchelliformis (see G. monticola, p. 747)
3. Not as above; spore-bearing cavities often smaller and columella usually present; very common
under conifers, but also occurring with hardwoods . 4
4. Spore mass yellowish to bright yellow-brown or ochre; spores appearing “winged” under the
microscope .G. pterosperma(see G. monticola, p. 747)
4. Spore mass typically rusty-brown or darker or duller; spores longitudinally lined but not
“winged”..G. monticola & others, p. 747
Gautieria monticola. Left: Exterior; note how there is practically no skin, i.e., the chambered spore
mass is visible. R ight: A specimen sliced open to show the interior. N ote the thin branching columella.
Gautieria monticola
FRUITING BODY (1)2-9 cm broad, round to elongated or irregularly knobby (potato¬
like), often with a mycelial cord (rhizomorph) at base. Outer surface pallid when very
young, soon becoming light brown to ochre to rusty-brown or dull brown. Peridium
(skin) very thin, soon wearing away to expose the spore-bearing cavities. SPORE MASS
(interior) composed of numerous small (0.5-3 mm) round or elongated chambers, firm and
rubbery (not fragile) and crisp when fresh, ochre-brown to rusty-brown to dull cinnamon
to dull brown at maturity; odor often strong in age (sometimes reminiscent of decaying
onions). STALK absent, but a distinct columella usually present and often penetrating
to the center of the spore mass; columella whitish or translucent, thin, often branched.
SPORES 10-15 * 6-9 microns, elliptical, longitudinally grooved, rusty-brown to ochre-
yellow under the microscope.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups or clusters in duff under conifers (some¬
times partially exposed at maturity); common in western North America, particularly
under mountain conifers in the late spring, summer, and early fall. I have seen large
numbers in the Sierra Nevada and Cascades in June, and a similar species occurs in our
area under hardwoods. The strong odor that develops in age presumably aids animals
in locating them. The animals then help to disperse the spores.
EDIBILITY: Edible, I am told, but rather rubbery.
COMMENTS: The rubbery brown spore mass composed of numerous irregularly-
shaped cavities plus the absence or near-absence of an enveloping peridium (skin) are
characteristic of this species and its close relatives. Hysterangium species are somewhat
similar, but have a persistent skin and are differently colored. Similar species include; G.
graveolens, a larger-spored conifer-lover; G. pterosperma, fairly common in Oregon and
California, with “winged” spores and yellow-brown to ochre cavities; and G. Candida, with
melon-like spores. Other species: G. morchelliformis is a widespread hardwood-loving
species with very large (up to 10 mm broad) spore-bearing cavities, no peridium, and
little or no columella. I have sniffed it out under oak because, like G. monticola, itdevelops
a strong odor in age. Two small Gautierias with a persistent peridium should also be
mentioned; G. parksiana, whose peridium is yellowish-orange to ochre at first; and G.
gautierioides, whose peridium is whitish, at least initially. Both of these species occur on
the west coast and are likely to be mistaken for a Hymenogaster or Martellia until their
spores are examined.
747
748 HYMENOGASTRALES & ALLIES
THESE are small to medium-sized false truffles with an ochre to brown or blackish
mature spore mass, a persistent peridium (skin), and warted or wrinkled, non-amyloid
spores. Hymenogaster is a diverse genus that is gradually being split into smaller units
such as Destuntzia * A smaH“satellite” genus, Chamonixia, is also treated here; it inter¬
grades with Hymenogaster. All of these are thought to be related to the Cortinariaceae
or possibly the Boletaceae. None are significant from an edibility standpoint unless you’re
a squirrel or aspire to be one. Three species are described; several others are keyed out.
Key to Hymenogaster & Allies
l. Peridium (skin) white when fresh but staining vinaceous to vinaceous-brown or blackish after
handling (sometimes also with blue-green to yellow-green stains); columella and/or short
stalk usually present, often percurrent; mature spore mass dark brown to blackish; spores
longitudinally ridged; known from California under oak.Chamonixia ambigua, p. 751
1. Not with above features . 2
2. Peridium typically whitish when young but becoming pale lilac or dull bluish, then yellowish to
orangish and finally brownish in age; spores warted, not beaked; common under mountain
and northern conifers (e.g., fir, spruce, lodgepole pine) . H. sublilacinus, p. 749
2. Not with above features . 3
3. Fruiting body staining blue or bluish-green when bruised or cut in half .4
3. Not as above . 6
4. Peridium yellowish, often with reddish stains or becoming reddish to reddish-brown in age;
spores smooth .(see Truncocolumella rubra under T. citrina, p. 752)
4. Not as above; spores longitudinally lined or ridged . 5
5. Columella short and thick, occupying only the base of the fruiting body .
.Chamonixia brevicolumna (see C. ambigua, p. 751)
5. Not as abvoe .Chamonixia caespitosa & others (see C. ambigua, p. 751)
6. Peridium usually becoming pink, reddish, or vinaceous in age or when handled; chambers of
spore mass often (not always!) gel-filled .Destuntzia rubra & others, p. 750
6. Not as above . 7
7. Spore mass (interior) dark brown at maturity (see photo on p. 749); fruiting body often 1.5 cm
or more broad; mature spores somewhat honeycombed (i.e., with ridges and “pits”); found
mainly under conifers, especially Douglas-fir; rare H. utriculatus (see H. sublilacinus, p.749)
7. Not as above; common . 8
8. Spores longitudinally ridged, grooved, or “striped” .9
8. Spores wrinkled or warted, but not as above . 10
9. Spores 9-15 microns long, with an apical pore; peridium light brown to dark yellow-brown or
maroon-brown .Chamonixia caudata (see C. ambigua, p. 751)
9. Not as above; spores usually larger .(see Gautieria, p. 746)
10. Associated with eucalyptus . 11
10. Not as above; found with oak and other trees H. parksii& others (see H. sublilacinus, p. 749)
11. Peridium and spore mass containing dirt; spore mass dark brown and gelatinous at maturity;
rare . Chondrogaster
11. Not as above; peridium white to yellowish; common . . H. albus(see H. sublilacinus, p. 749)
*The genus Destuntzia and its species (see comments under D. rubra) are described in an article by Robert Fogel
and James Trappe, now in press. The names are used here with their permission.
HYMENOGASTER 749
Hymenogaster sublilacinus
FRUITING BODY 1-3 (5.5) cm broad, round to irregularly lobed (potato-like). Outer
surface often fibrillose, variable in color but typically whitish to lilac or dull bluish when
young, becoming yellowish and then orangish and finally brown in age; often staining din¬
gy ochraceous when handled (if older) or bluish (if young). Peridium (skin) often sepa¬
rating rather easily from spore mass. SPORE MASS (interior) composed of small or
minute chambers that give it a sponge-like appearance; pallid when very young but brown
to cinnamon-brown at maturity; odor variable (mild, sweetish, farinaceous, etc.). ST ALK
absent, but sterile tissue usually present as an expansion or thickening of the basal peri¬
dium, which may or may not give rise to a thin, short, branching columella. SPORES
8-13 (15) * 5-8 (9.5) microns, elliptical, warted-wrinkled, brown under the microscope.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious in soil or duff under mountain conifers, especially fir,
spruce, and lodgepole or ponderosa pine; fairly common in the Sierra Nevada and other
mountain ranges of the West in the spring, summer, and early fall.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This species appears to be the most common conifer-loving Hymeno¬
gaster, at least in California. The confusing color changes it undergoes as it ages and dries
out has led to the naming of several “new” species (e.g., H. brunnescens, H. diabolus,
H. subochraceus) where only one exists. The brown color of the mature spore mass plus
the warted brown spores separate it from other genera of false truffles. Other species:
H. parksii is very common in our area under oak and other trees. It is small (5-15 mm
broad) and whitish when fresh and has a grayish to ochre-brown or cinnamon-brown
spore mass and prominently beaked spores (see photo at bottom of p. 750).//. gilkeyae
closely resembles H. parksii but differs microcopically. H. mcmurphyi also grows under
oak, but yellows in age or when bruised. H. albus (-H. albellus, H. luteus) is a white
or yellow-staining species that grows under eucalyptus (often with Hydnangium
carneum). H. utriculatus (see photo below) is a conifer-lover with distinctive pitted-
reticulate spores at maturity. Macroscopically it rather resembles the description of
Octavianina asterosperma (dark spore mass, etc.). I have found it in large numbers under
Douglas-fir and redwood in June and July, but it probably fruits throughout the mush¬
room season. Because of its distinctive spores it may deserve a genus of its own. Many
other Hymenogasters occur, but most can only be identified with the aid of a microscope.
Hymenogaster utriculatus has very unusual spores (see comments under H. sublilacinus). Note the
dark spore mass (interior).
Destuntzia rubra is best told by its tendency to develop reddish or pinkish tones as it ages oris handled,
plus its dark, sometimes gelatinous spore mass (interior).
Destuntzia rubra
FRUITING BODY 1-4 cm broad, roundish to oblong or lobed (potato-like). Outer
surface white when young, but staining pink, reddish, or vinaceous (or even bluish) in age
or after handling. Peridium (skin) fairly thick, white when sectioned. SPORE MASS
(interior) olive-brown to grayish-brown becoming darker (sometimes nearly black) in age;
often speckled with white sterile tissue that separates clusters of minute chambers (use
hand lens!); firm or gelatinous (chambers may or may not be gel-filled). STALK and
columella absent, but vinaceous mycelium sometimes attached to base or visible in
humus. SPORES 8-12 * 6.5-9 microns, elliptical, with striate conical warts, brownish
under the microscope. Basidia borne in chambers but not typically forming a hymenium.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious in soil or duff (usually buried) in mixed woods and
under conifers; fairly common in our area in the late winter, spring, and early summer (but
probably more widely distributed). It seems to favor Douglas-fir. A similar species,
D. saylorii, is fairly common in the Sierra Nevada.
EDIBILITY: I can find no information on it.
COMMENTS: Formerly known as Hymenogaster ruber, this species and its relatives
can be recognized by their dark, often somewhat gelatinous spore mass and pink- or
reddish-staining exterior. The specimen shown in the photograph was pure white when
collected and entirely vinaceous when I brought it home. Several Rhizopogons stain
reddish, but usually have a more fibrillose exterior, paler interior, and/or smooth spores.
The spore mass of Destuntzia may gelatinize somewhat, leading to confusion with Melano-
gaster, but the chambers are much smaller than in that genus. Other Destuntzias include:
D. saylorii (with 1-spored basidia like D. rubra) and D.fusca of California;/), subborealis
of Idaho; and D. solstitialis, an eastern species (see footnote on p. 748).
Hymenogaster parksii (see comments under H. sublilacinus on previous page). This small whitish
false truffle is very common in our area, especially under oak. The distinctly chambered spore mass
is grayish to brownish and usually lacks a well-developed columella. There are a number of closely
related look-alikes, including H. albus, which commonly grows under eucalyptus.
Chamonixia ambigua is a rare oak-loving species with a dark spore mass and whitish exterior that
darkens when handled. Note presence of columella in sectioned specimen at center.
Chamonixia ambigua
FRUITING BODY (0.5) 1-5 cm broad, more or less pear-shaped to cushion-shaped (i.e.,
round or oval with a narrowed base) to somewhat lobed (especially if growing in clusters).
Outer surface white when fresh, but discoloring vinaceous to dark vinaceous-brown to
blackish-brown after handling or standing, and either staining yellow-green to bluish-
green when bruised or showing such stains, especially near the base; smooth but rather
soft or cottony. Peridium(skin) very thin. SPORE MASS dark brown to vinaceous-brown
to deep grayish-brown when fresh, minutely chambered, the chambers empty so that they
resemble small tubes. ST ALK absent or present as a white or greenish-stained sterile base
which usually gives rise to a columella; columella branched or unbranched, usually
percurrent. SPORES (9) 11-15 (18) x 8-12 microns, elliptical with a prominent “beak”
at one end, longitudinally ridged and slightly warted, the inner wall with an apical pore;
brown to dark brown under the microscope.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups or small clusters in humus and soil (buried)
under live oak; known only from California. Like many subterranean fungi, it is described
as being “rare,” but may very well be common once you know when and where to look for
it. I have found it in June and July in Santa Cruz County.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: The genus Chamonixia intergrades with Hymenogaster, but most of its
species can be told in the field by their tendency to stain bluish or to exhibit natural bluish-
green stains. The distinctly tubulose (spongelike) spore mass is reminiscent of a bolete,
and it has been suggested that Chamonixia is related to the boletes (along with Trunco-
columella). C. ambigua may or may not stain bluish when bruised, but typically stains
vinaceous to black when rubbed (within a few minutes) and usually has a percurrent colu¬
mella. C. caespitosa is a widespread species whose skin is white when fresh and rapidly
stains indigo-blue when bruised; it also has larger spores. C. brevicolumna has an olive-
ochre peridium that blues when bruised, plus a short broad rounded columella; it has been
found under conifers in Idaho. Hymenogasterpyriformis is a small blue-staining species
originally collected under oak in California. C. caudata has a yellowish-brown to brown
or maroon peridium and a short whitish stalk, but does not stain blue; it occurs under
oak and other hardwoods in California and Oregon.
751
752 HYMENOGASTRALES & ALLIES
TRUNCOCOLUMELLA
THIS small but common genus is distinguished by its smooth spores, branched or stump¬
like columella, and yellowish to olive color. The columella may extend below the spore
mass to form a short stalk (see photo), leading to possible confusion with the gastroid
agarics, but it is not usually percurrent. Rhizopogon is somewhat similar, but lacks a colu¬
mella, while Hymenogaster and its allies have wrinkled, striate, or warted spores. Trunco-
columella is thought to be closely related to the boletes, but it is not nearly as bolete-looking
as Gastroboletus (p. 544), which has a cap, exposed tube layer, and percurrent stalk.
At least two species of Truncocolumella occur on the west coast. One stains blue when
bruised and is perhaps better placed in Chamonixia (see key to Hymenogaster & Allies);
the other, described below, does not stain blue.
Truncocolumella citrina
FRUITING BODY 2-5 (7) cm broad, 1.5-5 cm high, irregularly rounded to oval, bulblike,
lobed, or kidney-shaped, often with a stubby stalk. Outer surface sometimes whitish when
very young but soon becoming yellow to ochre, greenish-yellow, or grayish-olive, smooth
or sometimes cracking to form a few scales or patches. Flesh(inperidiumand stalk) yellow
to buff, firm. SPORE MASS (interior) yellow-brown to olive-gray, becoming darker
(sometimes blackish) in age; composed of small empty tubular chambers, completely
enclosed by the peridium; firm when young but often quite gelatinous in old age. STALK
often (but not always) present as a short, thick, narrowed base; columella present also,
either stumplike (i.e., a broad basal region of sterile tissue) or branched and extending
into the spore mass for a considerable distance; yellow to buff. SPORES 6-10 * 3.5-5
microns, elliptical, smooth, yellowish to light brown under the microscope.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious under Douglas-fir (and possibly other western coni¬
fers); common, especially in the summer and fall, but fruiting practically year-round in
our area. Like most false truffles it develops underground, but often surfaces at maturity
or is dug up by rodents.
EDIBILITY: I can find no published information on it, but ethnomycologist Jim Jacobs
had a bizarre experience after putting some in an omelet: although they had little or no
Truncocolumella citrina is particularly common under Douglas-fir. Note narrowed stalklike base
in specimen at left and stout columella in sectioned specimen at right.
TRUNCOCOLUMELLA 753
flavor at the time of eating, a strong licorice-like flavor began to permeate his mouth an
hour or two later, and lingered for several hours!
COMMENTS: The yellow to buff, stumplike or branched columella plus the yellowish
to olive exterior make this a relatively easy species to identify. Other species: T. rubra has
a reddish or reddish-staining exterior, a dingy yellowish spore mass that stains blue when
cut, and larger spores. It was originally described from Washington but has been found in
the San Bernardino Mountains of southern California. For other blue-staining false
truffles, see comments under Chamonixia ambigua.
RHIZOPOGON
Small to medium-large underground or erumpent fungi found mainly under conifers. FRUITING
BODY round to oval or irregular (potato-like), variously colored. Peridium (skin) present, often
fibrillose, felty, or overlaid with rhizomorphs (mycelial strands). SPORE MASS (interior) sponge¬
like, i.e., composed of minute chambers;/im?, crisp, rubbery, or cartilaginous when young, some¬
times becoming soft or gelatinous in age; usually cinnamon-brown to dingy olive-brown or grayish
at maturity (but often white when young). STALK and columella typically absent. SPORES
hyaline (colorless) to yellowish or brownish under the microscope, typically smooth and elliptical
to cylindrical, sometimes amyloid. Basidia formingahymenium that linesthe walls of thechambers.
Capillitium absent.
THESE dingy, unattractive, potato-like fungi are the Russulas of the underworld—
unappreciated except by squirrels, but ubiquitous.* The 100+ known species are dif¬
ferentiated primarily on chemical and microscopic features such as whether or not the
spores are pronged and what color the hyphae of the peridium stain when mounted in
potassium hydroxide. However, the sameness and mundaneness of the Rhizopogons
make them relatively easy to recognize as a group. The fruiting body usually has a tough or
rubbery (“better bounced than trounced”) consistency and the interior is composed of tiny
chambers that give it a spongelike appearance (use a hand lens!). Also, the exterior is often
overlaid with mycelial strands (rhizomorphs), there is no stalk or columella (or rarely a
rudimentary columella) inside the spore mass, and the spores are typically smooth. Finally,
nearly all Rhizopogons are mycorrhizal with members of the pine family. (One unidenti¬
fied local species seems to grow only beneath cow patties or “meadow muffins,” but may
still be mycorrhizal.) In some species the spore mass becomes soft or gelatinous in old
age, but the chambers are never filled with a gel as in Alpova and Melanogaster, nor are
they separated by pallid veins, nor does the spore mass become powdery as in the puff¬
balls and earthballs.
Rhizopogons are not only the most ubiquitous of all the hypogeous (underground)
fungi, they are also among the most visible. Many are erumpent (i.e., they burst through
the surface of the ground at maturity); others are excavated by squirrels. A few species,
(e.g., R. occidentalis, R. smithii) are edible, but most have not been tested, and as already
pointed out, identification is very difficult. My own experience with them is limited. Not
only do I have an “allergy” to microscopes, but I just can’t seem to get excited about these
dingy, dumpy, dirty “small potatoes” of the mushroom microcosm when thereare so many
boletes to be picked and Russulas to be kicked. Over 200 species of Rhizopogon have
been described, most of them from western North America, but my carefully cultivated
ignorance of the subject permits only a very meager treatment here: a grand total of three
species are described and several others are keyed out. For a much more extensive treat¬
ment, see How to Know the Non-Gilled Mushrooms by Alexander Smith (who has “the
world’s largest collection of unidentified Rhizopogons”), Helen Smith, and Nancy Weber.
*Whereas the Russulas’ brittle flesh is irresistible to those who like to trounce things, the Rhizopogons’ rubbery
texture is a blessing to those who like to bounce things.
754 HYMENOGASTRALES & ALLIES
Key to Rhizopogon
1. Peridium (skin) yellow to ochre or tawny beneath a coating of brown to reddish-brown rhizo-
morphs (mycelial threads), but often developing reddish to brownish stains in age; common
under pine .R. ochraceorubens, p. 755
1. Not with above features; peridium often white or whitish when young.2
2. Fruiting body small (0.5-1.5 cm), bright yellow ... R. cokeri (see R. ochraceorubens, p. 755)
2. Not as above . 3
3. Peridium and/ or spore mass (interior) staining pinkish, reddish, or distinctly vinaceous when
cut or bruised (and often in age) .R. rubescens & many others, below
3. Not as above (but may stain purplish-gray, bluish, fuscous, or black) .4
4. Common on west coast under conifers other than pine(e.g., Sitka spruce, Douglas-fir); exterior
staining blue-black or purplish when bruised or in age . . . R. parksii (see R. e/lenae, p. 755)
4. Not as above . 5
5. Exterior usually staining or aging bluish .R. subcaerulescens (see R. ellenae, p. 755)
5. Not as above . 6
6. Peridium staining yellow when cut open ..../?. pinyonensis (see R. ochraceorubens, p. 755)
6. Not as above . 7
7. Fruiting body rather small (averaging 1-2 cm), vinaceous-tinged at least in age; spores not
amyloid; found under coastal pines.R. maculatus (see R. ochraceorubens, p. 755)
7. Not as above; fruiting body usually larger, often staining brown, gray, pinkish-gray, purple-
gray, or black with age or handling; spores amyloid or not R. ellenae & many others, p. 755
Rhizopogon ochraceorubens
FRUITING BODY 2-8 cm broad, round to oval or somewhat flattened or irregular
(potato-like). Outer surface yellow to tawny or ochraceous when young, but usually over¬
laid with conspicuous brown to reddish-brown rhizomorphs (mycelial strands), often
mottled with red or reddish-brown areas (especially in age), sometimes reddening some¬
what when bruised or discoloring brown to rusty-brown. SPORE MASS (interior) pallid
to grayish becoming olive or olive-brown in age, firm or spongy becoming tough as it dries;
minutely chambered. STALK and columella absent. SPORES 6-8 * 2-3 microns, oblong,
smooth, hyaline or tinged yellow or greenish under the microscope.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious or clustered (usually buried, sometimes erumpent)
under pine; widely distributed in western North America and very common. It is often
abundant in the Sierra Nevada as well as along the coast whenever it is damp enough.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: The conspicuous brown to reddish-brown rhizomorphs that cover the
exterior of the fruiting body are a distinctive though by no means unique feature of this
species. It doesn’t redden as much as R. rubescens, and is not white when young; there are
several similar species which can only be differentiated microscopically. Other species:
R. maculatus is a small (1-2 cm) vinaceous-tinged species with small rhizomorphs on its
outer surface and a grayish mature spore mass that becomes quite hard as it dries; it occurs
under coastal pines. R. cokeri (-R. truncatus) is an infrequent but widely distributed
species with a small (0.5-1.5 cm), bright yellow fruiting body that does not stain; it grows
under conifers also, particularly white pines. R. pinyonensis has a peridium that stains
yellowish when broken; it is one of several Rhizopogons associated with pinyon pine.
Rhizopogon ellenae
FRUITING BODY 1 -9 cm broad or long, oval to elongated to roundish, often somewhat
flattened. Outer surface white when young but developing dingy pinkish-gray to purplish-
lilac to fuscous (dark purple-gray or smoky) tones in age or after handling; smooth to
fibrillose or with a few rhizomorphs (mycelial strands). SPORE MASS (interior)
minutely chambered, firm and white when young, becoming gray to olive-gray in age.
STALK and columella absent. SPORES 7-9 * 3-4 microns, elliptical to oblong, smooth,
hyaline (colorless) or tinged yellow under the microscope, weakly amyloid at maturity.
755
Rhizopogon ellenae is very common under pine in many parts of the West. Note relatively large
size (for a false truffle) and dark stains.
THESE false truffles, which comprise the family Melanogastraceae, are easily told by
their chambered spore mass that is gelatinous and colored at maturity and marbled with
pallid or yellow veins. Microscopically they are also distinctive by virtue of their smooth,
lemon-shaped to cylindrical spores. In Alpova, the spores are colorless to brownish under
the microscope and the spore mass ranges in color from yellow to brown when mature. In
Melanogaster, on the other hand, the spores are darker and the mostcommon species have
a dark brown to black mature spore mass. The marbled interior can lead to confusion with
756
Left: Close-up of an Alpova (A. olivaceotinctus), showing the numerous gel-filled chambers that
comprise the spore mass. (Herb Saylor) Right: Melanogaster species are easily told by their blackish
interior marbled with white to yellow-orange veins. This is probably M. variegatus.
the true truffles (e.g., Tuber), which, however, have a harder, non-gelatinous interior and
bear their spores inside asci rather than on basidia. Hysterangium is also somewhat
similar, but usually has a translucent columella instead of veins, while Leucogaster and
Leucophleps have a whitish spore mass even when mature.
Both Alpova and Melanogaster are widely distributed. Neither is worth eating (unless
you’re a squirrel or wood rat!), although the latter has been used in Europe as a cheap
substitute for truffles. One representative of each genus is described here and several
others are keyed out.
THESE potato-like fungi can be told by their white or pallid interior which is composed
of gel-filled chambers (which may, however, be very small). Fresh specimens often exude a
white latex when cut, but the spores are not amyloid as in Zelleromyces, and there is no
stalk or columella. The interior of most other false truffles is darker when mature and/ or
has a different texture.
In Leucophleps the exterior of the fruiting body is usually whitish, the chambers are
tiny, and the spores are spiny (within their outer wall), while in Leucogaster the exterior
is often brightly colored, the chambers are usually larger, and the spores are pitted or
reticulate. Their evolutionary affinities are unclear, and modern taxonomists isolate
them in their own order, the Leucogastrales. Both are fairly small genera, but relatively
common, especially under conifers. As is commonly the case with false truffles, many
of the species are poorly known and/or difficult to identify. One representative is
described here and several others are keyed out.
759
760 HYMENOGASTRALES & ALLIES
RADIIGERA
Medium-sized woodland fungi usually found underground. FRUITING BODY typically round
or slightly flattened. Peridium (skin) thick, composed of two or three layers of tissue. SPORE
MASS (interior) with threads or plates that radiate from the columella, at first white and fleshy,
then becoming gooey and finally powdery; brown to black at maturity. STALK absent, but a
columella present; columella fairly thick, often rounded, white, unbranched, not percurrent.
SPORES warted or spiny, round, brown under the microscope. Capillitium present.
THIS small genus is easily recognized by its thick skin and rounded, unbranched columella
(see photo). The multi-layered peridium (skin), warted or spiny round spores, powdery
spore mass in old age, presence of capillitium, and rounded columella (or “pseudocolu¬
mella,” to be technically accurate) indicate a close relationship to the earthstar genus
Geastrum, and it is placed in the Lycoperdales by most taxonomists. However, the outer
skin never splits into rays as it does in Geastrum, and the underground growth habit is
also distinctive. It is not a particularly common genus. Three species are keyed below, but
undescribed species also occur, at least in California.
The interior of an immature Radiigera, showing the thick rounded columella and thick skin. This
species was never determined because the spores had not yet matured; it was growing under an oak.
Key to Radiigera
1. Outer peridium (skin) splitting into rays when mature (look around for older specimens); ex¬
terior usually smooth (but often dirty); sometimes growing just below the ground, sometimes
on top .(see Geastrum, Astraeus, & Myriostoma, p. 699)
1. Peridium not normally rupturing or splitting; exterior smooth or felty; usually underground 2
2. Mature spore mass blackish; outer layer of peridium rather heavy and felty R. atrogleba, below
2. Not as above; mature spore mass brown to dark brown . 3
3. Fruiting body typically 2-4 cm broad; spores warted .../?. taylorii(seQ R. atrogleba, below)
3. Fruiting body typically 3-8 cm broad; spores spiny . . R.fuscogleba(see R. atrogleba, below)
Radiigera atrogleba
FRUITING BODY 2.5-5 cm broad, round to slightly flattened or depressed, often im¬
bedded in white mycelial threads (rhizomorphs). Peridium (skin) three-layered. Outer
surface tough and felty or fibrous-cottony, rough, white to grayish, often developing buff,
pinkish, vinaceous, or brownish tints in age; usually separating readily from the two inner
layers. Inner layers closely adhering to each other, whitish to rosy or pinkish when fresh
(but may turn olive or buff when bruised), 3-5 mm thick, white when sectioned (or with a
greenish tinge). SPORE MASS (interior) composed of plate-like bundles of hyphae which
radiate from the columella to the peridium; white, fleshy, and rather softatfirst, becoming
gooey or inky and blackish, and eventually powdery (and blackish); odor often rather
unpleasant in the inky stage. STALK absent, but the basal portion of peridium usually
thickened slightly and giving rise to a prominent columella which is nearly round, cushion¬
shaped, or narrowed at the base and enlarged (rounded) at the apex; columella usually
0.8 cm thick or more at the widest portion, usually penetrating the spore mass at least half
way (never percurrent); white or tinged gray, sometimes disintegrating in old age.
Radiigera atrogleba, maturing specimen. Interior (shown at right) is black and gooey in this stage,
but eventually turns powdery. The top of the columella can be seen at the center, but its base has been
obscured by the gooey spore mass. Note how thick the skin is. (Herb Saylor)
Radiigera fuscogleba, immature specimens. Note how lines radiate from the columella in sliced
specimen. See comments below for more details.
SPORES 5.5 -6.5 microns, round, minutely warted, deep brown under the microscope.
HABITAT: Solitary or more often in groups or large, mycelium-incrusted clusters in soil
or duff in woods and along old roads through the woods, usually buried or only partially
exposed; not uncommon in the Pacific Northwest and California, but probably more
widespread. Radiigeras occur mainly with conifers in the summer and fall, but I have found
R. taylorii (see comments) locally under oak and pine in the winter.
EDIBILITY: Unknown; the gooey black spore“mess” of older specimens isn’t appetizing!
COMMENTS: The thick, often rounded or cushion-shaped columella plus the thick skin
and blackish spore mass at maturity make this a most distinctive fungus. Scleroderma
species also have a thick skin and dark spore mass, but lack a columella. The spore mass
passes through a gooey stage before becoming powdery. In this stage (see photo) it looks
like the “ink” from a shaggy mane and stains everything it comes into contact with. Other
species: R. fuscogleba is quite similar, but has an olive-brown to brown mature spore mass
and spiny spores (see photo above). R. taylorii, on the other hand, is smaller, with a
smoother brownish to drab exterior, paler brown spore mass, and warted spores. Both of
these species occur in California and the Pacific Northwest but may be more widespread.
762
Hysterangium separabile, immature specimens. In this stage the spore mass (shown in specimens on
left) is odorless and quite firm or cartilaginous. Note presence of a branched, translucent columella.
2. Fruiting body showing a thick gelatinous layerjust under the peridium(skin) when sliced open,
eventually “hatching” if old enough (i.e., a specialized spore-bearing structure emerging from
it); one or more thick mycelial cords usually emanating from the base; often found in lawns,
gardens, and other urban areas (but also in woods) .(see Phallales, p. 764)
2. Not with above features; usually found in woods . 3
3. Columella typically percurrent (extending all the way through spore mass); often fruiting
above the ground.H. darkeri(see H. separabile, below)
3. Columella not typically percurrent; usually underground or only partially exposed.4
4. Associated with eucalyptus .H.fuscum(see H. separabile, below)
4. Not as above . 5
5. Spore mass (interior) tough and pale pinkish when young; found under oak . . H. occidentale
5. Not as above .6
6. Fruiting bodies enmeshed in a copious mass of white mycelial threads; usually growing
in rocky or gravelly soil .H. crassum(see H. separabile, below)
6. Not as above ..H. separabile & many others, below
Hysterangium separabile
FRUITING BODY round to somewhat flattened or lobed, 0.5-3 cm broad, sometimes
with mycelial fibers at the base. Outer surface white to pinkish or sometimes buff, often
becoming pinkish where bruised or handled. Peridium (skin) easily cracking or peeling
away from the spore mass, at least at maturity. SPORE MASS (interior) olive-brown to
greenish, composed of small chambers; at first firm and tough (cartilaginous), but be¬
coming slimy and stinky (putrid) at maturity or in old age. STALK absent, but a columella
present; columella thin, translucent or whitish, arising from a rudimentary sterile base,
often branched and typically extending about half way into the spore mass. SPORES
12-19 x 6-8 microns, more or less spindle-shaped, smooth within a wrinkled utricle (sac),
hyaline (colorless) to pale greenish-brown under the microscope.
HABIT AT: Solitary to gregarious in humus or soil (usually buried) under both hardwoods
and conifers; very widely distributed, but especially common in western North America.
In our area it is abundant under oak and other trees practically year-round. In the Sierra
Nevada and Cascades it’s common in the late spring, summer, and fall.
EDIBILITY: Edible and choice—if you’re a squirrel or chipmunk.
COMMENTS: Once called H. clathroides and also known as H. coriaceum, this subter¬
ranean fungus look like a stinkhorn “egg,” but never hatches. The greenish spore mass and
translucent, branched columella distinguish it from most other false truffles, and the ten¬
dency of the peridium to crack and peel easily from the spore mass is also distinctive.
There are a number of similar species that differ microscopically. A few can be recog¬
nized in the field, including: H. setchellii and H. crassirhachis, with thick whitish septa
(partitions) emanating from a scarcely branched columella(the latter especially common);
H. aureum, with a golden-brown exterior; H. crassum, whose fruiting bodies are en¬
meshed in a copious mass of white mycelial threads, fairly common under western hard¬
woods and conifers, particularly in rocky or gravelly soil; H. darkeri, a slightly larger (1 -5
Hysterangium separabile. Spore mass is putrid and gelatinous in old age (specimen on right), but rub¬
bery or tough when young, and skin is easily separable. Note mycelial cords emanating from base.
cm) species that has a percurrent columella and often grows above the ground; H.fuscum
(-H. fischeri), associated with eucalyptus; and H. stoloniferum, fruiting body anchored
by a thick mycelial cord or “stolon” and spore mass sometimes bluish-tinged.
Another stinkhorn relati\e, Phallogaster saccatus, is quite different. It usually grows on
decayed wood and has a more or less pear-shaped fruiting body with a tapered, stalklike
sterile base. The peridium is white to pinkish or lilac, and typically develops lobes and
shallow depressions at the top which rupture irregularly at maturity in order to expose
the spores. The spore mass is mucilaginous, olive-colored, and fetid at maturity, and
separated into several large chambers within the fruiting body. It is fairly common in
eastern North America but absent in our area. Also see Rhopalogaster(in key on p. 724).
Stinkhorns
spores
PHALLALES
STINKHORNS are among the most fascinating and highly specialized of the fleshy
fungi. They differ from other Gasteromycetes in having a slimy or sticky, putrid spore
mass (gleba) that is borne aloft at maturity. However, they begin as puffball-like “eggs”
completely encased in a skin (peridium), and usually anchored by a thick mycelial cord(s).
A sectioned stinkhorn “egg” reveals a differentiated interior with a gelatinous substance
beneath the outer skin, a compressed stalk (and/or arms), and a brown or olive-colored
spore mass (see Color Plates 191-198). The superficial resemblance to a puffball is soon
rudely—and forever—dispelled, however, as the enclosed stalk or other spore-bearing
structure elongates rapidly, bursting out of its “shell” and into the world.*
In the common stinkhorns (Phallaceae), the mature fruiting body is unbranched and
explicitly phallic, with the spore slime coating the apex of the stalk or“head.” In the ornate
stinkhorns (Clathraceae), the fruiting body is branched or latticed and the spore mass
generally coats the inside surfaces of the branches or latticework. In both families the rup¬
tured peridium forms a sack (volva) at the base of the fruiting body, much as in Amanita. * *
*This rapid elongation process, which can take as little as one hour, is possible because all of the stinkhorn’s parts
are fully formed (though greatly compressed) within the “egg.” Its emergence is mainly an act of expansion
(elongation of cells) rather than of growth or development. As a result, stinkhorn “eggs” can be “hatched” at
home by keeping them in a humid environment.
