. Journal of botany, British and foreign . WG. Smith del etEiii V, 14.| 15. i ^fi 17. L. 1 II M mem Bros imp 1.3 Hyanum squamosum ScJuk/f. 4.9 AgS-TicMsfEcczJixLJ^oscMlus rwv.sp.10.13 Agancusr-Eca2i^;a-tropunctasP.14.20Agaricusfficaizzi.j acus rwv.sp. Tat.162. S^°13. W G. Smith del et Kth. Mmtern Bros imp. 1.3 Boletus sulfareus Fr. 4.8 Polyporus penetralis txcv. sp.9.13 Lascliia CO c cine a nov. sp. 97 (Original Sttrticlcj^, NEW AND IIAEE HYMENOMYCETOTJS FUNC^I. By Woethington G. Smith, F.L.S, (Tab. 161, 162.) The sub-genus Eccilia is one of the most interesting of all the sub-genera of Agaric

This image is a public domain image, which means either that copyright has expired in the image or the copyright holder has waived their copyright. Alamy charges you a fee for access to the high resolution copy of the image.

This image could have imperfections as it’s either historical or reportage.

. Journal of botany, British and foreign . WG. Smith del etEiii V, 14.| 15. i ^fi 17. L. 1 II M mem Bros imp 1.3 Hyanum squamosum ScJuk/f. 4.9 AgS-TicMsfEcczJixLJ^oscMlus rwv.sp.10.13 Agancusr-Eca2i^;a-tropunctasP.14.20Agaricusfficaizzi.j acus rwv.sp. Tat.162. S^°13. W G. Smith del et Kth. Mmtern Bros imp. 1.3 Boletus sulfareus Fr. 4.8 Polyporus penetralis txcv. sp.9.13 Lascliia CO c cine a nov. sp. 97 (Original Sttrticlcj^, NEW AND IIAEE HYMENOMYCETOTJS FUNC^I. By Woethington G. Smith, F.L.S, (Tab. 161, 162.) The sub-genus Eccilia is one of the most interesting of all the sub-genera of Agaricus. The species are few and rare, as are many of theplants which correspond in structure but differ in the possession ofwhite, brown, or purple spores (instead of pink) and which arcfound under the analogous sub-genera Omphalia, Tuharia, or Deconica.The two latter sub-genera have met with some little opposition inthis country as being founded on insufficient grounds, but Fries, inthe new edition of his Epicrisis (p. 273), has adopted Tuharia andplaced ten species under it, and variously altered Psilocyle and madeDeconica (p. 299) equivalent to one of its sections. There is no speciesof Eccilia recorded in the British Flora (1836), or in Berkeleys Ou