**Though their developmental stages are superficially similar, the stinkhorns differ from the Amanitas in several
fundamental respects. Stinkhorns lack gills, and like other Gasteromycetes, do not forcibly discharge their spores.
The spores, although borne aloft at maturity, are produced internally (within the “egg”). Amanitas, on the other
hand, do not form their spores until the cap has expanded. Their spores are produced on gills and are forcibly
discharged when ripe.
764
PHALLALES 765
THE common stinkhorns are unmistakable by virtue of their explicitly phallic fruiting
body which is simple (that is, unbranched), but may terminate in an enlarged “head” on
which the foul-smelling spore slime resides. Three genera are common in North America:
Phallus, which has a well-defined cap or “head”; Dictyophora, which resembles Phallus
but boasts a netlike veil or indusium that hangs from the lower edge of the “head”; and
Mutinus (the so-called “dog stinkhorns”), which lacks a differentiated “head.” (Dictyo¬
phora is incorporated into Phallus by some stinkhorn specialists, and Ithyphallus is an
outdated synonym for Phallus.)
Whether or not stinkhorns are handsome or repulsive has been the subject of con¬
siderable debate. The verdict seems to rest largely on personal prejudice and one’s ability
to overlook their obnoxious odor and the swarms of blowflies that come to wallowin their
spore slime. They are undeniably phallic, however, and as might be expected, their sug¬
gestiveness has given rise to a veritable “mother lode” of stinkhorn lore. For instance,
German hunters believed they grew where stags rutted, and it is said that their putrid
carcasses are burned outside houses in Thailand to discourage unwanted guests (a rather
drastic practice that might discourage wanted guests as well!). They’ve been used in count¬
less ointments and potions, e.g., as a cure for gout, epilepsy, and gangrenous ulcers.
They’ve been blamed for cancer and prescribed as a sure-fire remedy for it. And of course,
they’ve been employed as aphrodisiacs, and are supposedly still given to cattle for that
purpose in some parts of Europe. Alexander Smith tells of a remarkable encounter with
an elderly gentleman who carried a mammoth specimen under his hat in the certain
belief that it would cure his rheumatism! And, in an otherwise tedious book of Victorian
reminiscences by Gwen Raverat, there is this astonishing passage:
In our native woods there grows a kind of toadstool, called in the vernacular The
Stinkhorn, though in Latin it bears a grosser name. This name is justified, for the
fungus can be hunted by the scent alone; and this was Aunt Etty’s greatest invention:
armed with a basket and a pointed stick, and wearing special hunting cloak and gloves,
she would sniff her way round the wood, pausing here and there, her nostrils twitching,
when she caught a whiff of her prey; then at last, with a deadly pounce, she would fall
upon her victim, and then poke his putrid carcass into her basket. At the end of the
day’s sport, the catch was brought back and burnt in the deepest secrecy on the drawing¬
room fire, with the door locked, because of the morals of the maids.
One wonders how such an innocuous, splendid, upright organism could be so ruthlessly
and unjustly maligned, and I submit that this particularly perverse brand of fungophobia
be christened phallophobia. (“Aunt Etty,” incidentally, was Charles Darwin’s daughter!)
Attitudes change, however, and in the twentieth century the stinkhorns’ impudence
and imprudence have begun to be appreciated. Mycological literature is replete with
wonderfully provocative accounts of close encounters (of the casual kind) with stinkhorns
-as riddled with them, in fact, as an old Suilluspungens is with maggots. When stinkhorns
are discussed, the language makes a startling and unprecedented qualitative leap, from
monotonous minutiae to half-baked hyperbole, as if the authors were suddenly taking
Fruiting body development in the tropical basket stinkhorn, Dictyophora indusiata (p. 770). This
sequence was photographed within a time period of thirty minutes! Note how the ridges on the cap
become more visible in age (as the spore slime is carried away by flies and/ or rain). In old specimens
completely bereft of spore slime the cap is whitish. (Keith Muscutt)
an interest in what they were saying. They are lavish in their praise as they tread the fine
line between double-entendre and forthright fungal fact: “The mischief-maker is a hand¬
some specimen, as its plate shows”... “This is a highly specialized type of fungous fruiting
body” . . . “It is one of the seven unnatural wonders of the natural world”... “Never have
I seen such intricate lacework as on a Phallus” ... “It undoubtedly emerges from the depths
for a single noble and grand purpose—that of disseminating its spores. All of its parts
have been developed to accomplish this function in the most effectual manner possible”...
“It is inconspicuous while encased in its skin, and unlikely to be noticed by anyone who
is not looking for it. When fully elongated, however, it is pointedly, inescapably promi¬
nent” . . . “By extraordinary growth and expansion it carries the banquet of spores into
the light—a natural Jack-in-the-box” ... “When its expansion is complete, it begins imme¬
diately to become limp, bent, sinks down, and undergoes putrefaction” . . . “Once while
collecting fungi with other students we smelled a phalloid and tried to trace it down in
order to learn the species, but it seemed to keep moving. Finallly, we noticed that an old
man was also in the woods collecting fungi, and as I worked over toward him I realized
that a phalloid of some kind was very close” . . . “One is curious to learn the mechanism
by which so much is accomplished in apparently so short a time, and find in this instance,
as in all others where great things are accomplished with ease, that many forces have been
slowly at work to insure everything being in readiness for the success of the final flourish”
.. . “The banquet is prepared underground and the table, with its viands ready, is pushed
into the light while the invitation to guests is wafted swiftly on the breeze” . . . “It is a
glorious fungus—an admirable specimen of herculean proportions pokes up periodically
in my front yard.”
The common stinkhorns are more prevalent in temperate regions than their ornate
cousins, the Clathraceae, but still attain their greatest diversity in the tropics. Species
of Phallus are especially fond of populated areas, where they lurk in lawns, gardens,
flower beds, along roads, in ditches, under bushes, hedges, porches, and houses, in the
vicinities of churches and lumberyards, trash heaps, and old sawdust piles. Mutinus and
Dictyophora species, on the other hand, are more frequent in forests and are largely
restricted to eastern North America and the tropics. All of these fruit whenever
conditions are conducive to development—that is, warm and moist—and none are
known to be poisonous. One species from each genus is described here, and several others
are mentioned and/or keyed out.
767
768 PHALLALES
abode is in kitchen yards and under wooden steps where, when mature, it will compel the
household to seek it out in self-defense,” and his contemporary Nina Marshall says, “the
distracted housewife searches in vain for a solution to the difficulty and the odor disappears
as mysteriously as it came. If she is one of the initiated, however, she will search until she
finds the haunt of the offender andthen destroy it on the spot to avoid further repitition of
the nuisance.” The largest fruitings I have seen were on the lawn of a school in Los Angeles,
and in front of an old cathedral in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Stinkhorn specialist William
Burk recalls seeing massive clusters that apparently sprung from the foundation of
a house in Salt Lake City, Utah. If the “eggs” are carried home and transplanted in
cool, damp earth, more often than not they will continue to develop so that the fasci¬
nating elongation process can be observed firsthand.
EDIBILITY: Not poisonous (see comments on p. 765), but as Alexander Smith says,
“who would want to eat even the eggs?” Captain Charles Mcllvaine (the plenipotentiary
extraordinaire of turn-of-the-century toadstool testers), for one. He says, “(the eggs) are
semigelatinous, tenacious, and elastic, like bubbles of some thick substance. In this
condition, they demand to be eaten . . . cut in slices and fried or stewed, they make a most
tender, agreeable food.”
COMMENTS: This is one “wild” mushroom that is truly unmistakable. In shape it resem¬
bles nothing so much as a slimy cigar, leaky pipe, malodorous thumb, putrid horn, hollow
baton, spongy candle, or putrescent pencil. But the most distinctive thing about the stink¬
horn is its utter spontaneity. In the words of one founding member of the New York
Mycological Society, “you never know when one is going to pop up right in front of you,
so fast you can actually see it growing. And there is no way to predict or control them. It’s
the one thing in the world you can’t push or hurry.” The stinkhorn also hasa highly refined
sense of poetic justice. One “going strong” is said to have appeared in the concrete floor
of the newly built house greeting a newly married couple. To accomplish this instructive
feat, the mycelial cords had to force their way into the foundation from an old stump in the
garden!
The stinkhorn is sometimes mistaken inexplicably for an old morel, perhaps because
770 PHALLALES
of the pitted head and somewhat similar shape. However, the “indiscreet” odor and slimy
spore mass (both of which may be gone in old age) and presence of a volva(and frequently,
a squadron of flies) leaves no doubt as to its identity. The common variety in California
has a pinkish to purple peridium (see Color Plate 194) and is considered a distinct species,
P. hadriani (-P. imperialis, P. iosmus) but some authorities on the subject. Other species:
P. ravenelii is very similar, but has a smooth to granular rather than reticulate “head.” It is
quite common in eastern North America, especially in lignin-rich humus and on old
sawdust piles. The tropical “Devil’s Stinkhorn,”/*. rubicundus, is a rather long, slim, red
to scarlet species. It might be mistaken at first glance for a dog stinkhorn (Mutinus), but
has a clearly differentiated, detachable, more or less conical or bell-shaped “head.” It
occurs in southern and eastern North America (at least as far west as New Mexico), but
is not common. See also Dictyophora duplicata (under D. indusiata).
stalk elongates (see photographs on p. 767). In its prime the veil touches—or nearly
touches—the ground, and may be globelike or broadly skirtlike. Later, however, it shrinks
or collpases somewhat and begins to droop. Aside from its spectacular skirt, D. indusiata
resembles our common stinkhorn (Phallus impudicus) in shape, size, color, and texture
(including the pitted head), and some phallologists consider it “a good Phallus.” Other
species: D. duplicata (the “Veiled Stinkhorn”) is a robust temperate zone version that is
fairly common in the hardwood forests of eastern North America. It resembles D. in¬
dusiata, but is not so spectacular, the skirt being smaller-meshed and only 3-6 cm long
(it looks somewhat like the second photo on p. 767). D. multicolor is a colorful (yellow
to orange-red) tropical species. D. rubrovolvata of China has a reddish volva.
EDIBILITY: Nonpoisonous. Mature specimens, of course, are hardly tempting, but Bill
Roody of Elkins, West Virginia, says the “eggs” are excellent “peeled and rolled in flour
seasoned with garlic salt and pepper, dipped into beaten egg and then once again in the
flour mix before frying in butter or oil. They’re great as is or served with crackers and
cream cheese.”
COMMENTS: The slim, cylindrical, pink to orange-red fruiting body capped with olive-
brown spore slime is a unique and memorable—if suggestive—sight, and it is easy to see
how this “phalloid” got its common name (see color plates of M. elegans). The odor of
mature specimens can be rather feeble compared to that of Phallus impudicus or Clathrus
ruber, but is obnoxious nevertheless. The stalk varies from orange or pink to white, and
a variety that is entirely white (except for the spore slime) has been found in Oregon and
Michigan. (It has been called M. caninus var. albus, but may very well be a distinct species.)
Another dog stinkhorn, M. elegans (-M. bovinus, M. curtisii) (COLOR PLATES 195,
196) is sometimes called “Devil’s Dipstick.” It is also common in eastern North America,
and is frequently mistaken for M. caninus. It can be distinguished, however, by its longer
(9-18 cm) fruiting body that is usually thickest in the middle and tapered gradually toward
the tip. Also, a larger area of the fruiting body (up to 6 cm) is smeared with spore slime. In
my experience it favors the same habitats as M. caninus, but is more common.
772 PHALLALES
THESE stinkhorns are more fantastic than—but not nearly as phallic as—the common
or “true” stinkhorns (Phallaceae). Some have long “tentacles” that make them look like
starfish, others have stubby arms, still others boast two or more thick columns or an
elaborate, lovely lattice-like framework. None look like “horns,” but all of them stink
(to a greater or lesser degree), and flies seem to find them just as desirable as members of
the Phallaceae. Thus the label “stinkhorn,” though not completely accurate, is amply
deserved. In most cases the spore slime coats the inward-facing surfaces of the latticework,
columns, branches, or tentacles (or the upper surfaces of the tentacles if they unfurl). As in
the Phallaceae, the stalk (if present) is tubular, spongy, and fragile, and emerges from a
membranous peridium (volva) which has an inner gelatinous layer.
Most of the stinkhorns in this family are tropical, but several have established them¬
selves as “resident aliens” in the U nited States. The three most common genera are: Clath-
rus, whose fruiting body is composed of columns, a latticed ball, or four or more tentacles
(with or without a short stalk); Pseudocolus, with three or four tentacles and a short stalk;
and Lysurus, which has several thick arms ora latticed “ head” atop a long stalk or column.
Most of the ornate stinkhorns are edible in the egg stage, but in the words of Alexander
Smith, “are unlikely to become popular as food” (for obvious reasons!). One species,
Clathrus ruber, is said to be poisonous raw, but this reputation may rest on a single bizarre
incident (see p. 765). Five species are described here and several others are keyed out.
Key to the Clathraceae
1. Stalk typically much longer than the arms or fertile “head”; arms (if present) typically short
(less than 3 cm long) and thick . 2
1. Stalk absent (but two or more fused columns may be present), or if stalk present then relatively
long (2.5 cm or more) and slender arms or “tentacles” also present; stalk when present usually
short but sometimes fairly long .4
2. Fruiting body consisting of a rounded to somewhat flattened latticed “head” or netlike frame¬
work mounted on a stalk . Lysurus periphragmoides, p. 776
2. Not as above; stalk with several short arms that may or may not be fused at their tips .3
3. Arms usually bright red and fused at their tips to form a “spire” (but sometimes breaking free
from each other in age); stalk usually fluted or several-sided .Lysurus mokusin, p. 776
3. Arms red to pinkish, flesh-colored, brownish, or white, their tips sometimes touching at first
but not fused into a “spire,” and usually separating in age; stalk more or less cylindrical (i.e.,
round in cross-section) .Lysurus cruciatus, p. Ill
4. Fruiting body with three or more slender arms or “tentacles” which arise from stalk (but stalk
may be very short and hidden by the volva, or occasionally practically absent). 5
4. Fruiting body either a latticed ball or netlike framework or comprised of two or more thick
columns which are usually fused at their summit; stalk absent or rudimentary .7
5. Fruiting body typically with 3-4 “tentacles” that often remain joined at their tips .
.Pseudocolusfusiformis(see Clathrus archeri, p. 774)
5. Fruiting body typically with 4 or more “tentacles” that may initially be joined at their tips but
which usually break free and sometimes bend back in age .6
6. Arms or “tentacles” diverging from a flat disclike expansion of the stalk apex, often appearing
divided or paired; spore slime mostly in center of fruiting body or coating bases of the arms;
tropical .Aseroe rubra (see Clathrus archeri, p. 774)
6. Not as above; spore slime borne on inner or upper surfaces of arms . Clathrus archeri, p.774
CLATHRACEAE 773
7. Fruiting body lantern-like, i.e., the spore slime borne in a specialized structure slung between
2-4 red to orange or pink columns that merge at the top to form an arch; tropical (reported
from Miami, Florida) . Laternea triscapa
7. Not as above; fruiting body with columns or a latticed framework, but lacking a separate spore¬
bearing structure . 8
8. Fruiting body consisting of a latticed network of branches and “windows” (somewhat like a
“whiffle ball”—see photo on p. 774) .Clathrus ruber & others, below
8. Fruiting body composed of2-5 thick columns joined at their summit(the columns occasionally
with one or two transverse branches, but not enough to form a lattice) .9
9. Fruiting body composed of two creamy to yellow to orangish columns at first pressed closely
together but then bowing at the center; rare (native to Japan) .Clathrus bicolumnatus
9. Fruiting body typically with (2) 3-5 red to pink or orange columns; widely distributed and not
uncommon (especially in eastern North America) Clathrus columnatus {see C. ruber, below)
EDIBILITY: Nonpoisonous according to some sources, harmful (at least raw) according
to others (see the quote on stinkhorn poisoning on p. 765).
COMMENTS: Also known as C. cancellatus, this “wild” mushroom looks like a red or
orange “whiffle ball” (see photograph). The white volva from which it emerges and the
intolerable stench that develops at maturity are also distinctive. The color of the branches
varies considerably—from bright red to very pale orange—apparently depending on the
temperature and humidity. The putrid perfume attracts flies in large numbers and is,
in my humble fungal opinion, the vilest of any stinkhorn. It must be smelled to be believed!
(According to Ramsbottom, the smell is “so fetid that more than one artist has related
that it was impossible to paint it without discomfort. . . when the color photograph was
taken it would have been pleasing to have shown one or two flies at work, but they settled
in such swarms that they had to be driven off.”). The “eggs,” on the other hand, are quite
odorless and very knobby or furrowed just prior to bursting. In this stage they are easily
“hatched” at home. C. crispus is a similar but even more spectacular neotropical species
whose “windows” are circumscribed by “coronas”; it has been found in Florida. A species
of the Old W orld tropics, C. crispatus, is also quite similar, but the upper part of its lattice-
work regularly breaks up into fragments in age. C. columnatus (-Laternea columnata)
has 2-5 thick, orange to red columns which arise independently but are fused at the top and
Clathrus ruber is easily recognized by its bright red to pink to pale orange latticework. Left Mature
specimens; note absence of a stalk. Right: Note how lumpy this “egg” is!
may branch horizontally (but not enough to form a latticework). It is widely distributed
and has been found in many localities in eastern North America (particularly the South),
plus Hawaii. C. preussii and Ileodictyon cibarium (-C. cibarius) are but two of many
southern and/ or tropical stinkhorns with a delicate white latticework and large “win¬
dows.” The first is a native of Africa; the latter is common in the southern hemisphere.
774
Clathrus archeri is aptly called the “Octopus Stinkhorn” or“Stinkopus” because of its long, tentacle¬
like arms. They are intially joined at their tips (central specimen), but then separate and recurve(spe-
cimen at left). Note cords emanating from the “egg” in foreground. Also see the color plates.
Top view of the tropical stinkhorn Aseroe rubra (see comments above). Note how arms are deeply
divided and spore slime is concentrated at center. Stalks are not visible in this photo. (M ichael Fogden)
776 PHALLALES
of the “tentacles.” Although strictly tropical, it may turn up, like so many other exotic
fungi, in a greenhouse or similarly sultry environment. Also similar to C. archeri is the
“Stinky Squid ” Pseudocolus fusiformis(-P. schellenbergiae, P. javanicus). It is common
in scattered localities in eastern North America (especially Chapel Hill, North Carolina,
the home of stinkhorn specialist William Burk), as well as in Europe, Australia, Asia, and
Tierra del Fuego. It has a white to brown volva and only three to four “tentacles” which
are red-orange to orange or pinkish, arise from a common stalk, and are usually fused at
their tips (see photo on p. 777) but sometimes break free in age.
the vertical slits between the arms and coating their sides, mucilaginous, light brown to
olive-brown becoming darker (blackish) as it dries, with an unpleasant odor at maturity.
Spores 3.5-4.5 * 1.5-2 microns, oblong, smooth.
HABITAT: Solitary to densely gregarious or clustered in lawns, gardens, hard-packed
soil, etc.; common in southern California and fruiting there year-round, but partial to
warm weather. It is probably native to Asia, but is well established in California at least as
far north as Fresno. It has also been found in Texas and Washington, D.C.
EDIBILITY: Edible in the egg stage, but in my opinion, no better than Clathrus archeri
(I have fried it). However, it is considered a great delicacy in China.
COMMENTS: This gaudy stinkhorn is easily recognized by its red to pink color and
distinctive shape. In the words of Paul Rea (who wrote an extensive analysis of the deve¬
lopmental stages of this species), “the form of the expanded plant may be likened to a
moat (the volval cup) surrounding the base of a tower (the polygonal stipe) bearing a
belfry or lantern (the arms) surmounted by a spire”—a very apt description, except that
the “belfry” is usually besieged by flies (see color plate)! Specimens growing in hard
ground are apt to be larger than those growing in rich or loose soil, perhaps because they
take longer to develop. The arms sometimes break free from each other, but the several¬
sided stalk and often brighter color distinguish it from L. cruciatus.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups or clusters in lawns, gardens, under trees, in rich soil,
on rotten wood, etc.; apparently native to Australia and New Zealand, but now widely
distributed and well established in various parts of the U nited States. It is not uncommon
in southern California, but is not nearly as numerous as L. mokusin. It favors warm
weather but can be found most anytime. I have not seen it north of Santa Barbara.
EDIBILITY: Presumably edible, but see comments on the edibility of Clathrus archeri.
COMMENTS: Better known asL. (-Artthurus) borealis, this stinkhorn is easily told by its
short, thick arms which separate slightly but do not unfold a la Clathrus archeri. It can be
dull or brightly colored, and the tips ofits arms are neverfusedintoa spire asinL. mokusin.
It has often been confused with/,, gardneri, a tropical species whose arms have sterile bases.
NIDULARIALES
Tiny fungi found on soil, wood, dung, and vegetable debris. FRUITING BODY usually rather
tough, at first round to cylindrical or cushion-shaped, usually becoming cup- to mug-shaped(nest¬
like) at maturity, with several “eggs” enclosed (only one “egg” in Sphaerobolus). PERIDIUM
(wall of “nest”) conposed of 1 -4 layers. PERIDIOLES (“eggs”) usually flattened and lens- or
lentil-shaped, white to gray, brown or black, sometimes with minute cords attached. STALK
absent (but base of “nest” may be narrowed). SPORES borne inside the peridioles, typically
smooth and hyaline. Capillitium absent.
THESE minute Gasteromycetes look like miniature bird’s nests. The fruiting body
typically consists of a tiny vase or “nest” (peridium) furnished with several spore capsules
or “eggs” (peridioles), and in most cases a protective membrane or “lid” (epiphragm)
that initially covers the top of the nest. As such there is very little that the bird’s nest fungi
can be confused with, though when very young they might be mistaken for minute puff¬
balls, and when old and bereft of eggs they look like tiny, tough cup fungi.
The spores are dispersed with the aid of raindrops and animals. The force of a single
raindrop will splash the eggs out of the nest and as much as seven feet away (hence they
are sometimes called “splash cups”). The outer wall of the egg then decays or is eaten away
by insects and the spores within are exposed. Whereas most fungi produce millions of
spores, the bird’s nest fungi need only a few—each egg contains the correct mating strains,
so a fertile secondary (dikaryotic) mycelium develops directly, obviating the need for
large numbers of spores.
There are four common genera of bird’s nest fungi. In Cyathus and Crucibulum, each
egg is anchored to the nest by a minute cord or “stalk” (funiculus), while in Nidula and
Nidularia the eggs are imbedded in a sticky gel. Both the cords and the sticky mucilage help
the splashed eggs to adhere to whatever they land on. Also treated in this chapter is
Sphaerobolus, a dynamic relative of the bird’s nest fungi that is sometimes called the
“cannon fungus.” It features only one egg that is shot out with terrific force, accompanied
by an audible “pop.” (The Latin name literally means “sphere-thrower.”)
Bird’s nest fungi are found on various types of organic or vegetable matter—rotting
wood and sticks, herbaceous stems, humus, dung, and manure (the spores of dung-
inhabiting individuals presumably pass through—and out of—grazing animals). They
are gregarious creatures, but as they rarely attain heights of more than 15 mm, they are
difficult to see and worthless as food. Most of the common North American species are
keyed out here, but additional exotic types may turn up in greenhouses and flower pots.
NIDULARIALES 779
780
Nidula niveotomentosaisee comments under N. Candida), young specimens in which the nest is still
covered by the epiphragm(“lid”). Note white exterior and mug-shaped fruiting body. (Herb Saylor)
lid. Peridium(wall of the nest) tough, persistent. Exterior whitish beneath a gray to brown
or dull cinnamon scurfy or shaggy layer that covers at least the basal portion and the lid.
Interior of the nest smooth, white to yellowish-brown or brown. PERIDIOLES (eggs)
several, 1-2 mm indiameter, pallid to gray or brown (but often darker on underside),
flattened, without cords, instead imbedded in a sticky mucilage or gel which eventually
dries out. Spores 6-10 * 4-8 microns, elliptical to nearly round, smooth, hyaline.
HABITAT: In groups on rotting wood, berry canes, and herbaceous debris in gardens,
woods, along streams, etc.; widely distributed. It is common in our area in the late fall
and winter or even spring, but the empty nests persist for months without decaying and
sometimes give rise to new ones.
EDIBILITY: Academic; you’d have to be slightly looney to bother with something so puny.
COMMENTS: A common but frequently overlooked little fungus, easily told by the
brownish to cinnamon scurfy exterior and the sticky gel in which the eggs are imbedded,
plus the presence of a covering or lid when young. The species name, Candida, which
means “shining white,” is a misnomer since the fruiting body is neither shiny nor white.
However, a similar species witha shaggy white exterior (and numerous small browneggs),
N. niveotomentosa, is common in California and the Pacific Northwest, usually on sticks
or in moss. See also the genus Nidularia (in the key) and Cyathus stercoreus.
781
782
Ascomycetes
ASCOMYCOTINA
THE Ascomycetes are the largest subdivision of the true fungi. With over 15,000 known
species, they pose a challenge, in the words of one noted mycologist, to “an army”
of students. They are also an exceedingly diverse group, ranging from the most econo¬
mically important of all the fungi, the single-celled yeasts, to powdery mildews to bread
molds like Penicillium (the original source of penicillin) to prized edible mushrooms such
as the morels and truffles. Their common bond is fundamental but microscopic: the
sexually-produced spores are formed inside saclike mother cells called asci (singular:
ascus). The ascus is roughly analagous to the basidium of a Basidiomycete, although
fusion of the parent nuclei typically occurs in a separate cell, the ascogonium. Each ascus
contains one to several thousand spores depending on the species. The most frequent
number is eight.
Only a small fraction of the Ascomycetes have fruiting bodies large enough to merit
mention in this book. In the field they can usually be distinguished from Basidiomycetes
by a process of elimination, i.e., if your fleshy fungal fructification does not fit one of the
common categories of Basidiomycetes pictured on pp. 52-54 (agarics, boletes, puffballs,
etc.), then chances are it’s an Ascomycete. The fleshy Ascomycetes treated in this book
fall into two broad categories, keyed below.
DISCOMYCETES
DISCOMYCETES are not Ascomycetes that like to dance, nor are they necessarily disc¬
shaped. Discomycetes are Ascomycetes in which a palisade of asci line an exposed surface
of the fruiting body much as a palisade of basidia line the gills of an agaric. This palisade
of asci (see drawing at bottom of p. 782) is called the hymenium, and the fruiting body of
a Discomycete is called an apothecium (as opposed to the perithecium of a Pyreno-
mycete). All but a handful of the Ascomycetes treated in this book are Discomycetes.
Examples are the morels, false morels, elfin saddles, cup fungi, and earth tongues. Truffles
are also Discomycetes, but they have specialized underground fruiting bodies in which
the hymenium is infolded and internalized, or in some cases, non-existent (see p. 841 for
more details). The Discomycetes have been divided here into three orders (large groups),
keyed below. To facilitate identification, the key is based largely on the shape and size
of the fruiting body rather than on more critical(i.e., microscopic) characteristics. Excep¬
tions to the generalizations put forth in the key are then keyed out individually under
the various orders, families, and genera.
The fertile surface ranges from concave or flat in the cup fungi to convex or convoluted
in the false morels and elfin saddles to deeply pitted in the true morels. A stalk is present
in the latter forms but often absent in the cup fungi.
Members of the Pezizales can be found almost anywhere at any time, but are most
numerous and diverse in forests, in the spring. This means that in regions with mild winters
they usually peak after most of the Basidiomycetes have fruited, while in regions with cold
winters they are among the first fungi to appear after the snow has melted. Excluding the
truffles (which are treated separately in this book), there are seven major families in the
Pezizales, five of which are cup fungi. These are keyed below.
Key to the Pezizales
1. Fruiting body an irregularly cabbage-like, cauliflower-like, contorted, brainlike, or pitted mass
of tissue, with or without a stalk; flesh not gelatinous . 2
1. Not as above .. 3
2. Stalk absent or rudimentary, or if stalk present then stalk long (15-30 cm!) and solid and brown
and often buried and restricted to eastern North America; fertile portion of fruiting body
whitish to yellowish-brown, beige, pinkish, or lilac-tinged; rare . Pezizaceae & Allies, p. 817
2. Not as above; stalk present, long or short, usually hollow or partially hollow or complexly
folded or chambered in cross-section; fertile portion of fruiting body colored as above or
often darker; very common and widely distributed . 5
3. Fruiting body cup-shaped (concave) to disclike (flat), cushion-shaped, or sometimes top¬
shaped or splitting into rays; stalk present or absent; flesh gelatinous, fragile, or tough ... 4
3. Fruiting body with a cap and stalk; cap convex to conical to bell-shaped, round, lobed, brainlike,
saddle-shaped, or pitted but not cuplike (or cuplike only when very young); flesh fragile or
tough but not gelatinous. 5
4. Stalk absent, or if present then often (but not always!) short or merely a narrowed, downward
extension of the cup; stalk when present usually lacking distinct ribs; fruiting body fleshy,
fragile, rubbery, or gelatinous, sometimes brightly colored, large to minute; tips of asci amy¬
loid or not amyloid .Pezizaceae & Allies, p. 817
4. Stalk present, clearly differentiated from cap; stalk usually longer than width of cup or if shorter
then usually ribbed or fluted; fruiting body fleshy or fragile but not gelatinous and not brightly
colored, large to fairly small but not minute; tips of asci not amyloid . . Helvellaceae, p. 796
5. Cap honeycombed with ridges and pits, the pits usually fairly deep, or if not then the ridges
with a strong vertical orientation; cap intergrown with stalk (or in one case, only upper part
of cap intergrown with stalk) .Morchellaceae, below
5. Not as above . 6
6. Flesh gelatinous; fruiting body often viscid and brightly colored .... (see Helotiales, p. 865)
6. Not as above; flesh not gelatinous . 7
7. Cap roughly conical to bell-shaped, like a thimble on a finger (i.e., attached only to very top of
stalk, the sides hanging down freely like a skirt) .Morchellaceae, below
7. Not as above; cap lobed, brainlike, saddle-shaped, etc. and/or attached to stalk differently
.. Helvellaceae, p. 796
tical spores. The spores lack large oil droplets but typically have “crowns” of minute
droplets at both ends.
Key to the Morchellaceae
1. Fruiting body cuplike or spreading (flat); stalk very short or absent .Disciotis, p. 796
1. Not as above; fruiting body with a cap or “head” and well-developed stalk . 2
2. Cap with pits and ridges; at least the upper part of cap intergrown with stalk Morchella, below
2. Cap smooth to wrinkled or shallowly pitted, sitting on the stalk like a thimble (i.e., attached only
to very top of stalk, the sides hanging free like a skirt) .Verpa, p. 793
MORCHELLA (Morels)
Medium-sized to large, mostly terrestrial fungi. FRUITING BODY with a cap and stalk; interior
hollow. CAP honeycombed with ridges and pits (chambers), attached to the stalk for all of its length
(or in one case, for 1 /3-2/3 of its length). STALK well-developed, smooth to scurfy or wrinkled
below. SPORES typically elliptical, smooth, without large oil droplets. Asci lining inside surfaces
of pits; 8-spored, operculate, not amyloid.
THESE prized delicacies are among the best-known wild mushrooms in North America,
and they are so esteemed in Europe that people used to set fire to their own forests in hopes
of eliciting a bountiful morel crop the next spring! Luckily, morels are among the most
unmistakable of all fungi by virtue of their hollow, pitted or honeycombed “heads” (they
are also known as “sponge mushrooms”). False morels (Gyromitra) are vaguely similar,
but have a wrinkled or convoluted (not pitted) cap, while thimble morels (Verpa) have a
smooth to wrinkled or shallowly pitted cap with free (skirtlike) sides. Morels have also
been confused inexplicably with stinkhorns (Phallus), perhaps because of their similar
shape. The head of a fresh Phallus, however, is coated with a sticky, stinky spore slime and
there is a sack or volva at the base of the stalk.*
Much has been said about where and when to find morels, but no self-respecting morel
hunter will divulge any truly crucial information unless he or she is planning to per¬
manently leave the country (and then only for a stiff price!). Morel hunters are so
protective of their favorite “patches,” in fact, that they regularly disseminate misleading
—if not downright erroneous—information, and they practice a presidential evasiveness
when asked: “Where did all those morels come from?” Thus any “tips” or “secrets” you
manage to squeeze out of morel hunters should be taken with a grain (better make that a
bucket!) of salt. Having said this, I will now tell you where and when to find morels . ..
Morels usually grow outdoors: in forests (under both hardwoods and conifers) and open
ground, in abandoned orchards, gardens, landscaped areas, under hedges, on roadcuts
and driveways, near melting snow, in gravel, around wood piles or tree trunks, and in
sandy soil along streams. In other words, morels grow wherever they please! They will
even fruit in barbecue pits and on scorched ground in the wake of forest fires—sometimes
in awesome quantities, but only if conditions are favorable!
Morels are almost universally associated with the spring (“May is morel month in
Michigan”), but occasionally appear in the summer, fall, and winter. In the Midwest,
where they are particularly abundant, the various species appear in a definite succession
from late April through early June, and the annual morel festivals are a major tourist
attraction. The state of Minnesota, in fact, recently declared the morel its official “state*
mushroom.”' Morels seem to respond to a warming trend following a cold spell. This
explains why they are particularly abundant in regions with cold winters—which is only
right, because the people who survive those winters deserve a delicious spring! Alas, in
tepid coastal California morels are not nearly as common as one would wish. In our area,
in fact, finding them is largely a matter of luck, i.e., being in the right place at the right
* Don’t feel too embarrassed should you manage to confuse them—Morchella esculenta was originally classified
as a Phallus by Linnaeus!
Springtime bounty: A basket of black morels (Morchella elata group, p. 790).
time. In the Sierra Nevada and Cascades, however, they can actually be hunted—and
sometimes harvested in large quantities, particularly if there are spring rains. Although
timing is of critical importance because of competition from other morel hunters, it has
been shown that morels develop and age more slowly than most mushrooms, over a period
of three to four weeks! They have resisted all attempts to raise them commercially, but one
ambitious entrepeneur tells me that success isjustaround the corner. The spores germinate
readily in culture and the mycelium flourishes, but getting it to fruit has been the major
stumbling block (perhaps it needs to be chilled to simulate a cold winter?).
Although the genus Morchella is unerringly distinct, the disposition of species is largely
a matter of opinion. Dozens have been described based on differences in color, shape, and
orientation of the pits and ridges. However, each “species” seems to intergrade with the
next, leading some morelizers to recognize only three or four species. To most people the
“true” identity of a morel is academic anyway—what counts is that it is edible, and
incredible!
Raw morels often cause digestive upsets, so to stay on their good side, always cook them.
They are delicious sauteed (providing you don’t drown them in butter and herbs), and you
can serve them over toast or in soup. Because they are hollow, morels are easy to stuff,
but it is even easier to stuff yourself with morels! Before cooking, always split them length¬
wise to check for millipedes, slugs, and other critters that like to hide inside. Transfer all
such tenants to the compost pile or some other comfortable spot (just because you’re
evicting them from their home doesn’t mean you have to kill them!) and carefully remove
all grit or sand, using water if necessary. If you are lucky enough to stumble on a large
batch of morels and are unwilling to share the surplus with me, you can preserve them by
canning or sauteeing and freezing. Or you can string them into beautiful necklaces and
hang them up to dry (I will accept them in any form).
Four “species” of Morchella are described here, and several others are discussed. As
I am meticulously mapping their variation and distribution, I request you, generous
reader, to deliver any and all morels you find to my doorstep. Then, while I am savoring
the superb flavor of croutes aux morilles a la normande (having first, of course, studied
them thoroughly), you can bask in the altruistic satisfaction that comes from contributing
to science.*
*The least you can do is invite me over for dinner.
786
MORCHELLA 787
Key to Morchella
1. Volva (sack) present at base of stalk (dig up carefully!); odor often fetid (see Phallales, p. 764)
1. Volva absent . 2
2. Cap usually brainlike and irregularly lobed (as well as pitted), brown to reddish-brown; stalk
complex (i.e., cross-section half way up stalk revealing numerous internal folds), often massive
(up to 20 cm thick!) .(see Gyromitra, p. 799)
2. Not as above; cap not conspicuously lobed; upper stalk or mid-portion more or less simple in
cross-section (but base often folded or complex) . 3
3. Lower 1 / 3-2/3 of cap free from stalk (only the upper part intergrown) M. semilibera, p. 791
3. All or nearly all of cap intergrown with stalk (lower edge may be creased).4
4. Ridges of cap dark (dark gray to olive-brown to black) at maturity and sometimes dark when
young . M. data group, p. 790
4. Not as above (but ridges may blacken when they dry out and shrivel up) .5
5. Ridges white or markedly paler than the pits when young, but often becoming same color as
pits in age; pits usually large and often elongated vertically; fruiting body small to medium¬
sized (not large); common in suburbia, orchards, etc., less often in woods M. delidosa, p. 789
5. Not with above features (but may have some of them) .6
6. Fruiting body pale (whitish to buff), not darkening in age; pits usually vertically elongated;
mostly found in woods (especially montane) M. sp. (unidentified) (see M. deliciosa, p. 789)
6. Not as above; if pale then pits roundish to irregular . 7
7. Fruiting body medium-sized to large (11-30 cm tall or more), not reddish-tinged; stalk often
swollen at base and sometimes massive in age; base usually wrinkled, folded, or buttressed
(like a tree trunk); found mainly with hardwoods . . . M. crassipes(see M. esculenta, below)
7. Not as above; fruiting body usually small to medium-sized or reddish-tinged; stalk often
somewhat wrinkled at base but not normally buttressed; found in many habitats.8
8. Fruiting body reddish to reddish-brown or with a reddish tinge and/ or pits arranged in definite
rows . M. data group, p. 790
8. Fruiting body not reddish-tinged; pits usually rounded or irregular .... M. esculenta, below
EDIBILITY: Edible and one of the most avidly hunted of all wild mushrooms (see
comments on pp. 785-786).
COMMENTS: This, the common morel or “sponge mushroom,” is one of the most readily
recognized of all edible fungi. It can be told from other morels by its modest size, warm
brown to tan or yellowish color, and irregularly-arranged pits (see color plate), and from
the poisonous false morels (Gyromitra species) by its pitted or honeycombed rather than
brainlike or lobed cap. It could also be confused with the stinkhorn (Phallus impudicus),
but does not have a volva and lacks the foul-smelling spore slime of that species. It is typi¬
cally a denizen of low hardwood forests, riparian woodlands, and fruit orchards, whereas
the black morels are more common in northern latitudes or at higher elevations under
conifers. The ranges of the two overlap, however, and they can sometimes be found
growing in the same area. Like other morels, M. esculenta varies considerably in shape
and appearance. In most cases the pits are quite irregular-looking, but in some forms
the transverse ridges are not as well-developed as the vertical ones, giving the pits an
elongated, slotlike appearance. The ridges never blacken as in the M. data group, but
conical forms intergrade with M. deliciosa (see comments under that species). Pale
forms can also be confused with M. deliciosa, but usually have smaller, paler pits that
are not as vertically elongated. A giant morel with irregularly arranged pits occurs in
the same habitats as M. esculenta, but usually a little later. This is M. crassipes (or
M. esculenta var. crassipes). It measures 6-20 or more cm high and usually has a massive
stalk with an enlarged, wrinkled and folded or buttressed base (hence its nicknames,
“Thick-Footed Morel,” “Big-Foot,” and “Tree Trunk Morel”). It also tends to have
grayer pits when young with paler or even whitish ridges, but like M. esculenta, becomes
tan in age. Many morel connoisseurs in eastern North America prize it above all others.
In the West, unfortunately, it is relatively rare. I have found it under cottonwood in
Oregon, among forget-me-nots in an old orchard in California (see photo above), and
in landscaped areas.
788
MORCHELLA 789
The coastal Californian form of Morchella deliciosa (or what I have identified as that species). Note
how the ridges are whitish when very young but become colored like the pits in age. Also note how
large and elongated the pits are, and how the ridges on dried-up specimen at left have darkened. Two
mature specimens are shown in the color plate.
Black morels (Morchella elata group). This narrow-headed variety has also been called M. angusti-
ceps and M. conica(see comments on p. 791). Note the conical head and strong vertical orientation of
the ridges. They were found in a mountain meadow—a favorite haunt of the narrow-headed variety.
790
mm
Black morels (Morchella elata group). Left: This fat-headed specimen has the radially-arranged pits
of the narrow-headed variety (see comments below). Right: Typical examples of the fat-headed form.
COMMENTS: The above description covers a number of black morels (the so-called
“M. elata-M. angusticeps-M. conica” complex). Many of the morels in this category
are black or at least dark in age, but some are brown, reddish, or pinkish-tinged and/or
have pits that are usually more or less radially arranged (that is, arranged in rows).
Others are quite dark and may have pits that are not arranged in obvious rows. Excluded
are those morels with a “half-free” cap (see M. semilibera), brown or tan to yellowish-
capped morels with irregularly arranged pits (see M. esculenta), and morels with
dark pits and pale ridges when young (see M. deliciosa). There are at least two common
kinds of black morels in North America. The first variety, sometimes called the “Fat-
Headed Black Morel,” is probably the “true” M. elata, though it has gone under the name
M. angusticeps and has also been called M. conica. It has a roundish to oval or conical
“head” that is relatively large in comparison to the stalk, pits which are often elongated
but not necessarily radially arranged, and ridges that are gray to black before maturity
(and are often dark while very young). This variety is shown above and in the color plates.
The second variety, sometimes called the “Narrow-Headed Black Morel,” is shown in
the photo on p. 790. Its cap is often more conical or elongated and often spongier or
more fragile than the first variety. Its pits are usually arranged in rows and its ridges usually
blacken, but not as quickly or as consistently as the fat-headed variety. Its stalk is often
long and relatively thick (often as thick as the base of the cap), and is typically more
furrowed or wrinkled toward the base than the fat-headed variety, and also wartier or
scurfier. According to “morelizers,” this second variety, if distinct from the first, is
probably the “true” M. angusticeps, but it has also been called M. conica. A giant form of
this variety is shown on the back cover of the book.
These two black morels grow in the same regions, but the fat-headed one seems to be
the commoner of the two. Sometimes they seem distinct, at other times they intergrade or
“hybridize.” A third variety, often called the “Red Morel,” is shown on p. 31. It resembles
the previous two (especially the narrow-headed one), but a distinct reddish or pinkish
tinge pervades its stalk and/or cap. This variety, which may simply be a growth form,
has a particularly fine flavor. Still another variety has a whitish to buff cap. It may be an
albino form, or a separate species entirely (see comments under M. deliciosa). Whew!
791
Left: In most species of Morchella the cap is completely intergrown with the stalk, as shown in this
sliced M. crassipes. Right: In Morchella semi/ibera, however, the lower part of the cap hangs free
from the stalk. These are mature specimens.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious on ground in woods and under trees (mainly hard¬
woods); widely distributed, fruiting in the spring. In our area it occurs in sandy soil along
streams with cottonwood and alder, but is not as common as Verpa bohemica, which
favors the same habitats. Farther north (e.g., in Idaho) it is more frequent.
EDIBILITY: Edible, but more fragile and not quite as flavorful as other Morchellas.
Morchella semilibera, prime specimens. Note “half-free” cap and roughened stalk. Compare the cap
to the completely free, thimble-like caps of the Verpas (pp. 793-795).
MORCHELLA 793
The roughened stalk surface is, in the words of mycologist Orson K. Miller, “the texture
of a cow’s tongue.” Typical M. semilibera is unlikely to be confused with other morels,
but it sometimes intergrades with the black morel (M. elata group).
A VERPA looks like a thimble stuck on a finger, i.e., its smooth to wrinkled or pitted cap
is attached only to the very top of the stalk so that its sides hang free like a skirt. The true
morels (Morchella), in contrast, featured a pitted cap that is entirely or partially inter-
grown with the stalk, while the false morels and elfin saddles (Gyromitra and Helvetia)
have lobed, brainlike, or saddle-shaped caps.
Verpas are edible, but are more fragile than the true morels and not as flavorful. At
least one species, V. bohemica, is poisonous to some people, so it is advisable to eat Verpas
sparingly if at all. You can find them in woods and under trees and shrubs, particularly in
well-drained soil along rivers and creeks. They are most abundant in the spring about a
week to a month before the true morels (they are sometimes called “early morels”), but in
coastal California they also occur in the winter. Two farflung species are depicted here.
Key to Verpa
1. Upper portion of cap intergrown with stalk; cap pitted . . . (see Morchella semilibera, p. 792)
1. Not as above; cap free from stalk except at very top (like a thimble on a finger) . 2
2. Cap strongly wrinkled, the wrinkles usually oriented vertically and sometimes branched to
form pits; asci 2-spored... V. bohemica, below
2. Cap smooth or at times irregularly wrinkled; asci 8-spored . 3
3. Stalk often rather spongy and usually stuffed with a cottony pith (but may be hollow in age);
spores without oil droplets . V. conica, p. 794
3. Not as above; spores usually with one oil droplet at maturity .(seeHelvetia, p. 805)
morels (Morchella species), sometimes in the same places. It is abundant in parts of the
Pacific Northwest. In our area I have seen large fruitings under cottonwood and alder.
EDIBILITY: Edible with caution. Although eaten by many people, it can cause severe
stomach cramps and loss of muscular coordination, particularly when consumed in large
amounts or on several successive days. The flavor is strong but not on a par with the true
morels. Always cook it, and beware: some of the “morels” sold in markets are Verpas!
794
Verpa conica, typical specimens. Cap is relatively smooth and thimble-like, i.e., it is attached only to
the apex of the stalk and it pops off easily.
DISCIOTIS
THIS genus includes one farflung species, described below, with a brown, more or less
cuplike fruiting body. Consequently, it is keyed out under the cup fungi. Microscopic
features, however, relate it to the morels.
HELVELLACEAE
MOST of the fungi in this family have a well-developed cap and stalk, but a few are cup¬
like or disclike. In some species of Helvetia (the largest genus in the family), the cap is
concave (cup-shaped), with the hymenium (fertile tissue) lining the upper or inner surface
of the cup. In other Helvellas the cup turns inside-out as it matures and becomes lobed
or saddle-shaped, while in still others it is saddle-shaped or irregularly lobed from the
beginning. In Gyromitra the cap is often brainlike, but not deeply pitted as in the morels.
Microscopic features that unite the family include the non-amyloid asci and smooth to
roughened spores that typically contain one to three large oil droplets.
Several species of Gyromitra contain a deadly poisonous rocket fuel called MMH
(see p. 893). Although these species are usually harmless when cooked or dried, it is safer
to avoid them and to treat all members of the family with extreme caution (i.e., always
cook them, don’t eat large amounts, and be certain of your identification).
HELVELLACEAE 797
THESE are springtime cup- or disc-shaped fungi with a yellowish to brown fertile sur¬
face and a thick, short stalk or none at all. As such they are likely to be mistaken for cup
fungi (and are keyed out under that group), but microscopic features such as the non¬
amyloid asci and apiculate spores relate them closely to Gyromitra of the Helvellaceae.
Discina perlata. This common “snowbank” mushroom looks like a cup fungus, but usually has a
short stalk and is often umbilicate (i.e., with a “navel,” as shown here). The fertile surface can be
smooth or quite wrinkled. Microscopic features relate it to Gyromitra.
Pig’s ears (a common name also applied to Gomphus clavatus, a member of the chan¬
terelle family) are a common feature of our western springtime or“snowbank” mushroom
flora. They are said to be edible, but because of their close relationship to the poisonous
Gyromitras, it is best to eat them in moderation (if at all) and always cook them. The dozen
or so species of Discina are distinguished primarily on microscopic features such as the
shape and ornamentation of the spores. As only one is described here, a key hardly seems
necessary.
COMMENTS: This common springtime fungus is best told by its saucerlike to flattened,
umbilicate, or slightly downturned, yellowish to brown fruiting body that frequently has
a short, thick stalk. Like many of the larger Discomycetes, it develops quite slowly, and
since spores are not produced until the fruiting body is fully grown, “sterile” specimens are
often encountered. D. ancilis is apparently a synonym. There are several similar species of
Discina that are best differentiated microscopically. These include: D. apiculatula andD.
macrospora (the latter often with a reddish-brown fruiting body when mature); D.
olympiana, a smaller species found in the Pacific Northwest; andD. leucoxantha, a yel¬
lowish, sometimes stalkless, truncate-spored species found under both hardwoods and
conifers, particularly in eastern North America. Also very similar is Gyromitra mela-
leucoides (-Peziza melaleucoides, Paxina recurvum), with a somewhat waxy-looking
underside when moist, a sometimes slightly longer and narrower stalk, and much shorter
(10-14 microns), non-apiculate spores. See also Disciotis venosa and Peziza species.
THIS is a small but prominent and infamous genus whose grotesque fruiting bodies have
inspired a number of fanciful nicknames: brain mushrooms, elephant ears, lorchels, beef¬
steak morels, and of course, false morels. Despite the latter name, Gyromitras are unlikely
to be mistaken for morels {Morchella and Verpa) because their cap is neither deeply pitted
nor conical or thimble-like. They are easily confused with Helvellas, however, and several
species have been shuffled back and forth between Gyromitra and Helvetia because of
their “in-betweenness.” As currently defined, forms with a brown brainlike cap belong
to Gyromitra, while those with a differently colored and/or saddle-shaped cap (with
the exception of G. infula and its look-alikes) are placed in Helvetia.
Gyromitras are particularly common under northern and mountain conifers in the
spring, often at the same time as morels. G. infula, however, fruits in the summer and fall
(or the winter in coastal California). Several species, notably G. esculenta, G. infula, and
G. ambigua, are dangerously poisonous (even deadly!) raw, yet are eaten without ill effect
by many people. This apparent contradiction can be explained by two facts: (l)The toxin,
M M H (monomethylhydrazine), is extremely volatile, i.e., it is usually removed by cooking
or drying, and (2) there is a very narrow threshold between the amount of M M H the human
body can “safely” absorb and the amount that will cause acute poisoning and even death.
It seems foolhardy to risk eating the MMH-containing species, yet many people do and
dried G. esculenta is sold in many European markets. If you must try them, then
always either dry them out (then rehydrate and cook them) or parboil them first and
throw out the water, being sure not to inhale the cooking vapors (which contain MMH),
then saute them. Never eat them raw and never eat a large amount. MMH, incidentally,
is also carcinogenic and is used as a rocket fuel. See p. 893 for more details on its effects.
Gyromitra is a much smaller genus than Helvetia, but the fruiting bodies are usually
larger. Four species are fully described here and several others are discussed.
Key to Gyromitra
1. Cap shallowly cup-shaped to flattened, disclike, or with the edges turned down slightly; under¬
side of cap not ribbed .G. melaleucoides (see Discina perlata, p. 798)
1. Not as above . 2
800 HELVELLACEAE
Gyromitra gigas
(Snow Mushroom; Snowbank False Morel; Bull Nose; Walnut)
CAP 3-10 (25) cm broad, 3-6 (15) cm high, brainlike or strongly and deeply convoluted
and wrinkled, but typically compact (i.e., without strongly projecting lobes); fertile
surface typically yellow-brown to butterscotch-brown or tan when fresh, but at times
darker brown or even reddish-brown (especially in age); attached to the stalk at or near
the margin. Interior chambered; underside (sterile surface) usually whitish. Flesh thin and
fairly brittle. STALK massive (usually as thick or almost as thick as the cap) and usually
short (sometimes completely hidden by the cap margin!), 2-10 cm long and thick, white or
whitish, often rather irregular in shape or thicker at base; ribbed or wrinkled and grooved;
strongly channelled or folded in cross-section. SPORES 24-36 * 10-15 microns, elliptical,
the ends lacking projections or with only very short, blunt ones, smooth or finely rough¬
ened, typically with one large central oil droplet and smaller ones at the ends.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups on ground or rotten wood in coniferous
forests (occasionally under hardwoods); common throughout the mountains and colder
parts of western North America in the spring and early summer, typically near melting
snow or soon after the snow disappears. In our area, where the winters are mild, it seems
to be absent. However, I have seen enormous fruitings in the Sierra Nevada and Cascades.
EDIBILITY: Edible and popular. Apparently it can be eaten safely without parboiling
(e.g., sauteed like a morel), but should never be eaten raw. Some people prefer it to the
true morels—but be sure you identify it correctly!
Gyromitra gigas. This edible “snowbank” species does not have the bad reputation of other Gyro-
mitras. Note the chunky, almost cubical stature and thick stalk that is folded or chambered within.
COMMENTS: The chunky or almost cubical stature (see photo), strongly wrinkled cap,
and internally folded stalk are the telltale traits of this common “snowbank” fungus.
G. montana and Neogyromitra gigas are synonyms. It sometimes grows with the dan¬
gerous G. esculenta, but can be distinguished by its yellower cap color, chunkier stature,
and complex stalk. G. californica has a ribbed stalk, but usually has a strongly spreading
(umbrella-like) or puffed-up cap. G. gigas shows considerable variation in size. Specimens
weighing more than two pounds have been reported, but the normal size range is walnut-
or softball-sized. G. korfii (called G. fasdgiata in some books) is a very similar vernal
species. It is more numerous in eastern North America than in the West (under both
hardwoods and conifers) and has spindle-shaped spores with prominent projections at
both ends. For other complex-stalked species, see G. caroliniana (under G. esculenta)
and G. brunnea (under G. infula).
EDIBILITY: Dangerously poisonous, at least raw! Although eaten without ill effect by
many people, this species has caused numerous deaths in Europe (see p. 799 for more
details). Far fewer cases of poisoning have been reported from North America, suggesting
that the American version is safer than the European one, or that certain ecological
variants are less toxic. However, the paucity of poisonings may also indicate that fewer
Americans eat it, or that those who do treat it with more caution. I certainly don’t think it’s
worth the risk. In the words of mycophagist Charles Mcllvaine, who was famous for his
willingness to eat almost anything'. “It is not probable that in our great food-giving country
anyone will be narrowed to G. esculenta for a meal. Until such emergency arrives, the
species would be better left alone.”
COMMENTS: The brown cerebral cap and smooth to slightly grooved stalk plus its
occurrence in the spring are the hallmarks of this infamous fungus. Despite the moniker
“false morel,” it can scarcely be confused with the true morels, for the brainlike cap is
never deeply pitted or honeycombed. California specimens are more often reddish-brown
than yellowish-brown, but regional variation can be expected. The stalk is often slightly
grooved or compressed, but does not show the intricate folds in cross-section that are
typical of G. gigas. Other species: G. caroliniana is a springtime species that favors low
hardwood forests in eastern North America, but has also been reported from scattered
localities in the West. It has a brainlike to irregularly wrinkled or even pitted, brown to
reddish-brown cap, but has a massive stalk (up to 20 cm thick!) that is deeply furrowed
and complex (folded) in cross-section. It can attain weights of several pounds each, and is
said to be edible if prepared properly (parboiled, etc.). Like G. esculenta, however, it is
best avoided, particularly if there are morels out and about!
802
Gyromitra infula, rather old specimens. Note how stalk darkens with age and how the shape of the
cap is quite variable but never brainlike. See next page for a distinctly saddle-shaped specimen.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious under both hardwoods and conifers, usually on rotten
wood but also on soil, humus, along roads, in burned areas, etc.; widely distributed. In
most regions it fruits in the late summer and fall—a feature that helps distinguish it from
G. esculenta and other vernal species. In coastal California, however, it fruits in the winter
and early spring and is the most common Gyromitra (especially under oak and pine).
EDIBILITY: Poisonous! It contains MMH and should never be eaten raw! For more
details, see comments on p. 799 and p. 893.
COMMENTS: The saddle-shaped to irregularly lobed cap which is usually reddish-brown
to dark brown plus the more or less smooth (non-fluted) stem are the distinguishing
features of this false morel, which is also known as Helvetia infula. Its penchant for grow¬
ing on rotten wood is also distinctive, but by no means consistent or definitive. Saddle-
shaped specimens are apt to be confused W\ih Helvetia, and it is keyed out under that genus.
The color is quite distinctive, however, and the stalk is thicker than that of most non-
fluted Helvellas. The surface of the cap can be smooth to uneven or slightly wrinkled,
but is not pitted as in the true morels nor intricately folded or brainlike as in G. esculenta.
Smooth specimens of the latter species can usually be distinguished by their growth in the
spring soon after the snow melts. Other species: G. ambigua is a “dead ringer ” for G.
infula. Although it sometimes has a slight lilac or purplish tinge to the fruiting body, it
can only be differentiated with certainty by its spores, whichare longer(22-33 microns) and
have blunt projections at both ends. It has a northern distribution, fruits at the same time,
and is also poisonous. G. brunnea{-G. under woodii and now called G.fastigiata, a name
which has also been applied to G. korfii) is a springtime species found principally under
hardwoods in eastern North America. It has a pale to dark reddish-brown cap that is
usually saddle-shaped or “winged” (divided into 2-3 lobes—hence its common name,
“Elephant Ears”). The cap surface is often wrinkled above the stalk but relatively smooth
near the margin, and the undersides of the lobes are free from the stalk but often fused to
Gyromitra infula. Note the relatively smooth spore-bearing surface. It can be confused with young
specimens of G. esculenta, but fruits at a different time, often on rotten wood.
Left: A dark, saddle-shaped example of Gyromitra infula. Right: Gyromitra californica. Although
dried out, this specimen shows the widely spaced ribs on the stalk which fan out on underside of cap.
each other. The stalk is usually white and fairly thick (2-5 cm) and ranges from hollow to
complex (folded) in cross-section. It has finely warted spores and is edible with caution.
COMMENTS: Also known as Helvetia californica, this species can be told from other
Gyromitras by its thin, strongly spreading or umbrella-like cap and distinctly ribbed stalk,
and from Helvetia maculata by its pinkish- or vinaceous-tinged stalk (a fairly reliable but
not foolproof feature). The cap color is rather variable, but is not typically as yellow as that
of G. gigas, nor as red as that of G. esculenta. Other species: G. sphaerospora is its eastern
North American counterpart. It is quite similar but has round spores, and occurs at least
as far west as Montana.
804
805
HELVELLA is a common, distinctive, and attractive genus with a wide range of shapes
and sizes. Some species are cuplike (and are more aptly called “elfin cups’’); others look
like miniature saddles (hence the popular name “elfin saddles”); still others are irregularly
lobed. The cap, however, is not brown and brainlike as in Gyromitra, nor thimble-like as
in Verpa, nor prominently pitted as in Morchella.
Helvella( spelled Elvela in some older books) splits nicely into four groups: thosespecies
with a cuplike cap and a ribbed (or practically absent) stalk (e.g., H. acetabulum)', those
with a more or less saddle-shaped cap and smooth or non-ribbedstalk(e.g.,//. compressa)',
those with a cup-shaped cap and smooth, well-developed stalk (e.g., H. macropus); and
those with a saddle-shaped to irregularly lobed cap and a deeply ridged or fluted stalk
(e.g., H. lacunosa). Some authorites elevate some of these groups to genus rank (e.g.,
Leptopodia, Cyathipodia, Macropodia, Macroscyphus, Paxina), but their characters
intergrade to some extent and microscopically they are very similar.
The cup-shaped Helvellas are apt to be mistaken for cup fungi, but tend to have more
markedly ribbed and/ or longer stems. The convoluted species, on the other hand, can
be confused with Gyromitra, but are usually smaller and/ or differently colored.
Helvellas do not have the sinister reputation of the Gyromitras, but should be treated
with extreme caution. H. lacunosa is definitely edible, but many of the species have not
been adequately tested. Others are too small or rare to be of value. If you really must eat
Helvellas, always cook them thoroughly (in case they contain MMH) or dry them out.
Helvellas, like other Ascomycetes, are most numerous in the spring, but a few species
fruit in the summer and fall, and in mild climates such as ours they can be abundant in the
winter. They grow under trees and shrubs, along streams, and in the woods, or less com¬
monly in the open. Over 30 species have been reported from North America. Most of these
are keyed out or mentioned in this chapter; eleven are fully described.
Key to Helvella
1. Cap typically concave (cup-shaped) to plane, occasionally becoming convex or saddle-shaped
in old age (examine several specimens if possible) . 2
1. Cap typically convex (umbrella-like) to miter-shaped, hoodlike, saddle-shaped, irregularly
lobed, or brainlike, but sometimes with an upturned or inrolled margin when young that makes
it appear somewhat cup-shaped (examine several specimens if possible) . 14
2. Fertile (upper or inner) surface of cup black or blackish; stalk and base of cup not whitish . 3
2. Fertile surface not black, or if so then stalk or base of cup white or significantly paler than fertile
surface . 5
3. Stalk and exterior (underside) of cup or cap black or very dark, sometimes with ribs; fertile
(upper) surface not fading appreciably . 4
3. Stalk usually grayish (paler than fresh fertile surface); fertile surface often fading to grayish-
brown in age .H. villosa(see H. macropus, p. 810)
4. Stalk well-developed (1 -4 cm long, 2-5 (7) mm thick); fertile (upper) surface black or sometimes
narrowly margined with white; cup fleshy or brittle; spores elliptical, with one large oil droplet;
found in many habitats but not with melting snow ...//. corium (see H. macropus, p. 810)
4. Not with above features; stalk merely a narrowed base or if well-developed then fruiting body
tough or at least not breaking easily and/or growing in or near melting snow .
.(seeSarcosoma&c Allies, p. 826)
806 HELVELLACEAE
5. Stalk well-developed and slender, without prominent ribs, usually less than 6 mm thick (or if
thicker than fertile surface yellow-brown to olive-brown and underside blackish or fertile
surface more or less pinkish-brown with a scalloped or lobed margin) . 6
5. Not as above; stalk thicker and stouter than above and I or with prominent iongitudinal ribs 9
6. U pper stalk and exterior or underside of cup usually hairy or densely scurfy; stalk well-defined,
usually 1 cm or more long; fertile surface of cup grayish-tan to gray or grayish-brown or dark
brown; exterior same color or paler (not black) . 7
6. Not with above features . (see Pezizaceae & Allies, p. 817)
7. Underside of cup (sterile surface) often whitish, at least toward base; stalk often whitish also;
rather rare .H. cupuliformis (see H. macropus, p. 810)
7. Not as above; upper stalk and underside of cup usually grayish or colored like fertile surface
(but base of stalk may be whitish); fairly common . 8
8. Cap often becoming plane or even convex in age, the margin sometimes splitting to form lobes;
upper surface quite dark (grayish-brown); spores elliptical H. villosa(see H. macropus, p. 810)
8. Cap usually remaining cup-shaped (not often plane in age); upper or inner surface gray to
grayish-brown to grayish-tan or paler; spores often elongated H. macropus & others, p. 810
9. Cap often spreading or flattened in age and/ or center often wrinkled; fertile (upper) surface
yellowish to tan or brown (not normally gray or black); stalk usually short; usually found in
spring shortly after snow melts . (see Discina, p. 797)
9. Not with above features . 10
10. Ribs on stalk extending onto underside of cup, often nearly to the margin . 11
10. Ribs on stalk terminating at or near base of cup . 12
11. Cap gray to grayish-brown.H. griseoalba & H. costifera(see H. acetabulum, p. 807)
11. Cap light to dark brown or occasionally tinged violet. H. acetabulum, p. 807
12. Stalk (1) 3-7 cm or more long, usually well-developed, markedly ribbed; cap shallowly cup¬
shaped with opposite sides rolled up when young, often nearly plane in age H. queletii, p. 809
12. Stalk short (usually less than 2.5 cm long) or poorly developed; cup usually deeper or more
regularly shaped than above . 13
13. Interior of cup usually tan to pale brown to yellow-brown; exterior with brown hairs; texture
rather tough . (see Pezizaceae & Allies, p. 817)
13. Not as above .H. leucomelaena & others, p. 808
14. Stalk distinctly fluted, ridged, or ribbed longitudinally, often showing folds or chambers in
cross-section . 15
14. Stalk not as above, but may show a few indistinct grooves, especially near base; stalk simple and
round to slightly compressed in cross-section . 21
15. Cap typically spreading, undulating, or appearing puffed-up or umbrella-like, tan to brown or
grayish-brown, dark brown, or brownish-black (but not truly gray or black); margin of cap
usually free from stalk; stalk with widely spaced ribs that fan out on underside of cap and often
extend nearly to margin; stalk at least 1 cm thick (usually 2 cm or more), sometimes pinkish-
or reddish-stained at base .(see Gyromitra, p. 799)
15. Not with above features (but may have some of them); base of stalk not normally reddish- or
pinkish-stained; cap usually differently shaped or colored or stalk thinner . 16
16. Cap white to buff, creamy, or pale tan .H. crispa & others, p. 816
16. Cap darker (dark tan to brown, gray, or black) or sometimes pale gray or covered with a whitish
fungal parasite . 17
17. Cap typically gray to black (occasionally dark grayish-brown) . 18
17. Cap typically some shade of tan, brown, or grayish-brown . 20
18. Cap usually convex or umbrella-like; stalk slender, usually lacking external holes or pits ....
. H. phlebophora(see H. lacunosa, p. 815)
18. Cap usually saddle-shaped to irregularly lobed or brainlike; stalk often with external holes 19
19. Cap irregularly lobed or brainlike to saddle-shaped, the surface often wrinkled; stalk with
external pits and/or chambered in cross-section; very common, especially in western North
America .H. lacunosa, p. 815
19. Cap usually more or less saddle-shaped, surface not wrinkled; stalk ribbed but usually lacking
pits; more common in eastern North America than West H. sulcata^see H. lacunosa, p. 815)
HELVELLA 807
20. Cap brown to pale or dark reddish-brown or chocolate-brown; spores finely warted at maturity;
found mainly under hardwoods in eastern North America .(see Gyromitra, p. 799)
20. Cap brown to grayish-brown but not reddish-brown; spores smooth; found in western North
America .H. maculata &. others, p. 814
21. Stalk white to creamy or buff (significantly paler than cap unless cap is also pale-colored) 22
21. Stalk darker (brown, dark gray, or blackish), at least above (may be whitish toward base) 27
22. Stalk typically 0.8-2.5 cm thick; cap reddish-brown to dark brown or yellow-brown but not
grayish-brown or black; found on ground or rotten wood; spores with two oil droplets ....
.(see Gyromitra, p. 799)
22. Stalk typically less than 1 cm thick, or if thicker then cap grayish-brown to blackish but not
yellow-brown or reddish-brown; spores with one oil droplet; usually on ground . 23
23. Sterile surface (underside of cap) without hairs (use hand lens if unsure!) . 24
23. Sterile surface minutely hairy, at least when fresh . 26
24. Fertile surface of cap not usually very dark (i.e., yellow-brown to tan to brown or sometimes
grayish-brown or violet-tinged) .H. elastica, p. 813
24. Fertile surface of cap darker than above (grayish-brown to very dark brown to black) ... 25
25. Cap 3-7 cm broad and stalk 0.5-2 cm thick; margin of cap not significantly upturned when
young .H. leucopus, p. 812
25. Cap 1-2.5 cm broad and stalk 2-6 mm thick; margin of cap often upturned when very young
. H. albella{see H. compressa, p. 811)
26. Cap buff to tan, light brown, or cinnamon-buff .H. stevensii (see H. compressa, p. 811)
26. Cap typically darker than above, at least when fresh .H. compressa & others, p. 811
27. Cap irregularly lobed, or if saddle-shaped then stalk typically at least 8 mm thick; cap 3-15 cm
broad, yellow-brown to reddish-brown or dark brown but not gray-brown or black; spores
typically with two oil droplets .(see Gyromitra, p. 799)
27. Not as above; cap usually rather small, 1.5-4 (5) cm broad, usually more or less saddle-shaped,
gray-brown to dark brown to black; stalk typically 2-7 mm thick (occasionally thicker) . 28
28. Underside of cap (sterile surface) minutely hairy, at least when young and fresh. 29
28. Underside of cap hairless (use hand lens if unsure!) . 30
29. Cap grayish . H. ephippium (see H. atra, p. 813)
29. Cap dark brown to grayish-brown to blackish.H. pezizoides {see H. atra, p. 813)
30. Cap dark sooty-gray to black.H. atra, p. 813
30. Cap usually paler (brown to gray but not black) .H. subglabra (see H. atra, p. 813)
underside of the cup include: H. griseoalba, similar in size but with a gray cup; and H.
costifera, smaller and grayish-brown.
Helvetia leucomelaena. Left: Side view showing the short whitish ribbed stalk. Right: View of dark
inner surface and finely scalloped margin; note how short stalk is covered by dirt.
HELVELLA 809
Helvella queletii. This beautiful species has a well-developed stalk whose ribs do not extend to margin
of cup. Note how opposite sides of “cup” are inrolled when young (specimen at right).
/
810 HELVELLACEAE
Left: Helvella macropus, a young specimen with hairy-scurfy underside. Center: Helvella macropus,
mature specimen with a broader cup. Right: Helvella villosa (see comments above) resembles H.
macropus, but its cap or “cup” is often plane in age, as shown here.
Helvetia compressa. Left: Young specimens in which opposite sides of the cap are rolled up and in,
making the cap somewhat cuplike and hiding the fertile surface; sterile surface is whitish and minutely
hairy. Right: A mature saddle-shaped specimen which has faded somewhat (to brown).
Helvetia compressa, mature specimens. Note deep cleft (sinus) in the saddle-shaped cap. These small,
dark specimens could just as easily be referred to H. albella (see comments on next page).
812 HELVELLACEAE
COMMENTS: This attractive elfin saddle is best identified by its combination of brown
to grayish-brown cap with a finely hairy underside and slender, white, non-ribbed stem.
The transformation in the shape of the cap as it matures is apt to cause some confusion
unless intervening stages are found. When young the margin is curled over the fertile
surface so that the whitish underside is most visible and the cap is almost cuplike( see photo
at top of p. 811). In age, however, the margin unfurls and the saddle shape is more apparent
(see other photos on p. 811). H. albella is a very similar but smaller (cap 1 -2.5 cm broad and
high, stalk up to 5 cm long and 2-6 mm thick) species with a grayish-brown to blackish cap.
Some authors describe its underside as hairless while others maintain it is minutely hairy
when young. If the latter is true then its small size is the principal point of departure from
H. compressa. A small form meeting this description is not uncommon in California in
the winter and spring, usually under oak. Another closely related species, H. stevensii
(-H. connivens) is small to medium-sized but has a paler (tan to yellowish- or cinnamon-
buff) cap and slightly smaller spores. It has a wide distribution and also occurs in our area.
Both H. compressa and H. stevensii are distinguished from H. elastica by their upturned
cap margin when young, deeper and narrower cleft (sinus), and minutely hairy sterile
surface (see color plate), and from H. atra and relatives by their whitish stalk.
Helvetia leucopus. Note dark cap which often has three or more distinct lobes. Stalk is whitish,
usually hollow, and fairly thick (over 5 mm).
HELVELLA 813
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious on ground under trees, usually in the spring; widely
distributed. In our area I have found it under cottonwood in the late winter and spring,
but it grows in other habitats as well.
EDIBILITY: Not recommended. The European version is said to be edible, but I can
find no information on North American material.
COMMENTS: The above description is based on several dozen specimens that grew in
sandy soil under a cottonwood near Santa Cruz, California. It agrees perfectly with
European descriptions of H. monachella, a name now considered synonymous with H.
leucopus; H. albipes is yet another synonym. No matter what you call it, the dark cap
contrasts nicely with the white, unribbed stalk, making it a most attractive elfin saddle.
It is most apt to be confused with H. compressa and H. albella, but is usually larger and
stouter, with a more irregular, multi-lobed cap whose underside is hairless.
EDIBILITY: Unknown.
COMMENTS: This diminutive elfin saddle is easily recognized by its black, distinctly
saddle-shaped cap and non-ribbed, blackish stalk. H. lacunosa is similar in color but larger
and much more common and it has a fluted and pitted (lacunose) stalk; H. corium(see
comments under H. macropus) is black but has a cuplike cap. H. atra has several close
relatives with a dark saddle-shaped cap and dark, non-ribbed stalk, including: H. sub¬
glabra of eastern N orth America, which has a brownish to gray (never black) cap, and two
widespread species with a minutely hairy or downy underside (sterile surface): H. ephip-
pium, which is the same size as H. atra, but grayish; and H. pezizoides, which is slightly
larger and dark brown to grayish-brown or blackish. None of these are worth eating.
Helvella maculata. Cap is brown to grayish-brown but never black. Note deeply fluted stalk.
Helvetia lacunosa is our most common elfin saddle. The cap is black or gray and usually lobed or
wrinkled, while the stalk is white to dark gray, always deeply fluted, and usually lacunose (i.e.,
with visible pits). Note how cross-section of stalk (bottom right) is chambered. In our area this
species occurs in many habitats but is especially abundant under pine.
815
Left: This fluted black elfin saddle (Helvetia lacunosa) shows its lacunose (pitted) stalk to good
advantage. (Rick Kerrigan) Center: Another example of Helvetia lacunosa {others can be seen in
photo on p. 815). Right: Helvetia crispa, a common species in eastern North America, but infrequent
in California. The pale (white to buff) cap and fluted stalk are its trademarks.
small, pale gray to black cap that is usually saddle-shaped with a deep, well-defined cleft
plus a ribbed but not lacunose stalk (it often grows on rotten wood); and H. phlebophora,
a small, slender, rare species with a more or less convex or umbrella-like cap. All three of
the latter species have been reported from the Midwest and / or eastern North America by
Nancy Weber, and may occur in the West. I can find no information on their edibility.
816
817
Cup Fungi
spores
PEZIZACEAE& Allies
IN THESE ubiquitous but inconspicuous fungi the fruiting body is usually concave (cup¬
shaped) to disclike (flat) or cushion-shaped (very slightly convex) and may or may not
have a stalk. In a few species it is ear-shaped, top-shaped, cabbage-like, or irregular. The
spore-bearing asci line the upper surface of the fruiting body or inner surface of the cup.
The spores are shot out of the asci with such terrific force that cup fungi, like other members
of the Pezizales, will often “smoke” visibly (spew out clouds of spores) when handled.
The cup fungi are a vast group embracing five families and nearly one hundred genera
—or more than twice that number if you count the minute cuplike members of the earth
tongue order (Helotiales). Obviously, they can’t be covered thoroughly in a book of this
kind, and no attempt is made to do so. Most cup fungi are difficult to identify anyway
and are too small to be worth eating. A few, such as the Pezizas, can be quite large, but are
still unlikely to show up on anyone’s list of best edibles.
Cup fungi occur in a wide range of habitats—on dung and manure, in grass, humus,
soil, and moss, on wood and foliage, and in recently burned areas. As the characters used
to delineate the five families (Pezizaceae, Sarcosomataceae, Sarcoscyphaceae, Pyro-
nemataceae, Ascobolaceae) and numerous genera are almost entirely microscopic, I have
rather arbitrarily divided the cup fungi into five groups based on color, size, and texture.
These are keyed below.
Key to the Pezizaceae & Allies
1. Fruiting body merely the bowl- or cup-shaped remains of a puffball, usually with traces of spore
powder inside (or if not, then usually very dry and light as a straw) (see Gasteromycetes, p. 676)
1. Not as above . 2
2. Fruiting body beginning as a hollow underground ball, then splitting at the top into several
starlike rays; fertile (inner) surface sometimes grayish or whitish but more often pinkish or
purplish or lilac; exterior without brown hairs . Sarcosphaera, p. 825
2. Not with above features (but may have some of them) . 3
3. Fruiting body an erect hollow club or closed urn that splits lengthwise from the top to form
several rays; found on or near dead hardwoods .Sarcosoma & Allies, p. 826
3. Not as above . 4
4. Fruiting body an irregular mass of cabbage-like, cauliflower-like, brainlike, or contorted tissue,
with or without a stalk . 5
4. Not as above; fruiting body cuplike, earlike, disclike, etc. (but sometimes contorted, especially
if growing in clusters) . 6
5. Stalk present, long (15-30 cm), brown, solid; fertile “head” brainlike, pitted, or cabbage-like,
usually beige or yellowish-brown; found under hardwoods in eastern North America; rare
. Wynnea sparassoides
5. Stalk absent or rudimentary; widely distributed but not common ... Peziza& Allies, p. 818
6. Fruiting bodies consistently slit down one side, usually erect or semi-erect (often standing on
one end like a rabbit’s ear); usually medium-sized, not huge or minute, often clustered or in
contorted masses, not growing on manure or dung; tips of asci not amyloid . Otidea, p. 831
6. Not as above; fruiting bodies sometimes slit down one side but not consistently so, and not
usually growing erect; sometimes growing on dung . 7
7. Fertile (upper or inner) surface of fruiting body brightly colored (red, orange, yellow, blue, or
green but not violet) . Aleuria&t Allies, p. 833
7. Fertile surface some shade of brown, black, tan, dingy yellowish, or violet, or sometimes with
a pinkish or lilac tinge . 8
8. Flesh gelatinous to rubbery-gelatinous, or if not then flesh rather tough (not breaking easily)
and fertile surface dark brown to black .Sarcosoma & Allies, p. 826
8. Not as above; flesh fragile or brittle to slightly rubbery, but usually breaking easily . 9
818 PEZIZACEAE & ALLIES
9. Stalk usually present and flesh rather tough; either fertile surface more or less pinkish-brown
with a scalloped or stellate margin or fertile surface yellow-brown to olive-brown and underside
(sterile surface) blackish .Sarcosoma& Allies, p. 826
9. Not as above . 10
10. Exterior or underside (sterile surface) of fruiting body clothed with brown or black hairs (the
hairs sometimes sparse); tips of asci not amyloid. Aleuria & Allies, p. 833
10. Not as above . 11
11. Fruiting body large to fairly small but not minute, usually (0.5) 1-10 cm broad, often flattened
(disclike) or spreading at maturity; fertile surface yellow-buff to brown to dark brown, or
violet, or occasionally whitish or tinged pinkish; asci with amyloid tips; usually growing soli¬
tary, scattered, or in small groups (a few species in clusters) .Peziza & Allies, below
11. Fruiting body fairly small to minute, 0.5-2 (3) cm broad, often remaining cup-shaped at maturity;
fertile surface variously colored but not often dark brown or violet unless very small; sometimes
growing in large swarms; tips of asci not amyloid . Aleuria & Allies, p. 833
THIS is the largest and most common genus of cup fungi. It is also the most mundane. The
majority of its species are dull or dark colored. A short stem is sometimes present but more
often absent. Although most species are cup- or disclike, a few are truffle-like (e.g., P.
ellipsospora) and one, P. proteana, sometimes produces compound fruiting bodies that
look like heads of cabbage.
Identification of Pezizas is difficult even with a microscope. Most species grow in soil,
humus, or rotten wood, but some have more distinctive milieu. For instance, P. vesiculosa
grows on dung, P. violacea on burnt ground, and P. domiciliana in bathrooms, cellars,
rugs, and other domestic settings.
Little is known about the edibility of Pezizas, and considering how difficult they are to
identify, the entire group is best avoided. Only a few of the many species are described
here. Two closely related genera, Plicaria and Pachyella, are also treated.
6. Fertile surface dark brown to black .Plicaria endocarpoides & others, p. 820
6. Fertile surface paler than above. 7
7. Fertile surface creamy to pinkish or faintly lilac-tinged; tips of asci amyloid P. proteana, p. 824
7. Fertile surface reddish to yellowish to tan to brown, grayish-brown, or sometimes distinctly
pink; tips of asci not amyloid .(see A leuria&c Allies, p. 833)
8. Growing in bathrooms, on rugs, in cars, and other domestic situations P. domiciliana, p. 822
8. Not as above; usually growing outdoors. 9
9. Growing underground or under the humus (but sometimes partially exposed); fruiting body
round, lobed, or saucer-shaped with a permanently inrolled margin; interior hollow or with
canals or solid and marbled with veins . P. sp. (unidentified) & others, p. 824
9. Not as above . 10
10. Fruiting body developing underground with only the mouth at ground level (like a hole in the
ground); interior brown to dark brown; margin often lobed or scalloped at maturity; growing
in sand, sandy soil, or sand dunes .P. ammophila (see Sarcosphaera crassa, p. 825)
10. Not as above . 11
11. Fruiting body shallowly cup-shaped to umbilicate (with a central depression) to flat or even with
a downcurved margin; fertile surface usually yellow-brown to tan, but sometimes darker
brown or reddish-brown; short stalk often present; nearly always found in the spring when or
soon after the snow melts, especially under mountain conifers; mature spores often apiculate,
with oil droplets; tips of asci not amyloid . (seeDiscina, p. 797)
11. Not with above features (but may have some of them) . 12
12. Fruiting body somewhat rubbery or rubbery-gelatinous, almost the entire underside attached to
substrate (not just the center); usually found on wet wood . 13
12. Not as above; fruiting body rather brittle and centrally attached, on wood or ground .... 14
13. Fruiting body small (less than 5 mm broad) Pachyella babingtonii(see Peziza repanda, p. 821)
13. Fruiting body larger (typically 2-8 cm broad) Pachyella clypeata(see Peziza repanda, p. 821)
14. Fruiting body small (usually less than 2.5 cm broad) and stalkless, dark brown to nearly black,
usually becoming shallowly saucer-shaped or disclike (flat) at maturity P. brunneoatra, p. 820
14. Not as above; fruiting body usually larger, or if small then paler or more deeply cup-shaped
or with a stalk . 15
15. Fruiting bodies usually slit down one side and often clustered, causing them to be somewhat
contorted; tips of asci not amyloid .(see Otidea, p. 831)
15. Not as above; fruiting bodies often round (spherical) when very young and flattened or
spreading in age, or at least not as above . 16
16. Fruiting body 1-3 cm broad, brown to grayish-brown, often with a short stalk or narrowed
base (especially when young), not normally flattening out in age; tips of asci not amyloid
.(seeAleuria& Allies, p. 833)
16. Not as above . 17
17. Flesh staining yellow or exuding a yellowish juice when squeezed or cut .
. P. succosa (see P. sylvestris, p. 821)
17. Not as above . 18
18. Fertile (upper or inner) surface grayish to dark grayish-brown to nearly black; base of fruiting
body often with obscure ribs .(see Helvetia, p. 805)
18. Not as above; fertile surface usually tan to brown, reddish-brown, etc., but not grayish or
blackish . 19
19. Exterior (underside) of fruiting body brown to reddish-brown even in dry weather .
. P. badia& others (see P. sylvestris, p. 821)
19. Exterior usually white to pale tan, at least toward base (but often brown if wet) . 20
20. Fruiting body usually flattening out in age, the fertile surface usually strongly veined, wrinkled,
or pebbled (especially toward center); usually found on well-drained or sandy soil(e.g., along
streams) in spring; tips of asci not amyloid; spores smooth, without oil droplets .
. (set Disciotis, p. 796)
20. Not with above features (but may have some of them); tips of asci amyloid. 21
21. Usually found on rotten wood, wood chip mulch, or humus rich in lignin; fruiting body often
quite large and spreading (flattened) in age; spores smooth .P. repanda, p. 821
21. Usually found on ground, sometimes on very rotten wood; fruiting body usually medium-sized,
the spores often roughened at maturity .P. sylvestris & many others, p. 821
Left: Plicaria endocarpoides, a blackish charcoal-loving disclike fungus. Right: Peziza sylvestris.
Young specimen at bottom is cuplike; older one at top resembles a torn piece of discarded rubber.
Plicaria endocarpoides
FRUITING BODY 1 -7 cm broad, at first cup-shaped but soon becoming flattened or
undulating. Fertile (upper) surface dark brown to black, smooth or roughened, sometimes
also wrinkled. Exterior(underside) same color or paler, smooth or roughened. Flesh rather
brittle, usually paler or browner than fertile surface. STALK absent or rudimentary.
SPORES 8-10 microns, round, smooth, typically with several small oil droplets.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious on burnt ground, old campfire sites, etc.; usually but
not always fruiting in the spring; widely distributed.
EDIBILITY: Who knows?
COMMENTS: Also known as P. leiocarpa, this charcoal-lover is easily told by its dark
brown to black fruiting body that is usually stalkless and flattened at maturity (see photo).
P. trachycarpa is a very similar but smaller (up to 2.5 cm broad) warted species with larger,
roughened spores. P. carbonaria should also be mentioned. All three of these grow in
ashes, have round spores, and are placed in Peziza by some taxonomists.
Peziza brunneoatra
FRUITING BODY 0.5 -2.5 cm broad, cup-shaped becoming flattened (disclike) in age.
Fertile (upper or inner) surface brown to brownish-black, sometimes with an olive tinge,
smooth. Exterior (underside) same color or slightly paler or redder (red-brown). Flesh
thin, brownish, brittle. STALK absent or present only as a very short, narrowed base.
SPORES 16-22 x 8-12 microns, elliptical, smooth becoming roughened (warty) or par¬
tially reticulate at maturity, with one or two oil droplets.
HABITAT: Scattered to gregarious or clustered on damp soil along roads and paths
through the woods, near streams, under trees, etc.; widely distributed but not particularly
common. I have found it several times in our area in the winter and spring.
EDIBILITY: Unquestionably inconsequential.
COMMENTS: The small size, dark color, and tendency to become disclike in old age
help to identify this species. It is a “cup fungus” in name only, for mature specimens are
usually disclike or even slightly convex. Plectania species are also quite dark, but are
tougher and more deeply cup-shaped, while Pachyella species usually grow on wood and
Plicaria species favor ashes.
820
Peziza sylvestris. This common woodland cup fungus resembles many others in its genus. Fertile
surface is brown; exterior is whitish or buff, at least when dry. See photo on p. 820 for more specimens.
821
Left: Peziza repanda, fairly young specimens which have not yet flattened out; note growth on wood.
Right: This unidentified Peziza (see description on pp. 824-825) is one of several truffle-like species
that grow underground or on the surface of the soil beneath the humus. Note irregular shape.
tem'6/e-in-residence, has had specimens grow out of the wall above his bathtub—in two
different houses! It also grows in cellars, greenhouses, shower stalls, damp closets, under
porches, on wet rugs, behind refrigerators, around leaky water beds—and in my car!
EDIBILITY: If it were poisonous we would probably know by now, but I can find no
specific information on it.
COMMENTS: This white to tan or brown fungus is best identified by its propensity for
appearing in unexpected places. Several other cup fungi will occasionally grow indoors
(e.g., P. varia, P. petersii), but this one makes a habit of it. The color plate shows specimens
photographed in situ—in the carpeted “romper room” of a nursery school! It has been
shown that the fruiting bodies develop quite slowly, taking 3-5 weeks to mature. During
this time their shape, size, and color can change considerably.
Peziza vesiculosa, a common dung lover. These are young, almst spherical specimens. As they mature
they will open out or even become flat; those growing in clusters will often be distorted.
824 PEZIZACEAE & ALLIES
chambers which open to the exterior; colored like exterior. Flesh fragile; odor usually
sweet in age. STALK absent. SPORES 10-17 * 9-14 microns, broadly elliptical, minutely
roughened at maturity. Asci 8-spored, forming a palisade that lines the interior.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups under oak and other trees, usually growing
on the surface of the soil beneath the humus layer, but sometimes partially exposed; fairly
common in our area in the winter and spring.
EDIBILITY: Unknown, but too fragile to bother with.
COMMENTS: This is one of several truffle-like Pezizas. The internalizing of the fertile
surface is an obvious adaptation to growing underground (see chapter on truffles). The
above description is based on material collected near Santa Cruz, California, where it is
a common species (see photo on p. 822). It is apparently unnamed, although it approaches
P. (formerly Hydnotrya) ellipsospora, a sometimes large Californian species described as
being “purplish to brown” with slightly larger spores. Other truffle-like Pezizas include:
P. stuntzii, discovered under conifers in Washington, an aromatic species whose solid
interior is marbled with brown veins; andP. gautierioides, also found in the Pacific North¬
west, but growing quite deep in the soil (up to 6 inches down!), usually in the spring. All
of these can be confused with other underground Ascomycetes(e.g., Hydnotrya), but their
amyloid or amyloid-tipped asci place them in Peziza.
SARCOSPHAERA
THIS distinctive genus includes a single widespread species, described below. It usually
develops underground as a hollow ball, but when it surfaces the wall usually splits into
several lobes at the top to form a crown. In the underground stage it is apt to be mistaken
for a truffle, and was once given its own truffle genus, Caulocarpa. It is now placed along¬
side Peziza in the Pezizaceae because its asci have amyloid tips.
Sarcosphaera crassa, rather small specimens. This distinctive fungus begins as an underground ball
(right) which is hollow inside (center). Eventually, however, it splits at the top into starlike rays (left).
Sarcosphaera crassa. Left: Large, young specimens that are just beginning to split into rays. Right:
Older specimens. Large one at top has flattened out more than is usual. Flesh is thick but fragile.
THESE dark, tough to rubbery or gelatinous cup fungi are not necessarily cup-shaped.
The paler, non-gelatinous types can usually be separated from Peziza and Helvetia by
their tougher texture. The thickly gelatinous ones are more apt to be mistaken for jelly
fungi, but produce their spores in asci and are usually darker or differently shaped.
Sarcosoma, with gelatinous flesh, and Plectania and Urnula, with tough flesh, are the
three principal genera treated here. Along with a few other genera they comprise the
family Sarcosomataceae. They are saprophytic on humus and dead wood, and like most
Ascomycetes, are especially prevalent in the spring. Although distinctive, they are unpala¬
table except in an emergency because of their texture. Four species are described here and
others are keyed out, including gelatinous relatives of the earth tongues (Helotiales).
826
SARCOSOMA & ALLIES 827
15. Stalk well-developed, 2-5 (7) mm thick; cup fleshy or fragile; exterior of cup lacking orangish
granules; spores with one large central oil droplet .(see Helvetia, p. 805)
15. Not as above; fruiting body tough, not breaking easily; stalk usually present as a narrowed base
beneath cup; exterior usually black, sometimes with orangish granules .
. Plectania melastoma, p. 829
16. Fruiting body small and shallowly cup-shaped to disclike, usually less than 1 cm broad; usually
found on ground in association with a minute orange cup fungus called Byssonectria
aggregata .Nannfeldtiella aggregata
16. Not as above . 17
17. Found on burnt ground or in dung, or if not, then flesh fragile . 18
17. Not as above; flesh usually tough .Plectania melastoma & others, p. 829
18. Fruiting body small to minute; found on dung or burnt ground, sometimes in swarms .
.(see Aleuria & Allies, p. 833)
18. Fruiting body usually larger than 1 cm broad; found on ground or in scorched areas but not in
dung .(see Peziza & Allies, p. 818)
828
ft
Sarcosoma latahensis (see comments under S. mexicana, which resembles it very closely). Specimens
on right and left are being viewed from the top; those in center, from the side (the one at the bottom
has been sliced open to show the gelatinous flesh).
that is common under western conifers, particularly at higher elevations. Its flesh is
gelatinous when young but often becomes tougher and less gelatinous in age, plus its
spores lack oil droplets at maturity. Another species, S. globosum, may occur in the West
but is much more common in eastern North America. It is massive, black, and gelatinous
like S. mexicana, but its water-and-gel-filled base is very broad (not tapered) and may
“leak” when collected!
HABIT AT: Solitary or more often in groups or clusters on or near rotting hardwood sticks
and logs (the wood often buried); common in eastern North America in the spring.
EDIBILITY: Too tough to be worth eating.
COMMENTS: This dark brown to black urn-shaped fungus is one of the first fungi to
appear each spring in the hardwood forests of eastern North America. It differs from
Plectania melastoma by its deeper cup and better developed stalk, but the two species
might just as well be merged into one genus. I can find no record of it from the west coast,
but a similar species, U. hiemalis, has been found in Alberta and Alaska. It might con¬
ceivably be mistaken for a Craterellus, but the growth in the spring plus the fertile upper
or inner (rather than lower or outer) surface and slightly different shape distinguish it.
829
Plectania melastoma. This small black cup fungus can be recognized by its color, tough texture,
and frequently wrinkled underside. Note how young specimens (right) are nearly closed at the top.
dry, often glistening when wet, black or deep brownish-black. Exterior tough (but with
a semi-gelatinous inner layer when wet), minutely hairy, strongly wrinkled or veined,
black, but often with a rusty-orange tinge near the margin from the presence of minute
orange granules. Flesh tough or cartilaginous, not brittle. STALK absent or present as
a short, stout, narrowed base; continuous with and colored like exterior of cup, the base
often with wiry black mycelial threads that extend into the substrate. SPORES 20-28
* 8-12 microns, elliptical or spindle-shaped, smooth, with oil droplets when immature.
HABITAT: Solitary or more often in small groups or clusters on decaying sticks and
other debris of both hardwoods and conifers; widely distributed and not uncommon, but
easily overlooked, fruiting mainly in the spring. In our area this species or something very
similar (see comments) occurs under oak in the late winter and early spring. I usually find
it when I’m foraging for Craterellus cornucopioides, perhaps because both are black.
EDIBILITY: Unknown
COMMENTS: The black color, wrinkled exterior (or underside), small size, and tough
texture are the principal fieldmarks of this attractive cup fungus. The typical form with
rusty-orange granules usually grows under conifers. Our local oak-loving version usually
lacks visible granules, but orange granules can be seen under the microscope. Bulgaria
melastoma is an older name for it. Two very similar black cup fungi with little or no stalk
and no orange granules are also worth mentioning: P. milled has a stellate margin (i.e.,
with starlike points) and elliptical spores, while P. (-Pseudoplectania) nigrella has round
spores. Both usually occur under conifers. See also Urnula craterium, which has a larger,
deeper (urnlike) fruiting body.
830
Plectania nannfeldtii. This small black cup fungus has a long thin stalk and often grows near snow.
corium (see comments under H. macropus) is somewhat similar but larger, not as tough,
and often shows ribs on the stalk. P. (-Pseudoplectania) melaena also grows in the spring
under conifers, but is slightly larger and has a yellow-brown to olive-brown cap or cup
when young (but blackens in age) and a short or long stalk. For species with little or no
stalk, see Plectania melastoma.
OTIDEA
Medium-sized, mostly terrestrial fungi. FRUITING BODY usually erect or semi-erect (often
standing on one end), usually lopsided and open or slit on one side, sometimes shaped like a rabbit's
ear, at other times more cuplike. Fertile (inner) surface variously colored, usually smooth. Exterior
smooth or scurfy but not usually hairy. Flesh usually rather brittle, not gelatinous. STALK absent
or present as a short, thick base. SPORES elliptical, smooth, usually with two oil droplets. Asci
lining inside or upper surface of fruiting body, typically 8-spored, operculate, tips not amyloid.
THIS is a small but common group of lopsided or earlike cup cungi. The fruiting bodies
are usually erect (i.e., they stand on end) and slit down one side, and often occur in groups
or contorted clusters. Many other cup fungi can be open on one side or lopsided, but Otidea
is the only common genus that is consistently slit or lopsided and erect or semi-erect.
The dozen or so North American Otideas are differentiated primarily on microscopic
characters, but can be divided into two groups based on their shape. One group has an
elongated, erect, rabbit-ear-like fruiting body; the other is more open and cuplike and
often truncate (chopped off) at the top. To avoid otidealogical debate, only one species
from each group is described here. Otidea belongs to the Pyronemataceae.
Key to Otidea
1. Fruiting bodies arising in groups or clusters from an underground “tuber” (sclerotium), shaped
more or less like rabbit ears, 5-15 cm tall; fertile (inner) surface orange to pinkish to reddish-
brown, often blackening in age; exterior dark brown to blackish; found under hardwoods in
eastern North America, usually in the summer; rare, but often occurring in spectacular
numbers when it fruits .Wynnea americana
1. Not as above; fruiting bodies not arising from an underground “tuber” . 2
2. Fruiting body bright yellow to orange but usually developing dark bluish or greenish stains;
found mainly in spring under northern and mountain conifers (seeCaloscyphafulgens, p.837)
2. Not as above . 3
3. Fertile (inner) surface of fruiting body pale yellow to orange, ochraceous, or pinkish .4
3. Fertile surface predominantly tan to brown, sometimes with brighter areas . 7
831
832 PEZIZACEAE & ALLIES
4. Fruiting body pale to bright yellow, usually with a truncate (broad, flattened) apex .
. O. concinna & O. cantharella (see O. onotica, below)
4. Not as above . 5
5. Fertile surface bright orange; underside usually whitish; fruiting bodies only sometimes lop¬
sided or slit down one side (particularly when clustered) .(seeAleuria & Allies, p. 833)
5. Not as above . 6
6. Fertile surface dull orange to yellowish or tinged pinkish.O. onotica, below
6. Fertile surface yellowish, the exterior usually brownish . . O. leporina (see O. onotica, below)
7. Fruiting bodies typically elongated and erect (standing on end like rabbit ears) . 8
7. Fruiting bodies typically broadened and flattened somewhat on top (truncate) or cuplike or
distorted (especially when clustered); usually growing semi-erect . 9
8. Fertile surface yellowish-brown.O. leporina (see O. onotica, below)
8. Fertile surface usually deep reddish-brown to vinaceous-brown .
.O. smithii <fe Wynnella silvicola (see O. alutacea, below)
9. Fruiting bodies often nearly round (spherical) when young and flattened in age, usually solitary
or in small groups but not often clustered; tips of asci amyloid . (see Peziza & Allies, p. 818)
9. Not as above; fruiting bodies often clustered and distorted by mutual pressure, not normally
flattening out in age nor spherical when young; asci not amyloid O. alutacea & others, below
pinkish tinge, often slightly scurfy. Flesh thin, pallid, brittle. STALK present as a whitish,
narrowed, hairy or downy base that arises from a litter-binding mycelium. SPORES
12-14 x 6-8 microns, elliptical, smooth, with two oil droplets. Paraphyses (sterile cells)
strongly hooked.
HABITAT: Scattered or more often in groups or clusters under both hardwoods and
conifers; widely distributed. In our area it fruits in the winter and spring, but is not as
numerous as O. alutacea.
EDIBILITY: Edible according to some, but one study revealed the presence of the toxin
MMH. In other words, it is better chucked than plucked.
COMMENTS: The erect growth habit and earlike fruiting body plus the ochraceous or
orangish to pinkish-tinged fertile surface separate this species from most other cup fungi.
The apex of the fruiting body is not broadly flattened or truncate as is typical of O. alutacea.
Other species: O. leporina (“Rabbit Ears”) has a yellowish-brown interior and brownish
exterior, but is otherwise quite similar. O. concinna and O. cantharella are both pale
to bright yellow, but often have a broadened or truncate apex. All of these species are
widely distributed. For duller or browner Otideas, see comments under O. alutacea.
THIS is a motley multitude of miniscule to medium-sized cup- and disclike fungi with
non-amyloid, operculate asci and fragile to fairly tough but not gelatinous flesh. In
contrast to Peziza, many of the species are brightly colored, and those that aren’t are
usually small. A few, such as the common orange peel fungus, Aleuria aurantia, are
conspicuous, but most are so minute or mundane that only the most avid devotees of
diminutiveness (see p. 224) will notice them.
833
834 PEZIZACEAE & ALLIES
These cup fungi, like others, grow in a wide range of habitats. Many digest dung; others
occur in swarms on scorched earth and were among the first organisms to colonize the ash-
covered wasteland around Mount St. Helens after that volcano erupted. Space permits
descriptions of only a few species, nearly all of which belong to the Pyronemataceae (not
to be confused with the Pyrenomycetes or flask fungi). Exceptions are the scarlet cup
fungus, Sarcoscypha coccinea, and its relatives, which are placed in a separate family, the
Sarcoscyphaceae, because of their tougher texture and a number of microscopic dif¬
ferences. A third family, the Ascobolaceae, is only briefly mentioned here. Most of its
constituents are minute, dark-spored dung addicts of interest only to scatologists, asco-
mycologists, students of Fungi 112B, and other assorted eccentrics who deal with dung
on a daily basis.
Key to Aleuria & Allies
l. Growing on dung or manure . 2
1. Not as above . 3
2. Fruiting body typically at least 1 cm broad when mature, nearly round (spherical) when young
becoming cup-shaped to nearly flat in age, yellowish to brown, without prominent hairs;
asci with amyloid tips .(see Peziza & Allies, p. 818)
2. Not as above; fruiting body small or minute, often with hairs .
.Cheilymenia coprinaria & many others, p. 838
3. Exterior (underside) of cup or disc clothed with brown to black hairs; margin often fringed
with dark hairs also . 4
3. Not as above; exterior either hairless or with white or pale hairs . 12
4. Most or all of fruiting body immersed in the ground with only the top (mouth) showing,
making it look like a hole in the ground . (see Geopora, p. 846)
4. Not as above . 5
5. Fertile (upper or inner) surface yellow, orange, or red . 6
5. Fertile surface white to creamy, tan, gray, brown, etc. 9
6. Fruiting body small or minute, growing on burnt soil or charred wood .
.Anthracobia melaloma & others (see Cheilymenia coprinaria, p. 838)
6. Not as above; growing in soil, humus, or on wood but not usually in burned areas . 7
7. Fruiting body tough or corky and thick-fleshed; fertile surface orange to red or sometimes yel¬
lowish; exterior dark brown to black; found in eastern North America Wolfina aurantiopsis
7. Not as above . 8
8. Underside of fruiting body with minute brown hairs; fertile surface bright orange .
.Melastiza chateri(sec Scutellinia scutellata, p. 839)
8. Underside of fruiting body with fairly obvious hairs which fringe the margin like eyelashes;
fertile surface bright red to orange-red or orange .... Scutellinia scutellata & others, p. 839
9. Fertile (upper or inner) surface white to grayish; stalk absent or rudimentary . 10
9. Fertile surface white to grayish, brownish, or darker; stalk usually present (but often short) 11
10. Fruiting body typically 1-3 cm broad .Humaria hemispherica, p. 839
10. Fruiting body typically less than 1 cm broad .
. Trichophaea boudieri & others (see Humaria hemispherica, p. 839)
11. Stalk ribbed, often short; fertile surface white to tan or brownish but not gray .
.Jafnea semitosta (see Humaria hemispherica, p. 839)
11. Stalk not ribbed, or if so then fertile surface grayish or blackish .(see Helvetia, p. 805)
12. Growing on recently fallen branches or foliage of conifers; fruiting body small or miniscule,
stalkless, often brightly colored; asci operculate .
.Pithya vulgaris & others (see Sarcoscypha coccinea, p. 836)
12. Not as above . 13
13. Fertile (upper or inner) surface bright red to scarlet; exterior usually whitish or with white hairs;
usually growing on wood or buried sticks . 14
13. Not as above . 16
14. Fruiting body very small (less than 1 cm broad); exterior of cup with long hairs . 15
14. Fruiting body larger and/ or hairs on exterior short . . Sarcoscypha coccinea & others, p. 836
ALEURIA& ALLIES 835
15. Fruiting body arising from an elongated rootlike structure (several often arising together from
the same “root”) . Microstomaprotacta (see Sarcoscypha coccinea, p. 836)
15. Not as above .Microstoma floccosa (see Sarcoscypha coccinea, p. 836)
16. Fruiting body yellow to orange but soon developing dark bluish to greenish or olive stains; found
under northern and mountain conifers in spring and early summer Caloscyphafulgens, p. 837
16. Not as above (but fruiting body may be yellow or orange) . 17
17. Fruiting body bright yellow, minute (less than 5 mm broad), occurring in swarms on wood; asci
inoperculate (without “lids”) .(see Helotiales, p. 865)
17. Not as above . 18
18. Fruiting body minute (1-6 mm broad) and disclike to cushion-shaped; growing mainly in burned
areas, often in swarms or masses . 19
18. Not as above; either larger or distinctly cuplike or consistently growing in other habitats . 20
19. Fertile (upper or inner) surface orange to yellow-orange to reddish .
.Pyronema omphalodes & others (see Cheilymenia coprinaria, p. 838)
19. Not as above; fertile surface usually darker .
.Ascobolus carbonarius & others (see Cheilymenia coprinaria, p. 838)
20. Fertile (upper or inner) surface bright orange to yellow-orange . 21
20. Not as above (but fertile surface may have a dull yellowish or pale orange tinge) . 23
. 21. Stalk absent or rudimentary; very common .Aleuria aurantia, p. 837
21. Stalk present, at least in many specimens . 22
22. Fertile surface bright orange to bright yellow-orange . Aleuria rhenana & others, p. 836
22. Fertile surface pale orange to pale or dingy yellowish .Geopyxis vulcanalis, p. 840
23. Growing in recently burned areas . 24
23. Not as above . 26
24. Fertile surface pink to reddish; stalk absent or rudimentary .
.Tarzetta rosea (see Geopyxis vulcanalis, p. 840)
24. Not as above; fertile surface differently colored (including brick-red) . 25
25. Fertile surface more or less brick-red . Geopyxis carbonaria (see G. vulcanalis, p. 840)
25. Not as above . 26
26. Fruiting body turquoise to blue-green or at least tinged those colors; found on wood
.(see Helotiales, p. 865)
26. Not as above; differently colored . 27
27. Fruiting body with a stalk that arises from a swollen tuberlike structure (sclerotium) immersed
in the substrate; asci inoperculate .(see Helotiales, p. 865)
27. Not as above . 28
28. Fruiting body very small (typically less than 7 mm broad); stalk when present very thin; often
found on living plant parts (leaves, stems, etc.); asci inoperculate . .. (see Helotiales, p. 865)
28. Not as above; usually found on ground or dead wood; asci operculate (with “lids”) . 29
29. Fruiting body tough or leathery, the flesh very thin; exterior usually with white or grayish
hairs; common on dead hardwood sticks, branches, etc; spores borne on basidia .
. . . .. (see Stereaceae & Allies, p. 604)
29. Not as above . 30
30. Fertile surface pale orange to pale or dingy yellowish; fruiting body usually less than 1.5 cm
broad . Geopyxis vulcanalis & others, p. 840
30. Not as above; fertile surface grayish-tan to tan or brown and/or fruiting body larger .... 31
31. Stalk present (at least in most specimens) . 32
31. Stalk absent or rudimentary . 34
32. Exterior of cup and upper stalk usually hairy or densely scurfy when fresh; fertile surface
often dark; stalk well-developed though sometimes short .(see Helvetia, p. 805)
32. Not as above . 33
33. Fruiting body 1-3 cm broad . Tarzetta catinus (see Geopyxis vulcanalis, p. 840)
33. Fruiting body typically 1.5 cm broad or less Tarzetta cupularis (see Geopyxis vulcanalis, p. 840)
34. Fertile surface dark brown to blackish; fruiting body usually saucer-shaped or disclike (flat)
in age; tips of asci amyloid .(see Peziza & Allies, p. 818)
34. Fertile surface brown to yellowish; tips of asci not amyloid .
.Tarzetta bronca (see Geopyxis vulcanalis, p. 840)
836 PEZIZACEAE & ALLIES
Aleuria rhenana is a small orange or yellow-orange cup fungus with a well-developed stalk. It often
grows in clusters, as shown here (at left) and in the color plate.
ALEURIA 837
COMMENTS: The yellow-orange color and dark blue or greenish stains that make it
look like a moldy orange peel are the hallmarks of this springtime cup fungus. The my¬
celium apparently parasitizes the seeds of conifers (mainly spruce and fir) and clusters
of fruiting bodies often arise where squirrels stash their seed-containing cones. An albino
form of this species with bluish stains has been found in Idaho.
Cheilymenia coprinaria in its favorite milieu—a “road apple” (piece of horse dung). Note small size,
disclike fruiting body, and the long hairs or bristles protruding from its margin.
Scutellinia scutellata typically grows in groups (left) and is easily recognized by its orange to red color
and the dark hairs that fringe its margin (right). Unfortunately, the hairs do not show up as well in these
black-and-whites as they do in the original color photographs. (Ray Gipson, Dan Harper)
839
840 PEZIZACEAE & ALLIES
this an easy cup fungus to recognize. Jafneasemitosta is a larger (2-5 cm broad) species with
a creamy-white to tan or brown interior, a brown exterior clothed with scattered soft brown
hairs, plus a short ribbed stalk; it is fairly common in eastern North America. Other hairy
species: Trichophaea boudieri and T. bullata have a pale gray to whitish interior and
brown hairy exterior, but are much smaller (1-6 mm broad) and grow on wet soil under
conifers; T. abundans is a minute whitish species that grows in burned areas. For more
colorful hairy or ciliate species, see Scutellinia scutellata and Cheilymenia coprinaria.
Geopyxis vulcanalis. Note small size, gregarious nature, and the small stalk below the cup which is
often covered by dirt (visible in specimen at top).
841
T ruffles
TUBERALES
TRUFFLES are seldom seen because they grow underground.* Most of them look like
tiny potatoes or rocks, but reveal a system of canals, veins, and/ or cavities when sliced
open. They are likely to be confused only with the aptly named false truffles (Hymeno-
gastrales), which also grow underground but bear their spores on basidia rather than in
asci and typically have a minutely chambered rather than marbled, channelled, or hollow
interior. (For a more detailed comparison, see footnote at bottom of p. 844.)
The truffles are thought to be cup fungi which have gone underground. The evolutionary
pathway leading from a cup fungus to a truffle is exquisitely illustrated by the genus Geo-
pora. SomeGeoporus are truffle-like and subterranean, while others are cuplike and partly
exposed (i.e., hollow with a large mouth at ground level that opens to the air as shown on
p. 935). Some of the underground Geoporas are also hollow, but the mouth is oriented
randomly (at the side, bottom, etc.) and others have become greatly infolded so that the
interior is channel led or chambered (see photo on p.847) rather than hollow. The infolding
of the tissue is advantageous because it greatly increases the surface area for producing
spores (the spore-bearing asci line the canals or chambers inside the fruiting body). In
the “true” truffles (e.g., Tuber), this trend is carried to its logical extreme—the interior
of the fruiting body is marbled but solid (it presumably evolved through the fusing or
merging of folded tissue) and the asci are imbedded randomly in the tissue rather than
lining the canals or chambers.
As might be expected, truffles exhibit several other special adaptations to their under¬
ground lifestyle. In Geopora the spores are forcibly discharged as in the cup fungi, but
other truffles have lost the ability—and necessity—to discharge them because they do not
depend on the wind for spore dispersal. Instead, their spores are spread by various truffle¬
eating animals (rodents, deer, pigs, insects, slugs, etc.). The spores pass through the ani¬
mals’ digestive systems unscathed, and a microscopic analysis of the spore content of
animal droppings can give you a pretty good idea of which truffles and false truffles grow
in your area! Some animals, such as the California red-backed vole (a sort of burrowing
mouse) tunnel through the soil eating nothing but truffles and are thus restricted to the
coastal fog belt, where truffles and false truffles occur year-round.
To attract attention and make themselves desirable, most truffles have developed
distinctive odors and flavors. However, the odor and flavor do not normally become
strong until well after the truffle is mature, thereby insuring that the eater of the truffle will
ingest a large number of viable spores. Furthermore, truffles do not need to develop as
rapidly as epigeous (above-ground) fungi because they are insulated from sudden changes
in the weather. Instead, the maturation process takes place gradually, over a period of
several weeks or months, although a few spores often develop earlier coupled with a slight
scent, perhaps as a safeguard against a prolonged cold or hot spell that would inhibit
further development of the fruiting body.
Truffles, particularly species of Tuber, have been eaten for centuries. Unfortunately,
the fabled truffles of France and Italy have become a fetish of the rich. Due to their rarity
and the difficulty in finding them, they have acquired considerable snob appeal and retail
for more than $500 a pound! Their flavor and aroma are so powerful that a little goes a long
way, but to a person of modest means such as myself, nothing edible is worth that much!
Since truffles grow underground, we humans, with our underdeveloped noses, have
♦When speaking of truffles and false truffles, the terms “underground,” “subterranean,” “hypogeous,” and
“buried” are used rather loosely to mean beneath the surface of the ground, either in the humus layer or in the soil
itself or in the interface between the two.
Left: The famous “Black Diamond” of France, Tuber melanosporum, sliced open to show the
marbled interior (see pp. 854-855 for more details). Right: Microscopic view of the surface of a Tuber
spore, showing the alveolate (pitted-reticulate) pattern typical of many species. (Herb Saylor)
trouble finding them without “hired hounds.” Goats have been used to track down
truffles in Sardinia and bear cubs have been employed in Russia, but pigs and dogs are
the most accomplished truffle hunters. Some truffles contain pig sex hormones, meaning
that pigs have a natural nose (and lust!) for truffles. They require little or no training, but
must be physically restrained from devouring their quarry, and are hard to control even
when there are no truffles about. Acorns are sometimes given as nutritional recompense
for finding a truffle (a pitiful substitute, if you ask me) or the pig is muzzled and pulled
away just as it begins to dig up the truffle with its exceptional snout. Another problem with
pigs is that they tire easily, and must be carted to and from the truffle grounds if they are
distant.
Dogs, on the other hand, are tireless and devoted, and care more for humans than
truffles. In fact, most dogs loathe truffles and must be painstakingly trained to seek them
out. There are schools in Italy devoted exclusively to this purpose, and a seasoned truffle
hound commands a steep price. S hort-legged breeds are traditionally popular, presumably
because they’re closer to the ground. Both pigs and dogs, incidentally, can detect truffles
from as far away as 50 yards, and there is one case on record of a dog that jumped a hedge,
crossed a field, and “secured his prize” under a beech tree at least 100 yards away!
Perhaps you are now convinced that you need canine or porcine companions to find
truffles. Well, let me state, unequivocally, that you don’t. True, the odds against casually
bumping into a truffle are great, but you can find truffles by making a concerted effort
to find them. This means getting down on your hands and knees and systematically sifting
through the forest humus and soil, paying special attention to “truffle tracks”: squirrel
diggings, small cracks in the soil caused by those that develop close to the surface, strange
and compelling odors (some seasoned trufflers claim they can smell them out!), and an
occasional cloud of “truffle flies” hovering over the buried object of their affections.
Truffles, in fact, are far easier to find than most people realize. Looking for them is both
challenging and fun, like hunting for buried treasure or panning for gold, but without the
monetary incentive. (Entrepeneurs, are you listening? The expensive truffles of Europe
are not known to occur in the U nited States and most of our native species are notas richly
flavored.)
Why, then, do so few mushroom hunters look for truffles? Perhaps because they don’t
know how, when, or where. (As evidence of this assertion, I offer the chapter on truffles
in the first edition of Mushrooms Demystified!) The how, the when, and the where are
delightfully described by Harold E. Parks in the following excerpt from a 1921 article in
the scientific journal, Mycologia. A resident of San Jose, California, Parks was one of
California’s earliest and most avid trufflers, and he has had numerous species of truffles
and false truffles named after him.
842
TUBERALES 843
Even when one knows the ground thoroughly it is surprising how little of it may be
covered on a day of good collecting. Frequently two or three hours will be spent in
working over the ground under a single large oak, and on several occasions an entire
afternoon has been spent in one place . . .
The equipment of the truffle hunter is important. I use a wheel on many trips, as the
roads are excellent and the stops are very frequent in some places. It is easily hidden
in the brush when I leave the roadways and take to the high hills, and it makes accessible
places otherwise out of one’s reach. To the wheel is strapped a small combination rake
and hoe with a four-foot handle. This implement is very useful in climbing, raking and
digging and furnishes good protection in a snake country, as I well know. A short-
handled hoe useful for work in thick brush, a trowel, knife, tweezers, lens, kodak,
plenty of newspapers and a large number of small pasteboard cartridge boxes obtained
from a shooting gallery. These small boxes are very useful in handling the many small
specimens or single individual specimens, while large collections are wrapped in the
paper. Lunch and thermos bottle complete the outfit, and all are packed compactly in
the large canvas bags used by newsboys. These bags ride comfortably with a large load
evenly distributed over the shoulders.
In the earlier parts of the season the edges of the forests and the small groups of trees
are usually the best places for operations, although frequently the dense forest will yield
good specimens. Late in the season the best places are to be found deep in the forest,
where the ground retains more moisture. When the collector finds a favorable place
for operations the rake comes into use and a small area is raked free of leaves and humus.
W atch must be kept in the leaves for certain species... Other species will appear entirely
exposed on the surface of the earth [under the leaves] and some will be just beneath
the surface and out of sight. Excavation may be continued to a depth of a foot, at which
depth most species will cease to be found. Care should be taken at all stages, especially
near the surface, to avoid injury to specimens, but they will often be injured in spite of
it, and many of the dark-colored species will require very careful search and sifting of
the soil. The rewards are more often blistered hands and an aching back than truffles,
but there are also some intensely exciting moments . ..
To these remarks I would add only this: Digging up the forest can be unsightly as well
as destructive, so do it on a small scale, in scattered places over a large area, don’t go
truffling in locales traditionally frequented by mushroom hunters (they have a right to
undisturbed duff!), and always cover up the soil you expose, leaving the environment as
close to its original state as possible.
Truffles are mycorrhizal. This means they can be found wherever there are trees and
shrubs, but like the false truffles, they are especially abundant and diverse along the west
coast. They are normally terrestrial, but can also occur inside very rotten wood that has
been permeated by tree rootlets. This is particularly true in dry areas like the Sierra Nevada,
where the rotten logs are a major source of moisture for both the trees and the truffles.
In our area they seem to favor evergreen oaks (live oak and tanoak) and conifers such as
Douglas-fir. Because truffles develop slowly, they are usually found at the end of the
mushroom season (February-July in our area). Some, such as Tuber gibbosum, are
excellent esculents; others are mediocre and still others have yet to be tried.
Although a microscope is often required, truffles are not as difficult to identify as false
truffles (for one thing, there are far fewer species). A fairly extensive—but by no means
comprehensive—selection is offered here in the hope that it will stimulate mushroom
hunters to start looking for these clandestine denizens of our forests. Since I am by no
means an expert on truffles, I have gleaned much of the information in this chapter from
articles by Helen Gilkey and James Trappe, the past and presentauthorities on the subject.
Anyone who takes truffles seriously should consult these articles(see Suggested Readings
and References) or join the North American Truffling Society.
Modern taxonomists try to show the truffles’ relationships to the cup fungi by scattering
them among several families in the Pezizales, just as they place many false truffles with
the Agaricales. The Tuberales, in other words, is a defunct and artificial—but convenient
844 TUBERALES
—category that is used here because it facilitates identification. In the following key,
the truffles have been divided into several natural groups. An attempt has been made to
use field characters, but microscopic features have unavoidably come into play—
particularly the shape and ornamentation of the mature spores (you must have at least
one mature or partially mature specimen!). Truffle spores, incidentally, are exceptionally
ornate. Some are spiny like porcupines or pitted like golf balls, others are covered with a
geometrical network of ridges (see photo on p. 842), still others are warted, pegged,
or smooth.
*As already pointed out, this fundamental difference can only be seen with a microscope (and then only after the
basidia or asci have formed and before they disintegrate). However, the false truffles (underground Basidiomycetes)
and truffles (underground Ascomycetes) can often be differentiated in the field by the following characters:
There are also several mycorrhizal Zygomycetes (e.g., Endogone and Glomus) with truffle-like fruiting bodies.
These fungi are not treated in this book because they have neither asci nor basidia. Instead sexual spores are
formed by the conjugation of “mother cells” (gametangia), and asexual spores are often formed on hyphae.
Most species have gigantic spores (100-200 microns!) and some, such as the common Endogone lactiflua, exude
a latex when cut.
TUBERALES 845
8. Fruiting body a large hollow ball (but often lobed or flattened); inside surface white to grayish,
pinkish, or purplish, not warted; outer wall often splitting into lobes (at top) in age; common,
especially under northern and mountain conifers .(see Sarcosphaera, p. 825)
8. Not as above . 11
9. Exterior of fruiting body with rounded to angular warts . 10
9. Exterior of fruiting body smooth or hairy, but not distinctly warted . 11
10. Fruiting body black to brownish to reddish or orange, often (but not always) with a tuft of my¬
celium at the base; spores smooth even at maturity.Balsamia & Allies, p. 852
10. Fruiting body white to yellowish or yellow-gray, or if not then interior warted like exterior; basal
tuft present or absent; spores ornamented at maturity .Genea& Genabea, p. 849
11. Exterior of fruiting body with fuzzy brown hairs (i.e., tomentose); interior a hollow chamber
or with open canals formed by complex infolding of the fruiting body wall; spores forcibly
discharged, smooth at maturity; fairly common, especially under conifers . Geopora, p. 846
11. Not as above; exterior not brown and tomentose . 12
12. Spores smooth and round at maturity; chambers of the fruiting body typically stuffed with
cottony hyphae; tips of asci not amyloid; rare (at least on west coast) .Stephensia
12. Not with above combination of features. 13
13. Asci with amyloid tips (i.e., tips staining bluish in iodine solution) (see Peziza & Allies, p. 818)
13. Asci not amyloid . 14
14. Interior of fruiting body hollow or with open veins, canals, or chambers formed by complex
infolding of the fruiting body wall; spores ornamented at maturity; especially common under
northern or mountain conifers (often inside rotten wood), but also found in other habitats
.Hydnotrya, p. 848
14. Not as above . 15
15. Spores elliptical and smooth at maturity; channels or canals inside fruiting body usually empty
.Balsamia & Allies, p. 852
15. Not as above; spores ornamented (at least at maturity) .Tuber & Allies, p. 854
16. Columella (sterile column or base or rudimentary internal stalk) present, or if not then a very
distinct basal pad of mycelium present; exterior of fruiting body pallid to pinkish-gray to
brownish; interior pinkish-gray to grayish-purple to nearly black with narrow white veins;
spores very large (60-100 microns), elliptical, brown at maturity and ornamented with obscure
spines; found under conifers in the Pacific Northwest .Fischerula subcaulis
16. Not as above; columella absent .•. 17
17. Asci with amyloid tips or weakly amyloid throughout; asci arranged in a distinct palisade
(hymenium); spores elliptical . 18
17. Asci not amyloid; asci arranged in a palisade or randomly imbedded in tissue; common . . 21
18. Spores round, ornamented with spines or pegs at maturity; rare.Tuber & Allies, p. 854
18. Not as above; occasional . 19
19. Asci weakly amyloid throughout; fruiting body white to yellowish or yellow-brown; rare
(known from coastal California) . 20
19. Asci amyloid mainly or only at their tips; fruiting body often darker than above; widespread
.(see Peziza & Allies, p. 818)
20. Spores less than 20 microns long .Hydnotryopsis setchellii
20. Spores averaging 20 microns or more long.Hydnotryopsis compactus
21. Fruiting body with a fatty or gristle-like consistency (especially the interior), usually whitish
or buff when fresh; spores round and ornamented at maturity .Tuber & Allies, p. 854
21. Not as above; texture not gristle-like . 22
22. Spores smooth even when mature; exterior of fruiting body often warted; interior pallid when
mature or grayish to olive with pallid veins (rarely brown) .Balsamia & Allies, p. 852
22. Spores ornamented at maturity; exterior of fruiting body warted in some species, but more often
smooth; interior pallid when immature but usually brown or reddish-brown with pallid veins
when mature (but sometimes grayish or olive) .Tuber & Allies, p. 854
23. Fruiting body pale brown to brown or purplish; asci faintly amyloid; spores mostly 20 microns
or more broad, hyaline (colorless) under the microscope . Sphaerosoma
23. Fruiting body yellowish to olive or brown; asci not amyloid; spores 8-25 microns broad, hyaline
to yellowish or brown under the microscope .Sphaerozone
846 TUBERALES
THIS genus is best recognized by its fuzzy brown exterior. Some species, such as G. areni¬
cola, are traditionally grouped with the cup fungi (in genus Sepultaria) because of their
hollow fruiting body that grows just below the soil surface with only the large opening or
“mouth” at the top exposed to the air. G. cooperi, on the other hand, has traditionally
been treated with the truffles because it grows underground and has a complexly folded
interior and one or more irregularly oriented openings. These apparently disparate fungi
are linked by species such as G. clausa, which is hollow like G. arenicola, but grows under¬
ground and has an apical, basal, or lateral opening.
Geopora is currently placed in the Pyronemataceae, alongside Aleuria, Otidea, Geo¬
pyxis, and many other cup fungi. About a dozen species are known, most of them in the
mode of G. arenicola. However, G. cooperi seems to be the most common species in Cali¬
fornia. It is said to be a good edible, but I can find no information on other members of
the genus.
Key to Geopora
1. Wall of fruiting body complexly infolded to create numerous canals or chambers inside the
fruiting body . 2
1. Not as above; interior of fruiting body with a simple hollow . 3
2. Exterior of fruiting body only slightly hairy if at all; odor often sweet or garlicky when fully
mature; spores ornamented at maturity; often (but not always) growing inside rotten wood
. (see Hydnotrya, p. 848)
2. Not as above; exterior distinctly hairy or fuzzy; spores smooth .G. cooperi, below
3. Opening or“mouth” of fruiting body irregularly oriented(at top, base, or side); usually growing
underground .G. clausa (see G. arenicola, p. 847)
3. Opening or “mouth” always at top; fruiting body immersed or partly immersed in the ground
with the mouth exposed to the air .4
4. Fertile surface (interior) orangish to reddish or sometimes yellowish .
.G. aurantia& G. pellita(see G. arenicola, p. 847)
4. Fertile surface white to pale brownish or sometimes drying yellowish . 5
5. Fruiting body up to 1 cm broad .G. arenosa(see G. arenicola, p. 847)
5. Fruiting body l A cm broad .G. arenicola & others, p. 847
and conifers (but especially the latter); widely distributed in western North America and
locally common, especially under mountain conifers during the spring, summer, and fall.
It favors pine in coastal California and pine, fir, or spruce in the Sierra Nevada and else¬
where; in Alaska it has been found under willow and aspen. It develops underground
but may surface (or be dug up by squirrels) in age, and so is often seen by casual collectors.
EDIBILITY: Edible. Rodents are very fond of it and so are some humans.
COMMENTS: This is one of our largest truffles and also one of the more distinctive.
Its telltale traits are the fuzzy brown exterior and convoluted interior. The latter is simply
a mass of folded tissue (see photograph), with the spore-bearing asci lining the empty
spaces or“canals” between the folds. The spores are shot out of the asci as in the cup fungi.
It has numerous synonyms, including G. harknessii and G. magnata.
847
848 TUBERALES
THE fruiting bodies of this genus are extremely variable in size and shape. Some species
are hollow inside, others are complexly folded. All have open canals or chambers, non¬
amyloid asci, and spores which suggest a kinship to the elfin saddles and false morels
(Helvellaceae). Geopora exhibits a similar range of variation, but has a hairier or fuzzier
exterior and smooth spores. Genea and Genabea differ in having a distinctly warted
exterior and interior.
Hydnotryas are sometimes called “wood truffles” because several species can fre¬
quently be found inside rotten wood (they also grow in soil). As pointed out earlier, the
fact that they grow inside wood does not necessarily mean they are wood-rotters. Rather,
they could be associated with tree rootlets that penetrate the wood in search of moisture.
A dozen species of Hydnotrya are known; half occur in North America. They are fairly
common in the Sierra Nevada and other mountain ranges, but rare or absent in coastal
California. A single species is described here and several others are discussed.
Key to Hydnotrya
1. Exterior of fruiting body brown to dark brown to dark reddish-brown; interior complexly
folded or convoluted; odor often strong (sweet or garlicky) when fully mature', spores round
(but often knobby) . H. cerebriformis& H. tulasnei(see H. variiformis, below)
1. Exterior whitish to buff, cinnamon-buff, pinkish-cinnamon, or sometimes brown; interior
complexly folded or a simple hollow; odor not usually as above; spores elliptical. 2
2. Interior usually a simple hollow; spores often cubical; usually found in ground .
.H. cubispora (see H. variiformis, below)
2. Interior ranging from a simple hollow to complexly folded; spores not cubical; found in ground
or inside rotten wood . 3
3. Asci with amyloid tips; common in coastal California .(see Peziza & Allies, p. 818)
3. Not as above; asci not amyloid .H. variiformis & others, below
Hydnotrya variiformis
FRUITING BODY 0.7-4 cm broad, round to somewhat flattened, depressed, or lobed.
Exterior minutely velvety, whitish to creamy to buff or yellowish to cinnamon-buff or
brownish, not warted. INTERIOR variable in configuration, but small specimens often
containing a simple cavity with a prominent opening, and larger ones usually with several
chambers or narrow, branching canals formed by crowding and infolding of the outer
wall; canals usually empty but their sides often fused; white or pallid, but the hymenium
(fertile tissue) often brownish to pinkish-orange at maturity. SPORES 32-36 * 24-28
microns, elliptical, smooth becoming minutely pitted and wrinkled at maturity, yellowish-
brown under the microscope. Asci borne in a palisade (hymenium) that lines the canals or
cavity, typically 8-spored.
HABITAT: Solitary or in groups in soil or inside very rotten wood under conifers; oc¬
casional (along with H. cerebriformis—see comments) in the Sierra Nevada, Cascades,
and other western mountains. It fruits in the spring, summer, and early fall.
EDIBILITY: Edible? I can find no specific information on it.
HYDNOTRYA 849
COMMENTS: This species and H. cerebriformis (see below) can usually be told in the
field by their fondness for growing inside rotten wood plus their complexly folded interior
(at least in large specimens) and non-amyloid asci. The exterior lacks the warts of Genabea
cerebriformis and the brown hairs of Geopora cooperi. H. cerebriformis is similar to
H. variiformis and grows in similar habitats. It has a more consistently complex or con¬
voluted interior (not unlike that of Geopora cooperi, shown on p. 847), is usually slightly
darker than H. variiformis (dull reddish-brown to dark purple-brown), typically has a
strong garlicky odor when mature, and has round, minutely spiny spores. H. tulasnei is a
widespread odoriferous species that is very similar to H. cerebriformis; it is also brown to
reddish-brown, but has coarsely warted spores. H. cubispora is a widely distributed,
brownish to pinkish-cinnamon, usually terrestrial species with a more or less hollow (but
lobed) interior and spores which are often cubical. H. michaelis (-H. yukonensis) is a
rather rare northern species with elliptical warted spores and a convoluted interior.
THESE small truffles are easily recognized by their finely warted, often lobed fruiting
bodies with a hollow or partly hollow, warted, geode-like interior. Geneas typically have
a single, often irregularly shaped cavity and warted spores, while Genabeas usually
have a more complex or mazelike interior and spiny spores. In addition, the western
species differ in color: reddish to brown or black in Genea, white or creamy in Genabea.
The origins and affinities of Genea and Genabea are unknown; together they form the
family Geneaceae. Both are fairly common, at least in California. They seem to fruit closer
to the surface of the ground than many truffles and also have an earlier season, appearing
in late November in our area and continuing on into the spring. I can find no information
on their edibility. Their small size is hardly an asset, but they seem to be very popular with
our local wild pigs. (You can sometimes find them where pigs have been foraging.) Genea
has over 20 known species, whereas Genabea includes only a handful. Three Geneas and
one Genabea are described here and several others are keyed out.
Left: Genea gardneri (see comments above). Note black hollow interior (below) and warted exterior.
(Herb Saylor) Right: Genea compacta (see comments above), a common yellowish to brown, oak-
loving species. Note knobby fruiting body, large “mouth” (specimen at center), and hollow interior.
GENEA 851
infolding and inward projections of the wall; colored more or less like exterior. Odor
mild or strong. SPORES 28-44 microns, round, smooth at first but covered with long,
slender spines at maturity; hyaline (colorless) to grayish-yellow (in age) under the micro¬
scope. Asci arranged in a palisade (hymenium), typically 8-spored.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious in soil or humus in woods and under trees; fairly
common (for a truffle) in western North America under various trees, but especially fond
of Douglas-fir. In California it fruits, like other truffles, in the winter, spring, and early
summer. Although small, its light color makes it fairly conspicuous.
EDIBILITY: I can find no information on it; too small to be of much value.
COMMENTS: Formerly known as Genea (or Myrmecocystis) cerebriformis, this is one
of our most distinctive truffles. The yellowish-gray to white color plus the irregularly con¬
voluted and warted exterior and complex interior with open canals (in larger specimens)
distinguish it. The interior is vaguely reminiscent of Geopora cooperi, but that species is
much larger and has a fuzzy brown exterior. Other species: Genabea fragilis (the type
species of the genus) is a blackish species reported from Europe and Quebec; G. spino-
spora is a whitish species that has been found in Virginia.
THREE genera are treated here: Balsamia, Barssia, and Picoa. They are intermediate in
aspect between the geode truffles (Genea and Genabea) and the true truffles (Tuber and
allies). As a unit they are difficult to distinguish in the field because their unifying feature
is microscopic: the spores are smooth even at maturity. On an individual basis, however,
the three genera are easier to recognize. For instance, Balsamia can be told by the frequent
presence of a basal mycelial tuft plus its warted exterior and pale (white to yellowish)
marbled interior. Barssia typically has a broad depression or “mouth” at the top of the
fruiting body and several open canals which empty into it. Picoa, on the other hand, has
a solid interior plus a brown to blackish exterior. It is easily confused with the true truffles,
but has a greener or grayer interior and smooth spores.
Balsamia, Barssia, and Picoa constitute the family Balsamiaceae, but their relationships
to other families are unclear. They occur in a variety of habitats and seem to fruit relatively
early for truffles, at least in our area. All three genera are small; one species from each is
described here.
Key to Balsamia & Allies
1. Interior of fruiting body solid and usually gray to greenish-gray to greenish-blue at maturity;
exterior slate-violet to black, minutely warted; basal mycelial tuft absent .
.Picoa carthusiana, p. 854
1. Not as above; interior of fruiting body not solid, or if solid then remaining pallid .2
2. Interior of fruiting body with open canals which empty into a broad central depression at or near
the top of fruiting body; exterior warted or not warted; basal mycelial tuft absent .
. Barssia oregonensis, p. 853
2. Not as above; internal veins or canals empty or stuffed with hyphae; exterior finely warted;
tuft of mycelium often present at base . Balsamia magnata, p. 853
Balsamia magnata. Note marbled or veined interior and finely warted exterior. Unlike Tuber, the
interior does not darken appreciably at maturity. (Herb Saylor)
Balsamia magnata
FRUITING BODY underground, 0.5-2 cm broad, round to somewhat compressed or
flattened, the apex usually infolded and the base often with a tuft of mycelium. Exterior
divided into numerous rounded to pointed warts, occasionally with small depressions;
color variable: bright orange to reddish-brown to brownish-pink or occasionally black
(but may be whitish when very young). INTERIOR white to pale yellowish, even when
mature; composed of crowded folds which form mazelike canals, the canals united or
separated into several chambers and either open or filled loosely with cottony hyphae;
canals usually converging at the apex or sometimes at several points. SPORES 20-24 *
12-14 microns, variable in shape (cylindrical to elliptical to nearly round), smooth at
maturity, hyaline (colorless) under the microscope, usually with three oil droplets. Asci
mostly imbedded in the tissue between the veins or canals; typically 8-spored.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious (usually the latter) in soil under various trees and
shrubs (oak, pine, madrone, etc.); common (for a truffle) in California and Oregon in the
winter and spring; also reported from Arizona.
EDIBILITY: I can find no information on it.
COMMENTS: The prominently warted orange to reddish-brown exterior plus the pallid
interior composed of open or stuffed, often united or converging canals are characteristic
of this rather common truffle. It is most likely to be confused in the field with Pachyphloeus
citrinus (which can also be bright orange), but the smooth spores and pale interior dis¬
tinguish it. Pseudobalsamia magnata is an older alias, and the names P. alba and P.
nigrens have been used for the whitish and black forms (species?), respectively.
853
854 TUBERALES
COMMENTS: This truffle is best recognized by its color, the frequent presence of a
prominent depression into which several canals empty, and the white or pallid interior. It
might be mistaken for a Genea or Genabea, but is differently colored, not as warted, and
has smooth spores at maturity. An unidentified yellowish to pale orange Barssia with a
prominent broad apical depression has been found recently in the Guadelupe Mines area
near Almaden, California (an area as richly endowed with truffles as it is with mercury).
Small to fairly large, underground mycorrhizal fungi. FRUITING BODY round to copiously
lobed, often hard (especially in Tuber). Exterior sometimes warted in Tuber and Pachvphloeus,
otherwise not; variously colored. INTERIOR typically solid and firm, usually marbled, often
waxy, usually white or pallid when young but usually with dark fertile tissue at maturity or pockets
of fertile tissue separated by paler walls. STALK and columella absent; basal mycelial tuft
also absent (except in some species of Pachvphloeus). SPORES ornamented with spines, warts,
pegs, pits, or ridges at maturity) but smooth when young), round to elliptical in Tuber, round in
other genera; light to dark brown at maturity. Asci typically 1-6-spored in Tuber, 4-8-spored in
other genera, randomly imbedded in the tissue between the veins (or sometimes forming a palisade
or hymemum in Pachyphloeus and Choiromyces); not amyloid.
THE “true” truffles or “earth nuts,” as they are sometimes called, can be told from other
truffles by their solid, marbled interior and ornamented spores. There are two families,
the Tuberaceae (with one principal genus, Tuber) andtheTerfeziaceae. Tuber is the largest
and most famous genus of truffles. It includes the fabled black truffle (T. melanosporum
—see photo on p. 842) and white truffle (T. magnatum) of Europe as well as a number of
species endemic to North America. Tuber is an easy genus to recognize. The fruiting body
is hard and easily mistaken for a small rock or acorn. The interior is solid and marbled
TUBER & ALLIES 855
(typically whitish when young but become brown or black with white veins at maturity),
and has the consistency of wax, i.e., it flakes or chips like a candle. The exterior of the
fruiting body is smooth in some species and warted in others, and may or may not be lobed.
Microscopically, Tuber is distinct by virtue of its relatively large, round to elliptical, geo¬
metrically-patterned spores and one- to six-spored asci that are imbedded randomly in
the tissue between the veins. However, most species of Tuber are practically indistin¬
guishable from each other when young (i.e., without mature spores) and not much easier
to differentiate at maturity. A few are distinctive in color, odor, and habitat, but most can
only be identified by examining the spores under the microscope. Even then it isn’t easy,
because the ornamentation of the spores changes as they mature and the size is notoriously
variable (a one-spored ascus tends to produce significantly larger spores than a two- or
four-spored ascus in the same fruiting body). In other words, Tuber may be an easy genus
to recognize, but the identification of its species often requires the services of a specialist.
The second family of “true” truffles, theTerfeziaceae, encompasses five genera. Micro¬
scopically these genera differ from Tuber in several respects (see the key), but they can
often be told in the field on an individual basis. Pachyphloeus, for instance, has a more or
less round, warted fruiting body with a grayish-olive to blackish-olive interior marbled
with paler veins, and it often has a tuft of mycelium at its base; Delastria, on the other hand,
is often pink- or reddish-tinged; Terfezia is partial to sandy soil in arid or semi-arid regions;
Hydnobolites has a very distinctive gristly or fatty texture and pale color, while Choiro-
myces is even harder than Tuber and tends to be rougher and more copiously lobed.
Tuber is a fairly sizable genus, with about 60 known species and an equal number of
synonyms. Roughly half of these species occur in California and Oregon, making the west
coast the best truffle territory in North America. Tubers take an inordinately long time
to mature—several weeks or even months. In our area they typically begin developing in
the winter, which means they mature in the spring (March-June), after most other mush¬
rooms have long departed. They are mycorrhizal with both hardwoods and conifers, but
are particularly abundant under oak and Douglas-fir. Some of our species (e.g., T.
gibbosum) are good edibles, though not as distinctively flavored, perhaps, as their Euro¬
pean counterparts. Many other North American species have yet to be tried. As already
mentioned, differentiating the various species can be extremely difficult. Fortunately,
none are known to be poisonous. Alas, the famous European truffles (T. magnatum,
T. melanosporum, T. aestivum) do not seem to occur here, though special truffle hounds
have been flown in from Italy to look for them.
Terfezia is the largest genus in the Terfeziaceae. However, its dozen or so species occur
mostly in southern and/ or arid regions, and have yet to be found in California. The other
four genera in the Terfeziaceae are very small. Little is known of the edibility of the N orth
American representatives, but Terfezia arenaria, a large (5-12 cm) Mediterranean species
that grows in sandy soil (often with rock rose or Cistus) is prized in Islamic countries and
was a favorite with the Romans and Greeks. Four common Tubers and three members of
the Terfeziaceae are described here, and several others are keyed out.
4. Exterior of fruiting body usually warted and often brightly colored; interior either remaining
pallid at maturity or becoming olive to grayish to blackish with paler veins; mycelial tuft often
present at base of fruiting body; spores smooth or ornamented with spines or pegs . 5
4. Not as above; mature interior usually brown to reddish with white veins (but usually pallid when
young); exterior warted or not; mycelial tuft usually absent; mature spores ornamented . . 6
5. Spores smooth; interior whitish or pallid even in age .(seeBalsamia& Allies, p. 852)
5. Spores ornamented with pegs at maturity; interior pallid when young but becoming olive,
grayish, or darker at maturity . Pachyphloeus citrinus & others, below
6. Exterior of fruiting body covered with warts (warts often small).7
6. Exterior of fruiting body smooth, cracked, downy, pitted, etc., but not warted . 8
7. Found in eastern North America; exterior tawny becoming distinctly reddish or brown at
maturity; interior usually brick-red or reddish-brown with paler veins (at maturity) .
. T. canaliculatum (see T. gibbosum, p. 858)
7. Not as above; found in western North America T. murinum & others (see T. gibbosum, p. 858)
8. All of the spores round at maturity and alveolate (pitted-reticulate) .9
8. Spores spiny or alveolate at maturity, at least some of them elliptical or broadly elliptical 10
9. Fruiting body 1-10 cm broad, often lobed and very hard; spores with numerous small pits
like those on a golf ball .Choiromyces alveolatus, p. 858
9. Not as above; fruiting body 1 -3 (5) cm broad; exterior often with minute white hairs or patches of
hairs (i.e., pubescent) . T. calijornicum & others, p. 860
10. Associated with Douglas-fir; odor often garlicky when mature and the peridium (skin) often
cracking in age; spores alveolate (pitted-reticulate) . T. gibbosum, p. 858
10. Not as above . 11
11. Found in Texas and along the Gulf Coast . T. texensis (see T. gibbosum, p. 858)
11. Not as above . 12
12. Spores spiny; exterior of fruiting body brown to cinnamon-colored when mature (but usually
paler when young) . T. rufum, p. 861
12. Spores alveolate (pitted-reticulate); exterior of fruiting body usually some shade of brown or
yellowish-brown when mature, but sometimes reddish-brown (especially when old) .
. T. separans & many others, p. 859
COMMENTS: This species appears to be one of the most widespread of all the truffles.
The combination of orange to brown, warted exterior and solid, grayish-olive to blackish
interior is distinctive. The “pegs” on the spores are also unusual—at maturity each is
usually tipped with a small depression that makes it look like a golf tee. The fruiting bodies
are not nearly as hard as Tubers, and are usually rounder. Local material is usually bright
orange when immature and has the aspect of a madrone berry (see color plate) or the fruit
from a strawberry tree (a European madrone). Other species: P. virescens is said to be
similar, but has a dull green exterior and yellower interior. It was originally collected in
Los Gatos, California, but is also reported from Nebraska! P. melanoxanthus of eastern
North America and Europe has a black to greenish-black, warted exterior and a grayish
to blackish interior marbled with hollow or greenish veins (at maturity) and sometimes
has a short “stalk” of mycelial fibers. P. conglomeratus has slightly amyloid asci.
EDIBILITY: Prized by slugs, despised by humans. The texture is fatty but the flavor is not.
COMMENTS: This truffle is easily recognized by its pale color and gristly or fatty con¬
sistency. The latter feature is particularly striking and almost without parallel among
the truffles. The interior is whitish except in old age and the fruiting body is never as hard
as a Tuber. The very coarsely alveolate spores are also diagnostic. Other species://, cere-
briformis of Europe is said to have larger spores; it has also been found in Iowa.
to develop cracks in age, and strong garlicky odor (when present). Like other Tubers,
it has a marbled white-and-brown(or reddish-brown) interior when mature. The narrowly
elliptical spores are also very distinctive, providing you have a microscope. Other species:
T. besseyi is similar, but has an “olive-buff’ exterior and slightly longer spores. T. canali-
culatum is a sizable choice edible with a distinctly warted, brown to reddish or tawny
exterior. It is found in the summer and fall in eastern N orth America (a region not known
for its truffles). Several western truffles also have a warted exterior (e.g., T. murinum,
T. linsdalei, T. gardneri, and T. harknessii), but they are difficult to distinguish without
a microscope. T. texensis (of Texas, naturally) should also be mentioned. For other species
with elliptical, alveolate spores, see T. separans.
HABITAT: Widely scattered to gregarious in soil under oak and other hardwoods; known
only from the west coast, fruiting mainly in the spring and early summer (at least in our
area). I have found more than sixty specimens growing together in loose soil, associated
with tanoak or possibly madrone, in June and July.
EDIBILITY: Edible. It is mild or slightly nutty like Boletus edulis, but much crisper.
Slice it thinly and saute very briefly (about one minute) or the flavor will be lost.
COMMENTS: The above description is drawn from a single large collection made near
Santa Cruz, California, and thus may not represent the full range of variation within the
species. The yellowish to brown color of the hard, marble- to walnut-sized specimens was
quite constant, and they were frequently confused with acorns buried in the duff (see
photo on p. 860). The growth with hardwoods and lack of a strong odor at maturity distin¬
guish it from T. gibbosum, while the exterior is not pubescent as in T. californicum
859
Can you find the acorn among these prime examples of Tuber separans? If not, you aren’t alone—
I didn’t discover it until I’d brought home all of these truffles, which were found under a single tanoak.
Many other objects or “pseudotubers” (rocks, animal dung, etc.) can also be mistaken for truffles!
and the different color and alveolate spores separate it from T. rufum. However, there are
many very similar species with elliptical to nearly round, alveolate spores that can only be
differentiated with great difficulty. Part of the problem is that there are no up-to-date
keys available for the North American species, and the spore sizes (an important
feature) are useful only when correlated with the number of spores in each ascus. In other
words, the identification of most Tubers is best left to truffle experts such asJamesTrappe
(who identified the above-mentioned collection as T. separans). Among the many other
Tubers with elliptical, alveolate spores are: T. monticola, a rare species found under
conifers in the Sierra Nevada; T. citrinum, also rare, with a smooth, pale yellow exterior
in youth; T. dryophilum, a very widely distributed species with smaller, coarsely alveolate
spores and a yellowish-brown exterior at maturity; T. levissimum, a thicker-skinned
species that is also widespread; T. shearii, with large, coarsely alveolate, broadly elliptical
spores; and T. irradians, with many nearly round, coarsely alveolate spores. All of these
species have spores about the same size as T. separans or smaller. See also T. gibbosum.
860
Tuber californicum. This common species always has round (spherical) spores, but can usually be
recognized in the field by the patches of white pubescence on its exterior.
EDIBILITY: Edible. Some people detect a bitter taste, but the specimens I sampled had
a very strong mushroomy flavor that would go well in sauces or gravies.
COMMENTS: The critical feature of this Tuber is its uniformly round( not round toellip-
tical), alveolate spores. However, it can usually be told in the field by its pubescent or
downy exterior (use a hand lens!) and tendency to be quite knobby. T. sphaerosporum
also has uniformly round spores, but it lacks the pubescent exterior of T. californicum and
has fewer and larger pits on its spores. It occurs in eastern North America and Gary
Menser has found it under willow in Colorado. For alveolate-spored species with at least
some elliptical spores, see T. separans and T. gibbosum.
Tuber rufum (also known as T. candidum) is our most common truffle. The paler specimens in this
photo are younger, the darker ones older. Note the relatively smooth exterior and marbled interior.
862 TUBERALES
THESE thick-skinned truffles are unique among the Ascomycetes in having a dark
powdery spore mass at maturity. The powdery texture, which results from early disinte¬
gration of the asci,* plus the thick skin can lead to confusion with the earthballs (Sclero¬
derma). However, earthballs usually grow near the surface of the ground and have a
distinct base or point of attachment to their substrate, and are not usually incrusted with
rootlets (mycorrhizae), whereas Elaphomyces species grow up to 12 inches under the soil,
lack a distinct base, and are usually incrusted with dirt and mycorrhizae.
Elaphomyces differs from other truffle genera in several additional respects. The wall
of the fruiting body, in addition to being thick and hard, is marbled in some species (when
sectioned). Also, the interior, although apparently homogeneous in old age, is actually
divided into several large chambers by thick white bands of sterile tissue when younger.
Finally, Elaphomyces is the only genus of fungi to be parasitized by certain species of
Cordyceps (see p. 879). For these reasons, among others, Elaphomyces has traditionally
been separated from other truffles and placed in its own order and family. However, it
is now thought to be less dissimilar to other truffles than once believed.
Elaphomyces is mycorrhizal with both hardwoods and conifers. In our area it fruits
throughout the mushroom season and can even be found in the summer if you look hard
enough (or dig deep enough!). It is among the most abundant of all underground mush¬
rooms, but is seldom seen or collected, perhaps because the soil-incrusted fruiting bodies
look like balls of dirt. In Europe, species of Elaphomyces have been used as aphrodesiacs
and cheap truffle substitutes, but their rindlike skin is too tough and the mature spore mass
too powdery to be worth eating. Over 30 species have been described, based largely on
microscopic criteria. Two common and farflung representatives are depicted here.
Key to Elaphomyces
1. Fruiting body with a distinct base or point of attachment to its substrate; growing underground
or above it; spores borne on basidia .(seeScleroderma, p. 707)
1. Fruiting body usually lacking an obvious base, but exterior often incrusted with dirt and my¬
corrhizal rootlets; growing underground; spores borne inside asci .2
2. Peridium (skin) marbled when sliced open (as shown on next page) E. muricatusgroup, p. 863
2. Peridium not marbled when sectioned .E. granulatus group, p. 864
*The early disintegration of the asci is a unique and puzzling feature of Elaphomyces that has caused even myco¬
logists to confuse it with Scleroderma. The spores are often highly compressed and irregular in shape while inside
the asci, presumably as a result of pushing against the ascus wall. It may very well be that this pressure causes the
asci to pop like balloons!
Elaphomyces muricatus group, mature specimens. Note how spore mass is dark and powdery in the
two sectioned specimens (but the central core is still cottony in one of them), and how the exterior of
central specimen is incrusted with dirt and mycorrhizal rootlets.
Elaphomyces muricatus group. Close-up of a sectioned specimen, showing the thick marbled peri¬
dium (skin). The spore mass (interior) is still cottony and divided into chambers by white sterile tissue.
Elaphomyces muricatus group. Note how the thick skin is marbled in sectioned specimen at left, and
how the exterior is finely warted in specimen on right. E. granulatus and its close relatives (not illus¬
trated) look quite similar, but do not have a marbled peridium.
HABITAT: Solitary to gregarious in soil or duff in woods; widely distributed and fairly
common (if you’re digging for truffles). It is said to prefer pine woods, but in our area I
have found it as early as October under knobcone pine and manzanita and as late as July
under tanoak and madrone.
EDIBILITY: Unknown (but see comments on edibility of E. granulatus).
COMMENTS: This lesser-known cousin of E. granulatus is best told by its marbled
peridium (see photographs). Like other Elaphomyces species, it is sometimes parasitized
by Cordyceps, and is easily told from other truffles by its thick rindlike skin and dark,
cottony to powdery mature spore mass (interior). The latter features can lead to confusion
with the earthballs (Scleroderma), which, however, do not have a marbled peridium.
Other species of Elaphomyces with a marbled peridium (e.g., E. verrucosum, E. varie-
gatus) differ from E. muricatus microscopically.
EDIBILITY: Edible according to some reports, but not choice. In Europe it has been used
for centuries as an aphrodesiac and truffle-substitute.
COMMENTS: The thick rindlike skin and purple-gray to black, cottony to powdery
interior distinguish Elaphomyces from all other underground Ascomycetes. E. granulatus
and its close relatives differ from the E. muricatus group in having a non-marbled peridium
(as seen in sectioned specimens). The earthball genus Scleroderma is similar, but produces
spores on basidia, usually has a distinct base or point of attachment to the substrate, lacks
the small hard warts and outer crust of soil and mycorrhizae so frequently found in E.
granulatus, and usually grows nearer to the ground surface (or often above it). Other spe¬
cies of Elaphomyces with a non-marbled peridium are best differentiated microscopically.
One, E. subviscidus, has a smooth skin, dark brown mature spore mass, and smaller spores.
Earth Tongues
HELOTIALES
THIS large order includes hundreds of small stalked or cuplike Discomycetes with in-
operculate asci (i.e., each ascus has a pore at its tip through which the spores are expelled,
but no operculum or “lid” as in the Pezizales). The most conspicuous members of this
order are called earth tongues because of their clublike to tongue-shaped fruiting bodies.
Many others are cup-shaped or disclike, with or without a stalk.
The larger members of this order are saprophytic on soil, humus, and wood, while most
of the smaller types are parasitic or saprophytic on plant stems, leaves, and other tissues.
None are prized edibles, being too small or too tough or too small and too tough to bother
eating. There are several families and over 150 genera in the Helotiales. These are defined
largely on the basis of microscopic features, and only a smattering of the larger or more
colorful species are described here. These have been divided into five groups, keyed below,
based on the shape and texture of the fruiting body.
Key to the Helotiales
1. Fruiting body with a cap and stalk, the cap rounded to convex or wrinkled but not cuplike
(concave) or disclike . 2
1. Fruiting body variously shaped, sometimes with an enlarged “head,” but without a clearly
differentiated, rounded to convex or wrinkled cap . 4
2. Stalk very thin (usually less than 2 mm); cap bladderlike (hollow), whitish to yellowish; found in
eastern North America, often clustered; spores borne on basidia (see Aphyllophorales, p. 548)
2. Not as above; spores borne inside asci . 3
3. Cap with a sterile underside and an abrupt edge or margin (but the margin usually inrolled or
tucked in toward the stalk) .Leotia& Cudonia, p. 872
3. Not as above; cap merely an enlarged, differentiated “head” that lacks an abrupt margin and
sterile underside . 4
4. Flesh gelatinous or rubbery-gelatinous; fruiting body variously shaped but not clublike, pinkish
to reddish, purplish, brown, or black; growing on wood . Bulgaria & Allies, p. 875
4. Not as above . 5
5. Fruiting body cuplike or disclike, with or without a stalk . Ciboria & Allies, p. 877
5. Fruiting bod erect, clublike or with an enlarged or flattened “head” . 6
6. Fruiting body with large internal chambers or compartments .(see Helvellaceae, p. 796)
6. Not as above . 7
7. Entire fruiting body black or sometimes dark brown; at least some of the spores brown under
the microscope . Geoglossum & Trichoglossum, p. 866
7. Not as above; fruiting body usually lighter or brighter than above; spores hyaline (colorless)
under the microscope or tinged yellow .Microglossum, Spathularia, & Allies, p. 868
866 HELOTIALES
THESE attractive little Ascomycetes are easily recognized by their black (or occasionally
dark brown) clublike fruiting bodies. Their color separates them from the fairy clubs
(Clavariaceae) and other earth tongues, and they lack the pimpled surface or white spore
powder so often found inXylaria. Their very long(up to250 microns!) brown partitioned
(septate) spores are also distinctive.
Both Geoglossum and Trichoglossum are charter members of the family Geoglossaceae.
In the more common of the two, Trichoglossum, brown lance-shaped cells called setae
protrude from the surface of the fruiting body, giving it a velvety texture. In Geoglossum,
the setae are absent (at least in the fertile portion), and the texture varies from smooth
to viscid to only slightly velvety.
The black earth tongues are saprophytic on humus, soil, moss, or occasionally rotten
wood. Several of the more than two dozen North American species are common, but all
are difficult to distinguish from their surroundings because of their dark color and small
size. They are also difficult to distinguish from each other, even with a microscope. For
this reason, only one representative from each genus is described here. Neither is worth
eating.
Key to Geoglossum & Trichoglossum
1. Flesh usually white; exterior of fruiting body often roughened or minutely pimpled but not hairy
or velvety; growing on wood (but wood often buried); asci borne in flasklike “nests” (peri-
thecia) imbedded in the fruiting body .(see Pyrenomycetes, p. 878)
1. Not as above . 2
2. Surface of fruiting body distinctly viscid when moist, often glistening, not velvety.
. G. glutinosum & others, below
2. Fruiting body not viscid .:. 3
3. Surface of fruiting body (especially stalk) distinctly velvety; fruiting body often (but not always!)
with a spade-shaped or flattened “head”. T. hirsutum & others, p. 867
3. Not as above; fruiting body not velvety or only very slightly so, usually clublike or twisted, but
sometimes with a distinct “head” . . . G. nigritum & many others (see G. glutinosum, below)
COMMENTS: This dark earth tongue has many look-alikes (see below), but is one of the
few species with a distinctly viscid, glistening surface when moist. Similar viscid species
include: G. affine, rare, with shorter spores; and G. difforme, larger (3-12 cm tall), whose
spores have 8-15 septa. The genus Geoglossum also includes many similar dark brown to
black, non-viscid earth tongues that can only be differentiated microscopically. These
species are not as velvety as Trichoglossum and do not often have a well-defined “head.”
Some of the more common and widespread ones are: G. glabrum, a smooth-stalked species
up to 10 cm tall; G. simile, the most common species in eastern North America, stalk often
scurfy or minutely scaly; and G. nigritum (see photo), the most common species in our area
(but more widely distributed), with strongly curved paraphyses (sterile cells) whose tips
are scarcely enlarged. All of these have brown spores, but some Geoglossums have both
brown and hyaline (colorless) spores, including: G.fallax, whose hyaline spores are non-
septate; and G. alveolatum and G. intermedium, whose hyaline spores are septate. There
are also several similar, dark Microglossum species whose spores are ^//hyaline, including:
Microglossum atropurpureum, fruiting body dark brown to purplish or black; M.
fumosum, yellow-brown to brown; and M. olivaceum (see comments under M. viride),
greenish-brown to dark brown with very short spores (10-18 microns long).
867
Trichoglossum hirsutum. Note the often spade-shaped “head” of this common black earth tongue.
Left: Typical fruiting bodies. Right: These specimens were photographed with a strobe in an effort
to highlight some of the minute hairs that give them a velvety texture.
its little black clubs. In seems to favor habitats shunned by other mushrooms (e.g., red¬
wood), and usually fruits in the winter or spring. Like other black fungi, it is difficult to see.
EDIBILITY: Supposedly edible, but much too tough to be worthwhile.
COMMENTS: This dainty earth tongue is easily recognized by its black velvety fruiting
body. In California specimens the fertile portion is usually (but not always) set off from
the stem as a thickened or flattened, often spade-shaped “head.” The wonderful velvety
texture is caused by hundreds of minute projecting hairs or spines (setae) and is most
evident on the stalk, especially in dry weather. Geoglossum species are very similar, but
are not as velvety and do not normally have such a well-defined “head.” Other species of
Trichoglossum can only be differentiated microscopically. They include: T. velutipes,
with 4-spored asci and mostly 7-11-septate spores; and T. farlowii, with 8-spored asci
and 0-5 (usually 3)-septate spores.
THESE earth tongues are more cheerfully colored than Geoglossum and Trichoglossum,
and their spores are colorless when viewed under the microscope. They may superficially
resemble the unbranched coral fungi or fairy clubs (Clavariaceae), but bear their spores
in asci rather than on basidia and usually have a swollen or flattened, fertile “head.” The
“head,” when present, lacks the abrupt edge and sterile undersurface of a Leotia, Cudonia,
or Helvetia.
Four common genera, all members of the Geoglossaceae, are treated here. Among
these, Spathularia stands out because of its peculiar flattened, fanlike “head” that runs
down opposite sides of the stalk. Neolecta is also distinctive because of its highly irregular
shape, while Microglossum and Mitrula have more or less clublike fruiting bodies, the
latter with a clearly differentiated “head.”
868
MICROGLOSSUM, SPATHULARIA, & ALLIES 869
These earth tongues, like Geoglossum and Trichoglossum, inhabit humus, soil, moss,
and rotten wood, but do not grow on insects or truffles. None are large enough or tasty
enough to collect for the table, but several are quite beautiful, and are worth getting to
know for this reason if no other. One species from each of thefour genera isdescribed here;
several others are keyed out.
EDIBILITY: Said to be edible, but rather tough. Captain Charles Mcllvaine describes
it as “tenacious but tender.”
COMMENTS: The peculiar flattened, paddle- or fanlike “head” that extends down oppo¬
site sides of the stalk is unique to this little mushroom and its close relatives (see next page).
It might possibly be confused with Neolecta irregularis or a Microglossum, but is not as
Left: Spathularia flavida is easily told by its flattened, paddle-like “head.” Note how stalk of central
specimen appears to be wedged into the “head,” and how fertile surface can be wrinkled or smooth.
Right: Cudonia circinans (see p. 873). Note incurved cap margin and clustered growth habit.
brightly colored and has a more consistently compressed “head.” S. clavata is a synonym.
Other species: S. spathulata is said to be similar but has smaller spores and a somewhat
darker (yellow-brown to reddish-brown) fruiting body. Its cap ranges from flattened to
rounded (as in Cudonia) but is fertile over its entire surface rather than just at the top. It
was originally collected in Big Basin State Park, California, but I have not seen it there.
S. (-Spathulariopsis) velutipes of eastern North America is a common and distinctive
“fairy fan” with orange mycelium and a velvety dark brown to reddish-brown stalk that
may be thicker at the bottom or top, plus a yellow to yellow-brown flattened “head” that
is covered by a “veil” when very young and often retains “veil” remnants at maturity.
THESE two genera are unique among the earth tongues in possessing a well-developed
and clearly differentiated cap and stalk. The cap is not just a swollen “head” as in Mitrula
or other earth tongues; instead, it has a sterile underside and an abrupt margin that sets
it off from the stalk. In addition, Leotia is easily distinguished by its gelatinous to semi-
gelatinous tissue. Cudonia, in contrast, is fleshy or tough but not gelatinous. It is apt to be
mistaken for a small elfin saddle (Helvetia), but its cap is usually convex or rounded and
not as dramatically lobed as in that genus.
Leotia and Cudonia used to be classified with other earth tongues in the Geoglossaceae,
but are now placed alongside a number of genera (e.g., Bulgaria) in a larger family, the
Leotiaceae. Both are widely distributed, but only Leotia is common in our area. They
grow on the ground or on rotten wood, often in groups or clusters. Neither genus is worth
eating, although Leotia might be useful as a lubricant! Two species of Leotia and one
Cudonia are described here.
872
LEOTIA & CUDONIA 873
dark grayish-brown or fuscous fruiting body and usually fruits in the spring. C. lutea is a
yellowish to olive-buff eastern species that sometimes shows “veil” fragments on the
margin of the cap. It grows scattered to gregarious, usually under hardwoods.
Leotia viscosa, young specimens. Note the viscid-gelatinous stalk and flesh. As they mature the caps
will grow larger. The greenish cap distinguishes this species from L. lubrica (shown in color plate).
LEOTIA 875
smooth, hollow or filled with a gel, viscid to slimy when moist; white to yellow or orange,
sometimes with minute green dots or particles, especially above. SPORES 16-28 * 4-6
microns, spindle-shaped and often slightly curved, smooth, usually septate (partitioned)
at maturity, hyaline (colorless) under the microscope.
HABITAT: Solitary, scattered, or in groups or clusters in humus or on rotten wood;
widely distributed. This is the most common Leotia in our area. It fruits in the winter and
early spring under oak and various other trees.
EDIBILITY: Harmless but gelatinous.
COMMENTS: This gelatinous Ascomycete with the green head and white to orange stalk
can hardly be confused with any other. In dry weather the surface of the cap and stalk may
not be obviously viscid, but slicing open the fruiting body will usually reveal gelatinous
tissue within. The nickname “Chicken Lips” was obviously given to it by the same person
who dubbed Tricholoma flavovirens the “Man On Horseback!” Other species: L. atro-
virens (~L. chlorocephala) is a similar but smaller eastern species with a greenish to dark
green cap and green to pale green stalk. L. lubrica (see description) is usually yellower.
Bulgaria inquinans. These specimens were collected in dry weather and consequently are rubbery
rather than gelatinous. Note the narrowed base beneath the fertile portion.
BULGARIA 877
THE above synopsis covers a vast group of minute but cute cuplike and disclike fungi that
are seldom collected except by professional specialists. They differ from the many cup
fungi in the Pezizales in having inoperculate (lidless) asci. Some, such as Ciboria, have
long stalks attached to the substrate. Others, such as Sclerotinia, Whetzelinia, and Myrio-
sclerotinia, have long stalks that arise from a tuberlike mass of tissue (sclerotium). Still
others, like Dasyscyphus, have shorter, sometimes hairy stalks. Finally, there are many
(e.g., Mollisia) that have no stalk at all. A large number of these fungi are parasitic on
plant parts, but some are saprophytes. Without exception they are too small to interest the
average mushroom hunter and are certainly too small to eat. The two genera described
here, Ciboria and Chlorociboria, belong to different families (the Sclerotiniaceae and
Leotiaceae, respectively). Several other related families are not treated here.
HABITAT: Solitary or in small groups on old, fallen alder and willow catkins; widely
distributed but seldom collected, usually fruiting in the spring.
EDIBILITY: Who knows?
COMMENTS: The growth on alder or willow catkins rescues this little brown cup fungus
from the anonymity it so richly deserves.
Flask F ungi
spores
PYRENOMYCETES
THE Pyrenomycetes differ fundamentally from the Discomycetes (morels, cup fungi,
earth tongues, etc.) because they bear their asci in flask-shaped “nests” called perithecia.
The perithecia are usually imbedded in the fruiting body, but their necks or mouths often
protrude like small pimples.
The flask fungi are a varied lot, but only a few of them are conspicuous enough to be
considered in this tome. The most common types, Xylaria and Daldinia, are tough,
usually black, and grow on wood. Another distinctive group, Cordyceps, is parasitic on
insects and truffles. Still another, Hypomyces, engulfs other mushrooms in a pimpled or
powdery weft of tissue. The flask fungi treated here belong to a single order (Sphaeriales)
within the Pyrenomycetes. They are unpalatable except for one species of Hypomyces.
They fruit in moist weather, but the tougher types persist year-round.
PODOSTROMA
THIS rare, wood-inhabiting genus is represented by a single boring species in our area,
described below.
Podostroma alutaceum
FRUITING BODY 1-5 cm tall and 0.5-1 cm thick, cylindrical to club-shaped, without a
well-defined cap. Surface dry, minutely roughened by the slightly protruding perithecia
(flasklike nests of asci), whitish to yellowish to pale ochre, usually paler (white) at the
base. SPORES elongated, hyaline (colorless) under the microscope, finely warted and
septate (with one partition), breaking up into one-celled, round to elliptical segments
averaging 4-4.5 * 3^1 microns. Asci 8-spored, but each spore breaking in two to make 16.
HABITAT: Solitary or in small groups on rotting wood; widely distributed but rare.
I have found it only once in our area, on dead oak in the late winter.
EDIBILITY: Who cares?
COMMENTS: This forgettable clublike fungus can be recognized by its yellowish color,
growth on wood, and presence of perithecia (flasklike “nests” of asci) on the upper
portion of the fruiting body. It is most likely to be mistaken for a fairy club (Clavaria or
Clavulinopsis), but the above-mentioned features distinguish it.
CORDYCEPS
Small fungi found on insects (pupae, larvae, and adults), spiders, and certain truffles. FRUITING
BODY threadlike to club-shaped or with a differentiated “head" and stalk; often brightly colored
but sometimes dull or dark; surface often roughened or minutely pimpled by projecting perithecia.
STALK present, usually slender or very thin, arising from the host insect or truffle (which is often
buried). SPORES threadlike, typically hyaline (colorless) under the microscope and smooth,
multiseptate, but usually breaking up quickly into one-celled, barrel-shaped or elongated segments.
Asci borne in perithecia (flasklike structures) imbedded in or projecting from the“head”(if present)
or upper portion of the fruiting body.
THESE small but fascinating clublike fungi are obligate parasites of insects, spiders, and
certain truffles. As such they are easy to recognize, providing you dig them up carefully
so they can be traced to their host, which is often buried in humus, soil, or rotten wood.
When the host is overlooked or left behind, many species of Cordyceps can still be distin¬
guished from other clublike fungi by their minutely roughened or pimpled fertile surface.
Cordyceps is a fairly large genus and only a few species can be treated here. Most of them
parasitize insect larvae, pupae, and adults. The mycelium develops inside the insect,
killing it and devouring it. After the insect is completely mummified and emptied of
nutrients, the mycelium fruits and then dies. As the insect is the sole source of food for the
fungus, the size of the fruiting body is often dependent on the size of the host. Since insects
880 PYRENOMYCETES
are more abundant in warm, humid weather, it’s not surprising that Cordyceps is particu¬
larly prominent and diverse in eastern N orth America (where there are summer rains) and
the tropics. In California and the Pacific Northwest, where the summers are drier, insect¬
eating species are comparatively rare, but those that parasitize truffles are more common.
It should be emphasized, however, that even the “common” species of Cordyceps are rare
in relation to other mushrooms. Most mycologists consider one or two fruiting bodies of
Cordyceps a real find!
Cordyceps are worthless as food because of their small size and infrequent occurrence.
Their unique diet, however, makes them a fascinating group to study. Perhaps some day
we will find a practical use for them in the control of certain insect pests. Three species of
Cordyceps are described here, and several others are keyed out. Also worth mentioning
is the closely related genus, Claviceps, which parasitizes plants rather than insects or
truffles. The most potent hallucinogenic compound known, LSD, was derived from
Claviceps purpurea, better known as wheat ergot..
Key to Cordyceps
1. Growing on truffles (species of Elaphomyces) . 2
1. Growing on insects (adults, pupae, or larvae) or spiders. 3
2. Fruiting body with a cap and stalk .C. capitata & others, below
2. Fruiting body clublike (lacking a distinct cap), usually with yellow mycelial threads at base
or permeating the host .C. ophioglossoides (see C. capitata, below)
3. Fruiting body with a cap or “head” which is usually clearly delimited from the stalk or sterile
portion of fruiting body . 4
3. Fruiting body lacking a differentiated “head” or cap, but often thicker toward the top .... 7
4. Growing on beetles, moths, or butterflies (or their larvae or pupae) . 5
4. Growing on ants or wasps . 6
5. Stalk typically yellow; cap ochre to mahogany .... C. gracilis (see C. myrmecophila, p. 881)
5. Not as above; fruiting body brownish or tinged vinaceous; “head” warty .
. C. entomorrhiza (see C. myrmecophila, p. 881)
6. Growing on ants . C. myrmecophila, p. 881
6. Growing on wasps .C. sphecocephala (see C. myrmecophila, p. 881)
7. Fruiting body threadlike (less than 2 mm thick) .
. C. unilateralis, C. clavulata, & others (see C. militaris, p. 882)
7. Fruiting body not threadlike . 8
8. Fruiting body brown to purple-brown or blackish .C. ravenelii (see C. militaris, p. 882)
8. Fruiting body white to yellow, orange, or orange-red . 9
9. Growing on beetles (usually the larvae or pupae); fruiting body with sterile tip.
.C. melolanthae (see C. militaris, p. 882)
9. Growing on butterflies and moths (usually larvae or pupae); tip not sterile . 10
10. Fruiting body orange-buff to orange to orange-red .C. militaris, p. 882
10. Fruiting body whitish to yellow . C. washingtonensis (see C. militaris, p. 882)
whitish. SPORES threadlike, hyaline (colorless) and smooth under the microscope,
usually breaking up into one-celled segments averaging (8) 12-27 (32) * 1.5-3 microns.
HABITAT: Solitary, tufted, or gregarious on ground, but arising from underground deer
truffles (Elaphomyces species); widely distributed and one of the more common members
of the genus. Scattered fruiting bodies are the norm, but sometimes it fruits prolifically.
I have not found it in our area, but it may well occur {Elaphomyces certainly does). In the
mixed coastal forests of northern California it can be found in the fall and winter.
EDIBILITY: Possibly worth trying since it is larger than most species of Cordyceps, but
I can find no information on it.
COMMENTS: This is one of several Cordyceps species that grow only on Elaphomyces.
The latter can occur several inches deep in the soil, but specimens close to the surface are
more apt to be parasitized. The reddish-brown or darker cap which is sharply differen¬
tiated from the yellow to olive stalk are the principal fieldmarks. C. canadensis is a very
similar truffle-eater with much larger spore segments; it is known from eastern North
America and Europe. C. ophioglossoides is another species that parasitizes Elapho¬
myces, but it has a clublike fruiting body that lacks a sharply defined “head.” The club is
sometimes yellow when very young but soon becomes reddish-brown to olive-brown to
nearly black except for a yellow base and yellow mycelial threads thatextend into the host.
It is said to be the most common Cordyceps in eastern North America, but is rather rare
in California.
HYPOMYCES
U biquitous fungi that parasitize other mushrooms, partially or completely covering them in a layer
of pimpled or powdery tissue. FRUITING BODY taking on the shape of its host, but disfiguring
it; composed of a layer of tissue in which numerous perithecia are imbedded (but asexual stages
lack perithecia). SPORES (sexual) elongated, smooth or warted, often 1-septate, hyaline (color¬
less) under the microscope. Asexual spores of various shapes and sizes also produced by some
species. Asci borne in perithecia (flasklike structures).
THIS distinctive genus is parasitic on other mushrooms (mostly agarics and boletes),
engulfing them in a pimpled or powdery layer of tissue. The actual fruiting bodies (peri¬
thecia) of Hypomyces are not large enough to qualify as mushrooms, but are given shape
and substance by the mushrooms they grow on. Hypomyces can be found wherever
suitable hosts occur, sometimes in epidemic proportions. Apparently the mycelium lives
with or on the mycelium of its host and fruits at the same time. H. lactifluorum, sometimes
called the “Lobster Mushroom” because of its bright red to orange color, is eaten by many
people. Other species of Hypomyces are unpalatable and potentially dangerous, parti¬
cularly if the host is a poisonous mushroom disfigured beyond recognition. Two common
species of Hypomyces are described here and several others are keyed out.
Left: Cordyceps militaris (see p. 882). Note the pimpled surface caused by protruding perithecia, and
the insect on which it is growing (partly visible on left). (Alan Bessette) Right: Hypomyces chryso-
spermum{ see below) engulfs boletes in a white to bright yellow mass of tissue.
Key to Hypomyces
1. Growing on boletes, covering them in a white to bright yellow mass of tissue .
.H. chrysospermum, below
1. Not as above . 2
2. Growing on fruiting bodies of Russula and Lactarius, covering them in a minutely pimpled
layer of bright orange to red or magenta tissue .H. lactifluorum, p. 884
2. Not as above . 3
3. Growing on gilled mushrooms (mostly Amanita, Lactarius, and Russula) . 4
3. Growing on elfin saddles or coral fungi . 5
4. Growing on fruiting bodies of Amanita, covering them in a white to flesh-colored or pinkish
layer of tissue .H. hyalinus(see H. lactifluorum, p. 884)
4. Growing mostly on fruiting bodies of Lactarius and Russula (usually on the gills and upper
stalk), covering them in yellow to greenish tissue H. luteovirens (see H. lactifluorum, p. 884)
5. Growing on coral fungi (e.g., Ramaria) ...//. transformans(see H. chrysospermum, below)
5. Growing on elfin saddles (e.g., Helvella) ...//. cervinigenus(see H. chrysospermum, below)
883
Hypomyces hyalinus (specimens on right) disfigures various species of Amanita, in this castA.rubes-
cens (shown on left). See comments under H. lactifluorum for more details.
to handle. The different stages of the fungus have been given different names, e.g., Sepe-
donium chrysospermum was originally applied to the yellow stage. Other species: In our
area, H. cervinigenus commonly attacks the black fluted elfin saddle (Helvetia lacunosa),
covering it with white or pinkish tissue. H. transformans performs a similar transfor¬
mation on several species of coral fungi (particularly Ramaria). Neither of these should be
eaten. For species that attack gilled mushrooms, see H. lactifluorum.
884
885
XYLARIA& DALDINIA
Very tough to hard or charcoal-like, wood-inhabiting fungi. FRUITING BODY erect and clublike
or branched in Xylaria, or stalkless and hemispherical in Daldinia; usually black when mature,
but sometimes covered with a white or grayish or brown powdery coating of asexual spores (coni-
dia). Flesh tough or charcoal-like, usually white in Xylaria, concentrically zoned in Daldinia.
STALK present in Xylaria, absent in Daldinia. SPORES dark brown to black, usually spindle-
shaped or elliptical, smooth; asexual spores (conidia) hyaline (colorless) under the microscope,
smooth. Asci borne in flasklike structures (perithecia) imbedded in the fruiting body (usually
upper portion).
THESE tough, mostly black, wood-inhabiting fungi are very distinctive. The erect, club¬
like forms (Xylaria) might be confused with the black earth tongues (Geoglossum and
Trichoglossum), but are much tougher or harder and have paler flesh. Daldinia, on the
other hand, has a sessile (stalkless) fruiting body. It might be mistaken for a charred
polypore or crust fungus, but its concentrically zoned interior, pimpled exterior, and
brittle, charcoal-like consistency are distinctive. Both Xylaria and Daldinia
frequently produce spores asexually. These asexual spores (conidia) take the form of a
white to gray or brown powder that coats the surface of the young fruiting body. The
powder may disguise the black undersurface, but is easily rubbed or licked off. In mature
specimens, numerous asci-containing flasks (perithecia) can be seen if the fruiting body
is sliced open.
Xylaria and Daldinia are very common, but much too tough to be edible. Identification
of species is based largely on microscopic characteristics, but the genera are easily learned.
Two widespread Xylarias and one Daldinia are described here.
HABITAT: In groups or clusters on hardwood stumps, logs, etc., but often appearing
terrestrial if the wood is buried; widely distributed and common, but apparently absent
or very rare in our area. In eastern North America, where it favors beech and maple, the
fruiting bodies usually appear in the spring and mature (blacken) by the summer. They
last for months without decaying.
EDIBILITY: Much too tough and rough to be edible.
COMMENTS: Also known &s Xylosphaera polymorpha, this fungus is easily recognized
by its hard, dark fingerlike fruiting bodies. They are much thicker than those of X. hy¬
poxylon, Geoglossum, and Trichoglossum, and the white or pallid interior is also dis¬
tinctive. There are several very similar temperate and tropical species that are collectively
called “Dead Man’s Fingers.” These are differentiated primarily on microscopic charac¬
teristics. One, X. longipes, is similar but consistently slimmer (0.3-1 cm thick) than X.
polymorpha. It occurs across the continent, usually on hardwoods.
886
Daldinia grandis. Note the concentrically zoned interior (shown in sectioned specimen at upper right)
and minutely pimpled exterior. Charcoal-like consistency and growth on wood are also distinctive.
“King Alfred’s Cakes,” Daldinia grandis, sharing a juicy log with Phellinus gilvus (see p. 582).
888
MUSHROOM COOKERY
The abundance boneless
Without husk or scale or thorn,
Granting us this festival of all-embracing freshness
HELPFUL HINTS
1. Don’t eat a mushroom unless you’re absolutely sure it’s edible. In other words:
“When in doubt, throw it out.”
2. You wouldn’t eat a rotten egg, so don’t eat a rotten mushroom. Food poisoning is
a frequent cause of so-called “mushroom poisoning.”
3. You wouldn’t eat five pounds of asparagus, so don’t eat five pounds of mushrooms,
no matter how delicious they are. Overindulgence (COLOR PLATE 217) is another
common cause of so-called “mushroom poisoning,” particularly for those who
“What was desire in the hills becomes fulfillment in the kitchen,” says Angelo Pellegrini in The Savory
Wild Mushroom. At left is fresh Agaricus campestris. At right, a delicious cream sauce with white
onions and sliced A. campestris.
don’t eat mushrooms regularly. On the other hand, don’t be stingy—most wild
mushrooms cook down more than the commercial variety, so use them generously.
4. When trying a species for the first time, eat only a small amount. Then wait for a few
hours to see if you have an adverse reaction to it. Just as some people are allergic to
eggs or chocolate or scallops or strawberries, some are adversely affected by certain
kinds of mushrooms. Species to which many people are “allergic” (e.g., Laetiporus
sulphureus, Lepiota species) should not be served to large groups.
5. In the event of an “allergy,” you’ll want to pinpoint the culprit, so don’t mix two or
more species together unless you’ve eaten them before.
6. As a rule, maggot-riddled mushrooms (see photo at bottom of p. 277) should not be
eaten, especially when uninfested specimens are available. However, in the case of
certain choice species (e.g., Agaricus augustus), you may wish to remove the maggots
with a knife (if there are only a few) or even leave them in (they’re just a little extra
protein). Use your own judgment on this matter.
7. Use as little water as possible when cleaning mushrooms. They absorb it so readily
that it dilutes their flavor and causes them to cook up slimy. On the other hand,
there’s nothing worse than gritty wild mushrooms (unless it’s gritty domesticated
mushrooms), so don’t hesitate to use water if nothing else works. If you wash them,
drain them on a paper towel before cooking. The best place to clean mushrooms is in
the field (providing you already know their identity). Trim away all dirt with a knife
or small brush, and don’t mix dirty specimens with clean ones. Also, check for
maggots and remove any that are present so they won’t multiply and spread (even
though maggots are the larvae of gnats or flies, they are able to reproduce partheno-
genetically).
8. Use mushrooms as soon as possible after picking them. Prolonged refrigeration
deprives all vegetables (including mushrooms) of their freshness and flavor. Species
of Coprinus should be eaten the day they’re picked, or they will digest themselves.
There’s an old saying to the effect that you should boil the water before harvesting
the corn. Well, it’s not a bad idea to melt the butter before picking the shaggy manes!
889
Left: One day’s catch: Boletus edulis, Amanita calyptrata, Ramaria spp., and others. Right: Enjoying
the day’s catch (in this case, shaggy manes fried in egg batter and bread crumbs).
9. During periods of heavy rainfall, most mushrooms will be waterlogged. These are
apt to cook up insipid and slimy, but can be sliced and dried for later use (thereby
concentrating their flavor).
10. Don’t steam or pressure-cook mushrooms. You want to get rid of excess moisture,
not add to it. Pressure-cooked mushrooms bear an uncanny resemblance to slugs.
11. Don’t drown mushrooms in spices, butter, salt, garlic, or olive oil. All of these com¬
plement mushrooms nicely when used in moderation. Mushrooms and onions, for
instance, are practically made for each other, but the mushrooms must always
dominate in quantity because their flavor is more delicate.
12. If you don’t like a “choice” mushroom, give it a second and third chance. After all,
a lot depends on how you cook it and in what condition it was found. The environ¬
ment can also have an influence. For instance, blewits that grow under cypress are
often bitter-tasting. No one agrees on which kinds are best, but a species does not
acquire a widespread reputation unless it has something special to offer. On the other
hand, some relatively unknown mushrooms (e.g., Chroogomphus) are quite good.
Improvise!
Most mushrooms have fickle fruiting habits, appearing in large numbers for one or two
weeks, then disappearing for the rest of the year. To take advantage of their fleeting
abundance, you have to harvest them while you can and then preserve them for later use.
DRYING
Drying mushrooms is the easiest and most satisfactory way to preserve them. Fleshy
types like Boletus must be cut in thin slices; smaller species like Marasmius oreades can be
dried whole. Don’t use an oven. Circulation is more important than heat—you want
moisture to be carried away. Spread out the mushrooms on screens and use a light bulb
or hot plate as a heat source (unless it’s arid enough to sun-dry them). Or string them up
890
Dried mushrooms make a marvelous addition to sauces, soups, and gravies. They should be stored
in airtight jars to protect them from insects. This array of dehydrated delicacies includes Agaricus,
Boletus, Chroogomphus, Craterellus, Clitocybe, and Marasmius.
on thread and hang them in a warm, dry place. Remove all maggots before drying mush¬
rooms, and try to get them as clean as possible without washing them. If necessary, they
can be cleaned before use by placing them in a strainer and scalding them with water.
When thoroughly dried (brittle), the mushrooms should be stored in an airtight jar to
protect them from insects and mold. They will keep for months in this state. They can also
be pulverized or powdered and used as a condiment. Certain mushrooms, such as Can-
tharellus cibarius and Laetiporus sulphureus do not dry well (they become too tough and
leathery). Others, like Marasmius, Boletus, Leccinum, Craterellus, Chroogomphus,
Morchella, and Agaricus are excellent.
There are several methods for reconstituting dried mushrooms, depending on the type
of mushroom and kind of dish. They can be crumbled directly into soups or sauces, but
should be soaked first if they’re to be put in drier foods. An excellent method is to place
dried pieces between wet paper towels overnight. This allows them to absorb moisture
gradually while retaining their flavor.
FREEZING
Freezing is another excellent and easy way to preserve mushrooms, pro viding you saute
them briefly beforehand. (If you freeze raw mushrooms, they will decompose as soon as
they thaw out.) Practically all mushrooms freeze well—I have stored Amanita calyptrata
for over one year without any noticeable change in flavor! The mushrooms should be
stored in an airtight container (e.g., a ziplock bag). Mushroom sauces and stocks can also
be frozen for later use.
CANNING
Canning is a big undertaking, and is only worthwhile when you have an enormous
amount of mushrooms. A pressure canner, mason jars, and lids are required. Wash the
mushrooms thoroughly and let them cook in their own juices for a while. Then pack them
in sterilized pint jars, cover with boiling water, seal, and process at 10-15 pounds pressure
for 30 minutes (a very necessary step because they can easily become tainted with botulism).
A little ascorbic acid (vitamin C) can be added to retain color. Mushrooms will keep for
years if canned properly, but failure to observe sterile procedures can be disastrous. In
my experience, Cantharellus, Tricholoma, Dentinum, Boletus, Hericium, and Agaricus
can well.
891
892 MUSHROOM COOKERY
PICKLING
Pickling is just marinating on a larger and more elaborate scale. In Europe, mushrooms
are often preserved under oil and vinegar. It is a fairly simple procedure, but obviously,
the mushroom flavor is masked. Jars should be sterilized, but pressure cooking isn’t
necessary because of the acidic medium. I have successfully pickled Cantharellus, Clito-
cybe nuda, and Amanita calyptrata.
SALTING
This is another technique that is popular in some parts of Europe. The mushrooms
are cooked briefly and then packed in rock salt and stored in airtight jars in the refrigerator.
Naturally they are salty this way, but the salt is easily dissipated by adding the mushrooms
to soups or other watery dishes.
MUSHROOM TOXINS
MOST CASES of “mushroom poisoning” are the result of allergies* (idiosyn¬
cratic reactions or hypersensitivity), overindulgence (especially of raw mush¬
rooms), or food poisoning (ingestion of rotten mushrooms). All three usually
result in nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea. Another common type of “mush¬
room poisoning” is imaginary—people who have lingering doubts about the
safety of their meal are apt to experience discomfort whether or not there is a
physiological basis for it. All the more reason not to eat a mushroom unless
you’re absolutely certain it’s edible!
The two most common causes of mushroom poisoning are carelessness and
ignorance. Despite what people say, mushroom experts do not die from mush¬
room poisoning. But of course, it is much more sensational for newspapers to say
they do. Relatively few species are poisonous, but some of the most dangerous
ones are exceedingly common, and almost any poisonous mushroom can be fatal
to a small child or a person in poor health. Therefore it is useful to learn about the
different kinds of mushroom poisoning, should you or a friend experience
discomfort. A brief rundown of the major groups of mushroom toxins is pre¬
sented here. “Mushroom toxin,” as defined here, is a compound which produces
an abnormal effect on the human body. This definition encompasses mind-
altering drugs such as psilocybin, whether or not they are ingested deliberately.
As with any kind of poisoning, the two most important things to do are to seek
immediate medical attention and identify the agent responsible. Idiosyncratic
reactions to edible mushrooms are generally not serious enough to warrant a trip
to the hospital, but if there is any doubt, consult a physician.
AMANITA-TOXINS (AMATOXINS)
high mortality rate. However, it is unstable and apparently destroyed by cooking and/or
the human digestive tract. A group of complex cyclic polypeptides called phallotoxins
comprise the second group. They are also fatal when injected intravenously (they attack
the liver), but are apparently destroyed by the digestive tract. It is another group of poly¬
peptides, the amanitins, that are the culprits. They are twenty times more lethal than the
phallotoxins. Their concentration varies tremendously from individual mushroom to
individual mushroom, but an average fatal dose is about 2 ounces (fresh weight) of
Amanita phalloides.
All recent mushroom-induced fatalities in California have been caused by Amanita
phalloides and A. ocreata. Both are large, handsome, tempting mushrooms, whereas
the other deadly types (such as Galerina) are small and nondescript and therefore unlikely
to be eaten. Of course, there is no excuse for eating any of these mushrooms if you take
the time to learn about them.
GYROMITRIN (MONOMETHYLHYDRAZINE)
MUSCARINE
Mushrooms: Inocybe species; Clitocybe dealbata and seveal relatives; Omphalotus
species, and certain red-pored species of Boletus.
Muscarine was originally isolated in Amanita muscaria, but occurs in that mushroom
in insignificant amounts. However, many Inocybes contain large amounts of muscarine—
enough so that they can be fatal in large quantities.
IBOTENIC ACID/MUSCIMOL
Mushrooms: Amanita muscaria, A. pantherina, A. gemmata.
There are many contradictions in the literature regarding the principal toxins of
Amanita muscaria and A. pantherina. Muscarine was originally believed to be the toxin,
and then bufotenine was put forth as a candidate. It turns out, however, that the main
active principle is ibotenic acid, which is converted by the human body into muscimol, a
more powerful form that passes out in the urine.
Amanita muscaria is apparently one of the oldest intoxicants known. Its use by certain
Siberian peoples has been extensively documented and R. Gordon Wasson, in his book
SOMA: The Divine Mushroom of Immortality, makes a convincing case for it being
the mystical Soma plant of the RgVedas (sacred Hindu texts). It may have been used
throughout Eurasia in ancient times, but if so, its use has been suppressed. Curiously,
many Europeans fear A. muscaria more than its deadly cousin, A. phalloides. John
Allegro’s attempt to link it to the origins of Christianity (The Sacred Mushroom and the
Cross) is far-fetched and abstruse.
Amanita muscaria is erroneously listed in older books as deadly poisonous. It can be
fatal in large doses, but so can practically any poisonous mushroom. According to most
sources, A. pantherina is somewhat more dangerous, while A. gemmata is less so. Deli¬
berate ingestion of these mushrooms has increased now that it has been shown that they
are not as dangerous as once believed. However, their effects vary greatly from person to
person. As people’s metabolisms are different and the concentrations of the toxins vary
from mushroom to mushroom, there is no way of predicting what one’s reaction will be.
Some people experience extreme discomfort, others have vivid dreams, still others ex¬
perience no effects whatsoever. The ingestion of these mushrooms is definitely not
recommended here. Incidentally, not all of the toxins have been identified. For instance,
neither pure ibotenic acid nor muscimol produce the nausea and vomiting that frequently
occurs after eating A. muscaria.
A. muscaria frequently fall asleep (“swoon”), to awaken hours later with little or
no memory of their experiences. There is no “hangover” effect as with alcohol, but most
people who try it (including myself) do not wish to repeat the experience. Since muscimol
passes out through the urine, Siberian users “recycled” their A. muscaria by drinking their
own urine. I know of no one in the United States who has tested this approach.
Treatment of muscimol poisoning is largely supportive—reassuring the victim that the
effects are temporary. In the mistaken belief that muscarine was the principal toxin, older
texts prescribe atropine as an antidote. Atropine, however, is likely to exacerbate the
effects of ibotenic acid/ muscimol.
PSILOCYBIN/PSILOCIN
Mushrooms: Psilocybe baeocystis, P. caerulescens, P. cubensis, P. cyanescens,
P. semilanceata and many others; also certain Panaeolus species (e.g.,
P. cyanescens, P. subbalteatus)\ certain Conocybe and Gymnopilus
species; possibly Pluteus salicinus, P. cyanopus, and others.
These indole derivatives are well known for their psychedelic properties, and “psilo¬
cybin mushrooms” are often consumed for recreational purposes. Several hallucinogenic
mushrooms played an important role in the religious and medicinal rites of Native
Americans in Mexico and Central America. But the Spaniards suppressed their use to
such an extent that their existence was seriously doubted by early 20th century botanists.
The mushrooms were “rediscovered” in Oaxaca in the 1930’s, and 20 years later they were
identified as belonging principally to the genus Psilocybe. Since then their properties
have been so publicized that Oaxaca has been inundated by pleasure-seeking gringos. It
has subsequently been discovered that many psilocybin-containing mushrooms grow in
the United States as well.
Psilocin (a dephosphorylated version of psilocybin) is about ten times as active as psilo¬
cybin. Most psilocybin-containing mushrooms have only a trace of psilocin, but the
human body coverts most of the psilocybin into psilocin. A blueing reaction associated
with the presence of psilocybin and psilocin is caused by an enzyme that oxidizes psilocin.
However, not all mushrooms that stain blue contain psilocybin or psilocin, and not all
“psilocybin mushrooms” stain blue.
GASTROINTESTINAL IRRITANTS
Mushrooms: Many, including: Agaricus californicus, A. hondensis, A.placomyces, A.
praeclaresquamosus, A. xanthodermus; Boletus sat anas, B. erythropus,
B. haematinus, B. pulcherrimus, B. subvelutipes; Chlorophyllum molyb-
dites; Entoloma species; Gomphus floccosus; Hebeloma species; many
acrid and/or purple- or yellow-staining Lactarius species; Laetiporus
896 MUSHROOM TOXINS
As evidenced by the list, this is by far the largest and most prevalent group of mushroom
toxins. Very few of the active principles have been identified, however, perhaps because
they are rarely fatal. The most frequent culprits in gastrointestinal poisoning are the
phenol-smelling Agaricus species and Chlorophyllum molybdites, undoubtedly because
they closely resemble edible types. The most dangerous are Entoloma species, Hebeloma
species, Tricholoma pardinum, Boletus satanas and close relatives (raw), Naematoloma
fasciculare, and Chlorophyllum molybdites. “Allergic” reactions to edible mushrooms
normally take the form of gastrointestinal upset.
Symptoms and Treatment
Symptoms usually appears shortly after ingestion (20 minutes-4 hours). They include
nausea, vomiting, cramps, and diarrhea,* which normally pass after the irritant is expelled.
Severe cases, however, may require hospitalization. Treatment is largely supportive—
helping the body to eliminate that which it is not equipped to handle. Though not as serious
as other types of mushroom poisoning, gastrointestinal upsets are not to be taken lightly,
as evidenced by the fact that many people acquire a lingering distaste for mushrooms after
an all-night bout with nausea and diarrhea.
MISCELLANEOUS TOXINS
Lactarius uvidus (see p. 75) is one of several purple-staining milk caps. The cap is usually sticky or
slimy, but in one mountain-loving variety it is practically dry. Note how the stalk snaps open cleanly
like a piece of chalk—a characteristic feature of Lactarius and Russula.
Melanoleuca evenosa group (see p. 171) is reminiscent of a Russula or Tricholoma but has a fibrous
stalk and amyloid white spores. Look for it in the spring under mountain conifers soon after the
snow melts. Note how the gills are crowded and whitish.
Two agarics that typically grow in dense clusters. Top: Clitocybula familia (see comments under
Collybia acervata, p. 215) grows on rotting wood. These are young specimens; as they mature the
caps will broaden somewhat. Below: Lyophyllum decastes group (see p. 174) is usually but not
always terrestrial. This cluster is rather unusual because-the caps have watery spots.
Abnormalities are common in mushrooms. They are the result of environmental influence or im¬
proper development; they are not inherited or passed on. One widespread abnormality is the develop¬
ment of a small rosette of gills (“rose gill”) on the cap surface. In extreme cases, an entire mushroom
may ride “piggy-back” on another, like these Russulas (left). Albino individuals also occur. In this
cluster of Craterellus cornucopioides (right), half is normally colored and half is whitish! Other ab¬
normalities include aborted, parasitized, or sterile specimens and failure of the cap or gills to form.
899
Y ou may groan at the sight or sound of scientific names, but the paucity of common names
for mushrooms forces us to use them. As explained in the chapter on classification (p. 8),
many people are intimidated by scientific names because they are derived from Latin and
Greek. “How do you remember all those names?” I am repeatedly asked. Y et posers of this
question have usually mastered many scientific names without realizing it:
Since that which is understood is more likely to be remembered than that which is not,
learning the meanings of scientific names can increase your ability to remember them.
By refusing to be intimidated, you can demystify the names of mushrooms while you are
demystifying the mushrooms themselves.
Scientific names can be divided into three categories: descriptive, honorary, and
geographical. (A fourth possible category, nonsensical, needs no elaboration.)
Descriptive names are the most numerous as well as the most helpful. They can aid in
the identification process because they usually tell us something significant about the
mushroom, its habitat, or time of growth. For example:
You will soon discover that many of the longest and most “difficult” names are actually
composed of shorter, more familiar elements—familiar because the English language
is a thicket with many Latin roots. For instance:
A few descriptive names, unfortunately, are apparent misnomers, forthey bear no obvious
relation to the mushroom and may even contradict it:
Honorary names are usually recognizable as such because they don’t sound Latin.
Some, however, may not be obvious, particularly those that honor Europeans. Examples:
One major drawback of an honorary name is that it tells us nothing about the mushroom
itself. On the other hand, precisely because it tells us nothing it cannot be misleading!
Geographical names are formed by adding an adjective suffix to the name of a particular
region or locality. Most are self-evident (e.g., californicus, marylandensis, cubensis,
mexicana, olympiana). Some are Latinized, however (e.g., novaboracensis, of New York,
suecica, of Sweden) and others are obscure (e.g., hondensis, named after bustling La
Honda, California, and pitkinensis, which immortalizes populous Pitkin, Colorado).
Geographical names can be deceptive because they usually indicate where a species was
discovered rather than where it occurs. For instance, Longula texensis, originally col¬
lected in Texas, and Suillus sibiricus, first found in Siberia, are both widely distributed
in western North America.
SUFFIXES
Suffixes can have specific meanings, vague meanings, multiple meanings, or no
meaning at all. Some suffixes simply transform nouns into adjectives. Others indicate
possession, likeness, size, action, or degree. Still others designate gender—a concept
familiar to anyone who has studied French or Spanish. Thus a single root word can have
several forms depending on the gender and spelling of the word(s) with which it is used.
Example:
Brunne-, the root word for brown, becomes brunneus (masculine form) in
Boletus olivaceobrunneus, brunnea (feminine form) in Leptonia vinaceo-
brunnea, brunneum (neuter form) in Tricholoma albobrunneunm, and
brunneo-, brunnea-, or brunnei (combining forms), as in Clitocybe brunneo-
cephala. Suffixes with specific meanings can also be attached, as in brun¬
ne scens (“becoming brown”) or brunneola (“less than brown, brownish”).
As you can see, it is not necessary to know all the quirks and nuances of Latin and Greek
grammar in order to recognize root words such as brunne in their various manifestations.
Since suffixes are sundry and sometimes difficult to recognize, the more common ones
are listed separately. However, common prefixes as well as most suffixes with very specific
meanings (e.g., odon-iooi\\, pes-foot or stem, osm-=odor) can be found in the dictionary
of word elements.
The dictionary is for descriptive names only. It does not include people or places, self-
evident words such as giganteus (gigantic), caninus (canine), parasitica (parasitic), or
fragilis (fragile). Nor does it include names whose meanings are obscure, debatable, or
unknown. A hyphen indicates that the root word can have various endings (see discussion
of suffixes).
Space does not permit listing all the root words used in naming mushrooms, but with
the help of the dictionary and the material preceding it, you should be able to make sense
out of most of the scientific names in this book—and enrich your English vocabulary in
the process! Examples:
Common Suffixes
Note: Some suffixes, particularly those with feminine endings, may not be in alpha¬
betical order because they are listed under their masculine form. For instance, -ata
is listed under -atus, and -aria is listed under -arius.
-etes: (1) denotes class or larger grouping of -ius, -ia, -ium: (1) pertaining to, characteristic
fungi (2) one who is of, resembling (e.g., regius, pertaining to
-ettus, -etta, -ettum: diminutive kings) (2) occasionally used as diminu¬
-etum: denotes collective place of growth tive or comparative
-eus, -ea, -eum: (1) pertaining or belonging -ivus, -iva, -ivum: (1) possessing, furnished
to (2) color of, made of, similar to (e.g., with (2) pertaining to(3) capable of, able to
melleus, honey-colored) -izans: becoming like, resembling
-formis, -forme: resembling, especially in -limus: see -rimus
shape or form (e.g., strobiliformis, shaped -ma, mus: indicates action or result
like a pine cone) -nellus, -nella, -nellum: diminutive
-genus, -gena, -genum: born of, originating -odes: see -oides
from -oides, -oideus, -oidea, -oideum: resembling,
-i: see -ii similar to (e.gphalloides, like a phallus)
-ia: (1) see -ius(2) see -a (3) see -ae -olentus, -olenta, -olentum: see -ulentus
-iacus, -iaca, -iacum: pertaining to -olus, -ola, -ole, -olum: (1) diminutive (2) less
-iae: see -ae than, somewhat (e.g., luteolus, yellowish)
-ianus, -iana, -ianum: see -anus -on: neuter gender ending
-ibilis: see -bilis -onius, -onia, -onium: pertaining or related to
-icons: becoming, almost, closely resembling -opsis: resembling, similar to (e.g., Tricho-
(e.g., nigricans, becoming black) lomopsis, like Tricholoma)
-icius, -icia, -icium: (1) made of, pertaining to -orius, -oria, -orium: capable of, able to (e.g.,
(2) implies or denotes action tine tor ius, able to dye)
-icos: pertaining to -orum: pertaining to
-icus, -ica, -icum: belonging to, pertaining to -os: masculine or feminine gender ending
(e.g., californicus, of California) -osus, -osa, -osum: denotes fullness, abun¬
-ides: resembling, similar to dance, marked degree of development
-idion, -idius, -idia, -idium: diminutive (e.g., (e.g., succosa, full of juice)
Gomphidius, little peg) -otus, -ota, -otium, -otum: (1) resembling,
-idus, -ida, -idum: (1) resembling, similar to similar to, possessing, furnished with
(2) becoming, a\most(e.g.,a lb ida, whitish) (2) see ot- in dictionary
-iellus, -iella, -iellum: diminutive -rimus, -rima, -rimum: superlative (e.g., pul-
-iensis, -iense: see -ensis cherrimus, most beautiful)
-ii: named after (e.g., kauffmanii) -ros: pertaining to
-ilis, -He: able to, capable of, with property of -tatos, -tate, -taton: superlative
(e.g.,fragilis, able to be broken) -ter: agent or means
-illus, -ilia, -ilium: diminutive -teros, -tera, -teron: comparative
-imos: pertaining or relating to -tes, -tis, -tor, -tra, -tria, -tron, -tros, -trum,
-imus, -ima, -imum: superlative -trus: denotes agent, means, tool, or object
-inans: becoming, almost (e.g., necator, killer)
-ineus, -inea, -ineum: color of, made of, -ua: see -uus
similar to (e.g.,ferruginea, color of rust) -ugo: (1) made of (2) able to, capable of (3)
-inius, -inia, -inium: named after, relating to disease or rust
-inos: (1) made of (2) see -inius -ulentus, -ulenta, -ulentum: denotes full¬
-inus, -ina, -inum: (1) pertaining or belonging ness, abundance, marked degree of de¬
to, possessing, resembling (2) diminutive velopment
-ioides: see -oides -ulus, -ula, -ulum, -ullus: (1) pertaining to
-ion: (1) diminutive (2) denotes occurrence (2) diminutive (3) denotes lesser degree of
-ior: (1) comparative (e.g., strictior, very development (e.g., dulcidulus, slightly
straight) (2) see -ios sweet)
-ios: pertaining or relating to -um: most common neuter gender ending
-is: pertaining or relating to -unculus, -uneula, -unculum: diminutive
-isce, -iseus, -iscos: diminutive -urus, -ura: (1) implies result or action (2)
-issimus, -issima, -issimum: superlative (e.g., pertaining to
speciosissimus, showiest) -us: most common masculine gender ending
-istos: comparative or superlative -uscu/us, -uscula, -usculum: diminutive
-itas: see -itius -ustris, -uster, -ustre: see -estris
-ites, -itis: pertaining to, named after -utus, -uta, -utum: possessing, furnished with
-iticus, -itica, -iticum: (1) possessing, fur¬ -uus, -ua, -uum: implies result or possibility
nished with (2) capable of, able to of action
-itius, -itia, -itium: (1) with quality or color of, -ydrion, -yllion: diminutive
similar to (2) implies action or result -ys: comparative or superlative
903
Dictionary of Selected
Latin and Greek Word Elements
A
areolat-: areolate (cracked like dry mud)
a-, ab-, ad-, etc.: prefix meaning without,
argent-: silver
absent, or away from argill-: clay
abies, abie-, abiet-: fir, firs argillace-: clay-colored (dull yellow-brown)
acanth-: thorn, prickle argyr-: silver
acer-: (1) maple (2) acrid, sharp armen-: apricot, apricot-color
acerb-: bitter, sour armill-: bracelet, ring
acerv-: heap arquat-: (1) bowed, arched (2) rainbow-
acet-: vinegar colored
acetabulum: vinegar cruet arv-: field(s)
acicul-: bristle, needle, splinter asc-: bladder, bag, wineskin
acr-: acrid asper-, aspr-: rough
acumin-, acumen-: sharp point aster-, astr-: star
acut-: sharp, pointed, acute astragalin-: pertaining to goldfinch
adust-: scorched ater-, atr-: black, very dark
aegerit-: pertaining to poplar atrament-: ink
aereus: copper, bronze atrat-: clothed in black
aerug-: blue-green, green, or deep green attenuat-: narrowed, tapered, reduced
aest-: summer augean-: pertaining to Augeos, who main¬
affin-: related; adjacent tained an uncleaned stable for 30 years
agaric-: ancient term for mushroom august-: majestic, august
agath-: pleasant, good, excellent aur-: see aure- and auri-
agglutin-: glued auranti-: orange
agr-: field aurat-: gilded, ornamented with gold
alb-: white aure-: gold, golden
aleur-: wheat flour auri-, auric-: ear
alii-: garlic auriscalpium: ear scrape
aln-: alder austr-, austral-: southern
alutace-: leather-colored (yellowish-tan) avellan-: avellaneous (pale gray tinged with
amab-: pretty pink)
amanita-: ancient term for mushroom azur-: azure, blue
amar-: bitter
B
amentace-: pertaining to catkins
amethyst-: violet (amethyst) baccat-: (1) set with pearls or berries (2) soft,
amianth-: unpolluted, spotless pulpy
ammo-: sand badi-: reddish-brown
amoen-: pleasant, lovely bae-: slim, small
amygdal-: almond balsam-: balsam, fir
amylo-: amyloid (containing starch) balte-: belt, girdle
ananas: pineapple basidi-: basidium or basidia (derived from
andros-: a tiny herb or plant word for little base or pedestal)
angi-: vessel (derived from little base
angust-: small, narrow basilar-: fixed at the base of something, basal
annul-: ring, annulus bell-: pretty, handsome
anth-: flower benzoin-: resinous
anthrac-: coal, charcoal betul-: birch
apothec-: storehouse bi-: prefix meaning two, double, twice
appendiculat-: with a small appendage, biennis: lasting two years
appendiculate bol-: throw, thrower
apt-: fastened, bound bolaris: with little lumps of paint
aqu-: watery bolbit: cow dung
arachn-: spider or spider web bolet-, bolites: ancient words for a superior
arai-, arae-: thin, narrow kind of mushroom
arane-: spider or spider web bombyc-: silky
arcularius: maker of small chests boreal-: northern
aren-: sand botry-, botryt-: bunch of grapes
areol-: a small open space bovista: ancient term for puffball (probably
derived from word for ox)
904 LATIN AND GREEK DICTIONARY
GLOSSARY
acanthocytes needle-like crystalline de¬ boletivore one with an inordinate fond¬
posits on mycelium of certain mushrooms ness for eating boletes (p. 546)
acrid taste burning or peppery brown rot carbonizing decay
acute pointed or sharp buff an indefinite pale color: pale dull
adnate gills attached broadly to stalk (p. yellow or very pale tan
17) bulbous stalk with an enlarged base (p.
adnexed gills attached narrowly to stalk 17)
(P- 17) BUM Boring Ubiquitous Mushroom
agaric a mushroom with gills button a young fruiting body before it has
alveolate surface of spore or cap with opened up
broad pits (p. 842) butt rot a rot confined to the base or roots
amyloid staining blue, gray, or black in of the tree
iodine solution (e.g., Melzer’s reagent)
cap the caplike part of the fruiting body
anastomosing gills connected by cross¬
which supports the spore-bearing surface
veins
capillitium modified threadlike, often-
angular spores 4- to 6-sided, with corners
branched hyphae enmeshed in the spore
or angles
mass of many Gasteromycetes
annulus ring or collar of tissue on stalk
capitate furnished with a rudimentary
formed by ruptured veil
cap or head
apex top
carbonizing decay a cellulose-decom¬
apical at or near the top
posing decay
apical pore in certain Gasteromycetes,
carminophilous see siderophilous
the mouth at the top of the spore case
cartilaginous with the texture of carti¬
through which spores are released; in
lage; tough or rindlike, not fleshy
spores, a germ pore
cellular tissue composed of round or pear-
apiculate furnished with an apiculus
shaped cells (p. 19)
apiculus short projection on either end of
cellulose a compound composed of glu¬
a spore
cose units; it is a major constituent of
apothecium the fruiting body of an
wood and of plants’ cell walls
Ascomycete in which the asci are ar¬
cespitose (caespitose) tufted or clus¬
ranged in an exposed hymenium
tered
appendiculate margin of cap fringed or
chlamydospores thick-walled asexual
adorned with veil remnants or other tissue
spores formed by breaking up of hyphae
appressed flattened down or pressed
chrysocystidia cystidia with a highly re¬
against
fractive golden content as seen in KOH
areolate cap surface cracked into plaques
clamp connection a small bump, loop,
or blocks (like dried mud)
or swollen area formed at the cross-wall
ascocarp fruiting body of an Ascomycete
between hyphae in the process of cell
ascus (pi., asci) saclike mother cell in
division
which spores of Ascomycetes are formed
clamps mycological jargon for clamp con¬
(pp. 4, 782)
nections
autodigestion self-digestion
class a grouping of related orders
basal at or near the base clavate club-shaped
basidiocarp fruiting body of a Basidio- club-shaped stalk thickened noticeably
mycete toward base (p. 17); basidia thickened
basidium (pi., basidia) a cell, usually toward spore-bearing end
club-shaped, on which spores of Basidio- collarlike type of volva formed when the
mycetes are formed (p. 4) universal veil breaks around the circum¬
bolete a fleshy mushroom with tubes on ference of the cap, forming a collar or free
underside of cap rim near base of stalk (p. 264)
914 GLOSSARY
columella internal stalk; a sterile column divergent gill hyphae projecting down¬
of tissue projecting into the spore mass of ward (away from cap) as seen in cross-
certain Gasteromycetes section; diverging from the center (p. 19)
complex stalk folded or convoluted in division a group of related classes
cross-section; a group of closely related dry cap or stalk neither viscid nor hygro-
species or forms phanous
compound fruiting body with more than duplex flesh of two distinct textures
one cap and/or stalk arising from a
eccentric stalk off-center
common base
echinulate spores spiny like a sea urchin
conidia asexual spores formed by the
egg the button stage of a mushroom with
pinching off of hyphae
a universal veil (e.g., Amanita); also,
conifer a cone-bearing tree; one that has
spore-containing capsule in a bird’s nest
needles like a pine or redwood, or scales
fungus
like a cypress
elliptical spores rounded at both ends
conk a woody, usually perennial poly¬
with sides curved slightly
pore
endemic native to a region and generally
context the flesh of the cap or stalk
restricted to it
convergent gill hyphae projecting up¬
endoperidium the inner layer of the
ward toward the cap as seen in cross-
spore case in puffballs and their allies
section; converging toward the center (p.
entire gills with even edges; not serrated
19)
or toothed
convex cap rounded or domed (p. 17)
epigeous growing on or above the ground
convoluted wrinkled like a brain
epiphragm the thin membrane covering
coprophilous dung-loving; growing on
the nest of many young bird’s nest fungi
dung
equal stalk of more or less uniform thick¬
cortina a veil with a silky or cobwebby
ness throughout (p. 17)
texture
ericaceous pertaining to the heath family
cuticle the skin or surface layer of the cap,
erumpent fruiting body erupting through
more specifically one differentiated from
the ground but scarcely rising above it
the flesh
evanescent transitory; disappearing
cystidium (pi., cystidia) specialized ster¬
exoperidium the outer layer of the spore
ile cells projecting from the gills, tubes,
case in puffballs and their allies
cap, or stalk (p. 19)
expanded cap fully developed; spread
daedaloid pores elongated or meander¬ out
ing like a labyrinth; mazelike
fairy ring a circle or arc of mushrooms (p.
decurrent gills running down the stalk (p.
7)
17)
family a group of related genera
decurved margin of cap curved down¬
farinaceous odor like fresh meal or
ward
cucumber
delignifying decay a lignin and cellulose-
fetid (foetid) ill-smelling
decomposing rot
fibril a fine fiber or hair
deliquescing gills dissolving into a fluid;
fibrillose covered with or composed of
liquefying
fibrils
depressed cap concave, i.e., the center
fibrous composed of tough, stringy tissue
sunken below the level of the margin (p.
filamentous tissue composed of thread¬
17)
like cells or filaments (p. 19)
dextrinoid staining brown or red-brown
flaccid lacking firmness; flabby
in iodine solution (e.g., Melzer’s reagent)
flesh the tissue of the cap or stalk; the
dichotomous forking or dividing in pairs
meaty portion
differentiated different; not the same
fleshy having substance (e.g., a fleshy
throughout.
fungal fructification) or soft as opposed to
disc center of the cap
tough
distant gills widely spaced
GLOSSARY 915
potato chip conditions see footnote on septate partitioned; with one or more
p. 35 cross-walls
pruinose powdery or appearing finely serrated gill edges toothed like a saw
powdered; dandruffy sessile lacking a stalk
pseudocarp something that resembles a setae pointed, elongated, thick-walled
mushroom but isn’t sterile cells
pseudorhiza a rootlike extension of the sheathlike annulus or veil sheathing the
stalk; a “tap root” stalk (p. 312)
pubescent minutely hairy; downy siderophilous basidia with granules that
pulverulent appearing powdered darken when heated in acetocarmine
punctate dotted with minute scales or simple fruiting body unbranched, not
points compound; stalk not complex
putrescent readily decaying sinuate gills notched (p. 19)
sinuous crooked or curved
radially arranged pores or pits arranged
skirtlike annulus hanging down like a
in rows which normally radiate like the
skirt (p. 312)
spokes of a wheel
sordid dingy or dirty in appearance
recurved curved up and back
spawn the mycelium
resupinate lying flat on substrate; with¬
species (sp.) a particular kind of or¬
out a stalk or well-defined cap
ganism; the fundamental unit of tax¬
reticulate stalk marked with lines crossed
onomy
like the meshes of a net; netted (p. 489);
sphaerocyst a round or swollen cell in
spores with a network of ridges
certain mushrooms (e.g., Russula, Lac-
rhizomorph a rootlike or stringlike bun¬
tarius)
dle of mycelial hyphae
spines pendant spore-bearing “teeth” in
ring see annulus
the teeth fungi
rivulose marked by riverlike lines
splitter a taxonomist with a narrow genus
rufescent becoming reddish
or species concept
rufous brownish-red
spore the reproductive unit of a fungus,
rugose wrinkled
usually a single cell
saclike volva shaped like a sack, pouch, spore case the large chamber that holds
or cup (p. 264) the spores in puffballs and related fungi
saprophytic feeding on dead or decaying (Gasteromycetes)
matter squamose furnished with scales; scaly
sap rot decay of the sapwood squamulose furnished with small scales
scabers tufted hairs or short projecting stalk the stemlike structure that supports
scales on stalk (Color Plates 145-147) the cap in most mushrooms
scabrous roughened by scabers stellate star-shaped; with rays
scales pieces of differentiated tissue on sterigma (pi., sterigmata) prong on the
the cap or stalk, often of a different color basidium on which a spore forms
than background sterile not producing spores; infertile
scaly furnished with scales; volva with sterile base the sterile chambered base
concentric rings or scales at base of stalk beneath the spore mass in many puffballs
(P- 264) stipe the stalk
sclerotium a knot or tuber of hyphae, stipitate furnished with a stalk or stipe
usually underground, in certain mush¬ striate marked by lines; finely furrowed
rooms; a resting stage that fruits periodi¬ stuffed stalk stuffed with a pith
cally subdistant gills fairly well spaced
scrobiculate stalk pitted with conspicu¬ subperonate somewhat or slightly pero-
ous spots nate
seceding gills breaking away from stalk substrate the material to which a fruiting
as the cap expands body is attached
secotioid resembling Secotium, a genus subtomentose finely or somewhat to-
of gastroid agarics; reminiscent of an mentose
undeveloped or aborted agaric
918 GLOSSARY
Leucopaxillus amarus, a common but bitter-tasting brown-capped agaric. N ote how some specimens
have a ribbed cap margin. Gills and flesh are white. See p. 168 for details.
919
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Suggested Readings
and Primary References
N on-Technical Literature
(Note: Publications dealing with specific groups of fungi are listed under
“Technical Literature,” even though they may be written for amateurs)
Field Guides
Biek, David (1984). The Mushrooms of Northern California. Redding, Calif: Spore Prints.
Bowers, Jeannette & David Arora (1984). Mushrooms of the World Coloring Book.
New York: Dover.
Guzman, Gaston (1978). Hongos. Mexico City: Limusa.
Kauffman, C.H.(1918). The Gilled Mushrooms (Agaricaceae) of Michigan and the Great
Lakes Region. New York: Dover (1971 reprint).
Krieger, Louis C. (1936). The Mushroom Handbook. New York: Dover (1967 reprint).
Lange, Morton& F.B. Hora (1963). A Guide to Mushrooms and Toadstools. NewYork:
E.P. Dutton.
Largent, David, Harry Thiers, Roy Watling, & Daniel Stuntz (1973-). How to Identify
Mushrooms to Genus (5 vols.). Eureka: Mad River Press.
Lincoff, Gary (1981). The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Mushrooms.
New York: Alfred Knopf.
Mcllvaine, Charles & Robert Macadam (1902). One Thousand American Fungi.
NewYork: Dover(1973 reprint).
McKenny, Margaret & Daniel Stuntz (1971). The Savory Wild Mushroom. Seattle:
University of Washington Press.
Miller, Orson K. (1972). Mushrooms of North America. New Y ork: E.P. Dutton.
Moser, Meinhard (1983). Keys to Agarics and Boleti. England: Roger Phillips.
Phillips, Roger (1981). Mushrooms and Other Fungi of Great Britain and Europe.
London: Pan Books.
Ramsbottom, John (1953). Mushrooms and Toadstools. London: Collins.
Rinaldi, Augusto & Vassili Tyndalo (1974). The Complete Book of Mushrooms. New
York: Crown.
Smith, Alexander (1949). Mushrooms in Their Natural Habitats. New York: Hafner
(1973 reprint).
Smith, Alexander (1975). A Field Guide to Western Mushrooms. Ann Arbor: University
of Michigan Press.
Smith, Alexander, Helen V. Smith, & Nancy Smith Weber (1979). How to Know the
Gilled Mushrooms. Dubuque: William Brown.
Smith, Alexander, Helen V. Smith, & Nancy Smith Weber (1981). How to Know the
Non-Gilled Mushrooms, 2nd edition. Dubuque: William Brown.
Smith, Alexander & Nancy Smith Weber (1980). The Mushroom Hunter’s Field Guide
(revised). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Weber, Nancy Smith & Alexander Smith(1985). A Field Guide to Southern Mushrooms.
Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Wright, Greg (1981). Key to the Gilled Mushrooms and Boletes of Southern California.
Published by the author.
920 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Cookbooks
Grigson, Jane (1975). The Mushroom Feast. New York: Alfred Knopf.
Puget Sound Mycological Society (1973). Oft Told Mushroom Recipes (republished as
Wild Mushroom Recipes). Seattle: Pacific Search.
Mushroom Cultivation
Harris, Bob (1976). Growing Wild Mushrooms. Berkeley: Wingbow Press.
Stamets, Paul & J.S. Chilton (1983). The Mushroom Cultivator: A Practical Guide to
Growing Mushrooms at Home. Olympia: Agarikon Press.
Miscellaneous
Bo, Liu & Bau Yun-sun (1980). Fungi Pharmacopoeia (Sinica). Oakland, Calif: Kinoko
Company.
Jaeger, Edmund C. (1955). A Sourcebook of Biological Names and Terms. Springfield,
Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.
Rice, Miriam & Dorothy Beebee (1980). Mushrooms for Color. Eureka: Mad River Press.
Wasson, R. Gordon (1968). Soma: The Divine Mushroom of Immortality. New York:
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Wasson, Valentina & R. GordonWasson(1957). Mushrooms, Russia and History (2 vols).
New York: Pantheon.
Technical Literature
General
Bigelow, H. & H. Thiers, editors (1975). Studies on Higher Fungi. Germany: J. Cramer.
Miller, O.K. & D.F. Fa.rr(\915).AnIndexof the Common Fungi ofN orth America. Liech¬
tenstein: J. Cramer, Bib. Myco. 44.
Petersen, R., editor (1971). Evolution in the Higher Basidiomycetes: An International
Symposium. Knoxville: Univ. of Tennessee Press.
Richardson, M. & R. Watling (1968). Keys to Fungi on Dung. Bull, of the Brit. Myco.
Soc.2: 18-43.
Saylor, H., P. Vergeer, D. Desjardin, & T. Duffy. California Mushrooms 1970-1980:
Fungus Fair and Foray Collections. Myco. Soc. of San Francisco.
Shaffer, R.L. (1968). Keys to Genera of Higher Fungi, 2nd edition. Ann Arbor: Univ. of
Michigan Biological Station.
Singer, R. (1975). The Agaricalesin Modern Taxonomy, 3rd edition. Germany: J. Cramer.
Snell, W.H. & E.A. Dick (1957). A Glossary of Mycology. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard
Univ. Press.
Watling, R. & A.E. Watling (1980). A Literature Guide for Identifying Mushrooms.
Eureka: Mad River Press.
Russulaceae& Hygrophoraceae
Hesler, L.R. & A.H. Smith (1963). North American Species of Hygrophorus. Knoxville:
Univ. of Tennessee Press.
SUGGESTED READINGS AND PRIMARY REFERENCES 921
Hesler, L.R. & A.H. Smith (1979). North American Species of Lactarius. Ann Arbor:
Univ. of Michigan Press.
Largent, D. (1985). The Agaricales of California, 5: Hygrophoraceae. Eureka: Mad River.
Methven, A. (1985). New and Interesting Species of Lactarius from California. Mycologia
77: 472-182.
Shaffer, R. (1962). The Subsection Compactae of Russula. Brittonia 14: 254-284.
Shaffer, R. (1964). The Subsection Lactarioideae of Russula. Mycologia 56: 202-231.
Shaffer, R. (1970). Notes on Subsection Crassotunicatinae of Russula. Lloydia33:49-96.
Shaffer, R. (1972). North American Russulas of Subsection Foetentinae. Mycologia 64:
1008-1053.
T richolomataceae
Baroni, T. (1983). Tricholoma manzanitae—A New Species from California. Mycotaxon
18:299-302.
Bigelow, H.E. (1970). Omphalina in North America. Mycologia 62: 1-32.
Bigelow, H.E. (1982). North American Species of Clitocybe, Part 1. Liechtenstein:
J. Cramer.
Desjardin, D.E. (1985). New Marasmioid Fungi from California. Mycologia 77: 894-902.
Gilliam, M.S. (1975). New North American Species of Marasmius. Mycologia 67:817-844.
Gilman, L. & O.K. Miller (1977). A Study of the Boreal, Alpine, and Arctic Species of
Melanoleuca. Mycologia 69:927-951.
Hailing, R.E.(1983). The Genus Collybiain the Northeastern United States and Adjacent
Canada. New York Bot. Gar. Myco. Mem. 8 (Germany: J. Cramer).
Lennox, J.W. (1979). Coilybioid Genera in the Pacific Northwest. Mycotaxon9: 117-231.
Miller, O.K. & L. Stewart(1971). The Genus Lentinellus. Mycologia 63: 333-369.
Mueller, G. (1984). New North American Species of Laccaria. Mycotaxon 20: 101-116.
Singer, R. & A.H. Smith (1943). A Monograph of the Genus Leucopaxillus. Pap. Mich.
Acad. Sci. 28: 85-132.
Smith, A.H. (1947). North American Species ofMycena. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Mich. Press.
Smith, A.H. (1960). Tricholomopsis in the Western Hemisphere. Brittonia 12: 41-76.
Smith, A.H. (1979). The Stirps Caligata of Armillaria in North America. Sydowia 8:
368-377.
Smith, A.H. & R. Singer (1945). A Monograph of the Genus Cystoderma. Pap. Mich.
Acad. Sci. 30: 71-124.
Thiers, H.D. & W.J. Sundberg(1976). Armillaria in the Western United States. Madrono
23: 448-153.
Coprinaceae& Strophariaceae
Guzman, G. (1983). The Genus Psilocybe. Liechtenstein: J. Cramer.
Smith, A.H. (1951). The North American Species of Naematoloma. Mycologia 43:
467-521.
Smith, A.H. (1972). The North American Species of Psathyrella. N.Y. Bot. Gar. Myco.
Mem. 24.
Smith, A.H. & L.R. Hesler (1968). The North American Species of Pholiota. New York:
Hafner.
Vande Bogart, F. (1976-1979). The Genus Coprinus in Western North America I: Myco¬
taxon 4: 233-275; II: Mycotaxon 8: 243-291; III: Mycotaxon 10: 155-174.
Boletaceae
Singer, R. (1977). The Boletineae of Florida. Liechtenstein: J. Cramer, Bib. Myco. 58.
Smith, A.H. & H.D. Thiers (1964). A Contribution Towards a Monograph of North
American Species of Suillus. Published by the authors.
Smith, A.H. & H.D. Thiers (1971). The Boletes of Michigan. Ann Arbor: Univ. of
Michigan Press.
Smith, A.H., H.D.Thiers,&O.K. Miller(1965). The Species of Suillus and Fuscoboletinus
of Priest River Experimental Forest and Vicinity, Priest River, Idaho. Lloydia28:
120-138.
Snell, W.H. & E.A. Dick (1970). The Boleti of Northeastern North America. Germany:
J. Cramer.
Thiers, H.D. (1975). California Mushrooms: A Field Guide to the Boletes. New York:
Hafner.
Thiers, H.D. (1976). Boletes of the Southwestern United States. Mycotaxon 3: 261-273.
Thiers, H.D. (1979). The Genus Suillus in the Western United States. Mycotaxon 9: 285-296.
Wolfe, C.B. (1979). Austroboletus and Tylopilus Subgenus Porphyrellus with Emphasis
on North American Species. Liechtenstein: J. Cramer, Bib. Myco. 69.
Hydnaceae
Hall, D. & D.E. Stuntz (1971-72). Pileate Hydnaceae of the Puget Sound Area I: Myco¬
logia 63: 1099-1128; II: Mycologia 64: 15-37; III: Mycologia 64: 560-590.
Harrison, K. A. (1964). New or Little Known North AmericanStipitateHydnums. Canad.
Jour. Bot. 42: 1205-1234.
Clavariaceae& Cantharellaceae
Bigelow, H.E. (1978). The Cantharelloid Fungi of New England and Adjacent Areas.
Mycologia 70: 707-756.
Marr, C. & D. Stuntz(1973). Ramaria in Western Washington. Germany: J. Cramer, Bib.
Myco. 38.
Petersen, R.H. (1968). The Genus Clavulinopsis in North America. N.Y. Bot. Gar. Myco.
Mem. 2.
Petersen, R.H. (1971). Notes on Clavarioid Fungi IX. Persoonia6: 219-229.
Petersen, R.H. (1971). The Genera Gomphus and Gloeocantharellus in North
America. Nova Hedw. 21: 1-118.
Petersen, R.H. (1975). Ramaria subgenus Lentoramaria. Leichtenstein: J. Cramer, Bib.
Myco. 43.
Petersen, R.H. (1981). Ramaria subgenus Echinoramaria. Leichstenstein: J. Cramer,
Bib. Myco. 79.
Scates, C. (1982). Trial Key to the Species of Ramaria in the Pacific Northwest. Pacific
Northwest Key Council.
924 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Wells, V.L. & P.E. Kempton (1968). A Preliminary Study of Clavariadelphus in North
America. Mich. Botanist 7: 35-57.
Lycoperdales& Sclerodermatales
Coker, W.C. & J.N. Couch (1928). The Gasteromycetes of the Eastern United States and
Canada. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
Guzman, G. (1970). Monografia del Genero Scleroderma. Darwiniana 16: 233-407.
Long, W.H. & D.J. Stouffer(1948). Studies in the GasteromycetesXVI: The Geastraceae
of the Southwestern United States. Mycologia40: 547-586.
Ramsey, R. (1980). Lycoperdon nettyana, a New Puffball from Western Washington
State. Mycotaxon 16: 185-188.
Smith, A. H. (1951). Puffballs and Their Allies in Michigan. Ann Arbor: Univ. ofMichigan
Press.
Zeller, S.M. (1947). More Notes on Gasteromycetes. Mycologia 39: 282-312.
Hymenogastrales& Allies
Fogel, R. (1985). Studies on Hymenogaster. Mycologia 77: 72-82.
Singer, R. & A.H. Smith(1960). Studies in Secotiaceous FungiIX: The Astrogastraceous
Series. Mem. of Torrey Bot. Club 21: 1-112.
Smith, A.H. & R. Singer(1959). Studies in Secotiaceous Fungi IV: Gastroboletus, Trunco-
columella, Chamonixia. Brittonia 11: 205-223.
Thiers, H.D. (1979). New and Interesting Hypogeous and Secotioid Fungi from Cali¬
fornia. Sydowia Ann. Myc. 2:8: 361-390.
Trappe, J. (1975). A Revision of the Genus Alpova with Notes on Rhizopogon and the
Melanogastraceae. Beih. Nova Hedw. 6: 279-309.
Zeller, S.M. (1939). New and Noteworthy Gasteromycetes. Mycologia 31: 1-31.
Zeller, S.M. (1941). Further Notes on Fungi. Mycologia 33: 196-214.
Zeller, S.M. (1944). Representatives of the Mesophelliaceae in North America. Myco¬
logia 36: 627-637.
Phallales& Nidulariales
Arora, D. & W. Burk (1982). Clathrus archeri, a Stinkhorn New to North America.
Mycologia 74: 501-504.
Blanton, R.L. & W. Burk (1980). Notes on Pseudocolusfusiformis. Mycotaxon 12: 225-234.
Brodie, H.J. (1975). The Bird’s Nest Fungi. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
Burk, W.R. (1979). Clathrus ruber in California and Worldwide Distributional Records.
Mycotaxon 8: 463^468.
SUGGESTED READINGS AND PRIMARY REFERENCES 925
Pezizales
Denison, W.C. (1961). Some Species of the Genus Scutellinia. Mycologia51: 605-635.
Dissing, H. (1966). The Genus Helvetia in Europe. Dansk. Bot. Ark. 25: 1-172.
Kanouse, B.B. (1948). Studies in the Genus Otidea. Mycologia41: 660-677.
Kempton, P.E. & V.L. Wells (1970). Studies on the Fleshy Fungi of Alaska IV: A Prelimi¬
nary Account of the Genus Helvetia. Mycologia 62: 940-959.
Korf, R. (1973). Discomycetes and Tuberales (Chapter 9, Vol. IVA of The Fungi: An
Advanced Treatise, edited by Ainsworth, Sparrow, and Sussman). New York:
Academic Press.
Larsen, H.J.& W.C. Denison(1978). A Checklist of the Operculate Cup Fungi(Pezizales)
of North America West of the Great Plains. Mycotaxon 7: 68-90.
McKnight, K.H.(1969). A Note on Discina. Mycologia 61: 614-630.
Seaver, F.J. (1928). The North American Cup Fungi: Operculates. New York: Hafner
(1961 reprint).
Seaver, F.J. (1942). The North American Cup Fungi: Inoperculates. New York: Hafner.
Tylutki, E.E. (1979). Mushrooms of Idaho and the Pacific Northwest: Discomycetes.
Moscow, Idaho: Univ. of Idaho Press.
Weber, N.S. (1972). The Genus Helvetia in Michigan. Mich. Botanist 11: 147-201.
Tuberales
Burdsall, H.H. (1968). A Revision of the Genus Hydnocystis (Tuberales) and of the
Hypogeous Species of Geopora (Pezizales). Mycologia 60: 496-525.
Gilkey, H.M. (1916). A Revision of the Tuberales of California. Univ. of Calif. Publ. Bot.
6: 275-356.
Gilkey, H.M. (1954). Tuberales. North American Flora 2, 1: 1-36.
Parks, H.E. (1921). California Hypogeous Fungi—Tuberaceae. Mycologia 13: 301-314.
States, J.S. (1983). New Records of Hypogeous Ascomycetes in Arizona. Mycotaxon 16:
396-402.
Trappe, J. M. (1975). The Genus Fischerula (Tuberales). Mycologia 67: 934-941.
Trappe, J.M. (1979). The Orders, Families, and Genera of Hypogeous Ascomycotina
(Truffles and Their Relatives). Mycotaxon 9: 297-340.
Helotiales
Mains, E.B. (1954). North American Species of Geoglossum and Trichoglossum.
Mycologia 46: 586-631.
Mains, E.B. (1955). North American Hyaline-Spored Species of the Geoglossaceae.
Mycologia47: 846-877.
Mains, E.B. (1956). North American Species of the Geoglossaceae, Tribe Cudonieae.
Mycologia 48: 694-710.
Pyrenomycetes
Child, M. (1932). The Genus Daldinia. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden 16: 4114-86.
Mains, E.B. (1940). Species of Cordyceps. Mycologia 32: 310-320.
Mains, E.B. (1947). New and Interesting Species of Cordyceps. Mycologia 39: 535-545.
926
GENERAL INDEX
Note: This index includes topics, persons mentioned or quoted in the text, scientific
names other than those listed in the “Genus and Species Index,” and selected common
names—those which are best known or most likely to be remembered.
Bold face numbers indicated detailed treatment of the subject; if the treatmentcovers
several consecutive pages, only the first is given.
*—Indicates a photograph or illustration without accompanying text other than
the caption.
To avoid the confusion that results from using two sets of numbers, color plates are
not included; they are listed on the page where the subject is described.
Sphaeriales 878 T
Sphaerocysts 63
Tamarack Jack 497
Sphere Thrower 781
Tanoak 37
Split-Gill 590
Tawny Grisette 287
Splitters 10
Taxonomy 8
Sponge Mushrooms 785
Teeth Fungi 53*, 611
Spore Color 18
Telamonia 418,450,451
Spore Prints 18
Terfeziaceae 854-855
Spores 4, 5, 18, 19
Terminology 14
developing 6*
Termites 30
numbers of 576-577, 680
Terrestrial Pholiota 389
truffle 842*
Thelephoraceae 604
Spreading Brown Cup Fungus 821
Thick-Footed Morel 788
Spring Agrocybe 469
Thick-Skinned Puffballs 707
Spring Mushrooms 46
Thick-Walled Maze Polypore 587
Springtime Amanita 286
Thiers, Harry 285, 489, 536, 742, 745
Spruce 40
Thimble Morel 794
Squirrels 29
Thimble Morels 793
Staghorn Jelly Fungus 674
Thin-Walled Maze Polypore 588
Stalk 16
Ticks 27*
ornamentation (boletes) 488-489
Tidepool Conditions 35
position of 17*
Tinder Polypore 581
shape of 17*
Toadstool, Definition of 25
Stalked Latticed Stinkhorn 776
Toadstool Tester 24*
Stalked Oddball 713
Toothed Jelly Fungus 671
Stalked Polypores 554
Top Rot 550
Stalked Puffballs 54*, 715
Totally Tedious Tubaria 402
Stamets, Paul 368
Toxins, Mushroom 892
Starving Man’s Licorice 828
Trappe, James 748, 758, 843, 860
Starving Man’s Slippery Jack 504
Tree Ears 675
Steinpilz 530
Tree Oyster—see Oyster Mushroom
Stem—see Stalk
Trees 34-42
Stereaceae 604
Tree Trunk Morel 788
Stickney, Larry 117, 672
Tremellales 669
Stinker, The 179
Tricholomataceae 129
Stinkhorn 768
True Truffles 854
Stinkhorns 54*, 764, 766, 772
Truffle-Hounds 842,855
Stinkopus 775
Truffle Hunting 842-843
Stinky Squid 776
Truffle-Like Peziza 822*, 824
Stone Fungus 563
Truffles 55*, 739, 841, 854
Strawberries and Cream 627
Truly Trivial and Totally Tedious
String and Ray Rot 565
Tubaria 403
Strophariaceae 367
Truly Trivial Tubaria 403
Stuntz, Daniel 373,419,434,455,
Trumpet of Death 668
458, 560, 645
Trunk Rot 550
Stuntz’s Blue Legs 372
Tuberaceae 854,855
Suburban Psathyrella 363
Tuberales 841
Suffixes, Latin and Greek 900, 901
Tubes 488,549
Sulfur Shelf 572
Tuckahoe 564,604
Sulfur Tuft 382
Tulostomatales 678,715
Sunny Side Up 474
Tumbling Puffball 697
Swamp Beacon 870
Tumbling Puffballs 696
Sweat-Producing Clitocybe 163
Tunbridge Ware 878
Sweetbread Mushroom 240
Turkey Tail 594
GENERAL INDEX 935
Geopora arenico/a (see description on p. 847) is half cup fungus, half truffle. When young it looks
like a hole in the ground because all but the mouth is immersed in the soil. As it matures, however, the
hole broadens, and in old age the margin of the cup often splits into lobes as shown on left.
936
A
Agaricus (cont.) Agrocybe (cont.)
Abortiporus lilaceps 323 arvalis 469
biennis 566 “luteovelatus” 324 cylindracea 470
Abstoma 680 macrosporus 334 dura 470
reticulatum 681,690 maritimus 322 erebia 467,470
townei 681,690 meleagris 329 firma 468
Agaricus 58*, 310, 896 micromegathus 340 paludosa 467
abruptibulbus 335 nivescens 334 pediades 43*, 468
albolutescens 335 osecanus 333 praecox 469
alb o sanguineus 325 pattersonae 316,324 retigera 468
altipes 317 perobscurus 339 semiorbicularis 469
amethystina 341 perrarus 338 sororia 468,469
amieosus 316, 326 pinyonensis 331 tuberosa 469
argenteus 319 placomyces 314,329, Albatrellus 554
arorae 311*,325 895 avellaneus 557,558
arvensis 12*, 312*, 332 pocillator 314,329 caeruleoporus 555,559
augustus 311*, 337 porphyrocephalus 319 confluens 556,558
“barrowsii” 331 praeclaresquamosus cristatus 556,560
benesi 316,325 312*,329,895 dispansus 556
bernardii 322 purpurellus 341 ellisii 559
bisporus 319 rhoadsii 317 flettii 558
bitorquis 312*, 321 rodmani 322 hirtus 560
blandianus 320 rubronanus 325 ovinus 557
brunnescens 320 rutilescens 317,319 peckianus 558
californicus 312*, 327, semotus 315, 339*, 340 pescaprae 558*, 560
895 sequoiae 317,332 similis 558
campestris 312*, 318, silvaticus 325 sylvestris 560
889* silvicola 312*, 334 Alboleptonia 249
chionodermus 315, smithii 315,338 adnatifolia 253
317,335 solidipes 318 ochracea 253
chlamydopus 322 spissicaulis 326 sericella 252
comtulus 315,340 spp. (unidentified) 317,
Aleuria 833
cretacellus 315 318,325
aurantia 837
crocodilinus 315,317, subfloccosus 320
rhenana 836
334 subrufescens 336
rutilans 837
cupreobrunneus 319 subrutile scens 326
summensis 315,339
Alnicola 399
diminutivus 340 escharoides 400
dulcidulus 341 sylvicola 335
melinoides 400
edulis 322 urinescens 334
scolecina 400
fissuratus 333 vaporarius 317
villaticus 334 Alpova 756
fuse ofib rillosus 325
vinaceo-umbrinus 326 alexsmithii 757,758
fuscovelatus 324
vinaceovirens 322 cinnamomeus 758
haemorrhoidarius 325
xanthodermus 329,895 diplophloeus 757
halophilus 322
luteus 758
hondensis 326,895 Agrocybe 467
nauseosus 757,758
hortensis 320 acericola 470
olivaceoniger 757,758
lanipes 316 aegerita 467,470
olivaceotinctus 757*,
amara 469
758
GENUS AND SPECIES INDEX 937
A species of Auricularia (probably A. auricula) growing on a log. Brown color and rubbery-
gelatinous texture are distinctive (see p. 675 for details).
959
The author with some giant black morels (Morchella elata group, p. 790). (Joel Leivick)
South San
Francisco
Public
Library
$39.95
"What more can one ask for? Thousands of species, keys, splendid illustra¬
tions, perceptive and engrossing text, sound advice on cooking and eating.
. . . The top of the line in single volume identification guides, and it will
most likely remain so for your lifetime."
—Mushroom the Journal
Mushrooms
Demystified
nothing is more
elusive and mysteri¬
ous than the wild
mushroom. David
Arora celebrates the
gathering and study of
wild mushrooms with
engaging style, wit and
simple terminology.
Mushrooms Demystified
includes descriptions,
photographs, and keys
to over 2000 species.
There is a Beginner's
Checklist of the 70
most distinctive and common mushrooms plus detailed
chapters on terminology, classification, habitats, mush¬
room cookery, mushroom toxins, and the meanings of
scientific mushroom names.
David Arora has taught mycology for the last 15
years in California and has hunted and photographed
mushrooms across the continent. Beginners and ex¬
perienced mushroom hunters everywhere will find
Mushrooms Demystified a delightful, informative and
eventually indispensable companion.
ISBN-13: 978-0-89815-169-5
ISBN-10: 0-89815-169-4
5 3 9 9 5
Ten Speed Press
I
78 0898 51695 i